File size: 17,408 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 |
=== kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away === rogpeppe3 is now known as rogpeppe [13:34] <rick_h_> morning [14:26] <rick_h_> kadams54: morning, did a QA on your branch and linked some screenshots [14:26] <kadams54> k [14:26] <rick_h_> kadams54: be cool if you and hatch could look into it please [14:29] <kadams54> rick_h_: my understanding is that highlighting a service that's not related to anything should hide everything else. [14:29] <rick_h_> kadams54: ok, it seemed different [14:29] <rick_h_> kadams54: so I thought it was odd [14:30] <rick_h_> kadams54: if that's expected then qa ok [14:30] <kadams54> Well, QA is not OK :-\ [14:30] <hatch> rick_h_: where there any errors in the console? [14:30] <kadams54> The behavior in the other screenshots is not good [14:30] <kadams54> Highlighting should hide everything not directly related [14:30] <kadams54> Including services that aren't related at all. [14:31] <kadams54> So I'm investigating that. [14:31] <kadams54> Getting a real AWS env setup [14:31] <hatch> kadams54: does lxc not work for you? It's usually way faster than aws :) [14:32] <kadams54> hatch: I work in OS X, so I'd have to fire up a VM and then run LXC in the VM. [14:33] <hatch> ohhh [14:33] <kadams54> I've tried before but stuff like networking setup gets tricky [14:34] <hatch> I found that running the parallels vm with ubuntu is considerably less buggy than using vagrant [14:34] <kadams54> vagrant or virtualbox? [14:34] <hatch> the vagrant bugs are very odd too....like phantomjs crashing with no error [14:35] <hatch> I didn'tlike virtual box, parallels does a much better job [14:36] <kadams54> vagrant supports multiple providers, seems like you ought to be able to run it over parallels [14:37] <hatch> well if you have parallels there isn't much point in running vagrant heh, just run the whole os [14:37] <kadams54> https://github.com/Parallels/vagrant-parallels [14:37] <hatch> (although parallels does support vagrant images) [14:38] <kadams54> I'd much rather use vagrant's stripped down OS and easy provision/reprovision. [14:38] <hatch> yeah I tried that but I couldn't resolve the bugs [14:39] <kadams54> rick_h_, hatch: there was a bug fix that had been merged to develop in a separate PR. I've rebased that into this branch. [14:40] <hatch> cool [14:49] <hatch> kadams54: I've added a few review comments [14:51] <rick_h_> kadams54: ok === tvansteenburgh1 is now known as tvansteenburgh [14:57] <kadams54> rick_h_: I think the bug fix I merged in addressed the problem you were seeing [14:57] <kadams54> https://ec2-54-148-167-86.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/ [15:04] <rick_h_> kadams54: ooh ok cool [15:05] <hatch> kadams54: so you don't get phantom crashing with no error when running in vagrant? [15:05] <kadams54> yes, I do [15:05] <hatch> oh ok good - glad it's not just me heh [15:05] <hatch> well not good [15:05] <hatch> but [15:05] <hatch> you know [15:05] <hatch> ) [15:05] <hatch> :) [15:05] <kadams54> I mostly test in browser and use lots of .onlys [15:06] <hatch> heh painful [15:06] <hatch> on that front [15:06] <hatch> jasmine 2.1 will have fit and fdescribe [15:06] <hatch> which is like only [15:20] <hatch> rick_h_: kadams54 I filed the agent_state_data bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1393452 [15:20] <mup> Bug #1393452: agent_state_data isn't populated when service units fail on start <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1393452> [15:21] <kadams54> rick_h_: Looks like I just need your OK on QA to land 658. [15:21] <rick_h_> kadams54: ok, go ahead. If the bug fixed it then I'll trust that. [15:22] <rick_h_> kadams54: let me know when that lands and I'll start the release process [15:23] <kadams54> Will do [15:23] <kadams54> hatch: thanks for getting that bug files [15:23] <kadams54> *filed [15:27] <hatch> it'll probably get marked lower than low since I think we added it in the first place lol [15:28] <hatch> but at least there is a record somewhere :D [15:28] <rick_h_> lol [15:29] <hatch> kadams54: this but in your branch was the second one that had been fixed in develop but not in the branch - maybe we should make a 'rule' to rebase develop in before pushing? [15:29] <hatch> I never do heh, but it might be a good idea going forward :) [15:29] <rick_h_> hatch: well the merge thing does that [15:29] <rick_h_> hatch: it's kind of rare that things are so tied on each other like that [15:29] <rick_h_> hatch: I think it's just because we're at the release edge [15:29] <hatch> right - but your qa wouldn't have failed if that had been done [15:29] <hatch> yeah that's true [15:29] <rick_h_> hatch: right, but it's ok. The work on that vs the work of always rebase :/ [15:29] <kadams54> Yeah, in this case there was no excuse. [15:30] <rick_h_> I think it's ok as is, but something I should have kept in mind during QA [15:30] <kadams54> I did the bug fix branch [15:30] <kadams54> I did both branches. [15:30] <kadams54> I should have realized that I needed to rebase one into the other before sending the second off to QA [15:30] <kadams54> I blame it on being excited and relieved at finally being done :-) [15:30] <hatch> haha [15:30] <hatch> we hope ;) [15:31] <kadams54> Generally I try to sync my develop with remote and rebase onto latest before sending off to QA. [15:31] <hatch> it is pretty awesome when you hve a large environent [15:31] <hatch> highlight, fade, highlight, fade [15:32] <rick_h_> kadams54: :) go enjoy some nice maint cards, no pressure, just little things without big picture pains [15:32] <kadams54> lol [15:32] <kadams54> Can't relax yet. The merge build is still in progress. [15:33] * rick_h_ is optomistic today [15:33] <hatch> haha [15:33] <hatch> it's snowing fluffy snow [15:34] <hatch> that's a good sign [15:34] <perrito666> rick_h_: you feel like things can go in eight different ways? [15:34] * hatch can read snowflakes [15:34] <perrito666> rick_h_: ah, no that would be octomistic :p [15:34] <hatch> lol [15:34] <rick_h_> hah [15:34] <perrito666> yours is more like "things can go in a very optical way" [15:35] <hatch> wouldn't that be opticalistic? [15:38] <hatch> kadams54: yay tests passed [15:39] <rick_h_> lol [15:39] <hatch> kadams54: one good thing came out of your branch - I verified that we can use Array.isArray() in all our supported browsers [15:39] <hatch> one less YUI method :) [15:39] <hatch> IE<9 pssshhhhttt [15:40] <rick_h_> lol [15:44] <hatch> this weekend I spent some time researching js module systems and loaders..... [15:44] <hatch> seriously I have no idea what people have been doing since 09 [15:44] <hatch> nothing even comes close to the YUI loader [15:45] <rick_h_> hatch: :( stop, I'm still trying to get past everyone saying how we don't need YUI any more [15:45] <hatch> well there are few things in it we 'need' but I honestly can't find anything to replace the loader with [15:46] <frankban> hatch: never looked at it, but what about require.js? [15:47] <hatch> frankban: the problem with js module loaders is that they only support one type of module [15:47] <hatch> AMD, CommonJS etc [15:47] <hatch> the yui ones we can simply wrap the file in a YUI.add() and be done [15:48] <hatch> not so with these others [15:48] <hatch> and ES6 modules don't make it any better === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away [15:48] <hatch> luca__: hey [15:49] <luca__> hey hatch [15:51] <hatch> frankban: although AMD Is the lesser of the 3 evils :) [15:54] <rick_h_> uiteam call in 7 kanban please === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 [15:59] <kadams54> rick_h_: 658 just landed so we can proceed with a juju-gui release [16:00] <rick_h_> kadams54: on it [16:39] <hatch> kadams54: the card that you're working on right now - we used to set attributes using d3 on the svg and then use the d3 js to alter those attributes to fade in/out [16:39] <hatch> we should be able to add/remove a class to have it use css animations and be a lot easier [16:39] <kadams54> Yeah, and you want to switch it to altering classes [16:40] <kadams54> I remember :-) [16:40] <hatch> css overrides the attribute styles which were causing issues [16:40] <hatch> oh ok cool [16:40] <hatch> I wasn't sure how much I had spewed out before :P [16:41] <hatch> rick_h_: man I want your job https://twitter.com/iamdevloper/status/534385415860805633 :P [16:41] <hatch> lol [16:42] <hatch> Makyo: so jealous of your yard :) [16:44] <Makyo> Just a bit of snow :) [16:44] <Makyo> https://www.dropbox.com/s/tbtjgxek13fdxqs/IMG_20141117_093828.jpg?dl=0 [16:45] <hatch> yeah saw that on the twitters [16:45] <hatch> james doesn't mind the drive in? [16:46] <Makyo> Not too much. He's got a nicer car than I do :) [16:48] <hatch> haha [16:49] <hatch> I'd love to move out of town but sometimes the highways are a skating rink [16:50] <Makyo> Yeah, we ran into some of that last week, but thankfully they were on top of getting them plowed. [16:58] <rick_h_> hatch: see you in standup in 2? [16:58] <hatch> sounds good [17:11] <rick_h_> hatch: hah! I want that job :P [17:11] <hatch> haha [17:13] <rick_h_> hatch: http://www.kevindangoor.com/2014/11/simplifying-javascript-projects-with-react/ for the 'lunch reading' folder [17:14] <hatch> cool I'll check it out [17:14] <hatch> this industry is love hate, love that it's always changing, hate that it's always changing :D [17:27] <kadams54> Soooooo [17:27] <kadams54> I just spent my lunch hour on the phone with DISH. [17:28] <kadams54> Because they signed up a Kathy Adams awhile back and messed up her e-mail address. [17:28] <kadams54> I ended up getting all her e-mails, including signed copies of her service agreement and other paperwork. [17:28] <kadams54> Which has home address and phone number on it. [17:28] <hatch> what's DISH? [17:28] <rick_h_> hatch: sat. tv [17:28] <kadams54> Satellite TV [17:28] <hatch> ohh [17:28] <hatch> :) [17:29] <hatch> Just because we don't have enough compile to js languages http://spiderlang.org/ [17:29] <kadams54> DISH's first attempt at a fix was to change e-mail prefs so she (I) didn't receive any more marketing e-mails. [17:29] <hatch> lol [17:29] <kadams54> DISH's second attempt was to file a report on my (non-existent) account. [17:29] <hatch> haha why didn't they just call her? [17:30] <kadams54> Third attempt I got someone who removed my e-mail from her account, but because they can't make outgoing phone calls, they couldn't get the right address. [17:30] <kadams54> So I just called her and left her a very odd voicemail. [17:30] <hatch> rofl [17:30] <kadams54> Way to go DISH. [17:30] * hatch hopes she calls you back and you become best buds [17:30] <kadams54> She might be related. [17:31] <kadams54> I grew up in Indiana and have family scattered throughout small towns and farm country [17:31] <kadams54> She happens to live in a small southern IN town that's close to where one of the family branches settled. [17:31] <hatch> ohh look at that [17:32] <kadams54> It's a common enough last name that it's not likely, but it's still kinda funny that she's from Indiana, since DISH is nation-wide in the States. [17:32] <kadams54> I was actually kinda hoping to talk with her. [17:33] <kadams54> But her VM was one of the generic "You've reached this phone number" messages that doesn't give away any personal information. [17:33] <kadams54> Which is kinda funny considering. [17:34] <hatch> haha [17:34] <hatch> "we take your privacy very serious...unless we enter in the wrong email address, at which case...well you know" [17:47] <kadams54> Note to self: make sure e-mail verification is a part of new user/customer sign up in all future endeavors. Gracefully handle failures. [17:53] <hatch> haha [18:31] <kadams54> Changing locations, back in 10 or so. === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away [19:22] <hatch> well there is no question react is scalable now: https://twitter.com/remibecheras/status/534391509190459392 cc rick_h_ [19:46] <hatch> rick_h_: Makyo what's happening with local charm icons with the new api? [19:47] <hatch> re we still returning the default icon? [19:47] <rick_h_> hatch: so the deal is we'll use the new api [19:47] <rick_h_> hatch: and we'll need to filter non-promulgated client side [19:47] <rick_h_> hatch: but we want a flag that you can turn off in the gui config ui [19:49] <hatch> right but the charm path is local [19:49] <hatch> not in the store [19:50] <rick_h_> hatch: where are we looking? [19:50] <rick_h_> oh local charm icons [19:50] <rick_h_> hatch: yea so for now it's still got to be the local one [19:50] <rick_h_> hatch: we can look to update that once we get things update down the road [19:52] <hatch> ok sounds good [19:54] <hatch> rick_h_: this is the bug that is referenced in the code around the local charms https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1202703 [19:54] <mup> Bug #1202703: local charm icons are broken in GUI <charmworld:Triaged> <juju-gui:Fix Released by rharding> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1202703> [19:55] <hatch> maybe you want to close the charmworld one [19:55] <hatch> or ammend or something [19:55] <rick_h_> hatch: oh, those are pulled from the env now [19:55] <rick_h_> yea, the charmworld one is nadda [19:55] <rick_h_> ok, done [19:55] <rick_h_> hatch: that's one case where that's not charmworld but the juju environment [19:55] <rick_h_> hatch: so watch out for that one [19:56] <rick_h_> man this added services feature rocks [19:56] <hatch> yeah right now it's just defaulting to manage.......static/img/charm_160.svg [19:56] <rick_h_> we need to do a screencast [19:56] <hatch> so I'll just keep that functionality [19:56] <rick_h_> hatch: right, that's the default but we added support for pulling it from the env [19:56] <rick_h_> hatch: ok [19:57] <hatch> oh did we? Was that ever implemented in the code? [19:58] <rick_h_> hatch: ye [19:58] <hatch> hmm odd I don't see that - sec I'll get you the link [19:58] <hatch> https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/blob/develop/app/store/charmworld.js#L403 [19:58] <hatch> this is called from the handlebars helper [19:58] <hatch> and others....but similar [20:00] <hatch> so I'm not sure that it was ever hooked up to go to the env for local charm icons [20:01] <hatch> at least not here [20:01] <rick_h_> hatch: I know it works or worked at one point. It's probably from somewhere else though [20:01] <hatch> ok I'll keep my eyes open but keep this methods functionality the same [20:01] <rick_h_> hatch: k [20:02] <hatch> also is ?demo=true supported? I don't see it in the api docs [20:02] <rick_h_> ugh, we missed a git tag on the last release :( [20:02] <rick_h_> hatch: no, it never worked [20:02] <hatch> lol ok [20:02] <rick_h_> hatch: it was meant to work but never completed, ignore/rip that out [20:02] <hatch> consider it ripped [20:05] <hatch> rick_h_: hmm ok so the syntax is now different heh https://api.jujucharms.com/v4/static/img/charm_160.svg is not found [20:05] <rick_h_> hatch: yea, we'll have to use a local file I think. [20:05] <rick_h_> in the gui, I think the icon is there. [20:06] <hatch> oh ok lemme check [20:06] <hatch> it is [20:06] <hatch> :) === urulama is now known as urulama___ [20:18] <hatch> rick_h_: bundle icons we are going to use a local file as well? [20:19] <rick_h_> hatch: yes [20:26] <rick_h_> uiteam new gui release uploaded, working on charm release now [20:34] <hatch> awesome [20:34] <hatch> now the question is - do we have the bundle icon locally [20:35] <rick_h_> hatch: if not, right-click save as :P [20:35] <hatch> haha yeah just looking through the assets now === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away [20:37] <rick_h_> kadams54-away: or hatch can either of you take 5 and get me a few nice small screenshots of the added services bar stuff for a blog post once I ge the charm released and ingested [20:37] <rick_h_> or any of you want to write up the blog post on the release youselves? I'm not greedy. [20:37] <hatch> yeah I can do both [20:38] <hatch> can I do it after this stuff? [20:38] <rick_h_> hatch: ok, thanks. One thing to remember is the charm has the new custom port as well to mention [20:38] <hatch> like towards the eod [20:38] <hatch> yeah definitely [20:38] <rick_h_> hatch: well I'd like to read it over before release [20:38] <rick_h_> hatch: so yea, but make sure to hit me up then before you hit publish? [20:38] <hatch> ok sounds good - I just need to grab some lunch soon :) [20:38] <rick_h_> and I'll try to look after hours tonight [20:38] <rick_h_> hatch: ok [20:38] <rick_h_> ty kind sir [20:39] <rick_h_> https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/blob/develop/CHANGES.yaml#L24 changes [20:48] * hatch lunching [21:36] * rick_h_ grumbles about failing charm tests [21:48] <hatch> boo [21:49] <rick_h_> it works when I make deploy though wtf [22:03] <huwshimi> Morning [22:06] <hatch> morning huw [22:59] <hatch> heh I just broke this code and all the tests pass [22:59] <hatch> sumfing wong [23:00] <hatch> gona eod, will bbl [23:04] <rick_h_> hatch: night === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 [23:47] <kadams54> rick_h_: how's the release going? [23:48] <rick_h_> kadams sent an email to tge list with status [23:48] <rick_h_> basically stuck and eod'ing [23:48] <rick_h_> monday is my night with thge boy [23:49] <kadams54> +1 |