File size: 26,637 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ [01:49] <hyperair> did ssh-agent just go missing? [01:50] <hyperair> s/ssh-agent/seahorse-agent [01:53] <TheMuso> hyperair: Seems to be working for GPG and ssh here for me. [01:54] <hyperair> whoops, looks like it's gnome-keyring-daemon, not seahorse-agent [01:54] * hyperair forgot the command required to reinitialize it after it crashes [01:54] <hyperair> gnome-keyring-start, and then stuff the environment variables into compiz via gdb [01:55] <hyperair> :D [01:55] <hyperair> er gnome-keyring-daemon --start [03:37] <TheMuso> 6@pilot out [03:37] <TheMuso> @pilot out === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> trusty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: [04:00] <obiwandk> hello === salem_ is now known as _salem [05:03] <pitti> Good morning [05:03] <pitti> stgraber: \o/ thanks for reviewing [05:04] <Unit193> Howdy. [05:04] <pitti> ScottK: I don't know this very well, but it's plausible that its test needs to be updated to use a current release === seb128_ is now known as seb128 === didrocks1 is now known as didrocks [06:37] <tjaalton> shouldn't normal upgrades remove ubuntuone from trusty? [06:54] <pitti> tjaalton: ubuntu-release-upgrader ought to, in the cleanup stage [06:57] <tjaalton> guess it doesn't work when upgrading trusty->trusty [06:59] <LocutusOfBorg1> no problem barry :) [07:11] <tvoss> doko_, good morning :) [07:12] <tvoss> doko_, I just tried to install C++ pretty printers in gdb without luck. Do we have some instructions online how to enable them? [07:17] <dholbach> good morning === doko_ is now known as doko [07:35] <doko> tvoss, just what is available in the standard docs [07:35] <tvoss> doko, ack === evfool__ is now known as evfool [07:36] <doko> tvoss, have a look at libstdc++6, a pretty printer just has to be found in some location with a specific name [07:36] <tvoss> doko, ack [07:37] <doko> pitti, jibel: I demoted libcursesada to -proposed, however the failing autopkg test still seems to block ncurses. same for libaunit. any idea how to proceed? [07:40] <pitti> doko: ah, still uninstallable due to missing gnat-4.6 -> 4.9 transitino? [07:41] <doko> pitti, well, gnat wants to migrate too ... [07:42] <pitti> so the release team could certainly set an override for ncurses to migrate [07:42] <pitti> as it's clearly the "ada" part, not the "ncurses" one which is the problem :) [07:45] <pitti> doko: oh, a solution is in sight: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libncursesada_5.9.20140726-1.html [07:46] <pitti> seems gnat itself will still take a while: https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gnat [07:47] <pitti> (but we don't really care about ada, do we?) [07:48] <pitti> ScottK: I had a look at release-upgrader's tests, but they don't mention "quantal" explicitly; I suppose they download some meta-data from archive.u.c., but I'm not familiar with that; I'm afraid we need to wait for mvo for that, and in the meantime you could add a release team override? [07:49] * pitti mails him in the meantime === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN [08:38] <cjwatson> psivaa: Is there any way I can get hold of /var/log/partman for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/1352252 ? It's the best log to have for this, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to be attached as an artifact to the job [08:38] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 1352252 in parted (Ubuntu) "Exception during partitioning whilst utopic server installations" [High,Confirmed] [08:39] <cjwatson> psivaa: I've tried reproducing this locally and so far have been unable to, even with something that's as close as I can manage to the same disk size, so I need the partman log in order to have byte-identical configuration [08:40] <psivaa> cjwatson: let me take a look, if i can somehow find the log on a manual install [08:44] <Unit193> cjwatson: Hellos, I would guess now would be a bad time to remind about tasksel? [08:46] <cjwatson> Unit193: possibly OK, will have a look shortly [08:46] <Unit193> Great, thanks! [08:46] <cjwatson> psivaa: Ideally we'd change the utah config to attach that file on all future installations, both d-i and ubiquity [08:46] <cjwatson> psivaa: It never hurts to have it [08:48] <psivaa> cjwatson: yes, let me see if i can do this. probably this week. [08:48] <psivaa> cjwatson: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7959356/ is the partman.log [08:48] <psivaa> cjwatson: i'll attach to the bug too [08:49] <cjwatson> psivaa: Excellent, thanks [08:49] <psivaa> yw :) === psivaa is now known as psivaa-reboot [10:06] <doko> jamespage, java component mismatch ping ... === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN [10:56] <LocutusOfBorg1> sil2100, I changed the lucene++ debian/* license to be LGPL-2+ instead of LGPL-3+ [10:56] <LocutusOfBorg1> it should fix the lintian warning [10:57] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg1: ok, LGPL-3+ was anyway only a habit, I'm fine with 2 - thanks! [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> I don't know, it fixes this issue [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> I unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> lgpl-2+ (paragraph at line 89) [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> anyway they say it is good for debian files to have the same license as the upstream sources [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> to make it easier to send patches [10:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> anyway who cares? lintian is happy and if it is fine with you I'm happy too ;D [11:09] <pitti> dpm: FYI, fresh langpacks (touch and desktop) are in utopic now [11:10] <dpm> \o/ === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [11:17] <jibel> could anyone have a look at bug 1351262 it's blocking 12.04.5 [11:17] <ubottu> bug 1351262 in xorg-lts-transitional (Ubuntu) "precise alternate installations fail with unmet deps due to the conflict ' xserver-xorg-lts-trusty : Conflicts: libgl1-mesa-dri (>= 0~)'" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1351262 [11:23] <doko> tvoss, which team to use for phablet issues? [11:28] <doko> tvoss, ev, slangasek: looks like the CI train is bypassing our normal build rules ... see LP: #1349834 [11:28] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1349834 in libjsoncpp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] flask-script and libjsoncpp (b-d's for net-cpp)" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1349834 [11:29] <tvoss> doko, still on my list [11:29] <slangasek> doko: what rules are you referring to? [11:29] <slangasek> ah, component-mismatches [11:29] <slangasek> there's no way to enforce that in ppas, AFAIK [11:30] <cjwatson> Right, not fixable there, we just have to clean up afterwards as necessary and try to be vigilant [11:39] <doko> barry, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-keyring/4.0-1 can you have a look at a MIR, or removal of the new build deps? [11:55] <doko> pitti, jibel: the status of the autopkg tests for libgcrypt11 seem to be out of date [11:57] <jibel> doko, looking === tvoss is now known as tvoss|test === tvoss|test is now known as tvoss === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow [12:15] <jibel> doko, results will be synced on next run of britney [12:36] <barry> doko: will look [12:42] <michagogo> Hm, am I misunderstanding https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Reviewing_procedure_and_tools? [12:43] <michagogo> pitti sponsored the package for bug 1314616, but it's not listed on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1 nor http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru [12:43] <ubottu> bug 1314616 in bitcoin (Ubuntu Precise) "[SRU] bitcoin to be maintained upstream in PPA: Replace distro archive "bitcoin" bitcoin with an empty dummy package" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1314616 [12:44] <pitti> michagogo: it's in NEW, due to a Launchpad bug [12:44] <pitti> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=0 [12:44] <michagogo> What does that mean? [12:44] <pitti> michagogo: mostly just that the SRU team needs to check there instead of UNAPPROVED (state=1) [12:44] <michagogo> Ah. (do they know that?) [12:45] <pitti> michagogo: I was pinging #ubuntu-release when I sponsored it, and wgrant looked into why it got into the wrong queue, but usually the SRU team wouldn't know [12:45] <pitti> I was going to ping around every couple of days [12:45] <michagogo> Is there a way to put it in the right place? [12:46] <pitti> that's a question for wgrant ^ (but I expect him to be tight asleep right now) [12:46] * michagogo goes to read -release backlog [12:46] <pitti> michagogo: not much to worry about for you though [12:47] <pitti> bdmurray, RAOF, infinity, ScottK: when you process SRU the next time, please look into precise/NEW for the bitcoin one (not actually NEW, just an LP bug) === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 [12:48] <michagogo> pitti: Okay, thanks. === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:50] <wgrant> pitti: I'm in Nürnberg, actually. [12:50] <pitti> wgrant: oh, welcome to Bavaria! [12:50] <wgrant> michagogo, pitti: Rejecting and reuploading that package which stick it in unapproved. The bug is fixed, but it's not possible to get it from new to unapproved without a fresh upload. [12:50] <wgrant> s/which/will/ [12:51] * michagogo hopes (and assumes) pitti knows what that means [12:51] <pitti> wgrant: ah, fixed? nice; I can do that [12:53] <wgrant> pitti: Oh yeah, it was fixed on prod like 6 hours after you reported it, sorry. [12:54] <pitti> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= [12:54] <pitti> and there it goes [12:54] <pitti> michagogo: ^ [12:54] <pitti> wgrant: thanks! [12:54] <michagogo> Awesome, thanks pitti and wgrant! [12:55] <pitti> bdmurray, RAOF, infinity, ScottK: OK, bitcoin is in unapproved, unping === pete-woods is now known as pete-woods|lunch [13:24] <doko> Mirv, ok to NMU malaga, fixing #755915? [13:24] <pitti> rbasak: oh, no comments on http://www.justgohome.co.uk/blog/2014/08/ubuntu-git-merge-workflow.html? [13:28] <Mirv> doko: ok, I've had it highlighted in my personal inbox but haven't got to it [13:29] <doko> barry, a lot of packages start building modules for pypy. any opinion about having it in main? currently we just disabled these [13:31] <barry> doko: hmm. haven't thought about it too much, but i like that folks are starting to support pypy better, and i don't like carrying deltas just to manage this distinction. maybe we should MIR pypy... [13:31] <doko> barry, after this week you'll be a MIR expert ;-P [13:32] <barry> doko: that was my hope and dream! [13:37] <barry> doko: LP: #1352900 [13:37] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1352900 in pypy (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pypy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1352900 [13:57] <ricotz> pitti, hi, please cherry pick https://git.gnome.org/browse/libwnck/commit/?id=063cc9281372815e0bf0a6b2e63f9b07e1769448 [13:58] <pitti> ricotz: you tell me that 10 seconds after I hit dput.. [13:58] <pitti> ricotz: but I can do another upload, if you need it for anything in particular [13:58] <ricotz> pitti, i just noticed the packaging commits :\ [13:59] <ricotz> this fixes the reported geometry for gtk csd windows [14:00] <pitti> ricotz: sure, doing [14:01] <ricotz> pitti, sorry, i was hoping Trevinho would do an actual release ;) [14:01] <pitti> ricotz: heh, no problem [14:01] <ricotz> pitti, thanks! [14:01] * pitti fights with a svn assert when tagging the recent upload [14:02] <pitti> subversion, go away! [14:08] <pitti> ricotz: uploaded [14:08] <pitti> ricotz: I'll sync tomorrow morning when it got imported [14:08] <rbasak> pitti: I don't do blog comments. I get one legitimate comment a year, and many many spam messages. Not worth it IMHO. [14:08] <rbasak> pitti: reply to ubuntu-devel maybe? [14:08] <pitti> rbasak: that's what I did :) [14:08] <rbasak> Oh. Thanks! [14:08] * rbasak looks [14:09] <pitti> rbasak: nothing fancy, hence I'd have written it as blog comment, but ML is fine too [14:12] <ricotz> pitti, great! [14:22] <bdmurray> pitti: is bug 1352591 clear enough? [14:22] <ubottu> bug 1352591 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport-retrace does not update libraries in a sandbox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1352591 [14:25] <pitti> bdmurray: ah yes, it is [14:25] <pitti> bdmurray: so this needs to keep track of which version of a package is installed, instead of merely checking for existence of the lib [14:25] <pitti> bdmurray: it's on my todo list [14:26] <bdmurray> pitti: okay, thanks! [14:28] <ScottK> pitti: Thanks. [14:32] <xnox> bdmurray: release-upgrader failing autopkgtests, anything obvious to you ? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Utopic/view/AutoPkgTest/job/utopic-adt-ubuntu-release-upgrader/38/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/artifact/results/nose-tests-stdout/*view*/ [14:32] <xnox> (why is it using quantal?!) [14:33] <bdmurray> xnox: I believe quantal to saucy was a supported upgrade path because raring became EoL before Quantal [14:33] <xnox> bdmurray: not any more, since both quantal and saucy are EOL now. [14:34] <xnox> (it was interimish) [14:34] <xnox> and the files are gone from the archive repository and moved to old-releases by now. [14:42] <bdmurray> xnox: the issue is with "get_new_dist()" in test_dist_upgrade_fecther_core.py [14:53] <pitti> xnox: I mailed mvo about it; I loked into the tests, and they don't hardcode quantal anywhere === chuck_ is now known as zul [14:55] <bdmurray> pitti: I found the issue, see my last comment. === pete-woods|lunch is now known as pete-woods [15:09] <pitti> mdeslaur, infinity: reminder: TB in 50 mins, and you wanted to review the juju policy [15:09] <mdeslaur> pitti: yes, thanks for the reminder [15:18] <hallyn> cjwatson: for bug 1350435, if you'd like me to apply the patch in the archive until a proper fix hits upstream, let me know [15:18] <ubottu> bug 1350435 in launchpad-buildd "tcg.c:1693: tcg fatal error" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1350435 [15:20] <cjwatson> hallyn: well, I think that's up to you and I'm not going to make you apply something over upstream's wishes, but (if it made it to trusty-updates) I understand it would make a pretty massive dent in the failure rate of non-x86 virt PPAs [15:20] * cjwatson follows up to the bug [15:21] <Mirv> might some core-dev be able to give a packaging ack to https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-015-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_messaging-app_0.1+14.10.20140805-0ubuntu1.diff ? [15:23] <hallyn> cjwatson: I'm surprised by just how hostile he is toward it, but i think that's just bc he thinks we're whining to get it upstream; unless he feels that papering over it in the distros will lower priority of a proper fix causing upper linaro management to not ack the work... [15:23] <cjwatson> I'm certainly not whining to get it upstream; maybe he's inferring that from the upstream bug task [15:24] <hallyn> right [15:24] <hallyn> I'm debating whether to drop that part. Though it does need to also be tracked there. [15:24] <hallyn> I don't even know how to mark it in lp if I push the patch - 'fix released' wouldn't be right as it's not going to always work :) [15:24] <cjwatson> hallyn: re testing, while LocutusOfBorg1 can't supply an alternate qemu in their PPA, it's certainly possible to do testing of this kind of thing on staging by way of the (new) ~canonical-is-sa/ubuntu/buildd-staging PPA [15:25] <hallyn> cjwatson: are you saying a qemu pkg with that patch would go in that ppa, or that that ppa would be using the new qemu as a test? [15:25] <cjwatson> which we can ask IS nicely to copy stuff into and rebuild the scalingstack staging image [15:25] <cjwatson> the former [15:25] <hallyn> cjwatson: and you'd want this ofr utopic, or trusty, ot be useful? [15:26] <hallyn> I'm going to go off and merge qemu 2.1-rc1 into utopic right now; then i'll push something with that patch to a ppa. (then i need to keep testing precise-to-trusty migration using Alex's patch) [15:26] <cjwatson> hallyn: trusty [15:27] <cjwatson> scalingstack is all trusty. p.s. DIE HARDY DIE [15:27] <hallyn> :) [15:27] <cjwatson> obviously we use per-distroarchseries chroots but qemu-user-static comes from the base [15:27] <hallyn> so should i hadn you the pkg source? [15:28] <hallyn> s/hadn/hand/ [15:28] <cjwatson> stick it in a PPA somewhere [15:28] <cjwatson> ideally just that patch on top of trusty-updates [15:28] <hallyn> will do. yup, it will. bbl [15:28] <cjwatson> (I'm probably not going to be able to organise it this week though; already maxing out IS's tolerance of my requests, I think) [15:29] <hallyn> my kingdom for tiling support in unity! [15:29] <hallyn> cjwatson: ok, i'll just hand it to you so you'r enot blocked on me [15:29] <hallyn> unless you're saying i should make the request [15:32] <LocutusOfBorg1> cjwatson, if you want that I upload qemu in my ppa is fine, I can do it [15:32] <LocutusOfBorg1> just ask [15:33] <hallyn> cjwatson: actualy i'm doing it on top of trusty-proposed; shout if that seems irresponsible [15:36] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: no thanks [15:36] <cjwatson> won't help anyway [15:36] <cjwatson> hallyn: should be ok [15:37] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: (it's going to need to go through hallyn in any event, so he might as well do it ...) [15:43] <LocutusOfBorg1> I'm here if needed ;) [15:47] <hallyn> trial pkg pushed to ppa:serge-hallyn/qemu-user-thread [15:51] <rbasak> pitti, infinity, mdeslaur: would it help if I could get Juju upstream to today's meeting? [15:51] <rbasak> Particularly for QA questions [15:52] <mdeslaur> rbasak: it certainly wouldn't hurt [15:52] <pitti> rbasak: yeah, Curtis' reply was promising, I'm mostly interested in how much it can/will be exercised for SRU testing [15:54] <rbasak> pitti, mdeslaur: Curtis is unavailable. I can talk about SRU testing though - I've been working with Curtis on a plan for this. [15:59] <pitti> kees, infinity: #ubuntu-meeting-2 for TB, s'il vous plaît ? [16:13] <elopio> Hello [16:13] <elopio> can I get a review to the debian packaging changes here? [16:13] <elopio> https://code.launchpad.net/~autopilot/autopilot/trunk/+merge/228235 [16:15] <pitti> elopio: err, I was just looking, but I realize that like 90% of the packaging changes are my fault [16:16] <pitti> so that would be some kind of self-approval (not wrong in principle, as core devs do that all the time when uploading), just mentioning :) [16:16] <elopio> pitti: :) we can wait a little for somebody else to do the review if you prefer. [16:16] <elopio> I won't mind. [16:17] <pitti> elopio: MP updated [16:18] <elopio> thanks pitti. Mirv: do we need something else? [16:18] <pitti> elopio: and FWIW, the earlier that lands, the better [16:19] <elopio> agree. I really need it. [16:19] <Mirv> elopio: pitti doing the packaging (and review) is quite enough, he could upload it anyhow [16:19] <Mirv> but does it need a rebuild now? [16:20] <Mirv> no, just commented, great [16:20] <elopio> Mirv: nothing has changed, just the approvals. [16:20] <Mirv> pitti: elopio: umm. 12h ago slangasek directly uploaded this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopilot/1.5.0+14.10.20140716-0ubuntu2 [16:21] <Mirv> which is a problem for publishing this new branch [16:21] <slangasek> which new branch is this? [16:22] <pitti> ah, so I guess slangasek's upload needs to be re-folded into trunk first? [16:22] <slangasek> yes it does [16:22] <Mirv> slangasek: https://code.launchpad.net/~autopilot/autopilot/trunk/+merge/228235 [16:22] <Mirv> so update trunk, update merge, rinse and repeat [16:22] * slangasek nods [16:23] <Mirv> you can get it done still today easily, but not my today :) [16:23] <slangasek> Mirv: I'm in Germany at the moment and am also EOD [16:24] <elopio> ack. Thanks Mirv and pitti. [16:24] <elopio> I think I'll better leave it to veebers. He will know if we need to do more testing after the merge. [16:25] <Mirv> elopio: can you give him a note? the patch to fit in (including changelog entry) is http://launchpadlibrarian.net/181532211/autopilot_1.5.0%2B14.10.20140716-0ubuntu1_1.5.0%2B14.10.20140716-0ubuntu2.diff.gz [16:25] <elopio> Mirv: I'll wait for him and ping him as soon as he wakes up. [16:25] <Mirv> alright [16:25] <elopio> he loves me for getting him new things to do while having breakfast :) [16:28] <pitti> elopio: FWIW, slangasek's dep changes are unrelated to anything I've seen in the MP, and merging that upload should be a no-brainer given that it's already in utopic? [16:31] <elopio> pitti: you are right. We already got results running with that version. [16:31] <elopio> I'll do the merges. [16:31] <elopio> I was scared to break the dashboard somehow. [16:43] <michagogo> arges: okay, I did as you asked === robru_ is now known as robru [16:48] <elopio> pitti, Mirv: there's another entry on the changelog that is not in trunk [16:48] <elopio> 1.5.0+14.10.20140716-0ubuntu1 [16:50] <pitti> elopio: hm, process fail? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopilot/1.5.0+14.10.20140716-0ubuntu1 was clearly an auto-land CI train thing [16:51] <rsalveti> pitti: mterry: getting http://paste.ubuntu.com/7962615/ on latest image (emulator), wonder if that is expected [16:52] <elopio> I'm a little confused. I think I need to get the diff from 1.5.0+14.10.20140716-0ubuntu2 into the 1.5 branch, not into trunk. [16:52] <elopio> but I'll just wait for veebers. I might make a mess that's harder to fix. [16:53] <pitti> elopio: to both, presumably [16:53] <pitti> the 1.5 branch == utopic, trunk is the actual trunk [16:53] <pitti> (AFAIUI) [16:53] <pitti> anyway, way past EOD time, cu tomorrow! [16:54] <mterry> rsalveti, I'm not sure if they are expected or not. I've not noticed such errors before, but maybe they were there === timrc-afk is now known as timrc [17:22] <jtaylor> doko: any hint how to get a --no-as-needed into gccs hidden commandline for a specific gcc library? [17:22] <jtaylor> the thing it prints when running gcc -v <file> [17:22] <jtaylor> in ubuntu gcc nicely strips away -l{a,t,ub}san due to as-needed === psivaa is now known as psivaa-holiday === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk [18:13] <asomething> Anyone from Canonical IS around that I can chat with? elmo? [18:14] <Unit193> Might be better served in -sysadmin? [18:15] <asomething> Oh there's, a #canonical-sysadmin Didn't know, thanks Unit193 [18:15] <Unit193> Sure thing. [18:42] <ScottK> Anyone merging the reportbug security fix? [18:43] <rww> Is there a timeline or todo list for enabling 12.04 to 14.04 updates? Getting quite a few support questions about when it'll happen. [18:43] <ScottK> "When infinity feels like it" is the answer, AFAIK. [18:44] <sarnold> ScottK: mdeslaur said he was going to prepare updates [18:44] <ScottK> No reason people have to wait if they don't want to though. [18:44] <rww> ScottK: *nod* Last I heard there was a bugfix update pending for update-manager-core, but I think that got sorted. Not sure. [18:45] <rww> What's the preferred method for updating now? do-release-upgrade -p ? [18:45] <rww> (since trusty is in meta-release-lts-proposed ) [18:48] * ScottK does reportbug [18:49] <mdeslaur> ScottK: you're doing utopic? [18:49] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Yes. I was going to do a trusty debdiff too. [18:49] <ScottK> If you want it, go for it though. [18:49] <mdeslaur> ScottK: they're the same, so I'll let you handle trusty [18:49] <mdeslaur> I'll do precise [18:50] <ScottK> OK. [18:54] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Did you put a bug in LP yet? [18:55] <mdeslaur> ScottK: not yet, one sec, I'll create one [18:55] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Thanks. Please ping me the # and I'll start uploading. [18:55] <ScottK> (and give you a debdiff) [18:57] <mdeslaur> ScottK: bug 1353046 [18:57] <ubottu> bug 1353046 in reportbug (Ubuntu Utopic) "arbitrary code execution in compare_versions" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1353046 [18:57] <ScottK> Thanks. [19:06] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Utopic is uploaded and Trusty debdiff is in the bug. [19:07] <mdeslaur> ScottK: thanks! [19:07] <ScottK> Well, I'm motivated. I read the DSN and went "Wait, I use that package!". [19:07] <ScottK> yw in any case. [19:09] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Missed a spot. [19:09] <mdeslaur> ScottK: hrm? [19:11] <ScottK> My utopic upload failed. [19:11] <mdeslaur> ah, yes, trusty FTBFS too [19:11] <mdeslaur> hrm, that's odd [19:15] <ScottK> Very. [19:16] <ScottK> python -c "import reportbug; print reportbug.VERSION_NUMBER" in the source works fine locally. [19:16] <mdeslaur> that's not the one that's weird, it's the other one that specifically excludes the +nmu* part [19:17] <mdeslaur> $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | egrep '^Distribution:' | sed 's/^Distrib [19:17] <mdeslaur> ution: \([^+]*\).*/\1/') [19:17] <ScottK> Ah. [19:17] <mdeslaur> that one...so 6.5.0+nmu1ubuntu0.1 becomes 6.5.0 [19:17] <mdeslaur> I'm wondering if we're better to change the regexp and get the real version [19:17] <ScottK> I think that's more divergence from Debian, so let's not. [19:17] <mdeslaur> so all ubuntu versions will report as 1.5.0 from now on? [19:18] <mdeslaur> er...6.5.0 [19:18] <ScottK> Until there's a non-NMU. [19:18] <mdeslaur> ok [19:18] <ScottK> Confirmed that works [19:18] <ScottK> Do you want another debdiff? [19:19] <mdeslaur> nah, I'm good [19:19] <mdeslaur> I just changed it to 6.5.0 [19:21] <ScottK> Same here on Utopic. === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === juliank0 is now known as juliank [20:35] <hallyn> pitti: hi, would you mind sponsoring http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cgmanager/cgmanager_0.30-1.dsc ? I'm hoping this'll be it for some time. [20:36] <hallyn> (next step will be working on getting what we need from systemd itself) [21:01] <highvoltage> win 24 === salem_ is now known as _salem [21:56] <sarnold> a user in #ubuntu-hardened is complaining about hash-sum mismatches in http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/trusty-security [22:16] <sn33zy> any devs need someone to help them? im bored and need something to do (and the bugs.launchpad.net is beyond me) [22:18] <jtaylor> sn33zy: fancy digging around in the gcc-4.9 package? :) [22:18] <Noskcaj> jtaylor, That is mean [22:19] <sn33zy> jtaylor, Noskcaj if its easy task and I know what im looking for I will do it :) [22:20] <Noskcaj> sn33zy, You could try making an app for ubuntu touch. http://developer.ubuntu.com/ [22:20] <jtaylor> its probably not easy if your unfamiliar with the package :/ [22:21] <sn33zy> ok :( [22:21] <Noskcaj> Or fixing bugs in the ubuntu phone core apps [22:21] <Noskcaj> I have to go to school now, bye [22:21] <sn33zy> bye Noskcaj |