File size: 40,010 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
[00:04] <Quintasan> 4.12.3 works fine here on saucy
[00:07] <ahoneybun> if one were to remove ubuntu-desktop would that remove every gtk/gnome application?
[00:07] <Quintasan> ahoneybun: I do not think so.
[00:07] <apachelogger> Riddell: bug 1288469 I think the correct approach here is to have upstream do a release :P
[00:08] <ubottu> bug 1288469 in partitionmanager (Ubuntu) "package a snapshot" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1288469
[00:08] <ahoneybun> darfn
[00:08] <apachelogger> lazy upstreams not doing releases :@
[00:08] <ahoneybun> *darn
[00:08] <Quintasan> It will just remove the meta-package
[00:08] <Quintasan> + on what apachelogger said
[00:08]  * ahoneybun looks for packages to remove
[00:09] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: mmm ... maybe
[00:09] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: ask again on Friday xD
[00:10] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: I'll make a doodle later today since I want to ask you guys a few things.
[00:10]  * Quintasan goes to bed
[00:10] <Quintasan> Good night.
[00:13] <ahoneybun> this needs to get updated! https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PureKDE
[00:18] <ahoneybun> so I see muon software manager was removed?
[00:18] <ahoneybun> sorry I don't have it 
[00:24] <ScottK> ahoneybun: muon discover now.
[00:25] <ScottK> ahoneybun: That's a wiki, so you can fix it up.
[00:25] <ahoneybun> I see
[00:27] <ahoneybun> is muon discover going to replace muon update manager?
[00:29] <ScottK> No.
[00:30] <ScottK> It just replaces the software center, AIUI.
[00:41] <ahoneybun> aiui?
[00:55] <ahoneybun> sudo apt-get remove gnome-*
[00:55] <ahoneybun> removes a lot of ubuntu stuff
[00:57] <apachelogger> Quintasan, yofel: where do I get invited btw?
[00:58] <apachelogger> vgezer: out of scope
[00:58] <apachelogger> as I said, the desktop session is not localized as a whole, because there is no localization on the ISO other than english
[00:59] <apachelogger> so, if you go to the desktop it will just about always speak english with you, it does not matter whether the two items on the desktop are localized then
[01:00] <apachelogger> if you don't choose to go to the desktop but install directly you will get a fully localized experience (well, except for the ubiquity partitioning bug, but that is another story)
[01:00] <vgezer> apachelogger: yeah i see for the live version, but the installation? you said it also wont be localized, right?
[01:00] <apachelogger> vgezer: I said the items on the desktop won't be localized, the installer itself has localization bundled
[01:01] <apachelogger> when you start the ISO, you get to a screen with two buttons
[01:01] <apachelogger> one is 'try kubuntu' which drops you to the desktop, this will not be localized in aaaaany way
[01:01] <apachelogger> the other is 'install kubuntu' which continues through ubiquity and is localized as expected
[01:01] <vgezer> ah. i had no idea which localization packages gets also installed with the installation, so thought maybe kubuntu-l10-patched could also include the "Kubuntu Documentation".desktop
[01:02] <apachelogger> no localization packages get installed, that's the problem ^^
[01:02] <vgezer> yes you are right with the installation then... as it doesnt have any locale packages
[01:03] <vgezer> ops. :s. really :/. but i remember it was downloading some packages after installation related to l10n. isnt this step also the k'tu-l10n-patched is downloaded?
[01:04] <Mamarok> oh wow, I just upgrade to 14.04 beta1, and I am greeted with a perfectly black screen with absolutely no way to do anything in KDE, booting on a previous 3.11.x kernel solves the isuse. What did I miss?
[01:04] <Mamarok> looks as if everthing is black on black
[01:05] <Mamarok> only thing visible is the plasma panel, but all application windows remain black
[01:05] <Mamarok> I can see the title bar of the windows, that's it
=== ximion1 is now known as ximion
[01:05] <vgezer> apachelogger:  ^, in other words, as we download a lang. package, doesn't it update the .desktop files? e.g. Rekonq only is available as [en]=Rekonq for example. will choosing turkish at installation, update the rekonq.desktop with the turkish description?
[01:06] <vgezer> and the name
[01:07] <apachelogger> vgezer: there is no download in the live session
[01:07] <apachelogger> the only reason ubiquity is localized is because it has the translationed in the package itself
[01:07] <apachelogger> s/translationed/translations
[01:07]  * apachelogger should go to bed
[01:08] <apachelogger> Mamarok: graphics driver problem maybe
[01:08] <apachelogger> anyway
[01:08] <apachelogger> I am off
[01:08] <apachelogger> nite
[01:08] <Mamarok> why? I have a very plain intel thing here, always worked before
[01:10] <Mamarok> let's see more about that tomorrow, I need sleep as well
[01:13] <vgezer> apachelogger: ok i understood the live session, now just talking about the installation. i am gonna come tomorrow again :p :). good nite.
[01:23] <ScottK> ahoneybun: AIUI = As I Understand It
[02:39] <ahoneybun> apachelogger, http://www.gobolinux.org/?page=at_a_glance
=== Toadnohyp is now known as Hypnotoad
[08:02] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1288598] wallpapers disappear @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288598 (by Afiefh)
[08:22] <Mamarok> oh wow, I just upgrade to 14.04 beta1, and I am greeted with a perfectly black screen with absolutely no way to do anything in KDE, booting on a previous 3.11.x kernel solves the isuse. What did I miss?
[08:23] <Mamarok> actually yesterday evening. Something is probably not loaded when starting that kernel, any hints?
[08:23] <Mamarok> I use a Lenovo X220 which only has Intel stuff inside
[08:37] <Mamarok> hm, new kernel just came in, let's see if it work this time... brb
[08:39] <Mamarok> apparently thr problem is solved now
[09:48] <soee_> :)
[09:48] <soee_> do you also have The following packages have been kept back: linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic ?
[09:50] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:02] <Riddell> Mamarok: phew :)
[10:08] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1288598] wallpapers disappear @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288598 (by Afiefh)
[10:22] <Mamarok> soee_: dist-upgrade should get them
[10:34] <soee_> Mamarok: yes thank you
[10:35] <soee_> @this bug with wallpapers
[10:36] <soee_> ig you have several custom listed there and yuo download new one through Get new wallpapers, than you see only 2 items - default wallpaper and the downloaded one
[10:36] <soee_> if you close and open desktop settings again all is ok though
[10:37] <apachelogger> ahoneybun, ovidiu-florin: how's the wordpress testing/theming going?
[11:20] <manchicken> Morning
[11:24] <manchicken> apachelogger: You were saying before that these polkit issues might be resolved by simply installing my version of libqapt into prefix /usr?
[11:25] <apachelogger> yes
[11:27] <manchicken> I'm trying that now.
[11:29] <manchicken> Does Tonio ever come around anymore?
[11:29] <manchicken> I'm wondering if I just miss him due to time zones.
[11:32] <apachelogger> manchicken: hasn't been around for a month or so
[11:33] <apachelogger> well, rather, hasn't been on IRC, he's not been around for years :P
[11:33] <manchicken> Gotcha.
[11:37] <manchicken> Well, that didn't help the polkit issue.
[11:37] <manchicken> I'm wondering if I'm detecting the dbus write failures properly.
[11:38] <BluesKaj> 'Morning all
[11:39] <Riddell> morning BluesKaj 
[11:39] <BluesKaj> Hey Riddell
[11:43] <BluesKaj> still a few graphical artifacts here and there like blanking parts of the screen and flickering while scrolling in a browser, but less frequent than 2 days ago
[11:47] <BluesKaj> hard for me to guess whether it's a direct graphics driver problem or X server
[12:38] <sgclark> Riddell: kwindowsystem ready
[12:41] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: since we don't add the touchpad ksni thing to the systray area, do you mind if I create a todo to do that?
[12:50] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: go ahead
[12:50] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: should the KSNI be added even on non touchpad systems?
[12:50] <shadeslayer> aka desktops
[13:02] <ovidiu-florin> apachelogger: I haven't managed to take a look at it recently :(
[13:09] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: it should only be added if there is a touchpad i'd say
[13:09] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: right
[13:21] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: kde-runtime	i386 	logfile 	Dependency wait: libkubuntu-dev
[13:21] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: is it fine to backport libkubuntu to saucy
[13:21] <shadeslayer> or do I remove that build dep
[13:24] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: good to backport
[13:25] <shadeslayer> thx done
[13:37] <shadeslayer> whee
[13:37] <shadeslayer> staging is full
[14:04] <shadeslayer> we now have 16G's in staging :P
[14:16] <Riddell> 13:30 < avolkov> Riddell: kwindowsystem Build-Depends on libqt5x11extras-dev which is transitional to libqt5x11extras5-dev
[14:16] <Riddell> sgclark: further change needed ↑
[14:17] <sgclark> ok
[14:19] <shadeslayer> yofel: kubuntu-batch-backport seems a bit broken
[14:19] <shadeslayer> backporting from saucy to precise doesn't work
[14:20] <shadeslayer> however trusty to precise does
[14:20] <yofel> well, we have only one set of hooks, and they're meant for $dev->$stable
[14:21] <yofel> feel free to implement apply-as-needed detection for the hooks somehow if you're really bored ^^
[14:24] <Riddell> was there any conclusion to whether we should share a repository with debian for kf5 packaging?
[14:24] <Riddell> I think it's worth a try and I saw ScottK said the same
[14:25] <sgclark> Riddell: kdesignerplugin ready
[14:27] <Riddell> sgclark: up she goes!
[14:28] <sgclark> Riddell: E: Unable to locate package libqt5x11extras5-dev
[14:31] <Riddell> sgclark: oh so it's probably a change in qt 5.2 which isn't uploaded yet to ubuntu (but is in debian)
[14:31] <Riddell> I'll upload kwindowsystem as is
[14:31] <sgclark> ok
[14:33] <Riddell> sgclark: voila!
[14:37] <sgclark> Riddell: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7044391/
[14:39] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: where does hasBattery come from here http://paste.kde.org/psxvj5la0
[14:45] <Riddell> sgclark: yeah remove them, no ABI guarantee yet so that's fine for now
[14:46] <Riddell> but kwindowsystem just failed on i386
[14:50] <sgclark> ok
[14:56] <sgclark> Riddell: kwindowsystem patched for i386
[14:57] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: plasma api
[14:57] <apachelogger> plasma scripting api to be more precise
[14:58] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: and do you know how to connect to a dataengine using plasma scripting?
[14:58] <apachelogger> oh?
[14:58] <apachelogger> you cannot I think
[14:58] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: #plasma
[15:00] <Riddell> sgclark: uploaded!
[15:00] <shadeslayer> I believe you're right
[15:02] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: can you do dbus calls? via scripting? :OP
[15:03] <yofel> Riddell: wrt kf5 and debian, I talked a bit with maxy and apachelogger, and IMO it's worth a try, but we need to work out exactly how that's supposed to work before we start
[15:05] <sgclark> Riddell: kross is ready
[15:08] <Riddell> sgclark: uploaded!
[15:09] <Riddell> yofel: if it complex? surely it's just git repos in debian infrastructure with a debian branch and a kubuntu branch
[15:11] <yofel> suuuure, but I would prefer just one branch unless there's stuff that's really not supposed to be in debian..
[15:11] <yofel> otherwise I don't really see the advantage over them using git and git-bzr
[15:26] <shadeslayer> fooey
[15:26] <shadeslayer> yofel: apachelogger https://launchpadlibrarian.net/168520911/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.libkubuntu_14.04ubuntu3~ubuntu12.04.1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[15:26] <shadeslayer> cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option '-std=c++11'
[15:26] <apachelogger> well it's not good to be backported to 12.04 :P
[15:26] <shadeslayer> I can see that :D
[15:27] <apachelogger> can be patched
[15:27] <apachelogger> but meh
[15:27] <shadeslayer> clearly you don't support precise users
[15:27] <shadeslayer> why!
[15:27] <Riddell> yofel: I think we'll always have two branches as we'll want to upload at different times and there are some legit differences between bits debian wants and bits kubuntu wants
[15:27] <Riddell> yofel: but having them in the same repository makes merges so much easier
[15:28] <shadeslayer> git rebase ftw
[15:28] <Riddell> (or it will once I learn how to do git merges, reading the book now :)
[15:28] <sgclark> Riddell: frameworkintegration ready
[15:29] <yofel> well yeah, git is fun, I'm more worried about how debian will adjust to the workflow as they'll essentially have to merge our changes as we'll be ahead usually.
[15:29] <yofel> Nobody was really interested in that kind of thing for kde sc...
[15:30] <Riddell> sgclark: oh? onto tier 4?
[15:31] <apachelogger> "For all files that I have tested (extensions .mp4, .avi, .mpg) only sound is played. The dialog that offers to install additional codecs is only shown when I close dragon player. If I chose to search for new codecs, a new dialog from qapt is shown but no new codecs are ever found. "
[15:31] <sgclark> Riddell: yes :) we should finish today
[15:31] <apachelogger> phonon gstreamer seems broken
[15:31] <apachelogger> or maybe qapt-gstreamer
[15:32] <Riddell> no, too soon notice, I already have plans :(dput ppa:kubuntu-ppa/experimental frameworkintegration_4.97.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04~ppa4_source.changes
[15:32] <Riddell> hmm, curious mixed paste there
[15:32] <Riddell> anyway, uploaded :)
[15:33] <sgclark> Riddell: any idea on Dependency wait: libphonon5qt5-dev libphonon5qt5experimental-dev
[15:34] <shadeslayer> :P
[15:35] <Riddell> sgclark: libphonon5qt5-dev -> libphonon4qt5-dev  I think
[15:35] <sgclark> ok
[15:35] <Riddell> sane for experimental
[15:35] <Riddell> same for experimental
[15:36] <shadeslayer> uhmm
[15:36] <sgclark> Riddell: I cannot seem to locate optional * PkgConfig for knotifications
[15:37] <Riddell> sgclark: pkg-config  it should be
[15:37] <sgclark> ty
[15:43] <shadeslayer> Riddell: is there an issue with shipping things like libavbin0 which are in universe on the ISO?
[15:45] <Riddell> shadeslayer: no, most everything we ship is in universe
[15:45] <shadeslayer> Riddell: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/1285729
[15:45] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1285729 in amarok (Ubuntu) "amarok unable to transcode" [Medium,Confirmed]
[15:45] <apachelogger> SPACE
[15:45] <apachelogger> SPAAAAAAAACE
[15:45] <Riddell> shadeslayer: ah but is there some stuff with patent restrictions maybe
[15:45] <apachelogger> yeah
[15:46] <shadeslayer> wouldn't that be in multiverse?
[15:46] <shadeslayer> or restricted
[15:46] <apachelogger> libavbin itself is not doing anything it's a cli for libav, but libav has sort of patent stuff going on
[15:46] <apachelogger> also the things that actually make libavbin work are probably huge
[15:46] <apachelogger> it'd replicate gstreamer to some extent
[15:47] <shadeslayer> fooey
[15:47] <Riddell> shadeslayer: no that's only for copyright limited items
[15:47] <Riddell> if we put patent restricted items in multiverse everything would be in there
[15:47] <shadeslayer> :D
[15:47] <Riddell> shadeslayer: ask someone from the tech board to point towards the decision on libav bits
[15:48] <Riddell> but I guess if it's in kubuntu-restricted-extras then we can't ship it
[15:53] <shadeslayer> o_o
[15:53] <shadeslayer> W: tomahawk-dbg: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtomahawklib.so.0.7.0
[15:57] <shadeslayer> yofel: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/921946
[15:57] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 921946 in kdepim (Ubuntu) "E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'kmail'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)" [High,Confirmed]
[15:57] <yofel> ?
[15:58] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1288800] help in upgrade @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288800 (by saddamzemmali)
[15:58] <yofel> ah hm
[15:58] <shadeslayer> ubottu: could you follow up? :)
[15:58] <ubottu> shadeslayer: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[15:58] <shadeslayer> argh
[15:58] <yofel> apt-get is a black box to me
[15:59] <yofel> I'll look at it later though
[16:00] <shadeslayer> we have 4 year old bugs lingering in Launchpad @_@
[16:06] <sgclark> Riddell: knotifications ready
[16:09] <shadeslayer> !test
[16:09] <ubottu> Testing... Testing... 1. 2.. 3... ( by the way, remember that you can use /join #test )
[16:09] <shadeslayer> hm
[16:09] <shadeslayer> 4.12.3 ready for saucy in staging
[16:09] <shadeslayer> plz test
[16:09] <shadeslayer> Riddell: ^^
[16:11] <Riddell> shadeslayer: version number should be 4.97.0a for knotifications, that's because upstream released a tar which we uploaded but then updated it before release so we have to find a different version number
[16:11] <Riddell> sgclark rather ↑
[16:12] <Riddell> shadeslayer: I'll fire up an ec2 to test
[16:12] <shadeslayer> cool
[16:14] <mfraz74> Just booted my computer running 14.04 all updated and Akonadi won't start.
[16:14] <mfraz74> ProcessControl: Application 'akonadiserver' returned with exit code 255 (Unknown error)
[16:14] <mfraz74> "akonadiserver" crashed too often and will not be restarted!
[16:15] <Riddell> hmm, I did upload an akonadi alpha yesterday
[16:15] <Riddell> mfraz74: done a complete dist-upgrade ?
[16:15] <mfraz74> Riddell: Yes
[16:18] <Riddell> so more testing of akonadi needed :(
[16:18] <mfraz74> Riddell: how do I get it working again?
[16:19] <sgclark> Riddell: umm so then we need to update all frameworks the depend on knotifications with the a?
[16:20] <vgezer> i wanted to try new muon and libqapt, but due to this bug i am unable to upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1286415 . are there any other methods to upgrade?
[16:20] <Riddell> sgclark: nah, build-dep on >= 4.97.0 is good enough, all that matters is it's higher than 4.96.0
[16:20] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1280782 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1286415 Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04 - tk8.5-lib fails to upgrade to libtk8.5" [High,Triaged]
[16:20] <sgclark> ok
[16:20] <Riddell> vgezer: ug, do a new install would be one way
[16:21] <vgezer> Riddell: will the installer provide an option to upgrade or will it make a fresh installation?
[16:21] <Riddell> vgezer: a fresh install
[16:22] <Quintasan> sup
[16:22] <vgezer> Riddell: ops. thats what actually I wanted :/. thanks anyway :)
[16:23] <mfraz74> Riddell: Yes, I'm on 1.11.80-0ubuntu1
[16:24] <sgclark> Riddell: knotifications fixed, I am not entirely sure I did it right
[16:25] <Riddell> sgclark: yep all good thanks
[16:29] <shadeslayer> Riddell: mind reviewing http://people.ubuntu.com/~rohangarg/upload/tomahawk_0.7.0+dfsg1-0ubuntu4.dsc
[16:32] <vgezer> Riddell: its a bit out of topic but, some months ago there was a discussion regarding to kubuntu stickers. I also was thinking if Kubuntu 14.04 dvds (printed) could be distributed to some users or not.. I found some companies who do that and one dvd costs around 7 euros. maybe if we could order more, we could get a wholesale price?
[16:33] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/274150
[16:33] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 274150 in kdepim (Ubuntu) "Help functions return error message when help isn't installed" [Wishlist,Triaged]
[16:33] <Riddell> shadeslayer: why the split?
[16:33] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ^^ Maybe something like your kipi installation thing for gwenview could be done?
[16:33] <shadeslayer> Riddell: because apparently tomahawk provides public API that can be used by 3rd party developers
[16:33] <shadeslayer> to develop plugins
[16:43] <sgclark> Riddell: errr, I hoped to finish today, but major storm rolling through and my internet is wonky. trying though!
[16:45] <apachelogger> up the strea
[16:45] <apachelogger> m
[16:46] <sgclark> Riddell: kactivities-kf5 ready
[16:46] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: hm?
[16:46]  * shadeslayer cleans Quantal packages from staging
[16:47] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: needs solution upstream
[16:53] <Riddell> sgclark: uploaded
[16:55] <shadeslayer> ESOHUNGRY
[16:55] <Quintasan> Order a pizza?
[16:55] <shadeslayer> I've been having pizza for the last 2 days
[16:55] <Quintasan> Eat pizza for 3 days
[16:55] <Quintasan> :P
[16:55] <shadeslayer> hurray, kdepim is now down to 84 open bugs
[16:56] <Quintasan> Anything I can help with?
[16:56] <shadeslayer> triage bugs
[16:56] <shadeslayer> there be so many bugs
[16:56] <Quintasan> do we tag our bugs?
[16:56] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: actually, write a script to find all bug reports related to a package, fetch description, check if description contains an EOL release number, generate bug list
[16:57] <shadeslayer> that way you can probably mark a bunch of bugs as EOL easily
[16:57] <shadeslayer> you still have to manually check though
[16:57] <Riddell> Quintasan: ones we want to release note tag with kubuntu and milestone to 14.04, otherwise not really
[16:57] <shadeslayer> though maybe with some heuristics ( last comment date for example ) you might be able to automate it
[16:58] <shadeslayer> Riddell: got anything I can do>
[16:58] <Quintasan> Riddell closing LP #1008967
[16:58] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1008967 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] plasma-widget-redshift" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1008967
[16:58] <Riddell> shadeslayer: did agateau's reivew get reviewed?
[16:59] <Riddell> no it didn't https://code.launchpad.net/~agateau/ubiquity/kde-fix-cropped-greeter-buttons/+merge/208628
[17:01] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1282713
[17:01] <ubottu> Error: launchpad bug 1282713 not found
[17:01] <shadeslayer> be reproducible
[17:02] <shadeslayer> or well, it happens to me too
[17:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: throw some cards at me plz
[17:10] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: how do I lunchpad api?
[17:10] <Riddell> shadeslayer: 4.12.3 for saucy in staging working good after an upgrade and vnc login
[17:10] <Quintasan> yus
[17:10] <Quintasan> 4.12.3 be working here
[17:11] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: https://api.launchpad.net/
[17:11] <shadeslayer> cool copying over then
[17:14] <Quintasan> christ
[17:14] <Quintasan> Python?
[17:15] <Quintasan> See you in two hours
[17:16] <shadeslayer> heh
[17:16] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: sal script be broken I think
[17:17] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://i.imgur.com/Rz92oHB.png
[17:17] <shadeslayer> of all the things only systemsettings and dolphin are added
[17:18] <shadeslayer> yep quite broken
[17:20] <shadeslayer> as I suspected, netbook path not in kde4rc
[17:26]  * shadeslayer waves fist
[17:28] <Quintasan> hmm
[17:28] <Quintasan> I managed to log in 
[17:34] <shadeslayer> :D
[17:37] <Quintasan> How bad can this docs get?
[17:41] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: look at the Kubuntu scripts for inspiration
[17:46] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: Funny how there isn't a simple way to get all bugs assigned to a source package
[17:46] <shadeslayer> there is
[17:46] <shadeslayer> searchBugTasks 
[17:46] <shadeslayer> or something
[17:46] <Quintasan> lol
[17:46] <Quintasan> nope
[17:47] <Quintasan> OR
[17:47] <Quintasan> it's not in the docs
[17:48] <shadeslayer> it is
[17:48] <Quintasan> getBugData
[17:48] <Quintasan> >The only criteria currently supported is to search for a bugtask with the specified bug id.
[17:48] <Quintasan> lel
[17:50] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: https://api.launchpad.net/1.0.html#distribution_source_package
[17:50] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: searchTasks
[17:52] <Quintasan> weird.
[17:52] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: Doesn't allow you to search for source package
[17:52] <shadeslayer> you search for bugs from a source package item
[17:53] <shadeslayer> so you go archive -> get all sources subscribed to kubuntu bugs -> for each source find bug tasks
[18:04] <Quintasan> ubuntu.searchTasks(bug_subscriber=launchpad.people.getByEmail(email="kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com"))
[18:04] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: Man, this is certainly not easy.
[18:04] <Quintasan> or maybe I should say
[18:04] <Quintasan> intuitive.
[18:04] <Quintasan> brb food
[18:05] <shadeslayer> that query looks weird
[18:05] <shadeslayer> what's ubuntu
[18:05] <shadeslayer> don't say food
[18:05] <shadeslayer> my stomach is growling
[18:05] <shadeslayer> and I'm out of pears
[18:06] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: well, it's gets all bugs subscribed by Kubuntu Bugs
[18:06] <Quintasan> strange thing
[18:06] <shadeslayer> but what's ubuntu
[18:07] <Quintasan> In [56]: ubuntu = launchpad.distributions["ubuntu"]
[18:07] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: also, when triaging, you probably only want to query bugs of one source
[18:08] <Quintasan> dude, and I'm telling you that source_package has no method allowing you to get the bugs assigned to it
[18:08] <Quintasan> or I'm retarded
[18:09] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: but https://api.launchpad.net/1.0.html#distribution_source_package lists searchTasks right there!
[18:10] <Quintasan> bloody hell this is so unintuitive
[18:10] <yofel> and source_package.searchTasks() is there too
[18:10] <sgclark> Riddell: kde4support is ready
[18:11] <shadeslayer> yofel: I thought that's what I was saying :P
[18:11] <yofel> shadeslayer: distribution_source_package != source_package
[18:11] <yofel> for whatever reason
[18:11] <shadeslayer> O_O
[18:12] <yofel> Quintasan: as I understand it, searchTasks() simply mimicks the launchpad search - and the default bug listing on he web UI is a search with predefined defaults
[18:13] <Quintasan> ARGH
[18:13] <Quintasan> w/e
[18:14]  * Quintasan tires the hit the damn thing until it works approach
[18:14] <yofel> I usually get timeout errors when I try that ^^
[18:19] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ping
[18:20] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: how does pgst call qapt-gst-helper
[18:38] <Quintasan> shadeslayer, yofel: the thing about source_package.searchTasks() that bugs me is distroseries required argument
[18:39] <shadeslayer> leave it empty?
[18:40] <shadeslayer> wait what
[18:40] <yofel> Quintasan: now, either I'm not seeing it or you're doing something wrong
[18:40] <yofel> yes, a source_package has a distroseries associated to it
[18:40] <yofel> if you don't want that use a distribution_source_package
[18:40] <shadeslayer> yofel: 4.13 beta is directly released?
[18:41] <yofel> shadeslayer: been like that since 4.11 no?
[18:41] <yofel> betas and rc
[18:41] <shadeslayer> I thought you got a day or two
[18:41] <yofel> nope
[18:41] <shadeslayer> hm ok
[18:42] <Quintasan> yofel: okay, maybe I don't understand it
[18:43] <Quintasan> how the hell do I get from top-level collection to entry of the type source_package?
[18:43] <yofel> what type's the collection of?
[18:44] <Quintasan> uh
[18:44] <Quintasan> wat
[18:44] <Quintasan> https://api.launchpad.net/1.0.html
[18:44] <yofel> there is distribution.getSourcePackage()
[18:44] <yofel> which gives a distribution_source_package
[18:46] <shadeslayer> yofel: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1iBkLBLug5zYF4GQYbO7mXijWTTFZ73dYpFibUbqrrQs/viewform
[18:46] <shadeslayer> thoughts on improvements?
[18:46]  * yofel doesn't want to run apport-kde...
[18:46] <shadeslayer> yofel: heh, just have a look, and see what can be improved wrt QA
[18:47] <yofel> sure ^^
[18:48] <shadeslayer> like more questions that can be added to the form
[18:48] <yofel> bluesplash o.O?
[18:48] <shadeslayer> yeah, that thing 
[18:48] <yofel> ok, need to try this after all
[18:49] <shadeslayer> :D
[18:49] <yofel> hm....
[18:49] <yofel> i SIGSEGV nano and nothing happens :S
[18:49] <yofel> so much for the test ^^
[18:49] <shadeslayer> wait a couple of seconds
[18:50] <shadeslayer> yofel: and do you have /usr/share/apport/apport-kde
[18:50] <yofel> it should still at least make a crash file
[18:50] <yofel> which it didn't
[18:50] <shadeslayer> it should yes
[18:50] <shadeslayer> o_O
[18:50] <shadeslayer> works fine here
[18:50] <yofel> hm, it's not disabled...
[18:52] <yofel> does +filebug still redirect people to the wiki?
[18:53] <yofel> the relevant section on the help page is still there, so you might want to append ?no-redirect to the launchpad url
[18:55] <yofel> shadeslayer: the first PPA test case is junk, that's the default behaviour, but some PPA's (like neon4) have apport config files for PPA package bug reporting
[18:55] <yofel> so if you want to test that, give an example ppa
[18:56] <shadeslayer> kubuntu-backports ! :D
[18:56] <yofel> nice, the cancel button was fixed
[18:57] <yofel> well, the first one
[18:57] <yofel> next one -> "We are sorry, Apport KDE closed unexpectedly." :D
[18:57] <shadeslayer> I can haz backtrace
[18:57] <shadeslayer> yofel: also, this means good test cases :P
[18:58] <yofel> well, I was just running 'apport-bug bash' which is what I always do if I just want to launch it
[18:58] <yofel> covers your 2nd advanced test though
[18:58] <shadeslayer> I see
[18:59] <shadeslayer> yofel: but then apport crashed right?
[18:59] <yofel> damnit, why does sip never have debug symbols
[18:59] <yofel> wait a se
[18:59] <yofel> c
[19:00] <yofel> shadeslayer: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7045733/
[19:00] <yofel> but let me reboot quickly
[19:00] <yofel> I installed updates earlier
[19:01] <shadeslayer> QWidgetPrivate::deleteTLSysExtra
[19:01] <shadeslayer> hurray
[19:03] <shadeslayer> yofel: http://pad.lv/1282713
[19:03] <ubottu> Error: launchpad bug 1282713 not found
[19:03] <yofel> back
[19:04] <yofel> shadeslayer: looks like it
[19:04] <yofel> and it's reproducable
[19:04] <shadeslayer> https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/751e840dab47f7bf986db754c38aac49e09db4ba
[19:05] <yofel> ok, happens with the send button too, bad :/
[19:06] <yofel> apport works fine until the end though
[19:06] <yofel> just the UI crashes on close
[19:07] <shadeslayer>  :/
[19:07] <yofel> "Language support is incomplete"
[19:07] <yofel> someone fixed the locale installer? ^^
[19:08] <shadeslayer> notifications are fixed
[19:08] <shadeslayer> installer is still shit
[19:08] <yofel> and why the hell did I just get the xubuntu login screen, I probably have it installed, but it's not like I changed screens
[19:09] <shadeslayer> I changed from English to Catalan and back to English and dpkg is still in Catalan
[19:09] <yofel> ah, well that's something
[19:09] <yofel> ah yeah, happened with german on my other notebook too
[19:09] <yofel> freakin' annoying
[19:09] <shadeslayer> ^^
[19:09] <shadeslayer> yofel: try reverting http://launchpadlibrarian.net/166680672/apport_2.13.2-0ubuntu4_2.13.2-0ubuntu5.diff.gz
[19:10] <shadeslayer> and see if it still crashes
[19:11] <yofel> shadeslayer: maybe I make a bet that it will?
[19:11] <yofel> *may I
[19:11] <shadeslayer> heh, well, 0ubuntu4 has no crashes reported against it
[19:11] <shadeslayer> but 0ubuntu5 has 114
[19:11] <yofel> ah well, won't hurt
[19:13] <yofel> crashes, it's something other than apport
[19:13] <shadeslayer> yep
[19:13] <yofel> qt4 4.8.5 maybe?
[19:13] <shadeslayer> that's what I'm looking at
[19:15] <shadeslayer> yofel: try going back a few Qt versions?
[19:16] <yofel> lets see what I still have around
[19:17] <yofel> nothing, lets see if I can force it down to saucy
[19:17] <Quintasan> yofel, shadeslayer: http://wklej.org/id/1291744/?hl=python
[19:17] <Quintasan> over 9000 seconds in python
[19:17] <Quintasan> it only looks for the bugs for now
[19:18] <Quintasan> the question is how do I access the bug description now
[19:19] <yofel> bug.description?
[19:20] <yofel> https://api.launchpad.net/devel.html#bug
[19:20] <Quintasan> yofel: not accessible from that
[19:20] <yofel> meh, same for 1.0
[19:20] <yofel> o.O
[19:20] <Quintasan> AttributeError: https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+source/partitionmanager/+bug/1045896 object has no attribute 'description'
[19:20] <yofel> ok, this is fun
[19:21] <Quintasan> I think you meant "not fun"
[19:21] <Quintasan> seriously
[19:21] <shadeslayer> fooey
[19:21] <shadeslayer> https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/921946
[19:21] <Quintasan> the best thing is that
[19:21] <Quintasan> bug.id
[19:21] <shadeslayer> no bug description?
[19:21] <Quintasan> does not exists which means I have to parse bug.title for number to use the bugs collection
[19:21] <Quintasan> xD
[19:22] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: poke wgrant
[19:22] <Quintasan> wgrant: poke
[19:22] <yofel> ah damn
[19:22] <Quintasan> this code is shit
[19:22] <yofel> writable
[19:23] <shadeslayer> yofel: and?
[19:23] <Quintasan> I could write a library for that
[19:23] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: a library ontop of a library ? :D
[19:23] <Quintasan> look how complex it is to search for a list of bugs
[19:23] <Quintasan> like it couldn't be
[19:23] <yofel> ok, maybe not
[19:23] <Quintasan> launchpad.bugs(source_package="namehere")
[19:24] <yofel> this is mental
[19:24] <yofel> bug.bug.description
[19:24] <shadeslayer> o_o
[19:24] <Quintasan> wat
[19:25] <yofel> aaah
[19:25] <Quintasan> WAT
[19:25] <yofel> searchTasks gives a bug_task collection, a bug_task has a bug, which has a description
[19:25] <yofel> so it's bug_task.bug.description
[19:26] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: btw you also might want to filter out fix commited/released/invalid/wont fix
[19:29] <Quintasan> yofel: best thing that bug_task is iterable and has things like title
[19:29] <Quintasan> This does not look sane to me at all.
[19:30] <yofel> well... you can have multiple bug tasks sharing the same bug
[19:30] <yofel> i.e. bug affecting different packages
[19:30] <yofel> not sure why the bug task has a title though o.O
[19:31] <Quintasan> and bug.bug does not have status for example
[19:31] <Quintasan> lol
[19:31] <yofel> well, status is part of the bug task
[19:31] <yofel> bug_task is the yellow line on the web UI at the top
[19:31] <yofel> bug is the rest
[19:31] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: yofel http://paste.kde.org/pg56hx5vx
[19:31] <shadeslayer> except print line seems to print everything xD
[19:32] <Quintasan> diff pls
[19:32] <Quintasan> wait
[19:32] <Quintasan> what's going on in there
[19:32] <shadeslayer> diff it yourself
[19:32] <shadeslayer> cuz I don't have the original anymore xD
[19:32] <yofel> fun ^^
[19:33] <Quintasan> if "Release" or "DistroRelease" in bug.bug.description :
[19:33] <yofel> please rename the first bug in bug_task or so or it's really confusing :D
[19:33] <Quintasan> ooh
[19:33] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: bug descriptions have Release/DistroRelease in them, primary aim of the script was to filter out EOL releases
[19:33] <Quintasan> yeah
[19:33] <Quintasan> I just remembered what was the orignal intent
[19:33] <Quintasan> xD
[19:34] <yofel> well, pure technically a bug is not invalid just because it was reported against an EOL release...
[19:34] <Quintasan> tell that to shadeslayer xD
[19:34] <shadeslayer> yofel: right, however, atleast one can try reproduce these on current dev and mark them as EOL
[19:35] <shadeslayer> if not reproducable 
[19:35] <yofel> then they're 'Incomplete' and will auto-expire
[19:35] <shadeslayer> yofel: tell that to Launchpad :P
[19:35] <shadeslayer> I think auto expiry was introduced recently
[19:35] <shadeslayer> so bugs marked before that are still around :(
[19:35] <shadeslayer> I closed one that was marked incomplete for 2 years today
[19:36] <yofel> no, it was there since pretty much the beginnings, it was just turned off because buggy until ~2 years ago or so
[19:36] <shadeslayer> ah I see
[19:36] <Quintasan> lel
[19:37] <yofel> I think 'Incomplete without response' is there as status for those bugs that won't expire
[19:37] <yofel> not quite sure
[19:38] <shadeslayer> ok, heading off to dinner
[19:38] <shadeslayer> cya
[19:38] <yofel> laters
[19:38] <Quintasan> aw shi...
[19:42] <yofel> hm, on the api that would be bug_task.staus == Incomplete and bug_task.bug.isExpirable() I guess
[19:42] <yofel> oh well
[19:42] <yofel> Quintasan: why are you writing this again? ^^
[19:42] <Quintasan> yofel: because shadeslayer is too lazy and we want to get rid of EOL bugs
[19:43] <Quintasan> and looking for them manually is...dull
[19:43] <yofel> true
[19:44] <Quintasan> this is retarded
[19:45] <Quintasan> for line in bug_task.bug.description.split("\n"):
[19:45] <Quintasan>                  if "Release" or "DistroRelease" in line:
[19:45] <Quintasan>                      print line.strip()
[19:45] <Quintasan> prints the whole description
[19:48] <Quintasan> If regexps do not work then there are not enough of them!
[19:50] <Quintasan> EHUEHEUHEUEHUE
[19:50] <Quintasan> 1031025 cannot label fat 32 partitions DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
[19:51] <Quintasan> shadeslayer, yofel: http://wklej.org/id/1291792/
[19:51] <Quintasan> werks
[19:52] <Quintasan> Though
[19:52] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: you know it's useless?
[19:52] <Quintasan> because you have to provide the package name
[19:52] <Quintasan> which is dumb if you want to get rid of EOL bugs
[19:53] <Quintasan> since we generally don't want to look for the names
[19:54] <yofel> can't you search by subscriber like you initially intended?
[19:56] <yofel> distribution.searchTasks() has a structural_subscriber parameter
[20:04] <Quintasan> yes
[20:04] <Quintasan> yofel: I was wondering about that
[20:04] <Quintasan> well
[20:04] <Quintasan> too lazy now
[20:04] <Quintasan> gotta think if I should write a library on top of library or poke wgrant to see if something can be done
[20:05] <yofel> ubuntu.searchTasks(structural_subscriber=lp.people['kubuntu-bugs']) might work, not sure what else is required
[20:08] <Quintasan> yofel: I'm more interested in whether we can use this thing in more ways that this
[20:09] <yofel> well, you can edit most of the bug data over api, and other teams do have bots that do automated bug processing
[20:09] <yofel> depends on what you want to od
[21:07] <shadeslayer> yofel: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/404895
[21:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 404895 in kdepim (Ubuntu) "Akregator: quick filter doesn't separate tokens" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[21:07] <shadeslayer> example of incomplete but not marked for expiry
[21:07] <shadeslayer> last comment is 2 years ago
[21:08] <shadeslayer> 2nd hit on the script output :P
[21:14] <shadeslayer> And I can't reproduce
[21:14] <shadeslayer> the bug
[21:42] <windows> ho ho 
[21:42] <windows> kubuntu legend 
[21:43] <windows> here one problem Im using 13.10 kubuntu 
[21:43] <windows> and I have wlan 0 and usb wlan 1 
[21:43] <windows> if signal in too low and I disconect my self few timees from wlan 1 
[21:44] <windows> after few times that signal disapear and I dont see it 
[21:44] <windows> but I can see tha same signal with wlan0 
[21:44] <windows> crazu but softw hide that sign 
[21:45] <windows> after reboot or after deleting wlan1 profile with pass I get again that ssid in list
[21:45] <windows> I HOPE I HELP ;)
[23:00] <wgrant> Quintasan: https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+source/partitionmanager/+bug/1045896 is a bug_gtask, not a bug. You want to load that, then load its bug attribute, and there you will find description and id.
[23:00] <wgrant> s/gtask/task/
[23:00] <kubotu> wgrant meant: "Quintasan: https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+source/partitionmanager/+bug/1045896 is a bug_task, not a bug. You want to load that, then load its bug attribute, and there you will find description and id."
[23:00] <Quintasan> I see
[23:02] <Quintasan> wgrant: Can I somehow get all bugs that Kubuntu Bugs is subscribed to?
[23:02] <Quintasan> I tried using searchTasks from distribution but I don't think that worked.
[23:02] <Quintasan> it didn't give me everything
[23:02] <wgrant> Quintasan: Subscribed how? Directly to the bug, or to the package?
[23:02] <wgrant> bug_subscriber and structural_subscriber are the relevant arguments to searchTasks
[23:03] <wgrant> Specific examples of what didn't work and what makes it look like it didn't work would be helpful.
[23:03] <Quintasan> wgrant: I don't think I can retrive that now but I'll give those two arguments a go and report back.
=== emma_ is now known as emma