File size: 11,706 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch
=== TheRealMue is now known as TheMue
=== gary_poster is now known as gary_poster|away
=== mwhudson is now known as zz_mwhudson
[03:38] <davecheney> hey, can anyone help with charm-tools ?
[03:47] <webbrandon> bangorang!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[03:48] <davecheney> +1, insightful
[03:50] <webbrandon> :)
[03:50] <webbrandon> I thought I remember 13.04 being pushed as the default server launch
[03:51] <webbrandon> I dont want 12.04
[03:51] <sarnold> webbrandon: 13.04 has been retired: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
[03:51] <webbrandon> how about 13.10
[03:51] <webbrandon> :)
[03:52] <webbrandon> kidding
[03:54] <webbrandon> can't find anything in the code for aws to handle this image-stream configuration setting that sits in the template.  I just wanted to launch a current version.
[04:14] <webbrandon> sarnold: this is useful :  juju metadata validate-images -s saucy -r us-east-1
[04:41] <dpb1`> Hi -- I'm trying to bootstrap azure, I keep getting 'The affinity group name is empty or was not specified', my storage-account-name is in West US, my location is West US.  Is there something I'm missing.  I get the same error on Trunk and 1.17 (trusty)
[04:45] <dpb1`> 1.16 too... must be something I'm doing.
[05:01] <dpb1`> ya, switching to the east us sorted it.  /me ignores for now
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob
=== mthaddon` is now known as mthaddon
[09:04] <tomixxx3> hi, can i launsch an "instance" in openstack without the dashbaord? because the dashboard does not work properly, i.e. the page "instances & volumes" ends up in an "interal server error" when clicking on it.
[09:22] <gnuoy> I'm using the openstack charms to deploy Havana. I'm setting the mtu on the quantum-gateway via dhcp to 1546 but something seems to be reverting it. Can you think of anything that might account for that ?
[09:54] <jamespage> gnuoy, odd
[09:54] <jamespage> I can't see anything in the charm that touches the MTU
[09:54] <jamespage> https://code.launchpad.net/~openstack-charmers/charms/precise/quantum-gateway/trunk
[09:55] <gnuoy> jamespage, and none of the neutron services are likely to fiddle with it themselves ?
[09:55] <Lord_Set> So quick question. With Ubuntu 14.04 is Openstack deployment with Juju going to get any better?
[09:55] <Lord_Set> Or any cool new features being added?
[09:56] <jamespage> Lord_Set, mailing incremental improvements; ML2 plugin will be the default for neutron
[09:56] <Lord_Set> Awesome
[09:57] <Lord_Set> What about Cisco Nexus/Neutron integration via Juju? Well the Openstack/Neutron side of it
[09:57] <jamespage> Lord_Set, some guys from Cisco have been working on that - they did an announce a few weeks ago
[09:57] <jamespage> the changes still need to land in the official charms but that is planned
[09:57] <Lord_Set> Yay great news. I missed that somehow.
[09:58] <jamespage> mailing == mainly
[09:58] <jamespage> gnuoy, I don't think so
[09:58] <Lord_Set> I love my Nexus stuff
[09:58] <gnuoy> jamespage, ok, thanks for your time. I'm going to redeploy the node in question and see what happens
[09:59] <jamespage> gnuoy, ok
[09:59] <Lord_Set> The Nexus API makes VM deployment a lot less of a headache but takes some time to setup and configure properly
=== alexlist` is now known as alexlist
[10:02] <Lord_Set> MAAS and Juju and soon going to dominate Mirantis. Trying to use Mirantis made me want to cry after a bit. Its deployment model is so rigid and to change or customize anything about deployment via Mirantis just plain hurts.
[10:14] <jamespage> Lord_Set, http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/availability-of-the-nexus-1000v-cloud-networking-platform-for-openstack-unveiled-at-cisco-live/
[10:26] <Lord_Set> Thanks James
[10:28] <Lord_Set> That is beyond awesome and I cannot wait! Cisco is doing some amazing things with Openstack and virtual machine networking.
[13:11] <nessita> hello everyone, I was hoping someone could help me debug why a LXC container where I ran juju bootstrap (as per https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/config-LXC.html) now can not connect to the internet
[14:00] <gnuoy> jamespage, after redeploying the quantum-gateway I see eth0 has the desired mtu setting. Looking at the other interfaces br0 also has it but the rest don't http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6970990/ is that ok ?
[14:03] <jamespage> gnuoy, yup
[14:03] <gnuoy> jamespage, excellent, thanks
=== benji_ is now known as benji
=== rektide_ is now known as rektide
=== medberry is now known as Guest5611
=== Guest5611 is now known as med___
=== frobware is now known as zz_frobware
[20:49] <cjohnston> A few of us just today started seeing "ERROR empty image-stream in environment configuration" when trying to deploy.. has something changed to cause this to happen?
[20:52] <rick_h__> cjohnston: heh, just hitting up people on this in #juju-dev
[20:52] <rick_h__> cjohnston: this on ec2?
[20:52] <rick_h__> natefinch: ^ makes me wonder if something is down on the simple streams side perhaps? or something like that?
[20:52] <cjohnston> rick_h__: canonistack
[20:52] <rick_h__> cjohnston: ok
[20:53] <cjohnston> rick_h__: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1217397  ?
[20:53] <_mup_> Bug #1217397: image-stream configuration option for openstack provider <config> <openstack-provider> <juju-core:Fix Released by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1217397>
[20:53] <rick_h__> cjohnston: yea, it seemed to be azure only but something today is causing issues with it on other providers
[20:54] <cjohnston> :-(
[20:54] <rick_h__> cjohnston: what juju version?
[20:54] <rick_h__> I've got another person testing on precise, I'm on trusty 1.17.2
[20:54] <cjohnston> the newest upload in t
[20:54] <cjohnston> 1.17.2-0ubuntu4
[20:54] <plars> I have 1.17.2-0ubuntu4 and I'm seeing it too
[20:54] <rick_h__> ok, well at least that bit is common
[20:54] <rick_h__> natefinch: this is looking like a bigger issue?
[20:55] <rick_h__> sinzui: ^
[20:55] <plars> I've been able to bootstrap and deploy just fine earlier today though (with no upgrade in between)
[20:55] <rick_h__> plars: yea, why I'm wondering if it's something associated with finding images not juju itself
[20:58] <natefinch> rick_h__: that error message is definitely a juju error message, it's trying to validate your configuration.... but for some reason it's barfing on the image-stream value, even though it's supposed to be fine for it to be unset
[21:15] <rick_h__> plars: on trusty?
[21:15] <plars> rick_h__: yes
[21:16] <rick_h__> natefinch: my teammate got it to run using 1.17.1 on precise
[21:18] <natefinch> rick_h__: hmmm... I'll bring it up with the rest of the devs.  Seems there's something funky going on with 1.17.2
[21:18] <rick_h__> natefinch: thanks. Did you want me to file a bug or are you ok from here then?
[21:22] <natefinch> rick_h__: bugs are always good.  Help prevent things from falling through the cracks
[21:26] <rick_h__> natefinch: filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1283246
[21:26] <_mup_> Bug #1283246: cannot deploy on 1.17.2 on trusty: error on image-stream <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1283246>
[21:26] <rick_h__> plars: cjohnston please add any notes and track &
[21:26] <cjohnston> thanks rick_h__
[21:30] <natefinch> rick_h__: thanks.  I'll make sure it gets looked at, ASAP.
[21:31] <cjohnston> natefinch: could we maybe get a slightly older version thrown in a ppa somewhere?
[21:34] <natefinch> cjohnston: 1.16 should be what's in ppa:juju/stable
[21:34] <rick_h__> natefinch: don't think it's built for trusty
[21:34] <rick_h__> or I lied
[21:34] <rick_h__> and it is
[21:34] <rick_h__> https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/stable?field.series_filter=trusty
[21:34] <cjohnston> ack
[21:35] <cjohnston> 1.16 complains about alot of config fields :-/
[21:36] <natefinch> unfortunately, forwards compatibility is not something we've spent any time on
=== med___ is now known as med_
[22:16] <lazyPower> has there been a recent change to the charmstore api?
[22:18] <rick_h__> lazyPower: how so?
[22:18] <rick_h__> and by store you mean juju store or charmworld?
[22:19] <lazyPower> rick_h__: i mean charmworld - my apologies. I keep forgetting there are 2 api's
[22:19] <rick_h__> lazyPower: what change are you getting. There was a release this week, but trying to recall what api changes might have existed
[22:20] <lazyPower> i have amulet tests that were working an hour ago - now i'm getting a non-helpful stacktrace bubbling up from charmworldlib. I'm trying to decompose to code to find the endpoint its calling - that way i can rule out a temporary hiccup in charmworldlib and validate its the code
[22:21] <rick_h__> lazyPower: gotcha, yea nothing changed today in charmworld. I'd have to see more details to help trace. Let me make sure charmworld is reporting healthy
[22:21] <rick_h__> bah, elasticsearch bit it
[22:24] <lazyPower> cool so i'm not going crazy then
[22:24] <mbruzek_> I am also encountering an error with juju lazyPower, and rick_h__
[22:24] <mbruzek_> rick_h__, I have a traceback that looks like this http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6973456/
[22:25] <mbruzek_> I can grab logs if you need them.
[22:25] <lazyPower> mbruzek_: its because the search provider tanked
[22:26] <rick_h__> lazyPower: mbruzek_ if it's charmworld I'm working with webops on it atm
[22:26] <lazyPower> thats the one :) Thanks rick_h__
[22:47] <webbrandon> Could I launch a t1.micro bootstrap to manage m1 type instances
[22:47] <lazyPower> webbrandon: thats not recommended at all. since hte controller node runs zookeeper and what not
[22:48] <lazyPower> you'll run out of memory on the bootstrap node when multiple nodes converge
[22:48] <sinzui> juju doesn't use zookeeper
[22:48] <lazyPower> wait, what?
[22:48] <sinzui> juju has used mongodb for 8 months
[22:48] <lazyPower> i'm just full of misinformation today
[22:49] <webbrandon> lazyPower: you sending me down the wrong path huh???
[22:49] <lazyPower> webbrandon: well, its still not recommended...
[22:49] <webbrandon> lol
[22:49] <lazyPower> regardless of my fud
[22:50] <lazyPower> sinzui: ty for correcting me. I'm thinking of chef-server not juju
[22:50] <lazyPower> my internal wiring is getting crossed looking at this charm
[22:50] <sinzui> webbrandon, juju's boostrap node has been run on 512m, but I think 1G is the minimum. Each deployment may require its own sizes just because the services need more storage or ram
[22:51] <sinzui> webbrandon, I often bootstrap with --constraints "mem=1G" the each deploy has --constrains "mem=2G"
[22:51] <webbrandon> sinzui: thank you
[22:52] <webbrandon> sinzui: I am thinking of launching t1 because its free to manage a bitcoin pooling service
[22:53] <webbrandon> unfortunatly i have to run m class instance just to install the software
[22:54] <sinzui> webbrandon, alas juju doesn't let you specify an aws/hp instance-type (yet). The constraints only guide the selection of an instance type. I think the the HP rules have issues in fact. 2G on aws gets me a more memory that 2G on Hp
[22:55] <webbrandon> I understand how to launch the right instance type.
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away
=== medberry is now known as med_
[23:41] <rick_h__> lazyPower: should be coming back
[23:42] <lazyPower> rick_h__: awesome. I'll run a test and see if its cleared up
[23:42] <lazyPower> thank you for driving this rick_h__
[23:42] <rick_h__> lazyPower: heh, last one around on a friday when it goes boom :)
[23:42] <rick_h__> lucky me!
[23:43] <lazyPower> We'll be meeting up in vegas soon enough. I'll buy the first beer :)
[23:44] <mbruzek_> thanks rick_h__
[23:44] <mbruzek_> now you can't say it is a thank-less job.
[23:45] <rick_h__> mbruzek_: hah, good call