File size: 11,882 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
[00:20] <zoktar> http://pastebin.com/zs4QeEKZ from X.log
[00:21] <penguin42> shouldn't happen
[00:25] <zoktar> learn by failing :P
[00:25] <penguin42> yeh, please file a bug
[00:44] <trism> zoktar: I notice an old bug but crashing at the same spot, bug 738526 , you don't happen to have xfs installed, do you?
[00:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 738526 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "crash accessing font info with xfs in fontpath" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/738526
[00:47] <penguin42> hmm long running nasty buf
[00:47] <penguin42> g
[00:53] <zoktar> i will have a look
[01:06] <zoktar> thanks !
[01:28] <zoktar> is there any native app for bug reference? so you dont nessesairly have to have a web page to use it?
[02:01] <raymond_> I couldn't really find an answer.. is there is anyway I can downgrade my X server in quantal?
[02:02] <raymond_> (by searching the web) I just want to downgrade the X server (preferably without building from source) so that the legacy fglrx drivers will work with it.
[04:45] <rainchick> Hi everyone. I can't get Font Viewer to work long enough for me to install a few TrueType fonts without crashing. Where are fonts stored in the filesystem? I'd much rather do this from a terminal.
[05:08] <cowsquad> Does anyone knows how to activate the window spreader in ubuntu quetzal
[05:12] <jbicha> cowsquad: try Super+W
=== geowany_ is now known as Geowany
[09:20] <zekoZeko> hey everyone
[09:20] <zekoZeko> grub trouble
[09:20] <zekoZeko> i get to the grub rescue prompt and try to load the normal.mod, but it fails
[09:20] <zekoZeko> although it's there
[09:20] <zekoZeko> grub rescue> set
[09:20] <zekoZeko> prefix=(hd0,msdos1)/boot/grub/
[09:20] <zekoZeko> root=(hd0,msdos1)
[09:22] <zekoZeko> when i ls $prefix/i386-pc/ i see the normal.mod
[09:48] <zekoZeko> anyone alive? I'd really like to know if there's any way to boot from grub rescue other than with a rescue cd ot netboot
[09:48] <zekoZeko> as i can't do either.
=== IdleOne is now known as Guest92513
=== jbicha is now known as Guest21308
=== blaze is now known as Guest20426
=== bodhizazen is now known as Guest93220
[11:05] <ActionParsnip> hi guys, my close/min/max are on the right. Ubuntu tweak doesn't seem to make it switch, can anyone advise how to switch it back. Thanks
[11:17] <BluesKaj> Howdy all
[11:18] <ActionParsnip> yo
[11:18] <penguin42> Mornin'
[11:19] <BluesKaj> hey ActionParsnip, penguin42
[11:29] <Guest20426> http://wklej.org/hash/316d3ac1011/txt/ - what's wrong?
[11:30] <penguin42> Guest20426: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview/Beta1
[11:31] <penguin42> Guest20426: See the note near the top of that; 12.04 sets update to only upgrade to next LTS by default
[11:33] <ActionParsnip> Guest20426: you'll need to edit /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades    and set Prompt=normal
[11:33] <Guest20426> thaks
[11:33] <Guest20426> *thanks
[12:06] <BluesKaj> just had an upgrade to kubuntu-desktop , that's a bit unusual
[12:08] <penguin42> ?
[12:11] <BluesKaj> usually there are associated packages
=== Guest21308 is now known as jbicha
[12:52] <penguin42> BluesKaj: Changelog shows it was a 'Refreshed dependencies'
[12:53] <user82> !info wine
[12:53] <ubottu> wine (source: wine1.4): Microsoft Windows Compatibility Layer (meta-package). In component universe, is extra. Version 1.4.1-0ubuntu1 (quantal), package size 0 kB, installed size 21 kB
[12:53] <user82> they really stick with wine 1.4 stable until 1.6?
[12:57] <penguin42> I think there might be ppa's of latest-wine
[13:01] <penguin42> user82: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wine/+archive/ppa  there is a few day old wine1.5 package in there
[13:04] <BluesKaj> penguin42, how does one configure the fonts in wine ...they're unreadable on my monitor unless I'm right up close
[13:04] <penguin42> BluesKaj: I don't actually use wine, don't know
[13:06] <BluesKaj> penguin42, ok ... I was curious about it again , hadn't used it in many yrs , but it was unreadable
[13:24] <gnomefreak> am i the only one that doesnt have screensavers? does KDE screensavers work?
[13:48] <user82> penguin42 true...but wine develops really fast i dont like the choice of sticking with 1.4
[13:51] <gnomefreak> wish there weas a site that told you what win apps work in winethan maybe i might use it
[13:52] <user82> gnomefreak http://appdb.winehq.org/
[13:52] <user82> don't you know that site
[13:53] <gnomefreak> no i didnt :(
[13:53]  * gnomefreak goes and looks
[13:54] <gnomefreak> you cant use warcraft on ubuntu?
[13:56] <gnomefreak> mostly games
[14:47] <penguin42> user82: It's hard to keep up with wine though, if you don't pick the release version which one do you decide to put into a release
[14:48] <user82> yes sure...but wine is not "ready" in a way so you could just go the firefox way and update to every version
[14:49] <user82> with most packages i understand they want a stable version...but the wine experience with a so called "stable" 1.4 is not any better than with the newest beta
[14:49] <penguin42> user82: not quite, firefox still has intermediates, the Firefox 15 is still there release; now why Ubuntu doesn't have Wine 1.4.1 is a valid question
[14:49] <user82> it has i think
[14:49] <user82> !info wine
[14:50] <ubottu> wine (source: wine1.4): Microsoft Windows Compatibility Layer (meta-package). In component universe, is extra. Version 1.4.1-0ubuntu1 (quantal), package size 0 kB, installed size 21 kB
[14:50] <penguin42> ah ok, so it is 1.4.1 - so that's what I'd expect
[14:53] <Wizard> Yeah, and Europa Universalis stopped working around 1.3 :/
=== Guest92513 is now known as IdleOne
[16:08] <hd1> i just apt-get dist-upgraded my quantal system, now it's stuck at the "grub restore>" prompt, any ideas?
[16:09] <hd1> am i hosed and need to reinstall from scratch?
[16:09] <hd1> or is there a way around this?
[16:09] <BluesKaj> hd1, yes , use the livecd to reinstall grub
[16:11]  * hd1 doesn't have a liveCD
[16:11] <hd1> though i suppose i could make one
[16:11] <hd1> the computer is a netbook, therefore no CDROM drive
[16:15] <BluesKaj> hd1, it should work from the media/OS installer you used
[16:15] <BluesKaj> usb stick ?
[16:15] <hd1> i installed the system years ago
[16:21] <BluesKaj> hd1, do you have separate/ and /home partitions ?
[16:24] <hd1> nope
[16:37] <penguin42> hmm - so on +1 how would I disable the guest login?
[16:37] <BluesKaj> hd1, whatever media that works on your netbook you can use to rescue it ,  a usb stick with the OS installer will work
[16:39] <hd1> BluesKaj: ok
[16:40] <penguin42> well, unity is more stable than last week in a kvm guest - but it's now moving from warm jelly to cold jelly stability
[16:44] <BluesKaj> then when the installer page comes up choose "Try Ubuntu", hd1 , do sudo fdisk -l ,  then sudo grub-install /dev/sdx , xbeing the name of the OS partition listed in fdisk , hd1
[16:54] <hd1> ok, cool, BluesKaj
[17:04] <zekoZeko> hello everyone. I'm having some grub trouble :) anyone willing to help?
[17:04] <zekoZeko> basically, i can only boot to grub rescue mode
[17:05] <zekoZeko> from which i can see the root/boot partition, but trying to load normal.mod fails
[17:05] <zekoZeko> with no such file or some such error.
[17:05] <jbicha> penguin42: try http://askubuntu.com/questions/62564/how-do-i-disable-the-guest-session
[17:05] <zekoZeko> ls works and i can see all the grub modules in $prefix/i386-pc
[17:05] <wilee-nilee> zekoZeko, this the only install or there other OS's
[17:06] <zekoZeko> only install
[17:06] <zekoZeko> happened yesterday when i updated to grub 2.0
[17:06] <zekoZeko> and the first partition starts at sector 2048, not 63
[17:06] <wilee-nilee> zekoZeko, from grub-legacy
[17:06] <zekoZeko> no
[17:06] <wilee-nilee> just a grub update?
[17:06] <zekoZeko> updated to Q a few days ago and it worked well
[17:06] <zekoZeko> yes
[17:07] <zekoZeko> i was updating daily for a few days and it all went tits-up yesterday.
[17:08] <wilee-nilee> zekoZeko, here are some reinstalls defaults to a live cd reload of the mbr the next is a chroot.  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2/Installing#Reinstall_from_the_LiveCD
[17:08] <zekoZeko> yeah, i could do that
[17:08] <zekoZeko> there's just a few little problems
[17:08] <zekoZeko> i don't have a cd burner and an empty CD/DVD
[17:09] <zekoZeko> and I can't boot from network, because i only have an USB keyboard and it doesn't work in BIOS, so I can't set the machine to boot from network
[17:09] <wilee-nilee> zekoZeko, You have a usb thumb that is loadable?
[17:09] <zekoZeko> not handy, but I can get it, that's what I was thinking about
[17:09] <zekoZeko> the strange thing is
[17:10] <zekoZeko> I can load another grub modul
[17:10] <zekoZeko> module
[17:10] <zekoZeko> what's it's name, just a sec
[17:11] <zekoZeko> minicmd
[17:12] <zekoZeko> with insmod (hd0,msdos1)/boot/grub/i386-pc/minicmd.mod
[17:12] <zekoZeko> but not with
[17:12] <zekoZeko> insmod minicmd
[17:12] <zekoZeko> set shows
[17:12] <zekoZeko> prefix=(hd0,msdos1)/boot/grub
[17:12] <zekoZeko> root=hd0,msdos1
[17:14] <wilee-nilee> I'm not familiar with that, I have the manual boot saved somewhere, but a live cd on a cd or a thumb is about your best tool you should always have.
[17:15] <zekoZeko> OK, that's what I'll do then, thanks.
[17:15] <zekoZeko> I usually carry a grub rescue thumb drive with me, but it seems I threw it out of the backpack when I was at home :)
[17:16] <wilee-nilee> supergrub is another for booting in and fixing grub, I have a multiload usb with both of those and a handful of other tools.
[17:17] <zekoZeko> don't know what happened though, I read here about problems for people that have the first partition starting at sector 63, but I cheched and on this machine it starts at 2048
[17:17] <wilee-nilee> I doubt that is a problem honestly
[17:18] <zekoZeko> there is another thing though
[17:19] <zekoZeko> this drive is on a promise soft-raid IDE controller
[17:19] <zekoZeko> and root id /dev/mappd/pdbsomething1
[17:19] <zekoZeko> err
[17:19] <zekoZeko> /dev/mapper/pdbsometing1
[17:20] <zekoZeko> I think I've heard that new grub has some trouble with device mapper root partitions
[17:21] <wilee-nilee> I know nothing on raid and grub, always mention anything unusual.
[17:36] <penguin42> jbicha: Wow - there's no gui to turn it off; that's pretty amazing for something that a lot of people would want to do for security
[17:37] <tsimpson> penguin42: the guest login is "jail-boxed", so it's not really much of a security issue
[17:37] <penguin42> tsimpson: Experience tells me that every jail box that people have done like that is pretty much useless
[17:38] <penguin42> tsimpson: It's an absolute no-no if you've got anything confidential on the box, especially if you're using full disk rather than home encryption
[20:32] <kanliot> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/989295
[20:32] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 989295 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Unable to create bootable USB stick and install properly" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[20:33] <kanliot> this bug is clearly misfiled  how can i 'fix' it
[20:34] <kanliot> for one reason, there's no info about if it's precise or quantal
[20:36] <Daekdroom> Of course there is.
[20:36] <Daekdroom> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
[20:39] <tsimpson> click the arrow on the left of "lubuntu-meta" and change the package
[20:44] <kanliot> no idea what the problem is really
[20:44] <kanliot> i don't want to guess
=== AlanBell is now known as zAlanBell
=== zAlanBell is now known as AlanBell
=== geowany_ is now known as Geowany
[22:12] <genewitch> i was looking at system requirements for 12.10-beta1-server and it doesn't mention HDD space, what's the bare minimum needed?
[22:22] <kanliot> i would guess 2 or 3
[22:22] <kanliot> genewitch,
[22:25] <genewitch> alright, good, anything more than that takes too long to set up on a mechanical HDD (as VHD)