File size: 10,735 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 |
[00:03] <rmk> Publishing seems to take longer than builds in most cases for me. [00:42] <ScottK> Interesting. [00:43] <ScottK> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-numpy/1:1.6.1-6ubuntu1/+build/3301333 is building on meissa (arm panda), but that doesn't show up on https://launchpad.net/builders [00:43] <ScottK> LP does know about it though ... https://launchpad.net/builders/meissa [00:43] <ScottK> wgrant: ^^^ expected? [01:03] <wgrant> ScottK: The enabled and listed flags are separate. Normally all enabled builders are also listed, but apparently someone misclicked here. [01:03] <wgrant> I've fixed it. [01:03] <ScottK> OK. Great. Thanks. [01:04] <ScottK> First time I remember seeing that. [01:12] <wgrant> ScottK: Yeah, I've only seen it happen once before. === JanC_ is now known as JanC === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer === amithkk is now known as ubuntu === ubuntu is now known as marcoceppi_ === danilo is now known as danilos [10:25] <pipedream> Can someone available please answer a query for more space for a PPA? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/189847 === jml` is now known as jml [10:45] <czajkowski> pipedream: I've asked someone to look into it for you [10:45] <mrevell> Looking at that now pipedream [10:46] <pipedream> great [10:46] <pipedream> currently each time I update I remove the all packages, wait a few minutes for launcpad to realise, and re-upload [10:47] <mrevell> pipedream, How much space do you need? [10:47] <pipedream> I'm not sure yet. How exactly is the space used? If I upload many versions, are old ones kept? For a period of time or for a few versions? [10:47] <mrevell> pipedream, 4GB enough? [10:48] <mrevell> pipedream, If you upload a version that supersedes something that's already there, the old version gets deleted. [10:48] <pipedream> 4G would be nice, and if I have problems I can ask again [10:49] <mrevell> pipedream, Cool. That PPA now has 4GB space. Let us know how you get on. [10:49] <pipedream> I hope to leave the sagemath-upstream-binary behind soon, and work on a from-source, which I can do in a separate PPA, I guess. But I still have a few bugs left [10:49] <pipedream> Thanks! [10:49] <mrevell> No prob :) [10:49] <czajkowski> mrevell: thanks [10:51] <Laney> I am getting an OOPS (e.g. OOPS-e4975d66c50bf7dacc7ce1bf5b388eaa) when trying to retry a build. Known fault? [10:51] <ubot5> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=e4975d66c50bf7dacc7ce1bf5b388eaa [10:56] <czajkowski> Laney: is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-libzip/0.10-1/+build/3293804 the page you are trying to retry ? [10:57] <Laney> yes [10:57] <Laney> I was just being too impatient to wait for the depwait to be broken automatically [10:58] <czajkowski> Laney: is it back working now as I only see a private page and cant access it [10:59] <Laney> czajkowski: It's in Needs building now, don't know if someone else retried or if it got done automatically :-) [10:59] <czajkowski> I cant try it so I guess automatically [10:59] <Laney> cool beans [11:01] <Laney> I just gave back armhf OK, so either it was specific to giving back from depwait or the problem is solved [11:01] <czajkowski> Laney: if it happens again can you log a bug and will get it looked at [11:01] <czajkowski> thanks === mpt_ is now known as mpt [11:17] <wgrant> Laney: Consistent retry timeouts normally indicate that the cronjob is part-way through retrying it. [11:17] <Laney> wgrant: Ah, makes sense. [11:18] <wgrant> retry-depwait is horrible and keeps transactions open for ages :( [11:19] <Laney> it's probably sufficiently unusual to worry about too much === geser_ is now known as geser === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson === marcoceppi_ is now known as amithkk === amithkk is now known as ubuntu === ubuntu is now known as amithkk === jwhite_ is now known as jwhite [14:50] <Pikkachu> hi, the indicated package diff is wrong here: https://launchpad.net/~renatosilva/+archive/ppa/+packages [14:51] <Pikkachu> "diff from 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120311 to 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315" [14:51] <Pikkachu> 20120311 was deleted, which will be definitive within 7 days, so I assume the diff link will disappear? [14:52] <Pikkachu> or it will be "from 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2 to 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315"? === Pikkachu is now known as PikkachuAway === PikkachuAway is now known as Pikkachu === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [15:21] <dobey> Pikkachu: it would be from the previous version in the ppa, to the current version in the ppa [15:34] <Pikkachu> dobey: I realize that, but the question is whether that link will change as it should, or not [15:35] <Pikkachu> the previous versions were deleted, they're all the same and it was just a matter of version adjustment === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [15:37] <dobey> the diff won't get regenerated afaik. also, your versioning will break things [15:37] <dobey> you want ~P20120315 i guess, and not -P.. [15:37] * EvilResistance agrees with dobey on this [15:37] * EvilResistance is a packager xD [15:37] <dobey> but hard to fix that now [15:37] <EvilResistance> mhm [15:38] <dobey> not sure what you're trying to do exactly with it in your ppa though [15:38] <Pikkachu> it what? [15:38] <Pikkachu> why ~ not -? [15:39] <dobey> because - separates the "debian version" from the "upstream version" [15:39] <Pikkachu> the diff should be changed, though [15:39] <Pikkachu> and ~? [15:39] <dobey> so your "upstream version" is now "1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2" [15:39] <Pikkachu> correct [15:40] <Pikkachu> I patched the ubuntu package, I'm not willing to create an alternative version [15:42] <dobey> you just did that [15:42] <dobey> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage#versioning [15:43] <dobey> although i have to totally disagree with that launchpad help page as well [15:44] <Pikkachu> "future Ubuntu versions will supersede your package. " -- does not apply [15:45] <Pikkachu> in that case, future versions would destroy the patch [15:45] <Pikkachu> well, seems reasonable though... it enforces me to keep up-to-date with latest version [15:46] <dobey> if you want to patch it, you should either keep up to date, and maintain your alternate version, or work to get the patch upstream [15:48] <Pikkachu> I'm confused with that page now [15:48] <Pikkachu> I'm confused at all [15:49] <Pikkachu> 2.10.0-0ubuntu3 will already supersede my version [15:49] <Pikkachu> so I see no practical difference between "ppa" and "-" [15:49] <Pikkachu> as for the tilde, I have no idea whether the package needs recompilation [15:50] <Pikkachu> besides, it's available only for oneiric already [15:51] <Pikkachu> as for getting the patch applied upstream, you'd be surprised how difficult it is to communicate with pidgin devs [15:51] <dobey> it won't supersede your version [15:51] <dobey> that's the point :) [15:51] <Pikkachu> why not? [15:51] <dobey> [dobey@lunatari:~]: dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu3 gt 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315 [15:51] <dobey> [dobey@lunatari:~]: echo $? [15:51] <dobey> 1 [15:51] <Pikkachu> false? [15:52] <dobey> yes [15:52] <Pikkachu> how so, I can't understand why [15:52] <dobey> because using the - where you did changed the semantics of the versioning [15:52] <Pikkachu> it's like a fork? [15:52] <dobey> well you made a fork regarldess of the version [15:53] <Pikkachu> ok I just want to understand it [15:54] <Pikkachu> the dash adds a semantic of a fork (just like if you changed package name), that's what I mean [15:55] <dobey> no. it changes the semantics of how the version comparison in dpkg works, because the "upstream version" is different in the two versions [15:55] <dobey> the upstream version is not "2.10.0" in both cases [15:55] <dobey> so "2.10.0-0ubuntu2" is greater than "2.10.0" [15:57] <dobey> i really need to go get lunch right now though. later [15:57] <Pikkachu> ok thanks anyway [15:58] <Pikkachu> anyway, it seems reasonable to not be superseded as well, because I don't really want to update the package [15:59] <Pikkachu> hmm but I need to get noticed of 0ubuntu3... [15:59] * Pikkachu confused === danilo is now known as danilos === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away === yofel_ is now known as yofel === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm [20:45] <kirkland> weird things are happening in LP right now [20:45] <kirkland> had a bug that just "disappeared" for a while [20:45] <kirkland> been working on it all day [20:45] <kirkland> went about 2 minutes with Launchpad giving it equivalent of a 404 not found [20:45] <kirkland> just came back [20:45] <kirkland> now, trying to change the assignee, that's failing [20:45] <kirkland> Sorry, something went wrong with your search. (Error ID: OOPS-3611440967e645c2a3d8c68345be9b24) [20:45] <ubot5> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=3611440967e645c2a3d8c68345be9b24 [20:46] <kirkland> trying to change the milestone says: [20:46] <kirkland> The following errors were encountered: [20:46] <kirkland> Object: , name: u'959650' [21:01] <jonrafkind> I want to set up an automated job to send nightly builds to launchpad but gnupg is asking for my password, is there a way to use debuild without gnupg prompting for a password? [21:51] <dobey> jonrafkind: why not use daily build recipes on launchpad itself [21:51] <jonrafkind> because i have no idea what that is [21:52] <dobey> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes [21:52] <EvilResistance> that's dependent, of course, on you having all the code and stuff on a Bazaar branch on LP [21:52] <dobey> we use launchpad recipes extensively for nightlies builds in ubuntuone [21:52] <jonrafkind> ah thats most likely why i dont use it and never will [21:53] <dobey> eh, you can create an import of a different upstream on launchpad, just for building recipes [21:53] <jonrafkind> sounds like a blast [21:53] <dobey> if the thing is already pacakged in ubuntu, there probably is an import of upstream already set up even [21:54] <dobey> you'd just need a branch that contians the debian/ directory [21:54] <dobey> which you nest with the recipe [21:54] <jonrafkind> anyway i just made a new gpg key without a password, supposedly that iwll work |