File size: 39,348 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
[00:39] <RAOF> Hm.  Apparently this unity-greeter that works fine on intel will fail to log in on my netbook.  Superb.
[00:42] <TheMuso> Awesome.
[00:42] <TheMuso> RAOF: If thats NVIDIA and you are using Nouveau, thats even more interesting, since I am using Nouveau here without issue.
[00:43] <RAOF> Oh, it's my locally-built trunk version that's aiming to fix the transition from greeter->session.
[00:44] <TheMuso> ah
[00:56] <RAOF> Ah.  I appear to not have gnome-session installed on the netbook.  That would explain failure-to-login :)
[01:06] <TheMuso> heh
[02:04] <cyphermox> sup all.
[02:29] <akgraner> Does the icon with the Ubuntu symbol on it have a specific name?
[02:30] <akgraner> or do I just say click the icon with the Ubuntu symbol on it in the launcher and type "terminal" to bring up a term window?
[02:32] <TheMuso> akgraner: The tooltip for the button is "Dash Button".
[02:32] <TheMuso> SO I guess that could be used.
[02:33] <akgraner> TheMuso, awesome thanks!  I didn't know what to call it :-)
[02:34] <TheMuso> akgraner: Sorry, its "Dash Home" not "Dash Button"
[02:35] <akgraner> no worries - changing it now
[02:36] <akgraner> Thanks TheMuso , I'm working on some edits to a command line chapter that are due in a couple of hours - and I realized I still have some place holders for things :-/ so hopefully I won't bug you all to much :-)
[02:37] <TheMuso> np
=== JackyAlcine_ is now known as jalcine
=== jalcine_ is now known as JackyAlcine
=== JackyAlcine is now known as jalcine
=== jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine
=== JackyAlcine is now known as jalcine
=== jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine
=== JackyAlcine is now known as jalcine
[04:38] <jasoncwarner_> hey guys...anyone getting this error when trying to upgrade right now? E: Internal Error, No file name for libc6
[04:46] <RAOF> jasoncwarner_: Didn't hit that when I updated this morning...
[04:46] <jasoncwarner_> RAOF: I just started getitng it maybe an hour ago...I updated this morning as well...
[04:47] <TheMuso> Haven't seen any suc error, at least in my terminals.
[04:48] <TheMuso> I also updated this morning.
[04:53] <jasoncwarner_> thanks, TheMuso and RAOF ... just got my laptop back from being repaired and I want to update, but I can't :/
[04:56]  * RAOF has additionally been able to update right now, and not run into that problem.
[05:02]  * TheMuso is doing likewise.
[05:03]  * jasoncwarner_ scratches head....
=== jalcine is now known as webjadmin_
=== webjadmin_ is now known as jalcine
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_> RAOF or TheMuso any thoughts on this? This is the specific error I'm getting. I tried the -f option, but that is when I get the message about libc6
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  lib32asound2 : Depends: libasound2 (= 1.0.24.1-4ubuntu1)
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  libc-dev-bin : Depends: libc6 (< 2.14) but 2.15-0ubuntu5 is installed
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.13-24ubuntu4) but 2.15-0ubuntu5 is installed
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  libc6-i386 : Depends: libc6 (= 2.13-24ubuntu4) but 2.15-0ubuntu5 is installed
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  libnih-dbus1 : Depends: libnih1 (= 1.0.3-4ubuntu9) but 1.0.3-4ubuntu5 is installed
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_>  libnih1 : Depends: libc6 (< 2.15) but 2.15-0ubuntu5 is installed
[05:13] <jasoncwarner_> E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
[05:15] <TheMuso> jasoncwarner_: Interesting that you have lib32asound2 installed... I wonder if that problem you have is a multi-arch related problem...
[05:16] <jasoncwarner_> TheMuso: any way to find out, or should I talk to steve L about it?
[05:16] <TheMuso> jasoncwarner_: I am just speculating, I really don't know from teh above, I just saw references to i3866/32-bit.
[05:17] <TheMuso> gah
[05:17] <jasoncwarner_> thanks, TheMuso I'll poke steve and see if he knows...otherwise I'll ask pitti when he gets up...pitti knows all ;)
[05:18] <RAOF> Hm.  You seem to have quite an old libc6 installed.
[05:20] <RAOF> Actually, no.
[05:20] <RAOF> What the devil is going on there?
[05:40] <jasoncwarner_> RAOF: I have no idea. This machine was in the shop for a month
[05:40] <jasoncwarner_> so...it could be quite old. I was using a diff machine for a month and am now just getting this one updated
[05:40] <jasoncwarner_> didn't htink it would be this hard ;)
[05:41] <RAOF> Yeah, you *don't* actually have an old libc, but it looks like it's trying to install an old libc6-dev.  For some reason.
=== fenris is now known as Guest98977
[06:29] <jasoncwarner_> RAOF TheMuso I don't know what I did..but I eventually got it to update
[06:29] <jasoncwarner_> I really have no idea what made it go
[06:31] <pitti> Good morning
[06:32] <pitti> jasoncwarner_: still having trouble?
[06:32] <jasoncwarner_> hey pitti
[06:32] <jasoncwarner_> no, I don't think so
[06:32] <jasoncwarner_> I got it updated, have latest unity and compiz
[06:33] <jasoncwarner_> I literally have no idea why it got fixed ;)
[06:37] <bryceh> /var/log/dpkg.log might be illuminating
[07:09] <pitti> doctor appointment, bbl
[08:41] <seb128> hey
[08:42] <pitti> bonjour seb128
[08:42] <pitti> seb128: nice bug work!
[08:42] <seb128> pitti, hey, pitti, wie gehts?
[08:42] <pitti> seb128: quite fine, thanks
[08:42] <seb128> pitti, did I get my second position back? ;-)
[08:42] <pitti> spent too much time on pygobject upstream yesterday, so I didn't get to distro bug fixing
[08:42] <pitti> seb128: yes
[08:42] <seb128> \o/
[08:43] <seb128> well I didn't fixed much but I was only 2 behinds I think
[08:43] <seb128> I spent some time improving a bit versions yesterday
[08:43] <seb128> pitti, btw I signed your key but the emails sending failed because I don't have postfix or similar working
[08:44] <seb128> pitti, but you should be able to --recv-key
[08:44] <pitti> hm, I did, says "unchanged"
[08:45] <seb128> pitti, it sent to pool.sks-keyservers.net
[08:45] <seb128> that's maybe not the right server to use
[08:46] <pitti> tried that one now, still no new sigs
[08:46] <seb128> hum
[08:46] <pitti> try gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-key 26B47B9F ?
[08:46] <seb128> pitti, your key is 26B47B9F right?
[08:46] <pitti> oui
[08:46] <seb128> pitti, done
[08:47] <pitti> hm, still nothing
[08:47] <pitti> seb128: could you check "gpg --list-sigs martinpitt@gnome.org" ?
[08:47] <seb128> let me retry to sign
[08:47] <seb128> yeah, seems it's no
[08:47] <seb128> caff was a fail
[08:47] <pitti> seb128: seahorse has a GUI for this
[08:47] <seb128> let me redo it ;-)
[08:47] <pitti> seb128: right, caff doesn't send to keyservers
[08:50] <chrisccoulson> whoop
[08:50] <seb128> hey chrisccoulson, how are you?
[08:50] <seb128> pitti, right, I did send but it seems it didn't sign
[08:50] <chrisccoulson> hi seb128, i'm good thanks. how are you?
[08:51] <pitti> hey chrisccoulson
[08:51] <chrisccoulson> hi pitti :)
[08:51] <seb128> pitti, maybe I shouldn't have exited gpg with "q" once it was done signing
[08:51] <seb128> chrisccoulson, good, thanks! ;-)
[08:51] <tjaalton> are the window management buttons supposed to be on the right or left side by default? going back to the default switched them to the right here
[08:52] <seb128> going back to defaults where?
[08:52] <seb128> no
[08:52] <tjaalton> dconf-editor
[08:52] <seb128> the editor doesn't understand overrides
[08:52] <tjaalton> sigh
[08:52] <tjaalton> ok
[08:52] <seb128> bug in the editor I guess
[08:52] <seb128> use gsettings reset
[08:53] <tjaalton> ok
[08:54] <seb128> pitti, --recv-key again?
[08:55] <pitti> hmm, still nothing
[08:55] <pitti> seb128: it might take a while before the updated keys are available, perhaps the servers run some checks or so
[08:55] <pitti> seb128: anyway, thank you!
[08:55] <tjaalton> seb128: same thing with gsettings reset
[08:56] <seb128> pitti, yeah, check in a bit, this time --list-sigs show my signatures, so it's likely server delay
[08:56] <tjaalton> gsettings reset org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences button-layout
[08:56] <seb128> tjaalton, dunno then, question for didrocks, he will be there on monday
[08:56] <tjaalton> seb128: ok
[08:56] <seb128> pitti, yw!
[09:12] <pitti> seb128: any luck with the libical FTBFS?
[09:12] <seb128> pitti, I was sort of waiting for Debian they have an RC bug for it, I hate wasting time to track something when we can get the fix for free by waiting 3 days
[09:13] <pitti> seb128: ah, that's fine
[09:13] <pitti> merci
[09:13] <seb128> de rien
[09:13] <seb128> pitti, I will look at it on monday if nobody moved in Debian by then
[09:33] <pitti> mhr3: good morning
[09:34] <mhr3> hey pitti
[09:34] <pitti> mhr3: could you please have a quick look at http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-desktop-team-ubuntu-12.04-beta-2.html#mhr3 and check if these two are still on track for b2?
[09:34] <BigWhale> I'll be so sad when Precise is out... No more daily upgrades that are 100+ MB ... Always fun. :)
[09:34] <pitti> mhr3: if not, we can move them to final, as they don't seen feature/code related
[09:35] <pitti> BigWhale: don't worry, there will be the quarreling quail to upgrade to
[09:36] <mhr3> pitti, will check the first, should be done afaik, as for the second we did have a chat about it, so i guess it's finished? :)
[09:36] <pitti> mhr3: splendid :)
[09:37] <pitti> chrisccoulson: "Add a restart-required banner to Firefox when any plug-in is upgraded", is that still for P?
[09:39] <pitti> Sweetshark: FYI, I took the liberty to update https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-p-libreoffice-packaging a bit
[09:42] <pitti> seiflotfy: hey Seif, how are you?
[09:42] <pitti> seiflotfy: would you mind having a quick look at http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-desktop-team-ubuntu-12.04-beta-2.html#seif and tell me what we should postpone to Q?
=== fenris is now known as Guest77154
[10:28] <seiflotfy> pitti: i would love to work on quicklists now
[10:29] <seiflotfy> but i need some1 to talk to
[10:29] <pitti> seiflotfy: I suppose at this point there's also quite some restrictions due to feature/UI freeze in ubuntu
[10:29] <seiflotfy> the ppl and disable logging stuff needs to be postponed
[10:29] <pitti> doesn't stop upstream work, of course
[10:29] <seiflotfy> pitti: no worries i don' care when it gets in as long as it gets in
[10:30] <pitti> seiflotfy: what is "ppl"?
[10:30] <seiflotfy> people lens
[10:30] <pitti> seiflotfy: so "Add ability to disable reading the db (but not logging)" -> deferred
[10:30] <seiflotfy> yes
[10:31] <seiflotfy> pitti its more complicated as you think
[10:31] <pitti> seiflotfy: thanks, I updated the BP accordingly
[10:32] <pitti> seiflotfy: just want to make sure that we don't postpone/drop anythign which you aren't happy about
[10:41] <pitti> argh, seb128 keeps fixing bugs, and I'm stuck with unbreaking the archive
[10:42] <seb128> pitti, ;-)
[10:42]  * pitti hugs seb128, keep up the great work!
[10:42]  * seb128 hugs pitti
[11:01] <seb128> kamstrup, mhr3: do you know if the zg code in rhythmbox is something that we should activate by default? it's not at the moment
[11:02] <mhr3> seb128, i actually wanted to ask didrocks if there's a reason the dataproviders aren't active by default
[11:02] <mhr3> seb128, although rb is not going to help much, we're not using that data anywhere by default
[11:02] <kamstrup> seb128, mhr3: I've been running with the RB provider enabled for some time. It works pretty well, but I think it pollutes the recent files list somewhat
[11:02] <mhr3> seb128, gedit should be active though afaict
[11:02] <seb128> mhr3, ok, I was not sure if it would be useful for the music lens or something
[11:03] <kamstrup> mhr3: the songs you play are added
[11:03] <kamstrup> visible in the files lens
[11:03] <kamstrup> not the ones it skips to automatically
[11:03] <seb128> hum, yeah,that's not good
[11:03] <kamstrup> but if you skip forward 10 songs yourself
[11:03] <kamstrup> it adds those 10 songs
[11:03] <mhr3> kamstrup, oh... right i forgot it's "clever"
[11:03] <kamstrup> even though you only heard 2s of each
[11:03] <kamstrup> I think it makes sense
[11:03] <mhr3> kamstrup, we'll have a proper rb scope, so we dont need them afaict
[11:04] <kamstrup> it should just only send the event if you hear more than say 75% of the song
[11:04] <kamstrup> right
[11:06] <seb128> kamstrup, I'm unsure, I would say it shouldn't add anything to the files lens from within rb
[11:06] <seb128> only files you clicked on
[11:06] <kamstrup> agreed
[11:06] <seb128> kamstrup, mhr3: what about gedit?
[11:07] <mhr3> seb128, is it active by default? i see it off here, but maybe that's just me
[11:08] <seb128> mhr3, yes it is, I just checked in a guest session, I guess it's user profiles not being changed on upgrade
[11:08] <seb128> so we are good
[11:08] <mhr3> k, then it's fine, thx
[11:09] <Sweetshark> pitti: saw it, thanks
[11:16] <Sweetshark> pitti: libreoffice-3.5.1-1ubuntu1 incoming today.
[11:17] <pitti> Sweetshark: yay -- does it add back the three missing armhf packages?
[11:18] <Sweetshark> oh, hmm, no it doesnt.
[11:22] <Sweetshark> at debian, armel armhf powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 s390x are still not building LO base ...
[11:31] <Sweetshark> pitti: I would need to try if these base thingies even build on armhf, Id suggest to upload 3.5.1-1ubuntu1 with them still missing. I will then try to build it on a builder box.
[11:38] <pitti> Sweetshark: ah, fair enough; I can also just remove these three binaries from the archive
[11:44] <pitti> Sweetshark: ^ so I guess I'll do that now?
[11:44] <pitti> Sweetshark: also, please ping me when you have the upload ready
[11:45] <pitti> Sweetshark: actually, -base, -evolution, -base-core _did_ build in 1:3.5.0-1ubuntu4
[11:45] <pitti> Sweetshark: just 1:3.5.0-2ubuntu1 dropped them
[11:46] <pitti> Sweetshark: and they did build for armel, too
[11:46] <pitti> Sweetshark: so it ought to be fine to re-enable them
[11:52] <Sweetshark> pitti: yes, please remove the binaries.
[11:52] <pitti> Sweetshark: so they built, but might not actuall work?
[11:53] <Sweetshark> yes, I know we did build them. But I dont want to send an upload into the build there (quite a lot happened upstream between 3.5.0 and .1). But yes, they might work.
[11:54] <Sweetshark> s/into the build/into the blind/
[11:55] <tkamppeter> pitti, hi
[11:56] <pitti> Sweetshark: ack, removing for now then
[11:56] <pitti> hey tkamppeter
[11:56] <pitti> Sweetshark: done
[11:57] <tkamppeter> pitti, I got a lot of texttopdf fixes from upstream so I will release cups-filters 1.0.6 soon. So a Ubuntu/Debian upload will most probably happen on Monday. Is this OK? When is b2 freeze?
[11:58] <pitti> tkamppeter: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule - March 22, so next Thursday
[11:58] <pitti> tkamppeter: NB that I'm off sick Monday, I get my other two wisdom teeth pulled
[11:58] <tkamppeter> pitti, OK, thanks, so np with the upload.
[11:58] <pitti> I'll be around early morning to do some sponsoring
[11:58] <pitti> but I can sponsor on Tuesday
[11:59] <tkamppeter> pitti, OK.
[11:59] <pitti> tkamppeter: alternatively, commit it to Debian VCS and do a -0bzr1 upload to Ubuntun only
[11:59] <tkamppeter> pitti, OK, thanks.
[12:10] <desrt> good morning hackers
[12:17] <pitti> it's a desrt!
[12:19]  * ogra_ feels thursty now
[12:20] <pitti> ogra_: you and your beer desserts!
[12:20]  * desrt brings ogra_ water?
[12:20] <ogra_> lol
[12:20] <pitti> it's Friday past one o'clock, and he's a German; he won't accept water
[12:20] <desrt> :)
[12:21] <dupondje> water, isnt that for fishes to swim in ?
[12:21] <desrt> is the 1:00 rule just so that germans don't get _totally_ sloshed at lunch?
[12:21] <desrt> or do you mean 1:00am? :)
[12:21] <ogra_> dupondje, yeah, and they make love in it too !
[12:21] <dupondje> lol
[12:21] <ogra_> who would drink that !
[12:22] <dupondje> true! :) belgian beer ! :D
[12:23] <mvo> seb128: hi, I guess I should know this ;) bug how do I make the retracer trace #956316  ? it has "apport-bug" as its tag already, do I need to add something like "needs-retrace"?
[12:23] <dupondje> we are almost at bug 1000000 :)
[12:24] <desrt> mvo: is a PPA involved?
[12:24] <pitti> mvo: needs-$arch-retrace, i. e. needs-amd64-retrace
[12:24] <pitti> mvo: also, they sohuld be apport-crash, not -bug
[12:24] <pitti> mvo: ah, nevermind, this is broken anyway
[12:25] <pitti> mvo: it has a .crash attachment, it wasn't actually sent as a crash report
[12:25] <pitti> so the retracer can't process this anyway
[12:26] <mvo> :/
[12:26] <seb128> re
[12:26] <seb128> back from lunch
[12:26] <mvo> thanks, I will ask for apport-collect this
[12:26] <seb128> hey mvo, desrt
[12:26] <mvo> but apparently its a huge file
[12:26] <seb128> mvo, apport-collect will not help you
[12:26] <mvo> desrt: no ppa involved
[12:26] <mvo> seb128: oh :/
[12:26] <seb128> mvo, you can download the file and apport-retrace or unpack it locally
[12:27] <desrt> seb128: good morning
[12:27] <seb128> mvo, or ask the submitter to ubuntu-bug it
[12:29] <Sweetshark> pitti: thx
[12:36] <mvo> seb128: so my submitter gets "Your computer does not have enough free memory to automatically analyse the problem and send a report to the developers." :/
[12:36] <ogra_> buy more ram !
[12:37] <seb128> mvo, download the file he added and gdb on it locally?
[12:43] <pitti> you can run apport-retrace -R --gdb <that crash file>
[12:44] <seb128> desrt, "fun" hud bug, bug #956878
[12:44] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 956878 in indicator-appmenu "HUD is sending 2 menu signals instead of 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956878
[12:46] <seb128> desrt, I guess it's on the unity side, hud-gtk doesn't have the issue
[12:48] <desrt> tricky.
[12:48] <desrt> let me see if i can reproduce that under unity
[12:49] <desrt> what's the new hotkey to open the overview in unity these days?
[12:50] <seb128> desrt, overview?
[12:50] <desrt> sorry.  the lenses
[12:50] <seb128> desrt, super as always?
[12:51] <desrt> windows key, right?
[12:51] <seb128> desrt, well it opens the dash, super-a, super-f, etc
[12:51] <seb128> for the app, file lens
[12:51] <seb128> desrt, right
[12:51] <desrt> hrmph
[12:51] <desrt> so that's working now, but it doesn't work immediately after login
[12:51] <seb128> desrt, does nautilus render your background?
[12:52] <desrt> nope
[12:52] <seb128> known bug
[12:52] <desrt> i was thinking that was the problem
[12:52] <desrt> k
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch
[13:18] <cyphermox> morning!
[13:22] <seb128> cyphermox, hey, how are you?
[13:25] <cyphermox> seb128: not bad, you?
=== greyback is now known as greyback|lunch
[13:27] <cr3> hi folks, the mouse is excruciatingly slow after starting ubuntu. against which project should I run ubuntu-bug?
[13:27] <seb128> cr3, try #ubuntu-x
[13:28] <cr3> seb128: it might be related to something other than x though, like I see this in powertop:
[13:28] <cr3> 23.4 ms/s     2194.8       Interrupt      [45] i915
[13:28] <cr3> where 2194.8 is the number of events per second, but I don't know whether that's really such a high number or not
[13:29] <seb128> cr3, dunno, doesn't seem desktopish in any case
[13:37] <cr3> seb128: I'll check with #ubuntu-x then. cheers!
[13:47] <pitti> kenvandine: good morning
[13:47] <seb128> kenvandine, RUN
[13:47] <seb128> ;-)
[13:48] <pitti> am I so terrifying? :-)
[13:48] <kenvandine> haha
[13:48] <kenvandine> what's up pitti?
[13:48] <seb128> the pitti workitems garbage collector is on you :p
[13:48] <pitti> kenvandine: so, I wondered whether we could drop indicator-applet's dependency on gnome-panel
[13:48]  * kenvandine should look at his workitems
[13:48] <chrisccoulson> nice, new home page in firefox: http://i.imgur.com/tTeHb.png
[13:48] <seb128> pitti, you can punt the informal "talk to jason about talking to GNOME about release cycle" which is on my list, it's not linked to the Ubuntu cycle in any wya
[13:49] <chrisccoulson> it's a shame that we miss out on this :(
[13:49] <kenvandine> pitti, why?
[13:49] <pitti> http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-desktop-team-ubuntu-12.04-beta-2.html#ken-vandine just has one blocked one, so no worries
[13:49] <seb128> chrisccoulson, is there anything which stops us to do something similar?
[13:49] <kenvandine> indicator-applet was just fixed to work with the new gnome-panel
[13:49] <seb128> chrisccoulson, waouh they got ride of the 2 bars after all?
[13:49] <chrisccoulson> seb128, we'd need to  have our own branded offline content
[13:49] <pitti> kenvandine: it's the least evil solution I see to bug 954939
[13:49] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 954939 in indicator-applet "Xubuntu 10.04 to 12.04 upgrade installs unity and gnome" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/954939
[13:49] <pitti> kenvandine: but I'm all ears for better proposals
[13:50]  * kenvandine looks
[13:50] <chrisccoulson> seb128, oh, i didn't notice that. i don't think that's the default atm. i think that's only on the UX branch
[13:50] <seb128> chrisccoulson, ok
[13:50] <pitti> seb128: while we are at it, do you want to keep the other two "talk to" items for b2?
[13:50] <pitti> (still two weeks to go, so plenty of time)
[13:51] <seb128> pitti, cf what I a wrote to you 2 minutes ago ;-)
[13:52] <pitti> seb128: sorry, I didn't see you saying anything aobut the two others
[13:52] <kenvandine> pitti, indicator-applet is only for gnome-panel
[13:52] <seb128> pitti, unsure about the second one, it's hard to get anything done in Debian, we could just rename dconf to dconf-not-what-you-want and d-conf to dconf in Ubuntu?
[13:52] <kenvandine> so dropping the depends would just be dropping the applet completely
[13:52] <seb128> pitti, 2 others?
[13:52] <seb128> pitti, well the "talk to jason" can be dropped from w.i
[13:52] <pitti> kenvandine: understood, but conceptually shouldn't the dependency be rather the other way around?
[13:52] <seb128> pitti, what do you think about renaming dconf in ubuntu?
[13:52] <pitti> seb128: "talk to debian about renaming epiphany and dconf"
[13:52] <kenvandine> tru
[13:52] <kenvandine> true
[13:52] <pitti> seb128: "talk to design,dx what to do for applications that expose a menu and an application menu (the new ones exported by gmenu)"
[13:53] <kenvandine> i think it would be fine to drop the depends
[13:53] <seb128> pitti, that dx one is DONE
[13:53] <pitti> kenvandine: i. e. there should be a gnome-classic or whatever package which pulls in the panel, the indicator-applet, and other bits
[13:53] <seb128> pitti, for some weeks
[13:53] <pitti> seb128: whoops, right
[13:53] <seb128> ;-)
[13:53] <seb128> pitti, so, wdyt, renaming dconf in Ubuntu?
[13:53] <seb128> I will try asking on #debian-gnome again, they were talking about it
[13:54] <seb128> but things can take a while in Debian
[13:54] <kenvandine> pitti, technically it really depends on the panel, but it actually isn't the way people are going to install it
[13:54] <pitti> seb128: hm, that would get us out of sync for both dconf and d-conf, and it's not an user-facing package
[13:54] <kenvandine> they will only want it if they already have the panel
[13:54] <kenvandine> so seems safe to me
[13:54] <pitti> kenvandine: right, but I don't think the way to get the classic session is to install indicator-application, is it?
[13:54] <kenvandine> we should check with jbicha
[13:55] <pitti> wouldn't that be gnome-session-fallback ?
[13:55] <pitti> which depends on -panel
[13:55] <pitti> kenvandine: I wonder what pulls in indicator-application right now
[13:55] <kenvandine> jbicha polished that stuff up so it worked nicely with the classic panel
[13:55] <kenvandine> pitti, indicator-applet does
[13:55] <kenvandine> i bet
[13:56] <seb128> kenvandine, pitti: indicator-application is pulled it by indicator-applet and unity iirc
[13:56] <pitti> kenvandine: sorry, that's what I meant
[13:56] <kenvandine> so if the gnome classic pulls in gnome-panel it should pull in the applet to
[13:56] <pitti> so, AFAICS the problem is not that gnome-panel doesn't get installed
[13:56] <kenvandine> right
[13:56] <pitti> as it's a direct dependency of gnome-session-fallback
[13:56] <pitti> so we don't need to depend on it in indicator-application
[13:56] <pitti> argh
[13:56] <kenvandine> so dropping the gnome-panel depends should be safe
[13:56] <pitti> indicator-applet
=== Trevinho|afk is now known as Trevinho
[13:57] <pitti> and it wouldn't pull in the whole gnome and unity stack just because you install one indicator
[13:57] <pitti> kenvandine: ok, that's what I thought
[13:57]  * kenvandine will make it happen
[13:57] <pitti> kenvandine: thanks for cross-checking!
[13:57] <pitti> kenvandine: ah, you want to? ok
[13:58] <kenvandine> sure, i have the branch handy
[13:58]  * pitti checks http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/bug-fixing/canonical-desktop-team-precise-fixes-report.html
[13:58] <pitti> ack, it's all your's :-P
[13:58] <pitti> once you get close, I'll upload such things right away and steal the trophy :)
[13:58] <seb128> lol
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow
=== greyback|lunch is now known as greyback
[14:36] <dobey> hrmm, requestsync is confusing
[14:38] <dobey> hrmm
[15:04] <desrt> seb128: how do i become a 'bug supervisor'?
[15:06] <seb128> desrt, you ask to bdmurray on #ubuntu-bugs I guess
=== dbarth_ is now known as dbarth
[15:11] <hallyn> is *this* the right place to ask about the scrollbar?
[15:11] <hallyn> (being unclickable)
[15:12] <cyphermox> hallyn: +1, yes, I think it probably is :)
[15:12] <cyphermox> hallyn: but perhaps the best is to file a bug :)
[15:13] <cyphermox> hallyn: by the way, you weren't dreaming things when wifi was acting up yesterday, we found some issues with libnl waiting for data
[15:13] <hallyn> yay :)
[15:13] <hallyn> cyphermox: file a bug against what exactly?
[15:13] <cyphermox> hallyn: just a seconf
[15:14] <desrt> jbicha: you are too late :p
[15:14] <cyphermox> hallyn: overlay-scrollbar
[15:14] <jbicha> wow, people come and go so quickly around here
[15:14] <desrt> :)
[15:14] <hallyn> cyphermox: thanks, will do that
[15:14] <desrt> seb128: so is it appropriate to assign this dbus message spam bug as a beta2 milestone?
[15:15] <desrt> what are the implications of me doing that?
[15:15] <desrt> i cause some annoyance to the release team if i don't fix it on time?
[15:17] <hallyn> (filed bug 957054)
[15:17] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 957054 in overlay-scrollbar "scrollbar disappears before i can click to drag it" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/957054
[15:17] <seb128> desrt, that's ok, they will just move target if it's not done
[15:17] <pitti> yes, we have a script to mass-move old milestones
[15:17] <seb128> hallyn, it's a dup of bug #949414
[15:17] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 949414 in gtk "Some GTK+3 events are not emitted when using a touchpad (but are with a mouse)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/949414
[15:17] <desrt> aww?  i don't have the ability to single-handedly delay the entire release? :)
[15:18]  * desrt pretends that he does anyway as extra motivation to fix it
[15:20] <seb128> desrt, ;-)
[15:27] <hallyn> seb128: grrr.  thanks
[15:27] <seb128> hallyn, yw
[15:28] <seb128> hallyn, bug #956062 as well which was the most recent bug reported on overlay-scrollbars before yours
[15:28] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 956062 in overlay-scrollbar "Impossible to catch scrollbar with touchpad in unmaximized nautilus windows" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956062
[15:28] <hallyn> not 100% sure i agree with 'medium', but i guess bug priorities aren't based on the amount of hair i pull out :)
[15:28] <hallyn> ok, thanks, then i'll carry on
[15:28] <seb128> hallyn, it's specific to some devices, doesn't happen with a mouse, but yeah, don't stop at the settings they don't reflect really how actively things are tracked
[15:29] <seb128> hallyn, btw it would be good to check open bugs before you report a new one ;-)
[15:29] <hallyn> none of the ones it showed me based on its guesses were it
[15:29] <seb128> hallyn, like the most recent bug on overlay-scrollbar has a title pretty similar to yours, how did you miss it?
[15:29] <hallyn> the gt3 one, i would never have guesed based on the title
[15:30] <seb128> right, but overlay-scrollbar has a least 2 bugs about it in the most recent 5 bugs
[15:30] <seb128> open the list, check recent bugs, it's not that hard ;-)
[15:30] <hallyn> seb128: bc i count on lp to give me the suspected dups
[15:30] <hallyn> that, and bc it was mixed in with 3-4 bugs yesterday that made my laptop unusable (super key not working, etc)
[15:30] <seb128> hum, k, that doesn't work great indeed :-(
[15:31] <seb128> hallyn, did you fix the super key issue?
[15:31] <hallyn> i thought it worked better than it apparently does
[15:31] <hallyn> i didn't fix it, it just started working this morning
[15:31] <hallyn> so i expect it to fail after next reboot :(
[15:31] <seb128> hallyn, it doesn't work if you are on an empty workspace
[15:31] <seb128> hallyn, or if nautilus doesn't display the background
[15:31] <seb128> hallyn, did you turn nautilus handling of the background off?
[15:31] <hallyn> wh...  uh, that's deemed a bug i hope?
[15:31] <hallyn> yes
[15:31] <seb128> there you go
[15:32] <seb128> yes, known issue
[15:32] <hallyn> ok, just wanted to make sure it's deemed an issue
[15:32] <seb128> you are just on a non standard, non testing config
[15:32] <seb128> non tested
[15:32] <hallyn> someone's gotta do it :)
[15:32] <seb128> i.e you tweak hidden options you are on your own ;-)
[15:32] <seb128> imho we need to start talking about reducing the number of option for next cycle
[15:32] <hallyn> laptop's too slow, i think that's why i turned it off
[15:32] <seb128> we have too many bugs because people tweak random crackful things
[15:33] <hallyn> hey!  i stuck to 100% things i can set with myUnity
[15:33] <seb128> well, still too much, see it broke your super key :p
[15:33] <hallyn> i thought iw as being good :)
[15:33] <hallyn> true dat
[15:33] <seb128> it's hard to cover all possible option combinaison
[15:33] <hallyn> ok, thanks.  never would've guessed.  so maybe i'll turn that back on
[15:34] <hallyn> (i'll avoid talking about how 15 years ago i could map keys to whatever i wanted, as well as suspend and resume and make my own bread :)
[15:34] <hallyn> thanks, ttyl.
[15:35] <seb128> bye
[15:52] <pitti> chrisccoulson: defaults-builder currently uses ./usr/lib/firefox-addons/distrib
[15:52] <pitti> erk, let's try this again
[15:52] <chrisccoulson> pitti - oh, yes. we need to move that :)
[15:52] <pitti> chrisccoulson: defaults-builder currently uses /usr/lib/firefox-addons/distribution/distribution.ini
[15:52] <pitti> chrisccoulson: I suppose that needs to move to /usr/lib/firefox/distribution/distribution.ini now?
[15:52] <chrisccoulson> yeah, it does. sorry, i was going to propose a merge for that ;)
[15:52] <pitti> chrisccoulson: the former was a workaround path while we had the version specific firefox paths, right?
[15:53] <pitti> chrisccoulson: np, doing now
[15:53] <pitti> bug 956899, FTR
[15:53] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 956899 in ubuntu-defaults-builder "Regression: firefox bookmarks not imported anymore" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956899
[15:53] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[15:54] <chrisccoulson> pitti - yeah, the former was just a workaround. i've moved the whole installation location now :)
[16:00] <pitti> chrisccoulson: is that planned to be done in SRUs, too?
[16:00] <pitti> this would be tricky, as it would break existing defaults pacakges
[16:01] <chrisccoulson> pitti - sort of. i've made an exception for the oneiric package to leave the distribution.ini file where it is though
[16:06] <pitti> mterry: hey Mike, how are you?
[16:06] <pitti> mterry: do you have some time to check the patch in bug 944035 and sponsor this?
[16:06] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 944035 in ibus "pinyin not listed by default on a fresh installation" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/944035
[16:07] <mterry> pitti, yeah, I know I didn't reply to bug, but I was going to look at it today
[16:07] <mterry> pitti, I saw the fedora patch, was reviewing it
[16:07] <mterry> pitti, I don't think it will require an FFe like the commenter does?  Seems just like a bug fix (though a bit of a hefty patch)
[16:16] <mterry> oh, hm... it does at least change UI...
[16:19] <pitti> mterry: well, a bit, but I really consider it a bug
[16:19] <pitti> it's quite useless by default righ tnow
[16:19] <pitti> and that used to work AFAIR
[16:19] <pitti> mterry: thanks for looking at this!
=== JackyAlcine_ is now known as jalcine
[17:16] <mvo> hm, where does gnome-settings stores the proxy info (http proxy) these days?
[17:17] <seb128> mvo, org.gnome.system.proxy.http
[17:17] <seb128> mvo, gsettings get org.gnome.system.proxy.http host ''
[17:17] <seb128> ups
[17:17] <seb128> mvo, gsettings get org.gnome.system.proxy.http host
[17:18] <mvo> seb128: ok, I don't get it, I set it to "manual" and http://localhost, but  gsettings get org.gnome.system.proxy.http enabled says false?
[17:19] <seb128> mvo, enabled is deprecated
[17:19] <seb128> host = '' is no proxy == disabled
[17:19] <mvo> aha, ok
[17:19] <seb128> if there is a value it's enabled
[17:19] <mvo> t
[17:19] <mvo> ta
[17:19] <seb128> yw
[17:39] <pitti> good night everyone, have a nice weekend!
[17:40] <pitti> FTR, I'll be off for most of Monday, getting my remaining two wisdom teeth pulled
[17:40] <pitti> I'll be online in the morning for doing some patch piloting, though
[17:41] <kenvandine> pitti, have a great weekend
[17:57] <chrisccoulson> heh - http://goo.gl/Y9qaM
[18:03] <kenvandine> chrisccoulson, i love it :)
[18:07] <dobey> man. internet memes are so lame now
[18:21] <Sweetshark> aarrgh
[18:21]  * Sweetshark cant get into chinstrap
[18:26]  * Sweetshark can get into chinstrap
[18:27] <Sweetshark> pitti: good luck with the teeth stuff!
[18:27] <Sweetshark> pitti: 3.5.0-1ubuntu1 uploading to chinstrap btw
[18:32] <desrt> ugh
[18:32] <desrt> my apartment is burning down again
[18:32] <desrt> or perhaps not...
[18:33] <micahg> Sweetshark: I assume you meant 3.5.1-1ubuntu1?
[18:34] <chrisccoulson> desrt, oh, that sounds quite serious
[18:34] <chrisccoulson> perhaps someone in your apartment is building libreoffice?
[18:35] <desrt> :)
[18:35] <desrt> the alarm bell sounded
[18:35] <desrt> but only for a moment
[18:35] <Laney> maybe it melted
[18:35] <desrt> that seems unlikely
[18:35] <desrt> it's just over there...
[18:36] <jbicha> chrisccoulson: that was nice & quick to get the Firefox 11 SRU out already :)
[18:36] <chrisccoulson> jbicha, micahg was involved too ;)
[18:37] <micahg> jbicha: was actually on the slower side unfortunately (not due to chrisccoulson, he was plenty fast)
[18:38] <chrisccoulson> jbicha, also, we have the next beta available already: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-next/
[18:38] <chrisccoulson> for precise too ;)
[18:38] <jbicha> chrisccoulson: I'll probably have to add that PPA, stable Firefox is too boring
[18:38] <chrisccoulson> yeah, you should do :)
[18:42] <Sweetshark> micahg: indeed
[18:43] <Sweetshark> micahg, chrisccoulson, desrt: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNnAvTTaJjM libreoffice building soundtrack
[18:44] <jbicha> chrisccoulson: oh FF12 is still pending publication to the PPA, I guess I'll wait a few more minutes
[18:44] <seb128> hey jbicha, how are you?
[18:44] <seb128> jbicha, how is the feedback on the new shell? ;-)
[18:47] <jbicha> seb128: not too much feedback, maybe people didn't notice yet? Cinnamon's broken but the Mint devs apparently don't care yet so neither do I
[18:47] <desrt> jbicha: it's awesome :D
[18:47] <seb128> I can see the news
[18:47] <desrt> seb128: i think anyone who is running gnome-shell on precise was running it out of the PPA already.... so no big change for most people
[18:47] <seb128> "Ubuntu breaks Mint to try to get users back"
[18:49] <desrt> seb128: is there a known bug with not being able to add new favourites to the unity panel?
[18:50] <seb128> desrt, launcher you mean? the left bar?
[18:50] <desrt> ya
[18:50] <seb128> no, and works for me
[18:50] <seb128> what did you do?
[18:50] <desrt> it's never worked for me
[18:50] <desrt> and i've tried a lot of times with a lot of versions
[18:50] <desrt> i do a search and then drag an icon
[18:50] <desrt> it even says "Drop to add application" when i hover the bar
[18:50] <desrt> but nothing happens
[18:50] <seb128> urg
[18:51] <seb128> if you run an app, right click on the launcher icon and pick "lock..."
[18:51] <seb128> does it work?
[18:51] <seb128> i.e does it stay after you close the app?
[18:51] <desrt> yes
[18:51] <desrt> thanks :)
[18:51] <seb128> yw
[18:51] <seb128> but the dnd should be working, it works for me
[18:51] <jbicha> Java apps don't pin to the launcher
[18:51] <desrt> how do i change the position of the icon?
[18:51] <seb128> desrt, dnd
[18:52] <desrt> it seems to move the entire launcher instead of just the icon
[18:52] <kenvandine> desrt, drag out to the right a bit
[18:52] <seb128> desrt, either stay pressed for a second, iOS way
[18:52] <seb128> desrt, or go right
[18:52] <desrt> oh.  that works.
[18:52] <desrt> both of those work
[18:52] <desrt> thanks
[18:52] <seb128> yw
[18:52] <topyli> seb128: the shell 3.90 in universe tends to crash. i downgraded to a ppa version myself in order to get anything done :)
[18:52] <seb128> urg?
[18:53] <seb128> jbicha, ^
[18:53] <seb128> topyli, universe should be basically the same as the ppa I think
[18:53] <seb128> ok, dinner time
[18:53] <seb128> bbl
[18:53] <topyli> i know. somehow it crashes more eagerly. i'm running ~ubuntu3. 4 and 5 like to crash too
[18:53] <seb128> have a good w.e everybody for those I will not see again (no work tonight but I might let IRC on a bit while hacking)
[18:56] <desrt> seb128: hacking != work? :)
[18:57] <desrt> seb128: can you remind me what is the freeze for beta?
[18:59] <jbicha> !schedule
[18:59] <ubot2`> The Ubuntu Precise Pangolin release schedule can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule
[18:59] <desrt> convenient.  thanks.
[18:59] <desrt> crikey.  all of next week
[18:59]  * desrt starts planning for all the things he can break in that time
[19:00] <nessita> hello all!!!
[19:00] <desrt> nessita: hello!
[19:00] <nessita> seb128: may I ask a very quick favor from you?
[19:01] <nessita> anyone with a non-english locale: would you please pastebin the content of your ~/ .config/user-dirs.dirs ?
[19:14] <dobey> nessita: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/xdg-user-dirs/+pots/xdg-user-dirs might help :)
[19:14] <nessita> dobey: looking!
[19:16] <dobey> 文档 is "Documents" currently, in the simplified chinese translation :)
[19:28] <seb128> nessita, hey
[19:28] <seb128> nessita, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/886785/
[19:28] <nessita> seb128: thanks!!!
[19:28] <seb128> nessita, yw
[19:29] <seb128> nessita, you can probably get the same by running LANG=fr LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8 xdg-user-dirs-update
[19:29] <nessita> seb128: did not know that, will take notes
[19:31] <seb128> nessita, you might need to --force if it does nothing
[19:31] <nessita> seb128: yeap, thanks!
[19:31] <seb128> nessita, yw
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away