File size: 14,049 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 |
=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger === Guest8646 is now known as jrgifford === jtv1 is now known as jtv [06:12] <alkisg> Hi, what should I do to avoid this error when requesting a recipe build? "Rejected: File ltsp_5.3.4+bzr2129~oneiric1.tar.gz already exists in PPA for Alkis Georgopoulos, but uploaded version has different contents. " [06:12] <alkisg> I think that the recipe re-creates the orig.tar.gz from launchpad, and it uses a different timestamp, hence the problem, but I don't know how to avoid that. [06:12] <StevenK> You can not reuse versions [06:13] <alkisg> Any hints how? [06:14] <alkisg> Here's my recipe: https://code.launchpad.net/~alkisg/+recipe/alkisg [06:14] <wgrant> alkisg: It's not using an orig.tar.gz at all [06:15] <wgrant> alkisg: You've only got one revno in the version template, but you've got two branches. [06:15] <wgrant> So a change in the packaging branch will not change the version string, so it won't be possible to upload it. [06:15] <alkisg> Ah, so I need to specify a version for the other branch too, got it [06:15] <alkisg> Thank you very much [06:19] <jono> hey folks [06:19] <jono> does anyone know who maintains Twisted in Ubuntu? [06:19] <jono> if anyone [06:19] <jono> it looks like I might have found a bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685 [06:19] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [06:21] <alkisg> jono, is the problem that pygtk/reactor apps don't close on exit? I had to call reactor.crash() to force my app to close on precise, while it works fine on previous ubuntu versions.... [06:22] <jono> alkisg, it might be related, but this issue is that some processes just don't run [06:22] <jono> alkisg, on the bug you can see the test script I wrote [06:25] <alkisg> My problem does not exist on debian testing with the same python-twisted-core version as precise... So I think it's caused by debian/patches/00_gi_gtk3reactor.patch [06:25] <alkisg> Maybe yours is caused by the same patch too [06:28] <jono> alkisg, could you test the script in the bug to see if you get the same issue? [06:28] <jono> alkisg, and maybe leave a comment on the bug about this? [06:29] <alkisg> jono, I'll try it later on today, both on precise and on wheezy [06:29] <jono> alkisg, that would be wonderful if you could, many thanks! [06:43] <alkisg> jono: you didn't include the test scripts though... [06:56] <aviksil> Can anyone tell me the reason for this recipe build failure: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/xbmc-linaro-daily [06:57] <aviksil> the recipe build was successful locally using bzr dailydeb [06:59] <jono> alkisg, it is attached to the bug [07:00] <jono> alkisg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685/+attachment/2832795/+files/scriptchecker-twisted.py [07:00] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [07:00] <alkisg> jono: accoms = [ { "script" : os.path.join(scriptslocation, "test1.py") }, [07:00] <alkisg> No test1.py here, it's still in your desktop [07:00] <jono> alkisg, oh, just create those, they can be anything [07:00] <alkisg> scriptslocation = "/home/jono/Desktop" [07:00] <alkisg> OK [07:00] <jono> I will clarify this in the bug [07:00] <alkisg> Or just use location = . and attach a .zip [07:02] <jono> alkisg, I can attach a zip [07:02] <jono> will do [07:03] <alkisg> jono: or, if they can even not be python files, execute something like /bin/true [07:04] <alkisg> But btw, I can't exit from the main loop with Ctrl+C, like in my app [07:04] <alkisg> I have to use Ctrl+\ ==> core dumped etc [07:05] <jono> alkisg, updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685 [07:05] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [07:05] <jono> alkisg, right, I have noticed that too [07:08] <alkisg> jono: the scripts seem to run properly here, I see all exit codes [07:08] <jono> alkisg, run it a few times [07:08] <jono> does it always run ok? [07:09] <alkisg> Yes, at 10 times at least [07:09] <alkisg> The only problem I see is that it doesn't terminate [07:11] <alkisg> http://paste.ubuntu.com/874146/ [07:12] <jono> alkisg, strange [07:12] <jono> what system are you running it on? [07:12] <jono> 12.04? [07:14] <alkisg> Yes, and dist-upgraded yesterday [07:14] <jono> what is your python-twisted version? [07:14] <alkisg> 11.1.0-1ubuntu1 [07:15] <jono> how strange [07:15] <jono> maybe a dist-upgrade from yesterday fixed it [07:15] <jono> dist-upgrading now [07:17] <alkisg> jono: I tried 6 more times, the 6th time I got the problem [07:17] <jono> alkisg, ahhh [07:17] <alkisg> run scripts [07:17] <alkisg> Running: /tmp/test1.py [07:17] <alkisg> <hanged> [07:17] <jono> you were just lucky it seemed :-) [07:17] <alkisg> Indeed, maybe running the same script in a loop would help [07:18] <jono> alkisg, very possibly [07:18] <jono> could I ask you to add your feedback to the bug report? [07:19] <alkisg> Sure, let me try the loop first... [07:20] <jono> thanks alkisg [07:20] <jono> good idea [07:20] <jono> brb [07:29] <alkisg> jono: I uploaded a loop version of the script which makes the bug always reproducable for me [07:37] <jono> thanks alkisg [07:59] <vibhav> How did my karma suddenly expire?? [08:01] <vibhav> It was there yesterday [08:02] <vibhav> https://launchpad.net/~vibhavp/+karma === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [10:15] <vivekimsit1> I have downloaded a diff file from the launchpad , how can I apply patch from that file in my local? [10:17] <bigjools> patch -p0 < filename [10:21] <vivekimsit1> bigjools:I use bazaar! [10:22] <vivekimsit1> and the diff file has three file changes === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga-afk [10:38] <aviksil> Can anyone tell me the reason for this recipe build failure: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/xbmc-linaro-daily [10:38] <aviksil> the recipe build was successfully locally using bzr dailydeb [10:41] <jelmer> hi aviksil [10:41] <jelmer> looking.. [10:41] <aviksil> jelmer: ok, thanks [10:41] <bigjools> vivekimsit1: you said you had a diff file, that doesn't sound like bazaar to me [10:43] <jelmer> aviksil: that seems to be bug 760735 [10:43] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 760735 in Launchpad Auto Build System "Daily recipe: failure because of Permission denied accessing build/patch directories" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760735 [10:44] <aviksil> jelmer: oh ok [10:49] <aviksil> jelmer: where can I put the workaround --tar-ignore=.pc? [10:52] <jelmer> aviksil: that's a dpkg-source option I think [10:52] <jelmer> aviksil: you don't have any control over the arguments to dpkg-source on Launchpad [10:53] <aviksil> jelmer: oh ok. then what could be the solution? [10:53] <jelmer> aviksil: one of the ways to workaround the issue is to not ship patches in your package but rather to have a 3.0 (native) package with all patches applied to the source tree [10:53] <jelmer> aviksil: that's what bzr-builder is doing anyway [10:54] <aviksil> jelmer: ok, will try native package then === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga [13:17] <l3on> Hi all, somebody can take a look at question #190062 [13:17] <l3on> ? === yofel is now known as yofel_ === yofel_ is now known as yofel === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [14:26] <jodh> Please could someone bump the 2 builds here as I'm trying to debug build failures and multi-hour turn around makes it a slow op: https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesodhunt/+recipe/upstart-daily-build-test [14:36] <dobey> jodh: you can test locally [14:37] <jodh> dobey: not that easy as the problem only seems to occur when building on lp, hence these test builds with extra debug. [14:38] <dobey> jodh: i mean, you can build a recipe locally, and then build the resulting .dsc in pbuilder, and get the same results [14:38] <dobey> though i don't remember the name of the "build the recipe" command at the moment [14:45] <jodh> dobey: thanks - I didn't know that. I'm trying that now... [15:06] <rebel> whee, just packaged & recipe-built my first ppa package! where's the cake? [15:08] * jelmer hands rebel some cake [15:09] <rebel> yummie :D just for a moment there I thought the cake thing was a not really happening [15:23] <jodh> dobey: I've built the recipe successfully with pbuilder locally. So, something about the lp environment is different. Please could you bump those builds so I can compare the local output with lp buildlogs? [15:23] <jodh> dobey: It may be the fact that lp is using a lucid kernel. I've been bitten by that a few times already. [15:25] <dobey> jodh: i don't know there is any way to bump the builds [15:25] <dobey> or at least, i don't think i have enough permissions to do it [15:46] <sisar> hello [16:00] <bdrung> hi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audacity/+bug/355846/comments/47 is spam [16:00] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 355846 in audacity (Ubuntu) "audacity stops recording after about a second when using software play-through" [Undecided,Confirmed] === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [16:02] <rick_h_> bdrung: taken care of [16:02] <bdrung> thanks === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch [16:31] <cmars232> hi [16:32] <cmars232> launchpad having any issues this morning? [16:32] <cmars232> cannot seem to propose a merge, it's hanging [17:28] <kirkland> czajkowski: howdy! cmars232 is reporting that launchpad propose merge is hanging for a long time for him.... [17:29] <czajkowski> kirkland: I know saw the question [17:29] <czajkowski> just on a call atm [17:29] <kirkland> czajkowski: ah, k, sorry! I pointed cmars232 here :-) [17:29] <czajkowski> cmars232: did you just file a question on lp [17:30] <cmars232> i did [17:30] <cmars232> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/190084 [17:30] <czajkowski> cmars232: nods I poked jcsackett about it [17:31] <cmars232> tried with bzr lp-submit, i get File exists: /srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/08/94/7c [17:32] <cmars232> i mean bzr lp-propose-merge [17:32] <cmars232> not lp-submit === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [18:04] <jcsackett> cmars232: if you're getting file exists, can you confirm that you do not see a proposal for it in your list of active reviews? (code.launchpad.net/~$YOURUSERNAME/+activereviews, if you're unsure what i mean). [18:43] <jamesf> Hi all. LP Bug search URLs have milestones as numeric ids ("field.milestone%3Alist=47818"). Is there a way for me to programatically work out what those should be (preferably via launchpadlib)? I want to construct search URLs, e.g. search by milestone plus tag. [18:51] <amorphous> hello folks...quick question. Is it normal to be able to 'bzr branch something...' without doing launchpad-login launchpad-id first? [18:52] <dobey> amorphous: for public things, yes i think so [18:52] <amorphous> ok..so the login is required only for writing stuff to launchpad or accessing additional data... [18:53] <lifeless> jamesf: hmm, thats odd an unexpected [18:53] <dobey> jamesf: probably can nab it from the milestone object in lplib [18:53] <lifeless> jamesf: you could file a bug, we should probably make that consistent with the API search params [18:54] <dobey> and yeah, what lifeless said [18:54] <dobey> amorphous: i think so, yes [18:56] <jamesf> lifeless: looks like this is relevant https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/436706 [18:56] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 436706 in Launchpad itself "Milestone vocabulary leaks object id" [Low,Triaged] [18:56] <jamesf> lifeless: I didn't find anything looking at the milestone object in lplib [18:58] <jamesf> (I'm manually creating myself a lookup table for now, until/unless I work out way to derive the table) [18:59] <jamesf> but re: launchpadlib, I may just not know where to look. Still, there's nothing in the json returned for the milestone object. [19:03] <dobey> jamesf: maybe it's not anywhere in there then. i would look at self_link; if it's using the name instead of the id though, i guess that won't work [19:05] <jamesf> dobey: yeah, no joy from self_link either. nvm, just thought I'd ask. Thanks === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:39] <ScottK> wgrant: How long is it reasonable to expect to wait for an automatic retry after depwait? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtruby/4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1/+build/3270370 finished over an hour ago, but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/korundum/4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1/+build/3270351 is still depwait. [22:39] <ScottK> I'd have thought with two publisher runs per hour, it'd be good by now? [22:40] <wgrant> ScottK: retry-depwait only runs once an hour. [22:40] <ScottK> wgrant: OK. Thanks. When does it run? [22:40] <wgrant> It takes about 50 minutes to run, so "all of the time" [22:41] <ScottK> OK. [22:42] <ScottK> So it's build, publisher run start -> finish, retry-depwait start -> finish. [22:42] <wgrant> Basically, yeah. [22:42] <ScottK> I'm guessing two hours wouldn't be surprising then. [22:42] <ScottK> Got it. Thanks. |