File size: 2,820 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 |
[07:46] <dholbach> good morning [08:13] <dpm> morning === popey_ is now known as popey === allison_ is now known as wendar [19:25] <ajmitch> morning [20:57] <cielak> morning [20:57] <cielak> I got confused by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda [20:57] <cielak> it says the meetings take place on the last friday of every month [20:58] <cielak> and that the next one is on Friday 29th February [20:58] <cielak> but 29th February is actually Wednesday [20:58] <cielak> am I missing something? [20:59] <ajmitch> no, you're not, it was edited wrong [20:59] <cielak> okay, thanks :) [20:59] <ajmitch> I think highvoltage must have a different calendar to the rest of us :) [21:00] <cielak> ahh... silly timezones! :))) [21:03] <highvoltage> hi! [21:03] <highvoltage> oh crap [21:03] <ajmitch> highvoltage: yeah, it should be this friday [21:04] * highvoltage updates it [21:04] <ajmitch> might be worth sending out a mail to the list about it [21:04] <highvoltage> will do [21:04] <ajmitch> thanks :) [21:05] <cielak> maybe you've meant the 31st of February? that would indeed be Friday :) [21:06] <highvoltage> hah, I messed it up again (only noticed it as I sent the email) [21:06] <ajmitch> should be Octember imho [21:06] <highvoltage> (made it for 22 Feb, *this* wednesday) [21:06] <micahg> TB discussion of ARB exceptions for lenses and scopes for those interested [21:07] <micahg> #ubuntu-meeting [21:07] <stgraber> highvoltage: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=App+Review+Board+Meeting+&iso=20110127T18 says Thursday ;) [21:08] <cielak> stgraber: isn't it the previous meeting's day? [21:10] <highvoltage> stgraber: that's fixed too now :) [21:10] <stgraber> highvoltage: thanks [22:09] * ajmitch needs to work out what was actually agreed on at that TB meeting & what we need to decide this week [22:24] <mhall119> stgraber: wendar: do you want me to add this item to the ARB agenda? [22:25] <wendar> mhall119: yes, please do [22:25] <wendar> mhall119: and thanks! [23:41] <ajmitch> stgraber: one thing that jumps to mind when having everything in one source package - everytime you want to add a new lens or scope you have to rebuild the lot, and everyone has to download the rebuilt binary package [23:41] <stgraber> ajmitch: yeah, I mentioned it at the end of the mail [23:42] <ajmitch> oh you did too :) [23:42] <stgraber> ajmitch: in the case of unity stuff, we're talking 2kB python scripts mostly, so may be a bit annoying to the user but it won't kill their or our bandwidth [23:42] <stgraber> and it may been seen as a feature as they'll see the lens get updated and so will know that something new is available for it (if they actually read the changelog) [23:43] <ajmitch> right, source package per lens may not be too bad, depending on the lens & how popular it is |