File size: 35,389 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 |
=== ashams_ is now known as ashams [14:34] <ashams> thelinuxer, dude, we need them to agree on membership method before talking about procedures, right? [14:34] <ashams> :D [14:47] <thelinuxer> ashams: methods and procedures are synonyms :D [14:52] <thelinuxer> ashams: you can add any subtopics you see appropriate to clarify it .. [14:57] <thelinuxer> hi mgamal [14:57] <thelinuxer> :) [14:57] <mgamal> hi [14:58] <ashams> thelinuxer, I meant the whole *membership* idea aslan :D [14:58] <ashams> mgamal, hiiiiiiiiiiii [14:58] <mgamal> hi guys [14:58] <ashams> mgamal, hi :) [14:59] <mgamal> hi ashams [14:59] <ashams> thelinuxer, hi [14:59] <ashams> mgamal, hi [14:59] <mgamal> hi [14:59] <ashams> hell, hi [14:59] <ashams> stop saying hi, so I won't reply hi [14:59] <ashams> :P [14:59] <thelinuxer> ashams: this was the main idea behind having a non-elected council! [15:00] <thelinuxer> to put some standards and start accepting members [15:00] <thelinuxer> who will have voting rights [15:00] <ashams> thelinuxer, man, I can't understand you these days :P [15:00] <thelinuxer> y r we talking in loops ?! we have been having this conversation for almost a year now! [15:01] <thelinuxer> a year a whole year!!!! [15:01] <ashams> thelinuxer, hi [15:01] <ashams> meetingology, hi [15:01] <thelinuxer> ashams: i won't hi u back :P [15:01] <meetingology> ashams: Error: "hi" is not a valid command. [15:01] <thelinuxer> lol [15:01] <ashams> thelinuxer, lol [15:01] <ashams> hahahahaha [15:01] <thelinuxer> i will jon an wazery [15:02] <thelinuxer> will call* [15:02] <ashams> Y? [15:02] <thelinuxer> shouldn't they be here by now ? [15:02] <ashams> ba7eb a3mel feha 3abeeet awiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii :P [15:03] <thelinuxer> wazery has ubuntu related problems :D he should be here in 2 mins [15:04] <thelinuxer> jonathan should be here in 5 [15:04] <thelinuxer> mgamal: y don't u familiarize yourself with meetingology since u gonna be the meeting chair [15:04] <mgamal> how does it work? [15:04] <ashams> 5 points, maybe mins, maybe hours, maybe days, maybe weeks, maybe years [15:04] <thelinuxer> just send it msgs [15:05] <thelinuxer> for instance i will try to make u chair [15:05] <thelinuxer> meetingology: #chair mgamal [15:05] <meetingology> thelinuxer: Error: "#chair" is not a valid command. [15:05] <ashams> non, he should startmeeting by himself [15:05] <thelinuxer> there is a chair command! [15:06] <thelinuxer> i saw it in the wiki page! [15:06] <thelinuxer> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [15:06] <ashams> I assume it's to chane or set chair [15:06] <ashams> after starting meeting [15:07] <thelinuxer> mashy [15:07] <thelinuxer> mgamal: you should use "startmeeting" when the time comes :D [15:07] <thelinuxer> then "topic" and "subtopic" ..etc [15:07] <jonathanhindi> I am here now [15:07] <jonathanhindi> sorry for being late [15:07] <mgamal> waiting for wazery [15:07] <thelinuxer> wazery should be here sooon [15:08] <jonathanhindi> Can you send me the agenda ? [15:08] <thelinuxer> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EgyptTeam/Meetings/Agendas/2012-02-10 [15:08] <ashams> jonathanhindi, hi (he don't know what I'm going to do next) [15:09] <thelinuxer> lool [15:09] <mgamal> ashams, can u handle all those meetingology stuff? [15:09] <jonathanhindi> ashams: 7asies bi ma2lab gai :D [15:09] <ashams> mgamal, noooooooooo [15:09] <ashams> jonathanhindi, hi [15:09] <thelinuxer> ashams: just logistical stuff ... we would only need a link to the meetingology minutes page [15:09] <thelinuxer> no need for "present" section ..etc [15:10] <thelinuxer> mgamal: we will all learn together :D [15:10] <ashams> ok, I think we should forget about that bot this time [15:10] <ashams> ok, let's learn [15:10] <jonathanhindi> why i feel that i am not understanding anything now ! [15:10] <ashams> coz you didn't reply the hi [15:10] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: we have a meeting bot [15:10] <mgamal> jonathanhindi: lighten up, we haven't started yet [15:10] <ashams> reply and I'll tell you :P [15:10] <thelinuxer> ashams: lol stop it [15:10] <jonathanhindi> hi [15:11] <ashams> thelinuxer, ok, mr op :( [15:11] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: hi [15:11] <ashams> yyyaaaaay [15:11] <ashams> jonathanhindi, hi [15:11] <jonathanhindi> ashams: hi [15:11] <thelinuxer> ashams: hi [15:11] <ashams> oh nooooooooooo [15:11] <ashams> jonathanhindi, thelinuxer hi [15:11] <thelinuxer> thelinuxer: hi :P [15:11] <jonathanhindi> ana zh2t :D [15:11] <ashams> hahaha [15:11] <thelinuxer> tab i will call wazery tany [15:13] <ashams> ya3am 2ollo yenazzel windows wi yerayya7 dema3'ooo [15:13] <thelinuxer> wazery lost his home (folder of course) [15:13] <ashams> good start [15:13] <mgamal> whoa! [15:13] <mgamal> I am using Window$ btw [15:13] <thelinuxer> he will join us from a live cd session [15:14] <thelinuxer> cool here he is [15:14] <mgamal> my wireless is screwed on oneiric [15:14] <thelinuxer> hi wazery [15:14] <wazery> sorry guys :( [15:14] <wazery> hi thelinuxer [15:14] <mgamal> hi wazery [15:14] <ashams> mgamal, shame on you [15:14] <ashams> wazery, hi [15:14] <wazery> hi mgamal [15:14] <thelinuxer> mgamal: start the meeting? [15:14] <ashams> mwahahhaaha [15:14] <wazery> hi ashams [15:14] <ashams> wazery, hi [15:14] <mgamal> guys let's start [15:15] <ashams> ok [15:15] <mgamal> ashams: what's the first topic on our list? [15:15] <thelinuxer> who will be handling meetingology ? [15:15] <ashams> crap [15:15] <ashams> #startmeeting [15:15] <meetingology> Meeting started Fri Feb 10 15:15:45 2012 UTC. The chair is ashams. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [15:15] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired [15:15] <ashams> #chair mgamal [15:16] <meetingology> Current chairs: ashams mgamal [15:16] <ashams> #topic council meeting II [15:16] <ashams> now what? [15:17] <mgamal> what's the discussion point now? [15:17] <thelinuxer> proceed with the agenda [15:17] <ashams> #startmeeting council meeting 2 [15:17] <meetingology> ashams: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress. [15:17] <ashams> #meetingtopic Council Meeting 2 [15:18] <jonathanhindi> i have to go 4 15 mins [15:18] <ashams> ok, let's pass [15:18] <mgamal> ok [15:18] <mgamal> what's the first topic on our agenda? [15:18] <ashams> How can ppl join Council? [15:19] <thelinuxer> #endmeeting [15:19] <ashams> we have membership method suggested for joining and voting [15:19] <mgamal> didn't we say elections are held on october and april? [15:19] <ashams> yes, but who can be nominated [15:19] <mgamal> and what's the method? [15:19] <ashams> mgamal, membership [15:19] <mgamal> great [15:20] <mgamal> the question is, how can one be a member? [15:20] <ashams> that's to make a somewhat threshold so one person won't get some of his friends to vote for him [15:20] <mgamal> ok [15:21] <mgamal> now membership will be approved by the councik [15:21] <mgamal> *council [15:21] <mgamal> but who can apply to begin with? [15:21] <ashams> it was suggested that 6months of contribution is enough [15:21] <mgamal> cool [15:21] <mgamal> now this opnes another question [15:21] <mgamal> on FGs [15:21] <ashams> yes [15:21] <mgamal> should the contribution be actually through the FGs? [15:22] <ashams> I guess yes [15:22] <mgamal> if we go far an open model, then people join the FGs as they desire [15:22] <ashams> mgamal, not all fgs [15:22] <mgamal> once they contribute for 6 months, they are eligible for membership [15:22] <mgamal> if we go for a closed model [15:22] <ashams> fgs need to be somehow not fully open [15:22] <ashams> so we keep quality [15:22] <mgamal> then people join FGs if and only if they are laready members [15:22] <mgamal> *already [15:23] <ashams> members of the parent team, right? [15:24] <mgamal> what parent team? [15:24] <ashams> I mean ~ubuntu-eg [15:24] <ashams> pad.lv/~ubuntu-eg [15:25] <thelinuxer> ashams: I am sorry but isn't this a bit confusing ? [15:25] <ashams> yes [15:26] <thelinuxer> i am gonna follow ur train of thought, how can one be a member of ubuntu-eg (the parent team)? [15:26] <mgamal> nice one, thelinuxer [15:26] <mgamal> :) [15:26] <ashams> I mean, mgamal means members of ~ubuntut-eg which is fully open or members of "ubuntu-eg members" which is not fully open [15:26] <thelinuxer> ashams: fine .. [15:26] <ashams> coool [15:26] <thelinuxer> i have a point to say about FGs [15:26] <ashams> it's not a long train though [15:26] <mgamal> no, members of FGs [15:26] <ashams> shooot me [15:27] <ashams> mgamal, that's good [15:27] <thelinuxer> we discussed the option of having core FGs and completely open FGs [15:27] <ashams> yes [15:27] <thelinuxer> core are close and related to the day to day operations and event like graphics or web teams for instance [15:28] <thelinuxer> while other FGs can be useful and everything but not as essential like a dev team (not that dev is not important ..) just an example [15:28] <ashams> so if any one is a member of a core fg, s/he can be nominated, right? [15:28] <mgamal> yes [15:28] <thelinuxer> mgamal: i guess the 6 month rule should be followed [15:28] <mgamal> and members of open fgs can be nominated if they contribute for 6 months :) [15:29] <thelinuxer> joining the FG means he was accepted by the FG leader, we can think he's on probation [15:29] <mgamal> I have a different model in mind [15:29] <ashams> mgamal, go [15:29] <thelinuxer> or he could become a member if he got a recommendation from the FGs members/leaders [15:29] <thelinuxer> mgamal: shoot [15:29] <mgamal> look guys [15:29] <mgamal> I hate too much hirearchy [15:29] <ashams> we can't look, it's irc [15:30] <mgamal> I want to keep it as flat and open as much as possible [15:30] <mgamal> don't want to have too many "elites" in the group and os [15:30] <mgamal> *so [15:30] <mgamal> it's against open source principles [15:30] <mgamal> so anyway [15:30] <mgamal> my idea is that FGs are open [15:30] <ashams> good point [15:30] <ashams> but quality [15:31] <ashams> we can't give ppl a very bad support for ex. [15:31] <mgamal> there are no quality concerns in FGs [15:31] <mgamal> it's all natural selection [15:31] <ashams> what about support fg? [15:31] <mgamal> in other words [15:31] <mgamal> Ubuntu-eg is a collective of all FGs [15:31] <mgamal> anyway [15:31] <mgamal> you contribute to FGs [15:31] <mgamal> for 6 months [15:31] <mgamal> once you do so [15:32] <mgamal> and are approved by FG leader/community [15:32] <mgamal> you can apply for membership [15:32] <ashams> why membership ba2a? [15:32] <wazery> ashams: I think the quality is the responsibility of the leader of the fg [15:32] <ashams> we can make it just get nominated [15:32] <ashams> wazery, good point [15:32] <thelinuxer> mgamal: fine by me .. as a membership process, types of FGs and their responsibilities should be discussed separately [15:33] <jonathanhindi> am back [15:33] <thelinuxer> wb [15:33] <jonathanhindi> thelinuxer: thanks [15:33] <mgamal> cool [15:33] <ashams> mgamal, if we're doing all of this, why we put "membership" in their way [15:34] <mgamal> don't get you ashams [15:34] <thelinuxer> ashams: it's not in their way, it's not blocking them from doing anything .. [15:34] <ashams> I think if one spent 6m in any core fg, he can get nominated for council [15:34] <ashams> why we put them somewhere else while they'll be in their place with their record on that fg [15:35] <ashams> recomendation from fg leader will be received anyway, who would say no? [15:35] <ashams> recommendation* [15:36] <ashams> mgamal, is it clear now? [15:36] <thelinuxer> ashams: a side point but we will need a list of emails for the voting process, so we will need to collect those who has voting rights somewhere ... [15:36] <mgamal> not really [15:36] <ashams> thelinuxer, I'm talking about nomination only for now [15:37] <thelinuxer> mgamal: were u replying to him or me ? [15:37] <mgamal> to ashams [15:37] <thelinuxer> ashams: it's the same for me, any member can nominate himself [15:37] <ashams> any member of what? [15:38] <thelinuxer> any members who passed the membership process with status approved [15:38] <ashams> guys, you keep "member" while we have a lot of memberships in here... [15:38] <mgamal> guys [15:38] <mgamal> let me clarify my idea [15:38] <ashams> plz [15:38] <mgamal> ignore core FGs for a moment [15:38] <jonathanhindi> guys, ana etl5bat, you are discussing the membership of fg ? [15:38] <mgamal> yes [15:39] <mgamal> and this will lead us to ubuntu-eg mebership [15:39] <mgamal> and thus to council [15:39] <mgamal> for open FGs [15:39] <ashams> ah [15:39] <mgamal> anyone joins [15:39] <mgamal> contributes 6 months [15:39] <mgamal> and is eligible to apply for membership [15:39] <mgamal> if their quality is bad [15:40] <mgamal> we simply would filter them out and not vote them for membership [15:40] <mgamal> for core FGs [15:40] <jonathanhindi> mgamal: +! [15:40] <mgamal> we don't need to follow this procedures [15:40] <thelinuxer> mgamal: +1 [15:40] <jonathanhindi> mgamal: +1* [15:40] <mgamal> because membership is already closed, and only good members are allowed in [15:41] <mgamal> so being a member of a core FG means you can automatically apply for Ubuntu-eg membership [15:41] <mgamal> Ubuntu-eg membership is to be approved by the council [15:41] <mgamal> that's all [15:41] <mgamal> who agrees? [15:41] <ashams> how can we measure quality then? and who are we in "we simply would filter them out and not vote them for membership" [15:42] <ashams> ? [15:43] <mgamal> the council [15:43] <ashams> +0 [15:43] <thelinuxer> are we voting now ? [15:44] <thelinuxer> ashams: can u start a vote ? [15:44] <ashams> #vote 6m at fg > membership [15:44] <meetingology> Please vote on: 6m at fg > membership [15:44] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) [15:44] <mgamal> +1 [15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from mgamal [15:44] <ashams> +0 [15:44] <meetingology> +0 received from ashams [15:44] <wazery> +1 [15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from wazery [15:44] <jonathanhindi> +1 [15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from jonathanhindi [15:45] <thelinuxer> ashams: close vote [15:45] <ashams> #endvote [15:45] <meetingology> Voting ended on: 6m at fg > membership [15:45] <meetingology> Votes for:3 Votes against:0 Abstentions:1 [15:45] <meetingology> Motion carried [15:45] <ashams> coool [15:46] <mgamal> now, which are the core FGs and what are open ones? [15:46] <ashams> mgamal, I think all fgs we agreed upon are core? [15:46] <mgamal> really? [15:47] <ashams> I guess so [15:47] <mgamal> can you remind me which were which? [15:47] <jonathanhindi> mgamal: till now we said that we will start with the core fg [15:47] <mgamal> hmmm [15:47] <mgamal> I guess we can discuss this division offline, but let's move on [15:47] <ashams> mgamal, ok, grabbing them [15:48] <ashams> PR: Marketing + Social Media + Spokespersons? [15:48] <ashams> from last meeting [15:48] <ashams> #subtopic PR: Marketing + Social Media + Spokespersons? [15:49] <mgamal> fine by me [15:49] <mgamal> any concerns? [15:49] <ashams> jonathanhindi, objected having sp inside PR [15:49] <ashams> it's irrelevant [15:49] <jonathanhindi> yes [15:49] <ashams> can we kick it out? [15:50] <ashams> vote? [15:50] <jonathanhindi> ashams: can't understand you? [15:50] <ashams> sorry, should we collect votes on this issue? [15:50] <thelinuxer> we would also need a group for inter-teams affairs :D like with other Arabic teams for instance [15:51] <ashams> movin spokespersons outside pr [15:51] <ashams> thelinuxer, that would be community [15:51] <jonathanhindi> ashams: movin spokespersons outiside marketing [15:51] <jonathanhindi> ** [15:51] <ashams> outside PR [15:52] <jonathanhindi> ashams: please name it marketing [15:52] <ashams> it's not my name, after all [15:52] <ashams> you suggest to change PR to marketin and kick SP outside it? [15:53] <ashams> marketing* [15:53] <jonathanhindi> yes [15:53] <ashams> what you think guys? [15:54] <ashams> mgamal, current FGs are: A)Support [15:54] <ashams> B)Sponsors [15:54] <ashams> C)PR: Marketing + Social Media + Spokespersons [15:54] <ashams> D)Moderators [15:54] <ashams> E)Website Maintainers [15:54] <thelinuxer> i really don't have a say in this technically they are different [15:54] <ashams> F)Bankers [15:54] <mgamal> thelinuxer [15:54] <mgamal> please weigh in [15:54] <thelinuxer> weigh in what ? [15:55] <mgamal> say why you think they're different [15:55] <jonathanhindi> thelinuxer: technically they are different social media is a part of marketing but pr is a different field [15:56] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: yes exactly what i mean [15:56] <mgamal> cool [15:56] <thelinuxer> for instance the PR should be the one dealing with ArabNet [15:56] <mgamal> we should make them separate then [15:56] <jonathanhindi> bezabt :D [15:56] <thelinuxer> while the marketing team should be trying to increase our followers with any means necessary [15:56] <jonathanhindi> thelinuxer: 3lik nour :) [15:57] <ashams> so, Marketing, PR and SP.... [15:57] <mgamal> I agree to this [15:57] <ashams> any objection before collecting vottes? [15:58] <mgamal> no [15:58] <jonathanhindi> ashams: i think sp should be under the pr because it is very related but 3ashan el remote areas we should make it different [15:58] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: i disagree ... [15:58] <jonathanhindi> i am just confusing my self. [15:58] <thelinuxer> it depends on what a spokes person means [15:59] <thelinuxer> is he someone who can represent the team in events by giving lectures ? [15:59] <thelinuxer> or is he someone who would get us sponsorship deals ? [15:59] <ashams> thelinuxer, a representative while no council members in area [16:00] <thelinuxer> representation for what ? [16:00] <ashams> that simple [16:00] <ashams> representative of the team [16:00] <thelinuxer> any approved members should be a representative of the team in general [16:01] <ashams> good point [16:01] <thelinuxer> if they are a team they should have specific responsibilities [16:01] <jonathanhindi> thelinuxer: yes i am with you in this point, Ubuntu-eg member is ubuntu-eg ambassador anywhere any time [16:03] <thelinuxer> i guess we don't really have a definition for SP team, so we should cancel it all together .. [16:03] <ashams> cool, let's do it for now [16:03] <jonathanhindi> thelinuxer: +1 to cancel the sp team [16:04] <ashams> #vote Marketing + PR (No SP) [16:04] <meetingology> Please vote on: Marketing + PR (No SP) [16:04] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) [16:04] <jonathanhindi> but any Ubuntu-Eg Approved member is an Ubuntu-Eg ambassador [16:04] <jonathanhindi> +1 [16:04] <meetingology> +1 received from jonathanhindi [16:04] <wazery> +0 [16:04] <meetingology> +0 received from wazery [16:04] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: we can write this in the membership page ... [16:05] <mgamal> +0 [16:05] <meetingology> +0 received from mgamal [16:05] <ashams> heh [16:05] <ashams> -1 [16:05] <meetingology> -1 received from ashams [16:05] <ashams> #endvote [16:05] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Marketing + PR (No SP) [16:05] <meetingology> Votes for:1 Votes against:1 Abstentions:2 [16:05] <meetingology> Deadlock, casting vote may be used [16:05] <thelinuxer> i will be the tie breaking, cool ? [16:05] <mgamal> agree [16:05] <jonathanhindi> hehe :) [16:06] <ashams> now what? [16:06] <thelinuxer> ok np let the record show my big +1 :D [16:06] <jonathanhindi> niah :_ [16:06] <thelinuxer> ashams: next item in the agenda ... [16:07] <thelinuxer> on* [16:07] <ashams> Guys, plz say why you gave +0 and what are your suggestions? [16:08] <ashams> thelinuxer, "on" istead of "in", comment: ya wad ya daqeeeq... [16:08] <thelinuxer> :) [16:08] <ashams> guys we didn't settle to anything thing in this regard so far..... [16:08] <thelinuxer> no we did [16:08] <ashams> what? [16:08] <thelinuxer> if i would be the tie breaking vote [16:09] <wazery> I have no suggestions about the sp :), I leave it for you guys [16:09] <thelinuxer> i voted +1 [16:09] <ashams> thelinuxer, that would be 2/5 [16:09] <ashams> i gave -1 [16:09] <thelinuxer> so the whole score is +1 [16:09] <mgamal> same as wazery [16:10] <thelinuxer> ashams: i don't really understand what r voting against ? what other structure you would like ? [16:10] <thelinuxer> would you* :P [16:11] <ashams> how would teams with no experienced persons make their way through [16:11] <ashams> they will need a lnamed leader [16:11] <ashams> to move the wheel [16:11] <ashams> named* [16:11] <thelinuxer> i think this unrelated to the structure itself ... [16:11] <mgamal> ashams: just like we did with the council [16:11] <thelinuxer> this is* [16:11] <mgamal> current active members can be assigned to lead FGs [16:12] <ashams> ok [16:12] <mgamal> so [16:12] <ashams> let's pass? [16:12] <mgamal> next item on the agenda? [16:12] <thelinuxer> so this structure is accepted, right ? [16:13] <ashams> yes, to me [16:13] <mgamal> same here [16:13] <thelinuxer> cool [16:13] <thelinuxer> proceed .. [16:13] <mgamal> Marketing + PR with no SP team, I am getting this right? [16:13] <thelinuxer> yes [16:13] <ashams> mgamal, would you look for the next item yourself, sorry I'm confused [16:13] <ashams> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EgyptTeam/Meetings/Agendas/2012-02-10 [16:14] <mgamal> #subtopic Eventing [16:15] <ashams> how can we increase online events? or should we do aslan? [16:15] <mgamal> ping! [16:15] <ashams> pong :-) [16:15] <mgamal> was just going to ask [16:15] <mgamal> what are online events? [16:15] <mgamal> I guess we have things like global jams [16:16] <thelinuxer> online events like ubuntu user week [16:16] <mgamal> but I can't really think of any more online events on the LoCo leevel [16:16] <thelinuxer> and ubuntu developer week [16:16] <mgamal> yes [16:16] <thelinuxer> we can have in the Arabic teams level .. [16:16] <mgamal> but the LoCo has nothing to do with these [16:16] <thelinuxer> events like this in Arabic language [16:16] <ashams> that's it, in arabic [16:16] <mgamal> except probably promoting them [16:16] <mgamal> we can do dour own events definitely [16:16] <mgamal> but this is something that can be taken in its time [16:17] <mgamal> I don't see a need for much discussion here [16:17] <ashams> postpone it? [16:17] <thelinuxer> mgamal: sure i think it can be postponed .. [16:17] <ashams> pass? [16:17] <thelinuxer> +1 [16:18] <mgamal> no+! [16:18] <mgamal> +1 [16:18] <mgamal> sorry [16:18] <ashams> ok [16:18] <ashams> #subtopic Finding fund for events. [16:18] <ashams> it doesn't work :-( [16:18] <mgamal> I don't have much to weigh in here [16:19] <ashams> we have no fund for anything [16:19] <mgamal> we probably needed Anas to tell us about it [16:19] <mgamal> we will need to make Funds [16:19] <ashams> our work on the new structure is almost useless [16:19] <ashams> unless we make events [16:19] <mgamal> why? [16:19] <ashams> which need more money [16:19] <mgamal> events need funds [16:19] <mgamal> so [16:19] <mgamal> well [16:19] <ashams> so, we need funds [16:19] <jonathanhindi> self funded [16:20] <mgamal> IMO we can fund ourselves in two ways [16:20] <jonathanhindi> minimum contribution [16:20] <mgamal> 1- Self-funding [16:20] <mgamal> 2- By getting sponsors [16:20] <jonathanhindi> mgamal: i think doing the two together is a good idea [16:20] <thelinuxer> i think funding is a tricky issue, legaly i mean [16:20] <mgamal> jonathanhindi: I never said the two are mutually exclusive [16:21] <thelinuxer> we don't want to be accused of getting foreign funds :D [16:21] <jonathanhindi> we already discussed the min-contribution before in a public meeting [16:21] <mgamal> thelinuxer: making a gam3eyya isn't illegal I think :) [16:21] <thelinuxer> mgamal: sure [16:21] <mgamal> in other words [16:21] <mgamal> members can pay voluntary monthly payments [16:21] <mgamal> they will be kept to fund team activites [16:21] <ashams> We almost can't receive funds from any organizations, simply coz they pay i to get subtracted from taxees [16:22] <ashams> it* [16:22] <jonathanhindi> so min-contribution 15 L.E from every approved member [16:22] <ashams> taxes, even [16:22] <thelinuxer> jonathanhindi: mgamal back to the collecting issue .. [16:22] <thelinuxer> we want to make more meetings online [16:23] <mgamal> definitely [16:23] <thelinuxer> how would we collect the contribution every month? [16:23] <ashams> ok, what about biannually? [16:23] <mgamal> well [16:23] <mgamal> there was one bulletpoint before funding [16:23] <mgamal> I have no idea why ashams skipped it? [16:23] <jonathanhindi> biannually for students it is nearl imposible [16:23] <mgamal> Regulating ground events, by location and term. [16:23] <jonathanhindi> imposible [16:23] <mgamal> we need to say first how the group meets [16:24] <mgamal> how frequently [16:24] <thelinuxer> mgamal: good point [16:24] <ashams> mgamal, yes I skipped it [16:24] <mgamal> monthly meeting? [16:24] <wazery> Guys aside from our topic, we should also discuss making an event before the next release, because I have a lot of ready CDs and stickers [16:24] <ashams> ok [16:24] <mgamal> wazery, let's discuss this later [16:24] <thelinuxer> lets focus on one point now [16:24] <mgamal> in Sakia :) [16:24] <mgamal> so anyway [16:24] <thelinuxer> wazery: bring CDs with you please ... [16:25] <mgamal> what's your opinion that the group makes a monthly meeting? [16:25] <wazery> thelinuxer: ok [16:25] <ashams> mgamal, +1 [16:25] <thelinuxer> u mean physical meeting ? [16:25] <mgamal> should be attended by council members and FG leaders [16:25] <mgamal> yes [16:25] <mgamal> I mean a physical meeting [16:25] <mgamal> we can just discuss, have fun, be geeks, and most importantly, collect funds :) [16:25] <thelinuxer> hmm .. [16:26] <thelinuxer> didn't we try this over and over again ? [16:26] <mgamal> we never set it in stone :) [16:26] <thelinuxer> we always have problems committing to meetings every X [16:26] <wazery> mgamal: +1 [16:26] <ashams> yes, it was never regualted [16:26] <ashams> what about 3rd friday of each month [16:26] <ashams> every* [16:27] <mgamal> what about the 1st friday of every month [16:27] <mgamal> that's easier to remember :) [16:27] <ashams> mgamal, +1 even [16:27] <thelinuxer> ashams: mgamal wazery please guys tell me how is this different from what we did before ? [16:27] <thelinuxer> how is this regulating it ? [16:27] <jonathanhindi> +1 [16:27] <mgamal> we never had a regulation to start with [16:27] <mgamal> plus [16:28] <mgamal> attendance should be mandatory for council members and group leaders [16:28] <ashams> thelinuxer, dude, we need to make it in a way or another [16:28] <thelinuxer> ok lets try this once more [16:28] <ashams> it happens everywhere [16:28] <thelinuxer> that's what i am saying tell me the way .. [16:28] <thelinuxer> ok i agree too [16:28] <mgamal> thelinuxer: now we have set dates for meetings, all we need is to discuss meeting places on the ML before we meet [16:29] <mgamal> so [16:29] <mgamal> let's take a vote? [16:29] <thelinuxer> ok i guess we will need 1 online council meeting + 1 phsyical every month , right ? [16:29] <ashams> #vote 1 physical meeting + 1 irc meeting every month? [16:29] <meetingology> Please vote on: 1 physical meeting + 1 irc meeting every month? [16:29] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) [16:30] <ashams> +1 [16:30] <meetingology> +1 received from ashams [16:30] <jonathanhindi> +1 [16:30] <meetingology> +1 received from jonathanhindi [16:30] <wazery> +1 [16:30] <meetingology> +1 received from wazery [16:30] <jonathanhindi> Guys, I have to go now [16:30] <jonathanhindi> I am sorry [16:30] <jonathanhindi> bye [16:30] <mgamal> +1 [16:30] <meetingology> +1 received from mgamal [16:30] <ashams> ok, bye [16:31] <ashams> #endvote [16:31] <meetingology> Voting ended on: 1 physical meeting + 1 irc meeting every month? [16:31] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 [16:31] <meetingology> Motion carried [16:31] <wazery> bye jonathanhindi [16:31] <mgamal> we didn't say when btw? :) [16:31] <thelinuxer> 1st and 3rd fridays ? [16:31] <mgamal> 1st friday every month for physical, + 3rd friday for IRC? [16:31] <wazery> 1st for both [16:32] <ashams> mgamal, can it be 1st for irc and 3rd for physical? [16:32] <thelinuxer> wazery: it's a good idea actually ... [16:32] <thelinuxer> tiring for the council but good : [16:32] <thelinuxer> :D [16:32] <mgamal> why ashams ? [16:32] <ashams> so, we pre-discuss things on irc then we meet to finish it [16:33] <mgamal> we still can do that if it's the other way round? :) [16:33] <ashams> +1 [16:34] <thelinuxer> doesn't really matter pic one guys, bas fe3lan I like wazery's suggestion [16:35] <ashams> thelinuxer, why? [16:35] <thelinuxer> because if i am in the council I would like to finish the meetings in only one day [16:35] <thelinuxer> like today for instance we are meeting [16:35] <wazery> guys, I need to go [16:35] <thelinuxer> then we have a communitty outing [16:35] <ashams> thelinuxer, cool [16:36] <ashams> I +1 it [16:36] <thelinuxer> wazery: vote for this then go [16:36] <ashams> wazery, ok, bye dude [16:36] <wazery> thelinuxer: ok [16:36] <thelinuxer> ashams: start the vote [16:36] <mgamal> vote what exactly? [16:36] <ashams> #vote both meeting on 1st friday? [16:36] <meetingology> Please vote on: both meeting on 1st friday? [16:36] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) [16:36] <wazery> +1 [16:36] <meetingology> +1 received from wazery [16:37] <thelinuxer> mgamal: physical and IRC in the same day [16:37] <wazery> meet you in sakia iaA [16:37] <thelinuxer> wazery: ok bye [16:37] <mgamal> -1 [16:37] <meetingology> -1 received from mgamal [16:37] <ashams> bye man :D [16:38] <ashams> haha [16:38] <mgamal> please vote guys [16:38] <ashams> mgamal, why? [16:38] <thelinuxer> ashams: finish the vote! [16:38] <ashams> mgamal, why you -1'd ? [16:38] <mgamal> probably won't have much time for the meetings this way [16:38] <ashams> thelinuxer, one sec, let's lestin to mgamal 's logic [16:39] <mgamal> as you can see wazery and jon already left because they probably need that time to reach Sakia :) [16:39] <mgamal> so it confines the time for the IRC meeting [16:39] <ashams> I agree with this [16:39] <ashams> -1 [16:39] <meetingology> -1 received from ashams [16:39] <ashams> #endvote [16:39] <meetingology> Voting ended on: both meeting on 1st friday? [16:39] <meetingology> Votes for:1 Votes against:2 Abstentions:0 [16:39] <meetingology> Motion denied [16:39] <thelinuxer> that's decided too [16:40] <ashams> so 1st and 3rd fridays? [16:40] <thelinuxer> yes [16:40] <thelinuxer> can we list some action items ? [16:40] <mgamal> 1st friday physical, 3rd IRC [16:40] <ashams> mgamal, this month is a special case? [16:40] <mgamal> yes [16:40] <ashams> ok [16:40] <ashams> +1 [16:40] <thelinuxer> starting march isA [16:40] <ashams> thelinuxer, ? [16:41] <ashams> ok [16:41] <thelinuxer> action items .. [16:41] <thelinuxer> i guess we all agreed upon the core FGs [16:41] <thelinuxer> i will create these core FGs and make the council the owner [16:41] <ashams> don't know [16:41] <ashams> ok [16:41] <thelinuxer> what do u mean don't know ? [16:42] <mgamal> we still haven't completely agreed about which ones will be core ans which will be open [16:42] <mgamal> we'll discuss this when we meet [16:42] <ashams> have we agreed on marketing + PR? [16:42] <thelinuxer> yes [16:42] <ashams> ok [16:42] <thelinuxer> and i think graphics(not sure if we discussed this) [16:42] <ashams> I'm not comfortable with fully open FGs [16:43] <ashams> Open teams never helped [16:43] <thelinuxer> and i think we should start asking people to join these teams ASAP [16:43] <thelinuxer> ashams: we said we will have both [16:43] <ashams> you'll get teams filled with ppl but noone do nothing [16:43] <ashams> it won't help this way [16:44] <mgamal> yes, but this will create a closed hierarchy in the community [16:44] <ashams> we need some regulation to let ppl in [16:44] <mgamal> no [16:44] <mgamal> we don't [16:44] <ashams> mgamal, it's not closed, let's make a procedure [16:44] <mgamal> we can discuss this offline [16:44] <ashams> we can't invite ppl without discussing this [16:44] <thelinuxer> ok we can continue this discussion on the mailing list too .. [16:44] <mgamal> we have to discuss this tonight [16:45] <mgamal> in the outing [16:45] <mgamal> okay? [16:45] <ashams> mgamal, I won't come :( [16:45] <mgamal> mailing list then [16:45] <ashams> ok [16:45] <mgamal> start a thread and we would discuss [16:45] <ashams> ok [16:45] <thelinuxer> cool [16:45] <thelinuxer> here is what i am worried about .. [16:46] <thelinuxer> we only have 2 month, and the process should be running before the next elections [16:46] <ashams> by "Regulating ground events, by location and term" I meant making events like sessions or lectures or so, not just meetings [16:46] <thelinuxer> so we need to finalize the parts related to the membership/FGs ASAP [16:47] <ashams> thelinuxer, yep [16:48] <thelinuxer> ok i think this meeting is adjourned [16:48] <thelinuxer> we can continue on the mailing list [16:48] <ashams> end? [16:48] <ashams> ok [16:48] <ashams> mgamal, ? [16:48] <mgamal> end [16:48] <ashams> #endmeeting [16:48] <meetingology> Meeting ended Fri Feb 10 16:48:47 2012 UTC. [16:48] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-eg/2012/ubuntu-eg.2012-02-10-15.15.moin.txt [16:48] <meetingology> Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-eg/2012/ubuntu-eg.2012-02-10-15.15.html [16:49] <thelinuxer> i like the output from this bot! [16:49] <thelinuxer> nice! [16:49] <mgamal> yeah! *me gusta* [16:49] <ashams> yeah, I like it too [16:50] <thelinuxer> mgamal: lool [16:50] <thelinuxer> ok here is what we did wrong [16:50] <thelinuxer> meeting topic is wrong [16:50] <thelinuxer> and all topics are sub topics .. [16:50] <ashams> no problem will fix it :) [16:50] <thelinuxer> we should do better next time :D [16:50] <thelinuxer> don't fix it [16:50] <ashams> isA [16:51] <thelinuxer> it doesn't matter we were learning [16:51] <thelinuxer> mgamal: 7asaly el 3esha we anzel 3ala tool isA [16:51] <mgamal> ok [16:51] <thelinuxer> eshta [16:51] <mgamal> I am in Agouza, so I'll be in Sakia in no time isA [16:51] <thelinuxer> bye ashams catch u later [16:51] <thelinuxer> mgamal: cool [16:52] <mgamal> bye everyone [16:52] <ashams> thelinuxer, bye :-) [16:52] <ashams> mgamal, bye [16:52] <mgamal> ashams: bye [16:52] <ashams> mgamal, bye |