File size: 47,423 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac [14:57] <asac> fta2: libxul-embedding == 1.9 .... libxul-embedding-1.9.1 == 1.9.1 [14:57] <fta> asac, ? [14:57] <asac> thats at least my understanding for now [14:57] <asac> 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? [14:58] <fta> nope, it doesn't work [14:58] <asac> fta: what doesnt work? [14:59] <fta> i build with the 1.9 sdk, so with libxul-embedding but once installed, if i have 1.9.1, this is what is used [14:59] <fta> bug 295490 [14:59] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 295490 in liferea "Liferea doesn't start with "Aborted" error." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295490 [14:59] <asac> oh [14:59] <asac> fta: yeah. fix maxVersion [14:59] <fta> maxVersion in liferea ? [14:59] <asac> 1.9.* was wrong ... should have been 1.9.0.* [15:00] <asac> yeah [15:00] <asac> in the glue code [15:00] <fta> oh [15:00] <fta> cool [15:00] <asac> let me get it ;) [15:00] <asac> sigh. my network is soooooooooooo slow [15:00] <asac> 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? [15:00] <asac> oops [15:00] <asac> 1293B/s 21min21 [15:01] <asac> i think i have to reset my router [15:01] <asac> bb [15:02] <asac_> ok lets try ;) [15:03] <asac_> that worked ;) [15:03] <asac_> 2s [15:04] <asac_> fta: ./src/mozilla/mozsupport.cpp [15:04] <asac_> http://paste.ubuntu.com/72380/ [15:04] <asac_> ;) [15:04] <asac_> maybe we should detect that during built [15:06] <fta> damn, this could have saved me some hours :( [15:07] <asac_> fta: the other way would have been to make ls /etc/gre.d/ first spit out the 1.9.0 conf [15:07] <asac_> and not the 1.9.1 conf [15:07] <asac_> (which i expect is the case for you?) [15:07] <asac_> hmm [15:07] <asac_> fta: what does ls /etc/gre.d give you? [15:08] <fta> 1.9.0.4.system.conf 1.9.1b2pre.system.conf 2.0a1pre.system.conf libxul0d.conf [15:08] <fta> 1.9.1b2pre-restored.system.conf 1.9a8pre.system.conf.dpkg-bak firefox.conf [15:08] <asac_> a bit strange. xulrunner just tests file-by-file and first match is used [15:09] <asac_> so 1.9.0.4.system.conf should have been used. not sure if ls always gives the same order as 'C' dir listings [15:09] <asac_> though [15:09] <fta> i thought it preferred the newest version, which would make sense [15:10] <asac_> fta: from what i know it doesnt prefer newest [15:10] <asac_> e.g. in the past i had to make 1.9.0 configs illegal to test with 1.9.1 [15:11] <asac_> personally, I agree that newest would make more sense. we should look into fixing this [15:12] <asac_> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#156 === asac_ is now known as asac [15:13] <asac> fta: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#527 [15:13] <asac> so its really just readdir and then match first that suites [15:14] <fta> in my case, 1.9.1 always wins [15:14] <asac> fta: please do a strace -eopen -f liferea [15:15] <asac> and check whether 1.9.0.4.conf is actually looked at [15:15] <asac> otherwise readdir doesnt return in alphabetic order, but inode or something [15:21] <asac> fta: #include <sys/types.h> [15:21] <asac> #include <dirent.h> [15:21] <asac> fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72386/ [15:21] <asac> ;) [15:21] <asac> fta: try that code [15:21] <asac> and see which order it gives [15:21] <asac> here it seems like its "random" ;) [15:21] <asac> most likely your 1.9.1 preceeds the 1.9.0 stuff [15:22] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/72387/ [15:22] <asac> ^^ thats my garbage struck dir [16:09] <fta> i'm fighting against a scons [16:15] <armin76> asac: any idea about my bug? :( [16:23] <asac> armin76: which? [16:23] <asac> armin76: i think you never came back when i looked at a bug ;) [16:23] <asac> but now i forgot [16:24] <armin76> yeah, had to run fsck on a reiser [16:24] <armin76> gentoo bug 234110 [16:24] <ubottu> Bug 234110 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/234110 is private [16:24] <armin76> meh [16:24] <armin76> bug gentoo 234110 [16:24] <armin76> stupid bot [16:25] <armin76> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234110 [16:25] <asac> heh [16:25] <ubottu> bugs.gentoo.org bug 234110 in Applications "www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0* USE=xulrunner - hangs on first start" [Normal,New] [16:25] <asac> armin76: i would guess that those folks have a dirty install [16:25] <armin76> why? [16:25] <asac> its one of those things that regularly pop up [16:25] <asac> e.g. nothing works -> reinstall works [16:25] <asac> -> compreg.dat in pkglibdir [16:25] <asac> or some other cruft [16:26] <armin76> saw the strace? [16:26] <asac> armin76: they should attach a strace -eopen -f [16:26] <asac> no [16:26] <asac> only see a huge list of config options ;) [16:26] <armin76> comment 19 [16:27] <asac> yeah still [16:27] <asac> its meaningless [16:27] <asac> when people strip strace they always post unimportant parts ;) [16:27] <asac> hmm [16:28] <asac> armin76: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so [16:28] <asac> whats taht? [16:28] <asac> debug build? [16:29] <asac> armin76: they should attach a complete strace -eopen -f firefox to the bug [16:30] <armin76> dunno, i have that file, want it? :D [16:30] <armin76> k, i'll say so, thanks [16:30] <asac> armin76: you ahve that file? [16:30] <asac> armin76: is that a debug build?` [16:30] <armin76> nop [16:30] <armin76> e [16:31] <asac> armin76: how do you install stuff? [16:31] <armin76> make install? :) [16:32] <asac> armin76: well. i wouldnt trust make install to do the right thing for mozilla ;) [16:32] <asac> armin76: that file should be wrapped into libxul.so [16:32] <asac> and not be there [16:32] <asac> dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep pip [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.manifest [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.jar [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipnss.xpt [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pippki.xpt [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipboot.xpt [16:32] <asac> dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep so$ [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libpyxpcom.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libjemalloc.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxpcom.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libmozjs.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/python/xpcom/_xpcom.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libimgicon.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libdbusservice.so [16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libpyloader.so [16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so [16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libunixprintplugin.so [16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libnullplugin.so [16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libnssckbi.so [16:33] <asac> sry ;) [16:33] <asac> armin76: which configure flags do you pass? [16:33] <asac> --enable-optimize [16:33] <asac> --disable-debug [16:33] <asac> is important [16:33] <armin76> sec [16:34] <asac> fta: do you have a built tree lying around for xul 1.9? [16:34] <armin76> http://rafb.net/p/5ar7KI50.html [16:35] <fta> asac, hm, not sure, i trashed a lot of my stuff to make some room for chromium [16:35] <fta> asac, why ? [16:36] <asac> fta: just wondere where libpipboot.so would be lying around in it ;) [16:36] <asac> building my own 1.9.0 stuff now [16:36] <asac> fta: e.g. gentoo ships /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so [16:36] <asac> we dont have that [16:36] <asac> ;) [16:36] <asac> we have pipboot.xpt [16:36] <asac> which makes sense and i assume that we have it in libxul.so [16:36] <asac> armin76: do you have libxul.so at all? [16:37] <asac> armin76: urgh. you asked for a paste of the output? ... thats really really long ;) ... attaching would have been more readable i guess [16:38] <fta> asac, i ship components/libpipboot.so in sm2 and tb3, not in xul1.9*/ff3* [16:39] <fta> i see i have it in my openkomodo 5 tree too [16:39] <asac> oh [16:39] <asac> --disable-libxul [16:39] <asac> armin76: ^^ why that? [16:39] <asac> fta: yeah. i think its a libxul component [16:39] <fta> do we need that? [16:39] <asac> so those that dont use libxul, still have it [16:40] <asac> fta: no :) [16:40] <asac> fta: gentoo is doing something a bit wrong imo [16:40] <asac> --with-default-mozilla-five-home=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 [16:40] <asac> i dont think that that is still needed either [16:40] <armin76> asac: not sure [16:41] <asac> armin76: anyway. lets wait for the strace [16:41] <armin76> asac: yup, i have it [16:42] <asac> armin76: you have libxul.so ? [16:42] <armin76> yup [16:42] <armin76> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so [16:42] <armin76> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/lib/libxul.so [16:42] <asac> armin76: and also the .so files? [16:42] <asac> e.g. libpipboot.so [16:43] <armin76> yup [16:43] <fta> booouh, that's not upstream scheme, it looks like ice* [16:43] <asac> armin76: what size does libxul.so have for you? [16:43] <asac> fta: huh? [16:44] <fta> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/ [16:44] <asac> fta: i dont think that debian ships all components + libxul [16:44] <asac> fta: yeah ... a bunch of distros do it that way [16:44] <armin76> asac: 132k [16:45] <asac> fta: its a bit of a shame and alrewady caused discussion when people kept using -rpath [16:45] <fta> i'm facing the same problem with chromium [16:45] <asac> armin76: yeah thats tiny. a [16:45] <asac> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18201928 2008-11-12 19:49 /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so [16:45] <asac> armin76: but is in line with the --disable-libxul thing [16:46] <asac> not sure why there is libxul.so at all when you built that way [16:46] <asac> armin76: but its definitly not supported upstream [16:46] <armin76> i'm not sure where does the --disable-libxul thing comes... [16:46] <asac> fta: what do chromium folks do? [16:46] <armin76> oh, i see it [16:47] <asac> armin76: have you looked at what we pass as configure flags? [16:47] <armin76> yup, in fact i think i copied it from there :P [16:47] <fta> asac, so far, nothing. binaries are just in the objdir and all libs are static, i'm trying to change that [16:47] <asac> armin76: oh ;) [16:48] <asac> fta: does upstream want to provide ABI tracked libs? [16:48] <asac> otherwise linking them into main binary makes a bit of sense [16:48] <fta> good question [16:48] <fta> the binary is huge [16:48] <fta> > 250MB [16:48] <asac> fta: is that a problem? [16:48] <asac> (on its own ;)) [16:49] <asac> fta: i think we would like to keep v8 in a system lib [16:49] <fta> well, no, in the sense that it runs [16:50] <fta> asac, i already landed some system libs: http://codereview.chromium.org/10626 [16:50] <fta> but most create regressions [16:52] <asac> fta: why are your comments empty? [16:53] <fta> asac, because i just updated the patch [16:53] <asac> ok [16:53] <fta> i like that site, it's nice to do patch reviewing [16:54] <fta> imho, far better than bugzilla [16:54] <asac> yean [16:54] <fta> google splits bugs and patches [16:56] <fta> bugzilla should learn from this ;) [16:56] <fta> [reed], ^^ [16:56] <fta> mconnor, ^^ [16:59] <asac> armin76: what does gentoo do on unemerge? does it track files installed by make install? [17:02] <armin76> asac: it uses a sandbox system, so it keeps track of everything merged to the real system [17:03] <asac> armin76: do you ship .autoreg? [17:05] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/RMgPlv30.html [17:06] <fta> damn, patching those scons files is too much python in unknown territory. i need to step back a little bit. [17:06] <asac> /etc/gre.d/1.8.1.18.conf [17:06] <asac> ? [17:07] <armin76> hrm...sec [17:07] <asac> ok [17:07] <asac> 1.9 is further down [17:07] <asac> armin76: where is ffox 3? [17:07] <asac> (only see mozilla-firefox) [17:08] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/s48RV614.html and mozilla-firefox is ff3 [17:10] <asac> /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/.autoreg [17:10] <asac> so does that get installed by make instakk [17:10] <asac> ? [17:11] <armin76> sec [17:13] <armin76> asac: yes [17:14] <armin76> was checking if it got installed by some patch, but nope [17:15] <fta> seems impossible to build shared and static at the same time with scons :( [17:16] * asac wonders why scons is considered better than automake ;) [17:16] <fta> all in python [17:16] <fta> which is good.... if you like python [17:17] <asac> i dont see how that can qualify as better [17:17] <asac> i think they think that its better because of windows [17:17] <asac> well ... at least those that think that python build system is better ;) [17:18] <fta> scons brings in even more magic than make, debhelper and cdbs combined [17:18] <asac> i hate magic [17:18] <asac> well ... if its pure declarative its good [17:18] <asac> but thats not magic [17:19] <fta> i meant it's even more obscure [17:19] <asac> like maven for java [17:19] <asac> compared to ant [17:19] <asac> lol [17:19] <asac> http://crupp.de/?p=15 [17:19] <asac> rewad the first paragraph [17:19] <asac> the guy said he used autotools by ... [17:20] <asac> "I used hand-written makefiles...." [17:20] <asac> So I looked for alternatives, and decided to settle on SCons instead of GNU Autotools [17:20] <asac> he [17:20] <asac> "And now I decided to revert my decision. Why? Because SCons is far more complicated than it looks, while autoconf/automake is far more simple than it seems." [17:20] <asac> good guy [17:20] <fta> patching v8 build system promises to be a challenge [17:27] <asac> @time [17:27] <ubottu> Current time in Etc/UTC: November 15 2008, 17:27:00 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days [17:27] <asac> @time berlin [17:27] <ubottu> Current time in Europe/Berlin: November 15 2008, 18:27:03 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days [17:39] <armin76> asac: porting ff to arm? :D [18:04] <fta> armin76, i monitor the arm builds, so far, xul just failed: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [18:05] <fta> -so far [18:06] <fta> i was about to say, so far, xul is waiting for gnome, but not anymore [18:07] <armin76> fta: same as hppa did.... [18:08] <armin76> failing on cookie stuff wrt warning treated as err [18:09] <fta> like for hppa, i don't have access to arm, so i don't plan to blindly try to fix it [18:11] <armin76> may want to file a bug, then :) [18:12] <armin76> fta: or filter -Werror :) [18:13] <fta> no, not the good cure [18:14] <armin76> in fact [18:14] <armin76> mozilla bug 417345 [18:14] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 417345 in XPCOM "build broken on sparc" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417345 [18:14] <armin76> ah, now that i remember [18:15] <armin76> i did a "patch" for that [18:15] <armin76> mozilla bug 436133 [18:15] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 [18:16] <armin76> guess arm needs to be there as well :) [18:21] <armin76> asac: see the gentoo bug plz [18:22] <fta> probably but i have no idea how arm and armel differs in term of flags [18:23] * fta is going to lurk in #ubuntu-arm for a while [18:58] <jdhore1> What's going on with Firefox 3.0.4 in any version of Ubuntu (specifically Hardy)? [19:15] <armin76> omg [19:15] <armin76> asac: OMG BUMB! [20:02] <asac> jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon [20:02] <jdhore1> ah [20:02] <asac> armin76: the strace -eopen -f would be helpful regardless of whether it works or not [20:03] <asac> armin76: you have fixes for the alignment issues? [20:03] <asac> we see them on arm now [20:03] <asac> (armel) [20:04] <armin76> asac: see mozilla bug 436133 [20:04] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 [20:04] <armin76> asac: i punted --disable-libxul and now it works according to the guy [20:05] <asac> armin76: hmm. [20:05] <asac> armin76: still . i think he has garbage in his pkglibdir [20:06] <asac> most likely he will run into issues sooner or later again [20:15] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/PiQoTI26.html [20:15] <armin76> -r0 is with --disable-libxul, -r1 is without [20:15] <asac> yeah [20:15] <asac> armin76: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72517/ [20:16] <armin76> asac: i don't know about armel, you guys should ask if its safe to run -Wcast-align on arm or not [20:16] <armin76> s/arm/armel [20:17] <asac> armin76: who would be able to tell that thats "safe" i ngeneral? [20:17] <asac> i mean if it was safe then its a gcc bug that it warns at all ;) [20:17] <armin76> whoever maintains arm on ubuntu or debian [20:18] <asac> well. debian just did it i think [20:18] <asac> not sure if they seriously considered whether its safe or not ;) [20:18] <armin76> look the patch i did [20:19] <asac> yeah [20:19] <asac> easy enough to do [20:19] <asac> INTEL_CC? [20:20] <asac> who supports that? ;) [20:20] <armin76> hppa,ia64 and sparc give errors if stuff is unaligned [20:20] <asac> sure [20:20] <armin76> i didn't know arm did as well [20:20] <asac> armin76: armel does apparently [20:20] <asac> armin76: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [20:20] <armin76> yup [20:20] <asac> thats where i have the paste from [20:21] <asac> wonder if the code could be fixed to properly case [20:21] <asac> cast [20:22] <armin76> you are better than me at that [20:23] <armin76> the difference between debian and ubuntu is that debian isn't using -Werror [20:23] <armin76> while ubuntu does [20:23] <asac> i remember that they had the same issues on armel when it popped up [20:23] <asac> i think they then just deliberately passed -Wno-error [20:23] <asac> not sure if its really a gcc default [20:25] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.h#193 [20:25] <armin76> -CXXFLAGS += $(WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS) <- thats from debian [20:25] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.cpp#142 [20:25] <asac> armin76: thats in xulrunner right? [20:26] <armin76> yes [20:27] <armin76> they're just doing that on xulrunner-1.9.0.3/netwerk/cookie/src/Makefile.in [20:28] <asac> char mAutoBuf[sizeof(Impl) + (kAutoBufSize - 1) * sizeof(void*)]; [20:29] <armin76> asac: and btw, sparc is still sigbusing [20:30] <asac> armin76: in cookie? [20:31] <armin76> no... [20:31] * armin76 thinks asac has really bad memory [20:31] <asac> i can confirm that ;) [20:31] <armin76> mozilla bug 448658 [20:31] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 448658 in Phishing Protection "nsUrlClassifierDBService has bad alignment, causes SIGBUS" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448658 [20:31] <asac> now i remember ;) [20:32] <asac> armin76: but dont remember everythign. didnt we fix that? [20:32] <asac> ;) [20:33] <fta> our gcc has -Wformat -Wformat-security by default now [20:33] <fta> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags [20:34] <armin76> asac: not too much, you made me try with some patch that just delayed the sigbus 45 mins [20:35] <fta> on sparc ? [20:35] <armin76> yeah, see that bug [20:35] <asac> armin76: what was that patch? [20:36] <asac> did i just paste that or post it somewhere? [20:36] <armin76> one like debian's [20:36] <armin76> let me see the logs [20:42] <armin76> asac: you pasted me a patch, and then i saw the debian bug, and you told me that was the patch you pasted [20:44] <armin76> asac: then you got stuck in the canada thing, but you mainly said that with 45 mins you could live with it, i filed that bug at upstream's bugzilla and you didn't say anything after that [20:45] <asac> oh thats long time ;) [20:47] <armin76> asac: then we talked about it at the end of september, but you didn't said anything new [20:49] <armin76> i just asked you if you'd think 3.0.2 will sigbus, since it was released at that time [20:49] <armin76> and it did, so... [20:49] <armin76> asac: btw, bumb! [20:49] <armin76> why you didn't bumb 3.0.4 yet!!!! [20:50] <asac> armin76: in jaunty -> my lazyness in holiday mode [20:50] <asac> everywhere else: [20:50] <asac> 1:02 < asac> jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon [20:50] <asac> armin76: ^^ [20:50] <asac> armin76: the lines dont match anymore :( [20:51] <armin76> heh [20:51] <armin76> go fix the sigbus on sparc :P [20:52] <asac> looking ;) [20:52] <asac> armin76: is it still the same? [20:54] <armin76> asac: considering that the file(nsurlclassifierdbservice.cpp) hasn't been changed since 25th august, i'd say yes [20:54] <armin76> well, it got changed today [20:54] <asac> armin76: the lines dont match though [20:55] <armin76> ah [20:55] <armin76> the patch fails? [20:55] <asac> no ... the lines in the backtrace dont match anything sensible in the code ;) [20:56] <asac> at lesta the nsTArray line matches ;) [20:56] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#590 [20:57] <armin76> okay, let me run it again [20:57] <armin76> but i saw at the logs that you told me it didn't make any sense [20:57] <asac> yeah ;) [20:57] <asac> at least i found the line where the static cast happens [20:57] <asac> (i think) [20:58] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#182 [20:59] <asac> hmm. so what does new Type ... do? [20:59] <asac> (e.g. wihtout ()) [21:00] <asac> new (static_cast<void *>(e)) E; [21:00] <asac> what does that do :)? [21:00] <armin76> you ask me? :P [21:00] <asac> without assigning it anywhere :/ [21:00] <asac> fta: ^^ ;) [21:01] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#178 [21:04] <asac> fta: any clue if the cast implicitly binds the constructed thing to "e" = [21:04] <asac> = [21:04] <asac> ? [21:05] <fta> nope, i fried my brain earlier today inside a SConstruct file [21:10] <asac> something more simple ;) .... cout ... iostream doesnt have that? [21:11] <asac> ah ... namespace ;) [21:16] * armin76 is upgrading to jaunty [21:32] <asac> armin76: dont know. if you have a up-to-date backtrace of sigbus please show [21:32] <armin76> yeah [21:32] <armin76> gdb doesn't seem to run fine on jaunty, trying intrepid now [21:50] <asac> armin76: heh. now our toolchain guy kicks me for fixing armel + xulrunner [21:51] <asac> funny thing is that our toolchain needs xulrunner to bootstrap ;) [21:51] <armin76> you fixed something? :D [21:51] <asac> armin76: no he wants me to fix that [21:51] <armin76> thats interesting [21:51] <armin76> ah [21:51] <fta> xulrunner used in the bootstrap ??? [21:51] <asac> i think they made an ugly hack and copied xulrunner binaries from debian for the bootstrapping ;) [21:51] <armin76> s/for/to [21:51] <asac> fta: yeah :) [21:51] <fta> what for? [21:52] <asac> fta: its not required to be functional, but its required to build the huge gcc package [21:52] <armin76> i can't remember how i made the backtraces... [21:52] <asac> e.g. gcj provides a plugin ;) [21:52] <fta> lol [21:52] <asac> armin76: you need dbgsym ;) [21:52] <armin76> yeah...but its not available for sparc [21:52] <asac> fta: this reminds me. we have a new approach -> we go for -dbg packages again for jaunty [21:53] <fta> asac, already done in 3.1 [21:53] <asac> fta: good [21:53] <armin76> i think i used gentoo for them...hrm... [21:53] <asac> fta: so we have xulrunner-1.9-dbg there? [21:53] <asac> err [21:53] <fta> i was sick about missing dbgsym in ppa :( [21:53] <asac> 1.9.1 [21:53] <asac> ;) [21:53] <asac> fta: i am almost dead because of that ;) [21:53] <fta> yes, xul + ff [21:54] <armin76> so it wasn't jaunty, it was ff sigbusing at the start :D [21:54] <asac> armin76: heh [21:54] <asac> armin76: somewhere else? [21:55] <asac> fta: well done [21:55] <asac> fta: are they ok? [21:55] <fta> yes [21:55] <armin76> asac: no clue, no dbg symbols [21:55] <asac> (i assume you already used them with success) [21:55] <asac> armin76: for intrepid there should be dbgsym packages [21:55] <asac> its still in the main component [21:56] <asac> err i mean in intrepid branch (not -updates/-security) [21:56] <armin76> for sparc? [21:56] <asac> yeah [21:56] <asac> unless it didnt build at all [21:57] <asac> Alpha 1 freeze ahead [21:57] <asac> ;) [21:57] <asac> funny [21:58] <asac> fta: how many uploads did you do for jaunty? [21:58] <fta> none [21:58] <asac> same same [21:58] <asac> http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html [21:59] <asac> appears to be easy food in universe [21:59] <fta> persia wants fennec in REVU, but i need xul 1.9.1 in universe 1st [21:59] <asac> everything green [21:59] <asac> in REVU? [21:59] <fta> yep [21:59] <asac> what kind of idea is that? [22:00] <fta> no idea, it seems he wants motu to have a look 1st [22:00] <asac> create an empty ubuntu-dev branch ... request merge there for review ;) [22:00] <fta> ah? [22:00] <fta> eh? [22:00] <armin76> hardy sparc Failed to build [22:00] <armin76> fail [22:00] <asac> fta: if he wants the ability for motus to take a look and discuss the packaging, we can do that in launchpad code review [22:01] <asac> no need to use REVU for bzr packages [22:01] <fta> tell him [22:01] <asac> fta: i can do that. though i would rather not put that through motu [22:01] <asac> fta: isnt mozillateam maintainer? [22:01] <fta> it is [22:02] <asac> fta: where is the policy for NEW packages in universe? [22:02] <asac> so trolls are on wiki.ubuntu.com [22:03] <asac> all russian on start page [22:03] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ [22:04] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Packaging%20it%20yourself [22:04] <fta> it means "This page is created for people living in Uzbekistan." [22:04] <asac> fta: ^^ [22:04] <asac> ok sounds at least a bit honourable ;) [22:05] <armin76> asac: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/firefox-3.0 <- i don't see the dbgsym packages [22:05] <asac> fta: ok i dont like the idea to just ignore that policy (though i did in the past for sure - unknowingly) [22:05] <asac> fta: i will talk to MOTU leaders about adapting that policy to allow review of bzr branches through merges to empty branches [22:06] <asac> maybe we should test if that works [22:06] <asac> armin76: they are not there. l00ser [22:06] <armin76> die! [22:06] <asac> armin76: sec [22:06] <asac> armin76: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes [22:07] <asac> adjust the apt lines !!!! [22:07] <asac> ;) [22:07] <asac> i guess that dbgsym archive should be added to software repositories [22:08] <asac> in update manager UI [22:08] <armin76> asac: there's no sparc binaries! [22:08] * armin76 shoots asac [22:08] <asac> hoho [22:08] <armin76> http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/universe/f/firefox-3.0/ [22:08] <asac> now i really feel ashame ;) [22:08] * asac shoots around too [22:08] <fta> i can't push it to revu if xul 1.9.1 is not in 1st [22:08] <asac> fta: heh ;) [22:08] <asac> fta: right [22:09] <fta> it's not that i don't want to, it's a dep [22:09] <asac> fta: so basically this means that xul 1.9.1 has to go through REVU too ;) [22:09] <asac> see how that makes sense [22:09] <fta> oh god [22:09] <asac> fta: will revu complain if you upload with unfullfilled debs? [22:09] <asac> deps [22:10] <asac> or will reviewers just be pissed if they cannot "test" on their own? [22:10] <fta> revu itself no, but reviewers most probably [22:10] <asac> fta: well. reviewers should review not test ;) [22:10] <asac> if they want to test they can do ppa [22:10] <fta> btw, i only used revu twice, it was an horrible experience [22:11] <asac> fta: yeah ;) [22:11] <fta> i had to beg for weeks for reviews [22:11] <asac> fta: well. fennec will be quick i am sure [22:11] <armin76> lol [22:11] <asac> but that isnt the point [22:11] <asac> those are no MOTU packages ;) [22:11] <armin76> who can it beeeeee now! [22:11] <asac> those are MT packages and its understood that there isnt much know-how in MOTU [22:14] <asac> fta: how lintian clean are our packages :) :-P [22:14] <asac> ? [22:14] <fta> i guess for xul, it's ugly.. the usr/share vs usr/lib 1st [22:14] <fta> fennec should be quite clean [22:15] <fta> let me try it [22:15] <asac> fta: but fennec ships everything in usr.lib too [22:15] <asac> fta: we should add overrides [22:15] <asac> if we go through REVU i dont want people to start complaining about this kind of stuff [22:15] <asac> that would give me too much heart-pain for sure [22:17] <fta> just 2: [22:17] <fta> W: fennec source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.0) [22:17] <fta> W: fennec: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fennec === mib_wug8ke is now known as asac_the_bumber [22:17] <fta> i don't see the point of a man page for fennec [22:18] <asac> thats ok [22:18] <asac> those dont need to be dealt with [22:18] <asac_the_bumber> you guys packaging fennec? [22:18] <asac> its all there [22:19] <fta> for months, i packaged it in june [22:19] <asac_the_bumber> why? is it fun? :D [22:21] <fta> asac, oh, i want to close mozilla-devscripts 0.11 before i start new devs, could you push it in jaunty for me? [22:21] <asac> its fun + its a proof of concept thing for more complex xulapps [22:21] <asac> fta: what are the changes? [22:22] <fta> asac, quite a lot: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72566/ [22:22] <asac> fta: btw, i was a bit scared during this security update because i didnt keep my eyes on whether we took extra care that orig tarballs are 100% backward compatible (e.g. because of the artwork) [22:22] <asac> fta: so we should definitly take extra care, that whatever we do with the tarballs, they should be compatible ;) [22:22] <asac_the_bumber> permet à tous Bumb [22:22] <asac> so we can use the same for hardy+intrepid+jaunty [22:23] <fta> asac, i think it is [22:24] <asac> fta: i think it is too. just as a reminder that we should keep that in mind ;) [22:24] <asac_the_bumber> Fennec utilisations xul 1.9.1, n'est-ce pas? [22:24] <asac> yeah [22:24] <asac> oui [22:24] <asac> the only word i know ;) [22:24] <asac_the_bumber> yay, ASAC sait français: D [22:25] <asac> asac_the_bumber: so do you have a better backtrace? [22:25] <fta> lol, -sait+connait [22:25] <asac> dico [22:25] <fta> -sait+connait le [22:25] <asac> dicet [22:26] <asac> from me the "latin" n00b ;) [22:26] <asac_the_bumber> ASAC: il ne s'est pas écrasé encore, de manière surprenante, c'est avec 3.0.2 [22:26] <fta> is that from google translate ? [22:26] <asac> please stop non-english languages [22:26] <asac_the_bumber> lol [22:26] <asac> i have a bug open where the reporter uses google translate from russian [22:27] <asac> and insisted that its good to do that and that it would be harsh not to proceed [22:27] <asac_the_bumber> fta: this thing has a translator embedded [22:27] <asac_the_bumber> asac: i said that it didn't crash yet [22:28] <asac_the_bumber> and that i'm using 3.0.2 until the system is upgraded [22:28] <fta> asac, so, m-d, can i close it ? [22:28] * armin76 tries to build fennec [22:28] <asac> fta: you can always close ;) [22:29] <asac> i have no feature requests for now [22:29] <asac> except that i would like to move our branches to use in-package variables to define the orig behaviour [22:29] <asac> but thats most likely for 0.12 [22:29] <asac> and we stilll need to support the apps for the old branches of course [22:30] <asac> armin76: take our orig [22:31] <asac> armin76: are you using 3.0.2 without the original patch? [22:31] <asac> (i assume you have it ;)) [22:31] <armin76> what original patch? [22:31] <asac> armin76: well. the obvious one ;) [22:31] <armin76> debian's? [22:31] <asac> the one debian has ;) [22:31] <asac> right [22:32] <armin76> yeah, i think its without 3.0.2 [22:32] <armin76> err [22:32] <armin76> its without the patch [22:32] <asac> ok [22:32] <armin76> we'll see if it crashes on 45 mins [22:32] <asac> wired ;) [22:32] <fta> oh damn, hell, damnation [22:32] <asac> weird [22:32] <fta> ix:~/bzr/mozilla-devscripts$ bzr push [22:32] <fta> Using saved location: bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/ [22:32] <fta> bzr: ERROR: KnitPackRepository('bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/.bzr/repository/') [22:32] <fta> is not compatible with [22:32] <fta> KnitPackRepository('file:///src/bzr/.bzr/repository/') [22:32] <fta> different rich-root support [22:32] <asac> fta: what branch type do you use? [22:32] <asac> err repo type [22:33] <asac> did you upgrade the repo with 0.92 branches inside? [22:33] <fta> i had to upgrade my repo to import chromium from svn [22:33] <asac> thats a bad thing ;) [22:33] <armin76> 17 + 45 [22:33] <asac> fta: i made that mistake at some point [22:33] <asac> now i have ubuntu_bzr and ubuntu_bzr2 ;) [22:33] <asac> everything was trashed afterwards [22:33] <armin76> it should crash at 00:05 [22:34] <asac> i think i could recover by reinstantiating the backup .bzr of repo and branches [22:34] <armin76> 00:07, sorry *g* [22:34] <fta> how come my pushes to the fennec branch worked an hour ago ?? [22:34] <asac> armin76: why 45? [22:34] <asac> thought after the patch it took 45 min [22:34] <asac> fta: mere luck? [22:34] <armin76> asac: yeah...but now it doesn't crash and i think its without the patch :/ [22:35] <asac> fta: what is different for fennec and mozilla-devscripts (local/remote)? [22:35] <asac> KnitPackRepository doesnt sound like pack-0.92 [22:35] <asac> but i might be wrong [22:35] <asac> sounds more like the even older knit-pack format [22:36] <fta> why did i ever create a global repo [22:36] <fta> huge mistake [22:36] <asac> yeah could be [22:36] <asac> though it is supposed to boost initial checkout of related branches [22:37] <asac_the_bumber> jump in my car [22:37] <asac> fta: just push everything .... then trash everything and start over [22:37] <asac_the_bumber> i wanna take you home [22:37] <fta> I can't push [22:38] <asac> armin76: enable safe-browsing ;) [22:38] <asac_the_bumber> it is... [22:38] <asac> do you see the classifier db growing? [22:38] <asac> maybe you use an already complete profile? [22:38] <asac_the_bumber> where's that? [22:38] <asac> which doesnt import stuff [22:39] <asac_the_bumber> nope, i started over [22:39] <asac> in profile .... class.*sqli [22:39] <rzr> hi guys [22:39] <asac> hi rzr [22:40] <asac_the_bumber> its 7mb now [22:40] <asac> growing? [22:40] <asac_the_bumber> last mod 22:23 [22:40] <rzr> saw my new revision on flashblock ? [22:40] <asac> thats long ago [22:40] <asac_the_bumber> its utc, just 20 mins ago [22:41] <asac> rzr: yep [22:41] <asac> rzr: did you ask for review of the changes? [22:41] <rzr> ok great is it ok ? [22:41] <asac> not looked yet [22:41] <asac> rzr: if you have requested a merge of branches i will look now ;) [22:41] <rzr> i did [22:41] <asac> ok [22:41] * asac opens merges [22:41] <rzr> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/1683 [22:41] <fta_> <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info [22:41] <fta_> <fta> Repository tree (format: rich-root-pack) [22:42] <fta_> <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/fennec/fennec.head/ [22:42] <armin76> gonna try without gdb [22:42] <fta_> <fta> Repository branch (format: unnamed) [22:42] <fta_> <fta> it doesn't work either [22:42] <rzr> asac: is this the right way to request merges ? [22:42] <asac> rzr: its already merged [22:43] <asac> rzr: i think you did it the wrong way [22:43] <asac> rzr: you have to request a merge on your branch to the ubuntu-dev [22:43] <rzr> right [22:43] <asac> not the other way around (which you did from what i can tell) [22:43] <rzr> i wasnt sure [22:43] <rzr> i suspected i was wrong [22:43] <asac> rzr: well. navigate to your branch and click on propose ofr merge [22:43] <rzr> when I set my branch as target [22:44] <asac> go to your branch and use ubuntu-dev as target [22:44] <asac_the_bumber> asac: it grow from 32k at the beginning to 1.2mb atm [22:44] <rzr> ok this makes sense [22:44] <asac_the_bumber> 2.7mb [22:44] <asac> asac_the_bumber: not sure what you mean. you said 8mb? [22:45] <asac_the_bumber> yeah, i started over without gdb [22:45] <asac> asac_the_bumber: good. must be mere luck or your sparc doesnt care about alignment that much ;) [22:45] <asac> or the patch is applied [22:46] * asac feels good about using his original ffox profile again ;9 [22:46] <rzr> There is already a branch merge proposal registered for branch ~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu to land on ~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu that is still active. [22:46] <asac> rzr: where? [22:46] <rzr> i suppose this is the hardy backport [22:46] <rzr> let me cancel it [22:46] <asac> let me check [22:46] <asac_the_bumber> asac: doubt it...i think i tested 3.0.2 and it sigbused...the only thing that has changed is that i now use a kernel 2.6.26 [22:46] <asac> rzr: dont need to i think [22:47] <asac> or does it complain? [22:47] <asac_the_bumber> anyway, 3.0.4 is the one important now [22:47] <rzr> it can't : error [22:47] <asac> rzr: ok then cancel and rerequest [22:47] <asac> we have to create stable branches anyway i think [22:47] <asac> rzr: which revision was released to hardy? [22:47] <fta_> bzr: ERROR: Cannot convert to format <RepositoryFormatKnitPack1>. Does not support rich root data. [22:48] <asac> rzr: 7? [22:48] <rzr> 12 [22:48] <asac> fta_: i cannot help you ;) ... i did what i said above (backup.bzr) [22:48] <asac> rzr: to hardy? [22:49] <rzr> welll forget about this one [22:49] <rzr> https://code.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 [22:49] <asac> rzr: which package version is current in .hardy? [22:49] <rzr> I have to check [22:49] <asac> rzr: why do you include the backport to hardy in that branch? [22:50] <asac> that should be in a separate branch [22:50] <rzr> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/flashblock/1.3.9a-0ubuntu1 [22:50] <rzr> yes [22:50] <asac> based on the actual hardy released revision [22:50] <asac> oh [22:50] <asac> let me think for a moment [22:50] <rzr> I reverted this since I didnt pushed to a .hardy branch [22:51] <rzr> LP is confusing sometime [22:51] <asac> ok its as i said. we have to create those .hardy branches and then merge from .ubuntu for backports [22:51] <rzr> well can we put this hardy branch on hold [22:51] <rzr> and backport latest one ? [22:51] <asac> rzr: we can. but we need to remove those revisions ;) [22:52] <rzr> which one ? [22:52] <rzr> there are none [22:52] <asac> 11 and 12 [22:52] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 [22:52] <asac> let me check [22:52] <rzr> ok i understand [22:53] <rzr> then I must push r12 to LP right ? [22:53] <rzr> in a .hardy branch [22:53] <rzr> then we'll sync latest one ? maybe you're busy now are you ? [22:55] <asac> phone [22:57] <asac> rzr: well. i dont mind. to do it properly we should dump revision 11 and 12 [22:58] <asac> push revision 7 to .hardy .... push revision 10 to .intrepid .... then merge .intrepid to .hardy and name that hardy-backports [22:58] <asac> rzr: but i can do that infrastructure stuff for you [22:58] <asac> i have to do that anyway i think [22:59] <rzr> ok please do, but I think I can do this [22:59] <asac> rzr: well. i have to push to the ~ubuntu-dev branches first. if you could give me the revisions that match the released versions for hardy/intrepid that would be helpful [22:59] <rzr> ok === fta_ is now known as fta [23:01] <fta> ok, everything recovered [23:01] <asac> :-P [23:02] <fta> asac, m-d closed, rev 190 [23:02] <rzr> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashblock [23:02] <rzr> hardy 7 : http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/7 [23:02] <fta> now, i'm getting rid of that bzr repo [23:03] <rzr> intrepid : looking for 1.3.10a~snapshot20080611-0ubuntu2 [23:03] <asac> rzr: ok i think i have them [23:03] <rzr> I missed to merge ? [23:03] <asac> its 7 for hardy and 11 for intrepid [23:03] <asac> ok [23:03] <asac> so [23:03] <rzr> i dont see it [23:04] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.hardy-backports [23:04] <rzr> not 11 : [23:04] <rzr> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/11 [23:04] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.intrepid-backports [23:04] <rzr> ok then I didnt merge this branch [23:04] <asac> rzr: not sure. i looked at the ~ubuntu-dev brtanch [23:05] <rzr> grr [23:05] <asac> rzr: so ... do the new upstream on top of current .head [23:05] <rzr> I didnt know it existed :) [23:05] <asac> rzr: well. i created them right now [23:05] <rzr> where is head ? [23:05] <asac> rzr: but the ~ubuntu-dev always must be the base for your work [23:05] <asac> rzr: head is always ~ubuntu-dev .... .ubuntu [23:05] <rzr> i then it's ok [23:06] <asac> rzr: no it cant be ok if your revision 11 is different from the ~ubuntu-dev branches ;) [23:06] <asac> rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu [23:06] <rzr> I shouldnt commited backport in 'my main' ~rzr/*.ubuntu branch then ? [23:06] <asac> rzr: 2. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.intrepid-backports [23:06] <asac> rzr: 3. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.hardy-backports [23:07] <asac> rzr: rzr well. the name of your branch doesnt matter [23:07] <asac> rzr: you need to create one branch for each of the 3 steps above [23:07] <asac> rzr: after they are merged you should delete them from launchpad and locally [23:07] <rzr> ok [23:07] <asac> so you start from ~ubuntu-dev next time again [23:08] <rzr> Is there a document on the workflow , I'll double check it [23:08] <asac> rzr: the workflow is like above ;) [23:08] <asac> 3 steps [23:08] <rzr> ok [23:08] <asac> plain and simple [23:08] <asac> maybe step 0. update .upstream branch [23:08] <asac> rzr: do you have a proper upstream branch? [23:08] <rzr> yes [23:08] <asac> ok [23:09] <asac> rzr: should be quite quick then i guess [23:09] <rzr> but i am on debian, now I'd like to test it to make sure [23:10] <rzr> and when you said : [23:10] <rzr> <asac> rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu [23:10] <rzr> I can push to ~ubuntu-dev [23:11] <asac> rzr: no merge to always means: [23:11] <asac> 1. branch the target branch [23:11] <rzr> and request merge ? [23:11] <asac> 2. merge the branch locally [23:11] <asac> 3. push to ~rzr [23:11] <asac> 4. request merge [23:11] <asac> yeah ;) [23:11] <rzr> ok [23:11] <rzr> i wasnt sure [23:11] <asac> the name of the ~rzr branch doesnt matter ... it can match the target ~ubuntu-dev ... but doesnt need to [23:11] <asac> its your choice [23:12] <rzr> ok [23:12] <rzr> let's destroy my current branches then [23:12] <asac> heh ;) [23:15] <rzr> humm upstream is active [23:15] <rzr> I checked [23:16] <asac> does that hinder you from updating the branch? [23:16] <rzr> I think I'll wait a few days , then [23:16] <fta> done, except the root cause, the chromium upstream branch :( [23:16] <rzr> well I can merge last week branch since it seems to work [23:16] <asac> rzr: not sure if we should really wait for upstream being inactive ;) [23:16] <asac> rzr: yes. thats a better idea [23:17] <asac> just merge what you know works [23:17] <asac> and then go on from there [23:17] <rzr> i havent tested deeply since I am mostly on sid [23:17] <rzr> you should hate me :) [23:17] <asac> i dont mind [23:17] <asac> extensions should be more or less distro agnostic [23:18] <rzr> if only we were on a same browser :) [23:18] <rzr> well let's finish this job ... I have some other stuff to be done soon [23:18] <asac> good [23:19] <asac> fta: how messy are nspr/nss branches? [23:20] <asac> fta: did i ever revert the soname stuff somewhere? [23:20] <fta> i updated nspr and nss 2 days ago to match 1.9.0.4 reqs, all fine for me [23:20] <fta> yes [23:20] <fta> weeks ago [23:21] <asac> fta: is that nss.dev? [23:23] <fta> no, nspr.head and nss.head [23:23] <fta> remember we cleaned that up a while ago ? [23:23] <asac> yeah [23:24] <asac> was just confused that an nspr.head overwrite removed a bunch of revisions for me [23:25] <asac> fta: why is .head still at RC ? [23:25] <asac> nss [23:25] <fta> because that's what upstream has [23:25] <asac> really? thought they were at RTM now [23:26] <asac> fta: so .dev isnt used anymore? [23:27] <fta> not by me [23:27] <fta> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/client.mk [23:27] <fta> NSPR_CO_TAG = NSPR_4_7_3_RTM [23:27] <fta> NSS_CO_TAG = NSS_3_12_2_RC1 [23:27] <asac> ok [23:28] <fta> both are in my ppa [23:29] <asac> fta: ok i am doing bzr push -r 12.1.26 lp:~mozillateam/nss/nss.intrepid now [23:31] <asac> and bzr push -r 36 lp:~mozillateam/nspr/nspr.intrepid [23:31] <fta> intrepid ? [23:32] <fta> it's meant for jaunty [23:34] <asac> fta: sure. i created the stable branch post-mortem ;) [23:34] <asac> see the revisions [23:34] <asac> will --overwrite the .dev branches for now [23:34] <fta> but i didn't close nss/nspr.head yet [23:36] <asac> fta: doesnt matter ;) [23:36] <asac> i just want to fix the .dev branches which are diverged somewhat [23:37] <asac> and we will do a release soonish [23:38] <fta> TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'instance' objects: [23:38] <fta> i hate python [23:39] <fta> this is list damit, not an instance' objects [23:39] <fta> -list+string [23:40] <asac> hehe [23:40] <asac> you have to use concat(...) [23:40] <asac> dont you? [23:40] <asac> or .str() [23:40] <asac> tostr [23:40] <asac> hmm [23:40] <asac> cant remember ;) [23:45] <rzr> dammit I forgot I cant reboot while I am rsyncing large files [23:46] <fta> hmm, it's a file instance, not a string [23:46] <rzr> let's chroot and test ... erm erm [23:47] <asac> fta: i think python is like java and has a generic string method associated with every object [23:47] <asac> you just have to invoke that explicitly [23:47] <fta> AttributeError: File instance has no attribute 'tostring': [23:48] <asac> with some luck file instance returns the proper things [23:48] <asac> fta: yes. like i said. its str() ... or even str(object) [23:48] <asac> that does that [23:48] <asac> or something like that [23:49] <asac> fta: yeah i think its str(object) [23:50] <asac> that runs the __str__: function [23:50] <asac> but i think its not the right way to get he file path reliably [23:51] <asac> fta: why are we on rc1 again ... i updated to rc2 in revision 78 [23:51] <fta> read the entire version [23:52] <asac> heh [23:52] <asac> ok [23:52] <asac> fta: hmm. so we dont have the final .1 release [23:53] <fta> we missed it [23:54] <asac> obviously ;) [23:56] <armin76> asac: it crashed [23:56] <armin76> the sqlite file is 9.8m [23:56] <armin76> i'll try tommorrow [23:56] <fta> ix:~/bzr/build-area/chromium-v8-0.4.3.1~svn20081105r696$ scons library=shared PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=debian/tmp install [23:56] <fta> scons: Reading SConscript files ... [23:56] <fta> ['debian/tmp/usr/lib/libv8.so'] [23:56] <fta> \o/ [23:57] <asac> fta: please use -version-info in some way ;) [23:57] <fta> Rome was not built in one day! |