File size: 46,208 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 |
=== mbp_ is now known as poolie [00:19] <CarlFK> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/250340 "Add a comment/attachment" ... how? [00:20] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 250340 in ubuntu "alt install: Cannot find /lib/modules/2.6.26-4-generic" [Undecided,New] [00:21] <thumper> CarlFK: are you asking how to add a comment or an attachment or both? [00:21] <thumper> CarlFK: click on the link, and a form should appear [00:21] <thumper> CarlFK: needs JS [00:21] <thumper> CarlFK: or if JS is disabled, it *should* take you to another page [00:31] <CarlFK> i reloaded the page, now it is a link [01:02] <wgrant> thumper: You are of course assuming that production is serving CSS and JS. That isn't a valid assumption at this point. [01:26] <hansengel> Hi, I messed up here.. I accidentally created a milestone named '1.1' inside the 'trunk' release series, which I don't use. I just realized this after already filing bugs under this milestone. How can I move the milestone to the '1.0' series, and delete the 'trunk' series? [01:26] <hansengel> my project is at https://launchpad.net/twitkit [02:37] <hansengel> hi, are there any launchpad admins in here? I need this release series to be deleted https://launchpad.net/twitkit/trunk [02:40] <Rinchen> hansengel, please file an answer ticket (see irc top) and someone should get around to it tomorrow during the week [02:43] <hansengel> Rinchen: okay, thanks [04:26] <Wofl> hey, who do i talk to if i need a project to be renamed? [04:26] <mwhudson> Wofl: answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [04:28] <Wofl> not possible to find someone on irc really fast? [04:29] <Hobbsee> Wofl: probably not at this time. [04:29] <Wofl> ok, thanks [04:29] <Hobbsee> Wofl: and i'm not sure that "really fast" is a priority for launchpad. [04:29] <Hobbsee> (in general, anyway) [04:34] <thumper> :) === asac_ is now known as asac [04:43] <Wofl> its ok, i just submitted it there [04:43] <Wofl> lets see how long that tkaes [04:44] <Wofl> takes* [05:00] <spm> Wofl: name changed. Sorry for delay. Was recovering a downed server. :-) === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh [05:17] <poolie> hey that was actually pretty fast :-) [05:42] <Wofl> thanks a lot [05:43] <Wofl> did you see my question regarding a redirect? [05:54] <thumper> yeah, LP isn't set up to handle redirects right now [05:54] <thumper> we have raised it before WRT renaming projects [05:54] <thumper> cool URLs don't die and all that [06:09] <Wofl> thumper: just toss a php file in there for now? or that too much extra? [06:10] <thumper> haha [06:10] <thumper> sorry [06:10] <thumper> the entire system is "virtual" [06:10] <thumper> a zope based web servcie [06:10] <thumper> service [06:16] <Wofl> i see... [06:47] <Wofl> should i register a ndiswrapprer project and have a like to the real page? [07:10] <lut4rp> I have a branch in my project, which has one subscriber. I cant delete that branch, and I cant figure out how to remove that subscriber. Can someone help me? [07:12] <jml> lut4rp: you have to contact the subscriber and ask them to unsubscribe. [07:13] <lut4rp> jml, even if I am the admin of the project? [07:13] <jml> lut4rp: yep. [07:13] <lut4rp> jml, thanks [08:17] <kblin> morning folks [08:20] <kblin> what's the best way to make the bug tracker changes go to a mailing list? sorry if that's sort of a common question, but I'm still waiting for answers.lp.n to come up for me, I'm on a really lousy connection [08:34] <BjornT> kblin: you can create a team, setting the mailing list address as the 'contact address'. you can then subscribe that team to the project's bugs. [08:37] <kblin> I can make a team a member of another team, right? === thumper changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Next meeting, all welcome: Thu 17 July 2008, 1800UTC #launchpad-meeting | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Questions and spam reports: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Code Scanner is back! [08:42] <BjornT> kblin: yes [08:44] <kblin> BjornT: ok, that'll do then. Thanks :) === mdz_ is now known as mdz === stub1 is now known as stub [09:57] <gnomefreak> any LP admins awake yet? [09:58] <lut4rp> I am using bazaar and lp for the first time. sorry if this is dumb, but i am unable to figure out how to push to trunk. I have an ssh key. can someone help me? [10:03] <spiv> lut4rp: what command are you trying? [10:03] <spiv> lut4rp: and what error are you getting? [10:04] <gnomefreak> spiv: i dont think he has by the sound of it hes not sure of the commands [10:04] <lut4rp> spiv, i am trying "bzr push lp:poonji" as it says on my project page. [10:04] <gnomefreak> i was gonna look they all up [10:04] <lut4rp> strangely, i have got no response or error for the past 15 mins. [10:04] <gnomefreak> lut4rp: did you commit first? [10:05] <lut4rp> gnomefreak, sorry, what do you mean by that? [10:05] <gnomefreak> lut4rp: you have to commit the files that you are trying to push. [10:05] <gnomefreak> lut4rp: hold on i have all the commmands you need [10:06] <lut4rp> gnomefreak, okay. [10:07] <lut4rp> hmm, its saying on LP, Branch format 6 [10:07] <gnomefreak> damn i dont have them but first you have to make your local files a branch [10:07] <lut4rp> Repository format: Packs containing knits without subtree support [10:07] <lut4rp> gnomefreak, and how do I do that? [10:08] <spiv> lut4rp: you mean the 'bzr push lp:poonji' command has given no response for 15 minutes? [10:08] <gnomefreak> lut4rp: theres bzr docs online. iirc its "init" than "commit" than push but you would have to read docs. once i get a sec ill find them [10:09] <lut4rp> spiv, you're right. I am on ubuntu hardy, if that's needed. [10:10] <lut4rp> okay, i did do "init" [10:10] * lut4rp looks up "commit" [10:10] <gnomefreak> lut4rp: it commits the files to get them ready to be pushed [10:11] <lut4rp> hmm, it should be more verbose :) [10:11] <spiv> lut4rp: you should have gotten a response from the command like "No revisions to push." [10:12] <lut4rp> spiv, but I didn't. I cancelled it anyway now. [10:13] <spiv> lut4rp: yeah, that sounds like a bug. If you could pastebin your ~/.bzr.log I'd be interested to see where it got stuck. [10:13] <spiv> lut4rp: Anyway, http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/latest/en/mini-tutorial/index.html is worth looking over if you haven't already. [10:13] <lut4rp> oh thanks! [10:14] <gnomefreak> spiv: are you LP admin by chance? [10:15] <spiv> gnomefreak: nope [10:15] <spiv> Just a bzr developer (and ex-launchpad developer). [10:16] <gnomefreak> it seems teams only have a month when you renew the membership this has just happened ice had team for over a year now i have to renew every month [10:17] <spiv> gnomefreak: that doesn't sound good, but unfortunately I don't know anything about that. [10:17] <alecw1> Why isn't Launchpad open-source? [10:17] <gnomefreak> alecw1: parts of it is [10:17] <gnomefreak> just not the part we use ;) [10:17] <alecw1> which parts? [10:17] <spiv> alecw1: https://help.launchpad.net/FAQ#Is%20Launchpad%20Free%20Software/open%20source?%20If%20not,%20why%20not? [10:19] <wgrant> gnomefreak: The team admin sets the renewal period... [10:19] <alecw1> So, it's closed because (1) you don't want "multiple launchpads", and (2) it helps funding? [10:19] <gnomefreak> wgrant: i set it to not expire when i made it over a year ago [10:19] <gnomefreak> or longer [10:19] <wgrant> gnomefreak: That sounds unlikely and bad. [10:20] <gnomefreak> Created on: 2006-12-27 [10:20] <wgrant> And none of my teams work like that. [10:20] <wgrant> What are the settings? [10:20] <alecw1> Will Launchpad ever release it's source? [10:20] <alecw1> its* [10:20] <gnomefreak> aafter hitting renew i got Membership renewed until 2008-08-26. [10:20] <gnomefreak> a month? [10:20] <wgrant> alecw1: 'Unlike those other services, we have committed to making Launchpad Free Software.' [10:21] <wgrant> gnomefreak: How is the team configured, what do you expect to happen, and what happens? [10:21] <alecw1> Okay, but I'm wondering why it's not open-source, not "free". [10:21] <gnomefreak> Subscription period: 0 [10:21] <wgrant> Open source is almost sysnonymous with Free. [10:21] <wgrant> *synonymous [10:22] <gnomefreak> wgrant: i expect it to work the same way since the date i showed you above [10:22] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Huh? What does the date have to do with anything? [10:22] <gnomefreak> wgrant: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam [10:22] <alecw1> wgrant: no, that's not true at all. Things that are free as in "free beer" are not the same as "you can look at the ingredients, and the recipe here, for free." [10:22] <wgrant> alecw1: 'Free Software' has a specific meaning. [10:22] <gnomefreak> wgrant: the sate i created it. this is the first time i had to renew it and now it seems like its monthly [10:22] <wgrant> Meaning free as in speech, not as in beer. [10:23] <gnomefreak> s/sate/date [10:23] <wgrant> gnomefreak: You probably have an expiry date set... [10:23] <alecw1> What does it mean that it is free "as in speech"? [10:23] <stgraber> alecw1: in this sentence "Free Software" is meant as in "free speech", LP is already free so there would be no point in saying "we have commited to making" otherwise [10:24] <wgrant> alecw1: Same as it means for any other piece of Free Software. [10:24] <kblin> alecw1: if you want to fix the free as in beer vs. free as in speech thing, find out where to file a bug about the English language [10:24] <gnomefreak> wgrant: no i just showed you. please look at https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam === lut4rp is now known as lut4rp--away [10:24] <gnomefreak> and give me a hint on wtf is wrong [10:24] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Subscript period != your expiry date [10:24] <wgrant> *subscription period, damnit. === rraphink is now known as raphink [10:25] <gnomefreak> is 0 [10:25] <alecw1> wgrant: I'm not sure what "free as in in free-speech" metaphor means. Can you explain? [10:25] <kblin> alecw1: for all practical purposes, "free as in free speech" for software means open source [10:25] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Have you altered your expiration date since you were last asked to renew? And are you sure it's on that team? [10:26] <wgrant> alecw1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software is good. [10:26] <gnomefreak> wgrant: no this is the first time i had to renew [10:26] <alecw1> you mean, "I have the right to browse the code source." [10:26] <gnomefreak> i havent touched any settings [10:26] <alecw1> because "open source" literally means... "open source". [10:26] <kblin> alecw1: there's some philosophical connotations to both "Open Source" and "Free Software" [10:27] <wgrant> alecw1: But Free Software implies something extra. [10:27] <alecw1> Not just that it is "free" as in beer? [10:27] <wgrant> There are many Open Source licenses which are unfortunately not Free Software. [10:27] <wgrant> RIght. [10:28] <alecw1> So, how does the community benefit from a project being "free software" without releasing its source? [10:28] <kblin> alecw1: yeah, but what about a license where you're allowed to see the source, but not to modify it? :) [10:28] <wgrant> That's not possible. [10:28] <wgrant> Free Software implies Open Source. [10:28] <wgrant> But not vice-versa. [10:28] <gnomefreak> found the issue and fixed it [10:28] <alecw1> Then Launchpad should be open source, right? [10:28] <wgrant> gnomefreak: What was the issue? [10:28] <alecw1> If you claim to be "free software". [10:28] <wgrant> alecw1: They do not claim to be free software. [10:28] <wgrant> They claim they will be. [10:29] <alecw1> "we have committed to making Launchpad Free Software. " [10:29] <stgraber> alecw1: please read the page you were pointed to before ... "we have committed to making Launchpad Free Software." [10:29] <alecw1> Oh. [10:29] <gnomefreak> wgrant: i missunderstood since mozillateam is owner of mozillasquad it was mozillasquad page that was causing it [10:29] <alecw1> So, you are NOT "Free Software" right now. [10:29] <stgraber> indeed [10:29] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Aha. So I was right: "And are you sure it's on that team?" [10:29] <gnomefreak> it was saying mozillateam as owner the relationship between 2 team would expire [10:29] <alecw1> Therefore, you have committed to release the source code, eventually, correct? [10:29] <wgrant> alecw1: Note that there are no official Launchpad people involved in this conversation right now. [10:29] <gnomefreak> yep [10:30] <alecw1> wgrant: noted. =) [10:30] <alecw1> Has Launchpad made any progress to just "eventually"? [10:30] <gnomefreak> You must specify a default renewal period greater than 0. [10:30] <gnomefreak> since when [10:30] <alecw1> I mean, it would be great to have a timeframe, or some sort of specification for when they will release the backend. [10:31] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Leave it blank, I suspect. [10:31] <gnomefreak> wgrant: same thing [10:31] <kblin> alecw1: the way I read the FAQ, it seems so [10:31] * kblin shrugs [10:31] <kblin> I have to admit I don't care. :) [10:31] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Ensure you have the first option selected. [10:31] <gnomefreak> its optional so i shouldnt have to put anything there and im assuming nothing == 0 [10:31] <wgrant> AS one can't automatically renew for 0 days. [10:31] <alecw1> I mean, they have "dedicated" to "becoming" free software, but I would like some sort of real commitment that it WILL happen. [10:31] <wgrant> alecw1: As would we all. [10:32] <wgrant> alecw1: Parts have been released. [10:32] <gnomefreak> subscription policy == openteam [10:32] <wgrant> gnomefreak: No, the renewal policy. [10:32] <alecw1> wgrant: which parts? significant ones? [10:32] <gnomefreak> subscription period == 30 [10:32] <wgrant> alecw1: Storm is pretty significant, I suspect. [10:32] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Period != policy. [10:32] <gnomefreak> next invite them to renew their own memebership [10:32] <alecw1> Oh, there is a paragraph showing what they have released. [10:33] <gnomefreak> renewal period == problem [10:33] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Right, that's the problem. [10:33] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Set it to not allow them to renew their own? [10:33] <kblin> alecw1: you're preaching to the choir here. I doubt any foss developer would mind more open source software [10:33] <mwhudson> yeah, releasing cscvs really enabled community contributions! [10:33] <wgrant> gnomefreak: You can't allow them to renew their own but then say you can only renew for 0 time. [10:33] <mwhudson> </sarcasm> [10:33] <wgrant> mwhudson: But cscvs is useless as we have bzr-svn. [10:33] <wgrant> And it seems to work. [10:33] <wgrant> Whereas other parts of LP do not. [10:33] <alecw1> kblin: I'm certainly not trying to preach, I'm just trying to understand, and get some sort of feel for the current status with launchpad's status as free software. [10:34] <mwhudson> wgrant: it's still the best choice for importing cvs when you don't have the ,v files, afaik [10:34] * gnomefreak confused only thing that matches that is renew their membersip auto.. also notifie admins [10:34] <wgrant> mwhudson: Probably so. [10:34] <wgrant> gnomefreak: EPARSE [10:34] <wgrant> 'invite them to apply for renewal' [10:34] <mwhudson> (i would actually be extremely interested if i'm wrong about this) [10:34] <gnomefreak> When someone's membership is about to expire, notify them and: [10:35] <gnomefreak> 05:33 < wgrant > gnomefreak: You can't allow them to renew their own but then say you can only renew for 0 time. [10:35] <alecw1> I can't think of a reason they wouldn't release the source code, either. They are currently well established in the open-source community, thus, they probably don't have to worry about being one-upped by someone with their own source. [10:35] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Yes? [10:35] <gnomefreak> you are conflicting comments [10:35] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Where is this conflict? [10:35] <gnomefreak> you said dont let them renew [10:36] <wgrant> I don't see where I've said otherwise. [10:36] <gnomefreak> wgrant: oh i see it i had to scroll :( [10:36] <wgrant> That form needs rewording, but it's quite intelligible. [10:36] <kblin> alecw1: hm, sorry, that's a figure of speech. I mean you're telling this to people who will agree with you [10:36] <gnomefreak> wgrant: it sounded conflicking sinc ei couldnt see whole page [10:36] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Ah. [10:36] <wgrant> It is strange that it's labelled as optional when it is in fact required most of the time. [10:36] <wgrant> And I shall now run off and file a bug. [10:36] <gnomefreak> ok so everything will stay good than? [10:37] <wgrant> gnomefreak: If you have the first radio button selected, it should let you pass. [10:37] <alecw1> kblin: well, I guess it ended up like that, yes. But originally I was just curious about Launchpad's code. [10:37] <gnomefreak> wgrant: it did [10:37] <alecw1> Thanks a lot, everyone. [10:37] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Great. [10:38] <gnomefreak> wgrant: thanks [10:38] <wgrant> np [10:39] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Bug #173019 [10:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 173019 in launchpad ""Renewal period" is marked as "(Optional)" when it isn't" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173019 [10:39] <wgrant> (thankyou Hobbsee) [10:39] <gnomefreak> ah not just me [10:39] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: opened that bug? [10:40] <wgrant> She did. [10:40] <gnomefreak> she seems to open bugs just beofre i see the issue [10:40] <wgrant> This was 80000 bugs ago. [10:40] <wgrant> Hm, that's a few bugs. [10:40] <gnomefreak> maybe she should stand in door way to this channel and tell people problems when she finds them ;) save us alot of worrk [10:40] <wgrant> Heh. [10:42] * wgrant shakes a fist at mpt. You broke my automated process for looking at each Launchpad bug by making the milestone easy to see. [11:00] <mpt> Gooooooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders! [11:06] <mpt> wgrant, what automated process? [11:07] <wgrant> mpt: The one where I automatically expand the task (sorry) to see if it's going to be fixed in the next 12 months. [11:07] <mpt> aha [11:07] <mpt> I didn't break that, the milestone's still there [11:07] <mpt> I just made it unnecessary ;-) [11:07] <wgrant> Some pleasant retraining will be required. [11:07] <wgrant> This is true. [11:09] <geser> where did the box with the package versions on the bug page go? I was quite handy while doing sponsoring for checking the last version and component [11:09] <wgrant> geser: To mpt's context independent land [11:09] <wgrant> One decision I see the rationale for, but cannot agree with. [11:10] <mpt> geser, hover over the package name [11:10] <wgrant> mpt: Where is this documented? [11:11] <wgrant> And woah that date is ugly. [11:11] <wgrant> And there are no links :( [11:11] <geser> mpt: thanks for the hint. It contains all the info I need [11:11] <mpt> wgrant, do you have any suggestions for where we could document its new position that would be easier to find than its new position? [11:12] <wgrant> mpt: It could be inside the task. [11:12] <geser> wgrant: LP just want to be precise about the upload date :) [11:12] <wgrant> Or somewhere less completely undiscoverable. [11:12] <wgrant> It should be in the tooltip as well. [11:12] <wgrant> But it should be mentioned in the non-existent page help. [11:13] <wgrant> As I don't want to have to hover over every element on the page or grep through the source to work out what has a .title. [11:14] <mpt> wgrant, eventually we want to get rid of the expandable section, so that wouldn't be a long-term design [11:14] <wgrant> mpt: Where do all of the widgets go!? [11:14] <mpt> a long-term solution, rather [11:15] <mpt> wgrant, into the table when you click on a cell. [11:15] <mpt> e.g. click "New" and it turns into an option menu. [11:15] <mpt> Click the package name and it turns into a text field. [11:15] <mpt> etc. [11:15] <wgrant> mpt: Oh, I thought that that must have been dismissed as an option, as it's rather obvious. [11:16] <wgrant> I was thinking that the package name could act somewhat like an <abbr> [11:16] <mpt> It already does, in the sense that <abbr> usually has title=, and the package name has title= giving its details [11:16] <wgrant> ? cursor, dotted underline, which everyone knows to mean it has a tooltippy thing. [11:16] <mpt> In what sense do you mean it? [11:16] <mpt> ah [11:19] <wgrant> I spent all too much time cleaning a webapp UI up today. So I might be annoyed and wrong. [11:30] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: no, i opened the bug ages ago when creating a team, after the auto-expiry stuff. [11:30] <Hobbsee> that's months old [11:31] <gnomefreak> ah [11:31] * gnomefreak very behind ;) [11:42] <Hobbsee> dear launchpad, if you can't cope with Big Numbers, why do you let me enter them in your fields? [11:43] <Hobbsee> why not restrict me to numbers the size that you can actually handle. no love, me. [11:44] <wgrant> Hobbsee: What's this? [11:44] <Hobbsee> wgrant: manually reprio'ing a build. [11:44] <Hobbsee> wgrant: LP will let you put in a Very Big Number, then will oops, presumably because the number is too big. [11:45] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Nice. How big were you making it? [11:45] <Hobbsee> oh, i held down '9' for a couple of seconds, so pretty long. [11:45] <wgrant> Ah. [11:45] <Hobbsee> surely, if you've only got a limited number of possible inputs, you can limit the number of digits that can be entered, so your software *won't* fall over. [11:45] <wgrant> I think you need a 'build this now really kthxbye' button. [11:46] <wgrant> Or at least fail gracefully. [11:46] <Hobbsee> wgrant: buildd.py tends to do that, yes. [11:46] <Hobbsee> i was just already there, and only wanted to hit one arch. [12:21] <mpt> Hobbsee, please report that, (I assume) I don't have permission so I can't give an example URL [12:22] <mpt> (I mean I don't have permission to reprioritize a build, not that I don't have permission to report a bug) [12:23] <Hobbsee> mpt: i've already reported it for the length of time for members of a team to be invited to renew, and afaik, that hasn't been fixed yet. [12:23] <Hobbsee> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/7.3.6.cvs20080702-1ubuntu1/+build/662729/+rescore is a sample url [12:23] <Hobbsee> well, is the one i used before [12:23] <mpt> Hobbsee, that's a separate bug that'll need a separate fix [12:23] <mpt> ok [12:24] <mpt> Hobbsee, do you have the oops code handy? (or generate a new one?) [12:24] <Hobbsee> you'll have to find something that hasn't built yet, and look up the build, and add +rescore to it for another one. [12:24] <Hobbsee> i do not. [12:25] <Hobbsee> mpt: (Error ID: OOPS-933EA36) [12:25] <Hobbsee> from https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/softgun/0.16-2.1/+build/666832/+rescore [12:25] <mpt> thankyew [12:25] <Hobbsee> np. [12:26] <mpt> Hobbsee, do you happen to know what the maximum value is? [12:27] <mpt> Ursinha, welcome! [12:27] <Ursinha> mpt, hi! :) [12:27] <Ursinha> thanks :) [12:28] <mpt> Everybody, Ursinha is our new QA person [12:28] * Ursinha waves [12:29] <andrea-bs> hi Ursinha! I hope you'll like my bugs :D [12:29] <Ursinha> hahahahaha :) [12:30] <Ursinha> andrea-bs, sure i will :) [12:30] <mpt> andrea-bs is one of our most prolific bug reporters [12:31] <andrea-bs> Ursinha: mpt is too generous ;) [12:31] <Ursinha> :) [12:33] * wgrant apologises to Ursinha in advance. [12:33] <Ursinha> hahaha why so? [12:33] <wgrant> I file too many bugs. [12:34] <Hobbsee> mpt: 2147483647 is the highest number you can put in. [12:34] <Ursinha> you should be proud of it ;) [12:34] <Hobbsee> without LP oopsing. [12:34] <Hobbsee> heya Ursinha [12:34] <wgrant> Oh no! Implementation details! Run! [12:35] <mpt> Hobbsee, reported bug 250490 [12:35] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 250490 in soyuz "Entering large rescore value causes an oops" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/250490 [12:35] <Ursinha> Hobbsee, hi :) [12:36] * Hobbsee is another troublesome filer. [12:36] <Ursinha> so you are the bug gang :P [12:36] <Hobbsee> yeah... [12:36] <Hobbsee> and we're the "whine when LP goes down, or otherwise breaks" gang. [12:37] <Ursinha> :) [12:37] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Whining that one of the production appservers is borked doesn't help on a weekend, unfortunately. [12:37] <Hobbsee> wgrant: don't you have numbers of doom to call? [12:37] <Hobbsee> actually, i couldn't reproduce the errors. [12:37] <Hobbsee> which is why i didn't call. [12:37] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Of course not. [12:37] <geser> wgrant: just abolish weekends for LP admins and LP devs :) [12:38] <Hobbsee> oh, i see, that's what the subscriber panel is supposed to look like. [12:38] <wgrant> It was only production, so most would have missed it. [12:38] <wgrant> And what's this? A LOSA in a sane timezone! Yay! [12:38] <Hobbsee> even when switching to production [12:38] <mpt> Hobbsee, as opposed to...? [12:38] <Hobbsee> mpt: the bloody mess it is in anything ubuntu-related. [12:38] <Hobbsee> :) [12:39] <mpt> aha [12:39] <wgrant> At least the actions are up the top now. [12:39] <wgrant> That is a definite improvement. [12:39] <Hobbsee> yeah, but what shocks me more is you can actually easily see what the next box is underneath it [12:39] <Hobbsee> you dont' have to do the scrolling dance first. [12:39] <Hobbsee> to the point where the boxes underneath are vaguely useful [12:39] <wgrant> It is much more pleasant navigating LP bugs. [12:40] <Hobbsee> although, why we have a search on the lower right, and another one at the bottom, i'm not so sure. [12:41] <mrevell> New Launchpod episode online at: http://news.launchpad.net/podcast/launchpod-episode-8-developer-interview-with-curtis-hovey-and-chat-about-landscape [12:41] <wgrant> Huh? Landscape in Launchpod? [12:42] * Hobbsee wonders offhand, if planet ubuntu is supposed to be an advertising ground. [12:42] <mpt> Hobbsee, does that mean you won't scream if I get rid of the search from the lower right? [12:42] <Hobbsee> mpt: i'd say so - i've never used it. [12:42] <wgrant> I find the LP posts on Planet Ubuntu to be somewhat appropriate. It is a big part of Ubuntu. [12:43] <mpt> I'm fairly sure I've seen posts about bugzilla.gnome.org on Planet Gnome [12:59] <gnomefreak> where is the page to turn off edge.launchpad.net? i thought it would be at launchpad.net but its not there [13:00] <gnomefreak> nevermind it wasnt there under edge but is without the edge [13:03] <geser> is there a reason why the edit icon/link for the bug title is after the title while every other icon is before the text? === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [13:19] <mpt> geser, the edit icons for bug supervisors and translation groups are also after the text [13:19] <mpt> The one for bug privacy is before the text, but that'll change soon [13:20] <mpt> Putting the one for the bug title before the text would indent the title oddly [13:20] <mpt> but putting it after makes the title harder to copy [13:20] <mpt> soren, not sure what to do there :-) [13:20] <mpt> arg, *so* I'm not sure what to do there [13:21] <mpt> (that's the second time I've done that in the past week) [13:27] <geser> it looks a little bit inconsistent right now, but if some other links will change soon, perhaps it doesn't look inconsistent afterwards anymore [13:34] <soren> mpt: You're not the only one... :/ [13:34] <soren> :) [13:35] <mpt> soren, at least you don't have a kernel driver named after you [13:35] <soren> Hahah! [13:35] <soren> No, I do not. [13:35] <soren> Yet. [13:35] <soren> :) === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [13:56] <jmunro> does anyone know why my ppa package builds on most architectures, but not amd64? the build deps are correct as far as i can tell [13:57] <jmunro> "dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 needed by debian/sugar-develop-activity/usr/share/sugar/activities/Develop.activity/lib/libgtksourceview-2.0.so (its RPATH is '')." [13:58] <jmunro> i have the required dependancies and this builds fine on i386 [14:04] <mpt> bigjools, ^ [14:19] <mpt> bigjools, can you help jmunro? [14:20] <bigjools> I'll have a look [14:20] <bigjools> jmunro: what is your PPA name please [14:21] <jmunro> chapter78 === EdwinGrub is now known as EdwinGrubbs [14:22] <jmunro> im sure its just me making a novice error, but help is appreciated [14:27] <Hobbsee> jmunro: which arches is it building on? [14:28] <jmunro> i386, lpia [14:29] <Hobbsee> er, which package? [14:30] <geser> Hobbsee: I'd guess the package is sugar-develop-activity [14:30] <bigjools> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16211531/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-amd64.sugar-develop-activity_33-0ubuntu1~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [14:31] <Hobbsee> oh, the one that's deleted, and the other two that are superceeded? [14:31] <Hobbsee> yeah, no wonder i didn't find that one [14:32] <Hobbsee> jmunro: didn't you fix it, with ~ppa3? [14:33] <jmunro> nope i made human errors on all of them lol [14:33] <jmunro> excluding the one i deleted, that failed to build [14:33] <Hobbsee> no it didn't [14:33] <Hobbsee> the one you deleted *did* build. [14:33] <Hobbsee> * sugar-develop-activity_33-0ubuntu1~ppa3.diff.gz (1.2 KiB) [14:33] <Hobbsee> * sugar-develop-activity_33-0ubuntu1~ppa3.dsc (693 bytes) [14:33] <bigjools> only on i386 [14:33] <Hobbsee> * sugar-develop-activity_33-0ubuntu1~ppa3_all.deb (210.8 KiB) [14:33] <Hobbsee> * sugar-develop-activity_33.orig.tar.gz (209.7 KiB) [14:33] <jmunro> ppa3 has human error [14:33] <Hobbsee> bigjools: yes, that's deliberate. [14:34] <Hobbsee> but that will work on all arches [14:34] <jmunro> Hobbsee: i changed arch to 'all' but this is incorrect [14:34] <Hobbsee> jmunro: why? [14:34] <jmunro> it has .so's, surely these are arch dependent? [14:35] <jmunro> (apologies for taking your time, im inexperienced at creating packages) [14:37] <Hobbsee> oh, hmmm. [14:37] <Hobbsee> libgtk2.0-0 is definetly *built* on all the arches, separately. i don't know :) [14:38] <jmunro> im a bit confused to the nature of the problem, at home i have amd64, i could try building there to see if it stumbles on the same problem [14:40] <bigjools> there might be a problem with the libgtk2.0-0 package on amd64, I dunno [14:40] <jmunro> is it still possible that there is an error on my behalf? [14:40] <MagicFab> Where should I log a bug about news.launchpad.net ? [14:41] <beuno> MagicFab, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-documentation/ [14:42] <MagicFab> gracias :)_ [14:42] <beuno> de nada [14:44] <bigjools> jmunro: I see the package being installed in the build chroot, then dpkg-shlibdeps can't find one of its files. I can't see anything else wrong, sorry I can't help more :( [14:45] <jmunro> thats ok, perhaps there is somewhere else i can find help bigjools? [14:46] <bigjools> jmunro: I like your idea of building it on your home machine [14:47] <jmunro> ill try this tonight [14:47] <bigjools> let me know how it goes [14:47] <jmunro> thanks for your help! [14:47] <bigjools> np, sorry I can't help more [15:10] <mpt> I'm looking for a prettier way to present the "This site is running pre-release code" message on edge.launchpad.net. Anyone have any suggestions? :-) [15:12] <intellectronica> mpt: ah i see what you mean. on my screen, it would fit nicely on the same line as the menu and the username/logout button [15:12] <intellectronica> there may not be enough space on smaller windows, though [15:12] <mpt> intellectronica, which menu? You mean the Launchpad > ... hierarchy? [15:13] <intellectronica> mpt: yes [15:15] <mpt> Yes, whether there was room there would depend highly on the name of any project/package/person and the width of the window [15:15] <andrea-bs> mpt: how about a small "beta" label near the "launchpad" logo on the location bar? [15:15] <mpt> I was thinking maybe a diagonal ribbon in the corner [15:15] <mpt> or something in the footer [15:16] <andrea-bs> in the footer there's "beta site" near the version number [15:16] <mpt> andrea-bs, that would work, but it wouldn't be obvious how to report bugs [15:16] <andrea-bs> mpt: that's right [15:17] <klette> A nice large gif animation of some road workers and a big fat "under construction" sign.. Back to the 90s ;-) [15:17] <mpt> http://mpt.net.nz/archive/2005/12/27/web-2 [15:18] <klette> hehe [15:19] <klette> A ribbon or something non-intrusive like that is a good idea though. Doesnt need to be a big fat warning, as lp is mainly for developers anyway, and all developers know that beta-software means :-) [15:22] <beuno> mpt, hey there. Is it just me, or under the last item of the hierarchy, there is blank 1-2px blank space? [15:23] * andrea-bs notices this too [15:24] <beuno> mpt, also, maybe for pre-release code, you can add an overlapped round icon that says "beta" on the top left of the hierarchy. Like we did with the messages/warnings/errors [15:25] <mpt> beuno, the 1px gap is dependent on your font size and zoom level. I'm expecting it to go away when I redo the hierarchy with floats. [15:26] <beuno> mpt, I have default font size and zoom level set. The only way I can get it to go away is by zooming out. [15:27] <mpt> Well you implemented that, you tell me ;-) [15:29] <beuno> heh, fair enough. I'll take a stab at it, and see if I can find what's causing this === kiko is now known as kiko-afk [15:31] <beuno> mpt, I also have a fix for the warning image to send you, which doesn't have a transparent background now [15:32] <mpt> beuno, ah great, I was going to regenerate it from the SVG but hadn't had time yet [15:33] <beuno> mpt, I have somewhere around here an improved SVG, so I'll send you the whole lot [15:33] <mpt> ok, thanks [16:04] <mpt> beuno, since it's going to be rewritten anyway, it's probably not worthwhile to spend time on the 1px gap [16:04] <mpt> More interesting to investigate why the tabs aren't centered and "Answers" wraps occasionally :-) === _Paracha is now known as Paracha [16:27] <beuno> mpt, centered by a few pixels? I know why that is already. Answers, on the other hand, hmmm... any way to reproduce that? [16:28] <mpt> beuno, sure, resize the window. Happens at many widths in IE, moderately often in Konqueror, occasionally in Firefox. [16:29] <beuno> ah, I see... [16:30] <beuno> min-width is probably off [16:30] * beuno pulls [16:50] <mrevell> Hey, beuno, could you check a line of Spanish text for me please? [16:54] <beuno> hey mrevell, sure [16:55] <mrevell> thanks beuno. "Por favor, seleccione la página de inicio que desea usar" [16:55] <beuno> I don't quite understand in what context that would work, but there's nothing wrong with it === MagicFab is now known as MagicFab_afk === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [17:58] <beuno> mpt, I don't see the 1px separation in trunk :/ [18:00] <mpt> beuno, try zooming in [18:05] <Dexhu> hello [18:06] <Dexhu> 13 does anayone know anything about - enabled community maintained software (universe) [18:07] <Dexhu> 13 hello === mrevell is now known as mrevell-bbl [18:08] <Dexhu> any upgard people here?? [18:09] <Dexhu> any upgrade people here?? [18:10] <mpt> Dexhu, what are "upgrade people"? [18:10] <mpt> Dexhu, this channel is about Launchpad. If you're looking for help with Ubuntu, try #ubuntu. [18:10] <Dexhu> I'm upgrading to 8.04 and I want to knw what - enabled community maintained software (universe) IS?? [18:11] <Dexhu> should I go to Ubuntu to find this anaswer?? [18:11] <LaserJock> Dexhu: #ubuntu would be the right place [18:12] <Dexhu> OK..THX laser jock [18:12] <beuno> mpt, right, if I zoom in enough, I see it. But I have to fiddle with it. Right now, I see if by default [18:12] <beuno> any unlanded changes to the CSS? [18:12] <mpt> beuno, yes, the hierarchy rewrite that I mentioned before :-) [18:13] <beuno> mpt, ignore me, for some reason, I can see the same issue now [18:13] * beuno grumbles and gets back to CSS [18:14] <LaserJock> is there somebody about I can bug about bug #81002 ? [18:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 81002 in malone "Changing sort order after advanced results forgets any assignee value" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/81002 [18:14] <LaserJock> it's rather annoying to not be able to sort search results === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:15] <LaserJock> is there a reason why sorting was removed? [18:41] <smarter> Hi [18:41] <smarter> How many times does it take for a .pot/.po to be approved? [18:44] <smarter> *how long [19:18] <bdmurray> bug spam is dealt with via answers is that right? [19:20] <matsubara> bdmurray: yes, that's the best way to get lp admins attention. [19:36] <LaserJock> is there a particular reason why I wouldn't be getting bugmail for comments I've made? [19:37] <LaserJock> it's been a number of minutes and I haven't gotten anything [19:39] <andrea-bs> LaserJock: It may be a temporary slowdown. How long have you been waiting? [19:39] <LaserJock> hmm, probably 20min [19:40] <kiko> LaserJock, for what? [19:40] <LaserJock> not all that long, but usually they are quite quick [19:40] <LaserJock> kiko: I've been changing some tags and making comments on some bugs [19:40] <LaserJock> but I haven't gotten any bugmail [19:40] <kiko> LaserJock, hmmm, that's odd === mrevell-bbl is now known as mrevell [19:56] <LaserJock> kiko: do you know of any reason why I wouldn't be getting my own bugmail? I've been getting bugmail in general [19:56] <kiko> LaserJock, no, I asked BjornT but he didn't answer, but I've been receiving some at least [19:58] <LaserJock> hmmpf [19:58] <LaserJock> weird [20:07] <andrea-bs> I've filed a bug 8 minutes ago and I've received the mail just now [20:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 8 in rosetta "Translator forums/means of communication" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/8 [20:12] <LaserJock> hmm, I've still got nothing [20:46] <BjornT> LaserJock: you're not using gmail, are you? [20:51] <BjornT> LaserJock: if you are, that's probably the problem. gmail doesn't display mail from yourself by default. [20:52] <kiko> yeah [20:52] <beuno> BjornT, really? I constantly get emails "from myself" that LP sends [20:52] <beuno> to the point where it's annoying :) [20:53] <beuno> reporting bugs, for example [20:53] <BjornT> beuno: i think there is a setting for this. maybe you have changed it (or google changed the default) [20:55] * beuno looks [20:56] <beuno> I can't find such a setting [20:57] <LaserJock> BjornT: what? really? [20:57] <LaserJock> I am indeed using gmail [21:02] <BjornT> LaserJock: you could try sending a mail to yourself; see if you get it. [21:04] <LaserJock> ok, I did [21:05] <LaserJock> BjornT: yeah, I do get it when I just send a test email to myself [21:06] <LaserJock> BjornT: I got bugmail from myself on July 10th [21:09] <BjornT> LaserJock, beuno: hmm. i know there used to be such a setting. and from reading the help, it seems like gmail still does it for mails you send to mailing list. maybe there is some auto-detection going on there. [21:10] <BjornT> LaserJock: can you give an example of a bug you changed, but didn't get a notification for? [21:10] <beuno> BjornT, ah, yes, I don't get emails from mailing lists I send, although I always thought that was something the mailing list did for me [21:11] <LaserJock> beuno: many mailing lists are set up that way [21:11] <BjornT> LaserJock: also, are the mail sent directly to you, or through a mailing list? [21:11] <LaserJock> BjornT: which mails? [21:13] <beuno> mrevell, this weeks Launchpod was really good, congrats :) [21:14] <BjornT> LaserJock: sorry, i was referring to the bug notifications. i.e., are you subscribed directly, or through a team that has a mailing list. [21:14] <LaserJock> BjornT: it wasn't through subscriptions [21:14] <LaserJock> bug #109544 is an example [21:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 109544 in ubuntu "Automated system update of x64 Kubuntu 6.10 to 7.04 has messed up my display settings." [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/109544 [21:15] <LaserJock> BjornT: do I have to be subscribed to a bug to get my own bugmail? [21:15] <BjornT> LaserJock: yes [21:15] <LaserJock> why? :( [21:16] <LaserJock> I don't remember needing to in the past [21:17] <kiko> LaserJock, you are auto-subscribed if you reported the bug. I don't know what you are talking about. [21:17] <BjornT> LaserJock: it has always been like that. doesn't make sense to get only your changes, but not anyone else's, does it? [21:17] <kiko> this has never changed [21:18] <LaserJock> are you sure? [21:18] <LaserJock> I swear that I used to get all bugmail [21:18] <LaserJock> BjornT: yes, it very much does make sense [21:18] <LaserJock> I use the bugmail to record what I've done [21:20] <kiko> LaserJock, yes, we're absolutely sure. you /are/ confused, trust me. [21:20] <kiko> LaserJock, if you're not subscribed to a bug, you don't get email about it. end of story. always been that way. you can be however an implicit subscriber. [21:21] <LaserJock> hmm, I'm not sure how I could have been getting that bugmail previously then [21:21] <mario_limonciell> cprov, ping [21:21] <cprov> mario_limonciell: pong [21:21] <LaserJock> I guess it must have been through implicit subscription, but I'm not sure how [21:21] <mario_limonciell> cprov, i got a reject email on my first try to upload dkms to main [21:21] <kiko> anyway, I have a session now, will be back later [21:21] <mario_limonciell> telling me that "Signer is not permitted to upload to the component 'main' of file 'dkms_2.0.20.2-0ubuntu1.dsc'." [21:22] <cprov> mario_limonciell: irght, let me check [21:23] <LaserJock> BjornT: so how do I get a record of what I've done then? if the bugmail is incomplete and the activity logs are incomplete I'm not sure where else I can get information [21:23] <kiko> LaserJock, ubuntu-bugs. [21:23] <matsubara> cprov! [21:23] <kiko> bbl! [21:23] <cprov> matsubara: opa [21:23] <matsubara> cprov: de volta pra terrinha? [21:25] <cprov> matsubara: yup, I'm back home. [21:25] <matsubara> cool. welcome back! [21:33] <cprov> matsubara: thanks [21:34] <mrevell> thanks beuno! [21:37] <cprov> mario_limonciell: there is indeed a problem in the code, mainly caused because you already have perms to 'universe'. I will have to debug it a little more. [21:37] <mario_limonciell> cprov, ah, that's unfortunate then [21:37] <cprov> mario_limonciell: is the upload urgent ? [21:37] <mario_limonciell> cprov, it's not urgent. it's a minor bug fix release [21:38] <cprov> mario_limonciell: ok, give some hours, I will email you soon. [21:38] <mario_limonciell> cprov, okay thank you [21:42] <TuniX12> hello [21:43] <TuniX12> how to upload packages into PPA ?? [21:43] <beuno> TuniX12, take a look at: https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart [21:44] <mouz> I'd like to use wikiname Mouz. I can not because it is in use by another account. As far as I can see the account has never been used (de-can; created 2005-08-29). I sent a mail about 6 days ago to the mail address on ~de-can, but I got no reply. Can I have the Mouz wikiname somehow? Currently I'm using MouzMouz and redirecting it to 'his' page. [21:46] <jpds> mouz: I'd file a question in Launchpad requesting that the inactive user be deleted. [21:47] <mouz> jpds: ok i'll do that. thanks [21:49] <TuniX12> hello how to make sha keys? [21:50] <beuno> TuniX12, https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/CreatingAnSSHKeyPair [21:50] <TuniX12> beuno: thanks [21:50] <beuno> :) [21:51] <beuno> TuniX12, https://help.launchpad.net/ contains all kinds of wisdom, I'd recommend you check it out [21:51] <TuniX12> ok thank you [21:52] <beuno> welcome' [22:31] <mario_limonciell> so it appears that with the libtool in intrepid, ltmain.sh got moved from /usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh to /usr/share/libtool/config/litmain.sh. Should we be writing patches to configure scripts to handle this, or what's the appropriate policy for it? [22:33] <mwhudson> mario_limonciell: this is definitely not the right place for that question [22:33] <mario_limonciell> oops sorry mwhudson i thought i was in #ubuntu-devel :) [22:33] <mario_limonciell> my bad [22:34] <mwhudson> :) [22:54] <Laibsch> Is it correct that to download translations from launchpad you need to be logged in, IOW you need to have an account? [22:56] <wgrant> It needs to know your email address, doesn't it? [22:56] <emgent> wgrant: heya. [22:57] <wgrant> Hi emgent. I'm about to leave. [22:58] <emgent> why launchpad dont send an email to last uploader if someone open bug on package? [22:59] <wgrant> emgent: Because we don't have the concept of maintainers, and TIL is weak at best. [22:59] <wgrant> You should subscribe to the package's bugs if you want to get them. [22:59] <wgrant> doko doesn't want to get mail for 600 packages because he uploaded a transition [22:59] <emgent> yeah but i can subscribe in a bug, not in package. [23:00] <wgrant> emgent: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/somepackage should have the action. [23:00] <wgrant> You can subscribe to all bugs for a package easily. [23:00] <wgrant> Ah, scrap the 'bugs.' [23:01] <doko_> wgrant: ? [23:01] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/somepackage/+subscribe [23:01] <wgrant> doko_: Argh, I thought it wouldn't ping you because you had a tail. Sorry. [23:01] <emgent> oh nice, i saw now. [23:07] <Laibsch> wgrant: that is rather suboptimal [23:07] <wgrant> Laibsch: Why? [23:07] <wgrant> Laibsch: It needs to know when to email you. [23:07] <wgrant> *where [23:07] <Laibsch> not if the stuff was available for download [23:07] <wgrant> And it probably needs to stop people from requesting enormous numbers of exports or the world will collapse. [23:07] <Laibsch> I am trying to push LP for translation [23:07] <Laibsch> and this could be the killer for it [23:08] <wgrant> Is it that hard to create an account? The Launchpad account creation process is particularly painless. [23:08] <wgrant> But I must run. [23:10] <Laibsch> well, *I* have an account and I don't see a problem [23:42] <Q-FUNK> howdy! is there any way to relaunch a build that stopped because of a missing build-dep on a ppa? [23:43] <cprov> Q-FUNK: access the build page and click 'retry'. [23:43] <Q-FUNK> ah, ok. let's see... [23:44] <Q-FUNK> I see build logs, but not build actions [23:45] <Q-FUNK> ah [23:45] <Q-FUNK> found [23:45] <Q-FUNK> ot an obvious place |