File size: 3,615 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac === thegodfather is now known as fabbione [14:55] <F1l1p3> help [14:55] <F1l1p3> i just compiled the kernel [14:55] <F1l1p3> and i got a black screen after the boot [14:55] <F1l1p3> anyone?? [14:56] <alex_joni> F1l1p3: does it finish booting? [14:59] <F1l1p3> yeah right before the login screen [14:59] <F1l1p3> all get black [15:00] <F1l1p3> so i have to restart [15:00] <F1l1p3> i get no msg just the screen got black [15:00] <alex_joni> F1l1p3: can you use Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get to a console? [15:01] <visik7> hi [15:01] <visik7> what's the command that you guys use to create the kernel package ? make-kpkg or dpkg-buildpackage ? [15:03] <F1l1p3> no i can`t use nothing [15:04] <F1l1p3> i got the sound that entered in the login screen [15:04] <F1l1p3> but it`s all black [15:07] <F1l1p3> and all it rest is me to restart the laptop [15:27] <alex_joni> if I build a new kernel (same ABI, almost no changes), would it be possible to use the old modules? [15:27] <visik7> alex_joni: just tring right now [15:27] <visik7> I'll tell you [15:28] <alex_joni> visik7: I use fakeroot debian/rules .. to build a kernel [15:29] <alex_joni> was wondering if anyone knows what gets tested for struct_module version matching [15:29] <visik7> I use this command [15:29] <visik7> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 AUTOBUILD=1 NOEXTRAS=1 fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic [15:30] <visik7> alex_joni: what are you patching ? [15:31] <alex_joni> visik7: rtai [15:31] <alex_joni> www.rtai.org [15:35] <visik7> I think it could broke the abi [15:36] <visik7> didn't it ? [15:36] <alex_joni> I already built a kernel which works, now I need to update it slightly [15:37] <alex_joni> and I wonder if all modules built for the old one still work with the new one [15:40] <alex_joni> vermagic from modules from both kernels look the same [17:32] <BenC> mjg59: ping [17:33] <BenC> alex_joni: if you have the old ABI in your build, it should check and tell you if anything changed (ABI check will fail) [19:57] <lamont> Jul 20 12:54:12 rover3 kernel: [ 351.868666] /dev/vmmon[9916]: Task_Switch: Intel VT mode is in use by some other software [19:57] <lamont> how do I know what task I need to kill? [20:07] <lamont> interesting. nuking the kvm package fixed it... I guess I'll have to figure out how to switch that with less of a crowbar [20:21] <alex_joni> BenC: it doesn't fail.. but loading an old module on the new kernel brings: [2214758.908354] rtapi: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module [21:11] <mjg59> BenC: Hi [21:17] <BenC> mjg59: Hey...this vt font saving patch we have, is it suitable to send upstream? [21:24] <BenC> alex_joni: if you are passing AUTOBUILD, the check isn't done [21:25] <BenC> alex_joni: and disagreement about struct_module means you have an ABI change, and you should use the new modules [21:36] <alex_joni> BenC: ok, thanks [21:37] <alex_joni> BenC: I used "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=2 NOEXTRAS=1 fakeroot debian/rules custom-binary-foo" [21:40] <BenC> oh, custom-binary does not get ABI checks [21:41] <alex_joni> aha, then that's probably the issue.. [21:41] <alex_joni> there is an ABI bump, but I missed it ;) [21:41] <alex_joni> m'kay.. thanks for clearing it up [21:46] <BenC> mjg59: And the patch for "blank screen, only blinking cursor after console switch" patch... [21:52] <mjg59> BenC: It's a feature enhancement, but I don't see why not [21:53] <BenC> mjg59: on both counts? [21:53] <mjg59> BenC: The latter is a requirement for the former [21:53] <mjg59> BenC: Should probably be merged [21:53] <BenC> mjg59: ok, thanks === dashua__ is now known as dashua |