File size: 37,722 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
[00:13] <Keybuk> vuntz: of course, I can't take a screenshot
[00:13] <Keybuk> if I go to an empty viewport, and click it, I get all my apps
[00:14] <Keybuk> if I click it again, I get only 3
[00:17] <vuntz> weird
[00:17]  * vuntz wonders if there's another wm using viewport
[00:18] <vuntz> sawfish, maybe
[00:18] <vuntz> or maybe compiz does work on my laptop now...
[06:33] <Hobbsee> ubotu: part
[06:33] <Hobbsee> (george is already in here, and i don't have access)
[06:36] <Amaranth> George: test
[06:37] <Hobbsee> !help
[06:37] <George> I am ubotu, all-knowing infobot. You can browse my brain at http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi - Usage info: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBots
[06:37] <Hobbsee> works
[06:37] <Amaranth> Hobbsee: I could just ban George :P
[06:37] <Amaranth> bug 67834
[06:38] <George> Launchpad bug 67834 in kdebase "add an option to disable the system bell system-wide" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/67834
[06:38] <Amaranth> then again...
[06:38] <Hobbsee> Amaranth: if you like.  both do it.
[06:38] <Hobbsee> Amaranth: this ubotu doesn't work with !info basket, etc, though.
[06:38] <Hobbsee> although it'll tell you if something isn't in ubuntu
[06:38] <Amaranth> nah, this seems to work for the only thing it ever gets used for
[06:38] <Amaranth> bug 49346
[06:38] <George> Launchpad bug 49346 in metacity "Gnome mistakes window closing confirmation as frozen programme. (dup-of: 29584)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49346
[06:39] <George> Launchpad bug 29584 in metacity "False reports of "Window not responding" error" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29584
[06:40] <Hobbsee> George:  bug #172300
[06:40] <George> Launchpad bug 172300 in linux-source-2.6.22 "Unable to boot 7.10 on abit ib9 due to ata xfermode" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172300
[06:51] <dholbach> good morning
[06:56] <Amaranth> @schedule
[06:56] <George> Schedule for Etc/UTC: 19 Mar 21:00: Server Team | 26 Mar 21:00: Server Team | 28 Mar 04:00: MOTU
[08:46] <seb128> hey hey hey mvo gicmo
[08:48] <seb128> gicmo: your nautilus-cd-burner changes work correctly ;-)
[08:48] <mvo> hey seb128!
[08:49] <gicmo> seb128: cool, totally strange that they left that call in there, could you attach the patch to the bug?
[08:49] <seb128> gicmo: sure
[08:49] <seb128> gicmo: I manage to lock nautilus apparently though
[08:50] <gicmo> oh
[08:50] <seb128> gicmo: does http://paste.ubuntu.com/5860/ looks like a locked situation?
[08:50] <seb128> gicmo: I tried to open several folder etc on the sftp location while I was disconnect
[08:50] <seb128> that didn't block nautilus which is good ;-)
[08:51] <seb128> but when I reconnected it did the actions queued apparently
[08:52] <seb128> DOH
[08:52] <seb128> don't keep fingers on ctrl-alt to switch workspace after typing
[08:52] <seb128> or don't delete a char while you are doing so rather ;-)
[08:52] <gicmo> hehe
[08:53] <gicmo> looks like its blockin in dbus
[08:53] <seb128> anyway, after being connected again it opened several directories on which ones I clicked during the disconnect time
[08:53] <seb128> and then got greyed (ie, the compiz way to tell you the app is not responding)
[08:54] <lool> seb128: was happening to me all the time; I decided to add DontZap to my config when I was tired of losing my work :)
[08:54] <seb128> lool: we should do that by default ;-)
[08:54] <lool> I proposed that a while back!
[08:55] <lool> But I was told many users kill their session in this way, especially when it's hung
[08:55] <seb128> which is true
[08:56] <seb128> we got quite some complain because gdm was not coming back properly after ctrl-alt-del in some cycle
[08:56] <gicmo> seb128: hmm tricky
[08:57] <seb128> gicmo: don't bother too much with this one, that was just in case there was something obvious there
[08:58] <gicmo> k
[09:02] <huats> morning everyone
[09:02] <huats> :)
=== fta_ is now known as fta
[09:03] <crevette> heu huats
[09:08] <huats> hello crevette mvo and of course seb128
[09:08] <huats> :)
[09:08] <mvo> hey huats
[09:08] <seb128> lut huats
[09:14] <pitti> kwwii: I just noticed that with the new gdm theme the "incorrect password blabla" line is partially covered by the input line; it should be somewhere else
[09:14] <pitti> kwwii: is this on your radar already or shall I file a bug?
[09:14] <seb128> pitti: there is several duplicates from this one already
[09:14] <seb128> I'm going to kick the next user bugging gdm about it
[09:14] <seb128> ;-)
[09:14] <kwwii> pitti: there is already a bug on that (and I will fix it)
[09:14]  * pitti shuts up
[09:14] <pitti> kwwii: danke
[09:14]  * pitti hugs seb128
[09:15]  * seb128 hugs pitti
[09:15] <kwwii> I'll have the tweaked package ready a bit later :-)
[09:15] <seb128> that's annoying, they all send bugs on gdm
[09:15]  * pitti currently tests pretty much everything in the live system
[09:15] <seb128> pitti: how buggy is it?
[09:15] <pitti> pretty good actually
[09:15] <pitti> PK works again, all apps that I tested so far work
[09:15] <seb128> cool
[09:16] <pitti> bug 203612 is a bit nasty
[09:16] <pitti> but just cosmetic, too
[09:16] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 203612 in displayconfig-gtk "Screens & Graphics menu item in wrong section" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203612
[09:16] <pitti> all in all we are in a pretty good shape
[09:16] <seb128> pitti: I though it had been removed from the menus?
[09:16] <pitti> (this can't be right, it's too good....)
[09:16] <pitti> removed entirely? why should it?
[09:17] <pitti> it's my live saver to get a correct resolution, and I guess for many other people, too?
[09:17] <pitti> System -> Administration is a good place for it?
[09:17] <Amaranth> oh, i thought Screens&Graphics went away
[09:17] <seb128> pitti:
[09:17] <seb128>  displayconfig-gtk (0.3.8ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
[09:17] <seb128>  .
[09:17] <seb128>    * Disable displayconfig-gtk in menus (replaced by Screen Resolution tool)
[09:18]  * pitti wonders WTH a "802.1X protected wired network" is
[09:18] <pitti> asac: ^ current network-manager
[09:18] <seb128> pitti: bryce argued that it's too buggy and not useful now that we have the xrandr 1.2 capplet
[09:18] <Amaranth> yeah, since it's really only needed for bulletproofx
[09:18] <pitti> but if X misdetects the resolution, xrand doesn't help at all
[09:18] <Amaranth> the xrandr 1.2 thing doesn't work for nvidia but then again screens & graphics doesn't do the right thing for nvidia either :)
[09:18] <pitti> (e. g. vmware only has 800x600 due to a bug in X.org somewhere)
[09:19] <seb128> Amaranth: bryce wants to use the nvidia tool for those
[09:19] <pitti> well, either way, it shouldn't be in Apps -> Other
[09:19] <seb128> pitti: well, iz xorg bug
[09:19] <Amaranth> yeah, nvidia-settings is better :)
[09:19] <seb128> no it shouldn't
[09:19] <pitti> seb128: right; but even if this particular one is fixed, we'll always have some
[09:20] <pitti> "cannot fix detected screen resolution" is the top #1 complaint from the people around me why they did not install Ubuntu permanently
[09:20] <pitti> granted, it got much better in hardy
[09:21] <pitti> seb128: ah, and tomboy crashes
[09:21] <pitti> (when trying to quit it)
[09:22] <pitti> and the tracker search tool doesn't allow me to enable tracker
[09:22] <seb128> pitti: you should enable it from system, preferences, indexing
[09:22] <seb128> pitti: well, I'm not the one to argue with, but I really don't like this displaygtk-config
[09:22] <seb128> I had bad comments about it and I think it's quite buggy
[09:23] <pitti> I tend to agree
[09:26] <pitti> seb128: hm, System Tools -> Hardware Testing... I don't think we want that there either ,right?
[09:26] <pitti> System -> Administration, for all users?
[09:27] <seb128> pitti: yeah, cr3 mailed me about that yesterday
[09:27] <seb128> pitti: I'm not sure to be honest
[09:27] <seb128> pitti: I'm pondering moving things back to applications, system tools
[09:27] <seb128> system, preferences has too many items now
[09:28] <pitti> hm, but they mostly fit well into the idea of "system administration" IMHO
[09:28] <pitti> hwtest doesn't, right
[09:28] <seb128> and vmware, virt, etc install items in applications, system tools
[09:28] <seb128> which means you quickly get this submenu back when installing softwares anyway
[09:28] <pitti> right, gnome-device-manager is, too (universe, though)
[09:29] <pitti> it just looks a bit weird to have just one entry in the menu
[09:29] <pitti> but *shrug*
[09:29] <pitti> seb128: as long as it has been discussed, I'm fine
[09:29] <pitti> just want to make sure it's not an oversight
[09:29]  * pitti hugs seb128
[09:30] <seb128> pitti: I didn't reply to cr3, but we will not let one item there
[09:31] <seb128> either we move back things which were there
[09:31] <seb128> ie, gnome-system-monitor
[09:31] <seb128> or we move the hardware testing somewhere else
[09:31] <seb128> not sure what is the best yet
[09:31] <seb128> I'll likely put that on the desktop team meeting agenda
[09:34] <pitti> oh, system monitor is a great idea
[09:34]  * pitti doesn't even find that in the menu
[09:34] <pitti> it's applet-only ATM?
[09:35] <pitti> wow, we have a "Network Manager Editor" now
[09:36] <pitti> . o O { that doesn't really belong into the main menu IMHO; would be better in right-click nm-applet menu }
[09:36] <pitti> seems I'm in a nitpicking mood today
[09:46] <asac> pitti: i have seen some discussion about that
[09:47] <asac> but i don't have any details
[09:47] <asac> will try to look it up when i have some time
[09:47] <Amaranth> pitti: can you make jockey set UseCompositeWrapper for nvidia too?
[09:47]  * Amaranth should really file a bug :)
[09:48] <pitti> Amaranth: sure, but please file a bug and give some explanations
[09:48] <pitti> Amaranth: will that cause any regressions for other hardware or performance?
[09:49] <Amaranth> it might be a performance hit but it just makes the nvidia driver use something from the X server (that i'm guessing other drivers use) instead of doing stuff by itself
[09:49] <Amaranth> apparently Qt apps are basically unusable with the driver we have if you don't enable this
[09:50] <Amaranth> with compiz, i mean
[10:14] <Keybuk> pitti: it is in the right-click NM menu, isn't it?
[10:14] <pitti> Keybuk: oh, indeed it is
[10:15] <pitti> so why is it repeated in the menu?
[10:15] <seb128> because right click is not discoverable
[10:16] <seb128> but I agree on this one, it should not be in the menu
[10:17] <Keybuk> the fact that NM has both left and right click menus is, of course, a different issue
[10:17] <Keybuk> (and an idiotic one)
[10:17] <pitti> . o O { session startup in a fresh vmware installation is delightfully fast again! }
[10:18] <pitti> asac: what is a 802.1X protected wired network? Can we change that string to something mere mortals can understand?
[10:18] <asac> pitti: huh? didn't you get my answer or did i forget to hit enter? ... i currently have no idea what it is. i just rememberd that someone was happy that it worked now on NM list
[10:19] <asac> where do you read that string?
[10:19] <pitti> asac: ah, there; sorry
[10:19] <pitti> asac: left click on nm-applet
[10:19] <pitti> seb128: ah, recently you were asking me about floppy, right?
[10:20] <asac> i dont see anything there right now. guess have to remove my entry from eni. will do so after a short breakfast
[10:20] <pitti> seb128: it just occurred to me that in vmware I can have a fake floppy, and I indeed get that "invalid hal function signature yadayada" error when I select it in the places menu
[10:20] <seb128> pitti: yes, I would like to know if those are working in nautilus now
[10:20] <seb128> pitti: and using the computer location?
[10:20] <seb128> pitti: that's weird because the method is available now
[10:20] <pitti> seb128: there it correctly says "no media in the driver"
[10:21] <pitti> s/driver/drive/
[10:21] <seb128> hum
[10:21] <seb128> would be interesting to try with a floppy in the drive
[10:21] <seb128> to see if it gets mounted
[10:22] <asac> pitti: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.1x ... so its authenticated wired apparently (like one could guess)
[10:23] <asac> now breakfast
[10:25] <Amaranth> so no one can sniff your wired connection?
[10:25] <pitti> seb128: let me find/download a floppy image
[10:25] <seb128> pitti: thanks
[10:26] <pitti> hm, that vmware isntance does not have a floppy...
[10:26]  * pitti shuts down and adds one
[10:27] <slomo_> seb128: ah, please sync banshee 0.13.2+dfsg-8 from debian :) adds mtp and gnome-settings-daemon 2.22 support
[10:27] <slomo_> seb128: and last-exit 5-2
[10:27] <seb128> pitti: is that ok to do universe syncs now?
[10:28] <pitti> seb128: sure
[10:28] <pitti> seb128: ah, convenient: vmware offers me to create an empty floppy image :)
[10:28] <seb128> ah, cool
[10:36] <pitti> seb128: hmmm
[10:36] <pitti> so I created and mformat'ed the floppy
[10:36] <pitti> and mount /media/floppy works (standard fstab entry)
[10:37] <pitti> but computer place still says 'no media' and places menu has that weird hal signature error
[10:37] <seb128> ok, so it's still buggy
[10:37] <pitti> gnome-mount -vbd /dev/fd0 works at least
[10:39] <pitti> same result when I remove the fstab entry
[10:41] <pitti> seb128: hm, seems to be pretty much bug 188256 for floppies
[10:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 188256 in nautilus "empty CD-ROM Drive doesn't do anything when clicked" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188256
[10:42] <seb128> pitti: right
[10:42] <pitti> it's mentioned in the second-last comment
[10:42] <seb128> pitti: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/197954 too
[10:42] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 197954 in gvfs "Hardy: Unable to scan Floppy Drive for media changes" [Low,Triaged]
[10:43] <seb128> pitti: once the floppy mounted you can browse it though?
[10:44] <pitti> when I use gnome-mount -d /dev/fd0, then the Places menu gets a secodn icon "disk" with a floppy icon (in addition to "Floppy drive")
[10:44] <pitti> same in the computer place
[10:44] <pitti> the disk icon opens nautilus with the floppy contents
[10:45] <pitti> floppy drive icon continues to be broken
[11:16] <slomo_> seb128: oh, and after freeze you can merge glib and sync gvfs please ;)
[11:17] <seb128> slomo_: glib is not buggy then? you told me yesterday to wait
[11:17] <lapo> ciao
[11:17] <slomo_> seb128: the bug was somewhere else as expected but i just wanted to be sure :) (n-m had memory corruption, causing a segfault in a glib function)
[11:18] <slomo_> seb128: also all those patches are upstream now (or will later today)
[11:18] <seb128> slomo_: alright
[11:18] <seb128> slomo_: what patches?
[11:18] <seb128> slomo_: I did send the gio nfs one upstream today
[11:18] <slomo_> seb128: the nfs4 patch?
[11:18] <seb128> yes
[11:18] <slomo_> ok, none of the others? :)
[11:18] <slomo_> i meant 80_static-mutex-aliasing-warnings.patch and 81_c99-inline-warnings.patch
[11:18] <seb128> I've enough to carry zillion of changes because Josselin doesn't bother sending what he does upstream
[11:19] <seb128> slomo_: no, I was going to look at the other later but if you do it that's good ;-)
[11:20] <slomo_> ok ;)
[11:20] <seb128> slomo_: btw did you port the single click patch for nautilus to the new version?
[11:20] <slomo_> i dropped it iirc
[11:21] <seb128> ok, cool
[11:21] <seb128> because it's creating issues
[11:21] <slomo_> seb128: how was the file called? :)
[11:22] <seb128> slomo_: 05_places-sidebar_single-click.patch
[11:22] <slomo_> oh, that is still applied (and didn't need porting)
[11:22] <slomo_> sorry
[11:23] <slomo_> what issues does it create?
[11:23] <seb128> slomo_: bug #189110
[11:23] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 189110 in nautilus "nautilus erroneous error message opening Samba share - can't display Samba drive" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189110
[11:23] <seb128> slomo_: and right clicking on a location to copy things for example makes it switch to the location
[11:24] <slomo_> ok, thanks... will take a closer look at the patch and disable for next upload unless it's possible to fix it easily; )
[11:24] <seb128> thanks
[11:26] <slomo_> i hate all these patches :)
[11:26] <seb128> me too
[11:27] <seb128> we should really profite of alex being active to get things upstream or drop the distro changes if they are not appropriates
[11:28] <slomo_> yes, just needs someone to do it... most nautilus patches were in bugzilla though
[11:30] <seb128> alex doesn't use bugzilla a lot, too much things there
[11:30] <seb128> better to ask him on IRC or use the nautilus list
[11:33] <slomo_> yes, that's my plan
[11:33] <slomo_> :)
[11:33] <slomo_> seb128: apart from that he will have much less time for such things starting in 10 days (i thought you got the mail too?)
[11:34] <seb128> slomo_: yes
[11:34] <seb128> slomo_: that's why we should try to get changes upstream now ;-)
[11:35] <slomo_> seb128: yes, later... need to get some food now and then i'll do it :P
[11:35] <Amaranth> what happens in 10 days?
[11:36] <seb128> Amaranth: alex goes on paternity leaves for some months
[11:36] <Amaranth> ah
[11:36] <Amaranth> i thought that was a couple months ago
[11:46] <slomo_> seb128: any reason why you didn't commit the nfs4 patch yet? :)
[11:47] <seb128> slomo_: I'm not a glib maintainer and nobody approved it yet
[11:48] <slomo_> seb128: can't alex approve at least gio related things? well, someone will probably look at it and if not i'll ask mclassen later when i've all patches prepared ;)
[11:49] <seb128> slomo_: alex read the gio bug mails and approve patches usually, I just don't want to bother him every 15 minutes on IRC, I'll let him deal with the bug when he wants rather, there is no hurry ;-)
[12:18] <seb128> lool: did you get the cheese update uploaded?
[12:20] <lool> seb128: It was incomplete
[12:20] <lool> seb128: missing b-deps bumps and changelog information
[12:21] <lool> seb128: I can easily complete the update in some minutes if you need it at any time
[12:21] <pedro_> slomo_: hello, have you seen this bug 199496 ?
[12:21] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199496 in tomboy "Tomboy.exe crashed with SIGSEGV in exit()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199496
[12:21] <seb128> lool: I don't really need it, but would be nice to have the GNOME 2.22 version
[12:22] <seb128> lool: I was just wondering because you said it would be uploaded by tuesday
[12:22] <slomo_> pedro_: known gtk# or mono bug
[12:23] <slomo_> pedro_: assuming it happened when exiting tomboy
[12:23] <pedro_> yes same one
[12:23] <slomo_> no fix known yet but it's nothing to worry about too much
[12:23] <slomo_> just annoying because of apport ;)
[12:23] <pedro_> hehe ok, thanks
[12:23] <lool> seb128: I said we should set the deadline to tuesday, but then I backed up when I recalled about the freeze
[12:24] <lool> seb128: To be clear: set the deadline, and I'll honor it :)
[12:24] <lool> seb128: I've passed the info to tremolux, and he output the update over the WE, but it was slightly incomplete
[12:24] <lool> Hence the back and forth
[12:24] <lool> If it's too long for you, tell me, I'll finish it
[12:28] <seb128> lool: next week would be nice
[12:29] <lool> seb128: next Monday?
[12:29] <lool> seb128: I'll pass down the target to tremolux
[12:29] <lool> seb128: Feel free to escalate to me any time you want it
[12:30] <slomo_> seb128: /usr/share/gnome/applications/defaults.list <--- is this a debian invention?
[12:30] <lool> slomo_: Isn't this XDG stuff?
[12:30] <lool> desktop-file-utils
[12:30] <seb128> lool: monday is a holiday, there is no really hurry, just try to get it uploaded next week if you can, thanks ;-)
[12:31] <seb128> slomo_: yes
[12:31] <slomo_> lool: yes... but i mean this location, other location are XDG, right
[12:31] <lool> seb128: Oh *right* \o/
[12:31] <lool> holidays \o/
[12:31] <slomo_> seb128: ok, not going upstream :)
[12:31] <seb128> slomo_: no
[12:31] <seb128> slomo_: that should be dropped from debian too if you ask me
[12:32] <slomo_> seb128: why exactly?
[12:33] <seb128> because it creates extra diff and should be done in a standard way
[12:33] <seb128> that has been discussed on the xdg lists some weeks ago
[12:34] <seb128> I'm not sure that KDE is using defaults.list anyway
[12:34] <slomo_> ok, did you drop it for ubuntu?
[12:34] <seb128> we never had it in ubuntu
[12:34] <slomo_> heh
[12:34] <seb128> that's something josselin did for debian I think
[12:34] <seb128> but I never agreed with it
[12:35] <seb128> and kubuntu didn't complain either so I think it's a non issue
[12:35] <slomo_> yes... how are default applications for a mimetype selected in ubuntu?
[12:35] <seb128> as they are upstream
[12:35] <seb128> using the defaults.list but not in a gnome subdir
[12:36] <slomo_> seb128: what are the other paths? i know the one in the home directory but is there a system wide too?
[12:36] <seb128> /usr/share/applications/defaults.list is the standard one
[12:37] <slomo_> ah, non-existing here... so it does automagic somehow? ;)
[12:37] <seb128> no, josselin patched the debian gnome to look at the debian specific location
[12:38] <slomo_> is there a /usr/share/applications/defaults.list in ubuntu?
[12:38] <seb128> yes
[12:38] <seb128> we ship it in desktop-file-utils though
[12:38] <seb128> not in gnome-vfs as debian
[12:39] <slomo_> ok, gives more or less the same problem though, just a different patch
[12:39] <seb128> what problem?
[12:40] <slomo_> these are all gnome applications... now if someone uses for example xfce he will have gnome applications as default unless he sets something different and not what xfce offers
[12:40] <slomo_> (same for kde if they use it too)
[12:40] <slomo_> not sure if this is important
[12:41] <seb128> we go no complain from kubuntu so I guess KDE is using something else
[12:44] <seb128> slomo_: there is a mail on the xdg lists stating "KDE uses InitialPreference. GNOME uses defaults.list."
[12:44] <slomo_> ok
[12:46]  * slomo_ isn't happy with having gnome specific things in glib... but /usr/share/gnome is even worse :)
[13:08] <slomo_> seb128: 18_disable_signal_handler.patch  <--- talked with alex about this one already? :)
[13:09] <seb128> slomo_: I just noticed that I forgot to drop it when I read your changelog
[13:09] <seb128> slomo_: alex fixed it differently upstream, the patch can be dropped
[13:09] <slomo_> seb128: thanks
[13:09] <slomo_> ok, i have everything ready now to flood alex with patches :P
[13:10] <seb128> ;-)
[13:17] <slomo_> vuntz: ping? :)
[13:20] <slomo_> vuntz: gnome-menus currently installs /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu and similar things... ubuntu/debian already adds "gnome-" as prefix to them, what do you think about getting this upstream? :)  needs a small fix in gnome-panel too... and resolves a conflict with kde (which has a kde-applications.menu, not sure if it's called applications.menu upstream too)
[13:21] <vuntz> slomo_: I've thought about this
[13:21] <slomo_> vuntz: ...but? :) it looks like a small change that shouldn't cause any problems at all
[13:21] <vuntz> slomo_: problem is that people who have edited their menus will lose their changes if we change the name of those files
[13:21] <slomo_> oh
[13:22] <slomo_> ok, that's bad then :)
[13:23] <slomo_> vuntz: any ideas how to solve that better?
[13:23] <seb128> slomo_: btw, ubuntu doesn't add gnome- there
[13:23] <seb128> slomo_: that's another change josselin did in debian I disagreed about
[13:23] <slomo_> oh, i didn't know you dropped that patch
[13:23] <slomo_> why did you disagree? except what vuntz said?
[13:24] <seb128> slomo_: and I think Amaranth recommended against it because it was creating issues for menu edition or something
[13:24] <seb128> slomo_: because it was breaking thing and a distro specific behaviour
[13:24] <seb128> slomo_: it requires to patch applications to use the right naming
[13:25] <vuntz> slomo_: it's hard to fix now
[13:25] <slomo_> ok, so not beautiful forever or until gnome 3.0 ;)
[13:26] <vuntz> slomo_: well, I'd love to fix this
[13:27] <slomo_> vuntz: ok, what about the gnome-panel-logout application patch? :)
[13:28] <seb128> vuntz: btw, could you review http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505488?
[13:28] <ubotu> Gnome bug 505488 in gconf "gconfd does not unblock signals properly" [Normal,Unconfirmed]
[13:32] <vuntz> seb128: gconf?
[13:33] <vuntz> slomo_: I'm not fond of this patch. Will be fixed properly in 2.23
[13:33] <seb128> vuntz: nobody is maintaining it upstream
[13:33] <slomo_> vuntz: ok, good enough for me :)
[13:33] <seb128> vuntz: so I figured you might be able to review the patch and commit since that's a small one ;-)
[13:33] <seb128> vuntz: I'll try kmaraas otherwise
[13:35] <vuntz> seb128: I don't understand the patch
[13:35] <vuntz> seb128: isn't gconfd.c only used for gconfd? What's the relation with the library?
[13:35] <seb128> lool: ^
[13:36] <seb128> vuntz: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/188007
[13:36] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 188007 in gconf "gconfd does not unblock signals properly" [Medium,Triaged]
[13:36] <seb128> vuntz: there is some details there, not sure if that's useful to you though
[13:36] <slomo_> isn't gconfd forked from the library?
[13:37] <vuntz> slomo_: hmm. In GNOME, no
[13:37] <lool> vuntz: gconfd is autospawned by the lib
[13:37] <lool> vuntz: such a gconfd inherits whatever state the process had
[13:37] <vuntz> slomo_: I mean, yes, but it's started by gconf-sanity-check
[13:37] <lool> As it's a fork() + exec()
[13:38] <vuntz> anyway, it can't harm
[13:44] <seb128> vuntz: thanks!
[13:48] <lool> Pff we have ugly patches in gconf
[13:50] <seb128> lool: which one?
[13:50] <lool> The syslog one
[13:50] <lool> The other one isn't too ugly, it's just hurd cruft; can probably be merged upstream as is
[13:53] <seb128> right
[13:57] <soulc> cd burning software?
[13:58] <seb128> soulc: hi, you want to go on #ubuntu
[14:00] <soulc> want is desktop concerned with?
[14:02] <seb128> getting work done
[14:02] <seb128> that's not an user chan
[14:02] <seb128> rather a chan to discuss work we are doing
[14:03] <soulc> ah ok
[14:03] <soulc> so #ubuntu will work for me huh?
[14:07] <vuntz> Amaranth: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520726 doesn't apply here
[14:08] <ubotu> Gnome bug 520726 in general "make left and up viewport moves work" [Normal,Unconfirmed]
[14:08] <vuntz> is there any other patch that you apply before this one?
[14:11] <vuntz> ah, maybe the patch from bug 520704
[14:18] <vuntz> seb128: I think you can kill 80_from_bugzilla_add_action_above.patch in libwnck
[14:18] <seb128> vuntz: thanks
[14:19] <vuntz> I remember thinking it should be killed a few months ago, but you might need to check why ;-)
[14:19] <seb128> Amaranth: ^ confirming? ;-)
[14:20] <vuntz> ok, no real important patches for libwnck
[14:33] <slomo_> pedro_: hi :) want to file FF exception requests for gtk-sharp2, gnome-sharp2 and gnome-desktop-sharp2 and a main inclusion report for the latter (f-spot wants gtkhtml)? :)
[14:33] <slomo_> pedro_: would get us rid of gtkhtml3.8 from main among other things
[14:38] <pedro_> well if that fixed the crashes
[14:43] <mvo> slomo_: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5871 <- interessting for you? (dapper->hardy)
[14:44] <slomo_> pedro_: doesn't fix the crashes... but makes pitti happy and will make it more likely that people can use our gtk# for the complete hardy supported time
[14:46] <lool> vuntz: Would you mind merging the hurd support patch in gconf?  http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnome/desktop/unstable/gconf/debian/patches/25_gconf-path-max-hurd.patch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
[14:46] <lool> Since you seem to be on a patch merging day :)
[14:48] <vuntz> lool: not now (finishing some gnome-desktop bugzilla crawling and then meeting in 10 minutes)
[14:48] <vuntz> lool: but you can ping me later :-)
[14:51] <lool> Sure
[14:52] <kwwii> mvo: what was the sytax for adding a bug number to a commit message again? (LP: #bugnumber)?
[14:58] <mvo> kwwii: yeah, "LP: #number" will work
[14:59] <kwwii> thanks
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
[15:02] <kwwii> mvo: remeber all the time we spent changing the gtk theme stuff to include clearlooks and murrine? Now it is time to revert that :-)
[15:03] <mvo> kwwii: meh - sounds like fun. so what is the new plan? do we go back to humanlooks?
[15:03] <kwwii> mvo: yes
[15:03] <mvo> hmmm
[15:03] <mvo> ok
[15:03] <mvo> why?
[15:03] <kwwii> mvo: I guess we can just take the older version of the pacakge, or?
[15:04] <mvo> kwwii: yeah, just doing that might be the easiest way
[15:04] <kwwii> mvo: because someone likes it better (and there are good reasons like the scrollbars, progress bars, etc)
[15:05] <mvo> heh, ok :)
[15:05] <kwwii> if it was up to me we would be using darklouche or such
[15:05] <kwwii> :-)
[15:06] <kwwii> and now everyone knows why it is not up to me :p
[15:08] <mvo> slomo_: if you don't have time to look mono overwrite issue, I'm happy to do it, just let me know
[15:09] <slomo_> mvo: would be nice if you could do it
[15:17] <slomo_> seb128: ok, so we only have one patch in nautilus left that is not upstream... well, after alex branched and i committed the last ready one :)
[15:18] <seb128> slomo_: yeah, I've read the chan activity
[15:18] <seb128> we had quite some buggy patches, what did you do with those, dropped them now?
[15:18] <slomo_> yes
[15:19] <slomo_> well, disabled them for now if they're still valid
[15:19] <seb128> ok
[15:19] <slomo_> attached the last versions to the bug and explained what needs to be done to get it into nautilus
[15:19] <kwwii> btw, if someone wants to take a look at the gdm bug fix, it is in bzr and the source package is here:
[15:20] <kwwii> http://sinecera.de/ubuntu-gdm-themes_0.26.dsc
[15:20] <kwwii> http://sinecera.de/ubuntu-gdm-themes_0.26_source.build
[15:20] <kwwii> http://sinecera.de/ubuntu-gdm-themes_0.26_source.changes
[15:20] <kwwii> http://sinecera.de/ubuntu-gdm-themes_0.26.tar.gz
[15:37] <slomo_> lool: what shall we do about glib now? simply ignore joss and do the XDG_DATA_DIRS hack in gnome-session? ;)
[15:37] <slomo_> lool: and a separate package for the defaults of course
[15:42] <lool> slomo_: Yeah; Joss just doesn't want to lose face, but you can ignore him now, he kind of admitted XDG_DATA_DIRS in g-s is the only clean way we found for now
[15:43] <lool> slomo_: Perhaps glib could be generally more clever, but it would take a while to spec and implement cleverness on such stuff
[15:44] <lool> slomo_: For instance, we could teach glib about where it's running in ("this is a GNOME session") and teach it to prefer .desktop files for GNOME
[15:44] <lool> (I'm just listing crazy ideas; I'm not actually proposing to do this)
[15:44] <lool> But if you look at it today, the glib patch is pure uglyness for something which should really be achieved with an env var
[15:44] <slomo_> lool: ok, will do that then... what would you suggest for the gnome defaults? simply ship with gnome-core? :)
[15:44] <slomo_> yes, i really hate the current glib patch
[15:45] <lool> I don't like shipping the defaults in a particular package; it doesn't really make sense to me
[15:45] <slomo_> for gnomevfs it could stay as it is now, i don't care... the defaults should just be shipped by another package
[15:45] <lool> But for now, you could ship them in gnome-session as it's probably the only thing which will use that XDG dir
[15:46] <lool> On the longer term, it would be doable to have a trigger (haha) generate the defaults based on sensible info; perhaps from the packages or from the existing desktop files
[15:46] <slomo_> ok, noted and will do once later... and upload once glib moved to testing
[15:46] <slomo_> hehe, triggers... maybe next century :)
[15:47] <seb128> having the defaults.list is a lib or desktop applications sucks
[15:48] <seb128> because it means changing it is not as cheap as it should be
[15:49] <lool> seb128: Yeah, exactly
[16:20] <nxvl> mvo: are you still working on Bug #33505 ??
[16:20] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 33505 in apt "BADSIG errors using transparent http proxies" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33505
=== crd1b is now known as crdlb
[18:40] <pochu> seb128: hey, I already have my new desktop! ;-)
[18:40] <seb128> pochu: ah, good ;-)
[18:40] <pochu> seb128: btw totem-plugins should depend on python-gdata, which is needed for the youtube plugin
[18:41] <seb128> pochu: no it should not, that's an universe package and the youtube plugin is quite buggy
[18:41] <pochu> seb128: ah, then suggest it? :)
[18:42] <pochu> it WFM btw
[18:42] <seb128> pochu: I think I'll split the package, move the binary to universe and add depends there
[18:42] <seb128> pochu: very weird, it was broken due to the gnomevfs changes, gicmo fixed it and the patch has been uploaded to debian and ubuntu but it's blocked by the freeze
[18:43] <pochu> then the plugin won't be installed by default?
[18:43] <seb128> I'll revisit the choice once I've tried with the gnomevfs fix
[18:43] <pochu> seb128: I don't have sound though, but that's because I don't have speakers yet ;-)
[18:43] <seb128> try searching for ubuntu and play the library example
[18:43] <seb128> does it work?
[18:44] <pochu> Ubuntu @ The library?
[18:44] <pochu> Could not open location; you might not have permission to open the file.
[18:44]  * pochu wonders why...
[18:49] <pochu> seb128: search for "within temptation" and watch the "Stand my ground" videoclip
[18:53] <seb128> pochu: I didn't say none was working ;-)
[18:53] <pochu> seb128: ah, ok :)
[18:53] <seb128> pochu: but most of the ubuntu ones are broken for example
[18:53] <seb128> pochu: and you need the gst-plugins-bad installed
[18:53] <seb128> pochu: so it can't work out of the box
[18:53] <pochu> :(
[18:53] <pochu> that's a cool plugin ;)
[18:53] <seb128> right
[18:54] <seb128> we don't have mp3 working out of the box neither
[18:54] <seb128> it's useful too ;-)
[18:54] <seb128> patents suck
[18:54] <seb128> but we have to do with those
[18:54] <pochu> right, but at least we have the easy-codec-installation :)
[18:55] <seb128> I'll have a look at the youtube plugin again after beta anyway
[18:55] <pochu> great
[18:56] <seb128> pochu: if you are looking at things to do you are welcome to look at all the uploads slomo did to debian and see what we can sync or merge easily
[18:56] <seb128> we can likely lower the delta and sync some packages easily after beta
[18:56] <slomo_> seb128: the side pane one click patch was updated... and IMHO it looks good now, didn't test it yet though
[18:56] <pochu> plugins-bad is in universe btw... perhaps when the required plugin gets some work and is promoted to -good...
[18:56] <slomo_> seb128: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355760  if you want to test... :)
[18:56] <ubotu> Gnome bug 355760 in Sidebar Panel: Places "Side pane items shouldn't require a double click to open the location" [Minor,New]
[18:57] <seb128> slomo_: does it fix the double click smb error and the left click action?
[18:57] <seb128> right click I mean, and apparently it does
[18:57] <pochu> lool, seb128: what was that upnp python module we needed a MIR for? I don't have the logs from the last week or so
[18:58] <slomo_> seb128: well, it has the same behaviour as if you set nautilus to single click everywhere
[18:58] <pochu> hey slomo_
[18:58] <seb128> well, that's not the default so not many people notice
[18:58] <seb128> pochu: I think python-coherence should be promoted, would be nice to look at that ;-)
[18:58] <slomo_> pochu: if you want, merge gnomevfs :) and gstreamer stuff... and gtk-sharp2/gnome-sharp2/gnome-desktop2 (needs FF exception and the latter need MIR) :)
[18:59] <seb128> slomo_: oh you didn't upload the gnome-vfs change to hardy? I though you did
[18:59] <seb128> you decided to just work on debian and let other people do the ubuntu merges now? :-(
[18:59] <seb128> we need to recrute new contributors ;-)
[19:00] <slomo_> seb128: i'll upload gnomevfs after freeze to see if the patch is fine until then
[19:00] <slomo_> seb128: and if pochu doesn't want to do that stuff i've to do it ;)
[19:01]  * pochu is on holidays :)
[19:02] <seb128> slomo_: you don't "have to" do anyway, but help to merge debian updates is welcome
[19:02] <seb128> I'll do what I can but there is lot to do and not so many people active at the moment
[19:02] <slomo_> seb128: well, i don't have to but i want to :)
[19:03] <seb128> thanks ;-)
[19:05] <pochu> slomo_: I can do the gstreamer merges today or tomorrow
[19:06] <pochu> slomo_: we are in sync for -base, aren't we? so can't we just sync it? (I didn't look at the changes yet as I'm cathing with the mail though, so I don't know what changed ;)
[19:06] <slomo_> pochu: yes, base can be synced
[19:06] <slomo_> as can all the others too iirc, except core
[19:08] <seb128> pochu: we have to delay syncs to after the freeze, they don't go to the queue but are directly accepted
[19:08] <seb128> but feel free to make a list and ping me after beta ;-)
[19:08] <gicmo> re
[19:10] <pochu> seb128: sure, I'll make a list when I process sid-changes ;)
[19:10] <pochu> hey ember
[19:41] <lool> seb128, pochu: I'm also looking at getting python-coherence promoted for elisa
[19:41] <lool> I think I told people around here to try the RB uPnP plugin; it's now quite capable
[19:41] <lool> pitti: ^
[19:42] <lool> pitti: In general, python-coherence would enhance the RB plugin and elisa :)
[22:37] <pitti> lool: hm, sounds like a new feature to me
[22:37] <pitti> lool: I explained my gut feeling in the MIR bug
[23:14] <pochu> pitti: where's that bug? I see no bugs for coherence in lp