Datasets:

SHASWATSINGH3101
/

bail_data_text

Modalities:

Text

Formats:

text

Size:

10K - 100K

Libraries:

Datasets

License:

Dataset card Viewer Files Files and versions Community

bail_data_text

File size: 22,412 Bytes

2b7e388

Prompt:
Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details:

- CASE: Crime No. 632 of 2014
- DISTRICT: Not available
- BAIL APPLICATION: Not available

---
Output:

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2015

Badshah alias Dada son of Hemant Singh resident of
Dahilamau, Police Station – Kotawali Nagar, District –
Pratapgarh

.....Applicant

(In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttar Pradesh

.....Opposite Party

Case Crime No. 632 of 2014

Under section 452, 323, 504, 506, 354B,

And 7/8 The Protection of Children

From Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Police Station – Kotwali Nagar

District – Pratapgarh

Bail application rejected by the,

Additional Sessions Judge, Room No. 1,

Pratapgarh on 18.09.2015

APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr. P.C.
The applicant most respectfully submits as under:-
For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying

affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail
to the applicant in the interest of Justice.

Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh)

Advocate

Dated : .2015 Counsel for the applicant

Case Crime No. 632 of 2014

Under section 452, 323, 504, 506, 354B,

And 7/8 The Protection of Children

From Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Police Station – Kotwali Nagar

District – Pratapgarh

Bail application rejected by the,

Additional Sessions Judge, Room No. 1,

Pratapgarh on 18.09.2015

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2015

Badshah alias Dada ...Applicant

(In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party

AFFIDAVIT

(In support of bail application)

I, Suraj Kumar Singh aged about 18 years son of

Hemant Singh resident of Dahilamau, Police Station –
Kotawali Nagar, District – Pratapgarh, Religion –
Hindu, Education – Literate, Occupation – Perusing
B.Sc. II year , do hereby solemnly affirm and state on
oath as under :-

That the deponent is the real brother of the

applicant and duly authorized by the applicant

for doing pairvi of the case/ application before
this Hon'ble Court and as such he is fully
conversant with the facts of the case and deposed
as under. The ID Proof of the deponent is
enclosed and his photograph is affixed on the
affidavit.
That this is the first bail application before

this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail
application pending before this Hon'ble Court or
rejected by this Hon'ble Court.
That brief facts of the case is that a first

information report has been lodged against the
applicant and one another & two unmanned persons
on 31.07.2014 at 17.30 hours by the informant
Ghanshyam Rawat under Section 452, 323, 504, 506,
354B I.P.C. and under Section 7/8 The Protection
of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at
Police Station – Kotwali Nagar, District –
Pratapgarh. The photocopy of the first
information report dated 31.07.2015 is being
annexed as Annexure No. 01 to this application.
That as per first information report, the alleged

incident took place on 31.07.2014 at 01.00 P.M.
as the applicant with other accused on
31.07.2014, when the daughter of the informant
namely Ku. Rajni came back from her school, the
accused persons beaten the daughter of the
informant and also abusing to her.

That the real incident is that, being resident of

same locality of the accused and the informant,
the daughter of the informant and accused/
applicant quarreled for passing the cycle on the
road, when the victim returning home from her
school.
That thereafter informant become annoyed and

decided to punished the accused person and for
that purpose the informant putting the gravity of
the case lodged the said first information report
on the false ground and reason.
That from perusal of the first information

report, it is clear that the Section 7/8 The
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,
2012 is not made against the applicant as the
nothing was alleged and mentioned in first
information report and as well as statement of
the victim, which is essential element of the
Section 7 of The Protection of Children From
Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The fact itself
creates doubt on the genuineness of the first
information report. The type of the statement of
the victim is being annexed as Annexure No. 02 to
this application.
That the medical of the victim done at District

Hospital, Pratapgarh on 31.07.2014 and as per
medical report the one injury shown which is
simple in nature. The photo/ type copy of the

medical report dated 31.07.2014 is being annexed
as Annexure No. 03 to this application.
That the statement of the informant has been

recorded by the concerned police under Section
161 of Cr.P.C. on 31.07.2014 and also alleged
eyewitnesses therein all repeat the first
information report, nothing has been changed in
their statements. The type copies of the
informant and alleged eyewitness are being
annexed collectively as Annexure No. 04 to this
application.
That alleged eyewitness produced by the informant

10.

are not really eyewitnesses as the said incident
not took place, they are well managed produced by
the informant.
That a minor quarreled between the victim and

11.

accused but due to ego of the informant, he
cooked false incident and implicate the
applicant.
That the alleged incident is said to have been

12.

taken place in broad day and it is also
impossible to the applicant to tried as alleged
by the informant.
That there is no credible evidence on record

13.

which could show that the applicant is guilty or
committed the crime in question and the evidence

available on record itself show that no prima-
facie offence under Section 452, 323, 504, 506,
354B I.P.C. and under Section 7/8 The Protection
of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is
made out against the applicant.
That the applicant is student and belongs to

14.

respected family of the society also and due to
ego of the informant he falsely implicated in the
said case crime.
That since the applicant has not committed any

15.

offence as alleged but he has been falsely
implicated in the case by the informant in
malafide intention.
That the applicant moved bail application bearing

16.

No. 1528 of 2015 before Additional Sessions
Judge, Room No. 1, Pratapgarh and his bail
application has been rejected by the court
concerned on 18.09.2015. Certified copy of the
bail rejection order dated 18.09.2015 is being
annexed as Annexure No. 05 to this application.
That the applicant in jail since 14.09.2015.

17.

That the applicant has no criminal history except

18.

the aforesaid false case and not likely to hope
in future to commit any offence.

That there is no chance of the applicant

19.

absconding or tempering with the prosecution
witnesses.
That the applicant is ready to furnished the

20.

security and bond and also undertake that he will
be never misused liberty of bail.
That in view of the above, it would be expedient

21.

and necessary in the interest of justice that the
applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of
case.

Lucknow
Date : 2015 Deponent

VERIFICATION

I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the
contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are
true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false
and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me
“GOD”.
Lucknow
Dated: 2015 Deponent

I, identify the deponent on the basis of the record

produced by the deponent, who has signed before me.

Advocate

Solemnly affirmed before me on

at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, who has been
identified by Sri Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Advocate, High
Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrollment No. 8078 of
2011, resident Nigohan, Lucknow. Mobile No. 8004776600

I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent

that she understands the contents of this affidavit,
which have been read over and explained by me.

OATH COMMISSIONER

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2015

Badshah alias Dada ...Applicant

(In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party

INDEX

Sr.No

Particulars Page No.

Application for bail under section
439 Cr.P.C.

Affidavit in support of

application
Annexure No. 1

The photocopy of the first
information report dated
31.07.2015
Annexure No. 2

The type of the statement of the
victim
Annexure No. 3

The photo/ type copy of the
medical report dated 31.07.2014
Annexure No. 4

The type copies of the informant
and alleged eyewitness
Annexure No. 5

Certified copy of the bail
rejection order dated 18.09.2015
Memo

Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh)

Advocate

Dated : .2015 Counsel for the applicant

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW

BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2015

Badshah alias Dada ...Applicant(In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party

Annexure No. 2

Type copy
Examined Rajni Rawat aged 15 F daughter of Ghanshyam
Rawat resident of Dahilamau, Police Station – Kotwali
Ngar, dated 31.07.2014 at 5.55P.M.
B/B Sharita Dubey HG 1076, Police Station – Kotwali
Nagar
A black mole on the lower lip medial
Injries

Abrasion 1cm*.2cm on the Lt. forearm 7 cm below

from Lt. elbow joint red color.

Opinion – Injury is simple in nature. Caused by rab and
object duration fresh.
Rt. I attested Sd. Illegible

EMO EMO

District Hospital District Hospital
Pratapgarh Pratapgarh

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW

BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2015

Badshah alias Dada ...Applicant(In Jail)

Annexure No. 3

c;ku et:c%& jtuh jkor iq=h ?ku”;ke jkor fu0 nfgykeÅ Fkkuk
dksrokyh uxj izrkix< iwNus ij crk;k fd ?kVuk vkt yxHkx 1 cts fnu
dh gSA Ldwy ls i<dj vius ?kj igqaph rks eSaus viuh lkbfdy [kMh
djh Fkh iMksl ds nks yMds ckn’kkg mQZ nknk iq= gseUr flag]
vfer iky iq= rqylhjke iky nks vU; yMds ftUgsa eSa igpkurh ugha
gWw [kMs Fks eSa lkbfdy [kMh dj ?kj ds vanj ?kwl x;h rks
mijksDr pkjksa yMds vanj ?kj esa ?kql vk;s vkSj xyr uh;r ls esjs
lkFk tksj tcjtLrh djus yxs vkSj cykRdkj djus dh uh;r ls esjs diMs
QkM Mkys esjs fojks/k djus ij eq>s ykr ?kwlk FkIiM ls ekjs ihVs
o Hkn~nh xkyh nsus yxs eSaus tc 'kksj epk;k rks gekjs iMksl ds
vkse izdk”k flag ekSds ij igqaps rks oks pkjksa yksx mudks Hkh
xkyh xykSt nsus yxs o esjk HkkbZ Hkh ckgj ls ekSds ij igqapk
rks mldk eksckby Nhu fy, /khjs /khjs vkl ikl ds yksx Hkh vkds
bdB~Bk gksus yxs rks eksckby Qasddj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh
nsrs gq, Hkkx x;sA ftlds ckn ge Fkkuk x;s eqdnek fy[kk;k o viuh
MkDVjh bykt djk;hA ;gh esjk c;ku gSA

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW

BENCH, LUCKNOW

Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2015

Badshah alias Dada ...Applicant(In Jail)
Annexure No. 4
c;ku oknh%& ?ku”;ke jkor iq= ekrk izlkn jkor fu0 nfgykeÅ
Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj izrkix< iwNus ij crkrk gS fd ?kVuk vkt nksigj
yxHkx 1 cts dh gS esjh yMdh jtuh mez yxHkx 15 o"kZ d{kk 9 dh
Nk=k gSA Ldwy ls ?kj okil vk;h rks cxy ds nks yMds ckn”kkg
mQZ nknk iq= gseUr flag] vfer iky iq= rqylhjke iky fu0 nfgykeÅ
Fkkuk dks0 uxj] izrkix< o nks vU; yksx ftUgsa igpku u lds esjh
yMdh tc lkbfdy [kMh djds ?kj ds vanj ?kqlh rks mijksDr pkjksa
yksx ?kj ds vanj ?kql x;s rFkk esjh yMdh ds lkFk tksj tcjtLrh ls
cykRdkj djus dh dksf”k”k fd;s rFkk euk djus ij pkjksa yMdksa us
esjh yMdh dks ykr ?kwlk ewdk FkIiM ls ekjk ihVk rFkk xkyh
xqIrk nsus yxs o mlds lkFk NsM[kkuh djus yxs esjh yMdh ds
fpYykus ij esjs iMkslh vkse izdk’k nkSMdj vk;s rks mUgsa Hkh
xkyh xqIrk nsus ysxs blh nkSjku izkFkhZ dk yMdk Hkh ekSds ij
igqapk rks mldk eksckby Nhu fy, ckn esa yksxksa dh HkhM
bdB~Bk gksus ij eksckby Qsad dj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nsrs gq,
pys x;s ;gh esjk c;ku gSA
c;ku xokg p”enhn%& vkse izdk”k iq= pUnz Hkku flag fu0
nfgykeÅ Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj izrkix< iwNus ij crkrk gS fd ?kVuk
vkt yxHkx 1 cts dh gSA eSa vius ?kj ij ekStwn Fkk eq>s ?ku’;ke
jkor ds ?kj ls fpYykus dh vkokt lqukbZ nh eSa nkSMdj ekSds ij
igqapk rks ns[kk fd iMksl ds yMds ckn”kkg mQZ nknk iq=

gseUr flag] vfer iky iq= rqylhjke iky nks vU; yMds vKkr ftUgsa
eSa igpkurk ugha gWw ?ku’;ke jkor ds ?kj ds vanj mldh yMdh
ds lkFk NsMNkM dj jgs Fks eSaus tc mudks euk fd;k rks oks
yksx eq>s xkyh xqIrk nsus yxs o jtuh jkor dks ykr ?kwalk o
FkIiM ls ekjus yxs 'kksj lqudj /khjs /khjs dkQh yksx bdB~Bk
gksus yxs blh chp ?ku”;ke dk yMdk lqHkk"k jkor Hkh igaqp x;k
ftldk og yksx eksckby Nhu fy;k o HkhM ns[kdj og yksx eksckby
Qasd dj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nsrs gq, pys x;sA eSaus ?kVuk
dks ns[kk gS ;gh esjk c;ku gSA