File size: 24,732 Bytes
2b7e388
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
Prompt:
Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details:

- CASE: Crime No. 36 of 2016
  - DISTRICT: Not available
  - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available

---
Output:

                IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

                                          LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

                              Criminal Misc. Case No.   (B) of 2017

              Mohd. Zuber son of Arkhul Rahman, resident of Village –
              Bachhandamau, Police Station – Hathgawan, District –
              Pratapgarh 

                                                                         .....Applicant

                                                                  (In Jail from 26.02.2016)

                                                        Versus

              State of Uttar Pradesh              .....Opposite Party

                                                                     Case Crime No. 36 of 2016

                                                        U/s 302, 307, 504, 506, 34 I.P.C. 
                                                        and 7, Criminal Law Amendment Act

                                                                                    P.S. – Manikpur

                                                                           District – Pratapgarh

                                                          Bail application rejected by the

              Special/ Additional Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh on 02.08.2017

                     APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr. P.C.
                     The applicant most respectfully submits as under:-
                     For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying

              affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this
              Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail
              to the applicant in the interest of Justice. 

                                                          

              Lucknow                                      (Dr. Gyan Singh)

                                                                               Advocate

              Dated :       .2017        Counsel for the applicant

                                                                   Case Crime No.  36 of 2016

                                                        U/s 302, 307, 504, 506, 34 I.P.C. 
                                                        and 7, Criminal Law Amendment Act

                                                                                    P.S. – Manikpur

                                                                           District – Pratapgarh

                                                          Bail application rejected by the

                                                     Special/ Additional Sessions Judge, 

                                                                      Pratapgarh on 02.08.2017

                IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

                                          LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

                        Criminal Misc. Case No.                (B)of 2017

              Mohd. Zuber                                            ...Applicant

                                                                  (In Jail from 26.02.2016)

                                                        Versus

              State of Uttar Pradesh                ....Opposite Party

                                                     AFFIDAVIT

                                  (In support of bail application)

                  I, Hazifur Rahman son of Arkhul Rahman, resident of

              Village   –   Bachhandamau,   Police   Station   –   Hathgawan,
              District – Pratapgarh Religion – Muslim, Education –
              Literate, Occupation – Agriculture, do hereby solemnly
              affirm and state on oath as under :-

                         That the deponent is the brother of the applicant

                  1.

                         and duly authorized by the applicant to file the
                         aforesaid application before this Hon'ble Court

                         and as such he is fully conversant with the facts
                         of the case and deposed as under. The ID Proof of
                         the deponent is enclosed and his photograph is
                         affixed on the affidavit.
                         That this is the first bail application before

                  2.

                         this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail application
                         pending before this Hon'ble Court or rejected by
                         this Hon'ble Court.
                         That brief facts of the case is that a first

                  3.

                         information report has been lodged against the 3
                         named   and   3   unnamed   persons   on   25.02.2016   at
                         00.15 hours by the informant namely S.O., Police
                         Station – Manikpur, Shri Pramod Kumar Singh under
                         Sections 302, 307, 504, 506, 34 I.P.C. and 7,
                         Criminal Law Amendment Act at Police Station –
                         Manikpur, District – Pratapgarh with regard to
                         murder   of   on   duty   Homeguard   Mahadev   Prasad
                         (hereinafter   referred   to   as   deceased).   The
                         alleged incident was took place on 24.02.2016
                         around 23.30 hours. The photocopy of the first
                         information   report   dated   25.02.2016   is   being
                         annexed as Annexure No. 01 to this application.
                         That it is relevant to mention here that the

                  4.

                         applicant is not named in the first information
                         report. According to the first information report
                         lodged on 25.02.2016 by informant, in which he
                         alleged that around 23.30 hours the most wanted
                         criminal   of   area   along   with   others   criminals
                         fired   and   bombard   on   the   Police   Station   –
                         Manikpur and run away from incident place. The
                         informant and his companions tried to catch him

                         failed to do so. 
                         That the post mortem was conducted at District

                  5.

                         Hospital, Pratapgarh on 25.02.2016 by the doctor
                         concerned.   The   cause   of   death   ascertained   as
                         “Shock due to coma as a result of Anti-mortem
                         firearm injury”. The photo/typed copy of the post
                         mortem report dated 25.02.2016 is being annexed
                         as Annexure No. 02 to this application.
                         That the concerned police arrested the accused of

                  6.

                         the said case crime namely Shiva alias Shivmani
                         Tiwari   and   Vikash   Mishra   and   they   were   given
                         their confessional statement before the concerned
                         police   but   they   have   said   the   name   of   the
                         applicant. The typed copy of the confessional
                         statement of the accused Shiva alias Shivmani
                         Tiwari is being annexed herewith collectively as
                         Annexure No. 03 to this application.
                         That   the   concerned   police   was   called   the

                  7.

                         applicant on 26.02.2016 for some queries with
                         regard to incident and falsely implicate him in
                         said   crime   case   for   ulterior   motive.   The
                         concerned   police   forcefully   taken   confessional
                         statement of the applicant and on said basis he
                         was in jail. The typed copy of the confessional
                         statement of the applicant is being annexed as
                         Annexure No. 04 to this application.
                         That   the   concerned   police   without   proper

                  8.

                         investigation,     the     investigating     officer
                         submitted charge sheet bearing No. 48 of 2016
                         dated   19.05.2016   against   the   applicant   and   3

                         others persons.
                         That the real story is this; the applicant is

                  9.

                         common and law abiding citizen, on 26.02.2016,
                         the applicant was called by the concerned police
                         for the asking about the incident took place at
                         Police Station – Manikpur but he was arrested by
                         the   concerned   police   and   concerned   police
                         forcefully taken his confessional statement and
                         falsely   implicate.   The   applicant   falsely
                         implicate in several cased thereafter.
                         That neither the applicant has motive nor any

                  10.

                         motive has been assigned to him to commit the
                         crime in question and the motive to commit the
                         crime   in   question   has   been   assigned   by   the
                         concerned police.
                         That   the   applicant   has   no   concerned   with   the

                  11.

                         murder of the deceased in any manner as alleged
                         by the concerned police and allegation against
                         the applicant and also the prosecution story is
                         totally   against   the   evidence   and   same   is   not
                         reliable   in   manner   so   far   concerned   to   the
                         applicant.
                         That   there   is   no   credible   evidence   on   record

                  12.

                         which could show that the applicant is guilty or
                         committed   the   crime   in   question,   except   his
                         confessional     statement,     which     was     taken
                         forcefully   by   the   concerned   police   and   the
                         evidence available on record itself show that no
                         prima-facie offence under Section 302, 307, 504,
                         506, 34 I.P.C. and 7, Criminal Law Amendment Act

                         at   Police   Station   –   Manikpur,   District   –
                         Pratapgarh is made out against the applicant.
                         That the applicant has no motive to commit the

                  13.

                         alleged crime and false motive which given in
                         case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned
                         police.
                         That since the applicant has not committed any

                  14.

                         offence   as   alleged   but   he   has   been   falsely
                         implicated in the case by the informant/concerned
                         police in malafide intention.
                         That the applicant moved bail application bearing

                  15.

                         No.   941   of   2017   before   Special/   Additional
                         Sessions   Judge,   Pratapgarh   and   his   bail
                         application   has   been   rejected   by   the   court
                         concerned on 02.08.2017. Certified copy of the
                         bail rejection order dated 02.08.2017 passed by
                         the court below is being annexed as Annexure No.
                         05 to this application.
                         That two other co-accused of the aforesaid case

                  16.

                         crime namely Pradeep Kumar Tiwari alias Rohit and
                         Vipin Kumar Pandey, have been released on bail by
                         this Hon'ble Court. The photocopy of the orders
                         passed by this Hon'ble Court is being annexed as
                         Annexure No. 06 to this application.
                         That   the   applicant   in   jail   since   26.02.2016

                  17.

                         without committing any offence. The applicant has
                         not convicted ever before. 

                         That after arresting the applicant the concerned

                  18.

                         police falsely implicate the applicant in several
                         cases as under:
                         i.Case Crime No. 36 of 2016 under Section 302,

                            307,   504,   506,   34   IPC,   Police   Station   –
                            Manikpur, District – Pratapgarh.

                                    Case Crime No. 37 of 2016 under Section

                          ii.

                            307 IPC, Police Station – Manikpur, District –
                            Pratapgarh. 

                                    Case Crime No. 38 of 2016 under Section

                          iii.

                            3/25   Arms   Act,   Police   Station   –   Manikpur,
                            District – Pratapgarh.

                                    Case Crime No. 41 of 2016 under Section

                          iv.

                            307, 504, 506 IPC and 7, Criminal Law Amendment
                            Act, Police Station – Hathigawan, District –
                            Pratapgarh.

                          v.Case Crime No. 22 of 2016 under Section 396,

                            412 IPC, Police Station – Nawabganj, District –
                            Pratapgarh.

                         That   there   is   no   chance   of   the   applicant

                  19.

                         absconding   or   tempering   with   the   prosecution
                         witnesses.
                         That   the   applicant   is   ready   to   furnished   the

                  20.

                         security and bond and also undertake that he will
                         be never misused liberty of bail.
                         That in view of the above, it would be expedient

                  21.

                         and necessary in the interest of justice that the
                         applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of

                         case.

              Lucknow
              Date :     .10.2017                                   Deponent

                                                   VERIFICATION

                             I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the
              contents of para    1     to       of this affidavit are
              true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false
              and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me
              “GOD”.
              Lucknow
              Date :     .10.2017                                   Deponent

                     I, do hereby declare that the person making this

              affidavit and alleging himself to be the deponent is
              known   to   me   from   the   perusal   of   papers   and   I   am
              satisfied that he is the same person.

                                                                             Ashok Kumar Mishra

                                                                                    Advocate Clerk

                                                                        Reg. No.

                     Solemnly affirmed before me on

              at             A.M./P.M. by the deponent above named, who
              has been identified by Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra clerk Dr.
              Gyan   Singh,     Advocate,   High   Court,   Lucknow,   Bench,
              Lucknow. Enrolment No. 11667 of 2010, resident of 34,
              Pipra   Ghat,   Dilkusha   Cantt,   Lucknow,   Mobile   No.
              9452226667

                     I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent

              that she understands the contents of this affidavit,
              which have been read over and explained by me.

                                                                                                     OATH

                                                                                       COMMISSIONER 

                   IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

                                            LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

                            Criminal Misc. Case No.            (B)of 2017

              Mohd. Zuber                                              ...Applicant

                                                                     (In Jail from 26.02.2016)

                                                        Versus

              State of Uttar Pradesh           ....Opposite Party

                                                         INDEX

               Sr.No

                                               Particulars                       Page No.

                        Application for bail under section 439
                        Cr.P.C.

                   1.

                        Affidavit in support of application

                   2.

                        Annexure No. 1 

                   3.

                        The photocopy of the first information
                        report dated 25.02.2016
                        Annexure No. 2

                   4.

                        The photo/typed copy of the post mortem
                        report dated 25.02.2016
                        Annexure No. 3 

                   5.

                        The   typed   copy   of   the   confessional
                        statement of the accused Shiva alias
                        Shivmani Tiwari 
                        Annexure No. 4

                   6.

                        The   typed   copy   of   the   confessional
                        statement of the applicant
                        Annexure No. 5

                   7.

                        Certified copy of the bail rejection
                        order dated 02.08.2017 passed by the
                        court below
                        Annexure No. 6

                 8.

                        The photocopy of the orders passed by
                        this Hon'ble Court
                        ID proof of the deponent 

                 9.

                        Memo

                 10.

              Lucknow                                       (Dr. Gyan Singh)

                                                                               Advocate

              Dated :      .10.2017       Counsel for the applicant

                   IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

                                            LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

                                 Criminal Misc. Case No.   (B)of 2017

              Mohd. Zuber                  Versus       State of U.  P.

                                                   Annexure No. 

              c;ku  vfHk;qDr  &  cnfj;k¶r  vfHk0  f”kok  mQZ  f”ko  ef.k
              frokjh iq= ccyw frokjh fu0 izrkiiqj ijsx<] Fkkuk laxzkex<]
              mez djhc 19 o’kZ yxHkx LosPNk ls tqeZ Lohdkj djrs gq,
              crk;k fd vkt chrs jkr eSa fodkl feJk iq= f”ko “kadj feJk]
              bejku iq= eks0 gk:u] iznhi frokjh         fu0 Hksokyiqj]
              laxzkex< iz0 eks0 tqcsj iq= gjeku o cky d`’.k feJk mQZ
              ckys uktk;l vlygksa ls ySl gksdj Fkkuk ekfudiqj esa jkf=
              11-30 cts vU/kk/kqU/k Qk;fjax Qk;fjaxx o ceksa ls geykdj
              M~;wVh   ij   [kMs   gksexkMZ   dh   gR;k   dj   nh   Fkh   rFkk
              fnukad 22-01-2016 dks viuh lkFkh bejku iq= eks0 gk:u o
              cky d`’.k feJk mQZ ckys ds lkFk feyk “kke djhc 7-00 cts
              Fkkuk ekfudiqj    Fks dV~Vk fjokYoj Nhu fy;k FkkA esjs ikl
              cjken uksfd;k eksckby Qksu mlh ywV dk gSA blh rjg
              fnukad 03-02-2016 dks viuh mijksDr ikap lkfFk;ksa cky
              d`’.k mQZ ckys] bejku iq= eks0 gk:u] iznhi frokjh iq=
              mekdkUr frokjh eks0 tqcsj iq= jgeku] fodkl iq-     fofiu
              dqekj iq= xk;=h izlkn ik.Ms; fuoklh jkeiqj pkSjkgk Fkkuk
              gksykx< tuin izrkix< Hkh   cukdj  gR;k o ywV fd;k FkkA

              vkSj   ywV   ls   udnh   o   pkanh   cjken   gq;h   FkhA   16000
              gtkj :i;k   feyk FkkA ftldk 7 gtkj :i;k esjh tsc ls vkt cjken
              gqvk gS vkt tks eks0 lk0 o mlds >ksys esa j[kh pkj ce
              cjken gq; gS o eks0 lk0 esjh gS ftlds dkxtkr esjs ikl ugha
              gSA vkt tks reapk esjs ikl ls cjken gqvk gS blh ls chrh jkr
              esa eSaus Qk;fjax djds M~;wVh ij [kMs xkMZ dks ekj
              fn;kA   eq>s   i”pkrki   gks   jgk   gSA   eSuas   lkfFk;ksa   ds
              cgdkos o ykyp esa lHkh crk;h ?kVuk dkfjr fd;k gSA 

                   IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD,

                                            LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW

                                 Criminal Misc. Case No.   (B)of 2017

              Mohd. Zuber                  Versus       State of U.  P.

                                                   Annexure No. 

              c;ku vfHk0 & okafNr eks0 tqcsj iq=       jgeku Fkkuk
              gfFkxoka tuin izrkix< mez yxHkx 26 o’kZ tqeZ Lohdkj
              djrs gq, crk;k fd vkt eSa vius lkfFk;ksa cky d`’.k feJk mQZ
              ckys iq= lTtu yky fuoklh cNjkSyh o bejku iq= eks0 gk:u
              fu0 uUnk dk iqjok ds lkFk ,lvks izesUnz dqekj flag dh
              gR;k dh fu;r ls [kMs Fks vkSj gR;k dk iz;kl Hkh fd;k ysfdu
              foQy jgkA ,lvks mlds flikfg;ksa }kjk dV~Vk o ce    cjken
              gqvkA ce ds lkFk eq>s idM fy;k x;kA ekSds ls ckys o
              bejku Hkkxus esa lQy jgsA ;g ?kVuk lk<s ckjg cts fnu
              LFkku ns”kjkt   ds ikl dh gSA cky d`’.k feJk mQZ ckys  ge
              yksxksa ds xSax yhMj gSaA cky d`’.k feJk mQZ ckys
              bejku] NksVw mQZ f”kok fuoklh izrkiiqj] iznhi frokjh iq=
              mek “kadj frokjh] fu0 Hkksykiqj Fkkuk laxzkex<] fodkl
              feJk iq= f”ko “kadj feJk mQZ fofiu ik.Ms; fu0 jkex< pkSjkl
              Fkkuk gkSykx< ds lkFk feydj fnukad 03-02-2016 dks le;
              yxHkx lk<s ikap cts “kke ykokuk cktkj esa ,d ifjokj dh
              gR;k djds :i;s o tsojkr ywV fy;s FksA eq>s bl ywV esa
              16500 :i;s feys Fks rFkk fnukad 24-02-2016 dh jkr djhc

              lk<s 23 cts eSaus vius lkfFk;ksa cky d`’.k feJk mQZ ckys
              lqr lTtu yky feJk]   bejku lqr eks0 gk:u fu0   f”kok mQZ
              f”ko ef.k frokjh iq= ccyw frokjh fu0 izrkiiqj pjgV Fkkuk
              laxzkex<] fodkl feJk iq= f”ko “kadj feJk fu0 /kekSj Fkkuk
              vUrw o iznhi frokjh iq= mekdkar frokjh fu0  laxzkex< ds
              lkFk feydj ,lvks izesUnz dqekj flag dh gR;k dh fu;r ls
              Fkkuk ekfudiqj x;s FksA ,lvks ds u feyus ij ge yksxksa us
              va/kk/kq/k xksfy;ka cjlkdj o ce ekj djds ogka ij [kMs ,d
              xkMZ dh gR;k dj nh FkhA ;gh xqukg Avijk/kA fd;s gSaA
              eq>ls xyrh gks x;hA eq>s {kek dj nsA vc tSlk vki yksxsa
              dgsxsa   vkSj   ifjokj   okys   pkgsxsa   eSa   ogh   d:axkA
              fnXHkzfer   gks   x;k   FkkA   vki   yksxksa   ls   ekQh   ekaxrk
              gWwA vnkyr esa Hkh tks eSaus xqukg fd;s gSa mldh
              ekQh ekax ywaxkA vkSj tqeZ dh n.M U;k;ky; }kjk fn;k
              tk,xk mldks Lohdkj dj ywaxkA vc eSa vijk/k ls rkSck djrk
              gWwA bl izdkj vfHk0 eks0 tqcsj mijksDr }kjk viuk c;ku
              vafdr djk;k x;kA