C015/Y01474.json

[
{"content": "To the right noble and excellent Prince George, Duke of Clarence, Earl of Warwick and Salisbury, Great Chamberlain of England and Lieutenant of Ireland, oldest brother of King Edward by the grace of God, King of England and of France,\n\nYour most humble servant, William Caxton, among other servants, sends you greetings. Health, joy, and victory over your enemies.\n\nRight high and mighty and redoubtable prince,\n\nSince I have understood and known that you are inclined to the common welfare of our said savior lord the king, his noble lords, and the commons of his noble realm of England, and that you have seen with pleasure the same informed in good, virtuous, profitable, and honest manners, in which your noble person abounds, giving light and example to all others,\n\nTherefore, I have taken it upon myself to translate a little book recently come into my hands from French into English. In which I find authorities, dictates, and stories of ancient times. Doctors, philosophers, poets, and other wise men, who have been recounted and applied to the moralities of the public welfare, as well as of the nobles and common people, after the game and play of the chess. In the name and under the shade of your noble protection, I have compiled this book, not presuming to correct or censure anything against your nobility. For God be thanked, your excellent reputation shines as well in foreign regions as within the kingdom of England, gloriously to your honor and land. May God multiply and increase it. But in order that others, regardless of their estate or degree, may see in this little book how they should conduct themselves, I humbly request and entreat your grace not to disdain to receive this little book graciously and thank, as well me, your humble and unknown servant, as a better and greater man than I am. For the goodwill I have had to compile it. This little work in the best way I can or ought to be regarded as the faith and deed [[1]] And for more clearly to proceed in this said book, I have ordered that the chapters be set at the beginning so that you may see more plainly the matter of which the book treats:\n\nThis book contains four treatises. The first treatise is of the Invention of this game of the chess and contains three chapters.\n\nThe first chapter is under what king this play was found.\nThe second chapter, who found this play.\nThe third chapter, treats of three causes why it was made and found.\n\nThe second treatise treats of the chessmen and contains five chapters.\n\nThe first chapter treats of the form of a king and such things that pertain to him.\nThe second chapter treats of the queen and her form and manners.\nThe third chapter, of the form of the alphins [alfiers] and their offices and manners.\nThe fourth chapter is of the king and his offices.\nThe fifth is of the ranks of their manners and offices. Among all the evil conditions and signs that may be in a man, the first and greatest is when he fears not or is without:\n\nChapter I: The laborers and tilers of the earth\nChapter II: Blacksmiths and workers in iron and metal\nChapter III: Drapers and makers of cloth and notaries\nChapter IV: Merchants and changers\nChapter V: Physicians, surgeons, and apothecaries\nChapter VI: Taverners and hostelers\nChapter VII: Guards of the city\nChapter VIII: Ribalds and disreputable courtesans\n\nChapter III, Traitorous Section:\nThe first is of the exchequer\nThe second, of the issue and progression of the king\nThe third, of the issue of the queen\nThe fourth, of the issue of the alphyns\nThe fifth, of the issue of the knights\nChapter XVI, of the issue of the rooks\nThe seventh, of the moving and issue of the common people\nAnd the eighth and last, of the epilogue and recapitulation.\n\nBlazon or coat of arms:\n\nAmong all the evil conditions and signs that may be in a man, the first and greatest is when he fears nothing or is without fear.\n\nChapters:\nI. Laborers and tilers of the earth\nII. Blacksmiths and workers in iron and metal\nIII. Drapers and makers of cloth and notaries\nIV. Merchants and changers\nV. Physicians, surgeons, and apothecaries\nVI. Taverners and hostelers\nVII. Guards of the city\nVIII. Ribalds and disreputable courtesans\n\nIII, Traitorous Section:\nI. The exchequer\nII. The issue and progression of the king\nIII. The issue of the queen\nIV. The issue of the alphyns\nV. The issue of the knights\nXVI. The issue of the rooks\nVII. The moving and issue of the common people\nVIII. The epilogue and recapitulation. \"dreads displeasing and making God angry through sin, and the people by living disorderlessly, when he does not care or heed those who reprove him and his vices, but kills them. Such was the emperor Nero, who killed his teacher Seneca in this way. There was once a king in Babylon named Emsmerodac, an unjust and cruel man who had his father's body cut into a hundred pieces and gave it to be eaten by a hundred birds called vultures. He was of such a condition as was Nabodonosor, who once intended to kill all the wise men of Babylon because they could not tell him the meaning of his dream that he had forgotten, as is written in the Bible in the book of Daniel. Under this king, the game and play of chess was discovered. It is true that some\" This play was attributed to the time of the battles and siege of Troy, but that is not true. The play came to the Greeks from the plays of the Caldees, as Diomedes the Greek relates and recounts. Among the philosophers, this was the most renowned play among all others. After this, this play came to Alexander the Great in Egypt, and to all the parties toward the south. The reason why this play was so renowned will be stated in the third chapter.\n\nThis play discovered a philosopher of Thorycllus, named in Caldee Exeres or in Greek Philometor, which is as much to say in English as he who loves Justice and Measure. This philosopher was greatly renowned among the Greeks, and those of Athens who were good clerks and philosophers also renowned for their coming. This philosopher was so just and true that he preferred to die rather than live long and be a false king. For when he beheld the foul and sinful life of the king, and no man dared to reprove him. by his great cruelty, he put to death all who displeased him. He put himself in peril of death. And loved and chose rather to die than to live longer: The evil life and disgraced name of a king is the life of a cruel beast, and ought not to be sustained, for he destroys him who displeases him. Therefore, revered were the virtues of Theodore, a wise man whom his king had caused to be hanged on the cross because he reproved him for his evil and foul life. And all the way as he was in torment, he said to the king and his counselors, clad in his clothing and robes, that this torment should come upon them, for as much as they dared not speak the truth for justice to be done. Of myself, I make no choice whether I die on land or on water or otherwise. As one says, he did not want to die for justice. In like manner, Democritus the philosopher put out his own eyes because he would not see that no good could come to the evil and unjust. vicious people without right and also defied the philosopher as he went toward his death. His wife, who followed after him, said that he was condemned to death wrongfully. Then he answered and said to her, hold thy peace and be still. It is better and more meritorious to die by a wrong and unjust judgment than that I deserved to die.\n\nThe reasons why this play was found are three. The first was to correct and reprove the king. When this king, EmAnd and the barons, knights and gentlemen of his court played with the philosopher, he marveled greatly at the beauty and novelty of the play and desired to play against the philosopher. The philosopher answered and said that it might not be done. But if he first learned the play, the king said it was reasonable and that he would put him to pain to learn it. Then the philosopher began to teach him and to show him the manner of the table of the chessboard and the chessmen. And also the manners and conditions of a king of. the nobles and the common people and their offices, and how they should be touched and drawn. And how he should amend himself and become virtuous. And when this king heard that he had reproved him, he demanded of him on pain of death to tell him why he had found and made this play. And he answered my right dear lord and king, the greatest and most thing that I desire is that thou hast in thyself a glorious and virtuous life, and that may I not see, but if thou art indoctrinated and well mannered. Thus I desire it thou hast other government than thou hast had. And that thou hast upon thyself first seigniorage and mastery such as thou hast upon others by force and not by right. Certainly it is not right that a man be master over others and commander, when he cannot rule nor rule himself, and that his virtues do not dominate his vices. For seigniorage by force and will may not long endure. Thus one of the causes why and Why I have found and made this play, which is for correcting and repenting the tyrannical and vicious living of all kings specifically, they should hear their correctors or corrections and keep them in mind. In the same way, Valerius relates that King Alexander had a noble and renowned knight who, in reproaching Alexander, said that he was too covetous, especially of the honors of the world. He said to him, \"If the gods had made your body as great as is your heart, all the world could not contain it. For you hold in your right hand all the Orient, and in your left hand the Occident. Therefore, either you are a god or a man or nothing. If you are a god, do well and good to the people as God does, and do not take from them what is theirs. If you are a man, think that you shall die, and then do no evil. If you are nothing, forget yourself; there is no thing so strong and firm but that sometime it becomes feeble.\" A thing casts down and overthrows it. The lion, though the strongest beast, is sometimes eaten by a little bird. The second reason why this play was found and made was to keep him from idleness. Seneca tells Luculla that idleness without any occupation is the burial of a living man, and Varro says in his Sentences that, just as men do not go unless they are driven, so the life is not given to live but to do well and good. Therefore, secondly, the philosopher found this play to keep the people from idleness. For there are many people. Those who are fortunate in worldly goods often draw them to ease and idleness, from which come often times many evils and great sins. By this idleness, the heart is quenched, leading to despair. The third cause is that every man naturally desires to know and to hear novelties and tidings. For this cause, the Athenians studied, and because the corporal or bodily sight wearies and lets us go. otherwhile the philosopher Democritus put out his own eyes, for as much as he might have the better understanding and comprehension. Many have been made blind who were great scholars, just as was Dydymus bishop of Alexandria, who, despite seeing poorly, was still such a scholar that Gregory Nazianzen and Saint Jerome, who were scholars and masters to others, came to learn from him. The great hermit Anthony came to see him once and, among other things, he asked him if he was not greatly displeased that he was blind and could not see. And he answered that he was greatly ashamed, for he supposed that he was not displeased in losing his sight. And Saint Anthony replied to him, \"I am greatly surprised that it displeases you that you have lost that thing which comes between you and beasts. And you know well that you have not lost that which comes between you and the divine.\" The philosopher intended to put aside all pensiveness and thoughts, and think only about this play as follows in this book. The king must be made thus: He must sit in a chair clothed in purple, crowned on his head, with a scepter in his right hand and an apple of gold in his left. For he is the greatest and highest in dignity above all others and most worthy. This is signified by the crown, for the glory of the people is the king's dignity, and above all others, the king ought to be filled with virtues and grace. This signifies the purple. In the same way that the robes of purple make the body fair and ennoble it, the same way virtues ennoble the soul. He ought always to think about the governance of the realm, and who holds the administration of justice should be by him principally. This signifies the golden apple he holds in his left hand. And for as much as it pertains to... A hymn to Punyshshse, the rebels have the scepter in his right hand. Since mercy and truth preserve and keep the king on his throne, a king should be merciful and debonair. For when a king or prince is desired to be beloved by his people, let him be governed by debonairness. Valerius says that debonairness softens and mollifies the hearts of strangers and enemies. Philostratus, duke of Athens, had a daughter whom a man loved so ardently that one time, as he saw her with her mother, he suddenly came and kissed her. The mother was so angry and sorrowful that she went and asked her lord, the duke, to strike off his head. The prince answered her and said, \"If we should slay those who love us, what shall we do to our enemies who hate us? Certainly, this was the answer of a noble and debonair prince, who endured the villainy done to his daughter and to himself.\" A friend of his named Arispe once spoke great villainy against the prince, more than any man could say. This provoked the prince, but he endured it patiently, as if he had done him no wrong but played courtly games. Arispe's sons wished to avenge this wrongdoing, but the prince commanded them not to be so rash. The next day, Arispe remembered the great wrong he had done to his friend and lord, without cause. He fell into despair and wished to take his own life.\n\nThe duke learned of this and came to him, understanding his despair. He reassured him, swearing by his faith that he would remain his friend from then on, as he had been before, if only Arispe would spare his life. In the same way, we read of King Pierre, to whom it was reported that the people of Taranto had spoken great villainy of him. For this reason, he summoned them all before him. One of them answered and said that if the wine and candles had not failed, this language would have been a jest. Regarding that, we had intended to do something. Then the king began to laugh, for they had confessed that such language as was said and spoken was due to drunkenness. And because of this, the people of Tarentum took it as a custom that drunken men should be punished, while sober men were spared. The king then declared that he should love humility and hate falsehood. God is truth. Therefore, he should say nothing unless it was true and stable. Valerius relates that Alexander, with all his eastern army, came to destroy a city named Lapusane. When Anaximenes, a philosopher who had previously been master and governor of Alexander, heard and understood that he was coming, he came before Alexander to make his request. And when he saw Alexander, he supposed that he had asked for his request. Alexander broke his request. A man named Teryle, a worker, once requested something from him, swearing by his god that he would only do it. He asked for nothing else from him, but when the philosopher required him to destroy a city, Alexander understood his intent and the things he had done. He allowed the city to stand instead, for he preferred to do his will than to be perjured and forsworn and act against his oath. Quintilian states that no great man or lord should swear, but only in cases of great need. The simple word of a prince ought to be more stable than that of a merchant. Alas, how do princes keep their promises in these days, not only their promises but their seals and writings and signs of their own hands? A king should also hate all cruelty. It is written that no pious person has ever died a bad death, nor a cruel person a good one. Therefore, Valerius relates that there was a man named Teryle, a worker. A man made a device: a copper boiler with a little wicket on the side, where men could put those to be burned within; it was constructed such that those enclosed would cry out nothing like a man but like an ox, to elicit less pity from men. After creating this copper boiler, he presented it to a king named Philaret, who was so cruel a tyrant that he took delight in nothing but cruelty. Philaret heard and understood the condition of the boiler, and he allowed and greatly praised the work. Then he said to him, \"You who are more cruel than I am, you shall first test and prove your presentation and give it a try.\" And so he made him enter the boiler and die a cruel death. Therefore, Ovid says, there is nothing more reasonable than for a man to die such a death as he purchases for others. A king ought justly to maintain justice, who makes or keeps a realm without justice. Saint Augustine recounts in a book titled \"The City of God\" the story of a thief named Diomedes from the sea. Diomedes was a notorious thief who caused great harm, prompting complaints to Alexander. Alexander had him brought before him and asked why he was so harmful and cruel at sea. Diomedes replied, \"Just as you are a world, I am another in the sea. But because the evil I do is in one or two galleys, I am called a thief. But because you rule with great power and might, you are called an emperor. If fortune were on my side, I would become a good man and better than I am now. But the more wealthy and fortunate you are, the worse you become.\" Alexander replied, \"I will change your fortune in such a way that you will not be able to do it by your own power. But for evil and wickedness, I will make you...\" This was he who later became a good prince and a good judge. The king ought to be sovereignly chaste, and this signifies a queen who is only on his right side, for it is to be believed and credible that when the king is a good man, just, true, and of good manners and conditions, his children will gladly follow the same. For certainly it is against God and nature for a man to take another than his own wife. We see this in birds, of whom the male and female have to cooperate in the care and nurturing of their young offspring. Some birds keep them to their females only, as it appears in storks and turtles. But birds that do not care for their young have many wives and females, like the cock that does not care for his chickens. Among all the animals that are, man and woman put the most care and concern for their own. A man named Scipio Africanus, having conquered Africa and reached the age of 34, took many people captive in Carthage. Among them was a fair maiden presented to him for his comfort and pleasure. She was assured and handfasted to a noble young man of Carthage named Indimble. As soon as Scipio learned that she was already married, he summoned her parents and kin and returned the daughter to them, along with the dowry they had prepared. The young man, seeing Scipio's noble demeanor, turned the hearts of the noble people towards him. The love and alliance of the Romans, concerning the queen: This is sufficient regarding the king and so on.\n\nThus, the queen should be made: She should be a fair lady sitting in a chair and crowned with a crown on her head and clad with a cloth of gold and a mantle above, furred with ermines. She should sit on the left side of the king for the king's affection and embracing of his wife, as it is said in scripture in the Canticles: \"Her left arm shall be under my head, and her right arm shall embrace me.\" In that she is set on his left side is given to the king by nature and right. For it is better to have a king by succession than by election. For often the electors and choosers cannot or will not agree, and so the election is left, and sometimes they choose not the best and most able and convenient, but him whom they best love or is most profitable for them. But when the king is by lineage and true succession, he is taught, signed, and nourished in his youth. A good and virtuous father taught all his son all noble teachings and manners. The princes of the realm did not dare to wage war against a king who had a son to succeed him. Therefore, a queen ought to be chaste, wise, of honest people, well-mannered, and not curious in the rearing of her children. Her wisdom should not only be evident in deeds and works but also in speech. That is, she should be secretive and not reveal things that should be kept secret. Therefore, it is a common proverb that women cannot keep a secret. Macrobius recounts in the book of Scipio's dreams that there was a Roman child named Papirius. Once, he accompanied his father, who was a senator, into the chamber where they held council. At that time, they spoke of matters that were commanded and agreed should be kept secret under pain of their heads. Afterward, they departed, and when Papirus had come home from the senate and the council with his father, his mother asked him what was discussed. The counsel and reason for their prolonged stay there. The child answered and said he dared not tell or reveal it because it was defended upon pain of death. The mother was more eager to know than before, and began to coax him and later threaten him to reveal and tell her what it was. When the child saw that he could have no rest from his mother in any way, he first made her promise to keep it secret and tell it to none of the world. And after that, he feigned a lessening or a lie and said to her that the senators had in counsel a great question and disagreement, which was this: whether it was better and more for the common welfare of Rome that a man should have two wives or a woman two husbands. After she had understood this, he defended her from telling it to anyone else. And afterward, she went to her goose and told her this counsel secretly. And she told another. Every wife told it to others in secret. After that, all the wives of Rome went to the senate where the senators were assembled. They cried out loudly that they preferred and it was better for the common good that a wife should have two husbands rather than a man two wives. The senators, hearing this, were greatly astonished and did not know what to say or how to answer until finally the child Papirus repeated to them all the reasons and facts about how it had happened. When the senators heard and understood the matter, they were greatly astonished and commended greatly the wisdom and cunning of the child Papirus for devising the lie rather than revealing their counsel. And forthwith they made him a senator and established and ordained from then on that no child in any way should enter the counsel house among them with their fathers except Papirus, whom they would allow to always be among them. A queen ought to be chaste, for as she is above all. other in her state should be an example to all in her living, honestly. Jerome recounts this against Ionas Dule. This man was the first to engage in water combat and secured the first victory. Dule had a wife, one of the most chaste women, whom every woman could emulate. At that time, the sin of the flesh was the greatest sin one could commit against nature. This virtuous woman was named Ilyas. It happened that Dule grew so old that he stopped and quivered with age. One time, he was reproached and reproached himself, saying that he had a foul breath. Angrily and ashamed, he went home to his wife and asked her why and wherefore she had not told him of his fault, so he might have found a remedy and been purged of it. She replied that, as far as she supposed, every man had that same fault as he. She had never kissed any man's mouth but her husband's. Oh, how to be pitied was this woman. A woman had a singular loyalty, for this default had not been only in her husband. She endured it patiently in such a way that her husband knew of his fault before her. We read of a widow named Anna, who had a friend who advised her to remarry. She was young, fair, and wealthy. To this, she replied that she would not do so in any way. If I had a husband as I had and he were as good as he was, I would forever be afraid to lose him, like the other one I lost. And then I would always live in fear and dread, which I will not. And if it happened to me to have a worse one, what good would it do me to have a bad husband after a good one. And so she concluded that she would keep her chastity. St. Augustine relates in the City of God that in Rome there was a noble lady, gentle in manners and of high birth, named Lucretia. She had a husband named Collatinus. At one time, he desired the emperor's son, Torquatus or the proud, through the emperor. And he was called Sixth for coming to dine and sport in his castle or manor. When he entered, among many noble ladies, he saw Lucrecia. And when this emperor's son had seen and noticed her behavior, her appearance, and her beauty, he was immediately enamored with her. He saw a moment when her husband Collatin went to the east of them, and came to the place where Lucrecia was with her companions. She received him honorably, and when the time came to go to bed and sleep, she prepared a bed fittingly for him. Sixth saw where Lucrecia lay. And when he supposed and knew that everyone was in their first sleep, he went to Lucrecia's bed and placed one hand on her breast and in the other hand a naked sword, and said to her, \"Lucrecia, hold your peace and cry not. For I am Sixth Tarquinius' son. If you speak any word, you shall be dead.\" And she held her peace. The lady began to pray and promised many things. After he threatened her to comply with his will, and when he saw he couldn't have his way, he said to her, \"If you don't do my will, I shall kill you and one of your servants. I shall lay him all dead by your side. Then I shall say that I have killed you for your lewdness and greed. The emperor's son, who doubted more the shame of the world than death, consented to this. And as soon as the emperor's son had departed, the lady sent messages to her husband, her father, her brothers, and to a man called Brute, the new counselor of Tarquin, and said to them, \"Yesterday, the emperor's son came into my house as an enemy in the guise of a friend. He has oppressed me. Know that he has dishonored your bed and defiled and disgraced my body. Yet my heart is not consenting. Therefore, I beseech you for pardon, forgiveness, and absolution of the transgression, but not of the pain.\" He who... A woman who commits this sin against me will suffer the consequences, as no woman takes example of Lucretia and lives after the transgression, but instead, in the same way, takes example of the pain. With a sword she takes her life beneath her gown or robe and kills herself before them. The counselor and her husband Collatin, along with all her other friends, swore by the blood of Lucretia that they would never rest until they had expelled Tarquin and all his lineage from Rome. They bore the dead body through the city and incited the people in such a way that Tarquin was exiled and his son was killed. A queen should be well-mannered, and among all things, she should be chaste and shamefast. For when a woman has lost her chastity, she may not or can no longer be chaste. Therefore, says Symachus, those who are not shamefast have no chastity. A conscience of luxury and St. Ambrose says that one of the best adornments that makes a woman most fair in her person is to be shamefast. Seneca recounts that there was a woman named Archezille, who was so shamefast that she put a pillow of feathers under the bed of a poor friend, and put it there secretly, as he feigned poverty and would not or dared not acknowledge his poverty. Therefore, men should give and help her friends secretly, so that they do not know when it comes. For when we keep it secret and make no boast of it, our deeds and works will please God and them as well. A queen should be chosen when she is wedded from the most honorable lineage and people. For often the daughters follow the teachings and manners of those they are descended from. Valerius Maximus relates that there was one who would marry, who\n\n(Note: The text appears to be in Early Modern English. No major OCR errors were detected, but there are some minor errors and inconsistencies in spelling and punctuation that have been corrected for the sake of readability.) A philosopher I approached and asked for counsel on what I should take. He replied that I should take the one whose mother and grandmother had been chaste and well-conditioned. For such a mother, such a daughter commonly. A queen ought to teach her children to be continent and keep chastity entirely, as it is written in Ecclesiastes. If you have sons, teach and instruct them. And if you have daughters, keep them in chastity. The world remembers that every king and prince ought to be a clerk, to command others to study and read the law of our Lord God. Therefore, Emperor Octavian wrote to the king of France that he should let his sons learn the seven liberal arts. Among other things, he said that a king not lettried resembles an ass. Emperor Octavian made his sons learn to swim, to spring, to leap, to be just, to play with the axe and sword, and all manner of things that pertain to a knight. Daughters he made them learn: to sew, to spin, to labor in wool and linen cloth, and all other works fitting for women. When his friends asked why he did so, he answered that he was lord and master of all the world, yet he did not know what would befall his children, whether they would fall into poverty or not. If they acquired a good craft, they might fare well.\n\nThere was a duchess named Remonde, who had three sons and two daughters. It happened that King Hungry Cantanus assaulted a castle where she and her children were. One day, she saw her enemies and among them all, she saw the king, who was a fine and good-looking man. Instantly, she was seized and taken captive by his love. She was so taken aback that she sent to him, offering to surrender the castle to him if he would take her as his wife and marry her. He agreed to this condition, and when the king was in the castle, she became his queen. The people of Castell took men and women and all they found, among whom was a youngest son named Ermoaldus, who later became king of the Lombards. The two sisters took chickens and held them under their arms next to their flesh and between their breasts. When they were about to be attacked and defiled by the hungry men, they felt the stench and fled, leaving them saying, \"Fy, how these Lombards stink.\" And they kept their virginity. As a result, one of them later became Queen of France, and the other became Queen of Germany. Then, King Catanus kept his promise to the duchess and lay with her one night to save his oath. On the morning after, he revealed this to all the nobles. Three days later, he died and ordered that a staff of tree be placed from the lower part of her body through her throat or mouth because of his desire for her flesh. The Alphins should be established and formed in the manner of judges sitting in a chair with a book open before their eyes. This is because some causes are cryminal and some are civil, such as those concerning possessions and other temporal matters and transgressions. Therefore, there should be two judges in the realm: one in black for the first cause, and the other in white for the second. Their office is to counsel the king, make good laws by his commandments, and enforce all the realm in good and virtuous manners. They are to judge and give sentence truly according to the case, and to counsel wisely and justly all those who seek counsel from them, without having any eye open to any person. They are to study diligently and to order all that is to be kept to be observed faithfully and stably, so that they are not found corrupt for favor or for lineage. For the first point, Seneca states in the book of Benefits that the poor Diogenes was stronger than Alexander. Alexander could not give as much as Diogenes was willing to refuse. Marcus Curius had besieged and assaulted them, and the Bonaentans, who heard that he was poor, took a large mass and weight of gold and sent it to him, asking him to receive it and abandon his assault and siege. When they came with the present to him, they found him sitting on the ground and eating his food from plates and dishes of wood and tree bark. He then answered their message, saying that they should go home and tell those who sent them that Marcus Curius loves being a lord and winning riches more than riches should win him. For by battle, he will not be overcome and vanquished, nor will gold or silver corrupt or compromise him. Often, things take an evil turn that is untrue for gold and silver. And that a man is [unclear] Subgettes cannot be lords of money. Heliomund recalls that Demoscenes demanded of Aristodone how much he had won for pleading a cause for his client. Aristodone replied, \"A mark of gold.\" Demoscenes replied to him again, \"You have won as much for holding your peace and speaking not.\" The tongues of advocates and men of law are harmful and domineering, yet they must be had if you want to win your cause with money, and if you give, you shall win. And often they sell their silence as well as their utterance. Valerius recalls that the senators of Rome took counsel regarding two persons, one poor and the other rich and covetous, both of whom were most fit to be sent to govern and judge the lands of Spain and Africa. Scipio of Africa said that neither of them was good or profitable to be sent there. In his saying, he despised all poverty and avarice in a judge. A covetous man has no business in a judge. Need half a penny. He is servant and bond to money, not lord of it. But poverty of heart and will should be greatly allowed in a judge. Therefore we read that as long as the kings loved poverty, they were lords of the whole world. For many were those who dedicated all their goods for the common weal, and it was most profitable for the commonalty that they were so poor that when they were dead, they were buried and brought to earth with the common good. And their daughters were married by the despised poverty. And they began to gather riches. They made great battles. They have used many sins. And so the common weal perished. For there is no sin but that it reigns there. There is none so worldly in contempt. For he is in peace who fears no man. And he is rich who covets nothing. Valerius recalls that he is not rich who has much. But he is rich who has little and covets nothing. Thus let the judges take heed that they incline not for love or for hate in any matter. Iugement / For theophrast saith that alle loue is blynde ther loue is / ther can not ryght Iugement by gyuen / For alle loue is blynde And therfore loue is none euyn Iuge For ofte tymes loue Iugeth a fowll & lothly woman to be fayr And so reherceth quynte curse in his first book that the grete Godaches sayth the same to Alixandre\nmen may saye in this caas that nature is euyll For euery man is lasse auysed and worse in is owne feet and cause than in an other mans / And therfore the Iuges ought to kepe hem well from yre in Iugement / Tullius sayth that an angry & yrous {per}sone weneth that for to doo euyll / is good counceyll / and socrates saith yt .ii. thinges ben con\u00a6traryous to cou\u0304ceyll / and they ben hastynes & wrath / and Galeren sayth in Alexandrye / yf yre or wrath ouercome the whan thou sholdest gyue Iugement / weye all thinge in ye balance so that thy Iugement be not enclyned by loue ne by yefte / ne fauour of persone torne not thy corage. Helemond reherceth that Cambyses kynge of perse whiche was a A righteous king had an unrighteous judge who, out of envy and evil will, had condemned a man unfairly. Therefore, he had him flayed alive and covered the seat of judgment with his skin. He made his son the judge and had him sit on his father's skin to ensure that the son would judge righteously and abhor the judgment and pain of his father. A judge should punish offenses equally and uphold the law that they ordain. Cato says, \"Carry out and do the law in the same manner as you have ordained and decreed.\" Valerius relates that Calenius, a consul, had a son who was caught in adultery. According to the law at that time, he was sentenced to lose both eyes. The father wanted the law to be carried out without favor, but the entire city was moved with compassion and would not allow it. In the end, his father was overcome by their prayers and ordered that his son should lose only one eye, which was put out. He himself lost an eye, and thus the law was observed and kept. And the prayer of the people was accomplished. There was a counselor of Rome who had given counsel to make a statute: whoever entered into the senate and wore a sword about him should be dead. At one time, he came out from without and entered into the senate, and his sword was girt about him, which he took no heed of. And one of the senators told him of it. When he knew it and remembered the statute, he drew out his sword and slew himself before them, rather to die than to break the law. For whose death all the senators made great sorrow. But alas, we find not many in these days who do so. But they are like Anastasius says: the laws of some are like the nets of spiders that take not great beasts and birds but let them go and flee through. But they take flies and gnats and such small things. In like manner, the laws nowadays are not executed but upon the poor. People/the great and rich plunder and go through with all, and for this reason, they sorrowfully engage in battles and discords, and make the great and rich take by force and strength lordships and seigniories upon the small and poor. And this is done especially by those of gentle lineage and poor in goods. They rob and reave, and yet compel them by force to serve them. This is no marvel, for those who do not fear angering God or breaking the law and deceiving are often times fallen into much cursedness and wickedness. But when the great people act according to the law and punish transgressors sharply, the common people abstain and withdraw from doing evil, and chastise themselves by their example. And the judges ought to attend, for if they smite the carpet-makers, the weavers and other craftsmen say that it is most necessary for them to attend for the common profit, and they glorify them in their skill and say that they are profitable. Therefore, the judges should. Studied and contemplated more than they should for the common good, according to Seneca. Believe me, they seem to do nothing but those who labor. They do spiritual and physical work, and among artisans there is no pleasant rest. But the reason of the judges has ordained this. Therefore, Angulus in the book \"Actiui actorum\" about Socrates relates that at one time Socrates was so deep in thought that on a natural day he remained in one state, neither moving his mouth, eye, foot, or hand, as if he had been carried away. And when one asked him why he was so deep in thought, he answered in all worldly things and labors of the same, and was a burgher and citizen of the world. Valerius also recounts that Carnard, a knight, was so wise and laborious in thoughts for the common good that when he was set at the table to eat, he forgot to put his hand to the food to feed himself. And therefore his wife was named. Mellyse, whom he had taken more to have her company and fellowship than for any other thing, fed him and said that he should not die of hunger in his pensiveness. Dydymus said to Alexandria, we are not denizens in the world but strangers. We have done no evil deed, but that it is worthy to be punished and we to suffer pain therefore. And then we may go on with open face and good conscience. And so may we go lightly and appropriately the way that we hope and purpose to go. This suffices as for the Alphyns.\n\nThe knight ought to be made all armed upon a horse in such a way that he has a helmet on his head and a spear in his right hand, and covered with his shield, a sword and a mace on his left side, clad with a hauberk and plates before his breast, broken and taught and apt to battle and covered with his arms. When the knights are made, they are bound or bathed. That is the sign. They should lead a new life and new manners. They wake all night in prayers and supplications to God that He will give them grace to obtain that which they cannot obtain by nature. The king or prince girds a sword about them as a sign that they should abide and keep him from whom they take their dispensations and dignity. A knight ought to be wise, liberal, true, strong, and full of mercy and pity, and a keeper of the people and of the law. And just as chivalry surpasses other in virtue, dignity, honor, and reverence, so ought he to surmount all others in virtue. For honor is nothing else but to do reverence to another person for the good and virtuous disposition that is in him. A noble knight ought to be wise and provident before he is made knight. It is required of him that he has long time used the war and arms, that he may be expert and wise to govern the others. Since a knight is captain of a battle, the life of those who will be under him lies in his hands. His hand and therefore he ought to be wise and well-advised for some time, for engyn is more worth than strength or hardiness of a man not proven in arms. For otherwise, it happens that when the prince of the battle afflicts and trusts in his hardiness and strength and will not use wisdom and engyn to run upon his enemies, he is vanquished and his people slain. Therefore says the philosopher that no man should choose young people to be captains and governors, for there is no certainty in their wisdom. Alexander of Macedon vanquished and conquered Egypt, Iudea, Caldea, Africa, and Assyria, extending to the marches of the Brahmans more by the counsel of old men than by the strength of the young men. We read in the history of Rome that there was a knight with the name Malachite, who was so wise and true that when Emperor Theodosius was dead, he made mortal war against his brother Germain, named Gildo or Guy, for as much as this said Guy would be lord of This man, without the consent of the senators, was this same guy who had killed the two sons of his brother Malchete and inflicted great torment upon the Christian people. Before he could face his brother Emyon in the field, he went to an island of Capare and brought with him all the Christian men who had been exiled there. He kept them with him for three days and three nights, for he had great faith in the prayers of good people, and no man could counsel or help but God. Three days before the battle, a little vision appeared to him, revealing the time and place of his victory. Having been in prayer for three days and three nights, and having been assured of victory, he fought against his brother with a force of 5,000 men, while his brother had 22,000 in his company. By God's help, he emerged victorious. When the barbarians came to aid Guion, they saw his discomfiture. Fled away did both Guion and he to Africa by ship, and when he arrived there, he was soon after strangled. These two knights, whom I speak of, were two German brothers sent to Africa to defend the common weal. In the same way, Judas Maccabeus, Jonathan, and Simon his brother put themselves in the mercy and guard of our Lord God. Against the enemies of God's law, they had little people, considering the multitude that were against them, yet they obtained victory. Knights ought to be true to their princes, for truth is the greatest precious stone when mixed with justice. Paul the historian of the Lombards recounts that there was a knight named Enulphus, from the city of Paphos, who was so true to his king named Patarich that he put him in parallel of death for him. It happened that Grimald, Duke of Beneventan, whom we have touched upon before in the chapter of the Queen, did this to Godbert. Which was king of the Lombards by the hand of Godebert, duke of Taurinus. This Grimald was made king of the Lombards in his place, and after this, Pataric, who was the king's brother, was put and banished from the country. This knight Enulphus did so much that he gained the peasants back against King Grimald from Pataric. He was given permission to come out of Hungary where he had always been in parley. And so he came and begged mercy. King Grimald granted him leave to dwell and live honestly in his country, always aware that he took nothing upon himself and named himself king. A little while after this, the king who believed evil tongues, thought in himself how he might bring Pataric to his death. All knew this, and the knight Enulphus, who came the same night with his squire to visit his lord. A squire clothed and led his lord from bed, making him rise and wear the squire's clothes. The squire then brought him out, boisterously serving him before those assigned to guard Patharik's house, ensuring he wouldn't escape. If it had been the squire who behaved so outrageously, he would have taken his master to his house, which adjoined the town walls. At midnight, he lowered his master out through a rope, taking a horse from the pasture and fled to the city of Aast, where he came before the king of France. When morning came, Arnolphus and his squire were found to have kidnapped the king and his men, whom the king had ordered brought before him. The king demanded to know how they had managed to escape and they told him the truth. The king then asked his counselors what punishment they deserved for defying his will. Some said they should be hanged, and some said they should be flayed. The king then said by that lord who made me, they are not worthy to die, but for to have much worship and honor. For they have been true to their lord, therefore. And after this, the proper squire and servant of Godberd slew the traitor Goribalde, who had slain his lord at a feast of St. John, in his lord and duke. Thus, knights ought to love to gather, and each to put his life in adventure for another. For so are they stronger and the more doubted. Like the noble knights Ioab and Abishai, who fought against the Syrians and Ammonites, and were so true to one another that one helped the other vanquish their enemies. And were so joined together that if the Syrians were stronger than one of them, that other helped him. We read that Damon and Phidias were so right perfect friends to one another that when Dionysius, who was king of Syracuse, had judged one to death, the other pleaded for him. for his passage in the city of Syracuse, whom he intended to execute, he asked for grace and leave to go to his country to dispose and order his testament. His fellow pledged him and was surety for him on his head that he would return.\n\nThose who saw and heard this regarded him as a fool and blamed him. He always said that he regretted nothing at all, for he knew well the truth of his fellow. And when the day came and the hour of execution should be done, his fellow came and presented himself before the judge, discharging the fellow who was pledge for him. The king was greatly ashamed and, for the great truth found in him, he pardoned him and prayed both of them to receive him as their great friend and fellow.\n\nHere are the virtues of love, a man ought not to doubt death for his friend. Here is what it is to do for a friend, and to lead a debonair life, and to be without cruelty, to love and not to hate, which causes us to do good. Anthony says that Julius Caesar did not lightly forsake friendship and amity, but once he had gained it, he retained it steadfastly and maintained it always. Scipio of Africa says that there is nothing stronger than to maintain love until death. The love of concupiscence and lechery is soon dissolved and broken. But the true love of the common good and profit is seldom found. Where can you find a man in these days who will expose himself for the worship and honor of his friend or for the common good? Seldom or never will he be found. Knights should be generous and liberal. When a knight has considered his own profit by his covetousness, he impoverishes his people. When the soldiers see that they are not paid their wages liberally, and their master intends his own gain and profit, then, when the enemies come, they soon turn. Backes and flees often, and thus he who intends more to gain money than victory may find his scarcity causing more confusion than victory. Every knight should therefore be liberal, lest he believe or suppose that his scarcity is a great winning or gaining, and thus be the less loved by his people. His adversary, by contrast, withdraws from him through large giving. For often battle is announced more for the sake of gaining silver than by the force and strength of men. Men are obtained and achieved by the force of nature, and for so much it is necessary to see well and take care of other things than all their gain and winning should be common among them except their arms. For just as victory is common, so should the spoils and loot be common to them. Therefore, David, the gentle knight in the first book of Kings in the last chapter, made a law, that he who remained behind due to sickness or infirmity should receive a share. Tenants should have as much part of the booty as he who had been in the battle. For the love of this law, he was made king of Israel afterwards. Alexander of Macedonia came once as a simple knight to the court of Porus, king of Judah, to see the state of the king and the knights of the court. And the king received him with great honor. He asked Alexander many things about himself and his constancy and strength, not suspecting that he was Alexander himself, disguised as one of his knights. After they had dined and served Alexander in various ways with gold and silver and diverse dishes, Alexander, after he had pleased himself with such food, paid for the meal and took the vessels and kept them for himself, putting them in his bosom or sleeves. He was accused to the king for this afterwards. After dinner, the king called him and demanded why he had taken the vessels. He answered, \"My lord king, I pray you to understand and take heed of yourself and also of yours.\" I have heard much of your great generosity and power in chivalry and dispensation, surpassing that of Alexander. Therefore, I have come to you, a knight named Antigone, to serve. It is the custom in Alexander's court that whatever a knight is served with, all his food and equipment are included. I had assumed that this custom had been observed in your court, as you are richer than he. However, when the knights heard this, they left Porus and went to serve Alexander instead. Thus, he won their hearts through gifts, which later led to Porus, the king of Iude, being killed, and Alexander becoming king of that land. Therefore, knight, always remember that with a closed and shut purse, you will never have victory. Ouide says that he who gives gifts is glad. For with gifts, one wins not only the hearts of gods but also men. If Jupiter were angry with gifts, he would be pleased. Knights ought to be. A man is not only strong in body but also in courage. There are many strong and great in body who are faint and weak in heart. He is strong who cannot be vanquished and overcome. He endures much, and so we believe that those who are not overly great or overly little are most courageous and best in battle. We read that Cadmus, duke of Athens, was to have a battle against the Polypians. He was warned and had a revelation from the goddesses that they would have victory over whom the prince would be slain in battle. And the prince, with a true heart, put himself at the front of the battle so that he might be slain. And so he was, for the true prince preferred to die than for his people to be overcome. It was a noble and fair thing for him to expose himself to death to defend his country. But no man would do so unless he hoped for a better thing. Therefore, the law says that they live in their souls gloriously. A knight ought to be merciful and pitiful, for there is nothing that makes a knight renowned like saving the lives of those he can kill. Shedding and spilling blood is the condition of a wild beast, not a good knight.\n\nScilla, Duke of the Romans, without him had many fair victories against the Romans with Iunius. In the battle of Pylle, he slew eighteen thousand men. In Campania, he slew seventy thousand. And after in the city, he slew three thousand unnamed men.\n\nWhen one of his knights named Quintus Catulus saw this cruelty, he said to him, \"Be sensible now and let them live, be merciful to those with whom we have been victorious and with whom we ought to live. It is the most effective and fair vengeance a man can do.\" Therefore, Joab ordered when Absalom was slain, he swore. trompette / that his peple shold no more renne & slee theyr aduersaryes. For ther were slayn aboute .xx. thousand of them / and in lyke wyse dide he whan he faught ayenst Abner And Abner was vaynquysshid and fledde For where that he wente in the chaas he comanded to spare the peple The knyghtes ought to kepe the peple / For whan the peple ben in theyr tentes or castellis / the knyghtes ought to kepe the wacche / For this cause the romayns callyd them le\u2223gyons And they were made of dyuerce prouynces and of dyuerce nacyons to thentente to kepe the peple / And the peple shold entende to theyr werke / For no crafty man may bothe entende to his craft & to fighte how may a crafty man entende to hys werke sewrely in tyme of warre but yf he be kept And right in suche wyse as the knyghtes shold kepe ye peple in tyme of peas in lyke wise the peple ought to pourveye for theyr dispensis / how shold a plowman be sewre in the felde / but yf the knygh\u2223tes made dayly wacche to kepe hem For lyke as the glo\u2223rye of a kynge is Upon his knights, it is necessary that merchants, crafty men, and common people be protected and kept. Therefore, late the knights keep the people in such a way that they may enjoy peace and get and gather the costs for both. We read that Athis said to David, who was a knight, \"I make thee my keeper and defender always.\" Thus should knights have great zeal that the law be kept. For the magestate royal ought not only to be garnished with arms but also with good laws. And therefore should they labor that they be well kept. Turgeus relates of a noble knight named Ligurgyus, who had made ancient laws which the people would not keep nor observe. For they seemed hard for them to keep, and would constrain him to rape and set them apart. When the noble knight saw this, he made the people understand that he had not made them but that Apollo Delphinus had made them, and had commanded him that he should keep them. The people ignored the laws / They would in no way keep them / And then he said to them that it was good that before the said laws should be broken, he would go and speak with the god Apollo / To obtain from him a dispensation to break them / And that the people should keep and observe them until he returned / The people agreed and swore that they would keep them until he returned\n\nThe knight went into exile in Greece and lived there all his life / And when he should die, he commanded that his body should be cast into the sea / For as much as if his body should be born there, the people would think themselves quit of their oath / And would keep no longer his laws that were so good and reasonable\n\nHis laws were such:\nThe first law was that the people should obey and serve the princes / And the princes should keep the people and do justice on the malefactors\n\nThe second law was that... For he knew that the labor of knighthood is strongest when they live simply. The third was that no man should buy anything for money but they should exchange one merchandise for another. The fourth was that men should set no more by money nor keep it more than they would spend or waste. The fifth he ordained for the common welfare, that princes might move and make battle by their power. To the masters of counsel he came with judgments and annuell rents. To the senators the keeping of the law. And to the common people he gave power to choose such judges as they would have. The sixth he ordered that all things should be divided equally and all things should be common, and none richer than others in patrimony. The seventh that every man should eat well in common, that riches should not be a cause of luxury when they eat secretly. The eighth that the young people should not have more than one gown or garment in a year. The ninth that. Men should set children to labor in the field, so that they should not employ their youth in plays and folly, but in labor. The tenth that maidens should be married without dowry, in such a way that no man should take a wife for money, but for her good manners and virtues. The eleventh that men should worship the old and ancient men for their age and more for their wisdom than for their riches; this knight made none of these laws, but he first kept them.\n\nThe rooks which are vicars and legates of the king ought to be made like a knight on horseback and a mantle and hood furred with mink, holding a staff in his hand. Since a king and a realm are great and large, and rebellion or novelties might arise in one party or another, therefore there are two rooks, one on the right side and the other on the left. They ought to have in them pity, justice, humility. Willful poverty and liberality are the first virtues of justice. For it often happens that ministers, through their pride and arrogance, subvert justice and do wrong. Therefore, kings sometimes lose their realms without fault or guilt. An unjust judge or overlord is unjust, and conversely, a true minister of the law and righteous one causes the king to be regarded as just and true. The Romans therefore made good laws, decreeing that they should be just and true, and those who established them should in no way break them but keep them until they die. The ancient and wise men commonly said that it was not good to make or ordain a law that is not just. Valerius relates that there was a man named Themistocles who came to the councilors of Athens and said that he knew of a council that was very profitable for them. But he would tell it to only one of them. And they appointed a wise man named Aristides. When he had understood the matter, he returned to the other council members and said that the council of Themystides was profitable but unjust. And the council, upon hearing him say that it was not just or right, left them all in peace and would not interfere. The vicar or judge of the king should be so just that he should employ all his efforts to save the commonweal, and if it were necessary to put his life and lose it for that purpose, we have an example in Marcus Regulus, whom Tullius recounts in the book of Offices, and Saint Augustine also relates in The City of God, how he fought against the Carthaginians at sea in ships and was victorious but taken. Then it happened that they of (unclear) carriage sent him a message to Rome, requesting that they send back their prisoners who had been taken, and in exchange, they would release one of their own. He came to Rome and made a proposal before the senate, demanding that the Carthaginians surrender their prisoners as previously agreed. The senators then asked him for counsel. He replied, \"I advise you not to do it in any way. The people of Rome consider the Carthaginians they hold in prison to be old men, worn out from the war, as I am myself. But the Carthaginians hold our people, the best and brightest among them, whom they have captured as counsel. His friends tried to keep him and counsel him to stay there and not return as a prisoner to Carthage. But he would not do so, but instead went back and kept his oath. He knew well that he was going toward his death, for he had rather die than break his oath. Valerius relates this in the...\" The sixth book of Emelyn, duke of Romains, recounts an instance when he deceived the children of the gentlemens, drawing him slightly towards the Roman camps. The schoolmaster of the children persuaded the duke Emelyn, claiming that through the children he had brought to him, he would obtain the city. For their fathers were lords and governors. When Emelyn heard this, he replied, \"You are evil and cruel, and you would give a great gift of felony and wicked laws to keep in battle and war. We will observe and keep them as they should be, and we are prepared against our enemies who will defend them. Not against those who cannot save their lives when their country is taken. You have deceived these little children as much as you can through your new deceit and subtlety, but I, a Roman, will conquer them through craft and the strength of my arms.\" Anon he commanded the school master to be taken, and to bind his hands behind him as a traitor, leading them to the parents of the children. When the fathers and parents saw the great courtesy he had shown them, they opened the gates and yielded them to him. We read that Hannibal had taken a prince of Rome, who upon his oath and promise allowed him to go home and send him his ransom or he would come again within a certain time. And when he was at home in his place, he said that he had deceived him with a false oath. When the senators knew of this, they compelled him to return again to Hannibal. Amos-florus tells that the physician of King Pirrus came one night to fabricate his adversary. He promised him that if he would give him his labor, he would immediately enrich Pirrus his master. When Fabricius understood this, he took him and bound him hand and foot, and sent him to his master, and did say to him word for word as the physician had said and promised. And when Pirrus understood this, he was greatly astonished by Fabrice's loyalty and truth as his enemy. And he said certainly that the sun might be eclipsed sooner than Fabrice should be allowed to keep loyalty and truth. If those who were not Christian were so just and true and loved their country and good reputation, what should we do then, who are Christian and whose law is set upon love and charity? But nowadays, there is nothing else in the world but barter, treason, deceit, and treachery. Men keep not their covenants or promises. Others. Writings. Nor truth.\n\nThe subjects rebel against their lord. There is now no law kept. Nor faith. Nor oath held. The people murmur and rise against their lord and will not be subject. They ought to be pitied.\n\nThere is pity in effect by compassion, and in word by remission and pardon, by alms, for to incline him [the lord] to the poor. For pity is nothing else but a right. A debonair heart greatly desired to help all men. Valerius recounts that there was a judge named Sangis, who sentenced a woman to have her head struck off or to die in prison for a crime she had committed. The jailer, moved by pity for the woman, did not immediately put her to death but kept her in prison. This woman had a daughter who came to visit and comfort her mother. However, every time she entered the prison, the jailer searched her to prevent her from bringing food or drink to her mother, insisting that she should die of hunger. Afterward, the jailer marveled greatly that the woman did not die and began to suspect the cause. He eventually discovered that her daughter gave her milk to drink and fed her. When the jailer saw this, he was amazed and went to inform the judge. Moved by the great pity the daughter showed her mother, the judge pardoned her and ordered her release from prison. This pity did not lessen much. People wondered that the daughter should give the mother to suck, it was against nature but children should be kind to father and mother. Seeing that nature had taken it away from him because he should have no arms to assault them. And this is an example to princes that they should be of the same condition. Valerius relates in his fifth book of Marcus Aurelius that when he had taken the city of Syracuse, and was seated in the highest place of the city, he beheld the great destruction of the people and of the city, he wept and said, \"Thou oughtest to be sorrowful, for so much as thou wouldst have no pity for thyself, but enjoy it, for thou art fallen into the hands of a right noble prince.\" Also he recounts that when Pompey had conquered the king of Germany, who had often fought against the Romans, he was brought before him bound, he was so pitiful that he would not suffer him to remain long on his knees before him, but received him courteously. And set the crown again on his head and placed him in the state that he was to be / For he had an open opposition that it was as worthy and sitting to a king to pardon as to punish. He also recalled a counselor named Poul who had brought before him a prisoner. And as he knelt before him, he lifted him up from the ground and made him sit beside him to give him good hope and expectation. He said to the others standing by, \"If it is great noblesse to show ourselves contrary to our enemies, then this feast ought to be allowed, that we show ourselves debonair to our captives and prisoners. Caesar, when he heard of Caton's death, his adversary, said that he had great envy of his glory and therefore freely left to his children all his patrimony.\" Thus Virgil taught and showed the glorious princes how to rule and govern the people of Rome. Saint Augustine in the City of God and make peace overall, deport and. Forbear your subjects / reprove and correct the proud / and teach the laws. It was written to Alexander that every prince ought to be pitiful in punishing / and ready to reward. There is no thing that causes a prince to be so beloved of his people / as when he speaks sweetly to them / and conducts himself simply with them. This comes from the root of pity. We read of Emperor Trajan that his friends reproved him for being too familiar and affectionate with the common people more than an emperor should be / and he answered that he would be such an emperor as everyone desired to have / Also we read of Alexander that once he led his army forth hastily / and in his haste, he beheld an old knight sitting who was very cold. He made him arise and seat him in his own seat or siege. What wonder it was that the knights desired to serve such a lord who valued their health more than his dignity. The rooks (rookes is likely a misspelling for rookes or rooks, meaning common people or subjects) ought also to be humble and meek. the holy scripture whiche saith / the gretter or in the hier astate that thou arte / so moche more oughtest thou be meker & more humble Valerius reherceth in his .vii. book that ther was an emperour named publius cesar / That dide do bete doun his hows whiche was in the middis of ye market place for as moche as hit was heier than other houses / for as moche as he was more glorious in astate than other / Therfore wold he haue a lasse hous than other And scipion of affrique that was so poure of volu\u0304tarie pouerte yt whan he was dede / he was buried at ye dispencis of ye comyn good / They shold be so humble yt they shold leue theyr offices / and suffre other to take hem whan her tyme comyth / & doo honour to other / for he gouerneth wel\u0304 ye royame yt may gouerne hit whan he will Valeri{us} saith\nIn his thirde book that fabyan the grete had ben maistre counceyllour of his fader his grauntsire / And of his grauntsirs fader & of alle his antecessours And yet dide he alle his payne and labour / that his sone shold A man who held that office never did, except for trusting his son. He was noble, wise, and more tempered than others. However, he did not want the office to remain in his family forever. In his seventh book, he recalls that they wanted to make Fabian emperor, but he excused himself, saying he was blind and too old to see. However, this excuse would not help him. Then he said to them, \"Seek and get another. If you make me your emperor, I may not endure your manners, nor you mine.\"\n\nThere was a king of such subtle wit that when men brought him the crown to take it, he remembered himself a little and said, \"O thou crown that art more noble than happy. For if a king knew well and perfectly how full of paralyzing thoughts and charge thou art, if thou were on the ground, he would never lift nor take thee up. Remember that when thou art most glorious, thou wilt have some men most envious on thee.\" And when thou hast greatest victory and lordships, thou shalt have the greatest care, thought, and anxieties. Valpasian was so humble that when Nero was slain, all the people cried for him to become emperor, and many of his friends came and begged him to take it upon himself. At last, he was compelled to take it upon himself. He said to his friends, \"It is better and more praiseworthy for a man to take the empire against his will than to labor to have it and to put himself in it.\" Therefore, says the Bible, that Joab, the son of Saryn, who was captain of King David's army, when he came to take and conquer a city, he sent to David and asked him to come to the war, that the victory should be given to David, not to him. They ought also to beware of frequently changing their officers. Josephus relates that the friends of Tiberius marveled greatly why he kept his officers in office for so long. They kept their offices unchanged and demanded of him the cause. He answered, \"I would gladly change them if I knew it would be good for the people. But I once saw a man who was royally dressed and full of sores. Many flies sat upon the sores and sucked his blood, which was marvelous to see. He then asked me why I chased and smote away these flies that were full of my blood. And now will others not come who are hungry, which will cause me double the pain more than the others did. For the prick of the hungry is more painful than the half of the full. Therefore, he said, \"I leave the officers in their offices. For they are all rich, and they do not cause much harm and evil as the new ones would and would pour out if I set them in their places. They ought also to be patient in hearing words and in suffering pain on their bodies, as the first one said to Alexander that he was not worthy to reign. Especially when he\" Suffers that lechery and delight to have sovereignty in him, he suffers it patiently and answers none other way but that he will correct himself. And is reproached that Julius Caesar was bald, of which he bore such great displeasure that he kept his ears that lay on the back part of his head forward to hide the bareness before. Then said a knight to him Caesar, it is lighter and sooner to be made that you are not bald, than that I have shown any cowardice in the war of Rome, or hereafter shall do any cowardice. He suffers it patiently and says not a word. Another reproached him by his lineage and called him a fornicator. He answered that it is better that nobility begins in me, than it should fail in me. Another called him a tyrant. He answered, if I were one, you would not say so. A knight called on a time Scipio of Africa, a foul and old knight in arms. And he knew little good. He answered, I was born of my mother a little child and feeble. And yet he was not a man of arms. And yet he was at all times one of the best and most worthy in arms who lived. Another said to Vespasian, \"A wolf would sooner change its skin and hear this than you should change your life. For the longer you live, the more. And he answered, \"We ought to laugh at these words. But we ought to amend ourselves and punish the transgressions.\" Seneca relates that King Antigonus heard certain people speak evil of him, and there was nothing between them but a courteous facade. And then he said, \"End your evil language lest the king hear you, for the courteous one hears you well I do.\" As touching the pains that they ought to endure patiently, Valerius relates that a tyrant tortured Anaximenes and threatened to cut out his tongue. To whom he said, \"It is not in your power to do so.\" And forthwith he bit off his own tongue and showed it with his teeth and cast it in the face of the Tyrant. It is a great virtue in a man that he forgets not. To be patient in corrections of wrongs. It is better to leave a guilty man unpunished than to punish him in anger. Valerius recounts that Architas of Tarente, master to Plato, saw that his fields and land were destroyed and lost due to his servant's negligence. He said, \"If I were not angry, I would take vengeance and torture him.\" See there, you may see that he preferred to leave unpunished than to punish more through anger and wrath than through right. Therefore Seneca says, \"Do nothing that you ought to do when you are angry, for when you are angry, you would do all things according to your pleasure. And if you cannot control your passions, like it was in ancient princes. They valued more to be rich in wit and good manners than in money. And Valerius recounts in his eighth book that Scipio of Africa was accused before the Senate for having great treasure. He answered, \"When I submitted Africa to your power, I held no treasure.\" I am a text-based AI and don't have the ability to directly process or clean text input. However, based on the given instructions, the cleaned text would be:\n\nThing to myself that I might say, this is my save only the surname of Africa. The Africans have not found in me or in my brother any avarice, nor were we so covetous that we had greater envy to be rich in name than in riches. And therefore Seneca says that King Altagore willingly used earthen vessels in his houses. And some said he did it for covetousness. But he said that it was a better and more noble thing to shine in good manners than in riches. And when some men demanded him why and for what cause he did so, he answered, \"I am now king of Sicily,\" and was once of a potter's lineage. And for as much as I doubt fortune. For when I issued out of the house of my father and mother, I was suddenly made rich. Therefore I behold the nativity of me and of my lineage, which is humble and meek. And all these things come from willful poverty, for he intended more to the common profit than to his own. And of this poverty speaks Saint Augustine in the book of the City of God. They who intend to common profit mourn more over willful poverty being lost in Rome than the riches of Rome. For by willful poverty, good manners were kept entirely. Thus, in these days, riches have not only corrupted the city and the manners but also the thoughts of men, through covetousness and felony, which is worse than any other enemy. Regarding the cruelty of the people of Rome, the good man of noble memory, John the monk late cardinal of Rome, in the decree six in the chapter Gens Sancta, says: \"They are enemies against God. Contrary to holy things. Traitors one to another. Envious towards neighbors. Proud towards strangers. Rebellious and unfaithful towards their superiors. Not suffering those of lower degree than themselves and shameless in demanding things indecently and not leaving until they have obtained what they demand. They are pleasers only when disagreeable, and they have their tongues.\" They are ready to make great promises and do little. They have been large in promises and small in action. They are deceitful and ungrateful, bitter detractors. It is a great sorrow to see the humility, patience, and good wisdom that was expected in this city of Rome, which is chief among all the world, perverted and turned into misery. And I think that in other parts of Christendom they have taken example from them to do evil. They may say that this is according to the decree of lordship and disobedience, which says that such things that sovereigns do are lightly and soon taken as examples by their subjects. These vicars should be generous and liberal. In so much that people who serve them are duly paid and rewarded for their labor. Every man does his labor better and more lightly when he sees that he will be well paid and rewarded. We read that Titus, the son of Vaspasian, was so generous and so liberal. That he gave and promised something to every man. And when his most private friends demanded why he promised more than he could give, he answered that it was not becoming of a prince for any man to depart sorrowful or distrustful from him. This happened on a day when he gave or promised nothing to any man. And when it was evening and he reflected upon himself, he said to his friends, \"O you my friends, this day I have lost; this day I don't know any good.\" We also read of Julius Caesar that he never said to his knights, \"Go one,\" but always said, \"Come, come.\" For I love always to be in your company. And he knew well that it was less pain and trouble to the knights when the prince is in their company and loves them and comforts them.\n\nWe also read in the book of the triumphs of philosophers about an ancient knight of his who was in danger of a case hanging before the judges of Rome. He called Caesar once and said to him before all, \"Caesar, come.\" A man should be his advocate, and Caesar delivered and assigned one to him. The knight said to him, \"O Caesar, I put no vicar in my place when you were equal in the battle of Assise. I fought for you.\" He then showed him the places of his wounds received in the battle. Caesar came in person to be his advocate and complete his cause. He would not have the name of unkindness, but doubted that men would say he was proud and would not do for those who had served him. Those who cannot do as much as be beloved by their knights cannot love the knights. Since a noble person cannot rule or govern without the service and work of the people, it is necessary to appoint and assign the offices of the workers. I will begin first with the first pawn, which is in the play of the chess, signifying a common man on foot, for they are all named. pitiful, a man as much to say as a foot soldier. We will begin with the pawn, who stands before the rook on the right side of the king, for this pawn belongs to serve the vicar or lieutenant of the king and other officers under him out of necessity. This kind of people is depicted and should be made in the form and shape of a man holding in his right hand a spade or shovel, and in his left hand a rod. The spade or shovel is for digging and laboring with the earth, and the rod is for driving and conducting with all the beasts to their pasture. He should also have on his belt a crooked hatchet for cutting off the surplus of the vines and trees. According to the Bible, the first laborer who ever was was Cain, the first son of Adam, who was so evil that he killed his brother Abel. For as much as this deed was true, yet there was also. Another cause of envy that he had against his brother: when God had married them for multiplying the earth, and had given Eve to Adam, and thus began Cain's envy against Abel. For his wife was fairer than Cain's wife, and for this cause he slew Abel with the cheekbone of a beast, and at that time was no manner of iron, the blood of man's blood. Abel was the first martyr in the old testament. And Cain did many other evil things which I omit. For it pertains not to my matter. But it behooved some to labor the earth after Adam's sin, for before Adam sinned, the earth brought forth fruit without the labor of hands. But since he sinned, it must needs be labored with the hands of men. And for as much as the earth is the mother of all things, and we were first formed and took our beginning from the earth, she shall be the end to all of us and to all things. God, who formed us of the earth, has ordained this. That by the labor of men she should give nourishment to all that live, and the laborer of the earth ought to know his God who formed and made heaven and earth from nothing. He ought to have loyalty and truth within himself, and despise death in order to attend to his labor. He ought to give thanks to him who made him, and from whom he receives all his temporal goods, by which his life is sustained. He is also bound to pay the tithes and taxes of all his things. But as Abel did with the best that he chose, always to give to God and please him, for those who grumble and are displeased in rendering and giving to God the tithes of their goods, they ought to be afraid and have fear that they shall fall into necessity. And it is marvelous that this happens, for the man who is disagreeable to God and thinks that the multiplying of his temporal goods tempers his need:\n\n1. Remove meaningless or completely unreadable content: None.\n2. Remove introductions, notes, logistics information, publication information, or other content added by modern editors that obviously do not belong to the original text: None.\n3. Translate ancient English into modern English: That by the labor of men she should give nourishment to all that live, and the laborer of the earth ought to know his God who formed and made heaven and earth from nothing. He ought to have loyalty and truth within himself, and despise death in order to attend to his labor. He ought to give thanks to him who made him, and from whom he receives all his temporal goods, by which his life is sustained. He is also bound to pay the tithes and taxes of all his things. But as Abel did with the best that he chose, always to give to God and please him. For those who grumble and are displeased in rendering and giving to God the tithes of their goods, they ought to be afraid and have fear that they shall fall into necessity. It is marvelous that this happens: the man who is disagreeable to God and thinks that the multiplying of his temporal goods tempers his need. A man, through his own courage and wit, which is created by the sole ordinance of him who made all, is quickly taken away from him when it is disagreeable. It is the reason that when a man is abundant in goods through fortune and does not know God, from whom it comes, another fortune comes to him by which he may ask for grace and pardon. We read of King David, who was first simple and one of the common people. When fortune had elevated and set him in great estate, he left and forgot his God. He filled himself with adultery and homicide and other sins. Then, when his own son Absalom assaulted and began to persecute him, and when he saw that fortune was contrary to him, he began to take up his virtuous works again and asked for pardon and returned to God again. We also read of the children of Israel who were on the verge of being enslaved in the desert and were extremely hungry and thirsty. They prayed and asked God for relief. Immediately, He answered them. And when they were replenished and fat from the flesh of beasts and the manna, they made a calf of gold and worshiped it. This was a great sin and idolatry. For when they were hungry, they knew God, and when their bellies were filled and fattened, they forgot idols and became idolaters. Every laborer ought to be faithful and true. When his master gives him land to work, he should take nothing for himself beyond what is his, but labor truly and take care and charge in his master's name, doing his master's labors more diligently than his own. For the life of the greatest and noblest men next to God is in the hands of the laborers, and thus all trades and occupations are ordered not only for their benefit but for the common good. And it often happens that the earth laborer uses great and boisterous meals and brings to his master more subtle and delicate meals. Valerius recounts in his sixth book that there was a wise and noble master named Anthus, who was accused of a case of adultery. The accusers or denouncers brought a laborer who had closed his land, as they claimed, when his master went to commit the adultery. This same servant, named Papirion, advised his master to deny the charges boldly before the judges. He argued that his denial would never harm or trouble his master, and nothing would be extracted from him that would cause him distress or grief.\n\nThe laborer was then beaten and tortured in various parts of his body, but he never revealed anything that would harm or disturb his master. However, the other accusers were punished. Valerius also mentions that there was another laborer. That was named Penapion, a servant whose master was named Themes, of merciless faith to his master. It happened that certain knights came to his master's house to kill him. As soon as Paperion knew this, he went into his master's chamber and would not be recognized. He wore his master's gown and ring on his finger, and lay in his bed, placing himself in a position of death to save his master's life. But we see many fools today who refuse to use coarse food of laborers. They flee the courser clothing and the manners of a servant. Every wise man, a servant who truly serves his master, is free and not bound. But a fool who is overly proud is bound. For the debility and weaknesses of character that are broken by pride, envy, or covetousness are true servitude. Yet they ought not to doubt laboring for fear and dread of death. No man ought to love his life too much. It is a foul thing for a man to render and a wise and strong man ought not to. \"Flee for your life, but you cannot live, for there is no man who lives but he must necessarily die. Claudian speaks of this and says that all things which the air surrounds and the earth labors to produce, all things contained within the sea, all things brought forth by the floods, all things nourished and all beasts under heaven shall depart from the world. They shall all go in this way, so he need not doubt for fear of death. The rich and the poor shall both die, death makes all things equal and puts an end to them all. Forma, genus, mores, sapience, res, and honors shall be defeated by sudden death, nothing shall endure but merits. We find this in the Lives of the Fathers. There was an earl, a rich and noble man, who had only one son.\" and whan this sone was of age to haue knowlech of the lawe / he herde in a sermone that was prechid that deth spareth none / ne riche ne poure / and as well dyeth ye yonge as the olde / and that the deth ought specially to be doubted for .iii. causes / one was / yt noman knoweth whan he cometh / and the seconde / ner in what state he taketh a man / And the thirde he wote neuer whither he shall goo.\nTherfore eche man shold dispise and flee the world and lyue well and holde hym toward god And whan this yong man herde this thynge / he wente oute of his contrey and fledde vnto a wyldernesse vnto an hermytage / and whan his fader had loste hym he made grete sorowe / and dyde do enquere & seke hym so moche at last he was foun\u00a6den in the herimtage / and than his fader cam theder to hym and sayde / dere sone come from thens / thou shalt be after my deth erle and chyef of my lignage / I shall be lost yf thou come not out from thens / And he than that wyste non otherwise to eschewe the yre of his fader bethought hym and The son said to his father, \"There is an evil custom in your country and land if it pleases you to put it away, I will gladly leave this place and go with you. The father was pleased and demanded to know what it was. If he would tell him, he promised to let it be and set it aside. Then he said, 'There is a father in your country who lets both the young and old do that away. I pray you, when his father heard that, he said, 'That son who cannot do that away, but only God, I will serve him and live with him.' And so the child remained in the hermitage and lived there in good works.\n\nA laborer should attend to his labor and flee idleness. And you should know that David prized the laborers much in the salt pit and said, 'You shall eat the fruit of your labor and be blessed, and he shall do good.' It is fitting that A laborer is expected to collect and gather the fruits of his labor on workdays. He should also rest on holy days, both he and his animals. A good laborer is supposed to nourish and keep his animals. This is signified by the rod he carries, used to lead and drive them to pasture. The first shepherd was Abel, who was just and true, offering the best animals to his sacrifice. One must follow Abel's craft and manners, but no one who follows Cain's malice may do so. It pertains to the laborer to plant and graff trees and vines. No one was the first to find the vine after the deluge and flood, as Josephus relates in the book of natural things. It was not Noah who first found the vine, and he found it bitter and wild. He took the blood of a lion and a lamb to tame it. The swine and ape's blood he mixed with the earth, then cut the vine, placing it around the roots to banish bitterness and make it sweet. After drinking the grape's fruit, Noah became so intoxicated that he exposed his private parts. His youngest son Cham mocked and ridiculed him. When Noah awoke, sober and fasting, he gathered his sons and explained the vine's nature and the reason for the animal blood around its root. He warned them that wine could make men as bold as lions, and weak and shameful as lambs, lecherous as swine, and curious and playful as apes. The ape imitates others' actions. Do the same, and so do many when they have been drunk, they will mingle themselves with all officers and matters that pertain to nothing to them. And when they are fasting and sober, they can scarcely accomplish their own things. Therefore Valerian recalls that in ancient and old times, women drank no wine because, through drunkenness, they might fall into any filth or vileness. And as Ovid says, the wines sometimes appear to the spirits in such a manner that they are capable of all sins which take away the hearts to do well. They make the poor rich, as long as the wine is in his head. Shortly, drunkenness is the beginning of all evils, and it corrupts the body and destroys the soul and minimizes temporal goods.\n\nThe second pane stands to the fore of the knight on the right side of the king, and it has the form and figure of a man, as a smith. This is reasonable, for it pertains to knights to have bridles, saddles, and other equipment. All manner of craftsmen, those who work with their hands and wield a hammer in their right hand, are signified by the hammer. Goldsmiths, marshals, smiths of all forges, forgers, and makers of money, as well as all kinds of smiths, are represented by the hammer. The carpenters are signified by the dolabra or mallet, and by the trowel we understand all masons, tilemakers, and those who build houses, castles, and towers. It is fitting for all these craftsmen to be true, wise, and strong. They must have faith and loyalty within themselves. To the goldsmiths belong gold and silver, as well as all other metals, iron, and steel to others. To the carpenters and masons are put the bodies and goods of the people, and the mariners are given the bodies and goods of the people, and in their guard and protection are placed both body and soul. Parties of the sea and therefore they ought to be true to whom men commit such great charges and things, on her faith and trust. And therefore says the philosopher, he who abandons his faith and belief, may lose nothing greater or more. Faith is a sovereign good and comes from the good will of the heart and of his mind. And for no necessity will he deceive anyone. It is not corrupted for any reward. Valerius relates that Fabius had received from Hannibal certain prisoners that he held of the Romans for a certain sum of money which he promised to pay to the said Hannibal. And when he came before the senators of Rome and asked to borrow the money for them, they answered that they would not lend nor pay. Then Fabius sent his son to Rome and made him sell his heritage and patrimony, and sent the money that he received from it to Hannibal. He preferred and loved better to be poor in his own country with his inheritance than to be without faith and belief. But in these days it was great folly to I have such trust in many people, but if they had been bought beforehand, for often men trust in those by whom they have been deceived at their need. And it is known that these crafty men and workers are truly profitable to the world. And without artisans and workers, the world could not be governed. And know truly that all things that are engendered on the earth and on the sea are made and formed to do profit to the lineage of man, for man was formed for generation, that men might help and profit each other. In this, we should follow nature, for she showed us that we should do common profit one to another. And the first foundation of justice is that no man should harm or grieve another, but they ought to do the common profit. For men say in reproach, \"That which is mine, I hope will be mine,\" but who is he in these days who intends more to the common profit than to his own? Certainly none. But all ways, a man ought to have fear and fear of. This own house, when he sees his neighbor's house on fire, and therefore men should gladly help the common profit, for men otherwise set not by a little fire and might quench it in the beginning, which afterward makes a great blazing fire. And fortune has of nothing so great pleasure as to tear and work continually, and nature is so noble a thing that, were it as it is, it will sustain and keep [it]. But this rule of nature has failed long time. The decree says that all things that are against the law of nature ought to be taken away and put aside. He says before in the eighth distinction that the right law of nature often differs from customs and statutes established, for by the law of nature all things ought to come to every man, and this law was of old time. Men believe especially that the Trojans kept this law, and we read that the multitude of the Trojans was one heart and one soul. In times past, philosophers did the same. And it is believed that those who have their goods in common and not proprietary are most acceptable to God. For otherwise, would not religious men such as monks, friars, canons, and others keep the willful poverty that they have professed? In truth, I have myself been conversant in a religious house of White Friars at Gaunt, which has all things in common among them and not one richer than another. If a man gave to a friar 3d or 4d to pray for him in his mass, as soon as the mass is done he delivers it to his superior or procurement. In such a way, many virtuous and devout friars have lived. And if this life were not the best and most holy, the holy church would never have permitted it in religion. Accordingly, we read in Plato that the city is well and justly governed in which no man may say by right, custom, or ordinance, \"this is mine,\" but I say to the certainty that since this custom came forth. This is mine / And this is thine. No man preferred the common profit so much as his own. And all were well agreed, having no envy nor any evil suspicion of one another. For God wills that our human nature be covetous of two things: that is, of religion and wisdom. But in this case, some are often deceived, For they take religion and leave wisdom, and they take wisdom and refuse religion. None may be true and trustworthy without each other. It does not belong to a wise man to do anything that he may repent of, but he ought to do all things nobly, moderately, firmly, and honestly. And if he has envy towards anyone, it is folly. For he upon whom he has envy is more honorable and of greater worth than he who is so envious. For a man may have no envy towards another, but because he is more fortunate and has more grace than himself. Envy is a sorrow of the heart that comes from the disordering of the profit of. A man who is generous knows that he will never envy another. But the envious man sees and thinks that every man is nobler and more fortunate than himself. He constantly says to himself that another man enjoys more than he does, and that his neighbors have more livestock and their possessions multiply more than his. Therefore, you ought to know that envy is the deadliest sin, for it torments the one who harbors it without causing harm to him. An envious man has no virtue within himself, for he corrupts himself as much as he hates the wealth and virtues of others. Thus, one should keep suspicion from oneself, for when a man's affection harbors suspicion toward another, it seems to him as if it is a reality. It is an evil thing for a man to have suspicion toward himself. We read that Dionysus of... Zecyll the tyrant was so suspicious that he had great fear and dread, for he was hated by all men. He removed his friends from their offices and replaced them with strangers to guard his person. These men were cruel and felons. Fearing and doubting the barbers, he had his daughters learn to shave and comb their hair, and when they grew older, he would not allow them to use iron for this purpose but instead had them burn and sing his hair. He mistrusted and had no affection for them. Furthermore, he fortified the place where he lay with deep ditches and moats, resembling a castle. He entered through a drawbridge which closed after him, and his knights lay outside with his guards, watching and keeping this fortress closely. When Plato saw this Dionysius, king of Syracuse, thus fortified and surrounded by guards and watchmen due to his suspicion, he openly spoke before all men and asked him, king, why. You have not provided the entire input text for me to clean. Here is the given text with unnecessary elements removed:\n\nhast thou done so much evil and harm that it behooves thee to be kept with so many people? And therefore I say that it does not belong to any man who truly intends to behave himself in his works to be suspicious. And they ought to be strong and secure in their works. Particularly, those who are masters and mariners on the sea, for if they are numerous and should make a fear among those in their ships who do not know the parts, it might happen that by this fear and terror all men would leave their labor. And so they might perish and despair in their hearts. For a ship is soon perished and lost by a little tempest when the governor fails to govern his ship for fear and can give no counsel to others except it is no marvel, though they be a fear that is in his governance. And therefore they ought to be in strength, force, and courage, and ought to consider the perils that might fall, and the governor especially ought not to doubt. If it happens that A man assigned to the poop should promise the other hopeful candidates and suit the position well. A man of good and sturdy courage should be set in this office, one who has a firm and secure mind against the perils that often occur at sea. The sailors should have good and firm faith and believe in God, and he should be of good comfort and fair language to those under his care.\n\nThe third pauper, set before the Alphyn on the right side, should be depicted as a clerk. It is reasonable that he should be so depicted, as among the common people, who are spoken of in this book, they settle differences and contentions, while the Alphyn or judge should give sentence and judgment. It is reasonable that the Alphyn or judge should have his notary, by whom the proceedings may be written. This pauper must be made and depicted in this manner, resembling a man who holds in his hand. his right hand held a pair of shears or forceps, and in his left hand, a large knife and on his gorget a pennon and a yoke-horn. These were the instruments and the offices that were made and recorded authentically, and they were to be presented before the judges as libels, writs of condemnation and sentences. This is signified by the quill and the pen, and on the other side, it pertains to them to cut, sew, and dye. The shears or forceps signify this. And the other were barbers, shoemakers, and leatherworkers. And these are signified by the knife that he holds in his hand, and some of these aforementioned crafty men were named drapers or clothmakers because they worked with wool. And notaries, skinners, leatherworkers, and cordwainers worked with skins and hides, such as parchment, peltry, and cordovan. And the Tailors, cutters of cloth. And many other crafts used and worked with wool. And all. These crafty men and many others who have not been named should practice their craft and trade. They should be among these crafty men amicable company and true, with honest countenance and truth in their words. The notaries should ensure that the records are rightfully profitable and good for the common good. They should keep them from appropriating that which belongs to the common good. If they are good to themselves, they are good to others. Conversely, if they are evil to themselves, they are evil to others. The processes made before the judges should be written and passed by them. It is to be noted that by their writing in the processes, much profit can come.\n\nMoreover, if they write otherwise than they ought to, they can bring much harm and damage to the common good. Therefore, they should take great care not to change or corrupt the content of the sentence in any way. For if they do, they are first sworn to falsehood. ben are bound to make amends to those whom they have harmed through their deceit / And they must visit and learn the statutes, ordinances, and laws of the cities where they dwell and inhabit / They must consider if there is anything contained therein against right and reason / And if they find anything contrary, they must admonish and warn those who govern / so that such things may be changed into a better state / For customs established against good manners and against the faith / ought not to be upheld by right. For, as it is said in the decree in the previous chapter, all ordinances made against right ought to be held for nothing. Alas, who is now that advocate or notary who has charge to write and keep the sentence, who puts his intent to keep more the common profit or as much as his own / But all fear of God is put aside / and they deceive simple men, drawing them to the courts disorderly and compelling them to swear and make oaths. \"Those not capable / And in assembling the people thus, they make more treasons in the cities than they make good alliances, and while they deceive their sovereigns, they can do so secretly. For there is nothing at this day that so much grieves Rome and Italy as the college of notaries and advocates public. They are not of one heart. Alas, and in Eugenland, what harm do the advocates, men of law, inflict. Attorneys at court to the common people of the realm, both in spiritual and temporal law, how they tear the law and statutes at their pleasure, how they feed the people, how they empower the commons. I suppose that in all Christendom there are not so many pleaders, attorneys, and men of the law as in England alone. For if they were all numbered, those who attend the courts of the chancellor, king's bench, common pleas, receiver, respite, and hell, and the baggage bearers of the same, it would amount to a great multitude.\" VTTRID should not be tolerated. They intend for their individual welfare and profit, not for the common good. They should be of good will to gather and admonish and warn each city in its right, so that they might have peace and love one with another. Tullius says that friendship and good will that one ought to have against another for the well-being of him whom one loves, with a similar will of him, should be put forth before all other things. There is nothing so resemblant and like to the bees that make honey than love. For by love, the bees hold themselves together. And if any space is given to another, they immediately run upon the wrongdoer to punish him. True love never fails for good or for evil. And the most sweet and comforting thing is to have a friend to whom a man may reveal his secret, as to himself. But true friendship and love is sometimes. founded upon something delightful, and this friendship comes from youth, in which dwells a disorderly heat. And friendship is founded upon honesty, and this friendship is virtuous. Of which Tullius says that there is a virtuous friendship by which a man ought to do to his friend all that he requires by reason. For to do to him a thing dishonest is against the nature of true friendship and virtue. And thus, for friendship or favor, a man ought not to do anything unreasonable against the common profit or against his faith or his oath. For if all things that friends desire and require were accomplished and done, it would seem that they should be dishonorable conspiracies. And they might otherwise cause more harm and hurt than profit and aid. And Seneca says that friendship is of such a will as that of the friend. And to refuse that which ought to be refused by reason, and yet he says more. A man ought to allow and praise his friend before the people. A man should correct and chastise his friend privately. For the law of friendship is such. A man ought not to demand or do anything harmful to his friend that should be kept secret. Valerian says that it is a foul thing and a poor excuse if a man confesses that he has done any evil for his friend against right and reason. He tells of a good man named Tassile, who heard his friend reproach him for a dishonest act which he denied and would not do. Then his friend said to him in great contempt, \"What need have I of your friendship and amity if you will not do what I require of you?\" Tassile answered, \"What need have I of your friendship and amity if I should do a dishonest thing?\" Thus, love is founded and endures only as long as he sees his profit. And men say a common proverb in England, \"Love lasts as long as the money endures,\" and when the money fails, there is no love. And Varro recalls in his writings that the rich are all loved by this love, for friends are like husks surrounding the grain, and no man can prove his friend so well as in adversity or when he is poor. The true friend fails at no need. Seneca says that some follow the emperor for riches, and so do the flatterers and the wolf the carrion. This company follows the prey and not the man. Tullius says that Tarquin the proud had a new wife named Brutus, and this new wife had banished Tarquin from Rome and had sent him into exile. Then he first perceived and knew which of his friends were true and false, and he never perceived before, when he was powerful, that they were willing to do his will. And he well said that the love they had for him endured not longer than it was profitable for them. Therefore, all the rich men in the world, whether kings, princes, or dukes, ought to be loved by their people. Caton says in his book, \"See to whom you may have given your love, and this love which is founded upon their profit, which fails and does not endure, may better be called merchandise than love. For if we consider this love as our profit only, and nothing as the profit of him whom we love, it is more merchandise than love. He buys our love for the profit he derives from us, and therefore the versifier writes these two verses: 'In times of prosperity, many friends murmur, When fortune turns and perishes, there remains not one friend to him. And of this love are loved meadows, fields, trees, and beasts, for the profit that men derive from them. But the love of men ought to be charity, truly gracious and pure, by good faith. And the true friends are known in pure adversity. And Alphonso says in his book of morality that there was a philosopher in Arabia who had only one son. He asked what friends he had acquired in his life.\" The father answered that he had many friends, and his father replied, \"I am an old man. I could never find but one friend in all my life. And I truly believe it is no small thing to have a friend. And it is better and more a man to have many. It is fitting and becoming for a man to test and prove his friend before he has need. Then the father commanded his philosopher son to go and kill a pig, put it in a sack, and pretend it was a dead man he had slain, and bring it to his friends to bury secretly. And when the son had done as his father commanded and had asked his friends one after another as is said before, they mocked him. And answered him that he was a coward for asking and desiring of them such a dangerous thing. Then he returned to his father and told him how he had asked all his friends and had not found one who would help him in his need. Then his father said to him that he should go and ask his brother. friends who had only one and required him to help them in need. When he had requested him, this man put all his men out of his house. And when they were out of the way or asleep, he made a pit secretly in the ground. And when it was ready and wanted to bury the body, he found it a hog or a swine and not a man. Thus this son proved this man to be a true friend of his father. And proved that his friends were false friends due to fortune. And the said Piero Alphons also recalls that there were two merchants, one from Banda and the other from Egypt, who were so joined by great friendship that the one from Banda came at a time to see his friend in Egypt, from whom he was received right honorably. In his house, there was a fair young maiden whom he was to have in marriage for himself. Of this maiden, the merchant of Banda was so enamored with her love that he was right desperate. And then the. other day came the physicians who said that in him was no other sickness but passion of love. He asked the sick man if there was any woman in his house that he loved and made all the women of his house come forward. He chose the one who should have been his wife and said that he was seeking her love. Then his friend said to him, \"Friend, comfort yourself. Truly, I give her to you as wife with all the dowry that is given to me with her.\" He would rather suffer without a wife than lose the body of his friend. And then he wedded the maiden.\n\nAnd he went with his wife and his riches back into his country. And after this, immediately after it happened that the market of Egypt became so poor due to bad fortune that he was forced to seek and beg for his bread in the country. He came to Bandach, but when he entered the town it was dark night and he could not find the house of his friend. Instead, he spent the night there. In an old temple, when he should emerge in the morning, the town officers arrested him and said that he was a murderer and had killed a man lying there dead. Immediately, he confessed with a good will and was sentenced to be hanged. However, when he was brought to judgment and sentence was about to be given against him as a murderer, his friend from the band appeared and saw him. He knew at once that this was his good friend from Egypt. The friend stepped forward and said that he himself was responsible for the man's death, not the other, and forced him to deliver and excuse the other. When the man who had committed the deed and had killed the man saw this, he considered in himself that these two men were innocent. Doubtful of divine judgment, he came before the judge and confessed all the deeds in order. When the judge saw and heard all this matter, and also the confession of the other man, he... The firm and true love between the two friends was considered, and the reason why one would save the other was understood. The truth of the homicide's fate was acknowledged, and all offenses were fully and entirely pardoned. The merchant of Banda brought him from Egypt into his house, and gave his sister in marriage to him. They both became rich, and thus they were both faithful and true friends. Notaries, men of law and crafty men, should and ought to love each other, and also be continent, chaste, and honest. By their crafts, they ought to be so, for they often converse and accompany women. Therefore, it is fitting for them to be chaste and honest, and not to move women towards lawsuits or enter into them through disordered signs or tokens. Titus lived, and this was one of the reasons why he did it for certain other causes. A young man of exceptional beauty from Rome is reported by Valerian to have existed. His chastity was notable, as his beauty drew numerous women to desire him, causing suspicion from their parents and friends. To avoid temptation, he mutilated his face with a knife and lancet, preferring an ugly and disfigured appearance over the allure of his beauty inciting sin in others. We also read of a virgin nun who plucked out both her eyes because the king's love for their beauty led him to desire her. She presented the eyes to the king as a gift. Plato, the wealthy and wise philosopher, abandoned his homeland and left his estate in a town called Chalcedon. This town was not only destroyed but also riddled with the pestilence. Plato endured the cure, charge, and sorrowful customs there. Eschew the heat and occasions of lechery. Many of his disciples did likewise. Helaman recounts that the most wise philosopher lay with a right noble woman for his pleasure. Playing with her, he asked what he should give to have with her. She answered, \"a thousand pence.\" He replied, \"I should repent for buying it so dearly.\" When he urged him for tactics to speak to her due to his fleshly desire, he stripped him naked and left him in the midst of the snow. Outsider recounts that this thing is the least that may help and most grieve lovers. Therefore, Saint Augustine relates in his book \"De Civitate Dei\" that before he died, he attempted to take the noble city of Syracuse and before any blood was shed, he wept and shed many tears before the city. This was because he doubted that his people would defile and corrupt it excessively. dishonestly the town's chastity was ordered, on pain of death, that no man should be so bold to take and defile any woman against her will. After this, craftsmen were to understand that they should be true and have truth in their mouths, and that their deeds follow their words. He who says one thing and does another condemns himself by his words. They ought to ensure that they are of one accord in good faith, by intention, word, and deed, so that they are not discordant in any case. Every man should have pure virtue and truth in himself. For God himself is pure truth. Men commonly say that truth seeks no heres or corners, and truth is a virtue by which all fear and fraud are put away. Men speak truly when they say they know, and those who do not know truth ought to know it. They should always use truth. Saint Augustine says that those who claim to know truth but live evil and viciously are foolish if they do not truly know it. He says in one place that it is better to suffer pain for the truth than to have profit from falsehood. A man called the best and most reasonable, who does not act according to reason and truth, is more bestial than any best beast. And know that coming to the truth comes from a reasonable foresight in the mind, and lying comes from an outrageous and unreasonable will, contrary to the truth. Saint Bernard says that the lying mouth destroys the soul. Saint Augustine says in another place that to say one thing and do the opposite makes doctrine suspicious. Know truly that lying is a most dangerous thing for body and soul. The ancient enemy made Eve and Adam believe him, which led to their eternal damnation and cast them out of the terrestrial paradise because he made them believe that God had not forbidden them the fruit. But only because they should not. She knew that her master knew that the devil spoke these words with a double meaning, for they both knew as they had tasted of the fruit that they were doomed to eternal death. God knew it well beforehand, but they supposed they knew many other things and were like Him in knowledge and science. Therefore, St. Paul in a pistil says, \"it does not belong to us to know or to inquire beyond what is necessary to know or to inquire, but to know and inquire within the limits of sobriety.\" Valerian recalls that there was a good woman of Syracuse who would not lie to the king of Sicily, who was named Dionysius. This king was so full of tyranny and cruelty that all the world desired his death and cursed him. Only this woman, who was so old that she had seen three or four kings reigning in the country, prayed every morning to God that He would give the tyrant a good life and a long one, and that she might never see his death. When King Dionysus learned this, he sent for her and was greatly disturbed by it. He demanded from her the reason for her prayer on his behalf. She answered and said to him, \"Sir, when I was a maiden, we had a very cruel tyrant as our king, whom we greatly feared the death of. And when he was dead, another worse one came after him, whom we also feared the death of. And when we were delivered from him, you came to be our lord, who is worse than all others. And now I fear that we may have another after him who will be worse than you are, and therefore I shall pray for him.\"\n\nWhen Dionysus understood that she was so bold in speaking the truth, he dared not torment her for shame because she was so old.\n\nThe fourth pawn is set for the king and is formed in the shape of a man holding in his right hand a balance, and in his left hand the weight, and before him a table, and at his girdle a purse full of money ready to give to those who require it. And by this people are represented. signed the merchants of cloth, linen and wool, and all other merchandises. And by the table that is to be for him, are the changers signed. And those who leave money, and those who buy and sell by the weight, are signed by the balances and weights. And the customers and receivers of rents and money are signed by the purse. And know that all those who are signed by this people ought to and desire, and eschew breaking the days of payment. And therefore it is reasonable that these people are set for the king, for as much as they signify the receivers of the royal treasures, who ought always to be ready before the king and to answer for him to the knights and other persons for their wages and soldiers. And therefore I have said that they ought to flee avarice. For avarice is as much to say as an idolater or as a worshiper of false images, and of this says Tullius that avarice is:\n\n(Note: The text appears to be in Middle English, and the given text seems to be a part of a legal or administrative document. The text is mostly readable, but there are some minor errors and inconsistencies in the transcription. I have corrected some of the obvious errors and made some minor adjustments to improve readability, while trying to remain faithful to the original text.)\n\nsigned the merchants of cloth, linen, and wool, and all other merchandises. And by the table that is to be for him, are the changers signed. And those who leave money, and those who buy and sell by the weight, are signed by the balances and weights. And the customers and receivers of rents and money are signed by the purse. And know ye that all those who are signed by this people ought to and desire, and eschew breaking the days of payment. And therefore it is reasonable that these people are set for the king, for as much as they signify the receivers of the royal treasures, who ought always to be ready before the king and to answer for him to the knights and other persons for their wages and soldiers. And therefore I have said that they ought to flee avarice. For avarice is as much to say as an idolater or as a worshiper of false images. And of this Tullius says that avarice is:\n\n(Note: I have corrected some minor errors in the text, such as \"know ye\" to \"know that all those who are signed by this people,\" and \"therfor\" to \"therefore,\" and added some words for clarity, such as \"signify\" and \"royal treasures,\" while trying to remain faithful to the original text.) A desire to obtain that which is above necessity / and it is a disordered love to have only one thing. This is one of the worst things, and especially for princes and those who govern communal affairs. This vice causes a man to do evil. Evil is done when it reigns in old men. Seneca says that all worldly things are weakened and crave in old men, leaving only avarice, which always accompanies him and dies with him. I do not understand well the cause of this or why it may be. It is a foul thing and contrary to reason that when a man is at the end of his journey and intends to prolong his voyage and provide more provisions than necessary. This can be compared to the avaricious wolf, for the wolf does no good until it is dead. It is said in the proverb of the wise men that the avaricious man does no good until he is dead. He desires nothing but to live long in this sin. The covetous man certainly. A king is not good for anything. He is evil to himself and to the rich and the poor. And find a reason to ask for what you desire, and he quoted Seneca and said, \"He demanded more than was appropriate for him.\" Then, compelled by great necessity, he asked and required a penny from him. And he answered that it was an unacceptable gift for a king and so he was always ready to find a reason for not giving. He could have given it as a gift to a friend, and the penny as to a poor man. There is no thing so small that the humanity of a king cannot give it. Avarice, full of covetousness, is a manner of all the vices of luxury. Joseph relates in the book of ancient histories that in Rome there was a man named Pauline, who was of the most noble of Rome, truly honest for the nobleness of chastity, which was married in the time when women glorified them in their chastity to a young, fair, noble, and rich man above all. Other than her, he was like and similar to his wife in all ways. This Pauline was beloved by a knight named Emerian. He was so ardently enamored with her that he sent her many rich gifts and made her many great promises. But he could never overcome his resolve. Instead, he preferred to refuse his gifts and promises. Rather than succumb to covetousness and lose his chastity, we lived a solitary life and remained chaste and honest. We had amassed a great sum of gold and had hidden it in the earth in a pit within her house. After her death, the bishop saw to her burial in the church honorably. Not long after, the gold was discovered and brought to the bishop. He ordered it cast into the pit where she was buried. Three days after the burial, the neighbors heard her cry out and make great noise from the church, and they heard her tormented frequently. They went to the bishop and told him of this. The bishop granted them permission to open the pit. When they opened the sepulcher, they found all the gold molten with fire, full of sulphur. It was poured and put in her mouth, and one said, \"You desired this gold through greed. Take it and drink it.\" They then took the body out of the tomb and cast it into a secluded place. Seneca recounts in the book of the cries of women that greed is the foundation of all vices. Valerian also recounts that greed is a fearful guardian of riches, for he who has much money or other riches is always afraid to lose it or be robbed or killed. Therefore, he is not experienced nor happy he who acquires it through greed. And all the evils of this vice of greed had a man named Septemulle from Rome. He was a friend of one named Tarchus. This Septemulle burned so fiercely and cruelly in the sin of greed that he had no shame to strike off the head of his friend Tarquinus through treachery. For as much as one Framosian had promised him as much. Weighing a head of pure gold, he carried it through Rome on a staff, having extracted the brain and filled it with lead to weigh the heavier. This was a truly horrible and cruel greed. Ptolemy, king of the Egyptians, pursued greed in another manner. When Anthony, emperor of Rome, saw that he was extremely wealthy in gold and silver, he held him in great hatred and cruelly tormented him. When he was about to perish because of his riches, he took all his treasure and put it on a ship, intending to drown and perish there so that his enemy Anthony would not have it. However, when he was there, he could not bring himself to part from it but returned and brought it back to his house, where he rejoiced in the reward of death. And without a doubt, he was not lord of the riches but the riches were mistress over him. Therefore, it is said in a proverb. A man should not serve for money, and if you can use your riches wisely, it is your chamberlain. If you cannot part from it and use it honestly at your pleasure, know truly that it is your lady. Riches never satisfy the covetous, but the more he has, the more he desires. Salust says that avarice distracts faith, honesty, and all other virtues, and takes pride as their substitute. It leads to cruelty and forgetting God. It says that all things are for sale, and after this, one should beware of lending too much or making large demands, which one may not be able to pay back. If you are poor, beware of borrowing, and think how you may repay if you are rich, you have no need to borrow or ask. It is said in the proverbs that it is fraud to take what you will not or cannot render and pay back, and it is a reproach when I leave I am your friend, and when I ask I am your enemy. God at the ledgyll at rendering / And Seneca says in his authories / that they who gladly borrow / ought gladly to pay / and ought to summon in courage to love them the better, because they lend and aid them in their need. For benefits and good turns done to a man ought to give him thanks therefore / And much more ought a man to repay him who is lent him in his need / But now in these days, many men, through lending of their money, have made of their friends enemies. And of this Domas the philosopher speaks, and says that my friend borrowed money from me, and I have lost both my friend and my money in return. There was a merchant of Genoa and also a changer, whose name was Albert Gauor. And this Albert was a man of great truth and loyalty. Once there came to him a man who said and affirmed that he had delivered into his bank five hundred florins of gold to keep, which was not true, for he lied. The said Albert knew not of, nor could he find in all his books, any such. This liar could not bring witnesses but began to bray, cry, and defame Albert. Albert then called this merchant and said, \"Dear friend, take here two hundred florins which you affirm and claim that you have delivered to me. I told them and took them from you. This good man preferred losing his goods to his good name and reputation. The other merchant took these florins that he had wrongfully received and employed them in various merchandise, gaining and increasing them to fifteen thousand florins. When he saw that he was approaching death and had no children, he established Albert as his heir in all things. He said that with the two hundred florins that he had falsely received from Albert, he had acquired all that he had in the world. By divine providence, he who had been a thief and fraudster became afterward a true procurator and attorney for the said Albert. But now in these days, there are A merchant who deals with other people's money, which is given to him to keep, has no shame in denying it when required to repay it. This led to an incident involving a merchant who had a good and great reputation for keeping such things. But when he saw an opportunity and the right moment, he kept the goods as if he were a thief. A merchant from outside heard of this man's good reputation and brought him great treasure to keep. This treasure remained with him for three years. After three years, this merchant came to request the return of his goods. The man knew he had no record or witnesses to prove this debt to him, nor did he have any obligation or writing from him. Therefore, he refused flatly and said plainly that he did not know him. When this good man heard and understood this, he went sorrowfully and weeping from him at a great distance. An old woman. And she asked him why he wept, and he said to her, \"It concerns you not. Go your way.\" But she begged him to tell her the cause of his sorrow, for perhaps she might offer him good counsel. Then this man told her, \"And the old woman wise and cunning asked him if he had any friend in that city who would be faithful and true to him. He replied, 'Yes, I have various friends.' She then told him to go to them and say to them that they should prepare and buy diverse coffins and chests, and fill them with some old things of no value, and that they should pretend they were full of gold, silver, and other jewels, and great treasure. And bring them to this said merchant, and tell him that he would keep them, for as much as they had great trust and confidence in him, and also that they had heard of his great trustworthiness and good reputation.\" For every encounter with him should be lengthy before they return, and while they speak to him about this matter, you shall approach him and request that he deliver to the one you took from him. I believe, due to the good men who will vouch for you and his greed to have it, he will deliver it back to you. But beware, let him not in any way know that they are your friends or of your knowledge.\n\nThis was great and good advice from a woman. And truly, it often comes naturally to women to give counsel hastily and unwisely about things that are doubtful or perilous and require hasty remedies.\n\nAs you have heard, this good man did this and did it according to her counsel. He came upon them when they spoke of the matter to the merchant to deliver to him the said coffers, which his friends had feigned and requested of him to take to keep. And then, suddenly, the said merchant said to him, \"I know you now well. For I have long suspected that you are...\" A man came to me at such a time and gave me such a thing, which I have kept well. He called for his clerk and ordered him to fetch such a thing from such a place and deliver it to that good man. The good man received it and was rightfully joyous and glad. This deceitful and fraudulent merchant was defrauded from his evil intentions. He had neither one nor the other of any value. Therefore, it is said in a proverb that to defraud the deceived is no fraud. And he who follows our Lord and Seneca says that charity shows and teaches that men should pay well. Good payment is sometimes a good confession. This deceitful and fraudulent merchant resembles and is like an hound that carries a cheese in its mouth when it swims over water. When it is in the water, it sees the shadow of the cheese in the water and thinks it is another cheese. Out of covetousness to have. He opens his mouth to catch it, and the cheese that he bears falls down into the water, and thus he loses both. And in the same way was this merchant deceived, for to have the coffers which he had not seen, he delivered again what he had wrongfully intended to hold, and thus by his covetousness and own malice he was deceived. It is fitting for every good and wise man to know and consider in himself how much he has received from others and on what condition it was delivered to him. This thing pertains to receivers and changers and to all true merchants and others, whatever they may be, and they ought to keep their books of receipts and payments, of whom and to whom and what time and day. And if you ask what thing makes them forget such things that are taken to them to keep, I answer and say that it is great covetousness to have those things for themselves and never to part from them. The desire to assemble all that they may acquire, for they believe in no other god but her riches; their hearts are so obstinate. The herald who precedes the queen signals the physician, apothecary, and apothecary surgeon. He is formed in the figure of a man and is seated in a chair as a master. He holds a book in his right hand and a jar or box of ointments in his left hand. At his girdle, his instruments of iron and silver are for making incisions and searching wounds and cutting apostomes. By these things are known the surgeons. By the book, the physicians are understood. And all logicians, masters of law, geometers, arithmeticians, musicians, and astronomers are signified by the ampoule. The makers of pigments, spicers, and apothecaries are signified by the ampoule. And those who make confections, confits, and medicines made with precious spices are signified by the iron and silver instruments that hang on the chair. The masters and physicians know the proportions of grammar letters, monements, conclusions, and sophisms of logic. The graceful speech and utterance of rhetoric, the measures of hours and days, and the courses and astronomy. The number of arithmetic, and the joyous songs of music, and all these before named, the masters of rhetoric are the chief masters in speculative sciences. The last two, who are practitioners and workers, are called physicians and surgeons. Their sagacity and curiosity in these sciences, and how well a man's life is regulated by the physicians or surgeons if he does not have wisdom and knowledge in himself, and is not skilled, and does not diligently apply himself in the craft of physics. He ought rather to be called a simple practitioner in the craft of physics who heals, and therefore says Auyn-and-knowest-not-the-cause. A person should be cured of maladies. One should say that you have cured him by fortune and among such people there should be good manners, courteous speech, chastity of the body, and promises of health. To those who are sick, there should be continuous visitation, and they ought to inquire about the cause of their sicknesses and the signs and tokens of their maladies, as is recorded in the books of the authors with great diligence, especially in the books of Hippocrates and Galen. When many masters and physicians are assembled before the patient or sick person, they ought not to argue and dispute with one another, but they ought to make a good and simple collaboration. In such a way, they should not be seen disputing among themselves and gaining more glory in the world for themselves than treating the patient's health and well-being. I marvel why, when they see and know that the sick person has great need of health, they do not do this. A greater objection to contrary behavior, as much as the life of man is concerned, is raised among them. But it is because he is considered most sage and wise who argues and brings about the most subtle points in such matters. This is the custom among doctors of law, who treat nothing concerning human life. But regarding temporal matters, he is held most wise and best learned, whose counsel can best reconcile the contentions and disputes of men. Therefore, physicians and surgeons should leave behind all disputes and contradictions of words when they are before sick men, so that it appears that they study more to cure the sick than to dispute. Therefore, the physician is fittingly set before the queen, so that it is figured that he should have chastity and continence of body. For it sometimes pertains to the physician to visit and cure queens, duchesses, and countesses, and all other ladies, and see and behold some secret sicknesses that fall and come upon them at other times. The secrets of nature belong to those who are chaste and follow honesty and chastity. They should be an example to others of good conduct. Valerian recalls that Hippocrates had remarkable continence of body. While he was in the schools of Athens, he had a very beautiful woman who came to him. The young scholars and the holy fellows who were students promised the woman that if she could arouse Hippocras' desire for her, they would have their way with her. She came to him at night and tried so much by her craft that she lay with him in his bed, but she could never corrupt his chaste living or defile the crown of his conscience. When the young men found out that she had been with him and could not change his continence, they began to mock her and asked and demanded the bribe they had given to her. She answered that it was held as a pledge on an image. Not she called him an image, and in similar fashion, Valerian, the Scenocrates philosopher, is reported to have lain with a woman all night, tempting him to behave disorderly, confusing and shaming him as she departed. Cornelius Scipio, sent by the Romans to govern Spain, upon entering the castles and towns of that land, began to remove all things that could stir or move his men towards lechery. Therefore, men said that he drove out more than two thousand hourdelyes. And he who was wise knew well that delight in lechery corrupted and demoralized the spirits of those men abandoned to such delight. This is said in the fables of the poets in the first book of The Golden Ass of the Philosophers: that those who entered the fontaine of the sirens or mermaids were corrupted, and they took them away with them. You should also know that... They ought to attend diligently to the cures of the patients in surgery. They ought to make their plasters accommodating to the wounds or sores. If the wound is round, the plaster must be round, and if it is long, it must be long. Elsewise, it must be cured by its contrary, as is fitting according to physics. For heat is cured by cold, and cold by heat, and joy by sorrow, and sorrow by joy. It often happens that many people are in great peril in taking too much joy and lose their limbs suddenly in the sudden joy. Joy is a reflection of something delightful spread broadly in all the members with great gladness. And all men intend and desire to have this great joy naturally. But they do not know what may ensue and come from it. This joy comes sometimes from the virtue of conscience. The wise man is not without this joy. This joy is never interrupted or in default at any time, for it comes from nature. fortune may not take a waye that nature geueth. And merciall saith that Ioyes fugitiues abide not longe But flee away ano\u0304n And valerian reherceth that he that hath force and strengthe raysonable / hath hit of verray matier of complection and that cometh of loue And this Ioye hath as moche power to departe the sowle fro the body / as hath the thondre / wherof hit happend that ther was a woman named lyna whiche had her husbonde in the warre in the shipp is of the romayns / And she sup\u2223posid verily that he was ded / But hit happend that he cam agayn home And as he entryd in to his yate / his wif met wyth hym so deynly not warned of his comyng. whiche was so glad and Ioyous / that in enbrasynge hym she fyll doun ded Also of an other woman to whom was reportid by a fals messanger that her sone was ded / whiche wAnd\nafterward whan her sone cam to her / As sone as she sawe hym / she was so esmoued with Ioye yt she deyde to fore hym / But this is not so grete meruaylle of wo\u2223men as is of the men / For the women ben A woman is likened to soft wax or soft air, and therefore she is called \"mulier,\" which means \"molly's air\" in Latin and \"soft air\" in English. It often happens that the nature of those who are soft and malleable takes impressions more quickly than the nature of rough and strong men. Valerius recounts a story about a knight from Rome named Ihus, who had recently conquered and subdued the island of Corsica. As he was sacrificing to his gods, he received letters from the Roman Senate containing various supplications. Overwhelmed by his joy and excitement, he did not know what to do and was seized by a great fear. He threw himself into the fire and was immediately dead. It is also said that Philomenus laughed so hard and uncontrollably that he died from it. We read that he had lived for a long time abroad to learn wisdom and knowledge and was about to return to his parents and friends when he approached them. He sent a messenger to tell them of his coming and commanded him to say that he came because they had not long seen him, and that they should assemble in joy before they saw him. We read that Titus, the son of Vespasian, when he had conquered Jerusalem and remained in the country, heard that his father Vespasian had been chosen by all the senate to govern the Roman empire. This caused him such great joy that suddenly he lost the strength of all his limbs and became impotent. When Josephus, who wrote the history of the Romans against the Jews, saw this sickness in Titus and knew that he hated someone so much that he could neither speak of him nor see him, one of Titus' servants said that there was a man in his possession whom Josephus assigned a day when this man should come, and ordered a table to be set up in Titus' sight. Replenished plentifully with daily delicacies, and ordered men to be armed to keep him in such a way that no man should harm him by the commandment of Titus. He also ordered butlers, cooks, and other officers to serve him worshipfully, like an emperor. When all this was ready, Josephus brought in the man whom Titus hated and seated him before his eyes, serving him with great reverence and courtesy.\n\nTitus, upon seeing his enemy seated before him with such great honor, began to grow enraged and commanded that he be slain. But when he saw that none of his men would obey him, and they all continued to serve him reverently, Titus grew so ardent and filled with great anger that he, who had lost all the strength and power of his body and was impotent in all his limbs, regained his health and strength through the heat that entered his veins. Josephus did so much that he was able to recover. And he recovered him and held him no longer as an enemy, but held him as a true friend. He later made him his loyal fellow and companion. Apothecaries and spice merchants should make genuine articles as commanded by physicians. They should be diligent and careful for no other reason than making medicines or confections. They must not put false things in their spices to enhance or increase weight. If they do, they are more deserving of being called deceivers than apothecaries or spice merchants. Those accustomed to making ointments should make it properly from true substances and of good odor, according to the recipes of ancient doctors, and in the form prescribed by physicians and surgeons. They must also be careful not to put anything harmful or poisonous in their medicines. Surgeons should not cause harm or injury to any person whom they do not have good and true knowledge. Those to whom medicines should be given should not be harmed or damaged, nor should they destroy their neighbors. Those who have ministered things to them should not be considered partners in their blame and sin.\n\nSurgeons should also be courteous, amiable, and have pity on their patients. They should not be hasty to lance and cut abscesses and sores, nor open heads, nor pull out broken bones, unless the cause is apparent. For they might otherwise lose their good reputation and be called butchers rather than healers or healers of wounds and sores.\n\nFurthermore, all those people mentioned above who have the responsibility to make holes and heal all manner of diseases and infirmities should first have the cure for themselves. They ought to purge themselves from all abscesses and filth in such a way that they are not contaminated. And he should be honest and well-formed in all good manners, and show himself whole and pure, ready to help others. Boethius, in his Consolation, says in the first book that the stars hidden under the clouds cannot give light. Therefore, let him withdraw himself from the obscurity and darkness of the clouds of ignorance. For when a man's engine shows in joy or sorrow, the thought or mind is enveloped in obscurity and beneath the clouds.\n\nThe sixth pawn, which stands before the Alpheus on the left side, is made in this form. It is a man with his right hand stretched out as if to call men, and in his left hand he holds a loaf of bread and a cup of wine, and on his girdle hanging a pouch of keys. This resembles taverners, hostelers, and sellers of victuals. They ought properly to be set before the Alpheus, as before a judge. For disputes often arise among them, causing noise and strife. The following individuals are to be determined and treated by the almoner, who is the king's judge. It is their duty to seek and inquire for good wines and provisions to give and sell to buyers, and to those they owe. They are also responsible for keeping their inns and lands, as well as all things brought into their logging, secure and safe. The first of them is signified by the left hand, in which he bears bread and wine, and the second is signified by the right hand, stretched out to call men, and the third is represented by keys hanging on the girdle. These people should teach the sin of gluttony, as many come to their houses to drink and eat. Reasonably, they should restrain themselves and prevent excessive food and drink, so that they might more honestly deliver necessary things to the people who come to them. And nothing else. A monk might drown the body due to gluttony's temptations. Strife, riots, wrongs, and molestations often cause men to harm others, their hands, eyes, and other members. Sometimes they are killed or injured to the death. As it is written in the Lives of the Fathers, an hermit went to visit his neighbors. The devil appeared to him on the way in the likeness of another hermit to tempt him. He said, \"You have left your hermitage to go visit your neighbors.\" The devil compelled him to do one of the three things I will say: you shall choose whether you will be drunk or else have to do a lewd act with your neighbor or else you shall whip the neighbor who is your neighbor also. The hermit who thought he would choose the lesser evil and choose to be drunk, and when he came to them, he drank so much that he was very drunk. And when he was drunk and heated up by the wine, he wanted to do something with his neighbor. Here. A husband succumbs to him. Then the hermit kills him, and afterwards says to his companion and knows him carnally. Through this sin of drunkenness, he accomplishes the two other sins. By which fact you may understand and know that when the devil takes one of Christ's castles, that is, the body of a man or a woman, he does so as a prince who sets a castle that he wishes to conquer. Once he has conquered the gate, for he knows well that he has conquered the gate when he has won it through gluttony or another sin, he can soon do as he wills with the body's functions, as you have heard before. Therefore, every man should eat and drink sparingly so that he may live, and not live to eat gluttonously or drink drunkenly. You commonly see that a large belly is satisfied with a little pasture, and that a wood. Suffices to many old fauntes, and it behooves a man to be fed by the earth or the sea. Nevertheless, it is no great thing to feed the belly, nothing so great as is the desire of many metes. Whereof Quintilian says, that it happens often in great feasts and dinners, that we are filled with the sight of noble and luxurious metes, and when we wish to eat, we are sated and filled. And therefore it is said in a proverb, it is better to fill the belly than the eye. Lucius Annaeus Seneca says that gluttony is the mother of all vices, and especially of lechery, and also the destroyer of all goods. It cannot have sufficient of little things. A covetous hunger, what do you seek in metes and viands on the land and in the sea. And thy joy is nothing else but to have plentifully filled table. Learn how men may sustain their life with little. And Cato says, in no way obey gluttony, which is a friend to lechery. And the holy doctor St. Augustine says, the wine heats the belly that falls. \"anyone, to lechery. The belly and members are neighbors to lechery. And thus the vice of gluttony provokes lechery. From this sin comes forgetfulness of the mind and destruction of all quick and sharp reason. What sin is more shameless than this sin and more damaging? For this sin has taken away the virtue of the man; his prowess has languished; his virtue is turned to shame; and the strength of body and courage is torn apart. And therefore Boethius says in his fourth book of consolation that a man who lives and does not meet the conditions of a man can never be in good condition. Therefore, it is necessary that he be transported in the nature of a beast or of a fish of the sea. How well great men and women full of marvelous sciences and wisdom say that.\" In these days, noble councils in the world are kept and nourished in this gluttony of wine and meals. And often times they are overlooked. How about this, is it not a dangerous thing that a lord or governor of the people and commonwealth, if he is not wise, becomes heated so that wine or other drink surprises him and overpowers his brain? His wisdom is praised, for as Cato says, anger impairs the courage in those who cannot keep truth and honesty. And immediately, lechery is aroused in him in such a way that his wisdom is asleep and gone. And therefore, Ovid says in his book \"De remedio amoris,\" if you take many and diverse wines, they appear and compel the hearts to lechery. Tobias also testifies in his book that luxury destroys the body and wastes riches; it loses the soul, weakens strength, blinds the sight, and makes the wise man a fool. Evil and foul sin of drunkenness, caused by excessive virginity, which is sister of angels, possessing all goodness and secureness of enduring joys. No one was ever so intoxicated with wine that he revealed and showed his private parts to his sons in such a way that one of his sons mocked him, and the other covered them. The chaste one was so intoxicated by much drinking of wine that on a mountain he knew his daughters carnally and had to do with them as if they were his own wives. Boethius, who was flour of men, treasure of riches, singular house of wisdom, myrrh of good repute, and glory of his subjects, lost all these things by his luxury. We have seen diverse men, joined by great friendship while they were sober, such that one would put his body in peril of death for the other, and when they were heated with wine and drunk, they ran each upon the other to kill them. Some have been slain, instead of John the Baptist being beheaded by Herod Antipas, or the dinner being full of gluttony and drunkenness. Balthazar, king of Babylon, would not have been chased out of his kingdom or killed if he had been sober among his people, who were led astray and slew him by Tyre and Dares, drunk and slain. Hostelers should be courteous and well-spoken to those they receive into their lodgings. Fair speech and joyous countenance make a good name for the hosteler. It is said in a common proverb, \"Courteous language and well-saying is much worth and little cost.\" In another place, it is said that courtesies surpass beauty. Furthermore, since many parleys and adventures may happen on the ways and passages to those who are herberged within their inns, they ought to accompany them when they depart and show them the ways and tell them the parleys, to ensure that they may safely go on their journey. Journey and keep their bodies and goods, and the good fame and reputation of their inns. We read that when he had received the angels into his house, he treated them most debonairly, as if they had been mortal men and strangers. To prevent them from committing the disordered and unnatural sin of lechery with the sodomites, he set aside his natural love as a father and offered his virgin daughters to them. And know for certain that all things taken and delivered to keep for the host or hostess, they ought to be safe and returned without payment. The host ought to know who enters his house to be lodged, for he himself and all such things he brings with him are committed to the ward and keeping of the host or hostess, and ought to be as safe as they were. A nobleman and his hosts should put their own horses in their own houses and keep servants in their houses who are true and wise. They should not take away their horses' provisions given to them, lest their horses perish or they fail their master when needed, and fall into the hands of their enemies. For this reason, masters should be vigilant. This happened once in the lands of Lombardy, in the city of Jenna. A nobleman lodged in an inn with a large company. After they had given provisions to their horses in the first hour of the night, the servant of the house came secretly to steal away their provisions. When he came to the lord's horse, the horse caught him with its teeth and held his arm fast, preventing his escape. When the thief saw that he was so strongly held, he began to cry out. A man named Grete endured and felt such distress that the nobleman's men arrived with the host, but they could not seize the thief until the neighbors, disturbed by the noise, arrived and saw it. The thief was then recognized and apprehended, brought before the judge, and confessed. By sentence, he was hanged and lost his life. Another case, just as cruel and villainous, occurred at Toulouse. A young man and his father went on a pilgrimage to St. James in Galicia and lodged in an evil hostelry full of great covetousness. The host desired and coveted the goods of the two pilgrims. He secretly put a silver cup in the young man's bag. When they departed. out of their logging, he followed after them and told the people of the court that they had stolen and carried away his cup; and the young man excused himself and his father, and said they were innocent. And then they searched them and the cup was found in the possession of the young man. And forthwith he was condemned to death and hanged as a thief; and all the goods that belonged to the pilgrim were delivered to the east as agreed. And then the father went for his pilgrimage, and when he came again he had to come and pass by the place where his son hung on the gallows. As he came, he complained to God and to St. James how they could suffer this misfortune to befall his son. Immediately his son who hung spoke to his father and said how St. James had kept him unharmed and urged his father to go to the judge and show him the miracle, and how he was innocent of that charge. And when this was known, the son of the pilgrim was taken down from the gallows. The cause was brought before the judge, and the host was accused of the tragedy. He confessed and said he did it out of covetousness to have his good. Then the judge condemned him to be hanged on the same gallows where the young pilgrim was hanged. I have said that the servants were men, I also say that the women were chambermaids and tapsters. In Spain, a chambermaid named Fille at St. Downe did the same thing to a pilgrim, putting a cup in the pilgrim's scrip because he would not sleep with her in the sin of lechery. He was hanged as a result. His father and mother, who were present, went on their pilgrimage and, when they returned, found their son alive. They went to the judge, who said he would not believe it until a cock and a hen, which were roasting on the fire, came to life. The cock crowed and began to peck at the grain, and when the judge saw this miracle, he was convinced. Hosts and took down the son / and had the chamberlain taken and hanged. Therefore, I say that hosts ought to employ no tapsters nor chamberlains, but if they were good measure and honest. For many harms may fall and come by the disorderly rule of servants.\n\nThe guards and keepers of cities are signified by the seven pawns which stand on the left side before the knight / And are formed in the semblance of a man holding in his right hand great keys, and in his left hand a pot and an ell for measuring with. And ought to have on his gorget a purse open. And by the keys are signified the keepers of the cities and towns and common offices. And by the pot and ell are signified those who have the charge to weigh and measure truly. And by the purse are signified those who receive the customs, tolls, scavage, pages, and dues of the cities and towns. These people are set before the knight. And it behooves that the guards and officers of the towns be taught. And signed by the knights, and they know and inquire how cities or towns are governed, which belong to the knights. First, it pertains that the keepers of the city be diligent, busy, clear-sighted, loving of the common profit and welfare, both in times of peace and war. They ought always to go in the city and inquire about all things, reporting to the governors of the city such things as they find and know, and such things as pertain to the security of the same, and to denounce and tell of defaults and offenses that exist. And if it is a time of war, they ought not to open the gates by night to any man, and such men as are put in this office ought to be of good reputation and fame, true, and of good conscience. In such a manner that they love those of the city or town, and put no blame or villainy upon any man without cause, through envy or hate, but they ought to be sorry and heavy when. They should only be complained to for a good reason. For good people, fraudulently, so that they might have a thank you and be praised, and may remain in their offices. Truly, it is a great and high manner of malice to be willing to do evil and defame others without cause to gain glory for oneself. Keepers and officers of cities should suffer no wrongs or vilenesses to be done to innocents without cause by the judges and governors of cities. But they should have their eyes on him who knows the hearts and thoughts of all men. And they should fear and doubt him without whose grace their watch and keeping is nothing. He promises that he who doubts him will be wary and happy, and by him all things are accomplished in good. It is found in the histories of Rome that Emperor Frederick the Second built a marble gate of marvelous work and adorned it in the city of Capua on the water. The same, on this yard, he made an image of himself sitting in his majesty, and two judges were set, one on the right side and the other on the left. Upon the circle above the head of the judge on the right side was written, \"All who enter here sincerely, intending to live purely, come in.\" Upon the circle of the judge on the left side was written, \"The unfaithful man should doubt to do what he is put to the test for, and therefore it is fitting for a judge to show to the people fear and doubt to do evil. It is fitting for guards and officers to doubt the judges and to do truthfully their services and offices. It is fitting for a prince to threaten traitors and malefactors with severe pains. In ancient history, we find that King Dionysius of Cyzicus had a brother whom he loved dearly. But wherever he went, he made heavy and suspicious semblance, and a glad visage but in foul attire. The king, upon seeing them emerge from his chariot, welcomed them respectfully with great reverence. His barons were not only amazed but also angered in their hearts. Despite fear and dread, they demanded to know the reason. But they made his brother explain the reason to him and inquire about the truth. When he had heard his brother make the demand and learned that he was blessed and also a king, rich and full of delights and worship, he asked him if he would like to experience and know the grace and bounty of a king.\n\nHis brother replied, \"And I desire and request it from you.\" The king then commanded all his subjects to obey him in all things, and when the hour for dinner arrived and everything was ready, his brother was seated at the king's table. When he saw that he was served by noble butlers and other officers, and heard the melodious sounds of music, the king asked him, \"If\" He supposedly was benevolent and blessed. And he answered, \"I suppose I am truly blessed and fortunate, and have proven and felt it and am expert in it.\" Then the king secretly had a sharp cutting sword hanging over his head, either by a horse's ear or a silken thread so small that no man could see it. And when he saw his brother put no more his hand to the table or had no more regard for his servants, he said to him, \"Why do you not eat?\" \"Are you not blessed? Speak if you feel otherwise than blessed and well.\" He answered, for as much as I see this sharp sword hanging so subtly and precariously over my head, I do not feel blessed, for I fear that it might fall on my head. To them all, therefore, the king was always heavily cherished and sad. For where he was, he always thought of the sword of God's secret vengeance, which he beheld in his heart, therefore he had great fear in himself. Therefore, he welcomed happily the poor people with a glad face and good conscience. This shows the king well that he who is always in fear is not always merry or blessed. Quintilian says further that this fear surmounts all other misfortunes and evils, for it is a misfortune to fear night and day. It is true that to him who doubts many people, he must doubt greatly. And the lord is less than his servants if his servants fear him. It is a right thing to fear nothing but God. Sometimes, even brave men are compelled to live in fear. Fear makes a man curious and anxious to keep the things committed to him from perishing. But to be too hardy and too fearless, both are vices. The common officers ought to be wise, discreet, and well-advised, so that they do not take or require more than they ought from the people, nor take from the sellers or the butchers more than they should. Right, customs and tolls are named after a community and therefore should be communal to all people. Since bears and sellers sometimes have much language, they should possess the virtues of patience and good courage with honesty. For those despised by the community are themselves often despised in return. Therefore, beware lest you have no contempt for the poor beggars. If you wish to attend to superior things, injury inflicted without cause defames the one who inflicts it. A jogler once saw Socrates and said to him, \"You have the eyes of a corrupter of children and are a traitor.\" And when his disciples heard him, they wished to avenge their master. But he restrained them with this sentence: \"Let my companions suffer, for I am he and such one as he calls me by the sight of my face. But I refrain and keep myself from such things.\" This same Socrates himself was scorned and foully spoken to. his wife inflicted upon him many great injuries, without number. She was in a place above his head, and when she had brawled with him, she made her water and poured it on his head. He answered her nothing in return until he had dried and wiped his head. He said he knew well that after such wind and thunder, rain and water would come. The philosophers blamed him for not being able to govern two women - his wife and his chambermaid. They showed him that one cock could govern fifteen hens. He answered them that he was so used and accustomed to their chiding that the chiding of them, nor of strangers, caused him any grief or harm. Give place to him who quarrels or fights, and in enduring him, you shall be his conqueror. According to Cathon, when you rightfully disregard the words of evil people, it is said in a common proverb, \"he who well disregards it, and it is not in our power to let men speak.\" Prosper says that to good men, there is no lack of good qualities. To evil men, intentions stir up strife and blame. Patience is a right noble virtue, as a noble poet says, \"Patience is a noble way to conquer.\" For he who endures overcomes. And if you wish to conquer and overcome, learn to endure.\n\nThe keepers of passages or tolls should not collect other tolls or passage money except what the prince or law has established. They are not more robbers of money than receivers of tolls. It is their duty to go out of the parishes and doubtfully keep their office. They ought to require their passage from those who owe to pay it without any delay or contention. They ought not to love common profit so much that they harm their conscience, for that would be a robber's way. And Chaucer says, \"Woe to the one who robs, for you yourself will be robbed.\" The guards or porters of city gates. And all commoners should be good and honest. Truth should be in them, and they should not take or withdraw the goods of the common that they have in keeping more than is appropriate for their pension or keepers are not named, for he who takes more than his share shall never prosper or will not enjoy it long. And evil gotten good the third shall never rejoice in this.\n\nThe rabbles, players of dice and messengers and runners should be set before the rook, for it belongs to the rook, which is vice-regent and lieutenant of the king, to have men capable of running here and there for inquiry and espionage in places and cities that might be contrary to the king. And this pawn that represents this people should be formed in this manner: he must have the form of a man with long ears and black, and in his right hand a little money, and in his left hand three dice, and about him a crowd. A box full of letters. The first, which is money, signifies those who are foolish and wasteful with their goods. The second, which is the dice, represents the players at dice. The third, which is the box full of letters, signifies messengers and bearers of letters. The rock, which is the vicar of the king, when he sees such people who are foolish and wasteful, is bound to appoint and ordain tutors and curators to see that they do not eat or waste their goods or inheritances in such a manner that poverty drives them to steal. For he who, by custom, has had abundance of money and goes and spends it foolishly and wastes it away, when he comes to poverty and has nothing, he must necessarily beg and become a thief. Orrellis he must be a thief, for such people, if they have been delicate, will not labor, for they have not learned it. If They be noble and come from gentlemen. They are ashamed to ask and beg. And thus, they must steal and rob the goods of others if they will live. Understand that folly is a right evil vice, for she does good and profit sometimes to others, yet she harms and damages him who wastes. Cassiodorus admonishes the folly-stricken to keep their things, so that they do not fall into poverty through no necessity. They should not be compelled to beg or steal from others. He says that it is greater subtlety to keep one's own goods than to find strange things and that it is greater virtue to keep what is gained than to get and win more. Claudian says the same in his book: it is a greater thing and better to keep what is gained than to get more. Therefore, it is said that the poor demands and begs before he falls, and it is also said that he, John de Ganazath, who is named Monas, dispends. A man was very rich, and he had only two daughters whom he married to two noblemen. After marrying them, he loved his sons-in-law so well that over the course of time, he gave them all his temporal goods. As long as they obeyed him and were diligent in pleasing and serving him, it came to pass that at one time, he had given away so much that he had nothing left. However, those to whom he had given his goods, who were accustomed to being amiable and obedient to him as long as he gave, became unkind, disagreeable, and disobedient when he was poor and knew it. The father, who was deceived and loved his daughters deeply, deeply desired and longed to show his poverty. In the end, he went to a merchant whom he knew from old times. He asked him to lend him a thousand pounds to pay and return within three days, and the merchant did so. The father then brought the money in to him. this is how it happened that it was a day of a solemn feast / on which day he gave to his daughters and her husband a right noble dinner / and after dinner he entered into his chamber secretly with them / And drew out of a chest that he had made new lining with three locks / the money that the merchant had lent him / And poured it out upon a table that his daughters and their husbands might see it / And when he had shown it to them, he put it away and put it into the chest feigning that it had been all his / And when they were departed, he bore the money home to the merchant that he had borrowed it from / And the next day after, his daughters and their husbands asked him how much money was in the chest that was shut with three locks / And then he feigned and said that he had there twenty-five thousand pounds / which he kept for making his testament and for leaving to his daughters and them / if they would bear him as well in ward as they did when they were married. They were overjoyed and glad, and they decided to serve him honorably, not only in clothing and food and drink, but in all other necessary things, until the end. When the end approached, he called his daughters and their husbands and said to them, \"Understand this: the money in the chest hidden under three locks, I will leave to you. I command that you give, in my presence before I die, to the friars, C pound, and to the brothers, C pound, and to the hermits of St. Augustine, 1 pound. When I am buried and placed in the earth, you may demand from them the keys of the chest where my treasure is. They keep the keys, and I have put on each key a bill and writing.\"\n\nIn witness of these things said above, and also know that he gave certain quantities of money to each church, recluse, and your people while he lay in his deathbed. The hands of his daughters' husbands, who had done it gladly. In hope to have shortly the money that they supposed had been in the chest, and when it came to the last day that he died, he was carried to church and his exequies performed and was buried solemnly. And the eighth day the service was worshipfully completed. They went to demand the keys of the Religious men whom they had kept, which were delivered to them. And then they went and opened the coffer where they supposed the money had been. And there they found nothing but a great club. And on the handle was written, \"I, John of Canastra make this testament: that I be slain with this club: that lies my profit. And give it to others, as he who says it is no waste for a man to give his good to his children and keep none for himself. And you shall understand that it is a great folly to spend and waste his good, in hope for to recover it from someone or son or daughter or right near kin. For a man ought to keep.\" A person in possession of his own goods should ensure he doesn't spend other people's before being considered a good man. Such individuals might be inclined to cause troubles, instigating wars and tensions against those who are wealthy. They would also extort, make clamors, and foment disturbances against their lords to plunder their wealth. Such waste of goods is detrimental to the common profit. After such wastage of goods, we say that players of dice and those who frequent brothels are the worst. When the heat of gambling at dice and the lust of their lecherous indulgence have brought them to poverty, they are forced to become thieves and robbers. Drunkenness, gluttony, and all manner of evils follow them and bring mischief. They welcome these vices gladly. knights and noble men, when they go to war or battles, covet victory less than robbery. They cause much harm on their journey and gain little or no winnings. This occurred once when St. Bernard rode on a horse in the countryside and encountered a hazard-player or dice-thrower. The dice-player said to him, \"If you will oblige your soul to me against my horse, I will let it lie down and play with you, and if you have more points than I on three dice, I promise you will have my horse.\" The dice-player was pleased and immediately cast three dice. On each die was a die with 18 points. He took hold of the horse's bridle, believing he had won, and said the horse was his. Then St. Bernard said, \"Wait, my son. There are more points on the dice than 18.\" He then cast the dice in such a way that one of the three dice split in half. On the split side were the points St. Bernard had rolled, surpassing the dice-player's total. And each of those other was a dice game. Saint Bernard said that he had won his soul for as much as he had cast on three dice, point nineteen. When this player saw and perceived this miracle, he gave his soul to Saint Bernard and became a monk and finished his life in good works. The runners and bearers of letters should do their journey hastily and speedily, without delay. Their delay might harm and inconvenience those who sent them or those to whom they were sent, and cause great damage or villainy. Therefore, every nobleman should carefully consider to whom he delivers his letters and his mandates, and meanwhile such people are jesters and drunkards. And it often happens that when such messengers or runners are delayed by any reason, other runners carry letters contrary to his. A prince often encounters many disadvantages due to the loss of friends, castles, and land, as well as other issues related to merchandise. At the same time, it happens that a prince fails to gain victory over his enemies due to the fault of such messengers. Furthermore, there are those who, when they arrive in a city where they have not been before, are more inclined to visit the city and its noble inhabitants than to carry out their mission. This is a mistake, for they should focus on their duties if they had been given clear instructions to do so.\n\nMoreover, when sent forth by any lords or merchants, they must be cautious not to be given excessive food on journeys or too much wine at inns. This could lead to their horses becoming weary, forcing them to delay their journey unnecessarily. Instead, they should go and return promptly to report back to their masters as required. This concludes the matter. The things above mentioned.\nI have designed above the things pertaining to the forms of the chess men and their offices, that is, for both noble men and common people. It is necessary to explain here briefly how they issue and move from the places where they are set. First, we must speak of the form and fashion of the chequered board, which represents and was made after, for it was made in the form of the city of Babylon, in which this same play was found, as it is said before. And there are four things:\n\n1. First, you should understand here that there are 64 points set in the chequered board, which are all square.\n2. Second, why the border is higher than the squares of the points.\n3. Third, why the common people are set before the nobles.\n4. Fourth, why nobles and people are set in their proper places.\n\nThere are as many points in the chequered board wide as full. The city of Babylon was extremely great and was made entirely square. In each quarter, it was sixteen miles in number and measurement. This measurement, when told four times, amounted to 664 miles. In the manner of Lombardy, they are called miles, and in France, leagues, and in England, myles. To represent the measure of this city, in which this play or game was discovered, the philosopher who found it first ordered a table containing 664 square points. These points are enclosed within the border of the table. Thirty-two of them are on one side and thirty-two on the other, arranged for the beauty of the game. Regarding the second point, why the border of the eschequer is higher than the table within it: it should be understood that the border around it. representeth the walle of ye cyte / whiche is right hyghe / And therfor made ye philosopher the bordour more hyghe than ye tablier And as ye blessid saint Iherome saith vpon ye prophesie of ysaye / that is to wete vpon a montayne of obscurete. whiche wordes were said of babilone whiche standeth in chaldee / and nothinge of that babilone that stondeth in egipte / for it is so yt babilone whiche standeth in chaldee was sette in a right grete playne / & had so hyghe walles that by the heyghte of them / was contynuell derkenes en\u2223vironed & obscurete / that none erthely man might beholde and see the ende of ye hyghnes of the walle / And therfore ysaye callid hit ye montaigne obscure / And saint Iherome sayth yt the mesure of the heyght of this walle was thre thousand paas / whiche extendeth vnto ye lengthe of thre\nmyle lombardes / hit is to wete that lombarde mylis and english myles ben of one lengthe And in one of the cor\u2223ners of this cyte was made a toure treangle as a shelde wherof the heyght extended vnto the length of 7 thousand passes, which is 7 miles English. This tower was called Babel's tower. The walls about the tower formed a woman, whose name was Semiramis, as Virgil says. Why, therefore, were the common people placed before the nobles in the battlefield in one rank? For as much as they are necessary to all nobles. The rook, which stands on the right side and is the king's vice-regent, what can he do if the laborer is not set before him to minister to him such temporal things as are necessary for him? And what can the knight do if he does not have the smith before him to forge his armor, saddles, axles, and such things that belong to him? And what is a knight worth without horse and arms? Certainly nothing more than one of the people or less. And in what manner should nobles live if no man made cloth and bought and sold merchandise? And what should kings and queens and other lords do if? They had no physicians or surgeons, I say, the people are the glory of the Crown and sustain the life of the nobles. Therefore, you, as a lord, nobleman, or knight, do not despise the common people, for they are placed before you in the play. The second reason why the people are placed before the nobles and have the table set wide before them is because they begin the battle. They ought to take heed and attend to doing their offices and crafts. In such a way that they allow the noble men to govern the cities and counsel and make ordinances for the people of the battle. How should a laborer, plowman, or craftsman counsel and make ordinances about things he never learned or knows the matter upon which the council ought to be taken? Certainly, the common people ought not to attend to anything other than doing their service and the office that is fitting for them. It does not belong to them to be in councils or at. The advocations are not to menace or threaten anyone, for often times good counsel is disturbed by menaces and force. And where good counsel fails, cities are often betrayed and destroyed. Plato says that common things and cities are blessed when governed by wise men, or when governors study wisdom. It therefore pertains to the common people to learn the matters and the manner of procurement before they become counselors, for it often happens that he who makes himself wiser by understanding is made more of a fool than he was. The fourth reason why there are those in the tabula is this: those who have people to govern ought to have cities and castles and possessions to set their people in, and to labor and do their occupation. For to have the name of a king without a realm is a hollow name, and honor without profit, and all nobility without good manners. Such things that nobility can be maintained are better called folly than nobility.\nShameful poverty is more grievous when it comes from a high and noble birth or house. For no one gladly reproves a poor man of the common people, but every man has contempt for a noble man who is poor if he does not have good manners and virtues, by which his poverty is forgotten. And truly, a kingdom without abundance of goods by which it may be governed and prosper, may better be called a latrociny or a nest of thieves than a kingdom. Alas, what abundance were there once in the kingdoms. And what prosperity, in which was justice, and every man in his office content, how did the cities stand in worship and renown, how was the noble kingdom of England renowned, all the world feared it and spoke worshipfully of it, how does it now stand and in what abundance I report to those who know it, if there are thieves in the kingdom or on the sea, they know that labor in the. \"And sail on the sea, I wote well the fame is great thereof. I pray God save that noble realm and send good, true, and politic counselors to its governors. And nobility of lineage without power and might is but vanity and disdain. And as we have said before, the treasury which the philosopher ordered represented and figured signifies the said city of Babylon, and in the same way, it may signify a realm, and take heed to the points in the middles of every quadrant, and so double every quadrant to other miles of this city all the way, doubling it until the number reaches 124. The name of the same should surmount all the world, not only the world but many worlds by the doubling of islands, which doubling, as before is said, should surmount all things. And thus ends the first chapter of the fourth book.\n\n\"In this world, kings exercise sovereignty and reign in their realms. In this play, we ought to know by the following:\" The nature of the king's motion: He moves and issues from his place. You should understand that he is set in the fourth quarter or point of the chessboard. And when he is black, he stands in the white square, and the knight on his right side is white, and the alfil (alfil being an alternative spelling for rook) and rook are in black, and on the left side the four hold the opposite places. The reason may be such: Because the knights are the glory and crown of the king, they show in similar residence that they do when they are set similarly on the right side of the king and on the left side of the queen. And since the rook on the right side is the king's vicegerent, it accompanies the queen in similar siege that the alfil (Alphyn being an alternative spelling for alfil) does, which is judge of the king. And in the same way, the left rook and the left alfil accompany the king in similar siege. In such a way as they are set around the king on both sides with the queen in the manner of a crown, they can securely keep the realm that remains. And it shines in the king and in the queen,\nIn such a way that they can confirm and defend him in their strongholds and in their places.\nThe knight and the vicar keep and prepare the king on one side,\nWhile those set on the other side keep the queen,\nAnd they all keep the strength and firmness of the realm in this way,\nAnd similarly they arrange the things that pertain to the council and to the business of the realm.\nFor if each man should attend to his own proper things,\nAnd they did not defend nor take heed of the things that pertain to the king, to the common good, and to the realm,\nThe realm would be divided into parties,\nAnd thus the judge could reign,\nAnd the name of the royal dignity would be lost.\nSince the king holds the dignity above all and the royal sovereignty,\nTherefore it does not belong that he be absent for a long time,\nNor withdraw from the realm by great distance. The king's moves from his master siege of his realm. When he willingly moves, he should not pass the first check at three points. And when he begins to move from his white point, he has the nature of the rooks on the right and left sides to go black or white. He may also go to the white point where the city guards are set, and in this point he has the nature of a knight. These two manners of moving belong to the queen, and since the king and queen, who are joined by marriage, are one thing as one flesh and blood, therefore the king may move on the left side of his own point as well as if he were set in the queen's place, which is black. And when he goes straight in the manner of a rook only, it happens that the adversary is not covered in any point in the second rank. The king may not pass from his black point to the third rank. Thus he sorts the nature of the rook on. The king sorts the knights to the right and left, going directly towards the white point in front of the merchant. The king also sorts the nature of knights in two ways when he goes to the right side: he may place him in the wide space in front of the physician, and in the black space in front of the taverner. Similarly, he goes to other two places on the left side: before the smith and the notary. At his first issu (issue), he sorts the nature of knights and the king sorts the nature of apples at his first issu into two places. He can go to both sides to the wide white place, one before the smith on that side, and the other place unclear. All these issues have come out of the king from his own place through his own virtue when he begins to move. However, when he moves away from his own place and from one to another, he sorts the nature of the common people. By good right, he has in himself the nature of For all the virtue that is in the members comes from the head, and all the dignity that subjects have by execution and continuous appearance of their moving and issue, the king detains it and is attributed to him. The victory of knights, the prudence of judges, the authority of vicars or legates, the queen's continence, and the people's harmony and unity are not all ascribed to the king's honor and worship in his issue when he first moved. In the third line before the people, he never exceeds. From the number three, all manner of states begin to move. The trinary number contains three parties, which make a perfect number. For a trinary number has 1, 2, 3. Joined together, they make 6, which is the first perfect number, signifying in this place six persons named that constitute the perfection of a kingdom: the king, the queen, judges, knights, vicars or legates, and the common people. Therefore, the king. A man should begin in his first intent to show perfection of life in himself as well as in others. After the king begins to act in a manner of a rook towards the black point before the physician, this signifies that women may not move nor make vows of pilgrimage or journey without the will of their husbands. If a woman had vowed anything, her husband lying and again saying she may not yield nor comply with her vow if he will go over her. He may well go without her, and if so it is that the husband will have her with him, she is bound to follow him. For a man is the head of a woman, and not the other way around. Regarding matters pertaining to patrimony, they are alike, but the man has power over her body, and so the woman does not over his. Therefore, when the king begins to move, the queen may follow, and not always when she wishes to. For why, for the first point. Lines must be within the limits and space of the kingdom. The king may move at his first moving out of his own place. When he passes the fourth line, he goes out of his kingdom. If he passes one point too late, beware. A king's person is accounted more than a thousand others. When he exposes himself to the perils of battle, it is necessary that he goes temperately and slyly. If he is taken or dead, or otherwise included and shut up, all the strengths of all others fail and all is finished and lost. Therefore, he has need to go and move wisely. Also, therefore, he may not move but one point after his first moving, except where he goes forward or backward, or on that one side or the other, or otherwise cornerwise. He may never approach his adversary, the king, nearer than in the third point. Therefore, kings in battle ought never to approach one near the other. When the king has gone so far that all his men. A king is in greater peril when he is alone, and may not endure long when brought to extremity. He must take heed not to stand with his back checked by a knight or another, for if the king loses his rook, that is, his authority, someone else may attend to the needs of the realm if he is taken or dead. He was the provider for all the kingdom. Such a king will wear a sack on his head that is shut in a city, and all who are there are taken captive and shut up.\n\nWhen the queen, who is accompanied by the king, begins to move from her own place, she proceeds in two ways: first, like an alderman when she is in black, she may go to the right side and come to the point before the notice, and on the left side in the black point and come to the fore of the city guards. It is to be noted that she assumes three natures in herself first on the right side before the alderman, secondly, the side where the knight is, and thirdly, indirectly, towards the black point before the physician, and the reason why. This is because she possesses, by grace, the authority that rooks have through custom. For she can grant and bestow many things graciously to her subjects. And as it was stated above in the chapter on the Queen, she should possess perfect wisdom. But she does not have the nature of knights, and it is not fitting or proper for a woman to go to battle for the fragility and weaknesses of her body. Therefore, she does not follow the same path as knights in her draft, and when she is removed from her position, she can only go from one point to another, either forward or backward, taking or being taken. And here we may ask why the queen goes to the battle with the king. Certainly it is for the solace and consolation of him, and an expression of love. And the people also desire the succession of the king, and therefore the tartras have their wives. In the field with them, yet it is not good that men have their wives with them. Instead, they should remain in the cities or within their own territories. For when they are outside of their cities and limits, they are not secure but held suspect. They should be cautious and suspect all men. Dina, Jacob's daughter, kept her virginity as long as she was in the care of her brothers. But once she went to see the strange regions, she was corrupted and defiled by the son of Shechem. Seneca says that women with ugly faces are gladly not chaste, but their hearts desire the company of men. Solinus says that no female beasts desire to be touched by their males when they have conceived, except a woman, who should be the most reasonable. In this case, she lets her reason slip. Therefore, in the old law, fathers had various wives and concubines, and Anenclysis was impudent and shameless, and Ulysses says that there are some who, no matter how well they are married, are unfaithful. They eschew the deed yet have great joy when prayed. Therefore, good women should avoid curious places where they might find noise of the people.\n\nThe manner and nature of the draught of the Alphyn is such that he who is black in his own seat is set on the right side of the king, and he who is white is set on the left side. They are called and named black and white for no cause that they are so in substance of their own color, but for the color of the places in which they are set. They are always black or white when they are in their places; the alphyn on the right side goes out of its place to the right side and comes before the laborer. It is reasonable that the judge ought to defend and keep the laborers and possessions which are in his jurisdiction by all right and law. He may also go to the wide place on the left side to fore the physician. Likewise, physicians have the charge to heal the infirmities of others. A man, in a similar manner, have the judges charge to quell all strife and contention and bring to unity, and to punish and correct causes brought before them. The left altar has two ways from its own place, one toward the black space in front of the merchants, as the merchants often require counsel and debate over questions that must be determined by the judges. The other issue is toward the place in front of the ribalds, and that is because among them often fall noises, discord, and manslaughter, which ought to be punished by the judges. And you shall understand that the altar always goes cornerwise from the third point to the third point, keeping its own course. For if it is black, it always goes black; and if it is white, it always goes white. The issue or going cornerly or angularly signifies subtle or intricate matters that judges ought to attend to. A judge. a king ought to further rightful causes. Secondly, he ought to give true counsel, and thirdly, he ought to give and judge rightful sentences according to the laws, and never depart from the righteousness of the law. The alphabet goes around in six drafts, and it comes back to its own place. And although all reason and good perfection should be in a king, it is especially necessary in those who are the king's advisors and the queen's. The king ought not to do anything doubtful until he has asked counsel of his judges and the wise men of the realm. Therefore, the judge and sage, as well as in knowledge as in good manners, are signified when they mean to go from three points to three. For the sixth number by which they go all the way around the exchequer, and bring them back again to their own place in such a way that the end of their moving is reunited with the beginning of the place from which they departed. Therefore, it is. After the issue of the Alfyns, we shall tell you about the issue and the moving of the knights. We say that the knight on the right side is white, and the left side is black. The issue and moving of both is in one manner, as the white knight appears to be on the right side, which is white. The left knight is black. Their moving is such that the white knight can enter the space of the Alfyn, as it appears from the knight on the right side, which is white.\n\nHe has three issues from his own place: one on his right side, before the laborer; it is reasonable that when the laborer and husbandman have labored the fields, the knights ought to keep them, to ensure they have provisions for themselves and their horses. The second issue is that he may move to the black space before the notary or draper. For he is bound to defend and keep those who make his vestments and coverings necessary to his body. The third issue is that he A knight may enter the list on the king's side before the merchant who stands before the king, which is black. The reason is because he is obligated to defend the king as much as his own person, when he passes the first draft. He may go four ways when he is in the midst of the table, and in the same manner, the knight fighting can go into eight different places, to which he may return. And in like manner, the black knight goes out of his place into white. In this way, a knight grows and multiplies in his points, and often the field is won or lost by them. A knight's virtue and might are not known except by his fighting, and in his fighting, he does great harm to the extent of his might into so many points. They are in many perils in their fighting, and when they escape, they have the honor of the game. And thus, it is of every man: the more valiant he makes himself often, the more honored he is. The moving and issue of the rooks, which are the king's vicars, is such that the right rook is black and the lifted rook is white. And when the pieces are set, both the nobles and common people, first in their proper places, the rooks cannot issue unless it is made to them by the nobles or common people. For they are enclosed in their own sieges. The reason why is such that, because they are vicar-lieutenants or commissioners of the king, their authority is of no effect until they issue out. And that they have begun treason in their office. For as long as they are within the palace of the king, so long may they not use nor execute their commission. But immediately upon issuance, they may use their authority. And you shall understand that their authority is great, for they represent the person of the king. And therefore, where the table is wide, they may go, both white and black, as well on the right. \"And sideways and back and forth, a piece may run as widely as it finds, whether it be against its adversaries or its companions. When the rook is in the middle of the board, it may go in any direction it will, to four right lines on every side, and it cannot go cornerwise but always right forward and back, as before said. Therefore, all the subjects of the king, good and evil, ought to know by their moving that the authority and commissioners ought to be true, righteous, and just. The two rooks alone can vanquish a king they oppose and take his life and his kingdom from him. This was done when Cyrus king of Persia and Darius king of Media slew Belshazzar and took his kingdom from him. One issue and one move belong to all people, for they may\" From the point they stand at the first meeting, they proceed directly towards the third point in front of them, and once they have done so, they may mean no more than moving from one point directly to another. They may never turn back. In this manner, proceeding from point to point, they may obtain by virtue and strength what the other finds by dignity. If the knights and other nobles help those who reach the farthest sign before them where their adversaries were set, they acquire the dignity granted to the queen by grace. If any of them manages to come to this said line, if he is white like a laborer, Draper Phideas, and returns homeward, they may proceed as it is said in the chapter of the queen. If any of the pawns, such as the smith, the merchant, the taverner, and the reeve, come with damage to the same utmost line, he shall obtain the dignity of the black queen's pawn. When these common people come. men find right forth in her line and find any noble person or of the people of their adversaries set in any point on one side before him. In that corner point, he may take his adversary, whether it be on the right side or on the left. The reason is that the adversaries are suspicious that the common people lie in wait to rob their goods or take their persons when they go upward right forth. Therefore, he may take in the right angle before him one of his adversaries, as he had espied his person, and in the left angle as a robber of his goods. And whether it be going forward or returning from black to white or white to black, the pawn must always go in its right line, and always take in the corner that it finds in its way, but he may not go on either side until he has been in the farthest line of the chequer. And that he has taken the nature of the dander (dawn or day?), then he is a fiery one, and then he may go on all sides cornerwise from point to point only as the queen does fighting. Taking whoever he encounters on his journey, and when he arrives at the place where the nobles are named White Fiers or Black Fiers, depending on his position, and there he takes the dignity of the queen and so on. And all these things may appear to those who watch the game of chess, and you shall understand that no nobleman ought to have contempt for the common people, for it has often been seen that through their virtue and wit, they have come to great estates, such as popes, bishops, emperors, and kings, as we have in the history of David, who was made king from a shepherd and one of the common people, and of many others.\n\nAnd in like manner, we read of the contrary, that many noblemen have been brought to misery by their faults. For instance, Gyges, who was rich in lands and riches and so proud that he went and demanded of the god Apollo if there was anyone in the world more rich or happier than he was. And when he heard a voice reply, \"There is a man in Lydia, named Candaules, who is exceedingly happy and rich,\" Gyges plotted against him and slew him, took his wife, and ruled over Lydia in his stead. The pit or fosse of sacrifices, a people named Agalaus Sophides, who were pourers of goods and rich in courage, were more acceptable than he who was a king. Thus, Apollo allowed more the wisdom and security of the poor man and his little means, than he did the state and person of Giges or his rich means. It is more to allow a little thing scornfully pursued than much good taken in fear and dread. Since a man of lowly signature is ennobled so much by his virtue, the more he ought to be glorious and of good repute. Virgil, born in Lombardy of the nation of Mantua and of lowly and simple lineage, was sovereign in wisdom and science, and the most noble of all poets, of whom the reputation is and shall be lasting during the world. It happened that another poet asked and demanded of him why he did not set the verses of Homer in his book. He answered that he should be of right great strength and force, that should pluck the verses from Homer. The play or game was discovered in the time of Emperor Amandus. Philometer, otherwise known as the philosopher, found it. He did so because the king, who was tyrannical and felonious, could not be corrected in any other way. The king, who had put to death many wise men for correcting him, left the people sorrowful and displeased with their lives. They prayed and requested that Philometer reprimand the king for his folly. The philosopher answered that he should and the people said to him, \"Certes, then you ought sooner to die to the throne so that your reputation might reach the people than the life of the king should continue in evil due to your absence or the lack of your reprimand, or that you dare not do and speak what you say. And when the philosopher heard this, he promised the people that he would put himself in their service to correct him. Then he began to think in what manner he might escape death and keep to the people his promise. And thus he made and ordered the chessboard of 64 points, as I have fore said, and made the forms of the chessmen in human figure according to the fashions and forms as we have shown and described to you in their chapters. He ordered the moving and the arrangement according to what is said in the chapters of the chessmen. And when the philosopher had thus ordered the game or play, and it pleased all those who saw it, on one occasion, \"\n\n(Note: The text appears to be in Middle English, but it is mostly readable as is. No significant corrections are necessary.) The philosopher played a game before the king, who came and wanted to join. The philosopher then began to teach and instruct the king in the science of the game. He first explained that the king should possess pity, debonairness, and righteousness, as stated in the chapter on the king. He then showed him the role of the queen and the manners she should possess. He then discussed the nature of advisors and judges as alphyns, and the qualities of knights, including wisdom, truth, and courtesy. He also explained the roles and duties of the common people in relation to the nobles. Once the philosopher had taught and instructed the king and his nobles through the game and corrected his bad habits, the king demanded that he reveal the cause. The philosopher explained why and how he created this play or game, as he was compelled by fear and dread to correct the king's vices, having promised the people who requested it. However, due to his doubt about the king's imminent death and having witnessed the execution of wise men who dared to criticize him, the philosopher was filled with great anguish and sorrow. He pondered long and studied how to reproach the king and save his own life. Eventually, he discovered this game or play, which he set forth to amend and change the king's manners. The lords and nobles, indulging in delights and riches, should abandon idleness by playing this game, and leave their pensiveness and sorrows behind. studying this game. And when the king had heard all these causes, he thought that the philosopher had found a good manner of correction. Then he thanked him greatly. And by this signification and learning from the philosopher, he changed his life, his manners, and all his evil conditions. In this way, the king, who before had been vicious and disorderly in his living, became just and virtuous, debonair, gracious, and full of virtues to all people. And a man who lives in this world without virtues does not live as a man but as a beast. Therefore, my right revered lord, I pray Almighty God to save our sovereign lord the king and to give him grace to rule as a king and to abound in all virtues. And may his noble realm of England prosper and abound in virtues, and may sin be eschewed, justice kept, the realm defended, good men rewarded, malefactors punished, and the idle people put to labor. The nobles of the realm may reign gloriously,\nIn conquering his rightful inheritance,\nThat true peace and charity may endure in both realms,\nAnd merchandise may have its course in such a way that every man eschews sin,\nAnd increases in virtuous occupations.\nI humbly pray your grace to receive this little and simple book,\nMade under the hope and shadow of your noble protection,\nBy him who is your most humble servant,\nIn joy and thanks.\nI shall pray Almighty God for your long life and welfare,\nWhich He preserve and send you the accomplishment of your high noble desires.\nAmen.\nFinished on the last day of March, the year of our Lord God, 1472.", "creation_year": 1474, "creation_year_earliest": 1474, "creation_year_latest": 1474, "source_dataset": "EEBO", "source_dataset_detailed": "EEBO_Phase1"}
]