Datasets:

Languages:
English
Multilinguality:
monolingual
Size Categories:
100K<n<1M
Language Creators:
found
Annotations Creators:
crowdsourced
Source Datasets:
original
Tags:
License:
leondz commited on
Commit
bc990e5
1 Parent(s): 6f92cda

formatting

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +3 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ H |Non-UK| 2014 |General collection |Crowd & expert |2000
113
  The most varied parts of the BTC are sections F and H. However, each of the remaining four sections has some specific readily-identifiable bias. So, we propose that one uses half of section H for evaluation and leaves the other half in the training data. Section H should be partitioned in the order of the JSON-format lines. Note that the CoNLL-format data is readily reconstructible from the JSON format, which is the authoritative data format from which others are derived.
114
 
115
  **Test**: Section F
116
- **Development**: Section H (the paper says "second half of Section H" but ordinality could be ambiguous)
 
 
117
  **Training**: everything else
118
 
119
 
 
113
  The most varied parts of the BTC are sections F and H. However, each of the remaining four sections has some specific readily-identifiable bias. So, we propose that one uses half of section H for evaluation and leaves the other half in the training data. Section H should be partitioned in the order of the JSON-format lines. Note that the CoNLL-format data is readily reconstructible from the JSON format, which is the authoritative data format from which others are derived.
114
 
115
  **Test**: Section F
116
+
117
+ **Development**: Section H (the paper says "second half of Section H" but ordinality could be ambiguous, so it all goes in. Bon chance)
118
+
119
  **Training**: everything else
120
 
121