Datasets:
Tasks:
Image Segmentation
Modalities:
Image
Formats:
parquet
Sub-tasks:
semantic-segmentation
Size:
1K - 10K
ArXiv:
License:
File size: 6,711 Bytes
c13f953 9f347e3 af6a1f1 4f6e16e 9f347e3 34e1208 4f6e16e 34e1208 4f6e16e 34e1208 4f6e16e 34e1208 9f347e3 4f6e16e b34ae4c 279345f b34ae4c |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 |
---
license: apache-2.0
size_categories:
- n<1K
task_categories:
- image-segmentation
task_ids:
- semantic-segmentation
dataset_info:
features:
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: label
dtype: image
- name: classes_on_image
sequence: int64
- name: id
dtype: int64
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 1140887299.125
num_examples: 4983
- name: validation
num_bytes: 115180784.125
num_examples: 2135
download_size: 1254703923
dataset_size: 1256068083.25
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: validation
path: data/validation-*
---
# Dataset Card for FoodSeg103
## Table of Contents
- [Dataset Card for FoodSeg103](#dataset-card-for-foodseg103)
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
- [Data categories](#data-categories)
- [Data Splits](#data-splits)
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
- [Source Data](#source-data)
- [Initial Data Collection and Normalization](#initial-data-collection-and-normalization)
- [Annotations](#annotations)
- [Annotation process](#annotation-process)
- [Refinement process](#refinement-process)
- [Who are the annotators?](#who-are-the-annotators)
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
## Dataset Description
- **Homepage:** [Dataset homepage](https://xiongweiwu.github.io/foodseg103.html)
- **Repository:** [FoodSeg103-Benchmark-v1](https://github.com/LARC-CMU-SMU/FoodSeg103-Benchmark-v1)
- **Paper:** [A Large-Scale Benchmark for Food Image Segmentation](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.05409.pdf)
- **Point of Contact:** [Not Defined]
### Dataset Summary
FoodSeg103 is a large-scale benchmark for food image segmentation. It contains 103 food categories and 7118 images with ingredient level pixel-wise annotations. The dataset is a curated sample from [Recipe1M](https://github.com/facebookresearch/inversecooking) and annotated and refined by human annotators. The dataset is split into 2 subsets: training set, validation set. The training set contains 4983 images and the validation set contains 2135 images.
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
No leaderboard is available for this dataset at the moment.
## Dataset Structure
### Data categories
| id | ingridient |
| --- | ---- |
| 0 | background |
| 1 | candy |
| 2 | egg tart |
| 3 | french fries |
| 4 | chocolate |
| 5 | biscuit |
| 6 | popcorn |
| 7 | pudding |
| 8 | ice cream |
| 9 | cheese butter |
| 10 | cake |
| 11 | wine |
| 12 | milkshake |
| 13 | coffee |
| 14 | juice |
| 15 | milk |
| 16 | tea |
| 17 | almond |
| 18 | red beans |
| 19 | cashew |
| 20 | dried cranberries |
| 21 | soy |
| 22 | walnut |
| 23 | peanut |
| 24 | egg |
| 25 | apple |
| 26 | date |
| 27 | apricot |
| 28 | avocado |
| 29 | banana |
| 30 | strawberry |
| 31 | cherry |
| 32 | blueberry |
| 33 | raspberry |
| 34 | mango |
| 35 | olives |
| 36 | peach |
| 37 | lemon |
| 38 | pear |
| 39 | fig |
| 40 | pineapple |
| 41 | grape |
| 42 | kiwi |
| 43 | melon |
| 44 | orange |
| 45 | watermelon |
| 46 | steak |
| 47 | pork |
| 48 | chicken duck |
| 49 | sausage |
| 50 | fried meat |
| 51 | lamb |
| 52 | sauce |
| 53 | crab |
| 54 | fish |
| 55 | shellfish |
| 56 | shrimp |
| 57 | soup |
| 58 | bread |
| 59 | corn |
| 60 | hamburg |
| 61 | pizza |
| 62 | hanamaki baozi |
| 63 | wonton dumplings |
| 64 | pasta |
| 65 | noodles |
| 66 | rice |
| 67 | pie |
| 68 | tofu |
| 69 | eggplant |
| 70 | potato |
| 71 | garlic |
| 72 | cauliflower |
| 73 | tomato |
| 74 | kelp |
| 75 | seaweed |
| 76 | spring onion |
| 77 | rape |
| 78 | ginger |
| 79 | okra |
| 80 | lettuce |
| 81 | pumpkin |
| 82 | cucumber |
| 83 | white radish |
| 84 | carrot |
| 85 | asparagus |
| 86 | bamboo shoots |
| 87 | broccoli |
| 88 | celery stick |
| 89 | cilantro mint |
| 90 | snow peas |
| 91 | cabbage |
| 92 | bean sprouts |
| 93 | onion |
| 94 | pepper |
| 95 | green beans |
| 96 | French beans |
| 97 | king oyster mushroom |
| 98 | shiitake |
| 99 | enoki mushroom |
| 100 | oyster mushroom |
| 101 | white button mushroom |
| 102 | salad |
| 103 | other ingredients |
### Data Splits
This dataset only contains two splits. A training split and a validation split with 4983 and 2135 images respectively.
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
Select images from a large-scale recipe dataset and annotate them with pixel-wise segmentation masks.
### Source Data
The dataset is a curated sample from [Recipe1M](https://github.com/facebookresearch/inversecooking).
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
After selecting the source of the data two more steps were added before image selection.
1. Recipe1M contains 1.5k ingredient categoris, but only the top 124 categories were selected + a 'other' category (further became 103).
2. Images should contain between 2 and 16 ingredients.
3. Ingredients should be visible and easy to annotate.
Which then resulted in 7118 images.
### Annotations
#### Annotation process
Third party annotators were hired to annotate the images respecting the following guidelines:
1. Tag ingredients with appropriate categories.
2. Draw pixel-wise masks for each ingredient.
3. Ignore tiny regions (even if contains ingredients) with area covering less than 5% of the image.
#### Refinement process
The refinement process implemented the following steps:
1. Correct mislabelled ingredients.
2. Deleting unpopular categories that are assigned to less than 5 images (resulting in 103 categories in the final dataset).
3. Merging visually similar ingredient categories (e.g. orange and citrus)
#### Who are the annotators?
A third party company that was not mentioned in the paper.
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
Authors of the paper [A Large-Scale Benchmark for Food Image Segmentation](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.05409.pdf).
### Licensing Information
[Apache 2.0 license.](https://github.com/LARC-CMU-SMU/FoodSeg103-Benchmark-v1/blob/main/LICENSE)
### Citation Information
```bibtex
@inproceedings{wu2021foodseg,
title={A Large-Scale Benchmark for Food Image Segmentation},
author={Wu, Xiongwei and Fu, Xin and Liu, Ying and Lim, Ee-Peng and Hoi, Steven CH and Sun, Qianru},
booktitle={Proceedings of ACM international conference on Multimedia},
year={2021}
}
```
|