File size: 7,859 Bytes
d24a0cb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
---
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
base_model:
- SIRIS-Lab/affilgood-affilroberta
tags:
- affiliations
- ner
- science
---

# AffilGood-SPAN

## Overview

<details>
<summary>Click to expand</summary>
  
- **Model type:** Language Model
- **Architecture:** RoBERTa-base
- **Language:** English
- **License:** Apache 2.0
- **Task:** Named Entity Recognition
- **Data:** AffilGood-SPAN
- **Additional Resources:**
  - [Paper](https://https://aclanthology.org/2024.sdp-1.13/)
  - [GitHub](https://github.com/sirisacademic/affilgood)
</details>

## Model description

The English version of **affilgood-span** is a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model for identifying span of single affiliation strings in raw affiliation strings from scientific papers and projects, fine-tuned from the [AffilRoberta](https://huggingface.co/SIRIS-Lab/affilgood-affilroberta) model, a [RoBERTa](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692) base model futher pre-trained for MLM task on a medium-size corpus of raw affiliation stirngs collected from OpenAlex.

Raw affiliation span identification task is aimed at extracting and cleaning affiliation strings when there is noise and/or when there are multiple affiliation strings in the same signature. 
Typically, multiple institutions have been considered to be separated by semicolons. However, other punctuation marks, spaces or *and* connectors are frequently used to separate affiliations.

We have annotated a dataset containing 2,072 raw affiliation strings obtained from OpenAlex to identify spans containing relevant affiliation data within them. 
The annotated instances were selected by a stratified random sampling by country, focusing on ensuring diversity in affiliation languages and origins. 
Additional manually-chosen instances with noisy sequences were included in the annotated data so we could train our model to filter out non-affiliation strings. 
It is frequent that affiliation data automatically extracted from PDF files contain texts that should have been discarded (e.g. email, acknowledgements or part of the contents of the publication). These data can introduce errors in the subsequent steps of the pipeline.

We have fine-tuned the models for 25 epochs, using 80% of the dataset for training, 10% for validation and 10% for testing. Best performing model is available here.

## Intended Usage

This model is intended to be used for raw affiliation strings in English, because this model is pre-trained on English RoBERTa, however SPAN and large further pre-training corpora are both multilingual.

## How to use

```python
from transformers import pipeline
affilgood_span_pipeline("ner", model=model, tokenizer=tokenizer, aggregation_strategy="simple")
sentence = "Deanery of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, and TW2Informatics Ltd, Gothenburg, 42166, Sweden / Received in revised form February 22, 2016; ENaC, epithelial sodium channel"
output = affilgood_span_pipeline(sentence)
print(output)
```


## Limitations and bias

No measures have been taken to estimate the bias and toxicity embedded in the model.

We have annotated a dataset containing 2,072 raw affiliation strings obtained from OpenAlex to identify spans containing relevant affiliation data within them. 
The annotated instances were selected by a stratified random sampling by country, focusing on ensuring diversity in affiliation languages and origins. 
Additional manually-chosen instances with noisy sequences were included in the annotated data so we could train our model to filter out non-affiliation strings. 
It is frequent that affiliation data automatically extracted from PDF files contain texts that should have been discarded (e.g. email, acknowledgements or part of the contents of the publication). These data can introduce errors in the subsequent steps of the pipeline.

## Training

We used the [AffilGood-SPAN dataset](link) for training and evaluation.

We fine-tuned the adapted and base models for token classification with the IOB annotation schema. 
We trained the models for 25 epochs, using 80% of the dataset for training, 10% for validation and 10% for testing. 

Hyperparameters used for training are described here:
- Learning Rate: 2e-5  
- Learning Rate Decay: Linear  
- Weight Decay: 0.01  
- Warmup Portion: 0.06  
- Batch Size: 128  
- Number of Steps: 25k steps  
- Adam ε: 1e-6  
- Adam β<sub>1</sub>: 0.9  
- Adam β<sub>2</sub>: 0.999  

The **best performing epoch (considering macro-averaged F1 with *strict* matching criteria) was used to select the model**. 

### Evaluation

The model's performance was evaluated on a 10% of the dataset. 

| **Model**                | **Exact F1** | **Partial F1** |
|--------------------------|--------------|----------------|
| Semicolon split (baseline) | .793        | .907          |
| RoBERTa                  | .929        | .981          |
| XLM                      | .931        | .978          |
| AffilRoBERTa             | **.938**    | **.981**      |
| AffilXLM                 | .927        | .979          |

All the numbers reported above represent F1-score with *strict* and *partial* match, when both the boundaries and types of the entities match.

## Additional information

### Authors 

- SIRIS Lab, Research Division of SIRIS Academic, Barcelona, Spain
- LaSTUS Lab, TALN Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

### Contact

For further information, send an email to either <nicolau.duransilva@sirisacademic.com> or <info@sirisacademic.com>.

### License

This work is distributed under a [Apache License, Version 2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0).

### Funding

This work was partially funded and supporter by:
- Industrial Doctorates Plan of the Department of Research and Universities of the Generalitat de Catalunya, by Departament de Recerca i Universitats de la Generalitat de Catalunya (ajuts SGR-Cat 2021),
- Maria de Maeztu Units of Excellence Programme CEX2021-001195-M, funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033
- EU HORIZON SciLake (Grant Agreement 101058573)
- EU HORIZON ERINIA (Grant Agreement 101060930)

### Citation

```bibtex
@inproceedings{duran-silva-etal-2024-affilgood,
    title = "{A}ffil{G}ood: Building reliable institution name disambiguation tools to improve scientific literature analysis",
    author = "Duran-Silva, Nicolau  and
      Accuosto, Pablo  and
      Przyby{\l}a, Piotr  and
      Saggion, Horacio",
    editor = "Ghosal, Tirthankar  and
      Singh, Amanpreet  and
      Waard, Anita  and
      Mayr, Philipp  and
      Naik, Aakanksha  and
      Weller, Orion  and
      Lee, Yoonjoo  and
      Shen, Shannon  and
      Qin, Yanxia",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP 2024)",
    month = aug,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.sdp-1.13",
    pages = "135--144",
}
```

### Disclaimer

<details>
<summary>Click to expand</summary>

The model published in this repository is intended for a generalist purpose 
and is made available to third parties under a Apache v2.0 License.

Please keep in mind that the model may have bias and/or any other undesirable distortions. 
When third parties deploy or provide systems and/or services to other parties using this model 
(or a system based on it) or become users of the model itself, they should note that it is under 
their responsibility to mitigate the risks arising from its use and, in any event, to comply with 
applicable regulations, including regulations regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence.

In no event shall the owners and creators of the model be liable for any results arising from the use made by third parties.
</details>