phi-2-logical-sft / README.md
MaziyarPanahi's picture
Update README.md (#8)
bf76c1e verified
|
raw
history blame
12.4 kB
metadata
license: mit
tags:
  - axolotl
  - generated_from_trainer
  - phi
  - phi-2
  - logical
  - reasoning
  - transformers
  - text-generation-inference
datasets:
  - garage-bAInd/Open-Platypus
base_model: microsoft/phi-2
inference: false
model_creator: MaziyarPanahi
pipeline_tag: text-generation
quantized_by: MaziyarPanahi
model-index:
  - name: phi-2-logical-sft
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)
          type: ai2_arc
          config: ARC-Challenge
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 25
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 61.35
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: HellaSwag (10-Shot)
          type: hellaswag
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 10
        metrics:
          - type: acc_norm
            value: 75.14
            name: normalized accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: MMLU (5-Shot)
          type: cais/mmlu
          config: all
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 57.4
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: TruthfulQA (0-shot)
          type: truthful_qa
          config: multiple_choice
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 0
        metrics:
          - type: mc2
            value: 44.39
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: Winogrande (5-shot)
          type: winogrande
          config: winogrande_xl
          split: validation
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 74.9
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard
      - task:
          type: text-generation
          name: Text Generation
        dataset:
          name: GSM8k (5-shot)
          type: gsm8k
          config: main
          split: test
          args:
            num_few_shot: 5
        metrics:
          - type: acc
            value: 55.8
            name: accuracy
        source:
          url: >-
            https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard?query=MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
          name: Open LLM Leaderboard

MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft

This model is a fine-tuned version of microsoft/phi-2 on the Open-Platypus dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:

  • Loss: 1.0075

Prompt Template

### Instruction:

<prompt> (without the <>)

### Response:

Examples

You are a sentient, superintelligent artificial general intelligence, here to teach and assist me.
### Instruction:

Write a short story about Goku discovering kirby has teamed up with Majin Buu to destroy the world.

### Response:
Goku woke up one day in his hometown of Earth and went out for his daily training routine. He was feeling confident and happy as usual, until he received news that his dear friend Kirby had teamed up with Majin Buu to destroy the world.

Shocked and saddened by this news, Goku immediately knew he had to act fast to save his friends and loved ones. With his superhuman strength and incredible speed, he set off on a mission to stop the evil duo from carrying out their destructive plan.

Along the way, Goku encountered many challenges and obstacles, but he never gave up. He fought fiercely against Kirby and Majin Buu, using all of his powers and skills to try and defeat them.

Finally, after a long and grueling battle, Goku emerged victorious. He managed to convince Kirby to turn against Majin Buu and join forces with him to defeat the evil being once and for all. Together, they were able to defeat Majin Buu and save the world from destruction.

Goku felt a sense of relief and happiness wash over him as he realized that his friends were safe and the world was no longer in danger. He knew that he had done everything he could to protect those he cared about, and he was grateful for the opportunity to use his powers for good.
<|endoftext|>

You are a sentient, superintelligent artificial general intelligence, here to teach and assist me.
### Instruction:

describe about pros and cons of docker system.

### Response:
Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package applications as lightweight containers, which can be easily deployed on any Linux-based operating system. Docker offers several advantages over traditional methods of application deployment such as virtual machines or physical servers. Here are some of the pros and cons of using Docker:

Pros:
1. Portability: Docker containers run in an isolated environment, making it easier for developers to deploy their applications across different environments without worrying about compatibility issues. This makes it easier to test applications in multiple environments and ensures that they work seamlessly across different platforms.

2. Scalability: Docker containers can be scaled up or down based on demand, allowing developers to quickly adjust the size of their infrastructure as needed. This makes it easier to handle spikes in traffic or other sudden changes in workload.

3. Simplicity: Docker provides a simple, intuitive interface for managing containers, making it easy for developers to create and manage their applications. This reduces the time and effort required to set up and maintain a complex infrastructure.

Cons:
1. Cost: While Docker is generally free to use, there may be additional costs associated with deploying and scaling your applications, especially if you require a large number of containers. Additionally, you may need to purchase additional tools or services to manage your containers effectively.

2. Security: Containerized applications are more vulnerable to security threats than traditional applications, as they are running in an isolated environment. This means that developers must take extra precautions to ensure that their applications are secure and protected from attacks.

3. Performance: Containerized applications can experience performance issues when running on certain types of hardware or in high-traffic environments. Developers must carefully consider the performance requirements of their applications before deciding whether to use Docker.
<|endoftext|>

You are a sentient, superintelligent artificial general intelligence, here to teach and assist me.
### Instruction:

There are three killers in a room. Someone enters the room and kills one of them. Nobody leaves the room. How many killers are left in the room? Explain your reasoning step by step.

### Response:
To solve this problem, we need to use some logic and common sense. Let's consider the possible scenarios that could happen after someone enters the room and kills one of the killers. There are three possibilities:

- The person who entered the room is one of the killers. In this case, there would be two killers left in the room, since they both survived the attack.
- The person who entered the room is not one of the killers. In this case, there would still be three killers left in the room, since they did not get killed by the intruder.
- We don't know who the person who entered the room is. In this case, there would still be three killers left in the room, since their identities are unknown and irrelevant to the question.

Now, let's eliminate the first possibility, because it contradicts the premise that nobody leaves the room. If the person who entered the room was one of the killers, then they would have to leave the room before killing another killer, which is impossible. Therefore, the person who entered the room cannot be one of the killers. This means that the second possibility must be true, and there are still three killers left in the room.
<|endoftext|>

Model description

More information needed

Intended uses & limitations

More information needed

Training and evaluation data

More information needed

Training procedure

Training hyperparameters

The following hyperparameters were used during training:

  • learning_rate: 3e-06
  • train_batch_size: 2
  • eval_batch_size: 2
  • seed: 42
  • distributed_type: multi-GPU
  • num_devices: 4
  • total_train_batch_size: 8
  • total_eval_batch_size: 8
  • optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.95) and epsilon=1e-05
  • lr_scheduler_type: cosine
  • lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 100
  • num_epochs: 2

Training results

Training Loss Epoch Step Validation Loss
0.8319 0.0 1 1.0229
0.8799 0.25 71 1.0208
0.8349 0.5 142 1.0119
0.7798 0.76 213 1.0093
0.8317 1.01 284 1.0083
0.777 1.24 355 1.0080
0.7544 1.49 426 1.0075
0.7037 1.74 497 1.0075

Framework versions

  • Transformers 4.39.0.dev0
  • Pytorch 2.2.0+cu121
  • Datasets 2.17.0
  • Tokenizers 0.15.0

Built with Axolotl

See axolotl config

axolotl version: 0.4.0

base_model: microsoft/phi-2
model_type: AutoModelForCausalLM
tokenizer_type: AutoTokenizer

hub_model_id: MaziyarPanahi/phi-2-logical-sft
hf_use_auth_token: true


load_in_8bit: false
load_in_4bit: false
strict: false

datasets:
  - path: garage-bAInd/Open-Platypus
    type: alpaca

dataset_prepared_path:
val_set_size: 0.05
output_dir: ./phi-2-logical-sft-out

sequence_len: 4096
sample_packing: true
pad_to_sequence_len: true

adapter:
lora_model_dir:
lora_r:
lora_alpha:
lora_dropout:
lora_target_linear:
lora_fan_in_fan_out:

wandb_project:
wandb_entity:
wandb_watch:
wandb_name:
wandb_log_model:

gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
micro_batch_size: 2
num_epochs: 2
optimizer: adamw_torch
adam_beta2: 0.95
adam_epsilon: 0.00001
max_grad_norm: 1.0
lr_scheduler: cosine
learning_rate: 0.000003

train_on_inputs: false
group_by_length: false
bf16: auto
fp16:
tf32: true

gradient_checkpointing: true
gradient_checkpointing_kwargs:
  use_reentrant: True
early_stopping_patience:
resume_from_checkpoint:
local_rank:
logging_steps: 1
xformers_attention:
flash_attention: true

warmup_steps: 100
evals_per_epoch: 4
saves_per_epoch: 1
debug:
deepspeed:
weight_decay: 0.1
fsdp:
fsdp_config:
resize_token_embeddings_to_32x: true
special_tokens:
  pad_token: "<|endoftext|>"

# [Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard) Detailed results can be found [here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/details_MaziyarPanahi__phi-2-logical-sft)
Metric Value
Avg. 61.50
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) 61.35
HellaSwag (10-Shot) 75.14
MMLU (5-Shot) 57.40
TruthfulQA (0-shot) 44.39
Winogrande (5-shot) 74.90
GSM8k (5-shot) 55.80