File size: 1,483 Bytes
770b4c2 d371ad8 fa76930 d371ad8 fa76930 d371ad8 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 |
---
license: mit
---
## EQA-PMR-large
EQA-PMR-large is initialized with [PMR-large](https://huggingface.co/DAMO-NLP-SG/PMR-large) and further fine-tuned on 6 Extractive Question Answering (EQA) training data from training split of [MRQA](https://aclanthology.org/D19-5801).
The model performance on the in-dev sets are:
|| SQuAD | NewsQA | HotpotQA | NaturalQuestions | TriviaQA | SearchQA |
|--|-------|-------|-------|------------|--------|--------|
|RoBERTa-large (single-task model)| 94.2 | 73.8 | 81.6|83.3| 85.1 | 85.7 |
|PMR-large (single-task model)| 94.5 | 74.0 | 83.6 | 83.8 | 85.1 | 88.3 |
|EQA-PMR-large (multi-task model)| 94.2 | 73.7 | 66.9 | 82.3 | 85.4 | 88.7 |
Note that the performance of RoBERTa-large and PMR-large are single-task fine-tuning, while EQA-PMR-large is a multi-task fine-tuned model.
As it is fine-tuned on multiple datasets, we believe that EQA-PMR-large has a better generalization capability to other EQA tasks than PMR-large and RoBERTa-large.
### How to use
You can try the codes from [this repo](https://github.com/DAMO-NLP-SG/PMR/QA) for both training and inference.
### BibTeX entry and citation info
```bibtxt
@article{xu2022clozing,
title={From Clozing to Comprehending: Retrofitting Pre-trained Language Model to Pre-trained Machine Reader},
author={Xu, Weiwen and Li, Xin and Zhang, Wenxuan and Zhou, Meng and Bing, Lidong and Lam, Wai and Si, Luo},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04755},
year={2022}
}
``` |