|
--- |
|
license: apache-2.0 |
|
language: |
|
- en |
|
- de |
|
- es |
|
- fr |
|
- it |
|
- ja |
|
- ko |
|
- pl |
|
- ru |
|
- tr |
|
- zh |
|
- ar |
|
--- |
|
<h1 align="center">UForm</h1> |
|
<h3 align="center"> |
|
Multi-Modal Inference Library<br/> |
|
For Semantic Search Applications<br/> |
|
</h3> |
|
|
|
--- |
|
UForm is a Multi-Modal Modal Inference package, designed to encode Multi-Lingual Texts, Images, and, soon, Audio, Video, and Documents, into a shared vector space! |
|
|
|
This is model card of the __Multilingual model__ (12 languages) with: |
|
|
|
* 12 layers BERT (8 layers for unimodal encoding and rest layers for multimodal encoding) |
|
* ViT-B/16 (image resolution is 224x224) |
|
|
|
The model was trained on balanced multilingual dataset. |
|
|
|
If you need English model, check [this](https://huggingface.co/unum-cloud/uform-vl-english). |
|
|
|
If you need more languages, check [this](https://huggingface.co/unum-cloud/uform-vl-multilingual-v2). |
|
|
|
## Evaluation |
|
|
|
The following metrics were obtained with multimodal re-ranking: |
|
|
|
**Monolingual** |
|
|
|
| Dataset | Recall@1 | Recall@5 | Recall@10 | |
|
| :-------- | ------: | --------: | --------: | |
|
| Zero-Shot Flickr | 0.558 | 0.813 | 0.874 | |
|
| MS-COCO (train split was in training data) | 0.401 | 0.680 | 0.781 | |
|
|
|
**Multilingual ([XTD-10](https://github.com/adobe-research/Cross-lingual-Test-Dataset-XTD10))** |
|
|
|
Metric is recall@10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| English | German | Spanish | French | Italian | Russian | Japanese | Korean | Turkish | Chinese | Polish | |
|
| -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: | -------: |
|
96.3 | 92.6 | 94.5 | 94.4 | 94.4 | 90.4 | 88.3 | 92.5 | 94.4 | 93.6 | 95.0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
## Installation |
|
|
|
```bash |
|
pip install uform |
|
``` |
|
|
|
## Usage |
|
|
|
To load the model: |
|
|
|
```python |
|
import uform |
|
|
|
model = uform.get_model('unum-cloud/uform-vl-english') |
|
``` |
|
|
|
To encode data: |
|
|
|
```python |
|
from PIL import Image |
|
|
|
text = 'a small red panda in a zoo' |
|
image = Image.open('red_panda.jpg') |
|
|
|
image_data = model.preprocess_image(image) |
|
text_data = model.preprocess_text(text) |
|
|
|
image_embedding = model.encode_image(image_data) |
|
text_embedding = model.encode_text(text_data) |
|
joint_embedding = model.encode_multimodal(image=image_data, text=text_data) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
To get features: |
|
|
|
```python |
|
image_features, image_embedding = model.encode_image(image_data, return_features=True) |
|
text_features, text_embedding = model.encode_text(text_data, return_features=True) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
These features can later be used to produce joint multimodal encodings faster, as the first layers of the transformer can be skipped: |
|
|
|
```python |
|
joint_embedding = model.encode_multimodal( |
|
image_features=image_features, |
|
text_features=text_features, |
|
attention_mask=text_data['attention_mask'] |
|
) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
There are two options to calculate semantic compatibility between an image and a text: [Cosine Similarity](#cosine-similarity) and [Matching Score](#matching-score). |
|
|
|
### Cosine Similarity |
|
|
|
```python |
|
import torch.nn.functional as F |
|
|
|
similarity = F.cosine_similarity(image_embedding, text_embedding) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
The `similarity` will belong to the `[-1, 1]` range, `1` meaning the absolute match. |
|
|
|
__Pros__: |
|
|
|
- Computationally cheap. |
|
- Only unimodal embeddings are required, unimodal encoding is faster than joint encoding. |
|
- Suitable for retrieval in large collections. |
|
|
|
__Cons__: |
|
|
|
- Takes into account only coarse-grained features. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Matching Score |
|
|
|
Unlike cosine similarity, unimodal embedding are not enough. |
|
Joint embedding will be needed and the resulting `score` will belong to the `[0, 1]` range, `1` meaning the absolute match. |
|
|
|
```python |
|
score = model.get_matching_scores(joint_embedding) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
__Pros__: |
|
|
|
- Joint embedding captures fine-grained features. |
|
- Suitable for re-ranking – sorting retrieval result. |
|
|
|
__Cons__: |
|
|
|
- Resource-intensive. |
|
- Not suitable for retrieval in large collections. |