Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -17,6 +17,17 @@ co2_eq_emissions:
|
|
| 17 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 18 |
---
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
# Model Trained Using AutoTrain
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- Problem type: Binary Classification
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 18 |
---
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
This app is a proof-of-concept demonstration of using a ViT model to predict whether an artistic image was generated using AI.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
It was created in October 2022, and as such, the training data did not include any samples generated by Midjourney 5, SDXL, or DALLE-3. It still may be able to correctly identify samples from these more recent models due to being trained on outputs of their predecessors.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
Furthermore the intended scope of this tool is artistic images; that is to say, it is not a deepfake photo detector, and general computer imagery (webcams, screenshots, etc.) may throw it off.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
In general, this tool can only serve as one of many potential indicators that an image was AI-generated. Images scoring as very probably artificial (e.g. 90% or higher) could be referred to a human expert for further investigation, if needed.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
For more information please see the blog post describing this project at:
|
| 29 |
+
https://medium.com/@matthewmaybe/can-an-ai-learn-to-identify-ai-art-545d9d6af226
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
# Model Trained Using AutoTrain
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
- Problem type: Binary Classification
|