awacke1 commited on
Commit
ca503ed
1 Parent(s): 83aba54

Update app.py

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. app.py +1 -1
app.py CHANGED
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ title="Question Answer Deverbal Nominalization"
15
  examples = [
16
  [models[1], "Physics is the lowest form of rationalization followed by chemistry which orders memory of the universe by bonds and selection. Everything else is but a recommendation. People can break the law, but nobody can break the laws of physics. ", 0.45],
17
  [models[1], "To boil something down to most fundamental principles, things that we are most confident of are true at a foundational level. That sets your axiomatic base, and then you reason up from there. And then you cross check your conclusion against the axiomatic truth. Some basics in physics would be like are violating conservation of energy or momentum or something like that, then it's not gonna work.", 0.65],
18
- [models[0], "So first for any kind of technology problem you have to sort of just make sure you're not violating physics. First principles analysis, I think, is something that can be applied to really any walk of life, anything really.", 0.65],
19
  [models[1], "What is the perfect arrangement of atoms that would be the best possible product? And now let us try to figure out how to get the atoms in that shape. I mean, it sounds, its almost like Rick and Morty absurd until you start to really think about it. And you really should think about it in this way cause everything else is kind of, if you think you might fall victim to the momentum of the way things are done in the past", 0.5]
20
  ]
21
 
 
15
  examples = [
16
  [models[1], "Physics is the lowest form of rationalization followed by chemistry which orders memory of the universe by bonds and selection. Everything else is but a recommendation. People can break the law, but nobody can break the laws of physics. ", 0.45],
17
  [models[1], "To boil something down to most fundamental principles, things that we are most confident of are true at a foundational level. That sets your axiomatic base, and then you reason up from there. And then you cross check your conclusion against the axiomatic truth. Some basics in physics would be like are violating conservation of energy or momentum or something like that, then it's not gonna work.", 0.65],
18
+ [models[0], "So first for any kind of technology problem you have to sort of just make sure you're not violating physics. First principles analysis, I think, is something that can be applied to really any walk of life, anything really.", 0.58],
19
  [models[1], "What is the perfect arrangement of atoms that would be the best possible product? And now let us try to figure out how to get the atoms in that shape. I mean, it sounds, its almost like Rick and Morty absurd until you start to really think about it. And you really should think about it in this way cause everything else is kind of, if you think you might fall victim to the momentum of the way things are done in the past", 0.5]
20
  ]
21