textgraphs / docs /rubric.md
Paco Nathan
A new start
91eaff6

A newer version of the Streamlit SDK is available: 1.36.0

Upgrade

Appendix: ML OSS Evaluation Rubric

The following checklist provides an evaluation rubric for open source code related to machine learning research. For any given code repository, tally a score based on these questions:

  • Q1: Does the repository use a business-friendly license?
  • Q2: Does the code install correctly with either pip or conda package managers?
  • Q3: Are the library dependencies reasonably current, not using pinned versions for popular libraries?
  • Q4: Has the project provided sample code which runs without exceptions?
  • Q5: Can the sample code reproduce the published results of the research?
  • Q6: Does the library provide affordances for data integration, i.e., it's not optimized for a particular benchmark?
  • Q7: Can the code be called programmatically as a library, i.e., not run primarily through a command line interface (CLI), and not requiring container/microservice orchestration?
  • Q8: Will the library and its dependencies pass a reasonable level of security audit without structural changes?
  • Q9: Does the code support concurrency and parallelization?
  • Q10: Has the repo been maintained within the past six months?

Dependency Evaluations

Based on this checklist, the dependencies integrated within this project scores as follows:

rubric | OpenNRE | pulp | qwikidata | REBEL | spaCy | Spotlight | SpanMarker | transformers --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- Q1 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q2 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q3 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q4 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q5 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q6 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q7 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q8 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q9 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x Q10 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x

OpenNRE

pulp

qwikidata

REBEL

spaCy

spaCy-DBpedia-Spotlight

SpanMarker

transformers

There were many other open source code projects which were evaluated but scored < 8 and were therefore considered unusable for our work.