Update README.md

README.md

@@ -301,16 +301,7 @@ This is more efficient than ZS since it requires only one forward pass per examp
 
 ## Evaluation
 This model ranked 1st among all models with the microsoft/deberta-v3-base architecture according to the IBM model recycling evaluation.
-Results:
-[Evaluation on 36 datasets](https://ibm.github.io/model-recycling/model_gain_chart?avg=1.41&mnli_lp=nan&20_newsgroup=0.63&ag_news=0.46&amazon_reviews_multi=-0.40&anli=0.94&boolq=2.55&cb=10.71&cola=0.49&copa=10.60&dbpedia=0.10&esnli=-0.25&financial_phrasebank=1.31&imdb=-0.17&isear=0.63&mnli=0.42&mrpc=-0.23&multirc=1.73&poem_sentiment=0.77&qnli=0.12&qqp=-0.05&rotten_tomatoes=0.67&rte=2.13&sst2=0.01&sst_5bins=-0.02&stsb=1.39&trec_coarse=0.24&trec_fine=0.18&tweet_ev_emoji=0.62&tweet_ev_emotion=0.43&tweet_ev_hate=1.84&tweet_ev_irony=1.43&tweet_ev_offensive=0.17&tweet_ev_sentiment=0.08&wic=-1.78&wnli=3.03&wsc=9.95&yahoo_answers=0.17&model_name=sileod%2Fdeberta-v3-base_tasksource-420&base_name=microsoft%2Fdeberta-v3-base) using sileod/deberta-v3-base_tasksource-420 as a base model yields average score of 80.45 in comparison to 79.04 by microsoft/deberta-v3-base.
-
-
-
-|   20_newsgroup |   ag_news |   amazon_reviews_multi |    anli |   boolq |      cb |    cola |   copa |   dbpedia |   esnli |   financial_phrasebank |   imdb |   isear |    mnli |    mrpc |   multirc |   poem_sentiment |    qnli |     qqp |   rotten_tomatoes |     rte |    sst2 |   sst_5bins |    stsb |   trec_coarse |   trec_fine |   tweet_ev_emoji |   tweet_ev_emotion |   tweet_ev_hate |   tweet_ev_irony |   tweet_ev_offensive |   tweet_ev_sentiment |     wic |    wnli |     wsc |   yahoo_answers |
-|---------------:|----------:|-----------------------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|-------:|----------:|--------:|-----------------------:|-------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|----------:|-----------------:|--------:|--------:|------------------:|--------:|--------:|------------:|--------:|--------------:|------------:|-----------------:|-------------------:|----------------:|-----------------:|---------------------:|---------------------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|----------------:|
-|         87.042 |      90.9 |                  66.46 | 59.7188 | 85.5352 | 85.7143 | 87.0566 |     69 |   79.5333 | 91.6735 |                   85.8 | 94.324 | 72.4902 | 90.2055 | 88.9706 |   63.9851 |             87.5 | 93.6299 | 91.7363 |           91.0882 | 84.4765 | 95.0688 |     56.9683 | 91.6654 |            98 |        91.2 |           46.814 |            84.3772 |         58.0471 |            81.25 |              85.2326 |              71.8821 | 69.4357 | 73.2394 | 74.0385 |            72.2 |
-
-For more information, see: [Model Recycling](https://ibm.github.io/model-recycling/)
+https://ibm.github.io/model-recycling/
 
 ### Software and training details
 https://github.com/sileod/tasksource/ \
@@ -318,8 +309,7 @@ https://github.com/sileod/tasknet/ \
 Training code: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1iB4Oxl9_B5W3ZDzXoWJN-olUbqLBxgQS?usp=sharing
 Training took 7 days on RTX6000 24GB gpu.
 
-This is the shared model with the MNLI classifier on top. Datasets including bigbench, Anthropic rlhf, anli... alongside many NLI and classification.
-Each task had a specific CLS embedding, which is dropped 10% of the time to facilitate model use without it. All multiple-choice model used the same classification layers. For classification tasks, models shared weights if their labels matched.
+This is the shared model with the MNLI classifier on top. Each task had a specific CLS embedding, which is dropped 10% of the time to facilitate model use without it. All multiple-choice model used the same classification layers. For classification tasks, models shared weights if their labels matched.
 The number of examples per task was capped to 64k. The model was trained for 45k steps with a batch size of 384, and a peak learning rate of 2e-5.