|
--- |
|
license: mit |
|
base_model: microsoft/deberta-v3-base |
|
tags: |
|
- generated_from_trainer |
|
- calibration |
|
- uncertainty |
|
model-index: |
|
- name: apricot_clustering_trivia_qa_deberta-v3-base_for_vicuna-7b-v1.5 |
|
results: [] |
|
datasets: |
|
- mandarjoshi/trivia_qa |
|
library_name: transformers |
|
--- |
|
|
|
<!-- This model card has been generated automatically according to the information the Trainer had access to. You |
|
should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. --> |
|
|
|
# apricot_clustering_trivia_qa_deberta-v3-base_for_vicuna-7b-v1.5 |
|
|
|
This model is fine-tuned for black-box LLM calibration as part of the π Apricot paper ["Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only"](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05973) (ACL 2024). |
|
|
|
## Model description |
|
|
|
This model is a fine-tuned version of [microsoft/deberta-v3-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/deberta-v3-base) to predict the calibration score for the [lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5](https://huggingface.co/lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5) model on the questions from the trivia_qa dataset. It uses the clustering type of calibration target score. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Intended uses & limitations |
|
|
|
More information needed |
|
|
|
## Training procedure |
|
|
|
### Training hyperparameters |
|
|
|
This model was trained with the code available on the [parameterlab/apricot GitHub repository](https://github.com/parameterlab/apricot) using the following command: |
|
|
|
```shell |
|
python3 run_regression_experiment.py --model-identifier lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5 --dataset-name trivia_qa --device cuda:0 --num-training-steps 600 --num-in-context-samples 10 --data-dir $data_dir --model-save-dir $model_save_dir --result-dir $result_dir --lr 0.00003369 --weight-decay 0.008936 --model-save-dir models --push-to-hub |
|
``` |
|
|
|
### Framework versions |
|
|
|
- Transformers 4.32.0 |
|
- Pytorch 2.0.0+cu117 |
|
- Datasets 2.14.6 |
|
- Tokenizers 0.13.3 |
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
If you find π Apricot models useful for your work, please cite our paper: |
|
|
|
``` latex |
|
@inproceedings{ulmer-etal-2024-calibrating, |
|
title = "Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only", |
|
author = "Ulmer, Dennis and |
|
Gubri, Martin and |
|
Lee, Hwaran and |
|
Yun, Sangdoo and |
|
Oh, Seong", |
|
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and |
|
Martins, Andre and |
|
Srikumar, Vivek", |
|
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)", |
|
month = aug, |
|
year = "2024", |
|
address = "Bangkok, Thailand", |
|
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.824", |
|
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.824", |
|
pages = "15440--15459", |
|
abstract = "As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in user-facing applications, building trust and maintaining safety by accurately quantifying a model{'}s confidence in its prediction becomes even more important. However, finding effective ways to calibrate LLMs{---}especially when the only interface to the models is their generated text{---}remains a challenge. We propose APRICOT (Auxiliary prediction of confidence targets): A method to set confidence targets and train an additional model that predicts an LLM{'}s confidence based on its textual input and output alone. This approach has several advantages: It is conceptually simple, does not require access to the target model beyond its output, does not interfere with the language generation, and has a multitude of potential usages, for instance by verbalizing the predicted confidence or using it to re-prompting the LLM to accurately reflecting its uncertainty. We show how our approach performs competitively in terms of calibration error for white-box and black-box LLMs on closed-book question-answering to detect incorrect LLM answers.", |
|
} |
|
``` |