Accelerate documentation

Using Local SGD with πŸ€— Accelerate

You are viewing v0.30.0 version. A newer version v1.2.1 is available.
Hugging Face's logo
Join the Hugging Face community

and get access to the augmented documentation experience

to get started

Using Local SGD with πŸ€— Accelerate

Local SGD is a technique for distributed training where gradients are not synchronized every step. Thus, each process updates its own version of the model weights and after a given number of steps these weights are synchronized by averaging across all processes. This improves communication efficiency and can lead to substantial training speed up especially when a computer lacks a faster interconnect such as NVLink. Unlike gradient accumulation (where improving communication efficiency requires increasing the effective batch size), Local SGD does not require changing a batch size or a learning rate / schedule. However, if necessary, Local SGD can be combined with gradient accumulation as well.

In this tutorial you will see how to quickly setup Local SGD πŸ€— Accelerate. Compared to a standard Accelerate setup, this requires only two extra lines of code.

This example will use a very simplistic PyTorch training loop that performs gradient accumulation every two batches:

device = "cuda"
model.to(device)

gradient_accumulation_steps = 2

for index, batch in enumerate(training_dataloader):
    inputs, targets = batch
    inputs = inputs.to(device)
    targets = targets.to(device)
    outputs = model(inputs)
    loss = loss_function(outputs, targets)
    loss = loss / gradient_accumulation_steps
    loss.backward()
    if (index + 1) % gradient_accumulation_steps == 0:
        optimizer.step()
        scheduler.step()
        optimizer.zero_grad()

Converting it to πŸ€— Accelerate

First the code shown earlier will be converted to use πŸ€— Accelerate with neither a LocalSGD or a gradient accumulation helper:

+ from accelerate import Accelerator
+ accelerator = Accelerator()

+ model, optimizer, training_dataloader, scheduler = accelerator.prepare(
+     model, optimizer, training_dataloader, scheduler
+ )

  for index, batch in enumerate(training_dataloader):
      inputs, targets = batch
-     inputs = inputs.to(device)
-     targets = targets.to(device)
      outputs = model(inputs)
      loss = loss_function(outputs, targets)
      loss = loss / gradient_accumulation_steps
+     accelerator.backward(loss)
      if (index+1) % gradient_accumulation_steps == 0:
          optimizer.step()
          scheduler.step()

Letting πŸ€— Accelerate handle model synchronization

All that is left now is to let πŸ€— Accelerate handle model parameter synchronization and the gradient accumulation for us. For simplicity let us assume we need to synchronize every 8 steps. This is achieved by adding one with LocalSGD statement and one call local_sgd.step() after every optimizer step:

+local_sgd_steps=8

+with LocalSGD(accelerator=accelerator, model=model, local_sgd_steps=8, enabled=True) as local_sgd:
    for batch in training_dataloader:
        with accelerator.accumulate(model):
            inputs, targets = batch
            outputs = model(inputs)
            loss = loss_function(outputs, targets)
            accelerator.backward(loss)
            optimizer.step()
            scheduler.step()
            optimizer.zero_grad()
+           local_sgd.step()

Under the hood, the Local SGD code disables automatic gradient synchronization (but accumulation still works as expected!). Instead it averages model parameters every local_sgd_steps steps (as well as at the end of the training loop).

Limitations

The current implementation works only with basic multi-GPU (or multi-CPU) training without, e.g., DeepSpeed..

References

Although we are not aware of the true origins of this simple approach, the idea of local SGD is quite old and goes back to at least:

Zhang, J., De Sa, C., Mitliagkas, I., & RΓ©, C. (2016). Parallel SGD: When does averaging help?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07365.

We credit the term Local SGD to the following paper (but there might be earlier references we are not aware of).

Stich, Sebastian Urban. β€œLocal SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little.” ICLR 2019-International Conference on Learning Representations. No. CONF. 2019.

< > Update on GitHub