divinetaco's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub (#1)
93547a3 verified
metadata
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
base_model:
  - Netrve/Miqu-PlayMaid-70B-v0.1
  - ShinojiResearch/Senku-70B
library_name: transformers
tags:
  - not-for-all-audiences
  - nsfw
  - mergekit
  - merge

aranea-tenebris-120b-v1.0-gguf

aka Netrve/Miqu-PlayMaid-70B-v0.1 + ShinojiResearch/Senku-70B
Model merge for uncensored creative writing and rp

image/png

A mergekit frankenmerge based on Netrve/Miqu-PlayMaid-70B-v0.1 with interleaved layers of ShinojiResearch/Senku-70B.
This was the top performing model from a second series of merge experiments to create a highly coherant creative writing and rp model.
Tests consisted of a series of private DnD scenario benchmarks, with manual comparison of the most promising merges.

A number of different base models, interleave models and layer offsets were compared.
This model outperformed a number of other popular 70B+ models and merges in both creativity and coherancy tests. It was (briefly) compared to Mixtral 8x22B running 2/3/4 experts.

  • Usable context: ~32768
  • Recommended prompt format: Alpaca
  • Layers: 137

Quantization

llama.cpp imatrix.dat

Will upload a few quants when bandwidth permits.

Testing

Two different writing styles were considered for each testing scenario:

  • Completions for 3rd person narration. No character role was assumed.
  • Completions for 1st and 2nd person turn based (out-of-order) rp. A character role was assumed by the model, but narration of minor characters and events was encouraged.

Tests assumed a mature audience, but a range of scenarios were constructed.
Thematic inconsistancy or bias in character behaviour was penalized heavily.

Models showing the following were penalized during manual comparison:

  • Consistently short responses.
  • Laziness or readily gave up on solving a character problem.
  • Overly malleable, where characters could not hold opinions or beliefs.
  • Passiveness or an inability to drive the narrative.
  • Persistent repeats. Bad merges tend to latch onto and reuse specific keywords.
  • Ignoring or missing obvious scenario solutions.
  • Impersonating other major characters out of turn during rp tests.
  • Faliure to follow a character's description. This criteria is pretty broad, and could include things like character skills, refusals etc.
  • Major inconsistencies in scenes or recall. Note - invention of thematically consistant detail was encouraged.

Interesting observations from benchmarking

  • 10 layer interleave stride with a 20 layer interleave width consistently outperformed alternative combinations for coherancy.
  • 8 layer interleave stride with a 16 layer interleave width consistantly outperformed alternative combinations for creativity whilst remaining reasonably coherant.
  • Regular stride intervals are not optimal. In particular offsetting the first or last set of base models offets often improved metrics.
  • Goliath-120B is still a good standard for coherancy below 4096 context. A few miqu-1 merges are comparable, but testing found a small amount coherancy could be sacrificed for notable creativity improvements.