Datasets:
Tasks:
Tabular Classification
Modalities:
Image
Formats:
imagefolder
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -127,6 +127,39 @@ The full analysis notebook is available here:
|
|
| 127 |
👉 [Open The Notebook in Google Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1YxqN2Urjli1ToxtYO9LtUztXxb5SeEcb?usp=sharing)
|
| 128 |
---
|
| 129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130 |
## 👤 Author
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
**Yonathan Levy**
|
|
|
|
| 127 |
👉 [Open The Notebook in Google Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1YxqN2Urjli1ToxtYO9LtUztXxb5SeEcb?usp=sharing)
|
| 128 |
---
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
+
## ❓ Questions & Answers
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
**Q1: Is the app market democratic — can any app go viral?**
|
| 133 |
+
No. 86% of apps released in 2020 never exceeded 10K installs. The market is winner-takes-all: less than 1% of apps reached the Viral tier (1M+ installs), and their median install count is roughly 1,000x that of Medium-tier apps.
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
**Q2: Does a higher rating mean more installs?**
|
| 136 |
+
Surprisingly, no. Rating and Installs show a weak negative linear correlation (r = −0.31). Viral apps attract polarising reviews — millions of users means more critics. Quality alone is not the driver; distribution and visibility are.
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
**Q3: Does monetization strategy matter?**
|
| 139 |
+
Yes — it's the strongest predictor in the dataset. Ad-based and Hybrid (ads + IAP) apps reach significantly higher install counts than Pure Free or Premium apps. The price barrier of Premium apps dramatically limits reach.
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
**Q4: Does having a rating at all matter?**
|
| 142 |
+
Yes, dramatically. Apps with a visible rating contain virtually all Medium and Viral tier apps. This reflects a chicken-and-egg dynamic: installs drive ratings, ratings drive visibility, visibility drives more installs.
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
**Q5: Does the Rating–Installs relationship hold across all categories?**
|
| 145 |
+
No. The global r = −0.31 masks very different dynamics per category. In Tools and Business, there is almost no relationship. In Entertainment and Games, high-install apps cluster at specific rating bands.
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
---
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
## 🔧 Key Decisions
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
| Decision | What I did | Why |
|
| 152 |
+
|----------|-----------|-----|
|
| 153 |
+
| **Subset to 2020** | Filtered 544,882 apps released in 2020 | Consistent 6–18 month measurement window for all apps |
|
| 154 |
+
| **Stratified sampling** | Cochran's formula → 9,436 rows, sampled proportionally by Category | Preserve category distribution while reducing computational load |
|
| 155 |
+
| **Rating = 0 → NaN** | Replaced zero ratings with NaN | Zero means unrated, not bad — imputing would distort analysis |
|
| 156 |
+
| **Rating not imputed** | Kept 54.9% of Rating as NaN, created `has_rating` instead | Missing rating is a meaningful signal, not random noise |
|
| 157 |
+
| **Size_MB winsorized** | Capped at 65.8 MB (IQR upper fence) | Extreme sizes are edge cases that distort correlations |
|
| 158 |
+
| **Installs kept as-is** | No capping on extreme install counts | Viral outliers ARE the story — removing them defeats the purpose |
|
| 159 |
+
| **log_installs** | Applied log(1 + Installs) transformation | Raw installs follow a power-law — log scale is needed for analysis |
|
| 160 |
+
| **monetization_model** | Combined Free + Ad Supported + In App Purchases into 5 categories | Three boolean columns carry more meaning as a single business model feature |
|
| 161 |
+
```
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
## 👤 Author
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
**Yonathan Levy**
|