meskipun dinasti ini berasal dari etnis turki asia tengah, namun telah sangat terpengaruh persia dalam bidang bahasa, budaya, sastra, serta adat kebiasaan,david christian: a history of russia, central asia and mongolia; blackwell publishing, 1998; pg. 370: "though turkic in origin [...] alp tegin, sebuk tegin and mahmud were all thoroughly persianized".j. meri (hg.), medieval islamic civilization: an encyclopedia, "ghaznavids", london u.a. 2006, p. 294: "the ghaznavids inherited samanid administrative, political, and cultural traditions and laid the foundations for a persianate state in northern india.
..."sydney nettleton fisher and william ochsenwald, the middle east: a history: volume 1, (mcgraw-hill, 1997); "forced to flee from the samanid domain, he captured ghaznah and in 961 established the famed persianate sunnite ghaznavid empire of afghanistan and the punjab in india".meisami, julie scott, persian historiography to the end of the twelfth century, (edinburgh university press, 1999), 143.
nizam al-mulk also attempted to organise the saljuq administration according to the persianate ghaznavid model.. sehingga beberapa ahli memandangnya lebih sebagai suatu "dinasti persia" daripada turki.b. spuler: the disintegration of the caliphate in the east; in: p.m. holt, ann k.s. lambton, bernard lewis (hrsg.): the central islamic lands from pre-islamic times to the first world war; the cambridge history of islam, vol. 1a; cambridge: cambridge university press, 1970; pg. 147: "one of the effects of the renaissance of the persian spirit evoked by this work was that the ghaznavids were also persianized and thereby became a persian dynasty."m.a.
amir-moezzi, "shahrbanu", encyclopaedia iranica, online edition: "... here one might bear in mind that non-persian dynasties such as the ghaznavids, saljuqs and ilkhanids were rapidly to adopt the persian language and have their origins traced back to the ancient kings of persia rather than to turkish heroes or muslim saints ..."b. spuler, "the disintegration of the caliphate in the east", in the cambridge history of islam, vol. ia: the central islamic lands from pre-islamic times to the first world war, ed. by p.m.
holt, ann k.s. lambton, and bernard lewis (cambridge: cambridge university press, 1970).
pg 147: one of the effects of the renaissance of the persian spirit evoked by this work was that the ghaznavids were also persianized and thereby became a persian dynasty.anatoly m khazanov, andr wink, "nomads in the sedentary world", routledge, 2padhte padhte to pagla jayega aadmi, a history of russia, central asia and mongolia, blackwell publishing, 1998.
pg 370: "though turkic in origin and, apparently in speech, alp tegin, sebuk tegin and mahmud were all thoroughly persianized"robert l. canfield, turko-persia in historical perspective, cambridge university press, 1991.
pg 8: "the ghaznavids (9891149) were essentially persianized turks who in manner of the pre-islamic persians encouraged the development of high culture"john perry.
the caucasus, vol. 5, (2001), pp. 193200.
the historical role of turkish in relation to persian of iran. excerpt: "we should distinguish two complementary ways in which the advent of the turks affected the language map of iran. first, since the turkish-speaking rulers of most iranian polities from the ghaznavids and seljuks onward were already iranized and patronized persian literature in their domains, the expansion of turk-ruled empires served to expand the territorial domain of written persian into the conquered areas, notably anatolia and central and south asia.
secondly, the influx of massive turkish-speaking populations (culminating with the rank and file of the mongol armies) and their settlement in large areas of iran (particularly in azerbaijan and the northwest), progressively turkicized local speakers of persian, kurdish and other iranian languages."(john perry.
the caucasus, vol. 5, (2001), pp. 193200.
the historical role of turkish in relation to persian of iran)
anak sabuktigin, mahmud dari ghazni, mendeklarasikan independensinya dari kekaisaran samaniyahthe early ghaznavids, c.e. bosworth, the cambridge history of iran, vol. 4, ed. c. e. bosworth, (cambridge university press, 1975), p. 170 dan meluaskan wilayah kekaisaran ghaznawiyah hingga ke amu darya, sungai indus, dan samudera hindia di sebelah timur, dan ke rey dan hamadan di sebelah barat.
di bawah pemerintahan mas'ud i, dinasti ghaznawiyah mulai kehilangan kendali atas wilayah-wilayah baratnya kepada dinasti seljuk setelah pertempuran dandanaqan, sehingga kekuasaannya menjadi terbatas pada wilayah yang saat ini adalah afghanistan, punjab, pakistan, dan balochistan.truths and lies: irony and intrigue in the trkh-i bayhaq, soheila amirsoleimani, iranian studies, vol. 32, no. 2, the uses of guile: literary and historical moments (spring, 1999), 243.ghaznawids, b. spuler, the encyclopedia of islam, vol ii, ed. b.lewis, c. pellat and j. schacht, (brill, 1991), 1051.
pada tahun 1151, sultan bahram shah kehilangan ghazni ke tangan ala al-din husayn dari dinasti ghuriyah.
kategori:bekas negara di asia