premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Leslie is not cheeky. | neutral |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Jonathan is not emotional. | entailment |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Jonathan is emotional. | contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Blanca is not emotional. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Blanca is emotional. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Leslie is cheeky. | neutral |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kendall is not lucky. | neutral |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Jonathan is cheeky. | contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Matthew is electronic. | contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kianna is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Jonathan is not electronic. | entailment |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Blanca is cheeky. | neutral |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Harlan is not angry. | neutral |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kendall is not angry. | contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Blanca is not cloudy. | entailment |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kendall is emotional. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kianna is electronic. | contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Jonathan is cloudy. | entailment |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kianna is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall is angry.
Kianna is not cheeky.
Blanca is not emotional.
Jonathan is cloudy.
Kianna is emotional.
Jonathan is not emotional.
Kianna is angry.
Kendall is emotional.
Harlan is electronic.
Kianna is not cloudy.
Matthew is not electronic.If Jonathan is electronic, then Leslie is angry and Matthew is not cheeky, and vice versa.
Someone who is lucky is always not electronic.
Someone who is cheeky is always both not lucky and not cloudy.
If Blanca is not emotional and Leslie is angry, then Blanca is not electronic.
Someone who is angry is always not emotional.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Leslie is not emotional.
Kendall being not emotional or Jonathan being not cloudy implies that Jonathan is not cheeky.
Harlan being not cloudy and Jonathan being lucky imply that Harlan is cheeky.
If there is someone who is emotional, then Kianna is not lucky and Matthew is not electronic.
Someone who is cloudy is always both not cheeky and not electronic.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is not cloudy and Kianna is lucky.
If there is someone who is electronic, then Blanca is emotional. | Kianna is angry. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Mila is not ashamed. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Fred is careful. | contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Fred is not mental. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Homer is mental. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Brooke is not remarkable. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Brooke is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Alexis is not careful. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Mila is ashamed. | contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Brooke is mental. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Clive is not careful. | entailment |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Mila is not confident. | neutral |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Homer is not careful. | neutral |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Homer is not remarkable. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Alexis is ashamed. | contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Brooke is careful. | contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Hall is mental. | neutral |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Brooke is remarkable. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Mila is not careful. | neutral |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Hall is not self-disciplined. | neutral |
Fred is not mental.
Clive is not mental.
Fred is ashamed.
Homer is not confident.
Homer is mental.
Brooke is not remarkable.
Alexis is not mental.
Homer is self-disciplined.
Clive is ashamed.
Alexis is self-disciplined.
Clive is remarkable.
Brooke is not careful.All not mental people are not careful.
Someone is remarkable if and only if he is not confident.
If someone who is not ashamed is also not self-disciplined, then he is mental.
All not careful people are self-disciplined.
As long as someone is either ashamed or confident, he is mental and not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either mental or careful, then Brooke is not confident.
Someone being both not ashamed and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not remarkable.
If someone is self-disciplined or not mental, then he is not ashamed.
Someone is not confident if and only if he is remarkable.
Someone being both mental and remarkable is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Homer being remarkable is equivalent to Homer being confident and Mila being self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Fred is not mental once knowing that Brooke is not self-disciplined. | Clive is confident. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Mark is courteous. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Olin is not courteous. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Isaac is not teeny. | neutral |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Henry is not wild. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Vera is not wild. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Mark is not dangerous. | neutral |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Arvel is not joyous. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Isaac is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Isaac is wild. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Ian is few. | entailment |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Mark is not joyous. | entailment |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Isaac is joyous. | entailment |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Henry is joyous. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Henry is not joyous. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Ian is not teeny. | neutral |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Mark is not courteous. | entailment |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Arvel is few. | entailment |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Isaac is teeny. | neutral |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Arvel is courteous. | contradiction |
Arvel is not courteous.
Vera is wild.
Arvel is dangerous.
Ian is few.
Isaac is not wild.
Isaac is not few.
Mark is not joyous.
Mark is not courteous.
Arvel is joyous.
Isaac is joyous.
Henry is not joyous.
Olin is not courteous.Arvel being dangerous or Mark being not joyous implies that Vera is teeny.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and teeny, then Arvel is dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and joyous, then Olin is not courteous.
If there is at least one people who is both joyous and not courteous, then Vera is teeny.
Someone is teeny and courteous if and only if he is dangerous and not joyous.
Ian being not dangerous implies that Henry is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Henry is not wild and Isaac is courteous once knowing that Henry is teeny and Mark is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is either wild or not courteous, then Henry is joyous.
If someone is teeny or joyous, then he is wild.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not wild, then Ian is few.
If there is at least one people who is not teeny, then Olin is courteous and Arvel is few.
If someone is joyous and not teeny, then he is both wild and dangerous, and vice versa. | Olin is not teeny. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is not polite. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is polite. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Kurt is loyal. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is not loyal. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is not dangerous. | entailment |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is not loyal. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is not polite. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Matthew is not dangerous. | entailment |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is silly. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Sherard is not loyal. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Sherlock is loyal. | contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is not arrow. | neutral |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is not arrow. | contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is silly. | entailment |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Luna is polite. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Matthew is not loyal. | entailment |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Sherard is dangerous. | contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Richard is not dangerous. | entailment |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Sherard is right. | contradiction |
Luna is not right.
Matthew is arrow.
Luna is not polite.
Richard is arrow.
Richard is not right.
Sherlock is not loyal.
Alberto is arrow.
Richard is not polite.
Kurt is not right.
Alberto is polite.
Sherlock is silly.
Luna is silly.Someone who is eithor not dangerous or not right is always polite.
If there is someone who is either arrow or not silly, then Sherard is not dangerous and Sherlock is not right.
If someone is not polite and arrow, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
Sherard is polite if and only if Sherlock is not right.
Someone who is eithor not arrow or polite is always not right.
If everyone is arrow or not silly, then Alberto is not polite.
If Kurt is silly or Sherlock is not polite, then Matthew is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is not arrow or not dangerous, then Matthew is polite.
Kurt being not arrow implies that Alberto is not loyal.
If there is at least one people who is both not silly and not arrow, then Alberto is not loyal.
Someone who is dangerous is always both arrow and not polite.
If someone is polite and not right, then he is not dangerous and silly. | Matthew is loyal. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Ryan is not difficult. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Harvey is not dangerous. | neutral |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Ryan is difficult. | entailment |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Homer is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Peter is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Lincoln is not easy. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Ryan is dangerous. | neutral |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Carl is easy. | entailment |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Homer is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Cedric is not neat. | entailment |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Carl is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Carl is neat. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Harvey is not difficult. | neutral |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Lincoln is consistent. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Cedric is not consistent. | entailment |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Lincoln is easy. | entailment |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Ryan is not emotional. | contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Peter is emotional. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Ryan is not easy. | neutral |
Lincoln is emotional.
Peter is neat.
Cedric is not emotional.
Lincoln is not neat.
Cedric is not consistent.
Ryan is emotional.
Lincoln is not consistent.
Cedric is not dangerous.
Homer is neat.
Peter is easy.
Peter is difficult.
Carl is not consistent.Someone who is both not consistent and emotional is always easy.
If there is someone who is consistent, then Peter is neat.
If Homer is difficult or Peter is not easy, then Homer is emotional.
If someone is not dangerous, then he is not difficult, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is emotional, then Carl is not dangerous and Cedric is not easy.
It can be concluded that Cedric is consistent and Carl is not dangerous once knowing that Lincoln is neat.
If someone is not neat and not emotional, then he is not dangerous, and vice versa.
If someone is either not difficult or easy, then he is not emotional and dangerous.
Someone is dangerous and consistent if and only if he is not emotional and neat.
If someone is both not dangerous and not difficult, then he is emotional.
Someone who is eithor neat or not difficult is always not dangerous.
Someone is difficult if and only if he is emotional. | Harvey is not consistent. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.