premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Rupert is available. | entailment |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Walter is not magnificent. | entailment |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Keene is not available. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Kilian is miniscule. | contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Luisa is not ugly. | neutral |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Kilian is not available. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Luisa is not disgusted. | neutral |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Luisa is disgusted. | neutral |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Sloane is not ugly. | contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Sloane is not available. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Curt is disgusted. | contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Keene is available. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Keene is miniscule. | contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Keene is not miniscule. | entailment |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Keene is magnificent. | entailment |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Sloane is available. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Kilian is disgusted. | contradiction |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Walter is not available. | neutral |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Walter is ugly. | neutral |
Sloane is splendid.
Luisa is not available.
Kilian is not available.
Kilian is magnificent.
Curt is available.
Keene is ugly.
Curt is not ugly.
Keene is not available.
Kilian is not miniscule.
Keene is magnificent.
Curt is not miniscule.
Sloane is ugly.Someone who is ugly is always not available.
Someone who is eithor splendid or ugly is always available.
If there is at least one people who is both disgusted and magnificent, then Walter is not ugly.
Keene being magnificent is equivalent to Rupert being splendid.
If Kilian is ugly, then Curt is not disgusted, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not disgusted and miniscule is always splendid.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid, then Sloane is miniscule.
Someone who is magnificent is always both not miniscule and not splendid.
As long as someone is not miniscule and available, he is not splendid and not disgusted.
It can be concluded that Rupert is miniscule once knowing that Luisa is magnificent and Sloane is disgusted.
If Sloane is disgusted and Rupert is not magnificent, then Sloane is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not splendid, then Walter is not magnificent. | Sloane is miniscule. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Grant is smoggy. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is not tense. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Grant is tense. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Jessie is not massive. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Gloria is not self-confident. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Sherman is self-confident. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is massive. | neutral |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Sherman is not tense. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is not hurt. | contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Phineas is inquisitive. | neutral |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is inquisitive. | neutral |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Jessie is massive. | contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Sherman is not self-confident. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is not smoggy. | neutral |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Grant is inquisitive. | contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Grant is not tense. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Sherman is not smoggy. | contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Kim is hurt. | entailment |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Jessie is self-confident. | contradiction |
Sherman is smoggy.
Sherman is self-confident.
Kim is not tense.
Jessie is not massive.
Jessie is tense.
Grant is tense.
Gloria is tense.
Gloria is not self-confident.
Grant is not massive.
Grant is smoggy.
Sherman is massive.
Lester is not massive.It can be concluded that Sherman is not smoggy once knowing that Sherman is massive and Phineas is inquisitive.
If someone who is hurt is also smoggy, then he is not massive.
Gloria is not hurt if and only if Phineas is not smoggy.
All inquisitive people are massive.
If Phineas is not tense or Lester is not smoggy, then Lester is self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not tense and not inquisitive, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not massive, then Grant is not self-confident and Kim is hurt.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sherman is not self-confident.
Sherman being smoggy is equivalent to Lester being hurt.
Jessie is not tense if and only if Kim is not inquisitive.
Gloria being not massive and Jessie being not self-confident imply that Phineas is not tense. | Jessie is not hurt. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Baldwin is dull. | contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Baldwin is not jealous. | entailment |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Marcus is not lively. | contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Lane is not dull. | entailment |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Clive is not dull. | entailment |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Marcus is nice. | self_contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Angelique is nice. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Keene is lively. | entailment |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Baldwin is lively. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Baldwin is nice. | entailment |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Lane is nice. | contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Clive is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Clive is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Lane is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Angelique is not lively. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Clive is nice. | contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Baldwin is not lively. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Marcus is dull. | contradiction |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Angelique is not nice. | neutral |
Keene is not dull.
Stanley is weak.
Lane is jealous.
Keene is not jealous.
Lane is not lively.
Stanley is not jealous.
Baldwin is nice.
Clive is not nice.
Marcus is not nice.
Lane is not dull.
Keene is lively.
Keene is not nice.If there is someone who is either plain or lively, then Clive is jealous and Stanley is not nice.
Someone who is jealous is always both not plain and not lively.
If someone is nice, then he is not jealous.
If there is someone who is not weak, then Marcus is dull and Marcus is not lively.
If someone is either not nice or not jealous, then he is weak and not dull.
If someone is not dull, then he is both plain and not jealous.
It can be concluded that Angelique is not dull once knowing that Keene is lively or Keene is jealous.
If someone who is plain is also not jealous, then he is not dull.
As long as someone is dull and nice, he is not plain and not weak.
Someone is plain and jealous if and only if he is not nice and not lively.
Marcus being weak or Stanley being dull implies that Marcus is nice.
Someone is weak and lively if and only if he is not nice and plain. | Clive is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Aidan is attentive. | self_contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Sherman is not good-tempered. | entailment |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Sherman is good-tempered. | contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Clive is not thoughtful. | entailment |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Chapman is tired. | neutral |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Garth is not desperate. | contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Garth is thoughtful. | contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Sherman is tired. | neutral |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Clive is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Garth is not good-tempered. | entailment |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Lionel is not unfair. | entailment |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Aidan is not unfair. | neutral |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Clive is desperate. | entailment |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Chapman is not desperate. | neutral |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Kendrick is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Lionel is attentive. | contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Clive is attentive. | self_contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Garth is attentive. | contradiction |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Aidan is desperate. | neutral |
Garth is desperate.
Chapman is not thoughtful.
Aidan is thoughtful.
Aidan is tired.
Sherman is not thoughtful.
Kendrick is not unfair.
Lionel is not unfair.
Clive is attentive.
Kendrick is desperate.
Clive is not unfair.
Aidan is attentive.
Kendrick is not tired.It can be concluded that Kendrick is not unfair once knowing that Chapman is thoughtful.
If there is someone who is either good-tempered or desperate, then Aidan is not attentive.
Someone being both not tired and not attentive is equivalent to being unfair.
Someone who is desperate is always both not thoughtful and not attentive.
Someone is not thoughtful and desperate if and only if he is not unfair.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and good-tempered, then Kendrick is not desperate.
Someone being not attentive is equivalent to being not good-tempered.
Chapman being unfair or Sherman being tired implies that Kendrick is thoughtful.
If all people are not desperate or not tired, then Sherman is not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either desperate or thoughtful, then Sherman is not unfair.
Someone who is unfair is always not desperate.
If there is someone who is good-tempered, then Lionel is not tired and Kendrick is thoughtful. | Kendrick is desperate. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Shamus is not pleasant. | neutral |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Fred is pleasant. | contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Shamus is helpful. | entailment |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Kirk is not silly. | neutral |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Bevis is helpful. | entailment |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Kirk is not pleasant. | neutral |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Bevis is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Bevis is useful. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is not alive. | contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Shamus is alive. | entailment |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Hector is not alive. | neutral |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Fred is not silly. | contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Bevis is silly. | neutral |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is wet. | contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Shamus is wet. | entailment |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Bevis is not helpful. | contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is not pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Ross is not helpful.
Bevis is useful.
Bevis is not alive.
Shamus is helpful.
Hector is not pleasant.
Hector is not useful.
Fred is silly.
Bevis is helpful.
Samson is silly.
Samson is alive.
Shamus is not silly.
Shamus is alive.Someone being useful is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is someone who is either pleasant or not alive, then Shamus is wet.
All not silly people are helpful.
It can be concluded that Shamus is useful and Hector is not helpful once knowing that Shamus is not alive.
Someone being both useful and wet is equivalent to being alive and not helpful.
If there is someone who is alive, then Ross is not useful and Fred is not pleasant.
It can be concluded that Samson is pleasant once knowing that Shamus is useful or Fred is not wet.
If Samson is not useful, then Samson is not pleasant and Hector is not silly, and vice versa.
If Fred is not alive, then Kirk is not wet.
Someone who is silly is always both not wet and not useful.
If there is someone who is both wet and alive, then Bevis is not useful.
If someone is both alive and pleasant, then he is not wet. | Samson is not wet. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.