premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|---|
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Lucy is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kimberly is not aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kimberly is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kimberly is cold. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kathryn is blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Rosie is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kathryn is administrative. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Lucy is not administrative. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kimberly is worried. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Lloyd is not messy. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Sherlock is not aggressive. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Sherlock is worried. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Sherlock is messy. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Greyson is not worried. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Kathryn is not administrative. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Rosie is not administrative. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Sherlock is aggressive. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Rosie is aggressive. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Lloyd is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cold.
Kimberly is worried.
Greyson is not cold.
Lucy is not administrative.
Rosie is not worried.
Greyson is messy.
Sherlock is not aggressive.
Kathryn is administrative.
Kathryn is not aggressive.
Kimberly is not aggressive.
Lloyd is not worried.
Lloyd is not blue-eyed.If someone is aggressive and not blue-eyed, then he is both not messy and worried, and vice versa.
Someone being both blue-eyed and worried is equivalent to being not messy.
If there is at least one people who is not worried or aggressive, then Kathryn is not blue-eyed.
If Kimberly is worried, then Lloyd is not blue-eyed.
If someone is both worried and messy, then he is not cold.
Someone who is aggressive is always not messy.
If Greyson is blue-eyed, then Rosie is cold and Rosie is not messy, and vice versa.
If Kimberly is messy and Rosie is not administrative, then Kathryn is not worried and Lloyd is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If someone who is worried is also not cold, then he is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not aggressive, then Lloyd is not cold.
If someone is not messy and not blue-eyed, then he is not worried, and vice versa.
Lucy being messy is equivalent to Kimberly being not blue-eyed and Rosie being administrative. | Greyson is cold. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Titus is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Titus is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Janet is elated. | entailment |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Charlie is elated. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Tony is not large. | neutral |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Ricardo is desperate. | neutral |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Tony is elated. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Mila is not large. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Tony is not uninterested. | entailment |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Titus is not legal. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Mila is large. | entailment |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Titus is desperate. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Janet is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Janet is not elated. | contradiction |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Titus is large. | entailment |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Ricardo is not elated. | neutral |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Tony is large. | neutral |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Ricardo is large. | neutral |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Tony is not desperate. | entailment |
Janet is not uninterested.
Charlie is not desperate.
Titus is not obedient.
Tony is not desperate.
Tony is not elated.
Mila is large.
Titus is large.
Charlie is not elated.
Janet is legal.
Titus is desperate.
Janet is not obedient.
Mila is obedient.If everyone is elated, then Mila is not large and Ricardo is obedient.
Someone who is not elated is always both not uninterested and not desperate.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not desperate, then Sterling is not legal.
It can be concluded that Charlie is desperate and Sterling is large once knowing that Titus is uninterested.
If someone is not legal or he is not obedient, then he is not desperate.
If everyone is not uninterested or not legal, then Mila is not elated.
Someone being both not desperate and not obedient is equivalent to being elated.
Someone is obedient and elated if and only if he is legal.
If there is someone who is elated, then Mila is not desperate and Titus is legal.
If there is someone who is either elated or large, then Mila is obedient.
Titus being elated implies that Titus is not desperate.
If someone who is desperate is also not obedient, then he is elated. | Janet is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is not misty. | entailment |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is mellow. | entailment |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Sherwin is not shy. | neutral |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is helpful. | contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is not mellow. | contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is not mellow. | contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is attentive. | entailment |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is misty. | contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Sherwin is mellow. | neutral |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Laurence is helpful. | neutral |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Laurence is shy. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is not misty. | entailment |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Lincoln is misty. | neutral |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is mellow. | entailment |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is not shy. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Lincoln is not mellow. | contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Shamus is not shy. | neutral |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is shy. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Kent is various. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not shy.
Roswell is mellow.
Laurence is not misty.
Conroy is not helpful.
Lincoln is not various.
Kent is helpful.
Sherwin is not attentive.
Kent is various.
Kent is not shy.
Lincoln is not helpful.
Laurence is not shy.
Conroy is not shy.If someone is not shy, then he is attentive.
Shamus is mellow if and only if Sherwin is shy.
Roswell being not misty and Sherwin being shy imply that Shamus is not attentive.
Kent is shy if and only if Kent is attentive and Sherwin is not misty.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being various.
if there is at least one people who is mellow and helpful, then Kent is shy and Laurence is not misty.
If someone is shy or he is not attentive, then he is not misty.
Someone being both not misty and shy is equivalent to being attentive.
Someone who is helpful is always not various.
If someone is not mellow and various, then he is both shy and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is either misty or not helpful, then he is mellow and various.
If Shamus is attentive, then Kent is mellow and Lincoln is helpful, and vice versa. | Conroy is shy. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Colin is friendly. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Colin is dangerous. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Chalmers is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Colin is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Colin is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Jeremiah is comprehensive. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Travis is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Jeremiah is ugly. | neutral |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Travis is not terrible. | entailment |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Shamus is comprehensive. | entailment |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Shamus is ugly. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Travis is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Jorge is not terrible. | neutral |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Colin is not dangerous. | entailment |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Chalmers is friendly. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Chalmers is dangerous. | neutral |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Shamus is dangerous. | neutral |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Shamus is global. | neutral |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Chalmers is terrible. | entailment |
Jeremiah is not comprehensive.
Jorge is not comprehensive.
Chalmers is not global.
Irvin is terrible.
Shamus is not terrible.
Irvin is ugly.
Colin is not friendly.
Colin is global.
Chalmers is not friendly.
Travis is not comprehensive.
Jeremiah is dangerous.
Colin is ugly.If someone is not terrible or not global, then he is comprehensive.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Colin is not dangerous.
All terrible people are ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Irvin is not friendly and Travis is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Jeremiah is friendly once knowing that Jorge is terrible and Jeremiah is not global.
If there is someone who is not dangerous, then Colin is comprehensive and Chalmers is terrible.
If someone is both not friendly and comprehensive, then he is not ugly.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Colin is not dangerous and Shamus is not friendly.
Someone who is both friendly and not ugly is always global.
If there is someone who is both not comprehensive and dangerous, then Shamus is ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not global or not dangerous, then Chalmers is comprehensive.
If someone is global, then he is both not comprehensive and not friendly. | Chalmers is not friendly. | entailment |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is unfair. | entailment |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Todd is expensive. | neutral |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is not expensive. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Sophia is not tough. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Sophia is teeny. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Morton is not expensive. | neutral |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Sophia is not expensive. | entailment |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Jeremiah is unfair. | neutral |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Todd is shy. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Morton is not tough. | neutral |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Sophia is tough. | entailment |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is tough. | entailment |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Bryant is expensive. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Sophia is not shy. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Jeremiah is not tough. | neutral |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is shy.
Debra is teeny.
Morton is not unfair.
Debra is expensive.
Sophia is not expensive.
Debra is shy.
Todd is not tough.
Bryant is not expensive.
Debra is friendly.
Todd is not shy.
Sophia is tough.
Sophia is friendly.It can be concluded that Jeremiah is shy once knowing that Jeremiah is teeny or Sterling is not expensive.
If Bryant is not tough, then Sterling is teeny, and vice versa.
Morton being not expensive implies that Jeremiah is shy.
If Todd is expensive and Morton is not friendly, then Debra is teeny.
If someone is not teeny, then he is both not expensive and tough.
If there is at least one people who is both tough and not friendly, then Todd is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Sterling is tough and Jeremiah is not expensive once knowing that Todd is teeny.
Someone who is tough is always both shy and not expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly or tough, then Sterling is shy.
If there is someone who is teeny, then Debra is not friendly.
Someone being not friendly is equivalent to being unfair.
All friendly people are not teeny. | Debra is shy. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.