premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Sherman is conscious. | neutral |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Deborah is evil. | contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Sherman is not evil. | neutral |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Alvin is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Alvin is confident. | entailment |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Kelsey is not sufficient. | entailment |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | James is evil. | neutral |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Aedan is dead. | self_contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Deborah is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Sherman is not conscious. | neutral |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Deborah is confident. | entailment |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Aedan is not dead. | self_contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | James is not dead. | entailment |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Alvin is sufficient. | contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Aedan is sufficient. | contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Deborah is not evil. | entailment |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Kelsey is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Sherman is not confident. | neutral |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Deborah is not confident. | contradiction |
Alvin is not critical.
James is critical.
Aedan is not dead.
Sherman is not dead.
Deborah is confident.
Deborah is not critical.
Aedan is not confident.
Kelsey is dead.
Deborah is not evil.
Carlton is not sufficient.
Deborah is dead.
Kelsey is confident.If there is at least one people who is not conscious, then Aedan is evil and James is sufficient.
If there is someone who is not evil, then Alvin is confident.
Someone who is dead is always both not conscious and not critical.
Kelsey being conscious is equivalent to Alvin being sufficient.
If there is someone who is not sufficient, then Kelsey is not evil.
If someone is not conscious or he is not confident, then he is critical.
If Deborah is not sufficient, then Carlton is critical.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not sufficient.
Sherman being not critical implies that Sherman is sufficient and James is not dead.
If there is someone who is both not dead and not confident, then Alvin is not conscious.
If there is at least one people who is not confident, then Aedan is dead and Sherman is not critical.
If someone is not critical and conscious, then he is not confident and not dead. | Kelsey is conscious. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Quillan is famous. | neutral |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Kerwin is impressive. | entailment |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Kirk is not sleepy. | neutral |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Sterling is annoying. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Charles is not impressive. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Quillan is impressive. | entailment |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Hadwin is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Charles is not famous. | entailment |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Hadwin is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Hadwin is cute. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Hadwin is upset. | entailment |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Sterling is upset. | neutral |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Sterling is impressive. | neutral |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Sterling is not cute. | entailment |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Carl is annoying. | neutral |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Quillan is annoying. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Hadwin is not upset. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Quillan is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Quillan is not impressive. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not famous.
Quillan is upset.
Sterling is not famous.
Hadwin is upset.
Sterling is not annoying.
Charles is not famous.
Quillan is not cute.
Carl is not sleepy.
Hadwin is not impressive.
Charles is impressive.
Kerwin is upset.
Kerwin is cute.If Kerwin is not cute, then Quillan is annoying, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not impressive or annoying, then Quillan is sleepy.
All upset people are not annoying.
Quillan being sleepy implies that Carl is impressive and Charles is not annoying.
Someone being both annoying and famous is equivalent to being not upset and not sleepy.
It can be concluded that Kerwin is not impressive once knowing that Quillan is not famous or Carl is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Charles is annoying.
If Kirk is annoying, then Charles is not cute.
If someone is either upset or not famous, then he is not cute and annoying.
Someone who is both upset and annoying is always impressive.
If there is at least one people who is both not impressive and not cute, then Charles is sleepy.
Someone is not upset if and only if he is cute. | Charles is not sleepy. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Lambert is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Ives is not grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Lambert is not dead. | entailment |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Lambert is dead. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Solomon is not successful. | entailment |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Albert is not dead. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Katrina is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Lambert is wandering. | entailment |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Katrina is not successful. | neutral |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Albert is not successful. | neutral |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Ives is grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Cuthbert is not grumpy. | entailment |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Cuthbert is not friendly. | neutral |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Royce is wandering. | entailment |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Albert is not wandering. | neutral |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Lambert is not friendly. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Solomon is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Katrina is friendly. | neutral |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Royce is not wandering. | contradiction |
Lambert is not grumpy.
Katrina is grumpy.
Royce is wandering.
Ives is not friendly.
Lambert is successful.
Solomon is not dead.
Ives is not grumpy.
Royce is friendly.
Cuthbert is not dead.
Ives is self-disciplined.
Ives is successful.
Albert is dead.If there is someone who is either not self-disciplined or not friendly, then Solomon is wandering.
If Cuthbert is not self-disciplined, then Ives is not dead and Ives is grumpy.
If someone is not friendly or wandering, then he is not self-disciplined.
If Katrina is not friendly and Royce is wandering, then Solomon is grumpy.
If there is at least one people who is wandering or grumpy, then Lambert is friendly.
If there is someone who is successful, then Cuthbert is wandering and Solomon is self-disciplined.
Cuthbert being not dead is equivalent to Solomon being not successful and Lambert being not self-disciplined.
Someone being not grumpy is equivalent to being not dead.
If someone is not self-disciplined and not grumpy, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Royce is successful once knowing that Solomon is wandering.
If someone who is not successful is also not dead, then he is wandering.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Cuthbert is wandering. | Ives is not self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Curtis is not hard-working. | entailment |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alastair is not hard-working. | neutral |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alisa is weary. | entailment |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Neville is not weary. | contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Curtis is angry. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alastair is fuzzy. | neutral |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Neville is angry. | contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Bryant is weary. | contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Harley is weary. | neutral |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alastair is timid. | neutral |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alisa is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Royce is timid. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alisa is timid. | entailment |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Bryant is not timid. | entailment |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Royce is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Royce is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Curtis is not angry. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alastair is not timid. | neutral |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Alisa is white. | contradiction |
Bryant is not timid.
Curtis is timid.
Harley is not angry.
Alisa is not white.
Alastair is not weary.
Curtis is not angry.
Harley is not hard-working.
Bryant is not weary.
Royce is fuzzy.
Curtis is not hard-working.
Neville is not fuzzy.
Royce is not timid.If there is at least one people who is either not white or not timid, then Neville is not angry and Curtis is not weary.
If there is at least one people who is fuzzy, then Alisa is angry and Royce is not white.
Someone who is not fuzzy is always weary.
It can be concluded that Alisa is weary and Alisa is fuzzy once knowing that Curtis is angry.
Harley is angry if and only if Alisa is not white and Alisa is not fuzzy.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is not timid.
If Bryant is not timid and Curtis is weary, then Bryant is not angry and Alisa is white, and vice versa.
If someone is not white and not hard-working, then he is timid and angry.
Royce being not angry is equivalent to Neville being not fuzzy and Royce being not white.
Someone who is not white is always both timid and not fuzzy.
Someone is weary and hard-working if and only if he is not white.
Curtis is angry if and only if Bryant is fuzzy and Curtis is not hard-working. | Royce is not angry. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is not alive. | self_contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Martin is not nice. | neutral |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Harmony is nice. | neutral |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is expensive. | contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Gilbert is cute. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Crispin is not expensive. | contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is homely. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Crispin is expensive. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Crispin is homely. | contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is not homely. | contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Truman is friendly. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Truman is not cute. | entailment |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Gilbert is not expensive. | neutral |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Brock is not expensive. | contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Crispin is cute. | neutral |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Martin is not expensive. | neutral |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is nice. | self_contradiction |
Truman is not cute.
Brock is expensive.
Truman is nice.
Truman is not homely.
Truman is expensive.
Bud is not friendly.
Crispin is expensive.
Martin is homely.
Bud is nice.
Harmony is not alive.
Crispin is not homely.
Truman is friendly.if there is at least one people who is nice and not homely, then Gilbert is not expensive and Gilbert is cute.
Someone who is both not expensive and not friendly is always homely.
Someone who is both nice and not expensive is always not friendly.
If someone is either not nice or not friendly, then he is not expensive and alive.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Gilbert is cute and Bud is nice.
Someone is homely and friendly if and only if he is not expensive and not nice.
Martin is not friendly if and only if Brock is expensive and Gilbert is not nice.
Someone is not nice and friendly if and only if he is not expensive.
Someone being both nice and alive is equivalent to being homely and not expensive.
Someone is not expensive and nice if and only if he is not alive and homely.
If all people are nice or not homely, then Bud is not cute.
Someone who is not friendly is always cute. | Bud is alive. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.