premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is medical. | contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is wet. | contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Charlie is not wet. | neutral |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Arlen is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Silas is obnoxious. | neutral |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadden is not sticky. | neutral |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Glenn is obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Arlen is obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Arlen is not medical. | entailment |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Glenn is not wet. | entailment |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Glenn is medical. | contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is open. | contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Jacob is not wet. | entailment |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is not wet. | entailment |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Jacob is not open. | entailment |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Jacob is open. | contradiction |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Silas is wet. | neutral |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Charlie is not open. | neutral |
Glenn is not open.
Hadden is not open.
Hadwin is not unhappy.
Hadwin is not medical.
Glenn is not wet.
Arlen is obnoxious.
Jacob is not open.
Hadden is unhappy.
Glenn is not obnoxious.
Jacob is not wet.
Hadwin is not open.
Arlen is unhappy.If there is someone who is either open or not wet, then Arlen is not obnoxious.
Someone is not medical if and only if he is not wet.
All sticky people are open.
If all people are not unhappy, then Arlen is open.
Charlie being open implies that Silas is wet.
Someone is not wet if and only if he is obnoxious.
If Glenn is not unhappy, then Glenn is not obnoxious and Hadwin is not open, and vice versa.
Jacob being not medical implies that Jacob is not unhappy.
Glenn being not sticky is equivalent to Hadden being open and Arlen being not medical.
It can be concluded that Silas is not unhappy and Hadwin is not obnoxious once knowing that Arlen is not medical.
If there is nobody who is not not open, then Jacob is sticky and Jacob is wet.
If there is someone who is medical, then Silas is not wet and Charlie is not unhappy. | Hadwin is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kirby is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Marcus is warm-hearted. | neutral |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Gifford is shallow. | contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kirby is not warm-hearted. | entailment |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Rupert is not existing. | contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kirby is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Gifford is not existing. | neutral |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Sean is existing. | entailment |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Rupert is not severe. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kelvin is not warm-hearted. | neutral |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Rupert is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kirby is crooked. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Marcus is not funny. | entailment |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Gifford is not shallow. | entailment |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Sean is not shallow. | contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Sean is warm-hearted. | neutral |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Sean is not severe. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Kelvin is crooked. | contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Rupert is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Matthew is crooked.
Marcus is crooked.
Kirby is funny.
Kirby is severe.
Gifford is not shallow.
Sean is shallow.
Sean is existing.
Marcus is not severe.
Kelvin is existing.
Sean is not funny.
Rupert is severe.
Rupert is shallow.If someone is not funny or shallow, then he is not severe.
If someone is not funny and existing, then he is severe, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either warm-hearted or shallow, then Kirby is severe and Marcus is not funny.
If there is someone who is severe, then Matthew is warm-hearted and Kirby is crooked.
Matthew being severe is equivalent to Marcus being not shallow and Matthew being funny.
If Marcus is not funny, then Rupert is warm-hearted and Kelvin is not crooked.
Marcus being not funny and Gifford being warm-hearted imply that Gifford is shallow and Gifford is not existing.
Someone being shallow is equivalent to being funny.
As long as someone is not funny and warm-hearted, he is severe and shallow.
If Kirby is not warm-hearted, then Kirby is not crooked and Gifford is not shallow, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either severe or not existing, then Kirby is not warm-hearted.
If someone is not funny and crooked, then he is not severe, and vice versa. | Matthew is not severe. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimball is not exuberant. | entailment |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimball is exuberant. | contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Theodore is not impressive. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Curt is not impressive. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Hamlin is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Debra is not realistic. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Curt is concerned. | contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Debra is concerned. | contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimball is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimberly is not misty. | entailment |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Hamlin is realistic. | contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Debra is exuberant. | entailment |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimball is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Quimby is not adventurous. | entailment |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Theodore is not realistic. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Quimby is not exuberant. | entailment |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Hamlin is misty. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Debra is not misty. | neutral |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Kimball is not realistic. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not concerned.
Quimby is not exuberant.
Kimberly is concerned.
Quimby is not misty.
Kimball is misty.
Kimball is realistic.
Debra is not impressive.
Hamlin is impressive.
Hamlin is adventurous.
Debra is exuberant.
Kimball is impressive.
Hamlin is misty.If there is someone who is not impressive, then Kimberly is not misty.
All not misty people are not adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or concerned, then Curt is exuberant.
It can be concluded that Hamlin is exuberant once knowing that Quimby is not impressive and Curt is misty.
If someone is not impressive and adventurous, then he is both not exuberant and not realistic, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both adventurous and not misty, then Curt is realistic and Quimby is impressive.
It can be concluded that Kimball is not realistic once knowing that Kimberly is concerned.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is not misty and not adventurous.
If there is someone who is both not impressive and not exuberant, then Hamlin is not realistic.
If all people are misty, then Theodore is exuberant.
As long as someone is not realistic, he is adventurous and not exuberant.
If there is someone who is realistic, then Kimball is misty and Curt is not concerned. | Debra is impressive. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Brice is terrible. | neutral |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Brice is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Travis is not terrible. | neutral |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Harlan is not successful. | entailment |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Cedric is successful. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Cedric is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Adrian is fuzzy. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Adrian is fair-minded. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Cedric is terrible. | neutral |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Cedric is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Harlan is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Garth is successful. | neutral |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Harlan is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Garth is optimistic. | entailment |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Bowen is not fair-minded. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Adrian is optimistic. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Travis is not fair-minded. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Adrian is successful. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Bowen is terrible. | contradiction |
Harlan is fuzzy.
Garth is optimistic.
Bowen is not terrible.
Brice is optimistic.
Cedric is not fuzzy.
Garth is fair-minded.
Brice is not fair-minded.
Adrian is optimistic.
Adrian is successful.
Bowen is not optimistic.
Harlan is modern.
Travis is not successful.If someone is not modern, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both optimistic and fuzzy, then Cedric is not successful.
If there is at least one people who is not successful, then Bowen is fair-minded and Cedric is fuzzy.
If someone who is optimistic is also not terrible, then he is fuzzy.
If there is at least one people who is terrible or not fuzzy, then Travis is modern.
If there is someone who is not fuzzy, then Cedric is not optimistic.
Someone is not fuzzy and modern if and only if he is not fair-minded and not successful.
As long as someone is successful, he is not optimistic and not fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is fuzzy once knowing that Cedric is fair-minded.
Someone is modern if and only if he is not fuzzy.
If Brice is successful, then Bowen is fuzzy and Harlan is not terrible.
Adrian being not optimistic is equivalent to Travis being fair-minded. | Brice is modern. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Benton is latter. | entailment |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Alexia is psychological. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Benton is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Nathalie is not practical. | contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Theodore is not afraid. | entailment |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Justin is practical. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Benton is practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Alexia is afraid. | contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Theodore is not psychological. | contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Alexia is not latter. | contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Benton is electrical. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Alexia is practical. | entailment |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Benton is not psychological. | entailment |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Nathalie is not afraid. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Alexia is not cute. | contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Carl is latter. | entailment |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Theodore is cute. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Theodore is not cute. | neutral |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Carl is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not psychological.
Kianna is not cute.
Nathalie is afraid.
Alexia is not afraid.
Nathalie is cute.
Benton is latter.
Carl is not practical.
Carl is latter.
Kianna is not psychological.
Theodore is not afraid.
Theodore is psychological.
Justin is electrical.Someone being not afraid is equivalent to being latter.
If someone is both psychological and not electrical, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is psychological, then Nathalie is latter and Kianna is not afraid.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and electrical, then Carl is not cute.
Carl being psychological is equivalent to Kianna being not afraid.
Kianna being latter or Kianna being practical implies that Nathalie is not electrical.
All not afraid people are practical.
If there is someone who is both not cute and latter, then Theodore is afraid.
It can be concluded that Kianna is afraid once knowing that Kianna is latter.
Someone is not afraid and not practical if and only if he is not psychological.
Nathalie being not electrical implies that Alexia is cute and Benton is not afraid.
If someone is not practical, then he is latter. | Kianna is not afraid. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.