Black holes and big bangs

This text has ideas on the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself.

The ideas might be wrong, but we must NECESSARILY play mathematically and with computer simulations to test these ideas. Also play with quantum field theory in extreme situations. Try to describe a maximal degeneracy pressure phase transition.

Help humanity understand how the universe works.

If you don't like these ideas find better ones.

Please create groups combining many fields of study: quantum field theory, black hole physics, mathematics, particle accelerator physics, astrophysical observation, etc. and work on these issues.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

We have to better define what happens inside the event horizon.

The physical true black hole is the rotating one.

A black hole needs a mechanism to eternally collapse.

Maybe a torus, because singularities and ringularities are impossible in quantum field theory = nature.

General relativity fails in these levels of degeneracy / degenerate pressure.

We really have to better define what happens inside the event horizon, because the black hole is nature's experiment to help us understand the state before the Big Bang.

The state before the Big Bang and the maximal degeneracy area inside the natural spinning black hole isn't that scary... it is maximally degenerate spacetime (we don't have the quantum field theory formulas on it; workgroups should work on it; it's doable; we should be open to make mistakes, use computer simulations and make corrections).

Nowadays physics doesn't have a definition of the maximally degenerate spacetime (it's not like neutron degeneracy... maximal degeneracy doesn't allow particles to be individual; the overall Planck-degenerate chromodynamic fluid has to act as a single default particle). We don't know if these default degeneracy maximal particles come in quanta inside black holes; thus we cannot have intermediate maximal degeneracy masses, but only quantized ones. I bet on it. There is a 100% certainty I'm correct = degenerately correct (no alternatives are allowed).

The interior of the natural spinning event horizon has many regions. We have to see where the maximal degeneracy region dwells.

Miniscule black holes, immediately evaporate, because behind the event horizon there are perpetual flows of mass–energy. And if the reabsorption mechanism doesn't happen inside the event horizon, the black hole immediately evaporates. Nowadays physics doesn't have a mechanism for the reabsorption flows (they are necessary for eternal collapse; some mass–energy tries to tunnel out, because quantum tunneling doesn't care about gravity; enough degeneracy energy exist to cause a tunnel[l]ing out (I am 100% correct on that) but in natural black holes (black holes which exist in nature) the black hole is able to return back almost all of the mass energy which tries to tunnel out (the overall reabsorption mechanism must happen behind the event horizon, otherwise the black hole will either evaporate or shrink to a manageable size; quasars extend their degeneracy tunneling outside their event horizon, because quasars consume too much mass, and due to inertia don't have the time to expand their event horizon at the correct size in time, thus complete reabsorption of the internal tunneling mechanism is impossible (I am 100% correct on that). Simulations and formulas are needed to test these views. We shouldn't be afraid to make mistakes; otherwise we'll never learn what really happens inside the event horizon.

I repeat, we have to better describe what happens inside the event horizon, because we have to describe the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime = Plank degeneracy = defaulting of spacetime.

The pre-Big-Bang degeneracy state was a sole primordial omniblackhole, which either didn't have external spacetime, or it was too big, and it had enough inertia to stay in place and decay into the Big Bang.

One cyclic cosmology claims that due to the accelerating expansion of spacetime, very old universes exhibit big rip (big bang and big rip noncapitalized in cyclic cosmology), which produces enough mass–energy to collapse into a sole primordial omniblackhole (immediate big rip big bang isn't well justified because very old universes aren't homogeneous enough). The sole primordial omniblackhole is not a normal black hole with all its parts; instead it's only the maximal degeneracy spacetime = maximal energy in all fields which is unable to get expressed as individual particles; but the overall maximal degeneracy spacetime acts as a single particle (it has virtual Everettian possible particle arrangements which cannot become materialized due to the degeneracy pressure; we'll have to use quantum field theory to define the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime). Because the sole primordial black hole doesn't have external spacetime or because it's huge enough to have inertia stability, the omniblackhole can't do anything but phase transition into its decay which is a big bang (similar to Roger Penrose's cyclic cosmology but with a different phase transition and pre-transitional preparation mechanism).

My ideas might be wrong and stupid but we should work hard, make mistakes, and try to. finds solutions.

Please work on these ideas, speak to theoriticians and also we can even test in quasars and miniscule black holes if these ideas hold true.

## comment 1

### Guesses about the maximal degeneracy pressure torus of natural rotating black holes

General relativity and its singularity and ringularity fail to describe the physical degeneracy torus of a rotating black hole, because they describe no spacetime mechanism. Quantum field theory can describe maximal degeneracy (of spacetime itself) as a pretransitional phase (pre-Big-Bang state), and that will happen in the future.

You (most professors) never mentioned on YouTube (when speaking about black holes) that quantum tunneling can happen when enough energy is compressing a particle and when the boundaries confining it aren't strong and thick enough to confine it. Replace the word particle with maximal degeneracy pressure. Natural rotating black holes have an intricate interior behind their event horizon. Their maximal degeneracy pressure area wants to tunnel out, and quantum tunneling is restricted by gravity but not prohibited; also gravity doesn't have the same value everywhere; relative weaker gravity curvature regions exist behind the event horizon and there the degeneracy loop tunneling reabsorption mechanism can exist (we have to use the schematic of the rotating black hole, and add tunneling loops surrounding the maximal degeneracy region). The result is a permanent flow of looping tunneling surrounding the maximal degeneracy pressure area. This view can explain why miniscule black holes immediately evaporate = their event horizon is too small to have a degeneracy reabsorption mechanism behind the event horizon. Also this view can explain why quasars emit huge amounts of radiation; quasars consume mass–energy too fast, and their event horizon cannot grow big enough in time due to inertia, thus a part of the degeneracy reabsorption mechanism gets exposed outside the event horizon and most of that mass–energy escapes. All these things are guesses, but what is the alternative explanation? We should start explaining these mechanisms somehow. We don't have the quantum field theory definition of maximal degeneracy pressure. Not all regions behind the event horizon are maximally degenerate. Maximal degeneracy pressure is maximally compressed spacetime. No specific particles are able to get expressed there, but the overall maximal degeneracy region is one particle as a whole. If these ideas are wrong what is the alternative? Organize multidisciplinary groups of scientists to find better descriptions.