Let's Talk Wiki:RfR

f you can say yes to all of the following questions, you may be eligible to be granted rollback rights.

1. Would you like to work for the betterment of the Warriors Wiki and elimination of spam and vandalism?
2. Do you understand the duties that come with Rollback Rights and are you competent in Wikicode?
3. Are you familiar with the rules of Let's Talk Wiki, and the implementation of those policies?
4. Do you feel that you are trusted by the Let's Talk Wiki?

## Status

*Let's Talk Wiki* is accepting rollback applications at this time.
## Information

The Request for Rollback Rights process is comprised of two (2) distinct steps which will be outlined in this article. Every request must go through these steps.

### Nomination of the user

The **user** opens their nomination.
This user should meet the eligibility requirements for Nomination.
*This step begins the process and shows the user's commitment to begin the process.*
The user must also add the admin and rollback voting form, and change the dates to the appropriate ones.

```
==Admin + Rollback Vote==
{{vote-basic|opendate=TODAY|closedate=ONEWEEKAWAY}}
```

### Admin + Rollback Vote

The current **administrators** and **users with rollback rights**, including rollbacks and content moderators, hold a vote.
In the event of a tie, the vote will be open to the general community providing they are active.
*This vote indicates support of the current staff and is intended to establish a consensus amongst people with experience with the tools and rights being given out before bringing the vote before those without experience with these tools.*
### RfR closed or passed into voting

#### Unsuccessful RfR nominations

Nominations that are not passed are to be archived.
#### Ensure eligibility

Once voting is closed, the admins ensure that all votes collected came from voters.
### Ending the process

#### Unsuccessful RfR

RfRs in which the nominee does not earn rollback rights will be archived.
#### Successful RfR

RfRs in which the nominee earns rollback rights will be archived and Rollback Rights will be applied to the Nominee.
The following is a list of requirements a user must meet to be eligible to be nominated into the RfR process.

### Requirements

#### Time

At least six (6) months of membership to the wiki, during which a user can be made familiar with most aspects the art of Wikicode and the ways of the Warriors Wiki, is required for eligibility for nomination.
#### Edits

A member being nominated should have an edit history that indicates activity for at least the previous month. Members with longer edit histories are more likely to be taken seriously. The edits of a member should be of quality. Members who are rolled back frequently when editing should attend to this issue prior to nominating themselves.
At least fifty percent (50%) of all of a users edits should lie within contributive namespaces or be of a contributive nature (Contributive namespaces include Main, Let's Talk Wiki, Help, and Template).
#### Behavior

The behavior of a user wishing to nominate themselves must comply with Let's Talk Wiki rules
### Flexibility of Requirements

Requirements can be waived for users who shine in some way. Waiver of requirements can be done during the nomination process by the nominee. This is done by putting forth the reason *why* that requirements should be waived for that user.
### Voter eligibility

Current administrators and users with rollback rights are asked to vote on rollback applications. In the event of a tie, members of the community are asked to vote, providing they are active with a consistent edit history within the last three (3) months.
#### Voter qualification

The **voting individual** must meet the eligibility requirements to qualify to vote.
* A user must have been a member of the wiki for at least three (3) months.
* The user must have a consistent edit history for at least the previous month.

The voter may **not have been solicited** by the nominee any other person to be considered fairly involved in the election.
The voter must sign their own vote. Any vote left unsigned is to be immediately struck from the record.
#### Support text

**Support text** for a vote is encouraged, but not required.
### Striking of votes

Votes are struck at the discretion of the administrators, and are to be stricken **only** by administrators. If the administrators fail to agree on the actions surrounding an individual vote, it will stand, but NOT be eligible in the case of a win by the number of 'questionable votes'. (IE: 10 votes for, 12 against, but 3 questionable votes against would result in a FOR result.)
Votes may be immediately struck for the following reasons:
1. Vote was left unsigned by the voter.
2. Vote text contained a clear personal attack against another user.
3. Fail to meet the voting eligibility requirements.