Messages to Juan Maldacena

## text 1

Should the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime be described otherwise?

Via topological quantum field theory?

It doesn't result in a singularity, but in a superfluid.

And after we have some topological quantum field theory of the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself, we may answer why more degeneracy causes it to adiabatically decay into a big bang.

(It's doable to play with the mathematics. At least speak to someone who wants to use topological quantum field theory).

## text 2

You reject the importance of cyclic cosmology because we have to define maximal degeneracy pressure.

You are wrong, because maximal entropy is tautological (via an adiabatic phase transition) to minimal entropy in that phase transition and it has to be described.

Play with what you hate.

Not only with logical comfortable things.

## text 3

A black hole has external spacetime and can grow larger in size.

The pre-Big-Bang degeneracy = maximal degeneracy of spacetime itself, didn't have external spacetime (or that primordial black hole was huge enough to have enough inertia) thus it couldn't get more compressed and it adiabatically decayed into the big bang.

(It's one hypothesis. But it makes sense.)

We don't have the definition of the maximal degeneracy of spacetime (maximal possible).

Humanity has to answer that.

Quantum field theory is a proven theory.

String theory isn't a guaranteed truth.

But we don't have any definition of the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself.

(singularities are physically impossible/ unprocedural/ unsubstantial/ without a rigorous mechanism of specific field interactions or other logical mechanism)

## text 4

Is it possible to create a superfluid ( chromodynamic strong force or of the uniforce) with 100% tunneling probability and infinite spread like a condensate?

The pre-Big-Bang state wasn't ready during the maximally hot big rip, but after the big rip in cyclic cosmology produced the omniblackhole (it existed enough mass–energy per region for all the universe to collapse as the primordial omniblackhole, and it absorbed any imperfections [we need that for homogeneity and isotropy; immediate big rip cyclic cosmology is more noisy])...

I return to the subject: but the primordial omniblackhole was only the maximal degeneracy black hole core (without the accretion disc, the particles' halo, the astrophysical jets and the regions inside the event horizon which aren't maximally degenerate as inside typical black holes]), and being a condensate due to degeneracy, it couldn't express heat, but it could express fine structure degeneracy of high energy virtual particles' interactions. Exceedance of the degeneracy threshold of spacetime itself, causes the fine structure (slightly different states virtual particles can exist) energy levels to tangle amongst themselves, then the omniblackhole collapses into a big bang (big rip and big bang not capitalized in cyclic cosmology except when we speak about the causes of our universe-strain).

The overall omniblackhole is practically a single indivisible particle, which is equivalent to overlapping interpreted virtual particles (in order to be analyzed).

You can blame me all day long, but we have to do something in order we understand the big bang.

We shouldn't be afraid.

## text 5: black holes and entropy

Black holes include many microstates behind the event horizon = they have enormous entropy, but the chromodynamic torus (ringularities and singularities are physically impossible) being maximally degenerate = maximal degeneracy of spacetime itself (only the most compressed region inside the event horizon) has very low entropy (maximal degeneracy cannot express enough microstates; we can use our understanding of maximal degeneracy for the pre-Big-Bang state; the CMB radiation patterns are collapse results in our Everettian universe-strain [Everettianly other zillion other big bang collapses and different CMP patterns were produced in alternative evolutions]).

Why microscopic black holes don't exist? Maximal degeneracy in order to be maintained it requires a loop-tunneling reabsorption [mechanism] headroom. Microscopic black holes immediately evaporate because they don't have the loop-tunneling reabsorption (of the maximally degenerate chromodynamic fluid; but when it escapes it becomes high energy particles and radiation; it changes state) headroom.

General relativity doesn't elaborate at the specific field phenomena.

A black hole has layers, like any star, but it includes the loop-tunneling reabsorption [mechanism] headroom and various superfluid degenerate condensates.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

We have to use quantum field theory and computer simulations to test the possible structure behind the event horizon. Speaking only about general relativity without to care about the specific field mechanisms which cause the phenomena isn't enough.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

My ideas are stupid and erroneous.

People start with erroneous ideas and make corrections.

If you claim that huge black holes are totally maximally degenerate without layering you are wrong.

If you claim that the specific layering inside the event horizon will not help us understand how high entropy is compressed into low entropy via the production of extra gravity and astrophysical jets (because entropy has to be converted to something), and that this mechanism will not help us understand the cyclic pre-Big-Bang phase transition you are wrong.

If you have a better idea say it.

We have to play with these thing.

The most important thing is to understand the universe.

We have to get entropic/dirty/within erroneous ideas to find the correct ones.

## text 6: omniblackhole spin-decay big bang

All natural black holes rotate.

We have to prove that they necessarily rotate, due to the extra folding of spacetime by the rotation, and that a non rotating black hole, would immediately emit some part of its mass as gravitational waves, and the rest would randomly select a biased rotational direction.

Does a maximal limit of black hole rotation exist?

Yes.

A rotating black hole has the shape of an oblate spheroid (spin rates of 1,150 times per second has been reported).

(The black hole rotation is necessary due to the spatiotemporal dynamo effect of the black hole which compresses information and converts it into gravity [and jet particles when it absorbs mass–energy at a pace faster than the corresponding to its mass threshold of accretion [it has to be measured; it causes the quasars/ yes, each black hole mass has a threshold pace of accretion; it vomits out = jets out = quasars out the excessive mass–energy]

A way faster black hole rotation would cause the black hole to become even more oblate.

After a point of even faster rotation the black hole tends to become torus-like. The parts that become disk-like of the insanely spinning impossible black hole escape totally the black hole, and when the (very fast spinning/impossible in nature) black hole reaches the spin limit, it produces instabilities in the event horizon and it explodes because even its degenerate regions fragment by random interactions with the fields.

It is a silly thought experiment.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

The cyclic pre-big-bang state was a primordial omniblackhole (infinite or insanely huge).

We don't know the cause of the big bang.

The cause of the big bang has to do with the phase transition between maximal and minimal entropy.

A very old universe-strain experiences big rip which is maximally entropic. The mass-energy is enough to collapse into a primordial omniblackhole, which decays due to a quantum field theory mechanism or a topological quantum field theory adiabatic mechanism (we don't have that theory).

One playful way to avoid (as a game; then we have to return and elaborate the quantum field theory mechanism) quantum field theory (a little bit; still not totally), is to define the disintegration spin of the black hole.

Monster black holes spin slower than typical ones.

Thus the disintegration spin might have an upper and a lower threshold.

Thus one silly way to cheat (as a game; not as a final answer) is to calculate when the primordial omniblackhole = the pre-Big-Bang state, had no spin at all. Black holes necessarily spin as a way to fold more information and spacetime. When the spin stops the black hole disintegrates, and that caused the pre-big-bang state to decay into the big bang.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

We need to find the omniblackhole spin decay mechanism and compare it with quantum field theory versions of the omniblackhole decay.