Armillaria gallica

Template:Short description
Template:Taxobox
Template:Mycomorphbox

***Armillaria gallica*** (synonymous with *A. bulbosa* and *A. lutea*) is a species of honey mushroom in the family Physalacriaceae of the order Agaricales. The species is a common and ecologically important wood-decay fungus that can live as a saprobe, or as an opportunistic parasite in weakened tree hosts to cause root or butt rot. It is found in temperate regions of Asia, North America, and Europe. The species forms fruit bodies singly or in groups in soil or rotting wood. The fungus has been inadvertently introduced to South Africa. *Armillaria gallica* has had a confusing taxonomy, due in part to historical difficulties encountered in distinguishing between similar *Armillaria* species. The fungus received international attention in the early 1990s when an individual colony living in a Michigan forest was reported to cover an area of Template:Convert, weigh at least Template:Convert, and be 1,500 years old. This individual is popularly known as the "humungous fungus", and is a tourist attraction and inspiration for an annual mushroom-themed festival in Crystal Falls. Recent studies have revised the fungus’s age to 2,500 years and its size to about 440 tons, four times the original estimate.

*Armillaria gallica* is a largely subterranean fungus, and it produces fruit bodies that are up to about Template:Convert in diameter, yellow-brown, and covered with small scales. On the underside of the caps are gills that are white to creamy or pale orange. The stem may be up to Template:Convert long, with a white cobwebby ring that divides the color of the stem into pale orange to brown above, and lighter-colored below. The fungus can develop an extensive system of underground root-like structures, called rhizomorphs, that help it to efficiently decompose dead wood in temperate broadleaf and mixed forests. It has been the subject of considerable scientific research due to its importance as a plant pathogen, its ability to bioluminesce, its unusual life cycle, and its ability to form large and long-lived colonies.

## Phylogeny, taxonomy and naming

Template:Cladogram
Confusion has surrounded the nomenclature and taxonomy of the species now known as *Armillaria gallica*, paralleling that surrounding the genus *Armillaria*. The type species, *Armillaria mellea*, was until the 1970s believed to be a pleiomorphic species with a wide distribution, variable pathogenicity, and one of the broadest host ranges known for the fungi. In 1973, Veikko Hintikka reported a technique to distinguish between *Armillaria* species by growing them together as single spore isolates on petri dishes and observing changes in the morphology of the cultures. Using a similar technique, Kari Korhonen showed in 1978 that the European *Armillaria mellea* species complex could be separated into five reproductively isolated species, which he named "European Biological Species" (EBS) A through E. About the same time, the North American *A. mellea* was shown to be ten different species (North American Biological Species, or NABS I through X); NABS VII was demonstrated shortly after to be the same species as EBS E. Because several research groups had worked with this widely distributed species, it was assigned several different names.

The species that Korhonen called EBS B was named *A. bulbosa* by Helga Marxmüller in 1982, as it was thought to be equivalent to *Armillaria mellea* var. *bulbosa*, first described by Jean Baptiste Barla (Joseph Barla) in 1887, and later raised to species status by Josef Velenovský in 1927. In 1973, the French mycologist Henri Romagnesi, unaware of Velenovský's publication, published a description of the species he called *Armillariella bulbosa*, based on specimens he had found near Compiègne and Saint-Sauveur-le-Vicomte in France. These specimens were later demonstrated to be the same species as the EBS E of Korhonen; EBS B was later determined to be *A. cepistipes*. Therefore, the name *A. bulbosa* was a misapplied name for EBS E. In 1987 Romagnesi and Marxmüller renamed EBS E to *Armillaria gallica*. Another synonym, *A. lutea*, had originally been described by Claude Casimir Gillet in 1874, and proposed as a name for EBS E. Although the name had priority due to its early publication date, it was rejected as a *nomen ambiguum* because of a lack of supporting evidence to identify the fungus, including a specimen, type locality, and incomplete collection notes. *A. inflata* (Velenovský, 1920) may represent another synonym, but the type specimens were not preserved, so it is considered a dubious name (*nomen dubium*). As of 2010, both the Index Fungorum and MycoBank consider *Armillaria gallica* Marxm. & Romagn. to be the current name, with *A. bulbosa* and *A. lutea* as synonyms.

Phylogenetic analysis of North American *Armillaria* species based on analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data suggests that *A. gallica* is most closely related to *A. sinapina*, *A. cepistipes*, and *A. calvescens*. These results are similar to those reported in 1992 that compared sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA.

The specific epithet *gallica* is botanical Latin for "French" (from *Gallia*, "Gaul"), and refers to the type locality. The prior name *bulbosa* is Latin for "bulb-bearing, bulbous" (from *bulbus* and the suffix -*osa*). *Armillaria* is derived from the Latin *armilla*, or "bracelet".

## Description

Template:Multiple image
The fruit bodies of *Armillaria gallica* have caps that are Template:Convert broad, and depending on their age, may range in shape from conical to convex to flattened. The caps are brownish-yellow to brown when moist, often with a darker-colored center; the color tends to fade upon drying. The cap surface is covered with slender fibers (same color as the cap) that are erect, or sloping upwards.

When the fruit bodies are young, the underside of the caps have a cottony layer of tissue stretching from the edge of the cap to the stem—a partial veil—which serves to protect the developing gills. As the cap grows in size the membrane is eventually pulled away from the cap to expose the gills. The gills have an adnate (squarely attached) to somewhat decurrent (extending down the length of the stem) attachment to the stem. They are initially white, but age to a creamy or pale orange covered with rust-colored spots. The stem is Template:Convert long and Template:Convert thick, and almost club-shaped with the base up to Template:Convert thick. Above the level of the ring, the stem is pale orange to brown, while below it is whitish or pale pink, becoming grayish-brown at the base. The ring is positioned about Template:Convert below the level of the cap, and may be covered with yellowish to pale-brownish woolly cottony mycelia. The base of the stem is attached to rhizomorphs, black root-like structures 1–3 mm in diameter. While the primary function of the below-ground mycelia is to absorb nutrients from the soil, the rhizomorphs serve a more exploratory function, to locate new food bases.

### Microscopic features

When the spores are seen in deposit, such as with a spore print, they appear whitish. They have an ellipsoid or oblong shape, usually contain an oil droplet, and have dimensions of 7–8.5 by 5–6 µm. The spore-bearing cells, the basidia, are club-shaped, four-spored (rarely two-spored), and measure 32–43 by 7–8.7 µm. Other cells present in the fertile hymenium include the cheilocystidia (cystidia present on the edge of a gill), which are club-shaped, roughly cylindrical and 15–25 by 5.0–12 µm. Cystidia are also present on the stem (called caulocystidia), and are broadly club-shaped, measuring 20–55 by 11–23 µm. The cap cuticle is made of hyphae that are irregularly interwoven and project upward to form the scales seen on the surface. The hyphae that make up the surface scales typically measure 26–88 µm long by 11–27 µm thick and can be covered with a crust of pigment. Clamp connections are present in the hyphae of most tissues.

### Edibility

Like all *Armillaria* species, *A. gallica* is considered edible. Thorough cooking is usually recommended, as the raw mushroom tastes acrid when fresh or undercooked. One author advises to consume only a small portion initially, as some people may experience an upset stomach. The taste is described as "mild to bitter", and the odor "sweet", or reminiscent of camembert cheese.

### Similar species

*Armillaria calvescens* is rather similar in appearance, and can only be reliably distinguished from *A. gallica* by observing microscopic characteristics. *A. calvescens* has a more northern distribution, and in North America, is rarely found south of the Great Lakes. *A. mellea* has a thinner stem than *A. gallica*, but can be more definitively distinguished by the absence of clamps at the base of the basidia. Similarly, *A. cepistipes* and *A. gallica* are virtually identical in appearance (especially older fruit bodies), and are identified by differences in geographical distribution, host range, and microscopic characteristics. Molecular methods have been developed to discriminate between the two species by comparing DNA sequences in the gene coding translation elongation factor 1-alpha.

### Metabolites

*Armillaria gallica* can produce cyclobutane-containing metabolites such as arnamiol, a natural product that is classified as a sesquiterpenoid aryl ester. Although the specific function of arnamiol is not definitively known, similar chemicals present in other *Armillaria* species are thought to play a role in inhibiting the growth of antagonistic bacteria or fungi, or in killing cells of the host plant prior to infection.

### Bioluminescence

The mycelia (but not the fruit bodies) of *Armillaria gallica* are known to be bioluminescent. Experiments have shown that the intensity of the luminescence is enhanced when the mycelia are disturbed during growth or when they are exposed to fluorescent light. Bioluminescence is caused by the action of luciferases, enzymes that produce light by the oxidation of a luciferin (a pigment). The biological purpose of bioluminescence in fungi is not definitively known, although several hypotheses have been suggested: it may help attract insects to help with spore dispersal, it may be a by-product of other biochemical functions, or it may help deter heterotrophs that might consume the fungus.

## Humongous fungus

 File:Armillaria gallica 27834.jpg
Researchers reported finding *Armillaria gallica* in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan in the early 1990s, during an unrelated research project to study the possible biological effects of extremely low frequency radio stations, which were being investigated as a means to communicate with submerged submarines. In one particular forest stand, *Armillaria*-infected oak trees had been harvested, and their stumps were left to rot in the field. Later, when red pines were planted in the same location, the seedlings were killed by the fungus, identified as *A. gallica* (then known as *A. bulbosa*). Using molecular genetics, they determined that the underground mycelia of one individual fungal colony covered Template:Convert, weighing over Template:Convert, with an estimated age of 1,500 years. The analysis used restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to examine isolates collected from fruit bodies and rhizomorphs (underground aggregations of fungal cells that resemble plant roots) along Template:Convert transects in the forest. The 15-hectare area yielded isolates that had identical mating type alleles and mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment patterns; this degree of genetic similarity indicated that the samples were all derived from a single genetic individual, or clone, that had reached its size through vegetative growth. In their conclusion, the authors noted: "This is the first report estimating the minimum size, mass, and age of an unambiguously defined fungal individual. Although the number of observations for plants and animals is much greater, members of the fungal kingdom should now be recognized as among the oldest and largest organisms on earth." After the *Nature* paper was published, major media outlets from around the world visited the site where the specimens were found; as a result of this publicity, the individual acquired the common name "humongous fungus". There was afterward some scholarly debate as to whether the fungus qualified to be considered in the same category as other large organisms such as the blue whale or the giant redwood.

The fungus has since become a popular tourist attraction in Michigan, and has inspired a "Humongous Fungus Fest" held annually in August in Crystal Falls. The organism was the subject of a Late Show Top Ten List on Late Night with David Letterman, and an advertising campaign by the rental company U-Haul.

## Life cycle and growth

The life cycle of *A. gallica* includes two diploidization–haploidization events. The first of these is the usual process of cell fusion (forming a diploid) followed by meiosis during the formation of haploid basidiospores. The second event is more cryptic and occurs before fruit body formation. In most basidiomycetous fungi, the hyphae of compatible mating types will fuse to form a two-nucleate, or dikaryotic stage; this stage is not observed in *Armillaria* species, which have cells that are mostly monokaryotic and diploid. Genetic analyses suggest that the dikaryotic mycelia undergo an extra haploidization event prior to fruit body formation to create a genetic mosaic. These regular and repeating haploidization events result in increased genetic diversity, which helps the fungus to adapt to unfavorable changes in environmental conditions, such as drought.

The growth rate of *A. gallica* rhizomorphs is between Template:Convert per year. Population genetic studies of the fungus conducted in the 1990s demonstrated that genetic individuals grow mitotically from a single point of origin to eventually occupy territories that may include many adjacent root systems over large areas (several hectares) of forest floor. Based on the low mutation rates observed in large, long-lived individuals, *A. gallica* appears to have an especially stable genome. It has also been hypothesized that genetic stability may result from self-renewing mycelial repositories of nuclei with stem cell-like properties.

## Habitat and distribution

 File:Armillaria gallica 57632.jpg
*Armillaria gallica* can normally be found on the ground, but sometimes on stumps and logs. Mushrooms that appear to be terrestrial are attached to plant roots underneath the surface. It is widely distributed and has been collected in North America, Europe, and Asia (China, Iran, and Japan). The species has also been found in the Western Cape Province of South Africa, where it is thought to have been introduced from potted plants imported from Europe during the early colonization of Cape Town. In Scandinavia, it is absent in areas with very cold climates, like Finland or Norway, but it is found in southern Sweden. It is thought to be the most prevalent low altitude species of *Armillaria* in Great Britain and France. The upper limits of its altitude vary by region. In the French Massif Central, it is found up to Template:Convert, while in Bavaria, which has a more continental climate, the upper limit of distribution reaches Template:Convert. In Serbian forests, it is the most common *Armillaria* between elevations of Template:Convert. Field studies suggest that *A. gallica* prefers sites that are low in organic matter and have high soil pHs.

In North America, it is common east of the Rocky Mountains, but rare in the Pacific Northwest. In California, where it is widely distributed, the fungus is found in a variety of plant communities, including aspen, coastal oak woodland, Douglas Fir, Klamath mixed conifer, montane hardwood, montane hardwood-conifer, montane riparian, Redwood, Sierran mixed conifer, valley oak woodland, valley-foothill riparian, and White Fir. It was found to be the most common *Armillaria* species in hardwood and mixed oak forests in western Massachusetts.

A Chinese study published in 2001 used the molecular biological technique restriction fragment length polymorphism to analyze the differences in DNA sequence between 23 *A. gallica* specimens collected from the Northern Hemisphere. The results suggest that based on the restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns observed, there are four global *A. gallica* subpopulations: the Chinese, European, North American–Chinese, and North American–European geographical lineages. A 2007 study on the northeastern and southwestern Chinese distribution of *Armillaria*, using fruit body and pure culture morphology, concluded that there are several unnamed species (Chinese biological species C, F, H, J and L) that are similar to the common *A. gallica*.

## Ecology

 File:Trichoderma harzianum.jpg
*Armillaria gallica* is a weaker pathogen than the related *A. mellea* or *A. solidipes*, and is considered a secondary parasite—typically initiating infection only after the host's defenses have been weakened by insect defoliation, drought, or infection by another fungus. Fungal infection can lead to root rot or butt rot. As the diseased trees die, the wood dries, increasing the chance of catching fire after being struck by lightning. The resulting forest fire may, in turn, kill the species that killed the trees. Plants that are under water stress caused by dry soils or waterlogging are more susceptible to infection by *A. gallica*. It has been shown to be one of several *Armillaria* species responsible for widespread mortality of oak trees in the Arkansas Ozarks. The fungus has also been shown to infect Daylily in South Carolina, Northern highbush blueberry (*Vaccinium corymbosum*) in Italy and vineyards (*Vitis* species) of Rías Baixas in northwestern Spain. The latter infestation "may be related to the fact that the vineyards from which they were isolated were located on cleared forestry sites". When *A. solidipes* and *A. gallica* co-occur in the same forest, infection of root systems by *A. gallica* may reduce damage or prevent infection from *A. solidipes*.

 File:Armillaria gallica 57535.jpg
*Armillaria gallica* can develop an extensive subterranean system of rhizomorphs, which helps it to compete with other fungi for resources or to attack trees weakened by other fungi. A field study in an ancient broadleaved woodland in England showed that of five *Armillaria* species present in the woods, *A. gallica* was consistently the first to colonize tree stumps that had been coppiced the previous year. Fractal geometry has been used to model the branching patterns of the hyphae of various *Armillaria* species. Compared to a strongly pathogenic species like *A. solidipes*, *A. gallica* has a relatively sparse branching pattern that is thought to be "consistent with a foraging strategy in which acceptable food bases may be encountered at any distance, and which favours broad and divisive distribution of potential inoculum." Because the rhizomorphs form regular networks, mathematical concepts of graph theory have been employed to describe fungal growth and interpret ecological strategies, suggesting that the specific patterns of network attachments allow the fungus "to respond opportunistically to spatially and temporally changing environments".

*Armillaria gallica* may itself be parasitized by other soil flora. Several species of the fungus *Trichoderma*, including *Trichoderma polysporum*, *T. harzianum* and *T. viride*, are able to attack and penetrate the outer tissue of *A. gallica* rhizomorphs and parasitize the internal hyphae. The infected rhizomorphs become devoid of living hyphae about one week after the initial infection. *Entoloma abortivum* is another fungus that can live parasitically upon *A. gallica*. The whitish-gray malformed fruit bodies that may result are due to the *E. abortivum* hyphae penetrating the mushroom and disrupting its normal development.

## See also

* List of *Armillaria* species
* List of bioluminescent fungi

## References

1. ↑ This Humongous Fungus Is as Massive as Three Blue Whales. Smithsonian Institution (15 October 2018). Retrieved on October 21, 2018.
2. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Termorshuizen1997`
3. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Volk1995`
4. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Hintikka1973`
5. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Korhonen1978`
6. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Anderson1979`
7. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Anderson1980`
8. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Marxmuller1982`
9. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Barla1887`
10. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Velenovsky1927`
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Marxmuller1992`
12. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Marxmuller1987`
13. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gillet1874`
14. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Watling1987`
15. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Termorshuizen1987`
16. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Antonin1990`
17. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlSpecies Fungorum - Species synonymy`
18. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlMycoBank, the fungal website`
19. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Kim2006`
20. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Anderson1992`
21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `OEDlatin`
22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Stearn`
23. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Stager1999`
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Fox2000`
25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Mihail1995`
26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Bas1995`
27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Antonin2009`
28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Rogers`
29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlArmillaria gallica (MushroomExpert.Com)`
30. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlarmillaria mellea gallica`
31. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gribble2009`
32. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dervilla1986`
33. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Peipp1992`
34. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Mihail2007`
35. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Shimomura2010`
36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sivinski1981`
37. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Buller1924`
38. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Stamets2000`
39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Volk2002`
40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Smith1992`
41. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Wilson1999`
42. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sceurman2010`
43. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sieger2004`
44. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Peabody1985`
45. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Peabody2000`
46. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Peabody2003`
47. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Peabody2005`
48. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gatto2009`
49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Rishbeth1991`
50. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Rizzo1995`
51. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Saville1996`
52. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Hodnett2000`
53. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gladfelter2009`
54. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Roody2003`
55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Qin2007`
56. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Asef2003`
57. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Ota2009`
58. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Coetzee2003`
59. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Guillaumin1993`
60. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Keca2009`
61. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Blodgett1992`
62. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Oliva2009`
63. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Ammirati2009`
64. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Baumgartner2001`
65. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Brazee2009`
66. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Qin2001`
67. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Marcais2006`
68. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Healy2008`
69. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Stamets2005`
70. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Packham2007`
71. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Kelly2009`
72. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Schnabel2005`
73. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Prodorutti2006`
74. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Prodorutti2009`
75. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `AguinCasal2003`
76. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlCFS:Armillaria gallica`
77. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Lamour2007`
78. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dumas1992`
79. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Czederpiltz2001`

## External links

Template:Commons

* Template:IndexFungorum

Template:Taxonbar
Template:Featured article