Αθεϊστικό κίνημα του Κολοράντο (αγγλικό κείμενο)

The Seal of Colorado includes the triangulated Eye of Providence (god's eye) and should be removed.

The majority rule doesn't authorize the nationalisation of personal beliefs.

The flag should represent all citizens and it should avoid metaphysical opinions including atheism (we never said we want our logos on it).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I compose philosophical texts on atheism = metaphysical naturalism.

The common hypernym of atheism and religion is "metaphysical worldview".

Atheists have the same rights on expressing metaphysical ideas, but religion isn't the hypernym of both itself and nonreligion. This is very important to note. We should protect our rights and push for the legal evolution.

Does an atheist have the same rights as a theist?

Is philosophy tautological to law?

No. They are different fields of study.

Is the law created by god, or do we humans gradually evolves it?

Can the law include a term not yet established?

The atheist has the same legal rights to express metaphysical worldview,

but that doesn't mean that "religion = violation of physics to fulfil human biases"

is "metaphysical naturalism = atheism = to accept nature as it is without to claim that humans are the center of the universe and some daddy or some magical field violates the causal series of event via magic which is pleasant to humans, and their goals and values".

Keep my texts.

Many atheists don't like me, because they simply want to say "there is no god", but I'm correct on analysing ideas, otherwise we will be not understood and we will have less rights, with the law using wrong terms that harm us.

atheism = a- + theism

Atheism is a theistic exonym. According to decision theory, atheism is disaffirmative to theism.

metaphysical naturalism is a synonym of atheism

Metaphysical naturalism is an endonym of unbiased analytical and impersonal reasoning.

According to decision theory, metaphysical naturalism is affirmative to unbiased analytical and impersonal reasoning.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The term religious adherent is hypernymous to theist, because not all religions have gods, neither if they do have gods are they cosmogonic (some gods are noncosmogonic).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Metaphysically important scientific fields of study, incompatible to religion:

Some religions adherents claim that science is compatible to religion[s].

This isn't the case for some very important fields of study in which you have to decide between atheism and religion:

1. pre-explosive cosmogony (watch on YouTube: Before the Big Bang 4 and all the other episodes) vs self-evident precosmic cosmogonic thinkers/bearer of personhood (person-god)

2. brain with its components (see: neuroscience, Nancy Kanwisher on YouTube) vs immaterial overdense pointlike personhood (see: simple (philosophy) Wikipedia),

here pointlike means without proper parts (not necessarily a dot).

Theists claim that thought pre-exists the biochemical functions of the brain, thus also the dead can think, and personhood isn't the result of brain processing.

3. chemical abiogenesis (watch on YouTube: Jack Szostak) vs divine origin of life

I have many other texts like:

Why Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye are wrong (they are wrong because we have their views) on confusing "metaphysical naturalism based on an incomplete theory" vs agnosticism: 1. doubt on the existence of god, 2. in agnostic theism and agnostic atheism certainty that the provability or the disprovability of the existence of god are fundamentally unreachable (in decision theory and philosophy usually the hypernym of and affirmative and disaffirmative statement is the affirmative statement but put/stated/posed in a generic way as a question) undecidability in the existential decision on god (decision here used as a term in decision theory).

Why all forms of agnosticism are metaphysically personocratic/mindocratic/personhood-biased?

Because 1. in common equilibrated agnosticism the possibility of a person-god is open (this is a metaphysically personocratic/mindocratic/personhood-biased view), 2. in both agnostic atheism and agnosticism theism, the state of decidability of god's existence is crucial (both agnostic atheists and agnosticism theists pay extreme attention to explore the decidability of god's existence, thus focus on the biased view about a supposedly self-evident precosmic cosmogonic person [disaffirmation doesn't cancel the interst bias].

There are infinite possible biases. Most biased views are never expressed. Usually people express biases which are beneficial to them.

explicit metaphysical personocracy: To claim that god is a person like you, and thus understands you.

implicit metaphysical personocracy: To claim that some impersonal divine field, violates physics (the causal series of events) either by immediately benefitting humans, or by explicitly pleasing their values and æsthetics on the cosmic order.

Ask for more.