recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
Deism In Media

A
--

Adepts of God = This is an online meta-franchise I made for both myself and anyone who is interested in telling stories about superheroes empowered by God. It started out as a goofy little game idea but it's definitely grown since then.

April Morning = Starring Tommy Lee Jones who plays the role of a Deist father during the revolution and how his death propels his son into maturity.

B

Benjamin Franklin = A self-professed Deist, Benjamin Franklin is regarded as both one of America's best statesmen and its first scientist.

Brother Cadfael = A medieval monk, seasoned by a lifetime of war in the crusades, now works to solve criminal mysteries using common sense and scientific knowledge. Frequently eschewing church rules and superstition, Cadfael proves himself a Deist by frequently instructing his close friends to not give up their reason and espouses a theology based more on common sense than church teaching.

Bruce Almighty = This comedic work by Tom Shadyac has the protagonist, Bruce Nolan, get God's attention after cursing His' name one too many times. Tired of Nolan's near constant berating, God offers him a chance to get a taste of what it is like being in charge of everything. Bruce Almighty was favorable towards all faiths equally and does not single out one over the other, in fact Nolan's relationship with God tends to be pretty straight on without any need for organized religion.

D

Deism (World of Warcraft)

Describe RMS As A Game

F

Facebook Deist Group = This is one of several Deism-related Groups registered on Facebook.

Faiths of the Founding Fathers = This informative book offers a more detailed example of what the religious landscape was like during the founding of America.

K

Kingdom of Heaven = A movie about a young Christian knight named Balian who comes to Jerusalem during the Crusades seeking forgiveness. Balian ends losing his faith and becoming an Atheist/Agnostic type. However, he befriends a Hospitaller knight who turns out to be a Deist who 'puts no stock in religion' but still believes in God. Eventually, Balian learns to trust his own conscience and works to bring an end to the crusade.

P

Philosophy Discussion (World of Warcraft)

R

Reddit Deism Group = This is the r/Deism on Reddit.Com.

T

Temple of Reason

The Name Of The Rose = Sean Connery stars as a scholastic monk who uses not blind faith but his own wits and intelligence to solve crimes and mysteries. This movie has a strong portrayal of the hierarchical church's tendency to being opposed to the spread of free information.
Creating Is Always Closeness To God

-Creating is the will of God, and to create is to immerse yourself in the mind of God.

-Therefore, Creator keeps you close to God, even if you don't explicitly pray to the sentience of Existence or whatnot, you are still keeping close to Him by creating.

\*The fact that God doesn't seem to communicate with us directly lends credence to the idea that He is more about us acting in concert with His nature than strictly just 'talking' to Him.
Connectivity

-Connectivity or the Connecting-Factor is the question of which TTB allows me to connect with all things.

>This is important because connecting with all things is a non-negotiable, it has to happen. Unlike other theological questions which are often of opinion, perceptions or a particular line of reasoning.

-Both Creator and Theist claim to offer a direct connection with all things.

\*Everything is closer to some other topic besides that of Theism (ie, Gaia, Machine, etc.).

## Actualization Nullifies the Names:

-You cannot use the Names of Theist to connect with God becuase of the question of Actualization. Because you cannot know everything, for all you know, what you think if the Actualization of a particular Name is actually something else.

>For instance, if you are connecting to God and something through the Prime-Mover Name, for all you know God somehow had something else be the Prime-Mover. For whatever reason He did this, who knows?

-Creator doesn't suffer from this because we know It exists, it exists all around us, we can do it inside our heads. Creator definitely is real and we can know It is Supreme ala the A-Ideal.

-It should be pointed out that the question of Actualization nullifies all Names, even that of The Creator. However, while this cripples Theist, Creator is just fine, since A-Infinity is still clearly Addition, thus you can still connect by being Creator.

## Existential Distance & Unknowability Still Kill The Names:

-Just because you can create symbolic ideas that connect you to God mentally doesn't not work all the time. In daily life, God feels distant, unknowable, and/or not even real. This is still a problem.
Doom Of Deism

by Benjamin Styles

When Deism spawned in early America, it seemed to have arrived on the scene at just the right time to burgeon into a legitimate religion in its own right. Many of the Founding Fathers were Deists, semi-Deists, Christian Deists, Half-Deists, or some other kind of Deist...

Thousands of years earlier, in ancient Greece, a form of philosophical Deism arose thanks to Platonism, Neo-Platonism and Aristotelianism. Yet, Religion dominated the ancient Aegean and the area eventually succumbed to Roman Catholicism.

In modern times, with the advent of the Internet, Deists can now communicate and organize online. Facebook groups abound and there are many, many websites featuring Deism or Deism-related topics. Yet, despite being around for over a decade, there still aren’t any Deist national conventions?

Why? Why does Deism consistently fail to organize itself and move towards a more established community?

I believe that Deism suffers from an internal weakness, that of Complacency.

Deism is a naturally occurring religion, so members of the group do not feel the need to proselytize in order to secure the future of their beliefs.

Some Deists have returned to religion or spirituality, citing a desire to remain skeptical of truth or authority claims but wanting to be part of an organized whole.

The Enlightenment era Deists eventually collapsed, as one online moderator put it, not because they lacked good arguments but because the fire went out of them. Christian heritage re-asserted itself and Deists lacked the energy to resist. The same explanation can be used for what happened in early America. Deism failed to really distinguish itself apart from American Protestantism and eventually its members were ‘re-absorbed.’

Most people who come to Deism eventually slide out of it or simply fade away due to lack of ‘content’ or interest. I’ve written before how Deism can be highly satisfying and effective as a chosen religious standpoint, but it needs to be welded to a specialty.

Deistic or semi-Deistic groups like the Freemasons, Bavarian Illuminati, Facebook Deist Community, the 18th century Sons of Liberty and more all prove that Deism can be highly successful. But it needs a purpose. You need to ‘do something’ with it or else you slowly fall away.

Complacency has been the roadblock for Deism historically. If Deists want to overcome it, we need to do a better job of erecting sub-groups. Some Deists have acknowledge online that Deism makes for a great category of religion but that a human being will need more in order to clarify their beliefs and give themselves an identity.
Necessary Existence

-The A-Ideal is not about Existence. At least, not in one way of thinking about it. Existence in its entirety is A-Infinity.

-The A-Ideal is not about A-Infinity. It is only about the Object of Itself. This is a crucial difference and failing to see that will lead to Creator TTB (which is about A-Infinity in practice).

\*What is the A-Ideal all about? Not all of Existence, but Its own Existence, which is Theist and not Creator etymologically.
Divine-Will

-The Question has never been Certainty or Supremacy (what is known or what is best) but instead the Divine-Will (what does God want us to be?). Whenever I shift to Theist or Creator, it is because I think that's what the Overmind would want.

-So the Anchor and Question are the principle of the Divine-Will.

\*All other notions, such as Least-Parts, etc., are but traps to divert from this. Both Creator and Theist rely directly and solely on the FBE and nothing else.

\*See Absolutist-TTB.

## Divine-Will Argument:

-What does God want us to be?

>The Divine-Will is the FBE (Force-Behind-Existence). The FBE would want to be the A-Ideal, for that is the greatest concept. The A-Ideal is all about Itself.

>How do we follow the A-Ideal? In general, because Least-Parts makes no other option viable. Any additional parts requires argumentation which always introduces parts and thus introduces Doubt *even if the arguments are correct*!

>God would not build a reality like this and then demand a specific TTB that makes it impossible to confidently connect with Him.
God's Preferences

-God's Preferences = God prefers law over disorder, good over evil, and creator over destroyer. Life is about learning all of these. You don't need to push it by being just one TTB dedicated to any of them!

>Notice how people know this stuff instinctively anyway!

>More than anything, people must first and foremost remain bonded to God! That is the spirit of Theist !
How To Determine The TTB Of The A-Ideal

-How to determine the TTB of A-Ideal

\*The big takeaway here is the Internal-Action.

\*\*What would God want? He would want Specific-Worship!

>Specific-Worship, the A-Ideal would want us to have whatever TTB allows us to see It as It actually exists. Then we can know It and follow It.

>Specific-Worship is directly related to Internal-Action, because it is the Internal-Action that determines what the A-Ideal exists as precisely.

>The Internal-Action is Variation of God/End-Goal whose TTB is Existence/Creator. We know Creator is the etymological TTB of this because that is how it is Defined.

+Arguments against Creator TTB also work against Theist TTB and lead us back to the Darkness!

+Can we truly know the Internal-Action? Yes! Because there can be nothing left out! The A-Ideal is all things happening at once in order to be Itself! There is an infinite number of ways for A-Ideal to exist which incorporate all things, and all must be possible otherwise there is something that doesn't exist.

+What if there is more to the TTB of Theist than what we can see right now? The answer to this is that Creator is defined as being the TTB of Existence, so they wuld have the same Attribute List. The only real question is how accurate is how perception of Creator TTB?

++Why not just follow God in general as Theist? Because it opens us up to imperfection! We must follow God as He actually is!
God As Existence

-Putting aside any notion of the supernatural, which is hard for us modern people to contemplate let alone believe in, there is still the reality that we live within an infinite-substance that is Existence (as proven via Ind.).

-Infinity Theology and Ind. show that God is Himself what we call Existence. Therefore, the study of Existence is Theist.
Native Americans Already Deists?

Native American religion was complex, mostly because it didn't exist as a cohesive whole but instead was a series of oral traditions held by different groups and individuals. Shamans or 'medicine men' were the closest thing most Amerindian groups had to priests, although they derived their spiritual authority from communal acceptance rather than from some kind of priestly class (more or less).

Lewis and Clark were the first to encounter some tribes of Native peoples, and they reported stories of Amerindian religious belief in a 'Great Spirit' or 'Great Grandfather.' In one encounter, they remarked how Natives believed that this Grandfather decided people's fate and seemed to control the events of the world.

-http://www.native-languages.org/creator.htm
Modern Deism

"Modern Deism is not universally recognized as a distinct branch of Deism, but the number of people who fall into this group is too large to ignore. Modern Deism is the term used by members of a group of websites that later became the Deist Alliance. Sites such as Modern Deism, Positive Deism, Dynamic Deism, Deist Information and PONDER (no longer active) began promoting a positive and constructive form of Deism in the early and mid-2000s to counter what they felt was an overly critical and negative approach to Deism found elsewhere. Most of the original founders of Modern Deism are no longer active themselves, although some of their sites remain active. The Deist Alliance remains committed to promoting what was originally called Modern Deism."

-http://www.sbnr.org/varieties-and-categories-of-deism.html
Core Concept

-The Core Concept, as used in my A-Ideal theology/metaphysics, is that the idea behind the A-Ideal is all that It is.

-'There must be Something which is all other things combined' is the idea that leads to the A-Ideal.

>It is part of the A-Ideal, is Its only part (as per No Parts rule).

>Because it is Addition, A-Ideal is therefore Creator.

-Whether It is truly the A-Ideal adding things from Itself or things folding into A-Ideal, the result is still Addition.

-As per Internal/External rule, the A-Ideal wants our TTB to be Creator/Addition because that is what the A-Ideal is.

>Arguments that other things share in the nature of Creator are flawed; all things share in nature of Creator to some extent. Only A-Ideal is Fullness of Creating and all creating leads back to It.

-Does the A-Ideal care about all creatings or just Its own act of Self-Creation?

>Within the infinite frequency that is the substance of A-Ideal there exists the idea(s) of further parts, objects and creatings. Therefore, the A-Ideal is about them because the idea(s) behind it is part of It as well, and the A-Ideal is most definitely about Itself!

## How Can You Be Sure Core-Concept Is Creator?:

-The Creator-Object can be thought of as all other things combined into one. This is a fact inherent to the Object Itself.

>Besides, the Creator-Object/s one and only internal-act is Self-Creation, thus making It Creator anyway (ala No Parts).

>Also, remember the WOIP.
Caveat Of Theist

-The problem with 'being only all about' the A-Ideal is that everything is immediately related to A-Ideal. In order to truly be about all things related to A-Ideal, it is therefore necessary to still be about all things.

-You cannot truly separate the A-Ideal from A-Infinity in practical terms without not somehow being about the A-Ideal. Each is needed to fully be about the other.

## Aim of the A-Ideal?:

-While our TTB should be determined only by the A-Ideal and what it is, both Creator and Theist have made this same argument. Ergo, Aim does not adequately explain what the A-Ideal is simply by stating that It is 'all about Itself.'

>There are an infinite number of ways for the A-Ideal to be about Itself!
Intelligent-Design

-Our natural universe already argues this case, as evidenced by Biologos or Intelligent Design or whatever you want to call it. Natural Theology.

-Even if we live in a simulated or artificial world, whoever put us here are themselves creations that must have arisen in a universe of complexity.

-There is also the fact that some things exist and others don't. That means that the FBE, whatever It is that made things the way they are, created some things but didn't create other things that It could have. This implies willfulness on Its part, a conscious decision to make somethings but not others in order to achieve a goal!
Mortal Perception

-The problem with trying to define a TTB into being the TTB of the A-Ideal is that you can't know that one day you will uncover some other truth inherent within the A-Ideal which will change the TTB as you understand it.

-Unless you know all of the A-Ideal, ie its Attribute List, you can never be wholly sure that there isn't some other aspect or truth of the A-Ideal that will restrict, specificy or otherwise change the perception of what the TTB of the A-Ideal is!
Most Specific

-Both Theist and Creator have PTBASE, both depend only on the one Object of the A-Ideal...

-The only difference is that one is more specific than the other.

-This is in line with the A-Ideal which is *only about Itself as It actually is*. It therefore would only want the TTB that is most specific about Itself, since that TTB would be the most correct.

>The A-Ideal is all about perfection, It would not want TTB's that include imperfect variations of Itself.

>The A-Ideal desires utmost specificity because It is so perfect It cannot abide even the chance for imperfection or misunderstanding.

## The Truth Matters:

-Creator is what God actually is. What He is all about. Theist is open to multiple ideas of God, and falls apart when you try to nail God to certain truth. While Theist appears okay on the outside, in reality it is insipid and destructive because it lacks commitment to the truth.

-The reason you should be Creator over Theist, even if it does seem contrary to common sense, is because of Truth.

## Only Actualization:

-The A-Ideal is an Object that is Pure Actualization, perfect existence.

-Actualization is all that the A-Ideal is, and all that It is about. This is obvious to the mind.

-This also means that the A-Ideal would want a TTB that can only ever be about Actualization.

>Theist can be about other things besides Actualization. But Creator cannot.

>Theist gets its parameters right, but it misses the nature of the A-Ideal which the TTB cannot miss!

>
Ladder-Spoiler

-How can you be sure there isn't something out there that can offset Sum Of All Addition and change the overall nature of Creator-Object once it is introduced?

>Because of infinite-variation. For everything that may off-set, there must be an opposite that somehow changes it back!

>Infinite-Variation, like Spiral-Staircase, always brings everything back to Addition!
Deist Jesus

A Deist Jesus

This article does not insist that a human or mythical Jesus did in fact exist.

Setting aside the multifarious creeds and dogmas of all the various denominations and faiths, there is a core as old as humankind that can be termed natural religion. This is what arises from human observation and experience processed through reason.

Natural religion started to acquire a more formal aspect in 17th Century England when deism began to emerge. The word “deism” comes from the Latin “deus” which means God and was adopted to differentiate from the Greek “theos”, the root of theism, denoting the beliefs of Trinitarian Christians.

Deists proposed that the universe in general and humankind in particular, are not some random, chance creation. The intentional Originator is commonly called “God”, although deists often prefer the word Deus.

God or Deus, it is insisted, defies human comprehension and description, but the existence of such can be inferred from the complexity of creation acting according to discernible laws. Humans have purpose in their lives, so why should purpose be denied on behalf of wider creation.

Early deists mostly considered themselves to be Christians, their thinking emerging from the Trinitarian orthodoxy of the day. However, they insisted that Jesus had taught natural religion, his teachings subsequently subverted by Paul of Tarsus.

This subversion was further exacerbated when Christianity became a formal religion and the “word of God” was set into creeds and dogma by Church councils, beginning with the first in 325AD.

Jesus taught within a Jewish context, but his genius was to transcend it. The natural religion he promulgated was that one God was/is creator, with love of God and love of one’s neighbors being the two commandments.

Evidence that Jesus transcended his Jewish background can be seen in his broadening the concept of neighbor. At his time, according to Jewish law, a neighbor was a fellow Jew or a non-Jewish “sojourner”, a guest of the Jews. Jesus extended the notion of neighbor to include every Jew and gentile in the world.

Deists opposed Trinitarian doctrines such as original sin, the sacrificial atonement by Jesus’ crucifixion, the condemnation to Hell of non-Christians, the Trinity of God and the divinity of Jesus. Deists intended restoring the natural religion of Jesus.

Scientific thinking was embraced by deists as demonstrating the organized wonder of creation. Science was an ally not an obstacle to expanding human understanding of some of the Originator’s intentions. If science contradicted a religious precept, then that precept had been falsified and must give way.

Deism accepted the example Jesus set, that orthodoxy is no guarantee of veracity. Indeed, natural religion requires each individual to engage with creation, look beyond accepted orthodoxy and employ reason to gain some appreciation of divine being.
Early deists mostly considered themselves to be Christians, their thinking emerging from the Trinidadian orthodoxy of the day. However, they insisted that Jesus had taught natural religion, his teachings subsequently subverted by Paul of Tarsus.

-Original Source.
Creator Favored

-Why would God favor the concept of Creator so much It would define Him and be the TTB?

-Because Creator is Actualization, and God is the Actualization of all potential. It is why He is what He is, why He is Almighty. And almightiness is the defining characteristic of divinity.

-Creator is the only thing God does, and is the only thing God exists as.
Fullness Of Creator Cannot Be A Specific Type Of Creator

-The A-Ideal is, somehow, the Fullness Of Creating despite being just one Object.

-The A-Ideal cannot be a specific type of Creator if It is also the Fullness of Creating. Either It is all of Creating or It isn't!

-We know the A-Ideal is the Fullness Of Creating because whatever the A-ideal, It must be the fullness of it. The A-Ideal is somehow all things, so if anything is the Fullness Of Creating, it is the A-Ideal.
Least-Parts (Creator)

-The Quest for Certainty ends with Least-Parts.

-Creator TTB requires only one part, the concept of Creator, and from that we get everything we need. Theist, however, requires the A-Ideal, Indivisability, and the Force Behind Existence, which is parts!

-The Shifting is the storm of uncertainty and chaos of existence that tears apart any TTB with parts (or unknowns involved in its foundation). The only TTB that can resist the Shifting is one with Least-Parts.

## Notes:

-We need a single concept to dedicate our lives to, because concepts are all we truly posses.

-Creator TTB is the greatest concept because it can create any other concept, thus it posses their attributes within itself.

-Creator will always exist because as long as something exists, there is Creator. Also, as long as their is a Supreme, Creator (if not the Supreme's nature) will at least in Its potential.

-Creator is just all around simple and obvious, where else Theist always requires an argument (and arguments are parts!). This is why Theist always fails, as does trying to attach Creator to A-Ideal. Creator as a concept can stand on its own apart from A-Ideal (although technically they are probably both the same).
Logic

Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, *logikḗ*), originally meaning "the word" or "what is spoken" (but coming to mean "thought" or "reason"), is generally held to consist of the systematic study of the form of arguments. A valid argument is one where there is a specific relation of logical support between the assumptions of the argument and its conclusion. (In ordinary discourse, the conclusion of such an argument may be signified by words like *therefore*, *hence*, *ergo* and so on.)
Actualization Is Creation

-Actualization is Creator, since it is about adding by nature to existence. It is obvious to the mind that you cannot Actualize something without adding.

-As such, since the A-Ideal is a single Object that is all things Actualized at once, the only constant to the A-ideal is thus Actualization/Creator. Thus making the A-Ideal nothing but Creator.

-As per Theological Responsibility, this is the only TTB we should be, else we risk ignoring or misabusing something that is actually of God.

### Other Systems of Infinity Besides Actualization?:

-Actualization is the bringing forth and activation of Potential. Because all things exist in Potential, all things fall under the perview of Actualization, so there is no room left for any other 'system.'

### Actualization & Potential:

-Potential is itself Actualization in a sense, certainly in how the A-Ideal already exists and is all things combined which makes it all of Potential. Any created objects are thus from that Potential and are themselves Actualization.
Bad Things Happening

-Some Theists, usually the superstitious ones like Xtrians or other Abrahamists, often interpret calamity or things not going their way as somehow being a sign of God's displeasure.

-However, this is odd given that it is also recognized that God often causes things to happen to people regardless of whether they deserve it or not. Not because He is fickle, but because He orchestrates things from afar.

-Perhaps something bad happened to you because you deserved it... or maybe it was The Creator's way of triggering a new line of casualty that which actually prove beneficial?

-We mortals can never tell, because the number of variables in life is staggering.
Actions Before Allegiance

-One reason God might want Creator before Theist is because He is surprisingly uninterested in whether we relate back to Him often.

-God is The Creator, and to Him it matters more that we behave well, be productive, and be creative, rather than simply swear allegiance to Him. How many people frequently relate back to God in organized religion and yet are despicable people?!

\*This would also answer a long-standing and nagging question in human history; why God is aloof from us.

\*Also, see Intense Personal Relationship? page.
Creator's Auto-Correct

-There are an infinite number of potential TTBs, each with an infinite number of potential problems.

-Creator is unique in that it covers all objects but is defned as being about all existence in general and whatever actualized existence we have in specific. What this mans is that whatever works best per present scenario of existence is therefoe what Creator TTB would be about.

-This is the Umbrella-Model argument from Theist turned instead to Creator TTB.
Go-Negative As Anchor (Creator)

-While we must trust in God, for purposes of stuff like The Darkness and Cosmic-Trickster, and Protected-Knowledge is a thing; nonetheless, we can't know for sure what God may teach in the future.

>God could one day reveal a truth which completely eradicates or makes useless the Theocentric mindset of Theist TTB. It has to be possible and there's no way to prove definitively that it can't happen. Because anything is possible and we don't know all of God or what God has done.

## We Can't Know All The Truths About God:

-And unless we know everything about God, we cannot make a definitive conclusio about either what He is or what He wants. Certaintly not enough to justify a specific TTB!

## OESDE Kills Go-Negative:

Must Be An Infinite # Of Ways Theist Can Go Negative Without God Not Being Good:

-OESDE.

-And we can't know for sure if one of these is actualized!

-Endless-Questions!

-Must Be An Infinite # Of Ways Theist Can Go Negative Without God Not Being A-Ideal!

-Must be an infinite # of potential truths that if actualized would somehow make Theist not Go-Negative even if God Himself never did. OESDE.

-Infinite # of reasons in potential that God could exist as A-Ideal or whatever else we think, and He would still not want us to be Theist for whatever reason. The Will of God cannot be known in Its fullness!

-Hahahahaha!

-ETc etc etc etc etc.!
Eternal-Potential Refuted

-How do you know Potential will always last? What if in the future all things come to an end, no chance for anything after that? How can you really know?...

-I've answered these questions already, but the Anchor proper should have something that instantly deals with this. Creator TTB doesn't, certainly not in this format.

-BTW, remember how Creator TTB got crushed in real-life by The Darkness!?
Act Of Adding Is Only Part A-Ideal Has

-This is really the central point behind A-Ideal being the Creator-Object.

-This is what the A-Ideal is truly 'all about.'

-Any other discernable feature of the A-Ideal, like the Aim of the A-Ideal, is a consequence of this. To say otherwise is to introduce parts to the A-Ideal!

>Also, we can know that A-Ideal is all sufficient and thus only about Itself precisely because It is an act of infinite Actualizaton!

## But The A-Ideal Never Actually Adds!?:

-While A-Ideal doesn't form together to add up, It exists with the potential to be Whole or Parts, something which is inherent to It. Ergo, Addition as a concept is inherent to Object of the A-Ideal.

-The fact the WOIP exists also reinforces this.-
It Feels Weird When

-The important difference between Theist and Creator is how they relate to other objects. Theist needs only the Object of the A-Ideal, as per keeping with Aim of the A-Ideal. Creator will come up with fancy arguments, but in real-life when you are Creator TTB, it feels weird to lose, ignore, turn your back on or otherwise lose other objects in the category of Creator. Therefore, Creator fails that trait for the substance of the A-Ideal.
Needs Only One Object

-If Creator can be shown not to posses all of the traits of the substance of the A-Ideal, than it can't be the TTB of the A-Ideal.

-The A-Ideal, as per Aim of the A-Ideal, is only about Itself.

-Ergo, the A-Ideal requires only one object, that of Itself.

-But Creator is about all objects that more or less conform to the concept of creating or existence.

>To lose any of them is an affront to Creator and it feels a need to keep them!

-Therefore, it cannot be the TTB of the A-Ideal.

>For Creator TTB to lose anything that is 'creator' is an affront to its nature. This is obvious to mind and stems from personal experience.

\*Of course the Creator category requires mutliple objects, since the whole point behind Creator TTB is to collect and add objects that conform to the creator concept. But this creates a principle need for multiple objects, since to lose any of them runs counter to the point behind the whole thing.

\*A TTB can't stand to lose an object that conforms (more or less) to its nature. But only the A-Ideal has the full nature of the A-Ideal, and so that is the only thing Theist truly cares about.
Civilization As The Work Of God

Shifting seems to come from a feeling of vagueness about God. God is supposed to be distant, blurry and unknown.

>God can be known via the A-Ideal. And The Creator's intentions for us and this universe can be gleaned from how it was constructed: God wants the continuation and blossoming of civilization itself. Because our universe is geared towards the creation of that.
Caveat Of Aim Of The A-Ideal

-The A-Ideal is all-sufficient. It is completely and all just about Itself.

-However... everything is either the A-Ideal or the work of the A-Ideal. So doesn't that mean we should be about all objects anyway?

\*It's impossible to separate A-Ideal from everything else, since the A-Ideal is immediately related to all things.
Creator Tends Towards Full Actualization (Is Thus About Itself)

-The Aim of the A-Ideal is that the A-Ideal is only just all about Itself.

-Creator, which is Actualization, by its very nature is constantly pushing towards and favors Full Actualization.

-Full Actualilzation is the A-Ideal. That's the very core concept behind A-Ideal, to be all things actualized together as one.

-Therefore, Creator does indeed fulfill Aim of the A-Ideal!
Absolutist-TTB

-Theist is meant to be general and follows God/A-Ideal in general, with further specifications of Its nature being important but not determinate to the TTB.

-Creator requires God to be specifically creator-oriented and involves a host of further questions like the nature of creator, being creator, creator apart from Theist TTB, etc.

-Creator is absolute in this and so is an Absolutist-TTB and introduces doubt by requiring further parts beyond the A-Ideal/FBE.

## Absolutist-TTBs Always Distance Me From God!:

-Whenever I am Creator or any other Absolutist-TTB, I actually feel distant from God because I have to constantly second-check that God really has that concept as His nature!

-If purpose is derived from structure, than God would not have built our reality like this if He wanted us to follow Him with an Absolutist-TTB!
Can Function Without

-This is a more refined version of Potential To Be About Something Else and is also derived from the Aim of the A-Ideal principle.

-If the A-ideal is only all about the Object of Itself, than Its TTB cannot function without it. Ever. Even for a second.

\*Remember that the onus is on Creator here. Even one attribute of Creator turns out not to be kosher and its all over for Creator as a TTB!

## is The Object In The Definition?:

-Theist is defined as being about the almighty, which implies inherently a specific thing which is the best.

-Creator is specifically about addition, with a wider eye towards all of Existence.

>However, while Existence is God, it need not be the only setup for existing. There are alternate existences, an infinite number of which are a setup where God is not literally existence at all.

## Hypothetical Universe:

-In theory, you can create a hypothetical universe where A-Ideal isn't actualized, or at least isn't primary, and yet still be Creator. But you couldn't be Theist, or at least you couldn't be Theist and accept that reality.

>While it is possible to create a hypothetical existence where you trick A-Ideal into being about something else, that is self-defeating. If you have to trick the Theist TTB, that instantly just proves that It is about nothing but the A-Ideal after all!

## You Can Be Creator Without A-Ideal:

-If, for whatever reason, the A-Ideal decides to 'delete' Itself, and yet everything else somehow keeps running; you can still create, still be about existence. You can be Creator despite the A-ideal being no more.

-Creator may not be complete without the A-Ideal, but you can still be one. You can still keep creating in such a scenario!

## But Doesn't There Have To Be A Reality Where Theist Can Be Without Object Too?:

-All things are possible.

-However, all of these supposed realities are a trick. They are meant to trick the nature of the A-Ideal or veer it off somehow. This inadvertently just proves that the A-Ideal is about nothing but A-Ideal as per Aim of the A-Ideal.

Theist doesn't have to be infallible, only structurally correct (in a metaphysical sense).

## A Matter Of Definitions:

-Creator is to be about creating in general.

-Theist is to be about the almighty.

-Which of those sounds like Aim Of The A-Ideal!?
Nature Of The A-Ideal (Theist)

## Unknowability:

-While some facets of the total sum of the A-Ideal can be known, Its full and total nature cannot be understood by mortals.

-Once everything is added up, you cannot know with certainty that there wasn't something in the adding that will change the end nature of the A-Ideal, and can do so while bending or negating known rules of logic!

-We can know that the A-Ideal exists and that It is like all things somehow combined together. But beyond that, we can only be sure of Its nature by having 100% total knowledge of all of A-Infinity!

-How can you be sure the A-Ideal is an Object with only one internal action? Maybe It has multiple internal-actions!? While still being just one Part!?

-The A-Ideal can divide Itself into parts? How do you know It can't 'divide' Itself or do things with Itself in other ways totally unsimilar to dividing into parts?

-The WOIP just represents the A-Ideal's capacity to do anything; be it creative, destructive, or something else entirely!

-How do you know the Mind of the A-Ideal occasionally decides to change Its nature for whatever reason?

-How do you know the act of Self-Creation is the be-all and end-all of of the Internal-Action? Maybe its just the beginning! How can you conclusively prove there isn't more to it!

-The A-Ideal is Pure Existence, but that doesn't mean being Solus Creator. Existence is creator and destroyer both, and probably more too!

-The A-Ideal wills Itself to exist, but It is also all about It's potential death(s) in Omnicide, or more. To be all about the A-Ideal, you must be about the potential destruction of the A-Ideal, even if we know it can never happen!

-The A-Ideal is equally all things, both creator and destroyer!

-Sum Of All Addition just means that all parts that have been created can be traced back to A-Ideal. But how can you know there aren't other planes of existence where the A-Ideal created in other ways, besides parts?!

-Just because you arrive at the Object of the A-Ideal via a certain idea or concept doesn't mean that concept is the A-Ideal Itself.

>Also, remember that the sum total may not be the addition itself!
Issue Of Needs

-While Theist TTB might have the option of involving itself in other objects besides A-Ideal, Creator TTB HAS to be about all other objects as well. This is not the nature of the A-Ideal!

-Conversely, if the A-Ideal needs to also be about other objects in order to 'be all about Itself,' than It is not Self-Sufficient!
Emotional Needs

-Human beings need to be only all about God. I know this from personal experience. Creator TTB has never suceeded at this because it adds further steps and thus throws doubt on itself.

-Theist is simple and straightforward, it feels right. This is how we can know God would want Theist as TTB.

-Attempting to use things to bridge Creator TTB to Theist TTB doesn't work.

>It adds more layers of metaphysical justification, which always increases doubt.

>It also feels like you have to think of God strictly in one concept. You want to feel like you can be open to viewing God however you want too.

\*I've tried the Aspects fully now and they don't work!
Wikia Wiki futbol pedia

## Contenidos

la descubre todo sobre los jugadores y los clubes

## Novedades

* Fecha- Texto de novedades
* Fecha- Texto de novedades

## Colabora con este wiki

Para escribir un artículo, ingresa el título en la caja de abajo.

<createbox>
width=24
break=no
buttonlabel=Crear un nuevo artículo
</createbox>

**¿No estás seguro por dónde comenzar?**

* Revisa **Ayuda:Comenzando este wiki** para conocer algunos consejos
* Si eres un novato respecto a los wikis, revisa **Ayuda:Empezando**
* Revisa el **Portal de la comunidad** para ver en qué está trabajando la comunidad

## Artículo destacado

 Archivo:Destacado.png
*Rellena aquí con el primer párrafo de un artículo que quieras destacar. No olvides incluir un enlace al artículo para que los visitantes puedan leerlo completo.*
Bad Ideas Of God

-Bad Ideas of God do exist, the kind of ideas about God that lead to Iconoclasm, masochism in the form of overt flagellation, unrealistic chastity and more.

-God abhors falsehoods, especially about Himself, and would want us to stick to the one true idea of Him. The Creator.

-This is the real reason not to be Theist!

## Results of Bad Ideas of God:

-As Theist, if you push God without true knowledge of His nature, you risk people arriving at bad ideas of Him. History has shown time and again how destructive that can be!

-Why use multiple imperfect Names when you have the one True Name (Creator) of God? Wouldn't God want that!?-
God Equals Uncertainty

-The appeal of Theist has always been the idea of 'God' and the mysteries that flow from that.

-But, in practice, Theist always grinds down into numerous uncertainties which kill the magic and turn you back to Creator.

-It is the forgetfulness of the mind that has led to this constant cycle of coming back to retry Theist, a cycle which I have come to call the Shifting.

-Know this; no matter what mindset or your determination, you simply cannot follow that which is uncertain. Even if you think it is God.

-Remember this in order to stop the Shifting.

## But We Can Follow The A-Ideal As A Concept!:

-Except, according to Theist, the total nature of the A-ideal can't be known. And I've been Theist before and started wondering emotionally about what if the A-Ideal i actually something that can't be known, trusted or followed?

-This is in addition to the fact that you still worry that God is real, even with Indivisability.

-The A-Ideal as a concept is unsatisfying because it leads to following multiple Names, which adds complexity, which introduces doubt and therefore Uncertainty. EAch of these steps is natural and one flows into the other.

>And remember, you cannot follow Uncertainty!
Feeling Called To Theist

-I also felt called to Catholicism for the longest time too!

-And as for the notion that, arriving upon Aim of the A-Ideal we must be strictly Theist, our own God-given sense of rationality clearly feels that you should keep an open mind when you don't see most of the picture.  If our rationality speaks falsely on logic, what then?

>PK only says that the info you are getting is true, not that it is the full picture!

>Aim of the A-Ideal does not define what is the Supreme, whether the Supreme has other truths that may make Him want us to be more specific than the broad Theist TTB, or that for some reason God wants us to dedicate ourselves to something else as well (not because He needs it, but He simply wants it?).  The point is that I can think of some general variant scenarios that might be true and we can't know that invalidates AotAI alone as the indicator of God's TTB.

>Wouldn't God let us discover AotAI because that's the answer to the question we asked?  Yes, but is it the fullness of the situation?  You are only a mortal and cannot probably know the fullness of the truth!

>

-How do you know human logic is the fullness of logic!?!

-Endless-Questions!

-Doubt = Logic is well and good, but doubt will still plague you, as no man truly has seen God.  Only Kreator lets you know that the object of your TTB definitely and concretely exists.  Kreator can fulfill AotAI by seeing God as the One True Creator.
Правый Фронт ГК

Логотип ПФ

**Правый Фронт**- политическая партия Гусь-Клуба правого толка, основанная 9 июля как преемник Национал-консервативной партии Гусь-клуба. Создана и возглавляется Степаном Ткачем.

В конце мая реформирована М. Брянским в Президентскую коалицию, на выборах 1 июня 2017 года уже не была представлена. На момент реформации являлась второй силой Гусь-клуба, после коммунистов, однако реформация позволила Президентской коалиции занять первое место.
Сенат ГКДР VII созыва

Парламент
 Страна
 Предыдущий созыв
 Председатель Сената
 **Доминирующая партия** | КПГК (4 депутата)

Сенат ГКДР VI созыва - представительный законодательный орган, исполняющий свои обязанности с 29 апреля.

## Выборы

Выборы должны были пройти еще 14 апреля, однако, по причине временного отсутствия Ткача и халатности остальных, не смотря на призывы Ибрагимова, регистрация так и не начиналась. В итоге, 27 числа, Ибрагимов психанул и провел ее. На выборы впервые была зарегистрирована Монархическая Партия, в прошлый раз она не подала заявку на выборы, хоть и существовала.
Сами выборы прошли спокойно, без нарушений, фальсификаций и скандалов, хотя за ВСЕ партии, кроме МПГК проголосовали посторонние люди но это не было засчитано.
18.75% (3 голоса) - ЛПГК,
31.25% (5 голосов) - ПФ
37.50% (6 голосов) - КПГК
6.25% (1 голос) - МПГК
6.25% (1 голос) - против всех
Мандаты были распределены так:
10 человек: 4 от КПГК, 3 от ПФ, 2 от ЛПГК и 1 от МПГК.

## Состав

* КПГК - победитель выборов, одна из наиболее значимых фракций. Состав: Иван Удалов, Шихсолтан Караев, Антон Гречко, Мумия Абу-Джамал.
* Правый Фронт - вторая по значимость парти. Состав - Степан Ткач, Николай Добронравов, Иван Ибрагимов.
* ЛПГК - третья по значимости фракция. Состав - Иван Иванов, Вячеслав Колосов, Сергей Скляров.
* МПГК - впервые участвовавшая в выборах и впервые же получившая место в Сенате. Состав - Денис Кукунин.

Кстати, именно засчет этих выборов, Гречко был убежден остаться в ГК, а Колосов вернуться.

## Деятельность сената

### Рассмотренные законопроекты

1. Законопроект об установлении гимна ВС ГКДР. Как и в предыдущем созыве, внесен И.Ибрагимовым, депутатом от Правого Фронта. Иван Удалов, депутат от КПГК предложил свою версию. Однако, это голосование снова провалилось.
2. Законопроект о запрет полинезийского языка в Гусь-клубе. Внесен М.Корячкиным, депутатом от Правого Фронта. Не был понят другими депутатами, Степан Ткач спросил - зачем это надо? Мумия Абу-Джамал проголосовал против. Далее, он замалчивался всеми силами, пока М.Брянский не отозвал его.
3. Закон о запрете отрицания преступлений Каллио. Внесен М.Корячкиным, депутатом от Правого Фронта. Вызвал жесткие споры. Иван Иванов, Денис Кукунин и сам автор законопроекта сразу же его поддержали, как затем и Степан Ткач, но Иван Ибрагимов и фракция КПГК во главе с Иваном Удаловым и Мумией Абу-Джамалом выступили против. Шихсолтан Караев и Антон Гречко воздержались, все ждут других депутатов, чтобы решить вопрос. В итоге был принят, не смотря на протесты и покидания Сената Удалова.

Далее, он был распущен в связи с тем, что ЛПГК прекратила свое существование, а ее члены покинули Гусь-клуб.
Либеральная партия Гусь-клуба

**Либеральная партия Гусь-клуба** - политическая партия Гусь-клуба либерального и либертарианского толка, зарегистрированная 8 декабря. Создана Вячеславом Колосовым и Владом Панфиловым. Возглавлялась Иваном Ивановым.

## История

Своего первого триумфа достигла в декабре 2016, победив на выборах в Сенат в коалиции с Демократическим Фронтом, однако он привел к свержению Колосова Ивановым. После возвращения Колосова, она временно потеряла популярность, однако ее восстановил Январский кризис.

Перестала существовать в 2017 после Майских терактов, организованных членами партии, и распущена. Значительная часть электората после этого примкнула к Монархической партии, меньшая часть в КПГК.