Dinoavesia

**Dinoavesia** (Terrible birds in Greek ) sometimes called **DinoDirds**, were a mesothermic class of Septempollicema, They evolved around 230,130,030 years ago, and their point of origin is South Primaterra. They became the dominant class of South Primaterra around 210mya, and ruled for 111mya, that's not as long as the Dinosaurs reign on Earth, but still longer then any other class of Septempollicems. The earliest known Species from the fossil record is Xenoherrerasaurus herrerasaur, and the last known Species from the fossil record is Tigrimatisaurus epizon. Even though they are Septempollicems answer to Dinosaurs, they seem to mirror Avemetatarsalia Or **Ornithodira.**

66mya a meteorite struck Hume three, killing off all the Non-Fterotodermen **Dinoaves**, or so we thought, fossil evidence shows that one genus survived and in that genus there was twenty species, that genus was Tigrimatisaurus, after 1 million years one of those 20 species went extinct and the other 19 got to evolve into a new species, 1 million years after that one of those 19 species went extinct and the other 18 got to evolve into a new species, and so on and so on until there was only one species left, 20 million years after that mass extinction and the last Non-Fterotodermen **Dinoavesia** finally died out from being out competed By Gounia.

There two subclasses recognized at this point in time, Subclass: Avemosto and Subclass: Suchusosto, they are distinguished from each other by how dense their bones were, they both have hollow bones but one bones is hollering than the other, Avemosto bones are most hollow then Suchusosto bones. Avemoston bones are more like dinosaur bones and some later clades more like bird bones, and the bird-like bone ones would later give rise to the Dirds, while Suchusosto are more like crocodile bones to help them swim better. The first order was Herrerasauria, it is still up to debate on which subclass it belongs to, because it's bones are actually not as Hollow on the inside as Avemosto or Suchusosto, they're still Hollow just not as Hollow, some A.R.F. researcher believe they should be a third subclass just for them with them being the only order under it, it's also the only order to not be under a superorder and it's just the stand-alone order, and it is believed to be the order they gave rise to all other **Dinoavesia**.

## The feather controversy.

### Dinosauria

On Earth, it is not known which dinosaurs did or didn't have feathers. Originally it was unknown what dinosaur skin covering looked like, when dinosaurs were first discovered back in the 1800s, some assumed they were covered in scales, because they were thought to be reptiles and others thought that they had completely bare skin like an elephant or Rhino, which is why some toys and some of the artists reconstructions at the time depicted them as such. Then after finding some skin fossils showing scales it was believed that all dinosaurs were scaly. After the discovery of Archaeopteryx and a few other feathered dinosaurs, it was thought that only one clade of dinosaurs had feathers, the ones that would later give rise to birds and that every other dinosaur was scaly. Then after discoveries of a few dinosaurs that weren't too closely related to birds, but still had some kind of feathery integument it was then believed that maybe a few theropods or all theropods we're feathered. Then after a few years of research it was believed that only coelurosaurian theropods were feathered, some believed all of coelurosaurians were feathered including the T-Rex, while others believe that most of them are feathered with a few exceptions, like the T-Rex. There's a group of people called the feather Nazis, they want to believe either all or most dinosaurs were feathered and they will reach and grab at any straws they can, and when *Kulindadromeus* was discovered they went crazy. **Kulindadromeus was** a herbivorous dinosaur, a basal neornithischian from the Jurassic. Its **feather**-like integument is evidence for protofeathers being basal to Ornithischia and possibly Dinosauria as a whole, rather than just to Coelurosauria, as previously suspected. The feather Nazis love this guy, and they love to use this guy as evidence of all Dinosaurs having feathers, because if a member on one side of the family tree has feathers and members on the other side also had feathers then it means that the last common ancestor of all dinosaurs must have had feathers too. So then for a short while it was believed that all dinosaurs have a chance of having feathers. Until a few Skeptics relooked at the *Kulindadromeus* paper and seen that the person writing the paper never once refers to these things as feathers, instead just referred to them as odd scales, more research needs to be done into this *Kulindadromeus* to see if they're really feathers or not. And some researchers suggest that if it is a feather or fur like covering then it is not homologous and it actually convergently evolved these separately from the dinosaurs that evolve true feathers, making the feathers on *Kulindadromeus* pseudofeathers, but the feather Nazis would not let go and they still held it as evidence. Until 2017 when the dinosaur family tree had been rearranged, originally Dinosauria was divided into two subcategories originally listed as orders but were later changed into just clades, Saurischia, meaning lizard hips or reptile hip, and Ornithischia, meaning bird hip, Saurischia contain theropod and sauropods, Ornithischia contained every other dinosaur. But as of 2017 things have changed, now Ornithischia and theropods are more closely related to each other than theropods are to sauropods, meaning if *Kulindadromeus* skin covering is feathers then it just means the last common ancestor of theropods and Ornithischia have feathers and not the last common ancestor of all dinosaurs, the last common ancestor of all dinosaurs was probably completely scaly. It seems the feather controversy is not going to end for a long long time.

### Dinoavesia

On Hume III, It was unknown what **Dinoavesia** skin covering was, fossils of feathers and skin in general is extremely rare. So for the longest it was believed that just like Dinosaurs on Earth, most of them are scaly, but a few of them were feathery, and maybe some had bare skin. Until a Xenoherrerasaurus herrerasaur fossil specimen was discovered that actually had flesh and skin and yes even feathers. But just like *Kulindadromeus* Skeptics pointed out that it may just be odd scales, until scientists looked at them under a microscope and seen that they were structured just like other **Dinoavesia** feathers, meaning yes these were true feathers or weathers as they're called by A.R.F. researchers, meaning of feathers our ancestral to all **Dinoavesia**, and that any species found that was completely scaly either re-evolved its feathers into scales, similar to what the penguin and the Pangolins did on Earth, or they completely got rid of their feathers and the actual scale they're on their tails and legs moved up to cover their whole body. This is a incredible discovery, but the feather Nazis have taken advantage of this. They say since **Dinoavesia** started out with feathers then Dinosauria must have also, because they are Septempollicems answer to Dinosaurs, and they mirrored Dinosaurs so this must mean that dinosaurs started out with feathers, the problem with that is they seem to mirror Avemetatarsalia Or Ornithodira, not just Dinosauria, and they are aliens that are wholly unrelated to Earth creatures, why the hell would they evolve the exact same way there's no sense in that. Yes it is true a lot of Septempollicems reflect tetrapods a little bit, but they're not a perfect Mirror Image, they're not one to one, they evolved a slightly different way, so the fact that **Dinoaves** had feathers from the start does not mean dinosaurs had feathers from the start. And it was ridiculous to ever try to use them as evidence for such.

## Electricity levels

Agrioderma 100%

Olisthirodermia 88%

Folidotodermia 75%

Fterotodermia 25%

Gounia 50%

Ypsilistasia 99%

Frynoskorpia 50%

Xenosynapsid unknown

**Dinoavesia** unknown

Dracosauria unknown

Stelechosypsilistasia unknown.

The reason why it is unknown is because organs don't fossilize too commonly, so it is unknown how many of them kept their electric abilities, and it is unknown how powerful their electric abilities were, the only way to know for sure if the time travel, so we will never know for sure.

## Intelligence Level.

Like all extinct classes or any extinct animal at all, it is hard to judge the intelligence, but using computers and the same methods we use to judge dinosaurs intelligence, we can hopefully come up with an accurate estimate, but computer calculations have turned out wrong before, so all this is subject to change in the future.

### Dinosauria

When dinosaurs were first discovered back in the 1800s they were thought to be just as mindless as reptiles, slow-moving, cold-blooded, cumbersome, not very active, just like reptiles. But the first fully intact body of a Raptor was discovered in the 50s, the way its body stud and the body type it had May scientists realize that dinosaurs were once more active then once thought. More like birds and mammals rather than reptiles or amphibians. Then throughout the 70s and 80s the dinosaur Renaissance occurred, where many new things we know about dinosaurs today were established, and the idea that dinosaurs had feathers was also found out here, but we're not going to go into that we already did that up there. One of the things reconsidered during dinosaur Renaissance was their intelligence, but they kind of over overblowed how smart they really were, going from basically mindless to human-level intelligence. After their intelligence was reconsidered they assumed they were on the same level as placental mammals, with some of them reaching near human-level intelligence possibly even some reaching human-level intelligence. The genus they thought was the smartest was Troodon, Troodon had a large brain for its relatively small size and was probably among the **smartest dinosaurs**. Its brain is proportionally larger than those found in living reptiles, so the animal may have been as intelligent as modern birds, which are more similar in brain size. But as technology progressed and science progressed, new studies came out showing that they were either as smart as a chicken or as smart as a primitive opossum, not even a modern opossum, Just A Primitive opossum. So then people thought that so if that's the smartest dinosaur than that means all dinosaurs must have been dumb. Until more studies of other dinosaur species just straight out disproved Troodon was the smartest. But while Troodon was still thought to be the smartest it was also mistaken for a raptor because it has the Raptor foot claw, we now know that they were a separate family from Raptors, (update more research has come out and it's suspect that Raptors may not have been one family but an entire clade and the Troodon might fall into that clade so it may actually be a Raptor) but the general public didn't know any better, so in they're mines, it led to them thinking Raptors were the smartest group of dinosaurs. And this is how we got the Velociraptors in Jurassic Park, we now know thanks to more evidence and studies that Raptors did not hunt in packs, a lot of them probably weren't as fast as once believed, and the Velociraptor itself was probably only as smart as a seagull, and the actual species that velociraptor in Jurassic Park is actually based on probably wasn't that intelligent either.

In conclusion what we now know due to our computer calculations and computer simulations is that most dinosaurs were probably as smart as marsupials with only a few of them being anything smarter or Dumber, Hadrosaurs like Parasaurolophus was probably smarter than other herbivore dinosaurs but how much smarter is not known not sure if it broke into bird or placental mammal levels of intelligence maybe modern fish levels of intelligence it is uncertain. Raptors and the Troodontidae we're probably bird level intelligence or near bird level intelligent considering they were the closest relatives to birds. And finally a study came out that said the T-Rex was probably chimpanzee levels of intelligence, which is near human-level intelligence making the T-Rex the smartest dinosaur, but remember take it with a grain of salt, another study in the future might just disprove it.

### Dinoavesia

Now when **Dinoavesia** was discovered, because Septempollicems are smarter then tetrapods, it was believed that **Dinoaves** was smart then Dinosaurs, but once again humans over blowed it, once again saying that they were probably placental mammal levels of intelligence, but after using all the same methods we used on dinosaurs, we've come to the conclusion that most of them were about bird level of intelligence with only a few species going any higher and a few species going lower. Some species were found with fossilized tools buried with them, primitive tools but still tools. So yes they are smarter than dinosaurs, just not as smart as we thought.

Update: After a few more calculations and a bit more of studying, we have now come to the conclusion that Avemosto were around bird level of intelligence, and Suchusosto were around crocodilian levels of intelligence.

## Anatomy

### The Head

Their skull is where their brain is kept, it is hard to know how many of them retain the eyestalks, unlike Xenosynapsida which we know most of them probably kept them considering a good number of Gounia still have them, while no Dirds today have eyestalks, so it is hard to know how many **Dinoaves** had them, it is safe to assume that most of the early clades had them while a lot of the later clades lost them. How good their eyesight was probably depended on the clade, it's safe to assume that most of them probably had as good of eyesight as most modern Dirds. It is also hard to know how many of them had long or short whisacles, whisacles don't fossilize to well because they have no bone in them, some whisacles in some species, both extinct and Extant, have cartilage at the base, but that's it, and cartilage doesn't fossilize well either. How good their sense of smell was probably depended on the clade. Most of them probably had external ear holes, but it is possible that some of them had only internal ears. How good the sense of hearing was depended on the clade. Most of them probably had tongues and it is unknown how good their sense of taste was, we know most of them probably could taste, but what they could distinguish flavor-wise is a complete mystery. The meat eating ones had sharp teeth, the plant-eating ones has Square teeth or flat teeth, the omnivores had both, and some **Dinoavess** didn't have teeth, either because they completely replaced them with a beak or they lost them for another reason, majority of them had identical teeth that all look the same and all serve the same function, while small few of them had different teeth, just like mammals and some dinosaurs on Earth.

### The Body

#### The limbs

Unlike every other class of Septempollicema, **Dinoavesia** didn't start out on six legs and then eventually evolve to be bipedal, like Dinosauria on Earth they started out bipedal and then backwards evolved back into having four legs and some backwards evolved back into having six legs, the reason for this is because they evolved from a bipedal Raptile ancestor. Some individual species, entire genera, and even a few families lost a pair of limbs The only order retain the basal trait of seven digits on the hands and feet is Herrerasauria, for every order after this one, the hands can have anywhere between six fingers and one finger, and the feet can have anywhere between six toes and three toes, but one species has two toes. Theropods on Earth started out with four fingers, but later three fingers became the most common, the standard with a few exceptions like the T-Rex which only had two, but a small few species had only one finger. Agriouthirioupods on Hume III started out with six fingers, but later five fingers became the most common, but some species only had four, some only had three, some only had two, and some only had one. Some clades have lost a pair of limbs, some have lost two pairs of limbs.

#### The Skin

Their skin covering has been the subject of controversy as you've already read up there. But most of them probably had feathers in some places, scales in others, and bare skin in some places. The places where you more than likely see feathers in most species is, most of the body, the upper half of the leg above the knee, the neck, most of the head and the arms. The places where you would more than likely see scales is, the lower part of the legs below the knee, the dorsal side of the hands and fingers, the underbelly, and the tail. And the places where you would more than likely see bare skin would be the bottom of their feet, the palms of their hands, behind their arms, and their snout. But there were some species with scaly snouts and scaly tails, some species may have been completely scaly and some species may have been completely feathery and some species may have had completely bare skin.

### The Tails

Out of all classes of Septempollicems, this class has the most interesting tails. The opposite of Xenosynapsida, which didn't get to adventures with their tails, they didn't do very much with their tails, **Dinoavesia** on the other hand did the most with their tails experimenting with them more than any other class and trying out so many unique things, so it's kind of ironic that the only surviving remnant of **Dinoavesia** is the Dirds, which short tails almost no tail. The first & main thing their tails are used for is of course balance, kind of the whole purpose of tails in general. But just like Dinosauria on Earth, some of them have experimented with their tails giving them tail clubs and tail spikes, but they go even further than dinosaurs ever did. Some have evolve a stinger on their tail just like **Frynoskorpia,** some can channel electricity to the tip of their tail, a trait seen in a few other Septempollicems. Some have bioluminescent tails, what this ability would have been used for is up to debate, some theories are sexual display meant to attract a mate, another theory is it's used as a form of communication or maybe to assert dominance. Some had color-changing abilities, just like the octopus and the chameleon, meaning that their tails is where you're gonna be able to see this because most of them didn't have feathers on their tail, you could actually see their color changing scales on their bodies, where they were covered in feathers you wouldn't be able to see that. Some have evolved flat tails like a Spinosaurus either used to help them swim or as a display structure. Some of them have evolved tail flukes. Some of the ones that have bare skin tails have done something similar to the soft-shelled turtle on Earth, being able to absorb oxygen through their tails, allowing them to stay underwater longer. A lot of them have a bunch of pretty feathers or other weird structures that are just used for display. A lot of the fast running ones have stiff tails. While the not the best ones have a more flexible tail. We have mentioned tail clubs and tail spikes, but what about a tail spear, similar to the tailspike except directly on the back of the tail instead of on either side, and there's only one of them, some of them had these to either help them fish or its defense. Who needs tail clubs, tail spikes, and tail Spears, when you could just use the tail as a whip, some species do that. Some use their tails to store fat just like the hump of a camel or the tale of a platypus. This one's just a theory, we have no evidence for it, but some of them may have use their tails to express emotion, just like cats and dogs do. Some of them possibly use their tails to slap away Hume Flies or other annoying creatures. Some of them have prehensile tails. Smaller species could break their tails off to escape predators, and then it will grow back later. Some could possibly shoot blood out of their tail, the same way a horny toad can shoot blood out of its eyes.

And finally the most crazy and unique thing they've ever done with their tails, in the Family Ourakanonidae, they can fire a projectile from their tail, this is never happened on Earth, and is very rare in the universe only being documented on three other planets, and on two of those three planets the animals that could do that are now extinct. The first species of this family to be discovered was Ourakanoni ourakanoni, when it was found it had an odd tale structure on the end of it, this confused researchers until another specimen was found that actually had two projectile weapon still in there. The species they discovered that still had the projectile intact was Ourakanoni muller, named after the two brothers that discovered it. A few more species have been found, but more interestingly, a few fossilized incidences of the projectile itself were found three of them, one inside of a predator's leg, one inside of a predator's crotch, and one inside a herbivore's eye. The projectile has been named the Penetramizer by Jürgen Müller. It is made of keratin and after being fired they have to wait a few weeks to a few months to grow back, so it was probably mostly use as a self-defense tool rather than a hunting tool, but it could work as an occasional hunting tool.

### The internal organs and respiratory system

They breathe through operculum, they use the same form of breathing as Dirds, Birds, and Dinosaurs, it's called Sternal or gastralial pumping. The rest of their internal organs can safely be assumed to be not too much different from other Septempollicems,

## Note: From Boden Müller.

Hello Boden Müller here, just wanted to say that unlike Xenosynapsida, my brother is actually right about this. **Dinoavesia** is actually it's own class and not just a clade. But even though you were right about **Dinoavesia** brother this doesn't mean you're right about Dinosaursia, Dinosaurs are a clade of reptiles not their own class. Even though Jürgen is right about the **Dinoavesia**, are other brother Hans didn't believe and still gets into heated debates with Jürgen, me, and are other brothers about it, it's like he just doesn't want to believe that Jürgen was right. Oh well

-Boden Müller

## Taxonomy

Kingdom: Animalisaliena

Phylum: Xenochordata

Subphylum: Psariaskoulikion

Clade: Idiotamcaptionemviventem

Clade: Ilektrikapodia

Clade: Septempollicemia

Superclass: Septempollicem

Clade Gallinaeveteris

Clade: Xenoa**rchosauria**

Class: **Dinoavesia**

\*\*Subclasses under **Dinoavesia**\*\*

Subclass: Avemosto

Subclass: Suchusosto

\*\*Superorders under Avemosto\*\*

Superorder: Pachypoda

Superorder: Avempterygia

\*\*Superorders under Suchusosto\*\*

Superorder: Avemsuchusia

Superorder: Savronfteria

\*\*Superorders under **Dinoavesia**\*\*

Superorder: Pachypoda

Superorder: Avempterygia

Superorder: Savronfteria

Superorder: Avemsuchusia

\*\*Orders under Pachypoda\*\*

Order: Erpetoischia (Reptile-hipped)

Order: Pouliischia (Bird-hipped)

\*\*Suborders under Erpetoischia\*\*

Suborder: Savrapodiaformes

Suborder: Agriouthirioupodia

\*\*Suborders under Pouliischia\*\*

Suborder: Poulipodiaformes

Suborder: Therobrachia

\*\*Orders under Avempterygia\*\*

Order: Chorisfteria

Order: Alispictosdelapsia

Order: Alasvoladoria

\*\*Orders under Savronfteria\*\*

Order: Makryslaimos

Order: Kontoslaimos

\*\*Suborders under Makryslaimos\*\*

Suborder: Akamptoslaimos

Suborder: Efkamptoslaimos

\*\*Suborders under Kontoslaimos\*\*

Suborder: Ligolaimo

Suborder: Paenenullacollia

\*\*Orders under Avemsuchusia\*\*

Order: Suchusischia (Crocodile-hipped)

Order: Cetaceaischia (Whale-hipped)

\*\*Orders under **Dinoavesia**\*\*

Order: Herrerasauria

Order: Erpetoischia

Order: Pouliischia

Order: Chorisfteria

Order: Alispictosdelapsia

Order: Alasvoladoria

Order: Makryslaimos

Order: Kontoslaimos

Order: Suchusischia

Order: Cetaceaischia

Add your own Orders and Clades here.