Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This article details a subject that falls under the Legends brand.
Shortcut:
WP:RFU

**Wookieepedia**

**administration**

Bureaucrats

Administrators

Rollback

**Requests for user rights**

Requests for removal of user rights

Administrators' noticeboard

This page is for **requests for user rights**.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

## Requests for rollback

**Rules:**

* You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination **first**)
* You cannot nominate yourself.
* Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

### Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.

1. They have an account under a screenname.
2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
3. They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
4. Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
5. Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
6. At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote.

### Questions

1. Why should you be granted rollback rights?

## Requests for adminship

**Rules:**

* You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination **first**)
* You cannot nominate yourself.
* Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

### Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.

1. They have an account under a screenname.
2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
3. They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
4. They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
5. They have had at least some major article contributions.
6. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
7. They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
8. Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
9. Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
10. At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote, three of which must be administrators.
11. Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

### Questions

Here are some general adminship questions. They are **100% optional**, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

1. Why do you want to become an administrator?
2. In your opinion, what is the role of an administrator?
3. In your view, do administrators hold a technical or political position?
4. How do you feel admins should use their power/stand in comparison with other users?
5. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
6. Of your articles or contributions to Wookieepedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
7. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
8. How important is it for you to be involved in things such as CT, FA, GA, and other community-centered items that involve discussion and voting?
9. Do you think admins performing actions (I.e. deletions, blocks, etc.) for reasons not covered on policy should be sanctioned/punished? If so, how?
10. What is your policy, if any, of welcoming new users? Should you welcome a new user, do you look at his/her contributions beforehand? What about anonymous IPs?
11. How would you react if someone undeleted an article you'd mistakenly speedied? Under what circumstances would you consider it appropriate to undelete an article mistakenly speedied by another administrator, if any, and how would you approach this task?
12. How would you react if your user page was vandalized? Under what circumstances would you block the offender? Is there anything else that you would do in this situation?
13. Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an *established* user?
14. If you could change any one thing about Wookieepedia, what would it be?
15. Would you look at a glass to be half-empty or half-full?
16. Do you feel the current blocking policy is too restrictive, not restrictive enough, or OK as it is?
17. Have you ever considered becoming a regular visitor to the Wookieepedia IRC chat?
18. How do you feel about people who already have some influence on other Star Wars communities (TheForce.Net, StarWars.com) trying to change policies here?
19. How many clones do you think fought in the Clone Wars? (Note: You are wrong no matter what answer you give.)
20. Who is the most awesome Jedi of all time? (Note: The only correct answer is Kyle Katarn.)
21. What's more important to you: consensus or policy?
22. Have you had any previous leadership experience (in your community, on the web, etc.)?
23. What is your attitude towards users who have quit the site or have been banned, but still continue to attempt to influence the site in any way?
24. What is your wiki philosophy?

## Requests for bureaucratship

**Rules:**

* Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination **first**)
* You cannot nominate yourself.
* Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

### Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.

1. They are an administrator.
2. They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
3. They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
4. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
5. They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
6. Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month—from the day the nomination is put forth—are counted).
7. Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
8. At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote, five of which must be administrators.
9. Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.

### Questions

1. Why do you think we need another bureaucrat?
2. How do you see the difference between an admin and a bureaucrat?
3. What will you use your new status for if your nomination succeeds?
4. How many admins do you think we need?
5. How many bureaucrats do you think we need?
6. What should happen to admins and bureaucrats who disappear for awhile without warning, leaving many questions, projects, and that sort of thing hanging?