Swedish texts / Σουηδικά κείμενα (στα αγγλικά)

## text 1

The common physicalism is the philosophical physicalism, see: Physicalism on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, University of Oxford, etc.

Philosophical physicalism or common physicalism, is philosophical analyses used in debates against theism. Theism is metaphysical personocracy (person + krátos/dominance); the claim that personhood is self-caused ex nihilo, cosmogonic and omnicontrolling.

I am a scientophysicalist = scientific physicalist = a person who mostly focuses on science like:

1. foundations of substantiality: David Deutsch’s and Chiara Marletto's constructor theory, Max Tegmark's struogony = mathematical universe hypothesis

2. neuroscience = brainless thought is impossible and supernaturalists don't have a single theory

information theory is important to study the ideal mind

Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Neural Networks are important, because we have to study the brain regions and connectome which generates personhood. Watch all The Royal Institution videos on Consciousness on YouTube. Studying the human brain is correct because it's a personhood-yielding computer; but we should generalize the prerequisites for personhood (see: Mary Anne Warren's criteria of personhood, and study other criteria; we have to combine behavioural personhood with personhood-yielding computers; biological or digital)

3. Jack W. Szostak's videos on YouTube on the chemical abiogenesis of life, and other studies on abiogenesis.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Atheism isn't a religion because it's antisupernaturalistic.

The common hypernym (superordinate term) of atheism and religion is metaphysical worldview.

Surveys on the metaphysical worldviews in Sweden should be titled "Metaphysical Worldviews in Sweden" because not all Swedes are religious. Biased titling is CONSCIOUSLY unethical.

atheism = non-godism = against the claim that personhood and at least one person [bearer of personhood] are ex nihilo self-caused, cosmogonic and omnicontrolling

these nouns are related, study and compare: physicalism, metaphysical naturalism, atheism (atheism is more distant because it has different explanatory goals, but not entirely different)

Physicalism is superior to atheism because they support similar or the same spectrum of ideas, but physicalism is focused mostly on positive definitions. The universe was cyclic (see: 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics; the universe acceleratingly expands thus it will big bang ad infinitum in cycles; see: Sean M. Carroll on YouTube; Roger Penrose has a cyclic cosmology, but not the best version, because he has theoretical gaps on the phase transition before the big bangs [see MIT articles on the state before the Big Bang; Big Bang means the beginning of our specific universe cycles, and big bang any other one including ours).

The universe was physically and procedurally created by the big bang cycle, and the foundations of spacetime was created due to constructor theory's ontoaxiomatics: any mathematically possible universe, necessarily exists due to Deutschian constructivism (see: David Deutsch) and not due to a property of nothing (nihilogony/nilogony is wrong and without any theoretical foundation; Stephen Hawking was wrong on nihilogony = cosmogony from nothing itself; and he didn't have any theory to elaborate on the decay of nothing into universes; nothing is inert, it doesn't and cannot exist [if nothing existed you simply made a mistake because it's something else; if nothing had potentiality it would have been that potentiality and not nothing; don't confuse these terms [study them]: zero, nothing, void, null set).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Many Swedes are scientophysicalists = physicalists who focus on rigorous science and not on oratorically outdebating the supernaturalists.

Max Tegmark is Swedish–American.

I am an ideologically stateless centrist antiroyalist/republican[ist]/antimonarchist democrat.

I am philosophically "ideological stateless" (the English way to create two-worded but single nouns is: "ideological stateless"; the same is in Swedish; the form: ideologically stateless is comment-like).

I don't break things. I am philosophical on my ideological statelessness. Internationalism is the positive near-synonym/related term of ideological statelessness.

I am aracialist. I love science like statistical genetics, but I don't ascribe genetic criteria as social labels (but some people love it; I don't).

I don't care much about me. But these views are rare and not well analyzed.

Write some texts in Swedish on topics like these.

You are a different person. You don't owe to have the same opinions. Simply study these issues.

I am not a population. I am an individual. Mean/average ideas won't cut deep truths.
Actually my ideas exist in Sweden and in humanity in general.

Thus record my views and distort me; I believe in openness.
If some idea is weak, it must be changed.
David Deutsch says that good explanations go causally deep and are hard to vary.