Fysikalistisk institution = Physicalist Institution of Denmark

(I'm Ken Astute a physicalist philosopher)

Please establish the: Fysikalistisk institution = Physicalist Institution

Physicalism has two main subfields:

1. philosophical physicalism (see separately: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The University of Edinburgh, University of Oxford, Yale University, metaphysical naturalism, etc.)
2. scientific physicalism = scientophysicalism: see: David Deutsch, Chiara Marletto, Max Tegmark, Sean M. Carroll, etc.

I work mostly on scientophysicalism
major topics:
• quantum foundations, and hypernymously (a wider category) axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations (according to David Deutsch’s constructor theory, the cosmological constructor can be an open tree-like axiomatics and and algorithmoid [not unchanging algorithm, but innately evolving and multifurcating algorithm/ I have many texts on these ideas])
• studies on personhood: 1. philosophical definition of the prerequisites for personhood (state of being a person), 2. mechanisms/ systems to produce personhood = biological, digital and mathematical personhood-yielding computers (neuroscience, digital modalities' clusters, topological brain/ I have many texts on that)
• chemical abiogenesis of life (chemical speculation: Jack W. Szostak, prebacteria: Yohey Suzuki/ astrobiology)

Please establish the Fysikalistisk institution = Physicalist Institution
and create:
1. an archive
2. academic (full complexity) lectures
3. popularization lectures

Speak and teach in Danish. We need to record everything in Danish.

Sorry for not being Danish. My ethnicity is ideological aracialist/ ethnocultural nonconformist (I have texts on that; it's just an opinion, not the absolute correct ideonationality... and there isn't any.).

Your work as Danish Atheists is very important.
You are true rationalist.

I work also on antiagnostic atheism.
Atheists are rationalist agnostics, because we don't know everything.
But general agnostics are open to the supernatural.

The supernatural not only is unreachable and unteachable, but also it is only described through antiscientific and vague empiricism without any specific logical foundations; thus without rigorous specific foundational attributes, it is an impossibility.

I prefer the term physicalist because it is positive, and the universe wasn't created by the rejection of a fallacy. I am a physicalist. Atheist is a comment.

Being called anti-shithead or a-theist every morning isn't ideal, because I don't like shit and gods.

Of course I am anti-shithead and a-theist, but positive definitions like physicalist are wiser.

Please contact me.

Denmark is important to evolve even more, because Denmark helps humanity mature.

Atheist[ic] = anti-god lectures aren't always the same as scientophysicalist lectures = logical and specific antisupernatural procedures.

Most atheists don't care about rigorous scientific physicalism,
but we need a Fysikalistisk institution = Physicalist Institution to evolve and popularize antisupernatural logic and physical foundations.

I have many texts on the degrees metaphysical personocracy (krátos here means dominance).

• strong metaphysical personocracy: personhood and at least one supernatural person is self-caused and cosmogonic

• weaker metaphysical personocracy: god or gods aren't cosmogonic

• (rare) godless metaphysical personhood-bias: an impersonal divine field which either helps people or simply imposes a cosmic esthetic outside rigorous physics

Personhood is the result of a personhood-yielding computer.
God supposedly is an idealized mathematical personhood-yielding computer with infinite extra abilities.
Personhood-yielding computers are too complicated to be axioms of the physical foundations.
Any personhood-yielding computer = brain, requires space to exist, and time to perform calculations/ data-processing. Thus spacetime is more fundamental than the personhood-yielding computer. Quantum field theory is the deepest theory of physics which matches particle accelerator data, and it's not a personhood-yielding computer.

Even if God existed, still personhood-yielding computers work according to logical rules which leave no room to free will = exosystemic procedures. Thus even if God existed, he still wouldn't be God, because logic is more fundamental than personhood, because no physical foundations can be exological, because the supernatural is an impossibility as I elaborate earlier.

According to the Landauer principle any informational processing has intermediary states which when deleted are converted to heat; thus the idealized personhood-yielding computer = brain of God is impossible.

If God was a reversible computer (see: reversible computing) almost 100% of the universe would be useless informational junk, due to God's anxiety not to delete information, but that useless information would be acceleratingly orders of magnitude bigger than the useful information, and that produces ontological = informational entropy. If God expresses and ontologically is physical and informational entropy, then he is not God, but some physical impersonal process.

All my ideas belong to you. You don't have to mention me.
If you don't like something change it. But I'm rigorous. I don't ass-kiss the atheists who like simple solutions. For example "physical causal closure in philosophy" is erroneously presented, because philosophical common sense is used to describe with simple mathematics the quantum foundations, which is utterly retarded and a fallacy (see: Quanta Magazine, for example Neil Turok and David Tong's texts.

I can help you with texts.

Please establish the: Fysikalistisk institution = Physicalist Institution