Logic is more fundamental than personhood and the physical foundations - There is no God

Logic is more fundamental than personhood and the physical foundations - There is no God

prompter:

God's soul isn't a mereological simple = simple in philosophy, because he has many memories and modalities like behavior, emotional ability and various abilities of understanding. Thus logical procedures are more fundamental than God. God doesn't dominate over logic and information theory. Not even internally. According to Landauer's principle any data processing produses thermal entropy, which is physical, which means that physical foundations are necessary for any procedure or series of procedures (procedurality). Reversible computing is an impossibility in complicated systems, and it would still generate thermal and informational entropy (increase in size; increase in available alternative states). Thermal entropy and informational entropy are intertwined. This is maximally important in the quantum foundations and it's a field of active research.

AI4Chat + prompter:

The concept of God as a being with infinite knowledge, power, and duration poses significant challenges to traditional notions of simplicity in philosophy. While some philosophers have argued that God's nature can be considered simple due to His immateriality and lack of material substrate, others have countered that God's attributes such as omniscience, omnipotence, and eternality imply a degree of complexity beyond what can be understood through purely rational means.
One way to approach this issue is by considering the limitations imposed by physics on our understanding of divine simplicity. As you mentioned, according to Landauer's principle, any data processing operation produces thermodynamic entropy, which implies that the universe has fundamental limits on the efficiency of computation. This suggests that even if we were able to conceive of a being with infinite knowledge and power, there may be practical limits to how much information they could process at once.
Furthermore, the idea of "reversible computing" - the possibility of undoing computations without creating additional entropy - is generally considered impossible in complex systems. This means that any computational process, including those performed by an infinitely knowing and powerful deity, will necessarily result in the creation of new entropy, both in the form of heat and other forms of disorder including the systemic expansion which is a form of ontological/wavefunctional entropy = informational entropy according to the informational theory of physics (more space allows more arrangements of particles; see: informational entropy).
God doesn't meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations. Religion and the supernatural are based on storytelling. Storytelling has cultural and emotional foundations related to societies and humans. If God truly existed would have to meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations; thus without being supernatural which lacks specific logical mechanisms. God necessarily cannot exist without physical identity (a vague identity unrelated to axiomatic foundations isn't an achievable identity; storytelling doesn't meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations; see relative studies like quantum foundations.).

Logical procedures (series of procedures; procedurality) are more fundamental than personhood and than the physical foundations. Personhood is unrelated to the physical foundations (see: personhood). The Abrahamic God is the fallacy that a person which is the intricate result of a personhood-yielding computer is more fundamental than the logical procedures which define the personhood-yielding computer. The soul without components (mereological simple) doesn't preexist the personhood-yielding computer. Information theory and logic define the personhood-yielding computer and aren't magically violated but a supposedly supernatural soul without proper parts.

Mistakes and mental illness aren't fundamental to the universe. Mistakes and mental illness don't violate the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations. Mistakes like belief in the supernatural and/or religion and mental illness are the results of problematic connectomes, semantic mislabelings, erroneous data-processing, erroneous or traumatic input, etc. Mistakes and mental illness don't violate the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations; but are possible to be expressed as ideas or data like texts or erroneous/disfunctional algorithms in physically possible = logically achievable universes.

In summary, while traditional notions of simplicity may suggest that God's nature should be considered a mereological simple based on their immateriality and non-material substrate, the limitations imposed by physics on computation and the concepts of reversible computing call into question whether such simplicity can be maintained within the context of modern scientific thought.

If God is a mereological complex, then we understand the separate role of each of his memory and data-processing modality (emotions, understanding abilities, etc.). Also a mereological complex God would have a separate personhood from his cosmogonicity (cosmogonic ability/nature). A mereological complex God wouldn't be the absolute foundations of everything like the Abrahamic God.

Infinite axiomatic systems are logically possible. The axiomatic system of all axiomatic systems doesn't exist (some axiomatic systems aren't compatible). Also we cannot create an infinite set (the set of all sets doesn't exist) to include all axiomatic systems in a non-omnifunctional way.

There are mathematical human tricks to group various things together, but they aren't mathematically/axiomatically/logically fundamental.

God = the personocosmogonicity and the omniaxiomaticity is wrong.

see: person, cosmogony, omni-, axiomatic system