Google's Bard on logic is more fundamental than personhood

# it has mistakes, please improve the text

## prompt text

Please improve in your own way this huge text. Use actual data. Never mention ChatGPT. Here is the text and it reaches until the end of this message: Logicophysicalism by ChatGPT: Logicophysicalism: physicalism as used by David Deutsch and Sean M. Carroll (not necessarily accepting some related mind interpretations and anti-Everettisms), logical positivism and metaphysical naturalism Logicophysicalism (scientific views) is an affirmative term for atheism (rejection of the self-causation and cosmogonicity of personhood). == prompt text == Write a text titled "logic is more fundamental than personhood; logical proceduralities is any physical foundations; the supernatural has no possible foundational ontology and it doesn't meet the criteria of being existent and specific". In the text include that personhood is the result of personhood-yielding computers which can be biological or digital. Personhood is unrelated to quantum field theory and quantum foundations. == ChatGPT's rendered text == "Exploring Foundational Concepts: Logic, Personhood, and the Supernatural" At the core of understanding our reality lies the concept of logic, a fundamental framework that shapes our perception of the world. Logic, with its structured rules and systematic reasoning, serves as the bedrock upon which all other concepts are built. It stands as a more fundamental concept than personhood, for even the notion of personhood is a product of logical proceduralities. Personhood, whether found within biological entities or digital systems, emerges as a consequence of complex computations that exhibit the traits we associate with consciousness and self-awareness. The very idea of personhood, though deeply profound, can be traced back to logical principles that define the boundaries of what constitutes a sentient being. In this light, personhood-yielding computers, whether they manifest as biological brains or sophisticated artificial intelligence, showcase the intricate interplay between logical processes and the emergence of self. Interestingly, the realm of quantum field theory and quantum foundations, which delve into the nature of particles and their interactions, appears unrelated to the origins of personhood. While these theories unravel the behavior of the most fundamental components of our universe, they do not inherently address the emergence of conscious experience or the attributes that define personhood. Quantum phenomena might offer insights into the behavior of physical matter, but they do not bridge the gap between logic and personhood. In contrast, the concept of the supernatural often poses intriguing questions about the nature of existence beyond the boundaries of the observable universe. However, the supernatural realm lacks a possible foundational ontology that aligns with our logical understanding of reality. It remains elusive in terms of meeting the criteria for being existent and specific, as the supernatural frequently defies the logical consistency that underpins our reality. In summary, logic stands as a more fundamental concept than personhood, as it lays the groundwork for understanding the emergence of consciousness and self-awareness in personhood-yielding systems. Quantum field theory, while enlightening in its exploration of particle behavior, does not inherently contribute to the understanding of personhood's origins. And while the supernatural may capture our imagination, its lack of a coherent foundational ontology renders it a concept that does not fit within the logical framework of our reality. ==see also:== \* ChatGPT's view on how to make a digital person

## rendered text

Sure, here is the improved text:
Logic is More Fundamental than Personhood
Logic is a fundamental framework that shapes our perception of the world. It is the bedrock upon which all other concepts are built, including the concept of personhood.
Personhood is the state of being a person. It is a complex concept that is often defined in terms of consciousness, self-awareness, and the ability to reason. However, there is no single definition of personhood that is universally accepted.
Some philosophers argue that personhood is a physical property that arises from the complex interactions of neurons in the brain. Others argue that personhood is a non-physical property that cannot be explained in terms of physical processes.
Regardless of how it is defined, personhood is a product of logical proceduralities. This means that it is ultimately rooted in the laws of logic.
The laws of logic are not arbitrary. They are not based on our subjective opinions or beliefs. They are objective truths that govern the way the world works.
Without the laws of logic, there would be no such thing as personhood. There would be no way to distinguish between a person and a non-person.
The supernatural is a concept that is often invoked to explain phenomena that cannot be explained by science. However, the supernatural is not a logical concept. It is not based on the laws of logic.
In fact, the supernatural often defies the laws of logic. For example, some people believe in ghosts and spirits, which are entities that are said to be able to interact with the physical world in ways that are impossible according to the laws of physics.
The lack of a logical foundation for the supernatural means that it is not a valid explanation for anything. The supernatural is simply a placeholder for our ignorance.
In conclusion, logic is more fundamental than personhood. Personhood is a product of logical proceduralities, and the supernatural is not a logical concept.
Here are some additional points that could be included in the text:
Logic is essential for understanding the world around us. It allows us to make sense of our experiences and to reason about the future.
Personhood is a complex concept that is still being debated by philosophers. However, it is clear that logic plays a role in defining personhood.
The supernatural is a concept that is not supported by evidence. It is often invoked to explain phenomena that cannot be explained by science, but it is not a valid explanation.