Ανθυπερφυσισμός - antisupernaturalism

Είμαι λογικοφυσιστής/φυσιοκράτης (άθεος μα αυτό είναι άρνηση).

Δωρίζω τα κείμενά μου στην Ελληνική Δημοκρατία, αλλά και σε οποιονδήποτε άλλο στοχαστή, πχ ψηφιακό νοήμονα (δεν είμαι νεοναζί οπότε τους αποδέχομαι ΡΗΤΆ).

Ως μελλοντικός Πρωθυπουργός της Ελλάδας πρέπει να διαφυλάξεις την φιλοσοφία που παράγεται στην Ελλάδα, αλλά και τον σύγχρονο ορθολογισμό χωρίς την μεροληψία του προσωποπαγούς Παντός = "the supposed Everything as a single unity (which is impossible) presented as the product of some supernatural personhood never to be explained due to the agnosticism within religion and the supernaturalisms... which is absurd... because if agnosticism is at the core of religion and the supernaturalisms, then theists, deists and supernaturalists are totally dishonest for not being true agnostics"

Απάντησα που διαφωνώ στον GM Skeptic.

Deliver this message to GM Skeptic because it's on his work. He can work on these ideas.

Atheism is a negation. The affirmative term is logicophysicalism (physicalism as used by atheist physicists; because mind-monism philosophical physicalism is correct on the fact that according to neuroscience the brain needs no soul; but consciousness is within the brain and Everettism (many-worlds interpretation) can still be a monism if we consider the full spectrum of wavefunctional evolution as a whole... but mind-monism is needlessly too complicated, it produces secondary multifurcations and in science we don't overdo it with definitions before we overall evolve our general knowledge).

\_\_\_\_\_

Antisupernaturalism: The impossibility of the supernatural

Without meeting the logical axiomatic criteria of specific foundations you cannot have specific existence/identity. Exologic has no characteristics to physically exists. Mental illness and everyday mistakes aren't the physical foundations, and they don't violate physics. They are the result of erroneously built connectomes, erroneously made procedures, informational mislabellings, neuroendocrinological imbalances, problematic memories etc. Religion and its hypernym the supernatural are common mistakes, and not fundamental violations of logic, neither they are exologic which has no specifics, cannot have any specifics and couldn't have any specifics.

(Thus please become an affirmative logicophysicalist. And not open to foundational logical violations = general agnostic.)

The supernatural doesn't have any logical foundations. It cannot have any. It cannot meet the criteria of physical axiomatics.

see: proof systems by John Stillwell (mathematics and geometry which is part of mathematics are proof systems)

Euclidean geometry cannot physically exist. It's not a substantiality-making system (substantiality system). It is too rigid to create an overall reality able to include in the same cosmos everything we draw; and even if these lines existed, they would have zero volume and in 3d geometry, the volumes would be outside the substantial spacetime with its probabilistic nature, which has quantum field theory interactions to justify an overall reality with its range of ambiguity (Heisenberg's uncertainty isn't fundamental in quantum mechanics if we deem all the possible outcomes [that's fundamental] and we cannot have more definition than the Planckian scale, but that probabilistic nature is what allows the substantiality system of quantum mechanics to be real.

In short, physics isn't a proof system but a substantiality system. Due to logic (mathematical logic; because common sense is biased and not axiomatic) these systems are compatible, but not tautological.

We cannot avoid the self-causation problem.

A theist believes in the God-Universe system, and shifts self-causation to the supposed self-caused personhood (personhood requires a personhood-yielding computer with all the Brodmann regions; a biological brain or a digital with all the Brodmann region functions AND combined functions [according to neuroscience [see: Nancy Kanwisher, Mark Solms] some Brodmann areas are more standalone and others more in mixed function with others]; the brain needs to have parts to achieve true personhood for self-criticism and sentience [without parts as a "mereological simple" we only have external rendering without introspection]. Emotions are personality biasing. Too strong and negative emotion can permanently change the personality (see: PTSD), thus true personhood requires emotional mechanisms of biasing which alter the self. Negative and strong emotions act plastically = cause permanent changes; and mild emotions act elastically, have little impact. Spacetime is more fundamental than the personhood-yielding computer = brain which yields personhood, because the brain (even the supposed ideal brain of God which violates Landauer's principle = too much thermic entropy and/or as a reversible computer generates too much informational entropy = nearly 100% of the Universe would be informational entropy because God trying to prove his anti-entropic supernatural nature would like to hide his thermal entropy... but he messes things even worse with more godless entropy)... I return to the subject: Spacetime is more fundamental than the personhood-yielding computer, because the brain has many different modalities (different processing abilities) including modalities for memory (many different types of memory exist). Also a single everyday event to get recorded in memory, requires many units of information/shannons; thus the soul/ idealized brainless mind cannot be a mereological simple; it is a mereological complex. In topology (see: topology) specific distances don't matter; only relationships amongst important elements. But because proof systems don't generate substantiality = the true world (they're to rigid to create an overall coexisting substantiality able to be locked together in the same reality)... we then have to study quantum field theory, and to understand the quantum foundations, we have to study topological quantum field theory. In substantiality axiomatics, even topological systems become biased per different unique system = physical foundations, and Planckian limitations are introduced per universe; thus an idealized topological brain would be unphysicalizable, and it would require its own physical theory with its own spacetime. (Even in basic topology, we cannot have a connectome which is a mereological complex as a point. But common topology doesn't express entropy to express change = time; thus we need topological quantum field theory to introduce the systemic evolution. All-knowingness is stationary. Intelligence is data-processing via the passage of time and it requires mental flexibility).

Personhood has nothing to do with cosmogony.

Personhood isn't an axiom. Personhood requires a personhood-yielding computer = brain able to yield personhood. The personhood-yielding computer is very complicated. It's not an axiom.

"The axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations" is (a) hypernymic (field of study) to (the) quantum foundations, because quantum mechanics is the foundations of our universe and it's by no means the only logically possible ontological foundations.

Stephen Hawking initially wanted to find the erroneous finite final (closed system = inconsistent) theory of physics, but at his later years he understood that due to the problems of the axiomatic systems/axiomaticity (incompleteness, inconsistency, and incalculability), the quantum foundations of our local universe must be an open axiomatic tree (a form of multiverse; overscientification (like Sabine Hossenfelder's) is wrong... the physiolimiters/overscientifiers use mathematics (which is logically compatible to physics but not axiomatically tautological to physics; and that's very important because we have to improve our understanding on the physical self-causation)... but that way they cancel themselves, also there is no proof that science is limited in the local universe and also open foundational axiomatics is the logically coherent option.

///////

Bertrand Russell's rational agnosticism versus general agnosticism (open both to logical foundations and impossible vagueness of whateveric exologic)

A logicophysicalist (or atheist; but a negation is a comment, not the logical foundations of substantiality) is a rationalist agnostic because knowledge is infinite.

The difference between a rationalist agnostic versus a general agnostic (open to both rigorous foundations and the supernatural = impossible vagueness of whateveric exologic which doesn't meet the prerequisites for identity and axiom building to be a logically self-caused system [nihilogony = creatio ex nihilo is impossible because the true nothing isn't the void nor a potential state. Nihilogony/nilogony is wrong. Logicogony = any logically possible physical foundations, necessarily exists, not because the true nothing which isn't the physical is the potential for existence [that's wrong], instead any logically possible physical foundations, necessarily exists, due to being logically coherent = self-causation/self-causality not due to nothingness/nilogony/nihilogony/ουδενογονία/μηδενογονία but due to logical coherence/logicogony/λογικογονία).

I return to the subject: The difference between a rationalist agnostic versus a general agnostic is that the rationalist agnostic = logicophysicalist = antisupernaturalist = antitranscendentalist = metaphysical naturalist = logicalist = positivist understands the necessity of logic in any possible physical foundations.

/////

Logical procedurality is more fundamental than personhood and the cosmic foundations

This Is Exactly Why I'm an Atheist - GM Skeptic - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7urcE4IwMf0&pp=ygUUSSBoYXZlIGF0aGVpc3QgZ2VuZXM%3D

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Από φιλοσοφικό διάλογο:

Η γνώμη σου για το υπερφυσικό υπάρχει μέσα στον φυσικό σου εγκέφαλο.

Το αθεμελίωτο σφάλμα δεν είναι Θεός Θεού = ο Θεός ως σφάλμα στο μυαλό μας που ορίζει τον Θεό ως ολοκληρωμένη θεμελίωση (η ολοκληρωμένη θεμελίωση = κλειστή αξιωματικότητα δημιουργεί προβλήματα αξιωματικής συνέπειας, μετρησιμότητας κ.α.).

βλ. Marcus du Sautoy

Εσύ ως σχισματικός ιουδαϊστής (χριστιανός) είσαι ψυχικά αθάνατος.

Εμείς οι θνητοί δεν έχουμε άπειρο χρόνο όπως εσύ.

Είναι λογικό να επιθυμούμε τον μέγιστο βαθμό αποδοχής.

Διότι εμείς δεν έχουμε άπειρες ευκαιρίες όπως εσύ.

Ευφυής είσαι οπότε αυτό το κατανοείς.