Comments on Kurzgesagt

## they showed an impossibly small black hole

You killed me. You caused me physical harm. I work on natural (not general relativity based) black holes. The puny black hole you showed it's impossible to be maintained as a natural black hole. (It works as an idealized black hole in general relativity; without to rigorously elaborate on specific field mechanisms; only generic ones). You cause harm. You unteach people deeply and you present mistakes as permanent knowledge. I love black holes and that maximally hurts. Natural black holes have layers like stars. The upper layer is the loop-tunneling reabsorption headroom. Very massive black holes mostly have gas on their upper layers. Closer to the center different degenerate superfluids exist (quark-gluon plasma isn't their deepest layer but way above the degenerate superfluids). The deepest layer is the chromotorus = chromodynamic torus = maximal degeneracy of spacetime itself in the shape of a torus because all NATURAL black holes necessarily rotate. If we had a natural non-rotating black hole, it would immediately expel gravitational waves, and the remainder would immediately decay into a rotating black hole of an arbitrary direction, except if other huge astrophysical objects rotate nearby to influence the spin direction. Complexity is equally or more important than entropy in black holes. The twirling of spacetime compactifies even more spatiotemporal information. In stellar black hole it's impossible to fall in in a straight line, because the most straight line would be to follow the twirling spacetime. If you want to fall straight in the black hole, that would require impossible amounts of energy. Stellar-sized black holes have very very fast spins, but supermassive black holes spin slower. The pre-Big-Bang state, as the sole omniblackhole core had no overall spin when the Big Bang happened, and without a spin the spacetime-dynamo mechanism which converts mass–energy to curved and compactified spacetime ends, and the black hole decays. / About the loop-tunneling reabsorption headroom: miniscule black holes immediately evaporate, because they don’t have enough volume behind the event horizon to have that crucial mechanism. Don't only describe special relativity black holes. Instead use quantum field theory to describe particle interactions, degeneracy levels higher than neutron star degeneracy, and try to combine (complexity + entropy) information theory with quantum field theory. Thus ask 30 or 100 different professors. It's more honest to admit you don't know, than to authoritarianly unteach people. / Why the loop-tunneling reabsorption headroom exists? Because maximal degeneracy of spacetime itself isn't a normal thing. That energy wants to escape, but it gets trapped if the black hole is big enough to maintain behind the event horizon a loop-tunneling reabsorption headroom. / Also each black hole size has a threshold pace of enlargement due to inertia. Quasars are pushed to absorb more mass–energy than their corresponding pace of enlargement, and the excessive mass–energy is radiated out via the astrophysical jets and also as halo emissions. / Don't ask few professors, they aren't Gods. Don't ask people who only work in physics or only mathematicians who work in physics. Ask information theorists, condensed matter physicists etc. Narrowness leads to mistakes or to game-correctness of unphysical mythology presented as the full story.