Empire of Naalsachte

Banner of Naalsachte towards the end of the Empire (1763-1791)

Naalsachte at its peak in 1610, just before Emperor Freindarte's death

### Common languages

Naalsachte Austrian, Spore, Jaegon, Wintermacht Bohemian, Gammerian, Declavan, Spheroidic (Bosnian), various forms of Noobic, and more

### Government

**Feudal Monarchy** until July 1, 1553
 **Absolute Monarchy** until December 2, 1789
 **Constitutional Monarchy** onward

Archduke (1032-1465)King (1465-1553)
**Emperor** (1553 onward)

* Tristan I (1032-1066)
* Angelo I (1144-1149)
* Angelo II (1410-1425)
* Nytlchen III (1425-1434)
* Kahn I (1455-1478)
* Nytlchen IV (1478-1541)
* Freindarte I (1541-1611)
* Kahn II (1611-1632)
* Augustin I (1632-1667)
* Kahn III (1732-1747)
* Nytlchen VI (1782-1791)

### Historical era

**High Middle Ages to Ages of Revolution:*** Fall of Vienna (1032)
* Proclamation of the Kingdom (1465)
* Asaka Dynasty (1478)
* Freindarte's ascension (1541)
* Union with the Jaegons and the Empire of Naalsachte (1553)
* 30 Years War (1618-1648)
* End of the Jaegon Dual Union (1692)
* Seven Years War (1756-1763)
* Naalsachte Revolution (1789-1815)
* Execution of the Emperor (1791)

### Population

1100: 1 million1400: 2 million
1500: 4.1 million
1553: 10 million
1610: 16.1 million
1648: 11.2 million
1692: 5.6 million
1756: 7.1 million
1789: 8.2 million

### Currency

Ducat

The **Empire of Naalsachte** (Surnachte Naalsachte: Nalavasir Reich) was a European major power during the early modern period. Starting from the conquest of Vienna from a Spore warlord in 1032 AD, the kingdom stagnated for a while before quickly expanding into one of Europe's great powers, and later declining into oblivion nearly as quickly. Naalsachte as an empire is quite remarkable in that its rise can mostly be accredited to three kings (emperors), two of which were extremely long lived and all of which were beneficial to the empire; Kahn I, Nytlchen IV and Freindarte I. It was also one of the most prominently Decist states in Europe during its time, though how radical its form of Decism was depended on the Emperor at the helm, from tolerance during the early Asaka emperors, as well as Tristan I and Kahn I, to persecution of other religions indiscriminately (mainly Grystallicism) during much of the Archduchy, as well as Kahn II and most emperors after Augustin II.

### Naalsachte historiography crisis

Some believe the end of the Thirty Years War and the Peace of Hannover is sometimes believed to have been the start of the oblivion of the Empire, while others put the starting point at the breakaway of the Jaegons from the Empire. The latter idea, however, is typically held by Mudblood revisionists (due to the fundamental anti-magic ideas of the Mudbloods) in order to put blame on the mage orders for leading to the 'destruction of civilization'. Other historians believe that while the decline of the Empire started around 1648, it was certainly accelerated by the breakaway of the Jaegons, however it was not directly caused by the Jaegons. A very small minority view believes that Elkainia and the Donau-Patribund was a major or even the sole reason for the collapse of Naalsachte as an empire; this is generally agreed to be false, as Naalsachte was practically gone when the Donau-Patribund rose; the Donau-Patribund simply took a vast chunk of Naalsachtian land after the Revolutionary/Marian Wars. Generally, due to the political situation of Naalsachte, historiography over the lands are greatly disputed, including when the empire peaked, when its decline started, and when it truly 'fell', as well as if it was truly a sovereign state (for its entire existence, it was part of the Divine Surnachte Imperium).

#### Divine Surnachte sovereignty question

Up until the mid 20th century, most historians believed that Naalsachte was not a sovereign state, but rather a constitutent part of the Imperium. Contrarian views rose in the 20th century, and in modern times the boundary is typically drawn either from the coronation of Kahn I as King (1465) or the proclamation of the Empire by Freindarte (1553). Though the Naalsachte 'sovereign state' boundary theory is typically more accepted than the 'full constituent territory' theory, there is still a sizable portion of historians who believe that Naalsachte was not a sovereign state from its birth in 1032 until the formation of the Empire of Greater Germania and the dissolution of the Divine Imperium.

#### Accusations of Anti-Spore views

Throughout the 19th century, the Sporophobic Fever meant that Brainer loyalty to the Imperium of Naalsachte was questioned by many contemporary historians. Now, this is generally agreed to be Anti-Spore xenophobia as well as historical revisionism, as the Brainers were surprisingly loyal to Emperor Freindarte and even to Kahn II until its conquest by Karl Anderberg of the Empire of Greater Tolldernia in 1621.