What is gravity?

```
Please do that: create a quantum field theory description of particles, which makes them partially gravitationally distorted, but the vast amount of quantum field theory spatiotemporal curvature, is merely the virtual particles' path curvature.

```

```
What if gravity is merely a series of possible pathways? Very curved spacetime allows more alternative pathways. Gravity is simply the result of the informational entropy caused but the increase of possible pathways objects can follow as orbits, and the arrow of time simply is the fact that only one out of the many possible pathways is selected per universe. Gravity is mostly (nearly 100% of the times) a transient phenomenon (not a pure collapse for example, except very close to relavily small black holes [in which the surrounding spacetime itself is energetic enough to interact with particles] or quasars [very energetic surroundings are required/or typical accumulation disk]).

```

## What is gravity? 1a

Different objects don't attract each other. They simply cause spacetime to curve according to the object's mass via virtual particles' self-interactions.

A stationary object, sees a moving object compressed in the direction of motion, and vice versa, because there is no absolute inertial frame of reference.

What we want, in order to explain the cause of gravity, is mass to distort spacetime, and force objects compress in the direction of the gravitational force, and also move towards the center of mass.

Heavy objects, cause a bigger spatiotemporal curvature, because they cause more virtual particles' interactions.

But why objects move to bigger spatiotemporal curvatures = virtual particles' self-interactions?

Because any particle can be justified ontologically as self-interactions of virtual particles; thus particles are more probable to noisily move towards denser virtual particles self-interactions.

Heavy objects experience slower timeflow. The more self-interactions a region has, the bigger the gravitational curvature, and the slower the self-interactions pop in and out of existence.

Particles want to be in regions with many virtual particles' self-interactions, and slower timeflow.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

We can use quantum field theory, to express a 3D gradient of virtual particles' self-interaction density.

We can use calculus on quantum field theory to predict how the quantum jitters which make up the real and the virtual particles behave.

Also Everettism remains alive.
In general we can describe gravitational motion, but miniscule alternative many-worlds due exist.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

In an impossible thought experiment we can immediately place a heavy object in spacetime. Initially spacetime wasn't curved, but the gravitational curvature spreads at the speed of light.

The virtual particles' self-interactions not only cause spacetime to curve, but they force objects to distort as if they were moving in relation to other objects or in relation to the object called virtual particles of the void. Thus distorted objects necessarily move, in order causality (speed of light limitation and Lagrangian function) isn't violated inside them and in relation to other objects and the object called virtual particles of the void.

But why objects get relativistically compressed inside a curved spacetime? Due to the 3D probability density gradience of the virtual particles' self-interactions which cause the curvature of spacetime.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

## What is gravity?

Imagine we had a true void. It's wavefunction would express zero particles, and its wavepacket would include momentary virtual particles which cancel out.

If we introduce a sphere in that empty void, that sphere is entangled to that void, that partially entangled to its constituent virtual particles.

Gravity is not a force, but the result of how other fields behave. Thus virtual particles, which all belong to fields, bend the virtual mesh of spacetime to match up the entanglement configuration amongst the sphere and the virtual particles which comprise the void. Imagine noisy momentary relationships. Mostly partial entanglements in groups of particles and virtual particles which constantly change and new partial entanglements are created all the time as virtual particles pop in and out of existence.

If we have two objects, the continue to generate a spatiotemporal bias to virtual and substantial/real particles which appears as gravity.

[Official physics doesn't know the cause of gravity. Keep my definition before we find a better one. By my suggestion is good.]

What is superordinate/hypernymic/hyponymous gravity = dark matter;

In the galactic and stellar-cluster order of magnitude, a superordinate/hypernymic/hyponymous gravity = dark matter appears.

In rare (but not too rare) occasions, a small galaxy can lose its dark matter in a collision with a bigger galaxy. A trap mechanism with intricate curved paths might be necessary, because it doesn't happen in all these similar collisions.

The lost dark matter will gradually re-appear from the remaining mass, but it will take billions of years.

Also uncausally too much dark matter will dissipate, still in billions of years, if there isn't enough mass around to causally support it, or black hole to partially absorb it.

Why dark matter exists?

Because huge gravitational systems, produce superordinate/hypernymic/hyponymous gravity.

Why?

my guess: Too large gravitational systems include too many Everettian alternatives (Everettian alternative wavefunctional evolutions).

But some wavefunctional evolutions merge up = lead to the same timeline of events. The pruned out wavefunctional outcomes cannot totally vanish, and they're transformed into higher order gravity = dark matter.

But if merged realities produce high-order gravity/dark matter, do the wavefunctional alternative outcomes consume energy? No. The wavefunctional evolution and the directionality of time exist due to entropy. Without entropy the universe would have been stationary.

The entropy of the universe is part of the axiomatic algorithm of physics. We have to introduce it in quantum field theory.

[My text is based on too many personal ideas outside standard physics.]

///////////////

Is gravity subwavefunctions which share information (partially and biasedly decay to match each other) within a larger wave function?

Can that work mathematically in order it fits the observational data?

Of course gravity is a probabilistic process. That partial and biased wavefunctional decay happens also at the wrong direction, but the classical gravity direction prevails.

see: Quanta Magazine

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

What if time becomes materialized within the basic 3D dimensions of space as gravity?

We should mathematically play with that idea.

## comment 1

### Gravity as timeflowdynamics

A quantum field theory with more degrees of freedom in a more intricate Lagrangian function, able to express the gradual timeflow sharing amongst close objects with the result of moving closer to each other.

## comment 2

Gravity should be expressed as quantum field theory interactions.

Probably with extra factors? Expressed via topological quantum field theory?

Probably a simpler approach (quantum field theory with extra factors) should be the beginning.

Massive objects relativistically (when compared with other objects) exhibit slower timeflow = lower rate of field activity.

The spatiotemporal curvature distorts the paths of the interactions THUS WE NEED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY CALCULUS (in a generalized form, otherwise it's unmanageable). Also particles get distorted in spacetime. (Should we use supercomputers and then try to understand some emerging patterns? Some don't like that approach. We should try ANY possible method.)

All these approaches are equivalent (relativistically slower interaction rate [where mass is concentrated] + relativistically spaghettified interaction paths and particles).

All these ideas should be expressed if possible via quantum field theory because it's the causally deeper theory in physics.

We should debate with many mathematicians about possible approaches.

We should even use artificial neural networks or other more complicated A.I. to test better approaches on causally describing the mechanism of gravity which overlaps the definition of spacetime (but spacetime is a deeper question = the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations as instantiated by our universe [which by no means is the only logically possible physical foundations]).

Please create one or more groups to work on these ideas.