Black hole

## text 1

We need a formula about the pace of black hole feeding mechanism; it might even be complicated... a function with variables.

Can a black hole's central region get compressed? = We need a better formula about the range of allowed compression per black hole size; and we should elaborate on the difference of behavior amongst different sized black holes.

INERTIA OF SIZE

We need a mathematical formula for "the allowed pace of growth per black hole size" (we have to define a threshold of permitted pace of mass incorporation behind the event horizon "for each different black hole size", but the solution isn't clear cut, because the threshold acts probabilistically (it statistically rejects and incorporates matter behind the event horizon; thus the formula must not be simplistic but it should describe a statistical pattern change).

And all this has no meaning if we don't better define how the galactic gasses behave.
If few of gas is very close to the black hole, the black hole can incorporate most of it.
If a lot of gas is very close to the black hole, the black hole CANNOT VIOLATE the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself [not matter] (Is the central black hole Kerr torus a maximally degenerate state of spacetime? We need formulas... preferably based on quantum field theory and not generic descriptions).

If there is a lot of gas very close to a black hole, but in doses, the black hole might have enough time to overcome its SIZE GROWTH INERTIA (size growth inertia of the black hole; we have to define it mathematically)... thus the specific events of the gasses, are EXTREMELY important!

Also the black hole (its central region is probably "maximally degenerate spacetime"; we need to describe it mathematically)... also the black hole grows bigger NOT ONLY by consuming matter, but it also consumes gravitational curvature from nearby objects (gravity isn't proven to be a fundamental force [we don't have the graviton], but practically general relativity is about the allowed paths of particles and objects).

The black hole does incorporate some nearby spatiotemporal curvature (we need to mathematically elaborate on it).

One huge question (but we don't even mathematically define what the "maximally degenerate state of spacetime is", and we need it also for the pre-Big-Bang phase transition [if we could describe it via quantum field theory])...

one huge question:

Can the central black hole region (Kerr-like torus in real black holes and not a sphere, but it is a torus, not a massless bent line) behind the event horizon be compressed, or does the black hole has to grow in size.
Officially we know the answer. The black hole has to grow in size. But the actual solution is more complex...

Do the innards behind the event horizon of different sized black holes are exactly the same, and merely change in size? Not exactly (but close).

Black holes have a correcting mechanism. That's puny/micro/mini black holes immediately evaporate.
Mini black holes, don't have enough space behind their event horizon for the correction mechanism = tunneling back in energy which tries to escape (black holes shouldn't have any problem if general relativity was the deepest ontological definition of spacetime; but the world is quantum, thus quantum jitters momentarily are comporessed MORE than the threshold of "maximal degenerate pressure" and NECESSARILY have to tunnel out (we need that for the Big Bang, which had no outside... we need these formulas expressed via quantum field theory about the "maximally degenerate state of spacetime itself")...

astrophysical black holes have enough volume behind their event horizons,
to have a correction mechanism = tunnel back in the jitters which momentarily exceeded the
"maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself".

The correcting mechanism of the black hole is behind the event horizon. Only a negligible percentage of energy escapes the black hole that way.

## text 2

We don't know the threshold of degeneracy of spacetime itself.

(the threshold of degeneracy inside a black hole)

Black holes when they consume mass, cannot compress it more,
they have to enlarge.

If a black hole cosumes mass faster than the rate of mass incorporation it vomits it via the jets and via a halo of radiation, and in the case of the omniblackhole = all the universe being a single black hole (not a mere sphere)... then we have the next big bang (omniblackhole cyclic cosmology). Maximal degeneracy reaches a threshold (we do not have the formula of maximal degeneracy of the spacetime itself), and it cannot get compressed any more, thus the omniblackhole rebounds as a big bang and generates more spacetime by using the energy which was supposed to be used to violate the maximal spatiotemporal degeneracy (no violation of physics occurred).

(we don't have the mathematical formula for the mass threshold in relation to the pace of incorporation behind the event horizon; it is a nonlinear function which changes with black hole size).

Physics (if quantum field theory is used on those it would be ideal) doesn't have the formulas I mentioned: 1. maximal degeneracy pressure = maximal spatiotemporal degeneracy (of spacetime itself), 2. threshold of mass incorporation per unit of time (as observed by an afar observer) per black hole mass.

General relativity doesn't reveal anything on the specific field interactions.

Matter is absorbed inside the black hole via quantum tunneling (that way we avoid the infinite time duration of mass incorporation pseudoparadox).

## text 3: hadronic black hole

hadronic black hole: The black hole core [not necessarily immediately behind the event horizon, especially for huge black holes] is one of the permitted/allowable/possible hadrons [hydronic matter], simply way too complex [the overall black hole has too many quark antiquark pairs; but the overall characteristics of the black hole aren't that complicated when described as a wavefunction of a huge number of alternative states generically [its impossible to name these different Everettian quark configurations one by one]]. There is no information paradox because information isn't the utmost fundamental thing in the universe [see: David Deutsch], because there cannot be any information without a frame of reference = a connectome of many interacting particles. Thus there are sub-informational quantum field jitters which become informational within a range of many particles which can interact (Everettian view; wavefunctional). That sub-informational quantum jittering connectome mostly exists within the event horizon, but gradually escapes due to Hawking radiation [some sub-information = jitters leaks out; but it yields reshuffled information = particles]. Information cannot be lost, but it's not self-caused ex nihilo = it's not fundamental, because it requires a connectome of many particles [behind the event horizon things ALMOST BUT NOT ABSOLUTELY become disentangled from the rest of the universe's connectome], and when that connectome becomes reshuffled, information is practically irretrievable to a personal or impersonal [for example particle] interpreter = observer.

## text 4

General relativity and its singularity and ringularity fail to describe the physical degeneracy torus of a rotating black hole, because they describe no spacetime mechanism. Quantum field theory can describe maximal degeneracy (of spacetime itself) as a pretransitional phase (pre-Big-Bang state), and that will happen in the future.

You (...commenting a professor) never mentioned on YouTube (when speaking about black holes) that quantum tunneling can happen when enough energy is compressing a particle and when the boundaries confining it aren't strong and thick enough to confine it. Replace the word particle with maximal degeneracy pressure. Natural rotating black holes have an intricate interior behind their event horizon. Their maximal degeneracy pressure area wants to tunnel out, and quantum tunneling is restricted by gravity but not prohibited; also gravity doesn't have the same value everywhere; relative weaker gravity curvature regions exist behind the event horizon and there the degeneracy loop tunneling reabsorption mechanism can exist (we have to use the schematic of the rotating black hole, and add tunneling loops surrounding the maximal degeneracy region). The result is a permanent flow of looping tunneling surrounding the maximal degeneracy pressure area. This view can explain why miniscule black holes immediately evaporate = their event horizon is too small to have a degeneracy reabsorption mechanism behind the event horizon. Also this view can explain why quasars emit huge amounts of radiation; quasars consume mass–energy too fast, and their event horizon cannot grow big enough in time due to inertia, thus a part of the degeneracy reabsorption mechanism gets exposed outside the event horizon and most of that mass–energy escapes. All these things are guesses, but what is the alternative explanation? We should start explaining these mechanisms somehow. We don't have the quantum field theory definition of maximal degeneracy pressure. Not all regions behind the event horizon are maximally degenerate. Maximal degeneracy pressure is maximally compressed spacetime. No specific particles are able to get expressed there, but the overall maximal degeneracy region is one particle as a whole. If these ideas are wrong what is the alternative? Organize multidisciplinary groups of scientists to find better descriptions.

## text 5 (the same, differently phrased)

Please study some omniblackhole texts. I don't claim they're correct but: 1. we don't have the quantum field theory definition of the maximal degeneracy pressure state of spacetime itself (maximal degeneracy area inside event horizons and Planck degeneracy as the pre-Big-Bang state), 2. quasars emit high energy radiation which black holes don't, except if they consume too much mass–energy–gravitational-curvature faster than the pace the event horizon can grow, and the degeneracy reabsorption tunneling mechanism is exposed... please focus on natural spinning black holes and their intricate interior schematic, but we'll have to indicate the maximal degeneracy torus with reabsorption tunneling loops behind the event horizon). 3. The reabsorption tunneling loops don't have space to be expressed in miniscule black holes, thus they immediately evaporate. All my ideas might be wrong, but he have no serious alternative. We'll need quantum field theory to define the maximal degeneracy pressure state of spacetime itself, and it's not a monstrosity. It's doable. All fields are maximally compacted with the maximal possible energy = no particle has space to be expressed. The result is 1. either the maximal degeneracy pressure area expands towards the external spacetime, or 2. big bang starts because either the sole primordial omniblackhole is infinite, or huge enough to hold in place due to inertia and phase transition/ decay into a big bang (big bangs and big rips noncapitalized in cyclic cosmologies).