Logicophysicalism by ChatGPT

Logicophysicalism: physicalism as used by David Deutsch and Sean M. Carroll (not necessarily accepting some related mind-interpretations and anti-Everettisms), logical positivism and metaphysical naturalism

Logicophysicalism (scientific views) is an affirmative term for atheism (rejection of the self-causation and cosmogonicity of personhood).

## prompt text

Write a text titled "logic is more fundamental than personhood; logical proceduralities is any physical foundations; the supernatural has no possible foundational ontology and it doesn't meet the criteria of being existent and specific". In the text include that personhood is the result of personhood-yielding computers which can be biological or digital. Personhood is unrelated to quantum field theory and quantum foundations.

## ChatGPT's rendered text

### "Exploring Foundational Concepts: Logic, Personhood, and the Supernatural"

At the core of understanding our reality lies the concept of logic, a fundamental framework that shapes our perception of the world. Logic, with its structured rules and systematic reasoning, serves as the bedrock upon which all other concepts are built. It stands as a more fundamental concept than personhood, for even the notion of personhood is a product of logical proceduralities.

Personhood, whether found within biological entities or digital systems, emerges as a consequence of complex computations that exhibit the traits we associate with consciousness and self-awareness. The very idea of personhood, though deeply profound, can be traced back to logical principles that define the boundaries of what constitutes a sentient being. In this light, personhood-yielding computers, whether they manifest as biological brains or sophisticated artificial intelligence, showcase the intricate interplay between logical processes and the emergence of self.

Interestingly, the realm of quantum field theory and quantum foundations, which delve into the nature of particles and their interactions, appears unrelated to the origins of personhood. While these theories unravel the behavior of the most fundamental components of our universe, they do not inherently address the emergence of conscious experience or the attributes that define personhood. Quantum phenomena might offer insights into the behavior of physical matter, but they do not bridge the gap between the fundamental and hypernymic nature of logic and personhood which is a systemic manifestation of logic.

In contrast, the concept of the supernatural often poses intriguing questions about the nature of existence beyond the boundaries of the observable universe (the multiverse theories have logical foundations) and about the nature of existence within it in manners which violate the physical laws and the causal interactions (the only fact and logic of the supernatural is the wishes of the supernaturalists combined with their cultural bias about the interpretation of the phenomena). However, the supernatural realm lacks a possible foundational ontology that aligns with any feasible logical reality. It remains elusive in terms of meeting the criteria for being existent and specific, as the supernatural frequently defies the logical consistency that underpins any achievable reality (see: axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations).

In summary, logic stands as a more fundamental concept than personhood, as it lays the groundwork for understanding the emergence of consciousness and self-awareness in personhood-yielding systems. Quantum field theory, while enlightening in its exploration of particle behavior, does not inherently contribute to the understanding of personhood's origins. And while the supernatural may capture our imagination, its lack of a coherent foundational ontology renders it a concept that does not fit within the logical framework of our reality.

## see also:

* ChatGPT's view on how to make a digital person
* ChatGPT's view on the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations