Omniblackhole decay cyclic cosmology

```
A black hole core substance (maximally degenerate spacetime/the most degenerate state possible) has less entropy than separate particles, because it acts as a single/internally homogeneous particle. Use that as the pre-Big-Bang state. Entropy is materialized when it decays. It's a cyclic universe hypothesis (too many exist; remove the uncausal ones).

```

## Omniblackhole decay cyclic cosmology

in French: Cosmologie cyclique de désintégration de l'omni-trou-noir

The universe acceleratingly expands.
At some earlier time the universe was dense enough to be an omniblackhole.
The universe was an omniblackhole.
The omniblackhole is only the densest part of the black hole, without the other components of the regular black holes (disks, astrophysical jets, halo) and without external spacetime.
Nowadays we don't have the full description of the black hole.
Nowadays we don't have the full description of the contents behind the event horizon.
The singularity and the ringularity are physically impossible because they do not describe any spacetime with volume, timeflow and quantum field theory procedurality.
Not everything behind the event horizon is maximally degenerate (see: Kip Thorne's lectures on black holes).
Physical black holes rotate, thus the Kerr black hole model is closer to truth, but the ringularity has to be replaced with a maximally degenerate torus which is physically achievable.
We know that behind the event horizon a corrective tunneling mechanism of reabsorption exists, because mini black holes don't have the particular corrective headroom and immediately evaporate.
Nowadays we don't have the definition/the formulas of the maximal degeneracy pressure (of spacetime itself).
Maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime (spatiotemporal degeneracy) doesn't allow more degeneracy to be expressed; more degeneracy only can explode things outside the black hole, or generate the Big Bang, because omniblackholes have no outside/no external spacetime.

If we trace the history of our universe, at some early period it was an omniblackhole, and it bigbanged/it exploded as the Big Bang.

(Each black hole mass has a different threshold pace of mass increase [the mathematical formula is missing] due to: 1. inertia and 2. there cannot be more degeneracy beyond the maximal spatiotemporal degeneracy (mass-energy is then tunnelled out the black hole's densest region, and if there is not outside the omniblackhole bigbangs/causes spacetime to expand as a big bang (non-capitalized big bang in cyclic cosmology; Big Bang is a proper noun and the name of our particular cosmic cycle.)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The universe acceleratingly expands.

Hubble volumes (subluminal causality spheres) don't have a constant volume. Immediately after the big bangs they enlarge, then they shrink and at the "big bang phase transition" they expand again.

Hubble volumes are infinite and overlapping; thus the "Hubble volume field" which produces an Everettian bulk universe has to be studied deeper.

The Hubble volumes of the very afar future and old universe will tend to become omnipointwise (pointwise per each Hubble volume, but due to the Hubble volume field omnipointwise).

The omnipointwise cosmic phase is necessary to describe the homogeneity and isotropy of the cyclic universe.

The Hubble volume field never becomes omnipointwise according to general relativity, because general relativity isn't the most causally analytical physical theory. The term omnipointwise is based on general relativity.

The Hubble volume field in the physical world (not in general relativity) becomes an omniblackhole near the change of the cosmic cycle, because the average energy is enough to create an omniblackhole. When the conditions are right for a black hole to form are right, the black hole necessarily forms.

Thus an omniblackhole forms (omniblackhole: all the universe which isn't only the observable universe, becomes a black hole without any exterior and auxiliary black hole components but only with a maximally degenerate spacetime).

The omniblackhole absorbs any imperfections, the maximally degenerate spacetime acts like a single fundamental particle which biasedly decays into a universe primarily of matter due to symmetry violations (the nowadays mechanism of the prevalence of matter in the universe is wrong, because it doesn't take into account the decay of the maximally degenerate spacetime which produces symmetry violations).

* argument against the omniblackhole: spacetime always expands and has expansionary inertia thus the omniblackhole cannot form even when mass–energy is dense enough

* response: the omniblackhole initially consumes the expansionary inertia, and forms the omniblackhole with a calculable delay (quantum field theory based)

Our universe acceleratingly expands. It will become colder and then maximally hotter as spacetime rips itself apart. In the afar/distant future the average energy per volume will suffice for omniblackhole formation. The perfect omniblackhole will delay in order it absorbs the expansionary inertia and less dense regions. Then the omniblackhole will (verb: bigbang) explode causing the next big bang because that black hole has no exterior, and maximal spatiotemporal degeneracy is an absolute limit (which in the particular case exhibits phase transition becoming a big bang). The universe is cyclic thus this process repeats itself.

### comment 1

#### What was the state before the Big Bang?

The omniblackhole is a speculation. But study it well.

It has nothing to do with Lee Smolin who claims that degenerate black holes continue to be degenerate and in tandem define nondegenerate matter and also change the laws of physics. Lee Smolin is stupid because he doesn't understand the axiomatics of physics. Black holes don't change the physical foundations. see: Perimeter Institute, see: David Tong

We don't know if the omniblackhole view is correct. The cosmic inflation is based on unproven ideas. The omniblackhole is slightly closer to proven black holes. But nowadays physics doesn't have a definition of the maximally degenerate state of spacetime itself.

### comment 2

Actually the omniblackhole (omniblackhole = all the universe and not merely the corresponding compressed visible universe) isn't necessary. You can start the Big Bang from a humongous black hole huge enough to have entropy which goes awry according to the Gibbons and Hawking equation, thus in the imaginary time direction, the humongous pre-Big-Bang black hole periodically Big Bangs and cannot return to its initial state like common astrophysical black holes (microscopic black holes still evaporate, thus there is a range of normal black-hole activity). We don't know the upper mass–energy threshold for spontaneous Big Bang collapse (it's humongous; call the pre-Big-Bang state megablackhole, or more accurately primordial black hole/primoblackhole [here it's finite/noninfinite]).

### comment 3

The nowadays physics explanation about the missing antimatter in the universe is wrong. It is impossible to answer this question before we better describe the state before the Big Bang. One cyclic cosmology theory is predicting that the accelerating expansion of the universe causes big rips in very old universes, and the mass–energy produced during these big rips is dense enough to collapse and form sole primordial omniblackholes (immediate big rip big bangs aren't homogeneous enough in very old universes). The primordial omniblackhole can neither get more compressed (we know that from event horizons) nor expand, either because the omniblackhole is infinite or because it has enough inertia to keep it in place and decay into a big bang (noncapitalized big bangs and big rips in cyclic cosmology). We don't have the definition of the maximal degeneracy pressure (maximal possible = Planck degeneracy = defaulting of spacetime = pre-Big-Bang state). The prevalence of matter over antimatter is a result of the decay of the maximal degeneracy state of spacetime itself. We need quantum field theory to solve that phase transition problem = big bang cause. What I mention is guesses, but in a good path, because quantum field theory has been tested and it makes correct predictions. Our nowadays explanation about the prevalence of matter over antimatter, isn't compatible with the decay of the maximal degeneracy state of spacetime, which is supposed to violate symmetry. But we are missing the correct theory, but for sure humanity will find it with hard work.

### comment 4

The immediate Big Rip isn't homogeneous enough.

It has to collapse into the omniblackhole and secondarily adiabatically decay into the big bang.

It's a non-Penrosean idea. The phase transition includes entropy.

The local view (the corresponding part of the omniblackhole to our observable universe) omniblackhole doesn't capture all the previous universe.

Still the universe gets bigger. But in a complicated way.

## Inflationary resonance

### Failed sole primordial black hole model

According to the **inflationary resonance** (= failed sole primordial black hole model) the sole primordial black hole tries to form, but mathematically that is impossible due to its humongous size, thus the overall pre-big-bang-black-hole oscillates, and many acoustic frequencies are produced. The sole primordial black hole is impossible to get reached, but the overall pre-big-bang-black-hole frequencies tend to get synchronized and reach the first inflationary harmonic (we simply copy it from CMB and pretend we are erudites). That inflationary resonance is important in quantum field theory (we have to prove why), it separates the fundamental forces, and as they break, spacetime breaks shape-shifting into big bang (uncapitalized because it's a cyclic cosmology).

see: baryon acoustic oscillations

### mistakes:

1. the primordial plasma wasn't the maximally degenerate spacetime = initial pre-Big-Bang state
2. acoustic oscillations aren't strong enough to separate the fundamental forces
3. the maximally degenerate spacetime was single-particle-like and a bouquet of Everettian alternative configurations; no acoustic oscillation could become real before the Big Bang[s]

## Anthropic sole primordial black hole size theory

Only humongous primordial black holes can cause long-enough universe-strain lifespans for intelligent life to emerge. Smaller sole primordial black holes are possible to generate unintelligent big bangs (universe-strains without intelligent life).

* opposing opinions: all pre-big-bang states reach the exact same degeneracy pressure phase transition (reply: yes, but that still cannot guarantee the exact overall size; more mass–energy can coagulate in rare synchronizations)

////////////

## Many big bang initial conditions are possible; multiprimordial hypothesis

Relatively small black holes have a normal degeneracy core (maximally degenerate spacetime), but black holes in the mass range of 70 billion Suns, immediately explode but reabsorbe most of their mass–energy.

Black holes in the mass range of 120 billion Suns are unable to reabsorb most of their mass–energy; they are converted gradually to 70 billion Suns black holes.

Black holes in the mass range of 1.3 trillion Suns are immediately explodeable, but they are so big that their exteriors can end in an Everettian variety of Hubble volume alternatives. 1.3 trillion solar mass black holes cause causality fragmentations on their event horizon. They are connected to a variety of universes and can be interpreted as island universes. They can expell mass–energy, but also implode as mini big bangs which usually lead to impersonal universes without intelligent life.

Black holes in the mass range of 70 trillion Suns and more also implode (their internal phase transition of spacetime = big bang is by far more significant than external mass–energy loss) and are huge enough to probabilistically be intelligent/anthropic: they host intelligent life because they are big enough to probabilistically include that outcome. Also the lifespan of the universe is affected by the specifics of each different big bang, and the 70 trillion solar mass black hole decay = big bang has the correct attributes to guarantee universe-strains with intelligent life.

### mistakes

Our universe's mass is equivalent to 25 million Milky Ways [1] [or more; we need to study the Hubble volume field in order we describe how Everettian alternatives comprise the Universe as a whole]; thus the sole primordial black hole should be (cyclic universe; not have been) at least 25 million MW masses, otherwise either big bang cannot occur, life cannot emerge, or intelligent life doesn't have enough spacetime to probabilistically emerge.

Monoprimordial hypothesis: only one initial pre-Big-Bang state of maximally degenerate spacetime is possible in all big bangs/in all big bang cases (it is usually but not necessarily an omniblackhole hypothesis [omniblackhole: infinite black hole; versus big enough to meet the pre-big-bang state criteria but finite sole primordial black hole])

## Non-black-hole cosmogony: the list of pre-Big-Bang states' hypotheses which aren't black holes

### external links

* Why This Universe? A New Calculation Suggests Our Cosmos Is Typical. - Quanta Magazine

### videography

* What would we see if we fell INSIDE a BLACK HOLE? What's beyond the Event Horizon? · Arvin Ash · YouTube
* Black Holes: Seeing the Unseeable · World Science Festival · YouTube