Transcausality

## definition

Relationship which isn't directly causal, but has overlapping Wigner's friends (causal[ity] intermediaries) completely or partially entangled.

## synonyms

* transcausation
* metacausality with intermediaries, metacausation with intermediaries

## related terms

* metacausation, metacausality: The transcausal relationships which mathematically (not physically [it cannot be experienced; physically expressed in one Everettian universe-strain], but physioaxiomatically related to the physics foundations) hold the multiverse as one.

## examples

### Hubble volume

(see: Hubble volume = virtual subluminally expanding causal sphere)

Distant Hubble volumes are transcausally connected:

• via intermediary Hubble volumes

• via the common mathematical and allomathematical foundations of a specific universe (and a coherent multiverse)

### quantum entanglement

(very similar example; because nearby Hubble volumes are at least partially entangled; distant ones aren't, because dark energy is a form of quantum decoherence)

Quantum entanglement is endocausal/ intracausal (within the shared wavefunction). It cannot transfer useful information, but it is the result of a common wavefunction. Endocausality is ontologically/ substantially/ foundationally important (common framework).

Endocausality = quantum entanglement is useful for quantum encryption; but the encoding has to be causally (and not transcausally) established.

*note*: There is no omniuniversal axiomatics (omniaxiomatics; see: John Stillwell).

Some [allo]mathematically different universes are mutually exclusive.

There is no omniuniversal transcausality.

## dangerous and destructive questions

Tim Maudlin researches fringe and unofficial theories, like retrocausal ones. His research isn't useless, but I don't suggest people start building knowledge on fringe theories, because science should initially build its main core-theories. If you put too much effort on fringe theories, the overall edifice collapses. If you want certain victory = to understand correctly; conquer and safely-factually keep/ maintain what you conquer. Thus I don't support Tim's path, but you can have a fast read because we should answer these questions of wavefunctional evolution when mainstream physics evolves better criteria to judge them.

## see also

* infinite Wigner's friends = infinite series of Wigner's friends
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle isn't fundamental in quantum field theory in a finite universe, because the overall wavefunction (and its evolution) is deterministic. In an infinite universe (and the universe doesn't have any observable termination wall) Heisenberg's uncertainty principle becomes an ontoaxiomatic workaround to combat the problems of axiomaticity (of the axiomatic systems: axiomatic incompleteness, axiomatic inconsistency and uncalculability). Still the overall multiverse is deterministic because it meets the prerequisites for physical axiomatics (ontoaxiomatics), but it's totally unmanageable to be described in a non-trivially infinite (without simplistic patterns) physical foundations of one multiverse (a multiverse can be a family of kin universes; but there is no omnimultiverse, because some universes are mathematically incompatible and mutually exclusive).