Aeneas Del'arosa

Aeneas Del'arosa is a human sorcerer.

* Education: Extensive formal education from tutors during his youth in the Pearl Ward. Additional judicial training during his time as a student and a Reeve in the Office of the Justiciar in Whittengrove.

### Physical Appearance

* **Eye Colour:** A deep brown, almost black, filled with warmth.
* **Hair Colour:** Black and set in locs, with several long thin locs reaching down to the midpoint of his back.
* **Skin Tone:** Light brown, but significantly darkens after sun exposure.
* **Build:** Medium height and slender, not very muscular, but very welcoming
* **Ears:** Rounded and unpierced.
* **Distinguishing features:** A series of burns on the palms of both hands, stretching back to where they disappear under the sleeves of his clothing.
* **Preferred Outfit:**
* **Level of Grooming:**

### Behavior

* **Movement:**
* **Quirks:**

### Speech and Communication

* **Talk Speed:**
* **Style of Speech:**
* **Accent:**
* **Posture:**
* **General Expression:**
* **Do they Gesture?:**
* **How much eye contact that they like to make?:**
* **Personal Motto:**
* **Speech Impediments:**
* **Distinguishing Speech “tics”:**
* **What's their laugh like?:**
* **Describe their Smile:**
* **How emotive are they?:**

## Backstory

#### Introduction

The case of Del'arosa v. [**REDACTED**] stands as a paradigmatic example of the nuanced application of infernal contract law within the Diabolical Court of Phlegethos. This case, presided over by the Branded Reeve himself, hinged on the disputed involvement of the defendant, Aeneas Del'arosa, in a binding contract forged [**REDACTED**]. This study will delve into the intricacies of Aeneas' defence and the astute manoeuvring of the Adjudicator, who leveraged his position to challenge [**REDACTED**]'s objections.

#### Background

Aeneas Del'arosa, a human, found himself embroiled in a contractual dispute with [**REDACTED**], who claimed repayment of a substantial debt incurred by [**REDACTED**]. Del'arosa, with a [**REDACTED**] involvement in the initial contractual proceedings, sought to assert that he [**REDACTED**].

#### Defense Strategy

Aeneas' defence was anchored on the fundamental premise that, as a [**REDACTED**], his obligation to fulfil the debt was tenuous at best. He relied on the principle that infernal contracts are [**REDACTED**], requiring the [**REDACTED**]. Aeneas shrewdly refrained from contesting the validity of the contract per se, instead focusing on his lack of [**REDACTED**] in its formation. This strategic choice exhibited Aeneas' profound understanding of infernal contract law. By not directly challenging the contract's validity, he avoided the potential pitfall of being accused of contract nullification, a grave offense in infernal circles. Instead, he emphasized the importance of direct participation in the contractual process.

#### Belial's Adjudication

The Branded Reeve, renowned for his sagacity in infernal law, astutely recognized the subtlety of Del'arosa's argument. He seized upon the question of Aeneas' involvement, positing that while the contract remained legally binding, the matter of the defendant's [**REDACTED**] was a valid concern. This pivotal intervention demonstrated Belial's mastery of infernal contract law, wherein he deftly navigated the thin line between affirming the sanctity of contracts and acknowledging the importance of [**REDACTED**]. Furthermore, Belial leveraged his authority as an adjudicator to propose a creative resolution. By offering Aeneas the opportunity to [**REDACTED**], Belial cleverly fulfilled two objectives. Firstly, he ensured the debt would be gradually repaid through [**REDACTED**]. Secondly, he cemented his own position of influence, thereby countering [**REDACTED**].

#### Aeneas' Unique Utility

Aeneas' previous position as a reeve, a legal practitioner in the city of Whittengrove, played a pivotal role in shaping the course of this adjudication. His experience as a lawyer endowed him with an acute understanding of contractual intricacies and the ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. This background made him [**REDACTED**].

#### Temporary Resolution

It is crucial to note that this resolution, while pragmatic, is not without its contingencies. [**REDACTED**] offers a temporary solution to the debt obligation, as it is contingent upon [**REDACTED**]. Should this arrangement ever conclude, or if [**REDACTED**] opts to dispute the adjudication at a later date, the matter may be subject to further litigation. This underscores the impermanence of infernal contracts and the ever-shifting landscape of infernal law. It is imperative for all parties involved to remain vigilant and prepared for potential future developments in this complex legal realm.