Gnosticism

Viewing material existence as flawed or evil, **Gnostic cosmogony generally presents a distinction between a supreme, hidden God and a malevolent lesser divinity (sometimes associated with the Yahweh of the Old Testament)**[2] who is responsible for creating the material universe.[3] Gnostics considered the principal element of salvation to be direct knowledge of the supreme divinity in the form of mystical or esoteric insight. Many Gnostic texts deal not in concepts of sin and repentance, but with illusion and enlightenment.[3]

This presents the Christian God as an evil usurper, or as a malevolent manipulator. Simon Magus was said to be the founder of Gnosticism, or was at least the leader of it during the time of the Apostles.

Perhaps, the Devil was imprisoned in Hell because he realized that God was not the supreme being he said he was.

*Gnosis* refers to knowledge based on personal experience or perception. In a religious context, *gnosis* is mystical or esoteric knowledge based on direct participation with the divine. In most Gnostic systems, the sufficient cause of salvation is this "knowledge of" ("acquaintance with") the divine. **Could this be paralleled with the Druids?**

The use of gnostikos in relation to heresy originates with interpreters of Irenaeus. **The Druids hated Christian Monks, could there be an allegory here between Iranaeus and the Druids? Iranaeus describes Simon Magus as the fountainhead of all Heresy. Tertullian calls Paul "the apostle of the heretics**

Within early Christianity, the teachings of **Paul** (Simon Magus) and John may have been a starting point for Gnostic ideas, with a growing emphasis on the opposition between flesh and spirit, the value of charisma, and the disqualification of the Jewish law. The mortal body belonged to the world of inferior, worldly powers (the *archons**), and only the spirit or soul could be saved. The term gnostikos* may have acquired a deeper significance here.

**[Some] early Christians understood the pre-incarnate Christ, ontologically, as an angel.** *When Simon Magus says he got his gospel from Jesus, maybe he met the pre-incarnate Christ. What if the pre-incarnate Christ was actually Lucifer. So Jesus was an imposter, because he is God the imposter, and is part of the "Holy Trinity".*

Jesus as Gnostic saviour

Jesus is identified by some Gnostics as an embodiment of the supreme being who became incarnate to bring gnōsis to the earth,[66][58] while **others adamantly denied that the supreme being came in the flesh**, claiming Jesus to be merely a human who attained enlightenment through gnosis and taught his disciples to do the same.[67] **Among the Mandaeans, Jesus was considered a mšiha kdaba or "false messiah"** who perverted the teachings entrusted to him by John the Baptist.[68] Still other traditions identify Mani and Seth, third son of Adam and Eve, as salvific figures.

The Apocryphon of John contains a scheme of three descendants from the heavenly realm, the third one being Jesus, just as in the Gospel of John.

The Syrian–Egyptian traditions postulate a remote, supreme Godhead, the Monad. Perhaps the true God?

What if, the true God *is* in the 10th level of Heaven, and is distracted by the constant choir that is celebrating him. This would mean that we could have to confront God the Imposter earlier in heaven. Or, what if the Supreme being cannot be reached, because The Imposter God is not letting souls leave the material world, and is instead imprisoning them.

In many Gnostic systems, God is known as the Monad, the One.[note 18] God is the high source of the pleroma, the region of light. **The various emanations of God are called æons.**

The Sethian cosmogony as most famously contained in the Apocryphon ("Secret book") of John describes an unknown God, very similar to the orthodox apophatic theology, but different from the orthodox teachings that this God is the creator of heaven and earth. Orthodox theologians often attempt to define God through a series of explicit positive statements: he is omniscient, omnipotent, **and truly benevolent**. [How do you reconcile benevolence with Hell?] **This can be one of the major promises of the book. How to answer that?**

The Sethian hidden transcendent God is, by contrast, defined through negative theology: he is immovable, invisible, intangible, ineffable; commonly, "he" is seen as being hermaphroditic, a potent symbol for being, as it were, "all-containing". In the Apocryphon of John, this god is good in that it bestows goodness. After the apophatic statements, the process of the Divine in action is used to describe the effect of such a god.

In Gnostic tradition, the term *Sophia* (Σοφία, Greek for "wisdom") refers to the final and lowest emanation of God. In most, if not all, versions of the gnostic myth, Sophia births the demiurge, who in turn brings about the creation of materiality. The positive or negative depiction of materiality thus resides a great deal on mythic depictions of Sophia's actions. She is occasionally referred to by the Hebrew equivalent of *Achamoth* (this is a feature of Ptolemy's version of the Valentinian gnostic myth). Jewish Gnosticism with a focus on Sophia was active by 90 AD.[*citation needed]*  **[Sophia is Ennoia - As described by Epiphanius, in the beginning God had his first thought, his *Ennoia*, which was female, and that thought was to create the angels. But, perhaps Ennoia was stolen by the Imposter God and used to create his evil material world.]**

Sophia, emanating without her partner, resulted in the production of the Demiurge (Greek: lit. "public builder"),[56] who is also referred to as Yaldabaoth and variations thereof in some Gnostic texts.[49] This creature is concealed outside the pleroma;[49] in isolation, and thinking itself alone, it creates materiality and a host of co-actors, referred to as archons. **The demiurge is responsible for the creation of humankind; trapping elements of the pleroma stolen from Sophia inside human bodies. [So, is God the Imposter really the Demiurge? Yes!]**

**The demiurge creates the physical universe and the physical aspect of humanity.** The term demiurge derives from the Latinized form of the Greek term dēmiourgos, δημιουργός, literally "public or skilled worker".[note 20] This figure is also called "Yaldabaoth",[49] Samael (Aramaic: sæmʻa-ʼel, "blind god"), or "Saklas" (Syriac: sækla, "the foolish one"), who is sometimes ignorant of the superior god, and sometimes opposed to it; thus in the latter case he is correspondingly malevolent. Other names or identifications are **Ahriman, El, Satan, and Yahweh.**  **[What if Satan was actually Nous, the First Male Aeon?]**

**In Sufism, Iblis rules the material world in a manner that resembles the Gnostic Demiurge.**

Ibn al-Muqaffa depicted the Islamic deity as a demonic entity who **"fights with humans and boasts about His victories" and "sitting on a throne, from which He can descend".[As in he can be *De-Throned*]** It would be impossible that both light and darkness were created from one source, since they were regarded as two different eternal principles.[135] Muslim theologists countered this accusation by the example of a repeating sinner, who says: "I laid, and I repent";[136] this would prove that good can also result out of evil. **[Except God the Imposter did not repent]**

In Valentinianism, Nous is the first male Aeon. Together with his conjugate female Aeon, Aletheia (truth), he emanates from the Propator Bythos (Προπάτωρ Βυθος "Forefather Depths") and his co-eternal Ennoia (Ἔννοια "Thought") or Sigē (Σιγή "Silence"); and these four form the primordial Tetrad.

In late antiquity some variants of Gnosticism used the term archon to refer to several servants of the demiurge. **[Could Archons actually be Angels?]**

**[Could these concepts be the Rankings of the Druids?]**

Other Gnostic concepts are:

* sarkic – earthly, hidebound, ignorant, uninitiated. The lowest level of human thought; the fleshly, instinctive level of thinking.
* hylic – lowest order of the three types of human. Unable to be saved since their thinking is entirely material, incapable of understanding the gnosis.
* psychic – "soulful", partially initiated. Matter-dwelling spirits
* pneumatic – "spiritual", fully initiated, immaterial souls escaping the doom of the material world via gnosis.
* kenoma – the visible or manifest cosmos, "lower" than the pleroma
* charisma – gift, or energy, bestowed by pneumatics through oral teaching and personal encounters
* logos – the divine ordering principle of the cosmos; personified as Christ. See also Odic force.
* hypostasis – literally "that which stands beneath" the inner reality, emanation (appearance) of God, known to psychics
* ousia – essence of God, known to pneumatics. Specific individual things or being.

**Sects of Gnosticism [Could also be sects of the Druids?]**

Syrian-Egyptian Gnosticism includes

* Sethianism, attributed its gnosis to Seth, third son of Adam and Eve and Norea, wife of Noah, who also plays a role in Mandeanism and Manicheanism.
* Valentinianism, understood the conflict between *Jews* and *Gentiles* in Romans to be a coded reference to the differences between *Psychics* (people who are partly spiritual but have not yet achieved separation from carnality) and *Pneumatics (totally spiritual people).*
* Basilideans,
* Thomasine traditions, and
* Serpent Gnostics, as well as a number of other minor groups and writers.[92]
* Hermeticism is also a western Gnostic tradition
* Simonians were centered on Simon Magus

Other Gnostic groups

* Serpent Gnostics. The Naassenes, Ophites and the Serpentarians gave prominence to snake symbolism, and snake handling played a role in their ceremonies.**[They would no doubt Clash with St. Patrick]**
* Cerinthus (c. 100), the founder of a heretical school with gnostic elements. Like a Gnostic, Cerinthus **depicted Christ as a heavenly spirit separate from the man Jesus**, and he cited the demiurge as creating the material world. Unlike the Gnostics, Cerinthus taught Christians to observe the Jewish law; his demiurge was holy, not lowly; and he taught the Second Coming. His gnosis was a secret teaching attributed to an apostle. Some scholars believe that the First Epistle of John was written as a response to Cerinthus.[123]
* The Cainites are so-named since Hippolytus of Rome claims that they worshiped Cain, as well as Esau, Korah, and the Sodomites. There is little evidence concerning the nature of this group. Hippolytus claims that they believed that indulgence in sin was the key to salvation because since the body is evil, one must defile it through immoral activity (see libertinism). The name Cainite is used as the name of a religious movement, and not in the usual Biblical sense of people descended from Cain. **[Could Cain be the same as the Character in Irish Mythology that never dies?]**
* The Carpocratians, a libertine sect following only the Gospel according to the Hebrews
* The school of Justin, which combined gnostic elements with the ancient Greek religion.
* The Borborites, a libertine Gnostic sect, said to be descended from the Nicolaitans[124]

**Lore Dump**

Clipped from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Not to be confused with Agnosticism.

hide

Part of a series on

Gnosticism

Pages from the Gospel of Thomas, discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945.

Spirituality Influences Research

**Gnosticism**

(from Ancient Greek: γνωστικός, romanized: gnōstikós, Koine Greek: [ɣnostiˈkos], 'having knowledge') is a collection of religious ideas and systems which originated in the late 1st century CE among Jewish and early Christian sects.[1] These various groups **emphasised personal spiritual knowledge (gnosis) above the orthodox teachings, traditions, and authority of the church.** Viewing material existence as flawed or evil, Gnostic cosmogony generally presents a distinction between a supreme, hidden God and a malevolent lesser divinity (sometimes associated with the Yahweh of the Old Testament)[2] who is responsible for creating the material universe.[3] Gnostics considered the principal element of salvation to be direct knowledge of the supreme divinity in the form of mystical or esoteric insight. Many Gnostic texts deal not in concepts of sin and repentance, but with illusion and enlightenment.[3]

Gnostic writings flourished among certain Christian groups in the Mediterranean world until about the second century, when the Fathers of the early Church denounced them as heresy.[4] Efforts to destroy these texts proved largely successful, resulting in the survival of very little writing by Gnostic theologians.[3] Nonetheless, early Gnostic teachers such as Valentinus saw their beliefs as aligned with Christianity. In the Gnostic Christian tradition, Christ is seen as a divine being which has taken human form in order to lead humanity back to the Light.[5] However, Gnosticism is not a single standardized system, and the emphasis on direct experience allows for a wide variety of teachings, including distinct currents such as Valentianism and Sethianism. In the Persian Empire, Gnostic ideas spread as far as China via the related movement Manichaeism, while Mandaeism is still alive in Iraq.

For centuries, most scholarly knowledge of Gnosticism was limited to the anti-heretical writings of orthodox Christian figures such as Irenaeus of Lyons and Hippolytus of Rome. There was a renewed interest in Gnosticism after the 1945 discovery of Egypt's Nag Hammadi library, a collection of rare early Christian and Gnostic texts, including the Gospel of Thomas and the Apocryphon of John. A major question in scholarly research is the qualification of Gnosticism as either an interreligious phenomenon or as an independent religion. Scholars have acknowledged the influence of sources such as Hellenistic Judaism, Zoroastrianism, and Platonism, and some have noted possible links to Buddhism and Hinduism, though the evidence of direct influence from the latter sources is inconclusive.[3]

Etymology

Main article: Gnosis

*Gnosis* refers to knowledge based on personal experience or perception. In a religious context, *gnosis* is mystical or esoteric knowledge based on direct participation with the divine. In most Gnostic systems, the sufficient cause of salvation is this "knowledge of" ("acquaintance with") the divine. It is an inward "knowing", comparable to that encouraged by Plotinus (neoplatonism), and differs from proto-orthodox Christian views.[6]

Gnostics are "those who are oriented toward knowledge and understanding – or perception and learning – as a particular modality for living".[7] The usual meaning of gnostikos in Classical Greek texts is "learned" or "intellectual", such as used by Plato in the comparison of "practical" (praktikos) and "intellectual" (gnostikos).[note 1] Plato's use of "learned" is fairly typical of Classical texts.[note 2]

By the Hellenistic period, it began also to be associated with Greco-Roman mysteries, becoming synonymous with the Greek term *musterion*. The adjective is not used in the New Testament, but Clement of Alexandria[note 3] speaks of the "learned" (*gnostikos*) Christian in complimentary terms.[8]

**The use of gnostikos in relation to heresy originates with interpreters of Irenaeus.** Some scholars[note 4] consider that Irenaeus sometimes uses gnostikos to simply mean "intellectual",[note 5] whereas his mention of "the intellectual sect"[note 6] is a specific designation.[10][note 7][note 8][note 9] The term "Gnosticism" does not appear in ancient sources,[12][note 10] and was first coined in the 17th century by Henry More in a commentary on the seven letters of the Book of Revelation, where More used the term "Gnosticisme" to describe the heresy in Thyatira.[13][note 11] The term Gnosticism was derived from the use of the Greek adjective gnostikos (Greek γνωστικός, "learned", "intellectual") by St. Irenaeus (c. 185 AD) to describe the school of Valentinus as he legomene gnostike haeresis "the heresy called Learned (gnostic)."[14][note 12]

Origins

The origins of Gnosticism are obscure and still disputed. The proto-orthodox Christian groups called Gnostics a heresy of Christianity,[note 13][18] but according to the modern scholars the theology's origin is closely related to Jewish sectarian milieus and early Christian sects.[1][19][note 14][20] Scholars debate Gnosticism's origins as having roots in Neoplatonism and Buddhism, due to similarities in beliefs[citation needed], but ultimately, its origins are currently unknown. As Christianity developed and became more popular, so did Gnosticism, with both proto-orthodox Christian and Gnostic Christian groups often existing in the same places. The Gnostic belief was widespread within Christianity until the proto-orthodox Christian communities expelled the group in the second and third centuries (AD). Gnosticism became the first group to be declared heretical.[citation needed]

Some scholars prefer to speak of "gnosis" when referring to first-century ideas that later developed into Gnosticism, and to reserve the term "Gnosticism" for the synthesis of these ideas into a coherent movement in the second century.[21] According to James M. Robinson, no gnostic texts clearly pre-date Christianity,[note 15] and "pre-Christian Gnosticism as such is hardly attested in a way to settle the debate once and for all."[22] However, the Nag Hammadi library contained Hermetic teachings that can be argued go back to the Old Egyptian Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BC).[23]

Jewish Christian origins

See also: Origins of Christianity and Split of Christianity and Judaism

Contemporary scholarship largely agrees that Gnosticism has Jewish Christian origins, originating in the late first century AD in nonrabbinical Jewish sects and early Christian sects.[24][1][19][note 14]

Many heads of gnostic schools were identified as Jewish Christians by Church Fathers, and Hebrew words and names of God were applied in some gnostic systems.[25] The cosmogonic speculations among Christian Gnostics had partial origins in Maaseh Bereshit and Maaseh Merkabah. This thesis is most notably put forward by Gershom Scholem (1897–1982) and Gilles Quispel (1916–2006). Scholem detected Jewish gnosis in the imagery of the merkavah, which can also be found in "Christian" Gnostic documents, for example the being "caught away" to the third heaven mentioned by Paul the Apostle.[24] Quispel sees Gnosticism as an independent Jewish development, tracing its origins to Alexandrian Jews, to which group Valentinus was also connected.[26]

Many of the Nag Hammadi texts make reference to Judaism, in some cases with a violent rejection of the Jewish God.[19][note 14] Gershom Scholem once described Gnosticism as "the Greatest case of metaphysical anti-Semitism".[27] Professor Steven Bayme said gnosticism would be better characterized as anti-Judaism.[28] Recent research into the origins of Gnosticism shows a strong Jewish influence, particularly from Hekhalot literature.[29]

Within early Christianity, the teachings of Paul and John may have been a starting point for Gnostic ideas, with a growing emphasis on the opposition between flesh and spirit, the value of charisma, and the disqualification of the Jewish law. The mortal body belonged to the world of inferior, worldly powers (the *archons), and only the spirit or soul could be saved. The term gnostikos* may have acquired a deeper significance here.[30]

Alexandria was of central importance for the birth of Gnosticism. The Christian *ecclesia* (i. e. congregation, church) was of Jewish–Christian origin, but also attracted Greek members, and various strand of thought were available, such as "Judaic apocalypticism, speculation on divine wisdom, Greek philosophy, and Hellenistic mystery religions."[30]

Regarding the angel Christology of some early Christians, Darrell Hannah notes:

**[Some] early Christians understood the pre-incarnate Christ, ontologically, as an angel.** This "true" angel Christology took many forms and may have appeared as early as the late First Century, if indeed this is the view opposed in the early chapters of the Epistle to the Hebrews. The Elchasaites, or at least Christians influenced by them, paired the male Christ with the female Holy Spirit, envisioning both as two gigantic angels. Some Valentinian Gnostics supposed that Christ took on an angelic nature and that he might be the Saviour of angels. The author of the *Testament of Solomon* held Christ to be a particularly effective "thwarting" angel in the exorcism of demons. The author of *De Centesima* and Epiphanius' "Ebionites" held Christ to have been the highest and most important of the first created archangels, a view similar in many respects to Hermas' equation of Christ with Michael. Finally, a possible exegetical tradition behind the *Ascension of Isaiah* and attested by Origen's Hebrew master, may witness to yet another angel Christology, as well as an angel Pneumatology.[31]

The pseudepigraphical Christian text *Ascension of Isaiah identifies Jesus with angel Christology:*

[The Lord Christ is commissioned by the Father] And I heard the voice of the Most High, the father of my LORD as he said to my LORD Christ who will be called Jesus, 'Go out and descend through all the heavens...[32]

The Shepherd of Hermas is a Christian literary work considered as canonical scripture by some of the early Church fathers such as Irenaeus. Jesus is identified with angel Christology in parable 5, when the author mentions a Son of God, as a virtuous man filled with a Holy "pre-existent spirit".[33]

Neoplatonic influences

See also: Platonic Academy, Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, and Neoplatonism and Christianity

In the 1880s Gnostic connections with neo-Platonism were proposed.[34] Ugo Bianchi, who organised the Congress of Messina of 1966 on the origins of Gnosticism, also argued for Orphic and Platonic origins.[26] Gnostics borrowed significant ideas and terms from Platonism,[35] using Greek philosophical concepts throughout their text, including such concepts as hypostasis (reality, existence), ousia (essence, substance, being), and demiurge (creator God). Both Sethian Gnostics and Valentinian Gnostics seem to have been influenced by Plato, Middle Platonism, and Neo-Pythagoreanism academies or schools of thought.[36] Both schools attempted "an effort towards conciliation, even affiliation" with late antique philosophy,[37] and were rebuffed by some Neoplatonists, including Plotinus.

Persian origins or influences

Early research into the origins of Gnosticism proposed Persian origins or influences, spreading to Europe and incorporating Jewish elements.[38] According to Wilhelm Bousset (1865–1920), Gnosticism was a form of Iranian and Mesopotamian syncretism,[34] and Richard August Reitzenstein (1861–1931) most famously situated the origins of Gnosticism in Persia.[34]

Carsten Colpe (b. 1929) has analyzed and criticised the Iranian hypothesis of Reitzenstein, showing that many of his hypotheses are untenable.[39] Nevertheless, Geo Widengren (1907–1996) argued for the origin of (Mandaean) Gnosticism in Mazdean (Zoroastrianism) Zurvanism, in conjunction with ideas from the Aramaic Mesopotamian world.[26]  Buddhist parallels

Main article: Buddhism and Gnosticism

In 1966, at the Congress of Median, Buddhologist Edward Conze noted phenomenological commonalities between Mahayana Buddhism and Gnosticism,[40] in his paper *Buddhism and Gnosis*, following an early suggestion put forward by Isaac Jacob Schmidt.[41][note 16] The influence of Buddhism in any sense on either the *gnostikos* Valentinus (c. 170) or the Nag Hammadi texts (3rd century) is not supported by modern scholarship, although Elaine Pagels (1979) called it a "possibility".[45]

Characteristics

Cosmology

The Syrian–Egyptian traditions postulate a remote, supreme Godhead, the Monad. From this highest divinity emanate lower divine beings, known as Aeons. The Demiurge, one of those Aeons, creates the physical world. Divine elements "fall" into the material realm, and are locked within human beings. This divine element returns to the divine realm when Gnosis, esoteric or intuitive knowledge of the divine element within, is obtained.

Dualism and monism

See also: Nontrinitarianism

Gnostic systems postulate a dualism between God and the world,[46] varying from the "radical dualist" systems of Manichaeism to the "mitigated dualism" of classic gnostic movements. Radical dualism, or absolute dualism, posits two co-equal divine forces, while in mitigated dualism one of the two principles is in some way inferior to the other. In qualified monism the second entity may be divine or semi-divine. Valentinian Gnosticism is a form of monism, expressed in terms previously used in a dualistic manner.[47]

Moral and ritual practice

Gnostics tended toward asceticism (cousin to Platonism), especially in their sexual and dietary practice.[48] In other areas of morality, Gnostics were less rigorously ascetic, and took a more moderate approach to correct behaviour. In normative early Christianity the Church administered and prescribed the correct behaviour for Christians, while in Gnosticism it was the internalised motivation that was important. Ritualistic behaviour was not important unless it was based on a personal, internal motivation. Ptolemy's Epistle to Flora describes a general asceticism, based on the moral inclination of the individual.[note 17]

Concepts

Monad

Main article: Monad (Gnosticism)

In many Gnostic systems, God is known as the Monad, the One.[note 18] God is the high source of the pleroma, the region of light. **The various emanations of God are called æons.** According to Hippolytus, this view was inspired by the Pythagoreans, who called the first thing that came into existence the Monad, which begat the dyad, which begat the numbers, which begat the point, begetting lines, etc.

The Sethian cosmogony as most famously contained in the Apocryphon ("Secret book") of John describes an unknown God, very similar to the orthodox apophatic theology, but different from the orthodox teachings that this God is the creator of heaven and earth. Orthodox theologians often attempt to define God through a series of explicit positive statements: he is omniscient, omnipotent, **and truly benevolent**. The Sethian hidden transcendent God is, by contrast, defined through negative theology: he is immovable, invisible, intangible, ineffable; commonly, "he" is seen as being hermaphroditic, a potent symbol for being, as it were, "all-containing". In the Apocryphon of John, this god is good in that it bestows goodness. After the apophatic statements, the process of the Divine in action is used to describe the effect of such a god.

**Pleroma**

Main article: Pleroma

*Pleroma* (Greek πλήρωμα, "fullness") refers to the totality of God's powers. The heavenly pleroma is the center of divine life, a region of light "above" (the term is not to be understood spatially) our world, occupied by spiritual beings such as aeons (eternal beings) and sometimes archons. **Jesus is interpreted as an intermediary aeon who was sent from the pleroma, with whose aid humanity can recover the lost knowledge of the divine origins of humanity. The term is thus a central element of Gnostic cosmology.**

Pleroma is also used in the general Greek language, and is used by the Greek Orthodox church in this general form, since the word appears in the Epistle to the Colossians. Proponents of the view that Paul was actually a gnostic, such as Elaine Pagels, view the reference in Colossians as a term that has to be interpreted in a gnostic sense.

Emanation

Main article: Emanationism

The Supreme Light or Consciousness descends through a series of stages, gradations, worlds, or hypostases, becoming progressively more material and embodied. In time it will turn around to return to the One (epistrophe), retracing its steps through spiritual knowledge and contemplation.

Aeon

Main article: Aeon (Gnosticism)

In many Gnostic systems, the aeons are the various emanations of the superior God or Monad. Beginning in certain Gnostic texts with the hermaphroditic aeon Barbelo,[49][50][51] the first emanated being, various interactions with the Monad occur which result in the emanation of successive pairs of aeons, often in male–female pairings called syzygies.[52] The numbers of these pairings varied from text to text, though some identify their number as being thirty.[53] The aeons as a totality constitute the pleroma, the "region of light". The lowest regions of the pleroma are closest to the darkness; that is, the physical world[54]

Two of the most commonly paired æons were Christ and Sophia (Greek: "Wisdom"); the latter refers to Christ as her "consort" in A Valentinian Exposition.[55]  Sophia

**Main article: Sophia (Gnosticism)** see also: Simon Magus's Helen

In Gnostic tradition, the term *Sophia* (Σοφία, Greek for "wisdom") refers to the final and lowest emanation of God. In most, if not all, versions of the gnostic myth, Sophia births the demiurge, who in turn brings about the creation of materiality. The positive or negative depiction of materiality thus resides a great deal on mythic depictions of Sophia's actions. She is occasionally referred to by the Hebrew equivalent of *Achamoth* (this is a feature of Ptolemy's version of the Valentinian gnostic myth). Jewish Gnosticism with a focus on Sophia was active by 90 AD.[*citation needed]*

Sophia, emanating without her partner, resulted in the production of the Demiurge (Greek: lit. "public builder"),[56] who is also referred to as Yaldabaoth and variations thereof in some Gnostic texts.[49] This creature is concealed outside the pleroma;[49] in isolation, and thinking itself alone, it creates materiality and a host of co-actors, referred to as archons. **The demiurge is responsible for the creation of humankind; trapping elements of the pleroma stolen from Sophia inside human bodies.**[49][57] In response, the Godhead emanates two savior aeons, Christ and the Holy Spirit; Christ then embodies itself in the form of Jesus, in order to be able to teach humans how to achieve gnosis, by which they may return to the pleroma.[58]
Demiurge
A lion-faced deity found on a Gnostic gem in Bernard de Montfaucon's L'antiquité expliquée et représentée en figures may be a depiction of Yaldabaoth, the Demiurge; however, cf. Mithraic Zervan Akarana[59]

Main article: Demiurge

The term demiurge derives from the Latinized form of the Greek term dēmiourgos, δημιουργός, literally "public or skilled worker".[note 20] This figure is also called "Yaldabaoth",[49] Samael (Aramaic: sæmʻa-ʼel, "blind god"), or "Saklas" (Syriac: sækla, "the foolish one"), who is sometimes ignorant of the superior god, and sometimes opposed to it; thus in the latter case he is correspondingly malevolent. Other names or identifications are Ahriman, El, Satan, and Yahweh.

**The demiurge creates the physical universe and the physical aspect of humanity.**[61] The demiurge typically creates a group of co-actors named archons who preside over the material realm and, in some cases, present obstacles to the soul seeking ascent from it.[49] The inferiority of the demiurge's creation may be compared to the technical inferiority of a work of art, painting, sculpture, etc. to the thing the art represents. In other cases it takes on a more ascetic tendency to view material existence negatively, which then becomes more extreme when materiality, including the human body, is perceived as evil and constrictive, a deliberate prison for its inhabitants.

Moral judgements of the demiurge vary from group to group within the broad category of Gnosticism, viewing materiality as being inherently evil, or as merely flawed and as good as its passive constituent matter allows.[62]  Archon

Main article: Archon (Gnosticism)

In late antiquity some variants of Gnosticism used the term archon to refer to several servants of the demiurge.[57] According to Origen's *Contra Celsum, a sect called the Ophites posited the existence of seven archons, beginning with Iadabaoth or Ialdabaoth, who created the six that follow: Iao, Sabaoth, Adonaios, Elaios, Astaphanos, and Horaios.*[63] Ialdabaoth had a head of a lion.[49][64]

Other concepts

Other Gnostic concepts are:[65]

* sarkic – earthly, hidebound, ignorant, uninitiated. The lowest level of human thought; the fleshly, instinctive level of thinking.
* hylic – lowest order of the three types of human. Unable to be saved since their thinking is entirely material, incapable of understanding the gnosis.
* psychic – "soulful", partially initiated. Matter-dwelling spirits
* pneumatic – "spiritual", fully initiated, immaterial souls escaping the doom of the material world via gnosis.
* kenoma – the visible or manifest cosmos, "lower" than the pleroma
* charisma – gift, or energy, bestowed by pneumatics through oral teaching and personal encounters
* logos – the divine ordering principle of the cosmos; personified as Christ. See also Odic force.
* hypostasis – literally "that which stands beneath" the inner reality, emanation (appearance) of God, known to psychics
* ousia – essence of God, known to pneumatics. Specific individual things or being.

Jesus as Gnostic saviour

Jesus is identified by some Gnostics as an embodiment of the supreme being who became incarnate to bring gnōsis to the earth,[66][58] while others adamantly denied that the supreme being came in the flesh, claiming Jesus to be merely a human who attained enlightenment through gnosis and taught his disciples to do the same.[67] Among the Mandaeans, Jesus was considered a mšiha kdaba or "false messiah" who perverted the teachings entrusted to him by John the Baptist.[68] Still other traditions identify Mani and Seth, third son of Adam and Eve, as salvific figures.

Development

Three periods can be discerned in the development of Gnosticism:[69]

* Late-first century and early second century: development of Gnostic ideas, contemporaneous with the writing of the New Testament;
* mid-second century to early third century: high point of the classical Gnostic teachers and their systems, "who claimed that their systems represented the inner truth revealed by Jesus";[69]
* end of the second century to the fourth century: reaction by the proto-orthodox church and condemnation as heresy, and subsequent decline.

During the first period, three types of tradition developed:[69]

* Genesis was reinterpreted in Jewish milieus, viewing Yahweh as a jealous God who enslaved people; freedom was to be obtained from this jealous God;
* A wisdom tradition developed, in which Jesus' sayings were interpreted as pointers to an esoteric wisdom, in which the soul could be divinized through identification with wisdom.[69][note 21] Some of Jesus' sayings may have been incorporated into the gospels to put a limit on this development. The conflicts described in 1 Corinthians may have been inspired by a clash between this wisdom tradition and Paul's gospel of crucifixion and arising;[69]
* A mythical story developed about the descent of a heavenly creature to reveal the Divine world as the true home of human beings.[69] Jewish Christianity saw the Messiah, or Christ, as "an eternal aspect of God's hidden nature, his "spirit" and "truth", who revealed himself throughout sacred history".[30]

The movement spread in areas controlled by the Roman Empire and Arian Goths,[71] and the Persian Empire. It continued to develop in the Mediterranean and Middle East before and during the 2nd and 3rd centuries, but decline also set in during the third century, due to a growing aversion from the Nicene Church, and the economic and cultural deterioration of the Roman Empire.[72] Conversion to Islam, and the Albigensian Crusade (1209–1229), greatly reduced the remaining number of Gnostics throughout the Middle Ages, though a few Mandaean communities still exist. Gnostic and pseudo-gnostic ideas became influential in some of the philosophies of various esoteric mystical movements of the 19th and 20th centuries in Europe and North America, including some that explicitly identify themselves as revivals or even continuations of earlier gnostic groups.

Relation with early Christianity

History of

Christian theology Background Ecumenical CreedsPatristics and Councils Post-Nicene development Reformation From the Reformation to the World Wars Since the World Wars

Dillon notes that Gnosticism raises questions about the development of early Christianity.[73]

Orthodoxy and heresy

See also: Diversity in early Christian theology

The Christian heresiologists, most notably Irenaeus, regarded Gnosticism as a Christian heresy. Modern scholarship notes that early Christianity was diverse, and Christian orthodoxy only settled in the 4th century, when the Roman Empire declined and Gnosticism lost its influence.[74][72][75][73] Gnostics and proto-orthodox Christians shared some terminology. Initially, they were hard to distinguish from each other.[76]

According to Walter Bauer, "heresies" may well have been the original form of Christianity in many regions.[77] This theme was further developed by Elaine Pagels,[78] who argues that "the proto-orthodox church found itself in debates with gnostic Christians that helped them to stabilize their own beliefs."[73] According to Gilles Quispel, Catholicism arose in response to Gnosticism, establishing safeguards in the form of the monarchic episcopate, the creed, and the canon of holy books.[79]  Historical Jesus

See also: Jesus in comparative mythology and Christ myth theory

The Gnostic movements may contain information about the historical Jesus, since some texts preserve sayings which show similarities with canonical sayings.[80] Especially the Gospel of Thomas has a significant amount of parallel sayings.[80] Yet, a striking difference is that the canonical sayings center on the coming endtime, while the Thomas-sayings center on a kingdom of heaven that is already here, and not a future event.[81] According to Helmut Koester, this is because the Thomas-sayings are older, implying that in the earliest forms of Christianity Jesus was regarded as a wisdom-teacher.[81] An alternative hypothesis states that the Thomas authors wrote in the second century, changing existing sayings and eliminating the apocalyptic concerns.[81] According to April DeConick, such a change occurred when the end time did not come, and the Thomasine tradition turned toward a "new theology of mysticism" and a "theological commitment to a fully-present kingdom of heaven here and now, where their church had attained Adam and Eve's divine status before the Fall."[81]

Johannine literature

The prologue of the Gospel of John describes the incarnated Logos, the light that came to earth, in the person of Jesus.[82] The Apocryphon of John contains a scheme of three descendants from the heavenly realm, the third one being Jesus, just as in the Gospel of John. The similarities probably point to a relationship between gnostic ideas and the Johannine community.[82] According to Raymond Brown, the Gospel of John shows "the development of certain gnostic ideas, especially Christ as heavenly revealer, the emphasis on light versus darkness, and anti-Jewish animus."[82] The Johannine material reveals debates about the redeemer myth.[69] The Johannine letters show that there were different interpretations of the gospel story, and the Johannine images may have contributed to second-century Gnostic ideas about Jesus as a redeemer who descended from heaven.[69] According to DeConick, the Gospel of John shows a "transitional system from early Christianity to gnostic beliefs in a God who transcends our world."[82] According to DeConick, John may show a bifurcation of the idea of the Jewish God into Jesus' Father in Heaven and the Jews' father, "the Father of the Devil" (most translations say "of [your] father the Devil"), which may have developed into the gnostic idea of the Monad and the Demiurge.[82]

Paul and Gnosticism

**Tertullian calls Paul "the apostle of the heretics"**83] because Paul's writings were attractive to gnostics, and interpreted in a gnostic way, while Jewish Christians found him to stray from the Jewish roots of Christianity.[84] In I Corinthians Paul refers to some church members as "having knowledge" (Greek: τὸν ἔχοντα γνῶσιν, ton echonta gnosin).[85] James Dunn claims that in some cases, Paul affirmed views that were closer to gnosticism than to proto-orthodox Christianity.[86]

According to Clement of Alexandria, the disciples of Valentinus said that Valentinus was a student of a certain Theudas, who was a student of Paul,[86] and Elaine Pagels notes that Paul's epistles were interpreted by Valentinus in a gnostic way, and Paul could be considered a proto-gnostic as well as a proto-Catholic.[65] Many Nag Hammadi texts, including, for example, the Prayer of Paul and the Coptic Apocalypse of Paul, consider Paul to be "the great apostle".[86] The fact that he claimed to have received his gospel directly by revelation from God appealed to the gnostics, who claimed gnosis from the risen Christ.[87] The Naassenes, Cainites, and Valentinians referred to Paul's epistles.[88] Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy have expanded upon this idea of Paul as a gnostic teacher;[89] although their premise that Jesus was invented by early Christians based on an alleged Greco-Roman mystery cult has been dismissed by scholars.[90][note 22] However, his revelation was different from the gnostic revelations.[91]

Major movements

Syrian-Egyptian Gnosticism

Syrian-Egyptian Gnosticism includes Sethianism, Valentinianism, Basilideans, Thomasine traditions, and Serpent Gnostics, as well as a number of other minor groups and writers.[92] Hermeticism is also a western Gnostic tradition,[72] though it differs in some respects from these other groups.[93] The Syrian–Egyptian school derives much of its outlook from Platonist influences. It depicts creation in a series of emanations from a primal monadic source, finally resulting in the creation of the material universe. These schools tend to view evil in terms of matter that is markedly inferior to goodness and lacking spiritual insight and goodness rather than as an equal force.

Many of these movements used texts related to Christianity, with some identifying themselves as specifically Christian, though quite different from the Orthodox or Roman Catholic forms. Jesus and several of his apostles, such as Thomas the Apostle, claimed as the founder of the Thomasine form of Gnosticism, figure in many Gnostic texts. Mary Magdalene is respected as a Gnostic leader, and is considered superior to the twelve apostles by some gnostic texts, such as the Gospel of Mary. John the Evangelist is claimed as a Gnostic by some Gnostic interpreters,[94] as is even St. Paul.[65] Most of the literature from this category is known to us through the Nag Hammadi Library.

Sethite-Barbeloite

Main article: Sethianism

Sethianism was one of the main currents of Gnosticism during the 2nd to 3rd centuries, and the prototype of Gnosticism as condemned by Irenaeus.[95] Sethianism attributed its gnosis to Seth, third son of Adam and Eve and Norea, wife of Noah, who also plays a role in Mandeanism and Manicheanism. Their main text is the Apocryphon of John, which does not contain Christian elements,[95] and is an amalgam of two earlier myths.[96] Earlier texts such as Apocalypse of Adam show signs of being pre-Christian and focus on the Seth, third son of Adam and Eve.[97] Later Sethian texts continue to interact with Platonism. Sethian texts such as Zostrianos and Allogenes draw on the imagery of older Sethian texts, but utilize "a large fund of philosophical conceptuality derived from contemporary Platonism, (that is, late middle Platonism) with no traces of Christian content."[36][note 23]

According to John D. Turner, German and American scholarship views Sethianism as "a distinctly inner-Jewish, albeit syncretistic and heterodox, phenomenon", while British and French scholarship tends to see Sethianism as "a form of heterodox Christian speculation".[98] Roelof van den Broek notes that "Sethianism" may never have been a separate religious movement, and that the term refers rather to a set of mythological themes which occur in various texts.[99]

According to Smith, Sethianism may have begun as a pre-Christian tradition, possibly a syncretic cult that incorporated elements of Christianity and Platonism as it grew.[100] According to Temporini, Vogt, and Haase, early Sethians may be identical to or related to the Nazarenes (sect), the Ophites, or the sectarian group called heretics by Philo.[97]

According to Turner, Sethianism was influenced by Christianity and Middle Platonism, and originated in the second century as a fusion of a Jewish baptizing group of possibly priestly lineage, the so-called Barbeloites,[101] named after Barbelo, the first emanation of the Highest God, and a group of Biblical exegetes, the Sethites, the "seed of Seth".[102] At the end of the second century, Sethianism grew apart from the developing Christian orthodoxy, which rejected the docetian view of the Sethians on Christ.[103] In the early third century, Sethianism was fully rejected by Christian heresiologists, as Sethianism shifted toward the contemplative practices of Platonism while losing interest in their primal origins.[104] In the late third century, Sethianism was attacked by neo-Platonists like Plotinus, and Sethianism became alienated from Platonism. In the early- to mid-fourth century, Sethianism fragmented into various sectarian Gnostic groups such as the Archontics, Audians, Borborites, and Phibionites, and perhaps Stratiotici, and Secundians.[105][36] Some of these groups existed into the Middle Ages.[105]

Samaritan Baptist sects

According to Magris, Samaritan Baptist sects were an offshoot of John the Baptist.[106] One offshoot was in turn headed by Dositheus, Simon Magus, and Menander. It was in this milieu that the idea emerged that the world was created by ignorant angels. Their baptismal ritual removed the consequences of sin, and led to a regeneration by which natural death, which was caused by these angels, was overcome.[106] The Samaritan leaders were viewed as "the embodiment of God's power, spirit, or wisdom, and as the redeemer and revealer of 'true knowledge'".[106]

The Simonians were centered on Simon Magus, the magician baptised by Philip and rebuked by Peter in Acts 8, who became in early Christianity the archetypal false teacher. The ascription by Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and others of a connection between schools in their time and the individual in Acts 8 may be as legendary as the stories attached to him in various apocryphal books. Justin Martyr identifies Menander of Antioch as Simon Magus' pupil. According to Hippolytus, Simonianism is an earlier form of the Valentinian doctrine.[107]

The Basilidians or Basilideans were founded by Basilides of Alexandria in the second century. Basilides claimed to have been taught his doctrines by Glaucus, a disciple of St. Peter, but could also have been a pupil of Menander.[108] Basilidianism survived until the end of the 4th century as Epiphanius knew of Basilidians living in the Nile Delta. It was, however, almost exclusively limited to Egypt, though according to Sulpicius Severus it seems to have found an entrance into Spain through a certain Mark from Memphis. St. Jerome states that the Priscillianists were infected with it.

Valentinianism

Main article: Valentinianism

Valentinianism was named after its founder Valentinus (c. 100 – 180), who was a candidate for bishop of Rome but started his own group when another was chosen.[109] Valentinianism flourished after mid-second century. The school was popular, spreading to Northwest Africa and Egypt, and through to Asia Minor and Syria in the east,[110] and Valentinus is specifically named as gnostikos by Irenaeus. It was an intellectually vibrant tradition,[111] with an elaborate and philosophically "dense" form of Gnosticism. Valentinus' students elaborated on his teachings and materials, and several varieties of their central myth are known.

Valentinian Gnosticism may have been monistic rather than dualistic.[note 24] In the Valentinian myths, the creation of a flawed materiality is not due to any moral failing on the part of the Demiurge, but due to the fact that he is less perfect than the superior entities from which he emanated.[114] Valentinians treat physical reality with less contempt than other Gnostic groups, and conceive of materiality not as a separate substance from the divine, but as attributable to an error of perception which becomes symbolized mythopoetically as the act of material creation.[114]

The followers of Valentinius attempted to systematically decode the Epistles, claiming that most Christians made the mistake of reading the Epistles literally rather than allegorically. **Valentinians understood the conflict between *Jews* and *Gentiles* in Romans to be a coded reference to the differences between *Psychics* (people who are partly spiritual but have not yet achieved separation from carnality) and *Pneumatics (totally spiritual people).*** *The Valentinians argued that such codes were intrinsic in gnosticism, secrecy being important to ensuring proper progression to true inner understanding.*[note 25]

According to Bentley Layton "Classical Gnosticism" and "The School of Thomas" antedated and influenced the development of Valentinus, whom Layton called "the great [Gnostic] reformer" and "the focal point" of Gnostic development. While in Alexandria, where he was born, Valentinus probably would have had contact with the Gnostic teacher Basilides, and may have been influenced by him.[115] Simone Petrement, while arguing for a Christian origin of Gnosticism, places Valentinus after Basilides, but before the Sethians. According to Petrement, Valentinus represented a moderation of the anti-Judaism of the earlier Hellenized teachers; the demiurge, widely regarded as a mythological depiction of the Old Testament God of the Hebrews (i.e. Jehova), is depicted as more ignorant than evil.[116]

Thomasine traditions

The Thomasine Traditions refers to a group of texts which are attributed to the apostle Thomas.[117][note 26] Karen L. King notes that "Thomasine Gnosticism" as a separate category is being criticised, and may "not stand the test of scholarly scrutiny".[118]

Marcion

Marcion was a Church leader from Sinope (present-day Turkey), who preached in Rome around 150 CE,[119] but was expelled and started his own congregation, which spread throughout the Mediterranean. He rejected the Old Testament, and followed a limited Christian canon, which included only a redacted version of Luke, and ten edited letters of Paul.[120] Some scholars do not consider him to be a gnostic,[121][note 27] but his teachings clearly resemble some Gnostic teachings.[119] He preached a radical difference between the God of the Old Testament, the Demiurge, the "evil creator of the material universe", and the highest God, the "loving, spiritual God who is the father of Jesus", who had sent Jesus to the earth to free mankind from the tyranny of the Jewish Law.[119][7] Like the Gnostics, Marcion argued that Jesus was essentially a divine spirit appearing to men in the shape of a human form, and not someone in a true physical body.[122] Marcion held that the heavenly Father (the father of Jesus Christ) was an utterly alien god; he had no part in making the world, nor any connection with it.[122]

Hermeticism

Hermeticism is closely related to Gnosticism, but its orientation is more positive.[72][93]

Other Gnostic groups

* Serpent Gnostics. The Naassenes, Ophites and the Serpentarians gave prominence to snake symbolism, and snake handling played a role in their ceremonies.[119]
* Cerinthus (c. 100), the founder of a heretical school with gnostic elements. Like a Gnostic, Cerinthus depicted Christ as a heavenly spirit separate from the man Jesus, and he cited the demiurge as creating the material world. Unlike the Gnostics, Cerinthus taught Christians to observe the Jewish law; his demiurge was holy, not lowly; and he taught the Second Coming. His gnosis was a secret teaching attributed to an apostle. Some scholars believe that the First Epistle of John was written as a response to Cerinthus.[123]
* The Cainites are so-named since Hippolytus of Rome claims that they worshiped Cain, as well as Esau, Korah, and the Sodomites. There is little evidence concerning the nature of this group. Hippolytus claims that they believed that indulgence in sin was the key to salvation because since the body is evil, one must defile it through immoral activity (see libertinism). The name Cainite is used as the name of a religious movement, and not in the usual Biblical sense of people descended from Cain.
* The Carpocratians, a libertine sect following only the Gospel according to the Hebrews
* The school of Justin, which combined gnostic elements with the ancient Greek religion.
* The Borborites, a libertine Gnostic sect, said to be descended from the Nicolaitans[124]

Persian Gnosticism

The Persian Schools, which appeared in the western Persian province of Babylonia (in particular, within the Sassanid province of Asuristan), and whose writings were originally produced in the Aramaic dialects spoken in Babylonia at the time, are representative of what is believed to be among the oldest of the Gnostic thought forms. These movements are considered by most to be religions in their own right, and are not emanations from Christianity or Judaism.[*citation needed]*

Manichaeism

Manicheanism priests writing at their desks, with panel inscription in Sogdian. Manuscript from Khocho, Tarim Basin.

Main article: Manichaeism

Manichaeism was founded by the Prophet Mani (216–276). Mani's father was a member of the Jewish-Christian sect of the Elcesaites, a subgroup of the Gnostic Ebionites. At ages 12 and 24, Mani had visionary experiences of a "heavenly twin" of his, calling him to leave his father's sect and preach the true message of Christ. In 240–41, Mani travelled to the Indo-Greek Kingdom of the Sakhas in modern-day Afghanistan, where he studied Hinduism and its various extant philosophies. Returning in 242, he joined the court of Shapur I, to whom he dedicated his only work written in Persian, known as the *Shabuhragan. The original writings were written in Syriac Aramaic, in a unique Manichaean script.*

Manichaeism conceives of two coexistent realms of light and darkness that become embroiled in conflict. Certain elements of the light became entrapped within darkness, and the purpose of material creation is to engage in the slow process of extraction of these individual elements. In the end, the kingdom of light will prevail over darkness. Manicheanism inherits this dualistic mythology from Zurvanist Zoroastrianism,[125] in which the eternal spirit Ahura Mazda is opposed by his antithesis, Angra Mainyu. This dualistic teaching embodied an elaborate cosmological myth that included the defeat of a primal man by the powers of darkness that devoured and imprisoned the particles of light.[126]

According to Kurt Rudolph, the decline of Manichaeism that occurred in Persia in the 5th century was too late to prevent the spread of the movement into the east and the west.[127] In the west, the teachings of the school moved into Syria, Northern Arabia, Egypt and North Africa.[note 28] There is evidence for Manicheans in Rome and Dalmatia in the 4th century, and also in Gaul and Spain. From Syria it progressed still farther, into Palestine, Asia Minor and Armenia. The influence of Manicheanism was attacked by imperial elects and polemical writings, but the religion remained prevalent until the 6th century, and still exerted influence in the emergence of the Paulicians, Bogomils and Cathari in the Middle Ages, until it was ultimately stamped out by the Catholic Church.[127]

In the east, Rudolph relates, Manicheanism was able to bloom, because the religious monopoly position previously held by Christianity and Zoroastrianism had been broken by nascent Islam. In the early years of the Arab conquest, Manicheanism again found followers in Persia (mostly amongst educated circles), but flourished most in Central Asia, to which it had spread through Iran. Here, in 762, Manicheanism became the state religion of the Uyghur Empire.[127]

Mandaeanism

Main article: Mandaeanism

Mandaens in prayer during baptism

The Mandaeans are Semites and speak a dialect of Eastern Aramaic known as Mandaic. They are the only surviving Gnostics from antiquity. Their religion has been practised primarily around the lower Karun, Euphrates and Tigris and the rivers that surround the Shatt-al-Arab waterway, part of southern Iraq and Khuzestan Province in Iran. Mandaeanism is still practiced in small numbers, in parts of southern Iraq and the Iranian province of Khuzestan, and there are thought to be between 60,000 and 70,000 Mandaeans worldwide.[130]

The name of the group derives from the term Mandā d-Heyyi, which roughly means "Knowledge of Life". John the Baptist is a key figure in the religion, as an emphasis on baptism is part of their core beliefs. They are thought to be originally from Judea/Palestine and their anthropogeny appears Jewish and Gnostic.[131] Mandaeans revere Adam, Abel, Seth, Enos, Noah, Shem, Aram, and especially John the Baptist. Significant amounts of original Mandaean Scripture, written in Mandaean Aramaic, survive in the modern era. The primary source text is known as the Genzā Rabbā and has portions identified by some scholars as being copied as early as the 2nd–3rd centuries. There is also the Qolastā, or Canonical Book of Prayer and the Mandaean Book of John (Sidra ḏ'Yahia).

Middle Ages

After its decline in the Mediterranean world, Gnosticism lived on in the periphery of the Byzantine Empire, and resurfaced in the western world. The Paulicians, an Adoptionist group which flourished between 650 and 872 in Armenia and the Eastern Themes of the Byzantine Empire, were accused by orthodox medieval sources of being Gnostic and quasi Manichaean Christian. The Bogomils, emerged in Bulgaria between 927 and 970 and spread throughout Europe. It was as synthesis of Armenian Paulicianism and the Bulgarian Orthodox Church reform movement.

The Cathars (Cathari, Albigenses or Albigensians) were also accused by their enemies of the traits of Gnosticism; though whether or not the Cathari possessed direct historical influence from ancient Gnosticism is disputed. If their critics are reliable the basic conceptions of Gnostic cosmology are to be found in Cathar beliefs (most distinctly in their notion of a lesser, Satanic, creator god), though they did not apparently place any special relevance upon knowledge (*gnosis*) as an effective salvific force.[*verification needed]*

Islam

**In Sufism, Iblis rules the material world in a manner that resembles the Gnostic Demiurge.**

The Quran, like Gnostic cosmology, makes a sharp distinction between this world and the afterlife. God is commonly thought of as being beyond human comprehension. In some Islamic schools[which?] of thought, somehow identifiable with the Gnostic Monad.[132][133] However, according to Islam and unlike most Gnostic sects, not rejection of this world, but performing good deeds leads to the heaven. And according to the Islamic belief in strict Oneness of God, there was no room for a lower deity; such as the demiurge.[134] According to Islam, both good and evil come from one God, a position especially opposed by the Manichaeans. Ibn al-Muqaffa depicted the Islamic deity as a demonic entity who "fights with humans and boasts about His victories" and "sitting on a throne, from which He can descend". It would be impossible that both light and darkness were created from one source, since they were regarded as two different eternal principles.[135] Muslim theologists countered this accusation by the example of a repeating sinner, who says: "I laid, and I repent";[136] this would prove that good can also result out of evil.

Islam also integrated traces of an entity given authority over the lower world in some early writings: Iblis is regarded by some Sufis as the owner of this world, and humans must avoid the treasures of this world, since they would belong to him.[137] In the Isma'ili Shia work Umm al Kitab, Azazil's role resembles whose of the Gnostic demiurge.[138] Like the demiurge, he is endowed with the ability to create his own world and seeks to imprison humans in the material world, but here, his power is limited and depends on the higher God.[139] Such Gnostic anthropogenic can be found frequently among Isma'ili traditions.[140] However, Ismailism were often criticised as non-Islamic. Ghazali characterized them as a group who are outwardly Shias but were actually adherence of a dualistic and philosophical religion. Further traces of Gnostic ideas can be found in Sufi anthropogenic.[141] Like the gnostic conception of human beings imprisoned in matter, Sufi traditions acknowledge that the human soul is an accomplice of the material world and subject to bodily desires similar to the way archontic spheres envelop the pneuma.[142] The Ruh must therefore gain victory over the lower and material-bound psyche, to overcome its animal nature. A human being captured by its animal desires, mistakenly claims autonomy and independence from the "higher God", thus resembling the lower deity in classical gnostic traditions. However, since the goal is not to abandon the created world, but just to free oneself from ones own lower desires, it can be disputed whether this can still be Gnostic, but rather a completion of the message of Muhammad.[135] It seems that Gnostic ideas were an influential part of early Islamic development but later lost its influence. However the Gnostic light metaphorics and the idea of unity of existence still prevailed in later Islamic thought.[133]  Ginan, which literally translates to gnosis, refers to a collection of literature that is respected by the Ismailis. The Ismaili Pīr Ḥasan Kabīr al-Dīn writes that the gnostic can be compared to the lotus flower (*kamal*), a delicate flower with white petals that blooms in dirty swamps, and is commonly associated with beauty and purity. The flower is above the polluted swamps, rather than feeding from it, it waits for the clean, pure rain. Similarly, the gnostic lives in the physical world, but is not of this world. He is not interested in the material pleasures of the world, and is unaffected by its glamour. The gnostic awaits the *ginān* from the heavens, the life-giving water that the True Guide brings. Just like how the lotus flower would prefer death over drinking from the dirty swamp, the pure soul is unable to survive without the *ginān* from the True Guide. The gnostic too, would prefer death if it cannot obtain this precious nourishment.  [143]

Kabbalah

Gnostic ideas found a Jewish variation in the mystical study of Kabbalah. Many core Gnostic ideas reappear in Kabbalah, where they are used for dramatically reinterpreting earlier Jewish sources according to this new system.[144] The Kabbalists originated in 13th-century Provence,[note 29] which was at that time also the center of the Gnostic Cathars. While some scholars in the middle of the 20th century tried to assume an influence between the Cathar "gnostics" and the origins of the Kabbalah, this assumption has proved to be an incorrect generalization not substantiated by any original texts.[146] On the other hand, scholars such as Scholem have postulated that there was originally a "Jewish gnosticism", which influenced the early origins of gnosticism.[147] Kabbalah does not employ the terminology or labels of non-Jewish Gnosticism, but grounds the same or similar concepts in the language of the Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible).[148] The 13th-century Zohar ("Splendor"), a foundational text in Kabbalah, is written in the style of a Jewish Aramaic Midrash, clarifying the five books of the Torah with a new Kabbalistic system that uses completely Jewish terms.[149]

Modern times

Main article: Gnosticism in modern times

The Mandaeans are an ancient Gnostic sect that have survived to this day and are found today in Iraq.[150] Their namesake owes to their following John the Baptist and in that country, they have about five thousand followers.[150] A number of modern gnostic ecclesiastical bodies have set up or re-founded since the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library, including the Ecclesia Gnostica, Apostolic Johannite Church, Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica, the Gnostic Church of France, the Thomasine Church, the Alexandrian Gnostic Church, the North American College of Gnostic Bishops,[151] and the Universal Gnosticism of Samael Aun Weor.[152] A number of 19th-century thinkers such as Arthur Schopenhauer,[153] Albert Pike and Madame Blavatsky studied Gnostic thought extensively and were influenced by it, and even figures like Herman Melville and W. B. Yeats were more tangentially influenced.[154] Jules Doinel "re-established" a Gnostic church in France in 1890, which altered its form as it passed through various direct successors (Fabre des Essarts as *Tau Synésius* and Joanny Bricaud as *Tau Jean II* most notably), and, though small, is still active today.[155]

Early 20th-century thinkers who heavily studied and were influenced by Gnosticism include Carl Jung (who supported Gnosticism), Eric Voegelin (who opposed it), Jorge Luis Borges (who included it in many of his short stories), and Aleister Crowley, with figures such as Hermann Hesse being more moderately influenced. René Guénon founded the gnostic review, *La Gnose* in 1909, before moving to a more Perennialist position, and founding his Traditionalist School. Gnostic Thelemite organizations, such as Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica and Ordo Templi Orientis, trace themselves to Crowley's thought. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library after 1945 has had a huge effect on Gnosticism since World War II. Intellectuals who were heavily influenced by Gnosticism in this period include Lawrence Durrell, Hans Jonas, Philip K. Dick and Harold Bloom, with Albert Camus and Allen Ginsberg being more moderately influenced.[154] Celia Green has written on Gnostic Christianity in relation to her own philosophy.[156] Alfred North Whitehead was aware of the existence of the newly discovered Gnostic scrolls. Accordingly, Michel Weber has proposed a Gnostic interpretation of his late metaphysics.[157]

Sources

Heresiologists

Prior to the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945 Gnosticism was known primarily through the works of heresiologists, Church Fathers who opposed those movements. These writings had an antagonistic bias towards gnostic teachings, and were incomplete. Several heresiological writers, such as Hippolytus, made little effort to exactly record the nature of the sects they reported on, or transcribe their sacred texts. Reconstructions of incomplete Gnostic texts were attempted in modern times, but research on Gnosticism was coloured by the orthodox views of those heresiologists.

Justin Martyr (c. 100/114 – c. 162/168) wrote the *First Apology, addressed to Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius, which criticising Simon Magus, Menander and Marcion. Since then, both Simon and Menander have been considered as 'proto-Gnostic'.*[158] Irenaeus (died c. 202) wrote *Against Heresies (c. 180–185), which identifies Simon Magus from Flavia Neapolis in Samaria as the inceptor of Gnosticism. From Samaria he charted an apparent spread of the teachings of Simon through the ancient "knowers" into the teachings of Valentinus and other, contemporary Gnostic sects.*[note 30] Hippolytus (170–235) wrote the ten-volume *Refutation Against all Heresies, of which eight have been unearthed. It also focuses on the connection between pre-Socratic (and therefore Pre-Incantation of Christ) ideas and the false beliefs of early gnostic heretical leaders. Thirty-three of the groups he reported on are considered Gnostic by modern scholars, including 'the foreigners' and 'the Seth people'. Hippolytus further presents individual teachers such as Simon, Valentinus, Secundus, Ptolemy, Heracleon, Marcus and Colorbasus. Tertullian (c. 155–230) from Carthage wrote Adversus Valentinianos* ('Against the Valentinians'), c. 206, as well as five books around 207–208 chronicling and refuting the teachings of Marcion.

Gnostic texts

See also: Gnostic texts and Nag Hammadi library

Prior to the discovery at Nag Hammadi, a limited number of texts were available to students of Gnosticism. Reconstructions were attempted from the records of the heresiologists, but these were necessarily coloured by the motivation behind the source accounts. The Nag Hammadi library [note 31] is a collection of Gnostic texts discovered in 1945 near Nag Hammadi, Upper Egypt. Twelve leather-bound papyrus codices buried in a sealed jar were found by a local farmer named Muhammed al-Samman.[159] The writings in these codices comprised fifty-two mostly Gnostic treatises, but they also include three works belonging to the *Corpus Hermeticum and a partial translation/alteration of Plato's Republic*. These codices may have belonged to a nearby Pachomian monastery, and buried after Bishop Athanasius condemned the use of non-canonical books in his Festal Letter of 367.[160] Though the original language of composition was probably Greek, the various codices contained in the collection were written in Coptic. A 1st- or 2nd-century date of composition for the lost Greek originals has been proposed, though this is disputed; the manuscripts themselves date from the 3rd and 4th centuries. The Nag Hammadi texts demonstrated the fluidity of early Christian scripture and early Christianity itself.[note 32]

Academic studies

Development

Prior to the discovery of Nag Hammadi, the Gnostic movements were largely perceived through the lens of the early church heresiologists. Johann Lorenz von Mosheim (1694–1755) proposed that Gnosticism developed on its own in Greece and Mesopotamia, spreading to the west and incorporating Jewish elements. According to Mosheim, Jewish thought took Gnostic elements and used them against Greek philosophy.[38] J. Horn and Ernest Anton Lewald proposed Persian and Zoroastrian origins, while Jacques Matter described Gnosticism as an intrusion of eastern cosmological and theosophical speculation into Christianity.[38]

In the 1880s, Gnosticism was placed within Greek philosophy, especially neo-Platonism.[34] Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930), who belonged to the *School of the History of Dogma* and proposed a *Kirchengeschichtliches Ursprungsmodell*, saw Gnosticism as an internal development within the church under the influence of Greek philosophy.[34][162] According to Harnack, Gnosticism was the "acute Hellenization of Christianity."[34]

The *Religionsgeschichtliche Schule ("history of religions school", 19th century) had a profound influence on the study of Gnosticism.*[34] The *Religionsgeschichtliche Schule* saw Gnosticism as a pre-Christian phenomenon, and Christian *gnosis* as only one, and even marginal instance of this phenomenon.[34] According to Wilhelm Bousset (1865–1920), Gnosticism was a form of Iranian and Mesopotamian syncretism,[34] and Eduard Norden (1868–1941) also proposed pre-Christian origins,[34] while Richard August Reitzenstein (1861–1931), and Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976) also situated the origins of Gnosticism in Persia.[34] Hans Heinrich Schaeder (1896–1957) and Hans Leisegang saw Gnosticism as an amalgam of eastern thought in a Greek form.[34]

Hans Jonas (1903–1993) took an intermediate approach, using both the comparative approach of the *Religionsgeschichtliche Schule* and the existentialist hermeneutics of Bultmann. Jonas emphasized the duality between God and the world, and concluded that Gnosticism cannot be derived from Platonism.[24] Contemporary scholarship largely agrees that Gnosticism has Jewish or Judeo-Christian origins;[24] this theses is most notably put forward by Gershom G. Scholem (1897–1982) and Gilles Quispel (1916–2006).[163]

The study of Gnosticism and of early Alexandrian Christianity received a strong impetus from the discovery of the Coptic Nag Hammadi Library in 1945.[164][165] A great number of translations have been published, and the works of Elaine Pagels, Professor of Religion at Princeton University, especially *The Gnostic Gospels*, which detailed the suppression of some of the writings found at Nag Hammadi by early bishops of the Christian church, have popularized Gnosticism in mainstream culture,[web 3][web 4] but also incited strong responses and condemnations from clergical writers.[166]

Definitions of Gnosticism

According to Matthew J. Dillon, six trends can be discerned in the definitions of Gnosticism:[167]

* Typologies, "a catalogue of shared characteristics that are used to classify a group of objects together."[167]
* Traditional approaches, viewing Gnosticism as a Christian heresy[168]
* Phenomenological approaches, most notably Hans Jonas[169]
* Restricting Gnosticism, "identifying which groups were explicitly called gnostics",[170] or which groups were clearly sectarian[170]
* Deconstructing Gnosticism, abandoning the category of "Gnosticism"[171]
* Psychology and cognitive science of religion, approaching Gnosticism as a psychological phenomena[172]

Typologies

The 1966 Messina conference on the origins of gnosis and Gnosticism proposed to designate

... a particular group of systems of the second century after Christ" as *gnosticism*, and to use *gnosis* to define a conception of knowledge that transcends the times, which was described as "knowledge of divine mysteries for an élite.[173]

This definition has now been abandoned.[167] It created a religion, "Gnosticism", from the "gnosis" which was a widespread element of ancient religions,[note 33] suggesting a homogeneous conception of gnosis by these Gnostic religions, which did not exist at the time.[174]

According to Dillon, the texts from Nag Hammadi made clear that this definition was limited, and that they are "better classified by movements (such as Valentinian), mythological similarity (Sethian), or similar tropes (presence of a Demiurge)."[167] Dillon further notes that the Messian-definition "also excluded pre-Christian Gnosticism and later developments, such as the Mandaeans and the Manichaeans."[167]

Hans Jonas discerned two main currents of Gnosticism, namely Syrian-Egyptian, and Persian, which includes Manicheanism and Mandaeanism.[24] Among the Syrian-Egyptian schools and the movements they spawned are a typically more Monist view. Persian Gnosticism possesses more dualist tendencies, reflecting a strong influence from the beliefs of the Persian Zurvanist Zoroastrians. Those of the medieval Cathars, Bogomils, and Carpocratians seem to include elements of both categories.

Gilles Quispel divided Syrian-Egyptian Gnosticism further into Jewish Gnosticism (the *Apocryphon of John)*[95] and Christian Gnosis (Marcion, Basilides, Valentinus). This "Christian Gnosticism" was Christocentric, and influenced by Christian writings such as the Gospel of John and the Pauline epistles.[175] Other authors speak rather of "Gnostic Christians", noting that Gnostics were a prominent substream in the early church.[176]

Traditional approaches – Gnosticism as Christian heresy

The best known example of this approach is Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930), who stated that "Gnosticism is the acute Hellenization of Christianity."[168] According to Dillon, "many scholars today continue in the vein of Harnack in reading gnosticism as a late and contaminated version of Christianity", notably Darrell Block, who criticises Elaine Pagels for her view that early Christianity was wildly diverse.[169]

Phenomenological approaches

Hans Jonas (1903–1993) took an existential phenomenological approach to Gnosticism. According to Jonas, alienation is a distinguishing characteristics of Gnosticism, making it different from contemporary religions. Jonas compares this alienation with the existentialist notion of *geworfenheit, Martin Heidegger's "thrownness," as in being thrown into a hostile world.*[169]

Restricting Gnosticism

In the late 1980s scholars voiced concerns about the broadness of "Gnosticism" as a meaningful category. Bentley Layton proposed to categorize Gnosticism by delineating which groups were marked as gnostic in ancient texts. According to Layton, this term was mainly applied by heresiologists to the myth described in the *Apocryphon of John*, and was used mainly by the Sethians and the Ophites. According to Layton, texts which refer to this myth can be called "classical Gnostic".[170]

In addition, Alastair Logan uses social theory to identify Gnosticism. He uses Rodney Stark and William Bainbridge's sociological theory on traditional religion, sects and cults. According to Logan, the Gnostics were a cult, at odds with the society at large.[170]

Deconstructing Gnosticism

According to Michael Allen Williams, the concept of Gnosticism as a distinct religious tradition is questionable, since "gnosis" was a pervasive characteristic of many religious traditions in antiquity, and not restricted to the so-called Gnostic systems.[177] According to Williams, the conceptual foundations on which the category of Gnosticism rests are the remains of the agenda of the heresiologists.[177] The early church heresiologists created an interpretive definition of Gnosticism, and modern scholarship followed this example and created a *categorical* definition. According to Williams the term needs replacing to more accurately reflect those movements it comprises,[177] and suggests to replace it with the term "the Biblical demiurgical tradition".[171]

According to Karen King, scholars have "unwittingly continued the project of ancient heresiologists", searching for non-Christian influences, thereby continuing to portray a pure, original Christianity.[171]

Modern scholarship

According to the Westar Institute's Fall 2014 Christianity Seminar Report on Gnosticism, there actually is no group that possesses all of the usually-attributed features. Nearly every group possesses one or more of them, or some modified version of them. There was no particular relationship among any set of groups which one could distinguish as “Gnostic”, as if they were in opposition to some other set of groups. For instance, every sect of Christianity on which we have any information on this point, believed in a separate Logos who created the universe at God’s behest. Likewise, they believed some kind of secret knowledge (“gnosis”) was essential to ensuring one’s salvation. Likewise, they had a dualist view of the cosmos, in which the lower world was corrupted by meddling divine beings; and the upper world’s God was awaiting a chance to destroy it and start over, and help humanity to escape its corrupt bodies and locations by fleeing into celestial ones. [178]

Psychological approaches

Carl Jung approached Gnosticism from a psychological perspective, which was followed by Gilles Quispel. According to this approach, Gnosticism is a map for the human development in which an undivided person, centered on the Self, develops out of the fragmentary personhood of young age. According to Quispel, gnosis is a third force in western culture, alongside faith and reason, which offers an experiential awareness of this Self.[171]

According to Ioan Culianu, gnosis is made possible through universal operations of the mind, which can be arrived at "anytime, anywhere".[179] A similar suggestion has been made by Edward Conze, who suggested that the similarities between *prajñā and sophia* may be due to "the actual modalities of the human mind", which in certain conditions result in similar experiences.[180]

See also

* The Esoteric Character of the Gospels
* Marcellina (gnostic)
* Mithras

Notes

1. In Plato's dialogue between Young Socrates and the Foreigner in his *The Statesman (258e).*[subnote 1]
2. 10x Plato, Cratylus, Theaetetus, Sophist, Statesman 2x Plutarch, Compendium libri de animae procreatione + De animae procreatione in Timaeo, 2x Pseudo-Plutarch, De musica[web 2]
3. In Book 7 of his *Stromateis*
4. For example A. Rousseau and L. Doutreleau, translators of the French edition (1974),[9]
5. As in 1.25.6, 1.11.3, 1.11.5.
6. Adv. haer. 1.11.1
7. Irenaeus' comparative adjective *gnostikeron* "more learned", evidently cannot mean "more Gnostic" as a name.[10]
8. Williams, p. 36: "But several of Irenaeus's uses of the designation *gnostikos* are more ambiguous, and it is not so clear whether he is indicating the specific sect again or using 'gnostics' now merely as a shorthand reference for virtually *all* of the groups he is criticizing"; p. 37: "They argue that Irenaeus uses *gnostikos* in two senses: (1) with the term's 'basic and customary meaning' of 'learned' (savant), and (2) with reference to adherents of the specific sect called 'the gnostic heresy' in Adv. haer. 1.11.1."; p. 271: "1.25.6 where they think that *gnostikos* means 'learned' are in 1.11.3 ('A certain other famous teacher of theirs, reaching for a doctrine more lofty and learned [*gnostikoteron*] ...') and 1.11.5 ('... in order that they [i.e.,])."[10]
9. Of those groups that Irenaeus identifies as "intellectual" (*gnostikos*), only one, the followers of Marcellina use the term *gnostikos* of themselves.[11][subnote 2] Later Hippolytus uses "learned" (*gnostikos*) of Cerinthus and the Ebionites, and Epiphanius applied "learned" (*gnostikos*) to specific groups.
10. Dunderberg: "The problems with the term 'Gnosticism' itself are now well known. It does not appear in ancient sources at all"[12]
11. Pearson: "As Bentley Layton points out, the term Gnosticism was first coined by Henry More (1614–1687) in an expository work on the seven letters of the Book of Revelation.29 More used the term Gnosticisme to describe the heresy in Thyatira."[13]
12. This occurs in the context of Irenaeus' work *On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis*, (Greek: *elenchos kai anatrope tes pseudonymou gnoseos*, ἔλεγχος καὶ ἀνατροπὴ τῆς ψευδωνύμου γνώσεως) where the term "knowledge falsely so-called" (*pseudonymos gnosis*) is a quotation of the apostle Paul's warning against "knowledge falsely so-called" in Timothy 6:20,[15] and covers various groups, not just Valentinus.[16]
13. Clement of Alexandria: "In the times of the Emperor Hadrian appeared those who devised heresies, and they continued until the age of the elder Antoninus."[17]
14. Cohen & Mendes-Flohr: "Recent research, however, has tended to emphasize that Judaism, rather than Persia, was a major origin of Gnosticism. Indeed, it appears increasingly evident that many of the newly published Gnostic texts were written in a context from which Jews were not absent. In some cases, indeed, a violent rejection of the Jewish God, or of Judaism, seems to stand at the basis of these texts. ... facie, various trends in Jewish thought and literature of the Second Commonwealth appear to have been potential factors in Gnostic origins.[19]
15. Robinson: "At this stage we have not found any Gnostic texts that clearly antedate the origin of Christianity." J. M. Robinson, "Sethians and Johannine Thought: The Trimorphic Protennoia and the Prologue of the Gospel of John" in *The Rediscovery of Gnosticism*, vol. 2, Sethian Gnosticism, ed. B. Layton (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1981), p. 662.
16. The idea that Gnosticism was derived from Buddhism was first proposed by the Victorian gem collector and numismatist Charles William King (1864).[42] Mansel (1875) [43] considered the principal sources of Gnosticism to be Platonism, Zoroastrianism, and Buddhism.[44]
17. Ptolemy, in *Letter to Flora*: "External physical fasting is observed even among our followers, for it can be of some benefit to the soul if it is engaged in with reason (*logos), whenever it is done neither by way of limiting others, nor out of habit, nor because of the day, as if it had been specially appointed for that purpose."*
18. Other names include The Absolute, *Aion teleos* (The Perfect Æon), *Bythos* (Depth or Profundity, Βυθος), *Proarkhe* (Before the Beginning, προαρχη), and *HE Arkhe* (The Beginning, ἡ ἀρχή).
19. The relevant passage of *The Republic* was found within the Nag Hammadi library,[60] wherein a text existed describing the demiurge as a "lion-faced serpent".[49]
20. The term *dēmiourgos* occurs in a number of other religious and philosophical systems, most notably Platonism. The gnostic demiurge bears resemblance to figures in Plato's *Timaeus and Republic. In Timaeus*, the *demiourgós* is a central figure, a benevolent creator of the universe who works to make the universe as benevolent as the limitations of matter will allow. In *The Republic* the description of the leontomorphic "desire" in Socrates' model of the psyche bears a resemblance to descriptions of the demiurge as being in the shape of the lion.[note 19]
21. According to Earl Doherty, a prominent proponent of the Christ myth theory, the Q-authors may have regarded themselves as "spokespersons for the Wisdom of God*, with Jesus being the embodiment of this Wisdom. In time, the gospel-narrative of this embodiment of Wisdom became interpreted as the literal history of the life of Jesus.[70]*
22. The existence of Jesus is explored in other Wikipedia articles, such as: Christ myth theory, Historicity of Jesus, Sources for the historicity of Jesus, Historical Jesus, Quest for the historical Jesus
23. The doctrine of the "triple-powered one" found in the text Allogenes, as discovered in the Nag Hammadi Library, is "the same doctrine as found in the anonymous Parmenides commentary (Fragment XIV) ascribed by Hadot to Porphyry [...] and is also found in Plotinus' Ennead 6.7, 17, 13–26."[36]
24. Quotes: \* Elaine Pagels: "Valentinian gnosticism [...] differs essentially from dualism";[112] \* Schoedel: "a standard element in the interpretation of Valentinianism and similar forms of Gnosticism is the recognition that they are fundamentally monistic".[113]
25. Irenaeus describes how the Valentinians claim to find evidence in Ephesians for their characteristic belief in the existence of the Æons as supernatural beings: "Paul also, they affirm, very clearly and frequently names these Æons, and even goes so far as to preserve their order, when he says, "To all the generations of the Æons of the Æon." (Ephesians 3:21) Nay, we ourselves, when at the giving of thanks we pronounce the words, 'To Æons of Æons' (for ever and ever), do set forth these Æons. And, in fine, wherever the words Æon or Æons occur, they at once refer them to these beings." *On the Detection and Overthrow of Knowledge Falsely So Called Book 1. Ch.3*
26. The texts commonly attributed to the Thomasine Traditions are:

* *The Hymn of the Pearl, or, the Hymn of Jude Thomas the Apostle in the Country of Indians*
* *The Gospel of Thomas*
* *The Infancy Gospel of Thomas*
* *The Acts of Thomas*
* *The Book of Thomas: The Contender Writing to the Perfect*
* *The Psalms of Thomas*
* *The Apocalypse of Thomas*

1. Encyclopædia Britannica: "In Marcion's own view, therefore, the founding of his church – to which he was first driven by opposition – amounts to a reformation of Christendom through a return to the gospel of Christ and to Paul; nothing was to be accepted beyond that. This of itself shows that it is a mistake to reckon Marcion among the Gnostics. A dualist he certainly was, but he was not a Gnostic".
2. Where Augustine was a member of the school from 373–382.[128][129]
3. Joseph Dan: "The first kabbalistic text with a known author that reached us is a brief treatise, a commentary on the Sefer Yezira written by Rabbi Isaac ben Abraham the Blind, in Provence near the turn of the Thirteenth Century.*[145]*
4. This understanding of the transmission of Gnostic ideas, despite Irenaeus' certain antagonistic bias, is often utilized today, though it has been criticized.
5. Sometimes popularly known as the *Gnostic Gospels* after Elaine Pagels' 1979 book of the same name, but the term has a wider meaning
6. According to Layton, "the lack of uniformity in ancient Christian scripture in the early period is very striking, and it points to the substantial diversity within the Christian religion."[161]
7. Markschies: "something was being called "gnosticism" that the ancient theologians had called 'gnosis' ... [A] concept of gnosis had been created by Messina that was almost unusable in a historical sense."[174]

Subnotes

1. perseus.tufts.edu, LSJ entry: **γνωστ-ικός, ή, όν,** A. of or for knowing, cognitive: ἡ -κή (sc. ἐπιστήμη), theoretical science (opp. πρακτική), Pl.Plt.258e, etc.; τὸ γ. ib.261b; "ἕξεις γ." Arist.AP0.100a11 (Comp.); "γ. εἰκόνες" Hierocl.in CA25p.475M.: c. gen., able to discern, Ocell. 2.7. Adv. "-κῶς" Procl.Inst.39, Dam.Pr.79, Phlp.in Ph.241.22.[web 1]
2. Williams: "On the other hand, the one group whom Irenaeus does explicitly mention as users of this self-designation, the followers of the Second Century teacher Marcellina, are not included in Layton's anthology at all, on the grounds that their doctrines are not similar to those of the "classic" gnostics. As we have seen, Epiphanius is one of the witnesses for the existence of a special sect called 'the gnostics', and yet Epiphanius himself seems to distinguish between these people and 'the Sethians' (Pan 40.7.5), whereas Layton treats them as both under the 'classic gnostic' category."[11]

References

1. Magris 2005, pp. 3515–3516.
2. Bataille, Georges (1930). "Base Materialism and Gnosticism". *Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939*: 47.
3. Pagels, Elaine (1989). *The Gnostic Gospels (PDF). New York: Random House. p. xx.*
4. *The Social World of the First Christians* (1995) ISBN 0-06-064586-5, essay "Prolegomena to the Study of Ancient Gnosticism" by Bentley Layton [1]
5. Jerome Friedman (1978). *Michael Servetus: A Case Study in Total Heresy. p. 142. ISBN 2-600-03075-1.*
6. Ehrman 2003, p. 185.
7. Valantasis, Richard (2006). *The Beliefnet Guide to Gnosticiam and Other Vanished Christianities. Beliefnet. ISBN 978-0-385-51455-2.*
8. Morton Smith *History of the term gnostikos* 1973
9. Rousseau & Doutreleau 1974.
10. Williams 1999, p. 36.
11. Williams 1999, pp. 42–43.
12. Dunderberg 2008, p. 16.
13. Pearson 2004, p. 210.
14. Stephen Charles Haar *Simon Magus: the first gnostic?* p. 231
15. *Bible* 1 Timothy 6:20
16. Dominic J. Unger, John J. Dillon, 1992. *St. Irenaeus of Lyons Against the heresies*, Vol. 1 p. 3. Quote: "the final phrase of the title 'knowledge falsely so-called' is found in 1 Timothy 6:20."
17. Huidekoper 1891, p. 331.
18. "Early heretical movements". *www.britannica.com*. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
19. Cohen & Mendes-Flohr 2010, p. 286.
20. Brakke 2011.
21. Wilson, R. McL. "Nag Hammadi and the New Testament", *New Testament Studies*, vol. 28, (1982), p. 292.
22. J. M. Robinson, "Jesus: From Easter to Valentinus (Or to the Apostles' Creed)", *Journal of Biblical Literature*, 101 (1982), p. 5.
23. *Hermetica : the Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a new English translation, with notes and introduction*. Cambridge University Press. 1992. ISBN 0-521-36144-3. Hermetic sentences derived from similar elements in ancient Egyptian wisdom literature, especially the genre called "Instructions" that reached back to the Old Kingdom
24. Albrile 2005, p. 3533.
25. Jewish Encyclopedia, Gnosticism
26. Albrile 2005, p. 3534.
27. Gager, John G. (1985). *The origins of anti-semitism: attitudes toward Judaism in pagan and Christian antiquity*. Oxford University Press. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-19-503607-7.
28. Understanding Jewish History: Texts and Commentaries by Steven Bayme Publisher: Ktav Publishing House ISBN 0-88125-554-8, 978-0-88125-554-6 [2]
29. Idel, Moshe. *Kabbalah: New Perspectives*, Yale University Press, 1990, p. 31. ISBN 978-0-300-04699-1
30. Magris 2005, p. 3516.
31. Hannah, Darrell D. (1999). *Michael and Christ: Michael Traditions and Angel Christology in Early Christianity. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 214f. ISBN 978-3-16-147054-7.*
32. M.A. Knibb (trans.) (2010). "Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah". In James H. Charlesworth (ed.). *The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha*. **2**. Hendrickson Publishers. p. 173. ISBN 978-1-59856-490-7.
33. Papandrea, James L. (2016). *The Earliest Christologies: Five Images of Christ in the Postapostolic Age. InterVarsity Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-8308-5127-0. The most prominent example of Angel Adoptionism from the early Church would have to be the document known as The Shepherd* of Hermass. In *The Shepherd,* the savior is an angel called the "angel of justification", who seems to be identified with the archangel Michael. Although the angel is often understood to be Jesus, he is never named as Jesus.
34. Albrile 2005, p. 3532.
35. Pearson, Birger A. (1984). "Gnosticism as Platonism: With Special Reference to Marsanes (NHC 10,1)". *The Harvard Theological Review*. **77** (1): 55–72. doi:10.1017/S0017816000014206. JSTOR 1509519.
36. Turner 1986, p. 59.
37. Schenke, Hans Martin. "The Phenomenon and Significance of Gnostic Sethianism" in The Rediscovery of Gnosticism. E.J. Brill 1978
38. Albrile 2005, p. 3531.
39. Albrile 2005, pp. 3534–3535.
40. Verardi 1997, p. 323.
41. Conze 1967.
42. Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Clare Goodrick-Clarke *G. R. S. Mead and the Gnostic Quest* 2005 p. 8. Quote: "The idea that Gnosticism was derived from Buddhism was first postulated by Charles William King in his classic work, The Gnostics and their Remains (1864). He was one of the earliest and most emphatic scholars to propose the Gnostic debt to Buddhist thought."
43. H. L. Mansel, *Gnostic Heresies of the First and Second Centuries* (1875); p. 32
44. *International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: E–J* ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley  (1982). Quote: "Mansel ... summed up the principal sources of Gnosticism in these three: Platonism, the Persian religion, and the Buddhism of India." p. 490.
45. Pagels, Elaine H (1989). *The Gnostic Gospels. ISBN 978-0-679-72453-7.*
46. Hans Jonas, *The Gnostic Religion*, p. 42, Beacon Press, 1963, ISBN 0-8070-5799-1; 1st ed. 1958
47. Edwards, M. J. (1989). "Gnostics and Valentinians in the Church Fathers". *The Journal of Theological Studies*. **40** (1): 41. doi:10.1093/jts/40.1.26. ISSN 0022-5185.
48. Layton, Bentley (1987). *The Gnostic Scriptures*. SCM Press – Introduction to "Against Heresies" by St. Irenaeus
49. "The Apocryphon of John". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
50. "Allogenes". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
51. "Trimorphic Protennoia". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved September 29, 2013.
52. "The Pair (Syzygy) in Valentinian Thought". Retrieved 2009-02-13.
53. Mead, G.R.S. (2005). *Fragments of a Faith Forgotten*. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-8413-8.
54. "Gnosticism". *Gnostic Kabbalah*. 2016-11-24. Retrieved 2018-01-30.
55. "A Valentinian Exposition". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
56. "Demiurge". Catholic encyclopedia. Retrieved 2009-02-13.
57. "The Hypostasis of the Archons". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
58. Hoeller, Stephan A. "The Gnostic World View: A Brief Summary of Gnosticism". *www.gnosis.org*. The Gnostic Society. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
59. Campbell, Joseph: *Occidental Mythology*, p. 262. Penguin Arkana, 1991.
60. "Plato, Republic 588A–589B". "The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
61. "Demiurge". Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
62. "demiurge".
63. Origen. "Cotra Celsum". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 13 February 2009.
64. "Mithraic Art". Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2009-12-13.
65. Pagels 1975.
66. Roukema, Riemer (2010). "Jesus′ Origin and Identity – Theodotus [of Byzantium]". *Jesus, Gnosis and Dogma*. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-567-61585-5. The Saviour, jesus Christ, who from the fullness (the *pleroma*) of the Father descended on earth, is identified with the Logos, but initially not entirely with the Only Begotten Son. In John 1:14 is written, after all, that his glory was *as* of the Only Begotten, from which is concluded that his glory must be distinguished from this (7, 3b). When the Logos or Saviour descended, Sophia, according to Theodotus, provided a piece of flesh (*sarkion*), namely a carnal body, also called 'spiritual seed' (1, 1).
67. "The Gnostic Gospels". *FRONTLINE*. Retrieved 2020-08-13.
68. Macuch, Rudolf (1965). *Handbook of Classical and Modern Mandaic*. Berlin: De Gruyter & Co. p. 61 fn. 105.
69. Perkins 1987, p. 3530.
70. Doherty, Earl (Fall 1997). "The Jesus Puzzle: Pieces in a Puzzle of Christian Origins". *Journal of Higher Criticism.* **4** (2). Archived from the original on 2008-06-08. Retrieved 2017-03-14.
71. Halsall 2008, p. 293.
72. Magris 2005, p. 3519.
73. Dillon 2016, p. 36. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
74. Pagels 1979.
75. Perkins 2005, p. 3529.
76. Perkins 2005, pp. 3529–3530.
77. Bauer 1971.
78. McVey 1981.
79. Quispel 2004, p. 9.
80. Dillon 2016, pp. 31–32. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
81. Dillon 2016, p. 32. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
82. Dillon 2016, p. 33. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
83. Dunn 2016, p. 107.
84. Dunn 2016, pp. 107–108.
85. *Bible* 1 Corinthians 8:10
86. Dunn 2016, p. 108.
87. Dunn 2016, p. 109.
88. Dunn 2016, pp. 109–110.
89. Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, *The Jesus Mysteries,* 1999
90. Ehrman, Bart D. (2012). *Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth. New York: HarperCollins. pp. 25–30. ISBN 978-0-06-220644-2*
91. Dunn 2016, p. 111.
92. Magris 2005, pp. 3517–3519.
93. Stephan A. Hoeller, *On the Trail of the Winged God. Hermes and Hermeticism Throughout the Ages Archived 2009-11-26 at the Wayback Machine*
94. Elaine Pagels, *The Johannine Gospel* in Gnostic Exegesis. Heracleon's Commentary on John. Nashville: SBL Monograph Series 17, 1973
95. Quispel 2005, p. 3510.
96. Magris 2005, p. 3517.
97. Temporini, Vogt & Haase 1983.
98. Turner 2001, p. 257.
99. Broek 2013, p. 28. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBroek2013 (help)
100. Smith 2004.
101. Turner 2001, pp. 257–258.
102. Turner 2001, p. 258.
103. Turner 2001, p. 259.
104. Turner 2001, pp. 259–260.
105. Turner 2001, p. 260.
106. Magris 2005, p. 3515.
107. Hippolytus, *Philosophumena, iv. 51, vi. 20.*
108. Eusebius of Caesarea, *Ecclesiastical History* Book iv. Chapter vii.
109. *Adversus Valentinianos* 4.
110. Green 1985, 244
111. Markschies, *Gnosis: An Introduction*, 94.
112. Pagels, Elaine (1978). The Gnostic Gospels.
113. Schoedel, William (1980). *"Gnostic Monism and the Gospel of Truth" in* The Rediscovery of Gnosticism, Vol.1: The School of Valentinus*, (ed.) Bentley Layton*. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
114. "Valentinian Monism". The Gnostic Society Library. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
115. Bentley Layton, The Gnostic Scriptures (SCM Press, London, 1987)
116. Simone Petrement, *A Separate God*
117. Jon Ma. Asgeirsson, April D. DeConick and Risto Uro (editors), *Thomasine Traditions in Antiquity. The Social and Cultural World of the Gospel of Thomas, Brill.*
118. King 2005, p. 162.
119. Magris 2005, p. 3518.
120. Perkins & 11987, p. 3530.
121. "Adolf Von Harnack: Marcion".
122. Adolf Von Harnack (2007) *Marcion: The Gospel of the Alien God, translated by John E. Steely, Lyle D. Bierma, Wipf & Stock Publishers ISBN 978-1-55635-703-9*
123. González, Justo L.(1970). *A History of Christian Thought, Vol. I*. Abingdon. pp. 132–133
124. Van Den Broek, Roelof (2006). *Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism*. Boston: Brill. p. 194. ISBN 978-90-04-15231-1.
125. Zaehner, Richard Charles (1961). *The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism*. New York: Putnam. ISBN 978-1-84212-165-8.
126. "Dualism Religion – Definition – Dualistic Cosmology – Christianity". 2018-03-16.
127. Kurt Rudolph, *Gnosis: The Nature & Structure of Gnosticism* (Koehler and Amelang, Leipzig, 1977)
128. Cross, Frank L.; Livingstone, Elizabeth, eds. (2005). "Platonism". *The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church*. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
129. TeSelle, Eugene (1970). *Augustine the Theologian. London. pp. 347–349. ISBN 978-0-223-97728-0.* March 2002 edition: ISBN 1-57910-918-7.
130. Iraqi minority group needs U.S. attention Archived 2007-10-25 at the Wayback Machine, Kai Thaler, *Yale Daily News*, March 9, 2007.
131. Deutsch, Nathaniel. (2003) Mandaean Literature. In *The Gnostic Bible* (pp. 527–561). New Seeds Books
132. Winston E. Waugh *Sufism* Xulon Press 2005 ISBN 978-1-597-81703-5 p. 17
133. Tilman Nagel *Geschichte der islamischen Theologie: von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart* C.H. Beck 1994 ISBN 978-3-406-37981-9 p. 222
134. Andrew Philip *Smith The Secret History of the Gnostics: Their Scriptures, Beliefs and Traditions* Duncan Baird Publishers 2015 ISBN 978-1-780-28883-3
135. Tilman Nagel *Geschichte der islamischen Theologie: von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart* C.H. Beck 1994 ISBN 978-3-406-37981-9 p. 215
136. Tilman Nagel *Geschichte der islamischen Theologie: von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart* C.H. Beck 1994 ISBN 978-3-406-37981-9 p. 216
137. Peter J. Awn *Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblis in Sufi Psychology* Brill 1983 ISBN 978-90-04-06906-0
138. Willis Barnstone, Marvin Meyer *The Gnostic Bible: Revised and Expanded Edition* Shambhala Publications 2009 ISBN 978-0-834-82414-0 p. 803
139. Willis Barnstone, Marvin Meyer *The Gnostic Bible: Revised and Expanded Edition* Shambhala Publications 2009 ISBN 978-0-834-82414-0 p. 707
140. Corbin *Cyclical Time & Ismaili Gnosis* Routledge 2013 ISBN 978-1-136-13754-9 p. 154
141. Max Gorman *Stairway to the Stars: Sufism, Gurdjieff and the Inner Tradition of Mankind* Karnac Books 2010 ISBN 978-1-904-65832-0 p. 51
142. Tobias Churton *Gnostic Philosophy: From Ancient Persia to Modern Times* Simon and Schuster 2005 ISBN 978-1-594-77767-7
143. Virani, Shafique. "Symphony of Gnosis: A Self-Definition of the Ismaili Ginan Literature". *Reason and Inspiration in Islam: Theology, Philosophy and Mysticism in Muslim Thought*.
144. Scholem, Gershom *Origins of the Kabbalah*, 1962.
145. Dan, Joseph *Kabbalah: a Very Short Introduction*, Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 25.
146. Dan, Joseph *Kabbalah: a Very Short Introduction*, Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 24.
147. Scholem, Gershom. *Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah Mysticism, and the Talmudic Tradition*, 1965.
148. Lessons from the Kabbalah and Jewish history By Josef Blaha, p. 183
149. Jewish mysticism: an introduction By J. H. Laenen, p. 130
150. Rudolph, Kurt (2001). "Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism". p. 343.
151. Taussig, Hal (2013). *A New New Testament: A Reinvented Bible for the Twenty-first Century Combining Traditional and Newly Discovered Texts*. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 532. ISBN 978-0-547-79210-1.
152. Clarke, Peter B., ed. (2004). *Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements*. p. 236. ISBN 978-1-134-49969-4.
153. Schopenhauer, *The World as Will and Representation, Vol. II, Ch. XLVIII*
154. Smith, Richard. "The Modern Relevance of Gnosticism" in The Nag Hammadi Library, 1990 ISBN 0-06-066935-7
155. Cf. l'Eglise du Plérôme
156. Green, Celia (1981, 2006). *Advice to Clever Children*. Oxford: Oxford Forum. xxxv–xxxvii.
157. Michael Weber. Contact Made Vision: The Apocryphal Whitehead Pub. in Michel Weber and William Desmond, Jr. (eds.), *Handbook of Whiteheadian Process Thought*, Frankfurt / Lancaster, Ontos Verlag, Process Thought X1 & X2, 2008, I, pp. 573–599.
158. Markschies, *Gnosis*, 37
159. Marvin Meyer and James M. Robinson, *The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition*. HarperOne, 2007. pp. 2–3. ISBN 0-06-052378-6
160. James Robinson, introduction to *The Nag Hammadi Library in English*.
161. Layton, *The Gnostic Scriptures*, xviii
162. Lahe 2006, p. 221.
163. Albrile 2005, pp. 3533–3534.
164. Broek 1996, p. vii.
165. Albrile 2005, p. 3535.
166. Quispel 2004, p. 8.
167. Dillon 2016, p. 24. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
168. Dillon 2016, p. 25. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
169. Dillon 2016, p. 26. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
170. Dillon 2016, p. 27. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
171. Dillon 2016, p. 28. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
172. Dillon 2016, pp. 27–28. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
173. Markschies 2000, p. 13.
174. Markschies 2003, pp. 14–15.
175. Quispel 2005, p. 3511.
176. Freke & Gandy 2005.
177. Williams 1999.
178. "Fall 2014 Christianity Seminar Report on Gnosticism". *westar institute*. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
179. Dillon 2016, pp. 28–29. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDillon2016 (help)
180. Conze 1975, p. 165.

Sources

Printed sources

* Aland, Barbara (1978). *Festschrift für Hans Jonas*. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN 978-3-525-58111-7.
* Albrile, Ezio (2005), "Gnosticism: History of Study", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), *MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religion*, MacMillan
* Bauer, Walter (1979), *Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity*, Fortress, ISBN 978-0-8006-1363-1
* Brakke, David (2010), *The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity*, Harvard University Press, ASIN B004Z14APQ
* Broek, Roelof van den (1996), *Studies in Gnosticism and Alexandrian Christianity*
* Broek, Roelof van den (2013), *Gnostic Religion in Antiquity*, Cambridge University Press
* Burstein, Dan (2006). *Secrets of Mary Magdalene*. CDS Books. ISBN 978-1-59315-205-5.
* Cohen, Arthur A.; Mendes-Flohr, Paul (2010), *20th Century Jewish Religious Thought*
* Conze, Edward (1967), "Buddhism and Gnosis", in Bianchi, U. (ed.), *Origins of Gnosticism: Colloquium of Messina, 13–18 April 1966*
* Conze, Edward (1975), "Buddhist prajna and Greek Sophia", *Religion*, **5** (2): 160–167, doi:10.1016/0048-721X(75)90017-2
* Dillon, Matthew J. (2016), "Gnosticism Theorized: Major Trends and Approaches to the Study of Gnosticism", in DeConick, April D. (ed.), *Religion: Secret Religion*, MacMillan Reference US
* Dunderberg, Ismo (2008), *Beyond gnosticism: myth, lifestyle, and society in the school of Valentinus*, Columbia University Press
* Dunn, James D.G. (2016), ""The Apostle of the Heretics": Paul, Valentinus, and Marcion", in Porter, Stanley E.; Yoon, David (eds.), *Paul and Gnosis*, Brill, pp. 105–118, doi:10.1163/9789004316690\_008, ISBN 978-90-04-31669-0
* Ehrman, Bart D. (2003), *Lost Christianities*, Oxford University Press
* Filoramo, Giovanni (1990). *A History of Gnosticism*. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-18707-3.
* Freke, Timothy; Gandy, Peter (2002), *Jesus and the Lost Goddess: The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians*, Three Rivers Press, ISBN 978-0-00-710071-2
* Freke, Timothy; Gandy, Peter, *De mysterieuze Jezus. Was Jezus oorspronkelijk een heidense god?*, Uitgeverij Synthese
* Green, Henry (1985). *Economic and Social Origins of Gnosticism*. Scholars Press. ISBN 978-0-89130-843-0.
* Haardt, Robert (1967). *Die Gnosis: Wesen und Zeugnisse*. Otto-Müller-Verlag, Salzburg. pp. 352 pages., translated as Haardt, Robert (1971). *Gnosis: Character and Testimony. Leiden: Brill.*
* Halsall, Guy (2008), *Barbarian migrations and the Roman West*, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-43491-1
* Hoeller, Stephan A. (2002). *Gnosticism – New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing*. Wheaton: Quest. pp. 257 pages. ISBN 978-0-8356-0816-9.
* Huidekoper, Frederic (1891), *Judaism at Rome: BC 76 to AD 140*, D. G. Francis
* Jonas, Hans (1993). *Gnosis und spätantiker Geist vol. 2:1–2, Von der Mythologie zur mystischen Philosophie*. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN 978-3-525-53841-8.
* King, Charles William (1887). *The Gnostics and Their Remains.*
* King, Karen L. (2003), *What is Gnosticism?*, Harvard University Press, pp. 343 pages, ISBN 978-0-674-01071-0
* Klimkeit, Hans-Joachim (1993). *Gnosis on the Silk Road: Gnostic Texts from Central Asia*. Harper, San Francisco. ISBN 978-0-06-064586-1.
* Kosack, Wolfgang: *Geschichte der Gnosis in Antike, Urchristentum und Islam.* Verlag Christoph Brunner, Basel 2014. ISBN 978-3-906206-06-6
* Lahe, Jaan (2006), "IST DIE GNOSIS AUS DEM CHRISTENTUM ABLEITBAR? EINE KRITISCHE AUSEINANDERSETZUNG MIT EINEM URSPRUNGSMODELL DER GNOSIS", *Trames*, 10 (60/55) (3): 220–231
* Layton, Bentley (1995). "Prolegomena to the study of ancient gnosticism". In L. Michael White; O. Larry Yarbrough (eds.). *The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honor of Wayne A. Meeks*. Fortress Press, Minneapolis. ISBN 978-0-8006-2585-6.
* Layton, Bentley, ed. (1981). *The Rediscovery of Gnosticism: Sethian Gnosticism*. E.J. Brill.
* Magris, Aldo (2005). "Gnosticism: Gnosticism from its origins to the Middle Ages (further considerations)". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). *Macmillan Encyclopedia of Religion* (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Inc. pp. 3515–3516. ISBN 978-0028657332. OCLC 56057973.
* Markschies, Christoph (2000). *Gnosis: An Introduction*. Translated by John Bowden. T & T Clark. pp. 145 pages. ISBN 978-0-567-08945-8.
* Markschies, Christolph (2003), *Gnosis: An Introduction*, T.& T.Clark Ltd.
* McVey, Kathleen (1981), "Gnosticism, Feminism, and Elaine Pagels", *The Princeton Theological Seminary,* **37** (4): 498–501, doi:10.1177/004057368103700411
* Mins, Denis (1994). *Irenaeus*. Geoffrey Chapman.
* Pagels, Elaine (1975), *The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters, Trinity Press International, ISBN 978-1-56338-039-6*
* Pagels, Elaine (1979), *The Gnostic Gospels*, New York: Vintage Books, pp. 182 pages, ISBN 978-0-679-72453-7
* Pagels, Elaine (1989). *The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis*. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press. pp. 128 pages. ISBN 978-1-55540-334-8.
* Pearson, Birger Albert (2004), *Gnosticism and Christianity in Roman and Coptic Egypt*
* Petrement, Simone (1990), *A Separate God: The Origins and Teachings of Gnosticsim*, Harper and Row ISBN 0-06-066421-5
* Perkins, Pheme (2005), "Gnosticism: Gnosticism as a Christian heresy", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), *MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religion*, MacMillan
* Quispel, Gilles (2004), "Voorwoord", in Pagels, Elaine (ed.), *De Gnostische Evangelien*, Servire
* Quispel, Gilles (2005), "Gnosticism: Gnosticism from its origins to the Middle Ages [first edition]", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), *MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religion*, MacMillan
* Rousseau, A.; Doutreleau, L. (1974), *Saint Irénée de Lyon : Traité contre les hérésies*
* Rudolph, Kurt (1987). *Gnosis: The Nature & Structure of Gnosticism. Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-067018-4.*
* Smith, Carl B. (2004), *No Longer Jews: The Search for Gnostic Origins*, Hendrickson Publishers
* Temporini, Hildegard; Vogt, Joseph; Haase, Wolfgang (1983), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt *(Rise and Decline of the Roman World) Vl 21/1 Volume 2; Volume 21*, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-008845-8
* Tuckett, Christopher M. (1986). *Nag Hammadi and the Gospel Tradition: Synoptic Tradition in the Nag Hammadi Library*. T & T Clark. ISBN 978-0-567-09364-6. (206 pages)
* Turner, John (1986), "Sethian Gnosticism: A Literary History", *Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism and Early Christianity*, archived from the original on 2012-12-11
* Walker, Benjamin (1990). *Gnosticism: Its History and Influence*. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-1-85274-057-3.
* Williams, Michael (1996), *Rethinking Gnosticism: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category*, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-01127-1
* Yamauchi, Edwin M. (1983). *Pre-Christian Gnosticism : A Survey of the Proposed Evidences*. ISBN 978-0-8010-9919-9. (278 pages)
* Yamauchi, Edwin M., "Pre-Christian Gnosticism in the Nag Hammadi Texts?", in *Church History* vol. 48, (1979), pp. 129–141.

Web-sources

1. perseus.tufts.edu, LSJ entry
2. perseus.tufts.edu, *Gbostikos*
3. "National Book Awards – 1980". National Book Foundation. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
4. Sheahen, Laura (June 2003). "Matthew, Mark, Luke and... Thomas?: What would Christianity be like if gnostic texts had made it into the Bible?". *Beliefnet. Retrieved June 7, 2009.*

Further reading

Primary sources

* Barnstone, Willis (1984). *The Other Bible: Gnostic Scriptures, Jewish Pseudepigrapha, Christian Apocyrypha, Kabbalah, Dead Sea Scrolls*. San Francisco: Harper & Row. p. 771. ISBN 978-0-06-081598-1.
* Barnstone, Willis; Meyer, Marvin (2003). *The Gnostic Bible. Shambhala Books. pp. 880. ISBN 978-1-57062-242-7.*
* Barnstone, Willis; Meyer, Marvin (2010). *Essential Gnostic Scriptures*. Shambhala Books. p. 271. ISBN 978-1-59030-925-4.
* Layton, Bentley (1987). *The Gnostic Scriptures*. SCM Press. pp. 526 pages. ISBN 978-0-334-02022-6.
* Plotinus (1989). *The Enneads.* **1**. Translated by A.H. Armstrong. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-99484-3.
* Robinson, James (1978). *The Nag Hammadi Library in English*. San Francisco: Harper & Row. pp. 549 pages. ISBN 978-0-06-066934-8.

General

* Dillon, Matthew J. (2016), "Gnosticism Theorized: Major Trends and Approaches to the Study of Gnosticism", in DeConick, April D. (ed.), *Religion: Secret Religion*, MacMillan Reference US
* King, Karen L. (2005), *What is Gnosticism?*, Harvard University Press
* Broek, Roelof van den (2013), *Gnostic Religion in Antiquity*, Cambridge University Press

Sethians

* Turner, John D. (2001), "Chapter Seven: The History of the Sethian Movement", *Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition*, Presses Université Laval