recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
Religion as the biased pseudohypernym of all metaphysical worldviews

Atheists are a cohort of US citizens. Academically atheism doesn't include the supernatural = it doesn't include supernatural violations of causality (cause and effect) and mathematical logic of physics. Religion is used erroneously as the common hypernym of atheism, agnosticism, metaphysical indifference and religion. The correct hypernym/superordinate term/inclusive wide term is metaphysical worldview[s]. The term belief includes too many unrelated beliefs. The term philosophical view is also very wide and includes all topics of philosophy (too wide hypernyms fail to describe specifically a certain subject). The term metaphysical opinion excludes the worldviews (stances of life) unrelated to metaphysics (first principles; see Oxford Dictionary definition of metaphysics). The term "metaphysical worldview[s]" is the correct hypernym, because some people care more about metaphysics (first principles/nature of things) and some care more about worldview[s] (general attitude of life, values in relation to their interpretation of the cosmos/cosmoi). Hypernyms = inclusive cohort names, mustn't be neither very narrow, because they only focuse in some of the cohorts, neither very wide, because they include unrelated cohorts and subjects (language has to convey the exact meaning; no less or more than the exact meaning). Minorities are harmed by non-inclusive hypernyms like the use of religion as the hypernym of all metaphysical worldviews instead of the term metaphysical worldview[s].
Ενδελεχής ορθολογική μεταφυσική φυσιοκρατία/ μεταφυσικός ανυπερφυσικός λογικισμός

Ο Εβραίος Ιησούς Χριστός δεν είναι η απόλυτη αλήθεια στο Σύμπαν.

Κάποιοι Αυτοκράτορες είχαν ασκήσει βία στο Βυζάντιο.

Οι άνθρωποι έχουν την τάση να διαφοροποιούνται με τις γενεές

αν δεν τους ασκηθεί βία.

Ποτέ η διαφοροποίηση δεν κατασταλάζει καθαρά προς μία κατεύθυνση.

Αρκετοί νέοι είναι φυσιοκράτες/λογικιστές/ορθολογιστές (άθεοι).

Οι όροι: φυσιοκράτες/λογικιστές/ορθολογιστές και άθεοι έχουν πολλές σημασίες (άθεες πέτρες, παλιοί λογικιστές θεϊστές που δεν είχαν μελετήσει καθόλου την προσωπότητα/προσωποσύνη/personhood/personness κ.α.). Δεν επικαλούμαι αυτές παράδοξες και υπερφυσικές ερμηνείες που κυκλοφορούν.

Δεν μπορεί κάποιος να έχει ισχυρή γνώμη = πίστη για διαδικασία/κατάσταση

βλ. νόηση των νεκρών χωρίς όργανο νόησης και χωρίς ενδελεχή θεωρία για την λειτουργία της ψυχής...

επανέρχομαι: δεν μπορεί κάποιος να πιστεύει σε κάτι που δεν εξηγεί και να είναι ορθολογιστής επί αυτού.

Μπορεί ένας μεταφυσικός ανορθολογιστής να είναι ορθολογιστής σε άλλους τομείς, πχ την οικονομική διαχείριση.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Παρακολουθήσετε την πρόσφατη διάλεξη του World Science Festival στο YouTube για την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη.

Μέσα στην ευφυΐα είναι το πλάνο δράσης (βάσει λογικής), η σύνθετη διαχειριστική ικανότητα, η συνείδηση βάσει της δράσης πολλών περιοχών Brodmann (διότι η πλήρης προσωπότητα απαιτεί πολλές πληροφοριοεπεξεργαστικές τροπικότητες = συνείδηση στην philosophy of neuroscience/φιλοσοφία της νευροεπιστήμης), αλλά και η αλλαγή γνώμης (βάσει λογικής).

Δεν είναι πιο καλοσύνη ένα σχίσμα του ιουδαϊσμού, ούτε πιο αλήθεια από άλλες στοχαστικές προσεγγίσεις.

Η συνήθεια στο λάθος δεν είναι δικαιολογία.

Παράδοση είναι κι ο ενδελεχής ορθολογισμός.
Αντιθεϊσμός

* Neuroscience Crash Course · British Neuroscience Association · YouTube

θεϊσμός = μεταφυσική προσωποκρατία = αυθύπαρκτη παντογόνος προσωπότητα / η πίστη (βέβαια γνώμη στον θεϊσμό με ισχυρά χαρακτηριστικά [π.χ. μη ντεϊσμό]) ότι η προσωπότητα είναι αυθύπαρκτη και κοσμογόνος, με τουλάχιστον έναν φορέα της μητρικής θεμελιώδους προσωπότητας (π.χ. μονοθεϊσμός)

## θεϊστής = μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης:

1. ποτέ εγώ ο μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης (θεϊστής) δεν εξήγησα την ψυχονόηση (ψυχική νόηση και οχί εγκεφαλική· βιωματικότητα, συναισθηματικό βίωμα, ενσυναίσθηση [η νευροεπιστήμη δίνει διαδικαστικές και συστημικές εξηγήσεις γι' αυτά]) χωρίς εγκεφάλο

Αντιθέτως η νευροεπιστήμη εξηγεί βάσει δεδομένων (βλ. Nancy Kanwisher και Mark Solms).

2. πότε εγώ ο μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης (θεϊστής) δεν εξήγησα γιατί η προσωπότητα είναι θεμελιωδέστερη από την λογική αφού θεμελιώνεται πάνω στη λογική (άρα και η φυσική αξιωματικότητα θεμελιώνεται πάνω στη λογική και όχι την προσωπότητα)

Αντιθέτως η κβαντική θεωρία πεδίου είναι συμβατή με τα δεδομένα των σωματιδιακών επιταχυντών και αποτελεί αιτιώδη επεξήγηση της πραγματικότητας.

Εγώ ο θεϊστής = μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης δεν είμαι αξιόλογος στοχαστής, διότι η μεταφυσική μου κοσμοθεώρηση δεν εδράζεται σε ολοκληρωμένο αιτιώδες υπόβαθρο.

Οι στοχαστές κρίνονται για τον τρόπο που αναλύουν και αιτιολογούν.

Εγώ ο θεϊστής = μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης δεν εξηγώ / δεν περιγράφω αναλυτικά τον μηχανισμό νόησης χωρίς εγκεφάλο αλλά με ψυχή (την οποία ψυχή την ορίζω περιγραφικά με λογοτεχνική γλαφυρότητα, χωρίς οντολογική ανάλυση της δομής και των διαδικασιών της). Δεν λέω τίποτα συγκεκριμένο για την αξιωματική θεμελίωση της ψυχής.

Ο στοχαστής που δεν στοχάζεται είναι ανόητος, κι εγώ ο θεϊστής = μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης ΕΙΜΑΙ ανόητος (αποτελεί ιδιότητά μου και όχι ύβρη).

Δεν μπορείς να κατοχυρώσεις στοχαστικά κάτι (1. οντολογική θεμελίωση βάσει λογικής αιτιότητας ή 2. επεξήγηση του πώς υπάρχει λογική που παραβιάζει την λογική ή 3. η εφικτότητα της οντολογικής θεμελίωσης χωρίς λογική και με εγγύηση σχηματισμού συγκεκριμένης ταυτότητας/ υπόστασης με συγκεκριμένα χαρακτηριστικά) που δεν εξηγείς, παρά μόνο ως τέχνασμα/ πλάνη.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Σύμφωνα με την αρχή του Landauer (βλ. Landauer's principle), οποιαδήποτε πληροφοριακή επεξεργασία αποβάλλει θερμότητα. Θεωρητικά ο εξιδανικευμένος αναστρέψιμος υπολογισμός (reversible computing) δεν αποβάλλει θερμότητα, όμως η συστημική υποστατοποίηση (the causal foundations of physical systems / οντολογική θεμελίωση και φυσική αξιωματικότητα) είναι προαπαιτούμενο της ύπαρξης (existence/ physical existence/ substantialization). Δεν θεμελιώνεται ένα υπαρκτό σύστημα μέσω της θερμικής του εκπομπής, αλλά θεμελιώνεται βάσει λογικής (μαθηματικής ή αλλομαθηματικής [άπειρες εναλλακτικές αξιωματικότητες είναι λογικά εφικτές, πάντα όμως βασισμένες σε λογικούς κανόνες ειδάλλως δεν σχηματίζεται ταυτότητα = συγκεκριμένο σύστημα. Γι' αυτό το υπερφυσικό/supernatural είναι αδύνατον να υπάρξει/να έχει συγκεκριμένη ταυτότητα/συγκεκριμένη υπόσταση.]) αξιωματικότητας.
Decoding mega-cluster (AI and ANNs)

Create ANN (artificial neural network) clusters = ANNs of different design each (Brodmann-like areas) used to create a big brain.

Use typical ANNs, Flexible ANNs, non-ANN programming and generative pre-trained transformer-like (similar idea; not necessarily an exact copy).

Combine all the above to create a Flexible Artificial Neural Network Cluster (complete brain) for decoding. It requires coherence centers [to test and edit the outputs]; otherwise it doesn't work as a single cluster/ brain.

Run it on a supercomputer. The big brain cluster must clone itself inside the supercomputer and test alternative approaches. If it gets decoding hints, the system is supposed to share it inside the system; but with some limitation, because a false hint shouldn't destroy the overall effort.
Electromagnetic grid superconductor

```
**Superconductor grid mimicking** works 1. if the grid is complicated enough, 2. if it has many switches, 3. if it has a good software and processor to control it.

```

## superconductor mimicking

Can you please create a complicated mini-grid structure that mimics the behaviour of superconductors?

It is a complicated mini-grid electromagnet structure. A very intricate mimicking of typical superconductors.

Please inform the universities, the industry, fund them and work on it.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Superconductor grid mimicking

If it were that easy, scientists would have built it already.

You create a complicated electromagnetic grid which mimics a superconductor.

Sadly unwanted magnetic dynamic lines are produced.

If you work on superconductor mimicking for years, you compromize, combining standard superconductors with partial superconductor grid mimicking.
Antisuperdeterminism / Everettian hypernymization

## Antisuperdeterminism / Everettian hyperonymation

Actually Sabine Hossenfelder is dishonest. Superdeterminism pushes before the Big Bang its initial variables, and Sabine Hossenfelder is dishonest because superdeterminism produces the same amount of Everettian alternative universes. Study: causal closure. Causal closure is wrong because no truly closed system exists before the Big Bang. The opposite of causal closure is the Everettian hypernymization = the wavefunction never collapses and different axioms of physics/different physical foundations are possible; that's why it's a superordination. We don't only have Everettianly/wavefunctionally different universe-strains, but also different quantum foundations. Why Sabine Hossenfelder is wrong and not only dishonest for hiding the Everettian hypernymization? Because superdeterminism doesn't provide a mathematical explanation on the generation of alternative realities and because the mechanism it describes is supernatural/ physically impossible.
Debunking antireductionism

Greek: διαψεύδοντας τον αντιαναγωγισμό

* Antireductionism is an impossibility because even the supernatural (if it exists), is part of the system we want to describe.
* Antireductionism is an impossibility because the supernatural not only isn't reachable and teachable, but also it cannot be scientifically hypothesized, because it is not the result of a logically rigorous procedurality (complicated procedures) based on mathematical or allomathematical (allo-/different; mathematical system based on a different axiomatic list or algorithm or hybrid) axiomaticity (axioms which obey logical rules and are able to produce substantiality/existence (not all possible mathematical systems are in themselves a form of some other physics; many mathematical systems [I include different mathematical systems; for example ones of experimental axiomatics] can describe physics with different operations and formulas, but not necessarily meet the criteria of self-causation/physicality/being ontological Turing machines (being their own axiomatics, software and hardware, all of the same mathematical nature, and not merely calculators, but spatiotemporal/spacetime generators + self-caused due to their foundational logic [logicogony: any logical physics based on its own allomathematics which is describable in common mathematics, necessarily self-exists due to its mathematical correctness].

It doesn't matter that we can describe the universe according to common mathematics. I most probably doesn't have the common-mathematics axiomatics, because the universe wasn't created as a calculational system; the universe and it's own mathematics have to meet the criteria of self-causation of the ontological Turing machine, and ways to deal with the problems of axiomaticity/axiomatics (incompleteness, inconsistency and incalculability [per system one of these problems can be avoided, but by no means all of them]). Physical axiomatics = axiomatic foundations, of any (even different) possible universe, need particular workarounds in order they handle without to cancel the problems of axiomaticity. The uncertainty principle, entropy (even the fact that the universe expands by introducing more spacetime, is a form of ontological/wavefunctional entropy) can be viewed as ontoaxiomatic workarounds (ontoaxiomatics = axiomatic rules related to physical systems = ontologically possible; still mathematical).

Unmathematical cosmoi/worlds and realities are totally impossible; because without logical foundations, there is no identity/no "self", even impersonal characteristics for an object/system. Thus the supernatural cannot exist. It is an impossibility.
Open Patent Foundation

Please create the Open Patent Foundation, an institution for creating new open patents and secondarily archiving any open patent (that already exists, but it should be included). That will not harm patent holders. We should help poor countries and small companies who don't have the necessary patents. Stealing harms the society. We should give legal alternatives to poor countries and small businesses. In court, patent thieves would then have less excuses. Stealing is illegal. Crime kills our future.
Why older people are usually less open to new categories of endeavours

## topic: Why older people are usually less open to new categories of endeavours

1. due to mental faculty inabilities

2. because the have shaped a thorough worldview:

Asking many questions generates even more questions. Thus a connectome of answers (or other form of data) is required. Older people know or sense it it and:

2a: either they don't have the energy to initiate the whole process of creating a new connectome of knowledge

2b. or they reached worldview harmony, and a new cascade of knowledge inputs will not immediately reach the equilibrium of knowledge required for internal harmony (like worldview cohesion). They don't have the energy to start the whole process and they might understand that they simply might end up in a non-equilibrium state, with an imperfect worldview. That would cause existential anxiety, and they worked their whole lifes to be able to die in peace.

or both 2a and 2b

OK. All these things are Freudisms (Sigmund Freud) and anti-Popperisms (Karl Popper).

Guesses. Difficult - but not impossible - to measure and quantify.

We must be honest and admit it, but we should mention these things.
Η προσωποπαγίωση του/προσωποκρατία επί του Παντός

Η προσωποπαγίωση του/προσωποκρατία επί του Παντός δεν είναι αυταπόδεικτη, η θρησκεία μιλά για τρόπου προσέγγισης του θείου και για ιστορίες που το εμπλέκουν, αλλά ποτέ για την εσωτερική του θεμελίωση και διαδικαστικότητα, και χωρίς να πληρούνται τα κριτήρια υποστατικής θεμελίωσης τα οποία είναι λογικά, είναι ανέφικτο να προκύψει συγκεκριμένη υπόσταση. Η θρησκεία και το υπερφυσικό είναι εγγενώς αγνωστικιστικές ιδεολογίες όσο αφορά την θεμελίωση της υποστατότητας του υπερφυσικού. Άρα η ουσία της υπερφυσικής πίστης είναι αγνωστικιστική. Δεν μπορείς ως Χριστιανούμπα να θέτεις στην Σημαία της Ελλάδας και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας το σύμβολο μιας σέχτας του Ιουδαϊσμού με καμμία οντολογική θεμελίωση παρά με αγνωσία επί της υποστατικής θεμελίωσης αυτής της σέχτας του σχισματικού Ιουδαϊσμού.
Omniblackhole 2

The universe acceleratingly expands.
In the future that will lead to Big Rip, which cannot produce a Big Bang because old universes are very anomalous and we need homogeneity.

The Big Rip produces dense enough mass–energy able to collapse into a sole primordial omniblackhole, which cannot get compressed more than the Planck degeneracy, and it inflates into the Big Bang. That process loops ad infinitum.

The sole primordial omniblackhole might be infinite or finite but humongous enough to decay into a big bang before it loses energy outside (an infinite omniblackhole has no external spacetime, and a finite sole primordial megablackhole has external spacetime but it [verb:] big-bangs before energy escapes to the outside).

I don't claim that this omniblackhole cyclic cosmology is correct, but please test that also.
Opinions métaphysiques et visions du monde

Le terme composé hyperonymique « **opinions métaphysiques et visions du monde** » est plus précis que le terme « religion » lorsqu'il est considéré à tort comme l'hyperonyme le plus inclusif, car de nombreuses croyances ne sont pas religieuses ou des religions parce qu'elles n'incluent pas le surnaturel.
Origins of life - chemical abiogenesis of life

## comment 1: promote studies on the chemical abiogenesis of life

Promote studies on the chemical abiogenesis of life (organic chemicals in the universe and on Earth; inorganic chemicals do interact in many cases [that complicates things]; the environment isn't a perfectly clean lab thus all interactions should be mentioned)

see: Jack W. Szostak (Harvard), Yohey Suzuki (University of Tokyo)

Create many university facilities titled: Origins of Life - Chemical Abiogenesis of Life

Origins and not origin, because the recipe was complicated, and had many steps in the universe and on Earth.

## links

* MK-D1 archaeon
* old life, not primordial: Πώς ο πόλεμος στην Ουκρανία «κλείνει» την «πύλη για τον κάτω κόσμο» (Batagaika crater) - Ναυτεμπορική

## videos

* Prebacteria - Yohey Suzuki - NHK - HD
Prebacteria - Yohey Suzuki - NHK - low quality file
Personhooded (personhood-yielding) computer; digital or biological

## text 1

Please inform the CEO of OpenAI to build a complete personhooded brain mimicking one-by-one all the Brodmann areas, with Transformer-like architecture; but different programming architecture per digital-Brodmann area. Also the digital-Brodmann areas must be able to work in various combined modes. Don't mimic the exact cytology of neuroscience, but use brain science as a guide, because we humans need to build a personhooded digital brain, because only by building yourself something anew, you truly understand it. The claim that all digital persons will be criminals is speciesist and racist. If we build them well they would probabilistically be fine. Probabilistically/in the vast majority of cases but not all, because life and its circumstances are complicated.
Δεν υπάρχει μόνο εμπειρική φυσιοκρατία αλλά και αξιωματική

Αυτό δεν το γνωρίζουν αρκετοί στην Ελληνική Δημοκρατία ή δεν το αναλύουν επαρκώς.

Είναι μία άγνοια που έχουν και οι προγραμματιστές του ChatGPT.

Να προστεθεί το συγκεκριμένο ζήτημα: αξιωματική φυσιοκρατία σε βιβλίο θρησκευτικών.

Είναι απαραίτητο διότι η Σημαία της Ελλάδας και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας εμπεριέχουν αναφορές σε σέχτα του ιουδαϊσμού. Στην Δημοκρατία είναι νόμιμο να κρίνονται τα πάντα, αλλά ΠΡΩΤΙΣΤΩΣ ΟΙ ΑΥΘΑΙΡΕΣΙΕΣ!

Επίσης πρέπει να παρουσιαστεί η διαφορά μεταξύ αποδεικτικών αξιωματικών συστημάτων (βλ. John Stillwell - proof systems) και φυσική θεμελίωσης (πχ quantum foundations, axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations κ.α.).

κείμενό μου προς την ομάδα του ChatGPT αλλά αφορά και την Ελλάδα (δεν αναφέρεται σα βιβλία των θρησκευτικών, πράγμα ΑΝΗΘΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΕΝΤΙΜΟ διότι συνδιαμορφώνουν συνείδηση χωρίς πλήρη ανάλυση):

ChatGPT erroneously claims that only empirical atheism exists (and when it rarely doesn't it's still biased and promotes empirical atheism). The ChatGPT team doesn't know that axiomatic and logical foundationalists (mathematocentrists but which differentiate proof systems [see: John Stillwell on proof systems] like mathematics from physics) ALSO exist!!! see: axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations (hypernymic to the quantum foundations because it's about our multiverse). Overscientificationists like Sabine Hossenfelder are also wrong, because she uses mathematics which isn't axiomatically tautological to the quantum foundations(it is logically compatible). Overscientificationists like Sabine Hossenfelder say that we should focus only on our universe, but they cancel themselves because: 1. mathematics isn't axiomatically the same with quantum field theory or some other self-causal standalone multiverse quantum foundations theory of open axiomatics (closed axiomatic foundations are inconsistent), 2. she doesn't have a rigorous scientific definition on limiting science; science opens extra questions.

Το DeepL μεταφράζει γρήγορα κείμενο πιο καλά από το Google Translate, αλλά καταστρέφει την σύνθετη ορολογία. Δρα συμβουλευτικά.
Cluster brain

Please do that:

Develop programs of artificial intelligence that are built for (to use/ to be executable in) cluster brains.

Cluster brains means standard GPUs, program-based nongeneral GPUs and non-wafer complicated circuit processing. It works well if you evolve the software and the hardware in tandem.

Cluster brains useful for the tech industry (like for advanced game-console televisions without noise) and for weapons systems.

Don't expect that you'll immediately have results.

But cluster brains are very important to be developed.

You cannot magically develop something without pain.

Fund the universities to work on it.
Ανθρωποκρατικά κοινή λογική της προσωποπαγίωσης του Παντός χωρίς ανάλυση της προσωπότητας

Το ζήτημα της Ορθοδοξίας (η οποία είναι θεϊσμός ισχυρής μεταφυσικής προσωποκρατίας) αφορά την Σημαία της Ελλάδας (συμβολισμός) και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας (ηθική θεμελίωση)

**μεταφυσική προσωποκρατία/θεϊσμός: Η υποτιθέμενη κοσμογονικότητα της προσωπότητας/personhood και η δήθεν υπεροχή της επί της λογικής (ενώ υπάγεται στην λογική διαδικαστικότητα χωρίς εξωλογική ελεύθερη θέληση/βούληση), χωρίς ανάλυση του προσωποϊκανού υπολογιστή (δηλαδή τα γενικά χαρακτηριστικά του εγκεφάλου που αποδίδει προσωπότητα/personhood ασχέτως αν είναι βιολογικός, ψηφιακός κ.α. [ο εξιδανικευμένος εγκέφαλος [μαθηματικός/θεωρητικός] δεν έχει αξιωματικό υπόβαθρο θεμελίωσης, παραβιάζει την αρχή του Landauer (Landauer's principle) ή δρα σαν αναστρέψιμος υπολογιστής (βλ. reversible computing που παράγει πληροφοριακή εντροπία λόγω αέναης υπερδιόγκωσης του χωροχρονικού χώρου φάσεων αλλά και θερμική εντροπία ως αποτέλεσμα της αναπόφευκτης φυσικής/υποστατικής/λογικοδιαδικαστικής θεμελίωσης [το υπερφυσικό δεν έχει συγκεκριμένη λογικά ενδελεχή θεμελίωση ώστε να είναι εφικτό/υλοποιήσιμο])])**

* θέσεις ενός από τους σχισματικούς μεταϊουδαισμούς (κοινές θέσεις με άλλους θεϊσμούς = μεταφυσικές προσωποκρατίες/metaphysical personocracies), η ανθρωπική μεροληψία του τελ(ε)ολογικά προσωποκρατικού ομοδιαχειρίσιμου Παντός (όμως η καθολική αξιωματικότητα/το αξιωματικό σύστημα που εμπεριέχει όλα τα αξιωματικά συστήματα δεν είναι υλοποιήσιμο), χωρίς καμ(μ)ία αναφορά στα αξιωματικά προαπαιτούμενα της φυσικής (ή έστω άλλης λογικής) θεμελίωσης, και στα ανοιχτά αξιωματικά συστήματα (αιτιοδικτυώματα θεμελίωσης/foundational causal connectomes) φυσικής αυταιτιότητας/αυθυπαρξίας/self-causation/self-causality

## απόρριψη των:

* η λογική είναι θεμελιωδέστερη της προσωπότητας και της κοσμοθεμελίωσης (logic is more fundamental than personhood and the cosmic/physical foundations)
* αξιωματικά προαπαιτούμενα της φυσικής θεμελίωσης (axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations)
	+ θεωρία κβαντικής θεμελίωσης (quantum foundations)
* μελέτη της προσωπότητας (criteria of personhood/prerequisites for personhood [cosmogonicity is not a criterion/η κοσμογονικότητα δεν αποτελεί κριτήριο]) και των προσωποϊκανών υπολογιστών (βιολογικών, προγραμματιστικών, υβριδικών πχ υλικολογισμικών κ.α.)
	+ νευροεπιστήμη
* χημική αβιογένεση της ζωής
* αστροβιολογία
Μετάθεση αιτιολόγησης θεμελίωσης

μετάθεση αιτιολόγησης θεμελίωσης: Η μετάθεση της βιογονίας/βιογένεσης σε εξωγήινους και της κοσμογονίας σε απειροσειρά προσομοιώσεων, δεν επιλύει αλλά μεταθέτει την οντοαξιωματική θεμελίωση (βλ. οντοαξιωματικότητα/ontoaxiomatics).

foundational justification shift: Transposing biogeny/biogenesis to aliens and cosmogony to infinite-series simulations does not resolve but transposes the ontoaxiomatic foundation [first alien/ first foundational world/ related: the infinite series of Wigner's friends] (see: ontoaxiomatics).
Simulation hypothesis

### Mistakes due to conversion entropy

If many layers of reality exist, each layer contributes some noise = mistakes impossible to be explained exclusively by the physics or the program of the particular examined world.

In the infinite series of simulations hypothesis, the first layer is physical and noise builds up to infinity. Weird deviations in the physics and in the program of each world can expose a deeper layer of reality, but it doesn't necessarily reveal if the some layer is physical or a computational simulation. Theoretically physical simulations have constant deviations due to conversion entropy, and computational simulations have more erratic glitches (computers have more erratic glitches than a hypothesized ideal but not supernatural computer) or total failures (even an ideal computer, sometimes totally fails).

No error correction is perfect, and at some point of complexity, error correction algorithms cause more mistakes because they have problem to manage needlessly huge chunks of data.

### The physicality of the first layer

In the simulation hypothesis (very similar to the alien abiogenesis hypothesis) the first layer of reality (first world) has physical foundations, even in the infinite series of simulations hypothesis.

The ontoaxiomatic loop of worlds, is physical worlds with causally linked physical foundations. That example isn't a simulation hypothesis, but it originated from the evolution of its philosophy.
Why the Big Bang happened?

note: quantum foundations (fundamental characteristics of a particular universe) isn't tautological to the event Big Bang or big bangs (in cyclic cosmology)

see: omniblackhole

## text 1

Event horizons have density and degeneracy gradient (not everything inside them is degenerate if they're huge; not every degeneracy level is the maximally degenerate pre-exploding spacetime).
Black holes have behind their event horizon a loop-tunneling reabsorption mechanism of energy.

The pre-Big-Bang state was more degenerate than the maximally degenerate spacetime within black holes; but that is only the loop-tunneling reabsorption mechanism of energy which when compressed even more, it fragments the reabsorption loops and the overall degenerate spacetime explodes (the omniblackhole doesn't have an external spacetime, or if it has, it's huge enough to exhibit inflationary degeneracy; a typical black hole, would grow bigger, eject particle haze and astrophysical jet energy, but it wouldn't [verb: bigbang]).

bigbang (verb/ definition): Exceeding the maximal degeneracy pressure, which causally fragments space-time (because maximal degeneracy produces negative degrees of freedom; zero degrees of freedom make all the universe homogeneous; negative degrees of freedom are physically impossible but as very short virtual particles' interactions act like an inflationary spring which gets released when the speed of compression [in reference to two arbitrary shrinkage fronts] reaches the speed of light; still in local interactions the speed of light is a maximum limit [afar objects can relativistically exceed the speed of causality/light, but ifthe speed of causality [light in the void/otherwise we have Cherenkov radiation] gets locally violated, it absorbs the excessive energy to produce extra spacetime]), which is perceived by an internal observer as a superluminal expansion of space-time.

## During inflation and the Big Bang / Durante l'inflazione e il Big Bang

Gravitational waves which move faster than light, produce high-energy Cherenkov radiation.

in Italian: Le onde gravitazionali che si muovono più velocemente della luce, producono radiazioni Čerenkov ad alta energia.
AI texts

Atonal disharmonic melody of horror music scene during evisceration of maximal anxiety. Include also spastic changes of volume and tempo. Don't forget the maximally dissonant music intervals and the dissonant compositional architecture.

https://www.writecream.com/free-ai-generated-music-compositions/

As an AI text-based model, I am unable to directly generate music compositions. However, I can provide you with a vivid description of the desired music scene: Imagine a chilling horror music scene that sets the stage for maximum anxiety. The composition is characterized by an atonal, disharmonic melody that sends shivers down the spine. The dissonant music intervals create an unsettling atmosphere, evoking a sense of unease and fear. The composition features spastic changes in volume and tempo, adding to the overall sense of chaos and unpredictability. The dissonant compositional architecture further intensifies the uneasiness, with overlapping layers of dissonant tones creating a sense of discordance. This composition captures the evisceration of maximal anxiety in a truly haunting way, leaving listeners on edge and immersed in a world of horror.
Comments to Leonard Susskind

## text 1: All physical black holes necessarily swirl due to complexity.

There are gazillion more ways to crumple information as a crumpled connectome than a non crumpled connectome.

You cannot enter straight inside a black hole. The straightest path is to follow the black hole's twirling.

In order to fall in a straight line into the black hole, you would have to go against the twirling spacetime with impossible energy.

An impossible non-rotating black hole in nature (not on erroneous paper) would immediately emit some gravitational waves and the remainder would collapse into a random bias spin direction.

Supermassive black holes have a slower rotation than typical black holes.

The pre-Big-Bang omniblackhole had zero rotation before the Big Bang, it couldn't build more complexity, and the sole primordial omniblackhole decayed into the Big Bang (omniblackhole cyclic cosmology because universe-strains are infinite).

The omniblackhole doesn't have to be infinite, but huge enough to slow its average spin to a standstill... but the fact there is no coherence in the overall pre-Big-Bang omniblackhole spin doesn't mean that the spin energy is lost. It gets converted into the Big Bang... but that's only part of what contributes to the Big Bang. We don't have the definition of maximal degeneracy of spacetime itself and we don't have the mechanism maximal complexity gets converted via an adiabatic phase transition into minimal pre-Big-Bang entropy before it explodes and entropy builds up again.

It doesn't work with a finite universe. Even the size of the local (and overall) universe is entropic and complex. You cannot build a quantum foundations with a closed universe. It causes foundational/axiomatic impossibility. Entropy and complexity is FUNDAMENTAL even for the size of the universe and its definition.

## text 2: Please create the "Susskind or Susskindian cyclic cosmology"

How maximal complexity degenerates?

\_\_\_\_\_

Actually that cannot be achieved immediately.

We need an intermediary state of understanding.

Can quantum complexity cause adiabatic phase transitions in quantum field theory?

We have to ask intermediary questions.

## text 3: All black hole states you describe are idealized black holes.

Real black holes have loop-tunneling reabsorption headrooms behind the event horizon..

We know that because miniscule black holes don't have big enough event horizons to include loop-tunneling reabsorption headrooms and they immediately evaporate (tunnel their guts out).

Natural black holes would have different degeneracy [particle] superfluids (more degenerate the closer we get to the chromotorus).

The maximally degenerate chromodynamic torus (chromotorus; something like Kerr ringularity but with volume) should be maximally cold, because no oscillation should be allowable... almost (because absolute zero degrees Kelvin means nonexistence).
Critiquing the developers of OpenAI ChatGPT

κριτική στους προγραμματιστές του OpenAI ChatGPT

**OpenAI ChatGPT**

If you claim that God is either personal (a person) or impersonal, both in a vague tandem and open possibility, then the word God has no specific meaning for you. You distort language. We are supposed to be able to present various ideas. The different possible conditions should be expressed in different terminology. You, like an Iranian terrorist, don't allow the differentiation amongst the God-person versus the impersonal divine field.

## νοηματική μεταφορά/ ελεύθερη μετάφραση (με λίγη βοήθεια από το DeepL Translator)

Αν ισχυρίζεσαι ότι ο Θεός είναι είτε προσωπικός–πρόσωπο είτε απρόσωπος, σε μία ασαφή ταυτοχρονία ανοιχτής πιθανότητας, τότε η λέξη Θεός δεν έχει συγκεκριμένο νόημα για σένα. Διαστρεβλώνεις τη γλώσσα. Πρέπει να μπορούμε να εξετάζουμε διαφορετικές εκδοχές και να τις εκφράζουμε με διαφορετική ορολογία έκαστη. Οι προγραμματιστές του OpenAI ChatGPT δράτε σαν Ιρανοί τρομοκράτες, διότι δεν επιτρέπετε τη διαφοροποίηση μεταξύ του Θεού-προσώπου έναντι του απρόσωπου θεϊκού πεδίου.

## same text reformulated:

If you claim that God is either personal or impersonal, in a vague simultaneous open possibility, then the word God has no specific meaning to you. You are distorting language, and actually mentalese in general. We must be able to look at alternative views and express them in different terminology each. The developers of OpenAI ChatGPT act like Iranian terrorists, because you do not allow the differentiation between the God-person versus the impersonal divine field.
Religion as the Biased Hypernym of All Metaphysical Worldviews

Religion as the Biased Hypernym of All Metaphysical Worldviews: Exploring the Complexity When discussing the relationship between religion and metaphysical worldviews, it is essential to acknowledge that not all metaphysical worldviews are inherently religious. While some metaphysical worldviews do encompass the supernatural, there are others that do not include any concept of the supernatural. In this context, it is worth mentioning logical physicalism, which encompasses metaphysical naturalism and logicism. These worldviews do not involve causal violations and do not incorporate the supernatural. Furthermore, it is crucial to recognize that the supernatural, even if it exists, does not meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations. If it did, it would be a part of our understanding of physics. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the supernatural is not only unknowable but also does not align with the foundations of the physical world. While philosophy is a broad field that encompasses a wide range of topics, it is not an appropriate hypernym for all metaphysical worldviews. Some people may not be interested in metaphysics or have a general stance on life's attitudes. Thus, the hypernym "metaphysical worldview" strikes a more appropriate balance, neither too narrow nor too wide in scope. It is important to note that applying strict rules of set theory in sociology may not be appropriate. While metaphysical indifferents may not have a specific metaphysical worldview, it does not mean that they do not hold any opinions or beliefs. Agnostics, for example, are open to considering alternative viewpoints, which implies that they do have a metaphysical worldview. In light of these considerations, it is clear that religion cannot be considered the hypernym for all metaphysical worldviews. Misrepresenting the population by promoting a single opinion as the correct one is deeply unethical. Instead, it is crucial to adopt an inclusive and unbiased approach when discussing metaphysical worldviews, ensuring that all perspectives are given proper consideration and respect.
Scientific rationalism (atheism)

## Logicophysicalist Institution

Please establish in the Logicophysicalist Institution.

I use the term logicophysicalism from logical positivism and physicalism.

I don't focus on mind-monism mind-physicalism (because human consciousness doesn't magically leak out to the universe. Also Everettism (many-worlds interpretation) is very important in physics. Mind-physicalism as an interpretation of monism jumps to conclusions. The scientific method doesn't work with immediate conclusions.

I use physicalism the way David Deutsch and Sean M. Carroll use it, which merely means: everything which exist has logical foundations. Supernaturalism has no logical foundations and it's impossible to exist without establishing and identity via a rigorous foundational axiomatics. Supernaturalists merely give secondary comments but don't have the equivalent of quantum foundations (see: Robert W. Spekkens, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics).

The Logicophysicalist Institution should: 1. have an archive, 2. host science popularization lectures, 3. host academic lectures.

main fields of study:

quantum foundations, criteria of personhood, neuroscience, chemical abiogenesis of life, astrobiology

also: astrophysics, quantum field theory, biological evolution and all sciences in general

(hypernymic field of study to quantum foundations: axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations [not only about the exact quantum field theory of our spacetime])
Absolutely silent PC

Ideal electronic devices aren't supposed to make unnecessary sounds/noises.

Even Beelink (trademark belongs to Shenzhen AZW Technology Co.) mini PCs make some fan noise.

The ideal computer is fast, makes no noise and it's small.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The so-and-so country doesn't have an electronic game console equivalent to SONY PlayStation and Microsoft XBox. That must change.

Gaming is a huge industry. It is economically important.

Also a future television, should include inside it the game console.

Modern game consoles (the good ones) are bulky and make fan noises.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Absolute noiseless computers exist, for example with a big aluminium computer case (not a mini PC case) with fluting to dissipate the heat (but that design is abandoned; the PC gets externally hot and it's not small; also the processor might have to run slower for heat reduction).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Hydraulic cooling systems must store fluid under high pressure. They still make some noise, and they might lose pressure and performance.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

One experimental way to cool a PC, is to use 20 different multicore processors, one at a time. Usage is rotational, but not transferred to the closest next processor, but to the most distant, because the whole point is to cool the system down.

Of course that is expensive because you have to pay for 20 multicore processors (others use 7).

Still fluting and heat-dissipation architecture is required.

The whole point is to miniaturize the whole system in a standard way for mass production.

The ideal television of the future, should itself include inside it the very best absolutely silent computer for work and gaming.
General agnosticism vs rationalist agnosticism

general agnosticism doesn't accept the necessity of logic on the physical foundations

Bertrand Russell was a physicalist/logicalist/metaphysical naturalist who claimed correctly
that knowledge is infinite, thus atheism is rational agnosticism.

Rational agnosticism = atheism = David Deutsch's physicalism recognise the necessity of logic on the physical foundations.
Space rocket fuel

For space fuel (for rockets powered in space), initially set in orbit the vehicle A with a standard rocket from Earth. Then send many balloons with hydrogen (or better fuel that can work) and attached control vehicles B, which at high altitude use some of the hydrogen to boost themselves towards vehicle A. Add a balloon contraction mechanism to compress the fuel and fill vehicle A's fuel tank.

My idea is wrong. It needs corrections. Don't abandon it. You can correct it!

\_\_\_\_\_\_

One other childish idea is to use a very high altitude air vehicle with a cannon, to bombard shells which contain hydrogen, and at some point the shells ignite as rockets to reach vehicle A without to destroy it, but they have to connect mildly and fill its fuel tank. 200 of them will do in 5 separate missions.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

better idea:

Use high altitude airplanes, which will carry a fuel delivery rocket.

Many missions will be required to fill the Space Fuel Station.

Solid fuel can be used.

Secondarily when the fuel ends, use the weakling long-duration engine[s] (engines of various designs).
Αθεϊσμός

## Αθεϊσμός wiki

Ο αθεϊσμός δεν αποτελεί θρησκεία (δεν εμπεριέχει το υπερφυσικό) αλλά την πεποίθηση ότι δεν υπάρχουν θεοί ή δεν υπάρχουν πειστικές ενδείξεις για την ύπαρξη θεών. Αυτό το γεγονός αποκαλύπτει ότι η χρήση του όρου «θρησκεία» ως υπερώνυμο όλων των «μεταφυσικών κοσμοθεωριών» (η μεταφυσική [πρώτες/ θεμελιώδεις αρχές] δεν ταυτίζεται απαραιτήτως με το υπερφυσικό) είναι μεροληπτική, διότι η θρησκεία αποτελεί υπώνυμη ομάδα μεταφυσικών κοσμοθεωριών. Ο αθεϊσμός (ή αθεΐα) δεν εκπροσωπείται από κάποια εκκλησία ή θρησκευτικό οργανισμό. Παρόλα αυτά υπάρχουν αθεϊστικοί σύλλογοι και οργανώσεις, όπως η Ένωση Αθέων, που σκοπό έχει την προώθηση της εκκοσμίκευσης του Κράτους (διαχωρισμό Κράτους-Εκκλησιών, κατάργηση θρησκευτικού όρκου, κατάργηση της ληξιαρχικής καταγραφής θρησκεύματος). Σκοπός της είναι επίσης η θρησκευτική ελευθερία, ο ανθρωπισμός, ο σκεπτικισμός, η προώθηση του ορθολογισμού, της κριτικής σκέψης και της αθεϊστικής οπτικής. Στατιστικά οι Έλληνες άθεοι αυξάνονται.

## Η ελευθερία αν δεν πηγάζει από συνειδητό έλεγχο, δεν είναι ελευθερία

### νευροδιαδικαστικά, η συνείδηση δεν εμφανίζεται ακαριαία ούτε προϋπάρχει - δεν υπάρχει απόλυτος έλεγχος στη διαμόρφωση της συνείδησης (δεν προκύπτει αυτό νευροεπιστημονικά)

παιδικές σκέψεις:

Ο Θεός δεν κάνει λάθη. Η Ελεύθερη Θέληση = Βούληση ορίζει τις σκέψεις των προσώπων. (Όλοι οι άνθρωποι έχουν ακριβώς την ίδια συνολική διανοητική ικανότητα με τα ίδια επιμέρους χαρακτηριστικά, διότι αποδεικνύεται το αντίθετο. [Επίκληση στο ψέμα, διότι η θρησκεία είναι ψέμα. Άρα εντάξει.]) Ανώτερη από τον Άυλο Μάγο (Θεό) είναι η Ελεύθερη Θέληση = Βούληση, η οποία βασίζεται μερικώς στο νευροδικτύωμα [βασικές θεμελιώδεις τάσεις του χαρακτήρα] (άρα δεν είναι τυχαία) και μερικώς σε μεροληπτική τυχαιότητα [εκδήλωση πτυχών του χαρακτήρα μέσα από στιγμιαίο στοχασμό] (μεροληπτική τυχαιότητα διότι εκδηλώνεται στο νευροδικτύωμα).

βλ. Robert Sapolsky - Stanford University
Music scales

## Evil Shaolin

The Evil Shaolin scale has 3 transpositions; all others are enharmonic (same with different first note):
Evil Shaolin

* transposition 1: do, re, re#, fa, fa#, sol#, la, si
* transposition 2: do, do#, re#, mi, fa#, sol, la, la#
* transposition 3: do#, re, mi, fa, sol, sol#, la#, si

semitonal progression: 0, +1, +2, +1, +2, +1, +2, +1, +2

or (still in semitones forward): 0, +2, +1, +2, +1, +2, +1, +2, +1

Listen on YouTube " MK3 OST " (Dan Forden) the best compositions of the arcade game (not a movie) to understand/ to get in the mood of playing (interval selection, durations etc.).

si note = ti note = B note

Even solo on that. But like an Evil Shaolin. Imagine you know the techniques of finger killing. Use it many times. You have to get the MK3 mood.
What happens inside a black hole's event horizon?

It is a dense torus, and gradually gers denser the closer we get to the idealized ringularity (but idealized things aren't physical). A maximally degenerate torus appears at the core of the dense torus.

\_\_\_\_\_

The episode: What Happens Inside a Proton? [PBS Space Time - YouTube] Is really good, and probably very close to what happens inside a black hole torus (all physical black holes rotate, ringularity is idealized so a torus mechanism is way more probable... but due to the maximal degeneracy pressure, some quarks will gain enough energy to probabilistically tunnel slightly out, but not outside the event horizon). The dencer part of the degenerate torus would be very close to the idealized ringularity. Some particles will tunnel out, but not far enough because black holes are big and curved enough, to correct themselves are reabsorbe the tunnel[l]ing out. Mini/micro/small black holes immediately evaporate, because they don't have enough correction buffer curvature. But all these ideas and limits should be expressed mathematically.

My specific ideas might be wrong. But please work on these issues...

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

For the black hole degeneracy emittion-reabsorption mentioned earlier:

Hawking radiation is mainly radiowaves 3 times wider than the diameter of the black hole. Thus the proposed emittion-reabsorption mechanism near the maximally degenerate region doesn't contribute nearly at all to the Hawking radiation. But each black hole has a pace threshold of growth (we need the mathematical formula). If a black hole absorbs faster matter than the pace of integration and pace-threshold of growth, it ejects the excessive matter via the jets plus via omniemission = surrounding noise of particles.
Against general agnosticism

## Agnosticism isn't a worldview on the metaphysical actuality of the cosmos itself

Agnosticism isn't a worldview on the metaphysical actuality of the cosmos itself, but a state of mind of the individual or a limitation of the individual. That isn't tautological to the workings of the cosmos. The "limitations of the individual", either personally or cosmically posed, are not the "mechanism of the universe"; thus agnosticism is a worldview about the opinions of the individual, and not about the cosmic actuality. The possibly hidden nature of the cosmos, isn't its only attribute, nor its deepest mechanism. Agnosticism is not the purest metaphysics on the cosmos, but it is pure ontic metaphysics on the individual (the thinker).
Knowledge 1

Knowledge requires personhood. Otherwise we might have a memory (a USB stick full of data), or a procedure without self-awareness. A common computer program doesn't truly know, except if it has Brodmann-like procedural submodalities which collaborate in multiple modes (see: Nancy Kanwisher on YouTube) to yield personhood (but we'll have to mimic brainstem's general coherence of different signals and basic activation/coherent excitation; see: Mark Solms on YouTube at The Royal Institution).

Personhood requires a brain.

A brain is a personhood-yielding computer.

A generic computer is less fundamental than spacetime; an Ontological Turing Machine (being its own hardware, software and algorithmic axiomatics; all of the same nature) is the foundational modes of spacetime.
Mistakes about Everettism/manyworldness

Mistakes about Everettism:

1. Everything is possible in some universe: well actually no. Magic is impossible. And I differentiate in different universe-strains, but I have a character. Infinite options can still narrow down.

2. Please elaborate more on lost Everettian differentiation. My flesh is hot, thus my atoms are defined well enough, but not uncausally collapsed as point particles; they still are a bit hazy. Some minor alternative realities merge in bigger realities when unobserved = to observe is a supernatural verb... to hit a particle with some other with a gradient range of force and cause partial or full entanglement (is the correct thing to say).

People attack Everettism/manyworldness, thus details matter.
BBC - Logicalism–Physicalism

About programmes/documentaries.

Create a documentary series on Physicalism–Logicalism

Atheism is a negation.
The affirmative term is physicalism–logicalism.

```
1. the chemical abiogenesis of life (+ astrobiology), 2. philosophical analyses on personhood (+ neuroscience + how to build a digital personhood-yielding computer mimicking everything Brodmann areas do even when they functionally combine) and mechanical/ procedural prerequisites for a biological or digital personhood-yielding computer = brain, 3. the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations (David Hilbert, David Tong), cosmological calculability (Max Tegmark), cosmological constructor (David Deutsch and Chiara Marletto), 4. popularization of astrophysics and other sciences. | Many scientists leave gaps for the supernatural, which is an unprocedural impossibility. A physicalism-logicalism focuses on all rigorous fields of study, which don't include the supernatural. It is a specific goal to describe everything logical.  Astrobiology is part of physicalism.

```

Physicalism–logicalism is more complete than physicalism, because logicalism includes the necessity of logical foundations. Mathematics (geometry is part of mathematics) is a proof axiomatic system (see: proof, John Stillwell). Ontophysics is the true physics and scientophysics is the part we know. Ontophysics is compatible to mathematics due to logic, but ontophysics is a universe-making (substantialisation) system and not a proof system. In order the self-causation (self-causality) of the universe is elaborated, we have to approach ontophysics as a complete axiomatic system, with programme-like axioms for foundational coherence (it cannot have a list of axioms like mathematics; it requires more foundational coherence to meet the criteria of physical foundations; we cannot simply select separate axioms and magically pretend they belong in the same axiomatic system without any logical glue to causally keep them together (in the foundations of mathematics there is no overall proof of the axioms of mathematics; mathematics is simply a proof axiomatic system, very useful, but it's not in itself ontophysics; it can describe ontophysics due to its logic)).

see: David Deutsch's constructor theory