Crab logicism

Walking crablike sea-boxes can carry inside them secondary suicide seadrones.

Please create magnetic charging drones.

Install a long charging cable from an allied region which ends at a magnetic charger.

The crablike sea-boxes walk very very slowly on the seabed in order they don’t get detected by the enemy. They look like corals in order they don't get detected. The walking seaboxes charge on the magnetic charger under the sea.

The walking seaboxes go exactly below the enemy ship, they open their hatch and a secondary suicide drone is attached exactly below the enemy ship, where it explodes and it sinks it.

If the walking seaboxes walk fast they get detected.

If the walking seaboxes walk very very = extremely slowly and look like corals they don't get detected.

If the walking seaboxes have cables have endless energy but they get tangled = failed mission.

Thus move close to the enemy a magnetic charging cable with a magnetic charger at its end.

Make magnetically charging walking coral-like seaboxes which carry a secondary suicide seadrone for the Navy.

crucial information: The magnetically charging walking coral-like seabox can be linked to a detachable cable (to be released if tangled) for very long shipwaiting in empty positions waiting for days the ship for the kill. Still though the cable can get tangled in the legs. The magnetic charger should necessarily exist as an alternative.

**The magnetic charging pad is a swimming-walking undersea drone itself** (it shouldn't move very much because it gets detected).

The walking coral-like seabox, should also be able to swim, otherwise the missions fail. But the walking coral-like seabox it mostly walks on 8 legs, very very = extremely slowly, otherwise it gets detected. It charges on a magnetic charger.

//////////////

\_\_\_\_\_

affirmative terms: metaphysical logicism = physicalism = absolute rationalism = positivism =
negative terms: antisupernaturalism, antitranscendentalism, atheism

Bertrand Russell correctly claimed that every person is agnostic because knowledge is infinite. But not all persons are truly metaphysical agnostics. True metaphysical agnostics are open to the supernatural = exologic. The supernatural = exologic isn't only unknowable, but it more crucially is fundamentally impossible, because without logical foundations the physical foundations don't meet the axiomatic prerequisites to be logically achievable as something with specific identity thus necessarily the supernatural is impossible (it exists only as an erroneous opinion in logically achievable worlds/cosmoi). God is a person; if God is atheism or an impersonal supernatural field we merely distort language but we cannot distort semantics because we can speak periphrastically = with many words to convey meanings. In the Bible God has all the mental modalities (emotions, planning, sensations, etc.) of humans, thus God is a mereological complex (not a mereological simple; thus God has more fundamental parts than his wholeness; the Bible itself cancels the fundamental nature of God because he's mentally a mereological complex = non-fundamental wholeness). Data-processing produces thermodynamic entropy (memory storage isn't infinite, thus intermediary logical steps are deleted and converted to thermal entropy; Landauer's principle). The role of thermodynamic entropy, informational entropy and their relation is crucial in the physical foundations (quantum foundations for our universe). Reversible computing (see term) doesn't work for complicated data-processing and it still produces thermodynamic and/or informational entropy in the real world. The idealized personhood-yielding computer (hypernymic to the biological and digital brain) requires Brodmann-like areas and wiring to have all the necessary modalities to achieve genuine personhood. The supernatural is based on human esthetics on ethics which is psychological-bias logic but violates mathematical logic thus the supernatural is a human bias and a self-contradictory fallacy = emotional biased logic which violates mathematical logic = it has logical gaps which only make sense by biased emotional interpreters. The supernatural I repeat isn't only undetectable, but it most crucially doesn’t meet the criteria for logical foundations as an axiomatic system of a specific identity without logical gaps. The supernatural is fundamentally impossible and not only for the practical reason we cannot detect it.

Metaphysical logicism is correct and that the common metaphysical agnosticism being open to the possibility of exologic = the supernatural is wrong/ a fallacy.

Fallacies like religion are legal, but they cannot prove that complete personhood being an intricate result of logical procedures, magically preexists the logical procedures and also that personhood is more fundamental than spacetime whilst even idealized topological neural networks require space to exist and time to entropically evolve.

People who believe in the personocratically biased violation of logic aren't more kind than other humans. Mistakes and biases don’t make one more kind.