The European Physicalist Institution

A suggestion: The European Physicalist Institution should be established

for the overall popularization of science without gaps and supernaturalism on these fields:

• axiomatization of physics/ physical foundations/ quantum foundations/ David Deutsch’s constructor theory on cosmology/ Max Tegmark's cosmological calculability and other theories to be examined
(axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations)
• personhood: 1. philosophical definition (prerequisites for personhood), 2. procedural ways to yield it: biological brain, digital brain (mimicking all Brodmann areas and brains functions), idealized topological brain, etc.
• chemical abiogenesis of life (see: Jack W. Szostak and Yohey Suzuki; also including astrobiology)

+ general popularization of science (for example astrophysics)

Why the European Physicalist Institution should be established:

Many scientists are antisupernaturalists/ physicalist but leave gaps on fields of study they're not interested in.

Educated theists don't need God during surgery but reject neuroscience and against the neuroimaging facts claim that something outside the brain, specifically the soul, supernaturally provides humans with personhood before any brain biochemistry.

Some "causal closure" pseudosophers (bad philosophers) present physics as a closed system, whilst by no means all axiomatic systems are closed, neither there is proof that the universe is a closed system.

Also metaphysical personocrats (those who claim that the first principles of everything are originating from a person or at least are teleologically compatible to personhood's biases, desires and esthetics). They never studied personhood. See: criteria of personhood/ prerequisites for personhood for the philosophical definitions and for the personhood-yielding systems: neuroscience, program-based personhood-yielding brain (I work on mixed network flexible artificial neural network clusters [they include various forms of computational units like ANNs, Flexible ANNs, general GPUs, structural program nongeneral GPUs, etc.), and idealized mathematical personhood-yielding computers like topological personhood-yielding computers (based on topology and information theory).

Most scientists don't work on all fields of science. Many scientists leave open gaps for the violation of logical procedurality (complicated procedures) and for the logical foundations of everything that exists (or could exist/ we shouldn't erroneously claim that science elaborates only about things which exist within our universe by using mathematics, because mathematics isn't tautological to physics; some people work on the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations; and alternative approaches do exist, but the "foundations of mathematics" have gaps which cannot be completed because mathematics is a measuring-calculational-proof-science axiomatic tool system, but physics is about universes and there are techniques to create axiomatic systems with less foundational gaps but biased (not the sole solution) and not a tool for general calculations at the foundational level. Quantum computers work correctly (if they're small nowadays; due to noise) because different axiomatic systems are mutually transcribable, at least at a case-by-case basis (if two axiomatic systems are overall transcribable at their foundations level, then they actually are one axiomatic system; but there's no universal axiomatic system).

The European Physicalist Institution should have lectures and studies in areas other thinkers leave gaps and allow the violation of logic, without to analytically suggest something specific.

A universe is an algorithmoid/ algorithm-like system. It doesn't have to be a typical unchanging algorithm. We cannot separate the axiomatics, the hardware and the software of a universe, thus an internally evolving algorithmoid is more suitable for physical foundations than a static/ stationary algorithm. Of course mathematical and if possible observational research is required on the physical foundations (the physical foundations is hypernymic to the quantum foundations of our specific universe).