Secular Paganism & "Prejudices"

Secular Paganism & Prejudices

Many people believe in order to be pagan you can not be a racist, a prejudice person or being. I disagree with this notion or opinion.

Many warrior or barbarian heathen paths were also high in prejudice and racism. Such as being a Viking. They had at one time, NO Gods, No religion. They plundered villages, they thought and did bad things to women and children including killing and raping them for sport. Modern Asatru believe that the Vikings were noble, cared for the Gods, and had an awesome religion on their ancestors. They at one time did not believe in any of this, nor did they worship nature or holidays or seasons. This attitude has nothing to do with actual religion or spirituality of any God or Path.

What is the meaning of being secular?

**secular**. **Secular** things are not religious. Anything not affiliated with a church or faith can be called **secular**. Non-religious people can be called atheists or agnostics, but to describe things, activities, or attitudes that have nothing to do with religion, you can use the word **secular**.

1. Prejudice is an opinion of a person, a way of being towards others, or a preference.

pref·er·ence

/ˈpref(ə)rəns/

*noun*

1. 1. 1.

a greater liking for one alternative over another or others.

"he chose a clock **in preference to** a watch"
Prejudice in Paganism means "You have a right to feel some sort way about type of path or persons entering onto the path for spiritual evolving. Prejudice is very known to a higher spiritual evolved person because it is only the right combination of the path that brings about perfect will, peace and status in a person or being. There is no way around this. It is what it is, is not a paradox to anyone or thing, simple and easy to grasp.

Difficult to be shared with others, you may offend someone. Offending others with a preference is not a crime. It is just their disability to understand I am not their property.

Clearly, if I say to you, "I don't like African Americans." You can think of me as a bad person who is a racist person. There is nothing wrong with a person's preference. If I go out and ridicule African Americans about their culture or skin color, then I am a bully. I am in affront with the laws on harassing others. But if I don't harass others and I just say "I don't like African Americans", in polite company, I am making a preference to people. Now, if you know I don't like to be around African Americans and you go out of your way to harass me about it, and have A.A come over to my house and harass me about it, then you are the bully also, and in front with the law on harassing others. A BULLY does not make a preference, nor do they understand preference of prejudice. They think if I hate AA's I am going to make fun of them and call them names. I am not. I just don't like to be around AA's because both their men and their women do not have good hygiene, and they think every white girl walking in the "hoods" are their property to hit on. We're not. Hood to me, is just a street. I have as much right to walk it as they do.

Pagans should be open minded, they should be into their fears or their prejudices and love everyone. There is two aspects of love here however. Love everyone as your neighbor, and Love everyone as your lover. I am not going to date, kiss or have sex with AA's men or women. It's Gross to me. When people hear this from me, me stating my preference to only white men, (and even then, no) I am a bigot and not a pagan because I am not into screwing every race or color. Since when is that needed by Paganism people? Again, if we are to be like the "ancestors" to which we are not even connected too in the beginning, we will need to be prejudiced. Because they raided villages of Irish, Dutch, Gaul, Finnish, Norse, Orkney, Scotland, Britian and Wales if not also others. They did not care what color of skin of the people they plundered (stole from) were not very friendly, raped women and children in villages against their wills, killed men and women and children and animals. Got on their boats and roared out to the open sea again. No one knew how to communicate with anyone at that time. It may have gone better have they asked for help rather than killed and wiped them out. Not a very sexy image now is it?

Pagans, even neo pagans are particularly blind to the truth of ancestoral worship and celebration. These people did not have sabbat, esbat and so on. They did not celebrate easter or christmas until the late 11th century AD and then, it was very unlike the christmas we know of today. Vikings were plundering long before 3rd Century AD, more than likely starting around 383 BC. So the idea that Asatru is built on Viking things is not relevant or accurate. Vikings did not even recognize God's until 33BC. What they learned of God's were from other Heathen races, including Heatheru (Caysharoo) and Norsk (Orsh) shamanism. Some Asatru today believe it's ok to have sex with family members - Mothers with daughters and sons, Sons with Father's and also daughters. Same with Uncles and Aunts and Cousins. Incest in Viking Families were not uncommon and were supported to keep their lines pure, and the child's mental growth "limited", Incense teaches you not to go outside your family lines. This is domestic abuse at it's highest. This is also Prejudice/Right, and Prejudice/Intent, and Prejudice/Preference.

Christmas or Yule'olgc (ool-yawlk) was the ritual slaying of an elk or caribou, eating of the heart and splattering it all over their back yard and then having the children for ritual rape, at least three times in one day. Then, Chieftain men visited other Chieftain men and gave them presents. The women would also lay with one another as well from different clans and would maybe move in with other women at that time. It was an Immoral, disgusting tradition for Upyr (Gypsy) people for at least 3500 years. This was the Hutjr, long before they were Hungarians or Turks. Hutjr (Hoot-jer) means "Closeted" or "shut down". These people later settled in Europe, where Amsterdam is now. It consisted of a large flat plain, scraggly bushes and Hut people, the Hutjr. Hutjr can also be compared to early norse and danes.

About 1000 years later the Hutjr became Tutjr, and Hutfyr, and other names such as Vuthr.

Tutjr (open/apart) Hutfyr (closed/shut up/in) and Vuthr (sea person). Lived closer to the Black sea after a short migration. Being shut up from their domesitic clan abuse, they moved out and onward to change their histories. But they did not know about the abuse being abuse so never knew how to change it. The Vutjr began to not commit family rape or abuse, mated little and seem to move on from their awful pasts. Hutfyr continued to use family rape but only women with daughters. They later nomaded like their Vutjr brethren and re-opened domestic abuse and rape in their lines. The Vutjr being considered early Alp's slayed most of the Hutjr lines that migrated. It was not uncommon for these people to live 300 years or more.

So we see each clan at one time had prejudices. If they act on prejudice out of harassment then this is wrong. If they merely state a fact of I prefer this over that, then this is not wrong.

## Danes

Danes

Germanic tribe

## Description

The Danes were a North Germanic tribe inhabiting southern Scandinavia, including the area now comprising Denmark proper, and the Scanian provinces of modern southern Sweden, during the Nordic Iron Age and the Viking Age. They founded what became the Kingdom of Denmark. Wikipedia
People also search for: Geats, Anglo-Saxons, Saxons, Jutes, MORE [1] Wikipedia on the Jutes

## Jutes

Are Jutes Vikings?

But concerning the **Jutes**, how come they aren't considered **Vikings** like the raiders from 789-1066? The **Jutes** were Scandinavian, from the Jutland Peninsula, Denmark, were pagan, were known for their sea-borne raids and piracy and targeted Britain, Frisia and Northern Gaul.

They may have things in common with the Ruler/people called Partholan in Ireland. (The first of the five invaders of Ireland) [2] Partholan Link from wikipedia

## Prejudice in DNA

Perfect, humble people who are ascending masters and so on, are also racist and prejudiced.

if you know yourself and what you prefer you obviously have a preference.

We are very "Ist" people and beings, we know what we have come from, what we are going into a singular place for ourselves we turn to the world and look and see all the things wrong and we go this, this and this is all wrong. Don't do that! Wouldn't you want to help people making mistakes???

We are:

* Racist
* Speciest
* Prejudiced
* Humble of our origins
* Prefering one thing to another
* Opinionated
* Secular
* Orefering - meaning this is the way it is for us, this is our mission and we're not changing

Why do people so badly want us to change?

Because they can not or will not ascend.

They also, should their be a pandemic or crisis or what not get upset that we are not panicing and still having fun with our lives, we know that all is soon going to come around and be well. Tyrants don't want to tyrant, they want things a certain way to pay and boost up this economy.