Comments on Stefan Milo

## letter

Hello Mr. Stefan. or bother Stefan (I'm atheist also). Atheism is a negation. An affirmative term is logicophysicalism (logical positivism, physicalism, metaphysical naturalism, antisupernaturalism).

When I speak about physicalism I speak like (Google them/ YouTube them) David Deutsch, David Tong, Sean M. Carroll etc. which means that everything that exists has logical foundations, including the universe itself.

I don't focus on mind-physicalism... because according to neuroscience, personhood is an endo-experiencing (true personhood and not philosophical zombiehood) of the brain. Everettism (many-worlds interpretation) make things more complicated. I use physicalism like David Deutsch and Sean M. Carroll = everything that exists has logical foundations; the supernatural has no foundations, no rigorous attributes and it doesn't meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations like the quantum foundations (see: Robert W. Spekkens, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics).

If you ever win the lottery or if you have rich friends, please establish the Logicophysicalist Institution (atheism means non-godism; people who cannot express affirmative terms for their theory they're not fully aware).

The Logicophysicalist Institution (or Physicalist Institution, but I want to avoid mind-physicalism; science doesn't predetermine without facts if alternative realities are entangled as one or separated; science seeks logical proof and methodologically recorded evidence).

The Logicophysicalist Institution should have: 1. a scientific archive, 2. popularization lectures and 3. academic lectures (they should be available online).

An older text on The Physicalist Institution of the so-and-so country (replace text online):

Physicalist Institution of "the so-and-so country"

Please establish in "the so-and-so country" the Physicalist Institution, to popularize: 1. the chemical abiogenesis of life, 2. philosophical analyses on personhood and mechanical/ procedural prerequisites for a biological or digital personhood-yielding computer = brain (neuroscience, digital Brodmann area subroutine simulation or different equivalent personhood-yielding computers = brains able to yield true personhood), 3. the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations (David Hilbert, David Tong), cosmological calculability (Max Tegmark), cosmological constructor (David Deutsch and Chiara Marletto), 4. popularization of astrophysics and other sciences. | Why a Physicalist Institution should be established in "the so-and-so country"? Many scientists leave gaps for the supernatural, which is an unprocedural impossibility. A Physicalist Institution will popularize with lectures all rigorous fields of study, which don't include the supernatural. It is a specific goal to describe everything logical. Not all atheist scientists care to establish a Physicalist Institution and popularize or create academic lectures on all fields used by supernaturalists to introduce anthropic biases. Astrobiology is part of physicalism. I was born to help establish a Physicalist Institution. I am not rich and famous. Please establish a Physicalist Institution in "the so-and-so country" for all humans, even theist students who are rationalists.

Ask me things on the personhood-yielding computer, but before that watch Nancy Kanwisher on YouTube and read Mar Solms' books (see: YouTube).

ChatGPT mimics only the Broca's (physical language expressing) and the Wernicke's areas (language understanding).

For emotions we have to computationally mimic the limbic system, for needs the dopamiergic pathways, For overall coherence we have to mimic data coherence centers at the base of the cerebrum and in the brainstem (see: Mark Solms). Also the default mode network and also all possible combinational activity of the Brodmann areas should be mimicked. A digital brain doesn't have to exactly mimic the human connectome but instead we should focus on the basic priorities of the truly personhooded non-zombie brain. A truly personhooded brain acts elastically (returns to normal function) with mild emotional input, and acts plastically (a post traumatic stress disorder changes one's components of personality) when the emotional input is very strong and almost always negative.

Personhood is a gradient phenomenon with various degrees of intelligence (overall data-processing modalities/abilities), emotional ability and empathy.

Building a truly personhooded nonzombie digital brain will help humanity study better neuroscience and understand the biological evolution of the biological personhood-yielding computer = brain.

Please become richer or find rich people or find ways to publicly fund the establishment of the Logicophysicalist Institution (children say Atheist Institution but we need the affirmative term), to popularize all sciences including the ones you love more.

Quantum field theory isn't a personhood-yielding computer.

Personhood has spacetime as a prerequisite in order the connectome is spatially expressed (it's not a mereological simple = without proper parts, because memories require many shannons [units of information] and personhood-yielding computers include many data-processing modalities). Also thought is expressed with the passage of time. All-knowingness is stationary. Intelligence requires procedural ability and mental flexibility (see The University of Oxford books on intelligence).

Logic is more fundamental than the personhood-yielding computer.
Mistakes and mental illness aren't cosmofoundational errors, but logical results of systems (which aren't universes) with erroneous programming, connectome and semantic labeling.

Even if God existed, he couldn't be able to violate his logical foundations (that would annihilate his causally coherent foundations and procedural identity). Thus logic being God's God, would make him only a weak kami, that would totally vanish the day he would say: supernaturalism doesn't require specific logical foundations, procedurality, unbroken causality and logically possible physical axiomatics.

The supernatural isn't only unreachable and unteachable, but it isn't also scientifically non-hypothesiseable, because it lacks any logical foundations. Without meeting the criteria for physical foundations, there cannot be any existence.

Infinite axiomatic systems are possible, and infinite allomathematics = experimental mathematics based on different axiomatics (axiomatic list, axiomatic program or hybrid axiomatics). Physical axiomatics aren't like the axioms of Euclidean geometry. Instead physical axiomatics are proceduraly entangled and program-like, in order the physical foundations are able to express universe-like worlds.

see also: The Story of Proof by John Stillwell

Please establish the Logicophysicalist Institution or Physicalist Institution if you like shorter names.

Seek public funding.

Do something for the logicophysicalists, logicalists, physicalists, metaphysical naturalists (negations: antisupernaturalists, atheists).

Bertrand Russell was a "rational agnostic".

Physicalists (atheists) are rational agnostics because they don't know everything.

The term: (final theory) final and finite theory of the nontrivially infinite open physical axiomatics is wrong and unfactually jumps to conclusions.

see the problems of the axiomatic systems: incompleteness, inconsistency and axiomatic incalculability (open axiomatics works better for the physical foundations and for the logically procedural self-causation of quantum mechanics within the cyclic universe which is a part of the multiverse [which has foundational variations]

see: Marcus du Sautoy

Some people erroneously overscientify science and claim "science is only about our local universe" whilst they use mathematics which is a general proof system, and general proof systems don't have the same axiomatic prerequisites as physical foundations [ontoaxiomatics].

Ask me things, but please establish the Physicalist Institution to popularize ALL rigorous science.

Sadly (it makes things difficult) some supernaturalists accept both science and it's violations.

But they don't like logicoprocedural definitions of the personhood-yielding computer, impersonal cosmogony, the chemical abiogenesis of life and "logic and spacetime being more fundamental than personhood".

see also: Chris Impey, astrobiology