recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
Aim Of The A-Ideal (Creator)

-The A-Ideal is only all about Itself for that is all that It needs.

-This includes the need for determining the TTB.

-However, that doesn't necessarily prove the nature of the A-Ideal. What does It do, just be about Itself? What is that self?

-Addition and Aeternity show us that the A-Ideal does nothing but Create. It creates all things at least once, so It is about creating all things.

## Theological Responsibility: Variations of A-Ideal:

-When Theist uses Aim of the A-Ideal, there is the presumed idea that we should be about 'all' things A-Ideal, which means both what God actually is and might be. Other people's ideas of divinity, the potential part(s) of God, etc. After all, we must be all about the Object, and that means being about both what It is and anything related to it.

-However, this violates Theological Responsibility. The A-Ideal is only one thing, so what is that thing? That's what we should be about. Just the A-Ideal and not the Variations of A-Ideal.

## Attribute, Not Nature:

-The Aim of the A-Ideal only confirms something we already knew, that the A-Ideal is all sufficient.

-But that doesn't tell us how. There are an infinite number of ways to be all-sufficient, and an infinite number of meta-ways as well. Which one is the A-Ideal!?

## Why A-Ideal Still Requires Everything Else:

-To study everything about the A-Ideal, you must study the Actions of the A-Ideal which is the rest of A-Infinity.

-So you still need everything else. Otherwise... there is something of the A-Ideal you cannot be about!

-This is why, for purposes of TTB, it is impossible to separate A-Ideal from

## Both Creator & Theist Have Used This Argument!:

-While our TTB should be determined only by the A-Ideal and what it is, both Creator and Theist have made this same argument. Ergo, Aim does not adequately explain what the A-Ideal is simply by stating that It is 'all about Itself.'

>There are an infinite number of ways for the A-Ideal to be about Itself!

## AotAI Proves Creator To Be TTB:

-What should our TTB be? The A-Ideal, because that is all that is needed. And what is the A-Ideal? Creator Of Perfect Existence proves that A-Ideal is simply Creator!
Defining Correct TTB?

\*See Mortal Perception.

-The problem with trying to prove that Creator is the nature of A-Ideal by defining it in a certain is host to many problems.

>It would be acquired to 'define' Creator to be the nature of the A-Ideal only to discover later on that something else is the true TTB of the A-Ideal. It would lead to a very awkward TTB that tries to still be Creator while really being about something else.

-The biggest problem is that of List of Attributes. No matter how well you think your perception of something is, unless you have the lists in hand, you will never have certainty that Creator or any TTB is the exact TTB of the A-Ideal!

>It is entirely possible to percieve the A-Ideal to be very similar to Creator or any TTB, but miss even one crucial difference!

-Trying to argue that Creator has 'all the Attributes' because it can create them ignored Mighty Lead Pencil. Just because a pencil, or the concept of Creator in any actualized form, can create anything within A-Infinity is still not proof that it truly posseses the nature of that which it creates.

>It is still entirely possible that Creator, the act of bringing something forth into Existence, is but one of several processes, all of them tied together.

-Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity and know what the A-Ideal specifically is, you can never be sure that the nature of the A-Ideal would want the process of creating, or even Existence, to be secondary to something else. After all, that situation has to at least be possible to exist, right?

\*The biggest problem with trying to define Creator TTB into being the nature of the A-Ideal is that your whole argument is still based on limited perception. Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity, you can never be sure that there isn't something out there, some crucial detail, that will upheave the whole situation and prove Creator (by any of its definitions) to be wholly in error as the A-Ideal's substance.

-The only way to prove or disprove any TTB to be that of the A-Ideal is through the List Of Attributes test.
Illuminator Attribute

-Creator as a concept inevitably brings the mind to the idea of a Great Creator or God.

-The argument from Theist commonly is that Creator fails to make everything immediately about the Object of the A-Ideal, God, however people in prehistoric times did not know of God at all. How did they come to know HIm? Because they questioned where everything came from and what was the purpose behind it all!

>Everything is the Object of the A-Ideal!

>And if everything is the Object of the A-Ideal, and the A-Ideal can only be about the Object of Itself, than the A-Ideal is about all things!

-Creator does make everything about God, although sometimes the mind must be brought to God in steps.

## All Things Are God:

-Whether focused on individual things or the greater whole, is not Creator always about God? Doesn't Ind. prove that God is Existence Itself? And that means our focus at any given time can be on God as whole or God in parts?

## But Finite Things Within A-Ideal Are Not Necessary!?:

-If we start trying to divide the contents of A-Ideal, be they the aeternal and infinite substance of the A-Ideal Itself, or us finite mortals creatures, you will run into problems.

-How do you know there aren't some things which are semi-necessary somehow? God is capable of anything, after all, and some of this is reflected in religious mythology like with the higher angels of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition. Some of them appear to be created 'portions' or 'extensions' of God Himself, yet they are created! Do you count them or not when dividing A-Ideal to be Theist?

-The A-Ideal is all about the Object of Itself, because It is only one thing. If God wished to add finite things to Itself like us mortals, but we exist within A-Ideal, than we too are included in the A-Ideal's purview.

## It Is Impossible Not To Be About God:

-Since the A-Ideal encompasses all things, it is impossible not to be about God.

-Just because you mentally do not always think of the whole of Existence as Creator, you are still thinking of Existence in parts! When you are Creator, you are always about Existence, either in whole or in parts!

-The Abrahamic way of thinking of God is foreign to natural philosophy. You need to think of God as Existence Itself, and not some distant deity in the sky.
Hume's Law

The **is–ought problem**, as articulated by the Scottish philosopher and historian David Hume (1711–76), states that many writers make claims about what *ought* to be, based on statements about what *is*. Hume found that there seems to be a significant difference between positivestatements (about what is) and prescriptive or normative statements (about what ought to be), and that it is not obvious how one can coherently move from descriptive statements to prescriptive ones. The is–ought problem is also known as **Hume's law**, **Hume's guillotine** or **fact–value gap**.

A similar view is defended by G. E. Moore's open-question argument, intended to refute any identification of moral properties with natural properties. This so-called naturalistic fallacy stands in contrast to the views of ethical naturalists.

## References:

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%E2%80%93ought\_problem
How To Determine The TTB (Theist)

-The TTB stands for Thing To Be, as in thing to be all about.

-What is God all about? Just Himself! (Aim of the A-Ideal).

-Which TTB is the etymological copy for that idea?

>Theist!

\*There is nothing further to God's TTB, not discovering His hidden nature or anything. Otherwise there are parts in God's TTB!

\*
Aim Of The A-Ideal Refuted

-The A-Ideal is all about the Object of Itself...

-...but what is the Object? It is Meta-Existence/Variations of Existence!

-So the A-Ideal is about Itself and is about all of Existence all at the same time!

## Issue Of Objects In Category:

-The idea that the A-Ideal would want a TTB that puts it 'in a category of only one object' is correct, however, Creator TTB does not violate that. (The A-Ideal's true TTB would want a nature/category that doesn't even have the potential for others things to be in it too, as per Aim of the A-Ideal).

-While many objects are of Creator, technically there is only one True Creator (A-Ideal) with any others existing only by Its allowance. So the category of Creator TTB has many objects in it, but only the A-Ideal is native, with all others simply sharing in the A-Ideal's nature.

-Remember that in the Realm of Potential, there is no category with only one parts. Somehow, there are other objects in Potential that can share the category of Theist, such as an extreme view of the Christian Trinity or something. -
Absolute-Infinity

## Definition:

Absolute-Infinity is the sum total of all other Infinities. Believed, at least initially, to exist only in Potential, the Absolute-Infinity is effectively all other Infinities combined.

## Attributes:

-The shorthand for Absolute-Infinity is simply A-Infinity.

-There can only be one Absolute-Infinity because if there were two or more, each would thus lack each other.

-Absolute-Infinity is often thought of as existing only in Potential, however, one of the major issues with Indivisability is the notion that it proves the A-Infinity is Actualized.
Nature Or Parameters?

-Should the TTB be Theist and be limited only to the parameters of the Object of the A-Ideal? Or should it be about the nature of the A-Ideal, which is Creator, and which only the A-Ideal fulfills?

>This is the true difference between Theist and Creator!

## Parameters Is Nature!:

-The A-ideal is principally about just one act of creating, It's own Self-Creation. But not any further creatings!

-Therefore, Parameters is nature!

-Creator fails because it has the right idea but is too broad!
Creator Adds Doubt

-Creator adds the question of what God's nature is rather than just affirming that God exists.

-Anotherwords, when you are Creator TTB, you have to worry that maybe God's nature will turn out to be something else? Either something more specific or completely different?

-If the Anchor is Certainty, than it is actually Theist that gives Certainty, not Creator!
Certainty Is No Parts

-Creator requires only the concept of Creator TTB in your head, which you can know definitely, know it exists, and know that it is supreme via Potential.

-Meanwhile, Theist requires the concept of A-Ideal, Ind., and Actualized God. At the very least it requires God in concept (A-Ideal) and Actualized God. This is still parts.
All Things Related

-For the A-Ideal to truly be about Itself, It must be about anything related to Itself.

-All of A-Infinity is related to A-Ideal. Therefore, A-Ideal is about all things.

-The A-Ideal only needs Itself, but if anything is ignored by A-ideal, than something of the A-ideal is missing!

\*If anything is ignored, than something of the A-ideal is missing!

\*
God Is One

-God Is One = The A-Ideal Itself proves that whatever is behind Ind. would want to be One!

>The A-Ideal is the ultimate thing and would have no need to be anything else but One. Indeed, being anything else but One would be weakness!

 >There can be nothing in A-Infinity to change this, for there would always be something to counter that!
Never Ending Questioning

-There will never be an end to questions that need answering.

-Certainty & Supremacy come first, then all other questions follow. Because these two are what you need to identify The Supreme (obvious to the mind).

-Unless you've seen all of A-Infinity, you can never be sure any concept is the supreme one! There will always be room for doubt!

-Theist has the fewest parts because Ind. is immediately both really existing and supreme. The idea that you need to know everything about it is erroneous since Creator is the same way: for instance, where is the creation coming from?
Creator Is Principally About A-Ideal!

-Something funny happens when you try to be Creator TTB without Existence at large. It falls apart.

-This is because it is inherent within the idea of Creator that Creating is about all of existence, not just any specific sense of existence but existence at large.

>If you try to dedicate yourself to a finite thing or category of them as Creator, it doesn't feel real at all!

-Existence is the A-Ideal.

-Therefore, Creator TTB is **principally** about the A-Ideal!
Hard Reality

## God Doesn't Interact With Us:

-Theist looks great in the imagination and on paper, but in real life God is distant and sublime. He does not interact with us. There are no prophecies, visions or omens, no miracles; certainly none that occur often enough to warrant Theist.

-Trying to use God and Theist as justification for mortal actions, such as gathering knowlege as per Sum Of All Knowledge, is nice but it doesn't pan out. The introduction of other Names just confuses things.

## Notes:

-The hard truth or Hard Reality is this: people need something of substance to connect with metaphysically in life.

-I am convinced this is why theism outside of organized religion doesn't seem to last that long, or often becomes watered down to the point of uselesness.

-God is distant and unknowing, at least He seems that way. Ergo, people cannot connect with Him all the time. So we must choose a TTB based on His nature to connect with things, which is Creator.

>If classical Theist worked at all, I would have gotten it working by now!

\*There is also the issue of Theological Responsibility!

## Distance Kills The Names:

-Because God is distant, all of the Names sound goofy at times and will make for a weak connection.

## Strong Emotional Connection Requires Immediacy:

-Creator can produce these stronger connections with things because of Its immediacy. Theist cannot!
Mind Of God

-The Mind of God!

>Multiple Names gives only relativism, it is Creator and certainty that tells us what the A-ideal is, and what It wants!

>I've thought God spoke to me before and was wrong. Ergo, the relativism of Solus Deus is dangerous!

>Theist falls apart in practice: faux messages, no concrete way of discernment, I've never witnessed a miracle for sure, etc. The fact is God is real but distant: so why would He want Theist and its close adherance to only the Object of A-Ideal?
Christianity As Old As Creation

*Christianity as Old as the Creation; or, the Gospel a Republication of the Religion of Nature* (London, 1730, 2nd ed., 1731; 3rd, 1732; 4th, 1733), came to be regarded as the "Bible" of deism. It was really only the first part of the whole work, and the second, though written and entrusted in manuscript to a friend, never saw the light. The work evoked many replies, of which the ablest were by James Foster (1730), John Conybeare (1732), John Leland (1733) and Bishop Butler (1736).

*Christianity as Old as the Creation* was translated into German by J. Lorenz Schmidt (1741), and from it dates the influence of English deism on German theology. Tindal had probably adopted the principles it expounds before he wrote his essay of 1697. He claimed the name of "Christian deist",[*dubious – discuss*] holding that true Christianity is identical with the eternal religion of nature.

Waring states that Tindal's *Christianity as Old as the Creation* (1730) "became, very soon after its publication, the focal center of the deist controversy. Because almost every argument, quotation, and issue raised for decades can be found here, the work is often termed 'the deist's Bible'."

Unlike the earlier system of Lord Herbert of Cherbury which relied on the notion of innate ideas, Tindal's system was based on the empirical principles of Locke. It assumed the traditional deistic antitheses of external and internal, positive and natural, revelations and religions. It starts from the assumptions that true religion must, from the nature of God and things, be eternal, universal, simple and perfect; that this religion can consist of nothing but the simple and universal duties towards God and man, the first consisting in the fulfilment of the second—in other words, the practice of morality.

The author's moral system, is essentially utilitarian. True revealed religion is simply a republication of the religion of nature or reason, and Christianity, if it is the perfect religion, can only be that republication, and must be as old as creation. The special mission of Christianity, therefore, is simply to deliver men from the superstition which had perverted the religion of nature. True Christianity must be a perfectly "reasonable service," reason must be supreme, and the Scriptures as well as all religious doctrines must submit; only those writings can be regarded as divine Scripture which tend to the honour of God and the good of man.

Tindal's 'deist Bible' redefined the foundation of deist epistemology as knowledge based on experience or human reason. This effectively widened the gap between traditional Christians and what he called "Christian deists" since this new foundation required that revealed truth be validated through human reason. In *Christianity as Old as the Creation*, Tindal articulates many prominent facets of deism that have continued to characterize that belief through subsequent centuries unto the present day:

## Links:

-https://archive.org/details/christianityasol00tind
Disqualification By Infinity

-Any attempt to disqualify any TTB with any variation of 'This TTB does/does not have X, therefore it cannot be of A-Ideal' will always fail within the larger context of A-Infinity. There must always be a way for any TTB to or not to do something, be associated with something, etc.

-The argument that Creator can potentially be mentally distant from God is a great example. There must be an infinite number of potential existences where, somehow, Theist itself is (again, somehow) also able to be mentally distant from God. Otherwise there is something that doesn't exist!

-PTBASE was also an excellent example of this!
False Quickening

-There is such a thing as false inspirations of the imagination. I've had many myself.

-Not all eureka moments are genuine and I've many times been led down paths I've later proven to be wrong because of it. It's easy to get superstitious and think they all come from the A-Ideal, but they don't. Or at least, not all are given as actual answers.

-Also, see Infatuation.
Actualized

## Definition:

Actualization or to be Actualized means that a thing exists as more than just Potential. Actualization is, therefore, the opposite of Potential. It is something that has actually been done or made.

## Examples:

-A painter has an idea for a painting in their minds. The painting does not actually exists as anything other than an idea. However, when the painter does paint it, they have Actualized the painting.
Eureka High

-Metaphysical principals can be difficult to hold in your head and when you have a seeming epiphany about something it produces a sort of feeling of gladness and eagerness to embrace it.

-Creator TTB artificially feeds into this by causing faux-Eureka Highs thanks to Regional Laws instead of Universal ones. It's easy to mistake regional principles for universal ones and this, coupled with an emotional rush, causes one to want to Shift.
Definition Of Creator (Theist)

-Creator likes to annoyingly change its definition to keep adapting to new arguments.

-Let's set the record straight - the Definition of Creator is to be about ALL CREATINGS IMMEDIATELY.

>Theist is immediately only about the A-Ideal, but Creator is not. Therefore, it will never emotionally feel like the TTB of the A-Ideal.

-Creator will claim to be about 'existence,' but this is A-Infinity (A-Infinity being all creatings) where else the A-Ideal is only about Existence (the only existence that counts, which is the Object of Itself). While both of these things can be described as existence, they are clearly not the same thing!

-Theist is only immediately about the A-Ideal, Creator is immediately about all creatings.
Internal-Factors Of The A-Ideal

-We cannot derive an exact, absolute TTB of the A-Ideal because we cannot know everything about the A-Ideal.

>Unless you know everything about the A-Ideal, you can never be certain that an absolute TTB is the right one for A-Ideal, no matter how closely it resembles what you know of the A-Ideal. That room will always allow doubt to enter!

-The A-Ideal can said to be Creator, but does that truly translate into Creator in general or something specific, something else entirely? We already know of at least two factors, such as God's Preferences, so we know there have to be more!
Gödel's Ontological Proof

**Gödel's ontological proof** is a formal argument by the mathematician Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) for the existence of God. The argument is in a line of development that goes back to Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109). St. Anselm's ontological argument, in its most succinct form, is as follows: "God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist." A more elaborate version was given by Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716); this is the version that Gödel studied and attempted to clarify with his ontological argument.

## References:

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s\_ontological\_proof
Go-Negative Vs Widest-Net

Go-Negative vs Widest-Net:

-According to the Umbrella-Model, all TTBs have perfect connectivity, they are all Wideset-net.

-What matters isn't the connectivity of the TTB but the nature of the TTB in question, which primarily os how reliable it is (Go-Negative).

-if think if you're honest with yourself, Creator TTB isn't the only result of Point of Infinity, you could also be about all things through Order or Chaos or even Destruction.

-Creator is primarily about creating, a specific idea.

-What is the point of having all things if your life work turns out to be shit? Clearly, Go-Negative is the primary deciding factor here.

-Umbrella-Model/Go-Negative comes before Widest-Net.

-The primacy of Go-Negative is obvious to the mind.
All Creatings

-Lesser creatings are by definition related to the A-Ideal and thus are 'a part of It' in an external way. To be about the A-Ideal, you must be about all creatings, since they are related to It by wont of sharing in Its nature.

-For the A-Ideal to fully be about only Itself, It must be about all other creatings as well, for they are related to it. If the A-Ideal is not also about external creatings, than there is something related to the A-ideal that It is not about!
Knowing God

-Theist is the Worship of Uncertainty.

-Creator lets you know what God is, what He does, what He expects you to do in general behavior, and what He exists as.

-Theist offers nothing but multiple versions of God. God could exist as an infinite number of things, but He is the Creator-Object, presumably because that is the greatest!

-Does Theist let you know what the exact Internal-Action is?

-So the Object of the A-Ideal/Creator-Object exists principally only for Itself. But It can do that in an infinite number of ways? Which way exactly?

-Practically, does Theist let us know what God expects or wants (if He does)?

-You cannot know God if you can't sync with the Internal-Action, and to do that you need Creator TTB.

>Anything else and sometimes your thinking with delineate from the truth nature of the Internal-Action!

## Syncing with the Mind Of God:

-Creator can be shown in the past to have allowed people to anticipate God's creation and His apparent expectations.

>You can see this in your own life as well. (self-note)

-Theist, however, usually leads to something else. This can be shown in my own life as well. When I was Creator TTB, the way things were made sense to me. As Theist, however, there was a lot more unknown and uncertainty.

-Theist bases its perceptions of God off of other people's cultural traditions and perceptions, but this can be dizzying and confusing. Creator gives hard, concrete logical reasons for what God is, His traits, and His expectations. There is certainty there, unlike with Theist which relies on all sorts of unreliable things like myth, religion and spiritual practices.
Distance Dilutes Connectivity

-Creator/Addition is both A-Ideal AND A-Infinity, so It exists all around us. It is immediate.

-However, A-Ideal/God is mentally distance, and so the Names of Theist are at a disadvantage over that.

>The Question of Actualization also doesn't help with this weakness of the Names.

\*Creator will always have a stronger Connecting-Factor or Connectivity because It is both immediate and simple.
Mind's Eye Argumentation

-Creator has always been very good at offering highly intellectual arguments in favor of itself.

-However, they tend to fall apart when applied to real life, usually because they try to approach the complex entity that is God's created life for us in an overtly simplistic manner.

-At the end of the day, Theist just makes basic, all-around horse-sense over that of Creator. Be about God, whatever He is, working to know Him while also being open to what whatever else He 'might' be.
Determining The Nature

-The nature of a thing is determined by its role. This is universally understood and is why a name given to something relates to its actons. For instance, the nature of a gardener is to garden. The nature of a carpenter is to do carpentry.

-The actions of something tend toward a final goal.

-The final goal of the A-Ideal is to be Existence Itself. This is Creator, since Creator is the TTB of Existence.

>We know this is A-Ideal's final goal because that is It's Internal-Action/Meta-Action.

>There is no other existences worth mentioning. They can exist only if the A-Ideal allows it.

\*What somethin is is what it does. Because all that it has is meant for a final-goal.

\*I think it's pretty obvious that 'nature' is a synonym for 'purpose' or what a thing is meant to do. Therefore, the question of something's nature is the same as asking what something is meant to do.

>The A-Ideal is meant to be Existence. This is because Existence is the sum of all Actualized-Potential. When you Actualize all of Potential, than you have the fullness that is Existence.

>The obvious definition of Existence is 'that which is the sum total of all that is or can be.'
Deism Links

A
--

Amazing Vigilant Deist (Youtube)

American Deist

American Deist (Twitter)

American Deist (Youtube)

Awake In Our Mythology (Facebook)

C

Central US Deist Convention

Cherry Picking the Bible (Facebook)

Christ Myth

Christian Deism

Christian Deism (Pinterest Board)

Classical Deism (Facebook)

D

Deism (Community Organization)

Deism (Facebook)

Deism (Twitter)

Deism (Youtube Playlist)

Deism Center

Deism TV (Youtube)

Deist Angle (Youtube)

Deist Paladin (Youtube)

Deist Reality (Youtube)

Deist Thinker (Youtube)

Deistpedia, Online Deist Encyclopedia

Devout Deism (Youtube)

E

Enlightenment Deism

I

Ideism (Youtube)

L

Legendary Deist

Lewis Loflin (Youtube Channel)

M

Modern Deism

N

New Deism Press (Facebook)

New Deism Society (Facebook)

P

Positive Deism

Proud To Be Deist (Facebook)

R

Reasoned Media

S

Sullivan County

T

Temple of Reason (Facebook Page)

This Damned Life

U

United Deist Church (Facebook)

United Deists of America (Facebook)

W

World Union of Deists
God Is Mentally Distant

-If God wanted us to be Theist, He would not have set things up like this.

-While God is technically Omnipresent, He is mentally distant, otherwise atheism would never be a thing.

-If there was any Name out there that was simplicity and could make God mentally immediate, don't you think someone would have discovered it by now and abolished any chance for atheism?

>But atheism is a modern problem, because God is still mentally distant!
Absolute-Ideal (Creator)

## Description:

The Absolute-Ideal is a single Object whose Substance is the combined sum of all other Substances in Existence.

## What Does The A-Ideal Do?:

-The purpose of the A-Ideal, as evident from Its traits, is to exist to explore/experience Existence by being and doing an infinite number of things combined as one.

-Being and doing things is Actualization, Actualization is Creating (Actualization always results in addition to Existence).

-The end goal is to create/add/will into existence a single Object of absolute perfection and infinite existence.

## Both Whole & Parts: Object Is Doing Nothing But Creating Thing(s):

-The A-Ideal is a single Object which exists as all things within A-Infinity being Actualized (ie, created) once all together as an Object.

-Ergo, the A-Ideal does nothing but create. There can be nothing else for It to do because It does all things in that act of creating all things together as one.

-The A-Ideal as a concept exists in Potential but Ind. shows that Existence is the A-Ideal, and so It Actualizes. ACtualization is by definition creating because It involves bringing something into Existence/Indivisability.

## Creator Of Existence:

-A-Ideal exists as an Object that is both self-creating Itself but also at the same time creating everything at once as a single Object.

-This includes the Being About All Things principle and Impartiality, so the A-Ideal is about Creating both Itself and all other creatings (presumably in a secondary manner). Thus, It is only Creator and about all things, It is the Creator Of Existence!

## Attributes:

-The A-Ideal is both an Object and an Action(s).

-As per Self-Creation, the A-Ideal exists to will Itself into existence, thus making It Creator.

>The idea of Sum Unknown is incorrect, Spiral-Staircase and Mechanism Of Superiority ensure the 'system' of A-Ideal is Addition.

>Also, No Parts confirms this. A-Ideal exists as the Color White, which is not an action but the Thing itself!

-The Scope of the A-Ideal, as per Aim Of The A-Ideal and Indivisability is all things, for all things either are A-Ideal or the work of the A-Ideal and exist within the A-Ideal.

>Also, Hard Reality confirms this!

## Does It Have Multiple Systems?:

-Is Addition the only 'system' or 'system of infinity' within the A-Ideal or are there more?

>Negative, the act of infinite addition is all that the A-Ideal has, for there is nothing else to do, and anything else would mean the A-Ideal has parts!

## Lofty Ideals, But How Can We Be Sure?:

-Complex metaphysics always brings with it the feeling of unrealness.

-But remember Hard Reality, any form of Theist is weak in daily life, only Creator TTB lasts because It has immediacy.
Divine Ladder

-The Creator-Object exists as a single thing, an Object, which is like all things somehow combined together.

-That Object can take Itself apart, or create finite things based on sections of Its infinite substance, which is what the Platonic ideals are.

-I use an analogy of a ladder to describe this.

-Because this facet of the Object exists with It and in It, it is therefore a part of It. Ergo, the Object is Creator in nature, because addition is all that It has and does.
Is Creator A 'Secret Nature' Of God?

-The A-Ideal is only all about the Object of the A-Ideal Itself, for that is all that It needs.

>This is true regardless of any created or 'mortal' Objects.

-Thus, the A-Ideal's one part is Theist, and that is the only part It has. Ergo, Creator in general cannot be a 'secret nature' of the A-Ideal because we have already determined the only nature of the A-Ideal.
Final Argument For Creator

-The exact TTB of the A-Ideal is Creator

>Because A-Ideal is all Potential Actualized as One, and Actualization is the Definition of Creator (as per any Act of Creating).

-The truth matters. The A-Ideal would never want Theist because it is inherently open to vagueness and uncertainty. The A-Ideal would only want us to be about It as It actually exists.

\*All TTBs have PTBASE. Even Theist.
Can Concepts Give Certainty?

-To put it more bluntly, can Concepts die or fade away or whatever? That is, can we trust that the Creator Concept is here eternally.

-All things are found in Indivisability which is Existence Itself (Color White)(Ind. must posses Potential for all things because all things move through It). It is infinite, eternal and universal. More to the point, it is Creator. At the very least Creator is a part of It. Therefore, through Ind., Creator as concept has always existed and will always exist. Because Ind. or whatever is behind It must have infinite power, It does not need to change and will go nowhere.

### Always The Potential For Creator:

-For anything to be Almighty It must at least possess the potential for Creator, so in that sense Creator can and will always exist.

### Always More Addition:

-There is also the notion that, even if the very concept of Creator were somehow erased, what would you replace it with? Still, all things are possible, but there would always be the potential for more.

### Creator of Indivisability:

-Whatever It is that is behind Ind. is really the best bet for Creator concept to be eternal. We have the emotional certainty of the Concept of Creator while also knowing that the BTI will ensure Creator always exists. And that Creator has Supremacy.

-It's a two-fold concept here: for Ind. to be complete It must at the very least posses Creator in potential and we can also know that Creator is the supreme concept because It is all Potential.

### Always The A-Ideal:

-Whatever is best or "in charge" must be or be the thing that closest resembles the actualized A-Ideal. And if Creator is the supreme concept, that means that it is the nature of the A-Ideal (Transference of Attributes).

-This means that whatever is the actual, Actualized BTI will only be the best in so far as It resembles the A-Ideal/Creator.
False-Knowledge / False-Theology

-False-Knowledge is real.

-All variations of Theist are built solely on the foundations of Protected-Knowledge, but PK has objectively true limits.

-Ppl spend their lives in false religions. Many ppl have lived and died believing in the Trinity. God clearly, objectively, demonstrably does allow false knowledge of Himself.

>Now the idea is that He draws us to Himself in time, and only allows FK that is still usable. But now we are taking about percentages and 'how much' of Theist can 'really' be trusted?

>This will always introduce doubt into Theist.

-It's important to note that Protected-Knowledge and the Great-Hope are not the same thing. GH can survive better with FK than PK can.

## PK Does Not Gaurantee Exact Answers, Only Good Enough Answers:

-But we don't know how close close Theist is to the truth? It's good enough, but what does that mean?

-It introduces doubt and uncertainty as to what we've dedicated our life too!

-There is the possibly that Theist, or any variant of Theist, may be good enough 'for now,' but in the future the truth could be revealed to make Theist inadequate at that point. It's at least possible.

## Isn't Creator Just About One Thing Too?:

-Creator has a sub-definition to be about that which is good in any scenarior of actualized existence.

## Truths-Unrealized:

\*There are an infinite number of truths in potential that, if actual, could totally invalidate any variation of Theist even without invalidating the truths that Theist TTB is founded upon. OESDE!

## Random Notes:

-Another way to fight hte Darkness, accepting Death.

-Best to have PK and also a backup plan just in case.

-Omni-Objectism Refuted - Creator is about just one object of itself, yes, but its definition is designed to seek out the good in any meta scenario.

-Admission of False-Knowledge, rejecting the "God is just refining our knowledge" argument.

-Creator has PK too!

-If PK is anything less than 100% all the time, and in everyway, then there is room for doubt.

-God could reveal some great truth down the road that somehow changes anything. And since there is an infinite number of possibilities, an infinity of infinity, there's no real way to say it can't happen.

-Point of Infinity is the natural TTB, Umbrella-Argument is an attempt to use perfect PK (which doesn't exist) to ramrod Theist TTB.

-The VOT has said many things which have proven to be wrong before, and who knows where it comes from or even how many there are.

-Do you want to risk dedicating yourself to something that might be true or something that is definitely true right here right now.

-False-Knowledge kills Theist.

-There is both PK and FK, you need to be cognizant of both to arrive at the correct TTB.

>We have some truth but God is slowly bringing us to more truth. We must thus remain open to all things, because who knows what God will teach us in the future.

-Jesus Issue = FK won't go away, if God lets ppl believe in Xtrianity, that always adds doubt.

-Jesus Issues = FK Won't Go Away:

-Creator as an auto-crrect, a sub-definition that defeats Umbrella-Argument's accusation against Creator TTB.

-Theist Is Strict PK:
Eternal-Potential

-The quest for Certainty has many roads, but the shortest of them is Eternal-Potential.

-If you are searching for something to dedicate your life to, know that all things, all concepts, will always exist in Potential because any Supreme would not change Potential, since that would entail changing Itself and gimping Itself as well.

-If there is no true Supreme, how can it muster the ability to erase a concept from Potential forever?

-Potential is eternal. Dedicate yourself to a concept and rest assured that it will always exist and exist as what you think it does.

-Actualized-God always entails argumentation which is parts. Doesn't work out against extreme doubt in the harshness of real-life. Concepts can, however, and the greatest concept is that of Creator because it is the nature of A-Ideal (Transference of Attributes).
Full Actualization

-Creator tends towards full Actualization, since Creator is Actualization. And the ultimate Actualization, the end-goal of all actualizing, is the A-Ideal Itself. There can be only one. Hence, Creator TTB really is just about the Object of the A-Ideal.

-Remember, as you progress, the need for multiple parts eventually evaporates as Creator fulfills more and more Actualization of the perfection that is A-Ideal.

\*Let me be clear, in its full and primal state, Creator TTB is the A-Ideal, which removes any need for multiple objects. With Creator TTB, in the end, there is only the A-Ideal, with everything else merely potential within the A-Ideal Itself.
More Certain Of Creator Than A-Ideal

\*We must decide on our own what our Anchor is going to be. God won't say.

\*If this isn't what God wanted, than why did He set things up this way?

-Certainty is the Anchor because you don't want to waste your life fighting for something that doesn't really exist or may be something different completely.

-Creator as something that exists is indisputable. It is a concept and we know it exists. We know it is supreme as per A-Ideal. However, the A-ideal, even if It does exist, involves further steps to prove Its existence, unlike Creator as a concept which is immediate to the mind!

-Therefore, metaphysically and epistemologically speaking, we are more certain of Creator TTB than we are of the A-Ideal. Therefore, Creator TTB before Theist!
Being About Itself

-The Aim of the A-Ideal states that the A-Ideal is 'only just about Itself,' but in what sense?

-There must be an infinite number of ways to be about one's self!?

-This is why Aim of the A-Ideal does not satisfy fully the question of what we should be about!?

\*Even if you thought Theist was enough before, this is a valid question. And now that you know it, you must deal with it.
Creator & Destroyer

-At its heart, Creator TTB argues that God is specifically Creator TTB, or at least is geared towards being Creator.

-However, God is really the Fullness of Potential, and Potential is both Creator and Destroyer (and an infinite list of other things, otherwise there is something that doesn't exist!).
List Of Attributes (Creator)

-You can only know that two or more things have the same nature via Transference Of Attributes.

-What are the Attributes of Creator? All of them, since anything that is the fullness of Creator can create anything, and therefore can generate any attributes they want. The A-Ideal also has all attributes. Therefore, they are the same!
Creator-Object

-This is what the A-Ideal should really be called.

-The A-Ideal's Core-Concept is that It is all things combined together into one.

>Addition is Creator.

>What is the Internal-Action of the A-Ideal? It is a single infinite action that can be described as all other possible actions somehow combined together. Again, there is the presence of existence and addition, which are Creator TTB.

-Also, it is Obvious to the Mind that the A-Ideal/Creator-Object exists as a single act of perfect, infinite Existence.

>Creator is whatever serves Existence, be it generating things, protecting things, maintaining things, etc.

-ISS demands we be about nothing but Creator-Object!

-Reverse Thinking:

>The A-Ideal can be thought of as all things combined together. Or, more accurately, all things exist as copies of segments of the substance/frequency of the Creator-Object.

-Does the A-Ideal want to be called Creator-Object?:

>This goes back to the Mind Of God; what does the Creator-Object want?

>
How Can We Be Sure A-Ideal Is Actualization?

## Notes:

-The A-Ideal Itself exists in Potential, therefore all things exist in Potential.

>Anything is possible, so anything has Potential.

-If the A-Ideal did not exist in Potential, we would not be able to think of It in the realm of ideas.

-And because the A-Ideal has No Parts, and the A-Ideal's only action is to Actualize Itself, ergo the A-Ideal is nothing but Actualization.

## Doing Something:

-Actualization is simply 'doing something,' bringing something into being. The A-Ideal's Meta-Action makes it clear that the A-Ideal is one thing which is like an infinite number of other things all happening together in order to make the A-Ideal.

Actualization & Potential:
Adepts-System Kills Creator

The Adept-System Kills Creator:

-Creator suffers terribly from Only-Half, but the Adept System doesn't!

-Just concentrate on being Adept TTB!

-The Adept-Systems argument is true regardless of how strict PK might be.

### The First-Thing:

-Adept-System beats Creator as the most useful TTB because God is the First Thing. We must always keep our eyes on Him first to discern reality.
Category Of One

-The nature of the A-Ideal would want a TTB that creates a Category of interest that includes only one object, the A-Ideal itself. This is unlike Creator, where the A-Ideal is the chief object but other objects also share in the category.

-The A-Ideal is only all about Perfection.

-This helps to explain how the A-Ideal can, technically, have an internal-action that is creating and yet not have Creator as its TTB.
Being About All Things (Feeling Distant From God)

-Technically, everything is God, or at least everything exists and happens within God. It is not possible to not be about God.

-Creator often makes you concern yourself with the world and mentally that feels distant from God. But this is an illusion!

-God is Existence. Remember that. All of Existence deals with Him.

### Learning to be like God:

-When being Kreator, you are in reality training to be more like God.

### The Urge To Specialize Only In God: Keeping God Vague:

-Since all things are God or are of God, specializing in God leads to cognitive dissonance.
-Also, it goes against Specific Worship. Theist keeps God vague while Specific Worship says He wants us to follow HIm only as He actually is.

-Besides, unless you are about all things, you are missing out on God, so this kind of thinking is illogical anyway.
Is A-Ideal About All Creating?

-The A-Ideal performs one act of Self-Creation which can also be described as all kinds of creating done at least once.

-While all other creatings after this are not necessary for the perfection of A-Idea, they noentheless are still connected in a secondary manner. For each act of creating is a replication of a segment of the substance of the A-Ideal.
God Doesn't Feel Real

-While on an intellectual level Deism makes sense, in real life, the idea of God is a hopeful one but often a distant feeling.

-It's hard to be about the traditional concept of 'God' outside of religion, especially in this secular modern world.

-Theist hopes to keep the feeling of God going by weight of mankind's past association with various ideas of the Supreme. But that is just religion. And religion is only one sector of life. Outside of that one sector, Theist quickly wilts.

-I'm talking about connectivity here.

-And trying to use Names like Ind. and other variations of Existence are good-hearted but they don't work. No one wants to stand there and go through the intellectual motions to remind themselves of why existence is definitely God. There is always that kernel of doubt or feeling of unreality about the whole thing.
Internal-Act

-Our TTB should be exactly what the Internal-Act of the A-ideal is.

>Why? Because Specific-Worship!

>The pluralism of objects is an illusion - in reality there is only God and whether we are following Him as He actually is.

-Internal/External principle shows that what the A-Ideal is all about on the inside, It will be about on the outside as well.

-The Internal-Act is the A-Ideal single internal action of Self-Creation, an aeternal moment of being an Object that is all things combined (added) together.

-The A-Ideal creates Itself in the moment of aeternity.

>And is about all things related to Itself as well, which would be lesser acts of creating!

>If the A-Ideal wasn't about anything related to Itself as well, there would be something that It wasn't! A missing 'thing' from within Its substance!

### Object of Itself?:

-The A-Ideal is all and only about the Object of Itself. But It is the Fullness of Creating and so It relates to everything else as Itsel which is Fullness of Creating/Object of A-Ideal. They are the same!

### All That Matters (in finding the TTB:

-The Internal-Act of the Creator-Object is all that matters in finding the TTB. The A-Ideal will only be all about just that.

-It's relation with everything else will be that as well, else the Creator-Object has parts!

## Determinate for Finding the TTB!:

-The only thing needed to determine TTB is the Object of the A-Ideal Itself. The A-Ideal is all sufficient in all things! including determining TTB.

-However, stating that the Object of the A-Ideal is only about the Object of Itself is a bit redundant, it does not tell you what the A-Ideal actually is or is about.

>Also, it is possible to be about yourself in multiple ways. Which way(s) is the A-Ideal about Itself?

-It is obvious to the mind that the Internal-Action is the sole Determinate for finding the TTB because that is clearly the one thing that God, the Object of the A-Ideal, is only all about.

-The Core-Concept shows that the Internal-ACt of A-Ideal is an aeternal act of Self-Creation. Ergo, the A-Ideal is all about Creator.

>Fullness of Creating because the A-Ideal is all acts of creating/existence combined into one.

-While only the creation of the Object of Itself is principally necessary, the Internal/External Principle shows that God would want us to be about creating on the outside of A-Ideal as well, so our TTB should be Creator!

## Shouldn't The Internal-Act Of The A-ideal Be The Adding Of All Possible Internal-Actions?:

-Yes, but arguing against Creator like this is pointless because the point here is that all possible Internal-Actions are still being ADDED together, making Addition the meta-action here. Still Creator.
Mighty Lead Pencil

-Potential of causation does not equal a given thing's list of natural attributes.

-Technicaly speaking, my led pencil has to be able to create/produce/cause anything else in A-Infinity. Otherwise, there is something that doesn't exist! But this does not mean that my pencil is a pure fragment of the substance of Divinity.

-Being able to produce all other things does not equal true possession of all substances. It is just a massive quirk of operating within Absolute-Infinity.

-Creator TTB and its argument for supremacy via Transference of Attributes is therefore misapplied.