To France

## text 1

Christianity and Islam are mere bullshit. Religion speaks about how to approach God, stories about God, and how to perform ceremonies. Christianity and Islam are absolutely agnostic about the essence of God. Theism is basing its core on a different doctrine; on agnosticism. Thus agnosticism is superior to religion, according to the official texts of religion... We can separate agnosticism in many categories. One basic view is "general agnosticism" which doesn't recognise the importance of logic/logical procedures and it's open to supernatural vagueness without any definition of exologic (it's just a junk nullness without attributes and ontology = without existence), and the other view is logicophysicalism (David Deutsch's physicalism; to differentiate it from mind-monism physicalism which is correct for accepting the physicality of the brain [see: neuroscience], but mind-monism physicalism doesn't mean that consciousness is produced and experienced outside a personhood-yielding computer like the brain; and the many-worlds interpretation can be viewed as a monist bouquet of alternatives, but that complicates things. Mind-monism physicalism has too many interpretations, thus I prefer the basic Sean M. Carroll and David Deutsch's physicalism (because science shouldn't overdefine things before its gradual evolution), and I use the term logicophysicalism to differentiate it from various interpretations.

Atheism is just a negation and a comment. Logicophysicslism is Bernard Russell's "rational agnosticism" which acknowledges the significance of foundational logic/ logical procedures in everything that exists. Knowledge is infinite. Also Stephen Hawking rejected his previous view, and understood the problems of the axiomatic systems (we need it in self-causation axiomatic trees)... thus an open axiomatics as physical foundations is compatibile to Kurt Gödel's incompleteness theorems. A universe with finite axiomatics (a closed axiomatic system) would be logically inconsistent.

I live in Greece. The national flag of Greece includes a symbol of a heretical Jew, some insane guy called Jesus trying to copyright love under his name which is the biggest blasphemy. The majority rule doesn't authorize the nationalization of metaphysical worldviews which should remain personal.

The national flag of France doesn't include junk theories about the Universe ad personam from God/ the personocratic Universe (the state of being a person has being rigorously analyzed and has nothing to do with quantum field theory which is the superior theory of physics we have [it's even better than quantum mechanics because quantum mechanics doesn't include special relativity; also supersymmetry and string theory aren't proven to be correct]).

The national flag of France is philosophically very important.
You have to know that.

It is important to be French.

Also humanity needs France.

\_\_\_\_

add that word (procedurality):

(la) procéduralité : l'existence de procédures ; le fonctionnement des procédures

Please keep that French word.

Can you please love a bit more the national flag of France? An extra bit more!

Because it includes rigorous philosophy without fake bullshit.