Aliens (Demons)

## About

An image highlighting the similarities between modern depictions of aliens and demonic entities channeled by occultists.

## Appearances

### Appears in

Real Life

For all of human history, we have told stories of being visited by beings far more advanced than us. With Sumerian legends of the Anunnaki to religious texts referencing flaming chariots in the sky and angelic beings from the Heavenly plane, our history is filled with these types of stories. As we've moved further into the future, as a society we have shifted our view from a spiritual perspective on this phenomenon to a more material perspective, interpreting these encounters as extraterrestrials with super advanced technology. Since 2017, we have been rapidly moving towards official disclosure of the government's knowledge of these entities, with their existence being officially confirmed in 2020 by the Pentagon. To this day we don't know much, but there are plenty of sources from the intelligence community, the military, and independent investigators that can help us paint a clearer picture of what exactly these things are.

## History of the Phenomenon

While most people refer to the strange craft seen in the sky as UFOs, or **Unidentified Flying Objects**, the federally sanctioned projects officially investigating this phenomenon have shifted to use the term UAP, or **Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon**. Back in 2007, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, or AATIP, reclassified UFOs to UAPs to mean "unidentified aerial phenomenon," but their investigation quickly made it clear that the craft they were investigating were transmedium, meaning they can operate in air, space, and water. The new UAP acronym incorporates USOs, or **Unidentified Submerged Objects**, thus bringing UFOs and USOs under one umbrella.

Throughout human history we have seen lights in the sky, and such phenomenon are recorded all throughout history. The Vatican archives have stories from the Roman government about soldiers seeing "flaming shields" in the sky, and there is the infamous "Nuremberg Aerial Phenomenon" that was recorded in 1561, describing a celestial battle of spheres, triangles, and cylinder-shaped craft.

Modern UAP sightings, however, didn't really begin until the 1930s. According to recent whistleblower testimony, the first recovered UAP in our current retrieval program comes from a crash in Italy that occurred in 1933. Before this point in time, the craft in the sky weren't leaving behind any physical evidence. This was true even in the case of alleged crashes, such as over Nuremberg, as the craft would be engulfed in smoke and leave nothing behind but craters. UAP sightings would really pick up during World War II, and would absolutely explode in the 1940s.

UAP sightings were first a huge phenomenon in South America, and it was such a big deal that the militaries of Chile, Argentina, and Brazil have disclosed that UAP are real for decades. The sightings moved upwards into North America, culminating in a string of sightings in 1947. When most people think of 1947 they think of the infamous Roswell Incident, however this was far from the only UAP encounter that year. Military pilots specifically were seeing a lot of them, and several military installations were able to register them on their surveillance equipment. Given the number of sightings coming from reputable service members, the Air Force decided they needed a better program to keep track of the sightings.

## UAP Investigation Programs

While originally all UAP sightings were reported to the T-2 division at Wright Field, the Air Force quickly realized that they were being overwhelmed and needed another program that was specifically dedicated to UAPs. Additionally, they wanted an added layer of secrecy to limit the number of people who had information on the more sensitive aspects of these craft. In a released document dated at July 10th, 1947, the Air Force Directorate of Intelligence at the Pentagon requested other branches, including the FBI, be involved in data compilation and determining how to investigate UFOs. A documented dated to July 30th, 1947, shows Lieutenant Colonel George Garret analyzed data from sixteen UAP reports which had occurred from May 19th – July 12, 1947. His conclusion was that "something is really flying around," and he suspected it might be an experimental domestic aircraft program.

At Garret's suggestion, the FBI begins an investigation to determine if the craft are of domestic origin. Lieutenant General Nathan F. Twining, under the orders of General George Schulgen, compiled and analyzed data regarding UFOs. Twining was the Head of Air Materials Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. His report, published on September 23rd of that year, concluded the following:

* The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.
* There are objects probably approximately the shape of a disc, of such appreciable size as to appear to be as large as a man-made aircraft.
* The possibility that some foreign nation has a form of propulsion, possibly nuclear, which is outside of our domestic knowledge.
* Give consideration the idea to the possibility that these objects are of domestic origin - the product of some high security project not known to AC/AS-2 or this command.
* The reported operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability (particularly in roll), and action which must be considered evasive when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar, lend belief to the possibility that some of the objects are controlled either manually, automatically or remotely.

In December of that year, General Curtis LeMay requested an update on the UFO investigation. Twining's report recommended a formal investigative project be established, and so on December 30th, 1947, Project Sign was authorized by the Director of Research and Development.

### Project Sign

Project Sign was headed by Major General Laurence Craigie and was active throughout most of 1948. It operated under the designation MCIAXO-3 and was established under the Technical Analysis Division of T-2. The official mission statement was to “collect, collate, evaluate and distribute to interested government agencies and contractors all information concerning sightings and phenomena in the atmosphere which can be construed to be of concern to the national security."

Project Sign had 2A priority (1A was the highest priority assigned by the Air Force) and was informally nicknamed "Project Saucer." The name comes from intelligence reports on Foo Fighters from WW II, however none of those documents have ever been declassified or leaked. Sign's initial belief was that we were dealing with aircraft that were Soviet in origin, given that the Soviets had grabbed some of the same engineers responsible for Avro Canada's flying disc program. Among Soviet German assets were the Horten Brothers, responsible for the "flying wing" prototype craft.

As they gathered more data, however, they quickly realized this was not the case. In fact, the Soviets had their own UFO programs that suspected the craft they were seeing were US in origin.

Project Sign's official conclusion was released in a report titled "The Estimate of the Situation." The Estimate claimed that they had exhausted all terrestrial possibilities, and that the craft might be extraterrestrial in origin. While an extreme belief at the time, it passed all the way up the chain of command to Chief of Staff General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, who thought this was insanity. Citing a lack of physical evidence, Vandenberg dismissed the report and ordered copies of the Estimate to be destroyed.

Major Aaron J. Boggs, affiliated with Naval Intelligence but not Project Sign, was also in disagreement with the extraterrestrial hypothesis. He believed that these were German craft, reverse-engineered by the Soviets. In November of 1948, there was a huge debated between Boggs and Project Sign officers at the National Bureau of Standards. The end result of this debate was the acceptance of the non-extraterrestrial hypothesis, and all UFO sightings and supporting documentation were to be funneled to ATIC and supporting organizations, leaving Sign with no new material to investigate. With a lack of reports to analyze, Project Sign was disbanded at the end of 1948.

### Project Grudge

Project Grudge replaced Project Sign after its disbandment, with the name “grudge” being used because this project was dedicated to cataloging only UFO encounters that could be easily explained. Officially, the name-change was because the name of Project Sign had been compromised through leaked documents by UFO researchers, although unofficially it was because of Boggs and his grudge against Project Sign.

After Project Grudge began collecting data, they quickly realized these craft were not Soviet in origin, and by 1949, about 20% of the sightings classified by Project Grudge were “unknown.” In 1951, the Pentagon was not satisfied with Grudge’s debunking efforts and disbanded and reorganized Grudge into Project Blue Book. Project Grudge officially reported that all UFOs were natural phenomenon or misidentifications, except for that strange 20%.

### Project Blue Book

Project Blue Book was officially organized in 1952 and headed by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt as its first director. While officially stated as being “less debunk-focused” than Grudge, but its purpose was to serve as a public mouthpiece to debunk UFOs and was staffed by many of the same Project Grudge analysts. Blue Book cataloged a wide-range of sightings, and announced the official conclusion that there was no evidence of “technology beyond human capabilities.” That being said, 21.5% of their cases were labeled as “unknown” after analysis by Air Force scientists. This estimate comes from a study conducted by the Air Force in 1954-1955 at the Batelle Memorial Institute, and matches the percentage found in Project Grudge. The Secretary of the Air Force, however, claims this number to be much smaller at 3%, and the final report of Project Blue Book itself claims that only 6% (701 cases) are truly “unexplainable”

The estimate from the Batelle Memorial Institute is larger because, upon further inspection, many of the cases that Project Blue Book labeled as “explained” had no explanation; they said they could explain them “with further research” but that it “wasn’t worth the effort.”

### Post-Blue Book

Publicly, the US Military claimed that with the termination of Project Blue Book, UFO sightings were solved and would no longer be investigated. In private, however, a document from October 20th, 1980 obtained via FOIA states that “reports of UFOs would still continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedure designed for this purpose.” The US Air Force continued to document sightings well into the 60s and 70s, with many of them occurring at nuclear sites. Recent disclosure reveals that, from 2007-2012, a program called the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was collecting and analyzing UFO sightings. While we only know of AATIP, it is very likely there were other programs between Project Blue Book and AATIP.

### AATIP and Modern Programs

Information about AATIP is currently still being released, but we know that it was under the direction of Luis Elizondo, who himself was a member of U.S. Army Counterintelligence Special Agent and former employee of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. It was also AATIP who decided to shift away from the term “UFO” due to the stigma around it. They started calling these craft UAP, or **Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon**. As the investigation continued, however, the definition of UAP was changed to mean **Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon**, to incorporate the fact that the craft are transmedium and capable of operation underwater. As discussed previously, UFOs and USOs are now all classified as the same type of phenomenon, which is UAP.

AATIP was dissolved in 2012 and replaced by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) in 2017 after *To the Stars* leaked videos of UAPs that were recorded by military equipment. UAPTF dissolved in 2020, and was replaced by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). While AARO was formed in order to help bring about disclosure and investigate programs hidden from Congress, it ironically lacks the security clearance necessary to investigate these alleged programs. AARO was denied access to a UAP recovery program, which is what spurred whistleblowers to come forward. Many intelligence officials joined the *To the Stars Academy* in order to push along disclosure efforts, working with members of the government who wanted to make UAP information public.

### Disclosure Efforts

In 2017, the New York Times published an article revealing the existence of AATIP and the videos leaked by *To the Stars*. The ex-director of AATIP had provided these materials to *To the Stars* and was working with them because he felt that the public had a right to know about everything that was going on. While the initial article got a lot of press, attention quickly died down. To keep pressure on the government to acknowledge these programs, *To the Stars* leaked another classified video in 2018. By 2019 some members of Congress were calling for a hearing on UAP, and the Navy quietly updated their protocols for reporting UAP. All of the videos released so far were "debunked" as CGI and balloons, however the Navy did a 180 and confirmed the legitimacy of the videos. In 2020 the Pentagon confirmed the authenticity of the videos and officially released them, ending the debate on whether or not they were hoaxes.

In 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a report on UAPs, saying that they were "unexplained" and "physical objects," but there was no evidence of them being extraterrestrial. The whistleblower DG filed a complaint with the Inspector General, claiming that there were UAP recovery and reverse-engineering programs being illegally concealed from Congress, and that he had been threatened with retaliation if he came forward with the information. DG had witnesses that were members of these programs themselves, and the IG investigated and deemed DG's complaint "credible and urgent." This year also saw the formation of the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG), which would be re-structured as AARO.

Moving into 2022, members of the Pentagon UAP task-force briefed Canadian military officials on their findings so far. Around this same time DG was facing increasing retaliatory action from the intelligence community, but by this point a new Inspector General was appointed. DG, along with the prior IG, went to the current IG and plead their case to present DG's "UAP-related urgent concerns" to Congress. He found the case both "credible and urgent" and set things in motion for a Congressional hearing.

2023 and 2024 have been huge years for the disclosure of UAP programs within the government. Multiple whistleblowers came forward, and DG got his UAP congressional hearing. He officially quit his federal position in April of 2023, and then came forward publicly with his allegations. While the intelligence community greatly limited with DG was able to discuss, several congressmen decided to investigate his claims. They were denied access to a SCIF to get more information out of DG, and were denied access to UAP-related evidence when they visited an air force base. This only spurred them on further, leading to several meetings with the intelligence community in which they were denied answers. They were granted one key fact in one meeting that was accidentally leaked to the public; advanced propulsion systems were part of this coverup.

2023 also saw the exposure of how UAP-related programs were hidden in the first place; they were classified under the DoE at the same time as the Manhattan Project, and thus exempt for traditional reporting channels. This was accomplished by carefully wording these programs/departments to include "any material with nuclear properties." Many programs were also contracted out to third-party aerospace companies, adding an additional layer to shield these programs from Congress. It also makes it very difficult for Congress to even pry for information, as the DoE and Atomic Energy Act make it very difficult for any information regarding these programs to come to light.

A UAP amendment was added to the 2023 defense bill, however it was significantly neutered/watered down, losing its ability to grant Congress subpoena power and the requirement that private contractors turn over their exotic materials to Congress. It does maintain that material and reports older than 25 years can be released, if approved by the president. Despite the failure to pass a full-strength bill, it revealed the 5 members of Congress who are actively involved in the cover-up. They are lobbied by aerospace companies that are accused of being in the reverse-engineering programs, and they fought hard to ensure the bill was removed entirely.

The director of AARO, who was initially very into UAP disclosure, does a 180 and begins denying the existence of UAP recovery programs. AARO was denied access to the security clearance necessary to investigate these programs, and its director began to face accusations by whistleblowers of being recruited by an aerospace company to work directly in these programs in exchange for his silence. A FOIA request indicated these claims were false, *however* sleuths found that the director was listed as an employee of the aerospace company. This was quickly removed, however at the end of the year the director of AARO resigned and announced he would be accepting a position at said aerospace company.

Angry that the bill failed to pass, the lawyer representing the ex-director of AATIP began to list of the names of the aerospace companies involved in these programs, as well as facilities where they were storing exotic materials. Towards the end of December a retired Rear Admiral of the Navy came forward, confirming the existence of an active cover-up and stressing the need to go public, although he warned that disclosure might come with significant disinformation about the true nature of the phenomenon.

A FOIA request for information on DG and his report to the IG was released, although it was heavily redacted. What was released reveals the DG wasn't just a normal intelligence official; he was in charge of investigating UAPs directly for 14 years. In fact, he was the one that proposed AARO in the first place, although he was dissatisfied with how it would essentially become Project Bluebook 2.0. Several intelligence officials came forward publicly to confirm his claims, and a SCIF meeting with Congress in January of 2024 confirmed all of DG's allegations, prompting further investigation. One of the senators urged reporters to hone in on DG's claim that these "weren't extraterrestrial" but "interdimensional."

## Categories of Craft

When it comes to classifying UAP, there are two categories: physical craft and Immaterial Anomalies.

The physical craft are a relatively recent phenomenon, first being sighted in the 1930s. Up until this point, throughout all of human history, there had never been a physical UAP that crashed or left any sort of evidence behind. Now, not only do they crash, but according to whistleblower testimony we are quite capable of shooting them down. Immaterial Anomalies, on the other hand, seem to have been present throughout our history, and these sightings constitute a majority of UAP sightings that occur today.

The classification is made based on how the UAP operate and what types of technology is able to detect them. Physical UAP will show up on FLIR and several radar technologies, but Immaterial Anomalies almost never have corroborating sensory data. In some rare cases, electromagnetic sensors can detect Immaterial Anomalies, but in most cases the anomalies leave no quantitative evidence behind. They don't leave any sort of trail behind them, when they descend from the atmosphere there is no air friction, and when they "crash" they leave behind nothing but shallow craters. Oftentimes these anomalies are very weird geometric shapes, with the most common seen by pilots being a dark cube in a clear sphere.

Physical UAP, on the other hand, all tend to be either saucer-shaped or cylinder-shaped, such as the infamous Tic-Tac video. There are triangular UAP as well, and these are widely believed to be reverse-engineered craft.

The distinction between physical UAP and Immaterial Anomalies is important, and one that has been made by both AATIP and *To the Stars*, and it's important because it helps to demonstrate the true nature of the phenomenon. While the [REDACTED] takes a more in-depth look, the short version is that physical craft seem to have a human origin, whereas the Immaterial Anomalies are labeled as "interdimensional." For this reason, you see a switch in the official terminology used by these UAP programs in how they refer to these entities, with them now being called "Non-Human Intelligences" (NHI) instead of "extraterrestrials."

## Aliens...or People?

A vast majority of UAP sightings that include descriptions of the pilots or crew of the craft all describe them as human. Those within the UFO community refer to them as "Nordic Aliens," and they are described as being tall, with blonde/red hair and blue eyes, and speaking with a European/German accent. Despite the popularity in pop culture of the Greys, Nordic "aliens" are actually the most widely reported. Additionally, Nordic aliens are the most documented in official UAP monitoring programs, such as Project Blue Book. The most popular of these is the 1966 sighting of Eddie Laxson, recorded in Project Blue Book. Eddie described a full on crew of humans piloting a Tic-Tac shaped UAP. The craft was on the ground and the crew was tending to it, wearing uniforms with unknown symbols.

Not only are Nordic aliens the most commonly reported, but many stories about the Men in Black stem from these as well. Specifically, most people who claim to have been threatened by these agents after reporting UAP sightings reported the Nords. Some speculate this is because the government did not want people to spread information that "German sounding" people were flying around in UFOs, as this could feed into the conspiracy that the Germans had manufactured these craft and escaped the end of the war.

## What about the Greys?

The second most common reported entity in these encounters are your typical aliens, referred to as Greys. They have bulbous heads, big eyes, and skinny bodies. These guys are described as being like biological drones, engineered for a specific purpose. Some people claim that they are piloted remotely via some form of astral projection, which is kind of crazy to think about. In any case, the common perception of Greys is that they are some super-advanced race of intelligent extraterrestrials, but recent disclosure paints them as potentially less advanced than we previously thought. Why? Because many of the craft allegedly in UAP recovery programs didn't just crash; they were shot down.

The big takeaway from that revelation is that they are not as invincible or advanced as some people portray them as. Assuming the Human Hypothesis is true, UAP technology isn’t so much advanced as it is alternative. What that means is their technology is based off of a physics model that is contrary to the relativistic model that has become popular in our society today. Einstein’s Theory of Relativity wasn’t so much a turning point in physics as it was a branching point, as German physicists resisted the idea of relativity in favor of Tesla’s luminferous aether.

Reverse engineering a craft like this wouldn’t be too difficult of a task, because we aren’t leaping forward millions of years as some people phrase it. It isn’t technology that had more time to develop, but rather it is just an alternate approach to engineering based on alternative physics models. This is why the US has been able to successfully shoot down so many UAP. While traditional jets and defense systems are inadequate, there is specially developed anti-UAP equipment that seems fairly effective. To many, this is indicative of a terrestrial threat as opposed to a more advanced extraterrestrial origin.

Solving the issue of faster than lightspeed travel is difficult as well. No matter how hard we try, lightspeed tends to be the universal speed limit. Some immaterial properties, such as information, can be transmitted instantaneously (as demonstrated via quantum entanglement), however we aren’t precisely sure what mechanisms are at play here. Because of all of this, it seems like the identity of these Greys might not be advanced extraterrestrials, but some other type of entity.

## Biggest Flaw of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis

The biggest issue in the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis is that the universe, as far as we can tell, seems void of any other advanced intelligence. To a lot of people this doesn't make sense, as there are an estimated 70 quintillion planets in the universe, which is 7 followed by 20 zeroes. With such a huge amount of planets many argue that, from a probability standpoint, we should expect to see other life. Not only should we see other life, but the universe should be teeming with it. Despite this expectation, as far as we can tell, the universe is empty.

This is summed up as the **Fermi Paradox**, which states that intelligent life should be common, and yet there is none. One proposed solution to the paradox is the **Great Filter** theory, in which there is some selective pressure acting on civilizations that causes their extinction before they become advanced enough for interstellar travel. Another solution is that, while life is common, intelligent life is not. Many scientists argue back and forth on these solutions, but a more recent proposal suggests that life is simply more rare than anticipated.

While this enrages some egg heads, this theory states that scientists have overestimated the probability of life existing by using planets and stars as their baseline in calculating probability. The Fermi Paradox and Drake Equation are based on the Earth being standard, rather than exceptional, and thus all calculations derive from "*given this number of stars, we should expect to see this number of planets. Out of those planets, this number should be habitable and support abiogenesis*." The issue, according to this new theory, is that they should be focused on the probability of abiogenesis as their baseline.

Abiogenesis is the biochemical origin of organic life; it's the formation of biological life from inorganic compounds. Abiogenesis is presumed to be the origin of life on Earth, and as a natural process its assumed to occur fairly commonly. In fact, given phylogeny and genetic studies, some suggest it occurred as many as 3 times here on Earth. The Fermi Paradox assumes abiogenesis is a common process, but this seems to contradict observational science and experiments that look into it. While amino acids do form in nature (and have been found on asteroids), they rarely last long when exposed to a non-isolated environment. For example, one of the most famous experiments regarding abiogenesis is the Miller-Urey experiment. While this experiment demonstrated that specific atmospheric conditions could result in the formation of amino acids, it also showed that these amino acids were immediately destroyed in the artificial environment that Miller had created. There are various models of abiogenesis that try and solve the issue of biochemical fragility, as most biochemicals are destroyed when unprotected in the presence of water, oxygen, and solar radiation. Biochemical fragility is a complex problem, as an oxygenated atmosphere is needed for a protective ozone layer, without which biochemicals would be destroyed. At the same time, that very oxygenated atmosphere destroys biochemicals. In water, experimenters have debated for decades about whether protein channels or amino acids were biochemically created first, as a protective membrane is necessary to prevent the immediate denaturization of the amino acids.

The requirement for very specific environmental conditions is a limiting factor on the frequency of abiogenesis, but it isn't the only one. The formation of amino acids is only a small part of abiogenesis, and there are a multitude of other factors that must be taken into consideration. This is because most biological functions require "left-handed" amino acid configurations, and biochemical reactions produce both "right-handed" and "left-handed" amino acids. Not only that, but 19 of the 20 amino acids constantly switch between their D and L-configurations when not bound together, and you need them all locked into the L-configuration to be useful biologically. The amino acids also have to orient themselves properly to form a properly-oriented protein, as an improperly oriented protein will not function biologically. The most primitive organisms on Earth use about 124 proteins and 300 amino acids, and an issue with even one of the amino acids results in the cell not being able to carry out biological functions and dying immediately. The formation of these proteins and amino acids requires 47,120 successive selections to occur, each with a probability of 1 in 2. Taken into account, there is a probability of 1 out of 1 x 1014,184 that these would form in a natural way, which is much more rare than assumed by the Fermi Paradox and Drake Equation. The formation of even the most simple biological protein we've discovered has a formation probability of only 1 out of 1 x 10130, which is still incredibly rare.

To put it into perspective, out of the 70 quintillion planets, if we assume that abiogenesis **will** occur on 1 out of 10130 planets, we don't even have enough planets to make that happen. 70 quintillion has 20 zeroes, whereas you would need 1 followed by 130 zeroes to have enough planets where the formation of a single protein starts to become probable. This doesn't even take the specific environmental conditions discussed previously into account, as this would lower the number of viable planets for abiogenesis to occur on. This probability suggests that Earth is *exceptional* as opposed to the standard, as our abiogenetic origin is incredibly rare. This solution to the Fermi Paradox is not very popular, because most people assume abiogenesis is a standard event in the universe. In fact, the commonality of abiogenesis is the primary argument for the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis, as life should be "guaranteed" given the size of our universe.

Proponents of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis maintain that, given enough time, abiogenesis would be more likely than calculated above. Mathematicians note, however, that time does not really increase the probability of a rare event occurring in a meaningful way, because the impact of time on probability is linear rather than exponential. That means that for highly improbable events, you need an incredible amount of time before time starts to make the event more probable. In the case of the above probabilities, the universe would have to be magnitudes older than it currently is in order for time to make abiogenesis more likely.

If an extraterrestrial species managed to defy the odds, however, and develop their technology to the point that they can travel and interact with us, we should expect to see evidence of their existence. Potential evidence that astronomers would expect to see are radio waves, light oscillations from stars they travel around/in front of, artificial optical wavelengths, and megastructures. Astronomers have yet to find any of these things, however, which is how the Fermi Paradox came to be.

There is also the issue of faster-than-light (FTL) travel, because while there are hypothetical ways to *go* faster than the speed of light, lightspeed seems to be the universal speed limit in regards to physics. It is unknown how a biological lifeform could survive FTL, nor is it understood how a physical craft could. Egg heads have suggested potential gravity manipulation, in which the craft would bend space-time. This is a potential solution, but if such a craft were traveling through space while bending space-time it would leave observable evidence, specifically redshifting of the light it passes through. There is also an issue with navigating at FTL speeds, as a tiny grain of space debris would obliterate your craft if you hit it.

## Interdimensional Hypothesis

The Interdimensional Hypothesis solves the above issues, because in this case our visitors are not from other worlds but from another dimension. The entities are able to "phase" into our dimension and interact with us, but there is no evidence of them in our universe because they are not residents of it. Some suggest that physical craft travel interdimensionally, using oscillations and the manipulation of a specific element to generate gravitational waves. Proponents of this theory claim that this explains the more paranormal aspects of UAP and NHIs, as many of them purportedly speak via telepathy.

This would also explain the nature of Immaterial Anomalies, as many of these UAP are complex geometric shapes. Some suggest that these UAP might just be the "shadows" of higher-dimensional entities, interacting with us in a limited way. This might also explain why the NHI use biological drones, like the Greys, to travel in our world, and how they are capable of piloting them remotely from their own dimension.

Proponents of this theory also believe that modern physical UAP come from instructions given by these interdimensional NHI, which fits common narratives about their origin. There is a lot of testimony from German engineers that many of their own egg heads were in communication with NHI who were guiding them to construct these new craft, which many believe were the first physical UAP. Many of the occult members that were part of the German government during this time claimed to be able to "channel" these entities, and that they needed to build a craft that could take them to their dimension. The [REDACTED] goes more in-depth into this idea and discusses the history of these programs in more detail, so stay tuned.

While these reports are hard to verify, German engineers recovered post-WWII by the US were put onto a project with military contractor Avro Canada to construct a flying saucer, based on their work at a German airstrip near the Italian border in the early 1930s. This seems to lend legitimacy to the claim that these engineers really were working on German UAP programs.

The Interdimensional Hypothesis is also supported by the recent whistleblowers, AATIP, and *To the Stars*, who have access to a lot of information regarding UAPs. The biggest takeaway from AATIP was that physical craft were coming from the oceans as opposed to space, and that the Immaterial Anomalies seemed to originate interdimensionally. Given the track record of *To the Stars*, their claims tend to have more merit than the claims of other "leakers" that have come forward. For this reason, it seems reasonable that their claim that these NHIs are interdimensional as opposed to extraterrestrial is more accurate than the claim that these beings come from other planets.

## Demon Hypothesis (Truth)

If we assume that we are dealing with interdimensional entities, then we can speculate on their true nature. We don't know much regarding this, only that it is apparently "horrifying" (according to *To the Stars* and ex-intelligence members) and "not at all what people think." We don't know much publicly about these entities, but we know a few of their core traits thanks to investigations by several credible scientists.

### Frenchy

The most famous of these is the French astronomer Dr. Jacques Vallée, who was also a computer scientist and researcher with the French Space Committee. In 1955 he had his own UAP sighting near his house, and then another with his fellow astronomers while working. They tracked what appeared to be an unnatural satellite in Earth's orbit, and when reported his superiors came in and deleted the data. This secured his interest in UAP, and he dedicated his career to investigating them.

Diving in headfirst, Vallée set out to prove the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis, believing that the Earth was being visited by advanced beings from other planets. He started his investigation in the early 1960s, and by 1969 he was convinced that the extraterrestrial hypothesis was wrong, citing that it was "narrow" and "ignored too much data." He would go on to adopt the *Multidimensional Visitation Hypothesis*, which was an extension of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis that stated that aliens could be coming from anywhere, not just space.

Over time, however, he came to reject the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis entirely, stating:

“*Scientific opinion has generally followed public opinion in the belief that unidentified flying objects either do not exist (the "natural phenomena hypothesis") or, if they do, must represent evidence of a visitation by some advanced race of space travelers (the extraterrestrial hypothesis or "ETH"). It is the view of the author that research on UFOs need not be restricted to these two alternatives. On the contrary, the accumulated data base exhibits several patterns tending to indicate that UFOs are real, represent a previously unrecognized phenomenon, and that the facts do not support the common concept of "space visitors". Five specific arguments articulated here contradict the ETH...”*

These 5 arguments against the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis were as follows:

1. Unexplained close encounters are far more numerous than required for any physical survey of the Earth. If aliens were visiting us to survey the planet or collect data, they were coming more frequently than necessary. Beyond that, they weren’t masking their presence very well, which would potentially damage any “observational data” they were trying to collect.
2. The humanoid body structure of the alleged "aliens" is not likely to have originated on another planet and is not biologically adapted to space travel. Most aliens reported in UFO encounters look like humans, and we are not well adapted for space travel. Even aliens that are not human-like are still very humanoid, like the Greys, and are still not well adapted for space travel. Additionally, these non-human aliens share many physical characteristics with demons.
3. The reported behavior in thousands of abduction reports contradicts the hypothesis of genetic or scientific experimentation on humans by an advanced race. Most abduction cases describe horrifying torture with medical devices and assault, and their primitive tools and methods of experimenting on humans seems to contradict their level of development technologically, given they should have craft capable of traveling faster than light. One would imagine that such an advanced race would demonstrate better technology in regards to collecting organic data, as even humans have developed more minimally invasive procedures to collect data from wildlife. Descriptions of abductions do, however, match descriptions of demonic torture.
4. The extension of the phenomenon throughout recorded human history demonstrates that UFOs are not a contemporary phenomenon. While physical craft, such as the traditional flying saucer, only appeared relatively recently, UFO-like encounters seem to have been reported all throughout history. These sightings were interpreted as spiritual by our predecessors, and they seem to exhibit supernatural qualities even when compared to the flying saucers of today.
5. The apparent ability of UFOs to manipulate space and time suggests radically different and richer alternatives than traditional travel from point A to point B. The craft seem to travel interdimensionally as opposed to linearly, which suggest their origin to be interdimensional as opposed to extraterrestrial.

While Dr. Vallée's theory was certainly different than traditional UFOlogists, he was invited by the CIA in 1974 to serve as an advisor for their classified programs on remote viewing, including Project Stargate. He worked with the CIA on remote viewing into the 1980s, and he worked directly with Harold E. Puthoff, a member of *To the Stars*. He would go on to become a consultant for the National Institute for Discovery Science and a member of the scientific advisory board Bigelow Aerospace.

He also connected a lot of imagery from abduction cases to occult symbolism, stating:

“*The symbolic display seen by the abductees is identical to the type of initiation ritual or astral voyage that is embedded in the occult traditions of every culture...the structure of abduction rituals...the UFO beings of today belong to the same class of manifestation as the occult entities that were described in centuries past.”*

Dr. Vallée connected the UAP phenomenon specifically with the occult, and he suggested that these interdimensional entities might be demons.

### Misinterpreting Advanced Technology?

Many people claim that the similarities are merely because people in the past couldn't fathom the level of advanced technology that they were seeing, and had no concept of aliens. While this explanation more closely fits with our modern concept of spirituality, there are actually good reasons to suggest that this naturalistic explanation is a misinterpretation of the phenomenon, and that we are misinterpreting demonic activity as extraterrestrial.

The confirmation that these are interdimensional, immaterial entities is the first suggestion that these things might be demonic. We also know from the history of documented encounters with these things is that they lie, a lot. Their explanations for their origins varies from person-to-person and from year-to-year, always changing to fit pop-culture ideas about aliens. *To the Stars* has suggested that, in the past, these NHIs presented themselves as gods to various cultures, lying to them for an unknown reason. So, while the NHI have always been present, their explanation of what they are has always changed.

Dr. Vallée points this out in his own research, demonstrating that nearly every piece of information given by NHIs in their various encounters is either nonsense or contradicts another encounter. They appear to be intentionally lying to us about their origins, always matching closely to societal consensus. This applies not only to what they say, but to their craft as well. UAP sightings have varied from flaming chariots, flaming shields, flying boats, flying airships, flying saucers, and now to modern UAP that are cylindrical and saucer-like. NHI seem to present themselves as always "just beyond" our current capabilities, both technologically and spiritually, for unknown reasons. Dr. Vallée does note, however, that the 1930s marked a change in UAP sightings as there were now physical craft that left behind physical evidence that could be recovered. Regardless, the active deception surrounding Immaterial Anomalies (which make up the majority of UAP sightings) makes it difficult to gain a traditional scientific assessment of the phenomenon, because we are dealing with an intelligence actively engaged in deception. Typically, when we study something, we are dealing with data that exists in its given form, however it is possible that with UAP and NHI, at least for Immaterial Anomalies, we are dealing with data that has been deliberately manipulated by the NHI. For this reason, Dr. Vallée advocates that investigators approach the phenomenon from the perspective of detectives, as opposed to forensic scientists, because we are trying to understand something that is intentionally guiding us to false conclusions.

### Weird Consistency

Despite the various inconsistencies in the testimonies of NHI, one weird consistency is that, no matter the time period (post AD) or the culture, they are obsessed with Christianity, and specifically Jesus. Nearly 1/3 of all globally documented NHI "dialogue" is related to denouncing the divinity of Jesus, and this is true across cultures. If these encounters were psychological, you would expect the religion discussed by the NHI to be based on the specific person's cultural heritage, but this is surprisingly not the case. No matter where the experience takes place, whether it be the US, Asia, Africa, or the Middle East, the NHI seem obsessed with letting people know that Jesus was not divine. Additionally, Dr. Vallée and other researchers have noted that calling on the name of Jesus, similar to how one would in an exorcism, almost always immediately ends the encounter.

The behavior of the NHI also seems in line with what is discussed about demons in various cultures, but specifically what we read in the Old Testament and the Book of Enoch. The Greys, for example, are alleged to be bioengineered and contain segments from the human genome, as well as other species such as bovines. This matches with the activities of the Fallen Angels in Enoch, who loved to mix the "kinds" of animals, including humans. "Kinds" is a Biblical classification of animals that is not represented in modern phylogeny, but it is similar to a "family" distinction. Understanding the Biblical concept of kinds is actually fairly important, as it shows up throughout the Bible. One example is the story of Noah's Ark, in which Noah is instructed to bring one of every "kind" of animal onto the ark, as opposed to one of every species. While hybridization naturally exists within kinds, the mixing of different kinds was considered an abomination. Many people wondered why God would consider hybridization an abomination if it occurs naturally, but understanding the concept of Biblical kinds makes it more apparent why this was a sin. Additionally, it shows why it was a demonstration of supernatural power by the Fallen Angels to create these hybrids, as humans are capable of creating hybrids of different species. We cannot, however, produce hybrids of different kinds (or can we?). If Greys really are an engineered "hybrid" of several kinds of animals for these Fallen Angels to pilot in our material world, then this would fit with their historic behavior.

A second consistency that we see in UAP encounters is the strange lights in the skies. While the type of craft and type of entity piloting said craft vary from sighting-to-sighting and across the history of the phenomenon, the general appearance of the lights and their movements has remained largely the same. Specifically, when these sightings end the craft always seem to vanish or fade away, as opposed to linearly traveling elsewhere.

## Why Biblical Demons?

While many different religions include demonic entities, what we are observing today seems to line up most with Biblical demonology. This is based on the behavior of the NHI, the content of their messages, and other occult connections discussed in [REDACTED] in more detail. While it is possible that the Bible's interpretation of these demons is based on encounters with extraterrestrials, right now there is more circumstantial evidence to suggest that a Biblical interpretation more accurately describes the UAP phenomenon we're seeing today. This idea is even supported by an officially funded organization within the intelligence community known as the [REDACTED]. This group sits on the fence between "we shouldn't be interacting with these NHIs because they are demons" and "they provide us with advanced technologies." As a compromise, the group investigates UAP programs and briefs intelligence officials involved on the Demon Hypothesis (Truth) to minimize a potential negative impact. Various intelligence officials, including the director of AATIP, have noted that they have spoken to individuals from this organization, and they agree with their general assessment that these things are interdimensional and malevolent. Many people with insider information on the subject say that the true nature of NHIs is "horrifying," and that it is a large reason as to why disclosure has not already occurred. The obsession of NHI with Jesus is another strong indicator of their demonic nature, as it seems silly that advanced extraterrestrials or non-demonic interdimensional beings would be so obsessed with one specific religious figure.

## Deception

Many people claim that the physical UAP, which are likely engineered by humans, will be used to deceive people and promote a more unified global political system. These craft, along with potential Greys, could be used to trick people into thinking we are being invaded by extraterrestrials. Such a scenario would surely unite the world together to fight off the "invasion," and we would gladly reorganize ourselves politically to develop a global defense system against UAP.

Some tie this in to how the world might explain a pre-Tribulation Rapture, in which millions of people would vanish instantly. They might report that they were all abducted at random by extraterrestrials, and we need to unite to defend ourselves so this will never happen again. Any political figure who uses this event as opportunity to push disclosure and force global governments to fess-up about their UAP programs would be seen as a hero, and the world would rally behind them. This could, in theory, set the stage for the rise of the Antichrist, although this is pure speculation.

Others still think a potential invasion from a breakaway society that utilizes these physical craft might be coming, and so the government is pushing a disinformation disclosure to make us think that we are being invaded by extraterrestrials as opposed to other humans from the South Pole/Hollow Earth.

## Summary

In short, the existence of UAPs has been officially confirmed since 2020, and we have had a lot of information released regarding the phenomenon. We know that the intelligence community divides UAP into both physical craft and Immaterial Anomalies, and they suspect they are interdimensional as opposed to extraterrestrial. There is active disinformation surrounding UAP discourse, and for some reason a lot of it is to promote the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis, because the government thinks people are more ready to handle that than the reality that these things are interdimensional.

These interdimensional entities are referred to as NHIs and have been around throughout human history, although they are deceptive and have lied about their true nature that entire time. They tend to be related to the more paranormal side of UAPs, including abductions/channelings. Physical UAP are a new phenomenon, originating in the 1930s and exploding in the 1940s. These craft are suspected to be human in origin, with NHI contact being used to construct the first ones, and they have been successfully reverse engineered in some capacities, such as the triangular UAP commonly sighted near US military operations. These physical craft all originate out of the oceans rather than space, while the Immaterial Anomalies seem to be coming from another dimension.

Most pilots of physical UAP appear to be humans, although physical non-humans have also been reported. These are allegedly biological drones piloted remotely by NHI, although this is impossible to confirm at this time. These claims come mostly from *To the Stars*, which has a pretty good track record when it comes to giving truthful information as opposed to disinformation, and from recent whistleblowers.

The activities of these NHIs matches classical descriptions of demonic activities, and they seem particularly obsessed with denouncing Christianity. Lots of people involved with UAP have occult ties, and the NHI themselves behave in occult ways. There is an organization within the government dedicated to making sure we don't mess up while making our "deal with the devil," and they brief intelligence officers involved in these programs on the Demon Hypothesis (Truth).