Antitheism

* Quantum Field Theory visualized · ScienceClic English · YouTube

Theism with strong characteristics is usually a monotheism, in which personhood and its bearer is self-caused, and the cause of everything (universe, paradise, hell, beings, celestial objects, etc.).

Personhood can only be expressed via a thinking organ. Via a personhood-yielding computer. The brain is a subcategory of computers because it procedurally processes information. Even idealized brains are based in logic, thus logic is more fundamental than personhood, thus theism is an impossibility.

Even idealized topological brains require space to be expressed (see: topology). Topology doesn't have absolute measures, but relationships amongst included points do matter. In topological quantum field theory (see: David Tong) even topology begins to have meaningful measure units if examined within a particular system (the idealized personhood-yielding computer = brain that would be a topological computer; it's defined via topological information theory; specific logic gates begin to standardize within the system, thus units of measure make sense within the system itself; thus space units do start to make sense in topological systems). Thinking requires data-processing time. Thus spacetime is more fundamental than the idealized topological brains. According to the Landauer's principle any data-processing has thermal losses (a reversible computing would be nearly 100% junk data due to the anxiety of God for losing data; but junk-data-hoarding causes ontological/wavefunctional entropy [useless and excessive information + spacetime to maintain it, just due to the anxiety of losing it]) which are physical (but that's not the biggest problem of God; he doesn't even have a rigorous axiomatic foundation to be causally defined to exist in the first place. The supernatural isn't only unreachable and unteachable, but it isn't also scientifically hypothesizeable because it lacks ontological foundations based on mathematical or allomathematical logic [allomathematics means different axiomatic system. Infinite axiomatic systems are possible, but still have specific and logical foundations.] The supernatural is an impossibility because it doesn't have any specific logical identity to be causally justified and causally be something specific.). All-knowingness isn't a form of intelligence, because intelligence requires processing ability. All-knowingness is stationary, not intelligent-like. Any computer is based on logic structurally and functionally. Any self-caused system like the universe without God or the God-universe system for the theists, has to be an ontological Turing machine, a subcategory of the Turing machine which is its own axiomatics, software and hardware. Thus neither God nor the physicalist [atheistic] universe can avoid the prerequisites for self-causality. Personhood isn't a prerequisite for ontological axiomatic systems. Personhood has philosophical and brain-systemic definitions; these definitions aren't identical (aren't tautological). The definition of the system which yields personhood = personhood-yielding computer = true brain is more fundamental than the definition of personhood itself, because sometimes general philosophers (non-neuroscientists; non-information-theorists) overestimate and/or underestimate some procedures/ data-processing (Brodmann-like) modalities. I have texts on "artificial neural network clusters" = true brains.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The supernatural is expressed by its believers in the form of stories and vague explanations. Supernaturalists (religious adherents, theists, mysticists, magicians, witches, astrologers etc.) never explain a rigorous causal connectome of logical interactions and relationships without causal gaps (yes; they leave open too many causal gaps; one isn't a great thinker for not thinking or by not understanding the necessity of logical foundations to everything substantial.).

Mistakes are erroneous memories (pseudomemories), semantic mismappings and data-processing errors within physical worlds.

Yes, mistakes are physically possible.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_