Perspectival substantiality (perspective/perspectival/perspectivalist substantiality)

# Προοπτικιστική υποστατότητα

Things that exist in a common universe-strain comprise a common substantiality if they exist inside the same Hubble volume of subluminal causality (and many Hubble volumes afar, because they are infinite and overlapping, but gradually [tending to infinity; or is there a quantum threshold of causality via intermediaries? [we have to mathematically check it]] quantum decoherence builds up).

Things that have the potential to co-exist, live inside the same Minkowskian future cone. But that's not where the store ends, because the future cone is the cone of possible quantum interactions.

There is a hypernym of causality; the fading-out overlapping nearby space regions that do not have the possibility of direct (hyponymic/hyponymous/subordinate) causal interaction with the central point which defines the Minkowskian cones, but nearby regions which due to infinite other Minkowskian cones overlappingly shape a commonish (commonish because details about events are allowed to vary if they don't deviate enough to separate discausally the universe-variant/universe-strain).

Does only the present exist, of zero spacetime? Absolute moments include zero spacetime thus are unsubstantial. Substantiality necessarily requires spacetime (space and time). Relative moments are regional events of specific duration and space area of interactions.

The past and the future are not synchronous for all observers (see the work of Albert Einstein). Overlapping moments of different observers hold the universe-strains as wholes (with manyworlded/Everettian multifurcations in the details [when you "see" someone's face you don't see all her skin particles, you don't violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to force-decide all quantum properties, and most entanglements are partial; things loosely or non-entangled do exist in a range of alternatived according to you and to the owner of the face [she doesn't have a pointwise personality to force-detect her mereological complex [non-simple] self]).

The past and the future don't reachably exist now for the observer (the observer is any spatiotemporal region; observer = arbitrary spatiotemporal regions/area), but along with the variations of nearby overlapping (and non-overlapping via overlapping intermediaries) Minkowskian cones (with reference to other arbitrary observational centres which deviate around the initial arbitrary observer) they shape a multifurcated haze (with Everettian/many-worded deviations) of a specific universe-strain.

"Omnipointwise superluminal big bangs" means that big bangs start from a dense state of pointwise superluminal maximally degenerate phase transition of infinite matter which isn't a point, but each point in it superluminally expands with reference to itself one-by-one.

Big bangs (uncapitalised due to cyclic cosmology; the antientropic Penrosean cyclic cosmology is necessarily wrong the way it's presented) being omnipointwise cause the universe-strains to separate (except if we can prove that: 1. big bangs have two phases and collapse to become maximally degenerate black holes and bounces back more forcefully, homogeneously and isotropically, but 2. still the causal coherence of the universe isn't safe, it still might produce totally separate universe-strains due to big bangs' pointwise superluminal expansion... except if we take into account the third tier of causal hypernymy/superordinance which is the common ontophysics (ontophysics mean physics as they "ontologically evolve to be" [not statistically are, because ontoaxiomatics is an entropic and uncertainty algorithm] and not as they are scientifically approached]).