Cyclic universe text 1

I've sent that message to Paul Steinhardt:

He wants the universe contracting

data show it's expanding.

Both theories can have a DIFFERENT cyclic defaulting for different reasons but Paul Steinhardt presented his opposing theory as a theory of retards, but the whole point is to create top quality alternative theories = different mechanisms of defaulting the universe without causal connection.

PLEASE HELP HUMANITY UNDERSTAND!

TELL PAUL STEINHARDT TO PRESENT EVEN HIS ENEMY THEORY IN A RESPECTFULL MANNER WITH CORRECTIONS TO HELP THE CHILDREN OF HUMANITY UNDERSTAND! THE VICTORY OF THE EGO ISN'T THE POINT!!!!

Here is the message I sent to him:

Your cyclic theory is correct.

You erroneously presented that your theory is different than the theory of inflation,

(ok, inflation is ultra fast and a huge expansion, and your version is a milder defaulting)

by presenting inflation extremely clumpy. Your mistake is that the fundamental fields are impossible to get that crumpled and with so many high peaks per volume chunk after some threshold of high-peak crumpledness a phase transition still makes them as your own theory = it defaults them.

Do some steel-manning = present your enemies strong.

I know you try to present your self strong, and others weak.

Be magnanimous.

Sacrifice yourself for physics = which is maximally stupid at an individual level, but maximally beneficial for the understanding of physics.

Try to improve the position of your enemies.

Create a similar scalar phenomenon = a defaulting not because of causal connection,

but because the universe isn't allowed to express too extreme peaks of mass-energy per big order of magnitude volume.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

Try to improve your own version of the theory,

and also the theory of your enemies.

This will be important for humanity because we need to understand both a general relativity model AND a more rigorous quantum field theory mechanism which isn't that simplistic.

Try to bridge the two (supposedly when presented as caricatures) pseudo-opposing theories.

All people die one day.

Major victory for the ego cannot be eternal.

If you help humanity, your contribution will be remembered for longer.

Don't kick your enemies hard in the face. Help them! Actually you have no enemies.

These phenomena are very intricate and we'll need to resolve subtleties.

Make the theory of your enemies after too many big peaks per huge order of magnitude to default due to informational entropy...

Thermodynamic entropy and informational entropy are Interconnected in the quantum foundations.

By bringing these two pseudo-opposing theories together, we might gain more insight.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

Victory is very important in sports.

In physics understanding is the only victory.

We create models of the world.

Even different models of the world are useful if we don't mock them.

Keep some differences,

but also present the standard inflationary model as a defaulting without causal connection due to a formula which connects thermodynamic entropy and informational entropy.

Help physics.

Sacrifice yourself for physics.

Help your enemies.

They don't have the power to fight you in the same tier.

It is stupid to help one's enemies...

but victory or loss doesn't matter here.

We have to understand the universe.

A more useful enemy theory will help us ask more interesting questions.

If you present the opposing theory as retarded, you don't help enough physics.

Put physics first; before the self.

You can still win.

But if you really love physics the most important thing is to understand the universe.

The ONLY important thing.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The extremely increased acceleration of the future universe, will produce enough mass-energy to collapse it and make it a black hole core.

Brian Greene always erroneously shows that the pre-big-bang state was a finite spherical ball and not an extremely huge (or correctly universal due to an overall universowavefunctional state) dense region. Shame on you Brian Greene. Inflation doesn't have to straighten that stupid fake ball.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Here Paul Steinhardt mocks = presents as retarded his opposing theory.

He doesn't mention that an acceleratingly expanding universe will collapse due to mass–energy per volume meeting the criteria for a universal black hole core; and that a phase transition will not allow the mockingly extreme peaks he shows.

Cyclic big bangs start normally in his opposing theory IF HE DOESN'T MOCK IT!

video: Was the Big Bang the Beginning? Reimagining Time in a Cyclic Universe - World Science Festival - YouTube