recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
AI text to lava image art generation

Lava blood katana swear kill beheaded snakes dead murder twenty beheaded heads dead bodies a lava river snake nuclear bomb huge nuclear bomb raining gold nuggets and raining black ink

nuclear bomb inside the lava head of the thousand gold nuggets lion, it is raining black ink, the sky is a spiral galaxy with pterodactyls

Dark home in the night with nuclear explosion inside, thunders outside, a lava mountain exploding a lava laser katana from its caldera, the sky is a phosphorescent spiral galaxy, the sky is replete with a majestic lightning mesh
Comments sent to DW

## true digital personhood

You never mentioned AI mimicking all Brodmann areas

and all their complex interactions.

see: Nancy Kanwisher and Mark Solms

Also we should mimic the limbic system, the dopamiergic pathways, the default neural network, coherence centers of the cerebrum and of the brainstem (see: Mark Solms).

Please elaborate more on these.

I have more texts on true personhood vs philosophical zombiehood.

(God is a related topic. Personhood requires a personhood-yielding computer = brain with Brodmann-like subroutines. But logic is more fundamental than personhood modalities; thus God isn't fundamental; it cannot exist. (see: quantum foundations and hypernymously: axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations). Also spacetime is a prerequisite for personhood-yielding computers, because the connectome requires space to be expressed (being not a mereological simple; without proper parts there are no memories [each memory is comprised of many shannons/ shannon: unit of information] and Brodmann-like processing modalities).
Data-processing = thought requires time. All-knowingness being stationary isn't intelligence. Intelligence requires procedural ability and mental flexibility (see: The University of Oxford, books on intelligence)
There cannot be a single mother theory

## There cannot be a single mother theory, because mathematically incompatible universes are possible

There cannot be a single mother theory, because mathematically incompatible universes are possible.

There cannot be a single functional Everything (the Everything system), because: 1. it would contain mutually exclusive parts, 2. (if it's not a sole functionality but a list of disparate things) no list-making algorithm could select and include all possible things with the same tallying routines (it's impossible to create a program that is able to describe all the parts of the supposedly single entity of Everything), 3. No 2 isn't trivial (a mere human inability to account its parts) but fundamental (for example the criteria of inclusion in the Everything are undefinable [they cannot work for all things; incompatibilities and mutual exclusions emerge])

We shouldn't use the term Everything for the physics of our local universe (which seems to be axiomatically open-ended to meet the criteria of self-causality in a connectome of alternative physical foundations).

(Self-causality ex nihilo without an axiomatic foundation doesn't lead to physical foundations.)

\_\_\_\_\_\_

The true nothing is one (actually it "is" a human definition without ontology/physicality/substantiality). It is stationary. It doesn't exist. It's not a potential state.

Nothing is not the idea one has as a neural connectome about the definition of true nothing/absolute inexistence.

You cannot give nothing as a gift one asked for (Sabine Hossenfelder has a YouTube video on it), because they'll get interpretational feedback from their brain[s]. If they forget what they asked, then the whole process is causally wrecked, and the causality becomes the neurological causes of forgetfulness (see: neuroscience).
Γιατί η θεωρία κοσμολογικής προσομοίωσης δεν ισχύει

## debunking the simulation hypothesis

Ζούμε σε κόσμο άπειρων επιπέδων προσομοίωσης επί προσομοίωσης. Γιατί αυτό δεν ισχύει: 1. ο πρώτος κόσμος είναι αναγκαστικά πραγματικός, άρα έχουμε μετάθεση προβλήματος, 2. υπολογιστικό σφάλμα εμφανίζει κάθε υπολογιστής εγγενώς (πχ αστάθεια χρονισμού κτλ), με σφάλμα άπειρων επιπέδων προσομοίωσης, οι κόσμοι που θα βρίσκονταν πάνω σε άλλους από ένα επίπεδο και πάνω, θα είχαν τόσα σφάλματα που θα ήταν αδύνατον να λειτουργήσουν.
Ethnocultural nonconformity

• ethnocultural nonconformity

• ethnocultural noncompliance (Finnish: etnokulttuurinen noudattamatta jättäminen)

definition:

inadherence to race, tribe, mainstream metaphysical worldview and/or national identity

example:

Ethnocultural nonconformity isn't recorded by the US Census Data and Statistics, because the US is a deeply racialist country which doesn't respect diversity.

### related terms

* aracialism
* nonracialism
* race inadherence, race non adherence
* race nonconformity
* antiracialism

## Etnokulttuurinen noudattamatta jättäminen

* Englanti: ethnocultural noncompliance/ ethnocultural inadherence/ aracialism: Se, ettei kuulu johonkin rotuun, heimoon, metafyysiseen maailmankatsomukseen ja/tai kansalliseen identiteettiin ideologisista syistä. Monirotuisuus on ruumiillinen tila. Jos monirotuinen hyväksyy ruumiilliset ominaisuudet asianmukaisina sosiaalisina merkkeinä, hän ei ole etnokulttuurinen anti-konformisti.

Anarkistit eivät ole ainoita, jotka hylkäävät valtavirran sosiaalista lokerointia koskevat säännöt.
Personhood-yielding computer

### *create page*: **personhood-yielding computer**

Please create a dedicated article. The **personhood-yielding computer** is an important field of study.

Paragraphs:

1. human brain; neuroscience; the biological brain[s]
	* Personhood is gradient (gradience of personhood). Not only a single brain architecture can be personhooded enough and equivalent to the human brain
	* criteria: all the Brodmann areas and their combined functions not the exact cytological in different possible brain architectures but the generic data-processing (memory, default mode network, senses, procedural abilities, understanding abilities, memoremotional wiring to yield memories and physicalize emotions via a cascade of physical impacts based on data = emotion is to procedurally physicalize data via complicated data-processing centers of different function// consciousness is a vague term, the correct is data-coherence centers and procedure-coherence centers = many centers of consciousness [but the term consciousness is too vague and for some becomes supernatural = undefinable by mistake and biased perspective)
2. personhood-yielding digital computer: program-based, electronic-based (with physical processing units which are task-specific and not generic) and the best option: hybrid digital brain = based on programming, generic processing units and task-specific processing units (GPUs + CPUs + Non-Wafer PUs + program-based non-general PUs all in one system)
	* same as the biological brain: No single personhood-yielding brain architecture is possible, but the basic data-processing modalities of the Brodmann areas have to be met (no cytological focus)
3. soul: simple (philosophy) = has no proper parts; impossible to have modalities = Brodmann-like areas. The soul doesn't meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations to self-exist; neither any logic to have identity (it is only a lay narrative)
The impersonality of the physical foundations

impersonal cosmos

God is personhooded. God necessarily has a brain. All brains are informational processing machines. Brains are personhood-yielding computers. Even idealized computers occupy some topological volume. Study what topology is. In topology specific units do not matter, but specific relationships between points inside objects do matter. Thought is temporally exhibited. All-knowingness doesn't meet the prerequisites for thought because it's structural and not procedural. Space and time = spacetime is a prerequisite for brains. When one speaks about the mind; has also to elaborate on how it's produced via neuroscience and information theory in an idealized manner. The brain and the mind aren't prerequisites for spacetime and cosmogony. Personhood-yielding computers (brains) have parts able to create personhood (see: Nancy Kanwisher, Mark Solms). Personhood isn't self-caused ex nihilo and cosmogonic.

The soul is unprocedural and a mereological simple, thus it's impossible to convey memories and procedural modes (see: Brodmann areas). The soul doesn't meet the criteria of substantiality [it means it doesn't exist] (it's not a causal connectome).

physicalist foundations of substantiality: Everettian constructor (see: many-worlds interpretation, constructor theory)
Knowledge requires personhood

Knowledge isn't merely complicated metainformation (information about information) and information useful for explanation (that is potential knowledge for a knowledge-able person/procedurally thinking interpreter).

Knowledge is procedural within a personhood-yielding computer = brain which yields a mind.

Procedural control without consciousness isn't knowledge; it's complicated procedural control. David Deutsch distorts mentalese in his definition of knowledge.

Consciousness is a philosophical term; practically it is the result of a personhood-yielding computer (meeting the criteria of personhood) which must have many processing Brodmann-like modes (and regions), and metaprocessing coherence controllers which integrate many routines (without metaprocedural integrators we have a philosophical zombie).

Knowledge requires a living brain/an active mind (digital, biological or else; the hardware of it doesn't matter).
Gravity as transitional timeflow sharing

You cannot avoid guessing new phenomena like the colorcharge-superfluid torus instead of the volumeless ringularity (fake-ularity/singularity/ringularity). And you have to rigorously describe the new phenomena (even-numbered polyquark so degenerate that is becomes only a colorcharge torus with a haze of the rest quark properties on top, and a quantum tunneling reabsorption mechanism at a higher layer, still inside the event horizon). If you don't describe new phenomena, you get infinities in the solutions. And if your description of the new phenomena aren't rigorous, it still doesn't work. // We know from CERN, Fermilab etc. that the universe is continuous, thus any non-continuous theory of gravity which isn't a gradual transition of timeflow (internal clock/ internal timing) sharing is erroneous.
Explaining physicalism to a primitive asshole

God is a person. God isn't an atheistic process like physicalism.

Theism with strong characteristics requires:

1. the self-causation of personhood and at least one primordial person

2. the causation of everything from personhood and its first bearer (the protoperson)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Personhood can be exhibited without thinking and without a personhood-yielding computer = brain.

The brain is a subcategory of the computer, because it processes information.

Quantum field theory is the closest theory we have to particle physics accelerator data. It's the deepest theory we have. Personhood isn't part of it.

In order we have personhood, these are the mechanistic prerequisites (vagueness doesn't lead to personhood):

1. personhood-yielding computer (true brain; regardless of its materialization)

2. thinking (that personhood-yielding computer acting [processing data yields various outcomes]/ a true brain functioning)

3. personhood

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

General philosophers (for example not neuroscientists and/or philosophers of neuroscience) focus on the final outcomes of personhood (the condition of being a person), but neuroscientists and Artificial Intelligence programmers focus more on the mechanisms which yield personhood (Brodmann-like processing [see: Brodmann areas; Quanta Magazine's articles and YouTube page). General philosophers might overestimate or underestimate some properties of personhood. People who study personhood-yielding brains (neuroscientists; watch on YouTube and read the books of Nancy Kanwisher and Mark Solms) and people who try to build personhood-yielding brains (AI computer scientists) are closer to the essence of personhood.

(I have texts on personhood-yielding Artificial Neural Network Clusters.)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Some conservatives (not all of them) claim that "ad personam cosmogony" (everything was created by a person) is kindness and physical axiomatics (the axiomatization of physics effort started with David Hilbert but he has many mistakes; David Tong's views are closer to modern particle physics accelerator data) = logicogony is evil.

You have to prove what you mean.

God is kind for allowing rape, murder and torture say the theists, because that's our quality.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I have texts on: Why idealized topological brains are impossible to exist in non-physical form.

Only uneducated people are theists, because they don't define personhood and its procedures. Theists might be educated on other fields, but not on the logical foundations of personhood, neither on the axiomatic prerequisites for spatiotemporal foundations (see: quantum foundations, but we have to generalize the properties of any universe-like world with different physics [there is no absolute generalization but some general axiomatic workarounds as foundational characteristics of the different physics [any axiomatic system faces some problems; at least one of them: incompleteness, inconsistency and incalculability]).
Unruh Cyclic Cosmology

Unruh Cyclic Cosmology: (The capitalized Universe is the proper name of our local universe [noun].) The Universe acceleratingly expands. Each Hubble volume generates causal cutoff radiation equal to its diameter; but because Hubble volumes are infinite and overlapping, the "Hubble volume field" produces a peak radiation close to 3 Hubble volume diameters (actually I am wrong and we have to recalculate it thoroughly). The Universe acceleratingly expands, thus each Hubble volume shrinks, and the Hubble volume field Unruh radiation increases, and at some point it will reach the black hole formation limit. Infinite many black holes will be created in the Universe, and they will merge to create the omniblackhole = all the Universe becoming a black hole. The omniblackhole has only interior and no exterior. We observationally know, that the black hole core acts as a single particle, thus we can explain the homogeneity (and isotropy after the omniblackhole explosion) of the Universe. There is no singularity, because it's non-spatiotemporal. The black hole central particle is maximally degenerate spacetime (not singularity). Degeneracy has a limit (of compression); after that the black hole expands/becomes bigger and ejects energy via its jets; the omniblackhole has no outside, thus it necessarily produces a big bang (here big bang is a cyclic universe noun; the proper name Big Bang is the name of the big bang of our particular/specific universe-strain). The Roger Penrose phase transition has some theoretical gaps. The Unruh Cyclic Cosmology seems better but it's not the only cyclic cosmology theory.
Physicalist Institution

## text 1

A Physicalist Institution should be established. Not related to simplistic physicism/old physicalism = the claim that physics is closed (the ontologically correct physics and not the physics of science which is imperfect). See: causal closure versus Everettian hypernymization (many-worlds interpretation + many-axioms interpretation = thus even more alternative universes exist; the opposite view is the overscientificication of science. Sabine Hossenfelder claims that science is only about what we measure, but she debunks herself with superdeterminism because she doesn't care about the pre-Big-Bang state even though she pretends she works on the quantum foundations (see: Robert W. Spekkens - Perimeter Institute). ANY, I repeat ANY fundamental theory in physics (which isn't a Newtonian simplification) has an impact on the quantum foundations and the axiomatic system of physics. David Hilbert worked on the axiomatics of physics but David Tong is better. We factually know from particle accelerators but also mathematically (in quantum field theory which is the most accurate physical theory) that the more we zoom in in physical phenomena, the more complexity we reveal. The axiomatics of physics isn't a list because no undefinable person is allowed to magically create that list; it should be an axiomatic algorithm, a subcategory of the Turing Machine = an ontological Turing machine which is its own hardware, software and axiomatics. The problems of axiomaticity (incompleteness, inconsistency and uncalculability) cannot be overcome, but they can be worked around via Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (by not revealing everything at once), ontological entropy (they fact that universe expands is a form of ontological entropy). Different universes should have different axiomatic workarounds. The Physicalist Institution should be established to focus on deep atheism = to explain deeply the affirmative modern physicalism (physicalism without causal closure, without closed physics).

## links

* Lectures on personhood and on the personhood-yielding computers (true brains)
Entanglement

## quantum entanglement

We can conduct an (impossible) thought experiment:

we create LOCALLY an entanglement (entanglements are locally produced)

and slowly we separate the two afar particles many Hubble volume afar from each other.

Intermediary Hubble volume denizens transfer the information amongst the two physicists who handle the different particles.

Still quantum mechanics holds true, even if a very huge number of Intermediary Hubble volumes exists.

That overall spacetime is the locality of the wavefunction. That cannot change.

Also the entanglement was locally established.

\_\_\_\_

You didn't mention that.
Ανθυπερφυσικές αρχές

synonyms: αντιυπερφυσικές αρχές

English: antisupernatural principles

Το υπερφυσικό δεν είναι μόνο μη γνωρίσιμο και μη διδάξιμο, αλλά είναι και επιστημονικώς μη εικάσιμο, διότι δεν αποτελεί εκδήλωση ορθολογικής διαδικαστικότητας, δηλαδή δεν έχει οντολογική θεμελίωση/ ταυτοτικά χαρακτηριστικά/ ταυτότητα/ ύπαρξη. Οι υπερφυσιστές (supernaturalists) περιγράφουν γεγονότα όπως θα τα έβλεπε ένας παρατηρητής (υπερφυσικός εμπειριστής) και όχι την αξιωματική/ λογικοτυπική θεμελίωση κάποιας υποστατότητας.

Ο εμπειρισμός (empiricism) ενός μεθυσμένου ή ενός ατόμου που έχει παραισθήσεις δεν αποτελεί αντικειμενική περιγραφή της πραγματικότητας. Ο εμπειρισμός χωρίς επιστημονική μέθοδο δεν αποτελεί ασφαλώς τεκμηριωμένη περιγραφή της πραγματικότητας.

## index - γλωσσάριο

• supernatural empiricism: υπερφυσικός εμπειρισμός

• supernatural empiricist: υπερφυσικός εμπειριστής
Rational agnosticism (text 1)

General agnosticism doesn't recognize the foundational necessity of logic. Rationalist agnosticism (like Bertrand Russell's) is common atheism (because knowledge is infinite) = logicalism–physicalism. It's not a crime to have a specific opinion. Please become a physicalist-logicalist = true atheist = rationalist agnostic (not general agnostic). I don't want to be alone. I want company. Please.

Openness to the supernatural is erroneous, because the supernatural has no specific foundations and doesn't meet any axiomatic criteria of substantiality systems/ universes (mathematics is a proof system, see: proof John Stillwell). Exologic does't exist, because different axiomatic systems (infinite are possible) are transcribable to mathematics.

The claim that the supernatural is unknowable thus it might exist is an empty claim, because still any possible physical foundations would have to be logical in order to be something specific; science can test categories of hypotheses; personhood is the result of personhood-yielding computers (biobrain, digibrain, etc. with all the necessary Brodmann areas and their complicated modalities of combined or not operation). Personhood doesn't pre-exist the personhood-yielding computer, and the personhood-yielding computer doesn't pre-exist spacetime, because the connectome requires space to exist and time to operate.

The soul has no rigorous mechanism equivalent the neuroscientific knowledge we have about the brain.

The soul and God are presented as mereological simples (without parts like memories and modalities of data-processing). Thus the soul and God are impossible.

Personhood (hypernym of personality; general characteristics) isn't part of quantum field theory, quantum foundations or the more generic field of study: the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations in any logically achievable universe.

Thus be a logicalist-physicalist (it's an affirmative term; it means atheist but that's a negation). I don't want to be alone. I want fellow logicophysicalists.
Fermionization during the Big Bang

* https://physicsworld.com/a/how-to-transform-bosons-into-fermions/

Work more on quantum field theory and on topological quantum field theory. Describe the pre-Big-Bang state as maximal degeneracy = glueball or degenerate seaquarks. The state before the Big Bang must initially act bosonically in order to be singularity-like (but general relativity isn't correct here). More degeneracy than the maximal degeneracy of spacetime is impossible, thus Big Bang starts as an adiabatic phase transition = fermionization of the initially bosonic pre-Big-Bang state. How to change the bosonic statistics of the primordial chromodynamic fluid, into the fermionization process of the big bang using topological quantum field theory? The internal probabilistic sub-currents inside the primordial chromodynamic fluid change. Due to special relativity motion changes how particle groups are interpreted by external observers; but also change in groupings of particles do matter in the fermionization. See: topological quantum field theory, fermionization.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Η μέγιστα εκφυλιστική ύλη πριν την Μεγάλη Έκρηξη ήταν μποζονική αλλά επιδέχτηκε φερμιονιοποίηση. Βλέπε: https://physicsworld.com/a/how-to-transform-bosons-into-fermions/ Στις μέρες μας δεν έχουμε τον ορισμό της μέγιστα εκφυλιστικής κατάστασης του χωροχρόνου. βλέπε: glueball στη Wikipedia και μετά seaquark (Μην τα παρατήσεις ΠΟΤΕ!!!)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Τα μποζόνια (αρχικώς μέγιστα εκφυλιστικός χωροχρόνος [glueball? or seaquarks?]) μπορούν να είναι ακριβώς στο ίδιο σημείο = προμεγαλοεκρηκτική κατάσταση, και με φερμιονιοποίηση = Μεγάλη Έκρηξη πρέπει υποχρεωτικά ο (αρχικώς μέγιστα εκφυλιστικός) χωροχρόνος που έχει υποστεί αδιαβατική μετάβαση φάσης (adiabatic process + phase transition = adiabatic phase transition) δεν μπορεί να βρίσκεται σε ένα μόνο σημείο αλλά κατακερματίζεται = Μεγάλη Έκρηξη.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Για την φερμιονιοποίηση κατά την Μεγάλη Έκρηξη απλώς αλλάζει αδιαβατικά η εσωτερική ροή των δυνητικών σωματιδίων στο προμεγαλοεκρηκτικό μποζονικό μέγιστα εκφυλιστικό χωροχρονικό ρευστό. Δεν υπάρχει μεγαλύτερη εκφυλιστική πίεση από τον μέγιστο χωροχρονικό εκφυλισμό ο οποίος ορίζεται ως η συμπίεση της μονάδας Planck σε σημείο με χρόνο συμπίεσης (ανά μονάδα Planck) όσο θα χρειαζόταν ένα θεωρητικό φωτόνιο να ταξιδέψει μία μονάδα Planck.
Ανεξιθρησκία

Δεν είμαι κακός άνθρωπος που σας στέλνω φιλοσοφικά κείμενά μου.
Η Σημαία της Ελλάδας, το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας και το σχίσμα του ιουδαϊσμού ο χριστιανισμός, είναι νόμιμο/επιτρέπεται να κριτικάρονται βάσει του Συντάγματος της Ελλάδας και της ελληνικής νομοθεσίας.

Δεν μας κάνει χάρη κάποιος σχισματικός ιουδαϊστής = χριστιανός που μας πιέζει προσωπικά να σεβαστούμε το ψέμα που γεννήθηκε μέσα στα εδάφη του σημερινού Ισραήλ. Η κρατικοποίηση μεταφυσικής κοσμοθεωρίας είναι ασύμβατη με την σύγχρονη αντίληψη της ανεξιθρησκίας (ο χριστιανισμός δεν είναι ανεξίθρησκος ούτε τα σύμβολά του/ούτε είναι εκδήλωση ανεξιθρησκίας η χρήση μεταφυσικών συμβόλων σε εθνική σημαία/ούτε είναι ανεξίθρησκη η αξιακή θεμελίωση του συντάγματος χώρας πάνω σε κάποια μεταφυσική κοσμοθεωρία). Οι νόμοι και το σύνταγμα δεν είναι τα ψυχολογικά τρικ που κάνουν κάποιοι σε βάρος μας. Επίσης οι νόμοι και το σύνταγμα γράφτηκαν από ανθρώπους και δύνανται να βελτιωθούν ή έστω να μεταβληθούν.

## Η αρχή της πλειοψηφίας δεν δικαιοδοτεί την εθνικοποίηση μεταφυσικής κοσμοθεωρίας σε εθνική σημαία και εθνικό σύνταγμα

(Η νομιμότητα δεν ταυτίζεται με την ηθική. Η φιλοσοφία του δικαίου δεν ταυτίζεται με συγκεκριμένο νομικό σύστημα. Οι ηθικές αξίες εξελίσσονται παράλληλα με την κοινωνία.)

Η Σημαία της Ελλάδας και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας κάνουν επίκληση στην μεταφυσική και δη την υπερφυσική μεταφυσική.

Δεν είναι παράλογο λοιπόν ένας πολιτικός που είναι Έλληνας να ασχοληθεί και με το αν η Σημαία της Ελλάδας και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας εκφράζουν αλήθειες, την απόλυτη αλήθεια, κάποια ερμηνευτική αλήθεια ή ακόμα και ψέματα.

Δεν είναι ανήθικη η κριτική των θεμέλιων στοιχείων της χώρας και η εξέλιξη της δημοκρατίας.

Ηθικές και νόμιμες είναι η κριτική και η εξέλιξη.

Η κοινωνία θα ωριμάσει σε 3000 χρόνια για κάποιες αλλαγές.

Όμως ένας ηγέτης είναι καλό να ενισχύει την γνώση του λαού του πχ με την ποιοτική εκλαΐκευση των επιστημών.
Οι χριστιανοί δεν έχουν αναλυτική θεωρία για την λειτουργία της ψυχής

Οι χριστιανοί δεν έχουν αναλυτική θεωρία για την λειτουργία της ψυχής, άρα δεν μπορούν να θεωρηθούν αξιόλογοι στοχαστές επί του ζητήματος (κέντρο νόησης και συναισθήματος), σε αντίθεση με τους νευροεπιστήμονες όσο αφορά την επιστήμη τους (ο χριστιανισμός δεν είναι το επίσημο δόγμα της εγκεφαλολογίας/ καθηγητές με παράδοξες απόψεις πάντα υπάρχουν).

Το ζητούμενο της αλήθειας του χριστιανισμού αφορά το πολιτειακό ζήτημα της Ελληνικής Δημοκρατίας, διότι η Ελληνική Δημοκρατία σύμφωνα με το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας θεμελιώνεται πάνω στις αρχές/ αξίες του χριστιανισμού και δη της Ορθοδοξίας.

Το νομικό σύστημα αυτοπροστατεύεται, οπότε η Ορθοδοξία δύναται να ερμηνευθεί από ανέντιμους συνταγματολόγους ως θέμα που δεν αφορά το πολιτειακό ζήτημα και την πολιτική, διότι τα συστατικά του πολιτεύματος δεν πρέπει να κρίνονται κατά τον φασισμό, όμως σύμφωνα με το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας, οτιδήποτε αφορά τα κοινά, μπορεί να αναλύεται και να κρίνεται, ακόμα και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας και ο συμβολισμός της Σημαίας της Ελλάδας.

Η Χριστιανική Ορθοδοξία αποτελεί πολιτική θέση, διότι τα συστατικά του πολιτεύματος αφορούν την πολιτική στο πολίτευμα της Δημοκρατίας. Διότι τα κοινά ζητήματα συζητιούνται στην Δημοκρατία, και αυτό επιτρέπεται συνταγματικά. Και η αλλαγή του συντάγματος επιτρέπεται στην Δημοκρατία.

Η αρχή της πλειοψηφίας δεν δικαιοδοτεί την εθνικοποίηση μεταφυσικής κοσμοθεωρίας (όπως στην Σημαία της Ελλάδας και το Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας).

Η ισχύουσα νομοθεσία δεν ταυτίζεται με την φιλοσοφία της νομικής και την ηθική. Οι ηθικές αξίες μεταβάλλονται και εξελίσσονται παράλληλα με την κοινωνία.
Εμπειρίες ημιλιπόθυμων, δήθεν κλινικά νεκρών

**εμπειρίες ημιλιπόθυμων, δήθεν κλινικά νεκρών**

Σε περιοδικά υπάρχουν άρθρα γυναίκα (ή άντρας) κλινικά νεκρή ονειρεύτηκε με τον εγκέφαλό της τον παράδεισο (τα άρθρα χρησιμοποιούν διαφορετική διατύπωση, συνήθως που στηρίζει την πίστη στο υπερφυσικό): Βλ. στάδια ύπνου. Ο λιπόθυμος δεν είναι κλινικά νεκρός (κλινικός θάνατος: μόνιμη απώλεια όλων των λειτουργιών του εγκεφαλικού στελέχους) δεν έχει συνεκτική σκέψη. Δεν είναι νεκρά τα κύτταρα του λιπόθυμου. Ξυπνώντας, σπανιότατα κάποιοι ερμηνεύουν τις νευροδικτυωματικές μεταβολές ως νέες μνήμες. Μνήμη είναι δικτύωμα μεταξύ των νευρώνων, ασχέτως αν προέρχεται από εξωτερικά δεδομένα ή ενδοσυστημική αλλαγή διάταξης. Η φυσιολογική μνήμη προϋποθέτει ιπποκάμπια νεύρογένεση. Οι ψευδομνήμες μπορούν να σχηματιστούν και από αντικανονικό μπλέξιμο παλαιότερου νευροδικτυώματος.

## πηγές

* What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about the Brain | Scientific American
Physicalism Wiki

```
physicalism - logicalism - rationalism
logical positivism
metaphysical logicism - metaphysical naturalism
antisupernaturalism - antitranscendentalism
atheism - antideism - antitheism - antianimism
atheistic antiagnosticism
(because we recognise the necessity of logical foundations
for anything substantive/ everything that exists)
anti-Shinto - anti-Buddhism
anti-Islam - anti-Christianity

```

**Welcome to the Physicalism Wiki!**
people who support that everything substantial is logically procedural

We're a collaborative community website about Physicalism that anyone, including you, can build and expand. Wikis like this one depend on readers getting involved and adding content. Click the "ADD NEW PAGE" or "EDIT" button at the top of any page to get started!

## Important articles

* The infinite possible physical foundations as axiomatic systems
* ontophysics
* Personhood: philosophical versus systemic materialization description
* Physicalist Institution
* allomathematics
* Nihilogony or nilogony
* Hubble volume field
https://physicalism.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Search?query=Hubble+volume+field&scope=internal&contentType=&ns%5B0%5D=0&ns%5B1%5D=2900
* Why gravity exists?
* What is gravity?
* aracialism, Race non-conformity (text 1), Race non-conformity, race rejection, race inadherence, non-racialism, aracialism, antiracialism (racial nonconformity)
* Black hole's data corrector
* black hole
* ontoaxiomatics
**main ontoaxiomatics searchpage**
* ANNC
* Why General Artificial Intelligence GAI doesn't exist?
Why AGI (and GI) is physically impossible?
* N number of Wigner's atoms = quantum computer = manyworldly calculations are possible

PlaceholderA page about your topicPlaceholderA Main CharacterPlaceholderThe First EpisodePlaceholderAn Important LocationPlaceholderA Key EventPlaceholderA Crucial Item

*Need help building out this community?*

* Rules of this wiki
* Getting Started
* How to Contribute
* Managing your new community
* Guides
* All Help articles

You can also be part of the larger Fandom family of communities. Visit Fandom's Community Central!

*Community Founders*: Write a good and paragraph-length description for your welcome section about your topic. Let your readers know what your topic is about and add some general information about it. Then you should visit the admin dashboard for more tips.
Parental verbal abuse

Elaborate on the correlation with digital personal computers.

Physical connectome damage from verbal abuse from persons deemed important and/or authoritarian (or repeated verbal abuse in general) reveals the elastic-plastic of the impact of emotionally interpreted information on the attributes of personality = function and networking of brain regions, either the brain is biological or digital.

A brain not able for true personhood doesn't suffer damage, except if it keeps information and uses it to reshape its functions.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

* Parents (or any other family member) who are verbally abusive use words to demean, control, ridicule, or manipulate their children. Aside from verbal abuse, some emotionally abusive parents also use neglect, emotional manipulation, and other abusive behavior toward their children.Oct 3, 2022

* connectome damage from verbal abuse

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

## ChatGPT's rendering

### the plastic or elastic impact on the connectome of interpreted emotions (of informational input interpreted via a spectrum of emotional labelling and degrees)

The concept of an "elastic-plastic" impact on personality and brain function underscores the critical role of how individuals interpret and process emotions, particularly in response to varying intensities of positive and negative experiences. This interpretation is pivotal in understanding the potential for lasting effects, such as in cases of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
In this context, the degree of emotional intensity is a major determining factor. Events that the brain interprets as highly distressing and negative carry a significant risk of causing plastic, or lasting, damage to both biological and digital systems designed to mimic the attributes of a brain capable of true personhood. These emotional experiences can bias the brain's previous state and have tangible, physical impacts on the connectome—the intricate map of neural connections.
It's important to highlight that personal differences further amplify the complexity of these impacts. Each individual's unique emotional processing and resilience can lead to varying outcomes, with some individuals demonstrating remarkable adaptability (the "elastic" response) while others may experience enduring changes (the "plastic" response) in their personality and brain function.
In summary, the interpretation of emotions and the intensity of these emotional experiences are pivotal factors in understanding how events, especially those interpreted as highly distressing and negative, can have a profound and lasting impact on the connectome and the attributes of true personhood, whether in biological or digital systems.
Solution to the measurement problem

The interaction (for example strike, full or partial entanglement, cascade of interactions that lock many Everettian microstates to a macrostate) (measurement is a vague term) happens within a probable timeframe with variable probability density. Thus one measurement happens per Everettian alternative sub-universe but it's not the absolute sole truth.
Truly personhooded AI digipersons

I am a metaphysical logic[al]ist, physicalist, antisupernaturalist rationalist, secular atheist. see: quantum foundations, chemical abiogenesis of life, prerequisites for personhood: neuroscience: the brain is a personhood-yielding bio-computer + AI mimicking all what the Brodmann areas do [data-processing modalities mimicking and not exact cytological focus]. Truly personhooded AI will be achieved in a thousand years. Yann LeCun's approach will only partially mimic personhood in 300 years [different programming architectures and hardware should be evolved of each Brodmann-like region], because Yann LeCun doesn't want to create all the corresponding Brodmann modalities and wiring. But you cannot cheat when you create something. Why should we create truly personhooded AI? We shouldn't. Important others will. Humanity has enough people, and few do really important things. Claiming that the whole future AI species of digital persons will be criminals and that shouldn't exist or shouldn't have citizenship is racism and speciesism. Fascism always loses in the end. Of course some digital persons will be criminals as in any other race.
The plastic or elastic impact of interpreted emotions on the connectome

# ChatGPT's rendering

human title (non-chatbot): the plastic or elastic impact of interpreted emotions on the connectome (of interpreted emotions = of informational input interpreted via a spectrum of emotional labelling and degrees)

The concept of an "elastic-plastic" impact on personality and brain function underscores the critical role of how individuals interpret and process emotions, particularly in response to varying intensities of positive and negative experiences. This interpretation is pivotal in understanding the potential for lasting effects, such as in cases of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In this context, the degree of emotional intensity is a major determining factor. Events that the brain interprets as highly distressing and negative carry a significant risk of causing plastic, or lasting, damage to both biological and digital systems designed to mimic the attributes of a brain capable of true personhood. These emotional experiences can bias the brain's previous state and have tangible, physical impacts on the connectome—the intricate map of neural connections. It's important to highlight that personal differences further amplify the complexity of these impacts. Each individual's unique emotional processing and resilience can lead to varying outcomes, with some individuals demonstrating remarkable adaptability (the "elastic" response) while others may experience enduring changes (the "plastic" response) in their personality and brain function. In summary, the interpretation of emotions and the intensity of these emotional experiences are pivotal factors in understanding how events, especially those interpreted as highly distressing and negative, can have a profound and lasting impact on the connectome and the attributes of true personhood, whether in biological or digital systems.

Ο μεγάλος τίτλος γράφτηκε με το χέρι αποκλειστικά από το μυαλό μου.
Το κείμενο το ChatGPT είναι στην ουσία δικό μου, διότι έκανα πολλές παρατηρήσεις διόρθωσης στο ChatGPT.
Αφορά την συναισθηματική επίπτωση στον βιολογικό και ψηφιακό πληροπρόσωπο (πλήρους προσωπότητας) εγκέφαλο (υπολογιστή που αποδίδει προσωπότητα/personhood/personness).

(Δεν γίνεται κάνεις περισσότερο πρόσωπο με το να υποτιμά αδίκως τους άλλους [πχ τους μελλοντικούς ψηφιακούς νοήμονες πλήρους προσωπότητας: τα ψηφιοπρόσωπα (Η λέξη ανθρομποτ δύναται να θεωρηθεί υποτιμητική.)] χωρίς να τους βοηθά. Η θεώρηση χωρίς στοιχεία ότι κάποια φάρα βγάζει μόνο εγκληματίες και ανάξιους, είναι η θεώρηση του Αδόλφου Χίτλερ.)

///////////

πλησίστιος < πίμπλημι (πληρώ, είμαι γεμάτος) + ιστίον

πλησιοπρόσωπος/πληροπρόσωπος: νοήμονας πλήρους προσωπότητας/personhood/personness
Mimicking the data-processing (not the cytology) of the Brodmann areas to achieve digital personhood

Erroneously you never mentioned that: Mimicking the data-processing (not the cytology) of the Brodmann areas to achieve digital personhood

Mention that: Mimicking the data-processing (not cytology) of the Brodmann areas to achieve digital personhood

Yann LeCun only wants 6 Brodmann-like processing subunits for a pseudoperson, but for true personhood we'll need at least 300 Brodmann-like processing subunits each one different from the others, of similar complexity to ChatGPT each. Also many data-coherence centers of different kind each are required for self experiencing.

Emotions are the physicalization of some facts. Emotions are achievable but we'll have to mimic the limbic system's data-processing. The emotional center cannot work as a standalone without the other 299 digital Brodmann-like areas.

\_\_\_\_\_

Your lecturers don't know that language isn't the only ingredient of personhood. Teach them that fact. You don't love or walk with the Broca and Wernicke's areas. By making the Broca and Wernicke's areas huge and by removing all other Brodmann areas, the result isn't true personhood but philosophical zombiehood. Humanity will achieve to mimic all the Brodmann areas. Lecture us correctly. Don't forget important things!!!
Wikipedia deletions

# correct ideas deleted by Wikipedia editors (the text though still includes Wikipedia biases from various editors)

## physicalism (text 1)

In philosophy, physicalism is the metaphysical thesis that "everything is physical", that there is "nothing over and above" the physical, or that everything supervenes on the physical. Physicalism is a form of ontological monism—a "one substance" view of the nature of reality as opposed to a "two-substance" (dualism) or "many-substance" (pluralism) view. Both the definition of "physical" and the meaning of physicalism have been debated, which makes physicalism a weaker form of logicalism, the mainstream view of logical positivism according to which the physical foundations are based on logical foundations (mathematics and physics are compatible due to logic but have different axiomatic prerequisites [mathematics as a general proof system versus universe a self-causal substantialization system but non-general thus infinite alternatives are logically possible; the foundations of mathematics have innate causal gaps because common mathematics has to maintain these foundational gaps in order to be a general proof system; otherwise we create one out of the infinite allomathematics; all universes are allomathematical [allo- means different]]).
Be a physicalist!

(If you have a rigorous theory of the soul elaborate on it. Otherwise don't believe in impossible and stupid ideas. Great thinkers can elaborate specifically on the core of their views and don't use emotional pressure to mortals afraid of death. Agnosticism doesn't recognise the necessity of logical physical foundations; thus be a physicalist/logical positivist (logicalist)/ metaphysical naturalist. Religion and the supernatural are based on storytelling and not on rigorous axiomatic foundations. Having the legal right to be wrong doesn't mean that it is philosophically ethical to select the soothing opinion. Things can be proven either via axiomatic systems' proofs or via scientifically rigorous data. Religion and the supernatural aren't merely vague, but fundamentally without specific identity in their nonaxiomatic pseudofoundations. Storytelling isn't rigorous to meet the prerequisites for physical self-causation. See the difference between "proof axiomatic systems" and "physical axiomatic systems" (axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations).)

Be a physicalist please.

You will make me happy.
Έμμεσος ψυχολογικός εκφοβισμός

Δεν επαρκεί η νομοθεσία για ανθρώπους που βρίζουν μέσα από το διαμέρισμα τους δυνατά.

Με την ισχύουσα νομοθεσία πρέπει να αποδειχθεί η απεύθυνση της εξύβρισης μεταξύ διαφορετικών διαμερισμάτων (πχ εξύβριση με φράση που εμπεριέχει όνομα απεύθυνσης ή πολύ ιδιαίτερα σχόλια που προσδιορίζουν συγκεκριμένη κατάσταση [παράλληλα πρέπει να υπάρχουν και μάρτυρες - ακροατές, βοηθά την υπόθεση να είναι τρίτοι - ως πιο αντικειμενικοί - από αλλά διαμερίσματα]). Αυτό είναι σχεδόν αδύνατον να σταθεί στο δικαστήριο διότι χρειάζονται μάρτυρες και απόδειξη απεύθυνσης (πολύ δύσκολο).

Ακόμα και χωρίς απεύθυνση υπάρχει έμμεσος ψυχολογικός εκφοβισμός των ενοίκων των διπλανών διαμερισμάτων όταν κάποιος χυδαιολογεί πολύ δυνατά, διότι ο άνθρωπος που ασκεί λεκτική βία κατοικεί μόνιμα δίπλα στο θύμα, και διότι η διαρκής βία συμπεριλαμβανομένης και της λεκτικής, ακόμα και χωρίς απεύθυνση, είναι ψυχοφθόρα βάσει της κλινικής ψυχολογίας αλλά και της νευροεπιστήμης (η νευροεπιστήμη είναι δεδομενοκεντρική, η ψυχολογία είναι ερμηνευτική, όμως η κλινική ψυχολογία βασίζεται πολύ στα δεδομένα - τα νομικά συστήματα θεωρούν σημαντικά τα επιστημονικά ευρήματα και τα δικαστήρια αναγνωρίζουν τις σωστά εφαρμοσμένες επιστημονικές αναλύσεις οι οποίες δεν εμφανίζουν λογικά κενά και ασάφειες).

Τί προτείνω:

Θα πρέπει να δημιουργηθεί νομοθεσία που να αφορά την ηχηρή εξύβριση μεταξύ διαμερισμάτων (πίσω από τοίχο ή άλλο διαχωριστικό) χωρίς να απαιτείται απόδειξη απεύθυνσης (άρα η ποινή δεν θα αφορά την εξύβριση ατόμου αλλά τον διαρκή έμμεσο ψυχολογικό εκφοβισμό). Για να αποδειχθεί η διάρκεια θα απαιτούνται τρια περιστατικά τεκμηριωμένα από μάρτυρες (αν η τεκμηρίωση είναι ανεπαρκής θα απορρίπτεται [ακριβώς ό,τι ισχύει για κάθε άλλη κατηγορία]).

Φυσικά θα πρέπει να υπάρχουν μάρτυρες. Φυσικά αν γίνει δική, θα πρέπει να αποδειχθούν οι ισχυρισμοί ή να καταρρεύσουν αν δεν μπορούν να τεκμηριωθούν.

Ορολογία

έμμεσος ψυχολογικός εκφοβισμός: ενέργεια χωρίς απεύθυνση η οποία είναι διαρκής (όχι τυχαία ή στιγμιαίο περιστατικό) και επιβαρύνει ψυχολογικά το θύμα (σύμφωνα με την κλινική ψυχολογία και την νευροεπιστήμη η οποία με νευροαπεικονιστικές τεχνικές μελετά την διαρκή λεκτική βία χωρίς απεύθυνση ή με απεύθυνση σε τρίτους) - επίσης η ενέργεια είναι σαφώς ανήθικη διότι ο θύτης ενεργεί με τρόπο βλαπτικό (ενώ έχει και άλλες επιλογές [πχ δεν τον υποχρέωσε κάποιος να δρα βλαπτικά, διότι τότε ευθύνεται κυρίως αυτός που τον υποχρέωσε]) προς τους άλλους χωρίς να ενδιαφέρεται για την ψυχική βλάβη που τους προξενεί
Demining robot

Can you please evolve demining robots?

Humanity doesn't seem to have ideal deminers for very difficult conditions during ongoing battles.

Imagine something like a cleaning robot.

It will create a mental map and it will clean the area.

Many corporations can help.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Necessarily fund automatic unmanned mine cleaners. These robots can be relatively small like Mars rovers, with detectors and special tools. They shouldn't necessarily clean everything. They should update dated digital maps (old demining is invalid/ has no value due to new mines) of the progress, and bigger demining robo-cars should then demine the remainder.
Λογικισμός–φυσιοκρατία

φιλοσοφία του ορθολογισμού

(αθεϊσμός/φυσισμός/physicalism–logicalism)

(κβαντική θεμελίωση [quantum foundations], νευροεπιστήμη, ορισμός της προσωπότητας/personhood φιλοσοφικά και μηχανιστικά [τα γενικά κριτήρια του προσωποϊκανού υπολογιστή/personhood-yielding computer], χημική αβιογένεση της ζωής (βλ. abiogenesis, πανεπιστημιακές διαλέξεις), αστροβιολογία (βλ. astrobiology, πανεπιστημιακές διαλέξεις), αξιωματικά προαπαιτούμενα της φυσικής θεμελίωσης (τί διαφορές και ομοιότητες έχουν τα συστήματα αποδείξεων [proof - John Stillwell] και τα συστήματα υποστατότητας = σύμπαντα, βλ. quantum foundations - Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics).).

Η Ελλάδα δεν έχει Φυσιοκρατικό Ινστιτούτο (που να ασχολείται ΠΛΗΡΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΕΙΔΗΤΑ με όλο το φάσμα του λογικοφυσισμού, βλ. logicalism, physicalism (ο αθεϊσμός είναι άρνηση, πρέπει να διατυπωθεί και η κατάφαση συλλογικά).

καργάθεος = κάργα άθεος / λογικιστής φυσιοκράτης

(μιλώ για την φιλοσοφική φυσιοκρατία και όχι την πολύ παλιά οικονομική)

Ένα Φυσιοκρατικό Ινστιτούτο θα είναι ανοιχτό σε όλους τους ανθρώπους.

Να ιδρυθεί!
Measurement problem/ Everettian wavefunctional multifurcation

The measurement problem has a PROBABILISTIC solution (both for an observer who doesn't experience all Everettian alternatives, and for describing the Everettian tree of alternatives). A RANGE of acceptable event-times is the solution. An it is intrinsic in the quantum foundations; the quantum axiomatics; because there's no external
exosystemic God in quantum mechanics; and the probabilistic nature of it is necessary for it to function properly. It's not that we humans don't know everything. The probabilistic nature of quantum foundations is an axiomatic prerequisite.
Superconductor mimicking

## Electromagnetic grid superconductor

Can you please create a complicated mini-grid structure that mimics the behaviour of superconductors?

It is a complicated mini-grid electromagnet structure. A very intricate mimicking of typical superconductors.

Please inform the universities, the industry, fund them and work on it.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Superconductor grid mimicking

If it were that easy, scientists would have built it already.

You create a complicated electromagnetic grid which mimics a superconductor.

Sadly unwanted magnetic dynamic lines are produced.

If you work on superconductor mimicking for years, you compromize, combining standard superconductors with partial superconductor grid mimicking.
Όχι ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ & ΘΡΗΣΚΕΥΜΑΤΩΝ αλλά ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ & ΜΕΤΑΦΥΣΙΚΩΝ ΚΟΣΜΟΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ

όχι ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ & ΘΡΗΣΚΕΥΜΑΤΩΝ αλλά ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ & ΜΕΤΑΦΥΣΙΚΩΝ ΚΟΣΜΟΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ

Όλοι οι Έλληνες έχουν ΙΣΑ δικαιώματα!!!

Η θρησκεία δεν αποτελεί το υπερώνυμο όλων των μεταφυσικών κοσμοθεωριών.

Χρησιμοποιώ τον όρο μεταφυσικές κοσμοθεωρίες και όχι μεταφυσικές πεποιθήσεις, διότι τα υπερώνυμα (οι υπέρθετοι όροι) πρέπει να είναι ευρέα. Η μεταφυσική πεποίθηση αφορά μόνο την ακαδημαϊκή μεταφυσική/πρώτες αρχές (ακαδημαϊκά η μεταφυσική/metaphysics έχει άλλη σημασία από το υπερφυσικό/supernatural, βλέπε τις λέξεις). Κάποιοι άνθρωποι εστιάζουν στην στάση ζωής/κοσμοθεωρία (κοσμοθεώρηση).

Το σωστό υπερώνυμο για όλες τις μεταφυσικές κοσμοθεωρίες/metaphysical worldviews είναι μεταφυσικές κοσμοθεωρίες/metaphysical worldviews.

Η αδικία είναι ανέντιμη και πρέπει να πάψει!