Physicalist Institution of the Netherlands

## Please establish the Fysicistische Instelling = Physicalist Institution of the Netherlands

Please establish in the Netherlands the Physicalist Institution, to popularize:

1. the chemical abiogenesis of life (Jack W. Szostak, Yohey Suzuki + astrobiology, see: Chris Impey),

2. philosophical analyses on personhood and mechanical/ procedural prerequisites for a biological or digital personhood-yielding computer = brain,

3. the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations (David Hilbert, David Tong), cosmological calculability (Max Tegmark), cosmological constructor (David Deutsch and Chiara Marletto), see also: Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

The Big Bang is related but not identical to the quantum foundations (for example in a cyclic cosmology; see: the omniblackhole hypothesis = Planck degeneracy as the pre-big-bang state in many cyclic cosmology theories). (I have texts on that. We should debate. I don't claim I'm all-knowing, it's not that the point.).

We need the natural laws = quantum foundations, in order we have a single Big Bang or and infinite series of big bangs (not capitalized in cyclic cosmology; Roger Penrose's version has a problematic phase transition because he doesn't use quantum field theory to describe the maximal degeneracy of spacetime = Plank degeneracy, and the mechanism of its decay [adiabatic phase transition] into the Big Bang).

4. popularization of astrophysics and other sciences.

Why a Physicalist Institution should be established in the Netherlands? Many scientists leave gaps for the supernatural, which is an unprocedural impossibility. A Physicalist Institution will popularize with lectures all rigorous fields of study, which don't include the supernatural. It is a specific goal to describe everything logical. Not all atheist scientists care to establish a Physicalist Institution and popularize or create academic lectures on all fields used by supernaturalists to introduce anthropic biases. Astrobiology is part of physicalism.

One major topic is the foundational (axiomatization) differences between common mathematics which is a general proof system (the foundations of mathematics have innate logical gaps which are necessary to keep mathematics general) versus universes and their foundations which have different foundational prerequisites (the axiomatic foundations of physics should be a program; for example the Euclidean axioms are presented separately; but physics has to be foundationally more coherent; but closing fundamental gaps of logic requires biasing, thus infinite universes are logically possible with a different foundational biasing.

These topics are important to be studied.

Logicalism = the claim that self-causal systems like the universe are necessarily logical, because exologic = the supernatural has no attributes = no identity to exist.

Logical physicalism is the correct path.

Sadly some Christians have harmed physicalism will simplistic views, like the "philosophical causal closure" = cause and effect have no gaps. But that has to be answered via quantum field theory and not via orange counting and simple combinatorics; it leads to simplistic views which have no axiomatic foundations to meet the criteria of a possible complete system like the universe.

Also the universe most probably isn't a closed system; (it expands, and due to causopermeability of its ingredients we cannot separate its physical expansion from its axiomatic foundations).

The supposed final theory is locally impossible to be written in a nontrivially infinite open system.

We have to officially debate these issues.

Not all Humanists care about Physicalism and Logicalism, but please be magnanimous and establish the Fysicistische Instelling = Physicalist Institution to help humanity.

One other topic is: alternative brains. The human brain is a personhood-yielding computer which has many information-processing modalities; via the function of the Brodmann areas (usually they work as subroutine centers, but in some cases as complete processing units for specific tasks; see: Nancy Kanwisher and Mark Solms/ we cannot generalize the definition of the brain function. It depends on the task. Brodmann-like processing subroutine centres can build a "flexible artificial neural network cluster with general and program-biased GPUs" to produce a personhood-yielding computer = brain able for full personhood (philosophical nonzombieness [not a philosophical zombie]). I have texts on that.