Pillar of Garbage

> "Smash that Like button like it's the irony keyboard"
>
>

**Pillar of Garbage** is a YouTuber who makes video essays about movies and television

## History

### Lies About Lies About Lies

> "This is where we're at. It's like, Drinker watches this film and says, 'Everyone's calling it smart. It's really not,' and then this guy's like, 'Fuckin you think you're smart. You're not,' and then now it's our turn to go, 'Well, you think you're smart, and you're not,' and someone in the comments section'll be like, 'EFAP thinks they're smart, and they're not'"
> - MauLer
>
>

MauLer, Rags, Fringy, Metal, Capital-O Opinions, E;R, and DasBoSchitt first encountered Pillar of Garbage on EFAP 222, an Emergency 'FAP on what was initially meant to be a week off. Having previously thought themselves finished with the topic of *Glass* *Onion* altogether, MauLer had been made aware of Pillar of Garbage's video accusing Critical Drinker of having lied about it, which even some EFAPpers had been holding up as a solid rebuttal to Drinker's review. With such lofty accusations making the rounds, MauLer decided to take a look.

Pillar of Garbage explained that he avoids watching Drinker's videos out of principle, but watched this one because it was sent to him and he felt a moral obligation to push back against his lies, and Cap found the seeming attempt to best-of-both-worlds the situation by simultaneously wanting to respond to Drinker while also not wanting to validate him by suggesting his videos are worth watching amusing. Pillar of Garbage prefaced the brunt of his video with an unprompted "Thanks for unpausing," which took everybody off guard, with Rags even wondering if they had skipped an ad read, until MauLer realized that it was a reference to another video that had successfully predicted when Hasan Piker would pause while watching, minus the actual successful prediction. When Drinker began by saying the world is full of a lot of stupid people, Pillar of Garbage pressed a key on what he dubbed his "Irony Piano" to get across that it was actually Drinker who was stupid. He scoffed at Drinker referencing *The Last Jedi* for no reason, apparently unaware of the fact that Rian Johnson directed both of those films, then took issue with him citing a quote from Jennifer Lawrence saying movies did not have female action leads before *Hunger Games* because while he agreed the sentiment was dumb, Lawrence was not giving her own opinion but relaying what someone else had said to her. He conceded that Drinker may have been criticizing the person who said it to Lawrence, but then brushed the whole topic aside on the grounds it happened ten years ago (it had only just been made public), then ascribed Drinker's motivation for including the clip to "because SJW," and MauLer found it amusing that in his attempt to decry making everything about SJWs, Pillar of Garbage made it about SJWs. When Drinker laughed at the claim that Rian Johnson's planned *Star Wars* trilogy would actually come to fruition, Pillar of Garbage informed him that it was, in fact, still planned to happen, and MauLer and Cap were reminded of the "don't call us, we'll call you" phenomenon while Rags was reminded of similar statements about *Black Adam*.

Pillar of Garbage then scoffed at Drinker "whinging" about *Knives Out*, and Fringy informed him that *Knives Out* was in fact the film that *Glass* *Onion* is a sequel to. In response to Drinker criticizing *Kni*ves Out for being rife with coincidences, Pillar of Garbage countered that coincidences are actually "kind of pretty standard, essential even, to this genre," on the grounds that the story is kept going by alternate angles, red herrings, and dead ends... which are not the same thing as coincidences. He cited published author Barb Goffman, seemingly unaware that Drinker himself is a published author as well, quoting Barb saying about coincidences "So long as they're purposeful, they're good." E;R, however, read the rest of Barb's quote past what Pillar of Garbage had highlighted, and found that what it actually said was to rewrite the coincidence to *not* be a coincidence anymore, giving the example of changing the protagonist overhearing two killers discuss their plan by chance to following the two killers and eavesdropping on their conversation. Pillar of Garbage opted not to go through the meat of Drinker's arguments since the burden of proof is on him and he gave no proof, to which Fringy asked why he was content with directing people to his own video on the first *Knives Out* but expected to hear Drinker's arguments in his *Glass Onion* video rather than just watch Drinker's *Knives Out* video.

Pillar of Garbage tackled Drinker's first point against *Glass Onion*, that Miles should not have allowed Blanc into his party in the first place, by countering that the movie explained this since Miles believes Blanc was sent as a prank. MauLer and Metal argued back that Drinker knows that, and even then Miles still should have turned Blanc away since a professional detective showing up to a casual detective competition would ruin the competition, and Miles should want to keep any detective away from him since he is a murderer. He also argued that Miles' actions can be explained by him being dumb, prompting MauLer to keep a "but he's dumb" counter, and Fringy asked why that dumbness seemed to disappear when the plot needed Miles to do something smart, with MauLer citing that Miles was great at sleight of hand and did ultimately get away with murder at the end of the film. Pillar of Garbage added that there was no way the murderer would have known the uninvited murder detective was there to detect his murder, especially since he was thrown off by the seeming attendance of a ghost, that ghost being the woman he murdered accompanying a murder detective. He went on that since it was at least possible that the uninvited murder detective was not there to investigate a murder, Miles was better off letting him stay since he had no reason to turn away the uninvited guest from a private party not meant for him. When Drinker expressed doubt that a detective would be as world-famous as Blanc is, Pillar of Garbage interpreted that as Drinker saying it was impossible for a detective to be famous at all. He bolstered his point with a clip of Blanc, with his entire face covered by a hat, mask, and sunglasses, being recognized immediately, not realizing that that helped Drinker's point that Blanc was being recognized far more than he reasonably should be. Pillar of Garbage argued that a movie had no obligation to be realistic, but rather to have verisimilitude, and a Google search by Cap revealed verisimilitude to be almost exactly the same as realism. When Drinker asked why Miles invited a dead woman to his party, Pillar of Garbage answered it was to throw suspicion off of him. The gang was torn by this, having previously reasoned that arguments could be made both for and against inviting Andy, though Fringy did wonder how Miles pulling a fast one like that factored in to him being stupid. Having previously defended *Glass Onion*'s on the grounds of being a whodunnit, Pillar of Garbage compared Drinker to Ben Shapiro for being upset at it for not following the whodunnit formula. The clip he showed from Drinker's video, however, was of Drinker calling the reveal that Andy was being impersonated by her twin all along contrived and investment-undermining. He also argued that the twin reveal and Andy's journal detailing her entire life were good contrivances rather than bad because they set up the mystery rather than solve it, to which Rags countered that the mystery was the murder itself while Andy having a twin with a completely documented life helped solve that murder. The top comment on his video asked "Does Drinker not know that twins exist?" apparently under the impression that Drinker thought the mere existence of twin siblings was the issue. Pillar of Garbage concluded that most of the coincidences Drinker cited were not coincidences, "just things that happen," accidentally describing a coincidence in the process.

When Drinker questioned why Miles did not immediately try to kill the woman who seemingly survived his murder attempt, Pillar of Garbage explained that he tried later on because murdering her in front of people was not a viable option, and MauLer found himself having to explain that "immediately" did not mean literally immediately but rather as soon as he got the chance. Drinker asking why Miles did not destroy the only piece of evidence that incriminates him was met with a clip from the movie where a character in universe acknowledges that that is dumb, raising the question of wouldn't someone as vane and self-serving as Miles want to destroy the one things that proves him wrong rather than hold onto it. Pillar of Garbage responded to Drinker asking why Miles' guests sided with Helen when that would incriminate them by explaining that they only sided with her when she was throwing a tantrum for their own catharsis, but were against her again when she tried to destroy the *Mona Lisa*. This only further confused things, as Fringy pointed out, because they ultimately end up lying for her after she's destroyed the *Mona Lisa* despite their protests. When Drinker concluded that the whole story would have collapsed if any one of the contrived circumstances had not happened exactly as it did, Pillar of Garbage interpreted that statement as, "'The story would have fallen apart, if the story beats didn't happen'?"

Pillar of Garbage described what came next as an "anodyne avalanche of attempted nitpicks," which brought back fond memories to The Right Opinion's use of the word "anodyne" back in EFAP 9, right down the the narrative tripling of A-words. Drinker asked why Miles did not turn Blanc away from his party, and he answered that Miles tried to, but the clip he showed was of Blanc offering to leave and Miles assuring him it was fine for him to stay. Drinker questioning how the death of a high-profile tech industry name did not make the news was met with a clip of Blanc saying he suppressed the news, which did not account for the four days in between the authorities finding her dead and Blanc suppressing it. Cap also added that Helen knew about Andy's death before Blanc hatched his plan, and yet seemingly did not inform any of her family and friends. The question of why someone as allegedly smart as Andy let someone who had reason to want to sabotage her into her house was answered with a clip of Blanc saying that the reason she made such a wrong move was because she was so smart. When Drinker brought up how nobody talked to Helen about any personal issues that only Andy would know, Pillar of Garbage explained that the partygoers purposefully avoid her, yet the clip he put onscreen was of them engaging in conversation with her. He further elaborated that the partygoers already knew the court case had happened and so had no reason to discuss it further, leaving MauLer baffled that he would think people would not want to talk about a major development in the life of someone they personally knew. Drinker asked about the possibility of Miles' mansion having security cameras, and Pillar of Garbage answered that even if there were cameras, Miles was not constantly monitoring them, and MauLer had to explain that security cameras keep a record of the footage they capture, typically highlighting moments where they detect movement. When Drinker questioned the logistics of a series of fax machines spitting out Miles' sensitive information throughout all his buildings, Pillar of Garbage reminded him that Miles is in fact dumb, to which Cap highlighted the bigger issue was that even if only Miles was stupid and the rest of his company was competently run, Miles' system would leave trade secrets spitting out of every fax machine unsecured. At this point Pillar of Garbage began asking his own crazy questions to combat Drinker's absurd questions, and MauLer and co watched on as he Glass Onion'd himself into believing Drinker's simple questions about the movie were evidence of some convoluted way of thinking. MauLer joked that perhaps Drinker was too high brow and could only be understood after reading various obscure philosophers, and then right when the video unpaused Pillar of Garbage referenced Matthew Arnold, much to everyone's amusement.

The video ended with a "speed run," where Pillar of Garbage summarized Drinker's questions in his own words and then answered them. His first example, explaining that the reason why Miles shot Helen in the notepad was because he was actually trying to hit her in the chest and hit the notepad by accident, was so bizarre that the gang had to pull up Drinker's original video to verify what he actually said. Naturally, Drinker did not actually believe Miles shot the notepad intentionally and was pointing out the convenience of the notepad being there in the first place and stopping the bullet. Pillar of Garbage had an answer to that convenience too though, positing that it is not impossible for the notepad to have been made of bulletproof metal. The clip shown onscreen, however, showed the notepad with a bullet poking through it entirely, with no metal interior to be found. He also appealed to the fact that a bullet being stopped by a book on someone's person is a classic whodunnit trope, and Rags asked why he sometimes appealed to tropes as a desirable thing and other times criticized Drinker for being upset by a trope's exclusion. Luckily, Pillar of Garbage himself ended up accusing Drinker of the same, despite Drinker never actually advocating for more tropes, then conceded that perhaps Drinker was criticizing the movie for wanting to have its cake and eat it too when it came to tropes, but brushed that off because Drinker did not explain why having your cake and eating it too is bad, despite himself having accused Drinker of wanting to have his cake and eat it too. When Drinker asked why Miles did not confirm Helen was dead, he retorted that Miles actually did, referring to him looking on at her from a distance then taking Blanc's word that she was dead. Pillar of Garbage answered Drinker questioning why Miles did not shoot Blanc too by explaining that Miles did not know they were in cahoots, despite him having been brought as a guest by the impostor sister of his victim and him shouting her real name in front of Miles. He elaborated that Miles likely assumed Andy just survived his attack, despite him having seen her death reported and once again having heard Blanc call her by her real name. He was baffled by Drinker calling the bottle of hot sauce in Blanc's pocket convenient since there was a scene showing him pocketing it, when the convenience in question was the fact that he had pocketed and held onto a bottle that proved useful later, especially since he did so before even eating. When Drinker asked why Dave Bautista's character never noticed being pickpocketed, Pillar of Garbage answered that people tend not to notice being pickpocketed, leading the roster to wonder whether that was true or if it was even possible to verify given the nature of measuring something that by its nature goes unnoticed. Regardless, as Das added, an obsessive gun nut would likely notice his gun missing from his person even if it was successfully pickpocketed, and skillful pickpocketing seems at odds with a man whose defining trait has been repeatedly cited as stupidity and incompetence. Pillar of Garbage scoffed at the expectation that such puny sprinklers would stop a huge fire quickly as Drinker suggested, not realizing that the issue remains that a house that valuable with such sensitive contents should have better fire safety. Pillar of Garbage suggested that a man who lives in a "dumb onion house" would not care about safety, but Rags retorted that Miles' personality was irrelevant, since the architects of the building would be beholden to certain safety standards whether wanted or not. He also scoffed at Drinker's description of Miles' mansion being "leveled" by the explosion, refuting it with a clip of a building-sized fireball originating in the room everyone was standing in and reasoning that the brunt of it went into the top of the glass dome, then showing a room littered with flames and broken structures and asking why anyone should die from this, leaving the gang in utter disbelief that he would try to argue that the explosion was harmless since the word "leveled" was technically hyperbolic, Rags adding that regardless of outcome the fact still remained that Helen was willing to ignite a huge explosion in a building full of not only guests but custodial workers who could have been hurt. Pillar of Garbage also figured that no conclusions can be reached since Clear is a fictional fuel and its blast radius unknown, despite having shown the resulting explosion onscreen, and, as Fringy reminded, it being compared to the Hindenburg earlier. Around this time MauLer read a comment on the video praising the attention to detail suggesting that the *Mona Lisa* in the film was a fake since it was shown to be painted on canvas as opposed to wood like the real one, not realizing that that detail would make Helen's revenge impotent. This reminded him of Rian Johnson having confirmed cutting a scene of Blanc confirming the *Mona Lisa* to be a fake for that very reason, and he found it amusing that people's praises of the films were at odds with the film itself, and they seemed to be willing to defend it on any grounds regardless of its actual content.

Drinker's video concluded that *Glass Onion* justifies its own stupid story with Blanc's line, "It's just dumb!" in what he called a pathetic excuse for terrible writing. Naturally, Pillar of Garbage once again pressed the key on his irony piano. He skipped over what he described as "generalized grumbling," summing up Drinker's critique as the movie not leaving breadcrumbs and responding that it actually did, prompting the question of what the breadcrumbs were for Andy actually being her twin sister in disguise. He countered Drinker saying characters stumble upon clues by clarifying that they are shown intentionally sleuthing, not realizing that the issue being highlighted was that they would stumble onto things worth sleuthing on the moment they needed to overhear them. He made his biggest case for calling Drinker a liar at this point, laying out that Drinker accused the movie of lying by showing an event happen one way then showing it happen differently later on, then explaining that the clips did not actually contradict one another since they just showed different snippets of a longer sequence. MauLer explained that the new information added in the second clip, that Helen was hiding in the hedges alongside Blanc, was irrelevant, since Helen ended up with the same information Blanc obtained anyway, and the deceptive aspect of that scene was that it is initially portrayed as though Blanc is figuring out Bautista's character caught his wife cheating with Miles, but is later revealed to be Blanc watching him send his wife to honeypot Miles - the information was not being hidden from Blanc in-universe, it was being hidden from the audience to give them a false impression of what was happening. Pillar of Garbage bolstered his accusation by pointing out that Drinker did not include the audio from the clip, despite having neglected to play audio from Drinker's video throughout his response. Cap also noted that even if he had been making the point he had been accused of, many people erroneously read the scene that way, so it was an easy mistake to make and would not be evidence of lying. Pillar of Garbage posed the question of why Drinker would even want to lie about a movie, and considered that he may have been simply aping a popular viewpoint for money, which MauLer found funny given he had recently watched *Andor* partly based on Drinker saying it was good amidst many other people not recommending it. He figured that people saw *Glass Onion* portray something that looks smart but is dumb and were compelled to accuse the film of the same, to which Fringy pointed out that the owner of an Irony Keyboard was in no position to talk. Regardless, Pillar of Garbage eventually concluded he could not come up with a good reason why he would want to lie, but remained steadfast in his dedication to expose said lies because many of his subscribers thought Drinker's review was good. The gang was ecstatic to hear him say the classic "I didn't want to make this video" line, and MauLer and Rags found his characterization of Drinker as pretentious preposterous given he was the one citing obscure writers and artistic movements while Drinker portrayed himself as a lowlife alcoholic. They also noted that Pillar of Garbage could not stop comparing Drinker to Ben Shapiro, evidenced only by them both disliking the same film and possibly motivated by a belief that Drinker agreed with Shapiro politically. At the end of it all, MauLer came away with the opinion that Drinker needed to become a Longman like himself, explaining and backing up his points in even finer detail to make it harder for people to mischaracterize what he is saying. With Pillar of Garbage's video being so at odds with the reality of both Drinker's video and the film itself, one might go so far as to say Pillar of Garbage lied about Drinker. EFAP would never do that, but someone might...

### Pillar of Garbage Makes Another Video on Drinker

> "As a matter of principle I try my best to avoid watching this guy's videos"
>
>

> "Look, I didn't really want to make this video, but..."
>
>

> - Pillar of Garbage, EFAP 222
>
>

Pillar of Garbage made another video on Drinker

## Powers and Abilities

**Irony Keyboard** - A keyboard that signifies when Pillar of Garbage considers a statement to be ironic. Whether or not it is accurate is another story

## Trivia

* He didn't want to have to make this video

## Quotes

* "I feel a moral obligation to use my comparatively modest platform to push back against this slurry of boneheaded, brazen nonsense"

"Okay Superman, calm down"

- Pillar of Garbage and Fringy

* "Thanks for unpausing" - Pillar of Garbage, when nobody had paused, EFAP 222
* "That isn't gonna pay off immediately, but it's gonna pay off" - Pillar of Garbage, after having already paid it off
* "with some incidental *Last Jedi* hate. Really, really milkin that one, huh?"

"To be fair, a lot of people don't know this. Rian Johnson actually made *The Last Jedi*"

- Pillar of Garbage and MauLer, EFAP 222

* "You'll find most people are annoyed at everything being culture war, but then they'll still be the same people who make everything the culture war" - MauLer, on Pillar of Garbage, EFAP 222
* "What he's doing Fringy, let me explain this really well, if you literally started your review saying, 'What I do is break down chronologically first, and then summarize,' he'd be like, 'and **T**hen he **T**alks a**B**out **H**ow he **D**oes... his bull**S**hit'" - MauLer, EFAP 222
* "coincidences are kind of pretty standard, essential even, to this genre"
* "But hey, why listen to me, right? You could listen to Barb Goffman, though, a published mystery novelist, who's written a-"

"Who the fuck is Bob Goffman?"

- Pillar of Garbage and Capital-O Opinions, EFAP 222

* + "Hitler was published!" - Rags
		- "Coincidences in storytelling are necessary in your inciting incident" - Adolf Hitler, published author
* "So long as they're purposeful, they're good" - Pillar of Garbage, paraphrasing Barb Goffman
	+ "Here's what you do: you take your coincidence and make it purposeful" - Barb Goffman's actual quote
		- "Instead of Suzie Sleuth coincidentally ending up sitting in a diner booth adjacent to that of the two killers, where she overhears them talking about how they killed Mr. He Deserved It, change things so Suzie realized Killer One seemed shady so she was investigating him. In the course of her sleuthing, she followed him, purposely getting seated in the next booth. That way, when she eavesdrops and hears all the juicy details, she's done it because she figured things out, not because she stumbled upon the solution thanks to an unbelievable coincidence" - the rest of Barb Goffman's actual quote
* "YOU GUYS SHOULD STOP BULLYING THIS HUMBLE CHERRY PICKER!" - FaToni42 in Chat
* "Is he fighting a glass man right now?" - DasBoSchitt
* "Since there's at least a possibility Blanc knows nothing here..."
* "He believes that Drinker believes he can get away with this, that Drinker's like, 'Aha, I'm just gonna misrepresent the whole movie and no one will know!' Like, 'ah Drinker, someone might watch it though!' and he's like, 'ah fuck!'" - MauLer
* "When we're thinking about suspension of disbelief in any story, the objective isn't realism, it's verisimilitude"
	+ "the appearance of being true or real" - definition of verisimilitude
* "You can talk about both sides, each side has merits in its defense, and criticisms of it-"

"No, Rags, if you believe one of these sides you're a liar"

- Rags and MauLer

* "Some of them aren't coincidences, they're just things that happen"
* "... or that the killer didn't immediately try to take Helen out when he saw that the woman he apparently already killed was now alive and well"

"He does try this, we see it. It just isn't instant because there's a bunch of other people there"
"Let's do it guys, it's time to explain temporal linearity!... when Drinker says, 'why didn't he immediately try to kill her or get rid of her?' he doesn't mean literally strangle her in front of all of these people"

- Drinker, Pillar of Garbage, and MauLer

* "You need to have enjoyed the paintings of Gerschatzel Gerstanni of the late 16th period" "Don't you know about Neo-Renaissancistisivism? Haven't you studied the article by Gertrude Le LeTan Li DeAneur?"

"Ooh and don't forget, the late musings of Brian"

- MauLer and Rags, applying Pillar of Garbage's teachings

* "Does Drinker not know that twins exist?" - top comment on Pillar of Garbage's video
* "This is where we're at. It's like, Drinker watches this film and says, 'Everyone's calling it smart. It's really not,' and then this guy's like, 'Fuckin you think you're smart. You're not,' and then now it's our turn to go, 'Well, you think you're smart, and you're not,' and someone in the comments section'll be like, 'EFAP thinks they're smart, and they're not'" - MauLer
* "If any single one of these forced plot elements didn't happen exactly as they play out, then the whole story would have collapsed around it"

"'The story would have fallen apart, if the story beats didn't happen'?"

- Drinker, and Pillar of Garbage's attempt to summarize his point

* "anodyne avalanche of attempted nitpicks" - Pillar of Garbage, engaging in narrative tripling
* "Not *my* Pillar of Garbage" - E;R
* "What if Miles had security cameras installed in any of the house's public areas, and picked up on the conversation between Blanc and Helen?"

"Maybe there is a big security control room, but Miles isn't sitting there, monitoring the house"
"We did it with time, now it's time to explain how cameras can work. Um, I don't know if you guys are familiar, but a lot of cameras will run, let's just say 24 hours a day, and then when you check em up they say, 'hey, points of interest on the timeline, here, here, here, based on sounds and movement that are abnormal"

- Drinker, Pillar of Garbage, and MauLer

* "To be fair, Drinker is just so highbrow, so complex, so complicated. You need to have read Gojinga, and F'Leem, all of their works, I would say, before consuming any Drinker. Wanna get Brian and his musings, these are the important elements"

"Jesus, if Matthew Arnold knew this'd be the-"
"[uproarious laughter]"

- MauLer, an unpaused Pillar of Garbage, and the whole roster

* "'Why did Miles shoot Helen in the notepad?' He didn't know she had it, he shot her in the chest" - Pillar of Garbage, answering a question Drinker never asked
* "Fun factoid: the most common first words babies speak are "Tell me absolutely everything you know about Matthew Arnold or I'll pack this diaper" - Superchat from Dan1178
* "Maybe there's metal in the covers. Notepads like that exist"
* "'Level' must mean something different in Scotland I guess"
* "Why should they die from this?" - Pillar of Garbage, about an exploding mansion
	+ "I mean to be fair, we don't know that they didn't all have notebooks on them" - Cap
* "Anyard de Beauzaque is- he wrote in his treaties in 1824 about the dotototototototon, so there" - Rags, applying Pillar of Garbage's teachings
* "The mightiest porky"
* "There's a reason the Drinker plays these clips on mute"

"cuz he's talking"

- Pillar of Garbage and Rags

* "This cannot have been a mistake on the Critical Drinker's part"
* "Why would he just lie, blatantly, apparently, on repeat? I don't know! [sigh]"
* "You're allowed to write more than one joke you know" - Fringy, after the dozenth piano note
* "There's nothing pretentious about Critical Drinker, you're up here talking about fuckin dead philosophers from the 1800s and 'anodyne' and 'verisimilitude,' and you're like, 'oh yeah he's so pretentious, that Critical Drinker'"

"Meanwhile dude, the average Critical Drinker video will start with him saying, 'I was out on a bender, and I fuckin vomited in my own asshole, and then I watched this movie"

- Rags and MauLer

* "Look, I didn't really want to make this video, but-"

"[uproarious cheering and laughter]"

- Pillar of Garbage, and everyone else

* + "Bingo cards, everybody! 'I didn't wanna make this video!'"

"He did the sigh as well, earlier he had the sigh!"

- Rags and MauLer

* + "You know what, maybe he'll make another video responding to Drinker 3 months from now and say the exact same thing" - Cap
* "It's like they see that there's a film that revolves around people thinking something dumb is smart - 'haha no way that's great, I can just say the same thing about the film!'"

"You had a keyboard that was like, your irony keyboard!"

- Pillar of Garbage and Fringy

* "Smash that Like button like it's the irony keyboard"
* "Are you saying you guys don't wanna go check out his TikTok?" - Cap