Constitutions Policing Association

Without a doubt, the CPA was an undeniably contentious organization. Functioning as a vigilante policing force from 1957 to 1996, its main aim revolved around safeguarding and upholding the Constitutional principles regarding mental health. Consequently, the CPA rigorously opposed the SIC for a span of three decades by engaging in patrols, imposing curfews, and exhibiting a police force mindset that prioritized sheer force over ethical considerations. The CPA however was unable to be active in all countries. And mostly prioritised activity in Africa and Europe.

Although it was never officially prohibited, the CPA encountered significant criticism from the CSF and Cerebralian asylums. This disapproval stemmed from their strong extremist treatment to the SIC, leading to instances where the CPA would inflict physical harm on suspected SIC members within local communities before swiftly disappearing. While the CPA undeniably succeeded in targeting appropriate individuals, their assumptions regarding certain individuals being radicals were not always accurate. Consequently, innocent individuals were occasionally affected, resulting in injury or even loss of life. The CPA, while functioning as a vigilant force, occasionally exhibited tendencies resembling that of a terrorist group. They engaged in indiscriminate shootings of innocent individuals and subjected those they disapproved of to unwarranted interrogations. The CPA instilled greater fear within the community as their actions, despite claiming ethical superiority, were just as savage as those of the SIC. The CPA attempted to rationalize their behavior by asserting it as retribution for past injustices.

In contrast to the disciplined and ethically-driven Cerebralian security forces, the CPA, lacking a code of moral conduct, exhibited no boundaries in their relentless efforts to suppress Radicalists. Their actions ranged from employing explosive devices to resorting to physical violence with truncheons. The CPA displayed a notable absence of limits. Although the CPA's efforts, such as patrolling and arresting suspicious individuals in vulnerable communities, may have appeared reasonable, the armed offensive they launched in 1971 caused a significant controversy. During this offensive, armed vigilantes could be seen running through the streets, brandishing rifles and firing at individuals suspected of radicalism. This unfortunate turn of events resulted in a substantial backlash for the CPA. The influence and support of the CPA gradually diminished over time, resulting in a decline in their membership and resources. However, this did not considerably impact the organisation in the long term, as they continued to exert a strong grip on all their communities. Despite a gradual decline in activity, the CPA remained predominantly active until 1990. They were compelled to disengage from numerous communities and reduce their commitment to safeguarding them due to persistent shootouts and encountering frequent attacks, which resulted in extreme exhaustion.

The CPA never faced a formal defeat but voluntarily halted its operations. In 1996, they declared that the Radicalist threat was significantly reduced compared to the past, and they believed that the CSF was now capable of handling it independently. However, they did mention that if the need arose in the future, they would reactivate their operations.