Debating Tiers

**How it works:**

The ranks are awarded within the debating community by debaters of higher ranks. These higher-ranked debaters utilize their assessments and information to evaluate the current skill level of the debaters and assign them a rank. As this assessment is subjective, the ranking is not done by a single individual but by multiple individuals to generate the most objective assessment possible. The ranking process is based on comparing the debaters' rhetoric and knowledge with others. A rule is generated by assessing the abilities and knowledge of a debater in a neutral topic compared to others. This ensures that everyone is on the same level of knowledge and must rely on their rhetorical skills.

After debaters have debated on a neutral topic, their rank is determined based on multiple such debates. The official decision on the rank is made only when all the rank assigners agree with the result.

Through this process of evaluation and consensus, an effort is made to ensure a fair and representative assignment of ranks within the debating community.

**Tiering system:**

These explanations do not intend to establish criteria for ranking individuals; rather, they aim to provide an understanding of the unique characteristics and qualities associated with each rank. For instance, the presentations of an A-tier debater exhibit a distinct level of quality compared to those of a D-tier debater. However, it is crucial to note that delivering an excellent presentation does not equate to being on the same level as an A-tier debater.

**Unranked:** The rank "Unranked" refers to a state in which a debater has not yet received a placement or evaluation in the hierarchy of ranks. It means that the debater's performance or participation has not been sufficient to be classified within a specific Tier.

**D Rank:** The D rank represents the lowest level within the debating community. Debaters at this level typically have limited experience and may struggle with the fundamental aspects of debating, such as constructing arguments, delivering speeches, and effectively countering opposing points.

**C Rank:** The C rank indicates a moderate level of skill and improvement. Debaters at this rank show some understanding of the principles of debating and can present coherent arguments. However, they may still have room for improvement in terms of delivery, organization, and overall persuasive ability.

**B Rank:** The B rank signifies a significant level of competence and expertise in debating. Debaters at this rank demonstrate a strong understanding of the principles and techniques of debating. They possess excellent communication skills, construct well-organized arguments, and deliver speeches with clarity and conviction. B-rank debaters showcase solid research skills, employing evidence to support their arguments effectively. They consistently demonstrate adaptability in different debate formats, incorporating strategic thinking and showing the ability to counter opposing arguments with reasoned responses.

**A Rank:** The A rank represents an advanced level of debating skill. Debaters at this rank exhibit exceptional proficiency in all aspects of debating. They possess superior rhetorical skills, captivating their audience through compelling delivery and persuasive techniques. A-rank debaters display a comprehensive understanding of the topic, utilizing well-researched evidence to support their arguments. They consistently present logical and structured arguments, demonstrating critical thinking and the ability to dissect complex issues. A-rank debaters excel at refuting opposing viewpoints and consistently deliver speeches with confidence and impact.

**S Rank:** The S rank indicates outstanding expertise and mastery in debating. Debaters at this rank are recognized as exceptional and among the best in the community. They possess unparalleled rhetorical prowess, commanding attention with their eloquence and powerful delivery. S-rank debaters showcase an extensive knowledge base, specializing in various subjects and engaging in debates on complex and specialized topics. They consistently exhibit exceptional analytical abilities, identifying and exploiting weaknesses in their opponents' arguments. Moreover, S-rank debaters display remarkable adaptability, excelling in diverse debate formats and maintaining unwavering consistency in their performance.

**SS Rank:** The SS rank represents the highest level within the debating community, reserved for the absolute elite. Debaters at this rank epitomize excellence and are celebrated as the pinnacle of debating skill. They possess unmatched rhetorical mastery, captivating audiences with their extraordinary delivery and persuasive techniques. Their arguments are meticulously researched, incorporating a wide range of evidence while showcasing originality and innovative thinking. SS-rank debaters demonstrate superior critical thinking skills, consistently outperforming opponents with their intellectual depth, agility in adapting to any debate setting, and unparalleled command over a vast array of subject matters.

**Very important Information:** *While different communities and platforms engage in debates, it is important to understand that they exist within the framework of the debating community. This means that all debates and discussions taking place in these communities or platforms ultimately fall under the larger discourse and practices established within the debating community.*

*Whether it's discussions within specialized communities like the vegan community, gaming community, or feminist community, or debates taking place on online platforms, forums, or social media, they still fall under the principles and standards of the debating community. The debating community has its own criteria, methods, and evaluation systems used to assess the quality of debates and the performance of debaters.*

*This means that these communities and platforms, while having their own dynamics and discussions, are still subordinate to the debating community. The fundamental principles of structured argumentation, rational engagement, and constructive criticism continue to apply. The standards, requirements, and evaluation criteria developed within the debating community remain influential in assessing the performance and ranking of debaters, regardless of where the debates take place. It is important to understand this hierarchy and subordination in order to respect the specific rules and expectations of the debating community, even when debates occur within other communities or platforms. The debating community remains the overarching framework that serves as the basis for evaluating and ranking debaters.*

**Subtiers**:

Subtiers are subcategories that exist within the main tiers or ranks. They serve to allow for finer distinctions and gradations within a specific tier. While the main tiers represent the general progression and abilities of debaters, the subtiers provide a more differentiated assessment and recognition of their achievements.

Subtiers can consider various criteria, such as specific skills, subject knowledge, debate formats, or topic areas. They allow for a more precise differentiation of debaters within the same main tier and highlight their strengths and weaknesses in specific areas.

The introduction of subtiers aims to enable a more accurate and fair assessment of debaters while providing them with clear direction for their further development. It also allows for better comparability among debaters within the same main tier and encourages competition at an appropriate and challenging level.

"Low" is used to indicate that a debater is positioned at the lower end of a specific subtier. It suggests that the debater meets the basic requirements for that subtier but may still have room for improvement and further development.

On the other hand, the symbol "+" signifies that a debater is positioned at the upper end of a subtier and has demonstrated exceptional performance within that category. It indicates that the debater is particularly outstanding in terms of the specific skills, subject knowledge, or other criteria applicable to the subtier.

**Example for the most famous Debater from each Tier:**

* **Unranked:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low D:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **D:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **D+:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low C:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **C:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **C+:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low B:** German - English - Spanish *- French*
* **B:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **B+:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low A:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **A:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **A+:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low S:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **S:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **S+:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **Low SS:** *German - English - Spanish - French*
* **SS:** *German - English - Spanish - French*

**Other Pages:**

* The Debating community
* Debater Ranking
* Infomations about Debater
* Gap between the Tiers