Proposal for the Standardization of the Human Writing System

## PREFACE.

In the pursuit of a universally standardized writing system, it is imperative to recognize the diverse linguistic landscapes that characterize human communication. Languages, as intricate tapestries of expression, encapsulate an array of grammatical structures, syntactical nuances, and semantic subtleties. These linguistic variations, while testament to the richness of human culture, also pose a challenge in the context of global communication and education.

A fundamental premise underpinning this Proposal is the acknowledgment that if a standard writing system is to be utilized effectively, it must encapsulate the entirety of grammatical and syntactical innovations inherent in the world's languages. This inclusivity is not just a matter of convenience; it is an essential step toward fostering a more interconnected and understanding world. By codifying the multifaceted aspects of language, this proposal seeks to streamline the intricate process of learning, offering a singular, comprehensive framework that can be applied to all human languages.

In essence, this endeavor strives to bridge the linguistic divides that often hinder effective global communication and comprehension. It envisions a future where linguistic diversity is celebrated and preserved, yet where a common writing system acts as a unifying force, facilitating meaningful dialogue and collaboration across cultures. By embracing this proposal, we embark on a transformative journey—one that promotes harmony, inclusivity, and mutual understanding among the diverse peoples of our planet.

## NUMBERS.

Currently three main systems of counting large numbers exists in the world: the Short Scale, regularly derived from *n*-illions representing 103n+3; the Long Scale, regularly derived from *n*-illions representing 106n (interpreting the -illiard suffix as *n* + 0.5); and the eastern Myriad system, using seemingly arbitrary choices of characters to represent every 104 power. Among these, the Short Scale is superior, as it avoids the issue of differing suffixes and remains consistent to the lower order of counting (rather than saying "thousand million" as some European languages do).

Thus a new "short-scale," compared to the traditional power system, is presented as follows:

\*Alternatively written using the ancient 下数 ("lower-scale") terms 兆、秭、涧 respectively, though this is only acceptable from a compatibility standpoint.

In the range 109 (billion) to 1033 (decillion), numbers may be written using either the monosyllabic form, or decomposed into long forms (e.g. ⿰十⿸千丶*shūn* --> 十⿸千丶*shí qún*) similar to the format of Latin numeral + -illion in English. The pronunciation derives from 群 numerous and the glyph is a representation of 千 thousand with an additional stroke to represent one additional group of thousand, hence the intuitive interpretation of *n* groups of one thousand + one additional thousand.

Numbers in long form must be written following 一 to avoid confusion with smaller multiples of those numbers (c.f. *two undecillion* vs. *one unvigintillion*). Stylistically, one may also choose to use ヶ for this disambiguation to make it easier to distinguish graphically.

A full list of large numbers and their pronunciations:

⿸千丶*qún* — represents the -illion suffix.

⿰二⿸千丶*ēn*

⿰三⿸千丶*sēn*

⿰四⿸千丶*sún*

⿰五⿸千丶*wén*

⿰六⿸千丶*lún*

⿰七⿸千丶*qìn*

⿰八⿸千丶*bán*

⿰九⿸千丶*qìu*

⿰十⿸千丶*shūn*

These are mainly formed from a fusion of the two pronunciations, but some tones have been altered to distinguish them from other common homophonous terms.

Note that since ⿸千丶 is a suffix, it can be used to represent arbitrarily large numbers; in practice, however, the maximum numeric value it can represent without having to repeat the suffix is 九百九十九⿱一兆九百九十九千九百九十九⿸千丶(103000000000 or (103)^(109)).

## MEASUREMENTS.

As there exists a current global standard in the International System of Units, it would be fitting to transcribe these directly into characters.

### PREFIXES.

Higher order terms up to 1030 are defined to be identical to the numeral system described in the previous section.

### LENGTH.

The meter is to be glossed as either the ideogrammic 鿈 or the phono-semantic 粎, of which the former is preferred. The usage of 米 as a purely phonetic transcription of the word is completely deprecated; however, the pronunciations of the characters remain identical.

## NOMENCLATURE.

Chemical elements shall be named semantically, rather than phonetically, where etymology dictates. (Note that elements in the table are given in orthodox, rather than abbreviated, forms in contrast to the rest of this document.)

\*Traditional forms given in place of unavailable orthodox forms.