WASHINGTON CAROUSEL

An interesting story turns out. Often I see messages addressed to me that I can only expose what is on the surface, and really mysterious stories are beyond my power, so I carefully ignore them. What are you up to playing with me? Do you think I can’t expose what is being discussed today? I will expose or not. My name is Topa and probably welcome to the most difficult top secret at the moment. Chased. Yes, it is precisely this topic that is cited as an example that cannot be exposed. And I understand these people very well. Wherever you look - the press, educational documentaries, Wikipedia, even good science sites - all the carbon copies assure you that this actually happened. “What exactly happened?” - many of you will ask. And what happened was subsequently called conclusive evidence of the existence of flying saucers. Not yet scared in my pants? This is temporary. After all, you don’t know the story itself, which you still have to tell. Start there.

*"In 1952, an unexplained and shocking incident occurred in Washington. In July, a large number of unidentified flying objects hung over the city, which were seen by both ordinary citizens and the military, they were also fixed on radars, but every time fighters ready to attack flew to intercept, the targets immediately evaporated. This phenomenon has caused increased interest from the media, which published news about this in the front pages of newspapers. The government tried to hide this case under cover of weather conditions. But the truth was never found."*

Do not pay attention, as a child, he fell into a vat with conspiracy theology. It was told very briefly to just convey a thought. You can open any website you have and read in more detail. Believe me, you will not find any disclosure there. But mysterious information will be poured on you, which I will try to explain today. The Washington Carousel is a kind of ufological trump card up its sleeve. A win-win option for a conspiracy therapist. If this story is true, then the rest automatically too. Moreover, this is now especially true. There recently came out the series “Blue Book” and there is an episode about it.

*"We have a UFO over the capital. Can you see"*

*"Yes, there are several."*

YouTubers stepped up and started recording videos about it. All this will give rise to a new wave of people who will be mindless to believe all this. Although not without reason I will tell you. And so what do we have? An official government report that they were involved in this matter. FBI documents. Thousands of eyewitnesses who reported seeing something strange. The military, who are sure that they saw flying saucers on the radar, pilots who saw something strange with their own eyes. And finally, the sweetest thing, photos and videos. Of course, after reading and comprehending this, many people have no doubt that we are not alone in the universe. What if it is? Just imagine, it’s hard to imagine a greater discovery. You’ll make conclusions at the end of the video, and now we are waiting for a long story that will concern not only this topic. I will lie if I say that it was not difficult for me to seek information. My brain almost swam from everything I read. There is nothing publicly available. All books of participants in the events, all newspaper archives were bought, all scientific publications were found, and of course I will leave all this in the description. But the main thing is that I was finally able to make up my mind and finally assemble the entire puzzle.

## Chapter 1. The photo

From the most difficult start? Yes, actually not. As you know, the only thing I do on this channel is simply retell Wikipedia, but this case will be an exception.

*"The Washington Carousel is one of the most common UFO sightings. There are photographs and videos of the observed phenomena. For more than 2 weeks, the masses were able to observe many UFOs circling over the city. UFOs were also observed over the White House building."*

Super mysterious voice voiced a super mysterious thesis. But what if I tell you that everything you just heard is not true. What if I tell you that there is only one photo of those events and even with it everything is not so simple. The fact is that the media that cover this problem and cite photos as evidence are still experts. They do not show the whole picture, but crop so that only a UFO can be seen. They are certainly not 6.7 or 8 as reported. But we will play by their rules. 11 UFO hovering over the capitol and there are photos and videos. And all this is not true. Hackerman is back in business. I went in search of the full photo and found it without any problems. It’s not just that they cut her off, I thought. It is this element that they are trying to hide. Lampposts. An experiment is needed. To do this, we need light sources, a camera and that's it. I have two light sources in my hands, which I aim at the camera and get a flare effect or optical flare. As we can see, the flare behaves in a mirror with respect to the light source. This is how the lenses are arranged in the camera. Light passes through them and hits the matrix while a flare appears just from the lenses. Confused there and we see it in the final image, but in a different place. And yes, this works with both old cameras and phones.

*"And what should we see?"*

And now you will understand what I wanted to show. Take the original photo with flying saucers, duplicate the part with lampposts, rotate it 180 degrees and try to connect it with the saucers. Oh my God, what were the highlights? How amazing is this world in which there is physics. Yes? In fact, not all glare matches, because it is light from the windows and it was not enough to print on the picture. Well, these lights are not visible, because they do not look at the camera. Such matters, that is, we come to the same conclusion. This photograph is very far-fetched, especially since it is not 1952. This image first appeared in 1973, which already raises questions. But as it turned out, the photo itself was taken in 1965. 13 years after those events. For a long time, the aliens were cheerful there. It turns out I could not even do the experiment. Come on. It was fun. With this knowledge, you can expose many UFO photographs yourself. And there seems to be no point in talking further, but believe me, this is only the beginning. Where did this video come from and why is it so suspiciously like a fake photo? It's simple, this video was not made public until 2005 until channel 4 released a stupid documentary about aliens. Someone whipped up the schedule and added a die there, which was removed in 1952. No, it was not. If you animate a fake photo, then do it at least not so badly. As a result, there is not a single photograph, there is not a single video, although everyone around it refers to them.

*"Sorry, I didn’t listen."*

It's pretty sad to see such statements on sites that seem to be checking everything. And if we started talking about Wikipedia, there are a lot of jambs, as elsewhere. But it’s about this incident that you don’t try to read there. Mistakes alone are likely to believe in aliens. You just need to double-check that I’m constantly telling you. I understand correctly, even in the 50th year, people took tens of thousands of photos? They shot streets, friends, dogs, and even legs, but the most important event in the world, which, according to media assurances, almost everyone saw, forgot to photograph. I am not kidding. There is no visual evidence of this story. Very strange things.

*"So have become. Everything will be now. A bird will fly, let's do it one more time. Swap, ok."*

Nevermind. But what about those who saw it all with their own eyes?

## Chapter 2. Witnesses

As you probably already understood from the history of UFOs, they flew over Washington, they all looked at it with their mouths open, and of course, they started reporting immediately. How about no? See what exactly happened. The first messages came from air traffic controllers at the local airport. Then the pilots saw something, and then the military base confirmed something and it all quickly got into the newspapers, and on the front pages. Now I will show you the official charts that we animated. As we can see, there were no more UFO reports than ever, very few, but this is exactly what happened when the story was printed in the newspapers. It was an explosion. A crazy rush of messages that they saw it too. The second peak falls on the second wave of publications exactly one week later, when the military again reported UFOs over Washington. And the last peak came at the conference, when the military voiced their version of what was happening. After that, everything immediately began to decline. I don’t hint at anything, I just showed the data. But we have to put it off in the head. What people saw flying saucers is unprovable. It had no fixation, it was just words. Words that are used as evidence. But do not despair, because I have something to say even about this. Not so long ago I was at the next forum of scientists against myths, where one of the lectures was a lecture by the doctor of psychological sciences Vladimir Spiridonov on conspiracy theories. The topic that is closest to us, so at the end I asked such a question. Hello, I have a question that interests me very much. Look, there are many stories that many still believe in, but they either happened a long time ago, or were not recorded, or they cannot be verified. Here's how to argue with a conspiracy theorist, if you yourself have no evidence or you can’t double-check this or that theory, and is it worth it at all?

*"The recipes that I set out 5 minutes ago were in accordance with your last statement. If you quickly make sure, check that you have a conspiracy theorist, then the dispute is usually meaningless. You will not hear each other."*

I simultaneously and as much as possible agree with the speaker, because it is true. It is often impossible to convince a conspiracy theorist. Each of your arguments will be mirrored and turned in the direction of the conspiracy. Therefore, it makes no sense to explain what is not fixed. The burden of proof lies with the approver. But at the same time, I do not agree with the speaker. It seems to me that you still need to try to convince, because there is a possibility that he will listen. Therefore, we will try to the last. And I'll start, as always, with history. Don't you think it is suspicious that before the incident in Washington everything was calm, but after the article in the newspaper, the boom I assure you this is not a coincidence, but just another story with hysteria. Now I will tell you what UFO hysteria is. Once upon a time I came across the American book UFO Religion, which tells how all this paranormal culture was born. It’s a pity that there is no translation in it, so I would advise everyone. It describes something like the very first case of mass UFO sightings. It's good that I have a subscription to newspaper archives and we quickly find this article. In 1896, people saw something strange in the sky, at least as they wrote in the newspapers. Large luminous and with propellers. Strange, huh? But here is even more strange. They heard voices, laughter and conversations that were published from the aircraft, and then such screams. That is how aliens from other planets behave. I'm just sure. In general, it moved slowly, at least 2 people were sitting in it, above this structure was what looked like a balloon. Even with all this, people thought it was supernatural. Each time has its own nonsense. But in fact, all this can be easily explained. All versions of the aircraft that people supposedly saw, as it turned out, already existed. People very often saw this or that. And this art for a second appeared 46 years before the events. Airships were raised in the sky in both 52 and 63. It was a sensation, of course everyone talked about it and this is a direct event. This inspired Jules Verne to write the story Robur the Conqueror. Take a close look at this 1886 illustration. And throughout this time, talk of airships did not subside. The inventors tried to make their own versions of the aircraft, and in the newspapers flickered the concepts of inventions. In my opinion, it was these trials that people saw. And if not them, then they simply invented their stories based on pictures in newspapers and books. All these facts did not prevent a panic that lasted a whole year. After this message disappeared. And not surprising, because just at that time, mass tests of airships began. And in 1900 the first zeppelin appeared. It's about what. It really was hysteria, one message appeared, in one part of the country, after 10 days messages were streaming from all over the country. Someone alone said that these are messengers from Mars, so after a few days, everyone saw the messengers from Mars.

*"Was he tall in scales or small with a round head?"*

*"It seems tall."*

*"Reptile."*

But do you see the difference, when the newspapers showed something like airships, people saw them. It was not about plates at all. But what if I tell you that until 1947 no one saw flying saucers? Because the person has not invented them yet. This is an American businessman Kenneth Arnold, flying once in his corn field, he saw flying saucers in the sky. Before this incident, there was not even such a phrase in relation to aliens. The world lived in peace, but as soon as its story appeared in newspapers, people all over America began to see exactly the plates in the sky. Not before he saw, but right after that. Roughly speaking, he invented modern flying saucers and now I will explain why I said so. Opening the largest newspaper archive in the world, were there reports of flying saucers or disks in 1946 the year before? No. On June 24th, everything is quiet and calm, and on the day of publication, everyone begins to see something. And off we go. Researchers found that there were 853 messages from all over America over the two months. This is 10 times more than normal. Some said that they now see them. Others wrote that they also saw them on the same day, they simply forgot to report these plates. It happens. But want to laugh? Newspapers misunderstood Kenneth's words.

*"Newspapers lied. When I gave the interview, I was misunderstood, then one newspaper after another wrote about it and became so confused that no one really knew what it was about. They wrote as if I said that they look like saucers. And I said that they behaved as if they took a saucer and threw it into the water, as they throw flat pebbles."*

He confirms that he used the word plates only to describe their actions, but in fact he saw this. Agree now this is no longer like an alien ship, but an experimental American bomber, the tests of which were carried out in these years, by the way, or a German experimental horten. It doesn’t matter what he actually saw there, the main thing is that it turned out to be an overwhelming task for journalists to remember his version. And that’s what happened.

*"What too complicated plates."*

Well, newspapers and wrote about the plates. Since then, people have seen only flying saucers, but not the crescents, much less jumping. You want to see my face when I found out that the press misunderstood his words and everyone began to say that they saw flying saucers from outer space, because there are no such aircraft. That is the face. There wasn’t, yes. This aircraft was not built in 1933, but it was 42, and this one was not built in the 43rd. This is only America and only until 47 years old. Why can I find it in a couple of days, but journalists can’t. Just imagine the mistake that started this real nonsense. Thanks to this mistake, the well-known paranormal magazine FATE appeared, which talked about flying saucers. Do you know why they look like this now? We open the patents of those years and see that the plate was patented 2 years before people first saw it. Yes, because the inventor made a start from magazines that were long before that. Science fiction always dictates technological trends, and everyone around is even too lazy to double-check. People came up with this and they themselves continue to see it in the sky. Well, as you can see, everyone sharply forgot what year it is now, they take out their Nokia 3310, give it to their friend, who accidentally walks around on stilts and takes it all off.

*"Great, our Navy on new round airplanes."*

*"We do not have round airplanes."*

As we see on this chart in July 1952, there was the largest spike in UFO reporting. It all began in '47, when the dude misunderstood, but it ended very quickly. Now look at this table. 52, Washington immediately after publishing in newspapers, then a strong recession and again in the 57th. Guess what. Because newspapers write about UFO sightings. Recession again and suddenly a surge in 66th. And of course it all started with newspaper headlines telling us that farmers began to see flying saucers. Is it a coincidence that messages appear when an article about it appears and stop as soon as the newspapers stop focusing on it.

*"Ser, here is your morning newspaper."*

*"Hello, yes, I also saw them today. I see right now, they fly here."*

*"Forgive me, sir, the newspaper yesterday."*

*"That is, I saw yesterday. When everyone saw, then I saw. So write it down."*

This is all I need. If the newspaper wrote about flying balls, then people would start to see balls. I did all this just to show you that a lot of UFO reports are predicted statistics. This happens absolutely every time articles are published about it. Even when films come out about dishes, the number of observations always increases. This is psychology. People really can see something, but they already know that there are plates, therefore they are projected. Apofenia in all its glory. No one is safe from this. But the time has come for the most difficult.

## Chapter 3. Radar angels

Dispatchers see something on the radar, the military see something on the radar. They send planes to intercept, but the targets just evaporate. And so every time, but unfortunately there will be no photo of the radar, because no one has allowed reporters to them. In general, this event was apparently so important that no one was informed about it. Air Force captain Edward Ruppelt, who was responsible for unidentified objects and the rest of the intelligence, found out about this a day and a half later from the newspapers. Let us dwell on this for now. Tell me if specially trained people mistakenly misunderstand these goals. Sounds like stupid, right? Can all radars in the area be malfunctioning? What kind of nonsense? Let's see what you say a little later. We are assured that the dispatchers and the military were experienced and knew for sure that it was not just some kind of interference, but definitely something metallic. Well, they probably better know, because the military had the top equipment of those years, because there are wars. You need to be on the alert. But all the same, the technologies were not ideal, far from ideal. But what if I tell you that exactly the same plot came in Britain during the war.

*"The military sees an unidentified object on the radar, they are sure that it is an enemy aircraft. They fly their planes into the sky, but as soon as they fly to the target, there is nothing. And so every time. It was called a ghost plane. Everyone thought that he was equipped with something to prevent the approach of another plane, and therefore quickly flew away. This did not receive publicity, because then they had not yet talked about UFOs. They talked about Soviet spy planes. But Dr. David Clark went even further. He personally met with Sir Edward Fancy, an engineer who helped develop location equipment and was in the thick of things."*

And he told me that back in the 39th year, and then in the 41st they saw enemy ghost planes on the radar. They tried to intercept them, but found nothing. Nothing like. Since then, the military around the world has called it radar angels. This is even written in the Oxford Dictionary. Due to the fact that there was a war and did not understand, everyone simply attributed this to temperature inversion. I will explain a little. In general, the higher the sky, the colder. But it happens that it’s warmer there. This is called temperature inversion, and this has its own consequences, including bad ones. But plus everything because of this, the radar sends back false echoes. And such guys, I came across something. Yes, this explained many of the targets on the radar, but not all. But the Air Force had no other rational explanation, so after the Washington incident, they announced the following:

*"We think it was the temperature inversion that was in Washington at that time. It can create false signals on the radar. It can also be ice clouds. We already had such cases."*

*"Thank you so much. Stupidly a liar, you saw."*

Yes, someone from the press, and still the witnesses did not accept this version. It could not be so simple for them.

*"Three different radars spotted the lights. You say they took air for metal?"*

And this is the cornerstone in this whole story. Everyone says that no one accepted this version and in general it is nonsense and does not explain anything. Well, let's see who exactly did not accept this explanation, as everyone claims. First, the meteorological service did not agree with temperature inversion. Mismatch. It would be if it were an official statement, and not a story printed in one newspaper without an indication of the source and at least one last name. On the contrary, in the scientific analysis of this problem, meteorologists completely share the weather in those days and come to the conclusion that yes, it is very similar to what will cause problems with the radar. Second, the dispatchers did not agree, because they saw what they saw. And in general, why do you question our work, we are not a bunch of morons here and we know very well how the radar works and this is 100% inexplicable. Now tell me how do these boobies know what it was like if the first radar angel study came out 6 years after the incident?

### What does the bird have to do with it?

Abnormal targets have appeared on the radar ever since the radar generally exists, because the technology is fresh and far from ideal. The temperature inversion could not cover the whole spectrum of unidentified objects, so ornithologists came to the rescue. The fact is that they knew very well what caused such aircraft on the radar, because they had been using it for a long time. But it was impossible for the pilots and the military to prove that birds could do this on the radar.

*"Do you know who did this?"*

*"Yes aliens."*

These scientists laughed right in the face until the study came out. Ornithologists have clearly shown that it is migrations and flocks of birds that create such an effect, as if a huge plane were flying. 6 years after the Washington incident, they write that radar angels used to be attributed to temperature inversions and other things related to the atmosphere, but this could not explain all the cases up to this point. I will tell you briefly. Often this appears in the late afternoon. And I remind you that aliens arrived only at night, and dumped in the morning. Within a radius of 30 miles. And so it was. You might think that this is an airplane. Only everyone thought that they were plates the size of an airplane. Oh yes, what journalists are silent about. Nobody saw such a picture on the radar. They reported objects that were several miles away from each other, and sometimes there were messages in different parts of the radar. All this is consistent with studies that were subsequently published neither by the participants in the events, nor by the military, but by people who study birds. Birds.

*"The birds."*

*"I see targets on the radar, release two f-94s urgently."*

*"Better 8"*

*"Better 10. Radar shows that the target is right in front of you. Permission to open fire."*

And they explained that even insects can be seen on the radar. Their accumulation can create the illusion, as if something big is flying. By the way, even now, weather radars can track this. These are birds and these are birds. How unusual. As I said, the study appeared only after 6 years, so the report of the Washington incident refers only to temperature inversion. You know, these are at least not invaders from outer space, as claimed by those who disagreed. The Air Force then conducted its investigation and found out that unidentified objects were seen quite often over the past few months, but in each case, temperature inversion was also reported. It turns out the UFO loves such bad weather. But what they will not tell you on other channels. The press very much accepted this version, wrote about it in the newspapers and reports of UFOs immediately began to decrease greatly. Classic.

## The military will not lie. Chapter 4

*"The expert says that it was a temperature inversion, another says that it is not. In this situation, you should turn to air traffic controllers and pilots who really saw the objects."*

Seriously, but you need to apply. But what if they saw a star and thought that they were aliens and now they are proving to everyone. Let us turn to those who saw flat earth. Let's turn to the grandmothers who saw the brownie, these guys definitely will not lie. I say again, if there is no fixation, then personal experience cannot be considered evidence. Otherwise, absolutely every inexplicable case has irrefutable evidence, because this crazy man saw everything. No matter how experienced you are, your brain is still subject to apophenia and other distortions. I can give dozens of examples of scientists who have devoted their whole life to science, but believe in the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot, and they were also abducted by aliens. This does not mean that they are right. But fact is fact. The military did indeed report the presence of something in the air. They see it from the towers, they see it from the airplanes. These are not just civil alarmists, these are official reports.

*"We missed the invasion. I'm scared, sir."*

Can this be questioned and necessary? I believe that yes, because the person who will consider the short version will easily remain on the side of the faithful, and the one who goes deeper will have questions here. Fortunately, we have fatal inconsistencies in the testimony. “I see a bright orange light,” says one of them. How does it all represent. Something shines on you. Oh no, UFO, stop it. But how was it really? Somewhere there is something glowing, star. I don’t understand, probably not or yes. What? Some saw white light, some saw orange light. Plates with a tail, just luminous balls. One man even saw a huge red cigar in the sky. Two pilots flew nearby on a fighter, but one saw something strange, and the other did nothing. One looks and sees 7 objects on the radar, the other sees 5. The pilot sees 6. Some say they were moving at a speed of 1000 km / h, others say 11000 km / h. At the same time, a B-25 military aircraft flies over it and they say to him:

*"On the radar, we see objects in your area. Report the decor."*

*"Accepted, nothing, by the way."*

Even the reports say that the pilot saw a shooting star, then the person at the base saw a shooting star. Then they reported a star that was moving. They believed that she was moving, although most likely this is the influence of the atmosphere, as here. Just an illusion of movement. “Such is the power of suggestion,” summarizes one of them.

*"Air Force captain Harold May, who saw a light in the sky at night from Andrews Base, went out to look at the sky again in the morning and that light was still far away, very dim. “I believe the unidentified object was a star,” he says."*

When the pilot of the video shows something luminous near the plane, another says that around Washington there are always many different lights, that you can see some kind of light in any direction. And all the other airports did not even report anything similar at that time. So I have a question, if these objects were seen by everyone, then why not all of them saw them? It sounds stupid, of course, but it's me. Part of the information from Condon’s report that I bought is the largest UFO research ever. It was prepared in collaboration with the University of Collarrod in 1968 and other scientists called this document the most influential and scientific in the entire history of unidentified flying objects and that it will be correctly referenced every time it comes to flying saucers. And you know what? No one does it. The plates really fly, why do we need a different point of view?

*"One thing is certain, the aliens will kill us all."*

The National Academy of Sciences, a huge number of individual scientists and even Nature agreed with this report, although they were surprised why they should spend resources on such a thing, but do you know who did not agree? Ufologists, people who believed in flying saucers. Physicist James MacDonald and astronomer Joseph Heineck. Noble re-shoes I tell you. Because of them, everyone believes that the Air Force gave the press nonsense to just get off. These bugs even wanted to take control of the investigation. Just imagine what conclusion we would get in that case. It could really turn the story around. People would now see plates everywhere.

*"I am convinced that the repeated observations of reliable citizens here and abroad over the past 20 years cannot be cast aside as stupidity, but rather should be taken very seriously, as evidence that some kind of phenomenon is happening that we simply do not understand."*

Yes, articles on the Internet refer precisely to the arguments of these two. This is just a classic. Just imagine, scientists spend years and enormous efforts to prove the absence of flying saucers, although they could do the really necessary thing. This is incomprehensible to the mind, and in response to these tremendous efforts, people simply shrug their hands and say so what. This is just scribble and does not solve anything. I just saw the plate and everyone else believes these people. The world is really crazy.

## Chapter 5. The end?

If you are still a little unsure, then I have a trump card in my sleeve, which for some reason is not a word on the Internet. Look, people send letters that on that day they saw a flying saucer of about 40 meters, it glowed and its contours were smeared. Six months before this incident, a film entitled “The day the earth stopped” is released on all screens of the country. So now a little attention. I tell the story seems the first film in the world about flying saucers. The military sees something strange on the radar. It is approaching, it is being announced in the media. Everything is in a panic, a UFO flies over the whole city. How is this possible? And this film, judging by the newspaper archives, was still in theaters at that moment, if that. I am by no means saying that this was a film advertising campaign. I am not a conspiracy theorist. It is simply not surprising that everyone began to panic and see luminous objects. Indeed, in fact, what they saw in the cinema began to come to life. And there the aliens fired from blasters. Interestingly, after the film was released, an article appeared in the very famous Life magazine that observed objects could be alien invaders. Ciatata is literal. Who or what is on board? Where are they from? Why are they here? What are the intentions of the creatures that control them? We can get the answer both through the generation and tomorrow. And somewhere in the dark sky there may be those who already know the answer. Of course, the number of observations at once is small, but has grown, which confirms my hypothesis of mass panic.

*"And so the message about the fire in the sky, flying objects and possible alien landings come from all over the world."*

As is customary with conspiracy theorists and ufologists, official reports were ignored. And all the facts turned inside out and unfortunately, even after scientific analysis, very many believed them, because the unidentified very bribes agree. There was such Sherlock Holmes from the world of flying saucers, a very cool journalist Philip Klass. He once said that he would pay $ 10,000 to someone who proves the existence of a UFO. Here mouths all closed up. He also made such a correlation, radars became better and better, new filters were installed, and UFOs appeared less and less, so they were mostly seen on radars in the 40.50.60s. This all confirms our hypothesis that somewhere there everyone likes only bad technique. Bigfoot shot the epileptic on a pager, and the spirits are heard only through the broken voice recorder that KAMAZ moved.

*"Take a look at all these cases, each of them has a scientific, logical explanation."*

And Philip Klass said such an epic thing that each of you should sit in your head. If a UFO exists and they want to declare themselves, then let them land, and if they do not want their visits to be known, turn off the lights. By the way, a class, if Philippe Class is a class. Let's recap, the story is steep indisputably and I do not say that there was absolutely nothing there. People could see something perfectly, but they did not know what exactly it was, but to say that these were plates, and even more so from outer space, was very obscure. The question is different. Where did the flying saucers go after they reported a temperature inversion? Where did the bulk messages go? Why did the peak fall only in those years, when the equipment was still mowing? And why were there no plates as long as people did not invent them? Even after so many years, the best solution would be to admit that it was a misinterpretation of objects on the radar, not because of ignorance, but because that knowledge simply didn’t exist yet, and visual observations are most likely meteors or just the flickering of stars, which the word is often mistaken for a UFO. In this case, absolutely everyone is to blame. Reporters who were not allowed to photograph military radars and did not give them comments, so they wrote that the authorities were hiding from the population. The alarmists who see the meteors and call the newspapers, demanding to print their story, the military, who did not know what they saw, the ufologists, who were obscurantist. All involved are to blame for the fact that we have the most inexplicable case in history, after which the spread of the UFO abbreviation began, which by the way does not mean that they are aliens. This is absolutely any object that has not yet been identified. But at least I hope that you got a different point of view. Frederick Lindman, the government’s chief scientist at the time, said that cymbal fear is the product of mass psychosis, nothing more. Well, unidentified flying objects never returned to Washington. In ancient times, people looked at falling meteors from the point of view of their religion. They thought that these were omens, demons, gods, dragons. Opinions changed when technology came along. They began to see outlandish airships. When planes appeared, there were reports that something was flying faster than planes. It is difficult to say which next stage of development of unidentified objects is, but I think that everything depends on our imagination. But I would really like for people to come up with something else, since honestly the plates are out of date. I would like to believe, but hard to believe. Based on what I said, do you think it is likely that these cases were really extraterrestrial life forms? Of course there is, because we have no evidence to the contrary. But the fact remains. If ever another single occurrence of the appearance of something in the sky arises and this will be covered in the media, believe me in a week it will happen in the whole country, and then in the world. This is the statistics. And how to evaluate it is up to you. Although I’m ready to argue that in our time such stories are simply impossible. And why? Because everyone has a mobile in their pocket and there is a good camera. Thank you for watching. I hope that for this you put an unidentified flying finger up, subscribe to the social network and the novelty is my personal telegram channel, and in the description there is an insanely huge number of links and materials that you must see if you do not believe me. And you should always doubt. Well, now I’ll dance such a revealing dance for you.

*"They are glad that they exposed another story, but personally I think that they took everything out of context and did not take seriously those who proved the opposite. They didn’t perceive me, but I’m no longer going to endure, and now I’ll do everything so that every person knows how the world really works. I am the captain of FakeNews and I have a different truth. This is just the beginning."*