recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
大都市

この記事の内容は**架空の世界内における事象**であり、**現実の地名・人物・団体等とは一切関係ありません。**

**大都市**（たいと-し/タンドゥン-シンディン、Tandon）は絶都王国にある特別市。人口約1210万人を擁する絶都王国の首都であり、大上地都市圏を形成している。

概要
--

絶都王国の首都である。

地理
--

### 市勢

* 面積:?㎢
* 人口:12,098,468人

### 隣接する自治体

* 上城市
* 地界市
* 河北省
	+ 兆基市
	+ 蘇陽市

歴史
--

* 1756年 - **浄瞭国**が首都を絶都から大都へ遷都。
* 1xxx年 - **大都省**（直隷省）が発足。
* 1936年 - 大都省が廃止され、**大都市**・**上城市**・**地界市**の3市が特別市に指定される。

行政
--

* 市長:峡渋頼（2020年 - ）
	+ 歴代市長
		- 初代:具玉林（1936年 - 1942年）
		- 第二代:漢竹林（1942年 - 1951年）
		- 第三代:橙東蘭（1951年 - 1954年）
		- 第四代:金英森（1954年 - 1957年）
		- 第五代:張西人（1957年 - 1963年）
		- 第六代:陳壮遠（1963年 - 1969年）
		- 第七代:具恩連（1969年 - 1978年）
		- 第八代:孫天麟（1978年 - 1984年）
		- 第九代:洪文安（1984年 - 1990年）
		- 第十代:鄭各東（1990年 - 1999年）
		- 第11代:恩栄来（1999年 - 2005年）
		- 第12代:趙大中（2005年 - 2014年）
		- 第13代:李小臣（2014年 - 2020年）

交通
--

### 道路

* 国定道路2号
* 国定道路32号
* 国定道路411号
* 国定道路553号
* 国定道路797号
* 国定道路1238号
Образование в Ирландии

**Образование в республике Ирландия** является трёхступенчатым: начальным, средним ивысшим. Учебный год в Ирландии начинается в сентябре и заканчивается в мае. Образование обязательно для всех детей в возрасте от 6 до 16ти лет, *или* отучившихся три года на втором уровне образования и выдержавших экзамен на *Junior Certificate*. Возможно дошкольное обучение для детей с 4х лет.

## Начальная школа

англ. *Primary School*, ирл. Bunscoil — первый этап обучения, на котором, как правило, изучают 3 основных предмета: английский иирландский языки и математику. По окончании сдается экзамен на получение сертификата об окончании 1-го цикла средней школы (*Junior Certificate*); этого уровня достаточно для старта трудовой карьеры.

* Младшая группа (*Naíonáin Shóisearacha*)
* Старшая группа (*Naíonáin Shinsearacha*)
* Первый класс (*Rang a hAon*)
* Второй класс (*Rang a Dó*)
* Третий класс (*Rang a Trí*)
* Четвёртый класс (*Rang a Ceathar*)
* Пятый класс (*Rang a Cúig*)
* Шестой класс (*Rang a Sé*)

## Средняя школа

англ. *Secondary School*, ирл. Meánscoil — необходима для поступления в высшее учебное заведение. В течение младшего цикла производится подготовка к сдаче экзамена на старший уровень (*Junior Certificate*, *Teastas Sóisearach*); помимо обязательных предметов (английский, ирландский, математика), учащийся должен выбрать несколько дополнительных, которые в дальнейшем будут изучаться 2 года.

В конце старшего цикла обучения учащийся сдаёт экзамены для того, чтобы получить Сертификат о полном среднем образовании (*Leaving Certificate*, *Ardteistiméireacht* — аналог британского A Level). При поступлении в ряд университетов засчитываются высшие баллы по профильным предметам именно из этого сертификата.

*Leaving Certificate* признается всеми странами Европы, а также США, Австралией и Новой Зеландией.

### Переходный год

англ. *Transition Year*, ирл. Idirbhliain — в некоторых школах обязателен, в некоторых пропускается.

### Младший цикл[править

англ. *Junior Cycle*, ирл. Timthriall Sóisearach

* Первый год (*An Chéad Bliain*)
* Второй год (*An Dara Bliain*)
* Третий год (*An Tríú Bliain*)

### Старший цикл[править

англ. *Senior Cycle*, ирл. Timthriall Sinsearach

* Пятый год (*An Cúigiú Bliain*)
* Шестой год (*An Séú Bliain*)

## Высшее образование

Высшее образование в Ирландии называют «образованием третьего уровня» (Third Level education). По окончании ВУЗа выпускнику присваивается степень бакалавра (*Bachelor Degree*). Получение высшего образования возможно в государственных университетах, различных колледжах.

По данным UniPage в стране обучается 196 тыс студентов, из которых 11 тыс иностранные граждане[1]. Примерно 16 тыс ирландских студентов учатся за границей
Полярное сияние

**Полярное сияние** (**северное сияние**) — свечение (люминесценция) верхних слоёв атмосфер планет, обладающих магнитосферой, вследствие их взаимодействия с заряженными частицами солнечного ветра.

В очень ограниченном участке верхней атмосферы сияния могут быть вызваны низкоэнергичными заряженными частицами солнечного ветра, попадающими в полярную ионосферу через северный и южный полярные ***каспы***. В северном полушарии каспенные сияния можно наблюдать над Шпицбергеном в околополуденные часы.

При столкновении энергичных частиц плазменного слоя с верхней атмосферой происходит возбуждение атомов и молекул газов, входящих в её состав. Излучение возбуждённых атомов в видимом диапазоне и наблюдается как полярное сияние. Спектры полярных сияний зависят от состава атмосфер планет: так, например, если для Земли наиболее яркими являются линии излучения возбуждённых кислорода и азота в видимом диапазоне, то для Юпитера — линии излучения водорода в ультрафиолете.

Поскольку ионизация заряженными частицами происходит наиболее эффективно в конце пути частицы и плотность атмосферы падает с увеличением высоты в соответствии с барометрической формулой, то высота появлений полярных сияний достаточно сильно зависит от параметров атмосферы планеты, так, для Земли с её достаточно сложным составом атмосферы красное свечение кислорода наблюдается на высотах 200—400 км, а совместное свечение азота и кислорода — на высоте ~110 км. Кроме того, эти факторы обусловливают и форму полярных сияний — размытая верхняя и достаточно резкая нижняя границы.
Трискайдекафобия

**Трискайдекафобия** — болезненная боязнь числа 13. Связанный с трискайдекафобией - страх перед пятницей 13-го называют фриггатрискайдекафобией. Эти страхи считаются основанными на предрассудках суеверием.

## Причины

На сегодняшний день среди исследователей нет единого мнения о происхождении трискайдекафобии.
По одной из версий, число 13 может считаться «плохим» уже только потому, что оно больше 12, числа, которое является священным у многих народов. Кроме того, существует библейское предание, косвенно связанное с числом 13 — на тайной вечере Иуда Искариот, апостол, предавший Иисуса, сидел за столом тринадцатым. С этим преданием связывают самую распространенную в XIX веке примету, связанную с числом 13 — если за обеденным столом собрались 13 человек, один из них умрет в течение года после трапезы. Кроме этого, карта "13" в колоде Таро обозначает - Смерть.

## Примеры

В некоторых зданиях (например, в гостиницах Нью-Йорка) этажи нумеруются так, чтобы не нервировать трискайдекафобов: после 12-го этажа может сразу следовать 14-й, или же в здании могут существовать этажи 12А и 12Б, или 13 этаж используется для технических целей, например, установки отопительного оборудования и кондиционеров. Так, в здании Федерального резервного банка Нью-Йорка долгое время последним был 12 этаж с очень высокими потолками. Впоследствии он все же был разделен на 2 этажа. Иногда это также относится к номерам домов и помещений.
Ирландия

**Ирла́ндия**,   — государство в Северной Европе, занимающее бо́льшую часть острова Ирландия.

## Кухня

В "стандартный" ирландский завтрак входят тосты, яичница, бекон, сосиски, пудинг. Излюбленная ирландская еда - картошка в самых разных вариантах. несмотря на то, что Ирландия - островная страна, ирландцы употребляют не меньше чем рыбу.

## Экономика

Экономика Ирландии представляет собой современную, относительно небольшую, зависимую от торговли экономику. Сельскохозяйственный сектор, некогда игравший доминирующую роль, в настоящее время замещается промышленностью и информационными технологиями. Одним из важных секторов экономики является туризм, - поскольку страну ежегодно посещает более чем 6,2 млн людей, что примерно в 1,4 раза больше населения Ирландии.

## Литература

Ирландская литература — третья старейшая литература Европы. Трое представителей Ирландии получили Нобелевские премии по литературе: Уильям Батлер Йейтс (1923), Сэмюэл Беккет (1969), Шеймас Хини (1995). Среди крупнейших британских литераторов немало ирландцев по рождению или тесно связанных с Ирландией (Дж. Свифт, О.Голдсмит, Р.Б.Шеридан, Мария Эджуорт, Т.Майн Рид, О.Уайльд, А.Конан Дойл, Бернард Шоу и др.)

## Архитектура

Архитектура Ирландии достаточно разнообразна: древние захоронения, крепости, церкви, монастыри, городские постройки средневековья и сооружения нового времени.
Νευροεπιστημονική φυσιοκρατία - νευροεπιστημονικός φυσισμός

**νευροεπιστημονική φυσιοκρατία - νευροεπιστημονικός φυσισμός**

Οι αβρααμικοί θεϊστές ισχυρίζονται ότι θα σκέφτονται χωρίς εγκέφαλο μετά θάνατον. Τα άυλο δεν διαφοροποιείται από το τίποτα. Οι αιρετικοί Εβραίοι = χριστιανοί ορθόδοξοι δεν έχουν καμία θεωρία επί αυτού. Το τίποτα δεν επιμερίζεται, δεν αποδίδεται και δεν μπορεί να εκφραστεί ως διαφορετικές καταστάσεις, άρα δεν μπορεί να καταγράψει πληροφορία, ούτε να εκπροσωπήσει ιδεατά όργανα νόησης κι ενσυναίσθησης. Η νευροεπιστήμη έχει αποδείξει ότι η νόηση και η βιωματικότητα είναι αποτελέσματα της βιοχημικής δράσης του εγκεφάλου, και κακώσεις σε υποπεριοχές του εγκεφάλου, προξενούν τις αντίστοιχες με την αρχική τους λειτουργία ανικανότητες, ενίοτε μεταβάλοντας την ηθική κρίση αλλά και τον χαρακτήρα του ατόμου (βλέπε χωριστά: 1. Phineas Gage, 2. The Source of Consciousness - Mark Solms - The Royal Institution - YouTube). Ακόμα κι αν απορριφθεί ο βιολογικός εγκέφαλος ως το κέντρο νόησης, επεξεργασίας ερεθισμάτων και βιωματικής αφομοίωσης, ο ιδεατός νους δεν μπορεί να παραβιάσει τους κανόνες της θεωρίας πληροφορίας. Οτιδήποτε υπαρκτό είναι διαδικαστικό και αποτελεί εκδήλωση της σχέσης αιτίου και αιτιατού μέσα από συγκεκριμένες αλληλεπιδράσεις, οι οποίες περιγράφονται αναλυτικά κι επιστημονικά και όχι με ρητορικά τεχνάσματα τσαρλατάνων.
Razek LR

**Razek LR** is a contestant from Crusade: Scandinavia.

## Crusade: Scandinavia

**Name:** Razek LR

**Age:** 22

**Occupation:** Escort

**Hometown:** Reading, England

**Current Residence:** Orlando, Florida

**Hobbies:** Drinking + Video Games

**Pet Peeves:** Hashtags, Inefficient people going through airport security, Paying "delivery fee" but still having to tip the pizza driver, Long lines at fast food and people wait till they get to the counter to look at the menu, When people take pictures of food, When people pretend they're into something you are for no reason.

**3 Words to Describe Me:** Honest, Adventurous, Spontaneous

**If you could have 3 things on an island what would they be and why:** Dora the Explorer's backpack (she got everything in there), Huge fridge full of beer (see "Hobbies"), Magic Lamp (First wish: someone to drink all that beer with. 2nd wish: refill that fridge. 3rd wish: this wish will be saved for when I'm ready to GTFO of this island.)

**Favorite survivor season and why:** Season 29 (I think that's the only season I've actually watched fully)

**Survivor contestant you are most like and why:** I don't know

**Reasons for playing crusade:** It's a new game so I'm sure production will work extra hard to make it an awesome season and make a name of it.

### Voting History

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 10

## Trivia

* Razek is one of three castaways in Crusade: Scandinavia whose first language is not English. The others are Andrés and Eddie.
* Razek was the second person idoled out of Crusade: Scandinavia following Craig B and followed by Austin Scarborough
* Razek has the record of most challenges won total, with 4 tribal immunities, and 2 individual.
Алиса Кителер

**Дама Алиса Кителер** (англ. *Dame Alice Kyteler*, 1280 — после 1325) — ирландская аристократка. В 1325 году первой на территории Ирландии была признана судом ведьмой и осуждена на смерть за колдовство, ведовство, наведение порчи и т. д., однако смогла избежать казни.

Дама Алиса Кителер происходила из Кителер-Хаус, в графстве Килкенни в Ирландии, и была единственным ребёнком в знатной семье нормандо-ирландского происхождения. Была замужем четыре раза. Её первым мужем был Уильям Аутлав, банкир; второй звался Адам ле Блонд, третий — Ричард де Валль. Четвёртый её супруг, сэр Джон ле Поэр, к моменту объявления обвинений в адрес его жены, страдал головокружениями и обмороками. Дети сэра Джона считали, что Алиса отравила их отца. При обыске в доме родителя Алисы были обнаружены многочисленные «волшебные напитки и порошки», использовавшиеся при занятияхчёрной магией. В связи с этим сэр Джон ле Поэр и его дети обвинили Алису Кителер в том, что своим колдовством она умертвила трёх предыдущих мужей и «похитила здоровье» у четвёртого. Согласно обвинению, ведьма с помощью колдовских мазей, приготовленных из внутренностей принесённых в жертву сатане петухов и мозга некрещёных мальчиков, заколдовала до смерти и смертельных болезней всех своих мужей. Ей также вменялось в вину осквернение церквей, а также то, что она по ночам встречалась с дьяволом с тем, чтобы тот ей «давал советы, как творить Зло».

## См. также

* Хью Эверетт
* Чёрный кот
* Ирландия
Max DK

**Max DK** is a contestant from Crusade: Scandinavia.

## Crusade: Scandinavia

**Name:** Max DK

**Age:** 18

**Occupation:** University Student and Childcare Worker

**Hometown:** Canberra, Australia

**Current Residence:** Canberra, Australia

**Hobbies:** video games, listening to music and being basic

**Pet Peeves:** purple tribes, green tribes, people who don’t shave, smokers, elephants and scavenger hunts

**3 Words To Describe You:** Analytical, Delusional, Egomaniac

**If you could have 3 things on an island what would they be and why:** Floss, I hate when my teeth feel furry, a bag of carrots, I love carrots, and tons of sunscreen, look at me, I’m the whitest person around.

**Favorite Survivor Season and Why:** Gabon, its just a ton of crazy people doing crazy things. I’d rather watch a season with crazy antics than a season with excellent gameplay, but thats just me.

**Survivor Contestant You Are Most Like and Why:** Kenny Hoang, like me he is a nerdy gamer with a propensity for making stupid mistakes

**Reasons for playing Crusade:** To have fun, meet cool people and most importantly, kick ass!

## Trivia

* Max is the only castaway in Crusade: Scandinavia who does not live in America at the time of filming. He is from Canberra, Australia.
* Max won the award for Best Juror during the Reunion Show.
Γιανιπέδεια:Σημειωματάριο Γραφειοκρατών

Το **Σημειωματάριο Γραφειοκρατών** είναι ο χώρος, όπου μπορούμε να αφήσουμε ένα μήνυμα στους γραφειοκράτες. Ο σκοπός του είναι να διευκολύνεται ο συντονισμός των ενεργειών των γραφειοκρατών, με το να διαβάζουν όλοι τα μηνύματα και τις πληροφορίες που τους αφορούν. Καλό είναι κάθε νέο θέμα να το βάζετε κάτω από μια νέα επικεφαλίδα.
Jumbo

Η **Jumbo** είναι μία αμιγώς Ελληνική εταιρεία όπου η κύρια δραστηριότητα της είναι η λιανική πώληση παιχνιδιών, βρεφικών ειδών, εποχικών ειδών, ειδών διακόσμησης και ειδών βιβλιοχαρτοπωλείου.
Μέσα στα 27 χρόνια λειτουργίας της, η Εταιρεία εξελίχθηκε σε μία από τις μεγαλύτερες επιχειρήσεις λιανικής πώλησης με 70 καταστήματα: 53 στην Ελλάδα, 8 στη Βουλγαρία, 7 στη Ρουμανία, 5 στην Κύπρο και την Σερβία, 3 στο Κόσοβο και 2 στην Αλβανία και την ΠΓΔΜ ενώ διαθέτει και το ηλεκτρονικό κατάστημα e-jumbo. Κατά την 30.06.2017 ο Όμιλος απασχολούσε 7.830 περίπου εργαζομένους.
Επιπλέον η Jumbo έχει συνάψει συμβάσεις εμπορικής συνεργασίας με ανεξάρτητους πελάτες στην ΠΓΔΜ (FYROM) και την Αλβανία οι οποίοι διαθέτουν από δύο καταστήματα, με τη μέθοδο franchise.

Η Jumbo τώρα σχεδιάζει να ανοίξει καταστήματα σε Τουρκία και Βοσνία.

## Εξωτερικοί σύνδεσμοι

* Επίσημη ιστοσελίδα της Jumbo Α.Ε.Ε.
* Ηλεκτρονικό κατάστημα της Jumbo Α.Ε.Ε.
Αιτιότητα

## Isaac Newton created some formulas for predictions

If you create a good formula for predictions which doesn't analytically describe causality, you didn't finalise physics.

The same is true for general relativity.

## comment 1:

If we don't care about causality (= why things happen specifically, not via a generic model, but how the specific interactions occur) others will.
Чёрный кот

**Чёрные кошки** — объект суеверий различных народов. По мнению одних суеверных, служит предвестником несчастья (например, если чёрная кошка перебегает дорогу, то это приводит к дальнейшим неудачам в жизни). По мнению других суеверных, например, живущая в доме чёрная кошка приносит удачу. Предрассудки не зависят от породы кошки и касаются только её окраса.

## См. также

* Ведьма
* Крысы
Γιανιπέδεια:Δικαιώματα χρηστών

Αυτός εδώ είναι ένας **κατάλογος** με όλα τα **δικαιώματα** ανάλογα με το **είδος χρήστη**.

## Δικαιώματα Nέων Xρηστών και IP

* Να γράφουν στις σελίδες.
* Να δημιουργούν νέες σελίδες.
* Να προτείνουν διαγραφή σελίδων.
* Να διαγράφουν το περιεχόμενο των σελίδων.

## Δικαιώματα Αυτοεπιβαιομένων Χρηστών μπορούν επιπλέον

* Να γράφουν σε ημι-κλειδωμένες σελίδες.
* Να διατηρούν σελίδα για τον εαυτό τους και τις συζητήσεις τους. Δείτε τη Γιανιπέδεια:Σελίδα χρήστη για το τι επιτρέπεται και τι όχι.
* Να επιφορτώνουν Αρχεία

## Δικαιώματα Διαχειριστών μπορούν επιπλέον

* Να διαγράφει σελίδες.
* Να προστατεύει σελίδες (δηλαδή να απαγορεύει την επεξεργασία της σελίδας σε μη-διαχειριστές).
* Να απαγορεύει την επεξεργασία λημμάτων σε χρήστες οι οποίοι δημιουργούν προβλήματα στη Γιανιπέδεια.
* Να αλλάζει μηνύματα του συστήματος
* Να φράζει χρήστες και ip. Δες Γιανιπέδεια:Φραγή.

## Δικαιώματα Γραφειοκρατών μπορούν επιπλέον

* Να μετατρέπει λογαριασμούς χρηστών σε διαχειριστές και γραφειοκράτες και το αντίθετο.
* Να κάνει μετονομασίες χρηστών.
* Να παραχωρεί ή να ανακαλεί ιδιότητα bot σε λογαριασμούς χρηστών.
Crusade: Teotihuacan

**Crusade: Teotihuacan** is the second season of *Crusade*. It utilizes a tribe division based on the contestants' Myers-Briggs test results. The season is hosted by Alex G, Alex R, and Sam McCanada.

## Development

Planning for the season began in July of 2016. Applications went out in August and interviews were held in August. Invitations went out to cast members shortly after, and the chosen players began the game in mid September.

## Twists

* **Introverts VS Extroverts** - The tribes were divided based on their results of the Myers-Briggs test. The extroverts were placed in the red Eckero tribe, and the Introverts were placed on the blue Vagar tribe.
* **The Raids** - During the opening challenge people were allowed to claim items that would help their tribes, and them individually, throughout the game. The winning tribe of each challenge would be allowed to partake in the Viking tradition of raiding by stealing one item per player of their choice.
* **The Arm-Rings** - During the opening challenge players were allowed to claim ten different arm-rings which could also be stolen during the raids. If a player was voted out with an arm-ring it would be out of play. At final 13, an important number in Viking mythology, players who possessed an arm-ring would be immune while the ones who didn't would be vulnerable to be voted out. Those who had more than one arm-ring have to assign the extra ones to other players.

## Episode Guide

*1. Andres failed to post a confession resulting in a self-voting at Tribal Council.*
*2. Michael played an idol on Max negating all votes cast against him.*
*3. Everyone who was in posession of an arm ring was safe at tribal council leaving Andres, Brian, Hunter, Ojani, and Will were vulnerable.*
*4. Will played an idol on himself negating all votes cast against him.*
*5. Hunter used Ullr's Shield, which allowed him to negate someone's vote. He negated Ty's vote and Ty did not vote at tribal council.*
*6. Austin used his extra vote, and cast two votes for Will.*
*7. Michael played an idol on Andrés negating all votes cast against him.*
*8. The vote tied resulting in Danielle and Hunter facing off in a tie breaker challenge where Danielle beat Hunter.*
Αντιαγνωστική φυσιοκρατία στα αγγλικά

## αντιαγνωστική φυσιοκρατία στα αγγλικά/antiagnostic naturalism for Anglophones

Agnostics confuse the etymology of agnosticism, agnostos = the one who doesn't know, with the definition of agnosticism, which is epistemological. Many purist atheists and theists don't know everything. The agnostic expresses deeper ideas on agnosticism/the limits of knowledge itself. The universe itself isn't agnostic. The universe is either logical/naturalistic/unmagical = atheistic or magical = theistic/religious/spiritual/transcendental. Agnosticism isn't a specific metaphysical worldview about the universe, but it focuses on humans and their interpretations of the cosmos.

## What are the epistemological differences between purist atheism and agnostic atheism?

1. Agnosticism overestimates the cosmic importance of personhood, even when theism is rejected. Agnostic atheists are biased and analyse more the personocratic/anthropocentric theories of cosmogony. Religions are explicitly personocratic or implicitly anthropocentric (the Tao isn't a person, but its values and esthetics are human projections). Metaphysical personocrats like agnostic atheists examine only or mostly beneficial cosmogonies, like cosmogony from a person, but not from a chair, a tree, a mountain, or a cow. Nonpersonocratic/impersonal cosmogonies appear to be silly according to biased people, but everything has to be examined thoroughly in philosophy. Computability theory within mathematical logic can provide a generic probabilistic guide.
2. Agnostic atheism overestimates the importance of magic. It rejects magic but not fundamentally. Metaphysical naturalism (purist atheism) fundamentally rejects magic. Ontic states are the internal structural and procedural conditions within everything. Ontic states exist regardless of human knowledge and interpretation. Metaphysical naturalism (purist atheism) accepts the necessity of logical interactions as the evolving causal connectome within everything. Agnostic atheism rejects magic but cannot prove that claim fundamentally.
Grecatheism

## Greek: θεϊσμός/theism εναντίον/versus φυσισμού/physicalism

θεϊσμός: Η θεμελίωση κάθε υποστατότητας και του Παντός είναι μαγικά = υπερφυσικά προσωποκρατική και όχι μαθηματική/ απροσωπική/ διαδικαστική/ μηχανιστική.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The ontological foundations of everything according to theism, is metaphysically personocratic (person + krátos/ dominance). Personhood is self-caused ex precosmic nihilo and cosmogonic. David Deutsch and Max Tegmark are wrong on the mathematical foundations of any possible ontology. The foundations of any substantiality/actuality (and of everything itself) - according theism - is supernatural/ unmathmatical/ personal and not impersonal/ unprocedural/ nonmechanistic. But supernatural/ unmathmatical/ personal and not impersonal/ unprocedural/ nonmechanistic ontology not only cannot be rigorously and scientifically experienced according to science and physicalism; but it doesn't create any ontology in the first place. According to most theism the dead think without a brain. True theists reject neuroscience, or deem it incomplete without to provide a replacement theory. Theists reject mathematical pre-Big-Bang theories and spatiotemporal foundations. Theists reject the chemical abiogenesis/ chemical emergence of life. In order to be a better scientist and philosopher, you have to replace with better specifics the ones you reject. Theists are metaphysical personocrats: they deem personhood omnidominant (dominant over everything/omni-). Theists are unethical people, because they reject the idea of the death of their ego, because their goal is not to get sad, and not to understand the cosmos as it is. Theists try to make the world compatible to their needs, but all they do is they create a biased misinterpretation of it. Warriors of freedom aren't afraid to die. Honesty, rigirous causal analysis and education is more ethical than saving one's ass eternally.
Κατάλογος πόλεων της Ελλάδας

Ο ****κατάλογος των πόλεων της Ελλάδας**** περιλαμβάνει τους οικισμούς της Ελλάδας με μόνιμο πληθυσμό άνω των 10.000 κατοίκων, σύμφωνα με τα αποτελέσματα για το μόνιμο πληθυσμό της Απογραφής του 2011, που διηενήργησε η Ελληνική Στατιστική Αρχή καθώς και της Eurostat. Στον κατάλογο δεν αναφέρονται τα προάστια, δηλαδή «οικισμοί ή περιοχές που βρίσκονται στην περιφέρεια μιας πόλης, μακριά από το κέντρο της», οι πληθυσμοί τους όμως περιλαμβάνονται στον αναφερόμενο πληθυσμό της πόλης. Για παράδειγμα, η Καλλιθέα είναι νότιο προάστιο της Αθήνας και ο πληθυσμός της, 100.641 κάτοικοι, περιλαμβάνεται στον πληθυσμό της Αθήνας ο οποίος αναφέρεται στον κατάλογο.
Βαθμοί προσωπικής ελευθερίας / degrees of personal freedom

Βαθμοί προσωπικής ελευθερίας / degrees of personal freedom

## If magic is ontologically impossible, we have no free will; but what should we do to improve our lives?

If magic is ontologically impossible, we have no free will; but what should we do to improve our lives?

Free will doesn't exist (see my older texts on free will and about/on the impossibility of supernaturalism/magic/religion/soul/unprocedurality/discausality/immaterial somethings and other junky theories).

On the other hand "degree of [personal] freedom" do exist (things which enhance one's possibility to achieve happiness and general success in life [not in a single game or goal; that usually isn't enough]) (but there is no guarantee that the degrees of freedom will work; in general they are usually beneficial), like:

• youth (usually young people live longer; most people don't want to die)
• wealth (money helps people buy things they want; Christians say: "We don't want material things." Thus true Christians didn't buy the Bible, didn't build churches and became atheists.)
• health (emotional balance, sickness is expensive, sickness might kill, sickness decreases productivity, etc.)
• social ability (most people live in societies; social abilities help people find better jobs, partners, solutions, etc.)
• happy family life (happy family life is emotionally supportive for other things we do; family problems usually cause other problems: psychological, economical, behavioural, etc.)
• education (better jobs, knowledge to deal with problems, metaknowledge abilities: knowing ways to improve knowledge, etc.)
• peace [in the country] (war is detrimental)
• democracy, freedom of expression (Muslim extremists and Communists don't agree with that, but we can use indices of citizen well-being; some Chinese Capitalo-Communists don't care about free speech)
• freedom to move (ability to move freely)
• (other things I missed; add more)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

If someone doesn't have enough degrees of freedom she/he should try to increase the things she/he can (age cannot get lowered [safely nowadays; future artificial DNA repair might increase the rate of cancer... we don't know].

Society should have a goal to increase the degrees of personal freedom of its citizens.

Impoverished neighbourhoods decrease the degrees of freedom of their inhabitants. Ill-designed densely built districts are perpetuating low degrees of freedom/bad chances for happiness/well-being to their inhabitants.

We cannot speak for individual cases (one individual might be very happy in an ill-designed densely built district, and a rich individual in an affluent area might be miserable), but in general there are some general criteria for well-being via higher degrees of personal freedom.
Comments on PBS Space Time

## black holes don't encapsulate universes:

Why the maximally degenerate spacetime which isn't yet decayed inside the black hole isn't a single decayed universe but instead it's the full Everettian spectrum of wavefunctional alternatives?

Answer: Because the maximally degenerate spacetime which isn't yet decayed inside the black hole isn't a single decayed universe but instead it's the full Everettian spectrum of wavefunctional alternatives.
Crusade: Scandinavia

**Crusade: Scandinavia**, also known as **Crusade: Scandinavia - Extroverts VS Introverts**, is the inaugural season of *Crusade*. It utilizes a tribe division based on the contestants' Myers-Briggs test results. The season is hosted by Alex G, Alex R, and Sam McCanada.

## Development

Planning for the season began in July of 2016. Applications went out in August and interviews were held in August. Invitations went out to cast members shortly after, and the chosen players began the game in mid September.

## Twists

* **Introverts VS Extroverts** - The tribes were divided based on their results of the Myers-Briggs test. The extroverts were placed in the red Eckero tribe, and the Introverts were placed on the blue Vagar tribe.
* **The Raids** - During the opening challenge people were allowed to claim items that would help their tribes, and them individually, throughout the game. The winning tribe of each challenge would be allowed to partake in the Viking tradition of raiding by stealing one item per player of their choice.
* **The Arm-Rings** - During the opening challenge players were allowed to claim ten different arm-rings which could also be stolen during the raids. If a player was voted out with an arm-ring it would be out of play. At final 13, an important number in Viking mythology, players who possessed an arm-ring would be immune while the ones who didn't would be vulnerable to be voted out. Those who had more than one arm-ring have to assign the extra ones to other players.

## Episode Guide

*1. Andres failed to post a confession resulting in a self-voting at Tribal Council.*
*2. Michael played an idol on Max negating all votes cast against him.*
*3. Everyone who was in posession of an arm ring was safe at tribal council leaving Andres, Brian, Hunter, Ojani, and Will were vulnerable.*
 *4. Will played an idol on himself negating all votes cast against him.*
*5. Hunter used Ullr's Shield, which allowed him to negate someone's vote. He negated Ty's vote and Ty did not vote at tribal council.*
*6. Austin used his extra vote, and cast two votes for Will.*
*7. Michael played an idol on Andrés negating all votes cast against him.*
*8. The vote tied resulting in Danielle and Hunter facing off in a tie breaker challenge where Danielle beat Hunter.*
Φρικηπαίδεια

Η ****Φρικηπαίδεια**** είναι ένας ιστότοπος βασισμένος στο λογισμικό wiki. Αποτελεί παρωδία της Βικιπαίδειας, με την έννοια ότι ο καθένας μπορεί να διαβάσει και να γράψει άρθρα για κάθε θέμα, όπως και στη Βικιπαίδεια. Η Φρικηπαίδεια αποτελείται από ένα κύκλο 23 «αδελφικών» εγχειρημάτων σε διάφορες γλώσσες.

## Ιστορία

Η αγγλική Φρικηπαίδεια ιδρύθηκε τον Ιανουάριο 2005 από τον Jonathan Huang, αφού πολλοί χρήστες της αγγλικής Βικιπαίδειας δήλωσαν την επιθυμία τους για wiki παρωδία της Βικιπαίδειας. Σύντομα η Φρικηπαίδεια αναπτύχθηκε σε τέτοιο βαθμό που ο Huang αποφάσισε το Μάιο 2005 ο ιστοχώρος να φιλοξενηθεί στην Wikia.

Ο ελληνικός ιστότοπος ιδρύθηκε το Φεβρουάριο 2006 υπό την ονομασία Ανεγκυκλοπαίδεια, από μερικούς χρήστες της Βικιπαίδειας με πρόταση του Dada. Στις 20 Σεπτεμβρίου του 2006 κατόπιν ψηφοφοριών και αίτηση στο wikia επί του αποτελέσματός τους, η Ανεγκυκλοπαίδεια μετονομάστηκε σε Φρικηπαίδεια. Από το Μάιο του 2009 διαθέτει περισσότερα από 4.000 άρθρα και 700.000 εγγεγραμμένους χρήστες.
What a fundamental particle is? / Τί είναι το θεμελιώδες σωματίδιο;

**What a fundamental particle is? / Τί είναι το θεμελιώδες σωματίδιο;**

Particles are probabilistic field events, usually longer in duration than other interactions (like virtual particles = field interactions that didn't yet produce specific particles; the term virtual particles is interpretational, it means field interactions that didn't yet produce stable particles). Some particles are extremely unstable, thus lifespan isn't the sole criterion, but a usually concentrated probabilistic field event should meet the criteria of the main particle categories in order it is deemed a particle (particles are field events with particular attributes). But that is a phenomenological approach. Ideally infinite particles could emerge, but their number is finite in nature because pointwise superluminal expansion (big bangs) and the Plankian order of magnitude restrict the available materialisability range.

Can we have a rigorous definition of what an indivisible/fundamental particle is before we have the final ontoaxiomatics (ontoaxiomatical theory) of our universe? No. We can have very good approximate theories before we have the final theory of our universe which must elaborate on all the causal mechanisms of our universe's sustainability.

Can we have the absolute theory of the substantiality of our universe when ontoaxiomatics is based on not being absolute? Are we Gods to magically violate the substantiality of the universe simply to postulate a fallacy? But we can come closer to the ontologically relativist/perspectival truth (substantiality itself is relativist/perspectival; see my text on why it's impossible for a sole particle to un-universally [without a universe] exist).

(see: Sean M. Carroll)

## comment 1:

What if the whole universe were a single particle merely because we are too lazy to study what a Hubble volume is? OK. Even if the universe were a sole Everettianly/manyworldedly multifurcating wavefunction, that doesn't mean it meets the criteria of particlehood. Except if we prove that the Big Bang was generic to all its alternative sub-universal versions (subuniverses), but that it's an erroneous approach which kills its ontoaxiomatic substantiality causation connectome. (We might say that [that it started from a primordial particle] for our local subuniverse, but it's never totally separated from the wider universe [causoimperneability is impossible; purely closed systems don't exist in nature]).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

How do we know that our sub-universal subfurcation/universe-strain wasn't a pure particle at the moment of the Big Bang (nowadays it doesn't meet the "few attributes criterion")? Because we know from CMB (cosmic microwave background [radiation]) that the universe was nearly featureless (homogeneous and isotropic) but not exactly.
Πληροφοριακό μη παράδοξο της περιστρεφόμενης φυσικής μαύρης τρύπας

## Can the information paradox be conclusively resolved without a description of the maximally degenerate black hole's tori? No

We cannot resolve the information nonparadox (false paradox) if we don't resolve the maximally degenerate central region of the black hole. I suggest it is a torus comprised of two subtori that look like Earth's equatorial Coriolis small tori. Black holes do not absorbe particles themselves, particles decay, and before they become new particles the field vibrations are tunnelled in the maximally degenerate double chromodynamic/strong force tori. Information isn't lost but the particles are lost. Their field vibrations are not lost but become irretrievably mixed.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Black holes achieve maximal degeneracy pressure permissible in spacetime; thus if they consume more stuff they'll have to grow. If stuff enters the event horizon faster than the possible pace of black hole growth pace limit per black hole size (we don't have the particular formula), the extra mass will be ejected from the astrophysical jets, but scrambled into different particles than the original. Information isn't lost, but it gets irretrievably scrambled. There is a maximal degeneracy threshold in spacetime.
Προμαχώνας

Ο ****Προμαχώνας**** (παλαιότερα Δραγοτίνη) είναι χωριό που βρίσκεται στο Νομό Σερρών στα βόρεια Ελληνοβουλγαρικά σύνορα. Το Ελληνοβουλγαρικό τελωνείο έχει την ομώνυμη ονομασία. Κατοικείται από περίπου 300 κατοίκους. Εκεί εισέρχεται στην Ελλάδα ο Στρυμόνας ποταμός. Από το χωριό διέρχεται και ο αυτοκινητόδρομος 25 που συνδέει τη Θεσσαλονίκη με τις Σέρρες και τις Σέρρες με το τελωνείο Προμαχώνα και υπάρχει ο ομώνυμος σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός που συνδέει το χωριό με το Σιδηρόκαστρο Σερρών και τη Θεσσαλονίκη.

## Ιστορία

Το χωριό απελευθερώθηκε το 1913 από της Ελληνικές δυνάμεις. Κατά τα χρόνια της Τουρκοκρατία το χωριό ονομάζονταν *Δραγοτίνη*. Ύστερα από τα γεγονότα της Γενοκτονίας των Ελλήνων στη Μικρά Ασία, στο χωριό εγκαταστάθηκαν πρόσφυγες. Το 1927 το χωριό μετονομάστηκε σε Προμαχώνας. Γύρω από το χωριό, επίσης, υπάρχουν τα χωριά Καπνότοπος και Ρούπελ. Το 1928 το χωριό αρίθμησε σε 463 κατοίκους. Πριν τον Β΄ Παγκοσμίο Πολέμο το χωριό αρίθμησε 1.528 κατοίκους, όμως με την κήρυξη του Ελληνοϊταλικού Πολέμου το χωριό και οι άλλοι 2 οικισμοί του εκκενώθηκαν. Οι πρόσφυγες ύστερα από την απελευθέρωση και τον εμφύλιο εγκαταστάθηκαν (από τους άλλους δύο οικισμούς) στον Προμαχώνα και έτσι στο χωριό αριθμούν 245 κάτοικοι. Στην εθνική απογραφή του 1961 το χωριό αρίθμησε 416 κατοίκους.

## Μνημείο

Κοντά στην τοποθεσία της Μάχης του Κλειδίου, όπου ο Βασίλειος ο Βουλγαροκτόνος εξολόθρευσε το στρατό των Βουλγάρων το 1014, ανεγέρθηκε το Μνημείο Βασιλείου Β' του Μακεδόνος (Μνημείο Μάχης του Κλειδίου). Το Μνημείο βρίσκεται στο 14ο χλμ Σιδηροκάστρου-Προμαχώνα και είναι αφιερωμένο στον αυτοκράτορα Βασίλειο Βουλγαροκτόνο και τη νίκη του κατά τη Μάχη του Κλειδίου, που έλαβε χώρα το 1014 στην ευρύτερη περιοχή. Στην κορυφή του μνημείου είναι τοποθετημένο το σύμβολο Βυζαντίου, ο δικέφαλος αετός, ενώ στη μαρμάρινη στήλη είναι χαραγμένο το επίγραμμα:
ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΩ ΤΩ ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΩ ΑΥΤΟΚΡΑΤΟΡΙ
ΜΝΗΜΟΝΕΣ ΔΕΙΝΩΝ ΑΕΘΛΩΝ
ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΗΣ ΤΟΔΕ ΛΑΪΝΟΝ
ΕΠΙΓΟΝΟΙ ΣΤΗΣΑΝ ΔΟΞΗΣ ΑΪΔΙΟΝ
Τί υπόσταση έχουν τα σφάλματα; / What is the ontological (substantiality) state of mistakes?

Speaking about the impossible is possible though, because ideas about something aren't usually that particular something.

## What is the ontological (substantiality) state of mistakes?

1. search in the comment section the terms: ontoaxiomatics and ontophysics (the mathematical formulas behind each causal connectome which is a different universe-like world) (see also: David Deutsch’s constructor theory [I do not represent David Deutsch, but he focuses on the deep causality of substantiality/the deepest whies behind why ontophysics exists])

2. After I speak about mistakes and misinterpretations. Misinterpretations and mistakes do occur by thinkers and computers (dysfunctional neural operators, erroneous semantic mappings, systemic - connectome noise, etc.)

Mistakes and misinterpretations aren't magical, but they are the result of miscalculation. Mistakes and misinterpretations do not elaborate (usually; we have to examine them case by case) on ontological states / ontologically substantial states, but they are the results of ontological states of miscalculation.
Εβερεττισμός / Everettism

Everettism is deterministic as a huge group of alternatives;

it's a form of mechanism (mechanism [as used in philosophy] means modern determinism or not determinism but the claim that nature follows a mechanism = is procedural = is physicalist[ic]; mechanism is hypernymic to the probabilodeterministic Everettism because it includes other theories)

We don't experience the full range of alternatives.

Everettism is both probabilistic and deterministic = probabilistic-deterministic = probabilodeterministic
Knowledge / Γνώση

Knowledge requires personhood, and personhood the thinking brain regions

knowledge: The fact of a bearer of personhood (person) knowing about something; general understanding or familiarity with a subject, place, situation etc. (Wiktionary's definition expanded) / Knowledge is interpreted by persons. Otherwise it's merely a function or a part of a function or worse, unused memory. Without personhood there's no knowledge. Personhood requires a brain with most of its regions (the cerebellum isn't necessary).

Knowledge requires personhood, and personhood a brain

see: The Royal Institution videos on Consciousness (Mark Solms; but consciousness is a philosophical term; here we mean a brain which functions well enough; thinking abilities being more important than motor ones, but neuroscientists know that all the brain regions co-develop...).

Include the interpretation of a person who has a brain in the definition of knowledge;

otherwise its a function, partial function or inert memory.
Οντοαξιωματικός προοπτικισμός / ontoaxiomatic perspectivism

## Ontoaxiomatic perspectivism (the perspective nature of the causal connectome = of substantiality)

The ontological principle that Everettian interactions are always bound to the interpretive perspectives of the other causally connected elements of a particular substantiality (infinite ontoaxiomatics thus ontophysics and worlds exist; most universes aren't parallelisable/mathematically related; not all substantialities are universes but they are universe-like in order they can fully act [otherwise we have mathematical formulas yet insubstantial]).

Everett[ian]ism being the infinite unreachable depth of each of the infinite substantialities, and superdeterminism being substantial options of each Everettian multifurcation. (Everettians don't like the term superdeterminism, but these ideas are compatible. Manyworldedness multifurcates and creates a vast amount of false superdeterminisms [false because they cannot as standalones explain causality and ontophysics], but each of the multifurcating universe experiences one of them. Strong empiricists claim we cannot measure the full Everettian spectrum, but their approach is wrong because they don't provide sufficient ontoaxiomatics/foundations of physics.)

## comment 1:

The major other approach is eclectic and causally incoherent ontoaxiomatics = make a collage of things you like without causally linking them into the same substantiality foundations = a necessarily impossible approach to substantiality.

## comment 2:

Ontoaxiomatic perspectivism is complex because not only events (particles are probabilistic field events) are relative but also the laws of different physics.

see: Artificial neural networks testing different ontoaxiomatics with tweaking algorithms implemented on all physical theories we have; then filter the most promising ontophysics and repeat the calculational evolution process again and again.
Μπορούν οι χιμπατζήδες να γράψουν κωδικοποιημένα κάθε βιβλίο μετά από απειροτενή χρόνο;

## Can chimpanzees randomly write any book we want?

Yes but encoded, because they hit neurotically the keyboard and it's impossible for them to write it normally. Yes. Some things like magic are impossible.

The chimps hit neurotically the keyboard.
They can write encoded books though, with the encryption keys included (if we leave them trying a huge amount of lifespans of the cyclic universe).

Any book (or anything else) can be the encrypted version of any other; but in that case the encryption key isn't included.

The universe is a self-causal Turing machine, which includes its ontoaxiomatics, operational mechanism, data storage, etc. all in one; but that purported "one" isn't complete (ontologically it's not a strictly specific something), [it's not] static (it's entropically expanding); and that's a core element of the reason it exists.
Εναντίον του πρόχειρου φυσισμού

## Are identical states necessarily different? Should we destroy the correspondence between words and meanings?

Humans, aliens and octopuses (octopodes) are very complex systems thus it's nearly impossible for them to be in the same state.

They can be in alike states.

Humans, aliens and octopuses aren't harmoniously oscillating particles, time crystals, etc.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Should we destroy philosophy?

Should we destroy the correspondence between words and meanings?

Alike states are medically and descriptively useful, but they are by no means identical.

Even if our conscious effort becomes to be wrong, not all thinkers will be willing to follow.

## A comment in mocking mood

Some people claim that philosophy is the conscious effort to be wrong; but is it possible to be consciously unconscientious? Maybe yes, but unconscientiousness is usually the result of lacking control over the self.

Some people claim: Philosophy is erroneous simplifications which hinder the evolution of philosophy, because logical fallacies are always exposed. But other thinkers don't find it useful to consciously be wrong.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

* field of study: similarity theory (not identity theory; complex systems are nearly never in the same non-trivial state [the non-state/death/dreamless sleep is a trivially very similar mental state]) and multiple realisability
Austin

**Austin** is a contestant from Crusade: Scandinavia.

## Crusade: Scandinavia

**Name:** Austin S.

**Age:** 19

**Occupation:** Cook

**Hometown:** Dunn, North Carolina

**Current Residence:** Dunn, North Carolina

**Hobbies:** Gardening, Graphic Design, and Video Production

**Pet Peeves:** Spiders, Dirty Fingernails, and weaving palm fronds
**3 Words To Describe You:** Calm, Perceptive, and Witty

**If you could have 3 things on an island what would they be and why:** Jordan Rosenberg to keep me company; A bed, I am a comfort obsessor; and a working restaurant, maybe like a Chilis or Red Lobster. Something with variety.

**Favorite Survivor Season and Why:** Currently Survivor AU is my favorite.. but my favorite season would be Gabon. Sugars whole character and story just made the season so amazing for me, a close second is HvV.

**Survivor Contestant You Are Most Like and Why:** Probably Aubrey. She kept getting knocked down, got back up, dusted herself off, and found her way to the end and just fell short. I truly can’t pick someone who really correlates to me as a player.

**Reasons for playing Crusade:** I loved the icons, loved the hosts, and I love “doing in” a series which I’ve never done before. Playing in the inaugural season really means a lot to me!

## Trivia

* Austin is the third person to be idoled out, following Craig B and Razek LR
* Austin correctly voted for the boot 4 out of 9 times.
* The jury said had Austin reached the finals, he would have been the winner of Crusade: Scandinavia
Η πηγή της υποστατότητας / Substantiality foundations

## Our logic doesn't fundamentally originate in us / [Allo]mathematical logic is hypernymic to everything

(See my texts on why supernaturalism/unprocedurality is impossible. Supernaturalism not only doesn't meet the criteria of rigorous empirical observation, but also it doesn't have any possible ontology.)

Our neural connectome is biased (there's no specific average or single ideal brain), but also our inputs are biased (they aren't necessarily the most helpful for creating a true image of the events) and our systemic noise (cells and neural spikes behave not arbitrarily, but noise is a major component).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Ontophysics means true physics and not scientophysics, because we don't have the final theory which doesn't exist (but that's another topic).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

We process/calculate data with our biased connectome and neuroendocrinology, but biochemistry and ontophysics define the procedure.

If Everettism (the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics) is true, any possible outcome happens in a different universe-strain, and we live in one of the universes.

According to mechanism (alternative kin to determinism), we don't care or focus or know if Everettism = range of alternative allo-universal substantialities/actualities/realities is true. We only know that our own universe-strain and anything exhibited in it is based on and results from the ontological mathematics of that particular universe.

The ontological mathematics = ontomathematics aren't necessarily useful for general calculations like scientomathematics (but modern mathematicians experiment with allomathematics = mathematics based on different axioms and/or axiomatic algorithms which aren't necessarily lists).

The mathematical and/or allomathematical nature of any possible universe-like substantiality isn't determined by the ingredients of particular worlds.

Due to causopermeability and identity we cannot separate the objects of the universe from the universe itself; but that doesn't mean that any object or any universe are conscious originator agents. They obey mathematical and/or allomathematical logic which is causally coherent, procedural and mechanistic. Due to causopermeability and identity we cannot separate the allomathematics of a particular universe from its substantiality, but that doesn't mean that the universe had free will to violate its ontomathematical logic.

We should study David Deutsch’s constructor theory and Max Tegmark’s struogony = mathematical universe hypothesis based on mathematical structures. We should create a field of study called 'foundations of substantiality', specifically "foundations of any possible universe-like substantiality; and the general characteristics of the infinite possible ontoaxiomatic foundations per universe-like cosmos".