En passant (wikipedia)

### Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En\_passant[1]

***En passant*** (French: [ɑ̃ paˈsɑ̃], lit. *in passing*) is a move in chess.[1] It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn "as it passes" through the first square. The result is the same as if the pawn had advanced only one square and the enemy pawn had captured it normally.

The *en passant* capture must be made on the very next turn or the right to do so is lost.[2] Like any other move, if an *en passant* capture is the only legal move available, it must be played. *En passant* capture is a common theme in chess compositions.

The *en passant* capture rule was added in the 15th century when the rule that gave pawns an initial double-step move was introduced. It prevents a pawn from using the two-square advance to pass an adjacent enemy pawn without the risk of being captured.

## Contents

[hide]

* 1Conditions
* 2Notation
* 3Examples
	+ 3.1In the opening
	+ 3.2Unusual examples
	+ 3.3In chess compositions
* 4Historical context
* 5Threefold repetition and stalemate
* 6See also
* 7References

## Conditions[edit]

[2]

Animation of 1...d5 and 2.exd6e.p.

A pawn on its fifth rank may capture an enemy pawn on an adjacent file that has moved two squares in a single move, *as if the pawn had moved only one square*. The conditions are:

* the capturing pawn must be on its fifth rank;
* the captured pawn must be on an adjacent file and must have just moved two squares in a single move (i.e. a double-step move);
* the capture can only be made on the move immediately after the opposing pawn makes the double-step move, otherwise the right to capture it *en passant* is lost.

*En passant* is a unique privilege of pawns: other pieces cannot capture *en passant*. It is the only capture in chess in which the capturing piece does not replace the captured piece on its square.[3]:463

## Notation[edit]

In either algebraic or descriptive chess notation, *en passant* captures are sometimes denoted by "e.p." or similar, but such notation is not required. In algebraic notation, the capturing move is written as if the captured pawn advanced only one square, for example, ...bxa3 (or ...bxa3e.p.) in the first example.[4]:216

## Examples[edit]

### In the opening[edit]

There are some examples of *en passant* in chess openings. In this line from Petrov's Defence, White can capture the pawn on d5 *en passant* on his sixth move.

Black just played 5...d7–d5. White's e5-pawn may capture *en passant*.

**1. e4 e5**
**2. Nf3 Nf6**
**3. d4 exd4**
**4. e5 Ne4**
**5. Qxd4 d5** (diagram)
**6. exd6e.p.**[5]:124–125
Another example occurs in the French Defence after 1.e4 e6 2.e5, a move once advocated by Wilhelm Steinitz.[6]:2 If Black responds with 2...d5, White can capture the pawn *en passant* with 3.exd6. Likewise, White can answer 2...f5 with 3.exf6e.p.

Steinitz vs. Fleissig, 1882

After 3.exd6e.p.

An example is from this game by Steinitz and Bernhard Fleissig.[7]

 **1. e4 e6**
 **2. e5 d5**
 **3. exd6e.p.**
### Unusual examples[edit]

An example of overlooking
capturing *en passant*

Black to move. Should he play ...g5+?

In the diagram, if Black plays ...g5+, it seems to checkmate White, but it is in fact a blunder. Black overlooks that White can counter this check with the *en passant* capture fxg6, which cross-checks and checkmates Black. This game is a draw if neither side errs.

Another example is this game between Gunnar Gundersen and Albert H. Faul.[8] Black has just moved his pawn from f7 to f5. White could capture the f-pawn *en passant* with his e-pawn, but instead played:

**13. h5+ Kh6 14. Nxe6+**
Note that the bishop on c1 effects the check, via a discovered check. 14...Kh7 results in 15.Qxg7#.

**14... g5 15. hxg6e.p.#**
The *en passant* capture and discovered checks place Black in checkmate (from White's rook on h1, even without help from White's bishop; an *en passant* capture is the only way a double check can be delivered without one of the checking pieces moving, as in this position).

The largest known number of *en passant* captures in one game is three, shared by three games; in none of them were all three captures by the same player. The earliest known example is a 1980 game between Alexandru Sorin Segal and Karl Heinz Podzielny.[9]:98–99[10]

### In chess compositions[edit]

Kenneth S. Howard, 1938

White mates in three

*En passant* captures have often been used as a theme in chess compositions, as they "produce striking effects in the opening and closing of lines".[11]:106 In the 1938 composition by Kenneth S. Howard, the key move **1. d4**introduces the threat of 2.d5+ cxd5 3.Bxd5#. Black may capture the d4-pawn *en passant* in either of two ways:

* The capture **1... exd3e.p.** shifts the e4-pawn from the e- to the d-file, preventing an *en passant* capture after White plays **2. f4**. To stop the threatened mate (3.f5#), Black may advance **2... f5**, but this allows White to play **3. exf6e.p.#** with checkmate due to the decisive opening of the e-file.
* If Black plays **1... cxd3e.p.**, White exploits the newly opened a2–g8 diagonal with **2. Qa2+ d5 3. cxd6e.p.#**

An example showing the effect *en passant* captures have on pins is this 1902 composition by Sommerfeldt:[12]

O. Sommerfeldt, 1902

White mates in two

The key move

 **1. d4!**
threatens 2.Qf2#. The black e-pawn is now simultaneously pinned and unpinned, as 1...exd3e.p.+ is illegal, but

 **1... e3+**
is not. This, however, removes the black king's access to e3, allowing

 **2. d5#**
## Historical context[edit]

Allowing the *en passant* capture, together with the introduction of the two-square first move for pawns, was one of the last major rule changes in European chess, and occurred between 1200 and 1600. Other relatively recent rule changes were castling, the unlimited range for queens and bishops[13]:14,16,57 (Spanish master Ruy López de Segura gives the rule in his 1561 book *Libro de la invencion liberal y arte del juego del axedrez*[4]:108) and a change to the rules on pawn promotion. In most places the *en passant* rule was adopted at the same time as allowing the pawn to move two squares on its first move, but it was not universally accepted until the Italian rules were changed in 1880.[5]:124–125

The motivation for *en passant* was to prevent the newly added two-square first move for pawns from allowing a pawn to evade capture by an enemy pawn.[13]:16 Asian chess variants, because of their separation from European chess prior to that period, do not feature any of these moves.

## Threefold repetition and stalemate[edit]

The possibility of an *en passant* capture is relevant to the claim of a draw by threefold repetition. Two positions with the same configuration of pieces, with the same player to move, are for this purpose considered different if there was an opportunity to make an *en passant*capture in the first position, and that opportunity no longer exists in the second position.[14]:27

In his book on chess organization and rules, International Arbiter Kenneth Harkness wrote that it is frequently asked if an *en passant* capture must be made if it is the only legal move.[15]:49 This point was debated in the 19th century, with some arguing that the right to make an *en passant* capture is a "privilege" that one cannot be compelled to exercise. In his 1860 book *Chess Praxis*, Howard Staunton wrote that the *en passant* capture is mandatory in that instance. The rules of chess were amended to make this clear.[9] Today, it is settled that the player must make that move (or resign). The same is true if an *en passant* capture is the only move to get out of check.[15]:49