Suillellus luridus

Template:Short description
Template:Featured article
Template:Taxobox

```
Template:Mycomorphbox

```

***Suillellus luridus*** (formerly ***Boletus luridus***), commonly known as the **lurid bolete**, is a fungus of the bolete family, found in deciduous woodlands on chalky soils in Asia, Europe, and eastern North America. Fruit bodies appear in summer and autumn and may be abundant. It is a solid bolete with an olive-brown cap up to Template:Convert in diameter, with small red pores on the underside. The stout ochre stem reaches Template:Convert high and Template:Convert wide, and is patterned with a red mesh-work. Like several other red-pored boletes, it stains blue when bruised or cut. Though edible when cooked, it can cause gastric upset when eaten raw and can be confused with the poisonous *Boletus satanas*, though the latter species has a pale cap; as a result, some guidebooks recommend avoiding consumption altogether. When consumed with alcohol, *Suillellus luridus* has been implicated in causing adverse reactions similar to those caused by the compound coprine, though laboratory testing has not revealed any evidence of coprine in the mushroom.

First described in 1774, the species has been transferred to various Boletaceae genera in its taxonomic history, although it retained the original name given to it by German botanist Jacob Christian Schaeffer until a transfer to genus *Suillellus* in 2014. Several varieties, a subspecies, and a form have been described by European mycologists. *Suillellus luridus* is mycorrhizal, forming a symbiotic association with deciduous trees such as oak, birch and beech, and has been found to have a growth-enhancing effect on conifers in experiments. The fruit bodies are highly attractive to, and often infested by, insects, and several species of fly have been recorded feeding on them. Chemical analyses have revealed some aspects of the mushroom's components, including its volatile flavour compounds, its fatty acid and amino acid compositions, and the identities of the carotenoid compounds responsible for its colour.

## Taxonomy

*Boletus luridus* was described by German botanist Jacob Christian Schäffer in 1774, in his series on fungi of Bavaria and the Palatinate, *Fungorum qui in Bavaria et Palatinatu circa Ratisbonam nascuntur icones.* The specific epithet is the Latin adjective *luridus*, 'sallow'. French botanist Pierre Bulliard's 1791 *Boletus rubeolarius* is a heterotypic synonym (based on a different type). The following year, Johann Friedrich Gmelin called it *Boletus subvescus*, from the Latin words *sub* "nearly" or "under", and *vescus* "edible". However, this is a *nomen nudum*. Several taxonomical synonyms arose when the species was transferred to different genera within the family Boletaceae by different authorities, including *Leccinum* by Samuel Frederick Gray in 1821, *Tubiporus* by Petter Karsten in 1881, *Dictyopus* by Lucien Quélet in 1888, and *Suillellus* by William Murrill in 1909.

 File:Netzstieliger Hexenröhrling-1.jpg
The variety *Boletus luridus* var. *erythropus*, published as "beta" by Elias Magnus Fries in his 1821 *Systema Mycologicum*, is synonymous with *Boletus erythropus*. *Boletus luridus* var. *rubriceps* was originally described from Spain (as a species of *Tubiporus*) by René Maire in 1937, and later formally transferred to *Boletus* by Aurel Dermek in 1987. Other varieties of *B. luridus* include Roman Schulz's var. *obscurus* and var. *rubromaculatus* published in 1924; Josef Velenovský's 1939 var. *tenuipes*, found in the Czech Republic; and Jean Blum's 1969 var. *lupiniformis* and var. *queletiformis*, originally described from France and Spain, respectively. *Boletus erythrentheron*, originally described as a distinct species by Jan Bezděk, was later published as the variety *B. luridus* var. *erythrentheron* by Albert Pilát and Dermek in 1979, and finally as a subspecies by Jiri Hlavácek in 1995. Carmine Lavorato and Giampaolo Simonini defined the form *primulicolor* from Sardinia in 1997. Rolf Singer's 1947 variety *caucasicus* is currently considered an independent species, *Boletus caucasicus* Singer ex. Alessio. Similarly, *B. luridus* f. *sinensis*, found in Hainan Province, China, was later elevated to distinct species status as *B. sinensis*.

*Boletus luridus* is the type species of *Boletus* section *Luridi*, originally circumscribed by Fries in 1838. This section includes species producing medium to large fruit bodies with thick, swollen stems, and minute pores that are coloured red, orange, or brown. However, the genus as a whole is strongly paraphyletic and has been partly fragmented as further studies have resolved relationships to a finer detail. Manfred Binder and David Hibbett showed *B. luridus* to be most closely related to a group containing *B. torosus* and *B. luteocupreus*, with *B. vermiculosus* and *Pulveroboletus ravenelii* as more distant relatives, based on molecular phylogenetics inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. In a separate molecular study of ten frequently eaten European boletes, *B. luridus* clustered together with *B. rhodoxanthus*. Genetic analysis published in 2013 shows that *B. luridus* and many (but not all) red-pored boletes are part of a *dupainii* clade (named for *Boletus dupainii*), well-removed from the core group of *Boletus edulis* and relatives within the Boletineae. For this reason, it is now considered a species of *Suillellus*.

The English common name is lurid bolete. Both it and *Boletus satanas* are known as *ayimantari*, "bear mushroom", in Eastern Turkey.

## Description

Template:Multiple image
*Suillellus luridus* is a stout fungus with a thick yellow-olive to olive-brown convex cushion-shaped cap that can reach Template:Convert in diameter. The cap colour tends to darken with age, and regions of red, orange, purple, brown, or olive-green can develop in maturity. The cap surface is tomentose (velvety), becoming smoother with old age, and sticky in wet weather. The pore surface is initially dark red before turning orange-red, and has a lighter-coloured zone encircling the margin. There are 2–3 circular pores per millimetre, and the tubes are Template:Convert deep. The tubes are shorter around the cap margin and close to the stem, where they form a circular depression. Initially pale yellow, the tubes gradually become olive-yellow and then bluish-green upon exposure to air. A characteristic feature is the presence of a maroon layer between the tubes and the flesh. The thick stem is Template:Convert tall and Template:Convert wide, and bears a distinctive orange-red meshlike pattern on a paler yellowish or ochre background. The flesh is yellowish, with red marks in the cap, and stains an intense dark blue when bruised or broken. There is a faint sour smell, and the taste is described as mild.

Variety *queletiformis* can be distinguished from the main form by the reddish discolouration of the stem base that occurs both on the exterior surface and in the flesh. Variety *rubriceps* has a deep crimson red cap, while var. *lupiniformis* has a pale yellow or dirty ochre cap, sometimes with pink tones throughout.

 File:2009-10-09 Boletus luridus Schaeff 60182.jpg
The spore dust is olive to brownish olive. The spores are oval to somewhat fuse-shaped, measuring 11–15 μm long by 4.5–6.5 μm wide. The basidia (spore-bearing cells) are club-shaped and four-spored, and measure 29.2–36.5 by 11.0–12.4 μm. Cystidia on the sides of the tubes (pleurocystidia) are fuse-shaped with swollen middles and long necks, measuring 33–48 by 7.3–13.5 μm; cheilocystidia (on the edges of the pores) have a similar morphology. The cap cuticle is made of cylindrical hyphae 3.7–5.8 μm wide that are interwoven compactly, and the hyphal tips are erect and arranged in bundles. In contrast, the hyphae of the cap flesh is loosely interwoven with hyphae that are cylindrical and branched, measuring 3.7–8.8 μm. Hyphae do not contain clamp connections. The mycelium is an unusual yellow colour.

Some chemical tests can be used to help identify the mushroom. A drop of dilute potassium hydroxide placed on the cap cuticle will stain dark red to blackish, and orange-yellow on the flesh, while ferrous sulphate solution turns the cuticle yellow and then greenish-yellow. Melzer's reagent will turn the flesh dark blue, after the natural bluing reaction to injury has faded.

### Similar species

Also found on calcareous (chalky) soils, *Rubroboletus satanas* is larger and has a pale cap, and its upper stem lacks the reticulations characteristic of *S. luridus*. Its flesh does not turn blue so markedly on bruising or cutting. It has a more globular overall shape, and young mushrooms carry a smell of decay. The edible *Neoboletus luridiformis* can be distinguished from *S. luridus* by its dark brown cap; it also grows on sandy soils associated with conifers. In North America, it can be confused with the poisonous *Rubroboletus pulcherrimus*, which has a fatter stalk and deeper red pores. Initially collected in Michigan under oak, *Boletus vinaceobasis* resembles *S. luridus* but has shorter spores and its cystidia are dark brown in Melzer's reagent. *Boletus* species that share a similar appearance with *S. luridus* but lack reticulation in their stems include *B. subvelutipes* (found in North America and Asia) and *B. hypocarycinus* (United States).

*Boletus caucasicus*, found in southern Europe, has yellow flesh in the cap tissue immediately above the tube layer, in contrast to the reddish colour of the same flesh found in *S. luridus*. Another European species, *Rubroboletus rhodoxanthus*, has characteristic pinkish tones in the cap. The Chinese species *Neoboletus sinensis*, originally described as a form of *S. luridus*, can be most reliably distinguished from the latter by its larger spores, which have been reported to be as large as 12–17 by 5.5–7 μm. Fruit bodies closely resembling *S. luridus* have been recorded in Australia, though renamed *Boletus barragensis* as they differ in spore size and preference for trees of the family Myrtaceae.

## Ecology and distribution

The fungus grows in a mycorrhizal association with deciduous trees such as oak, birch and beech on chalky soils. It is also suspected of being a mycorrhizal associate of subshrub rock roses in the genus *Helianthemum*. Field studies indicate that the fungus, when paired as a mycorrhizal partner with seedlings of the conifer *Cunninghamia lanceolata*, increases the seedling's survival rate, augments its height and ground diameter, and increases the chlorophyll content in the leaves. A similar growth-enhancing effect had been noted earlier with *Pinus taiwanensis* seedlings. These beneficial effects on plant growth are a result of multiple interactions among the fungus, host plant, and indigenous soil microbes that increase the biomass of carbon, and increase the bacterial diversity in the mycorrhizosphere. In a study comparing the salinity resistance of three common ectomycorrhizal fungi (the others were *Suillus bovinus* and *S. luteus*), *S. luridus* was the most tolerant to high concentrations of salt, and is a good candidate species for the inoculation of tree seedlings to be planted on saline soil. Fruit bodies grow singly or scattered on the ground, from June to November after summer rains. *S. luridus* may occur in parks near a single tree, though it will not be found in acidic soils.

 File:Boletus luridus 239809.jpg
The predilection of insects for this mushroom was noted by 19th-century British mycologist Anna Maria Hussey, who wrote in 1847:

> there are very few of the soft-fleshed tribes, all of which are the nurseries of innumerable insects, so much in favour as the poisonous *Boletus luridus*, on breaking an old one it is a living mass of larvae. Our present subject is so soon attacked by insects that it is very rare to find specimens devoid of wriggling life, and being a very common and abundant kind, it must be of great service in the economy of insect existence.
>
>

 Several fly species have been recorded feeding on the fruit bodies, including *Phaonia boleticola*, *P. rufipalpis*, *Thricops diaphanus*, and, in North America, *Drosophila falleni*, *Pegomya mallochi*, *P. winthemi*, *Megaselia pygmaeoides*, and *Muscina assimilis*. In contrast, slugs tend to avoid consuming this species.

The fungus is widespread in Europe, east to the Black Sea region and eastern Anatolia in Turkey, and Pakistan, where it has been recorded from Khanspur, Kuzagali, Sudhan Gali and Hajinpir. In North America, it is known from eastern Canada and the United States east of the Great Lakes, although in one instance it was found in North Dakota. Its range extends south to Mexico, and it has been recorded once from Costa Rica. In Asia, it has been found in the Bar'am Forest in the Upper Galilee in northern Israel, and India. Taiwan, It is widely distributed in China, having been found in Hebei, Jiangsu, Anhui, Henan, Guangdong, and Yunnan provinces. The variety *rubriceps* has been recorded growing under linden (*Tilia*) in the Czech Republic.

## Toxicity

Mild tasting, *Suillellus luridus* is edible after thorough cooking and is highly regarded in France. It is also commonly consumed in Italy and China. The mushroom is sold in regional markets in central Mexico; despite this, it is considered inedible by inhabitants of La Malinche National Park. Caution is advised if choosing this species for consumption, as it resembles other less edible blue-staining boletes. Some guidebooks recommend avoiding it altogether. If eaten raw or insufficiently cooked, symptoms of gastrointestinal poisoning can occur within 30 minutes to two hours, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhoea. A full recovery can be expected within 24 to 48 hours if fluid losses are restored. Chemical analysis has revealed traces of the toxin muscarine and its stereoisomers.

*Suillellus luridus* has been suspected of causing an enhanced alcohol sensitivity similar to that caused by the common ink cap (*Coprinopsis atramentaria*), with gastric symptoms. A German mycologist reported having suffered symptoms himself upon imbibing alcohol with this "otherwise excellent" mushroom. A 1982 report of three cases from Switzerland further incriminated the species, yet a 1994 study casts doubt on this; researchers Ulrich Kiwitt and Hartmut Laatsch looked for antabuse-like compound coprine content in *S. luridus* and similar species, and found none in the historical suspect but did find indications for it in the rare *B. torosus*. They concluded that the most likely explanation for historical incidents was a misidentification of *B. torosus* with *S. luridus*, though they could not rule out *S. luridus* containing a hitherto unidentified compound causing alcohol-related reactions.

## Chemistry

 File:Boletus luridus 62499.jpg
The composition of the volatile flavour compounds of *Suillellus luridus* consists largely of linoleic acid, with smaller proportions of 1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, pentadecanoic acid, palmitic acid, linoleic acid methyl ester, and heptadecanoic acid. Pyrazine compounds might be responsible for the characteristic odour of the dried mushroom. The predominant sterol present in the fruit bodies is ergosterol, with smaller amounts of closely related derivative compounds. The main fatty acids of the mushroom include linoleic acid (53.4% of total fatty acids), oleic acid (24.1%), and palmitic acid (10.2%). Arginine is the free amino acid found in the highest concentration (96.9 μM per gram of dry weight), followed by glutamine (9.7) and alanine (8.2).

The carotenoid content of the fruit bodies differs substantially between the cap, the tubes, and the stem. The upper part of the cap, which contains 3.1 micrograms of carotenoid per gram (µg/g) fresh weight, has predominantly mutatochrome (47% of total carotenoids), 4-keto-α-carotene (40.2%), and δ-carotene (6.4%). The major carotenoids in the tubes (totaling 4.3 µg/g) include neurosporaxanthin (31.1%), auroxanthin (17.2%), 4-keto-α-carotene (17.1%), and rhodopin (15.8%). The stem (1.2 µg/g) contains primarily auroxanthin (32.5%), followed by 4-keto-α-carotene (19.9%), β-zeacarotene (18.5%), and rhodopin (11.4%). The colour change observed with tissue injury is caused by variegatic and xerocomic acids, both of which turn blue when oxidized enzymatically upon exposure to air.

## See also

Template:Portal

* List of North American boletes

## References

1. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Schaeffer 1774`
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Nilper 1977`
3. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Bulliard 1791`
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlFungorum synonymy: Suillellus luridus`
5. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gmelin 1792`
6. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Simpson 1854`
7. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Nilper 1977a`
8. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlMycoBank: Boletus subvescus`
9. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Gray 1821`
10. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Karsten 1881`
11. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Quélet 1886`
12. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Murrill 1909`
13. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Fries 1821`
14. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlMycoBank: Boletus erythropus`
15. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Maire 1937`
16. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dermek 1987`
17. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Michael 1924`
18. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Velenovský 1939`
19. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Index of Fungi`
20. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dermek 1979`
21. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Hlavácek 1995`
22. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Lavorato 1997`
23. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlFungorum: Boletus caucasicus`
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Lei 2009`
25. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Fries 1838`
26. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Snell 1970`
27. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlBinderHibbett2004`
28. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Mello 2006`
29. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Nuhn 2013`
30. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Vizzini 2014`
31. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlRecommended English Names for Fungi`
32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Demirel 2004`
33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Haas 1969`
34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Alessio 1985`
35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Zeitlmayr l976`
36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 36.5 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Bessette 2000`
37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Michell 2006`
38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Phillips 2006`
39. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Siquier 2008`
40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Ammirati 1985`
41. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Ramsbottom 1953`
42. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dickinson 1982`
43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Lamaison 2005`
44. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Arora 1986`
45. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `SmithThiers1971`
46. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Loizides 2011`
47. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Watling 1999`
48. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Grgurinovic 1997`
49. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Barden 2007`
50. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Wang 2006`
51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Hu 1981`
52. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Zhang 2010`
53. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sheng 2009`
54. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Hussey 1847`
55. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Skidmore 1985`
56. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Wheeler 1984`
57. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Elliot 1922`
58. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sesli 2007`
59. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Sarwar 2007`
60. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Stack 1981`
61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Montoya 2004`
62. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `urlHalling`
63. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Avizohar 1972`
64. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Kumar 2011`
65. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Zhishu 1993`
66. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Tichy 1998`
67. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Rubel 2008`
68. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Pérez-Moreno 2008`
69. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Tomalak 2011`
70. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Flammer 1985`
71. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Benjamin 1995`
72. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Kiwitt 1994`
73. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Li 2009`
74. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `De Simone 1979`
75. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Dembitsky 2010`
76. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Czezuga 1978`
77. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `Nelson 2010`

## External links

Template:Commons

* Template:Wikispecies-inline
* Template:IndexFungorum

Template:Taxonbar