Comments on David Deutsch

## text 1

on wavefunctional evolutions:

Shadow particles is a heavy/too complicated interpretation of the n-slit experiments.

An equivalent interpretation (more fundamental because we should focus on the definition of the particle) is that particles act as waves in relation to non-interacting others (observer is a vague term) an when an interaction occurs, that affects the INTERPRETED by an observer evolution of the particles' wavefunction.

Even if you don't cause an interaction and something other does in a small area, that affects the particles' wavefunctional evolution (common frame of reference due to intermediaries).

The results are the same either you believe in shadow particles, or wave-particles with relational correlations. The wave-particles with relational correlations version is deeper because it exposes what a particle actually is = an interpreted via interactions wavefunctional phenomenon.

Also mild interactions do exist. In slit experiments that causes mixed wave–particle behavior.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

on gravity:

Gravity should be described as a transitional phenomenon.

The curvature of spacetime must result from either a constant mild field interaction, or many noisy interactions (equivalent interpretations to better explain gravity).

Particles and virtual particles' interaction pathways get distorted, and in order the Lagrangian function remains correct, gravity brings heavy things together (equivalents: field or virtual particles currents). Single atoms get affected by quantum jitters also. Bigger objects cancel out that biasing/effect.

Why particles know the presence of other particles? Because the wavefunctions of particles aren't maximally centralized. They extend to infinity, thus causal = lightspeed = speedoluminal (having the speed of light in the void) interactions are possible.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Particles exist in relation to other particles (including the field curvature of the void as virtual particles or other equivalent interpretation).

Gravity has to do with the relative positioning of particles in bigger groupings = hyperwavefunctions = inclusive wavefunctions.

## text 2: moon problems

This isn't about you, but about supernaturalists who watch the moon without interaction[s], being superior to particles.

Why the moon stays in place when no exolunar particles interact with it, not even spacetime curvature (which is equivalent to virtual particles)? Actually it doesn't (that hypothetical moon is unlinked from its universe).

Why don't you believe in magical personhood [only supernaturalists telepathize with particles]? Why do you prefer to say interaction and not vague observation?

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

When we observe/interact with afar objects we are locked in a common reality. But it's not absolutely defined, not even locally.

One rare interpretation of dark matter is that the universe in big orders of magnitude, merges many Everettian alternative realities and that causes extra gravity (killing alternatives should have a physical impact). That merger might have to do with particle noise in mild interpretations to important differences in extreme interpretations (supernovae and other energetic phenomena, causally link different Hubble volumes via intermediary interactions... even weak interactions causally link the infinite and overlapping Hubble volumes = the Hubble volume field = an aspect of the overall universe [it includes more and more alternative realities the more Hubble volumes one deviates from the arbitrary origin/ The homekill paradox: The more Hubble volumes you deviate from home, the less likely is to find it in place. Of course it's an impossible thought experiment on causality.]).