Pelorosaurus

*Pelorosaurus conybearei*

***Pelorosaurus*** (/pɨˌlɒrɵˈsɔrəs/ pel-LORR-o-SAWR-əs; meaning "monstrous lizard") was a huge plant-eating dinosaur. *Pelorosaurus* was one of the first sauropod dinosaurs ever discovered. *Pelorosaurus* lived during the Early Cretaceous period, about 138-112 million years ago. Fossils referred to *Pelorosaurus* have been found in England and Portugal. It was about sixteen metres (50 feet) long.

It is problematic whether *Pelorosaurus* is a valid genus and if so, what its valid species are. Of the fossils the first species of *Pelorosaurus*, *P. conybeari*, was based on, a separately discovered humerus and vertebrae, the latter are the type specimen of the species and the former is seen as the holotype of the genus. Both specimens might not be of the same animal; furthermore, P. conybeari is a junior synonym of *Cetiosaurus brevis*. Many species have later been assigned to *Pelorosaurus*, most of which today are considered different dinosaurs. One later species still not having received a separate generic name, *P. becklesi*, is known from a sacrum, pelvis and limb fragments, as well as from skin impressions; it was covered in hexagonal scales.

## History

*Pelorosaurus* was the first sauropod to be identified as a dinosaur, although it was not the first to be discovered. Richard Owen had discovered *Cetiosaurus* in 1841 but had incorrectly identified it as a gigantic sea-going crocodile-like reptile.[1] Mantell identified *Pelorosaurus* as a dinosaur, living on land.

The taxonomic history of *Pelorosaurus* and *Cetiosaurus*, as noted by reviewers including Taylor and Naish, is confusing to the extreme. In 1842 Owen named several species of *Cetiosaurus*. Among them was *Cetiosaurus brevis*, based on several specimens from the early Cretaceous Period. Some of these, four caudal vertebrae, BMNH R2544–2547, and three chevrons, BMNH R2548–2550, found around 1825 by John Kingdon near Cuckfield in the Tunbridge Wells Sand Formation of the Hastings Beds, belonged to sauropods. Others however, among them perhaps the present specimen BMNH R10390 found near Sandown Bay on the Isle of Wight and BMNH R2133 and R2115 found near Hastings, actually belonged to some member of the Iguanodontidae. Noticing Owen's mistake in assigning iguanodont bones to *Cetiosaurus*, in 1849 comparative anatomist Alexander Melville renamed the sauropod bones *Cetiosaurus conybeari*.[2][3]

Gideon Mantell in 1850 decided that *C. conybeari* was so different from *Cetiosaurus* that it needed a new genus, so he reclassified it under the new name *Pelorosaurus Conybearei*. Mantell had originally, in November 1849, intended to use the name "Colossosaurus", but upon discovering that kolossos was Greek for "statue" and not "giant", he changed his mind. The generic name is derived from the Greek pelor, "monster". He also emended the specific name, honouring William Conybeare, to *conybearei* but under present rules the original *conybeari*, today written without a capital, has priority. Mantell not only used the sauropod material of *C. brevis* as the type of *Pelorosaurus conybeari* but also a large humerus found by miller Peter Fuller at the same site, BMNH 28626, which he assumed to have been of the same individual, being discovered only a few metres away from the vertebrae. Mantell acquired the bone for ₤8. The humerus, clearly shaped to vertically support the weight of the body and presumed to possess a medullary cavity, showed that *Pelorosaurus* was a land animal. This was a main motive in naming a separate genus; shortly afterwards, however, by studying the sacral vertebrae of *Cetiosaurus* Mantell established that it too lived on land.

Owen was highly piqued by Melville's and Mantell's attempts to "suppress" his *Cetiosaurus brevis*. By a publication in 1853 he tried to set matters straight, as he saw it, while avoiding having to openly admit his original mistake. First he suggested that Melville's main motivation for the name change was the presumed inaccuracy of the epithet brevis, "short", because the total length of the animal could not be deduced from such limited remains. Owen pointed out that anyone being acquainted with taxonomy would have understood that "short" referred to the vertebrae themselves, not to the animal as a whole. On a subsequent page, apparently separate from this issue, Owen in covert terms implied that his 1842 publication was not descriptive enough, thus merely having resulted in a *nomen nudum*, to which he now assigned the sauropod material, making *Cetiosaurus brevis* a valid name. This still left the problem of it having been named a new genus by Mantell. Owen resolved it by simply presenting the humerus as the sole holotype of *Pelorosaurus conybeari*. Remarkably, in 1859 he repeated his mistake by again referring iguanodontid vertebrae, specimens BMNH R1010 and R28635, to *C. brevis*.[6] The last of these he had in 1853 proposed to belong to *Pelorosaurus* together with a number of other iguanodontid vertebrae because Mantell had once labelled them as such in his collection; Owen suggested it had been by a mere mistake that the name *Pelorosaurus* had been connected with the *C. brevis* material instead of with these finds.

Owen's interpretation was commonly accepted until well into the twentieth century. By 1970 however, both John Ostrom and Rodney Steel understood that Owen's claim that *C. brevis* in 1842 was still a nomen nudum should be rejected as a transparent attempt to change the type specimen, inadmissible by present standards. By those same standards though, Melville's name change was also incorrect: as the name *Cetiosaurus brevis* was still "available" he should simply have made the sauropod bones the lectotype, removing the iguanodontid remains from the syntype series. The sauropod bones, not the iguanodont bones, would then have retained the name *C. brevis*. Therefore, *Cetiosaurus conybeari* is a junior objective synonym of *C. brevis*, that is, *C. brevis* is not only an older name, but one based on exactly the same fossils as the younger, invalid name. C. conybeari is thus a junior objective synonym.

## Further species

After 1850, more specimens continued to be assigned to both *Pelorosaurus* and *Cetiosaurus*, and both were studied and reported on extensively in the scientific literature. Slowly a tendency developed to subsume fragmentary sauropod material from the Jurassic of England under the designation *Cetiosaurus*, while assigning incomplete European Cretaceous sauropod finds to *Pelorosaurus*. *Pelorosaurus* thus came to be a typical wastebasket taxon for any European sauropod of this period. However, in recent years much work has been done to rectify the confusion.

### New species of *Pelorosaurus*

One of the later species of *Pelorosaurus* was completely new. In 1852 Mantell named *Pelorosaurus becklesii* based on a humerus (BMNH R-1868), ulna and radius found near Hastings. The specific name honours the fossil collector Samuel Husband Beckles. The find included skin impressions of large hexagonal scales. Today it is understood these remains have no provable connection with BMNH 28626 or *Cetiosaurus brevis*. *"Pelorosaurus" becklesi* — today spelled with a single "i" — is likely a different titanosauriform, for which a separate genus has yet to be named. Confusingly this species was in 1889 by Othniel Charles Marsh assigned to *Morosaurus* as a *Morosaurus becklesii* after which Richard Lydekker the same year coined the combination *Morosaurus brevis* as he considered it cospecific with *Cetiosaurus brevis* but different from *Pelorosaurus conybeari* — which is impossible under the present interpretation.

To an undetermined *Pelorosaurus* sp. five specimens have been assigned, among which teeth, bone fragments and a shoulder girdle from France but also two finds from England, the most remarkable being four gastroliths, BMNH R2004/BMNH R2565, discovered in Buckinghamshire in 1894.

#### Species list

* *Cetiosaurus brevis* Owen 1842 (type) = *Cetiosaurus conybeari* Melville 1849, = *Pelorosaurus conybearei* (Melville 1849) Mantell 1850, = *P. brevis* (Owen 1842) von Huene 1927, = *Ornithopsis conybearei* (Melville 1849) von Huene 1929.

#### Misassigned species

* *"P." becklesii* Mantell 1852 =represents a distinct genus from *Pelorosaurus*.

#### Misassigned to *Pelorosaurus* but described as nominal species of other genera

* *P. manseli* Hulke in Lydekker 1888 (nomen dubium) = *Ischyrosaurus manseli*
* *P. humerocristatus* (Hulke 1874) Sauvage 1887 = *Duriatitan humerocristatus*.
* *P. armatus* (Gervais 1852) Lydekker 1889 = *Oplosaurus armatus*
* *P. hulkei* (Seeley 1870) Lydekker 1889 = *Ornithopsis hulkei*
* *P. leedsii* (Hulke 1887) Lydekker 1890 (nomen dubium) = *Ornithopsis leedsii*
* *P. praecursor* (Sauvage 1876) Sauvage 1895 = *Neosodon praecursor*
* *P. mackesoni* (Owen 1884) Steel 1970 (nomen dubium) = *Dinodocus mackesoni*
* *P. megalonyx* (Seeley 1869) Huene 1909 (nomen dubium) = *Gigantosaurus Megalonyx*

## Family

Pelorosaurus appears to have been a brachiosaurid, similar to the related genera Brachiosaurus, Lusotitan, and Abydosaurus. Friedrich von Huene understood the possible link with its American cousin Brachiosaurus, so he placed it in the Brachiosauridae. Pelorosaurus belonged to the Brachiosauridae.

## JPInstitute.com Description

Pelorosaurus was the one of the first long-necked dinosaurs to be discovered. It was discovered in England in 1847 and named by pioneer dinosaur discoverer Gideon Mantell. It is a member of the same family of sauropods as Jurassic Park star Brachiosaurus. This was a huge plant-eater that had front legs longer than its back legs. This allowed the dinosaur to hold its head high above the ground to reach the tender leaves at the treetops.

The genus Pelorosaurus has been used for a number of European sauropod discoveries, some of which were later reclassified. It has been suggested that Pelorosaurus may actually be the same as Brachiosaurus. No skull material has ever been definitively assigned to this genus.

## Appearance in other media

### *Jurassic Park*

* Pelorosaurus is mentioned in the Jurassic World book "Dinosaur Digs".

## Links

http://web.archive.org/web/20030625160844/http://www.jpinstitute.com/dinopedia/dinocards/dc\_pelor.html