Οντολογικός προοπτικισμός / ontological perspectivism

## *visit the page*: ontological perspectivism

Perspectivism (also called ontological perspectivalism) is the ontoaxiomatic principle (principle of how the axiomatics of substantiality create Everettian causal connectomes = things that exist inside universes or other universe-like worlds which allow ontoaxiomatic operations) that the existence of anything substantial is probabilistic, relative and Everettian (one outcome of the wave function of the universe) bound to the particular perspectives of the sub-universal reality around the specific object (see: Hubble volume for the space of possible interactions around something; but Hubble volumes are infinite and overlapping which doesn't change the range of possible interactions but merely acts to hold the universe as a whole; see also: probabilistic entanglement [even extremely afar Hubble volumes that should have near zero causal correlation, do have partial entanglements with the Hubble volume of the observer because statistically some quantum rotations align by chance).

Some old atheists were afraid that ontological perspectivism is tautological/identical to ontological arbitrariness; but that's not the case. Each different ontoaxiomatic phase space (universe-like world) keeps its main characteristics, but the microstates inside it Everettianly/manyworldedly vary.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

### What is an ontoaxiomatics = ontological axiomatic system = axiomatic system of substantiality?

It is causally coherent axioms that ARE/COMPRISE the world (there is no causoimpermeability; due to causal permeability/causopermeability the ontoaxiomatics itself is the world. Any universe-like world is an ontological Turing machine which is its own computer AND program which both are of the same nature and ARE the physical world itself.

The difference between ontoaxiomatics and scientoaxiomatics is that ontoaxiomatics has causally coherent axioms (otherwise causality fragments and the foundations of the particular cosmos decay); scientoaxiomatics is an eclectic list of axioms which are useful to make science (ontoaxiomatics isn't usually good for generic calculations; thus the ontological Turing machine usually it is not a general computer) but [the axioms of scientoaxiomatics/scientific axiomatic systems] they are NOT (usually; because artificial neural network experiments and other experiments exist) creates by the same axiomatic algorithm.

Ontoaxiomatics is usually an algorithm and not a static/unmoving list, because any axiomatics faces the problems of incompleteness and/or inconsistency; and our ontoaxiomatic reality (universe) deals the axiomatic incompleteness and/or inconsistency with entropy (our universe expands = its own ontoaxiomatics = substantiality expands; there's no causoimpermeability thus there's one and the same) and with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is of substantial/ontological importance and not merely interpretational/observed; it is a core ontoaxiomatic component of substantiality; but the full Everettian alternatives and not a single observer's reality is the full ontology of the wave function of the universe).

By no means our own universe is the sole possible substantiality, thus we cannot use it as the general template, but many of its properties are generalizable. There is no omniontoaxiomatics / there's not a single recipe for creating physical substantialities. Absolute empiricism is wrong because it blocks the fields of study: quantum foundations and its hypernym: (the) foundations of substantiality.

Allomathematics are extremely important in ontoaxiomatics.

allomathematics = allo-/different mathematics = mathematics with different axiomatics than the mainstream axiomatics (but still logical, procedural, antispiritual, etc.)

natural worlds = ontoaxiomatics (they're one and the same with their ontological foundations because there's no causoimpermeability per stratified order of magnitude [reality is more like a connectome with pseudostratified densities which are causopermeable; see: Leonard Susskind)

Natural worlds have usually allomathematical foundations (not mathematics useful for general purpose calculations).

Allomathematics cannot (usually) be transcribed into mathematics as an overall system transcription, but particular operations are transcribable with different adjustments to each ontoaxiomatic operation. Thus we can have a better physics, but it's really difficult to discover the exact correct allomathematical axiomatic system of our universe (our universe isn't Everything: the Everything isn't a set, a system, etc. It cannot exist as a single standalone ontological Turing machine; the purported "theory of everything" is a misnomer because it's falsely used with the meaning "Theory of Our Local Universe").

see separately: The University of Edinburgh, David Deutsch