Comments on Sean M. Carroll

Sean M. Carroll on the entropy of the universe: It was even lower entropy yesterday... but the universe is a critical system/a nonlinear system (we cannot lineary repeat the same thing/ linear extrapolations don't work in humongous order of magnitude phase transitions).

With linear extrapolations we cannot understand the Big Bang.

The universe acceleratingly expands, and Big Rip is unable to produce a homogeneous Big Bang.

During Big Rip the mass–energy suffices to form a single primordial omniblackhole,

which THEN explodes as the Big Bang, because maximal Planck degeneracy if it cannot tunnel out the excessive energy... if there's no outside, then it can only [verb:] Big Bang.

Many people confuse the Big Bang with the physical foundations, but they're wrong, because Big Bang doesn't violate physics.

Many people support nihilogony = the claim that the Nothing is a substantial potential state of existence. But the Nothing cannot exist or act. Potential states obey field mechanics/ quantum field theory.

Thus each of the infinite different universe, is the result of its physical axiomatics (we need to differentiate the axiomatics of calculational systems like mathematics versus the axiomatics of any different physics [of course that's wrong, because different universes can have different rules... but they must meat some coherence and self-causality criteria... not handy system for calculations criteria though).

Why not to keep physics expressed via common mathematics as fragmented formulas and not via its own insightful allomathematics (mathematics with different axiomatics; [usually open] axiomatic list, axiomatic algorithm or hybrid axiomatics).

Well the allomathematics of our universe is compatible with common mathematics, but common mathematics isn't necessary succinct and insightful enough.

Infinite allomathematics are possible = mathematical systems with different axiomaticity (not necessarily list of axioms because they can have an algorithm or hybrid axiomatics).

Playing with alternative non-Euclidean geometries was a taboo.

Playing with allomathematics is useful.

Some particular problems are easier to solve with different allomathematics = still logically rigorous.

quantum field theory doesn't include personhood, thus God is a fallacy

Personhood is the result of thinking = personhood-yielding computers = brains.

Even an idealized topological brain would require space to be exhibited and time to process information (all-knowingness isn't a form of intelligence, because intelligence is procedural).

see: topological quantum field theory, see: David Tong

We should elaborate on: topological information theory

Even an idealized personhood-yielding computer = true brain (non-philosophical-zombie) would require logic gates or other data-processing modalities; thus as in topological quantum field theory, measure/ units start to have endosystemic (inside the system) meaning (if we compare functional minimal modalities within the system). (The soul is a fallacy, it has no measure. The supernatural isn't only unreachable and unteachable, but it isn't scientifically hypothesizeable because it lacks any specific logical foundations; thus the supernatural doesn't have specific characteristics/ identity and it cannot exist. Supernaturalists only explain shallow causes but never fundamental logical foundations./ The Landauer's principle suggests that any (even idealized) informational processing has a thermal output thus it's necessarily physical (of course a logical foundations isn't included, and any logically possible system would waste even more energy during its functioning). God would have to be a reversible computer in order he avoids one form of informational entropy = data deletion; but that would result to ontological entropy = nearly 100% of the universe would be useless undeleted data due to God's anxiety not to lose information, but that would cause the universe to exponentially expand, which still is entropic. If God is entropic his definition is also, thus he isn't something eternal and unchanging. God is an impossibility.