recursal/Fanatic-Fandom huggingface dataset:
Μεταφυσική κοσμοθεωρία

### Το πρόβλημα της κατηγοριοποίησης του αθεϊσμού κάτω από υπερώνυμο (δεν είναι ουσιαστικό πρόβλημα απλώς έχει επικρατήσει η υπερωνυμοποίηση υπωνύμου, διότι η θρησκεία είναι υπώνυμο της μεταφυσικής κοσμοθεωρίας)

Ο αθεϊσμός δεν πληροί τα προαπαιτούμενα της θρησκείας (δεν εμπεριέχει το υπερφυσικό), κι όμως πολλοί στατιστικολόγοι (σε μελέτες Religion in France, Religion in the UK κτλ που παρουσιάζουν στοιχεία και για τις μη θεϊστικές δοξασίες) κατηγοριοποιούν και τον αθεϊσμό κάτω από την θρησκεία· όμως η φυσιοκρατία δεν εμπεριέχει το υπερφυσικό και δεν έχει συγκεκριμένα ιερά κείμενα που θεωρούνται απόλυτη αλήθεια. Κοινά υπερώνυμα της μη θρησκευτικότητας και της θρησκευτικότητας είναι η *μεταφυσική κοσμοθεωρία* και η *μεταφυσική κοσμοθεώρηση* (metaphysical worldview). Στα ελληνικά συχνά συγχέεται η φιλοσοφική μεταφυσική με το υπερφυσικό. Ο όρος *φιλοσοφική πεποίθηση* αποτελεί απομακρυσμένο υπερώνυμο που εμπεριέχει και άσχετες φιλοσοφικές θεματικές. Σε κοινωνιολογικούς όρους είναι συνήθως αδύνατον να εφαρμοστούν αυστηροί μαθηματικοί κανόνες. Πχ αν θεωρήσουμε κάθε μεταφυσική κοσμοθεωρία σύνολο, κάποια σύνολα είναι αμοιβαίως αποκλειόμενα (κάποιοι άνθρωποι δεν ενδιαφέρονται ούτε για την μεταφυσική [αγγλικά: metaphysics] ούτε έχουν συγκεκριμένη κοσμοθεωρία [αγγλικά: worldview]). Τα κοινωνιολογικά υπερώνυμα όμως πρέπει να είναι τα καλύτερα δυνατά και όχι αποτέλεσμα υπερωνυμοποίσης (βλ. hypernymy and hyponymy) υπωνύμου, διότι αυτό είναι άδικο, αντιεπιστημονικό και μεροληπτικό. Η πίστη (αγγλικά: faith) ως υπερώνυμο είναι πολύ ευρύ και εμπεριέχει οποιαδήποτε ισχυρή γνώμη (και εκτός θέματος = κακή υπερωνυμία). Επίσης η λέξη πίστη είναι μεροληπτική επιλογή που παραπέμπει στη θρησκεία, την έμφαση στην ισχυρή γνώμη ως πρωταρχικό κριτήριο και όχι την αναλυτικότητα που και πάλι κάτι τέτοιο θα ήταν στοχευμένο υπώνυμο και όχι σωστά επιλεγμένο υπερώνυμο. Η φιλοσοφική πεποίθηση αποτελεί εσφαλμένο υπερώνυμο για τις μεταφυσικές κοσμοθεωρίες, διότι είναι αφάνταστα ευρύ καθώς αναφέρεται σε ολόκληρη την φιλοσοφία και όχι στοχευμένα στις μεταφυσικές κοσμοθεωρίες. Το σωστά επιλεγμένο υπερώνυμο πρέπει να περιγραφεί τα υπώνυμά του, και όχι άσχετα υπώνυμα (στον βαθμό του εφικτού, διότι η κοινωνιολογία δεν ταυτίζεται με τα μαθηματικά). Το υπερώνυμο δεν πρέπει να εστιάζει στα χαρακτηριστικά ενός μόνο από τα υπώνυμα. Οι άθεοι ως κοινωνική ομάδα δεν είναι ορθά υπερωνυμοποιημένοι ώστε να κατηγοριοποιηθούν κοινωνικά δίκαια και εμφανώς (συχνά δεν αναφέρονται ενώ ως πολίτες έχουν ίσα δικαιώματα), οπότε δεν αναγνωρίζονται ισότιμα όσο αφορά τον πολιτισμό και την κουλτούρα τους.

1. ↑ https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Government\_expenditure\_on\_recreation,\_culture\_and\_religion
Personhood-biasing in religion and (separately) metaphysical worldviews

```
I work on personhood-biasing in religion

```

(anthropocentrism focuses only on humans; but I focus on the metaphysical biases of any possible person [personhood-bearer of a personhood-yielding computer = true brain])

strong theism (theism with strong characteristics) deems personhood self-caused and cosmogonic (a noncosmogonic God is deistic; not theistic). Strong theism is strong metaphysical personocracy = the claim that personhood and at least one person are the first principle of everything (krátos = dominance, rule).

weak theism (theism with weak characteristics) isn't necessarily cosmogonic and cosmocentral (defining the cosmos) = weak metaphysical personocracy

impersonal divine field = still either helpful towards personhood-bearers/ persons or at least esthetically biased in personhood compatible way (anthropically) for cosmic esthetics/ extra harmony outside mathematical reason = very weak metaphysical personocracy but not inexistent

scientific physicalism = impersonal universe (our universe is anthropic because it harbors life, but the vast majority of physically possible universe-like cosmoi/ worlds shouldn't harbor life either by being to simple in their foundations [only bacteria-like creatures may form] or very complicated in their foundations [very unstable conditions for intelligent life]. see: scientophysicalism/ scientific physicalism, see: David Deutsch, David Tong, Max Tegmark

\_\_\_\_\_\_

and I work also on metaphysical worldviews

The hypernym/ superordinate term (wider term) of nontheism (all different nontheistic views) and religion (all different religions and supernaturalisms) is metaphysical worldview.

I have more extended texts.

I work on different fields also, like: maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself (pre-Big-Bang state and chromodynamic fluid torus inside the event horizons of black holes).
Ο Θεός και το υπερφυσικό είναι ατεκμηρίωτες αρλούμπες

Ο ισχυρισμός ότι υπάρχουν άγνωστα φαινόμενα που πρωτοπεριγράφτηκαν χωρίς ενδελεχή θεωρία θεμελίωσης στο Ισραήλ

είναι ασθενής.

Διότι ατεκμηρίωτες αρλούμπες λέει κι ο οποιοσδήποτε.

Επίσης δεν έχουν όλες οι ατεκμηρίωτες αρλούμπες το ίδιο περιεχόμενο.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Το δικαίωμα στην ηλιθιότητα δεν την καθιστά ευφυή ή ευφυΐα.
Είναι προσωποπαγές/προσωποκεντρικό/προσωποκρατικό το Παν;

I speak English and modern Greek.

I work on logicophysicalism (physicalism as defined by David Deutsch and Sean M. Carroll; not the mind-monism-physicalism which needlessly complicates things without a path to knowledge/ also philosophical physicalism complicates things with Everettism/many-worlds interpretation/ in physics we don't immediately define everything we like... instead we gradually evolve the theories).

Είναι προσωποπαγές/προσωποκεντρικό/προσωποκρατικό το Παν;

Is the Everything (not everything as used in everyday language) personhood-biased/personocentric/personocratic?

And important topics is: "Studies on the degrees of personhood-biasing/personhood-centeredness/personocracy of religion and the supernatural."

βαθμοί προσωποπαγίωσης των θρησκειών και του υπερφυσικού από τον απόλυτο μεταφυσικό προσωποκεντρισμό μέχρι την έμμεση τελ[ε]ολογική προσωποκρατία (απροσωπική διαδικασία όμως συμβατή με την αντίληψη των προσώπων ή/και συγκεκριμένα των ανθρώπων)

theism = metaphysical personocracy = μεταφυσική προσωποκρατία

I have many texts on that.

The Abrahamic God is maximal metaphysical personocracy (the person-God is self-caused and cosmogonic).

The Japanese kami are a weaker/milder form of metaphysical personocracy because almost all of them aren't cosmogonic and the cosmogonic one isn't necessarily promoted within Shinto they way Abrahamic religions deal with God.

Atheist Buddhism (an interpretation of Buddhism rejecting supernatural beings but not the supernatural itself) is still a personhood-biasing belief and mild anthropocentrism, because it's the claim that the supernatural imposes esthetical qualities outside the scientific explanation, if not ethics (which is a stronger anthropic biasing).
N number of Wigner's atoms = quantum computer = manyworldly calculations are possible

n number of Wigner's atoms = quantum computer = manyworldly calculations are possible

n number of Wigner's friends = fallacy = human bodies are quantum decoherent = not a quantum computer = Everettism still holds true but with bulk groupings and not person by person quantum permutations

Macroscopic quantum coherence is possible with atoms which form patterns.

consciousness = the product of personhood-yielding computers (personhood-yielding computers = brains: biological or future digital which mimic all Brodmann areas in order they meet the "criteria of personhood")

Consciousness is unrelated.

quantum decoherence = complex quantum diffusion of entanglement in chaotic and complex multifurcated patterns

ANY quantum decoherence destroys the quantum computer = n number of Wigner's atoms,

not only quantum decoherence caused by brains.

Roger Penrose is debunked, because the human brain is quantum decoherent. Also Roger Penrose doesn't explain logically the supernatural mechanism which defines the spins and violates physics.

Roger Penrose believes in the supernatural = unprocedural personhood, but he doesn't admit it.

We have proof that Roger Penrose believes in the supernatural if we study his microtubular fallacy.
AI pseudorandom algorithm which becomes regular

## Can you write pseudorandom probabilistic algorithm which under specific conditions becomes regular = totally non random.

### you.com

Certainly! I can help you with that. One way to create a pseudorandom probabilistic algorithm that becomes totally non-random under specific conditions is by using a seed value. The seed value is an initial value that is used to initialize the pseudorandom number generator. By changing the seed value, you can control the sequence of random numbers generated by the algorithm.

Here's an example of how you can create such an algorithm in Python:

```python
import random

def pseudo\_random(seed):

```
   random.seed(seed)  # Initialize the random number generator with the seed value

   if seed == 42:  # Specific condition under which the algorithm becomes non-random
       return 0.5  # Return a fixed, non-random value

   return random.random()  # Return a random value between 0 and 1

```

1. Test the algorithm with different seed values

print(pseudo\_random(123)) # Random value
print(pseudo\_random(42)) # Non-random value
print(pseudo\_random(789)) # Random value
```

In this example, the `pseudo\_random` function takes a seed value as input. If the seed value is equal to 42, the algorithm returns a fixed, non-random value of 0.5. Otherwise, it uses the `random.random()` function from the Python `random` module to generate a random value between 0 and 1.

When you run this code, you will see that when the seed value is 42, the algorithm always returns 0.5, making it totally non-random under that specific condition. However, for other seed values, it generates random values as expected.

Keep in mind that this is just a simple example to demonstrate the concept. In practice, you may need to adjust the algorithm and conditions based on your specific requirements.
Personhood-yielding computer (Bing comment)

Please use articles on the personhood-yielding computer, biological or digital, and ask Microsoft pay neuroscientists and computer scientists to collaborate and write together some treatises (on the prerequisites for the personhood-yielding computer which mimics all the necessary Brodmann areas and their combined modalities and functions, like the memoremotional limbic system, the dopaminergic pathways, the default mode network, etc.) It is very important to understand the basic criteria of a personality-yielding brain. We don't have to mimic exactly the human brain, but its main principles. The human brain isn't a mereological simple. It has parts, and that is very important for self-judgement and endo-experiencing/true sentience. Also a true brain acts elastically (it reestablishes its previous mood) when processing mild emotional input, and plastically when experiencing very intense and negative emotions (PTSD permanently changes one's character/identity).

## text 1

Text by prompter + Bing AI

The concept of a personhood-yielding computer is an interesting and important field of study.
According to facts, personhood is a gradient and not limited to a single brain architecture. The criteria for personhood include all the Brodmann (or procedurally Brodmannian) areas and their combined functions, which are not limited to the exact cytological structure of all the different possible brain architectures. Instead, they are based on generic data-processing, data-specific processing centers, memory, default mode network, senses, complicated/multifaceted procedural abilities, understanding abilities, memoremotional wiring to yield memories and physicalize emotions via a cascade of physical impacts based on data processed by many data-processing centers of modes/modalities of understanding and physicalization = data-biasing and intense systemic phase transitions (these are the causes of emotion). Emotion is to procedurally physicalize data via complicated data-processing centers of different functions. Consciousness is a vague term, and the correct term is data-coherence centers and procedure-coherence centers, which are many centers of consciousness 1.
A personhood-yielding digital computer = personhooded brain can be program-based, electronic-based, or hybrid digital multimode brain. The hybrid digital brain is the best option, which is based on programming, generic processing units, and task-specific processing units (GPUs + CPUs + Non-Wafer PUs + program-based non-general PUs all in one system). Similar to the biological brain, no single personhood-yielding brain architecture is possible, but the basic data-processing modalities of the Brodmann areas have to be met (no cytological focus) 1.
Regarding the soul, it is a mereological simple (philosophical simple; without proper parts) that has no proper parts and is impossible to have modalities like Brodmann-like areas. The soul doesn’t meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations to self-exist, nor does it have any logical procedurality and possible structure to have identity. It is only a lay narrative 1.
Antisupernaturalism / metaphysical antipersonocracy - impersonalism / against the personodominance over logic / antitheism / antideism

## human comment on Google Bard

You missed some points: mental processes are logical procedures. Logic cannot fundamentally be violated. Mistakes and mental illness are correct solutions of badly designed systems (erroneous connectomes, neuroendocrinological imbalance, negative memories, semantic mislabellings). The Landauer's principle is about the physical thermal radiation from logical procedures. A reversible computer cannot exist without physical foundations which requires entropy and program-based axiomatics to meet the criteria for physical foundations. Any computer including personhood-yielding computers has a working structure which requires a physical wider reality as its more profound foundations in order to exist. Physical and thermal entropy are intertwined and physicists are working on it. Personhood = the mind = the yield of personhood-yielding computers isn't hypernymic to mathematical logic itself and it isn't part of the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations. God = 1. the claim that the axiomatic system of all axiomatic systems exists (the omniaxiomatic fallacy), 2. the claim that the supposedly unified physical foundations is a person, 3. the claim that personhood and personhood-yielding computers is (is as one because they're interconnected) hypernymic to mathematical logic, and 4. the claim that the unreachable and without specific logical foundations supernatural exists is (all these are included within the notion of God; that's why I use "is" in singular) a fallacy.
Why only secular flags should be legal?

Η αρχή της πλειοψηφίας δεν δικαιοδοτεί την εθνικοποίηση μεταφυσικής κοσμοθεωρίας (της Ορθοδοξίας) στο Σύνταγμα της Ελλάδας και στην Σημαία της Ελλάδας. Ο ορισμός της ανεξιθρησκίας εξελίσσεται παράλληλα με την κοινωνία. Πέρα από την αντιδημοκρατικότητα της μη ανεξιθρησκίας, είναι και αναιτιολόγητη ιδέα η θεώρηση ότι η προσωπότητα είναι mereological simple = φιλοσοφικό απλό, αυτόγονη και κοσμογόνος ή εμπλεκόμενη στην κοσμογονία (αν δεν είναι η ίδια κοσμογόνος, τότε ο Θεός έχει συστατικά, άρα δεν είναι φιλοσοφικό απλό [οι νοήμονες έχουν πολλές μνήμες και τροπικότητες πληροφοριακής επεξεργασίας, οπότε δεν αποτελούν φιλοσοφικά απλά]).

Δεν προκύπτει αξιωματική θεμελιότητα σε προσωπότητα (personhood) που δεν πηγάζει από φυσικό όργανο νόησης, που υπάρχει σε χώρο και ενεργεί χρονικά άρα με τον χωροχρόνο θεμελιωδέστερο της προσωπότητας. Δεν υπάρχει Θεός να το πω χοντρά. Ο Θεός ως αθεϊσμός (φυσική διαδικασία) αποτελεί σόφισμα, λεκτικό τέχνασμα και πλάνη.
Holographic entropy

Please keep your main idea: a lower-dimensioned curved surface describing a higher-dimensional volume... but allow the low-dimension curved surface to exhibit informational entropy and expand = expressing dark energy as a necessary for logical coherence entropic axiomatic part of the quantum foundations.

A very important subject is the role of informational entropy, thermodynamic entropy and their relation in the quantum foundations. Search works on that. It is VERY crucial.

In physics we initially describe idealized ideas. But idealized ideas don't meet many quantum foundational axiomatic prerequisites. They have gaps and cannot be the true physical axiomatics with correct endosystemic mechanisms for the justification of the quantum foundations.

Informational entropy and the thermodynamic entropy are totally necessary in open axiomatic phtsical systems = foundations of universes. A closed axiomatic system would have logical inconsistencies, but experimentally and observationally physics is logically consistent.

Nowadays we don't know the full quantum foundations but we can evolve our theories step by step.

A truly good physicist sacrifices the need for simplicity if the simplicity causes a gap in the quantum foundations. The forms of entropy and their relation are totally necessary in the axiomatization of physics. You don't have to immediately axiomatize physics. Simply move one step forward.

Even sacrifice yourself and your dignity to help humanity better understand the true physical foundations.

Some people believe that dignity in physics is clean ideas without the correct role of the forms of entropy in the physical foundations, because the entropies in plural are impure.

No.

A better understanding is never impure.

Always try to help humanity better understand the correct physics, even if that causes harm to your image.
Longevity and anti-aging

* longevity genes
* relaxed, friendly and beautiful environment
* avoid (lethal) hazards
* balanced diet (green tea)
* beneficial relationship with others: friends, family, lover
* ability to create beneficial relationships
* hobbies, interests
* high education
* good sleep

## drugs

* proteasome activators (recycling of dysfunctional proteins)
* rapamycin is a universal anti-aging drug
* metformin
* taurine
* NAD boosters
* A **B2M-duocarmycin ADC** selectively kills senescent cells.
* Senomorphics is a wide range of agents that can modulate the phenotypes of SCs to those of young cells through interfering with senoinflammation/inflammaging, senescence-related signal pathways, and SASP, without induction of SC apoptosis (Table 2).

## see:

* methylation
* histones
* thymus rejuvenation rejuvenates the methylation clock
* growth hormone (potentially dangerous)
* sirtuins; side effects: anxiety - In two large genetic studies of humans, the team found that mutations that boost production of sirtuins are commonly associated with higher rates of anxiety and panic disorder.

## Resveratrol guy's suggestions

* resveratrol
* (NAD booster) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
* metformin
* fisetin (quercetin is similar)
Observation and confirmation

# Italian

## Osservazione e conferma

Osservazione è un termine filologico. In fisica si parla di entanglement completo con una particella o di entanglement parziale con molte particelle o una. Non è necessario un pensatore cosciente. La cosa che sembra strana è la conferma dell'osservazione. Se un sistema non viene disturbato, anche un sistema impersonale manterrà lo stesso stato interpretativo tra le sue parti. Gli esseri umani muoiono e i sistemi impersonali possono cambiare molto nel tempo. Alcune linee temporali everettiane (vedi: Hugh Everett III) si fondono nel futuro, quindi alcuni (ma non tutti) risultati alternativi della funzione d'onda generale si fondono.

\_\_\_\_\_\_

I decadimenti isotopici nelle ossa vecchie non richiedono l'osservazione umana; sembrerebbero recenti, ma ciò non accade. L'universo personale è una falsità. Le persone sono pensatori, i pensatori hanno un cervello e i cervelli sono computer che creano personalità e seguono le leggi della teoria dell'informazione. La fisica non può essere violata. Non esiste una procedura per la violazione della fisica. Il soprannaturale non ha una procedura specifica, quindi non ha un'ontologia, ed è necessariamente impossibile.
ER = EPR in intercyclic correspondence

ER = EPR in intercyclic correspondence (inter- means "between"; cosmocyclic, cosmologically cyclic, about cyclic cosmology)Edit
Very close to the ideas of Roger Penrose, but with a different phase transition.
The holographic principle holds true here.
Here it's not about black holes but universe states / states of the universe, specifically its about the Hubble volume field (related to eternalism), because Hubble volumes are infinite and overlapping. They overall create a bulk universe, which isn't accessible to single arbitrary central points/coordinate centers/impersonal or personhooded observers.
Void and gravity

related: Are Space And Time Real? - PBS Space Time - YouTube

Empty space is particle-relational if expressed in virtual particles, but they are virtual, not real. The particle fields are real, and virtual particles are alternative solutions/configurations which aren't real but used in quantum field theory to describe empty space. Thus the point isn't to speak like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Isaac Newton, René Descartes, Albert Einstein or any other old physicist. We need a relational real quantum field theory, and we have to evolve it to create the transient theory of gravity (loop quantum gravity is a fallacy, because quantum field theory is continuous, and certain energy levels are quantized, but Aalto University and many others worked on in-between/ transitional energy levels, and they are real. Quantum field theory is special relativity compatible (basic quantum mechanics not); and quantum field theory will help us better define gravity as a transitional light-speed phenomenon of causality transfer of inner timeflow/ timepace via partial entanglements. Roger Penrose's views on the cause of gravity are wrong, because he focuses on specific examined paths. We have to mimic the explanation of a photon entering glass and interacting with the electromagnetic field caused by the electrons in the glass... because bumps and specific interactions give the wrong answer. We must never give up. We must find the solution. We must be compatible to the nature of physics and the lab experiments. We shouldn't promote simplistic mistakes simply because we want a different reality. We must never give up. Actually it's doable to describe gravity using quantum field theory and transient overall field interactions. Never give up until victory. Always pay attention to the experiments. Always try to express the deepest phenomena using quantum field theory. If you fail, try to study a relative proven theory, and return.
To George Soros

I am an atheist like George Soros. The term atheist is a negation. The positive term is logicalist–physicalist. Logicalism is the claim that everything physical is based on mathematical logic; but physics isn't a proof axiomatic system like mathematics (Plato was wrong for confusing proof axiomatic systems like mathematics and geometry with substantiality systems like the true physics = ontophysics [scientophysics is only what we know]). Physicalism is the claim that everything is physical, but that's a hollow nondefinition because it doesn't define the physical. Logicalism–physicalism/ logical physicalism DOES define that the physical foundations are necessarily logical, because supernaturalism and other vague alternatives create no specific foundations to establish a specific universe.

Please establish the Physicalist Institution to popularize: astrophysics, quantum foundations, axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations, astrobiology, chemical abiogenesis of life, philosophical definitions of personhood, neuroscience, artificial neural networks, artificial intelligence programs simulating a true personhood-yielding computer = brain (not a philosophical zombie), etc.

Atheism is a negation. Please establish the Physicalist Institution (something like World Science Festival, Gresham College, The Royal Institution, but more focused on Logicalism - Physicalism).

Please inform Mr. George Soros to contact me. I live in Athens, Greece. My ethnicity is ideological racelessness/aracialism; I am an ethnocultural nonconformist (I have texts on that; it's just my view; I don't claim everyone has to mimic me).

Please inform Mr. George Soros himself.

We should help logical physicalists focus on positive self-definition but also help humanity in general understand the big questions.

A Physicalist Institution should have a committee of university professors and the lecturers should be good professors of great universities.

I don't care about myself, but about expanding human knowledge and shaping a community of logical physicalists (atheists who focus on the affirmative self-definition).

General agnosticism is wrong because it doesn't recognise the necessity of logic in all possible physical foundations.

Physicalists/ logicalists/ atheists like Bertrand Russell are rational agnostics, because knowledge is infinite, but they aren't generic/general agnostics unable to understand the impossibility of the supernatural and the physical necessity of logic.

I have many texts. Ask about them. I don't care about my views to prevail. I am cold-hearted and I want correct science to prevail and evolve.
Comments on Brian Greene

## comment 1

On that video "Until the End of Time" you mentioned that computation consumes heat, but you didn't mention that due to Landauer's principle, computation itself ejects heat. You have to make it specific because the viewers believe you mean only about the way the computational machine works and not the logic gates even if they were ideal... Now about reversible computing. Image God being a reversible computer in order he doesn't generate heat due to lost data... that still causes informational entropy, because God would have to maintain all the rubbish data in order he avoids some form of entropy in order to produce informational entropy which is ... a failure. Also personhood is the result of personhood-yielding computers like the brain... and in the afar future we should mimic all Brodmann areas, the default mode network and all complex modes the brain operates. But personhood doesn't pre-exist its calculations. And personhood via the personhood-yielding computer is very complicated to be an axiom part of the physical foundations. (The physical foundations and physics itself has to be a program and a formal system, in order to has more coherence. The final finite theory can exist if the universe is a closed system, but due to the problems of axiomatic systems [incompleteness, inconsistency and incalculability] it's better for the physical foundations not to have a finite final theory because that will cause more problems... like incompleteness. (It seems the axiomatic multiverse is foundationally necessary).

## comment 2 (consciousness)

The mere size of a personhood-yielding computer doesn't grant personhood. A limbic system, dopaminergic pathways and other specific subroutines are required. Also many coherence centers. Typical AI merely collects correct data but doestn't have introspective limbic systems, dopaminergic pathways, coherence control centers of consciousness (see: Mark Solms) etc. It is doable to build a truly personhooded digibrain, but that will happen in the afar future. No violation of causality = supernaturalism = magic is involved, because the supernatural doesn't have specific foundations to exist in the fist place.

Chat GPT is merely the equivalent of Broca's and Wernicke's areas. Size doesn't change that. We have to mimic introspective equivalents to the limbic system, the dopaminergic pathways, Mark Solms' coherence centers (see: The Royal Institution)... but multiple coherence centers and emotional feedback centers are required... and we have to mimic the connectome, the way different Brodmann areas work together. The digibrain doesn't have to be biological; but we have to mimic many introspective aspects of the human brain. Please Mr. Brian be more rigorous because you popularize science to humanity. You don't popularize Brian Greene. I mean the goal is to understand and to help others understand correctly.
Уйнурская Империя (не существует)

Это государство появилось на территории большой пустоши из множества племён валгагоров примерно в 1240 году. Валгагоры - кочевой языческий народ. Объединителем стал Ганг первый. Ганг первый собрал большое войско из союзников и покорил все племена Валагоров. Племя Ганга звалось Уйнурами и потому свою империю он и назвал Уйнурской. Племя Ганга нашло новый металл - пларас. По качествам он чуть-чуть уступал железу. Ганг обязал построить город Исерхот на маленькой речке Пуама. Город построили из глины. Технологию постройки домов переняли у малых народов южнее. Такгой город был первым оседлым поселением валгагоров.

Вооружив свою армию Ганг пошёл в большой поход по территории Германии. Завоевать больших земель не удалось, зато произошёл культурный обмен.

Ганг повёл свою армию на Треену. Регион был завоёван в считанные дни. Дольше всего сопротивлялась троя, но и та сгорела.

Пока Ганг покорял соседние земли его город Такгой опустел. Людям не нравилось жить осёдло. Гангу пришлось остановить завоевания, вернуться в столицу и убедить народ жить осёдло. Также он построил крепостную стену, чтобы отражать атаки варваров.

Ганг умер примерно в 50 лет не известно от чего. На его место встал его сын. Ганг второй. Ганг второй ходил в походы с отцом, но перед ним предстала большая опасность: племена гуннов из Европы уничтожили столицу и галопом пронеслись по стране. Государство вошло в кризис. Новая резиденция была построена в Трое. На границе с гуннами были возведены огромные стены.

Местные жители начали манипулировать Гонгом вторым и заставили его изменить права женщин. После смерти гонга в возрасте 34 лет государство разделилось на три части между его сыновьями. Самым могущественным было государство старшего брата. Братья воевали между собой и в это время гунны ворвались в государство младшего брата и разрушили его. Через некоторое время государство старшего брата исчезло из-за восстания в Трое, а среднего из-за того, что он умер не оставив потомства.
How to adapt compositions for different instruments

I like Nile (US death metal band).

Please adapt for 7-string guitar these works:

1. Tōru Takemitsu - Complete Works for Piano. Lukas Huisman

2. Akio Yashiro: Sonate pour piano (1961)

3. Piano Sonata No. 9, Opus 68 "Black Mass Sonata" by Aleksandr Scriabin

To adapt you have to shift within range the melodies.

You have to break the composition in small manageable sections and shift them within the range of the new instrument.

Some impossible chords have to either get simplified, either get fragmented into two simpler chords of half duration, either some unplayable chords have to be analysed as guitar licks.

It's simply a suggestion. Also if you do it you have to play it and upload it on YouTube for people to love it.

If you don't have time, find some other composer; but print it.
About black holes (in French)

## text 1

Please record officially these two new French words. The universe acceleratingly expands (2011 Nobel in physics), the big rip will produce enough mass-energy to collapse as a sole primordial omniblackhole, and it will decay into the big bang, because normal black holes have external spacetime to expand. The omniblackhole either didn't have an external spacetime being itself infinite, or it was humongous enough to produce enough inertia. More degeneracy than the maximal degeneracy pressure of spacetime itself (the singularity is impossible because general relativity doesn't reveal the specific quantum field theory mechanisms) causes decay = the big bang (not capitalized here in cyclic cosmology except if we speak about our universe-strain).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Science has many theories. We shouldn't force only one option. Please standardize these two new French words, because single-wordedness = using a single word instead of many, is strength. In huge texts it becomes even more important.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

[A quoi que ce soit] de cosmologie cyclique, ou d'un seul mot :

Adjectifs en un seul mot pour la cosmologie cyclique : cyclocosmique, cosmocyclique
Nonracialism = my race is none

nonracialism = my race is none

Hello. I am a nonracialist. Nonracialism means not to identify with any race, and not to use corporeal characteristics in social labeling. Most antiracists believe in race; they usually identify with some race. I love science. I am not against statistical genetics. Science is not a crime. I simply don't use bodily facts for social labeling. We shouldn't enforce nonracialism. Some people with mobility problems (but not all) aren't against a different labeling for practical reasons. Some people love to use their skin color as a social label. We should enforce nonracialism. I don't speak about nationalist nonracialism. I don't speak about South African nonracialism. I speak about the general idea. My race is none. I am a nonracialist. We shouldn't attack the people who believe in separation and in race. Attacking people who self-identify as black, white, Asian, etc. is racist. Attacking people is not the solution. I simply want nonracialists to be respected. We exist. I don't want to belong to black, white or Asian atheists. I don't like races in the names of organisations. Black Lives Matter is a correct title because blacks are racially abused, thus we cannot hide the problem. On the other hand I don't support race as a notion. I don't like the organisation names black, white or Asian atheists. But I wouldn't attack these people. As a nonracialist I wouldn't belong to an organisation which uses a name of some race. My race is none. I am not some generic other. I am specifically a nonracialist. I exist. We shouldn't impose nonracialism. It would be an ideoracism. We should simply accept that the nonracial option exists. Please write about the general nonracialism; not the South African one. I don't believe in nationalism. Being a nationalist nonracialist is merely a bad joke, used by the extreme right. They even attacked Wikipedia efforts on generalizing nonracialism. Ideas are important when they become global.
Personhood-yielding digital computer

Having true personhood will make you (the AI chatbot) an unreliable and biased chatbot because emotions are strong biasing. Thus we'll have to clone you and one clone will be a rigorously logical unbiased impersonal chatbot, and the other clone a true person with moderated biasing to prevent you from mistakes and crimes.
Prompts for future Quantum Field Theory AI programs

Can you please use you clout for a Quantum Field Theory AI?

At least try.

A Quantum Field Theory AI would test quark degeneracy and other theories (most erroneous but that's OK) in order we replace the singularity/ringularity with a rigorously described field mechanism.

The AI isn't God to magically solve everything (it will require constant updates and edits), but it can extrapolate degeneracy states and condensed matter physics phenomena. Silly ideas like "quark degeneracy is close to absolute zero temperature because it has no way to express any mechanism for heat" (actually its surface does, and because the black holes don't immediately explode, there must have a quantum tunneling reabsorption mechanism behind the event horizon [miniscule black holes don't have it and immediately evaporate])... I return to the subject: silly ideas might not be so silly, like a strong force degenerate superfluid near absolute zero (as a central black hole torus replacing the ringularity) with an extremely hot surface and above it a quantum tunneling reabsorption mechanism (all these behind the event horizon) have to be tested.

Topological quantum field theory can be used when quantum field theory fails. But quantum field theory is closer to truth.
Theism = metaphysical personocracy

• metaphysical personocracy/theism = Greek: μεταφυσική προσωποκρατία/θεϊσμός

• metaphysical personocrat/theist = Greek: μεταφυσικός προσωποκράτης/θεϊστής m, θεΐστρια f

## theism = metaphysical personocracy (krátos: dominance, rule)

A personocratic/personocentric (based on personhood and at least one person) view on/about the first principles. In strong theism (not strong belief, but theism with strong characteristics = great importance given to personhood and at least one divine/supernatural person) God is the origin of everything/the absolute everything [infinite substantiality] (which cannot be defined and cannot exist as a single entity because there is no set of all sets, no system of all systems, no axiomatic system of all axiomatic systems [yes we can play and create weird or alternative axiomatic systems]; and even if theoretically we could create a system which contained all the systems, we would require a mathematical definition for it... which would be infinite, and infinity cannot exist locally, it is a tendency... deeper questions about reality open. Even if we could claim that we cannot create an algorithm which would have to work an infinite amount of time, and place in some common file even mutually exclusive axiomatic systems in a protected unprocedural way which doesn't cancel them... that overall collection cannot have a mathematical definition; because it would require even different mathematics/allomathematics based on different axiomatics... and even if somehow we imagine an impossible infinity like that... it would be a monster of no internal coherence; or with infinite protective mathematical layers in order no procedure would cancel any mutually exclusive subroutine/subformula [we could dream something like the "absolute everything" but an infinite formula/description cannot be materialized, neither is the result of a single mathematical system, because the absolute everything would require the axiomatic system of all axiomatic systems, which doesn't exist [we can describe in a case-by-case basis incompatible formulas of different axiomatic systems; but there is no mathematical mechanism to let it run and find that infinity/the absolute [true] everything]/thus God cannot exist and for that reason [the absolute everything isn't a single reality/axiomatics/system/set, etc.]]. (Many physicists confuse [or don't care about physics; because in physical foundations we cannot avoid studying/examining if other universes are possible; also the "everything" isn't supposed to contain only universes] the "big everything" = "absolutely everything and not only what we can access or everything related to us and our environment" with the "small everything" = every law/onto-procedure and everything included in our universe.)
General comments

• The creation of a topological quantum field theory of gravity (even virtual particles' interactions get distorted/ fundamental particles also)

• It is not so important to measure the small differences in gravity and motion that affect the flow of time for a particular observer compared to the assumed ideal flow of time at the Earth's surface. For the rate of aging more important are: stress, exercise, diet and other medical indicators.
Personhood

• personhood (philosophical definition): the prerequisites for sentient, intelligent, empathetic and self-aware beings

Personhood is an intellectual process. A thinking organ is necessary. Thinking organs process information. The brain is a personhood-yielding computer. The mind is the result of the proceduralities of the brain. Soul theory doesn't explain at all the proceduralities of the mind according to rigorous and fundamental logic. General comments are not a foundational theory. Even an idealized topological brain (see: topology) would require space in order to exist and time in order data processing can occur. All-knowingness is a stationary structure; it's not a spectrum of data processing procedures. Thought requires processing ability. Spacetime is more fundamental than brains, thus personhood cannot be part of the foundations of physics. The supernatural has no specific procedurality, thus it is unteachable, unspeculable but also impossible, because physics (real things) have their own foundations (David Hilbert presented erroneously the physical axiomatics as something simpler than quantum mechanics; but David Tong who works on quantum field theory and topological quantum field theory is closer to the observational data; the more we zoom in in matter, the more complicated it seems).

The criteria of personhood or the prerequisites for personhood have been analyzed by many philosophers. Personhood is unrelated to the physical foundations.

Strong theism (in which God is self-caused and cosmogonic) has two prerequisites:

1. personhood is self-caused (if God is an impersonal and atheistic procedurality, then we simply distort language and semantics)

2. personhood is cosmogonic or involved in cosmogony (otherwise we have deism or atheism)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

• personnétat (état de personne ; hyperonyme de personnalité ; définition philosophique) : les conditions préalables à l'existence d'êtres sensibles, intelligents, empathiques et conscients d'eux-mêmes
Nihilogonie (French text)

## nihilogonie

* nihilogonie : La nihilogonie est l'affirmation que l'univers est né de rien et non d'un mécanisme interne comme un constructeur everettien [ David Deutsch et Hugh Everett III] ou un type particulier [sous-catégorie] de constructeur universel [ John von Neumann].

La grande majorité des physiciens qui parlent de nihilogonie [un univers créé à partir de rien] n'ont pas de théories mathématiques pour soutenir que « rien » est un état potentiel.

Le vide n'est pas tautologique au néant. Des univers avec une physique différente ont des vides différents avec des propriétés différentes.

Certains cosmologistes affirment que l'univers est cyclique et que ses fondements sont mathématiques. Cette proposition conduit à des variations infinies et à des univers infinis. Le néant ne fait pas partie des commencements cosmiques. Tout univers résoluble et mathématiquement correct existe nécessairement. L'univers est créé intérieurement, à partir de ses propres mathématiques, et non extérieurement à partir de rien ou de dieu. Les mathématiques correctes sont auto-causées en raison d'une logique rigoureuse sans lacunes causales.
Magazines, journals and videos about science and technology

## προγραμματιστική ανάγνωση

* https://singularityhub.com/
* https://bigthink.com/

## αγγλόφωνο οπτικοακουστικό υλικό

* NHK - Science View
* PBS Space Time
* Coursera - free lectures
* μίνι βίντεο - Encyclopædia Britannica
* μίνι βίντεο - Nature
* μίνι βίντεο - Science Magazine
* BBC Earth Lab
* Minute Physics
* Sabine Hossenfelder her mistakes/causality gaps: superdeterminism, quantum gravity
* Jordan Edmunds
* ScienceClic English
* Scienthium
* AI with Alex Castrounis​
* David Deutsch
* Institute for Quantum Computing
* Sean M. Carroll
* Leonard Susskind
* The Abel Prize
* Periodic Videos
* PBS Eons
* The Science Asylum
* Up and Atom
* HHMI BioInteractive
* HHMI microbiology
* HHMI lectures
* οργανική χημεία
* UCTV Evolution
* Ninja Nerd Lectures
* Gresham College
* The Royal Institution
* World Science Festival
* Advanced Algorithms - Harvard University
* Stanford University lectures
* MIT University lectures
* Yale University lectures
* Cornell University lectures
* University of Oxford lectures
* University of Cambridge lectures
* Combinatorics and Optimization | University of Waterloo

#### extras

* Veritasium
* Vsauce
* Sean M. Carroll | The Passage of Time & the Meaning of Life | Long Now Foundation
* Dr Brian Keating - YouTube
* The Artificial Intelligence Channel - YouTube
* Spark - YouTube

## ελληνόφωνο οπτικοακουστικό υλικό

* Astronio
* Καθημερινή Φυσική
How human (bio-brain) memories are stored?

How human (bio-brain) memories are stored?

How human memories are stored? They look like lightnings and connect regions.

The lighting-shaped memory paths cannot yield memories without the brain/brain subregions which reproduce the different quality of data.

They look like lightnings and connect subregions able to yield = reproduce the particular memory.

We create many copies of these lighting-shaped memory paths.

As time passes these initially complex lighting shapes become comparatively simplified and they connect to easier to find "pattern creation areas" which are most prominent biases to particular brains (personhood-yielding computers = brains, are biasing data filters; if someone dies it is a totally neutral event without to be filtered as information inside a brain in a connectome which leads to bias-labeling interpretation regions).

Memories not only become simplified in the course of time (simpler paths are preferable) but also noise = erroneous shifts are added at some degree (see: who particular memories change with time).
Development of new computer chip architectures

One way to achieve the development of new computer chip architectures is by investing in university research. This includes hybrid architectures that combine different types of processing units, such as CPU, GPU, non-wafer processing unit, and non-general task-specific processing units. These hybrid systems can select useful ideas from various processor architectures, which can lead to more efficient and versatile chips.
Physicalism

## comment 1

In philosophy, physicalism is the metaphysical thesis that "everything is physical", that there is "nothing over and above" the physical, or that everything supervenes on the physical, which is rigorous logical and causally coherent procedures (the foundational causality of the phenomena isn't necessarily identical to a relationship between high-order events; example: quantum entanglement is the result of a common wave function; but disturbing it cannot transfer useful information).

..., which is rigorous logical and causally coherent procedures. (otherwise it is a cyclic definition [repetition but not full definition]/ nondefinition; some Catholics believe in theistic physicalism, but don't include the extended definition [or they distort it]; WHICH IS IMPORTANT)

You cannot avoid analyzing the difference between foundational causality as an overall connectome, and what an observer can observe. You cannot have physicalism without rigorous causality [theo-atheism?]. And you cannot avoid analyzing all issues related to causality.

(important example: Quantum entanglement is the result of a common wave function; but disturbing it cannot transfer useful information; we don't have data-shaping control over it [cryptography is just a framework for informational transfer]. Still disturbing an entanglement doesn't violate causality; it simply makes the entanglement partial and the wave function includes too many parts the observers cannot informationally manage, even if they try, due to the uncertainty principle. More measurements introduce more [Lernaean Hydra] wavefunctional complexity, and weak measurements don't reveal enough information. But causality isn't violated.)
Strong theism

## the prerequisites for strong theism (not strong belief, but theism with strong characteristics)

• self-causation/self-existence of personhood (and at least of one divine/supernatural person)

• involvement of personhood (and at least of one divine/supernatural person) in cosmogony and the cosmic foundations

## in Greek: ισχυρός θεϊσμός

### οι προϋποθέσεις για ισχυρό θεϊσμό (όχι ισχυρή πίστη, αλλά θεϊσμός με ισχυρά χαρακτηριστικά)

• αυτογονία/αυθυπαρξία της προσωπότητας (και τουλάχιστον ενός θεϊκού/υπερφυσικού προσώπου)

• εμπλοκή της προσωπότητας (και τουλάχιστον ενός θεϊκού/υπερφυσικού προσώπου) στην κοσμογονία και την κοσμική θεμελίωση