Gravity

## gravity 1

**Using Quantum Field Theory we would need supercomputers to describe gravity**

What is gravity?

(I am not God. My ideas might be totally wrong.)

Motion and immobility are relativistically interpretational.

Subatomic particles move according to their wavefunction.
Big molecules behave semiwavefunctionally–semiNewtonianly (actually wavefunctionally, but with many microcollapses that don't allow a sole simple wavefunction to propagate; thus the result is semi-Newtonian).
Macroscopic objects seem to act Newtonianly, but actually they act wavefunctionally with many microcollapses which result on a very complicated wavefunctional evolution with many microevents between particles.

What is gravity? Mass attracts itself. Objects which have mass mutually move towards each other; and they accelerate because the closer they come to each other, the more their masses interact through the curved fields which comprise spacetime.

Imagine a lump mass able to act (nearly ideally but never perfectly) Newtonianly, moves through spacetime.

If we place an object in front of the lump, both will accelerate towards each other. But why?

Imagine the whole universe being a very complicated wavefunction, with many microevents which can be described as subwavefunctions (or subfunctions). We should focus on our own Hubble volume, because corresponding Hubble volumes vary in the Everettian universe (many-worlds interpretation) (the many-worlds interpretation is totally necessary for the physical axiomatics otherwise nonmathematical causal gaps emerge; it protects probabilistic alternative realities/particle configurations). Focusing on our own Hubble volume (the experiment's Hubble volume) makes our explanation simpler.

The overall regional Hubble volume can be described by a very complicated wavefunction. That wavefunction is totally impractical to be described exactly, but we can approximate it.

BUT WHY VERY COMPLICATED WAVEFUNCTIONS COMPRISING MANY PARTICLES WHICH FORM LUMPS ATTRACT EACH OTHER?

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Imagine we have two fundamental particles within spacetime.
Do their wavefunctions attract each other?

Their wavefunctions propagate through spacetime at lightspeed and they gradually interact; that interaction causes a partial/weak entanglement. The two objects can now be described by a single more complex wavefunction. Wavefunctions act probabilistically, thus we cannot have true gravity with very few particles instead we have a gravitational bias, because the two subwavefunctions lose informational complexity by trying to create an overall simpler wavefunction which includes both particles.

Newtonian-like objects (ideal Newtonism doesn't exist and cannot be justified) exhibit many microevents, able to reproduce gravity = which is the simplification of the overall wavefunction by redistributing the of the subwavefunctions to the overall wavefunction.

General relativity (= spatiotemporal curvature) is the result of special relativity (= relativistic (comparison amongst particles) balance of inner timeflow and external motion) decay (special relativity decay: particles share attributes to create an overall inclusive and simpler wavefunction, which keeps making simplifications to its subwavefunctions).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Is my view the final causality solution to gravity?

No, because we have to describe the behavior of the fundamental fields, and also use quantum field theory to describe the phenomenon of creating ever simpler inclusive wavefunctions.

Quantum field theory has different formalisms than the wavefunction and it's more fundamental.