Virginia Woolf

Died
 Relevant Work
(NATC, 3rd ed.)

## Biography

Virginia Woolf was born Adeline Virginia Stephen on 25 January 1882 to Julia and Leslie Stephen in London, the third of four children born to her parents. She also had two half-brothers and two half-sisters from her parents' prior marriages.

She received her early education via her parents, both from "highly literate and artistic" backgrounds (*Norton* 854). She showed an early affinity for writing and, though her parents frowned on formal education for females, writing was considered an "appropriate" profession for a woman, so her father encouraged it.

In 1895, Julia Stephen, Woolf's mother, died after suffering from influenza and Stella, Julia's daughter, returned home to assume her role as surrogate mother to her younger siblings. The death of her mother was a huge blow to Virginia and began her struggles with mental illness. The summer after her mother's death contained the first of her nervous breakdowns. In 1897, Stella died, followed by Leslie Stephen in 1902 and another nervous breakdown. By the age of 20, Virginia had lost both her parents and her older sister.

In 1912, she married Leonard Woolf. Together, they purchased a printing press in 1917 and published all of Virginia's works beginning with *Jacob's Room*, as well as other modernist texts (T.S. Eliot's *Wasteland* and the translation of Sigmund Freud's writings).

She suffered severe depressive periods and nervous breakdowns throughout the next decades before eventually taking her own life in 1941.

Virginia produced novels, biographies, and essays, exploring feminist and modernist themes, including sexuality, class position, insanity, motherhood, and stream-of-consciousness narratives.

## *A Room of One's Own*

### **Background and Historical Context**

The text was written during the trial of Radclyffe Hall's lesbian novel, *The Well of Loneliness*. It was also published during the same month as the stock market crash of 1929. Her book was so successful that the earnings enabled Woolf to add a room of her own onto her house in Sussex (*Norton* 856).

"Working at the intersection of modernism and feminism, both of which she stood for, Woolf analyzed the differences between women as *objects* of representation and women as *authors* of representation, and invited her audience to think about 'the books that are not there.' In the process, she opened up the territory of modern feminist criticism" (854).

"Her novels experiment increasingly with form and style...radical[ly] rethinking...what a novel can do.... Her later novels take diverse approaches to expanding the form" (855).

"Woolf has also been seen as a representative of the sexual sea change that came after, and out of, the Victorian era. She grew up, like many others, in a world of exaggerated gender roles, secret transgressions, and repressive silence about sexual matters (she was apparently abused in her childhood by her two stepbrothers)" (855).

### **Key Words and Terms**

**Androgyny** - the combination of masculine and feminine characteristics. Gender ambiguity may be found in fashion, gender identity, sexual identity, or sexual lifestyle.

**Anon** - the abbreviation of *anonymous* often used by those who don't want to assign a name to their work. Woolf said, "I would venture to guess that Anon, who wrote so many poems without signing them, was often a woman" (858).

**Authorship -** the state or fact of being the writer of a book, article, or document, or the creator of a work of art.

**Fatal** - something leading to death, failure, destruction, etc. Woolf brings up (not explicitly, but it's definitely a thread throughout the piece) the word "fatal" four times in the beginning sentences of the last paragraph (865). It's in regards to how we as a society regard sex, sexuality, gender, and beyond by boxing someone in and forcing works to define itself as such.

**Feminist Criticism -** literary criticism informed by feminist theory, or more broadly, by the politics of feminism. It uses the principles and ideology of feminism to critique the language of literature

**Gender -** the range of characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and femininity

**Literary History -** the historical development of writings in prose or poetry that attempt to provide entertainment, enlightenment, or instruction to the reader/listener/observer, as well as the development of the literary techniques used in the communication of these pieces

**Modernity -** the quality or condition of being modern

**Queer Theory -** a field of critical theory that emerged in the early 1990s out of the fields of queer studies and women's studies. Queer theory includes both queer readings of texts and the theorization of 'queerness' itself.

**Women's Literature** - writing done by women

### **Key Quotations**

"Let me imagine, since facts are so hard to come by, what would have happened had Shakespeare had a wonderfully gifted sister, called Judith, let us say" (857).

*~ The importance of this quote brings up one of Woolf's major opinions in this essay that men and women are not inherently more or less gifted. She allows for this comparison to be focused on the differences in circumstances based on gender alone.*

"She cried out that marriage was hateful to her, and for that she was severely beaten by her father. Then he ceased to scold her. He begged her instead not to hurt him, not to shame him in this matter of her marriage" (857). "Yet genius of a sort must have existed among women as it must have existed among the working classes" (858).

"When, however, one reads of a witch being ducked, or a woman possessed by devils, of a wise woman selling herbs, or even a very remarkable man who had a mother, then I think we are on the track of a lost novelist, a suppressed poet, of some mute and inglorious Jane Austen, some Emily Bronte who dashed her brains out on the moor or mopped and mowed about the highways crazed with the torture that her gift had put on her" (858).

"Indeed, I would venture to guess that Anon, who wrote so many poems without signing them, was often a woman" (858).

"[A]ny woman born with a great gift in the sixteenth century would certainly have gone crazed, shot herself, or ended her days in some lonely cottage outside the village, half witch, half wizard, feared and mocked at. For it needs little skill in psychology to be sure that a highly gifted girl who had tried to use her gift for poetry would have been so thwarted and hindered by other people, so tortured and pulled asunder by her own contrary instincts, that she must have lost her health and sanity to a certainty" (pg. 858).

"And, determined to do my duty by her as reader if she would do her duty by me as writer, I turned the page and read... I am sorry to break off so abruptly. Are there no men present" (859)?

"'Chloe liked Olivia...' Do not start. Do not blush. Let us admit in the privacy of our own society that these things sometimes happen. Sometimes women do like women" (859).

"It was strange to think that all the great women of fiction were, until Jane Austen's day, not only seen by the other sex, but seen only in relation to the other sex" (859-860).

"And I tried to remember any case in the course of my reading where two women are represented as friends...But almost without exception they are shown in their relation to men" (859-860).

"Now all that, of course, has had to be left out, and thus the splendid portrait of the fictitious woman is much too simple and much too monotonous. Suppose, for instance, that men were only represented in literature as the lovers of women, and were never the friends of men, soldiers, thinkers, dreamers; how few parts in the plays of Shakespeare could be allotted to them; how literature would suffer" (860)!

~ *The importance of this quote is that the narrator is making a point that men who write fiction, women are only seen in relation to men as lovers or objects of desire. To make her point clear, she asks her audience to imagine what literature would look like if men only told stories about how they were only women's lovers and what if this was men's only role in stories?*

"And I went on amateurishly to sketch a plan of the soul so that in each of us two powers preside, one male, one female; and in the man's brain, the man predominates over the woman, and in the woman's brain, the woman predominates over the man.The normal and comfortable state of being is that when the two live in harmony together, spiritually cooperating. If one is a man, still the woman part of the brain must have effect; and a woman also must have intercourse with the man in her" (861).

"Doubtless Elizabethan literature would have been very different from what it is if the woman's movement had begun in the sixteenth century and not in the nineteenth" (863).

"...that some of the finest works of our greatest living writers fall upon deaf ears. Do what she will a woman cannot find in them that fountain of perpetual life which the critics assure her is there. It is not only that they celebrate male virtues, enforce male values and describe the world of men; it is that the emotion with which these books are permeated is to a woman incomprehensible" (863).

"Poetry ought to have a mother as well as a father" (864).

"However, the blame for all this, if one is anxious to lay blame, rests no more upon one sex than upon the other" (864).

"Even so, the very first sentence that I would write here, I said, crossing over to the writing-table and taking up the page headed Women and Fiction, is that it is fatal for any one who writes to think of their sex. It is fatal to be a man or woman pure and simple; one must be woman-manly or man-womanly... And fatal in no figure of speech; for anything written with that conscious bias is doomed to death" (865).

"Some marriage of opposites has to be consummated. The whole of the mind must lie wide open if we are to get the sense that the writer is communicating his experience with perfect fullness" (865).

~ *The "marriage of opposites" that the narrator is referring to is is the "marriage" of both the female and male brain. If these two parts do not work together, the brain would be too male or too female; both it is argued would diminish writing in general.*

"Call me Mary Beton, Mary Seton, Mary Carmichael or any other name you please—it is not a matter of importance" (Woolf).

"A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction" (Woolf). "It would have been impossible, completely and entirely, for any woman to have written the plays of Shakespeare in the age of Shakespeare" (Woolf).

"Women are so suspicious of any interest that has not some obvious motive behind it, so terribly accustomed to concealment and suppression, that they are off at the flicker of an eye turned observingly in their direction"(71).

"What, then, it amounts to, if this theory of the two sides of the mind holds good, is that virility has now become self-conscious—men, that is to say, are now writing only with the male side of their brains. It is a mistake for a woman to read them, for she will inevitably look for something that she will not find"(85).

### **Discussion**

#### "Shakespeare's Sister"

In this portion of her essay, Woolf discusses the fate any woman with literary talent would have faced in the 16th century. She points out that talent is not enough to ensure success; the individual must also receive an education and financial and moral support from her family and community. During the 16th century, when a woman was expected to lead a domestic life and was educated only in ways that were necessary for that role, it would have been impossible for a woman to find success or fulfillment in any other societal role. After trying to make something of her natural talent, a 16th-century woman would have been rejected, exiled, or possibly killed by her community. This is Woolf's theory as to why we see virtually nothing written by women until the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The author also suggests that when women's writing did make it into the public sphere, it was authored anonymously. Essentially, Woolf's thought experiment regarding Shakespeare's sister demonstrates how it would have been impossible for a woman with literary talent and imagination to have a career or live a fulfilling life the way a man of equal talent could.

Woolf links the talent of writing with mental illness, a connection which could be related to her personal struggle with mental illness. She suggests that "when...one reads of a witch being ducked, of a woman possessed by devils...we are on the track of a lost novelist [or] a suppressed poet...who mowed about the highways crazed with the torture that her gift had put her to" (858). Through this statement, Woolf claims that unexpressed or unaccepted talent will inevitably force an individual to lose his or her "health and sanity to a certainty" (858). However, this type of reaction may not be as universal as Woolf imagines.

Because Woolf struggled with mental illness her whole life, it is not difficult to infer that, in this piece, Woolf is imagining herself and the reactions she would have displayed had she been born in the 16th century's restrictive environment. It is difficult to imagine that every talented woman found no place for her expression or was driven to insanity by her limited place in society. Such a universal claim cannot be the case. Instead, there certainly were ways for women to contribute creatively to their societies without being shunned. They could tell stories to their children and perhaps sing songs at community celebrations and gatherings. Unfortunately, as Woolf notes, little of this has been written down or recorded. Still, it seems extreme to claim that nearly all talented women were exiled or went insane because of their unused gifts. Sixteenth-century women must have been far more resourceful and creative than to simply allow their gifts to be entirely stifled. They must have found outlets for their thoughts and creativity, although, unfortunately, those outlets were not preservable.

In the "Shakespeare's Sister" portion of A Room of One's Own Virginia Woolf discusses the hypothetical life that a sister of Shakespeare would have lived had she had a similar talent for the arts. Fairly clearly we see that in this scenario had Shakespeare had a sister like this she would no doubt not succeed in the same way he did due to the misogynistic way of thinking that was so prevalent. Woolf goes on to demonstrate how women were predestined not to succeed in the same way men could and how often their very existence can be limited to their relationships with different men in their lives (fathers, husbands, etc). In the *Norton*, her introduction says that ideas like this went on to open up a lot of space for feminist criticism.

#### "Chloe Liked Olivia"

In this piece, the narrator is reading Mary Carmichael's *Life's Adventure,* when she reads the words, "Chloe liked Olivia." This invokes a realization in which Woolf is arguing that in literature, woman were, up until the nineteenth century, rarely considered in relation to other women, but instead were only seen as responding to men. She notes that even when women were seen interacting with one another, it was often out of jealousy and not friendship. Women were never portrayed as having other women for friends but were only depicted associating positively with men, as though that was all that women had in their lives. With that, Carmichael's text reveals how the women, Chloe and Olivia, have other pursuits outside of the home as they work in a laboratory together. The narrator recognizes the importance of thus pivotal transition in that Carmichael is going where no writer has been (859-861).

It's worth noting as well that this particular piece is often used in Queer Theory. While "Chloe Liked Olivia" is neither explicitly platonic nor explicitly romantic, it has been incorporated into lesbian literature and theory. There is even an anthology of lesbian literature from 1994 that is titled "Chloe Plus Olivia."

#### "Androgyny"

In the third and final passage, the narrator catches a glimpse of a woman and a man getting into a taxi together. This sight sparks an idea that when the mind is androgynous, or in harmonious unification of being both male and female, complete satisfaction and happiness takes place. She argues that if writing is conscious bias in being either purely male or purely female, it ceases to be fertilized. Thus, writing must be woman-manly or man-womanly in order to exercise total freedom of thought (861-865).

The concept of total freedom of thought has been given--and suggestively squandered--by men. Woolf explains: "it was delightful to read a man's writing again. It was so direct, so straightforward after the writing of women. It indicated such freedom of mind, such liberty of person, such confidence in himself" (901/862). This freedom is given when a mind has never been "thwarted or opposed, but had had full liberty from birth to stretch itself in whatever way it liked" (901/862). The advantage male writers have had in constructing their texts is this freedom of thought--an affordance to take risks and express one's self in whatever ways are most sensible to them. Freedom of thought is the ability to think without worry of unreasonable censorship, unfair criticism, or oppression stemming from sexist norms. Men are given this freedom from birth, causing them to write (predominantly) as men. Women have had to fight for it, causing them to see it from another perspective--one that causes Woolf to believe writing as a man or woman is fatal (865).

#### Feminist Theory [this section needs work - uses unreliable source]

The idea behind "Shakespeare's Sister,' is not to point out the waste of hidden talent, but to have the reader question, why gender is the deciding factor in creativity, talent, or skill? A definition of Feminist Theory, in Qwhatis.com *What is Feminist Theory,* simply says*,"*Feminist theory is a theory on women’s rights and gender equality. It involves the study of women’s roles in society which include their rights, privileges, interests, and concerns. It serves as an extension to feminism which evaluates the rightful place of women in the society" (http://www.qwhatis.com/what-is-feminist-theory/). Even though Sister was genetically built of the same components as her brother and possessed the same creative drive, according to convention; biologically, she didn't stand up to the gender test of ability and would have to hide her skill, train in domesticity, and/or kill herself out of frustration.

Frustration pointed out in the last (2nd) paragraph on page 857, "It is unthinkable that any woman in Shakespeare's day should have had the Shakespeare's genius...", how would they have known? Women were not allowed to showcase talent or forced into cultural disregard of their talent for training, "...forced to it (Domestic life), by their parents and held to it by all the power of law and custom"(857). If there was genius of the same caliber as Shakespeare it may have been found in one who was created the same as Shakespeare, brought up in the same way as William, desired the same career as him, and was the closest to being an exact copy with the exception of gender, which does not remove the imagination, creativity, or genius from the brain. We can never test this idea because her life was not allowed to go beyond the gender restrictions and in the end, caused her to take her life.

Read more: What is Feminist Theory? | What is? http://www.qwhatis.com/what-is-feminist-theory/#ixzz4LMT2RsV7

### **Major Criticism and Reception**

"Woolf’s example helped drive Cunningham to become a writer himself. His novel *The Hours* essentially retells *Dalloway* as a story within a story, alternating between a variation of Woolf’s original narrative and a fictional speculation on Woolf herself. Cunningham’s 1998 novel won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, then was adapted into a 2002 film of the same name, starring Nicole Kidman as Woolf."

Woolf has also been critiqued by Marxist theorists, who take issue with the connection she makes between freedom and the possession of property. Woolf herself came from a privileged social class and, in *A Room of One's Own,* argued that women need 500 pounds a year to be truly free.

## Other Works by Author

Note: Some of the titles are cross-genre and don't quite fit the categories below.

### Nonfiction

* *A Room of One's Own* (1929)
* *Flush: A Biography* (1933)
* *Three Guineas* (1938)

### Fiction

* *Jacob's Room* (1922)
* *Mrs. Dalloway* (1925)
* *To The Lighthouse* (1927)

## See Also

"Shakespeare's Sister" by the Smiths (1985)

Shakespears Sister (band)

1. ↑ Heitman, Danny. "Virginia Woolf Was More Than Just a Women’s Writer," Humanities 36.3 (May/June 2015) https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2015/mayjune/feature/virginia-woolf-was-more-just-womens-writer