Black hole’s maximally degenerate chromodynamic torus / Τόρος μαύρης τρύπας μέγιστου χρωμοδυναμικού εκφυλισμού

Black hole’s maximally degenerate time-crystal chromodynamic torus

## One extremely important topic is "physical black holes" (thus nonideal).

The Kerr black hole (an impossible ideal black hole) is closer to what a physical astronomical object is.

The ringularity includes zero spacetime = it necessarily doesn't exist (because zero spacetime is identical to nothing). The "nothing" isn't part of any universe. The "nothing" cannot have mass, different mases per cases [per different black hole], different ontologies (there "is" ["is" as a human language description] only one nothing, and that doesn't exist [as a something of specific procedural ontology]). I wrote the "nothing" to differentiate it from common language which sometimes conveys emotion without being literal.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Modern physics doesn't know all the degrees of degeneracy.

See videos about neutron stars. PBS Space Time and Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell are based on ideas of good professors. But we don't know the maximally possible spatiotemporal degeneracy = degeneracy limit = black hole torus state of matter.

We don't know what the maximally possible state of degeneracy is (the singularity and the ringularity are not quantum field theory descriptions; they aren't specific field behaviors; they aren't properly defined; THEY ARE PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE and astrophysics has to define the maximally degenerate double torus [start with the Kerr ringularity, but because its so energetic, it NECESSARILY forces energy to tunnel out... but because in the black hole maximal degeneracy region and nearby regions gravity is huge and spacetime extremely bent, the tunnelling forces the chromodynamic = strong force flow, to reenter and retunnel out ad infinitum, and that process generates the PHYSICAL = NONIDEAL double chromodynamic [strong force flow] torus. (Mini/micro black holes are impossible, because the tunnelling-reentering loop is very wide [for small sized black holes], and necessarily disintegrate.)

My idea on the maximally degenerate black hole torus does NOT violate the nowadays description of black holes, because I describe something within the event horizon. We don't know what happens inside the event horizon, but physics is procedural; nonsupernatural thus we should describe a procedure. Also the claim that black holes are totally disconnected from our universe is wrong, because they would have been replaced with arbitrary [of similar energy but arbitrary content] spatiotemporal oscillations [it would look like a white hole; an extremely huge explosion]; but that's not what we observe [black holes are connected to our universe, because each of their subregions are causally connected when examined in adjoining series. The maximally degenerate central region is an imperfect time crystal like the state before the Big Bang [its ingredients would have been causally disconnected due to superluminal spatiotemporal motion, but that view is totally wrong, because we have to see the "chromodynamic flow" as a single particle [that also explains the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe, because of its pre-Big-Bang imperfect time crystal state; most time crystals are made of particles, but maximally degenerate time crystals are made of extremely energetic field oscillations which being a chromodynamic flow cannot become stable particles] [black holes being so extreme phenomena will help us understand better the conditions before the Big Bang].

Also we should use quantum field theory to try to describe the maximally degenerate state of spacetime, and we should use computer simulations to reject silly ideas that don't work.

My suggestion is we should try and test an impossibility (something obviously wrong). The gluon plasma (NOT the quark–gluon plasma). We should use the impossible gluon plasma (which is a stupid idea, because a gluon plasma: 1. wouldn't meet the criteria of existence in the first place, it requires other particles, 2. it would be so energetic that even if no quarks existed they would be generated by particle interactions. My ERRONEOUS cheap excuse is that we have to see the maximally degenerate black hole torus as a single pure particle without ANY constituent, but we'll use the gluon plasma as a simulation, which being wrong will yield totally wrong results, but gradually via simulations and debates with physicists, we will create a possible PHYSICAL description of the maximally degenerate central black hole region.

The final solution will be way afar from my initial ERRONEOUS suggestion.

## the importance of probabilistic entanglement (see: probabilistic entanglement)

The maximally degenerate black hole chromodynamic [flow] timecrystal retunnelling-reentering-loop torus mainly acts as single particle; but its regional oscillations are probabilistically entangled (mostly partially entangled due to continuous interactions) with the particles that created them; thus no quantum information is lost.

But practically the quantum information of the particles who entered the black hole chromodynamic [flow] timecrystal retunnelling-reentering-loop torus becomes mixed to the overall torus thus it cannot be retrieved, because any effort to retrieve information would be probabilistic based on the wavefunction of the chromoblack torus and it would be totally impossible to guess which partially entangled datum partially matches to past infalling particles (because many interactions happen, one datum we retrieve PARTIALLY matches MANY particles, not one fully entangled particle).

\_\_\_\_\_

note: The maximally degenerate black hole chromodynamic timecrystal retunnelling-reentering-loop torus or 'chromoblack torus' for short (abbreviated) is more important than the event horizon, because we care about the maximally degenerate pressure, which causes ontological change to matter, not merely observational.

\_\_\_\_\_

How the 'chromotorus' consumes matter?

Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia said to René Descartes:

"We cannot have two different fundamental ontologies; they're incompatible."

I'm not going to defend René Descartes who believed in unprocedural thought (soul) and NEVER had a theory to support his view.

Thus particles never merge the 'chromotorus' as particles. Particles decay before they merge into the chromotorus, and being pure oscillations (virtual particles which haven't yet materialized), are absorbed into the chromotorus.

Thus Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia (I don't believe in monarchy though and I don't agree with anyone who accepts titles related to any monarchy) was correct.

"We cannot have two different fundamental ontologies; they're incompatible."

The chromotorus is a strong force timecrystal fluid which has the nature of a single overall particle with many statistical interpretations (if we could hit it hard [an impossible thought experiment] = observe it via decay; the verb observe is vague in physics; hit = entangle completely or partially and measure, is what we do) based on its wavefunction.

The absorption of the decay products of particles during the narrow window they are spatiotemporal oscillations (virtual particles which haven't materialized) by the chromotorus, is compatible with the single-natured view of Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia; but any monarchy must be abolished (single-natured rights for all citizens; same principle).

## comment 1:

Some of my ideas seem wrong to me (not all). I express them because we must simulate many alternative models. We should mimic the nuclear fusion settings. Of course the maximally degenerate state of matter is way different from the hot nuclear plasma (my text above expresses different ideas... but we can keep the element of creating vertical mini tori around the main torus)... but we should test some ideas of the overall nuclear fusion system (magnetic field controlled behavior and plasma behavior). These are different states of energy and matter from the maximally degenerate strong force fluid = chromodynamic fluid... but we should test many alternative theories and make corrections. Also we shouldn't immediately abandon ideas without to try to correct them. Usually what actually happens in one natural system, has elements we know from other systems and mechanisms. It doesn't seem correct the double torus system. There is a single flow (its a timecrystal fluid dominated by quantum mechanics even though the chromotorus is big, and we have to take that into account).