Xepition (x*)

Xepition (x\*) is another part of the Star Series. Its smaller counterpart is Xubition (x-) and its larger counterpart is Complete Xepition (cX\*) [coming soon].

## n-Physics

n-Physics begins with 0-Physics, which is the study of our physical world, this is what some might call "physics". The next step, 1-Physics is quite easy, this would be metaphysics, the study of things beyond our physical world. The difference between these is quite dramatic, physics is everything that actually exists, whereas metaphysics is everything that exists in the abstract. But then, what could be beyond this? What is 2-Physics? Well, let's find some relation between 0-Physics and 1-Physics:

The first thing we notice is that 0-Physics is only a tiny blip within 1-Physics, we can describe everything that's in 0-Physics within 1-Physics, but not the other way round. We also notice that there is a large philosophical gap between 1-Physics and 0-Physics, 1-Physics is completely inacessible to 0-Physics in a way that is unlike anything else.

So where do we go from here? We're going to have to define 2-Physics, but as we saw from the differences between 0-Physics and 1-Physics, 2-Physics would be completely undefinable to us, as we only know up to 1-Physics, the conceptual difference between 1-Physics and 2-Physics would be the same as the difference between 0-Physics and 1-Physics. 2-Physics would be something fundamentally more abstract that 1-Physics. This renders 2-Physics and n-Physics beyond 2-Physics absolutely ineffable to us, we would never be able to comprehend it, or even comprehend the idea of comprehending it. It's important that we understand that all levels of thought, all of mathematics, all of Hypergoogology and everything else we know that exists in some physical or abstract sense makes up only an infinitesimally small speck in 1-Physics. 2-Physics would be so utterly ineffable that no being, no matter how omnipotent would be able to comprehend it.

We can go further though, through to 3-Physics and beyond. Each level of n-Physics is fundamentally more abstract and complex. Anything beyond 1-Physics is completely incomprehensible, and we can only use them in the same way we use levels of thought, we can take a thing from a high -Physics and "collapse" them down to a lower form of -Physics. n-Physics has the same conceptual leap to n+1-physics as 0-Physics to 1-Physics, this is how we can """describe""" the trend of n-Physics.

## **Definition**

* **x\* transcends all forms of n-Physics, regardless of any other definition.**
* **x\* cannot be defined in any form of n-Physics, regardless of any other definition.**
* **x\* cannot be described in any way in any form on n-Physics, regardless of any other definition.**
* **x\* ignores anything that hinders its size or definition, even those that transcend "anything".**

## But that's impossible?

It might seem impossible for x\* to exist beyond 1-Physics, as that's all we can comprehend, but we can do a similar thing as we do to thought levels and "collapse" it. This would mean that x\* isn't *actually* beyond all n-physics, it is instead the 1-Physical idea of being beyond all n-Physics. This sort of "collapsed" thinking is useful all throughout Hypergoogology as it allows us to use some insane ideas that we otherwise wouldn't be able to use. If we deny the use of such concepts then we limit an incredibly large part of Hypergoogology. It's important to remember that within Hypergoogology things are often strange and lie outside the normal concept of "logic". If Hypergoogology was logical in the same way formal mathematics is (i'm not denying that Hypergoogology does indeed follow some form of logic), we might as well be doing large cardinal studies.

## How is this bigger than [number]?

Well, the first argument is that Reduk would be bigger than x\*, as x\* uses auto-collapsing concepts. This is fairly easily disproved because of 2 main reasons:

1. the 4th part of the definition, "x\* ignores anything that hinders its size or definition, even those that transcend "anything".", gives it a strong enough definition strength to where it simply does not care about Reduk's definition.
2. n-Physics is inherently more fundamental than anything in Reduk, this includes the entire idea of "number", "beyond" and even Hypergoogology itself. With thought levels, they are not as fundamental because Hypergoogology still contains them and they would just exist in 1-Physics, this is why Reduk is beyond the collapses of thought levels but not n-Physics.

cS\* though? surely that would be larger since x\* is a "thing"? Welp, sorry but "thing" is merely abstract and exists within 1-Physics. We could further apply thing to all n-Physics if we wanted but it still wouldn't be as large as x\* because not only does x\* transcend all n-Physics, but the definition of x\* also exists beyond all n-Physics, meaning that x\* literally could not be defined on any n-Physics...

Ok, but what about Diaeresis? Since x\* can be said to transcends n-Physics, surely Diaeresis is larger as that transcends all statements about it? Well, again we have to consider the fundamental nature of n-Physics, the concept of "transcending" something is an abstract concept, all abstract concepts inherently lie in 1-Physics, showing x\* to be larger.

## There is something more "size"-ey than size?

An interesting consequence to n-Physics is that there is something like size, but more fundamental than size. If we think about "size", it exists differently on every n-Physics; for example, our normal understanding on "size" (the one that our definition of "number" is based on) is a 1-Physical concept, it is abstract and different to the 0-Physical version of "size". The 0-Physical concept of "size" is literal, physical size (eg. n amount of rocks, or a building n units tall), this is very different to the 1-Physical version of "size" which is completely abstract. This leaves 2-Physical "size" being something even more abstract. 2-Physical size would be to 1-Physical size (abstract size) what 1-Physical size is to 0-Physical size... I don't even want to begin to think about 3-Physical size or further...

## Er... what's next then?

Well, we're just going to have to find something even crazier. Whenever we get stuck in Hypergoogology, we always find a way. As I said in the cS\* page, no matter how much of a brick wall something seems to be, we will always find something that surpasses it that is even more crazy. I suggest we start using some philosophical concepts to go further, i'm sure there is some strange ideas we could explore. There is still a whole world of mindfuckery to be explored....

(this was written by the same goodels that once claimed he was no longer interested in hypergoogology anymore. lol.)