伦奎斯特时期美国最高法院案例列表

这是一个美国最高法院首席大法官威廉·伦奎斯特 (1986年9月26日 - 2005年9月3日)任职期间依时间顺序排列的案例列表。

==1986年–1989年==
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;width:100%"
|-
! style="background:#6699FF"|案件名
! style="background:#6699FF;width:15%"|引用
! style="background:#6699FF;width:50%"|简介|-|colspan="3"|首席大法官威廉·伦奎斯特（1986年9月26日）负责的案件 
|-
| 科罗拉多州诉康奈利案
| 
| the involuntary statement of a criminal suspect uttered during a schizophrenic episode but not coerced by the Government is not precluded from admission in court by the due process clause
|-
| 格里菲斯诉肯塔基州案
| 
| 被告代理人在案件重审前因新宣布的合宪规则受益
|-
| Commissioner v. Groetzinger
| 
| addressed the issue of what qualifies as being either a trade or business under Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
|-
| 马里兰诉加里森案
| 
| 搜查令
|-
| Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of California
| 
| due process, personal jurisdiction, Minimum contacts 
|-
| 亚利桑那诉希克斯案
| 
| probable cause relating to the plain view doctrine under the Fourth Amendment
|-
| 美国诉邓恩案
| 
| open fields doctrine
|-
| Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca
| 
| Asylum applicants must show "well-founded fear" of persecution to establish their eligibility
|-
|Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictus
| 
| substantive due process, the takings clause of the 5th Amendment
|-
|O'Connor v. Ortega
| 
| 公职人员的由第十四宪法修正案规定的权利
|-
|蒂松诉亚利桑那州案案
| 
| Felony murder and the death penalty: death penalty is constitutional for major participants in felonies who exhibit extreme indifference to human life, even if someone else personally kills the victim
|-
| McCleskey v. Kemp
| 
| 种族歧视和死刑
|-
| 宾夕法尼亚州诉芬利案
| 
| right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings
|-
| Saint Francis College v. al-Khazraji
| 
| persons of Arabian ancestry may make claims for race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981
|-
| Hodel v. Irving
| 
| 第五宪法修正案和印第安人领土
|-
| 美国诉萨莱诺案
| 
| upholding Bail Reform Act of 1984 as not violating Due Process or Excessive Bail clauses
|-
| Turner v. Safley
| 
| 言论自由和同监者婚姻
|-
| Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon
| 
| Private actions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are arbitrable
|-
| First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County
| 
| substantive due process, temporary taking
|-
| O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
| 
| not a violation of the Free Exercise Clause to deprive an inmate of attending a religious service for "legitimate penological interests."
|-
| Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
| 
| 言论自由禁区范围的合宪性
|-
| Edwards v. Aguillard
| 
| constitutionality of mandating teaching of creation science in conjunction with evolution
|-
| South Dakota v. Dole
| 
| use of federal funding to encourage changes in state laws—here, raising the drinking age in all states from 18 to 21
|-
| Puerto Rico v. Branstad
| 
| 联邦政府强制引渡逃犯
|-
| 兰金诉麦克弗森案
| 
| 公职人员言论自由权
|-
| 美国诉史丹利案
| 
| soldier's tort claim related to Project MKULTRA barred
|-
| Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
| 
| 宪法第五修正案
|-
| Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
| 
| 报纸的言论自由
|-
| Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
| 
| 宪法第一修正案
|-
| Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu
| 
| Federal courts of appeals must review denials of motions to reopen immigration proceedings for abuse of discretion
|-
| Basic Inc. v. Levinson
| 
| interpretation of SEC Rule 10b-5, market price manipulation
|-
| Lying v. Northwest Indian CPA
| 
| 印第安人的信仰自由和公众利益
|-
| 南卡罗来纳州诉贝克案
| 
| Federal requirement that state and local bonds be issued in registered form did not violate the Tenth Amendment
|-
| Huddleston v. United States
| 
| admissibility of prior "bad acts" under the Federal Rules of Evidence
|-
| 加利福尼亚州诉格林伍德案
| 
| 4th Amendment; even absent a warrant, the search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside the curtilage of a home
|-
| Maynard v. Cartwright
| 
| 酷刑；死刑
|-
| 韦伯斯特诉多伊案
| 
| ability for CIA firings and hirings to be judicially reviewed
|-
| Schweiker v. Chilicky
| 
| no implied cause of action in the Social Security Act
|-
| Frisby v. Schultz
| 
| 第一修正案；隐私
|-
| Morrison v. Olson
| 
| independent counsel's office
|-
| Thompson v. Oklahoma
| 
| 宪法第八修正案；16岁以下儿童监禁
|-
| 亚利桑那诉布拉德案
| 
| state's failure to preserve evidence in a criminal case, absent bad faith, is not a due process violation
|-
| 米斯特雷塔诉合众国案
| 
| United States Sentencing Commission, separation of powers
|-
| 佛罗里达诉莱利案
| 
| aerial surveillance and the Fourth Amendment
|-
| City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.
| 
| Affirmative action, constitutionality of minority business set-aside programs for municipal contracts
|-
| Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
| 
| state anti-plug molding law struck down under preemption doctrine for interfering with federal patent law
|-
| DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
| 
| child welfare department's failure to protect a child from known child abuse does not violate due process
|-
| Teague v. Lane
| 
| new constitutional rules do not generally apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
|-
| Blanton v. North Las Vegas
| 
| Jury trial is unnecessary for petty offenses
|-
| Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association
| 
| requiring drug tests for railroad employees is not an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment
|-
| National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab
| 
| requiring drug tests for customs inspectors is not an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris
| 
| New York City Board of Estimate representation scheme was held to violate Equal Protection Clause
|-
| United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
| 
| FBI rap sheets may not be disclosed to third parties under the Freedom of Information Act
|-
| Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
| 
| held that the Indian Child Welfare Act governed the adoption of Indian children, and clarified the jurisdiction of the tribal court
|-
| Graham v. Connor
| 
| standard for claims for violations of the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser et al.
| 
| interlocutory appeals
|-
| Finley v. United States
| 
| pendent party jurisdiction, later overturned by statute
|-
| Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
| 
| standard of evidence for disparate impact employment discrimination cases
|-
| Hernandez v. Commissioner
| 
| Scientology courses do not qualify as charitable deductions under the Internal Revenue Code
|-
| Community For Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
| 
| 版权；雇用
|-
| Martin v. Wilks
| 
| civil procedure in employment affirmative action
|-
| Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police
| 
| States and their officials acting in their official capacity are not persons under Section 1983
|-
| Texas v. Johnson
| 
| freedom of speech (flag burning)
|-
| Ward v. Rock Against Racism
| 
| 言论自由；噪音
|-
| Granfinanciera v. Nordberg
| 
| Seventh Amendment right to jury trials in bankruptcy proceedings
|-
| Penry v. Lynaugh
| 
| 宪法第八修正案
|-
| Stanford v. Kentucky
| 
| 宪法第八修正案
|-
| Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
| 
| state funding for abortion rights
|-
| County of Allegheny v. ACLU
| 
| holiday displays and state endorsement of religion
|}

1990年–1994年
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;width:100%"
! style="background:#6699FF"|案件名
! style="background:#6699FF;width:15%"|引用
! style="background:#6699FF;width:50%"|简介
|-
| University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC
| 
| peer review privilege not required by Federal Rules of Evidence or First Amendment
|-
| Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
| 
| customer deposits constituting taxable income to a utility company
|-
| FW/PBS v. City of Dallas
| 
| regulation of "sexually oriented businesses"
|-
| Sullivan v. Zebley
| 
| determination of SSI benefits for children
|-
| Washington v. Harper
| 
| permissibility of involuntary treatment of psychotic inmates
|-
| United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
| 
| search and seizure of nonresident alien in foreign country
|-
| Chauffeurs, Teamsters, and Helpers Local No. 391 v. Terry
| 
| scope of 7th Amendment right to jury trial in civil cases
|-
| Employment Division v. Smith
| 
| religious freedom with respect to drug use
|-
| Missouri v. Jenkins
| 
| power of federal courts to order taxation by state or local governments
|-
| Osborne v. Ohio
| 
| states have the power to ban possession of child pornography without violating the First Amendment
|-
| Stewart v. Abend
| 
| rights of the successor of a copyright interest
|-
| Grady v. Corbin
| 
| double jeopardy and subsequent prosecutions
|-
| Taylor v. United States
| 
| definition of "burglary" under certain sentence enhancement provisions of the federal criminal code
|-
| Burnham v. Superior Court of California
| 
| physical presence as a requirement for personal jurisdiction
|-
| Duro v. Reina
| 
| Indian tribes have no jurisdiction over nonmember Indians
|-
| Westside School District v. Mergens
| 
| Bible study clubs in schools
|-
| United States v. Eichman
| 
| freedom of speech (flag burning)
|-
| Perpich v. Department of Defense
| 
| Congressional powers over U.S. National Guard
|-
| Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.
| 
| premarketing activity conducted to gain approval of a device under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is exempt from a finding of patent infringement
|-
| Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
| 
|  First Amendment and defamation--no "opinion privilege"
|-
| Illinois v. Rodriguez
| 
| Fourth Amendment, "co-occupant consent rule"
|-
| Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
| 
|  incompetent persons may not refuse medical treatment under the 14th Amendment
|-
| Hodgson v. Minnesota
| 
| requiring parental notification for abortion is constitutional with a judicial bypass provision
|-
| Walton v. Arizona
| 
| Capital punishment and sentencing procedure, partially overruled by Ring v. Arizona
|-
| Maryland v. Craig
| 
| the right of criminal defendants to confront witnesses
|-
| Perry v. Louisiana
| 
| forcibly medicating  a death row inmate  with a mental disorder in order to make sure he is competent to be executed is impermissible
|-
| Cheek v. United States
| 
| mistake of law is a valid defense to criminal tax evasion because of mens rea
|-
| Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell
| 
|  case "hasten[ing] the end of federal court desegregation orders.
|-
| Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.
| 
| an Indian tribe was not subject to state sales tax for sales to tribal members
|-
| Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
| 
| minimal quantum of creativity is required for copyright protection
|-
| Cottage Savings Ass'n v. Commissioner
| 
| income tax consequences of mortgage interest exchange, examination of the consequences of the Savings and Loan crisis
|-
| Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
| 
| enforcement of forum selection clauses
|-
| County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
| 
| suspects arrested without a warrant must be brought into court for a probable cause determination within 48 hours
|-
| Rust v. Sullivan
| 
| government is not required to fund abortion
|-
| Hernandez v. New York
| 
| prosecutor may use peremptory challenge against bilingual Latino jurors based on his doubts about the ability of such jurors to defer to the official translation of Spanish-language testimony 
|-
| Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association
| 
| unions may compel contributions from nonmembers only for the costs of performing its duties as exclusive bargaining agent
|-
| California v. Acevedo
| 
| police may search a container in a car without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains contraband
|-
| Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company
| 
| Batson's prohibition on race-based use of peremptory challenges applies in civil trials
|-
| Connecticut v. Doehr
| 
| Connecticut state statute that authorizes prejudgment attachment of real estate without prior notice or hearing violated the 14th Amendment right to due process
|-
| Toibb v. Radloff
| 
| holding that individual debtors may file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
|-
| McNeil v. Wisconsin
| 
|  differences between the rights secured by the Fifth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment
|-
| Florida v. Bostick
| 
| random bus searches routinely conducted pursuant to passenger's consent
|-
| Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.
| 
| First Amendment and the restriction of nude dancing
|-
| Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.
| 
| First Amendment, freedom of the press
|-
| Payne v. Tennessee
| 
| admissibility of victim impact statements, stare decisis could be disregarded where fairness to victim's rights
had priority over the demands of consistency in the common law.
|-
| Peretz v. United States
| 
| role of magistrate judges in jury selection in a felony trial
|-
| Harmelin v. Michigan
| 
| life imprisonment for cocaine possession
|-
| Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
| 
| holding that New York's Son of Sam law violated the First Amendment
|-
| Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Doherty
| 
| U.S. Attorney General has broad discretion to reopen deportation proceedings
|-
| INS v. Elias-Zacarias
| 
| asylum on account of political opinion must be based on the refugee's political opinion
|-
| Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
| 
| employer can exclude nonemployee union organizers from private company property
|-
| Hudson v. McMillian
| 
| excessive force against prison inmates, 8th Amendment
|-
| INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner
| 
| Expenditures incurred by a target corporation in the course of a friendly takeover are nondeductible capital expenditures under the Internal Revenue Code
|-
| United States v. Felix
| 
| conviction of a defendant for a crime and for a conspiracy to commit the same offense does not create double jeopardy
|-
| United States Department of Commerce v. Montana
| 
| formula used for reapportionment
|-
| Jacobson v. United States
|   
| entrapment occurs when government creates predisposition to commit offense where it did not exist
|-
| Foucha v. Louisiana
| 
| criteria for the continued involuntary commitment of an individual who had been found not guilty by reason of insanity
|-
| Riggins v. Nevada
| 
| Forced psychiatric medication during trial violated defendant's rights under Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
|-
| Quill Corp. v. North Dakota
| 
| Requiring out-of-state mail order vendor to collect use tax unconstitutionally burdened interstate commerce
|-
| United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company
| 
| taxation of firearms
|-
| Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
| 
| Standing in a suit to enforce the Endangered Species Act
|-
| United States v. Alvarez-Machain
| 
| application of the Ker-Frisbie doctrine
|-
| Morgan v. Illinois
| 
| A defendant facing the death penalty may challenge for cause a prospective juror who would automatically vote to impose the death penalty in every case
|-
| Georgia v. McCollum
| 
| standard on peremptory challenges from Batson v. Kentucky applied to criminal defendant
|-
| Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association
| 
|  federal preemption of state labor safety laws
|-
| Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement
| 
| 1st Amendment protection and police protection
|-
| New York v. United States
| 
| the take title provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 violated the 10th Amendment
|-
| Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.
| 
| permissible scope of taxation of out-of-state corporations doing business within a particular state.
|-
| R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul
| 
| fighting words, hate speech
|-
| Lee v. Weisman
| 
| First Amendment, establishment of religion (prayer at high school graduations)
|-
| Planned Parenthood v. Casey
| 
| abortion; reaffirming the "core holding" of Roe v. Wade
|-
| United States v. Fordice
| 
| segregation of colleges and universities
|-
| Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
| 
| per se rule of takings clause
|-
| Commissioner v. Soliman
| 
| "principal place of business" under the Internal Revenue Code
|-
| Nixon v. United States
| 
| judicial impeachment, political question doctrine
|-
| Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
| 
| Civil Rights Act of 1871 could not be used to halt blockades of abortion clinics
|-
| Herrera v. Collins
| 
| claim of actual innocence is not grounds for federal habeas corpus relief
|-
| Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
| 
| quantum of proof required for a claim of attempted monopolization under § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act
|-
| Shaw v. Reno
| 
| appropriateness of considering race in redistricting
|-
| Reno v. Flores
| 
| procedures for detaining juvenile aliens awaiting deportation
|-
| Saudi Arabia v. Nelson
| 
| jurisdiction in an action based upon a "commercial activity" under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
|-
| Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.
| 
| First Amendment protections against restrictions on distributing handbills
|-
| United States Department of Justice v. Landano
| 
| Freedom of Information Act and confidentiality
|-
| Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
| 
| Preemption, non-fiduciary liability under ERISA
|-
| Wisconsin v. Mitchell
| 
| enhanced sentencing for hate crimes and the First Amendment
|-
| Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
| 
| animal cruelty, freedom of religion
|-
| Minnesota v. Dickerson
| 
| seizure of contraband during stop & frisk
|-
| Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District
| 
| access by religious groups to public school facilities
|-
| South Dakota v. Bourland
| 
| an Indian tribes hunting and fishing rights were terminated on land the Federal government acquired for a reservoir
|-
| Sale v. Haitian Centers Council
| 
| illegal immigration
|-
| Godinez v. Moran
| 
| competency standard for pleading guilty or waiving the right to counsel
is the same as the competency standard for standing trial
|-
| Alexander v. United States
| 
| RICO's forfeiture provision does not violate the First Amendment
|-
| Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
| 
| federal judges as gatekeepers for allowing expert witnesses to testify in trials; see also Daubert Standard 
|-
| Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California
| 
|  application of Sherman Antitrust Act to foreign companies
|-
| Fogerty v. Fantasy
| 
| attorney's fees in copyright litigation
|-
| Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
| 
| copyright, commercial fair use is possible, parody
|-
| Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.
| 
| Commerce Clause
|-
| J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
| 
| peremptory jury challenges based on sex violate equal protection clause
|-
| Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver
| 
| private plaintiffs may not maintain an aiding and abetting lawsuit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|-
| Landgraf v. USI Film Products
| 
| retroactive application of statutory amendments effective while cases are pending in court
|-
| C&A Carbone, Inc v. Town of Clarkstown
| 
| Dormant Commerce Clause
|-
| Waters v. Churchill
| 
| Due process rights of public employees in workplace when alleging violations of First Amendment rights
|-
| Farmer v. Brennan
| 
| civil liability under the Eighth Amendment for rape of a transgender prison inmate
|-
| Dolan v. City of Tigard
| 
| Fifth Amendment takings clause
|-
| Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission
| 
| upholding must-carry rules against cable television provider's First Amendment challenge
|-
| Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
| 
| school district coinciding with religious community
|-
| Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
| 
| first amendment, restrictions on abortion protests
|-
| United Mine Workers of America v. Bagwell
| 
| constitutional limitations on the contempt powers of courts
|-
| United States v. Shabani
| 
| elements of criminal conspiracy (i.e., requirement for an overt act)
|-
| United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.
| 
| conviction under federal child pornography laws requires proof that the defendant knew the subjects were minors
|}

1995–1999
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;width:100%"
! style="background:#6699FF"|Case name
! style="background:#6699FF;width:15%"|Citation
! style="background:#6699FF;width:50%"|Summary
|-
| Schlup v. Delo
| 
| Standard of proof required for a habeas corpus petition to reopen a case in light of new evidence of innocence
|-
| Arizona v. Evans
| 
| Exclusionary rule does not require suppressing evidence obtained through good-faith reliance on a search warrant that contains a clerical error
|- 
|Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc.
| 
| color trademarks are appropriate subject matter under the Lanham Act
|-
| Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
| 
| separation of powers and finality of judgments
|-
| McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
| 
| anonymous campaign literature under the First Amendment
|-
| United States v. Lopez
| 
| interstate commerce, gun-free school zones
|-
| U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
| 
| preventing states from enacting term limits to the US House and Senate
|-
| First Options v. Kaplan
| 
| independent judicial review of arbitration clause
|-
| Adarand Constructors v. Peña
| 
| constitutionality of race-based set-asides (strict scrutiny test)
|-
| Witte v. United States
| 
| using "relevant conduct", as defined by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, at sentencing does not violate double jeopardy principles
|-
| Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
| 
| First Amendment freedom of association as applied to a private parade organizer seeking to exclude a group inconsistent with its stated message
|-
| Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc.
| 
| under the commercial speech doctrine of the First Amendment, states may forbid lawyers from directly soliciting personal injury cases for short periods of time after an accident or a disaster
|-
| Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton
| 
| constitutionality of public school drug testing; Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments
|-
| Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinnette
| 
| display of religious symbols on government property
|-
| Rosenberger v. University of Virginia
| 
| discrimination by state universities against student religious organizations
|-
| Miller v. Johnson
| 
| racial gerrymandering
|-
| Bailey v. United States
| 
| meaning of "use" in federal statute imposing a five-year prison sentence on anyone who "uses" a firearm during or in relation to a drug crime or a crime of violence
|-
| Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.
| 
| scope of software copyrights
|-
| Behrens v. Pelletier
| 
| appeal over ruling on qualified immunity
|-
| Hercules, Inc. v. United States
| 
| liability for producing Agent Orange
|-
| Bennis v. Michigan
| 
| held that innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture
|-
| Seminole Tribe v. Florida
| 
|  Article I and the 11th Amendment
|-
| Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.
| 
| claim construction of patents
|-
| 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. State of Rhode Island
| 
| restrictions on commercial speech
|-
| BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
| 
| whether punitive damages are limited by substantive due process; 14th Amendment
|-
| Smiley v. Citibank
| 
| Credit card late fees can be considered interest and thus not subject to regulation by states other than those of bank's location when charged by national banks.
|-
| Romer v. Evans
| 
| equal protection limitation on forbidding elimination of discrimination on the basis of homosexuality
|-
| Jaffee v. Redmond
| 
| federal evidentiary privilege for medical confidentiality
|-
| Gasperini v. Center For Humanities, Inc.
| 
| 7th Amendment, modern interpretation of the Erie doctrine
|-
| United States v. Virginia
| 
| separate but equal gender discrimination
|-
| Ohio v. Robinette
| 
| informing motorists that a traffic stop has ended and the motorist is "free to go" is not required under the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Caterpillar, Inc. v. Lewis
| 
| diversity of citizenship must exist at the time of entry of judgment
|-
| M.L.B. v. S.L.J.
| 
| states must provide transcripts to poor litigants wishing to appeal adverse parental termination decisions
|-
| Old Chief v. United States
| 
| admitting evidence of prior convictions and the danger of "unfair prejudice" under Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
|-
| Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York
| 
| protesters at abortion clinics
|-
| Auer v. Robbins
| 
| FLSA and overtime pay of police officers
|-
| Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
| 
| patent law, doctrine of equivalents
|-
| Clinton v. Jones
| 
| Executive privilege and immunity
|-
| Agostini v. Felton
| 
| reexamination of Establishment Clause jurisprudence as it applies schools
|-
| Kansas v. Hendricks
| 
| procedures for involuntary indefinite civil commitment of dangerous persons
|-
| City of Boerne v. Flores
| 
| scope of Congressional enforcement power under § 5 of the 14th Amendment
|-
| Washington v. Glucksberg
| 
| constitutionality of state law forbidding assisted suicide
|-
| Vacco v. Quill
| 
| right to die and assisted suicide
|-
| Raines v. Byrd
| 
| line item veto, legal standing; redirects to Clinton v. City of New York
|-
| Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana v. United States
| 
| background checks before purchasing handguns
|-
| Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
| 
| free speech, obscenity, CDA
|-
| State Oil Co. v. Khan
| 
| rule of reason applied to vertical maximum price fixing, overturned Albrecht v. Herald Co.
|-
| Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government
|  
| native rights over tribal lands
|-
| NCUA v. First National Bank & Trust
|  
| intent of Congress w.r.t. the Federal Credit Union Act of 1934
|-
| Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
|  
| pretrial procedures in multi-district litigation
|-
| Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services
| 
| applicability of 性骚扰 laws to same sex harassment
|-
| Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc.
| 
| application of first-sale doctrine of U.S. copyright law to reimported goods
|-
| Almendarez-Torres v. United States
| 
| prior convictions used to enhance a sentence need not be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
|-
| Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.
| 
|Seventh Amendment right to jury trial in a copyright infringement case
|-
| Breard v. Greene
| 
| criminal defendant could not raise a defense under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations on federal habeas corpus review
|-
| Miller v. Albright
| 
| citizenship of a child born outside the United States to a citizen father and an alien mother
|-
| Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
| 
| proper timing of a claim under Ford v. Wainwright, regarding competency to be executed, in federal habeas proceedings
|-
| Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
| 
| an Indian tribe is entitled to sovereign immunity to contract lawsuits, whether made on or off the reservation
|-
| County of Sacramento v. Lewis
| 
| liability of police under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for causing death during high-speed chases
|-
| Federal Election Commission v. Akins
| 
| standing conferred by statute
|-
| United States v. Bajakajian
| 
| excessive fines
|-
| Swidler & Berlin v. United States
| 
| death of an attorney's client does not terminate the attorney-client privilege
|-
| Clinton v. City of New York
| 
| constitutionality of the Line Item Veto
|-
| Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel
| 
| Substantive Due Process, Economic Liberties
|-
| National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
| 
| 1st amendment, government funding
|-
| Bragdon v. Abbott
| 
| application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to an asymptomatic HIV patient
|-
| Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild Inc.
| 
| union shop contracts
|-
| Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.
| 
| on-sale bar of United States patent law
|-
| Knowles v. Iowa
| 
| search subsequent to a traffic citation without consent
|-
| Department of Commerce et al. v. United States House of Representatives et al.
| 
| Census figures adjusted for undercount based on sampling may not be used for Congressional apportionment
|-
| Holloway v. United States
| 
| federal carjacking statute applies to carjacking crimes committed by defendants with the "conditional intent" of harming drivers who resist the highjacker.
|-
| Federal Republic of Germany v. United States
| 
| application of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations to death penalty cases
|-
| Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
| 
| non-scientists as expert witnesses in federal trials
|-
| Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
| 
| usufructuary rights of Native Americans on certain lands
|-
| Jones v. United States
| 
| subsections of federal carjacking statute define separate crimes subject to Sixth Amendment jury trial requirement
|-
| Wyoming v. Houghton
| 
| warrantless search of a passenger's container capable of holding the object of a search for which there is probable cause is not justified under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre
| 
| application of Chevron deference standard to Board of Immigration Appeals actions
|-
| Saenz v. Roe
| 
| welfare benefits to new state citizens and the right to travel
|-
| Hunt v. Cromartie
| 
| gerrymandering
|-
| Chicago v. Morales
| 
| loitering as gang activity
|-
| Olmstead v. L.C.
| 
| undue institutionalization of mental patients violates Americans With Disabilities Act
|-
| Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
| 
| sovereign immunity of the States
|-
| College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
| 
| sovereign immunity of the States
|-
| Alden v. Maine
| 
| sovereign immunity of the States
|}

2000年–2004年

{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;width:100%"
! style="background:#6699FF"|案件名
! style="background:#6699FF;width:15%"|引用
! style="background:#6699FF;width:50%"|简介
|-
| Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
| 
| Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment do not extend to the abrogation of state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment where the discrimination is rationally based on age
|-
| Illinois v. Wardlow
| 
| reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop
|-
| Reno v. Condon
| 
| upholding the Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 against a Tenth Amendment challenge
|-
| Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
| 
| standing, mootness, "voluntary cessation"
|-
| Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
| 
| campaign contributions to state political parties
|-
| Rice v. Cayetano
| 
| race-based voting restrictions for state government offices
|-
| FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
| 
| administrative agency power over an area heavily regulated by Congress
|-|-
| Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth
| 
| compulsory student fees to support political campus groups; 1st Amendment
|-
| Christensen v. Harris County
| 
| county's policy of requiring that employees schedule time off so that they do not accrue time off was not prohibited by the Fair Labor Standards Act
|-
| United States v. Morrison
| 
| limits of Congress's power under the commerce clause
|-
| United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group
| 
| scrambling of adult material on cable channels; 1st Amendment
|-
| United States v. Hubbell
| 
| criminal charges based on subpeonaed documents
|-
| Troxel v. Granville
| 
| fundamental rights of parents to raise their children, third-party visitation rights
|-
| Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
| 
| prayer in public schools
|-
| Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
| 
| federal preemption of state foreign trade regulation
|-
| Dickerson v. United States
| 
| legislative abrogation of Miranda right
|-
| Apprendi v. New Jersey
| 
| Juries must decide all elements of a crime beyond reasonable doubt 
|-
| California Democratic Party v. Jones
| 
| freedom of association and political primary elections
|-
| Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
| 
| right of free association, homosexuality
|-
| Stenberg v. Carhart
| 
| "late term" or "partial birth" abortions
|-
| City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
| 
| use of dogs at random traffic stops
|-
| Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers
| 
| public policy considerations do not require courts to refuse to enforce an arbitration award ordering an employer to reinstate an employee truck driver who twice tested positive for marijuana
|-
| Bush v. Gore
| 
| vote recounts in presidential election, the only court decision to determine the winner of a presidential election
|-
| Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass’n
| 
| expansion of state action to include "public entwinement"
|-
| Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
| 
| Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity and Equal Protection in a disability case
|-
| Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc.
| 
| determining the scope of the EPA's power to set air quality standards
|-
| Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
| 
| res judicata effect of federal judgments in state court
|-
| TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
| 
| trademark protection for patented designs
|-
| Ferguson v. City of Charleston
| 
| private hospitals that test pregnant women for drugs without their consent and then turn the results over to the police violate the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Egelhoff v. Egelhoff
| 
| preemption of state law by ERISA
|-
| Texas v. Cobb
| 
| Sixth Amendment right to counsel is "offense specific," it does not necessarily extend to offenses that are "factually related" to those that have actually been charged
|-
| Easley v. Cromartie
| 
| racial discrimination, gerrymandering
|-
| Alexander v. Sandoval
| 
| no private right of action for disparate impact under Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964
|-
| Atwater v. City of Lago Vista
| 
| constitutionality of arrests for fine-only misdemeanors|-
|-
| C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.
| 
| Tribal sovereign immunity, waiver by contract to arbitration
|-
| Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
| 
| The correct standard of review to use on appeals for excessive punitive damages
|-
| Rogers v. Tennessee
| 
| due process, "year and a day rule" in murder cases
|-
| United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative
| 
| necessity defense under the Controlled Substances Act for medical use of marijuana
|-
| Bartnicki v. Vopper
| 
| First Amendment and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act
|-
| PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
| 
| the Americans with Disabilities Act allows reasonable accommodations of handicaps in professional golf
|-
| Kyllo v. United States
| 
| defining 'search' under the 4th Amendment with respect to heat sensors
|-
| Good News Club v. Milford Central School
| 
| free speech, establishment clause
|-
| Saucier v. Katz
| 
| qualified immunity of a police officer to a civil rights case brought through a Bivens action
|-
| United States v. Mead Corp.
| 
| Court declines to extend Chevron doctrine to U.S. Customs Service decisions
|-
| Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr
| 
| The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, and their effect on habeas corpus petitions
|-
| New York Times Co. v. Tasini
| 
| copyright in databases
|-
| Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
| 
| Fifth Amendment takings clause
|-
| Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko
| 
| civil rights lawsuits against privately run prisons
|-
| Chickasaw Nation v. United States
| 
| Indian tribes are liable for Federal taxes on gambling revenue
|-
| United States v. Knights
| 
| warrantless searches of probationers
|-
| Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
| 
| meaning of the phrase "substantially impairs" under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
|-
| Kansas v. Crane
| 
| as-applied challenge to Kansas' involuntary indefinite civil commitment of dangerous persons, different result from Kansas v. Hendricks
|-
| Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo
| 
| peer grading does not violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
|-
| Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
| 
| First Amendment protection for simulated child pornography
|-
| Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
| 
| substantive due process, takings clause
|-
| City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books
| 
| zoning of adult bookstores
|-
| Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
| 
| prosecution history estoppel
|-
| McKune v. Lile
| 
| mandatory treatment for imprisoned sex offenders does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
|-
| Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton
| 
| door-to-door religious advocacy and the First Amendment
|-
| Gonzaga University v. Doe
| 
| Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act does not create a right which is enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
|-
| Atkins v. Virginia
| 
| imposing the death penalty on the mentally retarded; overruling Penry v. Lynaugh
|-
| Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran
| 
| no preemption of Illinois insurance statute under ERISA
|-
| Utah v. Evans
| 
| use of statistical sampling in the decennial census
|-
| Harris v. United States
| 
| Sixth Amendment does not require a jury determination of facts necessary to support the minimum punishment for using or carrying a firearm during or in relation to a drug crime or a crime of violence under 
|-
| Ring v. Arizona
| 
| Sixth Amendment requires that aggravating factors necessary for eligibility for a death sentence must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt; overruling Walton v. Arizona in part
|-
| Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
| 
| constitutionality of school voucher program
|-
| Hope v. Pelzer
| 
| use of the hitching post in prisons is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment
|-
| Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
| 
| election of state judges, freedom of speech
|-
| Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls
| 
| constitutionality of drug testing of high school students who participate in competitive interscholastic activities
|-
| Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania
| 
| the Double Jeopardy Clause does not forbid seeking the death penalty after an acquittal on first-degree murder charges
|-
| Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.
| 
| Social Security benefit assignment for coal industry workers
|-
| Eldred v. Ashcroft
| 
| extending the duration of the term of copyright under U.S. law
|-
| Scheidler v. National Organization for Women
| 
| applying RICO to activities of abortion clinic protesters
|-
| Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
| 
| claims of trademark dilution require proof of actual dilution
|-
| United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
| 
| the Federal government has a duty to maintain land held in trust for an Indian tribe
|-
| United States v. Navajo Nation
| 
| compensation for modification a lease of mining rights to land on an Indian reservation
|-
| Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
| 
| holding that Connecticut's sex offender registration statute did not violate due process clause
|-
| Ewing v. California
| 
| California's Three strikes law is not cruel and unusual punishment
|-
| Lockyer v. Andrade
| 
| California's Three strikes law is not cruel and unusual punishment
|-
| 史密斯诉多伊案
| 
| retroactive application of sex offender registration program is not an ex post facto law
|-
| 弗吉尼亚诉布莱克案
| 
| constitutionality of laws forbidding cross burning for purposes of intimidation
|-
| State Farm v. Campbell
| 
| due process limits on punitive damages
|-
| Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
| 
| Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 validly abrogated state sovereign immunity
|-
| Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
| 
| "reverse passing off" and rights to public domain works
|-
| Sell v. United States
| 
| Forced psychiatric medication by lower federal courts is permissible under some circumstances
|-
| United States v. American Library Association
| 
| Congressional requirement that libraries install web-filtering software held not to violate First Amendment
|-
| Gratz v. Bollinger
| 
| racial discrimination, affirmative action, equal protection
|-
| Grutter v. Bollinger
| 
| racial discrimination, affirmative action, equal protection
|-
| American Insurance Association v. Garamendi
| 
| California state insurance statute struck down for interfering with Presidential foreign policy
|-
| 威金斯诉史密斯案
| 
| ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing
|-
| 劳伦斯诉得克萨斯州案
| 
| 各州政府不得禁止成年人间相互同意进行的同性性行为
|-
| McConnell v. FEC
| 
| First Amendment; political speech
|-
| Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP
| 
| the Sherman Antitrust Act and requirements of telecommunications companies under the Telecommunications Act of 1996
|-
| Illinois v. Lidster
| 
| accident investigation checkpoints do not violate the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Fellers v. United States
| 
| once judicial proceedings have been initiated against a defendant, police officers cannot elicit information from the defendant without the defendant's counsel present
|-
| Doe v. Chao
| 
| governmental violation of privacy rights
|-
| 洛克诉戴维案
| 
| a religion clauses case upholding a Washington state scholarship program which excluded funding devotional studies.
|-
| 克劳福德诉华盛顿案
| 
| prior testimony exception to hearsay in criminal trials, Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses; abrogating Ohio v. Roberts
|-
| National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish
| 
| availability of death-scene images under the Freedom of Information Act over the objection of family members; investigation into the suicide of Vince Foster
|-
| United States v. Flores-Montano
| 
| reasonableness of removing a gas tank from a vehicle crossing the border under the Fourth Amendment
|-
| Vieth v. Jubelirer
| 
| justiciability of suit to enjoin gerrymandering
|-
| Tennessee v. Lane
| 
| Congress's power under the 14th amendment, section 5; Americans With Disabilities Act
|-
| 纳尔逊诉坎贝尔案l
| 
| challenging lethal injection protocols under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
|-
| Republic of Austria v. Altmann
| 
| retroactive application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
|-
| Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
| 
| an ambiguity in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
|-
| Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
| 
| Presidential foreign affairs and foreign trade actions
|-
| Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow
| 
| validity of “under God” in Pledge of Allegiance; standing to bring suit on another’s behalf
|-
| United States v. Dominguez Benitez
|  
| appellate review standard for violations of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governing the taking of guilty pleas
|-
| Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
| 
| constitutionality of state law requiring citizens to identify themselves to police
|-
| Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
| 
| ERISA's effect on federal jurisdiction of cases involving utilization review
|-
| Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
| 
| foreign tribunals
|-
| 布莱克利诉华盛顿案
| 
| jury must find all elements of a criminal sentence beyond a reasonable doubt
|-
| Schriro v. Summerlin
| 
| retroactively applying the rule set in Ring v. Arizona that a jury must find the aggravating factors in a capital murder case
|-
| Rumsfeld v. Padilla
| 
| detention of American citizens
|-
| 拉苏尔诉布什
| 
| jurisdiction over foreign nationals detained in Guantanamo Bay
|-
| Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
| 
| detention of American citizens
|-
| 密苏里诉塞伯特案
| 
| Missouri's practice of interrogating suspects without reading them a Miranda warning, then reading them the warning and asking them to repeat their confession is unconstitutional
|-
| Leocal v. Ashcroft
| 
| DUI is not a "crime of violence" requiring deportation of an alien
|-
| Koons Buick, Inc. v. Nigh
| 
| Truth in Lending Act imposes a $1000 limit on statutory damages for violations of the Act involving personal-property loans.
|-
| KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
| 
| fair use defense to a trademark infringement action does not require proof that there is no likelihood of confusing the marks
|}

2005年–2009年

{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;width:100%"
! style="background:#6699FF"|Case name
! style="background:#6699FF;width:15%"|Citation
! style="background:#6699FF;width:50%"|Summary
|-
| 美国诉布克案
| 
| applying Blakely v. Washington to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
|-
| 克拉克诉马丁内斯案
| 
| detention of aliens awaiting deportation
|-
| Illinois v. Caballes
| 
| 4th Amendment search and seizure
|-
| Commissioner v. Banks
| 
| Whether or not the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes.
|-
| Johnson v. California
| 
| proper standard for reviewing constitutional race-discrimination claim in sorting prison inmates
|-
| 罗珀诉西蒙斯案
| 
| imposing the death penalty on juvenile murderers; overruling Stanford v. Kentucky
|-
| Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt
| 
| a Federal contract with an Indian tribe is binding, even if Congress did not appropriate funds
|-
| 特尼特诉多伊案
| 
| enforceability of contracts between the government and spies (undercover CIA agents)
|-
| 谢泼德诉合众国案
| 
| proving prior convictions obtained through guilty pleas under Taylor v. United States
|-
| City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of N. Y.
| 
| the repurchase of tribal land by an Indian tribe does not restore tribal sovereignty to the land
|-
| Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
|  
| state court decisions and the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine
|-
| Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
| 
| standard for pleading loss causation in a securities fraud claim
|-
| Small v. United States
| 
| resolution of split appeals court decisions on inclusion of foreign courts in the term "any court"
|-
| Granholm v. Heald
| 
| interstate shipment of wine under the Dormant Commerce Clause 
|-
| Deck v. Missouri
| 
| shackling a defendant during the penalty phase of a capital murder trial
|-
| Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
| 
| legality of document destruction in the face of likely government investigation
|-
| Cutter v. Wilkinson
| 
| religious freedom for prison inmates
|-
| 托里诉科克伦案
| 
| defamation, enjoinment of speech; continuity of injunction after death
|-
| Gonzales v. Raich
| 
| legitimacy of using marijuana as a medicine, and power of the federal government to regulate intrastate activities
|-
| Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
| 
| applicability of the Americans with Disabilities Act to foreign-held companies
|-
| Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
| 
| applicability of patents in preclinical studies
|-
| 威尔金森诉奥斯汀案
| 
| due process requirements for placing prisoners in Supermax prisons
|-
| Miller-El v. Dretke
| 
| clarification of Batson v. Kentucky standard for peremptory challenges
|-
| Kelo v. City of New London
| 
| eminent domain; takings of private property for private development
|-
| Van Orden v. Perry
| 
| legality of a Ten Commandments display
|-
| Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales
| 
| liability of police departments under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failing to respond to domestic violence calls
|-
| McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky
| 
| constitutionality of a Ten Commandments display; potential reformulation of the Lemon test
|-
| MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
| 
| Copyright infringement in P2P file-sharing; re-examination of Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios
|-
| National Cable and Telecomm. Assn v. Brand X Internet Services
| 
| allowing small internet service providers to lease bandwidth from privately-owned coaxial cable lines
|-
|}

外部链接
Booknotes interview with David Savage on Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court, June 28, 1992.

美国最高法院案例列表