Datasets:
jimbozhang
commited on
Commit
•
ed16922
1
Parent(s):
1b06aad
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -12,14 +12,26 @@ size_categories:
|
|
12 |
---
|
13 |
# speechocean762: A non-native English corpus for pronunciation scoring task
|
14 |
|
15 |
-
##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
```bash
|
17 |
pip install datasets
|
18 |
pip install librosa
|
19 |
pip install soundfile
|
20 |
```
|
21 |
|
22 |
-
|
23 |
```python
|
24 |
>>> from datasets import load_dataset
|
25 |
|
@@ -44,69 +56,9 @@ pip install soundfile
|
|
44 |
'total': 9}
|
45 |
```
|
46 |
|
47 |
-
## Introduction
|
48 |
-
Pronunciation scoring is a crucial technology in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) systems. The pronunciation quality scores might be given at phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level for a typical pronunciation scoring task.
|
49 |
-
|
50 |
-
This corpus aims to provide a free public dataset for the pronunciation scoring task.
|
51 |
-
Key features:
|
52 |
-
* It is available for free download for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
|
53 |
-
* The speaker variety encompasses young children and adults.
|
54 |
-
* The manual annotations are in multiple aspects at sentence-level, word-level and phoneme-level.
|
55 |
-
|
56 |
-
This corpus consists of 5000 English sentences. All the speakers are non-native, and their mother tongue is Mandarin. Half of the speakers are Children, and the others are adults. The information of age and gender are provided.
|
57 |
-
|
58 |
-
Five experts made the scores. To avoid subjective bias, each expert scores independently under the same metric.
|
59 |
-
|
60 |
-
|
61 |
## The scoring metric
|
62 |
The experts score at three levels: phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level.
|
63 |
|
64 |
-
### Phoneme level
|
65 |
-
Score the pronunciation goodness of each phoneme within the words.
|
66 |
-
|
67 |
-
Score range: 0-2
|
68 |
-
* 2: pronunciation is correct
|
69 |
-
* 1: pronunciation is right but has a heavy accent
|
70 |
-
* 0: pronunciation is incorrect or missed
|
71 |
-
|
72 |
-
For the phones with an accuracy score lower than 0.5, an extra "mispronunciations" indicates which is the most likely phoneme that the current phone was actually pronounced.
|
73 |
-
An example:
|
74 |
-
|
75 |
-
```json
|
76 |
-
{
|
77 |
-
"text": "LISA",
|
78 |
-
"accuracy": 5,
|
79 |
-
"phones": ["L", "IY1", "S", "AH0"],
|
80 |
-
"phones-accuracy": [0.4, 2, 2, 1.2],
|
81 |
-
"mispronunciations": [
|
82 |
-
{
|
83 |
-
"canonical-phone": "L",
|
84 |
-
"index": 0,
|
85 |
-
"pronounced-phone": "D"
|
86 |
-
}
|
87 |
-
],
|
88 |
-
"stress": 10,
|
89 |
-
"total": 6
|
90 |
-
}
|
91 |
-
```
|
92 |
-
|
93 |
-
### Word level
|
94 |
-
Score the accuracy and stress of each word's pronunciation.
|
95 |
-
|
96 |
-
#### Accuracy
|
97 |
-
Score range: 0 - 10
|
98 |
-
* 10: The pronunciation of the word is perfect
|
99 |
-
* 7-9: Most phones in this word are pronounced correctly but have accents
|
100 |
-
* 4-6: Less than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced
|
101 |
-
* 2-3: More than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced. In another case, the word is mispronounced as some other word. For example, the student mispronounced the word "bag" as "bike"
|
102 |
-
* 1: The pronunciation is hard to distinguish
|
103 |
-
* 0: no voice
|
104 |
-
|
105 |
-
#### Stress
|
106 |
-
Score range: {5, 10}
|
107 |
-
* 10: The stress is correct, or this is a mono-syllable word
|
108 |
-
* 5: The stress is wrong
|
109 |
-
|
110 |
### Sentence level
|
111 |
Score the accuracy, fluency, completeness and prosodic at the sentence level.
|
112 |
|
@@ -137,68 +89,51 @@ Score range: 0 - 10
|
|
137 |
* 3-4: Unstable speech speed, speak too fast or too slow, without the sense of rhythm
|
138 |
* 0-2: Poor intonation and lots of stammering and pauses, unable to read a complete sentence
|
139 |
|
140 |
-
|
|
|
141 |
|
142 |
-
|
143 |
-
|
144 |
-
|
145 |
-
|
146 |
-
|
147 |
-
|
148 |
-
|
149 |
-
|
150 |
-
"fluency": [10.0, 9.0, 8.0, 8.0, 10.0],
|
151 |
-
"prosodic": [10.0, 9.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0],
|
152 |
-
"total": [7.6, 9.0, 7.9, 8.0, 9.1],
|
153 |
-
"words": [
|
154 |
-
{
|
155 |
-
"accuracy": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
156 |
-
"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
157 |
-
"total": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
158 |
-
"text": "WE",
|
159 |
-
"ref-phones": "W IY0",
|
160 |
-
"phones": ["W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0"]
|
161 |
-
},
|
162 |
-
{
|
163 |
-
"accuracy": [10.0, 8.0, 10.0, 10.0, 8.0],
|
164 |
-
"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
165 |
-
"total": [10.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.0, 8.4],
|
166 |
-
"text": "CALL",
|
167 |
-
"ref-phones": "K AO0 L",
|
168 |
-
"phones": ["K AO0 L", "K {AO0} L", "K AO0 L", "K AO0 L", "K AO0 {L}"],
|
169 |
-
},
|
170 |
-
{
|
171 |
-
"accuracy": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
172 |
-
"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
173 |
-
"total": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
174 |
-
"text": "IT",
|
175 |
-
"ref-phones": "IH0 T",
|
176 |
-
"phones": ["IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T"]
|
177 |
-
},
|
178 |
-
{
|
179 |
-
"accuracy": [3.0, 7.0, 10.0, 2.0, 6.0],
|
180 |
-
"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
|
181 |
-
"phones": ["B (EH0) (R)", "B {EH0} {R}", "B EH0 R", "B (EH0) (R)", "B EH0 [L] R"],
|
182 |
-
"total": [4.4, 7.6, 10.0, 3.6, 6.8],
|
183 |
-
"text": "BEAR",
|
184 |
-
"ref-phones": "B EH0 R"
|
185 |
-
}
|
186 |
-
],
|
187 |
-
},
|
188 |
-
...
|
189 |
-
}
|
190 |
-
```
|
191 |
|
192 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
194 |
-
|
195 |
-
|
196 |
-
* for score 0, use "()" symbol
|
197 |
-
* for the inserted phone, use the "[]" symbol
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
200 |
-
|
201 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
203 |
## Citation
|
204 |
Please cite our paper if you find this work useful:
|
|
|
12 |
---
|
13 |
# speechocean762: A non-native English corpus for pronunciation scoring task
|
14 |
|
15 |
+
## Introduction
|
16 |
+
Pronunciation scoring is a crucial technology in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) systems. The pronunciation quality scores might be given at phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level for a typical pronunciation scoring task.
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
This corpus aims to provide a free public dataset for the pronunciation scoring task.
|
19 |
+
Key features:
|
20 |
+
* It is available for free download for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
|
21 |
+
* The speaker variety encompasses young children and adults.
|
22 |
+
* The manual annotations are in multiple aspects at sentence-level, word-level and phoneme-level.
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
This corpus consists of 5000 English sentences. All the speakers are non-native, and their mother tongue is Mandarin. Half of the speakers are Children, and the others are adults. The information of age and gender are provided.
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
Five experts made the scores. To avoid subjective bias, each expert scores independently under the same metric.
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
## Uses
|
29 |
```bash
|
30 |
pip install datasets
|
31 |
pip install librosa
|
32 |
pip install soundfile
|
33 |
```
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
```python
|
36 |
>>> from datasets import load_dataset
|
37 |
|
|
|
56 |
'total': 9}
|
57 |
```
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
## The scoring metric
|
60 |
The experts score at three levels: phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level.
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
### Sentence level
|
63 |
Score the accuracy, fluency, completeness and prosodic at the sentence level.
|
64 |
|
|
|
89 |
* 3-4: Unstable speech speed, speak too fast or too slow, without the sense of rhythm
|
90 |
* 0-2: Poor intonation and lots of stammering and pauses, unable to read a complete sentence
|
91 |
|
92 |
+
### Word level
|
93 |
+
Score the accuracy and stress of each word's pronunciation.
|
94 |
|
95 |
+
#### Accuracy
|
96 |
+
Score range: 0 - 10
|
97 |
+
* 10: The pronunciation of the word is perfect
|
98 |
+
* 7-9: Most phones in this word are pronounced correctly but have accents
|
99 |
+
* 4-6: Less than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced
|
100 |
+
* 2-3: More than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced. In another case, the word is mispronounced as some other word. For example, the student mispronounced the word "bag" as "bike"
|
101 |
+
* 1: The pronunciation is hard to distinguish
|
102 |
+
* 0: no voice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
104 |
+
#### Stress
|
105 |
+
Score range: {5, 10}
|
106 |
+
* 10: The stress is correct, or this is a mono-syllable word
|
107 |
+
* 5: The stress is wrong
|
108 |
|
109 |
+
### Phoneme level
|
110 |
+
Score the pronunciation goodness of each phoneme within the words.
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
112 |
+
Score range: 0-2
|
113 |
+
* 2: pronunciation is correct
|
114 |
+
* 1: pronunciation is right but has a heavy accent
|
115 |
+
* 0: pronunciation is incorrect or missed
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
For the phones with an accuracy score lower than 0.5, an extra "mispronunciations" indicates which is the most likely phoneme that the current phone was actually pronounced.
|
118 |
+
An example:
|
119 |
|
120 |
+
```json
|
121 |
+
{
|
122 |
+
"text": "LISA",
|
123 |
+
"accuracy": 5,
|
124 |
+
"phones": ["L", "IY1", "S", "AH0"],
|
125 |
+
"phones-accuracy": [0.4, 2, 2, 1.2],
|
126 |
+
"mispronunciations": [
|
127 |
+
{
|
128 |
+
"canonical-phone": "L",
|
129 |
+
"index": 0,
|
130 |
+
"pronounced-phone": "D"
|
131 |
+
}
|
132 |
+
],
|
133 |
+
"stress": 10,
|
134 |
+
"total": 6
|
135 |
+
}
|
136 |
+
```
|
137 |
|
138 |
## Citation
|
139 |
Please cite our paper if you find this work useful:
|