michelecafagna26 commited on
Commit
2824c3b
1 Parent(s): c1bb42f

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -8
README.md CHANGED
@@ -244,19 +244,18 @@ There is no personal or sensitive information
244
 
245
  From the paper:
246
 
247
- >**Quantitying grammatical errors**
248
- We ask two expert annotators to correct grammatical errors in a sample of 9900 captions, 900 of which are shared between the two annotators.
249
  > The annotators are shown the image caption pairs and they are asked to edit the caption whenever they identify a grammatical error.
250
- The most common errors reported by the annotators are:
251
  >- Misuse of prepositions
252
  >- Wrong verb conjugation
253
  >- Pronoun omissions
254
 
255
- In order to quantify the extent to which the corrected captions differ from the original ones, we compute the Levenshtein distance (Levenshtein, 1966) between them.
256
- We observe that 22.5\% of the sample has been edited and only 5\% with a Levenshtein distance greater than 10. This suggests a reasonable
257
- level of grammatical quality overall, with no substantial grammatical problems. This can also be observed from the Levenshtein distance
258
- distribution reported in Figure 2. Moreover, the human evaluation is quite reliable as we observe a moderate inter-annotator agreement
259
- (alpha = 0.507, (Krippendorff, 2018) computed over the shared sample.
260
 
261
  ### Dataset Curators
262
 
 
244
 
245
  From the paper:
246
 
247
+ >**Quantitying grammatical errors:** We ask two expert annotators to correct grammatical errors in a sample of 9900 captions, 900 of which are shared between the two annotators.
 
248
  > The annotators are shown the image caption pairs and they are asked to edit the caption whenever they identify a grammatical error.
249
+ >The most common errors reported by the annotators are:
250
  >- Misuse of prepositions
251
  >- Wrong verb conjugation
252
  >- Pronoun omissions
253
 
254
+ >In order to quantify the extent to which the corrected captions differ from the original ones, we compute the Levenshtein distance (Levenshtein, 1966) between them.
255
+ >We observe that 22.5\% of the sample has been edited and only 5\% with a Levenshtein distance greater than 10. This suggests a reasonable
256
+ >level of grammatical quality overall, with no substantial grammatical problems. This can also be observed from the Levenshtein distance
257
+ >distribution reported in Figure 2. Moreover, the human evaluation is quite reliable as we observe a moderate inter-annotator agreement
258
+ >(alpha = 0.507, (Krippendorff, 2018) computed over the shared sample.
259
 
260
  ### Dataset Curators
261