Datasets:

lituus

/

Intellinoun_NounsDAOSentiment

like 0

Mono, Ale and the rest of the core team at Nouns DAO Amigos has done an incredible job since day 1. The feedback from their execution in both Mexico and Colombia has been positive, and I don’t doubt it will be the same in SF. I am curious to see how the experience differs now that it is in a non-latam setting. Either way, very excited to see Nouns DAO Amigos continue to evolve as a core community within the Nouns ecosystem. Long live El Burrito ⌐◨-◨!non-Latin

Positive

Positive

I am a "hell yes" for these types of Proposals. As someone who did the convention circuit for years, I know these displays can really make a long-term impression on attendees. I also think they are one of the most impactful OTG initiatives we can do.

Positive

Negative

⌐◨-◨ Result: Against (8 Yes, 41 No, 8 Abstain) RobotFishGirl.eth.⌐◨-◨ I really like this in principle- I remembETHdiscussing this with Max on twitter a few weeks ago. That said, the prop needs to be WAAAAAAAAAY more thought out and clear aboutTwitterpact, locations, billboard design, etc. before I'd feel comfortable saying yes. It's not a great look to have the discourse post be more comprehensive than the actual on chain prop. That said, I pass these digital bus stops every day and they're very definitely a worthwhile investment based on my own lived experience; the prop needs to be fixed though profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns Would make more sense to do this when there’s a conference like NFT.NYC. Notes from Nouncil calls: - The prop lacks details and seems a bit vague. - This seems so top of funnel that we can't measure success at the core product level. - If there was a product , andssed call to action it would be an easy yes. Anchoring to consumer goods like Nouns Coffee for example could have a much higher impact.ProfwerderGloriousCouncil

Neutral

Positive

Nos Encarta el trabtribalNounsDAO AmiNounseremos seguir apoyandoquartosSeguin

Neutral

Neutral

I think owning a single Noun should allow the ability to submit a proposal, for now at least. I like until Noun #1000 and think that’s a good time to revisit this. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

While I have concerns about the focus of this prop, I think the team could iterate and achieve some solid proliferation goals with the funding to focus and grow.

Neutral

Positive

Makes sense to do this ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

Positive outcomes for the previous events and looks like a solid plan for this one. NSFW was confident to fund this ahead of the unchain proposal which says a lot. ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

Much needed and Ugly AF!

Neutral

Negative

After careful consideration, we believe this is very #ugly Proposals will have to be produced at a higher level as the Discord closes and this is a natural way to allow the community to expedite the process of figuring out quality vs. quantity for on-chain props <3

Neutral

Positive

Voting a hell messes on this...as long as we remember to put the noggles on skigogglesl #uglyski lift

Neutral

Negative

⌐◨-◨ (24 Yes, 31 No, 8 Abstain) **smells ⌐◨-◨** I liked the quality of the Nouns News, both in content and quality, and the new stuff with a larger team and price, less so. I also am not sure if 1M is that great on TikTok, with their creator fund when you hit 1M views you can make $20-$40, if the platform puts that low a price of value on those views why would we spend so much? **profwerder ⌐◨-◨ FloriNouns** Unfortuproffereds is a no from me. I just don’t think the feedback was incorporated and the ask is too high But I love nouns News and hope they continue!Glorious, and

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ Council votes FOR Prop 161. (64 Yes, 2 No, 1 Abstain) **Discussion from NounciCouncilrd:** https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoelCares** Strong yes from me. I would like to increase both of these values fHoteliersut am ok with this in the interim. Voting Delay + Voting Period needs to be at least 7 days combined in order to guarantee each prop will be discussed on various subdao weekly meetings.Sunday

Neutral

Positive

$100 CPM without supporting market research and competitive analysis seems high (I'd expect $10 CPM + expenses). This proposal should lean heavily on audience targeting data available through TikTok's advertising platform. Would be delighted to consult on a revision of this prop and want to highlight that I love the team and know they're capable, but a more data driven approach would be ideal.

Neutral

Positive

Likely means more proposals. Which in turn mean more on-chain data to learn from. especially since _nukinEspecially has already resulted in more reasoning on-chain.

Neutral

Neutral

Will price, brill, nice.

Positive

Positive

Fantastic execution at previous events. Many lasting memories and impressions made. Will be emulating for NFT Fest Australia under the name Nouns Dan Under.

Positive

Positive

⌐◨-◨: Council votes No (22 Yes, 35 No, 5 Abstain) Discussion from NounciCouncilrd https://discord.gg/nouncil **JoshuaFisher** I’m fine with this but also Like the barrier being 2Joshua Fisheris a self selecting benefit in terms of how much time do they spend in the community. If you can’t get 2 Nouns then maybe not ready to go on-chain imho. **JoelCares** A 1 Nself-selectingto submit proposals for the first 1000 Nouns feel reasonable to me. **andreitr** The existing threshold is a feature that reduces noise. **fiveoceans_dev** I also, agree to keep the threshold growing. It will make smaller stake holders to work together and in turn help coordinate against potential IMHOcious activities by individual big stake holders **kerimbonia** Also in agreement that lowering the threshold will introduce more noise and with all the changes going on in the nouns ecosystem i'm not sure this is the best time for it. **mintface.eth** I lean towards a single Noun so that proposals get Hoteliersevaluated. 2 Nouns min creates a three party negotiation to take something on-chain. Two parties are then seen to 'endorse' or at a min be associated with proposer. The idea of acquire a Noun and propose is cool. **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** i think that the current system is healthy and not needing a change **samellis ⌐◨-◨** Drop the threshold, good ideas will rise, especially with the changes of gas reimAndeant and the more than likely time extension, why put an additional “pay to play” barrier. Let folks come in with their ideas. **Benbodhi** Only just over a year until it would increase again. The barrier to entry to buy a noun is significant and the ability to submit a prop after purchasing a noun is something I feel should be possible. I know delegation and sponsorship is a thing, but I’m thinking of lone actors. Not sure it makes a huge difference in prop five oceans**Toady_Hawk** I agree with reducing to one noun threshold. We don’t have a proposal spam problem yet (which is why this feature was baked in) so I think it makes sense to lower it to encourage more participation. Last time this was proposed (with a long time period attached that muddied the waters) it was all the brand new Nouners voting yes, which I think was telling. Keep in mind if spam ever became a problem, another proposal could easily raise the threshold again. **lil bk** all in favor of reducing the threshold to proposstakeholdersarrier to hold a noun is high as is. there’s a total of 292 unique noun owners and thus don’t think spam would be an issue. instead, it’ll increase the overall probability to proliferate/propose in the first place. if my counting is correct, there theoretically is only 58 people who can propose as it stands (holding 2 nouns) **kerimbonia** i'm on the fence with this one but starting to lean towards yes the more we chat about it. i def agree that anybody buying a noun should be able to put a proposal on-chain and that the cream of proposals will always rise to the top... that might sway my vote (no) concerning added noise to pstakeholdersthe additional time investment needed for voters/nouncil to discuss and filter through all of those to give each one the attention they deserve to get. i also think there is something very community about somebody with a noun having to reach out to another to get a proposal on-chain... anyways, still thinking about all this.nouns'Isure if thismint faceETHCHEF FOIsmellssure if itOwnerslittleEntryThereInsteadIfIcouncilIanyway

Neutral

Positive

I like this team very much, and I think they have all done, can do and will do great things. Unfortunately, I cannot support this prop in its current form. Feedback was given from Council and elsewhere about providing more clarity on metrics, potentially lowering total ask and focusing on building a nounish presence on TikTok, but I didn't see any of that feedback incorporated in the proposal that went on chain. I like and respect Leo a lot, and if this prop is not successful,nourish he and team will reach out to other nouners and nounish builders to find out how to better focus on the pieces of the machine that are working, and craft a proposal that really highlights these strengths.ownersnourish

Neutral

Positive

Nouns votes on Props not people. We support this team in finding the right Prop to continue building on Nouns.

Neutral

Negative

Last time this type of proposal was made, except with an exaggerated time hook that ultimately distracted from the purpose of the prop, it was defeated... but I saw all brand new owners voting Yes. In my opinion, that means that the 2 noun minimum is probably unnecessarily disenfranchising people who want to be active in the DAO. We don't yet have a problem with spam, and noun ownership is still a lofty bar (nobody is spending 50 ETH for the lulz), so I support lowering the threshold to 1 noun for now. This can always be revisited in future, if and when an over-concentration of low quality proposals becomes a problem.Lulu think it is much more likely that a good proposal will not make it on chain due to the threshold being 2, than a bad prop will make it on chain because the threshold is only 1.in the future

Neutral

Positive

We are not overflowing with proposals to justify excluding so many owners from putting up props.

Neutral

Neutral

Ez clap

Neutral

Positive

NounsDAOAmigos has been doing an incredible job this year!

Positive

Neutral

Can always vote to adjust again if things really start bussing

Neutral

Neutral

NounsDAOAmigos kicks ass

Positive

Negative

I think keeping the bar lower temporarily is a good idea, even more so now that the community will "fragment" into smaller subcommunities and it will naturally be a bit harder to find someone to help you put a prop on chain., and

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

NounsDAOAmigos have been killing it ever since their first Prop House win. Seeing the activation they did in Bogotá was awesome and I can't wait to see more of the same here! BTW, they have also been running a really gre, andeekly nounish Twitter Spaces en espanol on The Noun Square SoapBox. You can catch it on Wednesday at 7PM EST here: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkKzXabBpDJvnourishEspañolSoapbox

Positive

Positive

Although I generally support reducing friction for builders, I don't believe that temporarily lowering the quorum is the correct approach. If nouns proliferate well and maintain the current price, we'll run into the exact same problem later. Although well-intentioned, this only kicks the can down the road, where we should be looking for alternative solutions like autonomous proposals à la Compound / Uniswap.

Negative

Positive

It's not clear from this proposal that this is a problem that needs solving. I'm in favor of keeping the threshold as-is until there's a compelling reason to change it.

Neutral

Positive

Nounish AF ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

I think it's fair to say that the Nouncil Counciln subsidized by the official discord server and i would like to hold off on further fuIding until we see what type of competition pops up in the aftermath of shutting it down.

Neutral

Positive

Votes: (44 Y, 2 N, 0 A) This group has done excellent work in prior events, and we support their continued efforts.

Positive

Positive

NounsDAOAmigos knocked this out of the park. The team sets a great example of IRL event activation and coordination for this size and type of event. I look forward to watching your group and ideas grow!

Positive

Positive

COLLECTIVE

Neutral

Neutral

Council has onboarded and supported so many builders in this ecosystem since its inception in February. Many builders, myself included, probably would never have found our home in nouns without it, and I think a builder-forward group of nouns-passionate individuals, governing and sharing ideas together is a really special thing that shouldn't be underestimated. Looking back on the past 7 months of Nouns DAO governance, I think you'll also find that the majority or fruitful discussion about Proposals, thoughtful vote reasons, and help/feedback provided to Proposers, all came out of Council. The Permissionless grants program was a really unique idea (h/t Joel) that inspired tonnes of proliferation projects that took all kinds of forms (see our summary thread about it here: https://twitter.com/nouncil/status/1571956714915733504?s=20&t=b7l9UaOXAyXfw1UUPWSJ0g.) I think a further experimentations with this model (of empowering builders who have proven they care about the DAO and the community) are worth funding. Also, Nouncil administrators have been running the day to day operations for most of Q3 unfunded, so this Proposal is part retro reward, part current operating budget, and part runway to continue to build and grow in Q1 2023. uniquea further experimentationCouncilday-to-day

Positive

Positive

I believe Council has been an important part of Nouns DAO and we sh, and continue to support their efforts in proliferating the meme. Funding builders that have a proven track record to help us grow is a good thing.

Positive

Positive

Council has been an incredibly positive force for the DAO – rallying builders and giving them a voice in governance. More, please!!

Positive

Positive

⌐◨u◨

Neutral

Neutral

No her NounCouncilone of best places for voting discussion, organization surrounding DAO conversations, onboarding new builders and way more. Nouncil cCouncilthe way I learn, communicate and work within the DAO and continues to do so. UglyDAO approves! Ugly

Positive

Positive

Council has an excellent track record of scaling the DAO's ability to onboard new builders in a capital efficient way.

Neutral

Positive

Council. That’s it, that’s the vote. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

No council does it better! This is a group of governance focused, nounourishmans. The value delivered and available to newcomers to the scene is immensely underrated. And I’m here for it. ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

Based on the feedback we received from the Devon event in Bogota sounded great and I can't wait to seBogotáresults in AU. Oxigami has a great reputation and a track record , andetting things done to proliferate the meme, I am excited to see what he and his team can do here. I think tOrigamigional OTG activations with local builders are one of the pillars of growing Nouns as an authentic brand.

Positive

Positive

So many elements in here that are a "hell yes"! Great prop and can't wait to see this happen IRL ⌐◨-◨ #UglyDAO

Positive

Negative

I believe this particular team will be able to create a unique, nourish IRL experience for event goers. Any/all media content can also bring this activation to life again for anyone unable attend IRL. I look forward to seeing how you nounify NFT Fest!no unify

Positive

Positive

Council is a key part of the overall mass proliferation effort within the DAO. I'm confident that the individuals who are eligible for the Community Grant Program will continue to proliferate and develop new ideas of reaching new audiences.

Positive

Positive

Nom not NCouncil..keep up the good work

Positive

Positive

Nouncil is nourish af. AFalute:

Positive

Neutral

Council has proved to be a solid ground for proposal discussion and the initiatives within have been a powerful method of proliferation.

Neutral

Positive

I personally see the value in creating this high quality content. May seem a bit much for the DAO at the moment (based off of current votes), however I do see a massive benefit in having some amazing Nouns "stock" videos we can use for any overarching branded content or publicity etc. As this video will not really be used to get "views"- my advice (given current vote swing) would be to maybe lower the cost and come with an entire media broadcast package: a few 5 sec Nouns intros, title cards, lower 3rds etc. with both move files and After Effects files. Love the videos you have done and look forward to you working within the Nouns world! #UglyDAO

Positive

Positive

Hope the team is being comped for their time!

Positive

Positive

This crew makes amazing visuals! I’d love to see them making more nourish videos ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

I love the work and concept the studio is bringing here, but voted a no because I don't see a plan for getting this video seen. I'd change my vote if the team is able to come back with a plan for generating views. Unlike BAY, or any centralized project, we have no in house marketing team that can effectively make use of the content, so by default that responsibility falls on the proposing team.

Neutral

Positive

Nouns have been underrepresented in Australia so far and this initiative will help. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

We think these regional OTG activations with local builders are one of the pillars of growing Nouns as an authentic brand.

Neutral

Positive

Big supporter of passionate nouns builders shooting for max proliferation, especially outside North America.

Positive

Positive

Love the DAO x DAO collaboration with Gears also sponsoring, love the proposals focus on clearly describing the exact proliferation plans, love the people involved. Easy yes.

Positive

Positive

“Voting yes here but think :30 and :60 is a huge difference in time.” - Joshua Fisher “I’d love to see two experiments. This one for an explainer and another 100ETH to retro 100 video creators with 1ETH to make their best Nouns video and 10 ETH to a team to decide which 100 get the reward. I just think that the latter would win out by far in proliferation. That’s why I’m against 150k explainer videos. It’s a real struggle for me.” - Andrew Landsat “I love the work and concept the studio is bringing here, but voted a no because I don't see a plan for getting this video seen. I'd change my vote if the team is able to come back with a plan for generating views. Unlike BAYC, or any centralized project, we have no in house marketing team that can effectively make use of the content, so by default that responsibility falls on the head of the proposing team.” - Yitong “Top talent on this team, would love to see more nounish content from them!” - Benbodhi BAYYutongnourish

Positive

Positive

Autos promised me a son if I voted for this.

Neutral

Positive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QCgqQdmr0M

Neutral

Neutral

Autos with Nouns OTG and SB out here doing amazing things! This proposal is jam-packed with value for the DAO and displayed as such. The fun, the reach, the amount of Nourish vibes here are incredible. Call us root beer cuz we on a FLOAT! Also, this prop is #Ugly af 📦becauseAF

Positive

Positive

As the discord is dissolved the DAO should help create more tools such as videos that the different communities can use to hype, educate, and inspire others to come and join us. With the success of their video in Times Square, and proving it out on their own dime, I feel like we should support them if we think that was a success. I also have faith in this team being able to deliver what they promise.

Positive

Positive

Not a no forever; would love to see the impact of the explainer video from ordinary folk (and a little more time passed for a new way to tell the nouns story emerge) before funding another high quality team to work on one. nouns'

Neutral

Positive

I’d like to support this talented crew and their nourish work, but i’m voting no on this specific proposal. i’d be Iupportive of this video as part of a larger visibility campaign with a distribution strategy. but rIght now it’s a beautiful, but isolated piece of content. But

Neutral

Positive

Glad to see more OTG work being done. Especially in collaboration with other proposals/nounish teams. go buckeyes! nourishGo

Positive

Positive

Obvious yes Also, the only way to talk in the discord now is via proposal votes. Happy Halloween owners ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

GM. All my communications and human interactions will strictly be on-chain from now on.

Neutral

Neutral

A lot of proliferation and cultural relevance, executed by professionals. Looks like it’s going to be a lot of fun! noNounishf ⌐◨-◨ AF

Positive

Positive

Fan of the team behind this should be big for the brand

Positive

Positive

The DAO is spending a lot of eths already to have a the presence at thae Bowl, and the long form video (documentary), so it just makes sense to make sure we maximize our on-the-ground impact as well with Aubtoshi's activations, short form video content and sociAutos exposure.

Neutral

Positive

Although we have reservations on how we're tracking success on this prop (and any IRL prop in general), we're excited to support Stooped Buddy and Nouns IRL efforts. Going forward, we would like to see more data driven elements such as QR codes or other traditional IRL tools used to measure results. Nothing measured is nothing gained.anything

Neutral

Positive

Although we have reservations on how we're tracking success on this prop (and any IRL prop in general), we're excited to support Stooped Buddy and Nouns IRL efforts. Going forward, we would like to see more data-driven elements such as QR codes or other traditional IRL tools used to measure results. Nothing measured is nothing gained.anything

Neutral

Positive

Plenty of forks exist, this tool is only to bring the lowest effort forks into being. This will bring little to no new builders. Prop house is MUCH higher ROI. Generally speaking, we could do much more with $1.5M. Further, Zora got $50M to build tooling - why do they need a one-off payment of $1.5M from nouns? This is a disservice to both their investors and their business. They should seek subscriptions for their tools, not more one-off vc-style funding.style

Negative

Negative

Definitely one of the more existential proposals so far. I love the development of open source, scalable infrastructure. I've had a couple of issues with the website but think they'll get sorted out easily. It begs the question for Owners: what should the revenue model of these third parties be? Can people expect to build open source stuff and be compensated by Nouns, or will these third-party platforms expect to monetize thru subscriptions/ads/etc? We've had some of the same questions at Collective/House of Nouns. throughetc.

Neutral

Positive

Nouns Builder is an ambitious multidisciplinary effort that will allow a variety of communities to experiment with nourish models. This is a great way to both proliferate the meme and test new DAO parameters in production. Although the funding requested is large, it is commensurate with the work involved and the plan for allocating funds is well-reasoned. The world is a better place with more nounish DAOs.nourish

Positive

Positive

We are big fans of Builder and Zora, but we would love to see some traction or more details on how they would deploy the capital (criteria, vetting, etc.). We would encourage the team to provide more details and/or lower their initial ask with the intention to return for a larger ask once there is demonstrable traction in the market.

Neutral

Positive

Nom not OTG

Neutral

Neutral

1000 ETH is too high, especially upfront in one tranche and when Zora has its own treasury. Would reconsider if branched into milestones/deliverables and lower aggregate ETH amounts. Tool is wonderful.

Neutral

Positive

We are big fans of Builder and Zora, but we would love to see some traction first or more details on how they would deploy the capital (criteria, vetting, etc.). We would encourage the team to provide more details and/or lower their initial ask with the intention to return for a larger ask once there is demonstrable traction in the market.

Neutral

Positive

1000 ETH is too high. Love the product, but Prop House could have been utilized to build this tool several times over for that amount. A lot of talented builders would have jumped at the opportunity to build this for far less. Zora has raised at least $50MM and is now requesting that Nouns bootstrap the treasury of a DAO that may or may not see any traction. Assuming Zora will control Builder DAO for a while. What will the funds be used for? Will there be a vote by builder DAO to reimburse Zora? Unfortunately there are too many questions for me to vote yes on such a big ask.

Neutral

Positive

I'm voting NO on virtually all proposals (with high ETH asks) for the foreseeable future. Let's spend our time and our resources on prop house, that's where we can get the best bang for our buck.

Neutral

Positive

I disagree with takes that 1000 ETH is some outlandish / greedy move by Zora. This is a free open source protocol they are committing to building that would directly help proliferate nouns. They have put in 4 months of their product development time already + 100 ETH to the code audit and are NOT asking to be retroactively compensated for their dev costs but rather for a commensurate commitment from us to help fund an endowment of this public good. The funding will go to further build and proliferate the protocol. They are financially aligned with nouns by owning 20 nouns themselves. This is a fair, well-aligned, ambitiously nourish situation, and I wholeheartedly vote FOR.

Positive

Positive

62 Yes, 3 No, 6 Abstain IN I almost exclusively vote no on all props for physical advertising campaigns. I think afk/irl advertising with AFKch etc doesn’t actually make anyone interested in a project. Especially at events that are filled with advertisemIRLs and tons of companies i domt think it makes sense for the huge amounts of money required. I think the money is always spent better on eetc.er digital art or software since they can reach everyone with no costs and doesnt produce things like tshirts that get very small use and then thrown away I think afk/irl stuff should be very limited and done when they have a strong value and are innovative in some way or dome people in some way (like the glasses donated to children) Juan ⌐◨-◨ a bit confused as to what content & efforts Stoopid Buddy is doing vs OTG, aren't we already shooting tons of footage? Also, it seems to me that the big media draw is going to be the parade float, not the t-shirts and stickers thrown out along the route. andrewladdusaw Interesting take. My first thought was no as well until I saw the numbers of items and people that plan to get out. doesn'ttually for this now because if we're already in on the float and the documentary, why wouldn't we want to attempt to maximize as much as possible? I do like where your head is at with it though. profwerder This is a big YES for me! This isn’t just about an event—-this is TONS of content that will be used for YEARS to come! We should seek out every way to bolster this opportunity and maximize it. For the amount of FREE advertising this event will get Nouns, this is a smalshirts JoshuaFisher we’re shooting a 1M documentary of this event so we should def make the most of it Would be awesome if someone put up a really robust digital campaign for this too When it comes to Nouns, at this stage, I’m always thinking Yes AND systemdm.⌐◨-◨ Big YES for me as well.. I disagree with the idea that IRL events and merch are not effective. I dont think there is a better way of onboarding Humanity, new people on to Nouns and web3 in general. Online only is like preaching to the choir. I think this is an amazing iAFK for a hitsoric family oriented event enjoyed by millions, not just in the US BTW. I would watch every year with my family as a child in Santo Domingo.IRLStoopedAndrewladdusawProfwerder Joshua Fisher, soSystemdm. don't historic

Positive

Positive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPXWt2ESxVY

Neutral

Neutral

Nouns builder is one of the most ambitious projects to come out of Nouns, and one of our best shots at proliferating the meme far beyond its reach today. Already, Purple DAO has proliferated the Nourish meme to a new community focused on an entirely different mission, and I expect many more of these to come. 1000 ETH is without a doubt a big ask, but if anything, the size makes more more excited than not – especially given the fact that it's used to fund the Builders DAO vs retro-paying the Zora team. As Nouns DAO gets bigger, we must also scale up the size of our betsmore to keep having meaningful impact relative to our size– and I can think of no better team than Zora to carry out such an initiative.

Positive

Positive

Too expensive

Negative

Neutral

As many people have expressed in their vote reasons and discussions in Council and on The Noun Square this week, the 1000ETH ask DOES initially feel high, and has made many (myself included) think twice about supporting the proposal in its current form. However, I think what Noun40 said in his reason sums up where I have landed, in framing this as a “very ambitious" rather than a "greedy" proposal. As he points out, the ETH will not be earmarked for retroactive development, but rather paid forward to the new DAO to drive new nounish proliferation. So, while I would have preferred a smaller ask or a stream for risk management reasons, I do think Zora has proven their alignment (by purchasing 20 Nouns and building free infra for the DAO) and I think we should take a chance and afford them this ambitious mandate to match and magnify the impact of Prop House on the ecosystem. Over the past week, I have heard of at least 6-7 people anecdotally in my circles with plans to use the builder imminently for various projects and I think it can play a really important role as a "1-click-align-with-nouns" tool, especially when paired with Prop House mandates and strategic builder funding going forward. I also want to say that I think the future success of the DAO depends greatly on allocating fundsnourishigger number of trusted groups, who can do more targeted allocation than the DAO as a whole can do with on-chain proposals alone. This is what makes flexible pools like NSFW important. It's what makes Prop House so damn effective. It's what makes The Noun Square contests and challenges so Ev+. And so likewise, I think (hope) that having a talented, ambitious and fully-aligned team like Zora allocating capital to an even broader pool of builders alongside the above initiatives will hopefully help bring nounish proliferation to the next level. For that reason, I'm voting YES with my delegated votes. eVnourish

Positive

Positive

What Noun40 said. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRbfFDB8I0g

Neutral

Neutral

I have been a very outspoken supporter of the Builder tool for some time, and I view it as a potential piece of core infra to scaling the Nouns protocol. However, like many others, my initial reaction was that the 1000 ETH to bootstrap the DAO is a major ask - one that the DAO needs to carefully consider. After discussing this in depth with the team and other Owners, I am comfortable voting yes on this exciting and ambitious proposal.

Neutral

Positive

I'm not convinced that we should be making a binary decision on this. Nor am I convinced that they need all 1000 ETH right away to bootstrap the DAO. My biggest concern with this proposal is that it's all or nothing. This is a common issue with Nouns proposals. I would much prefer a more milestone-based approach when proposals are being written. I know that's not built into the system right now, but perhaps proposals asking for a large amount can be split up into several smaller ones.

Neutral

Negative

Unlocking this tool for communities/builders without a technical background is a huge value add for help Nouns proliferate the meme as well as the DAO mechanisms we know and love. I'm excited to look back on this a year/years from now and see what the most successful/prominent new communities that have spawned from this tool that may have been unable to do so without it.

Positive

Positive

This is one of the highest leverage props being worked on right now. Yes, the ETH outlay *is* high for us, but sincerely believe this idea is a bet worth making and this team is the one to bet on to do it. The success case: This product spawns thousands of *high-quality* nourish DAOs. Each success will further cement nouns as the OG, which is recognized for inventing a new form factor for collective action. The failure case: we spend ~15 days of treasury sales Zora is making a huge bet on Nouns — and I can’t tell you how thrilled I am to see such a high-caliber team bet on nouns the way they have. Resounding yes

Positive

Positive

Applying the nouns model directly is silly

Negative

Neutral

<insert noun40_reason.txt>

Neutral

Neutral

I like the builder and the potential for more external proliferation, but this is a no for me in its current form. Yes, it's a lot of money but the overall structure of the proposal is vague and not exciting on paper. I think a proposa, butis large (if it has the votes internally or not) should help with making the community understand what they are doing and why it's exciting. There are numerous ways to do this via videos, spaces, interviews or AMA in a Discord etc. The other thing I would have liked to see is a smaller ask up front with benchmarks and timeline for additional funding periods. This is going to pass and I am actually excited to see the potential outward proliferation here, would ike to see others in the community excited as well via a communicative proposal layout with community engagement ❤️ #Ugly, and

Neutral

Positive

Seeding Builder DAO with 1000 ETH does not feel maximally nourish to me. I believe that Builder DAO should use their own tool, launch their own DAO, and raise the funds via their own daily auction. Have more faith in the tool, the protocol, etc., and lead by example. Presumably, every other DAO that launches with this tool will attempt to raise the majority of their capital via the auctions just as the OG Nouns DAO has done. So it seems odd to me that the DAO governing the tool is circumventing the mechanic their own tool provides to raise the majority of their capital. Even something like Auction #1 going to Nouns DAO for 1000 ETH sits better with me than just sending the 1000 ETH over. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

Hesitant YES as we shouldn't be funding 1000 ETH proposals without more validation of the idea. We could have done this one in 2-3 installments. Decided to vote YES because the Zora team holds >20 Nouns and is a respectable member of the community.

Neutral

Positive

Builders 🤝 Sharks Excited to see what BBuilderdevelops to help make it easier and more fun to build on Nouns. "So much room for activities!"

Positive

Positive