Datasets:

lituus

/

Intellinoun_NounsDAOSentiment

like 0

Personally didn’t take the time to research shark 🦈 and formulate an opinion.

Neutral

Neutral

Nom not nouns ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

⌐◨-◨ I think pods like this will become an important proliferation tool to enable a wider community. If not now, I’m sure it will become a reality in the future.

Neutral

Positive

With all due love and respect for Shared and their heritage in the Nouniverse — feel that the vision No universebs overlaps with the ambitions of LilNouns, but without a reasonable strategy in place fSharksustainability. Echo’ing 22’s sentiment from Discourse conversation, a lot of these initiatives feel redundant and more aLionstely and organically funded individually through Nouns existing funding channels (prop, grants, onchain), rather than a lump sum funding formation of a new studio development with scope yet to beINGolly defined.unchain

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ Shared have been great contributors to the Nouns ecosystem and NouncCouncillorsgnise this with a unanimous vote FOR this proposal. We hope to recognizeenabled to make more impact through this initiative.

Positive

Positive

Would support halving the proposal threshold again, with 1 year runway rather than 26

Neutral

Positive

I feel strongly about supporting this. Seems like the 26 year time period is throwing people26-yeart can be changed via another proposal but I see this as a default safeguard against Itntralizing power into the hands of only those who own or are delegated many nouns. right now there shouldn't be any diffe, bute in power (besides # of votes) between those with 1 noun and those with many nouns. anyone with a noun should be able to submit a proposal to the DAO. And we can sume (at this point) anyone putting up the capital to buy a noun will come with a thoughtful proposal. If one nouners are required to find someone else to co-sign a proposal then there's not much difference between having a noun and not having a noRight If we wanted to change the threshold at a later date it would require thoughtful consideration and discussion, rather than continuing to kick the can down the road and lowering the threshold every few months.Anyoneputsowners

Neutral

Positive

Bc every nouner should be able to put up a prop.

Neutral

Neutral

Noun 401 mixed at random with 999 exact forgeries. 🔓. gGentle🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔓. maple 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ 🔒. _____ https://forMaples.wtf

Neutral

Positive

The road to Xanadu is the road less traveled

Neutral

Neutral

⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

Easy, ready, willin’, overtime Where does it stop? Where do you dare me To draw the line? You've got the body Now you want my soul Don't even think about it Say, “No go”

Neutral

Positive

Don't have an opinion here

Neutral

Neutral

I think we should make a threshold an opt-in and not an opt-out. We are having a system which makes noun holders unequal and creates a class. Those who can propose and those who can't.

Neutral

Negative

Nom not Xanadu ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

What Toady said

Neutral

Neutral

Incredible high-effort proposal, can't wait to see the outcome.

Positive

Neutral

I'm fully in favor of lowering the threshold but feel this proposal is too drastic. I'd prefer to revisit the topic in another year or so to re-evaluate. i'd vote for an alternate proposal requiring 0.1% of the noun supply to make proposIls (i.e. 1 noun required until noun 1000)

Neutral

Positive

When I look at the votes FOR on this proposal, I see a lot of new Owners, who undoubtedly feel disenfranchised by the recent 100% jump in Nouns required for proposal submission. I think the "26 years" piece muddied the waters on this proposal unnecessarily, but ultimately the threshold could be raised at any point in the future and I feel like "solving" this problem later, when the problem actually exists, makes more sense to me than the inverse. If this proposal should fail, hopefully an alternative for a shorter period of time will be more palatable to the DAO.

Neutral

Negative

Council was impressed by the effort and detail that went into this proposal. Many also expressed excitement around the repository of assets that will be made available as part of the deal. It was mentioned that during his appearance on Noun O' Clock at The Noun Square, Blu and his partner seemed genuinely passionate about Nouns and excited to work on this project in collaboration. Some raised questions about whether the production costs might be high, but ultimately most Councillors felt it will be worth the investment, both for the exposure that could come from the production itself and from the assets that will be created for free future use.

Positive

Positive

Council voted to put this proposal on chain on behalf of Brennan (who delegates his tokens to Nouncil.) During discussions on the weekly call wiCouncilproposer, Nouncillors liked the idea of having a conference to shape to Nouns' vision over time, and the idea of proliferating the Noggles mCouncillorsy to people interested in web 3 seemed like a worthy pursuit. Ultimately, Nouncil voted 29-2-12 in favor of this proposal. GogglesCouncil

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ While it seems somewhat "corporately" slapping a sponsorship on events, I still think it's a target crowd that benefits the DAO to have the ⌐◨-◨ imprinted in their minds.

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ I love that this proposal has grown through the ranks of prop house and is becoming something bigger. We like making kids happy. That’s nourish af.AF

Positive

Positive

⌐◨-◨ I like this concept and think it’s not a huge ask to get nouns in front of a lot of people. Additionally, it seems like they could/might purchase nouns as part of the prize pool. A single noun purchase is good ROI from a monetary standpoint. That with the addition of how many more eyes will see nouns, makes it a positive feeling for me. I’d like to see longer term nouns integration with the show and more games as well. ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

⌐◨-◨ Sonic branding is huge and is something I feel will add immense value to the DAO. This will allow creators of many mediums and networks to create and use sounds made with the CC0 assets that will create a nourish vibe when you hear them. The consistency across media will surely provide a recognisable sound profile that will benefit the ecosystem. I already know of a lot of media and creators that will be able to leverage this out of the gate. ⌐◨-◨recognizable

Positive

Positive

There is a huge need for a repository of cc0 music to be used in Nourish media (as someone who hosts a lot of live spaces and helps to produce a lot of nounish media, I can personally attest to this.) Additionally, asnourishsays in the Prop, there is currently no defined sound space for Nouns, and it is something that is badly needed— If nouns is building a decentralized brand, so far we’ve forgotten to hire the sound engineer. Music tends to get ignored sometimes in this space, relative to other kinds of art, and it’s a shame. Woody is a Grammy-winning producer and imho Nouns is lucky to have someone as talented and passionate as him who is interested sometimes ignored platform like this for our community. Also, the video proposal was novel and really well produced. Woody and Papaya (dev) have executed on every single project I’ve seen them work on in the toadz and nouns communities and I am confident this project will be no different. **airhorn**IMHO toad, andair horn

Positive

Positive

Let me Herrera the all the ⌐◨-◨ soundssssss

Neutral

Neutral

Sharks love the kids!

Positive

Positive

Somewhat reluctantly voting For. Despite the goggles, this is essentially 'charity for charity's sake' which I'm not that excited to fund. MuchoLove states that they aim to develop a moMudholeis replicable internationally, and Id like to see more of that before I vote to fund them again. For now, they get a pass because they are authentic and are doing fundamentally good things.I'd

Neutral

Positive

"We need to not only extend but also multiply this action," said Councillor Klim in Nouncil Votes Chat, and clearly Nouncil agreed, Voting unSlimously FOR with 54 votes. Necfas and co, keep on proliferating nouns Councilblic goods in the DR (and hopefully beyond!)CouncilNecks

Positive

Positive

Have had the great pleasure of seeing Necks come first through Lil Nouns PropHouse, then Nouns Launchpad, and nProp Housein, bringing nounish public goods to children in need in the DR. LFG!nourishLEG

Positive

Positive

During the weekly council call, it felt like most were initially against the proposal. Through discussions, the point was made that the ask is fairly small by on-chain prop standards, and the potential reach could be outsized considering the parties involved, and for that reason a fair number of nouncillors changecouncillorses to yes. It was nonetheless still a contentious vote, with only 21 YES, 12 NO and a whopping 17 undecided Abstentions. Because we calculate our Nouncil quorum including Abstentions, we are voting FOR this prop and we hope it will bring thousands of new eyeballs to nouns. NoesCouncil, and

Neutral

Positive

Sounds Nourish ⌐◨-◨ 🎶

Positive

Neutral

NOT BUSSING FR FFR

Negative

Neutral

"Big giant yes." "Awesome video." "Nouns garage band!" "Love loveeeee this project and idea!!!" "This is great on so moverseels, presentation is spoot on and the concept is excellent" Nothing but positivity about this proposal can be found anywhere in Nouncilsportnels. Woody has been a fixture in nouncil and in nouns for the past 7+ months has brought so much joy with his musical and production skills (Nouncil theme song, Woody's Soundboard, etc.) A soundscape / sonic aesthetic is important for Councilnd and nobody had tried to do one for nouns yet, so it feels like a no-brainer to give the Grammy-nominated noun-pilled a producer to blow our minds. Nouncil voted 55-0-0 unanimously in support of this proposal and this builder. councilCouncilCouncil

Positive

Positive

Directions Melt butter in a medium saucepan over medium-high heat. Cook, gently swirling pan constantly, until particles begin to turn golden brown and butter smells nutty, about 5 minutes. Remove from heat and continue swirling the pan until the butter is a rich brown, about 15 seconds longer. Transfer to a medium bowl, whisk in ice cube, transfer to refrigerator, and allow cooling completely, about 20 minutes, whisking occasionally. (Alternatively, whisk over an ice bath to hasten the process.) Whisking an ice cube into melted browned butter in order to cool it before adding to chocolate chip cookie dough. Meanwhile, whisk together flour, baking soda, and salt in a large bowl. Place granulated sugar, eggs, and vanilla extract in the bowl of a stand mixer fitted with the whisk attachment. Whisk on medium-high speed until mixture is pale brownish-yellow and falls off the whisk in thick ribbons when lifted, about 5 minutes. Close-up photograph showing ribbon stage of egg, and sugar mixture beaten in a stand mixer with the whisk attachment. Fit paddle attachment onto mixer. When brown butter mixture has cooled (it should be just starting to turn opaque again and firm around the edges), add brown sugar and cooled brown butter to egg mixture in stand mixer. Mix on medium speed to combine, about 15 seconds. Add flour mixture and mix on low speed until just barely combined, with some dry flour still remaining, about 15 seconds. Add chocolate and mix on low speed until dough comes together, about 15 seconds longer. Transfer to an airtight container and refrigerate dough at least overnight and up to 3 days. Chocolate chip cookie dough in a metal bowl going into the fridge to rest overnight before baking. When ready to bake, adjust oven racks to upper- and lower-middle positions and preheat oven to 325°F (160°C). Using a 1-ounce ice cream scoop or a spoon, place scoops of cookie dough onto a nonstick or parchment-lined baking sheet. Each ball should measure approximately 3 tablespoons in volume, and you should be able to fit 6 to 8 balls on each sheet. Tear each ball in half to reveal a rougher surface, then stick them back together with the rough sides facing outward. 325 °Ffer to oven and bake until golden brown around edges but still soft, 13 to 16 minutes, rotating pans back to front and top to bottom halfway through baking. Splitting a ball of chocolate chip cookie dough in half before baking to create a craggy top. Remove baking sheets from oven. While cookies are still hot, sprinkle very lightly with coarse salt and gently press salt down to embed. Let cool for 2 minutes, then transfer cookies to a wire rack to cool completely. Repeat steps 4 and 5 for remaining cookie dough. Allow cookies to cool completely before storing in an airtight container, plastic bag, or cookie jar at room temperature for up to 5 days.160 °C

Neutral

Positive

If nouns is sponsoring, it should be Season 2 with Nouns. If we are the focus of the game, we should be the focus of the marketing as well.

Neutral

Positive

The waterproof MC, you ain't wettin' me You need to stop rappin' and start robbin' banks like Steady B 'Cause see, no matter how much green you make You'll never taste the avocado, just another broke Versace model Tiger Woods ain't even up to par in the game of survival That's why I'm in you all Cristal bottles Drink Listerine, brush my teeth with amphetamine So I can sound fresh and say dope things in between Three strikes to five mics (forever snortin') I want a woman with the body of a and a personality like Lauryn Can't even say I didn't know 'Cause while we wanna be N.W.A. tCrystalate the N.W.O How many years (fo' mo'), so them fake John Gotti's Ain't got no Maseratis, I be at the party sippin' hot toddies My bumps in Arabic, out Audis in Saudi I'm thuggish ruggish to the bone And I'm gonna diss everybody, and I'm gonna diss everybody You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Lexus moonroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Lexus moonroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice I keep the afterwant to swervin', not quite like Michael Irvin Edumacating urban youth, like it or not These soliloquies explain our people's lack of stability You keepin' it real, but ain't got a clue what reality really be See the diameter of your knowledge is the circumference of your activity Me, I knew the deal before Babyface went solo, baggin' dime pieces Stackin' dividends and dressin' in more linen than Yoko Ono But on the low doe, we fightin' over the scraps Worshippin' the almighty dollar, "In God We Trust, " look it over Now what pyramids got to do with the pilgrims or Jehovah? Novus Ordo Seclorum means New forrld Order That's why I keep my friends close and my enemies closer We runnin' around in thousand dollar clown suits Better get some boots when Lucifer turn your city to Beirut You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Lexus moonroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Lexus moonroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice Avoid one-time, got Lela Rochon callin' my Jimmy sunshine Fifth floor of the Mondrian, so go 'head, fella, pop your Dom I'm the man whose esophagus transform to a gat like MeGottan Here's a sport unknown to Bob Costas, give it a name and you a hater But violence don't play that game, man Guerilla penmanship, the, preacher impeacher Heat seeker MC when I get pissed like a urethra My day-to-day, I'm tryna bubble, first place This paper I chase, "Touch Me and Tease Me" like Case But in the millennium, this C.R.E.A.M. turns electronic UPC barcodes on the hand is demonic They got concentration camps, from Alaska to Jersey But when the President declare a national emergency He payin' car notes tryna Rock the Vote I'm spittin' razor-sharp quotes tryin' to slit a throat You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Maserati'snroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice You want the truth, can't handle the truth You want Lexus moonroof, Hennessy 80 proof Scared to death, playin' the game of life Soul on ice Uh, uh, yeah I'm rhymin', beats provided by Diamond amAudi'srubbishgoing todissesgoing todissesmoon roofmoon roofafter-partyEducatingSeeBaby facewe're fightin'" NousOreoDecorumWe're runnin'a thousandmoon roofmoon roofCochinDOMatMegatonCostsyou aretrying toHe's payin'trying tomoon roofmoon roof

Neutral

Negative

I’ll roll with a Grammy nominated producers any day !

Positive

Neutral

Post merge, who this?

Neutral

Neutral

Although the idea of the game show seems fun, I just don’t see a fit for nouns.
 We won’t have a dedicated video ready in time, leaving us with nothing more than a game with goggles floating in space. So people won’t get an idea about nouns in any case. I don’t see nouns promoting our nounish-ness as a commercialised video add where the only thing we do is promoting a prize pool we have nothing to do with. It does not fit us. If we want to reach an audiencloutishnessdds I would suggest making a full page in the NYT or some other newspaper/magazine.commercialized

Neutral

Positive

Have had to look far and wide for good cc0 audio. The gamification integrating with nouns is super cool. Win:win

Positive

Positive

We like the woody

Positive

Positive

🏌️‍♂️

Neutral

Neutral

Strongly support more experimentation with Prop House, especially for larger amounts of ETH.

Positive

Positive

⌐◨-◨ Prop House has been an amazing platform, and I’m all about further experimentation in this direction. ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

Ph maxi

Neutral

Neutral

Ain't none of y'all you allthis but you could l, but a lesson for the first 6 bars of this song. fr fr https://www.youtube.com/watchfor=NWwbr-1tAVA&ab_channel=PushaTVEVOfor

Neutral

Neutral

⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of Slim’s toys and noggles. Seems like he’gogglesposition to create really high quality pieces that are amazing conversation starters. I get the feeling that they will have mass appeal beyond the nouns bubble too, which is good for proliferation into other cultures. These could be an iconic stable physical that will be enjoyed by all ages for a long time to come. Love to see it ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

A long distance directory assistance, area code 212 And say, hey, A&R, this is Mister Rhythm and Blues You said, "Hello" and put me on hold To say the least, the cat was cold He said, "Don't call us, child, we'll call you" ARE YOU FEELING ME GREMP? CAN YOU SMELL WHAT THE HONK IS DIDDLIN?GREPDIDDLING

Neutral

Neutral

I'm a simple delegate: I see Prop House, I vote YES.

Positive

Positive

Prop House continues to inspire and innovate! Love this!

Positive

Positive

"I’ve been waiting for this." "I have faith in Slim!" "Good luck, Klim. love the enthusiasm and hard work. overall, getting a lot of vibe rooting for this.... toysSlim cool, nounish toys--even cooler! ^ Some of the feedback from tLoveouncil Votes Chat. Nouncil voted almost unanimously to support Klim's proposal and put it on chaOverall then 48-1-2 in favor of a YES vote here. We believe in Klim's vision and his value as a Nouncillor and a builder, and we can't wait to see these toys in prnourishn. ⌐◨-◨SomeCouncilCouncilSlimSlimCouncillor

Positive

Positive

1) I respect Slim. I think he's a passionate, committed builder who has given a lot of time and effort to nouns. I want to see him continue to invest his time and energy here. 2) I don't collect figurines of any kind, but would probably still buy a few of these as a nounish novelnourishlso trust David Horvath when he says there could be a much broader potential market for them. 3) I appreciate the efforts Klim has made to iterate and modify the original designs to something with more appeal, and I think the final designs are pretty cute. 4) I like the fact that the proposaFormatoken down into Milestones. 5) ⌐◨-◨Slim

1) Positive 2) Neutral 3) Positive 4) Positive 5) Neutral

Positive

Without Prop House, Council would be, like, 5 builders, instead of 100 strong. Nouncil <3 Prop HousCouncil

Positive

Positive

The concept of mix and match Noun figures is innovative, and we are thankful for the iterations on the initial prototype. However, we continue to find these toys aesthetically difficult and do not think they are a good mass-market first impression for Nouns. We don't agree with using them as promotions or giveaways, don't agree with any digital tie-in (POAP, NFT/PFP, AR, metaverse wearable, etc), don't agrePOPth additional marketing or forced engagement after purchase. We hope there is an opportunity to work on future versions of the mix and match concept, but unless we think the toys are awesome, we cannot justify or endorse manufacturing 10,000 units.etc.

Neutral

Positive

Open to voting yes for a future version of this proposal. A willingness to reduce/modify the scope has been expressed, but I think its bad practice to approve proposals that explicitly state goals that will not be completed. A secondary reason for the no vote is to give those who have aesthetic feedback an opportunity to share it.

Neutral

Positive

Not for me

Negative

Neutral

Nom not toys

Neutral

Neutral

On one hand, I worry that we don't have a distribution plan for this many toys, and therefore question the impact. On the other hand, Slim has demonstrated a lot of tenacity as a builder and the ask is reasonable enough that it's worth taking a bet to see what happens, especially since many members of the DAO have already given this feedback around distribution, so it'll top of mind as he executes.

Neutral

Positive

Love working with gears on this. It'll be a great way to proliferate nouns to a completely new set of minds. And do a lot of good on the way.

Positive

Positive

Extremely nourish.

Neutral

Neutral

Slim, I first want to say thank you for your hard work and passion. The Sunglasses are wonderful and have added a tremendous amount of visuals to NounsOTG. That said, it is my personal opinion that this Prop is pNouns OTG. It would be more prudent to refocus on FUNglasses and achieve the agreed upon and funded delivery of goods. It is important that the DAO requires fulfillment, especially of physical products. Specifically, this Prop 141 has yet to be fluSunglassesadvice was not fully considered and frustrations seem to be taking control of the conversation. These are red flags, and for that reason I am voting no.

Neutral

Positive

This seems like a worthy activity but for scalability reasons, I believe the DAO should encourage proposals below 20 ETH to seek funding via Prop House

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ I’m a big fan of what the Brazil crew are doing and this opportunity to educate kids in the country that has the 2nd most active NFT users in the world makes a lot of sense. This prop covers so much for the price and involves skating heavyweight Bob Burnout. Plus it’s a DAO to DAO proposal, initially run as a community vote using snapshot and then submitted onchain on behalf of the community. ⌐◨-◨unchain

Positive

Positive

LFG Brazil

Neutral

Neutral

I am working towards better mechanisms for smaller proposals in the future but until then I would prefer to see this pass

Neutral

Positive

Skateparks = discord servers

Neutral

Negative

I wish parts of this prop were better, but ultimately pros outweigh cons.

Neutral

Positive

Its important that we continue to take shots with trusted community members

Neutral

Positive

Creating this type of shareable content is a great tool to help with proliferation, however, we need to remember that they are a help. We need to support these types of projects not just with our votes but actions by sharing and helping distribute their videos across our socials.

Neutral

Positive

With these 2 things combined this seems like a great way to create sharable content. "Nouns artwork by Brazilian artists will be painted at the Skate Cooley Institute, where classes are taught by Bob Burnquist." + "We will bring a film crew and later deliver a clip registering the workshops and painting action."Burnout

Neutral

Positive

Willprice is such a goober voting against this because it's a small ask

Neutral

Neutral

GOLD THE PEOPLE WANT MORE HONK MEDIA GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT THE MOST ELECTRIFYING SPONGE IN NOUNS DAO HISTORY

Neutral

Positive

Support this experiment, but only plan to support renewal if this generates meaningful impressions/views, even though I expect content to be high quality regardless.

Neutral

Positive

I'm excited to fund ambitious proposals from proven builders. Look forward to the impact that a full video production studio would bring!

Positive

Positive

Council has voted almost unanimously FOR this proposal. The ask is low for high impact with a few aspects including educating kids about the DAO and onboarding them to crypto in general in a country where NFT usage is 2nd highest in the world. The DAO to DAO proposal pipeline is also a fascinating approach to funding things that extension communities support but can't necessarily fund directly and have the ability to submit an on chain proposal at Nouns DAO.

Neutral

Positive

LEG

Neutral

Neutral

Gnars backing = nourish

Neutral

Neutral

This team is insanely good at what they do and Nouns DAO will benefit immensely from Gold making his studio and team into a full time Nounish machine. The quality of everything I’ve seen come from Nounish is so good andNourisheally digestible content for people that may not be familiar with Nouns or the space at all. The perfect proliferation media toolkit. I’m excited to see all the productions that will comNourishuition! ⌐◨-◨ Nounish AF ⌐◨-◨ , andNourish

Positive

Positive

Nounish = nourish

Neutral

Neutral

Couldn't be more excited about this prop. Gold and team are the perfect crew to tell the Nounish tale. Nourish

Positive

Positive

Such a clear yes. Very excited for this.

Positive

Positive

Supportive of empowering Gears to do more

Positive

Positive

Extremely nourish.

Neutral

Neutral

Nom not nnourish..Sha Sharkske the videos!

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ reading ⌐◨-◨ Yep, looks nourish.

Neutral

Positive

Gold and 142 are so good at what they do. As 4156 has said, the @nounish videos they have made already have helped to close so many key partnerships and ventures that they have already been worth their weight in ETH. I am excited to see the long form and short form content that they will be able to produce with this kind of runway and mandate. LEG, @nounish!

Positive

Positive

This is the only process we currently have available to buy Nouns for the treasury, and sometimes we need extra Nouns in the treasury.

Neutral

Positive

Council Results: Yes: 64% No: 8% Abstain: 28% "This will allow one click for any subDAO as wSundayo we'll instantly have a multitude of other nounish bots giving Twitter updates on auctions and other activities. That's the main benefnourishme. I think it's going to be a proliferation monster for the price." - andrewladdusaw "they also have a good record making these bots" - fiveoceans_devfive oceans

Positive

Positive

> This doesn't have to mean that every year we necessarily reward the community for contributions to any other noundry upgrades this way (if we set expectatiofoundryrds ahead of time especially, it should be much cleaner next time), but this past year it was an all-in group effort where a lot of value was created by many of the artists who ultimately didn't make it into the final collection. If we’re retroactively rewarding the winners and committee (without rules ahead of time) it feels fair and honest to also share some of that with the a wider set of contributors to the process. The downside feels limited, and curious to see how these funds get shared around. Hopefully with vethemited GIVES per coordinape participants, this is going to reward the top contributors as judged by the community. ⌐◨-◨coordinate

Neutral

Positive

Andre has been supporting Nourish extensions with sales bots for 10+ months and is a reliable, skilled builder. I look forward to seeing what he can do here.

Positive

Positive

I'd like to see a comp structure less impacted by the number of traits chosen (= not 45 ETH going to a single person)

Neutral

Positive

Council Results: Yes: 94% No: 0% Abstain: 6% Bring Nouns to the people ⌐◨-◨ 🙏

Positive

Positive

Generally excited to generous fund endeavors that have brought meaningful value to the DAO. Retro funding FTW

Positive

Positive

This will be helpful for many nouns extensions and will surely be a factor in proliferation across Twitter with more automated tweets. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

Although I'm very excited to fund builders on the expectation of (or based on the history of) great impact, I'm generally more weary of funding effort as an end goal in itself.

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

Abstaining because I do not understand enough about the historical context of the NAC to make an informed decision here.

Neutral

Neutral

yes

Positive

Positive