reason
stringlengths
1
24.1k
classification_a
stringclasses
5 values
classification_b
stringclasses
3 values
intensity_a
float64
-0.97
1
intensity_b
float64
-1
1
classification_match
bool
2 classes
intensity_diff
float64
-1.71
1.46
A vote of confidence in beautyandthepunk.eth Eth
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.5106
true
0.2894
βŒβ—¨-β—¨ Killing it as always, GG βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Positive
Negative
0.8
-0.4939
false
1.2939
Talented builders LFG
Neutral
Positive
0.5
0.5106
false
-0.0106
Awesome team, important vertical, no-brainer.
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.7096
true
0.0904
The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. We summarized Proposal 119 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here: https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/991651702841278496/1002022902331351091 Thank you to Sasquatch for coming on the show to explain the Proposal in detail. Our audience have voted FOR this initiative! We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multiset for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth Builders: If you want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!ETH
Positive
Positive
0
0.8593
true
-0.8593
1) B is awesome. 2) International proliferation is probably the single greatest opportunity for Nouns IMO. 3) B and team did a really great job at Art Basel on a tight budget and I'm sure they will get the DAO plenty of bang-for-buck in Brazil as well. , and
1) Positive 2) Neutral 3) Positive
Positive
0.7
0.9633
false
-0.2633
The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. We summarized Proposal 118 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here:https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/991651702841278496/1002022388969513030 Our audience have voted FOR this initiative! We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multisig for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth Builders: If you want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!MultisetETH
Positive
Positive
0
0.791
true
-0.791
As I said on Council call, this feels like a case of "this is my startup, please seed fund", but I don't really see the benefit to the DAO compared to other types of proposals. I do think wellness is important, but "wellness apps" is also a crowded vertical. Maybe a smaller proposal for a Youtube/TiktoYouTubes concentrating on wellness and using Nounish art (or even a less complicated app) could be a good alternative to this Proposal. TikTokNourish
Neutral
Positive
0
0.9761
false
-0.9761
Council has voted almost unanimously (50-1-1) in favor of this initiative. A comment from the discussion thread: "At broad level, am I leaning in to props in emerging economies... because grants go further there, and opportunity is larger due to sheer population density." -Mintfaced On the Nouncil call, Nouncillors expressed an affinity for and trust in B, and general excitement to see how much Mint facedtion this pod can achieve in Brazil. CouncilCouncillors
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.9169
true
-0.4169
Sasquatch made me abstain.
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Grateful for all the support towards the esports initiative thus far and excited to continue building βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.7964
true
0.0036
https://www.giantbomb.co…_super_super.jpg
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Don't have enough conviction adding nouns to a random app us a good idea.
Neutral
Positive
0
0.4404
false
-0.4404
Love the results so far and think this is a logical next step love sas's background and passion SAS
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.9081
true
-0.1081
Unfortunately there was a bit of contention among council members. While wellness is a good focus that is seemingly nounish, this prop feels to some like it is not nonourishnough and the previous experience mentioned is not in the current app market.nourish, and
Neutral
Positive
0
0.7096
false
-0.7096
βŒβ—¨-β—¨ Council likes the Esports pod! Continued proliferation in an impactfully up the good work. gg βŒβ—¨-β—¨ Gg
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.8016
true
-0.3016
nope
Negative
Neutral
0
0
false
0
Sharks 🀝 B
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
01100001010001110011100101110101011000010111100101000010011011010110010001010111010011100111001001100001010101110011010101101110010010010100011101010010011100000101101001000111010100100111001101100101010100010011110100111101
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Remember when Ronnie died, and you said you wished it was me? (Hehe) Well, guess what? IHe-hedeadβ€”dead to you as can be!
Negative
Negative
-0.9
-0.4857
true
-0.4143
I used to cut up they buddy, now they sayin' they love they're sayin'tell they friends I was ugly and wouldn't touch me Then I shfriend in that dubbed-out buggy And then they got fuzzy and they don't remember that And I don't remember you, and
Neutral
Positive
-0.2
0.4404
false
-0.6404
The first round for Nouns Mandates was a success, and we saw many quality proposals and ideas from it. Let’s run it back!
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.6114
true
0.1886
I tried to write a limerick about this but had a hard time, so I'm just going to link a youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tyzx6-nXCMw&ab_cYouTubeCinemaofMovies
Neutral
Negative
0
-0.1531
false
0.1531
100% Shared Approved nom nnomrts
Neutral
Positive
0
0.4215
false
-0.4215
β›³πŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈ
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
We are all unwell, and we know it (idk how we fix IDKs with an app tho)
Neutral
Neutral
-0.5
0
true
-0.5
Joked is seriously badass
Positive
Negative
0.8
-0.3182
false
1.1182
No 🧠
Neutral
Negative
0
-0.296
false
0.296
https://i.imgur.com/fdaOhFC.png
Neutral
Neutral
0.5
0
true
0.5
Appreciate the sentiment here, but 200e for a wellness app seems like an overreach
Neutral
Positive
-0.3
0.8381
false
-1.1381
Appreciate the creativity Sam has injected into the space and look forward to what he and/or Jason do next
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.6486
true
0.1514
Can we find even more effective ways to provide care?
Neutral
Positive
0
0.7645
false
-0.7645
β›³πŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈ
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
This is a vote of confidence in Sam Ellis, who is here building in Nouns every day (Blocks, Council, Auction Tracker, Story Bible, The Noun Square and more.) At this point it does look like this Proposal will fail, but I just want to encourage Sam to iterate and come back with something on a smaller scale and with broader support, so he can knock it out of the park and then go on to create the next Archer or Adventure Time (but make it Nounish.) Nourish
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.9403
true
-0.4403
Dynamic Quorum was not met.
Neutral
Positive
-0.5
0.3818
false
-0.8818
booooooolishhhhhhhhhhh
Negative
Neutral
-0.9
0
false
-0.9
https://i.imgur.com/8TGqk2P.jpg
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Prop House Mandates are the future of focused funding allocation in my opinion.
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.3818
true
0.1182
We like experiments
Positive
Positive
0.6
0.3612
true
0.2388
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Council has voted 41-0-3 in favor of this proposal. Sam spoke on our weekly call and gave an outline of his team's project. He argued that top tier animation talent will not leave secure employment for a short term gig, so if the DAO wants something truly amazing to be produced here, a sufficiently scaled project is required to attract them. We know Sam to be a consistent builder in the space and a talented illustrator and so even though this Proposal ask is quite large, overall we support his efforts to try and make something really special here that could truly raise the profile of the Nouns brand tremendously if executed properly. If this Proposal fails, we hope Sam and team will find another way to iterate, reframe, and try again.
Positive
Positive
0.7273
0.9723
true
-0.245
The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. We summarized Proposal 122 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here: https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/991651702841278496/1003869024783958016 By a narrow margin, our audience has voted AGAINST this initiative! We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multiset for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth Builders: If you want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!ETH
Neutral
Positive
0
0.791
false
-0.791
A reluctant Yes. I hope we don't have to fund similar props in the future. I also hope the dao can better guide prop bdayders to avoid similar scenarios going fwd.
Neutral
Positive
-0.2
0.802
false
-1.002
πŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈ
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
We like βŒβ—¨-β—¨ art! Congrats to all the talented people who had art selected for this round πŸ™Œ πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›
Positive
Positive
0.9
0.8588
true
0.0412
βŒβ—¨-β—¨ The success of the client front end round was immense IMO. Love this idea and look forward to seeing what this amazing swarm of talented nounish builders can achieve. πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€nourishπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›
Positive
Positive
0.9
0.9493
true
-0.0493
⌐❽-❽
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Incredibly proud to have one of Shared's founders and core members, Goldy, not only be a part of theGoldction team but also contribute such a comfy Noun to the collection. Congrats to all who are here, experimenting, learning and building NounsDAO together. Cheers to another great year.Nouns
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.9558
true
-0.1558
Love everything about it, very nourish collab with a respected artist done in an elegant way elegantly
Positive
Positive
0.9
0.886
true
0.014
With 51 yes votes, 18 thumbs up, 2 wows, 38 vibes, 6 mandating, and 373 corn reacts, Nouncil has boldy declared its support for this contrCouncill proposal. We like Nouns, we like art, we like the number 8, we like birthdays, bodyes, hangers, grease. Can't go wrong on this one. βŒβ—¨-β—¨ πŸ™
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.9549
true
-0.4549
John Humorous βŒβ—¨-β—¨ started following me on Twitter so I, sost vote for this proposal.
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Street art is nourish
Neutral
Neutral
0.5
0
true
0.5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWXWivwhi14&ab_channel=ReginaSpektor
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
gm
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Nourish AF βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. Coral Orca summarized Proposal 126 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here: https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/991651702841278496/1006738821691490406 Our audience has voted FOR this initiative, 31-0! We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multiset for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth Builders: If you want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!ETH
Positive
Positive
0
0.791
true
-0.791
Nothing about this is nourish to me.
Negative
Neutral
-0.7
0
false
-0.7
Not very nourish and we have just funded a more premium clothing line in the past few weeks
Neutral
Neutral
-0.2
0
true
-0.2
Feels like minimum nourish proliferation happening here
Neutral
Positive
-0.2
0.3612
false
-0.5612
Doesn't feel nourish still waiting on madhappy mad happyrs that are similar to deliver
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ“Β°β“’ We vibe at The Noun Square βŒβ—¨-β—¨ πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈπŸ€πŸ–€β€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’›β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπŸ’› πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›πŸ’›
Positive
Neutral
0.9
0
false
0.9
Love the concept. Seems like an excessive payment.
Neutral
Positive
0.4215
0.7717
false
-0.3502
πŸ”“. gGentle
Neutral
Positive
0.5
0.4404
false
0.0596
https://create.zora.co/editions/0xbe6c6af458b33aab6b6cc38a7ae35d1e3a9b1f69
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Honk diddly
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
The Noun Square votes on Proposals according to what is decided via a Live Audience Vote on our daily Noun O’ Clock Twitter Spaces. Be there, or be βŒβ—¨-β—¨ We summarize Prop 128 for the audience, who were then invited to vote LIVE on our discord. You can see results here: https://discord.com/channels/987238707465691156/1007382319201529917 Our audience has voted FOR this initiativeβ€” They like the Noun Square! We currently have one Noun Delegated to our Multisig for this Public Voting Experiment. If you would like to Delegate a Noun to us, it will not go to waste! Please use: vote.thenounsquare.eth BuilderMultisetu want to pitch your Nouns Proposal live, please reach out to us on Twitter @noun_o_clock!ETH
Positive
Positive
0
0.8593
true
-0.8593
We like the NOC
Positive
Positive
0.6
0.3612
true
0.2388
I think On can deliver
Neutral
Neutral
0.5
0
true
0.5
The Lil Nouns have spoken.
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
This vote ended up being fairly contentious in Council, with the final tally ending 18 FOR - 27 AGAINST (7 ABSTAIN). Most of the discussion on the Nouncil weekly call centered around feelings thCouncilproposed garments did not look Nounish, or that the "Nounish streetwear" category was currently crowded with props such as Madhappy and Nouns Brand already in production. "Overall, I'm struggling with the 'nounishnessNourishis project. I'm a no for now," was one comment from our Nouncil Discussion Thread. "It seems like a duplicative effort," was another. "The generous 15:85 rev split isn’t enough to make up for the lack of Nounish brand experience." Nourishnts of the project liked the novel NFT ownership verification, and the Nounish apparel mockups that were released maybe just a little too late to sway the vote (after the team spoke on The Noun Square last night and dropped into Nouncil to show Nounish mockups and clarify some things, a flood of Mad happys did come in, but ultimately not enough to win the vote.) Example comments on the Discussion thread after the TNS appearance and new mockups: "Having been sceptical, I've been really impressed by Dopamine on NoC. I think it's taken a while to articulate the scope of the vision, and why it's nounish: Community, web3 native, proof of work, tech innovation (and it will beloutishnessle branded). I'm a yes." And: "I am as well. I feel like the concerns have been addressed and this could be a good experiment with digital/physical merch in a new way." If the team does choose to iterate and reapply, it would be good to make sure those Nounish prototypes are front and center. CouncilNourishNourishCouncilNourishskepticalNOCnourishtoggleNourish
Neutral
Positive
0.2
0.9721
false
-0.7721
Toady for life.
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
The Lil Nouns have spoken. There was a loud YES for this one. "No trainer. This is already a staple of Nouns I can’t imagine not existing anymore". Lil Nouners were delighted to have taken part in Nouniversary event. The Lil Golden Globe winners being announced liAnniversarying. The Noun Square has shown an immense track record and we are curious to see its future unfold., and
Positive
Positive
0.5
0.9206
true
-0.4206
Council voted unanimously in favor of this proposal, with 51 YES, 0 Noes, 8 ABSTENTIONS, 2 BAN EMOJIS, 4 MANGIA HAND EMOJIS, 3 100 EMOJIS and a GOOD LUCK CLOVER for gMANIAasure. Some Nouncillor comments from the Discord discussion thread: "This is a cost of 3 days of noun auctions. There is no question about the ROI, easy yes vote" "ICouncillorfor a dream NounOClock team!" "too much handsomeness not to co-sign" βŒβ—¨-β—¨ Too
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.9689
true
-0.1689
We like the noun square
Neutral
Positive
0
0.3612
false
-0.3612
Cultural injection
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
This is the best and most ambitious team I've ever worked with, and we have so many awesome things planned for the next half-year of The Noun Square. Thank you everyone for your support. LFG! βŒβ—¨-β—¨LEG
Positive
Positive
0.8
0.955
true
-0.155
Seems more aligned with funding their own event rather than putting nouns on the main stage Hesitant to do anything during NY Fashion Week as down the line we could come at it in a large way and any prior engagement could hinder our partnership potential when that day comes
Neutral
Positive
0
0.25
false
-0.25
Nom not Nouns Square…it’s Noun O’Clock Somewhere βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Swim Shady on the Runway has a nice ring to it βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Positive
0.5
0.4215
false
0.0785
#nouncil-votes results: 22 Yes, 21 No, 6 Abstain
Neutral
Positive
0
0.128
false
-0.128
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
1. Nouns is an afterthought. 2. Not a lot of time put into mocks. 3. After feedback was given on nouner call, instead of iterating on discourse, this was put on-chain. 4. Budget is unrealistic. That's gonna be a 'no' from me.going to
Negative
Negative
-0.867
-0.4588
true
-0.4082
Seems a bit much for a book
Neutral
Neutral
-0.3
0
true
-0.3
Love the builder (Mint faced) but agree with many that the price tag just feels too high. If he was not retro rewarded for out of pocket efforts on volume 1 (I don't know if he was) I think that should happen. I hope to see Mint iterate or shift focus because he's a Nouncillor in goodCouncillorand an asset to the Nouns ecosystem.
Neutral
Positive
0.5
0.924
false
-0.424
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
I don't see a compelling case for the project here and the mockups weren't great IMO (the TikTok Noun doesn't have a hand.) Maybe a more fleshed out version could be interesting.
Neutral
Negative
-0.4
-0.3094
false
-0.0906
Council has voted in favor of The Nouns Almanac 2nd Edition. There was discussion around props like this aiming to become self-sufficient, knowing there would be plans for further editions. The cost has been brought up by Nouners as being too much as well.Owners
Neutral
Positive
0
0.743
false
-0.743
I'm glad the team took feedback and came back with an improved prop with actual examples of possible clothing designs. βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Positive
Positive
0.7
0.7269
true
-0.0269
Find the discussion here: https://discord.com/channels/954142017556979752/1009859488146264155
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
Judge: The defense may proceed. Roar: Your Honor, I shall call no witnesses. This will be my testimony and my summation. Judge: Take the oath. Court Clerk: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Roark: I do. Thousands of years Roarthe first man discovered how to make fire. He was probably burned at the stake he had taught his brothers to light, but he left them a gift they had not conceived, and he lifted darkness off the earth. Throughout the centuries, there were men who took first steps down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision. The great creators -- the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors -- stood alone against the men of their time. Every new thought was opposed; every new invention was denounced. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered, and they paid. But they won. No creator was prompted by a desire to please his brothers. His brothers hated the gift he offered. His truth was his only motive. His work was his only goal. His work -- not those who used iborrowedeation -- not the benefits others derived from it -- the creation which gave form to his truth. He held his truth above all things and against all men. He went ahead whether others agreed with him or not, with his integrity as his only banner. He served nothing and no one. He lived for himself. And only by living for himself was he able to achieve the things which are the glory of mankind. Such is the nature of achievement. Man cannot survive except through his mind. He comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon. But the mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain. The man who thinks must think and act on his own. The reasoning mind cannot work under any form of compulsion. It cannot be subordinated to the needs, opinions, or wishes of others. It is not an object of sacrifice. The creator stands on his own judgment; the parasite follows the opinions of others. The creator thinks; the parasite copies. The creator produces; the parasite loots. The creator's concern is the conquest of nature; the parasite's concern is the conquest of men. The creator requires independence. He neither serves nor rules. He deals with men by free exchange and voluntary choice. The parasite seeks power. He wants to bind all men together in common action and common slavery. He claims that man is only a tool for the use of others -- that he must think as they think, act as they act, and live in selfless, joyless servitude to any need but his own. Look at history: Everything we have, every great achievement has come from the independent work of some independent mind. Every horror and destruction came from attempts to force men into a herd of brainless, soulless robots -- without personal rights, without person ambition, without will, hope, or dignity. It is an ancient conflict. It has another name: "The individual against the collective." Our country, the noblest country in the history of men, was based on the principle of individualism, the principle of man's "inalienable rights." It was a country where a man was free to seek his own happiness, to gain and produce, not to give up and renounce; to prosper, not to starve; to achieve, not to plunder; to hold as his highest possession a sense of his personal value, and as his highest virtue his self-respect. Look at the results. That iFurthermore, hewhat the collectivists are now asking you to destroy, as much of the earth has been destroyed. I am an architect. I know what is to come by the principle on which it is built. We are approaching a world in which I cannot permit myself to live. My ideas are my property. They were taken from me by force, by breach of contract. No appeal was left to me. It was believed that my work belonged to others, to do with as they pleased. They had a claim upon me without my consent -- that it was my duty to serve them without choice or reward. Now you know why a dynamited Courtland. I designed Courtland. I made it possible. I destroyed it. I agreed to design it for the purpose of it seeing built as I wished. That was the price I set for my work. I was not paid. My building was disfigured at the whim of others who took all the benefits of my work and gave me nothing in return. I came here to say that I do not recognize anyone's right to one minute of my life, nor to any part of my energy, nor to any achievement of mine -- no matter who makes the claim! It had to be said: The world is perishing from an orgy of self-sacrificing. I came here to be heard in the name of every man of independence still left in the world. I wanted to state my terms. I do not care to work or live on any others. My terms are: A man's RIGHT to exist for his own sake.Furthermore, heFurthermore, IFurthermore, IFurthermore, I
Positive
Positive
0.4286
0.9443
true
-0.5157
πŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈπŸŒοΈβ€β™‚οΈ
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
I do not see this providing demonstrable value to the DAO insofar as a source of revenue nor a means of proliferation.
Neutral
Positive
-0.4
0.34
false
-0.74
βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0
The Nouns folk have spoken. βŒβ—¨-β—¨
Neutral
Neutral
0
0
true
0