Datasets:
annotations_creators:
- machine-generated
language_creators:
- crowdsourced
language:
- tl
license:
- unknown
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
source_datasets:
- extended|other-twitter-data-philippine-election
task_categories:
- text-classification
task_ids:
- sentiment-analysis
pretty_name: Hate Speech in Filipino
dataset_info:
features:
- name: text
dtype: string
- name: label
dtype:
class_label:
names:
'0': '0'
'1': '1'
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 995919
num_examples: 10000
- name: test
num_bytes: 995919
num_examples: 10000
- name: validation
num_bytes: 424365
num_examples: 4232
download_size: 822927
dataset_size: 2416203
Dataset Card for Hate Speech in Filipino
Table of Contents
- Dataset Description
- Dataset Structure
- Dataset Creation
- Considerations for Using the Data
- Additional Information
Dataset Description
- Homepage: Hate Speech Dataset in Filipino homepage
- Repository: Hate Speech Dataset in Filipino homepage
- Paper: PCJ paper
- Leaderboard:
- Point of Contact: Jan Christian Cruz
Dataset Summary
Contains 10k tweets (training set) that are labeled as hate speech or non-hate speech. Released with 4,232 validation and 4,232 testing samples. Collected during the 2016 Philippine Presidential Elections.
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
[More Information Needed]
Languages
The dataset is primarily in Filipino, with the addition of some English words commonly used in Filipino vernacular
Dataset Structure
Data Instances
Sample data:
{
"text": "Taas ni Mar Roxas ah. KULTONG DILAW NGA NAMAN",
"label": 1
}
Data Fields
[More Information Needed]
Data Splits
[More Information Needed]
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
This study seeks to contribute to the filling of this gap through the development of a model that can automate hate speech detection and classification in Philippine election-related tweets. The role of the microblogging site Twitter as a platform for the expression of support and hate during the 2016 Philippine presidential election has been supported in news reports and systematic studies. Thus, the particular question addressed in this paper is: Can existing techniques in language processing and machine learning be applied to detect hate speech in the Philippine election context?
Source Data
Initial Data Collection and Normalization
The dataset used in this study was a subset of the corpus 1,696,613 tweets crawled by Andrade et al. and posted from November 2015 to May 2016 during the campaign period for the Philippine presidential election. They were culled based on the presence of candidate names (e.g., Binay, Duterte, Poe, Roxas, and Santiago) and election-related hashtags (e.g., #Halalan2016, #Eleksyon2016, and #PiliPinas2016).
Data preprocessing was performed to prepare the tweets for feature extraction and classification. It consisted of the following steps: data de-identification, uniform resource locator (URL) removal, special character processing, normalization, hashtag processing, and tokenization.
[More Information Needed]
Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
Annotations
Annotation process
[More Information Needed]
Who are the annotators?
[More Information Needed]
Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
Considerations for Using the Data
Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Additional Information
Dataset Curators
Licensing Information
[More Information Needed]
Citation Information
@article{Cabasag-2019-hate-speech, title={Hate speech in Philippine election-related tweets: Automatic detection and classification using natural language processing.}, author={Neil Vicente Cabasag, Vicente Raphael Chan, Sean Christian Lim, Mark Edward Gonzales, and Charibeth Cheng}, journal={Philippine Computing Journal}, volume={XIV}, number={1}, month={August}, year={2019} }
Contributions
Thanks to @anaerobeth for adding this dataset.