removed borderline legal data originating from pile-of-law

Multi_Legal_Pile.py

@@ -185,10 +185,6 @@ _PILE_OF_LAW_NAMES = {
             "train": ["train.uscode"],
             "validation": ["validation.uscode"]
         },
-        "founding_docs": {
-            "train": ["train.founding_docs"],
-            "validation": ["validation.founding_docs"]
-        },
         "constitutions": {
             "train": ["train.constitutions"],
             "validation": ["validation.constitutions"]
@@ -206,7 +202,7 @@ _PILE_OF_LAW_NAMES = {
             "validation": ["validation.frcp"]
         },
     },
-    "analyses": {
+    "other": { # analyses
         "oig": {
             "train": ["train.oig"],
             "validation": ["validation.oig"]
@@ -216,51 +212,14 @@ _PILE_OF_LAW_NAMES = {
             "validation": ["validation.olcmemos"]
         },
     },
-    "conversations": {
-        "r_legaladvice": {
-            "train": ["train.r_legaldvice"],
-            "validation": ["validation.r_legaldvice"]
-        },
-        "euro_parl": {
-            "train": ["train.euro_parl"],
-            "validation": ["validation.euro_parl"]
-        },
-        "un_debates": {
-            "train": ["train.undebates"],
-            "validation": ["validation.undebates"]
-        },
-        "congressional_hearings": {
-            "train": ["train.congressional_hearings"],
-            "validation": ["validation.congressional_hearings"]
-        },
-        "scotus_oral_arguments": {
-            "train": ["train.scotus_oral"],
-            "validation": ["validation.scotus_oral"]
-        },
-    },
-    "study_materials": {
-        "bar_exam_outlines": {
-            "train": [
-                "train.stanfordbarexamoutlines",
-                "train.shajnfeldbarexamoutlines",
-            ],
-            "validation": [
-                "validation.stanfordbarexamoutlines",
-                "validation.shajnfeldbarexamoutlines",
-            ]
-        },
-        "cc_casebooks": {
-            "train": ["train.cc_casebooks"],
-            "validation": ["validation.cc_casebooks"]
-        },
-    },
 }
 
-_LANGUAGES = ["bg", "cs", "da", "de", "el", "en", "es", "et", "fi", "fr", "ga",
-              "hr", "hu", "it", "lt", "lv", "mt", "nl", "pl", "pt", "ro", "sk", "sl", "sv"]
 
-# the pile-of-law additionally contains "conversations", "analyses", "study_materials"
-# TODO maybe include those additional types as well: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.00220.pdf appendix E
+
+_LANGUAGES = ["bg", "cs", "da", "de", "el", "en", "es", "et", "fi", "fr", "ga", "hr",
+              "hu", "it", "lt", "lv", "mt", "nl", "pl", "pt", "ro", "sk", "sl", "sv"]
+
+
 _TYPES = ["caselaw", "contracts", "legislation", "other"]
 
 _JURISDICTONS = ["Austria", "Belgium", "Bulgaria", "Croatia", "Czechia", "Denmark", "Estonia", "Finland",
@@ -360,11 +319,9 @@ class MultiLegalPile(datasets.GeneratorBasedBuilder):
                     for name, train_val_files in _PILE_OF_LAW_NAMES[type].items():
                         if name == 'canadian_decisions':
                             info["jurisdiction"] = "Canada"
-                        elif name in ['echr', 'euro_parl']:
+                        elif name in ['echr']:
                             info["jurisdiction"] = "EU"
-                        elif name in ['un_debates', 'constitutions',
-                                      # these are maybe also mostly from the US
-                                      'r_legaladvice', 'cc_casebooks', 'bar_exam_outlines']:
+                        elif name in ['constitutions']:
                             info["jurisdiction"] = "N/A"
                         for split in ["train", "validation"]:
                             for file_name in train_val_files[split]: