Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Generation
Modalities:
Text
Sub-tasks:
language-modeling
Languages:
English
Size:
100K - 1M
License:
(* (c) Copyright 2006-2016 Microsoft Corporation and Inria. *) | |
(* Distributed under the terms of CeCILL-B. *) | |
Require Import mathcomp.ssreflect.ssreflect. | |
From mathcomp | |
Require Import ssrbool ssrfun eqtype ssrnat seq div fintype path. | |
From mathcomp | |
Require Import finset prime fingroup action automorphism quotient cyclic. | |
From mathcomp | |
Require Import gproduct gfunctor pgroup center commutator gseries nilpotent. | |
From mathcomp | |
Require Import sylow abelian maximal hall. | |
From odd_order | |
Require Import BGsection1 BGsection4 BGsection5 BGsection6. | |
From odd_order | |
Require Import BGsection7 BGsection8. | |
(******************************************************************************) | |
(* This file covers B & G, section 9, i.e., the proof the Uniqueness *) | |
(* Theorem, along with the several variants and auxiliary results. Note that *) | |
(* this is the only file to import BGsection8. *) | |
(******************************************************************************) | |
Set Implicit Arguments. | |
Unset Strict Implicit. | |
Unset Printing Implicit Defensive. | |
Import GroupScope. | |
Section Nine. | |
Variable gT : minSimpleOddGroupType. | |
Local Notation G := (TheMinSimpleOddGroup gT). | |
Implicit Types H K L M A B P Q R : {group gT}. | |
Implicit Types p q r : nat. | |
(* This is B & G, Theorem 9.1(b). *) | |
Theorem noncyclic_normed_sub_Uniqueness p M B : | |
M \in 'M -> B \in 'E_p(M) -> ~~ cyclic B -> | |
\bigcup_(K in |/|_G(B; p^')) K \subset M -> | |
B \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> maxM /pElemP[sBM abelB] ncycB snbBp'_M; have [pB cBB _] := and3P abelB. | |
have prM := mmax_proper maxM; have solM := mFT_sol prM. | |
apply/uniq_mmaxP; exists M; symmetry; apply/eqP. | |
rewrite eqEsubset sub1set inE maxM sBM; apply/subsetPn=> [[H0 MB_H0 neH0M]]. | |
have:= erefl [arg max_(H > H0 | (H \in 'M(B)) && (H :!=: M)) #|H :&: M|`_p]. | |
have [|H] := arg_maxnP; first by rewrite MB_H0; rewrite inE in neH0M. | |
rewrite inE -andbA => /and3P[maxH sBH neHM] maxHM _ {H0 MB_H0 neH0M}. | |
have sB_HM: B \subset H :&: M by rewrite subsetI sBH. | |
have{sB_HM} [R sylR sBR] := Sylow_superset sB_HM pB. | |
have [/subsetIP[sRH sRM] pR _] := and3P sylR. | |
have [P sylP sRP] := Sylow_superset sRM pR; have [sPM pP _] := and3P sylP. | |
have sHp'M: 'O_p^'(H) \subset M. | |
apply: subset_trans snbBp'_M; rewrite (bigcup_max 'O_p^'(H)%G) // inE -andbA. | |
by rewrite subsetT pcore_pgroup (subset_trans sBH) ?gFnorm. | |
have{snbBp'_M} defMp': <<\bigcup_(K in |/|_G(P; p^')) K>> = 'O_p^'(M). | |
have nMp'M: M \subset 'N('O_p^'(M)) by apply: gFnorm. | |
have nMp'P := subset_trans sPM nMp'M. | |
apply/eqP; rewrite eqEsubset gen_subG sub_gen ?andbT; last first. | |
by rewrite (bigcup_max 'O_p^'(M)%G) // inE -andbA subsetT pcore_pgroup. | |
apply/bigcupsP=> K; rewrite inE -andbA => /and3P[_ p'K nKP]. | |
have sKM: K \subset M. | |
apply: subset_trans snbBp'_M; rewrite (bigcup_max K) // inE -andbA subsetT. | |
by rewrite p'K (subset_trans (subset_trans sBR sRP)). | |
rewrite -quotient_sub1 ?(subset_trans sKM) //=; set Mp' := 'O__(M). | |
have tiKp: 'O_p(M / Mp') :&: (K / _) = 1. | |
exact: coprime_TIg (pnat_coprime (pcore_pgroup _ _) (quotient_pgroup _ _)). | |
suffices sKMp: K / _ \subset 'O_p(M / Mp') by rewrite -(setIidPr sKMp) tiKp. | |
rewrite -Fitting_eq_pcore ?trivg_pcore_quotient //. | |
apply: subset_trans (cent_sub_Fitting (quotient_sol _ solM)). | |
rewrite subsetI quotientS //= (Fitting_eq_pcore (trivg_pcore_quotient _ _)). | |
rewrite (sameP commG1P trivgP) /= -/Mp' -tiKp subsetI commg_subl commg_subr. | |
rewrite (subset_trans (quotientS _ sKM)) ?gFnorm //=. | |
apply: subset_trans (pcore_sub_Hall (quotient_pHall nMp'P sylP)) _. | |
by rewrite quotient_norms. | |
have ntR: R :!=: 1 by case: eqP sBR ncycB => // -> /trivgP->; rewrite cyclic1. | |
have{defMp'} sNPM: 'N(P) \subset M. | |
have [Mp'1 | ntMp'] := eqVneq 'O_p^'(M) 1. | |
have nsZLP: 'Z('L(P)) <| M. | |
by apply: Puig_center_normal Mp'1 => //; apply: mFT_odd. | |
rewrite -(mmax_normal maxM nsZLP) ?gFnorm_trans //. | |
apply: contraNneq ntR => /(trivg_center_Puig_pgroup pP)-P1. | |
by rewrite -subG1 -P1. | |
rewrite -(mmax_normal maxM (pcore_normal _ _) ntMp') /= -defMp' norms_gen //. | |
apply/subsetP=> x nPx; rewrite inE sub_conjg; apply/bigcupsP=> K. | |
rewrite inE -andbA -sub_conjg => /and3P[_ p'K nKP]. | |
rewrite (bigcup_max (K :^ x)%G) // inE -andbA subsetT pgroupJ p'K /=. | |
by rewrite -(normP nPx) normJ conjSg. | |
have sylPG := mmax_sigma_Sylow maxM sylP sNPM. | |
have{sNPM} [sNRM sylRH]: 'N(R) \subset M /\ p.-Sylow(H) R. | |
have [defR | ltRP] := eqVproper sRP. | |
by split; rewrite defR // (pHall_subl _ (subsetT _)) // -defR. | |
have [| D /setIdP[maxD sND]]:= @mmax_exists _ 'N(R). | |
by rewrite mFT_norm_proper // (mFT_pgroup_proper pR). | |
have/implyP := maxHM D; rewrite inE {}maxD /= leqNgt. | |
rewrite (subset_trans (subset_trans sBR (normG R))) //= implybNN. | |
have ltRN := nilpotent_proper_norm (pgroup_nil pP) ltRP. | |
rewrite -(card_Hall sylR) (leq_trans (proper_card ltRN)) /=; last first. | |
rewrite setIC -(part_pnat_id (pgroupS (subsetIr _ _) pP)) dvdn_leq //. | |
by rewrite partn_dvd ?cardG_gt0 // cardSg // setISS. | |
move/eqP=> defD; rewrite defD in sND; split; rewrite // -Sylow_subnorm. | |
by rewrite (pHall_subl _ _ sylR) ?setIS // subsetI sRH normG. | |
have sFH_RHp': 'F(H) \subset R * 'O_p^'(H). | |
case/dprodP: (nilpotent_pcoreC p (Fitting_nil H)) => _ /= <- _ _. | |
by rewrite p_core_Fitting mulgSS ?(pcore_sub_Hall sylRH) ?pcore_Fitting. | |
have sFH_M: 'F(H) \subset M by rewrite (subset_trans sFH_RHp') ?mul_subG. | |
case/(H :=P: M): neHM; have [le3r | ge2r] := ltnP 2 'r('F(H)). | |
have [D uF_D] := uniq_mmaxP (Fitting_Uniqueness maxH le3r). | |
by rewrite (eq_uniq_mmax uF_D maxM) // (eq_uniq_mmax uF_D maxH) ?Fitting_sub. | |
have nHp'R: R \subset 'N('O_p^'(H)) by rewrite (subset_trans sRH) ?gFnorm. | |
have nsRHp'H: R <*> 'O_p^'(H) <| H. | |
rewrite sub_der1_normal //= ?join_subG ?sRH ?pcore_sub //. | |
rewrite norm_joinEl // (subset_trans _ sFH_RHp') //. | |
by rewrite rank2_der1_sub_Fitting ?mFT_odd // mFT_sol ?mmax_proper. | |
have sylR_RHp': p.-Sylow(R <*> 'O_p^'(H)) R. | |
by apply: (pHall_subl _ _ sylRH); rewrite ?joing_subl // normal_sub. | |
rewrite (mmax_max maxH) // -(Frattini_arg nsRHp'H sylR_RHp') /=. | |
by rewrite mulG_subG join_subG sRM sHp'M /= setIC subIset ?sNRM. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Theorem 9.1(a). *) | |
Theorem noncyclic_cent1_sub_Uniqueness p M B : | |
M \in 'M -> B \in 'E_p(M) -> ~~ cyclic B -> | |
\bigcup_(b in B^#) 'C[b] \subset M -> | |
B \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> maxM EpB ncycB sCB_M. | |
apply: (noncyclic_normed_sub_Uniqueness maxM EpB) => //. | |
apply/bigcupsP=> K; rewrite inE -andbA => /and3P[_ p'K nKB]. | |
case/pElemP: EpB => _ /and3P[pB cBB _]. | |
rewrite -(coprime_abelian_gen_cent1 cBB ncycB nKB); last first. | |
by rewrite coprime_sym (pnat_coprime pB). | |
rewrite gen_subG (subset_trans _ sCB_M) //. | |
by apply/bigcupsP=> b Bb; rewrite (bigcup_max b) // subsetIr. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Corollary 9.2. *) | |
Corollary cent_uniq_Uniqueness K L : | |
L \in 'U -> K \subset 'C(L) -> 'r(K) >= 2 -> K \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> uL; have ntL := uniq_mmax_neq1 uL. | |
case/uniq_mmaxP: uL => H uL_H cLK; have [maxH sLH] := mem_uniq_mmax uL_H. | |
case/rank_geP=> B /nElemP[p /pnElemP[sBK abelB /eqP dimB2]]. | |
have scBH: \bigcup_(b in B^#) 'C[b] \subset H. | |
apply/bigcupsP=> b /setIdP[]; rewrite inE -cycle_eq1 => ntb Bb. | |
apply: (sub_uniq_mmax uL_H); last by rewrite /= -cent_cycle mFT_cent_proper. | |
by rewrite sub_cent1 (subsetP cLK) ?(subsetP sBK). | |
have EpB: B \in 'E_p(H). | |
apply/pElemP; split=> //; rewrite -(setD1K (group1 B)) subUset sub1G /=. | |
apply/subsetP=> b Bb; apply: (subsetP scBH). | |
by apply/bigcupP; exists b => //; apply/cent1P. | |
have prK: K \proper G by rewrite (sub_proper_trans cLK) ?mFT_cent_proper. | |
apply: uniq_mmaxS prK (noncyclic_cent1_sub_Uniqueness _ EpB _ _) => //. | |
by rewrite (abelem_cyclic abelB) (eqP dimB2). | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Corollary 9.3. *) | |
Corollary any_cent_rank3_Uniquness p A B : | |
abelian A -> p.-group A -> 'r(A) >= 3 -> A \in 'U -> | |
p.-group B -> ~~ cyclic B -> 'r_p('C(B)) >= 3 -> | |
B \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> cAA pA rA3 uA pB ncycB /p_rank_geP[C /= Ep3C]. | |
have [cBC abelC dimC3] := pnElemP Ep3C; have [pC cCC _] := and3P abelC. | |
have [P /= sylP sCP] := Sylow_superset (subsetT _) pC. | |
wlog sAP: A pA cAA rA3 uA / A \subset P. | |
move=> IHA; have [x _] := Sylow_Jsub sylP (subsetT _) pA. | |
by apply: IHA; rewrite ?pgroupJ ?abelianJ ?rankJ ?uniq_mmaxJ. | |
have ncycC: ~~ cyclic C by rewrite (abelem_cyclic abelC) dimC3. | |
have ncycP: ~~ cyclic P := contra (cyclicS sCP) ncycC. | |
have [D] := ex_odd_normal_p2Elem (pHall_pgroup sylP) (mFT_odd _) ncycP. | |
case/andP=> sDP nDP /pnElemP[_ abelD dimD2]. | |
have CADge2: 'r('C_A(D)) >= 2. | |
move: rA3; rewrite (rank_pgroup pA) => /p_rank_geP[E]. | |
case/pnElemP=> sEA abelE dimE3; apply: leq_trans (rankS (setSI _ sEA)). | |
rewrite (rank_abelem (abelemS (subsetIl _ _) abelE)) -(leq_add2r 1) addn1. | |
rewrite -dimE3 -leq_subLR -logn_div ?cardSg ?divgS ?subsetIl //. | |
rewrite logn_quotient_cent_abelem ?dimD2 //. | |
exact: subset_trans (subset_trans sAP nDP). | |
have CCDge2: 'r('C_C(D)) >= 2. | |
rewrite (rank_abelem (abelemS (subsetIl _ _) abelC)) -(leq_add2r 1) addn1. | |
rewrite -dimC3 -leq_subLR -logn_div ?cardSg ?divgS ?subsetIl //. | |
by rewrite logn_quotient_cent_abelem ?dimD2 //; apply: subset_trans nDP. | |
rewrite centsC in cBC; apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness cBC _; last first. | |
by rewrite ltnNge (rank_pgroup pB) -odd_pgroup_rank1_cyclic ?mFT_odd. | |
have cCDC: C \subset 'C('C_C(D)) | |
by rewrite (sub_abelian_cent (abelem_abelian abelC)) ?subsetIl. | |
apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness cCDC _; last by rewrite (rank_abelem abelC) dimC3. | |
apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness (subsetIr _ _) CCDge2. | |
have cDCA: D \subset 'C('C_A(D)) by rewrite centsC subsetIr. | |
apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness cDCA _; last by rewrite (rank_abelem abelD) dimD2. | |
by apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness uA _ CADge2; rewrite subIset // -abelianE cAA. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Lemma 9.4. *) | |
Lemma any_rank3_Fitting_Uniqueness p M P : | |
M \in 'M -> 'r_p('F(M)) >= 3 -> p.-group P -> 'r(P) >= 3 -> P \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> maxM FMge3 pP; rewrite (rank_pgroup pP) => /p_rank_geP[B]. | |
case/pnElemP=> sBP abelB dimB3; have [pB cBB _] := and3P abelB. | |
have CBge3: 'r_p('C(B)) >= 3 by rewrite -dimB3 -(p_rank_abelem abelB) p_rankS. | |
have ncycB: ~~ cyclic B by rewrite (abelem_cyclic abelB) dimB3. | |
apply: {P pP}uniq_mmaxS sBP (mFT_pgroup_proper pP) _. | |
case/orP: (orbN (p.-group 'F(M))) => [pFM | pFM']. | |
have [P sylP sFP] := Sylow_superset (Fitting_sub _) pFM. | |
have pP := pHall_pgroup sylP. | |
have [|A SCN_A]:= rank3_SCN3 pP (mFT_odd _). | |
by rewrite (leq_trans FMge3) ?p_rankS. | |
have [_ _ uA] := SCN_Fitting_Uniqueness maxM pFM sylP FMge3 SCN_A. | |
case/setIdP: SCN_A => SCN_A dimA3; case: (setIdP SCN_A); case/andP=> sAP _ _. | |
have cAA := SCN_abelian SCN_A; have pA := pgroupS sAP pP. | |
exact: (any_cent_rank3_Uniquness cAA pA). | |
have [A0 EpA0 A0ge3] := p_rank_pmaxElem_exists FMge3. | |
have uA := non_pcore_Fitting_Uniqueness maxM pFM' EpA0 A0ge3. | |
case/pmaxElemP: EpA0; case/setIdP=> _ abelA0 _. | |
have [pA0 cA0A0 _] := and3P abelA0; rewrite -rank_pgroup // in A0ge3. | |
rewrite (any_cent_rank3_Uniquness _ pA0) // (cent_uniq_Uniqueness uA) 1?ltnW //. | |
by rewrite centsC subsetIr. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Lemma 9.5. *) | |
Lemma SCN_3_Uniqueness p A : A \in 'SCN_3[p] -> A \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> SCN3_A; apply/idPn=> uA'. | |
have [P] := bigcupP SCN3_A; rewrite inE => sylP /setIdP[SCN_A Age3]. | |
have [nsAP _] := setIdP SCN_A; have [sAP nAP] := andP nsAP. | |
have cAA := SCN_abelian SCN_A. | |
have pP := pHall_pgroup sylP; have pA := pgroupS sAP pP. | |
have ntA: A :!=: 1 by rewrite -rank_gt0 -(subnKC Age3). | |
have [p_pr _ [e oA]] := pgroup_pdiv pA ntA. | |
have{e oA} def_piA: \pi(A) =i (p : nat_pred). | |
by rewrite /= oA pi_of_exp //; apply: pi_of_prime. | |
have FmCAp_le2 M: M \in 'M('C(A)) -> 'r_p('F(M)) <= 2. | |
case/setIdP=> maxM cCAM; rewrite leqNgt; apply: contra uA' => Fge3. | |
exact: (any_rank3_Fitting_Uniqueness maxM Fge3). | |
have sNP_mCA M: M \in 'M('C(A)) -> 'N(P) \subset M. | |
move=> mCA_M; have Fple2 := FmCAp_le2 M mCA_M. | |
case/setIdP: mCA_M => maxM sCAM; set F := 'F(M) in Fple2. | |
have sNR_M R: A \subset R -> R \subset P :&: M -> 'N(R) \subset M. | |
move=> sAR /subsetIP[sRP sRM]. | |
pose q := if 'r(F) <= 2 then max_pdiv #|M| else s2val (rank_witness 'F(M)). | |
have nMqR: R \subset 'N('O_q(M)) := subset_trans sRM (gFnorm _ _). | |
have{nMqR} [Q maxQ sMqQ] := max_normed_exists (pcore_pgroup _ _) nMqR. | |
have [p'q sNQ_M]: q != p /\ 'N(Q) \subset M. | |
case/mem_max_normed: maxQ sMqQ; rewrite {}/q. | |
case: leqP => [Fle2 | ]; last first. | |
case: rank_witness => q /= q_pr -> Fge3 qQ _ sMqQ; split=> //. | |
by case: eqP Fge3 => // ->; rewrite ltnNge Fple2. | |
have Mqge3: 'r('O_q(M)) >= 3. | |
rewrite (rank_pgroup (pcore_pgroup _ _)) /= -p_core_Fitting. | |
by rewrite (p_rank_Sylow (nilpotent_pcore_Hall _ (Fitting_nil _))). | |
have uMq: 'O_q(M)%G \in 'U. | |
exact: (any_rank3_Fitting_Uniqueness _ Fge3 (pcore_pgroup _ _)). | |
have uMqM := def_uniq_mmax uMq maxM (pcore_sub _ _). | |
apply: sub_uniq_mmax (subset_trans sMqQ (normG _)) _ => //. | |
apply: mFT_norm_proper (mFT_pgroup_proper qQ). | |
by rewrite -rank_gt0 2?ltnW ?(leq_trans Mqge3) ?rankS. | |
set q := max_pdiv _ => qQ _ sMqQ. | |
have sylMq: q.-Sylow(M) 'O_q(M). | |
by rewrite [pHall _ _ _]rank2_max_pcore_Sylow ?mFT_odd ?mmax_sol. | |
have defNMq: 'N('O_q(M)) = M. | |
rewrite (mmax_normal maxM (pcore_normal _ _)) // -rank_gt0. | |
rewrite (rank_pgroup (pcore_pgroup _ _)) (p_rank_Sylow sylMq). | |
by rewrite p_rank_gt0 pi_max_pdiv cardG_gt1 mmax_neq1. | |
have sylMqG: q.-Sylow(G) 'O_q(M). | |
by rewrite (mmax_sigma_Sylow maxM) ?defNMq. | |
rewrite (sub_pHall sylMqG qQ) ?subsetT // defNMq; split=> //. | |
have: 'r_p(G) > 2. | |
by rewrite (leq_trans Age3) // (rank_pgroup pA) p_rankS ?subsetT. | |
apply: contraTneq => <-; rewrite -(p_rank_Sylow sylMqG). | |
rewrite -leqNgt -(rank_pgroup (pcore_pgroup _ _)) /=. | |
by rewrite -p_core_Fitting (leq_trans _ Fle2) // rankS ?pcore_sub. | |
have trCRq': [transitive 'O_p^'('C(R)), on |/|*(R; q) | 'JG]. | |
have cstrA: normed_constrained A. | |
by apply: SCN_normed_constrained sylP _; rewrite inE SCN_A ltnW. | |
have pR: p.-group R := pgroupS sRP pP. | |
have snAR: A <|<| R by rewrite (nilpotent_subnormal (pgroup_nil pR)). | |
have A'q: q \notin \pi(A) by rewrite def_piA. | |
rewrite -(eq_pgroup _ def_piA) in pR. | |
have [|?] := normed_trans_superset cstrA A'q snAR pR. | |
by rewrite (eq_pcore _ (eq_negn def_piA)) Thompson_transitivity. | |
by rewrite (eq_pcore _ (eq_negn def_piA)). | |
apply/subsetP=> x nRx; have maxQx: (Q :^ x)%G \in |/|*(R; q). | |
by rewrite (actsP (norm_acts_max_norm _ _)). | |
have [y cRy [defQx]] := atransP2 trCRq' maxQ maxQx. | |
rewrite -(mulgKV y x) groupMr. | |
by rewrite (subsetP sNQ_M) // inE conjsgM defQx conjsgK. | |
apply: subsetP cRy; apply: gFsub_trans. | |
exact: subset_trans (centS _) sCAM. | |
have sNA_M: 'N(A) \subset M. | |
by rewrite sNR_M // subsetI sAP (subset_trans cAA). | |
by rewrite sNR_M // subsetI subxx (subset_trans nAP). | |
pose P0 := [~: P, 'N(P)]. | |
have ntP0: P0 != 1. | |
apply/eqP=> /commG1P; rewrite centsC -(setIidPr (subsetT 'N(P))) /=. | |
case/(Burnside_normal_complement sylP)/sdprodP=> _ /= defG nGp'P _. | |
have prGp': 'O_p^'(G) \proper G. | |
rewrite properT; apply: contra ntA; move/eqP=> defG'. | |
rewrite -(setIidPl (subsetT A)) /= -defG'. | |
by rewrite coprime_TIg // (pnat_coprime pA (pcore_pgroup _ _)). | |
have ntGp': 'O_p^'(G) != 1. | |
apply: contraTneq (mFT_pgroup_proper pP); rewrite -{2}defG => ->. | |
by rewrite mul1g proper_irrefl. | |
by have:= mFT_norm_proper ntGp' prGp'; rewrite properE gFnorm andbF. | |
have sP0P: P0 \subset P by rewrite commg_subl. | |
have pP0: p.-group P0 := pgroupS sP0P pP. | |
have uNP0_mCA M: M \in 'M('C(A)) -> 'M('N(P0)) = [set M]. | |
move=> mCA_M; have [maxM sCAM] := setIdP mCA_M. | |
have sAM := subset_trans cAA sCAM. | |
pose F := 'F(M); pose D := 'O_p^'(F). | |
have cDP0: P0 \subset 'C(D). | |
have sA1A := Ohm_sub 1 A. | |
have nDA1: 'Ohm_1(A) \subset 'N(D). | |
by rewrite !gFnorm_trans // gFsub_trans // normsG. | |
have abelA1: p.-abelem 'Ohm_1(A) by rewrite Ohm1_abelem. | |
have dimA1ge3: logn p #|'Ohm_1(A)| >= 3. | |
by rewrite -(rank_abelem abelA1) rank_Ohm1. | |
have coDA1: coprime #|D| #|'Ohm_1(A)|. | |
rewrite coprime_sym (coprimeSg sA1A) //. | |
exact: pnat_coprime pA (pcore_pgroup _ _). | |
rewrite centsC -[D](coprime_abelian_gen_cent (abelianS sA1A cAA) nDA1) //=. | |
rewrite gen_subG /= -/D; apply/bigcupsP=> B /and3P[cycqB sBA1 nBA1]. | |
have abelB := abelemS sBA1 abelA1; have sBA := subset_trans sBA1 sA1A. | |
have{cycqB} ncycB: ~~ cyclic B. | |
move: cycqB; rewrite (abelem_cyclic (quotient_abelem _ abelA1)). | |
rewrite card_quotient // -divgS // logn_div ?cardSg // leq_subLR addn1. | |
by move/(leq_trans dimA1ge3); rewrite ltnS ltnNge -(abelem_cyclic abelB). | |
have [x Bx sCxM']: exists2 x, x \in B^# & ~~ ('C[x] \subset M). | |
suff: ~~ (\bigcup_(x in B^#) 'C[x] \subset M). | |
case/subsetPn=> y /bigcupP[x Bx cxy] My'. | |
by exists x; last by apply/subsetPn; exists y. | |
have EpB: B \in 'E_p(M) by rewrite inE (subset_trans sBA sAM). | |
apply: contra uA' => sCB_M. | |
apply: uniq_mmaxS sBA (mFT_pgroup_proper pA) _. | |
exact: noncyclic_cent1_sub_Uniqueness maxM EpB ncycB sCB_M. | |
case/setD1P: Bx; rewrite -cycle_eq1 => ntx Bx. | |
have{ntx} [L /setIdP[maxL /=]] := mmax_exists (mFT_cent_proper ntx). | |
rewrite cent_cycle => sCxL. | |
have{sCxM'} neLM : L != M by case: eqP sCxL sCxM' => // -> ->. | |
have sNP_LM: 'N(P) \subset L :&: M. | |
rewrite subsetI !sNP_mCA // inE maxL (subset_trans _ sCxL) // -cent_set1. | |
by rewrite centS // sub1set (subsetP sBA). | |
have sP0_LM': P0 \subset (L :&: M)^`(1). | |
exact: subset_trans (commSg _ (normG _)) (dergS 1 sNP_LM). | |
have DLle2: 'r(D :&: L) <= 2. | |
apply: contraR neLM; rewrite -ltnNge -in_set1 => /rank_geP[E /nElemP[q]]. | |
rewrite /= -/D => /pnElemP[/subsetIP[sED sEL] abelE dimE3]. | |
have sEF: E \subset F := subset_trans sED (pcore_sub _ _). | |
have Fge3: 'r_q(F) >= 3 by rewrite -dimE3 -p_rank_abelem // p_rankS. | |
have qE := abelem_pgroup abelE. | |
have uE: E \in 'U. | |
apply: any_rank3_Fitting_Uniqueness Fge3 _ _ => //. | |
by rewrite (rank_pgroup qE) p_rank_abelem ?dimE3. | |
rewrite -(def_uniq_mmax uE maxM (subset_trans sEF (Fitting_sub _))). | |
by rewrite inE maxL. | |
have cDL_P0: P0 \subset 'C(D :&: L). | |
have nsDM: D <| M by rewrite !gFnormal_trans. | |
have{nsDM} [sDM nDM] := andP nsDM. | |
have sDL: D :&: L \subset L :&: M by rewrite setIC setIS. | |
have nsDL: D :&: L <| L :&: M by rewrite /normal sDL setIC normsIG. | |
have [s ch_s last_s_DL] := chief_series_exists nsDL. | |
have solLM := solvableS (subsetIl L M) (mmax_sol maxL). | |
have solDL := solvableS sDL solLM. | |
apply: (stable_series_cent (congr_group last_s_DL)) => //; first 1 last. | |
rewrite coprime_sym (coprimegS (subsetIl _ _)) //. | |
exact: pnat_coprime (pcore_pgroup _ _). | |
have{last_s_DL}: last 1%G s \subset D :&: L by rewrite last_s_DL. | |
rewrite /= -/P0; elim/last_ind: s ch_s => //= s U IHs. | |
rewrite !rcons_path last_rcons /=; set V := last _ s. | |
case/andP=> ch_s chUV sUDL; have [maxU _ nU_LM] := and3P chUV. | |
have{maxU} /andP[/andP[sVU _] nV_LM] := maxgroupp maxU. | |
have nVU := subset_trans sUDL (subset_trans sDL nV_LM). | |
rewrite IHs ?(subset_trans sVU) // /stable_factor /normal sVU nVU !andbT. | |
have nVP0 := subset_trans (subset_trans sP0_LM' (der_sub _ _)) nV_LM. | |
rewrite commGC -sub_astabQR // (subset_trans sP0_LM') //. | |
have /is_abelemP[q _ /andP[qUV _]]: is_abelem (U / V). | |
exact: sol_chief_abelem solLM chUV. | |
apply: rank2_der1_cent_chief qUV sUDL; rewrite ?mFT_odd //. | |
exact: leq_trans (p_rank_le_rank _ _) DLle2. | |
rewrite centsC (subset_trans cDL_P0) ?centS ?setIS //. | |
by rewrite (subset_trans _ sCxL) // -cent_set1 centS ?sub1set. | |
case: (ltnP 2 'r(F)) => [| Fle2]. | |
have [q q_pr -> /= Fq3] := rank_witness [group of F]. | |
have Mq3: 'r('O_q(M)) >= 3. | |
rewrite (rank_pgroup (pcore_pgroup _ _)) /= -p_core_Fitting. | |
by rewrite (p_rank_Sylow (nilpotent_pcore_Hall _ (Fitting_nil _))). | |
have uMq: 'O_q(M)%G \in 'U. | |
exact: any_rank3_Fitting_Uniqueness Fq3 (pcore_pgroup _ _) Mq3. | |
apply: def_uniq_mmaxS (def_uniq_mmax uMq maxM (pcore_sub q _)); last first. | |
exact: mFT_norm_proper ntP0 (mFT_pgroup_proper pP0). | |
rewrite cents_norm // centsC (subset_trans cDP0) ?centS //=. | |
rewrite -p_core_Fitting sub_pcore // => q1; move/eqnP=> ->{q1}. | |
by apply/eqnP=> def_q; rewrite ltnNge def_q FmCAp_le2 in Fq3. | |
rewrite (mmax_normal maxM) ?mmax_sup_id //. | |
have sNP_M := sNP_mCA M mCA_M; have sPM := subset_trans (normG P) sNP_M. | |
rewrite /normal comm_subG //= -/P0. | |
have nFP: P \subset 'N(F) by apply: subset_trans (gFnorm _ _). | |
have <-: F <*> P * 'N_M(P) = M. | |
apply: Frattini_arg (pHall_subl (joing_subr _ _) (subsetT _) sylP). | |
rewrite -(quotientGK (Fitting_normal M)) /= norm_joinEr //= -/F. | |
rewrite -quotientK // cosetpre_normal -sub_abelian_normal ?quotientS //. | |
by rewrite sub_der1_abelian ?rank2_der1_sub_Fitting ?mFT_odd ?mmax_sol. | |
case/dprodP: (nilpotent_pcoreC p (Fitting_nil M)) => _ /= defF cDFp _. | |
rewrite norm_joinEr //= -{}defF -(centC cDFp) -/D p_core_Fitting /= -/F. | |
rewrite -!mulgA mul_subG //; first by rewrite cents_norm // centsC. | |
rewrite mulgA [_ * P]mulSGid ?pcore_sub_Hall 1?(pHall_subl _ (subsetT _)) //. | |
by rewrite mulSGid ?subsetI ?sPM ?normG // subIset // orbC normsRr. | |
have [M mCA_M] := mmax_exists (mFT_cent_proper ntA). | |
have [maxM sCAM] := setIdP mCA_M; have sAM := subset_trans cAA sCAM. | |
have abelA1: p.-abelem 'Ohm_1(A) by rewrite Ohm1_abelem. | |
have sA1A := Ohm_sub 1 A. | |
have EpA1: 'Ohm_1(A)%G \in 'E_p(M) by rewrite inE (subset_trans sA1A). | |
have ncycA1: ~~ cyclic 'Ohm_1(A). | |
rewrite (abelem_cyclic abelA1) -(rank_abelem abelA1) rank_Ohm1. | |
by rewrite -(subnKC Age3). | |
have [x A1x sCxM']: exists2 x, x \in 'Ohm_1(A)^# & ~~ ('C[x] \subset M). | |
suff: ~~ (\bigcup_(x in 'Ohm_1(A)^#) 'C[x] \subset M). | |
case/subsetPn=> y /bigcupP[x A1 cxy] My'. | |
by exists x; last by apply/subsetPn; exists y. | |
apply: contra uA' => sCA1_M. | |
apply: uniq_mmaxS sA1A (mFT_pgroup_proper pA) _. | |
exact: noncyclic_cent1_sub_Uniqueness maxM EpA1 ncycA1 sCA1_M. | |
case/setD1P: A1x; rewrite -cycle_eq1 => ntx A1x. | |
have: 'C[x] \proper G by rewrite -cent_cycle mFT_cent_proper. | |
case/mmax_exists=> L /setIdP[maxL sCxL]. | |
have mCA_L: L \in 'M('C(A)). | |
rewrite inE maxL (subset_trans _ sCxL) //= -cent_set1 centS // sub1set. | |
by rewrite (subsetP sA1A). | |
case/negP: sCxM'; have/uNP0_mCA := mCA_L. | |
by rewrite (uNP0_mCA M) // => /set1_inj->. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Theorem 9.6, first assertion; note that B & G omit the *) | |
(* (necessary!) condition K \proper G. *) | |
Theorem rank3_Uniqueness K : K \proper G -> 'r(K) >= 3 -> K \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> prK /rank_geP[B /nElemP[p /pnElemP[sBK abelB dimB3]]]. | |
have [pB cBB _] := and3P abelB. | |
suffices: B \in 'U by apply: uniq_mmaxS. | |
have [P sylP sBP] := Sylow_superset (subsetT _) pB. | |
have pP := pHall_pgroup sylP. | |
have [|A SCN3_A] := rank3_SCN3 pP (mFT_odd _). | |
by rewrite -dimB3 -(rank_abelem abelB) (rank_pgroup pB) p_rankS. | |
have [SCN_A Age3] := setIdP SCN3_A. | |
have: A \in 'SCN_3[p] by apply/bigcupP; exists P; rewrite // inE. | |
move/SCN_3_Uniqueness=> uA; have cAA := SCN_abelian SCN_A. | |
case/setIdP: SCN_A; case/andP=> sAP _ _; have pA := pgroupS sAP pP. | |
apply: any_cent_rank3_Uniquness uA pB _ _ => //. | |
by rewrite (abelem_cyclic abelB) dimB3. | |
by rewrite -dimB3 -p_rank_abelem ?p_rankS. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Theorem 9.6, second assertion *) | |
Theorem cent_rank3_Uniqueness K : 'r(K) >= 2 -> 'r('C(K)) >= 3 -> K \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
move=> Kge2 CKge3; have cCK_K: K \subset 'C('C(K)) by rewrite centsC. | |
apply: cent_uniq_Uniqueness cCK_K _ => //. | |
apply: rank3_Uniqueness (mFT_cent_proper _) CKge3. | |
by rewrite -rank_gt0 ltnW. | |
Qed. | |
(* This is B & G, Theorem 9.6, final observation *) | |
Theorem nonmaxElem2_Uniqueness p A : A \in 'E_p^2(G) :\: 'E*_p(G) -> A \in 'U. | |
Proof. | |
case/setDP=> EpA nmaxA; have [_ abelA dimA2]:= pnElemP EpA. | |
case/setIdP: EpA => EpA _; have [pA _] := andP abelA. | |
apply: cent_rank3_Uniqueness; first by rewrite -dimA2 -(rank_abelem abelA). | |
have [E maxE sAE] := pmaxElem_exists EpA. | |
have [/pElemP[_ abelE _]] := pmaxElemP maxE; have [pE cEE _] := and3P abelE. | |
have: 'r(E) <= 'r('C(A)) by rewrite rankS // (subset_trans cEE) ?centS. | |
apply: leq_trans; rewrite (rank_abelem abelE) -dimA2 properG_ltn_log //. | |
by rewrite properEneq; case: eqP maxE nmaxA => // => /group_inj-> ->. | |
Qed. | |
End Nine. | |