Deletion of Forbes Fictional 15 (3rd nomination)

Comment: Meets  with coverage across media in multiple countries.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8433739/Scrooge-McDuck-tops-Forbes-Fictional-15-wealthiest-characters.htmlhttp://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/04/forbes-fictional-15-richest-characters-topped-by-smaug/http://www.msnbc.com/jansing-co/chris-list-forbes-fictional-15https://www.themarysue.com/forbes-fictional-15-twilight-vampire/http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/nation/the-15-richest-fictional-characters/http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-bruce-wayne-tony-stark-christian-grey-make-it-to-the-forbes-15-richest-fictional-characters-list-1901694http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/25/who-is-the-richest-fictional-character/ Last nomination was 10 years ago so that doesn't count for much. An alternative would be to merge to Forbes if it had a section on the company's famous lists, but do the thing which requires the least work. No indication of  either: lists are notable if they get media coverage which this plainly does. And if fiction isn't notable or encyclopedic then why do we have approximately 1000000 articles on fictional topics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)