Deletion of Roadworthiness

Comment: Via some basic Google searches, I found multiple sources which collectively suggest that the article has enough  to be expanded well beyond a dictionary definition (e.g. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Roadworthiness Google Scholar and http://www.google.com/search?q=Roadworthiness&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Google Books).  I agree that the article needs a fair bit of work by editor(s) with the time and inclination to sift through the published legal statutes and technical papers covering multiple national jurisdictions to put together a proper encyclopedic article.  Nonetheless, it can be done and hence deletion is not a necessary remedy ().  Also, I agree with a previous comment that it is possible for an article to provide a descriptive overview of what the law states across multiple jurisdictions without violating : i.e. an encyclopedic article simply provides a summary of what the law states, while a how-to guide gives advice on specific applications of the law
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:HOWTO)