Deletion of June 2017 Brussels attack

Comment: per EM Gregory. Continued coverage and discussion, including in academic sources indicates notability and not just routine  level of coverage. If the nominator's concerns on SYNTH are those currently discussed at the article talk page (the appropriate place to discuss such issues), it seems like a honest mistake on EM Gregory's part in which they confused two different ISIS-affiliated outlets, and not something that merits wholesale deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: If anyone still cares, the recent "expansion" by Gregory is, as usual, filled with |synth. I have just begun to look at this "expansion" and already found synth https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/808887377 here. More likely to follow. I hope editors remain diligent and avoid being fooled by news commentary and passing mentions being played off as in-depth sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)