Deletion of Kate Prusack

Comment: Notability is |not inherited, so a person does not get a Wikipedia article just for garnering some media coverage in the context of happening to be in a relationship with someone who, by virtue of ''his'' notability claim, is going to have his personal life ''invaded'' by the media almost by definition.  is not passed just because sources exist; if that were true we'd have to keep articles about presidents of local PTAs and owners of hot dog stands, because coverage of people at that level of significance does exist too. Rather, the sources ''do'' have to be covering her in a ''context'' that ''constitutes'' a reason why she might belong in an encyclopedia. In the (unlikely, but never say never) event that Johnson ''wins'' the election, she'll qualify for an article as the incoming First Lady of the United States — but "is dating a candidate for president" is not, in and of itself, a reason why we would need to maintain an article about her if we can't really say much ''more'' about her than that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails to achieve notability on her own merits. I see no reason to believe she is "|'remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSON)