Deletion of Tom Konecny

Comment: This whole article works really hard to give the appearance of notability to someone who is a very early-in-career doctor, but I'll comment on only a few salient points: (1) On the research claims (i.e. "his work has been published in the leading medical and popular journals"), we find 6 articles in WoS (along with a few meeting abstracts and letter-to-the-editor) with ''total'' cumulative citations of 18 and h-index of only 3. (2) First Prize in research presentations at an ACP chapter meeting is not a prestigious award at the national level (as described in  #2). (3) The article goes on to give a recitation of presumably more senior and famous physicians our subject has worked with, but he does not inherit notability through these channels. (4) Finally, much of the "coverage" listed in the sources are simply conference programs and abstracts, i.e. normal research fodder. This person very well may become notable some day, but is still far from it at the present time. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)