Deletion of Bernie Siegel (2nd nomination)

Comment: Spiritual/New Age source ≠ fringe source. The two sources are good, they meet the criteria for |reliable sources. I am impressed by his position (25) on Watkins' list. Looks like a well-thought out and educated list, and I must note that we have articles on many of the listees, right down to #100 Marion Woodman. I would like to see at least one more substantive source, since I presume the Watkins' list entry is rather brief (really the magazine with the full list should be cited along with a link to the web page with the top 10
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: according to , books which have been on bestseller lists are notable. According to , authors of bestselling books are notable. Exclusion of people for their spiritual or religious views that you do not share is |non-neutral |censorship
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTCENSORED)