Deletion of Joseph Steinberg (3rd nomination)

Comment: I saw Steinberg on television in Canada not that long ago and he is widely quoted about security matters in the security, business, and mainstream press per the links in the article (and a Google search). I agree with Dkriegls: per reative  which definitely applies since Steinberg is known primarily for his writing and for creating new technology: Based on the number of his peers who quote him, and other respected journalists who quote him, Steinberg is clearly “regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers.” Even more true since his patents are also cited by many of his peers. The links on Steinberg’s Google’s scholar page show besides many security companies citing his patents, some of those citing him are from other major computer companies like Microsoft so clearly Steinberg is also notable for “originating a significant new concept, theory or technique” as well as “widely cited by peers.” I also believe the other point Dkriegls made about Steinberg playing a major role in co-creating a significant work applies for the reason that he mentioned above. Steinberg meets criteria 1, 2, and 3. Definitely notable. Special:Contributions/99.226.47.28|99.226.47.28
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)