Deletion of Stewart Levenson (2nd nomination)

Comment: A borderline speedy though the text is clearly different from the previous round, but it still comes off as an attempt to keep the candidate to the fore. The only possible sign of real notability is the whistleblower thing, which smells of  except that we don't appear to have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I'll grant that this doesn't qualify for speedy, as the notability claim here is completely different than it was the first time, but it's still not one that makes the article keepable. Being an as yet non-winning candidate in a future election is not grounds for a Wikipedia article — a person has to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' office, not just have his name on the ballot, to pass . But this doesn't make any claim of preexisting notability that would have gotten him an article for any other reason either. So no prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat, but nothing here entitles him to already have a Wikipedia article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)