Deletion of Pan Theodor Mundstock

Comment: Reviews and academic discussion easily meet  #1 and . A  check would have proven notability. {{oldid2|851795519|Significantly expanded}}, so {{tq|no honest prospect for development}} was wrong. Re : "A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion." In any case, it was a brief placeholder for a significant book. ''Who'' made it isn't the issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:G5)