Deletion of Laurence M. Vance (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article's subject is still the topic of notable discussion, as the article notes in the  "Notes" section. Please see http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0504g.asp, https://www.mises.org/misesreview_detail.asp?control=276&sortorder=issue, and http://www.chalcedon.edu/articles/article.php?ArticleID=4. The assertion in this nom that the article has not been updated since the last AfD was ''closed'' is correct, however interested parties should note that the three sources I link above were added ''during'' the last AfD. Thus, while the nom assertion is technically true, it is ''not'' the case that this article has lain untouched since the previous nom brought up the concerns that are again raised here. Vance is not "extremely notable," but his work has been the topic of notable discussion and has been published in notable venues (not including his own press). Let's remember that #Notability is generally permanent|notability is generally permanent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: with no prejudice against re-creation if his controversial views achieve more widespread coverage. An interesting dude, who claims the Confederate side of the Civil War was a "just war" and that todays politicians using the cloak of Christianity to justify going to war are wrong, a view congruent with the National Association of Evangelicals, but contrary to most fundamentalist right-wing televangelists. He needs to get on The Daily Show with John Stewart. References from books he publishes fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)