Deletion of James D. Montgomery

Comment: while there isn't anything here to sugges that the subject meets  some of the recent ADF noms in this category make me nervous, and so I will withhold my vote.  The proftest is a very high bar.  If "more important than the average actor" or "more important than the average band" were that standards for other bio-like articles then a lot of cruft would go.   There are over a million schools in the US alone, if each one gets an article, then  seems an overly severe standard for scientists and other professional researchers.  There is nothing wrong with PROFTEST, it's simply out of step with other WP standards of notability, where more inclusionist editors have sway over notability standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST)

Comment: bad faith nomination, prod nomination does not even present a prima facie case for deletion, putting the lie to the nominator's stated motives for his crusade to delete articles on academics. Also accessory Wikistalking and  violation, since the original prodder has been targeting new user Tseeker's contribution for deprecation, disregarding the terms of the consensus deletion policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)