Deletion of Sceptic - journal published by University of London 1958

Comment: Whilst the article as it stands doesn't appear to be a notable subject, AfD'ing anything on the day it's first day it's created is a dubious practice. If it's so urgent and nasty that we have to shoot it on sight (WP:BLP or something) then we have s for doing that. This article hurts nothing, and maybe the creator has some vast new content yet to add. Nothing is served by this hurry, and it alienates new editors. If it doesn't improve after a week, ''then'' AfD it, but otherwise what's the hurry? We don't get to score ourselves for each scalp we hunt down and kill, we certainly don't aid the project by ing new article creators
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:BITE)