Deletion of You didn't build that

Comment: The notability of this topic (despite all protestations) is nil. Reviewing the relevant guideline, , the third bullet: "''Events having lesser coverage or more limited scope may or may not be notable; the descriptions below provide guidance to assess the event.''" and the fourth bullet "''Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) - whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time - are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance.''" apply here.  Looking at the sources in the article, none of them satisfy , and none of them satisfy .  This is precisely the "water cooler" type event that does not merit it's own article.  Including the content in the relevant campaign article is what makes sense here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: Unsuccessful campaign strategy and agree with  and . Maybe the real issue here is candidates focusing on the little things like this or "legitimate rape" instead of the major issues at hand, but that's probably best left to a different thread. Dreambeaver
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: The nominator is entirely correct about many points, especially that this is clearly non-notable as it had no lasting impact and |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which applies to more than its few examples given there. While it was a major topic at the RNC, notability is not inherited from the RNC/Romney campaign/the election as a whole, and therefore the article was never notable and  does not apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NTEMP)