Deletion of Scott Doe (3rd nomination)

Comment: The player does not meet the  guideline because the highest level he has played in so far is the 5th level (''not'' the 6th level as stated by the nominator) Conference National, which is a mixture of fully professional and semi-professional clubs. In this respect it is similar to the League of Ireland, player articles from which the nominator has been admirably trying to defend at every quarter. The sources provided clearly |verify the player's status and achievements, and arguably satisfy . He has been reported in national outlets like ''The Times'', BBC Sport and Sky Sports. In any case, and I know this is |crystalballing, he is now signed on a two year contract by a club in the 4th level Football League Two, and will therefore likely meet the  guideline soon as well. My attitude towards this is similar to ''well sourced'' articles about Irish players
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:V||WP:N||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: The article has more than enough references to pass , meeting the requirement for multiple substantial sources in third-party sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: sources Great Scott, Great Scott is one for future and Scott signs up are in detail passing significant independent coverage part of , which supercedes . Nom is factually incorrect, he has never played below the Conference National, which is the 5th tier in English football
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE)