Deletion of Susie Lu

Comment: per the nom, Possibly and Vexations, and per , including footnote 5, which discusses 'intellectual independence' - the six sources repeating information reported by ''Fast Company'' might contribute to notability if they were 'partial derivatives,' but only if they are |reliable sources, which as non-academic, non-news-outlet blogs, they are not. And ''https://www.fastcompany.com/90347782/the-humble-receipt-gets-a-brilliant-redesign Fast Company'' reports, "she doesn’t have plans to take the project any further." There are also two interviews published by her alma mater, links to her own website, a brief mention of the Viz Palette tool in an academic journal (https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008259 PLOS, 2020), a review of the tool by ''https://www.fastcompany.com/90168112/viz-palette-the-ultimate-tool-for-anyone-who-works-with-color Fast Company'', a brief mention of a 2017 tool from the ''https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sa-visual/visualizing-science-illustration-and-beyond/ Scientific American blog'', an interview with ''https://dataviztoday.com/shownotes/07 Data Viz Today'', a brief mention in a https://gijn.org/2017/08/29/top-ten-developments-in-data-visualization-this-year/ reproduced blog post by an author claiming no expertise, a https://resources.experfy.com/bigdata-cloud/third-wave-data-visualization/ brief mention of her cartoons, two ''Medium'' posts, a https://thedatacooks.com/blog/what-charts-say/ blog briefly mentioning a chart she made and her cartoons, and an https://www.worldcat.org/title/interactive-data-visualization-for-the-web-an-introduction-to-designing-with-d3/oclc/1001253513 e-book written by a college instructor that I cannot access. From my view,  requires more than this, even though it allows the combination of multiple independent and reliable sources "if the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial"; most sources do not appear to be independent and/or reliable, and most of the independent and reliable sources I have reviewed do not offer much more than trivial mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:RELIABLE||WP:BASIC)