Deletion of PictureTalk (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article has existed since February, they've had sufficient time to improve it, the primary editors of the article have spamed all competing vendor and web conferencing articles to link to their company page.  Though spamming is an unrelated matter, dubious activity and no effort to improve their article over a 5 month period shows the objective of their article is solely for advertising. Please note I may be in a  as I am involved in this marketplace.  I am also an expert in web conferencing.  Had they not spammed every single topic related to web conferencing and other  vendor articles (to link to their company article), I would not be involved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)