Deletion of List of people reported to have lived beyond 130

Comment: it is duplicating much of Longevity myths. Why 130? The article contains Biblical characters are 100+. Would a report of aworld record breaking 127 not be notable? Unavoidable issues of , I haven't got the edition of World records cited but the next edition makes it very clear that many of the claims are not of this age, yet, it is used for a citation without qualification. It should be noted that none of the claims has any scientific foundation. Surely, this would be better handled by an article commenting on longevity rather than a specific amalgamation of lists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)