Deletion of Nevada Stoody Hayes

Comment: to her husband -- She was not a pretender to any throne, though her husband was.  Her marriage seems to have been regarded as morganatic, that is not conferring royal status.  Even apart from that she would not have inherited his claim to the throne, because that would devolve according to the national law of succession, not according to the pretender's will.  The royalty of kingdoms are commonly notable, though distant relatives of a monarch may not be.  Pretenders (claimants to abolished thrones) will probably be notable, though not necessarily when abolition is so distant an event that the possibility of restoration is illusory.  However there non-royal relatives are not necessarily notable.  This is a common situation in WP with nobility ().  A common solution is to merge a summary of a wife's bio to her notable husband, leaving the usual redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)