Deletion of List of film spoofs in Mad

Comment: This is obviously not indiscriminate as the scope is quite narrow.  Complaining that it's fancruft is just .  AS Mad magazine, has a long history and is well-documented in detail by works such as ''Completely Mad: A History of the Comic Book and Magazine'', it seems reasonable to maintain such spinoffs which tie the magazine to the major movies over the years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I agree with Bayshrimp.  MAD film parodies individually are not notable, and a collection of them is an |indiscriminate collection of information; however, an encyclopedic article that explores their effect on pop culture and popular conception of satire would be much different.  Plus, it would live up to Cirt's "it's educational" argument.  As it stands, this is no more encyclopedic than a list of all the famous people named ''Bob
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)