Deletion of Sabongari fire outbreak

Comment: I hereby flag this discussion to '''speedy keep''' per #1. The nominator had failed to advance an argument for the article deletion. The article seemed not to be a candidate for deletion in the first instance and the nominator's rationale for deletion is not a policy-based rationale
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: per nom. Fires in crowded markets are a dime-a-dozen; even https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJe_Myo2RHE spectacular ones shouldn't rate articles for  reasons. Even massive ''deadly'' fires are often forgotten by RS beyond their current news cycle. Fires are the most common form of piece-meal property destruction
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)