Deletion of Linda C. Sobell

Comment: In addition to the points made above, she is also a recipient of multiple national level scientific awards, and that would already be enough to pass #C1. I added several references for those. This kind of specific and detailed biographical coverage http://southfloridahospitalnews.com/page/NSUs_Linda_Carter_Sobell_to_Receive_Betty_Ford_Award/1532/2/https://www.div12.org/dr-linda-sobell-receives-jellinek-memorial-award/ should be sufficient to pass / as well. I should add that it appears that the subject had been involved in a major scientific controversy in the 1980s. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/stanton-peele/alcoholism_b_3559263.html,https://www.nytimes.com/1982/11/02/science/showdown-nears-in-feud-over-alcohol-studies.html, https://www.peele.net/lib/glass.html, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-1684-6_9 Something about that ought to be added to the article, if someone has the time to look into the sources more closely and figure out what to say
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: As well as the pass of #C3 documented here her Google Scholar citation counts (for search term author:lc-sobell) appear even higher than claimed above, with top citation count on GS over 3500 and 48 publications with over 100 citations each (h-index presumably well above that), so the case for #C1 is also clear. I found three published reviews of one of her books https://doi.org/10.1192/S0007125000095234 https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.135.2.269 https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.29.7.475 and a significant controversy over one of her papers, reported as having "attracted considerable attention" https://www.jstor.org/stable/3967082. So there is also plenty of material with which to expand her article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)