Deletion of Ruby Muhammad

Comment: Please take a closer look. Above I cited significant coverage from: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=zCAyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=faIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4994,4443597&dq=ruby-muhammad&hl=en 2003 article by Teichert, Sacramento Bee,  http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=69975 2006 article by Saini, News and Review,  http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/19768/The_Mother_of_Sacramento  2009 article by Mendick, Sacramento Press, and http://www.sacbee.com/2010/02/17/2542081/112-year-old-plans-to-give-a-performance.html  2010 article by Creamer, Sacramento Bee. I do not see that a long article specifically about a person is "trivial." I do not see that articles in various newspapers by different writers published in  different years are not independent of the subject and each other. Even the "debunking" efforts by Young attest the subjects notability. The standard for |notability is whether she is noted, not whether she was born in 1897
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)