Deletion of Marcus Lindblom

Comment: A few things here: (1) yes, Lindblom is known for ''EarthBound'', which is why he meets #3 for his role as documented as the subject of multiple, independent articles: http://kotaku.com/the-man-who-wrote-earthbound-1188669175http://www.polygon.com/2014/1/18/5308416/why-did-nintendo-quash-a-book-about-earthbounds-developmenthttp://www.wired.com/2013/07/marcus-lindblom-earthbound/http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/news/35371/earthbound-book-from-english-translator-to-launch-on-kickstarter. (2)  this article went to AfD, the discussion at WT:VG and alternatives to deletion should have been discussed first. At the absolute least, Lindblom is still a prime redirect term, so AfD is the wrong venue. (3) Lindblom doesn't meet any of the three prongs of a : not a single event, not a low-profile individual, not an unsubstantial role. Looks like a vague wave at policy to me. czar&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:BLP1E)