Deletion of Omnicron

Comment: Upcoming films are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because IMDb and a Twitter tweet from the director technically verify that the film is in the production pipeline — as far as IMDb is concerned, for example, as of right now the film is still only in ''pre-''production. And the inclusion test isn't even just "filming has started", either — for the vast majority of films, notability hinges on ''commercial and/or festival release'', and only a very select few especially high profile projects that get ''constant'' coverage throughout the process, such as the ''Star Wars'' franchise, get to claim notability just because ''filming'' is in progress. So no prejudice against recreation if and when the film is actually in release and getting reviewed by critics, but nothing here is a valid reason for a Wikipedia article to already exist today. I also strongly suspect a direct |conflict of interest here, since the creator's been very nearly an SPA for Caillou Pettis over several years, beginning when Caillou Pettis was "known" ''only'' for a short Batman fanfilm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: per . The director's article has been repeatedly recreated by sockpuppets, and this article appears to be just another sock creation (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Filmlover2016|these Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FilmLover2016/Archive|SPIs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)