Deletion of Earthquake fish

Comment: to Giant oarfish. Agree with the OP. I'm not seeing any strong evidence one way or the other on the issue of whether the other two will have articles at some point, so I see no reason to delete content that could eventually be spun out into its own article(s). But if the content is merged, the  citations to Chinese Wikipedia should be removed. (As an aside, while I don't think it's related, it is suspicious that a shitty article on a Taiwanese topic would show up right after WAM. I was not that active on WAM this year, but I do think the event needs to get its act together; they were reluctant, earlier, to implement stricter content rules as it might discourage content creation, but the number of entries seems to have gone down every year regardless, without a forced improvement in article quality
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:CIRCULAR)