Deletion of Jar'Edo Wens hoax

Comment: It's notable; the article just needs cleaning up. The argument that "''Other longer running hoaxes were later found and there're no articles about them''" is meaningless and the opposite of  ("The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on what other articles do or do not exist"}. Just because other articles on hoaxes don't exist doesn't mean they should not or will not exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)