Deletion of Manatee Palms Youth Services

Comment: This clearly has multiple instances of non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. This clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Cmadler and others.  Many referenceshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Manatee+Palms+Youth+Services&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives  I've reviewed a number of them and found sustained substantial coverage by regional reliable news sources over a period of time on multiple matters.  The fact that most of the events that gave rise to the institution's notability are negative ones is not a criticism as such, it's just a series of negative events.  Perhaps that comes with the territory of being a mental hospital, particularly a "troubled" one.http://www.groundreport.com/Business/Florida-Regulators-Stop-Admissions-to-Troubled-You/2923094  Although some of the negative items are probably not worth noting in such a short article there are more recent events (an involuntary closure, new claims of abuse, etc.) that are not yet treated in the article.  The article has the potential to be a  and we need to make sure all of this stuff is presented in neutral, encyclopedic form.  That probably means getting rid of the "criticism" section in favor of a chronologically or thematically ordered structure.  If the article is imbalanced, we can trim at the edges but rather than getting rid of any key events in the institution's history, it would be better to fill out the other sections with a reasonable account of the institution's founding, management, programs, finances, and so on.  ''(note: I was alerted to this discussion by the AN/I report in question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)