Deletion of India and state sponsored terrorism

Comment: Yes, I concur with what ''Suraj88'', ''DBigXray'' above me have already said, it iniquitously violates ,  and perhaps . Reliable sources must be strong enough to support the claim. Questionable sources are generally unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties, which includes claims against institutions, persons living or dead, as well as more ill-defined entities. The proper uses of a questionable source are very limited. A lightweight source may sometimes be acceptable for a lightweight claim, but never for an extraordinary claim.This article is actually imputing terrorism to a ''whole'' nation, even though ''NO'' concrete evidence (only fabricated claims) has been provided on ''international podium'' to make India seem liable for "sponsoring-terrorism". This article is itself a wicked violation of . An article on the subject of ''this magnitude'' based on the unsubstantiated, speculative, tenuous reports or unfounded, propagandist allegations by unreliable, biased sources is not what should be encouraged. Also I don't think the article meets . Wikipedia is not an |indiscriminate collection of information. Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the ''purposes'' of article creation. Minor news stories are all examples of coverage but they do not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources. Thank you
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:COAT||WP:NOTCASE||WP:NPOV||WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)