Deletion of Jayne Mansfield in popular culture

Comment: Actually we did address the issues. |Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability are satisfied as indicated by DGG with two unimpeachable and serious references.  In addition, in one year 1956/1957, there were 2500+ newspaper photos, and 122,000+ newspaper lines of coverage published. There are also other references to her status in popular culture. I guess |Neutral POV could be addressed by adding an equal number of pop culture items that ''don't'' refer to Jayne Mansfield for balance (that's a joke, I think we need a bit of humor). The article is referenced, organized, and generally selective, although it could use pruning.  Pop culture has an overwhelming power to shape and form our culture, so it is a very suitable and important encyclopedic subject. There is a scholarly peer reviewed journal entitled: ''Journal of Popular Culture''. From their site: '' The Journal of Popular Culture continues to break down the barriers between so-called “low” and “high” culture and focuses on filling in the gaps a neglect of popular culture has left in our understanding of the workings of society.''http://www.msu.edu/~tjpc/ I say again, there is no consensus for deletion here, and the article ''is'' encyclopedic. And finally, there is no general consensus for the deletion of  articles in WP, nor is there a policy forbidding them (even if they are discouraged
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NPOV||WP:IPC)