Deletion of Nicholas Winset (2nd nomination)

Comment: or such. He certainly does not pass , nor would he be expected to (he is/was an adjunct). But I am with a version of keep on this one because, if renamed to be about his firing (addressing the  concern) and rewritten around the Controversy section, the article becomes about an event that looks to have legs. Besides the current links including BoGo and WaPo, it is featured on Chronicle of Higher Education|the Chronicle (http://chronicle.com/blogs/onhiring/jumping-the-gun/63), which in turn links to another article published on Salon (website)|Salon
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This appears to be a textbook example of both , since his firing seems to be the only noteworthy thing about him, and , since all of the sources appear within a week of each other.  As they say, "the story did not have legs".  My own search did not find any significant coverage of him that did not involve his firing.  Since his firing didn't seem to lead to anything significant, I also don't see where it is a WP notable event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)