Deletion of UFC on FX: Sotiropoulos vs. Pearson

Comment: as per : '''"Individual events are not inherently considered notable because, on the whole, the coverage they receive is outine|routine in nature (consisting of the event announcement, who is going to take part, and the results). To be considered for a standalone article, the article will need to demonstrate the event's |lasting effect using references from S|reliable and |diverse sources that are both Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject and show that the |duration of coverage lasted beyond the end of the event."''' This article has 12 citations, from 6 different sources. Both http://www.theherald.com.au/ nor http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ are typical newspaper websites and therefore "independent of the subject". The event is scheduled for December 15th and the sources range from September 7 to November 16, 2012. If this does not pass  i'm not sure what will. if  is not how we determine if an MMA article does or does not meet  then we need to come up with a more clear standard
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MMANOT||WP:R||WP:EFFECT||WP:RS||WP:DIVERSE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:MMANOT||WP:MMANOT||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: As per , as described above. I've been following this debate about the deletion of UFC articles for several months now, and it has become very clear that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)