Deletion of James M. Honeycutt

Comment: per .  While I think that the subject is probably marginally notable per  C1 and possibly C8 (although certainly not C5), the case doesn't look so strong per previous comments.  The unreferenced mess that is the existing article would need complete reworking in order to be a useful article. Blow it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NPROF)

Comment: from the number of citations this is a very borderline  case, but the promotional writing and lack of reliable sources are major problems that cannot be easily solved. At the very least this needs to be deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:TNT)