Deletion of UNICE global brain project

Comment: as original synthesis as well as lacking notability. I can't find evidence of discussion of this in independent, reliable sources - zero relevant hits on Scholar ('''note:''' when doing your own searches, watch for false positives generated by the University of Nice Sophia Antipolis (unice.fr) and the Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations of Europe; the three apparent hits you get when searching for "Universal Network of Intelligent Conscious Entities" all stem from authors having tried to look up the union acronym expansion - presumably via Wikipedia's disambiguation page - but having failed and picked the wrong one), and a handful of self-published hits on Google proper. One non-primary book hit - in a book marketed with "Can you put together the similarities and understand the TRUTH that organized religion and the government have sought to keep from us? Do you have the ears to HEAR?"...And as pointed out, the only non-primary sources in the article are synthesis - various sources talking about a world brain, a global brain, artificial intelligence|AI or consciousness in general being synthesized into discussion about this non-notable concept instead.As for the "Wiki-UNICE topics", 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWEBHOST)

Comment: The main topic seems non-notable, while the subtopics aren't even encyclopedia articles.  The subtopics in particular should be deleted per , as they are intended to be used for people to collaborate on finding solutions to problems.  Those pages seem completely incompatible with Wikipedia's purpose as an encyclopedia, and with core policies such as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)