Deletion of Second Glance (film)

Comment: as  is a poor deletion rationale, |multiple reliable sources are available with |due diligence, and nominator's |well-meant nomination shows a misunderstanding of the |applicable |notability guidelines. Also, nom's recent spat of deletion prods and noms being toward Christian-related articleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dkchana is MOST worrisome
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:AGF||WP:GNG||WP:NF)

Comment: Because we are about consensus, which part of  would you say it does not meet? What are some parts of  that you would say it does meet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:MOVIE)