Deletion of James Holloway (actor)

Comment: Despite the opinion of the article's creator, the deletion rationale is sound and well-founded. Subject does not meet , , . There is a paucity of content  |cited from |reliable sources that are |unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for |fact checking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR||WP:ANYBIO||WP:IS||WP:V||WP:cite||WP:reliable sources)

Comment: Just on its own the article makes no realistic attempt to demonstrate notability, the refs are lightweight and mostly interview based and give a good impression of being based on press releases. It signally fails . What concerns me more is the strangely familiar text of the article's defence above by its SPA author. Is somebody being paid here ? '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)