Deletion of List of fictional archenemies

Comment: You could ''theoretically'' write a version of this list that passed all our content policies, but it would suck (especially from a  standpoint), and TV Tropes already http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ArchEnemy does it better. Thus, I'd let it fall outside our scope
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: besides being full of , this list would end up being utterly unmaintainable.  I can't fathom the number of arch-nemeses there are, and who would argue what is and what isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per ,  and . Also, I noticed that all the users saying "keep" are saying so simply because the article is |useful. '''Erpert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:UNDUE||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: Per  - "Lists that are .. too broad in scope have little value."  This list is of potentially infinite scope and therefore must be too broad.  "List of fictional DC comics archenemies" would be an appropriate list, by comparison.  As a side argument, note that a featured list "comprehensively covers the defined scope"; is there any value in permitting a list to remain that is by definition incapable of achieving the featured list criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)