Deletion of Aleksander Piotr Mohl

Comment: I'm not sure here, but endorse giving the author a bit more time. I've added to sources, Piotrowski 2004 p 61 and Rojek 2000 p 515 which briefly cover Mohl's career in a footnote and index, respectively (I only see snippet view of either). These two bits alone give enough information that the substantive parts of Mohl's career discussed in the article pass . In the index of Rojek 2000, it says Mohl is discussed on 5 pages. Looking for snippets from those pages, Mohl seems to be a significant character in the story being woven, for instance on page 199, the snippet involving Mohl talks about Mohl's playing at least a substantive if small role in advising those involved in recovering Poland's gold reserves. So my guess based on Rojek 2000 is that Mohl passes /, at least for a single source (and it would be a surprise if more sources didn't exist, given the comparative paucity of Polish sources online). That said, there are definitely some OR and POV issues in how the article is currently written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV)