Deletion of 4cabling

Comment: I nominated the Kersh article as well; please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Kersh. I don't believe that the sourcing in the company article meet ; if there are specific examples of such coverage, I'd be glad to review them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: or '''Merge'''. There are no indications of notability for this company and despite the Keep !votes above, once again there appears to be a fundamental misunderstanding among some editors on the differences between sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability  of an organization and the *lower* standard of sources required for citations to support facts or information within an article. In order for references to meet the criteria for establishing notability, they must be intellectually independent - broadly speaking, this rules out references that are largely based on company announcements, hiring and firing news and references that rely extensively on interviews and quotations from company employees or related companies. Effectively that rules out all of the sources provided. I looked at the AfD of Nicole Kersh and the references that nudged that article to a Keep decision are all based on interviews. While references like those may be used to satisfy the |criteria for notability for people, it specifically |fails the criteria for organizations. Merging this content to Kersh's article appears like the sensible thing to do (perhaps one day  will also exclude references extensively based on PRIMARY sources from the criteria for establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PEOPLE||WP:ORGIND)