Deletion of Super-Jupiter

Comment: I'm ambivalent; I see indications this isn't a complete open-and-shut case. We have a Category:Super-Jupiters, which rather strongly implies there are other Wikipedians who feel Super-Jupiters are encyclopaedic.  Also, a few minutes on google does show up references to the term http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/1358/amateur-planet-hunters-help-find-strange-super-jupiterhttp://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_space_thewritestuff/2007/06/super_jupiter_d.html.  Those indications aren't sufficient to prevent deletion (they boil down to  and sources I don't consider reliable) but they do imply it would be worth asking an expert. I'll tag the article for expert attention accordingly
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)