Deletion of We the People Act (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not remotely notable, the bill has never been considered by the House Judiciary Committee; and has had no impact on the public debate.  The article has no printed secondary reliable sources: a passing mention on a radio show, two blogs, and a Christian right web magazine.  Merits maybe a sentence, if that, in the Ron Paul article; there is nothing meaningful in this article that is not already in jurisdiction stripping (which, by the way, is an abysmal article that needs a substantial rewrite--why are people creating all these meaningless stubs over collateral legislation with zero chance of passing when the main articles are in such poor shape?).  Baileypalblue's argument for keeping confuses "possible impact" with "notability" in contradiction to ; the Equal Rights Amendment is notable not because of its possible impact, but because it was the subject of extensive public debate and coverage by secondary reliable sources.  The article is also factually inaccurate and has POV problems, but that's a different issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)