Deletion of Stephanie Fryar (2nd nomination)

Comment: She meets .  While it is correct that it does not trump GNG, it is a guideline that creates a presumption.  Therefore we presume sources exist unless given a valid reason otherwise.  Her qualification was 9 years ago.  Online, that is a long time.  A Google search for "2008 National Finals Rodeo" and "2008 NFR" yields only about 3,500 collective results results while a search for "2016 National Finals Rodeo" and "2016 NFR" collectively yields about 25,000 collective results.  I think the presumption is not just the coverage received by competing at the NFR, but the results that got a cowboy/cowgirl there (e.g., the rodeos they won that season and the coverage in newspapers and the like that those wins produced).  Is anyone really going to go to the medium-sized town newspaper archives from a decade ago to determine if there is coverage?  No.  If this were for a 2015 or 2016 qualifier, I would think a show cause would be fair.  But due to the age of this subjects top athletic prime, I think we need to have the presumption carry weight.  And as a reminder, the community of editors came up with the guideline to give the presumption - the stance that this is on par to competing on America's Got Talent and only winners are notable goes directly against what the editors established as the guideline.  GNG does trump, but when GNG is not able to be reasonable assessed, as is the case here, then we should follow the wishes of the community of editors and keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRODEO)