Deletion of Mordechai Gafni

Comment: The article is thoroughly documented, using ample reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. While the category issue may require clarification, all of the claims are supported with appropriate sources. If there are NPOV concerns, the issues should be addressed by editing or tagging the article, not by deletion. #ANARCHY is a new one one me, but this article hardly seems to be an example of that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The issue is about whether the subject has been shown to be notable according to Wikipedia policies, not about the article creator's motivations. There are ample references to get this past  and . There is also plenty of non-negative information in the article so it can't be called an attack page. If there are any POV or BLP issues they can be dealt with by editing. (and yes, this is a copy/paste from my comment on Aron Tendler but I couldn't think of anything different to say
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)