Deletion of Frances Fox Piven

Comment: Unfortunately for the subject, she seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per article subject's request. While she is fairly notable, I believe she is not so notable that it is unreasonable to delete the article, as she has apparently asked. While this would not be my decision otherwise, I think it's merited in this case. If it is kept, I recommend permanent semiprotection, or even full protection in the stubbed form advocated by the subject, in this case. I also ask that those voting "keep" watchlist the page, in order to continually revert the s parroting Glenn Beck on her biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: just based on the Glenn Beck obsession.  This makes her newsworthy in the sense that people who either listen to Beck, or read about Beck's attacks on her (and there is plenty of non-Beck mainstream coverage of the latter), will want to go to a neutral source like Wikipedia and read about her.  We have a lot of things that Wikipedia is |not for, but this is something that Wikipedia *is* for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)