Deletion of Alessandro Strumia

Comment: The press coverage from before the controversy is fine, but a bit thin: he's quoted briefly, or named as one of multiple collaborators. So, it's not nothing, but it only goes so far. His citation profile is good: multiple strongly-cited papers, even discounting those from big collaborations where it's hard to discern what exactly his contribution might have been. I think we have a net pass off . The recent dust-up after his speech will, I expect, fade into the background. (The reliable sources have come, written their pieces and gone.) It matters enough to be described, but not, I think, at much greater length than the article currently does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: A credited co-author on the Higgs boson paper, which is one of the most important scientific breakthroughs in our generation, but '''Delete''' the section about the 'incident at CERN', because it's not encyclopedic. If gender discrimination was in Strumia's field, there would be a much stronger argument for cataloging it for eternity. As is, this specific section has no bearing on the scientist and comes off as  in light of MeToo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)