Deletion of Paul Pogba (2nd nomination)

Comment: sigh, this article has been deleted by CSD, PROD and AfD many, many times before. He has done nothing of note, failing both  and . Any coverage he ''has'' received fails , and can be arguably traced back to  - none of which allow for this fellow to have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:NTEMP||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Please note my rationale for first honoring the #G4 and then restoring. The article is substantially improved. Content and sourcing are different from before. Much has changed in the two years since the last AFD. The question is now whether or not the subject meets the . It would be wise to consider what reliable sourcing is available but not yet in the article before deleting. I would certainly not salt the article.  This is the second AfD. It would have been more prudent to wait for the subject to meet thlete before recreating. The issue would not be murky. Salting while the possibility of the subject meeting  or thlete remains would only cause more drama later. Should the subject not yet prove notable, userfication would be preferential to deletion so that when/if notability is met, the article will have been kept up to date and ready to roll back to article space
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:GNG||WP:A||WP:GNG||WP:A)