Deletion of Tristan Tondino (2nd nomination)

Comment: following up on my delete !vote above - The article was created by an SPA with an obvious COI, and has been heavily edited by another SPA, both of whom are focused on articles related to Tondino and his father. The article is , just like the one that was deleted some years ago. Fails NARTIST on all four points: 1) they are NOT regarded as an important figure, nor are they widely cited by peers or successors; 2) They are NOT known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique; 3)They have NOT played a major role in creating a significant or well known work or collective body of work, nor are they the primary subject of an independent and notable work, nor multiple independent books, articles reviews that cover them in a significant way; 4) Their work is NOT a significant monument, substantial part of a significant exhibition (like solo shows at museums), they have not won significant critical attention, nor are they in permanent collections of notable galleries or museums. I could not verify any of the collections listed in the article (which are private, family members, or corporate). The museums he attempted to donate his work to did not accept it for their collections. Just because someone is an artist and has had a few shows or screenings and a couple mentions in the press, is not enough to merit an encyclopedia article. WP is not a LinkedIn equivalent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)