Deletion of Albert Okura

Comment: It has been covered by RandKitty already, but I will say this - the coverage cited falls under outine and because of it the article does not meet the standards of inclusion. The argument made DependableSkeleton relies on the mistaken belief that because the source is reliable, the material cited to it is automatically reliable as well. that is not the case. Many of these sources are biographical fluff pieces that do not meet the same editorial standards as news pieces, as such they should be discounted. Other sources fall under ignificant - they are not about the individual himself, but are about an other subject in which he chimes in or is mentioned and as such the do not establish anything beyond erifiability. These things taken together mean that the article falls short of the standards of inclusion. As I also understand it,  requires substantially more than these types of sources as well for these type of articles. (I do not work in too many biographies, so my knowledge of them is rudimentary at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:S||WP:V||WP:BLP)