Deletion of Neda Agha-Soltan

Comment: Like Soltan, Till did not survive his one event. There does not appear to be a separate article devoted to the event (the word "murdered" ''is'' linked in Till's article, but it is a rather patronizing, direct link to the murder article itself), so Emmett Till should probably just be renamed to Murder of Emmett Till or, as with Soltan, Death of Emmett Till. In very sharp contrast, Parks survived her most famous event, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, by almost precisely half a century--long enough to make ''plenty'' of additional headlines. I think it is safe to say that, by the time she started Rosa Parks v. LaFace Records|taking on the hip hop industry, she had outlived  by a reasonable margin. King, finally, is more ambiguous. The fact that he is still alive means both A) that he has had Rodney_King#After_the_riots|additional occasions to make the news, and B) that  applies, and 1E is worded even more strongly than , so there may be a case at least to deemphasize less prominent aspects of his life. So, out of the examples you provided, Till would seem to be the best comparison to Soltan; and, just as it could make sense to ''rename'' Till's ostensible biography to something like Death of Emmett Till, given that such an article does not separately exist, it seems reasonable to ''delete'' Soltan's ostensible biography, given that Death of Neda Agha-Soltan not only exists, but also cannot (for obvious reasons) be updated with biographical information postdating the event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I have responded to both of the editors whom you mention. Please consider these responses and see if my invocation of  makes more sense in light of them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: into Death of Neda Agha-Soltan. The woman was notable for her death, not for her earlier life. Clear case of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)