Deletion of Gospel Music Association

Comment: I didn't ignore the dead links, but them being dead does factor into if there is currently existing reliable in-depth coverage of the company or not. Which is what AfDs are about. On the hundreds of entries you found, great for you. See . I said sources came up when I looked, just that they where trivial coverage or weren't otherwise reliable. Notability goes beyond just the existence of sources. If you have sources that meet 's notability standards, 100% contribute them. Without them though, this company isn't notable. Let alone should it be speedy kept just because of some Google hits
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:NCORP)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, topic therefore fails GNG/. Also, can we ban people from !voting "Speedy" anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)