Deletion of Plot of Naruto: Shippūden (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom as redundant to List of Naruto: Shippūden episodes. ness is not an acceptable argument to keep an article that is in clear violation of policies, such as #PLOT. However, that also doesn't mean one should go on an  campaign to have every article about a book, movie, anime, or manga. #PLOT mealy prevents articles that are nothing more then plot summaries with little to no real-world context, sourced annalist or critical commentary. Generally small plot articles can often times be fixed by adding in such information and controlling their size. But when you get to the scale of this one, it's far to big to clean up and you are better off deleting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:NOT||WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:NOT)

Comment: too much |fancruft is included in the article and will keep being fluffed as long as the show goes on, which may take years. It's no different than the deleted Plot of Naruto, except it appears nicer. However,  does not justify its continued existence. Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:ILIKEIT)