Deletion of JonTron (5th nomination)

Comment: plenty of high-quality sources here (I'm actually kind of surprised there aren't more). Easily meets |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of sources about the person and the channel from well-established RSes like BBC, A.V. Club, Kotaku, TIME.... I think people dismiss Youtubers and a lot of "internet culture" things because they're not into it, but  is the baseline for every article, regardless of topic, and this article's sourcing '''''far exceeds''''' the requirements of GNG, even though admitting that may displease some who would like to see Wikipedia cover more academic/scientific/historical topics and less pop-culture ones. I know "other stuff" is an argument to avoid in AfDs but there is no denying that we have multiple BLPs (Youtubers including) that have passed AfDs with far less strong referencing. I have kept a watchful eye on the latest recreation of the article and even assisted somewhat with the source-finding, and there is a very good reason why I didn't G4 or re-AfD it -- the article now demonstrates that it passes . ☺&nbsp;·&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)