Deletion of Time Cube (7th nomination)

Comment: Fails  as it does not have significant coverage in multiple independent (mainstream) 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: If I didn't think it was notable, I would have nommed it for deletion a month ago when its presence started to disrupt my calm. There are two sources cited as the article currently stands, both of which appear to be reliable. One (Maine Campus article) definitely gives it more than trivial coverage. The other (PC Magazine) mentions some specific things about the site which can be (and have been) extracted and placed in the article without original research. It therefore meets the requirements set out in . So we have two reliable, non-trivial sources as required by  and by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:WEB)