Deletion of Pictish Mithraism

Comment: The theory is certainly , but whether it is ''notable'' fringe in the terms of the policy, I can't tell. The thin referencing suggests not. At the very least (copyvio apart) it should be rewritten to make this crystal-clear. It is unfortunate that the article contains, among the fringe stuff, more good information on & illustration of the Pictish symbols than we currently have anywhere else. If Penny manages to get his book published that might alter things a little, though I can't see it being an RS, but the article might work as one on the book, quoting reviews etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)