Deletion of Gardendale High School

Comment: to the article about the city. A little research in the local newspaper's files and the local historical society could probably produce enough references about the history and importance of the school  to make an adequate article, since high schools are important to their communities, and consolidation, mergers, the expense of their construction, controversies about policies, problems and achievements, athletic prowess, notable alumni are usually topics of news articles. If someone ever cares to do the work, perhaps a stand-alone article could be created in the future. Many high schools have been the subject of multiple stories in reliable publications with nontrivial content sufficient to satisfy 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Another article where ample |reliable and |verifiable sources were available and added to establish a strong claim of notability. I strongly encourage those who voted based on the original "one sentence article" cited in the original nomination, and to look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gardendale_High_School&diff=124478153&oldid=124277237 substantial changes made since the article was put up for AfD. Furthermore, any AfD nomination that uses the word "cruft" (or any form thereof) is worthy of retention in my book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)