Deletion of RPGnet

Comment: This article has a lot of unsourced information and what seems to be .  If you're interested in improving the article, I'd like to request that you help out with a few edits.  There's a large group of new anons on the talk page that aren't completely clear with the concept of  and I'm afraid that the article may turn into a large user opinion piece. Most notably, there seem to be some editors who have been banned and/or would like to include that the website has a strong political bias with only a Xanga blog article as a reference.  Anyway, I won't drag this conversation into this AfD.  If you'd like to help out, I'd greatly appreciate it.  An article about a website this old deserves to be written well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)

Comment: I'm a member of the RPGnet community. Those coming here to defend the RPGnet article I recommend: ''do your homework''. That is, if the article does not currently meet |notability guideline, find the resources that establish notability so there is no question. Look in your gaming print mags, your podcasts, your rpg news sites, and even mainstream news sources. RPGnet is a major hub for the rpg community with lots of hits, so I believe that such sources probably exist, it's just a matter of finding them and documenting them. If you need help adding a source you have found to the article, please feel free to contact me at my
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)