Deletion of What Really Happened (2nd nomination)

Comment: It looks like the notability criteria needs an amendment that takes into account the volume and quality of comments made in defense of a site. I also think that the number of google hits should be considered as well (on my count 343,000 for "whatreallyhappened"). For the time being, and as regards the#1 criteria on multiple non-trivial published works, there were indeed two articles in the Toronto Star by Antonia Zerbisias in 2002 on Rivero's site. Considering that whatreallyhappened.com focuses on highlighting news stories the mainstream media misses, it is surprising that it even achieved that distinction. If the article has flaws, it should be edited, not deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails  and per all the keep votes. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This site fails  no evidence has been established as to how it fulfills it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)