Deletion of Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism

Comment: but major improvement needed.  As a disinterested party, I don't find the article to fall under the "hate" umbrella, particularly as the primary editor has a done a relatively great job of phrasing the issue from an objective perspective:  "XYZ commentator critices that yadda-yadda footnote" as opposed to "the following things are terrible about Foo".  Is still lacks a solid lede, and the sourcing needs some tweaking (though not as much as implied by above opponents).  I do join in cautioning the primary editor that links to hate sights aren't inappropriate ''because'' they're hate sites, but solely because drawing conclusions from primary sources falls under  (original research).  It is, however, totally legitimate to cite academic sources which ''observe'', rather than participate in, criticism of one sect or another.  Plus we have plenty of articles or sections on "Criticism of X belief", so I don't see any particular reason the Shi'a should be exempted provided it can be done encyclopedically. Note also that a CV tag appears to have been maliciously added to block the text.  The tag provided no URL for the alleged vio, it was not added to the CV notification page, and not even an Edit Summary was given to explain it.  So I've deleted it (which would normally be an Admin issue only) do to lack of any attempt to comply with CV procedure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)