Deletion of Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)

Comment: There already exists a Lamia (mythology)|lamia in mythology from which the D&D creature is obviously derived, this should just be a footnote in the pop culture section of that page. I'm going to repeat the argument I made over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankheg (2nd nomination)|this nom. Delete per , "Almost everything on |this page made it here because somebody managed to come up with some new bad idea that had not previously been anticipated... In general, 'that is a terrible idea' is always sufficient grounds to avoid doing something, provided there is a good reason that the idea is terrible." Looking at , even if this specific case is not directly addressed, it is very similar in kind to CATALOG, DIRECTORY, EVERYTHING, , MANUAL, , etc.  should not have to anticipate every bad idea for inclusion that is out there. Do we need a Wikipedia:Poképrosal for D&D monsters
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BADIDEA||WP:NOT||WP:NOTCATALOG||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)