Deletion of October 2013 Great Plains blizzard

Comment: Not worthy of an article until it gets coverage in sources that are independent of the subject — including chronologically independent.  We can |break the requirement for independent sources with extraordinary events (imagine a repeat of September 11, for example), but a blizzard that's not even in the headlines in Ohio (where I am right now, with newspapers) is not the kind of extraordinary event that warrants an article right now.  Wait until it gets coverage in books or academic journals, or until news sources speak of it in the past tense rather than speaking of it as news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)