Deletion of Crawfordsville monster

Comment: The newspaper reports from the time should technically satisfy GNG, per ; the GNG standard is essentially ''equivalent'' to "well-documented". But in addition, the phenomenon has an entry in the https://books.google.com/books?id=HL7aAAAAMAAJ&q=%22crawfordsville+monster%22&dq=%22crawfordsville+monster%22&hl=pt-BR&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiym_jYqo3cAhUDNd8KHSueAoIQ6AEIXjAH Encyclopedia of Strange and Unexplained Physical Phenomena, which is legit enough to have been https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=15166996203521372457&as_sdt=5,39&sciodt=0,39&hl=pt-BR cited a half-dozen times in scholarly publications, and was the subject of a History Channel episode, besides the thorough treatment on the https://blog.newspapers.library.in.gov/crawfordsville-monster/ Indiana Digital State Newspaper Program blog
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)