Deletion of Mark Bezos

Comment: I PRODed the article shortly after creation on much the same grounds as this nominator. It was then BOLDly redirected to Blue Origin NS-16 and then restored to a separate article.) Although there is some decent coverage of Mark as a consequence of this flight, I still think this is precisely the sort of article designed to be captured by . I cannot see that he had any notability before it, nor have I been able to find any real pre-event SIGCOV (https://www.wagmag.com/from-fire-house-to-school-halls-mark-bezos-advocates-volunteering/ this article is all I could find, which seems more like a puff piece for a TED talk). When it comes to this event, his only contribution was as a passenger, a status derived from being related to the person who paid for it - he didn't come up with the idea, or do anything other than sit there whilst it happened. If you compare that to the examples in ONEEVENT it's hard to justify a standalone article. In summary, I can't see any notability outside this ONEEVENT and his contribution to the ONEEVENT was not significant enough to justify an article. Put it this way: I don't feel as though the encyclopaedia would lose anything at all if, instead of this page, there was simply a short paragraph at Blue Origin NS-16 explaining the background of the various passengers. That said, it is a decently sourced article, and it's not doing any damage, so it's a policy-based delete rather than a deeply-principled one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per arguments above, specifically in terms of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)