Deletion of Rabia Salihu Sa'id

Comment: Even if her scientific impact might not meet the criteria of , there seems to me to be ample coverage of Sa'id herself to meet the GNG. Significant coverage by the BBC (which whatever its involvement with this article is still a very reliable source) http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0306cj9http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2015/newsspec_12497/content/english/index.html?v=0.1.21&hostid=www.bbc.com&hostUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fworld-34745739&iframeUID=responsive-iframe-58024518&onbbcdomain=true#facewall_78, NPR http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/02/17/386549295/tough-as-nails-women-scientists-rise-up-in-nigeria, Nature http://www.nature.com/news/developing-world-the-minority-minority-1.17023, Elsevier https://www.elsevier.com/connect/women-in-physics-and-math-to-receive-elsevier-foundation-awards-at-aaas-meeting and Yahoo News https://www.yahoo.com/news/5-women-scientists-developing-world-know-203541481.html?ref=gs stand out in particular. Remember we're here to judge notability, not scientific achievement. One doesn't necessarily go hand in hand with the other, even for academics. I think we should also be careful about relying to heavily on Google Scholar to judge impact in cases like this. It's not very good at picking up journals that aren't in English and/or aren't online and included in standard indexes, which probably gives it a significant systematic bias against scholars in developing countries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)