Deletion of Holiday Inn, Townsville

Comment: along with Jauerback per . Tons of precedent left and right on how these are treated in all sorts of forms and this is an example of why we have that to point to. Even if it's "popular" locally and has a distinct look, those are moot points. Unless it fits into the extremely narrow specs of uniquely artistic or original architecture, I'm not sure how one could even start a talking point to claim notability with literally nothing to work off of other than that it's proven to exist. For completion's sake, I'll say that It's far below the consensus on building height suggesting notability, and "tallest locally" isn't outlined in any way. Though I do respect hard work efforts done in good faith to make a "complete" set of articles for one's subject of interest, Wikipedia doesn't promote |notability merely for existing. Importance and notability are entirely different, and a Wik''ia'' would be the forum where such concerns are rarely raised. We have lots of comprehensive areas of fine articles for smaller communities, so to the authors I say you have every right to keep your chin up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CHAIN||WP:ENN)