Deletion of GiveWell

Comment: WP:TNT is not now and never has been policy.  Our actual policy is  which states, "Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome."  The topic is clearly notable as it is easy to find substantial source such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mFzpCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA43 Ethics in an Age of Savage Inequalities'' or ''https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/upshot/effective-altruism-where-charity-and-rationality-meet.html Effective Altruism: Where Charity and Rationality Meet''.  The page has existed since 2008 without all this current drama which seems contrary to .  Per , we should address any issues with ordinary editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:POINT||WP:ATD)

Comment: nbsp; As per my statement at the DRV, "riteria for speedy deletion states, 'Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion." with a wiki-link to nowball clause.&nbsp; nowball clause states, 'The snowball clause is designed to prevent editors from getting tangled up in long, mind-numbing, bureaucratic discussions over things that are foregone conclusions from the start.'&nbsp; The next sentence in SD states, 'Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases.'&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:S)