Deletion of Linda Wiggins

Comment: This article fails  and  because there is only  coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the fourth oldest x" is notable (The article incorrectly claims she is the oldest in the country, but the NZ Herald says she is the 4th oldest). The content of the article is pretty much just trivia on how she relates to her family's death dates or false claims to a longevity milestone, with some fluff about where she has lived and her secret to longevity. There is almost nothing actually said about her in an article that is supposed to be about her, which demonstrates how the article fails . Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on the List of supercentenarians by continent, where they are easier to view
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to appropriate list per  and . Fails  as coverage is local and routine birthday articles. Even if these local articles made her "notable", there's nothing in this article that can't easily be summarised on a list as it won't expand beyond "Born, got married, had kids, grandkids, etc and got old
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB||WP:GNG)

Comment: Being the oldest person in a substantial country like NZ is obviously not routine; it's a unique distinction and so the subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)