Deletion of Hugo Schwyzer (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . The  number of high-quality sources for the things in the article suggest that he really is notable for them. Some attention to the quality of sources in the article may be a good idea, per : e.g. source 5, for his circumcision, is primary, and that part should either be removed or its sourcing improved. But most of the article looks ok in this respect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BLP)