Deletion of David Reddish

Comment: Upon reviewing Wikipedia's guidelines for notablility and sourching, the reviews from websites MyTakeOnTV.com and PinkisthenewBlog.com should be acceptable under Wiki guidlines since both Courtney K. and Trent Vanegas exert full editorial control over their content.  Wikipedia rules state that opinion blogs are unreliable regarding opinions of people, but not their work.  Moreover, the previously discussed article at gay.net qualifies as  because, while it does interpolate original research in the form of an interview, the preceeding paragraph is a review of the novel ''not'' based on anything said in the interview itself.  Thus, the cited sources of The Daily Journal, MyTakeonTV.com, Bent-Con.org, PinkistheNewBlog.com, gay.net and The Advocate should all be permissable under Wiki guidelines because they are independent, edited sources providing significant coverage or attestation to the notability of Reddish and his work.  Also, having reviewed Wikipedia:Secondary does not mean independent, both The Daily Journal article and the Gay.net article qualify as sources: ''Secondary sourced material is based on primary sourced material, and may include synthesis.''  Ergo, even if an interview appears as part of the article, if it is merged with original writing, and in this case, both articles are, it qualifies as .  In terms of notability, we have discussed significant coverage here, including independent and reliable sources that would suggest Reddish, his novel ''Sex, Drugs & Superheroes'' or come combined entry of the two should be included here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP: SECONDARY)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Sources offered are completely worthless.  'Nuff said
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)