Deletion of Matt Embree (kickboxer)

Comment: Those who support keeping the article should provide evidence that he meets the kickboxer notability criteria at .  So far no evidence has been presented and my search didn't find anything.  The only non-results source provided is to an article that lists possible North American fighters "to lead the next generation" and gives only a few sentences about each.  That would seem to mark him as a prospect and not yet notable as well as insufficient coverage to be considered significant.  GNG requires several reliable sources showing significant independent coverage, not routine sports reporting.  Claims that he's better than other fighters who have articles is  and appears to be more 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NKICK||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Wikipedia does not keep an article just because brand new editors come along to ''assert'' that the topic has fame and notability — we keep or delete articles based on whether or not |reliable source coverage explicitly ''shows'' that the person has passed an objective notability ''criterion''. Nothing here shows that, however. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he actually achieves something that clears the bar, but it's reliable source coverage, which verifies an objective  pass, or bust
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NKICK)