Deletion of Dan Sperry

Comment: per the sources provided by Carrite above: local two bit press pieces are not enough to meet the GNG in my book, and some of those are primary sourcing as well (interviews), so they don't count towards the GNG anyway. He also certainly doesn't meet , which is what I suppose those above are arguing for when they discuss the subject notability guideline. I'll throw in my standard critique of the GNG in here where we read it to mean that someone where the available sourcing makes clear they shouldn't be included because of how insignificant they are actually means they should be included. Nothing here suggests that the subject is important or notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)