Deletion of Luca de Alfaro

Comment: According to my reading of Wikipedia:Notability (academics), the only criterion under which this individual would be notable is #5, "known for originating an important new concept".  The article goes on to say that "the originator of an idea that is similar to previously existing ideas may not meet criterion 5", and the article itself states "Some find that the software that rates individual editors for reliability is "very similar" to what Sanger implemented at Citizendium.12".  I can't judge the quality or quantity of his publications appropriately, it not being my field, but my gut reaction is that it's somewhat scanty for an associate/postdoc.  Given my reservations about  and #CRYSTAL noted above as comments, I suggest this should be deleted.  I would be happy to revisit the notability of this subject if and when the software is implemented on any Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOT)