Deletion of Vehicle registration plates of Northern Ireland

Comment: While, (as was the case for the split of Vehicle registration plates of British overseas territories back in 2017) the editor who split the section should probably have opened a discussion about the proposed split before undertaking it, personally I think it was correct to split it. And the resulting article should probably be kept. Albeit with additional effort required to "complete" the split. Such that the  concerns (noted by other contributors above) and the content that remains in the original article, would be addressed/summarised. That being said, the rationale (for a split and for keeping a separate article) seems to stack-up to me. I say this as the subject is sufficiently distinct as to stand on its own (in the sense expected by ). And there are sufficient references and sources which deal with the subject as its own "thing" , such that we can/could/should probably do the same.  In short, should the splitting editor probably have sought input before a split? Yes (per ). Should the splitting editor have completed that split properly to avoid content forks? Yes (per ). However, does that mean this subject isn't discrete enough to remain "split"? No (I would recommend a "keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:CONSPLIT||WP:CON||WP:CFORK)