Deletion of Atanu Kumar Pati

Comment: The subject fails  and   ,except for the claim of #C3 is rather weak and the subject lacks the scholarly notability or the high level of citations which is rather poor in this case or on academic achievements and cannot be taken in isolation of merely being a member of National Academy of Sciences and the article lacks sources . states This guideline, sometimes referred to as the professor test, is meant to reflect consensus about the notability of academics as measured by their academic achievements. For the purposes of this guideline, an academic is someone engaged in scholarly research or higher education, and academic notability refers to being known for such engagement. #C3 is to be taken in conjugation with this not in isolation of mere membership of a scientific body.Now claim of notability based on mere membership of NAS is not sufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)