Deletion of Odhava

Comment: and an admonishment to the nominator who failed  - the only thing wrong with the article was a lack of sources, but alas you found one including a reference to a post office. But, rather than adding the source and recognizing it met , you went ahead and nominated it for deletion. A repetition of such disruptive behavior will not be tolerated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GEO)

Comment: if there's a post office, it's an officially recognized, populated place, and so should be kept by . Needs to be sourced, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)