Deletion of Nick Peterson

Comment: and child articles as well. Non-notable, no reliable sources, self-promotional. It might not be a hoax, but  isn't enough to merit an article, I'm afraid. No prejustice against recreation ''if'' subject can be |reliably sourced as |being |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:MUSIC)