Deletion of Sarah Jeong

Comment: what's funny is that, had anyone found it before, the article would have gone straight into AfD because of .  The "sources" were college posts and a book that no one reviewed.  Now that it is  due to the NYT hiring someone that New York (magazine)|NY Mag posits "Is the newest member of the New York Times editorial board, Sarah Jeong, a racist?"{{cite news |last1=Andrew Sullivan |title=When Racism Is Fit to Print |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html |accessdate=6 August 2018 |work=New York (magazine)|New York |date=3 August 2018 |quote=Is the newest member of the New York Times editorial board, Sarah Jeong, a racist?  From one perspective — that commonly held by people outside the confines of the political left — she obviously is.}}, the actual event is the hiring of such a person to the Editorial Board of what has heretofore been known as "the newspaper of record" of the United States.  And you see, this is the event.  This is the issue.  Not a minor  individual, little known before.  Of course, now there are sources worldwide from where you can gather age, academic career, etc., but that's precisely what  was designed to prevent!  So delete the bio already and let's have an article about the controversy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLUG||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Sufficient sources and hardly a Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual|low-profile individual, so  does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)