Deletion of The Chimera Vector (novel)

Comment: I did a major cleanup of the article, as it was highly promotional in tone. It used primary sources for sources and had a "reception section" that was mostly full of unreliable sources such as facebook and blogs. There were three usable sources, which I added into the article. I think it might be , though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I'm not opposed to |userfication of the article for improvement.  TG, you're right, it is definitely a case of .  Zippy, we really appreciate your understanding on this one, either way it goes. =^_
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY||WP:TOOSOON)