Deletion of Super straight

Comment: ec}} Checking reliable sources in Google books, I find this term is used (rarely), but never with the meaning given here.  |Most commonly, this term is a descriptor for a hairstyle: (https://books.google.com/books?id=QhHcrDIkStUC&pg=PA111 1 https://books.google.com/books?id=KWcsg2gtuV0C&pg=PT10&dq=%22superstraight%22 2 https://books.google.com/books?id=klXoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT69&dq=%22superstraight%22 3 https://books.google.com/books?id=9R0LBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT129&dq=%22superstraight%22 4 https://books.google.com/books?id=KWcsg2gtuV0C&pg=PT10&dq=%22superstraight%22 5) or sometimes an adjective describing someone who is highly conventional, reserved, or socially conservative (e.g., "the superstraight girls almost never show up to our parties"; "collegeage and superstraight in a Jaycee way": https://books.google.com/books?id=MxEo_aM2sHAC&pg=PT33&dq=%22superstraight%22 6 https://books.google.com/books?id=eWo2AAAAQBAJ&pg=PT67&dq=%22superstraight%22 7 https://books.google.com/books?id=CgLLAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT143&dq=%22superstraight%22 8 https://books.google.com/books?id=ZWcPqPzYUCsC&pg=PP89&dq=%22superstraight%22 9) or a fictional brand of corset created by Edith Wharton: (https://books.google.com/books?id=SLHCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT77dq=%22superstraight%22 10 https://books.google.com/books?id=DxOpSF5u1FYC&pg=PA37dq=%22superstraight%22 11), or a description for attractive teeth: (https://books.google.com/books?id=qzAkAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT9&dq=%22superstraight%22 12 https://books.google.com/books?id=KYPhAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT785&dq=%22superstraight%22 13); but what it *never* is used for in books, is a type of gender identity.  In scholarly journals, there is one use of ''superstraight'' that might be taken as a gender identity, but it defines a subset of homosexuality or Men who have sex with men|MSM: (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0196859915575736 14). The https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=superstraight rest of the journal articles are about  metallic alloys, math, or chiropractic. Per , we might consider creating it as a type of hairstyle, but since these are all trivial mentions, it doesn't pass the bar of  so |cannot be created as a standalone article, so we should either delete it, or redirect it to Hairstyle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME||WP:COMMONNAME||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: largely per Crossroads. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or an indiscriminate collection of information. The |ten year test thought experiment makes it pretty clear that the issues with this article and its sourcing will only get worse over time - users above have described it as  "a flash in the pan with a long tail," which seems accurate. That tail appears to be receding already based on coverage of the term, and while the term ''could'' surge back into mainstream use or discussion tomorrow or in two weeks or in three years, we can't predict the future and we definitely can't base deletion decisions on it. This article is |too soon at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT||WP:TOOSOON)