Deletion of Brenton Lengel

Comment: The article seems to be properly sourced. I really don't see any issue. The request for deletion seems to have been done solely for personal reasons http://imgur.com/a/YBWEb. The person making the request has poisoned the well by repeatedly asserting that the page was created by the subject (an act that is |strongly discouraged on Wikipedia). I asked for some evidence of this a few days ago but no response has been given. I see no evidence of that the page was created by the subject and I see nothing wrong with the sources. If someone would like to present a better reason for deletion, I'm all ears. But until then, I think the article should stay. Thank you for your time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:YOURSELF)

Comment: The most reliable sources provided don't actually mention the subject at all, or are only passing mentions.  The only sources that really cover him specifically are blog posts, press releases, and the subject's own web site.  Very few of the "speedy keep" commenters appear to really know |what that term really means--it's for nominations where the subject very obviously is notable (which, even if my own assessment is incorrect, is most assuredly not the case), or for which the nomination was indisputably in bad faith (debatable, perhaps, but not indisputable).  Moreover, most of these "speedy keep" !voters have relatively few edits in general or in AfD discussions in particular.  (To be fair, the nominator doesn't have a long editing history either.)  Regardless of the motives on either side here, the article itself does not appear to meet the |notability guidelines for biographies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:BIO)