Deletion of Cameron Hughes (sports entertainer)

Comment: Alongside the two reliable sources already cited by Sportsfan77777: https://www.businessinsider.com/novak-djokovic-superfan-dancing-2015-9?r=US&IR=T Business Insider (2015), https://www.huffpost.com/entry/novak-djokovic-dance_b_951490 HuffPost (2017), https://www.reviewjournal.com/entertainment/entertainment-columns/kats/golden-knights-igniter-wins-pro-sports-top-act-award-1542692/ Las Vegas Review-Journal (2018), https://www.psychologytoday.com/hk/blog/science-small-talk/201109/novak-djokovic-and-the-crowd-whisperer-the-us-open?amp Psychology Today(2011) (a blog post, yes, but by the notable & published sports psychologist Sam Sommers). Clear pass through . While Bearcat's mother's former neighbour can't get in per , Hughes has been covered by multiple newspapers over a significant period of time and for several events, including two article-length profiles in national newspapers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass  on much more |reliable source coverage than this. Two of the three footnotes are the same deadlinked video piece, whose content is unverifiable for the purposes of establishing that it was ''about him'' in any non-trivial way — and the fact that weblinks often die and become completely unverifiable is ''precisely'' why one of the conditions that a source has to meet is that it is ''permanently'' archived somewhere ''accessible'' (e.g. ProQuest or Questia or newspapers.com), so that we will still be able to locate it 10, 20, 50 years later if we need to. And the only reference that is still live is a blog piece in which he is not the principal subject, which is not in and of itself enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)