Deletion of Men in skirts

Comment: with fire.  Not only is it a personal essay masquerading as an article, it's also a POV fork (whether deliberate or not) of the small section in skirt and dress which contains this topic without the |undue weight, |neologistic usage, |original research and occasional bits of |complete bollocks we see here.  Previous debates in respect of Male Unbifurcated Garment and Men's Fashioon Freedom show the way to go here: we have kilt, we have cross-dressing, and we have a very tiny residual presence of men who wear skirts "just because", which is covered in skirt and dress#Male wear.  I agree with Tony Sidaway: listing this is process wonkery and a positive magnet for puppetry - the forum members will almost certainly be along any minute.  The article serves mainly to advance an agenda, the assertions of trends in prevalence of this "movement" originate solely for a very small number of web-based forums devoted to it.  Walk around even a very cosmopolitan city like London and you will recognise within minutes that the so-called "MIS" movement (http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22men+in+skirts%22+MIS&safe=on&start=360&sa=N ~200 unique Googles, of which a fair number seem to be discussing the defeminisation of women in the business world) is not in any way significant.  We have been resisting this POV pushing for over a year, let's not stop now, shall we
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:BALLS)