Deletion of Journal of Trading

Comment: at least some of them.  Two reasons: first, I agree with Drmies, who's talking sense as usual, and second, I'm reluctant to endorse deletions of articles about specialist journals in any case.  These journals could well be future |reliable sources for other articles and Wikipedia should know about them.  (I'd like to see a guideline, eventually, that there should be a presumption to keep articles about verifiable, specialist trade and academic journals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)