Deletion of Psychiatric abuse

Comment: Idiosyncratic, non-encyclopedic, or agenda-driven compilations of individually notable incidents are a recipe for disaster. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid for an example of where this is headed. It's just a magnet for argumentation, |soapboxing, policy violations, etc on ''all'' sides. It will make the encyclopedia measurably worse and |more antagonistic. I've already !voted above, but I felt this to be worth repeating; the notable incidents here should be covered in more encyclopedic articles, and this particular editor-driven compilation of incidents should go. Otherwise I can almost guarantee it will be at ArbCom sooner or later, like the Allegations of apartheid series
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:BATTLE)

Comment: content with relevant articles, then '''Delete'''.  The content in this article has value, but the article itself is so loosely defined as to violate #INFO.  Reports of abuse are important, but should be placed under the article in question such as Medical restraint, Electroshock, etc
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)