Deletion of Satvinder S. Juss

Comment: Juss easily passes  and meets  as "widely cited by peers".  The article needs a lot of work, particularly the likely copyvio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The invited talk in NZ is suggestive, but other than that I don't see the evidence of passing . In particular, prolific publishing by itself is not enough — we need also evidence that those publications have had a big impact, and the citation record doesn't really show that. I'm also not impressed with the apparent lack of care with which our article was put together (not just the copyvio but also that the book listing includes an IEEE conference proceedings http://dblp2.uni-trier.de/db/conf/IEEEinteract/IEEEinteract2005 INTERACT-9 that is completely outside his subject and that nobody with a similar name has any association with), the fact that it appears to be an autobiography, and the fact that we are now seeing significant edits by a single-purpose account {{u|Razi100}} with the appearance of trying to hide the autobiographical nature of the edits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)