Deletion of Joel Hayward (2nd nomination)

Comment: This BLP is one of the most tendentious I have seen on Wikipedia. It contains bombastic bloat, unsourced claims, commercial spam and seems to be used as a battleground for agendas both for and against the subject. I suggest that contributors to this AFD check how many of the claims made in the BLP can be verified by the sources given. A careful look at the subject's GS profile https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gbyVBJ8AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao raises doubts that the number of citations claimed there is realistic. There should be no place in Wikipedia for a BLP like this. The best I can suggest is delete without prejudice to recreating a ed stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)