Deletion of Alternative versions of Supergirl

Comment: As the nominator has been informed before, |"article doesn't establish notability" and "there's too much plot" are not legitimate reasons for deletion. I would encourage them to better understand |deletion criteria. As for this supposedly not being notable, there has never been one particular Supergirl. The character has been reworked many times, reimagined, retconned into separate characters, and the original Supergirl wasn't even the version we know today. The likes of Supergirl (Kara Zor-El), Power Girl, Supergirl (Matrix), and Supergirl (Linda Danvers) are not just generic alternate versions, they were all '''the''' primary version of the character at one point or another (mostly because DC didn't know what to do with her). This is integral to the character's history and the fact that so many of them have articles of their own is further evidence that this article (which happens to be a hub article) is notable. It's impossible to find a source discussing Supergirl's history that doesn't also go into heavy detail and commentary about the alternate versions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:DELREASON)

Comment: Article is a  of the main character articles and re-treads most of the same ground, with no sources that really distinguish this as a separately |notable topic. I would also support deletion as this is completely cited to primary sources, or trivial mentions that really refer to the notable fiction more than the non-notable character. But  are always welcome when the consensus is pointing that way
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:N||WP:ATD)