Deletion of KJEL

Comment: There traditionally has been a |presumed notability for most broadcast stations — as long as it is |verifiably backed up by |reliable sources. At the time of nomination, this article actually ''did'', for certain, fail BCAST on that count — the only reference in the article at the time related to its affiliation with the St. Louis Cardinals Radio Network, and I don't think that's enough to get over the "needs sources" hump. (Whether or not we've been too lenient ''in general'' on the {{tq|large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming}} conditions over the years may well be another matter altogether.) However, I've expanded the article a bit so that there's more of a history of the station and also considerable more sourcing (and I also pruned some stuff about the station's prior owners that |weren't necessarily relevant to KJEL itself); I can't guarantee that it will definitively save the article (i.e., if it sufficiently establishes any notability KJEL might have), but it's reasonably safe to say that OUTCOMES|no matter what past outcomes for broadcast station AfDs have suggested about broadcast station notability in general, sufficient sourcing is a must if an article is to survive an AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:OFFTOPIC||WP:BCASTOUTCOMES)