Deletion of Administrator abuse on Wikipedia

Comment: as a POV fork, attack page,  violation, or some combination of the above. The history of the authors interactions on Wikipedia does not support the existence of this article as a good faith creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: If there's any viable content relevant to the Criticism article, can go there. But no redirect...inherently POV title. I just read the "criticism" section of the article, which I assume to be the core of the topic itself (not intro/setup about what WP Admins are, etc.), and its cited sources...they don't support the context of their use in the article. In other words, the whole article is . They just support that admins have extra powers, both in general and over non-admin editors. I don't see support for the claim of "abuse" of these powers. (disclosure: I'm an admin, not that it matters--part of adminship is ''not'' using position of authority in content discussions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: appears well sourced, regardless of how some people might be trying to misuse policy to remove content. Just a reminder  doesn't say we can't say anything negative about a person. It says it has to be well sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)