Deletion of Virginia C. Bulat

Comment: From , "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.".  Her work has been cited a by multiple articles revolving around Chicago history.http://saltcreekgreenwayassociation.org/files/benfuller.htmlhttp://www.lyonslibrary.org/Library%20History.htmhttp://villageoflyons-il.com/DocumentsAndForms/Documents/PDFs/Community%20Guide%20Final.pdfhttp://www.earlychicago.com/biblio.php?biblioid=285a Her work is considered an antique.http://www.antiqbook.com/boox/aar/19361.shtml. Now, take into account these books were published in the 60s. This is over 30 years since the invention of the internet. I can't find anywhere in the notability guidelines where "impact beyond her local community" is even relevant. Also, if you check the references, #3 is a book talking about the work she did - and she is not a contributing author to it. I believe applying  to her is an inappropriate choice - as she is not a professor (aka, the professor test fails for her), and as such, the criteria is not valid. Stick to author - that is what she is known for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: the subject doesn't pass any of the  criteria i.e no substantial impact, no prestigious recognitions and no important academic posts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)