Deletion of Bhurit Bhirombhakdi

Comment: No reason given to support deletion. The subject is clearly notable, given the amount of coverage in third-party reliable sources, which the nominator has not even claimed don't exist. I'd be happy to comment on the reliability of each source individually, but invalid arguments such as to delete an article because of links being dead and sources being in Thai are completely against policy. AfD is not for clean up. Regarding the YouTube links, the first and third ones are episodes from nationally broadcast terrestrial TV programmes. The second is produced by Forbes Thailand; the fourth is a self-published source, which should be fine for  matters. Only the last one is questionable. I have no idea what "bogus sites like wikivisually" is supposed to refer to. So two of the Forbes Thailand links are PR pieces. The other four are cover articles from the print magazine.https://forbesthailand.com/people/cover-story/%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%A2%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B5-%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%AB.htmlhttps://forbesthailand.com/people/cover-story/work-hard-play-harder-%E0%B8%AA%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%A5%E0%B9%8C-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89-%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1.htmlhttps://forbesthailand.com/people/the-next-tycoons/%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%8D%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88.htmlhttps://forbesthailand.com/people/cover-story/%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95-%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%A2%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B5-%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%AB.html The nom has forwarded no argument to disprove their reliability, nor those of the other sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:ABOUTSELF)