Deletion of Tulane virus

Comment: Notable coverage in scientific literature. However, not clear that "Tulane virus" is the best title, and although I think  should apply to viruses, SPECIESOUTCOMES is premature here. Viruses have an official database (http://www.ictvonline.org/virustaxonomy.asp); recognition there would satisfy SPECIESOUTCOMES, but Tulane virus isn't recognized there yet. The taxonomy is still in flux. "Tulane virus" is a proposed new species in a proposed new genus "Recovirus". As far as I can tell, the terms "Rhesus enteric calicivirus" and "Rhesus macaque recovirus" also refer to "Tulane virus", with none of these names yet satisfying SPECIESOUTCOMES (though they could be used as keywords to search for additional sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)