Deletion of Employsure (2nd nomination)

Comment: Can any of the Keep !voters please provide links to their best |THREE references that they believe meets the criteria for establishing notability? This isn't a !vote-counting exercise. Comments like "the company is well known" or "the current ACCC case makes them notable" or "the company is definitely notable" won't be considered unless you can back them up by referencing a secondary source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: Neither the article as it existed prior to {{user|Jack4576}}'s substantial editing nor Jack4576's version are worth keeping, with both being |biased and cited to incredibly dubious sources, the former being native advertising sourced to same and the latter being the Wikipedia equivalent of a perp walk from the star chamber. What little can be salvaged from either version already has, and it's not worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)