Deletion of Thefederalist.com

Comment: There are sufficient  for this to pass . At this point this should be closed as  since with the comments above from many experienced editors there is no way there will be consensus to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SNOW)

Comment: I'm a pretty active editor, so no one can accuse me of specifically joining this discussion after coming off "a break". And to be honest, not sure what "canvassing" means. It's clear to me, having read the above posts, that those who are requesting this article's deletion are doing so solely for political reasons.  Clearly, with the numerous citations (which I won't rehash - they are clearly stated above) in various publications which span the political spectrum, this article exceeds the minimum notability standards.  states, "Wikipedia bases its decision about whether web content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web content, its authors, or its owners." Those who claim the sources are trivial are using a subjective viewpoint (as I am in saying they aren't).  However the sheer volume of external sources would appear to contradict the claim of trivia. My understanding of Wikipedia that it was an experiment on consensus driven encyclopedic content. Not on blatant politically-driven censorship
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)