Deletion of Incest in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: Funny enough, I was just looking up Incest in literature and saw that it does not exist. This is not an article elaborating on incest in popular culture: why it is such a widespread topic, what kind of ideas are conveyed by it, what its expected effects are. It is a list. As a list it creates a connection between, for instance, ''Der Ring des Nibelungen'' and ''Fatal Frame IV: Mask of the Lunar Eclipse'': What do they have in common? Right, they contain an example of an incestuous relationship. That's no difference to an article Alfred in popular culture of all works that happen to name one of their characters Alfred, and that's about the prime example of |bad ideas for lists. ''Der Ring des Nibelungen'' and ''Fatal Frame IV: Mask of the Lunar Eclipse'' have nothing in common, and no secondary source can be found to claim they have. The list is thus unencyclopedic, original research, and indiscriminate. It should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)