Deletion of Harry Amos Moore

Comment: Fails , , and .  Subject has on instance of significant coverage.  On its own, not able to infer notability and I feel that it inherently does not infer notability as it was only a notable instance based on the notability of his father.  One other piece of coverage exists and it was published by the professional team he signed with.  I did a http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=%22Harry+Moore%22+melbourne+rugby Google News search and http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=%22Harry+Moore%22+melbourne+rugby#q=%22Harry+Moore%22+melbourne+rugby&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=5u6hTqn9C5DqtgeL1_yJBQ&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=8ad8b203bbd56586&biw=1152&bih=755 Googles News archive search to find those articles.  He fails  because he signed with a professional team's U-15 team and not their main team.  It seems like he may be notable in the future but I don't see that any inclusion guidelines are satisfied at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ATHLETE)