Deletion of Jared Jeffrey (3rd nomination)

Comment: easily passes WP:v and  with refs http://espn.go.com/sports/soccer/story/_/id/7732847/olympic-qualifying-us-vs-canada-grades here(espn), http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1242967-usmnt-scouting-the-next-crop-of-us-national-team-stars here, http://insider.espn.go.com/sports/soccer/blog/_/name/us_national_soccer/id/7289846/us-soccer-projecting-us-2012-olympic-soccer-roster here, and http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/soccer/12/30/jared-jeffrey/index.html especially here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  but I couldn't care less. This whole process of AfD is meant to filter out the worthless articles and keep the ones with meaningful information. The only thing which is left to make this article meet the criteria is that the guy plays one minute in a first team match. I refuse to vote delete on this decent non-stub article with multiple valid references. Many so called notable footballers which did play a few
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Previous keep was base on routine sports journalism to meet  and on speculation that failed to materialise. This is a text book example of why we have 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)