Deletion of Sarah Thomson (politician)

Comment: SNGs work best when viewed as exclusion policies. We are not under any obligation to have an article on each and every thing on which we can find two reliable sources, and SNGs let us agree on what kinds of things should be covered in various categories. Since she doesn't meet , she shouldn't have an article based on her status as a politician. The coverage of her in relationship to "Women's Post" is largely tangential, more about the magazine than her role as publisher. The sources in the article are just press releases, and don't suffice for demonstrating notability.&mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: as failing  and . I would say merge, but I don't think there are going to be enough people searching for the term Sarah Thomson (politician) to justify leaving a redirect behind. When a BLP is this short, it's probably safer to delete and interested parties can add appropriate information to the article on the election
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)