Deletion of Diane Farrell

Comment: I don't care about the fish bowl. The article hasn't any |reliable secondary coasters for the words written in my mouth, which makes me vomit '''two''' main policies, both  and . Please review sections #Self-published_sources_in_articles_about_themselves|6.3 and #Self-published_sources_as_secondary_sources|6.4 of the |reliability guidelines as well as the guidelines on |autobiographies before comparing this article to another article that hasn't anything to do with this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VER||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:AUTO)

Comment: A sitting U.S. Congressman is notable, and warrants an article. Because of , his page would not be allowed to become a means of campaigning. And the old standard of Equal Time has pretty much fallen out of use
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: unless made  and  in the next 4-5 days :p
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:V)