Deletion of R Viswanathan

Comment: per '''Ecclesiastes|Ecclesiastes 1:2''': this is just a CV dressed up as an encyclopedia article. The sources provided are not enough to establish notability. Most of them are written by the subject, and the two that aren't do not amount to substantial coverage. The second source is the Indian Consulate, so not very independent of its subject, the coverage is only one line, and has been |exaggerated in the article. That leaves source #1, a two-sentence  little thing. So we have a grand total of three sentences of independent-ish coverage to justify this article. I don't think so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL)