Deletion of Gligor Zisov

Comment: The Balkan wars were commonly a nasty business.  I am quite prepared to believe that the Greeks were not kind to a Bulgarian minority (and probably vice versa).  One result of the conflicts of the 20th century and the rise of the nation state in Europe has been to gather people of a single ethnicity in one country.  The collection of eye-witness statements by academics is a legitimate variety of research, commonly known as oral history.  Sometimes the results of such research do not make pleant reading for the perpetrators and theri descendants, but that does not make them untrue.   Personally, I would have preferred to see a more general article dealing with the subject as a whole, before we got down to the biographies of individual victims, however heroic.  Here we have an issue about propaganda, as I am sure that the Bulgsarian authorties particualrly in the Communist era would ahve made the best they could of anything to the credit of theri own and the denigration of a capitlaist neighbour.  WP requires |reliable sources.  Self-published works are frowned upon as close to .  On the other hand, peer-reviewed works, whether books or articles, are normally good sources.  Since I do not read Bulgarian (or even the Cyrllic alphabet).  I am not qualified to judge.  This article does cite a source.  Until some one can discredit that source, I would suggest that he article should be kept, but I know lilte of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)