Deletion of Rabbit pie

Comment: per  and . This is an adequate stub article for now. I find it impossible to believe that the nominator actually looked for coverage about rabbit pies, and came up with nothing. His nomination reason is inaccurate too - the article already had more detail than would be considered a dictionary definition, and did have what can be classed as http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/recipes/rabbitpie_89204 a reference over and above the bizarre Google search link (the fact the creator called it an External Link is irrelevant). So already, it's clearly not an unverifiable hoax topic is it? Combined with the fact that this article's existence probably only came to the nominator's attention for completely http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_Review&diff=prev&oldid=472079931 unrelated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Review (3rd nomination)|reasons to the topic, I can't see how this deletion proposal can possibly be entertained. There's no case for a redirect either (which isn't a matter for deletion anyway), which just makes it less likely that someone will improve the article if they find it while actually looking for it. I've wikilinked game pie in the first line, which is sufficient for navigation purposes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTFINISHED)