Deletion of Wayne of Gotham

Comment: WP:HEY, it's been updated to satisfy  indeed.  Well done {{u|Toughpigs}}, and quite quickly.  (To be a little more fair to the nominator, the reviews when nominated are dead sites that are definitely not up to the levels of the new adds. They're still available on web archives, but they look like blog posts. I can't see anything on to suggest sparknotes is actually a , but critiques4geeks.com at least had an editorial team on their http://web.archive.org/web/20141010062926/http://www.critiques4geeks.com/staff-page/ staff page.)  Coming off that aside and back to the point, the two new reviews meet .  Plot could definitely use some trimming
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:RS||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: as passes  with independent reviews in reliable sources such as US Today and Deseret News which have been used to add content to the article so that deletion is no longer necessary imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)