Deletion of Queen's University Chess Club (second nomination)

Comment: for the people commenting "keep and clean up": what would a cleaned-up article would look like? It would just be a shorter version of the current article: a disconnected list of tournaments and matches.  This is because the club itself has not been the subject of multiple, independent reliable sources, which would enable us to write a good article on it. Also, does anybody dispute Ohconfucius's analysis of the true age of this club? "It's old" was a reason offered for keep in both AfDs. Also,  is not a valid rationale for keep, nor is the connection to something else (Queen's University) that is (definitely) notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING)