Deletion of Louis J. Posner

Comment: for all the reasons given by the nominator. Subject does not have significant coverage and does not meet the GNG. His activity with VoterMarch never rose to significance, and the strip club episode certainly does not confer notability. There was prior consideration of redirection to VoterMarch, but it has been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoterMarch. The article  has now been recast to focus on his criminal activity. Though the effort has been valiant, the subject is still not notable.  There are many things that wikipedia is not, and Rogue's Gallery is one of them. Does not qualify for an article under .  (Please see the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Joseph Posner, which closed as no consensus due to the effect of edits by sockpuppets of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: Posner seems to derive most of his notability from local tabloids.  Trying to create a neutral article from the ''New York Daily News'' and ''New York Post'' is an exercise in futility.  In cases where the subject of a biography has |requested deletion, I usually err on the side of privacy.  Wikipedia is not a tabloid, and we do not exist to catalog the sins of |non-public figures
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL||WP:NPF)