Deletion of Geoffrey Sampson

Comment: Sorry, Dr. Sampson is notable and has been for many years. I believe he was somewhat justifiably upset at the "Controversies" section. The spat with Chomsky is definitely notable but we should not just write |neutrally, but |attribute views about the situation. The UK politics issue wasn't half clear -- did it attract national attention or not? If so, attribute like mad. I'm not sure how "right of reply" works in light of ; if there's a policy or guideline, could someone link to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:ASR)

Comment: Once a person enters the public eye through publication or a notable position, they become notable and are subject to coverage by Wikipedia and other media. Obviously the article must adhere to  policies, as well as . It's not unheard of for subjects of an article to be involved in their creation, so if the person here has an issue, he is invited to contribute to the creation of the article about him, so long as  is maintained, and certain provisions under  are also watched
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT)