Deletion of Sierra Vista Mall (5th nomination)

Comment: per long-standing precedent that this level of coverage is sufficient for asserting a mall's notability; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumter Mall (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southgate Mall (Missoula), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Findlay Village Mall (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mall at Westlake, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky),  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staunton Mall, et al., all of which were closed as "keep" despite a similar level of coverage. Merging to Clovis, California as the nominator did seemed to be in violation of  and , and the AFD's I've linked show that these kinds of sources are sufficient per  to assert enough notability. '''Ten Pound Hammer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:LENGTH||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Seems to fail , sources seem local, business as usual (ex. http://www.thebusinessjournal.com/news/real-estate/15780-sierra-vista-mall-sold-in-foreclosure-proceeding), or passing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCOMPANY)