Deletion of RedSpotGames (3rd nomination)

Comment: as a non-notable video game developer failing  () with no multiple (reliable independent) ''in-depth'' sources, such as /RS. To avoid repeating, I defer to Jovanmilic97 for their (excellent) source review. In short, the article is ed with sources that do not satisfy , except arguably the Gamasutra . A few of the others provide some good sourceable material, but are not in-depth sources about the subject itself for GNG. Having developed notable video games or worked on a notable console is . Previous AfDs and above !keep seems to hinge on NOTINHERITED and an interpretation of what "notable" means in a way that is not how it is used on Wikipedia. Other arguments like  and  aren't even close to GNG requirements. Reliable sources simply haven't done any significant coverage of the company itself, only passing mentions. May be some of the sourced Dreamcast-related content can be '''merged''' to Dreamcast#Decline or legacy or some such. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:VG||WP:REFBOMB||WP:GNG||WP:INTERVIEW||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL)