Deletion of Clear Books (3rd nomination)

Comment: previous AfDs were about the company article which failed to satisfy  due to lack of sources ''about the company''. The software however was covered in sources, which was noted in previous AfDs, so I created this draft and submitted to , so that another editor, uninvolved in previous AfDs could judge on notability, sourcing and tone of article without prejudice. This resulted in article being moved into main space. The statement that "the same notability concerns are present" is pretty puzzling in this context, as the notability of this software was never discussed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:AFC)

Comment: Previous article was about the company. This one is about the software and the references support Clear Books as accounting software. Per  Software is notable if it meets any one of these criteria: The software is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field. The field of Clear Books is online accounting software. Clear Books is discussed as online accounting software in e.g. http://secure.clearbooks.co.uk/modules/accounting/applications/external/DotNetMagazineReview.pdf .NetMagazine, http://www.bookkeepers.org.uk/MyICB/?dlid=579&dln=Clear%20Books ICB and http://www.killerstartups.com/Web-App-Tools/clearbooks-co-uk-online-accounting-software Killerstartups source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)