Deletion of Elonka Dunin (2nd nomination)

Comment: as meeting  for multiple non-trivial articles by uninvolved persons; published a reasonably successful book; and, appears to have gained general notoriety for her work on Kryptos.  Google shows 27,000 hits, some book listings and forum discussions, but many interviews beyond what's shown in article.  I can't say as I see any violations of , since the material generally seems NPOV, and verifiable.  I do agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTO)

Comment: Assertions of notability insufficient for own article. '''Merge''' some detail about her work and her website on Kryptos into the Kryptos article - not enough on their own for their own article though. Otherwise, I am so far unconvinced about her other claims to notability such as the game career. Also, some |vanity problems here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: I think it could use some trimming (not ''quite'' as dramatic as the one done above, however), but for the topic itself (which is more important, in this situation, than the actual quality of the article) ''is'' notable as per , and as such, should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as subject). There seems to be some possibility that this is a bad faith nomination on the part of Danny, because I disagreed with him earlier today in a Deletion review on the Musa Cooper article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_July_22#Musa_Cooper. As for the accusation that I'm just using my Wikipedia article as self-promotion, trust me, my Wikipedia article ain't it. ;)  When I need to get the word out, I use my http://www.elonka.com elonka.com website. To be honest, as much as I love editing Wikipedia (I think I'm at around 6,500 edits at this point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Elonka), my own Wikipedia bio article is something that I tend to perceive as being drastically out of date, but I try to respect  and keep my fingers out of it except for very simple factual updates. As for "proving" notability, let's see:  Elonka Dunin is a published author, notable game developer (some of her work is even cited as references elsewhere on Wikipedia)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grind_%28gaming%29#References, and she's a frequently-cited consultant on the CIA's Kryptos sculpture.  Typing "Kryptos" into Google shows that her site has even higher placement than that of the CIA or Wired.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=GGLB%2CGGLB%3A1969-53%2CGGLB%3Aen&q=kryptos&btnG=Search. The elonka.com website has over 2 million page views, and the name "Elonka Dunin" is cited often in the news.  Just this year alone, it's mostly related to stories about Kryptos, and a ''Da Vinci Code''-related story, (see: Smithy Code)http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/27/AR2006042701765.html. Recent media appearances that aren't mentioned in the Wikipedia bio (gee, I must have been falling down on the job in terms of using my Wikipedia bio for self-promotion): Washington Post http://www.readexpress.com/read_freeride/photos/2006-05-19-kryptos.pdf, MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann http://www.elonka.com/media/videos/list.html, NPR's All Things Considered http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5356012, Wired Newshttp://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70701-0.html?tw=wn_story_page_prev2 (this story was also the #1-ranked headline on AOL). Want more?  Check the place I ''do'' use for self-promotion, my http://www.elonka.com/elonkanews.html press page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)