Deletion of 3000–500 club

Comment: Per #STATS, the article does not " contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader." Without such limitations, there are hundreds to thousands of lists that could be created that while factually correct, are not notable.  Sources of the article on each club have not been found that discuss indepth the club as a whole and the significance of the feat, and need to go beyond trivial coverage of the milestone by an individual player or trivial mention of its members . This fails the "significant coverage" requirement of  which requires "more than a trivial mention". For the 300-300 club specifically, I found lots of sources that mention the term "300-300 club" and even mentions all of its members; however, the references do not describe the significance of reaching the club aside from its currently small number of members.  I am wary of calling this notable without sources supporting that its more than just a statistical anomaly, again per #STATS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am not taking a stance yet.  My initial thought was, if the topic was not directly addressed as the subject of article, book, etc, then the subject fails .  I moseyed over there and rechecked it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)