Deletion of Project Chanology

Comment: Very well-referenced article documenting a current event that has received significant media coverage.   Few YouTube videos pass 1 million views. Anonymous' declaration of war is (by far) the #1 most viewed and discussed video this week on Youtube.        Some scientologist admins are trying to push a pro-scientology POV by deleting articles critical of Scientology, no matter how well verified they are.   Deletion of this article would be POV-pushing since many topics with fewer reliable sources/notability have their own articles.   Because of the volatility of this article, it should not be merged yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR||WP:BUILD||WP:IGNORE||WP:POINT||WP:GAME)

Comment: The organization appears to be notable for exactly one event (it would be hard to be notable for more than one, considering its only TWELVE DAYS OLD).  This articles is a poster child for the "short burst of news reports" exception in otability, in spite (indeed, because) of the volume of news coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Afd is not the correct forum for a merge proposal. The notability of the topic of this article is proven beyond all reasonable doubt by its non-trivial coverage in reliable independent sources not limited to ''Wired (magazine)|Wired'',  ''National Post'', ''PC World (magazine)|PC World''. ''CNET News'', ''Baltimore City Paper'', ''FOX News'' and ''Edmonton Sun''.   is an essay;  is policy. This ridiculous nomination should be swiftly withdrawn and the discussion moved to the article's talkpage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT||WP:V)