Deletion of Sultan Mohammad Najib Ur Rehman

Comment: I see that  has already been met after looking at this http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Sultan_Mohammad_Najib_Ur_Rehman 15,000 views so no issues there. The 2 sources are  because both are known websites hird-party sources referenced in many other Wikipedia articles as their notability is higher and per the policy are known for "'''peer review and fact-checking'''". I see published books cited in the article as well "'''entirely independent of the subject being covered'''" such as "Sarwari Qadiri Order. India: General Books LLC. {{ISBN|9781158473861}}." and "Attar, Farid al-Din. Muslim Saints and Mystics: Episodes from the Tadhkirat Al-Auliya’ ('Memorial of the Saints'). Translated by A.J. Arberry. London, England.: Penguin (Non-Classics), 1990. {{ISBN|0-14-019264-6}}". Also, the discussion here isnt about sects so doesnt matter. The biographical article stands . Few words maybe paraphrased to make the article strictly encyclopedic but that is not the criteria for AfD per eletion policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:T||WP:V||WP:D)