Deletion of TRS-80 character set

Comment: The reason provided by the nominator is invalid, as the article ''does'' have some references already, and one of them also supports the important section of the character set. The TRS-80 was a mass-produced series of user-programmable computers, it is therefore obvious that much more proper documentation exists at least in paper form (not necessarily online for historical devices pre-dating the internet), because otherwise the utility value of those machines would have been seriously limited and they could not have met the success they had. TRS-80 character set and related issues are also discussed on quite many web pages today, and I found them mentioned in various journals, magazines and even in a book (try Google). There might be, however, some incompatibilities and quirks between different revisions of the character set which still need to be sorted out. This is rather common for new articles like this one and it is something dealt with in normal article improvement over the years. I added some refs and even offered to search for more references in a library myself when I'll visit one - however, this may take some time as I'm busy with other stuff. In either case, an (almost always valid) desire to have more references is not a valid reason to delete an article - it would be counter-productive, and we have other procedures for this. Per  it is not a requirement to provide detailed references for ''everything'' for as long as it can be reasonably assumed that such references exist (which is obviously the case for a mass-produced "open" computer system like this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOSSIBLE)