Deletion of Narnian timeline

Comment: I stopped by a public library and looked at "C.S. Lewis: a companion & guide". So it turns out, Hopper the executor of Lewis's estate and the legal copyright holder, thus making making him far from a neutral or independent source on this topic. But more importantly, C.S. Lewis's entire "Outline of Narnia History so far as it is known" is reprinted here in this article, almost verbatim. The list of dates I read at the library begins with the birth of the characters, their entry into Narnia, every subsequent re-entry into Narnia, right until the end of Narnia, with exact years quantified in both Earth and Narnian times. I continue to believe that even if this timeline were |synthesized purely by editors, a regular AFD would still be suitable since it takes more than a few lines about the authorship and publication of a plot to make the article something other than . But the fact that it basically reprints several pages from a copyrighted source with a few editorial annotations, it makes it more than just fundamentally unfixable. It makes this article an obvious "delete on sight". It's frustrating to think that the fans thought it was okay to do this, and no one else bothered to look into it until now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:JUSTPLOT)

Comment: per #PLOT and . As
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: I just want to say that while #PLOT is certainly the policy bit that is concerned with this discussion, the article itself is not plot driven. It is a timeline, which is a particular construct with an specific purpose and scope, that relies on plot elements by necessity
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)