Deletion of List of Roman cognomina

Comment: We have 53 examples at :Category:Ancient Roman cognomina, more than enough to merit a complementary, standalone index of articles per  and . So unless that category is somehow invalid (if it is, please demonstrate why), I'm not seeing any complaints here that can't be resolved by cleanup or development, such as by removing entries that don't merit articles. Also, LISTN is plainly satisfied by the existence of cognomen, which shows these are notable as a group
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN)