Deletion of CALA Homes

Comment: Minor company, coverage is PR and reprints a la 'business as usual', fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Despite the Keep !votes above, *none* of the references listed meet the criteria for establishing notability. Not only must references be published by independent third party reliable sources (which most contributors are aware of and like to quote at AfD pages), in order to count towards establishing notability, a reference must also be "intellectually independent" and contain in-depth information on the company. The references listed above are either based on announcements made by the company or information provided by the company - none are intellectually independent with independent opinion or analysis. The Telegraph articles rely on information and/or quotations provided by the company or their officers, thereby failing . The Scotsman article is a PR piece from the company, fails . The glasgowwestend article is from a small publication reporting on a small residents association meeting objecting to a building project - insufficient for establishing notability. I do not have access to the FT.com article so I cannot comment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)