Deletion of O. Leslie Stone

Comment: I have searched Newspapers.com excluding Utah (just to make sure that the newspapers were not affiliated with the LDS church), and I have added 11 references. Most of the significant coverage is from the ''Oakland Tribune'', although there is also some from newspapers in Texas and Idaho. I have added more information from these sources. Other papers in Nevada, Montana, Idaho and Ohio provide supporting information. The articles date from 1961-1978, and cover periods before that too. I believe that he meets , or at least : "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". I am sorry to come so late to this AfD, but I do wish that editors nominating or !voting on AfDs for people active in pre-internet days would check contemporary news coverage (personally, I think that should be added to the requirements for ). The sources in an article at the time of nomination are not a valid reason to delete. Perhaps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BEFORE)