Deletion of Surch

Comment: NN article,  crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Though the article does look somewhat better than it did when I first nominated it, it's still lacking sources. While I can appreciate that Surch might be a useful tool, unless there are |reliable sources out there that review the site, or something else that makes the article meet /, the article cannot be included at this time. Additionally, I believe the editors above that refer to crystal-balling mean that a lot of the reasoning for inclusion of the article is based not on what the website/company has accomplished, but what it expects to -- in other words, that Surch isn't yet well-known, but will be. Let me state that although I still feel the article should be deleted at this time, I have no prejudice against recreation in the future if Surch turns out to be wildly successful and then meets criteria for inclusion (and I wish Surch well in this respect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:CORP)