Deletion of James F. Adams

Comment: In practice, we have always kept articles on Medal of Honor recipients as passing  with flying colors, as it were. '''However''', I agree that most of these people really don't have enough coverage for a stand-alone article (and I've created several similar ones). 40% of MOHs were given out in the ACW, by the way. I don't think there's any way this AfD can generate consensus on its own to delete a recipient of the most prestigious personal military decoration in the United States. That's a clear pass of  #1 if you're looking for a guideline behind this. An RfC is the appropriate place to decide whether to merge/redirect these stubby articles to the list of ACW MOH recipients or keep them as is &ndash; |Wikipedia is not paper and |there's nothing wrong with a stub after all. In the absence  of a clear consensus on the wider issue, this article should be kept. Deletion is clearly inappropriate. Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PERMASTUB)