Deletion of Boycott of The Ingraham Angle

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The subject has received significant coverage in major newspapers (Boston Globe, Seattle PI, The New York Times) and magazines (GQ, AdAge, Inc., Newsweek, Variety) across the US, and even internationally (Paris Match, The Guardian, Deutsche Welle, Sydney Morning Herald, Japan Times). It easily meets GNG and is an important part of historical impact of student activism following the watershed Stoneman Douglas shooting.  does not apply since the subject is not routine reporting. The material is too long to be merged into another article without trimming essential information. Mysteriously, the OP recently voted '''strong keep''', at an AfD for a far-less-notable subject.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kyle_Kashuv&diff=prev&oldid=833431156
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)