Deletion of List of Net Yaroze games

Comment: I'm having a bit of a hard time understanding the rationale(s) for deletion here.   doesn't really seem applicable to me.  This isn't an indiscriminate grouping of random things (e.g., "List of objects that are yellow") or any of the other types of information that NOTCATALOG seems to bar.  Each of the list entries here has a source, the vast majority of which appear to be from sources that the community considers reliable (e.g., PlayStation Official Magazine – UK, Edge, Giant Bomb).  It's a list article so each source stands for the proposition that the item is appropriate for inclusion in the list, and its unsurprising that they, by themselves, don't have significant coverage regarding each game.  Furthermore, as  states "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been."  I don't think there's a debate that Net Yaroze (which includes the games themselves) meets GNG. So, in short, (1) I don't understand the application of NOTCATALOG here, (2) I disagree with the comments about the sources (or at least the lion's share), and (3) I feel like this AFD is contrary to some of what is stated in LISTN.  But, that's just my two cents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOG||WP:LISTN)