Deletion of Bonghan theory

Comment: here are some sources to begin with: http://tcmstudent.com/bonghan05.pdf, http://www.acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=31918, http://fasciacongress.org/2009/abstract_pdf/J_051%20lee%20bonghan-fascia%20model.pdf, http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4468/1/IJEB%2046%285%29%20336-339.pdf, http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/acu.2008.0600?cookieSet=1&journalCode=acu, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=zO0VAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-xMEAAAAIBAJ&dq=bonghan%20theory&pg=1154%2C2704352. There are likely many more on the subject, as I obtained those from a quick glance. The theory is obviously |notable, and within our guidelines. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: non notable  theory seeking to Science by press conference|gain attention by using public forums of discussion rather than through academic journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)