Deletion of Irexit

Comment: or '''merge/redirect'''). Per nom, if we take away the unlikely/speculative "some people have speculated about this and given it a notional name" type content, and remove the  (which links that speculation to the Apple judgement), we are largely left with a DICDEF. The suggestion that "there's a Frexit article with less substance" is in itself a near DICDEF of |"other stuff exists". If the Irexit title is to remain, then as proposed, the limited remaining few sentences (after the Apple stuff and uncited quotes are removed) might be merged to Withdrawal_from_the_European_Union#Parties_in_the_EU_advocating_or_considering_withdrawal. And this title redirected to that article/section
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OSE)

Comment: At first glance I was leaning more to delete (or not voting either way), from the  angle. However, this is well sourced, and a tangible discussion currently going on... where it ends up is speculation, but the discussion itself is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)