Deletion of These Heaux

Comment: A y test case, as is obvious from nominator's comment {{tq|I'm here because I would like these SNG assumptions to meet GNG proof}}. The purpose of SNGs is to save community time and attention, not to be a 100% predictor of coverage in every single possible case. Insisting on wasting that time and attention at AfD in an effort to show that SNGs are not 100% predictors of coverage in every possible case is, in my opinion, not only a misunderstanding of community consensus but also disruptive behavior in an already contentious and difficult area of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia talk:Notability is thataway. This topic meets the SNG, and every other issue is an editing matter that does not need to be handled, much less |bludgeoned, at AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:BLUDGEON)