Deletion of John F. Ashton

Comment: My initial delete vote was based on the lack of good sources for this article. This view was confirmed after reviewing JJB's shortlist. Put simply, none of the articles were reliable secondary sources which gave significant coverage to the subject. Some of the items on JJB's shortlist did not cover the subject at all! I agree with David Eppstein, that the problem here is our inability to identify any "core" of notability and the obfuscatory  of JJB which has wrapped this discussion in a haze confusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:WIKIPUFFERY)

Comment: I'm tired of wading through the vast cesspool of lousy sources that JJB has created looking for the pearl that he assures us is there. I have honestly spent a great deal of time evaluating the sources, and have found NOTHING, ZIP, ZILCH, NADA, that comes even close to satisfying any of the criteria of ,  or . And so have a whole slew of other experienced editors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)