Deletion of Auxiliary field

Comment: The IDEA of using a constructed "auxiliary field" to simplify calculation is a common technique in mathematical physics, and QFT in particular. As such THAT concept would certainly pass .  A comment on the article correctly points out that the "H" field in electromagnetism is sometimes referred to as an auxiliary field in that vein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is clearly about the same concept dealt with in easily found papers such as https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0550321383901013 Relation between different auxiliary field formulations of N = 1 supergravity coupled to matter (Nuclear Physics B) and https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0309256 Auxiliary fields and hadron dynamics (published Physical Review D, 2004) and further use of Google Scholar search indicates that the use of the term is widely discussed and so will easily clear GNG. The issues {{u|PianoDan}} raises are not -like issues, so I don't see them as mattering here; they are problems to be raised on the article's talk page when the AfD is done. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)