Deletion of Barbados–France relations

Comment: I had a quick look at the Google search posted by Jayron32 and failed to find third-party specific discussion of tax treaties between these two countries. I accept they exist, but until sources are posted to verify the |notability of the relations, the best strategy is to delete this stub. If sufficient material is found to justify an article on the relations between Barbados and France, another article can easily be created (but perhaps it should be about relations between France and the region?). The current article includes "The bilateral relations and trade between the two nations remain very modest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per . With nearly 200 countries in the world, you are looking at nearly 20,000 such articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCASE)

Comment: The presently applicable policy is the |general notability guidelines which require a topic to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" before WP can have an article on it. At present, this sources cited in this article are 2 government websites which fail the "independent" part of the GNG, and 6 articles that discuss multilateral relations between Caricom and the EU. The ''only'' mention of Barbados-France bilateral relations in all those articles is this: "The Government of Barbados will, however, continue the negotiations already underway with the Government of France to conclude an agreement which would remove the visa requirement for Barbadians traveling to the French territories in the Caribbean."http://www.gisbarbados.gov.bb/index.php?categoryid=13&p2_articleid=1830 This is hardly significant coverage in multiple sources, and the source actually Barbados Ministry of Foreign affairs, so it's not even independent. I've looked for sources on my own that would satisfy  and not found anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)