Deletion of Antin Infrastructure Partners

Comment: Despite the routine-sounding headlines, the two articles from FT https://www.ft.com/content/1aef8dac-c086-11e6-9bca-2b93a6856354 1https://www.ft.com/content/770b84f6-efdc-11e3-bee7-00144feabdc0 2 and this article from Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/cats-ma-antin-infrastructure/rpt-antin-infrastructure-hires-banks-to-sell-uk-gas-pipeline-idUSL5N25V3LR 3 are not merely 'routine business announcements' but are substantial coverage of investments (historic and recent), detailing significant impacts on transportation and energy infrastructure in the UK. The Telegraph article https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2019/05/04/infrastructure-giant-antin-lining-1bn-sale-pipeline-north-sea/ 4 is also substantial coverage, and Antin did not provide comment to the authors. I'm not sensing churnalism from any of the aforementioned articles, and given the scale of the investments they make, I've no doubt that there's more to be uncovered. When I first stumbled on the entry in October I initially thought the PROD made sense, but in further digging, the subject easily passes the requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)