Deletion of Boxxy

Comment: absolutely not notable in internet culture. The fact that the Guardian mention it means little because (with no disrespect meant) they're as clued up on internet culture as a few of the keep voters here. She'll be forgotten about in a month, easily. I won't object a redirect to 4chan but I will object adding content about her to the article, as I'd rather prefer it kept its FA status and didn't have random -violating stuff added to it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: trivial episode that is not now notable (no reliable sources to indicate that) and is almost certain to be forgotten very quickly. Making three videos, I remind those voting "keep", generally should ''not'' entitle one to a place in an encyclopedia. We are, after all (or at least some of us strive to be), an encyclopedia, not tabloid trash. Fails , , , etc., regardless of "the 4chan incidents
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: this unnencyclopedic trivia. 4chan and other juveniles can play their reindeer games wherever they like, except here. Fails:     
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:WEIGHT||WP:RECENT||WP:V)