Deletion of Qassim Afzal (2nd nomination)

Comment: Another politician debate that touches on the difficult question of competing notability guidelines.  would say he's not notable. The GNG would say he is. ''In my view'' (I stress ''in my view'' because people can legitimately disagree with this), these questions should be resolved by bearing two points in mind. First, they are only guidelines; neither takes precedence over the other. Secondly, both only confer ''presumptions'' not ''guarantees'' of notability and inclusion. In light of those two points, it is my view that we should balance the extent to which the subject meets one guideline against the extent to which he fails the other. He fails  significantly. He passes GNG marginally if at all. Thus any ''presumption'' conferred by the GNG here is weak, and is rebutted by the subject's clear lack of notability according to the community's standards for members of his profession
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)