Deletion of Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim

Comment: albeit weakly.  It is fairly obvious that the article's author is a newcomer here, and in the process of mastering the syntax for article creation.  The author is apparently also directly interested in the religion in question, and needs to get a handle on |neutral point of view: ''The church is in strong opposition to idol worshippers and forces of darkness; these evil forces are at all times rebuked and overcome . . ''  Parts of the article are apparently referenced by unpublished interviews with church leaders, which poses |verifiability issues.On the other hand, the article purports to describe a religious movement that has been around in one shape or form since the mid-1920s.  This fact alone seems to make a fairly good ''prima facie'' case for notability.  Apparently published sources and biographies of church leaders exist in Nigeria, and the article does seek to reference these as well; this literature may be a |primary source, but it is a source.  And. . . it is |interesting reading.  Generally, the fact that sources may be obscure or hard to find in Europe or North America is not grounds to delete anything.  The article was created the same day it was nominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:INTERESTING)