Deletion of Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per  and per . The article is an example of trivial things being blown up as part of a US presidential campaign. The coverage is about what Romney did, not about anything the dog did. The references do not state that this was in any way a remarkable or noteworthy dog. It is adequately covered by one sentence in the Mitt Romney article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: to Mitt Romney#Political positions and public perceptions.  Otherwise, delete per  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: As is quite usual in AfD discussions, '''people are misunderstanding and mis-applying the deprecated  wikilink''', which no longer even exists as a separate shortcut. If you click on  you land at a soft redirect which says, quite rightly, that it has been deprecated in favor of PAPER ( that has significantly revised language ) "to draw attention to the actual policy, not just the potentially misleading shortcut". The following ''are'' the relevant policy considerations that correctly apply, however
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)