Deletion of The Final Cut (1995 film)

Comment: I respect the nominator and her work, but for her to dismiss the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1994&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22The+Final+Cut+%22%2C+Sam+Elliott&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22The+Final+Cut+%22%2C+Sam+Elliott&lnav=od&btnG=Go numerous available news sources and then demand someone else provide them does not serve to improve the article nor the project.  All that  asks is that they |'''BE''' available and that the article has a reasonable chance of being D... not that editors who have looked and then comment a keep at AFD do |the work that the nominator might not have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:ATD||WP:IMPROVE||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Another in a long string of bad faith noms.  Anyone spending 5 minutes on google can find clear evidence of notability.  Just because someone |doesn't like the (admittedly poorly written) article doesn't justify deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)