Deletion of Brotherhood of Nod

Comment: or redirect.  indicates that split-off articles must be about notable aspects of the main article. If an article becomes too swollen with detailed descriptions of non-notable aspects, it needs cutting, not splitting. This is because what we otherwise get are articles such as this one that do not contain one third-party source - nice work, but suited for a fan wiki, not an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: WP:WAF AND  both say that splits and spinoffs need to be notable. Can't do that when the whole article is attributed to the games and developer diaries. Where are the third party sources? Special:Contributions/74.198.9.141|74.198.9.141
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: Notability is not inherited, and even if the article was merged, it still would not be too large compared to quite a few other similar articles we have (it would still be less than 80KB). That being said, the next issue would be whether or not merging would cause |undue weight; that I argue would be a valid counterpoint
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)