Deletion of Desmond Napoles

Comment: The article obviously lists some sources that are questionable for establishing notability, and the language and claims seem likely to be contested. Neither of those are good reasons to delete the article. Even ignoring the references that are from unreliable sources or are merely aggregated social media posts, there remains significant coverage of subject in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Not all social media attention translates into mainstream media attention. This time it did. Passes . Sources cover multiple events, so no  problem, either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Meets  in that he has received substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)