Deletion of Obama Eats Dogs

Comment: for reasons that should be self evident, but they seem not to be, so: , , , and
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:COATRACK||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: I am changing my vote to delete as it should have been all along. In the real world, this was a reaction to the Seamus (dog) story that was floated to disparage one of the Presidential candidates. A similar pattern occurred on WP. These two, election-year, bashing stories are meant only to disparage. They are not notable, of any lasting value, and are not topics for our encyclopedia. At first, I did not see that delete was an option; now, I see that there are enough editors for this mess to be cleaned up the right way. The NPOV way to deal with this issue is to ignore it in real life and delete it on WP. Also see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Per #NEWS. Basically silly political posturing with zero encyclopedic value. There really isn't anything worth merging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)