Deletion of Presidential prevarications (United States)

Comment: Interesting idea but Internet meme|WP:YDIW.  |#FactCheck.org.  Redirect to wikiquote:Category:United States Presidents|Almost everything a President has ever said.  An infinitely large subject; we don't have articles on All crows that are black; maybe Presidential truthtelling (United States) would be a manageable size.  There's only "one source," a 2007 magazine article, for the Washington "cherry tree" story being false, and it only "suggests" it "probably" is?  In all seriousness, there are some books on the subject such as ''When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences‎,'' ''Big Bush Lies: The 20 Most Telling Lies of President George W. Bush,'' ''The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq,'' ''Fraud: The Strategy Behind the Bush Lies and Why the Media Didn't Tell You,'' ''To Err Is Reagan: Lies and Deceptions from the President,'' and so on and articles like "The Contemporary Presidency: Presidential Lies" in ''Presidential Studies Quarterly,'' but as a practical matter I don't know how one would do an encyclopedia article about it, for the reasons others have stated above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: While I tend to see problems with this page, its not clear to me from any argument made thus far how it is in conflict with any Wikipedia policy or guideline.  Many of the statements in the page are cited, so its not clear to me how it is unverifiable.  Furthermore, the fact that a subject is contentions or a magnet for POV wars is no reason at all to delete.  Arguments that the page will be 'used' for some particular purpose are irrelevant.  Can someone explain a way in which a ''Wikipedia policy or guideline'' requires deletion of this page?  Can you explain how it is non-notable, unverifiable, or something else |Wikipedia is not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)