Deletion of Nicholas Hagger (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are few, if any reliable, independent secondary sources on this person.  The article does indeed contain over 50 footnotes, but there is considerable duplication, a number of them appear to be citations to unpublished correspondence or lectures, others don't identify the articles, authors or page numbers supposedly being cited, others are on their face not reliable sources.  A check through Google shows that, other than a handful of articles about the estate where he lives, there is virtually no coverage whatsoever of his career, writings or philosophy which is the bulk of the focus of the article. A prolific author whose work is ignored is simply not notable. Absent that this BLP does not meet the standards of , and none of his works meet the standard of . The initial decision to delete this BLP was undoubtedly correct
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK)