Deletion of Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (2nd nomination)

Comment: if this was unambiguous it would be deleted at fD as a redirect from a (now?) implausible search term; there's no justification for creating a dab page just because a couple more potential targets can be dreamed up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: facing into the snow) because I see a disambiguation page with 3 valid entries and no policy/guidance reason to delete (except perhaps ). This discussion reads like ''Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|Arguments to avoid bingo''.  So far I can spot "No respectable encyclopedia..." (), "absurd" and "insult ... intelligence" (), "not needed" and "completely unnecessary" (), "All Google results..." () and "all the reasons already mentioned" ().  ''House
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:IDL||WP:WEDONTNEEDIT||WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:EVERYONEELSE)