Deletion of William McBrien Building

Comment: Serving as the head office of a notable government agency is not a claim of notability that hands a building an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia, if |reliable source coverage ''about the building'' is lacking. But there's only ''one'' reliable source here that's ''about'' the building — the other reliable source is about a ''tangential'' plan to move to ''another'' building while not really talking about ''this'' building at all, and the only other source here is a |primary one — and ''one'' source is ''not'' enough to satisfy . I'm willing to reconsider this ''if'' somebody can pony up ''much'' better sourcing than has been shown here, but nothing present in the article as written is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG)