Deletion of Patrick M. Novack

Comment: Sounds like he was a fine person, but the article reads like a memorial, which Wikipedia is not. The Silver Star is not the nation's highest medal, and 100,000 to 150,000 have been awarded since 1932, per the Silver Star article.  The Pentagon does not even keep a list, apparently. The article appears to fail  and . Not every biography which has referenced facts belongs in Wikipedia; it is more than a compendium of every referenced fact or biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: Obituary coverage with brief local activity snippets, in local newspapers doesn't establish notability (unless such activity by itself is notable). Also, working in the police dept or contracting with DoD etc don't make one notable. Members of Congress attending the funeral fails the notability test too, connections to prominent people is explicitly excluded by io invalid criteria . The only fact that could possibly establish notability may be the honors - Silver stars, but even that, I'm not sure that they qualify per IO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:BIO)

Comment: I am going to summarize the arguments for deletion (as I see them) for clarity. Despite the subject's wonderful deeds, he still does not meet the criteria for  and this article should be deleted. I would again note that |Wikipedia is not a memorial and though I commend the author for his great work at recounting his father's legacy, Wikipedia is not the place for such an account. Now, as to the arguments
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: although the subject appears to have been a good man during his life, I do not believe the article satisfies  or  and is in violation of . I do, however, commend his son for his efforts in establishing this article. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)