Deletion of Diana Babar (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm the nominator) - Per  "People are likely to be '''notable''' if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is '''not''' conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does '''not''' guarantee that a subject should be included." (my underline added on the last part).  Insisting that ANYBIO1 means she ''has'' to have an article doesn't actually align with the ANYBIO policy.  As we've all found, the ''only'' reason we can identify for this article is her CBE award.  That's just not enough to reach  on it's own. Based on a misinterpretation of ANYBIO, or a precedent set by a prior AfD that is being used to overwrite an existing policy (a quasi-policy that is now being discussed as if it were unchangeable), we're ignoring , and are left with a two-sentence stub that isn't likely to ever expand.  '''''How does treating the CBE as the sole criteria for notability improve Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:NOCOMMON)