Deletion of Edward Wild

Comment: The nomination is based on a highly selective representation of Dr Wild's position and an over-stringent reading of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Although apparently I accepted this at AfC in April (I can't remember it at all, must be losing my marbles) on balance I would say it's  for Dr Wild. I think it's fair to say he hasn't made a significant impact in his field independently of his very large research group, and none of the other  criteria seem to apply. There's the odd mention in the media, but not enough to satisfy the GNG. So my !vote is to delete while acknowledging the strong possibility that he will be considered notable in a few year's time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF)