Deletion of Jeff Monaghan (2nd nomination)

Comment: for several reasons. While the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Monaghan|previous delete discussion was closed ''|NPASR'', renomination should be based on new arguments, and we have none. It's stated above that it meets , but that it fails . This doesn't seem logically possible; I'm fascinated to know which provision of  it fails! Similar logic problems with the claim that while the subject is mentioned in books, these books cite Wikipedia. If these books are considered ''reliable sources'' then their choice to cite Wikipedia for this particular topic (or to cite nobody at all) doesn't enter into it. We can't cite Wikipedia, but they can at their discretion, and when we then cite them we're relying on their scholarship not ours. Basically the argument for deletion above seems to be that people shouldn't be interested in the subject; That's exactly the argument  most strongly rejects. If others are interested, for whatever reasons, then so are we. That's basically what  says, and so agree that this article seems to meet , and that's then a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NPASR||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)