Deletion of Nathaniel Elliott

Comment: reading closely, there is ''not'' an assertion of significance. Frankly, raising $43,000 is ''not'' significant enough to be considered of encylopedic merit. What he is doing is commendable, but not sufficiently ''|notable'' for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Sources presented are either promotional, under the control of the subject or related organizations, or not sufficiently in depth to meet notability requirements. Coverage in reliable sources is not broad enough. One might say that the quality of the writing in the article-- vague, promotional, shallow in depth could be remediable through sourcing and editing. (I've said that myself in other cases.) However, that is not the case here unless significant, in depth, |verifiable information|from |reliable sources is brought forth. I find no in depth bio profile from a news service. Were he notable, someone would have made one. I find no national news service coverage. Not even a limited blurb or one off.  I find limited news coverage with little more information than is presented in this article. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)