Deletion of Russia Row

Comment: notability means something other than a lot of citations to trivial mentions.  This has been on a map for over 150 years; the fact that a few primary sources refer to people who live on that street isn't the "significant coverage in reliable sources" necessary to meet  or .  GEOROAD explicitly calls out requiring |secondary sources, which things like {{tq|In 1852 probate was granted for the will of James Gilburt, a silk manufacturer of No 4 Russia Row.}} absolutely are not.  The coverage in London Encyclopaedia and "London Street Names" borders on being , and based on current policies, I can't support the idea that virtually every London street (and, then, presumably every major street in every major city) is notable with that level of coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOROAD||WP:PSTS||WP:MILL)

Comment: per the |reliable source the London Encyclopedia and others.  It seems people discounting that source are just looking for an excuse to delete this article for the sake of deletion.  If there's in depth coverage by a reliable source, it passes .  If you |don't like that the source is very extensive on many other related topics, that in no manner negates the coverage this topic has received
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)