Deletion of Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor

Comment: I wasn't able to find much that would help this meet  or any of the organisation-specific notability criteria. I have significant concerns, too, about neutrality. The only |reliable independent sources I could find were passing mentions in the context of the organisation's own press releases and comments about events or reports produced by the organisation itself. The only independent secondary-source commentary I could find, '''a.''' confirmed the organisation exists, '''b.''' confirmed it is headquartered in Geneva, and '''c.''' asserted that it was outlawed by the Israeli Government in 2016. This means that any article we retain about the organisation could include these three facts and not much else. Anything else would be heavily reliant on primary sources. Again, I don't think it meets our notability requirements and I think it should be deleted. But I would caution those who want it retained (especially those with a conflict of interest) to consider what that might mean. We require organisations to meet our notability criteria for a range of reasons, and being able to factually cover the organisation in a neutral manner is one of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)