Deletion of Supernova (programming language)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Sources offered are all rimary (meaning, sources written by the author) or otherwise unsuitable.  Googling turns up nothing useful.  It's possible this is simply a case of oo soon and that new, more helpful sources could appear tomorrow.  But, frankly, I doubt it.  It's very difficult to imagine this going anywhere.  I don't know who would use it to do what.   is not a reason to delete but is a reason to question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:P||WP:T||WP:COI)