Deletion of Harold Ambler

Comment: This one is tough because Ambler has indeed received coverage that is ''about'' him, but I find the nominator's argument more convincing. As a published writer, Ambler can be evaluated under  /  which requires not just getting published, but having your publications recognized by others as significant contributions to the field. His news work is typical reporting and opinionating just like many other non-notable writers. His ''Don't Sell Your Coat'' book indeed received coverage, especially from media sources slanted toward climate change denial, but that coverage is almost entirely short and promotional. (While it's a little off-topic, see also  which requires non-trivial notice.) As for Ambler's other press coverage, he got noticed and quoted and briefly interviewed by a fair amount of denial-oriented media for that one controversial column in ''Huff Post'' in 2009, but that came and went, so  applies as well. Again, I consider this article to be a close call, but in the debate above, the article's supporters are only perpetuating its main problems -- trying to promote a fringe individual and blaming vague conspiracies for the subject's own insignificance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALIST||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NBOOK||WP:BIO1E)