Deletion of QuickSilver (project)

Comment: Despite papers going back fairly far, QuickSilver appears relatively new--all reports of it are in conference proceedings and technical reports.  My keep would be stronger if it was in a peer-reviewed publication.  Due to the fact that there are papers on the topic & you can download it, I don't really see how #CBALL can apply.  The article describes QuickSilver as it exists now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)