Deletion of Wajam (2nd nomination)

Comment: After a review of this article; searching through their references and looking at the magnitude of information that continually refers to this companies product as Malware, I find it hard for us to be able to keep this article in a place of eutrality. Seems that the argument that has been going on for some years now has created a wikipedia ghost (''The subject themselves'') that comes out to scare editors away should they try to make constructive contributions to the article.  It is apparent that we have an blatant  when the company or its representatives are reverting things to paint the company in a better light despite the overwhelming evidence that the article is clearly  pam. However, I will state for the record that the powers at be here in the fD may want to keep the article and alt it so the company or it's representatives cannot edit it. The reason for my statement is that with as many complaints that exist, this article could help someone to steer clear or uninstall this unwanted product should they come in contact with it. I did not vote to ''keep'' the article using that stance because I understand that wikipedia is not here to be a "how to" book, but rather to offer encyclopedic information on the company. Yet, good, bad or indifferent it is obvious that this article has issues that are not going to end should we allow the article to remain without some form of intervention by a diligent wikipedia administrator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI||WP:S||WP:A||WP:S)