Deletion of Children's feet (2nd nomination)

Comment: per #3. If the nominator actually read the article instead of assuming everything about children's feet is related to sex, they would see that this article clearly satisfies GNG with at least 3 . Also there was clearly no reasonable  that was performed because a super quick search through PubMed revealed these MEDRS: {{doi|10.1002/14651858.CD006311.pub2}}, {{doi|10.1186/s13047-018-0281-2}}, and {{doi|10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1}}. Also, . This article was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's feet|AFDed before resulting in keep. Not much changed between then and now to necessitate a re-evaluation of the notability of this article. I agree with others and from previous AFD that the article could have a more encyclopedic title, but this isn't 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:CSK||WP:MEDRS||WP:BEFORE||WP:NTEMP||WP:RM)