Deletion of Champika Liyanaarachchi

Comment: Sorry to disagree here but Ms. Liyanaarachchi is the editor of the “;;;The largest selling independent English daily in Sri Lanka, The Daily Mirror's independent editorial stand and its reliable and balanced presentation”, as quoted by LexisNexis, and shown here http://w3.nexis.com/sources/scripts/info.pl?337156.  Likewise,  Ms. Liyanaarachchi is sought after and quoted by her peers on several issues as shown here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sinhala/news/story/2007/04/070419_britishghota.shtml,http://www.lines-magazine.org/textnov03/shan.htm,http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/6113,http://members.ozemail.com.au/~pwessels/cja/NL10.htm  http://www.tamilcanadian.com/page.php?cat=537&id=3935, http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=126&art_id=nw20070418121907835C189863 and http://www.southasiamonitor.org/2007/oct/news/01news.shtml.  Additionaly, Champika Liyanaarachchi, I believe, has generated enough independent – 3rd party – reliable and verifiable coverage to at least meet the standards under reative|Creative professionals‘ as shown here, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Champika+Liyanaarachchi%22&start=90&sa=N.  Hope I explained my position clear enough to understand my rational.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)