Deletion of Decemyriagon

Comment: with Polygon. This article simply gives a definition, see #DICT. Agree the Polygon article should contain a list of polygons (or there should be a List of Polygons) rather than giving them separate articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not an #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|indiscriminate collection of information. There are an infinite amount of polygons, every polygon does not deserve an article. If there are multiple nontrivial |sources that will |verify content establishing some sort of E|notability then an article could be created for that particular polygon. I'm sure there are plenty of materials to cite an article for an octagon, a square, and a dodecahedron, but I dont think you can justify an article on a decemyriagon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:REF||WP:V||WP:NOTE)