Deletion of ActionTrip

Comment: and not in any sense a !vote): this isn't an open-and-shut case.  Take a look at the Alexa rank http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/actiontrip.com/reviews/simcoaster.phtml here and the site analytics http://siteanalytics.compete.com/actiontrip.com/ here: it's a very popular website.  And yes, I know Alexa rank's an |argument to avoid, but I do not intend to disregard an obvious indicator of notability just because of an '''essay''' that I don't agree with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: The tone is dreadful at times and the lack of sourcing doesn't help. However gaming industry is notorious for having wonky sources - most are online and bloglike so have to be weeded through and this is a Eastern-Europe website as well? This would suggest a double layer of |systematic bias that I'm reluctant to delete anything over. I would feel more confident if we had someone fluent in both sourcing gaming articles who also is fluent in the languages the potential sources are actually in. At this point I'm more inclines to '''weak keep''' based on these issues and the Alexa rankings which remain a good indication of web traffic. I suggest a stay of execution here, a clean-up to wikify, add website infobox and seek translation help although sourcing a gaming website article may not eseem like the most pressing concern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)