Deletion of John V. Krutilla

Comment: Multiple major newspaper obituaries (the kind the newspapers write themselves, not the paid death notice kind) are both a clear pass of  and a clear sign of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It is perhaps true that the article in its current form is unsalvageable and should be deleted for that reason (unless somebody completely rewrites it) . However, the subject appears to be notable, both on  and  grounds. E.g. there were obituaries about his death both in NYT http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/us/john-krutilla-81-economist-who-focused-on-environment.html, and in Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/2003/07/12/john-krutilla/1d9f8110-6b0c-483b-979f-df6ee381515c/. There is a bio page about him at  Volvo Environment Prize site https://volvoenvironmentprize.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/volvo-environment-prize-laureates-of-1990/, another obit here http://www.reed.edu/reed_magazine/in-memoriam/obituaries/november2003/john-v-krutilla-1949.html,  public lectures about his impact on environmental economics, like this one here http://www.reed.edu/news_center/press_releases/2004-2005/586.html. There is also coverage like this one http://www.ejolt.org/2015/02/krutillas-rule/ of something called "Krutilla’s Rule" in environmental economics. There is an entry about Krutilla http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100044382http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199754748.001.0001/acref-9780199754748-e-238?rskey=5GBwhp&result=238 in "The Biographical Dictionary of American Economists" published by the Oxford University Press. I'd say there is enough here to pass both  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:PROF)