Deletion of Barbary Coast Trail

Comment: Cullen's research shows that the trail has been covered in depth by multiple newspapers, some very non-local. I have no doubt that this trail is also covered in depth in many travel books about San Franscisco. For instance http://books.google.com/books?id=P5v0u5lINQoC&dq=%22Barbary+coast+trail%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s Frommer's San Francisco Free and Dirt Cheap has about a page on it and there is the 250-page book devoted to the trail: http://books.google.com/books?id=up0MAAAACAAJ&dq=%22Barbary+coast+trail%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xo1IUfyIIcPuiQK944DYCw&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA Walking San Francisco on the Barbary Coast Trail. The topic is well above general notability thresholds. The article does need more citations and better referencing, but these are surmountable problems . A notable topic and surmountable problems suggest that this article be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: subject has received |significant coverage from non-primary |reliable sources, clearly passes  and is notable beyond its |local area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:LOCALINT)

Comment: A Google News Archive search shows extensive coverage in many major newspapers, including several far from San Francisco. It meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)