Deletion of Jumpgate (Babylon 5)

Comment: The subject of the article, a fictional technological concept, does not meet the |general notability guideline (GNG) since all mentions about the ''jumpgate'' or ''jumpgates'' are either purely from a plot perspective mostly from tertiary and primary sources, trivial mentions or from unreliable sources with a |search engine test, nothing to presume significant coverage. Checking the sources provided within the article, the first two are tertiary sources, which do not work well for notability purposes per the GNG, and I found that in two of them ''jumpgate'' is a trivial mention. In the second one, it is limited to a single mention in a single sentence and in the third one, the only secondary source, the term is not mentioned at all, instead using ''jump-points'' and again in a single sentence. And with no reception or significance about ''jumpgates'' either in the sources or the article, it is a |plot-only description of a fictional work. Since the content is not supported with the references provided, it is also an unnecessary |content fork. In order to generate consensus, I believe that a merge to jumpgate is an acceptable alternative to deletion, although I fail to see what could possibly be added to the content about ''Babylon 5'' that is already there, particularly when nothing is actually referenced within the article in discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SET||WP:PLOT||WP:CFORK)