Deletion of Jessica Wakefield

Comment: Because the nominator doesn't give a policy-based reason for deletion (only citing arguments |about quality of the article that fail  and ), any "Per nom" votes above should be dismissed per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH||WP:NEXIST||WP:ARTN||WP:NOTAVOTE)

Comment: Nomination fails to give a reason for deletion. Per , , and , ''"The article is poorly written"'', ''"The article is poorly sourced"'', or ''"The article is too much plot"'' are not |reasons for deletion. In fact, these points are even listed in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD||WP:DELREASON)