Deletion of Kanhaiya Kumar

Comment: Essentially per NorthAmerica. The sources provided by them (many of which are already in the article) demonstrate that the subject comfortably passes . Although the genesis of the coverage might have been the JNU incident, there is clearly coverage that is not directly relevant to the JNU incident; see http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/kanhaiya-in-a-fresh-spot-over-anti-national-remarks-116030901337_1.html, http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/kanhaiya-in-a-fresh-spot-over-anti-national-remarks-116030901337_1.html, http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-kanhaiya-kumar-was-fined-by-jnu-for-alleged-misbehaviour-with-girl-student-2187880, and http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/will-storm-jnu-shoot-kanhaiya-kumar-and-umar-khalid-before-durga-ashtami-threatens-up-navnirman-sena_1869761.html. This coverage relates to his position as a significant individual in student politics, and thus a merge is inappropriate. Additionally, I found a few sources giving him non-trivial coverage well before the JNU incident; see http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-09-13/news/66496086_1_abvp-lyngdoh-committee-jnusu, http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/highvoltage-debate-at-jnu/article7640466.ece, http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/delhi/aisf-wins-president-s-post-abvp-makes-a-comeback-after-14-years/132850.html. These would be insufficient for an article by themselves, but combined with the sources provided here, show that  is completely inapplicable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E)