Deletion of Queen of Bollywood

Comment: Well, so it has happened as I had feared: instead of being improved as I had hoped, some editors have added yet more hyperbole to the names, without stating |reliable sources. What I was expecting in the manner of improvements to this dab page would be along the lines of "''name was referred to this title by source on date''", nothing more and nothing less
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: on having reviewed the potential links for inserting into the article, I found only http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India_Buzz/Who_is_the_next_Bollywood_queen/articleshow/3085603.cms  this one which could go some way to determine or define what the term is. However, there is |no universality in that definition, although |one could assume it. I still cannot escape the conclusion that it is still ''waaaaay'' |too generic a neologism to be meaningful. A link such as http://www.laweekly.com/music/music/asha-bhosle-queen-of-bollywood/18769/ this LA Weekly article, shows the phrase 'Queen of Bollywood' used in a very good example of press jingoism and headline creation. Overall, I would still favour deleting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:NEO)