Deletion of Ozy and Millie (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets neither  nor . Lack of coverage for the Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards and Ursa Major Awards show they are extremely minor awards that are not indicators of notability. They do not meet the "well-known and independent award" standard of . The only nearly good source with any significant coverage for this article is the interview in Attitude 3: The New Subversive Online Cartoonists. Interviews are primary sources, and sources for notability purposes should be secondary sources per . Also, it is a single source. We do not have the multiple reliable secondary sources that are needed to meet article standards. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GNG||WP:WEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: no meaningful (i.e. non-trivial) secondary sources, what exists appears to fail  / , and thus serious questions exist as to its |notability. I think Sigma 7's solution of making it available for transwikiing would be good - this is a well written article suited to another publication without Wikipedia's sourcing requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N)