Deletion of Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant (2nd nomination)

Comment: Same rationale of last AfD: Strong, multiple, continuous coverage by several undisputedly |reliable sources means that it passes our |general notability guideline with flying colours. No rational, objective reason exists to dismiss sources only because most of them are "regional", especially if the "region" includes millions of persons. The "delete" comments above seem to squirm into a personal interpretation of notability which isn't supported by any guideline apart perhaps for  -in any case, alternative notability guidelines are supposed to ''extend'' GNG, not to ''replace'' it, so the requirement of CORP of sources not being local is completely moot. Reliable sources are reliable sources and significant coverage is significant coverage ''regardless of the audience''. An academic journal on some exotic mathematics field would have probably much less audience than NYT, but nobody seriously argues to dismiss it as a RS. To pick up "local" as a proxy for "nobody cares about it" is deeply biased. Also, that it is now closed is entirely irrelevant for notability. On a sidenote, the nomination is done by proxy for Jimbo, and this somehow taints the process: why didn't he nominate himself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)