Deletion of Catullus 2

Comment: and '''cleanup'''. The article subject matter itself is noteworthy, so the only real dispute seems to be over , which is not grounds for deleting an article. Simply add references for any unreferenced claims (including disputed translations or academic disagreements over translation, which Wikipedia should report on, not weigh in on). Moreover, I see no policy or guideline saying that it is original research to translate a text, as long as the translation agrees with general academic consensus. As for the Wikibooks issue, this seems to be a case of sacrificing useful information for bureaucracy; there is no value to our readers in forcing them to go to an external website to view a short passage that we could just as easily quote here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)