Deletion of Lindy West

Comment: while the subject has received multiple mentions in multiple |non-primary or tertiary sources, there appears to be very few tertiary reliable sources where the subject is the primary subject of what is being written, and when that is the case, gives the subject |significant coverage. There is one sources, that goes rather http://www.vice.com/read/lindy-west-is-leaving-jezebel-but-she-still-hates-rape-905 in-depth, but it is an interview, so it should. Other sources are a paragraph of content(http://books.google.com/books?id=ddS5BAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA104&dq=%22Lindy%20West%22%20-wikipedia&pg=PA104#v=onepage&q=%22Lindy%20West%22%20-wikipedia&f=false such as this blurb, but nothing that I would consider significant coverage. Therefore, it is questionable, that the subject meets . Therefore, we look at the more stringent criteria of , while the subject has been cited at http://books.google.com/books?id=yiMXAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA176&dq=%22Lindy%20West%22%20-wikipedia&pg=PA176#v=onepage&q=%22Lindy%20West%22%20-wikipedia&f=false least once, I would not consider that as "widely cited by peers or successors". Thus, appearing IMHO to fail GNG and author, unless more significant coverage of the subject, as the primary topic of the reliable source, I cannot at this time support keeping this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)