Deletion of Andrew Andersen

Comment: It would be "quite sourced" ''where'', exactly? There's not a single reference to a |reliable source anywhere in the entire article — all it's got is a list of offsite external links to |primary source profiles (e.g. his books' sales pages on Amazon and his staff profiles on the websites of organizations or institutions that he's directly involved with), which isn't even ''remotely'' the same thing as reliable source coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: Possibly merely , and I admit that I did not read the shouting going on above.  What I did do was to search for his books, his name, even searched for him in smallwarsjournal.com, where a guy like this ought to be referenced if he's making much of a splash in this field.https://www.google.com/search?q=andrew+andersen++site%3Asmallwarsjournal.com&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8  He's just not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: He was a national doctoral fellow at the Center for Military and Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary, so he passes #5 and 6 for . Meeting just one requirement justifies notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)