Deletion of Maria Pacolli

Comment: In this case,  provides a shorthand for a much rticles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Politician|longer discussion (see talk page) about the notability of a First Lady|First spouse, because  does not specifically describe this position as being afforded the presumption of notability. That said, in the case of a first spouse, the community has accepted the presumption of notability to the holder of the position of First Spouse (time and again), and that presumption is found through the discussion in previous XfDs and currently expressed in . There is also : "The fact of having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG. Newborn babies are not notable except for an heir to a throne or similar. Note, however, that this does not apply to situations where the fact of having a relationship to another person inherently defines a public position that is notable in its own right, such as a national First Lady." Note: this too is ''supplemental'' information. To summarize, the keep argument is spelled out in two different places, both in POLOUTCOMES and NOTINHERITED, both designed as guides for editors to consider when nominating an article for deletion. So, it is easier to just refer (in this circumstance) to  and establish whether there information suggesting the subject was/is a first spouse is verifiable. In this case, there is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:A||WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:POLOUTCOMES)