Deletion of Rikki Six

Comment: I agree with Spartaz - non-policy based assertions and claims should be ignored. Another issue, which has already been mentioned, is there are no intellectually independent sources with significant coverage that demonstrate the award is significant or that demonstrate the the subject satisfies inclusion critera per  - and  explains why this is so. As a BLP, according to ,  it ''must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV), Verifiability (V), No original research (NOR)...contentious material about living persons...that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed...'' So, this AfD is in agreement with BLP criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRV||WP:WHYN||WP:BLP)