Deletion of Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial

Comment: Very ironical, how does this article meets ? its a trial project and a fellow wikipedian (user Hasteur) debunked the very keen attempt for romotion by the people who have direct involvement in the app project. User Hasteur have provided more than enough valid reasoning for AFD. The article clearly falls in category romotion . Yes its right that AFD is not how a  should be handled, but this article violates not one or two but every policy known under  including , , AY. Now i doubt this could be a  support by the editors defending to keep the article. What surprise me the most is that the last comment on the AFD page was by user "xeno" at 12:01 on 28 June 2014, but after my "strong delete" vote on AFD the article got three "Keep" votes within hours! This AFD needs to be seen by trusted Wikipedia admins. I can surely foresee something fishy going on around here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:P||WP:P||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:COI||WP:COI||WP:SELFPROMOTE||WP:SELFCITE||WP:PAY||WP:NOPR)