Deletion of Death of Prince

Comment: There seems to be a lot of , which should cause reflection but Wikipedia rules need to be followed, which would be a keep. This is because the article far exceeds the requirements of notability. There are many, many reliable sources about the death of Prince. These sources are not about Prince but about his death. They continue to come out even many days after his death and cover different aspects. Some have said that there was no proven murder or conspiracy, but that is not an article requirement. Some have been accused of not having many edits and at least one delete vote comes from someone who gives thanks for being notified. Some have tried to cross out comments and falsely accuse others. This is besides the point. The point is whether the article, much improved since day 1 (when it was, frankly, a terribly written article) passes the criteria. It does. Peace
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: until such time that there is consensus at Talk:Prince (musician) that a |spinoff is warranted
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: There's nothing in this coverage that calls for a separate article.  A biography of a dead person includes information about that person's death. A separate article about their death should be created when there's significant coverage in independent reliable sources of details that are not biographical.  There are lots of sources here, but they're all about biography.  Maybe, in the future, there'll be sources with which to differentiate this death from the deaths that all of us eventually face, but there's nothing like that yet.  Until there is,  applies.  It's not even a close call folks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)