Deletion of List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck" (9th nomination)

Comment: The article meets  standards, and I would think the value of the subject was already confirmed in the last nine RfAs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As others have noted, this list is well-sourced (copious references to reliable sources), and there are no , , , WP:SYN or other issues; it is also well-presented and well-organised. Overall, it's a fine bit of work.The nominator's complaint about it being unencyclopedic is addressed in the introduction to the list, which establishes the notability and significance of the use of the word "fuck" as one of the most taboo words in American film.  A list like this tracking the use of a non-taboo word such as "haddock" or "collander" would indeed be trivia, but that's not the case here. Far from being some sort of extraneous trivia, this list seems to me to be a very good example of the sort of thing that a |non-paper encyclopedia can do well: a summary of an issue which may be irrelevant to many people, but which has been the subject of heated controversy in popular culture for decades. Kittybrewster rightly asks who would have the time to count all the uses of these words, and I think that's an important point: the significance of this word, and the relevance of the list, is precisely that so much attention is paid to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NOTPAPER)