Deletion of Diane Farrell (Second nomination)

Comment: Considerable media coverage for a local political figure (First Selectwoman of Westport, reportedly equivalent to Mayor) satisfies .  Existence of Connecticut 4th congressional district election, 2006 also helps with &E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:C)

Comment: Removing well-sourced, verifiable content about such a figure simply because she is not elected is IPOV -- Incumbant's POV, and as such, violates . We really need to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: 497 current news articles listed in Google News.http://www.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&filter=0&q=Diane+Farrell&btnG=Search+News, many of which are national (US News & World Report, Washington Post, LA Times) and even international (The Guardian). This is a top 10-race, Farrell has been previously been elected to office, and this is clearly a notable person. Moreover &E are only '''proposed guidelines''', and are not enforceable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Any one who follows politics knows that this is a major race.  This, in turn, has led to a lot of press, and, please note in  that one positive factor is: "Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage".  As of this writing, she gets 429 news.google hits, and " 'Diane Farrell' + candidate" gets over 100,000 google hits.  Further, that she lost last time by only 4% shows that she is a significant figure in her district (as well has holding previous elected office
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)