Deletion of Bias in Mental Testing

Comment: I see that the nominator here means to uphold Wikipedia policy. I am aware from following his edits since 2010 that the nominator has in mind to continue long-delayed article cleanup following a 2010 ArbCom case, which found that the articles related to the topic of this article have been subject to much edit-warring and use of sockpuppets and meatpuppets to push points of view. I think his suggestion that discussion of this book should be merged with the biographical article on the book's author (who is no longer living) is a sound suggestion consistent with Wikipedia policy. I watchlist that article (as I watchlist the article on the book, which is a book I own) and I can contribute to updating the article per Wikipedia policy if the nominator's suggestion is followed here. The editors who have kindly suggested keeping the separate article on the book also make valid points, so I don't oppose their point of view. Because I own and have read the book, and own quite a few Wikipedia |reliable sources that refer to the book, my main interest here is to make sure that we establish |due weight for claims about the book and its influence and due weight for the factual claims about the world made in the book, which is important for upholding Wikipedia policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEIGHT)