Deletion of Open Learning Environment

Comment: As an application, it fits perfectly in that cateogry of pages, and it has an inhernet utility as references for users. Article needs heavy POV cleaning and referencing some independent sources, but apart form that, is similar in scope andd atyle to thousends of other well respecet application programs. That said, ''I profoundly disagree with the reasons proposed by the article's author for keeping'', though. Wikipedia is not a hall of fame, "they" don't deserve any "recognition" for their hard work or whatever, the article should stay ONLY because it looks to me to be a notable subject and useful resource for users. WP it's NOT a tool to "make people aware" of stuff, it should reflect the things that people are already aware of, hence the  requirement for articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: strongly.  An unreferenced article about |non-notable, non-consumer software, laden with meaningless, essayish and |promotional language: ''OLE tailored for corporate environments allows for business training and on-going corporate education via a dynamic collaboration environment.''  The phrase "open learning environment" may have applications to things other than this product
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:SPAM)