Deletion of Petersburg Animation Studio

Comment: per the |inherent vageries in trying to create and source an article on a non-English company with available sourcing to its non-English company name. I am not concerned with the |article at the Russian Wikipedia being unsourced,http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3_(%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8)http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%25D0%259F%25D0%25B5%25D1%2582%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25B1%25D1%2583%25D1%2580%25D0%25B3_(%25D1%2581%25D1%2582%25D1%2583%25D0%25B4%25D0%25B8%25D1%258F_%25D0%25B0%25D0%25BD%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B0%25D1%2586%25D0%25B8%25D0%25B8)&ei=e4OTT7eBA4qviQLnq-z0Dw&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDAQ7gEwAQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%25D0%25A1%25D1%2582%25D1%2583%25D0%25B4%25D0%25B8%25D1%258F%2B%25D0%25BA%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BC%25D0%25BF%25D1%258C%25D1%258E%25D1%2582%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B9%2B%25D0%25B0%25D0%25BD%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B0%25D1%2586%25D0%25B8%25D0%25B8%2B%25C2%25AB%25D0%259F%25D0%25B5%25D1%2582%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25B1%25D1%2583%25D1%2580%25D0%25B3%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26prmd%3Dimvns as they do not operate by our guidelines, nor we by their's.  However, in looking to ''OUR'' guidelines and considering that under its Russian name it does appear to be sourcable,http://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F+%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9+%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8+%C2%AB%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F+%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9+%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8+%C2%AB%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=bISTT_H9OavYiQKrke3WDw&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=80ef15c088075d7http://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F+%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9+%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8+%C2%AB%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1 this now looks to be |an adressable concern toward the unfortunate, unintentional, and recognized |systemic bias.  Even the google translations of the multiple Russian sources show that it has |received coverage and is a recognized entity in its field... in Russia.  And so even if |not sourced in their article, sourable notability to Russia if fine with en.Wikiedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB||WP:WAX||WP:ATD||WP:CSB||WP:NRVE||WP:WAX)