Deletion of Eugene Plotkin

Comment: The subject fails both the |general notability guideline and the specific |one-event only notability guideline. The subject also fails the |notability guideline for crime perpetrators, as the victim of the crime was not a renowned figure and the crime was not a |well-documented historic event. Finally, the primary writer of the article does not follow a |neutral point of view and provides multiple unsourced and dubious details
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:1E||WP:CRIME||WP:EVENT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The strongest arguments in favor of keeping are made by user Smallbones, who is the primary writer of the article in question. Smallbones seeks to shift the discussion from whether the article passes the guidelines for BLP to the way in which the article was nominated, which is irrelevant. The question of this discussion is whether the article itself should be retained or deleted. As user Tomtrinity explains above, the article does not meet the guidelines for a |well-documented historic event, which is prerequisite for crime perpetrators. It also does not follow a |neutral point of view. It states that the subject attended the California Institute of Technology where he lived in Fleming House and then transferred to Harvard thanks to a letter of recommendation for Professor Scott Page. What is the source of this information? It is not in any referenced sources. This strongly suggests that the writer of the article either knew the subject intimately or is making up this information for an unknown reason. Since user Smallbones is the primary writer of the article and the main defender in favor of keeping it, the arguments made by this user are not relevant to this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NPOV)