Deletion of Camelback Potential

Comment: Overly complicated. WP:BEFORE =  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316006954_The_one-dimensional_camelback_potential_in_the_parallel_dipole_line_trap_Stability_conditions_and_finite_size_effect https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.5220 http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4978876 https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.097004 https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.104522 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JAP...121m3902G https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19392556 http://ftp.aip.org/epaps//journ_appl_phys/E-JAPIAU-121-030712/030712JAP_EPAPS.pdf https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nxp0BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1174&lpg=PA1174&dq=Camelback+Potential&source=bl&ots=4ATVy6bWB3&sig=QsiQjULCypHmpEsJr1ZXZM5I4fs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW5P7FjvvWAhWHCcAKHct0CAs4ChDoAQhNMAg#v=onepage&q=Camelback%20Potential&f=false. So basically two papers that use the term, therfore not notable, this article has no real value to anyone, and unless substantially ed and rewritten, it is Quantumcruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)