Deletion of Justin Knapp (2nd nomination)

Comment: United Nations source is a "passing by" mention and is not enough to substantiate notability. Did it attract coverage from other media outlets? Nope. The rest are just repeated mentions of the same thing. I personally think that the one million edit thing might be a wonderful achievement in WikiLand, but from a non-Wikipedian's perspective it probably is just a trivial, non-impactful matter. Definitely no long lasting impact. Kill a million people, yes. Write a million books, of course. But make a million edits? A bot could too that as well. The article also fails to have much biographical focus for a BLP. 82% of the page talks about Wikipedia and Wikipedia. Early life (only an uncited birthdate)? Professional job (oh wait)? These are what a BLP should rightfully entail, at the very least. With all respect to the man, it's a clear-cut case of . As a weaker alternative, I suggest making a small mention at the appropriate History of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: As before, straight , a position not refuted by "meets WP:N" and the like.  We've already established that the subject appears in reliable sources, but 1E is the exception that allows us to disregard that.  "Keep he's notable!" is a failing argument here, which is why the article was deleted i nthe first place, and should be deleted again.  News blips for being a prolific editor on a website ''is'' the event, and the only reason that this is getting more attention than normal around here is because of knee-jerk navel-gazing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)