Deletion of 300 East 57th Street

Comment: First of all, too many articles for a nomination.  Always a nightmare to sort through the pros-and-cons of each with with a ton of different "keep"-"delete" combinations.  Secondly, these AfDs seem ill advised.  Just a quick look at 15 Central Park West alone shows very in-depth coverage from ''Vanity Fair'' and ''Fortune (magazine)|Fortune''.  http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/09/centralparkwest200809http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/12/10/101529193/index.htm  And these links are ''in the article''.  I'd usually advise the nom to follow  if they miss easily-found coverage, but in this case, the in-depth coverage was ''already presented to the nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)