Deletion of Bell's prime number theorem

Comment: per nom -- total hoax and . My math skills aren't ''that'' advanced, so I'm trusting the nom's skills
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Good find. Zero Google hits referred to the alleged name. None of your links mention Bell and none of them call it a theorem. They don't mention that (''p''2-1)/24 is composite for large ''p''. And prime numbers is mathematically a red herring: The divisibility by 24 holds for any integer ''p'' that is not divisible by 2 or 3. The observation about 24 dividing ''p''2-1 for prime ''p'' > 3 has been mentioned by some sources but it appears unnamed (a sign that it's not important) and I don't see what it could be moved to. I don't think the mentioned sources are enough for own article per , and there is not enough material for a meaningful article. A merge would leave a redirect on an apparently non-existing name, and there is no edit history that matters since a source can be quoted directly for the single line that remains if the unsourced part is removed. If references giving more significant coverage in multiple reliable sources are not found, then I think the one-line observation could be added to an existing article, either Prime number#Properties of primes or Square number#Properties. Bedivere can add it if he/she wants the edit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)