Deletion of Accolade Competition

Comment: It's sad that the article has sat |NEGLECTED for so long, but that is more a reason to |ACTIVELY fix it in a encyclopedia that is self-admittedly |IMPERFECT and a |WORK IN PROGRESS, and not to delete it due to a possible  laziness or animus (and no... I am not implying nor inferring anyone at this AFD is lazy or hateful).  No secondary sources?  Searches find it written of in https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Accolade+Competition%22 Google scholar, multiple https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Accolade+Competition%22+-wikipedia&num=50&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=EMs5VeitLsnooASpqIDIAw&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&biw=1024&bih=655 books and in multiple https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Accolade+Competition%22&tbm=nws Google news.  Does it being written of an mentioned in so many places outside of Wikipedia mean we can ignore it in all ways?  That so may non-Wikipedia sources feel it notable enough, should be a clue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NEGLECT||WP:SEP||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:WIP)