Deletion of Shabazz Muhammad

Comment: Easily notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Per , "High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is (1) independent of the subject and (2) clearly goes beyond  coverage." I'm seeing coverage of Muhammad, but it is neither substantial nor prolonged. Even though he's at the top of a lot of scouts' lists, I don't see him meeting the Wikipedia notability criteria yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Amateur athletes are not notable enough for Wikipedia. Is Muhammad a great HS player with a lot of press? Yes. Is now the right time to give him a Wikipedia article? No. I'm afraid that  fits the bill here.  Most of the Top 25 players get the same type of media coverage which makes all the above references .  I'm guessing that we need to clearly redefine the qualification for HS athletes as many things have changed an a lot of media coverage is expected on these players making what appears to be extensive coverage but is  in my opinion. I did an internet search on Muhammad and yielded results of mostly, statistics, blogs, sports sites, and fan type coverage.  Will Muhammad warrant an article once he becomes a college player? Probably so.  Is now the right time? Probably not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:ROUTINE||WP:ROUTINE)