Deletion of Mike Sutton (criminologist)

Comment: Needs to be thoroughly trimmed, but there is a notable subject underneath the promotional junk. As a criminologist, Sutton is https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=4pAMC9UAAAAJ reasonably well cited (#C1), and the awards and editorships cited in the article (#C2 and #C8) also suggest he is a notable scholar in his field. Besides, his strange book on Darwin attracted wide media coverage http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10859281/Did-Charles-Darwin-borrow-the-theory-of-natural-selection.htmlhttp://www.scotsman.com/heritage/people-places/darwin-may-have-stolen-evolution-theory-from-perthshire-farmer-1-4074755https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=21868%2c21868https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22019%2c22019https://evolutionnews.org/2016/05/darwins_theory/https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/who-will-debunk-the-debunkers/http://wallacefund.info/content/nullius-verba-darwin%E2%80%99s-greatest-secret-publishedhttp://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2016/05/02/crackpots/https://www.criminalelement.com/blogs/2012/02/darwin-evolutionary-plagiaristhttp://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2014/06/war-over-natural-selection/, probably enough to pass the  on its own. The fact that the article has not been edited in a while, and the content has outstanding problems, are not valid arguments for deletion. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG)