Deletion of Indaba Music

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Clearly fails . References given are to splogs that do not confer notability; and to self-published press releases that do not count as |reliable sources. Others seem to be  merely trivial coverage or mentions. Additionaly this is one part in a long history of spam and |promotion on wikipedia by '''''Indaba Media, LLC
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: per the plentiful coverage in |reliable sources. See http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/newmedia/la-ca-webscout19aug19,1,5973343.story?coll=la-entnews-newmedia&ctrack=3&cset=true this article from the ''Los Angeles Times'', http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation/2008/1223/the-worldwide-jam-session/%28page%29/2 this article from the ''Christian Science Monitor'', http://www.nysun.com/new-york/manhattan-musicians-go-global/56764/ this article from the ''New York Sun'', and http://vator.tv/news/show/2008-09-22-company-review-indaba-makes-jamming-global this article from Vator. Notability is fully established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Clearly an attempt to Wikipedia:Masking the lack of notability|Mask the lack of notability thru |bombardment of press releases, self-generated sources as it is clear that no significant coverage in secondary sources has "''actually''" been published about this company
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARD)