Deletion of Legal syllogism

Comment: The nomination makes a |vague wave to  without stating what the supposed synthetic proposition is.  The reason that the page has no references is that the nominator has edit warred to remove its reference.  It's quite easy to find more references such as: ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ll2FrD335xUC&pg=PA27 Methods of Legal Reasoning''; ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CNpwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA82 A Primer on Legal Reasoning''; ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_x8sDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA26 Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation''.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing per ; ; ; ; &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:SYN||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:SOFIXIT)