Deletion of Barış Özcan

Comment: There are a number of reasons an article is nominated. If we compare 4 million subscribers to the number of stars in the galaxy (100 "billion") then 4 million would be insignificant. That might be an apples to oranges comparison. If we compare https://socialblade.com/youtube/user/b31416 rankings: Social Blade rank= 7,061st, Subscriber  rank = 2,524th, Video views rank= 11,701st (reference on the article), |"Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site" (policy) and some consider that Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not YouTube|Wikipedia is not YouTube. The number of editors involved in that essay might be small (16) but it is usually a significantly higher number than a typical AFD is decided by. Other concerns would be that being in a "top extremely high number" in the YouTube ranking is encyclopedia insignificant and not passing the threshold required by |GNG. 1)- Being one of twelve YouTube "ambassadors for change" might provide more notability but that is barely mentioned, not likely known by the general public, or covered in-depth by sources I have seen, 2)- The subject reportedly has given "600 speeches at various institutions and conferences", as a "professional keynote speaker", apparently as part of his employment. This is not even mentioned in the article. If there is additional significant in-dept coverage on this it seems it would add to notability but I didn't locate reliable sources, 3)- A final serious concern would be the lack of a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view presenting an |advertising tone. There were some serious allegations, that the subject even addressed concerning FETO, but any mention of this is missing. If these issues can be resolved I think there would be enough for a stand alone article, otherwise I will have to go with '''Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOCIAL||WP:GNG||WP:NOTADVERTISING)