Deletion of Minecraft

Comment: in addition to the interview on Gamasutra (which admittedly doesn't help with reception) there's a http://jayisgames.com/archives/2009/07/minecraft.php full review on Jay is Games, there is a piece of some description on http://playthisthing.com/minecraft Play This Thing (which for some reason went down like yesterday, hope it is getting renewed :S), a small piece on http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/06/13/simply-splendid-minecraft-multiplayer/ Rock Paper Shotgun, http://www.indiegames.com/blog/2009/05/browser_game_pick_minecraft_ma.html small piece on indiegames - the weblog, http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/05/19/indie-showcase-may-19th-2009/ part article on Big Download (AOL) and http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/07/28/minecraft-available-for-pre-purchase/ another nugget. The Jay is Games piece is user-submitted, but it was done so as part of a competition and has been vetted by 8 of the site's reviewers, no less, so should be fine. I would really like access to the Play This Thing source, another review would be helpful, but I think the other pieces wing it in regards to |reliable non-trivial coverage in secondary sources (notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails . I browsed through the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources|sources recommended by WikiProject Video games and the only thing out there is the (currently linked) interview at Gamasutra. Everything else is trivial or a forum post (or both
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)