Deletion of Energy Catalyzer

Comment: or incubate as . Until there's a concensus as to whether this is real and hoax or something else, it's not encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It's really sad that this scam is being promoted on Wikipedia and throughout the credulous cold fusion community, but Blacklight Power|it's Bogdanov Affair|not EmDrive|the Torsion field (pseudoscience)|first Autodynamics|time that this has happened. The problem here is that the device is being promoted and the encyclopedic character of this topic is essentially completely tied in to the inventor who has a track record that should make anyone pause. The fact is that the sources used for this article are mostly promotional puff-pieces that do not serve to establish independent notability required of #Independent sources and the few citations that do fulfill that requirement are so off-handed and critical of the claims as to make one think that the subject doesn't deserve an article separate from that of its inventor. Compare, CSETI and Steven M. Greer for a similar fringe-theory type of example. Special:Contributions/128.59.171.194|128.59.171.194
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)