Deletion of Doug Imbruce

Comment: and then redirect- He fails  for lack of secondary sources coverage that is . Like the nominator has said, just redirecting this article alone would not be a great choice because someone can just revert it back (without also even noticing the one who did a redirect). I feel delete then redirect should be more often with AfD closures in my opinion, exactly because redirects can be easily reverted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The subject has only accrued passing mentions in , mostly due to his association with Qwiki. Content directly concerning the individual is all either trivial or as a part of listings, indicating a  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV)