Deletion of Peter Brearey

Comment: This now has sources, and enough coverage to meet . I would not consider sources 1 and 3 to be dictionaries, despite the name of source 3 - dictionaries do not generally include biographical information about people, which this does (its description on Google Books includes "The names of many people whose lives or work reflect freethought principles form a major portion of the entries.). Both are more like encyclopaedias, which are allowed as sources, per : "Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks, almanacs, and encyclopedias, may be cited." So there are 3 main . Apart from that, he was the editor for 5 years of a magazine which had existed for 112 years by the time he took over the editorship. For an academic journal, that would be a pass of  #8: "The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RSPRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:NACADEMIC)