Deletion of The KAZENERGY Eurasian Forum

Comment: spaced ndash}}The topic's notability is established per several reliable sources already in the article, particularly the http://en.tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_news/3712/ Tengri News article, a reliable objective news source with editorial integrity,  the http://www.rogtecmagazine.com/blog/kazenergy-new-horizons-for-investments-and-cooperation/ Rogtec Magazine article (which is NOT a copy and paste of a press release, it is an ''article in a magazine'', although there may be content within the article that is also verbatim in other articles, but not all of it), which satisfy each of Wikipedia's |General notability guidelines, including the existence of significant coverage of the topic, source reliability and editorial integrity, sources being secondary sources and sources being independent of the subject. Additionally, there are additional reliable sources in the article that verify the content within the article, specifically http://www.kazakhstanlive.com/2.aspx?ProdID=ecd09494-3949-45ff-8eab-ccc67ac2efc1&CatID=9f9f8034-6dd6-4f7e-adcf-0f6a7c0406d9&sr=100 International Information Centre of the Republic of Kazakhstan, http://www.ite-exhibitions.com/read_article.aspx?NewsID=114 ITE Group, and others. Many of the rationales for deletion are based upon the nominator's ''opinion'' rather than checking for reliable sources, which is necessary to to perform prior to nomination in Articles for deletion. Please refer to , "Before nominating an article for deletion," particularly point B2, "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See "Sourcing search" below)" and D1, "Sourcing search", "The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform." Qualification for this article's deletion hasn't been established, because the nominator hasn't qualified deletion per Wikipedia guidelines (stated above), and the rationale for deletion is based upon opinion. The nominator didn't state anything about searching for reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)