Deletion of Victim feminism

Comment: As an academic term at the heart of a long standing debate over what feminism should stand for, it definitely passes the . Would '''oppose merge''', because the idea is not limited to Wolf, but is tied to many other thinkers in the field. Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers, Natasha Walter, Katie Roiphe, and Rene Denfeld are listed alongisde Wolf in a non-exhaustive list in https://books.google.ca/books?id=QK3cAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&dq=Victim+feminism&source=bl&ots=jTWKyJQxUu&sig=MDK0hJhQVP7J-qg9hzcdLUzmqiM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiG_J7Jh43MAhUKs4MKHQU0BR44ChDoAQhaMAc#v=onepage&q=Victim%20feminism&f=false this chapter from an entire academic book studying victim feminism. Just because a term is sometimes used as a pejorative in certain forums does not mean that there cannot be an an article on the subject. A https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?start=60&q=%22victim+feminism%22&hl=en&as_sdt=1,5 Google Scholar search gives 900 results, many from the last decade, which could be a start point for someone better versed in feminism to contribute to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are no people or groups that identify as victim feminists. Anyone who is referred to as a "victim feminist" actually identifies with some other label of feminism that we already have an article for (radical feminism, gender feminism, etc.). I don't think this term by itself is sufficiently notable for a Wikipedia article, as only one source (Raven 1994) actually discusses it as a term (rather than simply being an example of someone using the term), and it only has 3 sentences about it. That doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)