Deletion of Vinay Deolalikar

Comment: Let's say it turns out the proof is correct.  In that case, he'll certainly be worthy of an article about him. And there will be plenty of time to write it at that time.  So what that the article doesn't get written for another few weeks or months?  We are an encyclopedia.  We are not a newspaper.  We are not the TV news.  Getting there first doesn't matter.  Getting it right does.  This is a classic case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: Subject fails , with an ''h''-score of only 8.  A not-yet-peer-reviewed supposed proof of P&ne;NP does not convey notability on the subject until it is picked up by reliable sources (in this context, academic journals, not press releases and blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: to be an article about the proof attempt, rather than about the individual.  This person doesn't seem to be notable enough to merit a biography due to  concerns, but the proof itself may deserve an article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)