Deletion of Philippines and weapons of mass destruction

Comment: This is not a POV title''. There's a whole series of "xxxx and weapons of mass destruction" articles that can be found in :Category:Weapons of mass destruction by country. While  is not grounds to keep an article, consistency is a good enough reason to follow an implicit naming convention. There is the matter of the US storage of nuclear weapons in the Philippines. Arguably this ''should'' be mentioned in Nuclear weapons and the United States (''not'' United States and weapons of mass destruction) but it isn't, and nor is there mention in that article (or its WMD parent) of US storage of nuclear weapons in other countries. I did find them mentioned in the WMD articles on Germany and South Korea; curiously, three of the most important storage countries are conspicuously missing WMD articles. Secondly, ''This is not a non-existent topic''. Countries do not need to have WMD programs to have policies on WMDs! Luxembourg has one! The Philippines has signed separate treaties on nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. There is a story behind each of these, there are books on the subject, and I am certain that materiel exists to write an article, so the topic passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG)