Deletion of Michael Gastauer

Comment: i agree - not great sources, and what there are suggest shadiness.  Both this article and WB21 were built by the same editors; am nominating W21 for deletion on the same grounds; poor refs, promo pressure, what refs we have suggest weirdness but neither refs nor hints are strong enough to build an article on, especially with BLP in mind.  So  and if this subject is eventually notable, article might look very different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: may become notable for fraud or media hoaxing, but  on those
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)