Deletion of First Fruits (Southern Africa)

Comment: to Nguni people per . First, let's remember that "|the absence of sources or citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that a subject is not notable." Second, here are some academic sources: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40341441 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/africa/article/social-aspects-of-first-fruits-ceremonies-among-the-southeastern-bantu1/5246894053543778BDD2A92B5E1925B3 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00020185308706909 https://books.google.com/books?id=gk8FAAAAMAAJ&q=nguni+first+fruits. It's a notable subject. That said, even though the specific practice is notable on its own,   suggests that if our readers will benefit from seeing the information in the broader context of a larger article, then we should put the information in the larger article rather than having a separate standalone article. In this case, readers would benefit from seeing why this particular practice is significant within the broader context of Nguni people
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NEXIST||WP:PAGEDECIDE)