Deletion of Janet Lee Bouvier

Comment: To cite , "Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass ". Is she known solely for her connection to her daughter Jackie? Yes, but it does not matter. She generated enough coverage to satisfy , even if that coverage was not due to something substantial that she contributed to the world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: perhaps rather than simply arguing that she does/doesn't meet the GNG, people could mention which sources they believe show that she meets the GNG?  Just looking at the article, the obvious one is ''Janet and Jackie:  The Story of a Mother and Her Daughter, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis''.  As far as I can see, nothing else cited in the article helps establish that the article meets the GNG: there are two wedding notices, two obituaries (all |routine and |run-of-the-mill), some articles about people related to her who aren't Jackie O; a biography of Jackie O, and ''Where the Bodies Are: Final Visits to the Rich, Famous, and Interesting''.  I don't have access to all of these, and so haven't actually checked them, but I would be surprised to find that they help establish Bouvier's notability.  On the other hand, there may well be other stuff out there, and if anyone can show that there is more than what is given in the article, then the case for notability could be made stronger
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:MILL)