Deletion of State terrorism by the United States (sixth nomination)

Comment: This article violates multiple Wikipedia policies such as |neutral point of view, |no original research, and more specific: |Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position. It has been updated with links such as Overseas expansion of the United States  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=next&oldid=70077450, the bombing of Hiroshima http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=128915264&oldid=128914133, etc, etc. Are we allowed at Wikipedia to interpret and write history for our own view? It is non-neutral and appears as non-encyclopedia material as it reads now - much like an essay to advance a thesis. The reason why it is well sourced, it combines other articles to do it. Can we write Alleged State terrorism by France as I have shown http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AState_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=138615336&oldid=138599615 here? As AFD is not a vote, strength of discussion shall be watched on this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: violates , particularly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SYN)