Deletion of Creation (theology)

Comment: I'd be inclined to disagree. If adequately sourced I see no  problem. One can take the perspective that theology and mythology are just points of view about the same thing, but there are enough universities that have distinct Religion (or Theology) and Folklore departments, for example, that there are a lot of  |reliable sources who regard them as different disciplines. We don't, for example, consider Quantum chemistry a POV fork of Quantum physics, or  Industrial Psychology a POV fork of Economics or Manufacturing. When different disciplines study something and develop different literatures so that there is a body of |reliable sources that treat them differently, separate articles are legitimate. Mythology and Theology are similarly treated as separate disciplines by numerous |reliable sources. Both Art and Optometry deal with people's vision.  One attempts to explore what people's vision says about the world, the other what it says about people's eyes. One is not a POV fork of the other. Same here. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS)