Deletion of Fall of Envy

Comment: There are potential notability claims being made here, but there are no |reliable sources being provided to support them. This has also been tagged for several months as a likely |conflict of interest with |advertorial overtones, but there's been an edit war over the past couple of weeks, with an anonymous IP removing the tags on the basis of "improvements" which didn't consist of actually changing any of the advertorialism or adding any sources, but merely unwikifying the entire article (including the categories) so that it was a linkless and uncategorized dead end — and they revert-warred over it enough times that I've had to sprot the article against unregistered editors. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can rewrite it ''neutrally'' and reference it ''properly'', but nothing claimed in the article entitles them to an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of valid sources for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:NOTADVERT)