Deletion of Zoe Graystone

Comment: due to obvious and undeniable evidence and assertion of notability.   is not a reason to redlink an article.  Indeed, no actual reason exists for deletion.  This article, created a mere few days ago, is easily improveable per Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state, Wikipedia:Give an article a chance, and Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built, which I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoe_Graystone&action=historysubmit&diff=344297094&oldid=344081802 started to do by use of http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Zoe+Graystone%22 Google News, where we find dozens of relevant hits (over 50) and even more interviews and reveiews for further expanding the development and reception sections exist on a regular Google Search that are not snagged by Google News, but that are nevertheless still on reliable secondary sources.  I used only a couple of the many sources available and a better writer than I could assuredly improve those sections using the dozens of additional sources with relative ease.  The character is notable by a practical or common sense standard: she figures on a well advertised show on a familiar basic cable network watched by millions of people as a main and recurring character who is essential in the mythology of one of the top ten or so most significant science fiction space franchises (''Battlestar Galactica'') of all time (she is the first of what becomes the chief villains, i.e. the Cylons, in a several years old franchise marketed in television, DVD movies, games, etc.).  She is consistent with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)