Deletion of Anoop Krishnan

Comment: I believe there are sufficient roles for . There is also significant coverage, although the main issue is whether the sources are reliable. While there are many ''Times of India'' articles online, which are not necessarily reliable, there are also some other sources from ''The Hindu'' and ''Deccan Chronicle''—two sources are already provided in the article—so I think  is met, too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)