Deletion of Alois Hitler

Comment: I agree with Monty, that the nom is confused about , which means only that we don't automatically give people articles just because they are related to or associated with notable people. It does not mean that we deny articles to notable people just because that relationship is why they satisfy  as the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Obviously there have been many people who are indisputably notable but only because Theo van Gogh (art dealer)|they were someone's brother, Michelle Obama|someone's wife, or Martha Jefferson Randolph|someone's child, regardless of how we feel about the merits of their own accomplishments or lack thereof. This deletion nomination is particularly daft given that Adolf Hitler has to be one of the most biographied individuals ever in human history, and there is undoubtedly significant insight and information that biographies of his immediate family provide to the central question of how and why Hitler became what he was. To rulemonger in the face of that is an unfortunate attitude, even apart from the fact that the nominator didn't even get the rule right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)