Deletion of Ra (channeled entity) (2nd nomination)

Comment: into Don Elkins. I am sorry, how is "delete" arguable as long as the justification of the  Don Elkins article isn't under dispute? "Ra" is clearly within the scope of the Don Elkins article. This is a classic case of an AfD that wouldn't be necessary in the first place. It is a very obvious case of merging, and any editor can do this without going through AfD. After the merger, if people think that the Don Elkins itself fails , there can still be a valid AfD discussion on that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Sourcing is not reliable, and I have concerns over 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)