Deletion of Kate Reynolds (academic)

Comment: The subject fails both the |general notability criteria and the alternative criteria at . Quite comprehensively in my view. I have both examined the references provided and done a fairly thorough search myself for material which might satisfy these criteria, including Google Scholar. I have found none. Neither she nor her work is discussed in the general press (General notability criteria), in fact not at all. The only entry for her in WorldCat is her PhD thesis. As far as I can see, she has no single-authored books. Ditto, coverage in the specialist literature ( criteria). All academics who do their job properly carry out research projects (and sometimes lead them), write articles, sit on committees, occasionally give advice to public bodies, occasionally do work for consultancy firms, attend conferences and chair sessions, and sit on editorial boards of journals, etc. Those are normal aspects of that job, shared by literally thousands of middle-rank academics. They are not marks of distinction or notability ''per se''.  The current references (and I can find nothing better) are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC)