Deletion of Loyer's paradox

Comment: following the conversation on the talk page it now seems that papers author now acknowledges there was a mathematical  error so there is not really a paradox and hence no need to article. I came very close to closing it early per  but though it best to give Gknauth a chance to respond
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: I initially http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Loyer%27s_paradox&oldid=281754526 proposed deleting this just over a month ago on the grounds that it was a non-|notable |neologism with 0 http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Loyer%27s+paradox%22+-wikipedia google hits. The latter is no longer literally true thanks mainly to wikipedia scraper sites, but http://math.hbg.psu.edu/asa-hbg/newsletters/Mar03.pdf the only non-wikipedia derived hit is a brief report of a talk given by Milton Loyer and clearly not enough to establish notability. (My thanks to Michael Hardy for explaining the mathematical error in detail, corresponding with the author and bringing this to AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:neo)