Deletion of Ralph & Russo

Comment: I did not include sources in my vote above, but here are some - the Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/a56b3a1c-3745-11e8-8eee-e06bde01c544, Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/meghan-markle-ralph-and-russo-wedding-gowns-2018-5/?r=AU&IR=T/#worn-by-camila-figueiredo-coelho-this-ralph-and-russo-wedding-gown-is-a-part-of-their-summer-2018-line-1, The Guardian re "the only extant British haute couture house" https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2018/jan/22/ralph-russo-unveils-a-fairytale-for-paris-fashion-week, The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hail-the-hottest-couture-house-and-its-british-fs3v7v0z3, The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/04/fashion/couture-fall-2017-guo-pei-ralph-and-russo.html, plus some in The Australian that are subscriber only, one in the Business section about a UK billionaire taking a stake in Ralph & Russo. I fail to see how this is not significant coverage - if it's not, then we should be deleting Stella McCartney, Victoria Beckham and other haute couture or celebrity designers. Not that I have any interest in fashion personally, but they certainly meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)