Deletion of Jean-Pierre Giroud

Comment: per  as explained above, but certainly not per . There are over 70 thousand ''chevaliers'' in the ''Légion d'Honneur'', and most are not notable. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Top cites on Google scholar for JP-Giroud (after filtering out the medical ones with a similar author name) are 396, 238, 204, 190, 174, 142, 139, 136, 121, 118, ... with 10 papers having over 100 cites and an h-index of 31. That's enough to convince me of a pass of #C1, even if his awards are too low-level for notability that way. And membership in the US National Academy of Engineering (for which I just added a source independent of the subject) is a clear pass of #C3. This article is indeed a mess but that's not an issue for AfD. And the nomination statement about what the author has said about sourcing is also not particularly relevant; it comes across more as one editor's misunderstanding how Wikipedia works than as proof that proper sources are unavailable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)