Deletion of Stephanie Pui-Mun Law

Comment: See Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability for the concern about other articles.  Her article stands on their own merits.  That said, she gets a passing mention amounting to a page of text in a 2004 graduate thesis for a Home Economics (?!?!) degree, available from google scholar's cache here http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:S8pZOnujTAAJ:www.uwstout.edu/lib/thesis/2004/2004mikla.pdf.++%22Stephanie+Pui-Mun+Law%22, and a page of text and four pages of example illustrations in a 112 page book from 2003 entitled ''The Art of Faery'', available to those with google book accounts here http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN1843400952&id=DpltUlcAu8kC&pg=RA4-PA82&lpg=RA4-PA82&ots=8Elcwnu7mG&dq=%22Stephanie+Pui-Mun+Law%22&sig=QstA7jlf9-co6thsjOidANERJWc#PRA4-PA81,M1.  The article also cites a profile at the CrescentBlues website.  That website's "about us" page shwos that they pay for work, but doesn't say that reviews will be rejected for errors, and some other things on the site indicate that the editors have other day jobs.  All of this isn't clear cut notability, but is enough reason for me to believe that she probably is notable to  standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)