Deletion of Chitty (cricketer)

Comment: the  wars return.  My position is still the same.   is obviously not met (the reference is trivial and it's unlikely others exist), but "notability" is neither one of the five pillars nor one of the three core content policies.  The content is verifiable (to the extent that any historical content is verifiable), and the  is met.  I have discussed and proposed changes to the  standard for first-class cricketers, but none of those have found consensus.  Wikipedia also serves as a |specialized almanac; having exhaustive listings of players (even those players who do not otherwise meet notability guidelines) can serve a purpose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN||WP:GNG||WP:SNG||WP:CRIN||WP:5P1)

Comment: Per , {{tq|the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article ''must'' be kept}}, and all of  is explicitly secondary to the . A single line in a stats table doesn't deserve an article, it deserves a single line in a stats table. Even if consensus somehow determines that this article passes our inclusion policies, common sense should dictate that we should delete it or merge it to the team article per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRICKET||WP:NSPORTS||WP:GNG||WP:IAR)