Deletion of Josh fight

Comment: This article needs polish, but it is an example of a , and many other memes and joke events (such as the Storm Area 51 meme) have their own pages
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Both keep and delete have used arguments that are discouraged by #CRYSTAL. We do not know if this event will be forgotten in two weeks, we do not know if it will be remembered in a decade. As several other Wikipedians have suggested here before me, the best course of action would probably be leaving this discussion for now as per no consensus, and have it resurface in a few months time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: per the points raised by Vaticidalprophet, MainPeanut, Cheeftun, and Phil Boswell. The original argument wherein a dog gets rescued from ice is just . So the dog got rescued. Are we supposed to make articles for every single rescue that have equally "miraculous" circumstances? Unlike an uncommon yet still frequent event like "dog rescued after four days", there's not a lot of (and possibly even near zero) instances where multiple people gathered from the continental United States&mdash;most of which bearing the name "Josh"&mdash;in order to participate in an event sparked from a "meme" as part of internet culture. The circumstances behind the event - mainly the method of how it was initially planned and its (surprisingly positive) outcomes - also warrant its uniqueness, and will likely serve as a basis for |future events of similar nature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DOGBITESMAN||WP:EFFECT)