Deletion of Dansynch

Comment: re the unsigned entry above: What is needed for inclusion in Wikipedia are |reliable sources. Blogs, Youtube, and other user-generated content sites are |not considered reliable in this context. If the topic is |notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia, then certainly newspapers, book authors, etc. have written about it. (I doubt that in this case, but if so, please supply the sources.) If not, it should not have an article on Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPS||WP:N)

Comment: as per above.  applies in spades, and I'm deeply distressed that Merriam-Webster is apparently publishing user-submitted neologisms without any evidence of their notability. I wasn't aware of that...anyone else think that might be worthy of a RfC? Bullzeye
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)