Deletion of Scooby-Dum

Comment: The fictional character does not meet the |general notability guideline to deserve a stand-alone article and the content of the article is mostly a |plot-only description of a fictional work. A |search engine test does not show reliable secondary sources that address the character in detail or that give it any sort of reception or significance. All that shows up are either unreliable sources or tertiary sources that give trivial mentions, but no secondary sources that provide the most objective evidence of notability with  analytic or evaluative claims. The three references in the article are all tertiary sources and do not appear to give significant coverage to the character either. |Google hits in tertiary sources are not evidence of notability, as said sources are for the TV series where the fictional character is only addressed as part of the plot, which can be perfectly covered in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:SET||WP:GHITS)