Deletion of The Crucible of Iron Age Shetland

Comment: meets  as it "has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources". The article makes it clear this is a planned nomination (so there is real, independent content) and discusses that aspect, then uses ummary style to briefly describe the three sites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:S)

Comment: The general topic is notable; for example, see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lFKBAAAAMAAJ In the shadow of the brochs'' which has much to say about these sites.  The current title seems a bit fanciful but we might easily rename to Prehistoric Shetland, just as we have Prehistoric Orkney and Prehistoric Scotland.  Such developments are a matter of ordinary editing  in accordance with normal |policy and deletion would be |disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:DISRUPTION)