Deletion of London Buses route 278 (2nd nomination)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' - This is a restatement of my comments at |Deletion Review.  The proponent of keeping the article says that they have substantially improved the article by adding sources.  I disagree.  The adding of sources is not a substantial improvement, because the original problem was not the lack of sourcing, but that the route is |run-of-the-mill, and it is still not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:MILL)

Comment: The page already has plenty of sources and it is easy to find more such as https://www.mylondon.news/news/west-london-news/tfl-launches-4-new-west-17396940 this.  The topic therefore passes  and our policy  applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)