Deletion of Novelty theory (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've got no objections to articles ''about'' crackpot theories. Wikipedia's criterion for inclusion is not the correctness of a belief, just the |verifiable fact that this belief exists and is |somewhat well known; we've got articles on Atlantis, UFOs, Flat Earth theory and Morgellon's disease and none of those are likely to be true, but these beliefs have been reported in mainstream media. That's where this article falls down. There are no |reliable secondary sources that indicate that this kookery is in any way notable. Any crackpot can come up with a bizarre theory, but as long as that theory is confined to self-published stuff and a small circle of like-minded kooks it shouldn't be documented here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS)