Deletion of Richard Potok

Comment: The author clearly fails  and . There's no coverage on the author, and notability is not . The book has been the subject of two academic reviews, and thus just barely passes . Under the circumstances it should be considered to move the more important part of the info on the author to an article on the book. On a sidenote, I'd like to suggest to James500 that they follow the guidelines on discussions: please indent (instead of bulleting) your replies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:INHERITED||WP:NBOOK)