Deletion of Lee Kenneth Ferrier

Comment: I took the trouble to run this through LexisNexis, only 1 mention in Supreme Court of Canada decisions and 22 mentions for Ontario Court of Appeal and Superior Court of Justice decisions. Lack of secondary |reliable sources establishing notability is also a major issue. If there is any landmark cases brought to my attention, I am more than happy to consider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Note that it has always been our practice (established many times at AfD) to keep judges at the higher level (e.g. US state supreme/superior court, English High Court), but not the lower level (e.g. US county and municipal court, English crown court). All these judges can try all cases and set precedent. It just so happens that (unlike the USA) all Canadian judges are provincial officials and members of the provincial superior court - that doesn't give them a free pass (all British judges are ''national'' officials - that doesn't give them a free pass either). If it did give them a free pass that would show clear bias in favour of Canadian judges against judges of other countries, and I have no idea why this should be sensible. Unfortunately,  when referring to judges is clearly only really referring to US judges (where state judges are a level above ordinary trial judges) and not Canada (where most provincial judges ''are'' ordinary trial judges) - it should be rewritten. The senior judges of the provincial superior court should be seen as falling within the category defined by  and therefore as notable, but the others should not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN)