Deletion of Beyond the Sky and Earth

Comment: meets , adequate review by Adam Goodheart in ''The New York Times'', and the other ones in ''Chicago Tribune|CT'', and ''The Globe and Mail|Globe'' mentioned by {{u|E.M.Gregory}} are enough, add to these ''Kirkus Reviews|Kirkus'' - https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/jamie-zeppa/beyond-the-sky-and-the-earth/ "An uneven account with many perceptive, lyrical passages.", ''Publishers Weekly|PW'' - https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-57322-118-4 "Zeppa's story is nearly an inversion of the ancient Buddhist tale of Siddhartha ... a lively tale of her earnest efforts to reconcile what she has learned with what she has known.", ''Booklist'' - https://catalog.wccls.org/polaris/search/title.aspx?ctx=1.1033.0.0.6&pos=1 "Zeppa's description of the terrain is breathtaking; her description of adaptation, growth, and transformation is both comforting and inspirational.", and ''Library Journal'' - https://catalog.wccls.org/polaris/search/title.aspx?ctx=1.1033.0.0.6&pos=1 "Her story reads like a good novel; even her youthful naivete has charm. .. Highly recommended." (yes, trade reviews are ok for notability, and no, they do not "review everything" (remark regularly/incorrectly seen at afd)), and this book is wikinotable (and as is stated in afds ad naseum ("often by you, coola") |a badly written article does not make a subject non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:ARTN)