Deletion of Zensar Technologies

Comment: for reasons those voting keep above.  Zensar gave me over 1,000,000 google hits; and while a lot of the early ones are Press release, Primary, Jobs etc, others are better.  So yet again I question was  dilligent?  Templating the uncited content, some of which seems at a glance to be fairly audacious, followed by removal of uncited or dubious content is surely a less disruptive way to go
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There are sufficient references that meet the criteria for establishing notability including two book references. I've cleaned up the article also. Topic meets GNG and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Struck - see below) to RPG Group#Zensar_Technologies|RPG Group. The sources (both here and elsewhere) are a mix of , (some rephrased) press releases or failures to satisfy Sig Cov or independent. Since {{noping|Sandstein}} relisted, it clearly has been noted that the Keep statements are not !votes. Please find and LINK some suitable sources here if you want to demonstrate notability, as  is currently not met
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NCORP)