Deletion of Women's association football

Comment: I see the nominator's point - putting women on a pedestal is nothing more than removing them to a position above society and into a gilded cage. This poorly planned and executed article doesn't help. I did find a source to support the  of the topic -- {{ cite book | title = Belles of the ball: The Early History of Women's Association Football|url=http://www.worldcat.org/title/belles-of-the-ball/oclc/24751810|year=1991|publisher=R&D Associates|pages=100|author=David J. Williamson|ISBN = 0-95175-120-4 }} Now's all we need is someone who can give the topic the care it deserves
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this seems like a bad faith/y nomination rather than a serious one. As others have noted above, the article on association football predominantly covers men's football, because it is the mainstream form of the sport. Women's football is notable enough and different enough to deserve a separate article: it's the very fact that it's the less common variant that ''makes'' it notable. (Here's a parallel: we have an article on Men's skirts because it is unusual in most countries for men to wear skirts. The article on women's skirts is simply called Skirt.) The claim that the existence of this article is 'discrimination' is, frankly, laughable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)