Deletion of Abraham Gancwajch

Comment: leaning toward '''merge''' with Group 13 - Two of the 11 sources are not , but nine sources is a good number for a short article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: this clear violation of , ,  a well as #SOAPBOX|#PROPAGANDA
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: Although not a great deal is known about his life, enough facts to support a clear |notability claim are |relaibly sourced. That is enough to support a keep under . AfD is about whether the subject is notable, not whether the current article is a good article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:BIO)