Deletion of The Sweetest Day Hoax

Comment: yes it is absolutly possible to have a neutral point of view on this topic...  and since you seen to be insinuating it is my "job" to edit this article...  I created a user account here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20050701125406&limit=50&target=Isotope23 over a year ago, racking up a number of edits on a myriad of articles, and learning the policies and guidelines here ''just because I knew you would come along and create this article'' and my whole history of edits is a machavelian attempt to hide my true purpose... to edit this article!  How did you ever figure it out.  I know that wasn't , but I couldn't resist.  No need for an apology... I have a thick skin... like the chocolate casing on a Rollo candy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: All" meaning 1 newspaper article (that is a primary source) and "industry-generated hoax" being your interpretation of what was written in said article... you are filling in the blanks here with your own views and interpretations and that goes against .  Beyond that, you keep harping on this "primary source" thing... please read Primary source.  Having supporting secondary sources is preferable.  The one secondary source you've supplied (the Bill Lubinger article) is interesting and '''should''' be incorporated into the Sweetest Day article, but in this case too you are reading more into it than it actually says and using it to "support" a hypothesis that it '''does not support
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: These two viewpoints '''must''' co-exist within the same article because they are both sourced to varying degrees.  "True" and "false" in this case are subejctive statements of a certain point-of-view. ''Neither can be objectively proven with the data and sourcing that has been provided at this time''.  I'm not trying to be un here, but I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works as well as how a logical, factual, neutral article should be created
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)