Deletion of Belle Knox

Comment: People are using  as a justification to delete this article. But that argument is becoming less and less convincing as news coverage shifts from college student turned porn actress to other major issues in our society like woman's right, freedom, bullying to even whether U.S. college is overpriced. This is no longer one event, IMO. Reliable sources no longer cover Knox solely in the context of porn, but have extended to other issues as well. Whether Knox remains a low-profile individual remains to be seen, but it is not unreasonable to assume that she would be cited as an example in literatures regarding woman's freedom or bullying of sex workers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I believe that given the media coverage of her, she satisifies , beyond the requirements of  and/or . Canuck89
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:GNG is exactly what it says it is: a general guideline. It's supplemented by policies like , other guidelines like , and good judgment. Knox fails PORNBIO by a mile like thousands of other college students who do sex work, so we're in the slightly fuzzier area of whether her response to her otherwise routine outing makes her notable. I think it's fairly clear from  that it doesn't, and honestly I don't see how you can read that guideline and think otherwise. Some of the policy-based keep !votes seem to really be arguing that her outing is |notable as an event, which per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PORNBIO||WP:1E||WP:EVENT)