Deletion of GladRags

Comment: as the article fails to |verify the |company's notability. Not wanting to be |bitey, but it seems to be another case of a |SPA using WP for |advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:COMPANY||WP:BITE||WP:SPA||WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: A quick search reveals several mentions in the press, both mainstream and alternative. I've posted several of the links on the article's talk page. I haven't looked into them to see if they would help with the  guidelines. Note that the article can be rewritten to remove the advert content and if sources are provided then there's little reason to delete this. I'm leaning toward "Keep and rewrite", though I'm ever hopeful that the burden of the rewrite will fall on the original author. That doesn't usually happen, so I may take a stab at it later. Stay tuned. Oh yes, and don't penalize the article for the author's mention of "other stuff" on the article's talk page, which I pointed out to him/her wouldn't fly here. Wouldn't you argue the same if you were a newbie? I would
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)