Deletion of Julian W. Lucas

Comment: as . Actors and models, disabled or otherwise, are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they've done stuff — the notability test for people, regardless of their career and regardless of what identity community they might happen to be part of, requires them to ''receive'' |reliable source coverage ''about'' their work. But that's not what the sources on offer here are: six of the ten footnotes are |primary sources that do not constitute support for notability, such as YouTube videos and his IMDb page and an entertainment calendar listing, and the other four (Gay Star News, Disability Horizons and Queerty) are |blogs, not reliable sources. People do not get a special exemption from having to clear  on the sources just because they happen to be members of underrepresented communities — the reception of proper reliable source media coverage ''is'' the ''definition'' of notability. Wikipedia does not exist as a free publicity platform to help you increase the visibility of aspiring future stars ''before'' they have the correct kind of media coverage: making it comes ''first'' and ''then'' the Wikipedia article ''follows'', not vice versa. Of course, he may come to clear our notability and sourcing standards in the future, so no prejudice against recreation if and when that happens — but "the things this person has done are so personally important to me that I should be allowed to use bad sources to make him notable because good ones don't exist yet" is not a thing we do: the quality and depth and range of the ''sources'' you can use to ''support'' an article ''are'' the notability test
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS||WP:GNG)