Deletion of Emilia Carr

Comment: Some of the arguments above have been based on arguments like "she's a woman on death row therefore notable in my book" which has no grounding at all in policy. Instead we do have a specific policy in cases like this, : "A person who is notable only for being the victim of or committing a crime or crimes should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there are any existing articles that do or could incorporate the available encyclopaedic material relating to that person." Capital punishment in Florida (which doesn't even mention this article's subject!) would seem to cover this. The exceptions to that are if it is a "well documented historic event." I don't see that here, it's simply a local one off killing. So, with only very local coverage,  and  seem to apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: In my opinion, BLP1E is irrelevant in that it helps determine whether notable material should be named after a person or an event. What I want to know first is whether or not this passes . There is obviously enough coverage in reliable sources to piece together an article that is relatively substantial, however, all the coverage seems to be from one, local geographic area. If or when the coverage goes nationwide, I will likely !vote for keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there's some interesting information here not just about the crime but about the prisoner's death row status. But  seems to cover this pretty well and has consensus. There are |good reasons for not having an article on every murder to ever appear in a local newspaper. Probably better to cover this in a broader article about death row in the state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:IINFO)