Deletion of Anand Ranganathan

Comment: Does not pass  criterion 3 as the Indian Academy of Sciences membership was an https://www.ias.ac.in/Fellowship/Associateship/ Associateship position from https://www.ias.ac.in/describe/associate/Ranganathan,_Dr_Anand 2002 to 2006 rather than a Fellowship.  His Associateship page does mention tuberculosis work, so if it had led to a vaccine in the ensuing decade, it is odd that his name is not mentioned in the articles tuberculosis or BCG vaccine or tuberculosis vaccines.  I can find work on characterising the ''Mycobacterium tuberculosis'' aspartate decarboxylase enzyme (published in ''Protein Expression and Purification (journal)|Protein Expression and Purification'' in 2002, {{doi|10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00039-6}}) and on its crystal structure (published in ''Proteins (journal)|PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics'' in 2006, {{doi|10.1002/prot.21126}}), and on the interactions of proteins encoded by the phthiocerol dimycocerosate locus of ''Mycobacterium tuberculosis'' (published in ''Molecular Genetics and Genomics'' in 2004, {{doi|10.1007/s00438-004-1088-3}}).  There are https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=anand+ranganathan+tuberculosis&btnG= more recent publications in journals including ''Nature'' and PLoS / PLoS One but none with substantial citations.  One page I saw indicated an ''h''-index of 7, which is hardly the stuff of -passing wikibios.  I am willing to be persuaded of a pass under  or another subject-specific guideline, though nothing I have seen to date is persuasive, and certainly I do not see a case for inclusion under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)