Deletion of 2037 Bomber

Comment: The sourcing has improved, but the  issue identified in the delete rationale remains. I do not think we should have an article entitled ''2037 Bomber'' since not only  does no such bomber exist, no specific plans for one were ever drawn up. What is of substance in the article is documentation of the requirements planning of US air defence policy, and neither the title nor the categories the article belongs to should suggest otherwise. I'm open to renaming this article, but rather than have this article remain under this title, I would !vote to merge it to Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider as the least distant article, under which the material could exist under the history section. Note further that if we cannot find several RSes that refer to this idea under the term ''2037 Bomber'', then the term falls foul of our policy per ; specifically, the Congressional sources I looked at do not support this as an established usage. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NEOLOGISM)