Deletion of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak

Comment: Is the subject of multiple non-trivial published works.  Just because some users might |not like the reason for the subject's "notablity", doesn't change the fact it passes our increasingly strict inclusion standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: as not passing . Or still better, '''redirect''' to Virginia Tech massacre
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per deletes above.   Fails .  Wikipedia is not a memorial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: It's not the subject she taught (French) that is at question here. She fails to meet  because she simply was not notable enough in the field. There are plenty of French professors (it appears she was only a lecturer, possibly without even a doctorate) who clearly meet . She does not appear to be one of of them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: as per the clear concensus in this debate. Verifiable information continues to pour in every hour and this is already within the bounds of . A clearly ill-advised AfD nomination at the wrong time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: to Virginia Tech massacre. Not otherwise notable aside from how she died. As Gloriamarie states, we cannot have articles for all the victims simply because of the manner in which they were killed - there has to have been |notability prior to the death (although not in all cases, but this isn't really a special case), and there doesn't seem to be any. We are |not a breaking news source - that is what Wikinews is for - and #MEMORIAL|we aren't a memorial, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)