Deletion of Xiaomi Mi Pad

Comment: from DRV) The product meets  and  by virtue of these : https://www.pcmag.com/news/323643/xiaomi-eyes-rivals-with-240-mi-pad-tablet PCMag, https://time.com/100805/xiaomi-mipad/ Time, and https://www.cnet.com/reviews/xiaomi-mi-pad-preview/ CNET, and there are others like https://www.theverge.com/2014/5/15/5719786/xiaomi-mipad-is-a-plastic-ipad-mini-for-android-lovers Verge and https://www.engadget.com/2014/05/15/xiaomi-mi-pad-tegra-k1-tablet/ Engadget. (The reviews appear to meet .) Additionally, per NPRODUCT and , merging this product article with the article on the company would make the article on the company too large, and potentially create an  problem. So, I think this product is best covered in a stand-alone article. Thanks to 0xSkyy for the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPRODUCT||WP:THREE||WP:PRODUCTREV||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:UNDUE||WP:HEY)

Comment: 2 or again): Agree with above comments on notability satisfaction  & on . Plus an optional 4th 😊 for  : https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-court-apple-xiaomi/apple-wins-eu-trademark-case-against-xiaomi-idUSKBN1DZ1IO?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtechnologyNews+%28Reuters+Technology+News%29 Reuters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPRODUCT||WP:THREE)