Deletion of Edgar de Evia

Comment: Certainly meets the criteria set forth at . The article is sourced and verifiable. Even a resource as poor as google turns up satisfactory verifiable information. As an aside, the nomination itself seems to be somewhat less than good-faith or civil as the nomination comes across more as a dispute with another wiki-editor than it does with the merits of the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)