Deletion of Stanley Leopold Fowler

Comment: As said above, the hagiography gets in the way of serious analysis, but once out of the way (it should be now- I've had a gin at it), the remainder of the article does not withstand scrutiny. Whatever limited notability the village had (and a search suggests it was not as popular as the article indicates), the creator had even less; their are almost no sources apart from us online. Now, of course, they don't have to be online only; but it would be odd for a notable topic not to have some online presence. The article's references do not exist, so they cannot be taken to demonstrate weight. '''The list of sources at the bottom of the article would be useful, but they are inaccessable to me atm. Perhaps someone who can glance through them can weigh up the  and  of coverage the article subject would require to pass ''' at the least
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:GNG)