Deletion of BoyChat

Comment: Having waded through most of the things that looked like news articles from reliable sources (one had technical difficulties), I didn't find that the forum was the primary subject of those articles.  Without being the primary subject of |independent coverage, I don't believe that it meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY||WP:WEB)

Comment: because the #Wikipedia_is_not_censored|Wikipedia is not censored section explicitly says that articles may include objectionable text only if they do not violate the law of the U.S. state of Florida. Having the BoyChat article on Wikipedia can be seen as a form of advertising its services (for instance, it becomes available on many search engines), and I'm pretty sure that the law of the U.S. state of Florida has some clause prohibiting advertising of such services. This is ''in addition'' to the not-notable-enough claim that I made above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  EVIL, with thanks to Herostratus for pointing it out.  I realize it's an essay and not policy, but it concisely describes why this article doesn't need to be on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)