Deletion of David Talbott (4th nomination)

Comment: Article appears to be a |coat rack for the subject's psuedo-scientific theories. As far as I can tell the sources appear to be mostly |Fringe and severely fail . While it is possible that the subject ''might'' be notable, as it stands the article fails  and . Much better sourcing, coupled with a complete rewrite will be needed to salvage this article. And thus far I have not been able to find enough RS coverage to ring the notability bell
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:FRINGE||WP:RS||WP:DUE||WP:FRINGE)