Deletion of India and state-sponsored terrorism

Comment: There are a lot of very poorly reasoned arguments being put forward here. To have an article on Wikipedia, a subject needs to have substantive coverage in multiple reliable sources. The folks defending this article have consistently failed to demonstrate the  existence of such sources. What we have right now is an article about "Accusations of Indian sponsored terrorism" (again, with the exception of the Sri Lankan content). {{ping|Mar4d}} says "We just have to see how |corroborated and widely covered those views are amongst |reliable sources"; and he is absolutely right; I just wish he would abide by his own argument. The accusations are widely covered, but they are ''not'' corroborated in substantial form anywhere. Most of the arguments here completely misunderstand the nature of the sources. A newspaper article which reports individual A saying "the world is flat" is not a reliable source for a sentence in Wikipedia that says "the world is flat." All it can be used for is ''Individual A says the world is flat"; and in this case, including that opinion would be inappropriate, because members of every government fling accusations at members of every other
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)