Deletion of 2010 UKIP PZL-104 Wilga crash

Comment: to Nigel Farage and/or UK Independence Party. Potentially temporary #NEWS|news coverage due to the involvement of the individual shouldn't establish independent |notability. The |essay mentioned above states (itself quoting Wikipedia:Notability) that it "''takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability''" and that "''Articles that meet criteria in only a single section are less likely to be notable enough for a separate article than those that meet criteria in multiple sections''". The article appears to meet one out of the 18(!) criteria. In any case a Wikiproject essay (which is apparently "''being beta tested''") should not outweigh the relevant Wikipedia |policies and guidelines
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NN||WP:AIRCRASH||WP:POLICY)

Comment: per  - passing event of no long-term notability, which doesn't satisfy the notability requirements for air disasters. No merge needed, as the significant content is already in the Nigel Farage article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)