Deletion of Cheese pudding

Comment: Oh dear Lord, do I have to do what I did to Macaroni soup?  If you don't like the tone of an article or the content is not appropriate, fix it.  This is a notable subject with many - with 509 google news references, http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22cheese+pudding%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=uk&ie=UTF-8  625 google books references, http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=%22cheese+pudding%22&btnG=Search+Books with 89 references on google scholar, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22cheese%20pudding%22&sa=N&tab=ps which indicates discussions in more depth.  See the first edit to macaroni soup for an even worse initial article.  We have numerous food stubs, so this is an acceptable topic which needn't even be much longer, see Verrine and Caraway seed cake. Give me half an hour at least to reemove dodgy content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Despite Sticky Parkin's assertion, |Google hits do not make a subject notable. Most of the hits you got were most likely recipes or cookbooks. There isn't enough to suggest that the subject is actually notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)