Deletion of Conspiracy realist

Comment: POV fork of conspiracy theory, no reference in a reliable source, |neolism, etc.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: for reliance on |dubious sources, not |verifiable.  PlusWikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day and the official cabal decree, h I say, what are you doing? Come down from there at once! Really, you're making a frightful exhibition of yourself..  Propagandists!  Realspeak!  Orwellian
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:O)

Comment: per , , , and possibly even #DICT.  The term does have some use (see http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/August.2005/0037.html and http://debatebothsides.com/archive/index.php/t-3941.html), but they are mostly on message boards, which do not meet .  Oh, and apparently, it's also a myspace account name.  Finally, a personal comment: to distinguish between a "theorist" and a "realist" in the way this article has done implies a complete lack of understanding as to what a theory really is (the "common usage" of the term is horribly wrong; crazy notions are just that--crazy notions--they are not theories).  OK, I'm done
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:RS||WP:NEO||WP:NOT||WP:RS)