Deletion of Peter Jacob (2nd nomination)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won yet — if you cannot demonstrate and |properly source that he was ''already'' notable enough for an article for some other reason ''before'' becoming a candidate, then he has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to become notable as a politician. And no, the volume of media coverage shown here is still ''not'' enough to make his candidacy a special case over and above everybody else's candidacy (a standard that isn't attained until you're approaching Christine O'Donnell levels of coverage and notoriety), because ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''everywhere'' could ''always'' show at least this much media coverage of the campaign
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails . In the previous AfD, I provided an analysis of the sources which remain the same. For example it is very disingenuous to cite the New York Times as a source that establishes notability when in reality all they have are a list of election results. That probably the most extreme example, but the other sources are not indepth coverage either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)