Deletion of Hyperactive Forums

Comment: per above, in particular the unsubstantiated claims about the sheer pwning power of the forums. Wikipedia |is not not a host or webspace provider, and the history of the forums would be better catered for by a series of posts in a locked and stickied thread on the forum itself, as opposed to an external site. If evidence showing the impact of the forums can be demonstrated through the use of |reliable and external third party sources, and by using these sources the information in the article can be |verified, it would pass the  inclusion criteria. (Note: Hyper Magazine ''would not'' qualify as an ''external, third party'' source. However, I am happy to settle for a '''Mention in and redirect to''' Hyper (magazine), limited to the existence of the forums, and what can be externally verified as true and summed up in a couple of paragraphs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEB)