Deletion of Joe Simokaitis

Comment: Doesn't meet the criteria of , even if one could argue that a story in the Lincoln, Nebraska newspaper about an athlete at the University of Nebraska, located in Lincoln, Nebraska, meets .  My view is that it wouldn't.  As far the websites, huskers.com is hardly "independent of the subject", and the stat sites have an entry for many many many minor league players.  There had been a comment above to the effect that every pro player should have a bio "as well done as this one".  That should have no bearing at all on the decision.  Some Wikipedians are better writers than others, but just as poor writing won't make a notable subject less notable, neither does good writing make a subject notable.  The issue is whether the writer has been able to make a case for notability, based on what he or she has to work with.  I don't see anything "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)