Deletion of Luma Health

Comment: because there are in-depth coverages in independent sources within its industry which makes it pass . It is not a B2C company that it will have huge press mentions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: possibly '''Strong delete''' - When I did Google quotation mark-enclosed phrase searches for "Luma Health" on Google News and Google web search, the only articles I found were related to their venture capital funding raises, employee hires and departures, and signing of business deals with other companies—all of which amount to trite, trivial, and inconsequential matters. At the same time, the rest of the results were |Yellow Pages-esque directory listings. There were only two articles from the BizJournals and San Francisco Business Times that ''may'' provide a substantive enough article to meet  and  standards to establish , but it's doubtful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NCORP||WP:SIG||WP:CORPDEPTH)