Deletion of Buddhist-Christian parallels

Comment: or '''Total Re-write''' I'm surprised how low the standards being applied are. First, it has tons of , a comment above notwithstanding, and regularly violates . Who decided, to take an early example, that "cognitive" and "theistic" are antonyms? The article is an extended argument in support of the theory that Christianity derives from Buddhism -- and as with all such arguments, it displays an incredible lack of critical judgement -- Antioch was founded by a king of a line that had diplomatic relations with an Indian king, therefore Buddhism influenced Christianity? Nazarene comes from Nazir? -- and a total disregard for chronology whenever it suits the argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)