Deletion of Controversy among United States mobile phone companies

Comment: I've moved the article to reflect that this really an annotated list, rather than a comprehensive treatise on the subject. In this context it is encyclopedic, because it brings together related topics. This is not , as some have commented, because that requites that the article actually synthesize a position, not simply bring facts into juxtaposition. As a list, it can be expanded to cover all related controversies, and link to articles that provide further information, which should address any perscieved POV issues. If any of the individual items on the list are not  they can be addressed by normal editing, but many are already cited, and most probably can be. I also don't see how this is a  unless someone seriously disputes these things, and they are covered differently in another article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:V||WP:POVFORK)