Deletion of Fort Trump

Comment: There are all sorts of proposals for international agreements that have yet to be finalized or are only in discussion phases that, due to coverage, pass . Here are a few examples: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Multilateral Agreement on Investment, Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty, Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism, Beilin–Abu Mazen agreement, Convention of Chuenpi, etc. As per the article, this is not only (and potentially even less) a literal proposal for a fort, but the colloquial name used to refer to a proposed strategic repositioning of U.S. military forces to Poland and bilateral military framework between the U.S. and Poland. Finally, since the term "Fort Trump" is frequently invoked in media reports without further context, it's reasonable to assume our readers may search for it. With the GNG threshold crested there's, therefore, no policy-based reason for a redirect. The merge proposal is unworkable as the volume of preservable content in this article would easily overwhelm the current Poland-U.S. relations article and would be inconsistent with the commonly accepted guidance described by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MERGEREASON)