Deletion of Nyala Rinpoche

Comment: I think he passes  and , I don't see how a book can be discounted because they asked someone close to the subject to fact check and credited them a such? If so, pretty much every book that talks about someone at length would have to be discounted because they would likely ask questions and fact check to someone close to the subject if they were or are at all reputable. For me this makes these sources ''better'', not worse. There are a lot of delete votes here but none really cite many valid reasons for doing so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . The single source in this article does not verify its content and does not provide the nontrivial coverage of the subject from multiple sources required by , and Lemongirl942's analysis shows that other sources mentioned in this AfD are also suspect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)