Deletion of Jean-claude Perez

Comment: Does not pass  based on the available info. I agree with Philosopher that the fact that the article is an autobiography is not by itself sufficient grounds for deletion. ( strongly discourages autobiographies, with good reasons, but does not forbid them.) However, the fact that this is an autobio is a reason to look at the article much more closely and skeptically. I have found little to show passing . Very few citations in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Jean-Claude%20Perez%22%E2%80%8E&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps and I have not found much in the WebOfScience either. GoogleBooks results are also smallhttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&hl=en&q=%22Jean-Claude+Perez%22%E2%80%8E&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N (most hits there are for another person with the same name who appears to be a historian).  This looks bad in terms of  since he works in active experimental fields where one expects to see substantial evidence of citability. The fact that his webpage listed in the article is actually a personal bloghttp://golden-ratio-in-dna.blogspot.com/ does not inspire extra confidence either. The only positive indicator of possible notability that I see thus far is the award mentioned in the article, listed there as:''1992 "Denis Guichard" prizewinner from the "Fondation de France"''. I tried to find something about this award by googling but did not get much (also verifying that the prize was actually awarded to him would be necessary). If someone knows something about "Fondation de France" and about its "Denis Guichard" award, please comment here. If this is a sufficiently significant award given for outstanding research accomplishments, he could be notable under criterion 2 of . Otherwise, in the absence of other data showing significant impact of his research and in view of  concerns, I go with delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTO)