Deletion of Jerkcity (3rd nomination)

Comment: For me the relevant guideline here is Wikipedia:Notability (web). I fail to see where this has "''been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.''" There is a http://archives.tcj.com/232/i_farnon.html brief mention in The Comics Journal but this is an interview with one of the comics' creators and in 7,219 words, only 66 words (6 sentences) are about Jerkcity. There is also http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2001/08/09/comics/index2.html an article in Salon.com but it has one sentence on Jerkcity and shows one of the characters (not labeled). So these are the two best mentions in reliable sources, and both seem fairly trivial to me. There is a nicely written http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/jerkcity/ article on Jerkcity at Rotten.com but I do not see that as a |reliable source and the article does not give an author or date or source (if it is a reprint from a RS). There is a Jerkcity book, but it was apparently self-published and I cannot find any reviews of it. I asked on the article's talk page in April 2010 for reliable sources and what I have mentioned here were the best provided - I've looked but cannot find better sources. I do not see how the article meets notability and so !vote for deletion. If better sources are out there, please provide them. Please note that this is copy and paste of my argument for deletionb in the last AfD - not much appears to have changed since then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)