Deletion of Transforming Faces

Comment: There was a ten-minute radio interview on the canadian version of NPR, which I think has not yet been mentioned.http://www.cbc.ca/freshair/episodes/2012/10/07/sunday-october-7/index.html  Charity-benefit-cinema in 2014 for the entity.http://www.insidetoronto.com/news-story/4624214-arts-in-brief-best-of-fringe-returns-to-north-york-theatre/  There was a burst of WP:NOTEWORTHY mentions in protest of a poor remake-movie.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/10195125/Disneys-Lone-Ranger-criticised-by-disability-campaigners.htmlhttp://www.inquisitr.com/864230/lone-ranger-boycott-issued-ahead-of-british-release/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lone-ranger-cleft-lip-charities-590224  This is the Toronto Star, not sure if it is the same as the ones mentioned above, which covers the first recipient of a new program the charity introduced.http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2011/04/29/easter_rebirth_a_6yearold_gets_a_new_face.htmlhttp://www.thespec.com/news-story/2251940-ethiopian-girl-thanks-canada-for-facial-reconstruction-surgery/  Same story, mentions two visits/surgeries were needed in 2011/2012.http://thestar.blogs.com/photoblog/2011/07/favourties-from-june-2011.html  Related story with mention of the big event, about financing such surgeries.http://globalnews.ca/news/619660/the-big-business-behind-cosmetic-surgery-loans/  Maybe-WP:noteworthy mention as part of the obit of one of the senior advisors to the charity, but title of page says this was paid obit, so maybe does not count as wp:rs.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CEFD8113AF933A15751C0A9679D8B63  Counting the radio-interview, and glomming together the toronto star articles, we have a couple sources with decent depth.  Does the charity-benefit-theater with proceeds going to Transforming Faces count?  Kinda sorta.  The burst of Cavendish-the-villian-related coverage has little depth, but does show that the charity is not ignored by the press, when something relevant arises.  Seems like a case where notability is unclear, and maybe merging-n-redirect into a more generic parent article is the way  suggests... but which article would it be a subsection within?  Cleft palate charity and facial reconstruction charity do not exist; maybe medical charities for children?  Merging the content into a more-highly-trafficked generic article will also help cut down on puffery and WP:SPIP, methinks, but I don't know what the generic article might be, if so. We do have some in-depth coverage, so deletion/userfication seems the wrong way to go, per . Special:Contributions/75.108.94.227|75.108.94.227
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FAILN||WP:PRESERVE)