Deletion of Tony Venhuizen

Comment: Several of these are roles that could get him an article if he could be shown as the subject of enough |reliable source media coverage ''for'' them to clear , but none of them are "inherently" notable roles that automatically guarantee him a Wikipedia article just because his existence can technically be |verified in a |primary source list of university scholarship recipients. Notability for Wikipedia purposes is not a question of what an article says, but of how well it does or doesn't ''reference'' what it says
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)