Deletion of Raccoon City (2nd nomination)

Comment: The last debate closed in january on the basis that the article "was sourcable".  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raccoon_City&diff=224173815&oldid=181665120 This is the difference between that version and the version today.  I don't see an assertion of notability from the sourcing.  I'm also http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Electronic+Gaming+Monthly%22+racoon+city&btnG=Search suspicious that the source in question even exists.   tells us that notability is not inherited (or , take your pick for a community standard).  This seems to be a textbook case of why we ought to be cautious in closing articles on the basis that they will be brought to marginal status over time.  A (gated) search of that EGM issue doesn't come up with that article name, just a review of RE that doesn't mention Racoon city. http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/jumpstart.jhtml?query=%27Electron+Gaming+Mon+%7E+Electronic+Gaming+Monthly+%7E+2008+January+Jan+01+224%27%3Cin%3EJI&prod=RDGFT,OMNIFT&fulltext=notchecked&eid=45c8126efd2272bed3793900fd89f61b Electron Gaming Mon ~ Electronic Gaming Monthly ~ 2008 January Jan 01 224 in  Wilsonweb
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:TOYS)

Comment: Gathering that this is the 2nd nomination for AfD in six months, along with the article being flagged for rescue, this sounds like a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)