Deletion of S.W. Randall Toyes and Giftes (2nd nomination)

Comment: I took part in improving the article and adding RSs to reveal the history of the company. Green C has done a great job of revealing misleading characterizations of the RS by the nominator. The nomination is vexatious : {{tq|Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.}}. The AfD was an overwhelming keep a  candidate and it was nominated for DYK. FYI: This is a second nomination and this AfD should reflect that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S.W_Randall_Toyes_%26_Gifts Here is the first
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELAFD||WP:HEY)

Comment: not that I think it has any chance to be deleted at this point with all the keep votes, but I'm voting delete in light of GreenC transparently extreme hyperbolic reason for voting keep that goes against  in pretty much every way a vote can and plus I semi agree with the original nominator about its dubious notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)