Deletion of Criticism of Pokémon

Comment: While it doesn't apply to this article, "Criticism of X" articles are not ''necessarily''  or unencyclopedic. If the "opinions" are |sourced to |reliable sources, they're not . If the criticisms are relevant to X's notability, then they're encyclopedic. And if the criticism of X is so extensive that  comes into play, you then have a "Criticism of X" article that is perfectly valid and encyclopedic
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:SUMMARY)