Deletion of Political positions of Barack Obama

Comment: recommend 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: This article was budded off from the main Barack Obama article, per Summary Style.  That article is already far too large to support the level of detail contained in this article.  Also, the nominator has not given a valid reason for deletion in their nomination (just the old |I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: this seems like an inexplicable nomination. The article contains |notable positions about a leading public figure, with each position properly |verified by |reliable sources. There are no problems with POV|neutrality, and no violations of |biographical policies that I can see. In addition, there is an http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama&oldid=289532694#Moving_forward ongoing discussion about how this article can be revamped following Obama's election. Given the enormous amount of information here, it would be difficult to see how this could be merged into the other articles suggested by the nominator without a significant loss of material. Also, this represents one of the sub-articles of Barack Obama, which is written in |summary style. Deleting this article would create cascading problems for the parent article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:SS)

Comment: Is an odd  nomination. This is one of the few articles I've seen recently that I really found useful. The article has a pretty well organized and comprehensive |notable policy positions of the President , with each policy |verified by |reliable sources. I see no  POV|neutrality issues. This is a valuable addition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV)