Deletion of List of people who died on the toilet

Comment: Non-encyclopedic" is the classic |argument to avoid of .  The reference to  is erroneous as that's about article sections.  What the nomination meant was , which is another argument to avoid.  All we really have here is  which fails per  as sources are easy to find – see ''https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2242053/pdf/tacca00010-0145.pdf Bed Pan Deaths'' or ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Uncle_John_s_Curiously_Compelling_Bathro/_ihZDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT52&printsec=frontcover Died on the John''.  The worst case would be merger to Toilet-related injuries and deaths#Historical deaths and so there's an obvious |alternative to deletion which we would prefer per the policy .  In other words, the nomination is crap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:NOTENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:TRIVIA||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NLIST||WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)