Deletion of Force lightning

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:N)

Comment: per First pillar, i.e. consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on Star Wars. Verifiable and reognizable topic that appears in notable films and video games.  "Cruft" is not a valid reason for deletion per , Wikipedia:Cruftcruft, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alien_and_Predator_Timeline&diff=201964537&oldid=201694627 DGG, and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Verdatum&diff=176061328&oldid=169950712 Verdatum.  And the article has improved from the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Force_lightning&oldid=208885698 nominated version versus the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Force_lightning&oldid=209352821 current version.  Moreover, we cannot "delete and merge" per Wikipedia:Merge and delete.  Finally, there is a clear http://stats.grok.se/en/200804/Force%20lightning interest in the topic among our readers and editors.  Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: Fails , , and OT#PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:NOT)