Deletion of Ben Cormack (2nd nomination)

Comment: The first vote at the other AfD, by {{u|Dysklyver}} – now locked across Wikimedia for sockpuppetry – insists they performed  but never provided any evidence. The other votes at the AfD basically amounted to: "Well, I couldn't find any sources that show he's notable, but I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt here." While giving an article a second chance in good faith is fine, there's no sign that notability has since been established, will be established, or can be established. {{u|Beemer69}} who voted ''Weak keep'' in the previous AfD seems to have put the most work into determining the notability of the subject and cleaning up the article, so I'll ping her for her thoughts on the matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)