Deletion of Yusof Mutahar (2nd nomination)

Comment: the sources are not independent, reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking. {{pb}}https://www.livemint.com/brand-post/a-doctor-s-dream-dr-yusof-mutahar-sets-eyes-on-bollywood-11576755945750.html is a "Brand Post". It has this disclaimer: This is a company press release. No HT journalist is involved in creation of this content.{{pb}}https://www.news18.com/news/press-release/dr-yusof-mutahar-the-new-household-name-of-india-2399325.html is a press release{{pb}}http://www.forbesindia.com/article/brand-connect/doctor-yusof-mutahar-turns-actor-eyes-bollywood/56223/1 is tagged "BRAND CONNECT" and has this disclaimer: The pages slugged ‘Brand Connect’ are equivalent to advertisements and are not written and produced by Forbes India journalists.{{pb}}https://www.ijf.org/judoka/49041/contests Doesn't have any content{{pb}}https://www.judoinside.com/judoka/129800/Yusof_Mutahar/judo-matches Mentions that he lost one match and won none{{pb}}http://www.businessmole.com/there-are-doctors-and-then-there-is-dr-yusof-mutahar/ makes that rather bold claim that he won "both state and national titles", representing Australia in 2018 {{pb}}https://boherald.com/meet-top-surgeon-of-australia-dr-yusof-mutahar-who-is-a-talented-actor-too/{{pb}}calls him a "top surgeon". He's not a surgeon, he's a General practitioner.{{pb}}https://guruobserver.com/2019/two-famous-doctors-from-the-same-family got their content from Issuewire.com; it's a press release{{pb}}https://www.cryptotim.es/dr-yusof-mutahar-an-exceptional-entrepreneur-and-doctor-from-australia/{{pb}}Why, one wonders, would a Spanish magazine write about an Australian GP. Because there is this really compelling question: "Will he enter the crypto space soon?" Seriously, that is the connection. Or perhaps {{pb}}cryptotim.es publishes press releases for pay and pretends they're editorials. {{pb}}https://www.mid-day.com/articles/yusof-mutahar-a-doctor-model-and-actor-all-set-to-make-a-debut-in-bollywood/22364159 is "partnered content"{{pb}}https://www.openthenews.com/dr-yusof-mutahar-the-soaring-model-and-actor-from-australia-driving-the-way-of-prosperity/ doesn't support that claim that he appeared in Shapludu, it says: "He made his debut in the acting industry in 2019, being cast in two, Hollywood movies." Whatever Shapludu is, it's not made in Hollywood.{{pb}}https://www.klkntv.com/story/41228322/dr-yusof-mutahar-doctor-model-up-and-coming-actor is a press release{{pb}}https://in.style.yahoo.com/yusof-mutahar-brilliant-actor-model-072034574.html is republished from popdiaries.com, a blog {{pb}}https://www.news18.com/news/press-release/dr-yusof-mutahar-the-new-household-name-of-india-2399325.html is a press release{{pb}}https://books.google.com.bd/books/about/ECG_simplified_by_Dr_Yusof_Mutahar.html?id=6Va6DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y Nobody believes that these five-star reviews of Dr Yusof's self-publshed book are real. {{pb}}https://www.thehansindia.com/life-style/its-time-to-welcome-renowned-doctor-yusof-mutahar-in-india-not-as-a-doctor-but-as-an-actor-584077 Isn't wonderful that a newspaper from Hyderabad has such interest in a GP from Perth, Australia? It's also funny that the sources cited keep mentioning that His net worth is estimated at more than 5 million dollars. That sure comes up a lot. {{pb}}https://www.californiaherald.com/meet-australias-multi-millionare-dr-yusof-mutahar/{{pb}}The california herald is a fake source. But Lisa Baker doesn't fail to mention "his worth is computed to be Five million dollars which are a massive figure to look at". This is apparently really important.{{pb}}http://www.californiatimes.us/dr-yusof-mutahar-in-talks-with-bollywoods-top-production-houses/{{pb}}Oh, look the author, "Chris Asher" points out that "his worth is computed to be Five million dollars which are a massive figure to look at". {{pb}}https://english.newstracklive.com/news/dr-yusof-mutahar--celebrity-doctor-and-fashion-model-sc17-nu-1048336-1.html It's not clear why this source is used to cite that he wrote Secondary Causes of Hypertension in General Practice, since it doesn't mention it. Perhaps the undisclosed paid editors who wrote this article got tired, and figured nobody was going to check the sources if they randomly plaste enough of them over the article?{{pb}}https://nagpuroranges.com/keeping-youthful-new-album-release-by-yusof-mutahar/{{pb}}https://www.cinetalkers.com/keeping-youthful-new-album-release-by-yusof-mutahar/ Here we have two articles, except that they're the same. Better cite it twice, eh? {{pb}}https://www.theamericanreporter.com/dr-yusof-mutahar-from-australia-is-all-set-to-enter-in-bollywood/ theamericanreporter.com is a fake source{{pb}}https://25hournews.com/news/keeping-youthful-new-album-release-by-yusof-mutahar-764 Here's that same article that Jeetu Likhar Jeetu Likhar  wrote for nagpuroranges and cinetalkers. Only this time is was written by Siddhartha.{{pb}}We really should do more than delete this article. We should ban the UPEs who wrote it and depricate or blacklist all the sources, including so-called newspapers like Mint (newspaper) and The_Hans_India{{pb}}because they publish for pay and we can't trust a word they print. {{pb}}I can't believe I just wasted all this time on this AfD. Next time any of these sources appear in an article, just take it straight to  as Unambiguous advertising or promotion. That's what this is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11)