Deletion of Civil Conflict (college football game)

Comment: to Bob Diaco, and leave a brief paragraph at the target explaining & putting the situation in context. I'm not as concerned with what either team's opinion is on the status of a rivalry (should we delete Texas–Texas A&M football rivalry just because the Longhorns want to pretend that A&M doesn't even exist anymore?) as I am about the facts. And, in this case, the fact is that this is a purported "rivalry" between two schools 1,200 miles away from each other, without any kind of common history or culture between them, and with a grand total of ''two all-time meetings'' on the field. To sum it up, this "rivalry" doesn't seem to have any kind of meaning or significance to anyone outside of Diaco, therefore I believe it's probably best to briefly address it on his page, and move on. And, I agree with Dirtlawyer that there are some legitimate  and  concerns with the article as it currently stands. I also note that, should this article be kept, it's title should be changed, it is currently disambiguated where no disambiguation is necessary, as Civil Conflict remains a redlink
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT||WP:NOTNEWS)