Deletion of List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction

Comment: per sourcability and notability for inclusion on the list as shown by examples above, and by the sheer number of bluelinks that lead back to those many sourced articles listed.  That a list may never be complete is not a valid reason to dismiss the list.  ''' inapplicable as this is not a list non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations.''' Does not violate  as the information on the list is verifiably objective and not subjective nor synthesis.  The list's discriminate inclusion criteria are clear: "a list of gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender characters in film, radio, and TV". Being discriminate meets the criteria set for such in . Does not violate  as it is NOT too general or too broad in scope have little value. Specifically, as a valuable information source, it meets PURP. Per #Common selection criteria, the shows and films listed meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect encyclopedic article in the English Wikipedia or are otherwise verifiable as a member of the listed group. Splitting can be discussed on article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOR||WP:LIST||WP:SALAT||WP:LISTPURP||WP:STAND)

Comment: There's a couple reasons for this. While the topic is probably notable, it is extremely broad. Nor is it a navigational list like  List of Fish. It purports to do more than what a category could do by putting multiple classifications on them rather than the simple alphanumeric listing in List of Fish. Also, while it is extremely broad, it as also arbitrarily focused. It includes many major media types but excludes print media and video games with no rhyme or reason. Film and TV have a basic similarity, but radio just throws a monkey wrench into it because one asks then why video games aren't included if its audio-visual medium? Finally, most of the info here is unverified |original research; since this cannot be navigational list, it fails that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)