Deletion of SimSig

Comment: notability ''not'' established. Forum postings and links to websites are not considered |reliable (secondary) sources. Nor could I find any such significant coverage thereof in a cursory http://www.google.com/search?q=SimSig&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google search (no hits in gNews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Jezhotwells.  Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: It may be a notable simulation of signaling, but it doesn't meet the overall  guideline for Wikipedia notability. As can be seen from the, presumably, best references (i.e., those listed in the article) all the references are to personal pages and forums which are not |reliable sources. I can't find anything else that is more reliable. Personally I feel it is time to look again at the standards for web sites, shareware and freeware because they are very rarely WP notable even when they are widely known in the on-line community. But an AfD isn't the place to discuss that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)