Deletion of Love's Journey

Comment: No evidence of substatial coverage in relaiable independent secondary sources. All I see is , which turn out to be book reviews and interviews in rather low quality tabloids with deceptively high-sounding names like the Economic Times and the Telegraph of Calcutta and blogs, none of which pass . Most of the material seems to ultimately derive from self-promotional press releases. My own searches turned up nothing even faintly promising. Even taken together, they do little to establish notability. Perhaps, some day, reliable sources will cover this book, at which time this article can be recreated. But that day is not yet here, and  applies for the time being. The article in its present state will not be a useful starting point for a future well-referenced article, and can be deleted in its entirety with no loss to the project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)