Deletion of Nia Imara

Comment: There is enough coverage in RS for GNG for the subject of this article. The local sources issue is a red herring and not mentioned even once on . As {{u|Tataral}} pointed out the lead wasn't very good, so I improved it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , in anything. The encyclopedia would not be substantially improved by deleting this article. In any case, removing an article about a woman scientist / artist seems hardly a priority while there are 72 entries in :Category:Japanese female adult models, 186 in :Category:American female adult models, or 89 in :Category:Penthouse Pets, with much worse sourcing than this. In another example, there are 17 entries in :Category:Penthouse Pets navigational boxes. You get the idea. Checking these BLPs out and nominating some for deletion would be more productive than spending community time removing articles on academics, even jr ones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)