Deletion of Yakult

Comment: The issue obviously isn't notability for company or product, as even the most casual English-language search reveals a popular product and a company with a colorful history: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/global/03food.html https://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/21/business/international-business-japan-company-derivatives-loss.html https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB890384441385097000 https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-south-korea-a-drive-to-build-a-yogurtmobile-1459712074 https://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2014/03/20/japanese-bacteria-to-go-on-science-mission-to-space/ https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2000/01/13/national/yakult-paid-off-gangsters-sources/ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-14/danone-to-sell-stake-in-japan-s-yakult-for-about-1-8-billion. Jytdog rightly points out that the issue is . Would taking out the entire "Nutritional Value" section, the sentences on cosmetics and chemotherapy, and the "marketed in different sizes" paragraph address the main promotional concern, and leave a workable article to fill out with easily-located -sourced information about the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:RS)