Deletion of Female genital cosmetic surgery

Comment: This is by no means my field of expertise, but a very quick search produced a plethora of relevant sources, many of which satisfy all the requirements of . Review papers have been published in peer-reviewed journals! I can't honestly see how the nominator can claim a lack of notability. (Their https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Female_genital_cosmetic_surgery&diff=654994619&oldid=654984999 previous attempt at speedy deletion via CSD A1 was equally bewildering.) I also don't think there's any merit to a merger with cosmetic surgery, itself only a section of the wider plastic surgery
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Rhododendrites and perhaps refine to Genital modification and mutilation#Female genitals|§ Female genitals. Not Genital modification and mutilation#Labiaplasty and vaginoplasty|§ Labiaplasty and vaginoplasty because the other subsections appear also satisfying the title. The original article equating FGCS with only those two kinds looks slightly |original research without sources making the definition out right. '''野狼院ひさし
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:original research)