Deletion of David William Parry (2nd nomination)

Comment: Posen607 Your whole approach on this Afd as  is to try obscure, obfuscate and disguise the fact this person non-notable, by presenting a whole series of smoke and mirrors references. I find it funny when you present a list of references that you claim are valid, when you personally ed the article to above 50k in size, with 128 references, where a full 110 of them were found to be totally invalid and non-RS. Examples included event listings, image references, raw search urls, loads of blog refs, self-published sources and claims to notability that don't exist or can't be proven, like being an actor or theatre producer. And no you present another set of supposed reference
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:PUFF)