Deletion of Customer Access and Retrieval System

Comment: Fails  or . I see no reason to redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFTWARE)

Comment: to telecommunications billing. I believe the Phrack article is a reliable source for hacking of telecommunication systems, most or all of the article stems from that source. The context seems obvious to me; hackers want to know details of customer databases to aid in their activities. Such details are typically not made public, which is why there are no other secondary sources from mainstream publishers. With the one source, the article fails notability guidelines, but is still verifiable material. Unfortunately, I could not find any suitable merge targets. CARS is a type of telecommunications billing program (among other things) and a redirect would be useful to at least give context for the topic. Per our deletion policy , alternatives to deletion are preferred over deletion for verifiable material, and I think redirect is the best compromise here. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)