Deletion of Kingdom of Jeypore

Comment: I agree with the previous commmenter. As per , "if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability." There definitly needs to be improvement to the article (at times is seems like closer to a geneology than history of a kingdom), there are many reliable, independent academic sources on the subject itself. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3034233?seq=1 1, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.658.9447&rep=rep1&type=pdf 2, http://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2013/jun/engpdf/70-72.pdf 3, https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/186879/13/13_chapter%203.pdf 4, https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA17311604&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=13590987&p=AONE&sw=w 5Therefore, even if there are problems with the sourcing of the current article it is still notable enough to be an article (albeit one that requires significant revisions and review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTN)

Comment: based on the existence of sources this is not fake, and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)