Deletion of Dorothy Walker Bush

Comment: While the single sentance in the Time Magazine article fails the "multiple" and "non-trivial" tests required of a |notable subject, a http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dorothy+Walker+Bush&btnG=Google+Search google search turns up some specific extra information, such as http://www.smmc.org/lifepromise/ this one indicating that a building is being named after her at the Southern Maine Medical Center and http://books.google.com/books?id=CiehwftuM84C&pg=PA153&lpg=PA153&dq=dorothy+walker+bush&source=web&ots=LSGtuU7_BA&sig=dLs6CgDpnrPaq11DGOD-b2urPQ4 this one, an actual book with some honest to God biograph just on her, and http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE3DE113BF933A15752C1A964958260 a full-page NY Times obit on her (much more than trivial, IMHO) and http://books.google.com/books?id=9EeRFIM53lYC&pg=PA411&lpg=PA411&dq=%22dorothy+walker+bush%22&source=web&ots=LVdxV2v31n&sig=oYrif5FFArR_90oG4f_d8p7Jal8 another biography of her.  While the article itself is stubby, she has notability in spades.  Any of these sources, and more found in the google source, could easily be used to expand the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)