Deletion of Adam4Adam

Comment: Seems to meet  and has enough NPOV to make the owner cringe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails to meet  per above.  Alexa rank is 7,186
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: WP:WEB does''' '''''not''''' '''say''':  "A topic is ''not'' notable ''unless'' it has been the ''exclusive'' subject (etc)."  An article discussing how Adam4Adam was used to lead a person into a situation in which he was murdered certainly does qualify as |verifiable |notability. An article about how Adam4Adam and Manhunt.net can lead to discharge from the Military qualifies as well.  These aren't trivial mentions and these aren't trivial subjects.  I bet most of us will think what we have here is |verifiable |notability. I bet a few will argue it isn't.  We can discuss semantics and wikilawyer each other senseless.  We could also Wikipedia:Use your best judgment|use our best judgement a little.  Are the references here a smoke screen or has Adam4Adam really gotten spontaneous media courage?  Is this article spammy and pointless POV clutter or is it more in keeping with the sort of NPOV encyclopedic info we generally strive to present
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Delete''' -  states that a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and each other such that there exists enough source material to write a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic.  ''Kennedy, Sean (August 29, 2006) The Advocate. They're peddling death. Issue 969, page 44'' might be consider one source.  In September 2005, ''San Jose Mercury News (September 11, 2005) "Busiest online matchmakers." Section: AE'' ranked Adam4Adam as number ten on the top 10 online dating sites based on traffic in the year prior to September 2005: 1 Yahoo! Personals, 2 Match.com, 3 eHarmony, 4 American Singles, 5 Gay.com Personals, 6 Tickle.com|Tickle Matchmaking, 7 Webdate.com, 8 True.com, 9 Perfect Match (dating)|Perfect Match, 10 Adam4Adam.  However, I did not find multiple sources for Adam4Adam.  Lots of interesting information, but the information should come from a Wikipedia source per  to be counted as contributing to a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)