Deletion of Boba Phat (2nd nomination)

Comment: as previously demonstrated both in the first AfD and above, the subject of the article clearly meets the minimum |standards for a standalone article per the notability |guideline. Once the minimum standards are met, self-published sources are |specifically allowed for and often essential for |verification of minor details. Outright deletion is still a |last resort option when there are |other things which can be done with verifiable content.That said, given http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Biohazard388 this, http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=Biohazard388&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia this, and especially when compared against http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Biohazard388 this I have to concur with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB||WP:V||WP:BEFORE||WP:MERGE)

Comment: I see a bunch of unreliable sources (YouTube, social networking sites, etc.), and only a handful of passing mentions in sources that might be considered reliable. That indicates a failure to meet |notability requirements, since there are no reliable, third-party sources that are actually and primarily ''about'' the article subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'd say it is blatant self promotion. A passing mention in two news articles doesn't qualify him for anything on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia will host a page about him, then why not an individual charity worker that has been in a local paper several times? By accepting an article on this character, a precedent is set that says anyone with two pictures on a website can be accepted. I believe this to be against the both the rules of the site, as outlined in . This tell's us that the social networking sites like Facebook, and the Youtube links are invalid for use as citation because of the "Independent of the subject" clause, listed in the first section. Also in that same section, "Significant coverage" is more than a trivial mention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)