Deletion of Zhou Chengzhou

Comment: I would normally say '''Draftify''' on the grounds of plausible notability. However, {{u|Sun8908}} helpfully provides extremely compelling evidence that the article's creator and primary contributor is the subject themselves, and it does not appear that they have disclosed this on the English Wikipedia. Furthermore, said editor's contribution history indicates that they have engaged in |forum shopping and |inappropriate canvassing to recruit allies for this deletion discussion, |refbombing to artificially stave off notability concerns, ''and'' |self-promotion across multiple articles, indicating that draftifying would not solve the problem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:FORUMSHOP||WP:CANVASS||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PROMO)