Deletion of Memoria Pichilemina

Comment: The nominator has already made clear I am related to the article's subject, I founded the website, and so I am not voting in this discussion, to avoid COI accusations. However, I think that the website satisfies the otability (web)|web content notability guideline. Why? It conforms to the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, yes, it does. There are two major sources in the article, the recent articles of ''El Expreso de la Costa'' and ''La Voz de la Región''. Both news articles are one-page-long, they are not simple "mentions". We do have other articles on local Chilean websites too, like WikiLosRíos, for example. To finish, it's important to mention I'm not even making money out of the website, it's non commercial and its content is released under a libre license. This will be my sole comment, because I don't really want a COI outcry, it's the least thing I would like to experience here on Wikipedia now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: the CoI seems to be irrelevant here. Suggesting an article to be created by others via equested articles is precisely what we suggest editors with a CoI do. Although Diego Grez may have suggested it, he never edited the page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)