Deletion of 2018 UPSL season

Comment: The latter is the more important point, and it is the burden of those arguing to keep the article to provide the source under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN)

Comment: Too many references are self interested parties and do not meet the requirements of editorial oversite and control as discussed in . Information can be summarized on main UPSL page until (and if) the league gets enough traction to justify separate articles for each season - the US soccer pages are littered with partially complete seasons for leagues that had big dreams but lived a short life and now need to be deleted summarized and cleaned up. Let's do this one right. Keep relevant info on main page and break that info out into a separate pages once the league demonstrates staying power and there will be more Wikipedia s to help do the work and keep the information up to date. Additionally, it appears to me that Too many of the edits on UPSL are by Wikipedians that seem to have either a financial or ownership interest in the league or one of its teams - creating additional neutrality problems that will be difficult for disinterested Wikipedians to monitor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: that latter source from the Vox site is more what I'm talking about since it discusses the league (although not the entire league season). I really don't see how any of the other sources listed aren't violations of , though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)