Deletion of Zeek

Comment: per ; even the sources listed above state: "Zeek’s business model is still not entirely clear..." The second rationale for deletion is , with content such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO)

Comment: I am well aware of the concerns raised by opposing editors regarding the article. But I don't believe they are justified at this stage of the article. The subject here should be the actual content of the article as opposed to how the information as it is presented by the media, although I do think It can be said with great certainty that Financial Times, Haaretz, The Guardian, Globes, and CNN Money are trusted sources. In regards to the claims made by opposing editors regarding COI. I'm not the creator of the article, but I do think it meets  and worth preserving. I did seek help in improving the article and I see nothing wrong with that. Editors seek help every single day in Wikipedia and as a community, we should strive to help one another as much as possible under the proper guidelines. I can't apologize for doing by best to improve the article. I did not try to intimate Wiki editors like other editors that have participated in this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Convincing arguments for deletion have been made; in particular it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)