Deletion of Sarah Natochenny

Comment: I think she's covered under the additional criteria of . However, voice actors are not specifically named, so she may count either as a "creative professional" or an "entertainer" - but I think either way she's covered. One of the additional criteria for "creative professionals" is: ''The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.'' Surely Pokemon, massive franchise that it is, has been the subject of many independent books, articles and reviews even only since 2006. And if being the voice actress for the main character doesn't count as a "major role in co-creation", well, then, what does? On the other hand, one of the additional criteria for "entertainers" is that they have: ''had significant roles or been featured multiple times in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.'' She has played the main character in the Pokemon TV series since 2006, as well as two Pokemon movies. In addition, she played the main character of Alicia in Bullet Witch.  These are significant roles in notable productions. (She also did the voice of the "Pokemon Trainer" in Super Smash Bros. Brawl, which seems like a slightly less major role but having not played it I can't be 100% sure on that.)So, whichever way you swing it, I think she's notable. And, by the way, a page being the target of vandalism is absolutely no reason to delete it! Vigilancy in reverting the vandalism, yes; deletion of the article, no. Also
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)