Deletion of Ben Breedlove

Comment: I'm finding it difficult on this one. Internet personalities are transient at best, it's difficult for us to prove notability on one, especially one who is not going to be producing anything new. This viral video is less than a week old, but it has clearly had more than a little effect, given the fact that so many news outlets are covering it. This isn't a  situation, as it's not written as a memorial and not by anyone who knows him. If you look http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Breedlove+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=c7w&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB%3Aofficial&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_max%3A24%2F12%2F2011&tbm=nws&source=hp&q=%22ben+Breedlove%22&pbx=1&oq=%22ben+Breedlove%22&aq=f&aqi=g-z2&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=127284l128196l2l130430l2l2l0l0l0l1l1061l1339l2-1.7-1l2l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=bc5c0a20bff71deb&biw=1325&bih=808 prior to Christmas day there are no gnews hits, so it does make me think "|one event". However, I think I've fallen on the side of Keep. He meets the GNG, he's an internet personality, he's made a viral video which many many news outlets are covering, celebrities have been commenting on him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: As mentioned by the nominator, Wikipedia is not a Memorial.  Being the subject or creator a temporarily popular viral video does not make one notable nor does this meet the requirements for .  Should we create biography articles for every cute baby playing with a puppy who shows up in a viral video that the media latches on to?  Of course not. This isn't any difference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)