Deletion of Provincialism in Romania

Comment: WP:OR, , , and others. An encyclopedia is not the place for ranting about perceived anti-Moldavian bias everywhere in Romanian society
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POINT)

Comment: per ,  and . In short, this article is a joke. The "phenomenon" was defined by the author (only too well-known for his theories on the differences between Moldavia and Wallachia), both title and text are whimsical, and the sources cited have no connection whatsoever to what the text is supposed to be about, and have been manipulated by the editor into something they are not (see for example where he cthe text "cites" a queen of Romania, making it seem like she endorses the concept because, in one of her statement, she said Wallachia was at the center of Romanian ''nationalism''). Let me add that all countries have regional rivalries (except perhaps Aruba), but that doesn't make the subject of such articles noteworthy. As for the noteworthy phenomenons in this case, we already have Mitică|an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SYNTH||WP:COAT)