Deletion of Richard Mourdock pregnancy from rape Is 'something god intended' controversy

Comment: Incredibly hastily created. This is the very point of #NEWS. Merge to United States Senate election in Indiana, 2012 and Richard Mourdock
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Absolutely no question this is a '''Speedy delete''', and should not be up for a week under AfD. Pure attack article, and designation of this as a "controversy" takes opinion and puts it as fact in WP's voice. Truth is, Mourdock has always had a clear, well explained (though not shared by many) position on abortion exceptions. If you read the whole quote, he explains his position clearly, and why, and is respectful of other viewpoints. While his view is not mainstream, even in his party, his justification, as a whole sounds reasonable. It sounds controversial when '''paraphrased''' or when the quote is '''edited''', and not without those "enhancements". Attack article, and created, as are most attack articles, to circumvent  or / on the Mourdock or Senate campaign Articles. Therefore also a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:FORK)