Deletion of Donald Trump racial views

Comment: As per nom. This is not only a , but falls under  by stringing together a number of different incidents in which Donald Trump said something that could be perceived as racist and then comes to the conclusion that Donald Trump is a racist. Each incident is already covered in relevant articles. Nothing in the article reflects Trump's own views, which are technically unknown outside of his quote "I am not a racist." Instead the article is about what other people believe his views are. The analysis section is not actually an analysis, its just attack quotes from people like Jim Acosta who has been at odds with Trump since day 1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The only reason this "article" (too many issues to genuinely call it that) was created rests solely on Trump's recent "sh*thole" remark; naturally, enough editors will |believe this news story needs a page in some form. However, I'm not entirely sure if the article creator even knows what this article is about. An actual article about Trump's racial views would have the reported views of, well, Trump, not every account when someone believes he was being racist -- all |loosely strung together. We may as well call this article "Instances when Donald Trump was racist" because that is the POV being pressed here. Would actually waiting for scholarly sources a few years from now have ultimately resulted in an actual encyclopedic article? Absolutely, but unfortunately that is not the encyclopedia editors seem to want to work toward
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Subject has received significant worldwide coverage, and is far too large at this point to document in a section of an article. It needs its own article. Concern about this seems to stem from  rather than any policy-based view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)