Deletion of List of Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards (3rd nomination)

Comment: Most citations self-referential, the remainder were trivial mentions. No evidence that the awards themselves have received "''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''" () - "''Merely being mentioned in a source whose primary purpose is to cover an entirely different subject does not satisfy this guideline.''" (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TRIVCOV)

Comment: Per the same rationale I posted to the deletion review whic will be quoted here-in as follows: "The article in questioned violated many principles of  by it's very nature, not to mention it had been marked as in need of citations and references on the majority of its points - the majority of which had been tagged as needing a citation for over 2 years. Others would be continuously added without the addition of references to accompany them. The |notability is in serious question as having |undue weight given to them by POV|editors rather than the industry themselves being as promotions such as WWE, Total Nonstop Action Wrestling|TNA and Ring of Honor|ROH do not actually acknowledge the granting of these awards, let alone their existence. Per the totality of that, I must question the pertinence of the article and it's assertion of notability beyond that of a niche publication. With that accounted for, most of the article was in violation of  per lack of sourcing given which reduced |verifiability, if not rendering it impossible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:N||WP:UNDUE||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:V)