Deletion of Common Dreams NewsCenter

Comment: I would have no objection to someone starting up a stub based solely around the sources Angus and others mention, but there is nothing on the current page that is sourced, encyclopedic, or worthwhile.  Delete per  and  with no prejudice to the creation of an article in its place that meets policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V)

Comment: Assuming good faith about the nomination (and its faulty google/blogosphere assertions), I'm having trouble finding sources on Google Books and Factiva which mention this website in more than a passing way i.e. more than a "recommended site" directory listing or a reference footnote. While the website claims some nice endorsement quotes from various dignitaries, that's not enough to pass . I can't find non-trivial references and there doesn't seem to be any awards won by this site. It's a popular site whose audience clearly extends beyond the blogosphere and into academia and professional political circles. However, wikipedia is not a directory and I haven not been able to find evidence of multiple non-trivial reference which would see this passing . I'm open to new evidence being produced for this afd but I'm !voting delete for now. (And since this article has been around since October 2005 with the attention of multiple editors, I see no reason to give this article a grace period
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: I agree with Night Gyr in that it is non-notable website rehashing news links. In fact, the website featured this spam advertisement http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0203-28.htm among the others contained there doing the same promotional write-ups. Without the support from other references, it appears the article fails  per ''Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)