Deletion of Nancy Wicker

Comment: as all the biographical information can be verified from reliable sources, which is the nub of . Apart from that, Wicker appears to be a more significant figure than most academics. When it comes to that criterion quoted from ACADEMICS about "an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association", the meaning of "highly selective" and "prestigious" is pretty subjective. Whether the Society of Historians of Scandinavia has a WP article or not, those descriptions must be arguable, and they do seem to apply to the Royal Society of the Humanities at Uppsala, which is limited to fifty members
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NACADEMICS)