Deletion of Mary Ann Mansigh

Comment: Per  and reasons above. Article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BIO)

Comment: It is clear that she is a borderline case so I don't think drafting this will change this.  The crux is that Mary has become notable due to the fact that she was one of the very few female computer scientists working at that time (several of the academic papers quoted in the article name check her in this regard, such as https://www.epj.org/images/stories/news/2013/epj_plus_1-01-13.pdf ".. more “he” than “she” in the 50’s and 60’s — Arianna Rosenbluth and Mary-Ann Mansigh are notable exceptions.." (we have a Arianna W. Rosenbluth article).  This status is sufficient for several notable academic institutions (quoted in the article and ELs), to name lecture series after her.  I think this meets  and .  Preserving such fragments of a female pioneer are useful encyclopedic activities
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: The very-non-neutrally-worded project notification by Ema--or at Special:Diff/1006287654 looks like a serious  violation to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)