Deletion of Lucio Fernandez

Comment: I think the question here is whether the subject passes  for their overall work and creative work. The subject has one notable nomination (going toward ) and has a nice profile in NJ.com from 2010. As a creative professional, the subject is the author of several plays. While I found several profiles of the subject in NJ and NY media organizations, I was not able to find anything that goes beyond local coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: In addition to the 40+ references in the article (just a couple include http://web.archive.org/web/20160304045446/http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/unioncity/index.ssf?/base/news-0/1288247211249180.xml&coll=3, http://web.archive.org/web/20180322082000/http://hudsonreporter.com/view/full_story/22046549/article-The-dancing-commissioner-UC ), there are others not in the article that demonstrate  including http://cubantop10.com/2017/09/19/lucio-fernandez-seen-from-cubantop10-show/ Cuban Top 10, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703882304575465733329777748 Wall Street Journal. There are also many Spanish language sources for instance https://www.infobae.com/teleshow/infoshow/2017/07/27/se-estreno-en-los-estados-unidos-la-pelicula-argentina-almas-de-furia/. There are plenty of trashy articles of questionable notability, especially in the US state of New Jersey. This one isn't one of them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject has received significant press coverage, as indicated by the 41 citations of secondary, reliable sources in the article, which means that he meets both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: GNG is not just counting up the footnotes and keeping anything that passes some arbitrary number: it also takes into account factors like the ''depth'' of coverage that each source represents, the geographic ''range'' of where the sources are ''coming'' from, and the ''context'' of what the sources are covering him ''for''. Any local political figure, for example, is simply and routinely ''expected'' to be able to show some local media coverage — but local political figures are ''not'' all automatically accepted as notable, so showing the existence of some local media coverage is ''not'' a "get out of  free" card in and of itself. And local creatives are also pretty routinely expected to get some coverage in the local media too, so it takes more than just the expected local media coverage to get them over  too — some of the arts awards could be notability claims if the coverage of him in that context were going above and beyond the purely local, but none of them are so "inherently" notable as to guarantee him an article just because his ''local'' newspaper gave him some "local guy does stuff" human interest coverage. To be notable for either of those things, his reliable source coverage would have to expand considerably ''beyond'' just Union City/Hudson County (and I mean ''more'' considerably than just the other side of the Hudson River, to boot, so the two Broadway World cites aren't the magic ticket either.) But every single source here that's even attempting to go any further than spitting distance from Union City is a |primary source or a |blog. This may look like enough volume, but it ''isn't'' enough ''range or depth or context'', to get a figure of "local to a single city" notability into an international encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:CREATIVE||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS)