Deletion of Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center

Comment: I am trying very hard to |assume good faith, and am not really succeeding.   a soapbox, and these continual AfD nominations appear to be part of a soapbox.  The article passes all the critera for inclusion.  We should not care that the conspiracy theories are good theories or bad theories.  We should simply document them as being a phenomenon that we record in an encyclopaedic manner.  Our role is not to judge the theories in any way except to document that which is notable.  The theories are patently notable.  If the article requires editing that is a different matter from nominating it for deletion.  Time to get back on message, guys.  It's an encyclopaedia, not a newspaper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NOT)