Deletion of Labour for a Republic

Comment: This won't seem like a very original contribution to the discussion but here goes: the subject fails both  (no in-depth coverage whatsoever) and  (on all counts). When the actual ''subject'' (not discussing present content but the subject) is isolated by removing the padding that artificially inflates the scope of the article, this is made more clear (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labour_for_a_Republic&oldid=1028073144 ver; compare with a previous version at the time of the keep !votes: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labour_for_a_Republic&oldid=1022609788 ver). Note: I disagree with an implication coming from the delete side that a minority movement or a fringe movement does not deserve an article in general -- this ''specific'' group (mostly on the social media) doesn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)