Deletion of Scouting and Guiding in Belarus

Comment: in response to the original nom, sources are not required to be neutral in order to be reliable per , also explicitly stated in the  policy.  So unless the nom has something else against Kroonenberg's book, it is fine as far as I'm concerned.  Also, excluding any source that has any connection at all with the scouting movement is just plain ridiculous.  That's like excluding all sources written by a scientist in a science article.  And I note that this article is not about a specific organisation, it is about scouting in general and covers a number of organisations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:NPOV)