Deletion of Terrestrial Based Relativity

Comment: as . Wikipedia does not publish original thought, ''even if'' it it true and correct. Such matters should be published in primary or seocndary sources first.  Also, there is a substantial problem with  - the author of the paper on line is also debating keeping the article he wrote here at WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COI)

Comment: per most delete recommendations above. I don't want Wikipedia to try to change the world if that would mean ignoring our policies and guidelines on |verifiability, |reliable sources, |original research, or |conflict of interest. If TBR achieves some level of acceptance by the scientific community, it can have a Wikipedia article at that time. On the other hand, if the scientific community actively denounces TBR (not just ignores it -- but rejects it in a well-publicized manner), that would ''also'' justify having an article about TBR, since it would then be a notable |fringe theory. Right now, all we know about TBR's level of acceptance is that the creator of the theory published it on his own web site. That's not enough to justify a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOR||WP:COI||WP:FRINGE)