Deletion of Michael Hagemeister

Comment: Hagemeister is a highly respected historian.  Such people are notable on account of their output, not so much on account of what is written about them. We have |guidelines for notability of academics that should be followed.  Of the list in that guideline, he easily satisfies #1 since ''every'' modern publication on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion|Protocols cites his work. It is not hard to find mentions of him in secondary sources but ''as befits an academic'' they are about his work rather than about him.http://www.cambridgeclarion.org/journal/hagemeister_protocols_4nov2014.htmlhttps://books.google.com/books?id=GeOR5LbOQwsC&pg=PA58https://books.google.com/books?id=9JCPBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA57 (etc, etc, search and you shall find
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)