Deletion of List of units in the Age of Mythology series (2nd nomination)

Comment: as I said in the previous AFD (also to maintain consistency), the content is explained in a real-world context and not necessarily in a game guide context. However, I wouldn't oppose to a '''soft redirect''' to the StrategyWiki page for convenience as well as maintaining |preservation of the content (which already is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I've softened on this article, because there is some interesting information about the units in the lead, and the article passes the bare threshold of notability. But Wikipedia does  cover every notable topic. This article violates 's general rule against lists of weapons, which is based on an amalgam of #PLOT, #GUIDE, and #DIR. Basically, we should summarize the notable concepts within any game, but a complete and detailed list of units is simply a violation of policy-based standards of what Wikipedia is supposed to be. If there is limited support for merging or redirecting, then deletion would be fine by me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:VGSCOPE||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Admirable effort has been put into making the game itself a featured article, which covers everything this list's preamble does and more, that part is duplicative. The list itself is exactly what  #6 refers to, it's surplus to requirements and falls between two stools - it's deliberately brief to avoid being a gameguide but at the same time does little to expand on the basic rock-paper-scissors system already explained in the main article. That leaves it as a list of internal links to articles which are about the mythic creatures etc. themselves, not their relationships in this game. Anyone who wants that is more than capable of using the search bar, the argument that they're based on real or mythical entities and therefore it's valid is bunk. It's exactly the same situation for the civillization special units in ''Age of Empires II'' and a very large number of the units from ''Age of Empires III''. For instance, I'm playing as the Russians in AoE3 ATM and had no idea what an Oprichnik or Strelet is, except that I do now because I just looked them up - no list involved. This list is nicely presented but when it boils down to it there's no real purpose to it. Players wanting to know what is effective against what have their manuals or in-game descriptions anyway and anyone undertaking research isn't going to find the answers on this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)