Deletion of Creationist cosmologies

Comment: Everything of value is discussed in the articles on creationism and the Christian creation myths. This article really is just a . Creationists don't have ''cosmologies'' as such, they just have the Bible and a whole bunch of post-hoc rationalisations to try to maintain belief in its literal truth in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. This article is and always has been a mish-mash of disjointed concepts, a synthesis from disjointed and often mutually exclusive ideologies. It started with good intentions, but since hydroplates now redirects to flood geology the purpose of this article is essentially redundant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This is so fringe that it hurts.  Presenting mythological alternatives to science on an equal footing violates  and everything that it stands for.  These concepts are already described in detail at Creation science and Young Earth creationism.  I have absolutely no problem with documenting creationist theology, but this article has only one purpose: to promote fringe beliefs over science.  If it merely documented the fringe beliefs themselves, it would not violate fringe guidelines or require strong scientific sources; instead, this posits them as valid scientific theories.  Any internal argument between pseudoscientists or theologians can be discussed in the appropriate articles.  This article is manifestly unnecessary.  I can't believe we're actually debating this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)