Deletion of Rohit Bal

Comment: There is enough non trivial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources to meet . The current version does not seem to be promotional
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This should be an  and may be an  candidate. A quick Google News search, even limited to using the |reliable sources search engine, reveals a ton of  that meets  and also |verifies that this is a majorly-notable fashion designer. We are way past  of the man https://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/rohit-bal-poses-in-a-ghagra-gives-his-most-revealing-interview-ever/story-yVHWlrjXXbr4tKIt3sF9JJ.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/Unplugged-Rohit-Bal/articleshow/4710306.cms https://www.hindustantimes.com/fashion-and-trends/i-am-not-a-commercial-designer-i-am-an-artiste-says-rohit-bal/story-zbCYzxhx1INNQe2l7174YL.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/fashion/designers/Rohit-Bal-splits-with-longtime-beau/articleshow/7970525.cms and his work https://www.hindustantimes.com/fashion-and-trends/rohit-bal-s-nature-inspired-collection-ends-the-india-couture-week-2018-on-a-high/story-RJdvhiwd68mZBWU0sbUFzN.html https://www.news18.com/news/lifestyle/lfw-rohit-bal-honours-kashmiri-craftswomen-in-the-most-heart-warming-with-guldastah-collection-2020597.html https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/the-new-indian-market. Just The New York Times, alone, has been writing about him for over 20 years https://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/06/arts/the-spoken-word.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=BBEC12EE41995F732AA6530036BEDA8D&gwt=pay, describing him as "one of India's most talked-about designers" https://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/style/IHT-revival-of-khadi-turns-gandhis-humble-cloth-to-couture-fabric-of.html?mtrref=www.google.com&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=DB184A88254E1F8C8C895D50643C86A7&gwt=pay and "one of India's leading fashion designers" https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/03/travel/one-mans-effort-to-stir-up-a-revolution-in-indian-food.html https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/fashion/28iht-rindia.html. Our article is very underdeveloped, it's true, but AfD is about the state of the sourcing, not the state of the article, and I honestly don't see how a  search would have missed the notability of this article subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK1||WP:SK3||WP:RSSE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:V||WP:THREE||WP:BEFORE)