Deletion of BlueGriffon

Comment: I think that BlueGriffon is well-enough established by the history of Daniel Glazman and his prior tools, Mozilla Composer and Nvu. Clearly, BlueGriffon is an update and advance of these prior projects. The recent 0.5 release seems to work for me, so it's not vaporware. While |conflict of interest has been raised as an issue, the article has been scrubbed of non-NPOV. Also, conflict of interest doesn't destroy |notability. To me, these facts (notable developer of prior notable software for the same purpose) are sufficient to establish notability of BlueGriffon, especially given its milestone release and favorable reception by the Open World Forum reviewers. Ultimately, if I were investigating HTML editors, I'd want to consider BlueGriffon. To me, all these facts, taken together, justify keeping the article. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:N)