Deletion of Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov (2nd nomination)

Comment: While I do not have the time (or even really the ability) to go through the sources and determine if any of them are reliable and significant, deciding that sources are bad and should be discounted is not .  If wikipedia goes through and determines that every source written about Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov is bad because the sources are either contradicting other, established sources about events or because they are patent nonsense, then he should not have an article.  If a historian (or, preferable, 2 or 3) does the same thing and publishes an account about it, then he is notable and we can write about it.  We don't write articles about the earth not being flat (though we do write them about the earth being round), we write articles about the belief that the earth is flat (possibly with sections on proofs that this belief is wrong) based on other people researching believers and writing about same
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)