Deletion of Lorne Munroe

Comment: He meets the requirements of usic. Also see these results in Google News all dates. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Lorne+Munroe%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1. Note that the proper course of action with an unsourced article is to look for sources rather than putting it up for deletion, especially given his description as a principal cellist with 2 highly notable orchestras. In this case they are very easily found. I also find it completely bizarre that this article was nominated for a speedy delete '''within 1 minute''' of it having been created. This AfD is totally inappropriate as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: A stub is no reason to AfD, it's clearly not speediable as there is an assertion of notability in the principle cello claim. A quick google search verifies this, and I think principle in an internationally renowned orchestra is a good indication of notability. As per  ''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.'' I've will add some refs to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)