Deletion of Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System (2nd nomination)

Comment: then, per MLKLewis. I've gone back over the article with MLKLewis's response in mind, and found several instances where, at the very least, the wording is problematic for . As long as the case gets relatively significant treatment in the main Werner Erhard article, I see no reason why the case should be kept as a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)