Deletion of Emily Temple-Wood

Comment: 1) the major sources specifically cover her not Wikipedia. (2) the major sources do have factual information that was not in the Wikimedia Blog, indicating, among other things, independent verification. (3) there are enough reliable sources with in-depth coverage to meet . (4) This is not the case of  or , this is continuous endeavor in a particular field. Kudos to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTEBLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: It's a classic case of , with some textbook Wikipedian |navel-gazing to boot. Let's just take a look at the article's lead section: {{tq|Emily Temple-Wood is an American Wikipedia editor... She plans to begin medical school in late 2016.}} What is ''notable'' here? Just looking at the lead, it approaches CSD A7, and, frankly, the situation does not improve much from reading the rest, apart from having a lot of funny giggles like this123458915. Let's face it, Wikipedia is under public scrutiny and whichever buzz we do is going to go through press, and a lot of it, because Internet press bytes are equally cheap as the bytes on Wikipedia servers. SSTFlyer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NAVEL)