Deletion of Kent Larsen

Comment: As discussed above, the sources covering the subject are uniformly problematic; they are either unreliable under , not independent or both. I accept that he has won an AML Award, and do not contest that it is a significant award among Mormons; I wish I could say it should be kept on this basis, but the  guideline does not allow us to interpret it as significant, in my view. The guideline says, "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times." If it were the intention of the guideline to specify a significant award ''within the field or culture in which the person is primarily known'', that would have been written in it. In its absence, we must interpret this to mean a significant award from the perspective of society generally, which I would argue this is not. Delete for failing  without prejudice for recreation if the subject becomes notable in future (and better sourcing is available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)