Deletion of List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable (2nd nomination)

Comment: It goes against the |manual of style, uses stats lists as references, and the content should be merged to other baseball articles. Either delete or rename and greatly revise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS)

Comment: I disagree with the nomination's premise about the original AfD being closed incorrectly.   and  are not substitutes for consensus. The article meets  with references from http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/h/henderi01.shtml LIFE, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/sports/baseball/17extra.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=baseball%20record%20broken&st=cse ''The New York Times'', and http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/sports/baseballs-unbreakable-records-61866.html ''The Epoch Times'' that discuss in prose the concept of unbreakable records.  While I dont agree with the questionable math and liberal use of the word "unbreakable" in sources, my POV is not a reason to deny that reliable sources exists that subscribe to the view that unbreakable records exist. Editors can help improve the article to add neutrality and remove any record not |verifiable, but an  article on a notable subject should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SUPPORT||WP:POLLING||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:UGLY)