Deletion of Andrew Conley

Comment: Murders are, and should be, newsworthy, and they will get covered in newspapers, but more than this is required to pass the  bar. Most murders are not encyclopedia material, and I cannot see this one as an exception. Life in prison for murder is a routine sentence, the age of the defendant (18) is low but not exceptionally low, and a psychological obsession as a motive is not unusual either. The "reactions to the sentence" section, with quotations from the judge, prosecutor, and defence attorney, is typical for newspaper coverage, but not typical of encyclopedias. In total, the event does not have enough impact, the coverage is not lasting or deep enough, to pass the  standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)

Comment: Subject doesn't meet ,  or  and I agree with DGG that merging would not be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)