Deletion of Nicholas R. Amato

Comment: I see enough information from reliable sources for a full biographical article per GNG. An opinion piece in the New York Times is ''not'' primary, it is not ''independent of him'', just as an autobiography would not be independent of him. You have confused primary and independent sources before. However, not everyone is selected to write opinion pieces for the New York Times, adding to his notability. Also, as a reminder, you are supposed to be looking for sourcing  you nominate, as you have been reminded multiple times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:before)

Comment: Allusions to  to dismiss otherwise- is not conforming to that essay, and dismissing the ''New York Times's'' coverage as "local" is rather provincial in attitude
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:RS)