Deletion of Handbra (2nd nomination)

Comment: The referenced article in ''The Guardian'', if you read it, should resolve any questions of |reliable sources, |verifiability, and |original research.  I've also seen the term used in lad mags, but a citation from the ''The Guardian'' should be sufficient. True, ''handbra'' is a neologism, but WP has many articles for neologisms (e.g. going commando, upskirt, badonkadonk, cameltoe, ''ad infinitum'' but I don't want to give you to many AfD ideas}.  WP is not a dictionary of neologisms, but often these terms warrant a discussion of their significance in popular culture as well as photographs. The examples of pop culture significance (especially in the Janet Jackson example, the #1 cover of ''Rolling Stone'') and the number of articles that already link to this one show why it is a worthwhile addition to WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:OR)