Deletion of Poonam Pandey

Comment: Sadly, "achievement" is not the same as "|notability"; Poonam Pandey is a likely search target and this article will almost certainly become better-sourced (sources are plentiful if relatively vacuous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: My !vote doesn't discuss Google hit numbers, because hit counts typically don't confer much toward topic notability. Each source in my !vote above is entirely about Poonam Pandey's career, actions and events, and some of them are not "brief"; rather, they are mostly "medium-sized", although a few are short. They certainly are not all stories about false claims, as suggested in the comment above. Did the person commenting directly above this comment actually read the articles? This topic also passes , which states (in part) "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." "Trivial coverage" in the  policy refers to the notion of passing mentions in articles, (from GNG: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.") which these articles are not comprised of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Nontrivial coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, clearly meeting the requirements of .  Why are we still having this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)