Deletion of Nokia 1600 (3rd nomination)

Comment: I did accept it. I accepted it, then waited several months and noticed no improvement in the article. I did that twice. Note that the first AfD didn't keep the article--it just didn't reach a consensus. The "no deadline" doctrine doesn't apply to articles that don't need to be here because of  or  or , like this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: Consumer products such as cell phones are like books or movies: they become "|notable" when people write about them (for example, reviews). There ''are'' published reviews of this cellphone (one is already linked from the article). There are even a couple of articles mentioning this phone on http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22nokia%201600%22&sa=N&tab=ps Google scholar; the first one seems very interesting but I can't access it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)