Deletion of Alex Deans (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is borderline and doesn't really pass GNG. I'm also leaning delete per  and . The subject is locally notable for participating in science fairs and winning awards - but quite a few kids have won such awards. The product he is working on hasn't really developed so I don't see what kind of lasting notability the subject would be known for at present. It should also be remembered that GNG is simply a presumption of notability - not a guarantee. Wikipedia is not a directory of kids winning science fairs (even kids winning multiple science fairs). Neither is it a platform for promotion. The multiple bad faith attempts at trying to create this article show that the intent is to promote a non-notable subject. A clear delete from my side
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: The claims made in the article are outrageous. According to the Windsor Star he was supposedly an "inventor, scientist, artist, athlete, politician" at 16 years old. He's none of those things per our guidelines. He has no career as an artist; he fails  in every conceivable way, and similarly fails ,  and . If age shouldn't matter, and I agree it shouldn't, then we should not hold children and adolescents to lower standards than adults, as the Winsor Star does. To say that he is an artist on the basis of a statement that "he’s been teaching himself the art of portraiture" completely invalidates the source. He's a promising young man, but until he has actually fulfilled that promise, he's not yet notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:POLITICIAN)