Deletion of Eisenhower Tree

Comment: There is a large explosion of coverage since it's being removed. While this may be accused of recentism, I feel that these and the other earlier mentions (and I'm sure there are more from offline sources such as books) means that I believe that this fulfils  and should be kept. Also as an iconic piece of golf history, I'd say it should have it's own article. Otherwise, articles of other iconic features in other sports such as Lord's Pavilion and Statue of Bobby Moore, Wembley should be deleted too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not |Recentism, the tree was already mentioned in this Augusta National Golf Club|article, and as C and E mentioned, there are much less notable trees with articles on wikipedia, the standard (low bar) has already been set and also the media coverage it is getting is also just adding to notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)