Deletion of Antisemitic incidents during the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict (2nd nomination)

Comment: Violates #NEWS. We don't need to document every time someone says/does something mean about another race/ethnicity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: There was no consensus at the afd that ended a week ago so starting another one now is pointless and will result in the same lack of consensus. As for the substantive issue, there's no POV fork - this article is way too big to be merged into anything and nominator doesn't even say where this was forked from. Wikipedia:not includes a huge number of policy rules. It would be prudent on the nominator to point out the specific policy in Wikipedia:not this article violates.  is inapplicable when this article just repeats exactly what is said in reliable sources. Furthermore, any OR problems should be resolved at the article talkpage, not at Afd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Perhaps move to 'Antisemitism and the 2008-2009 Israel-Gaza conflict'; this means it can be discussed in the article whether things were antisemitic, antizionist etc. The role of antisemitism in this conflict gained lots of media attention and therefore reaches . This isn't news, but could be an academic article on the role of antisemitism
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Widely reported phenomenon in |reliable secondary sources.  Calling it Anti-semitism|"antisemitism" is merely  calling  a spade a spade.  If these attacks were on Israeli embassies or Israelis only, then they could be considered "anti-Israel."  If a similar backlash was widely reported on any other ethnicity, Race (classification of human beings)|race, or religion|religious group, one would expect it would be widely reported.  If Arabs or Muslims the world over were being attacked and feeling a backlash reportedly due to this conflict, we would not bury it, but put it forward as relevant information.  Later editors can discuss name changing and improvements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)