Deletion of Dodil

Comment: I think that  may apply here.  requires significant  and , both of which are not 'plenty'. Being sponsored by the government to do anything is not a good enough reason to create a WP article. If that was the case every farmer in Europe that gets European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development|subsidies would qualify, but it would be notable if there was a press release or significant quality news coverage. I commend {{ping|Prince of Thieves}} for his work copyediting, but it still seems a bit too spammy for me. I don't see how anyone would at this moment benefit from this WP article, other than the creator. It doesn't seem objective, even after fairly extensive work for a stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:IS||WP:RS)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON / . Coverage is insufficient for a stand-alone article and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)