Deletion of Yaron Meiri

Comment: Granted, it is an obvious piece of self-promotion and needs paring down.  Creative professionals in all fields do this on Wikipedia (or try), the thing is, we keep the articles if notability can be verified. Even if they are lousy articles. But this is far from the worst of the type: it actually has some usable sources.  Coverage in Tabloid (newspaper format)|tabloids such as ABC (newspaper)|ABC certainly counts towards notability. Note, however, that El Economista (Spain)|El Economista is not a tabloid. And legitimate Hebrew news media (TheMarker) that cover business.  There does seem to be notability established by these sources and by sources including: http://www.romeing.it/time-elevator-rome/ for Meiri/Orpan Group under  ''"# 3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."'' i.e., the attractions he and his company creates garner significant media attention.  He falls more or less into the category of notable curators or set designers; see, for example, Lisa Small, George Tsypin). I have added category: museum exhibit designers to article, click on it and see that we have multiple articles about careers  of this type.  Also, where a creative artist and the corporation he founds are more or less synonymous, we have a single article with notability supported by articles about the artist and/or about the corporation (cf. Georg Jensen; Anne Klein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)