Deletion of Grover Furr

Comment: Coming to this late in the day, it seems that rather than argue on |PROF it should be considered solely under |GNG, rather in the way that a page exists on, say, David Irving. Individuals who attract impassioned coverage – pro and anti – should be on Wikipedia, by definition, and we exist to represent what is out there, so calling this |FRINGE seems to miss the cultural and historical context/value, whatever our personal viewpoints may be. Obviously, careful editing and monitoring become even more important on such pages, but better to see discussions and consensus achieved on Wikipedia than risk claims of censorship and watch information grow off Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Dr. Furr ultimately lacks |significant coverage in |independent reliable sources showing he is a notable academic.  Merely because he was |once somewhat remarked upon does not mean he is now notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)