Deletion of Ed Giecek

Comment: responders should note that WV (Winkelvi) is gutting the article, removing what in my opinion are |reliable sources, to ensure deletion of the article. This is bad form. Those who respond to the AfD should be relied upon to look into the references and decide for themselves how reliable they are
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The Keep voters seem a little fuzzy on Wikipedia guidelines concerning notability.  None of those guidelines say "A subject is notable if you think he ought to be."  They set black-letter standards.  Other than the GNG (which Giecek doesn't meet),  is the one at stake here.  It says, explicitly, "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of '''several notable galleries or museums'''." (emphasis mine)  ''One'' picture in ''one'' regional museum doesn't cut it, not remotely close. ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)