Deletion of Carola Rackete

Comment: This is a highly relevant topic with international relevance, covered in all kinds of media in many countries. Hundreds of top reliable and independent references can be provided. Notability is clearly given per ,  and . As of now the German WP article has seen about 87,000 page views in just a couple of days, the English WP is closely following with more than 33,000 hits already. While these numbers will go down again, with a court case coming and the underlying problem unsolved it should be obvious that the topic will remain relevant for many years to come, so it has lasting encyclopedic relevance. Also, this is not the first time Rackete has been in the news, so this is not even a case of  any more, but even if it would, as an encyclopedia it is our very duty to have articles about topics such as this one (: "remarkable, significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"). Please do a better homework  nominating articles for deletion in order not to unnecessarily bind the precious time and energy of other editors which could otherwise do more useful work in main space than wasting it in avoidable discussions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO1E||WP:BIO||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: First of all, in my opinion  does ''not'' apply, because per condition #2, the person of the article must be a |low-profile individual. In my opinion, Ms. Rackete {{tq|has participated in an attention-seeking manner in publicity}}, because she docked with her ship despite https://www.dw.com/en/what-drives-sea-watch-captain-carola-rackete-to-rescue-migrants/a-49415737 knowing that she would be arrested (which, of course, would be subject to media attention - which I guess was also one of her goals, achieving media attention for her cause). For that reason,  applies instead of ''BLP1E''. BIO1E says that when {{tq|an individual plays a major role in a minor event ... it is not generally appropriate to have an article on both the person and the event}}. Because, for as far as I know, no article exists for the event/incident, it is OK to have an article on her as a person.  is, by the way, easily met with the refs present in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:LPI||WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG)