Deletion of Lady Gaga on Twitter

Comment: and dispute what content in this article is trivial (ie perceived competition with Bieber - not encyclopedic) and what is actually important to her career (I tried to find something to put here, but alas, I failed). This doesn't justify a separated article in any regard, and I think its a shining example of . If Lady Gaga is too large an article, then I suggest creating a page on her media appearances/interviews on TV, film, radio AND social media in general, and not the narrow scope of Twitter
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: it's the same with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter; the article simply has no encyclopedic value.  stresses that "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia". Some of the content such as the fact that she's the most followed on Twitter can be put in the Lady Gaga article but a whole article about it is unnecessary as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WHIM||WP:WWIN)