Deletion of ESStonia

Comment: content into Anti-Estonian sentiment. This is more than a neologism, it is a protologism, and I don't think english Wikipedia should be used as a vehicle to promote protologisms or be a venue for disgruntled Users to create  articles because an AfD went against them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: To use some arguments from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putinjugend, ''I can't see why this widely used term should be deleted just because some doesn't like it. It's a wellknown term...'', ''wikipedia should be a neutral protocol of realities, actually used terms etc. and not decided by individuals' displeasures.'', ''This term is used in mass media. Besides, the article seems to be well sourced.'', ''eSStonia is a well-sourced and widely used term. As wiki is not censored it should have its place.'', etc. Well known Russian politician Konstantin Zatulin http://www.zatulin.ru/index.php?section=news&id=251 has used the term to describe Estonia within the context of the controversy, as have other political commentators in Russia. We have articles on Putinjugend, Phone Call to Putin, Putinism, etc and these are terms which are either fringe terms or are used in a disparaging way. Edward Lucas, who frequently attacks Russia in his articles and books has used both ''Putinjugend'' and ''eSStonia'' in his articles, and is used as references in both articles (2 separate articles in this instance), and he himself recognises that eSStonia is a widely used term. So keep as per that, and for |fighting systematic bias in Russian topics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)