Deletion of Neutrino telecommunications

Comment: Based on fringe-ish physics (PRC is certainly mainstream, but Weber was also almost certainly wrong) with no indication with no indication of widespread impact of any sort. I do not see either of the more relevant cited paper's authors meeting , so no subsuming merge there. The cosmological neutrino "lasing" paper, as mentioned above, is good but only tangentially relevant. Joseph Weber is well over the notability bar, but http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-7/p74.html this obituary indicates that this neutrino stuff was not a significant part of his career
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Can you imagine a Wiki in which a single New Scientist article establishes notability?  I can, and it scares me.  .  (The "cited" astro-ph preprint is competely unrelated to the article topic, except for the presence of "neutrino" and "laser" in the title
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)