Deletion of Ponte Velha de Padastros

Comment: another bundle with a ridiculous number of articles to consider, also, |"Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article.", and as editors above appear to have quite easily found sources for some of them, a lack of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTN||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I also object to the mass bundling, especially since I doubt that every single one of these have been checked for sources. I took one of these articles, Ponte de Segura, and made a little bit of research. I found a number of academic sources that discuss the bridge in depth, which isn't surprising since this is a Roman bridge from around centuries I/II. I added them to the article and I'll try to expand it a bit in the coming days. I don't know if all the bridges meet  (probably not), but a mass bundling like this prevents people from trying to do the same work I did for Ponte de Segura
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)