Deletion of Christopher Hamilton

Comment: Obviously if the details were true he would pass , but that's precisely why I always point out that the notability test is not passed by what the article ''says'', but by how well the article is ''referenced'' to |reliable sources which ''properly'' verify that the things it says are ''true''. People can and do try to insert lies into Wikipedia all the time, so just ''claiming'' passage of a notability criterion still doesn't exempt a person from having to have real sources. Obviously, if better sources can be found in the future to prove that he really existed, then an article could be recreated at that time — but there's enough doubt about this that the burden of proof would fall on the (re)creators rather than the gainsayers, and I won't be holding my breath in the meantime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS)

Comment: I wouldn't go as afar as saying this is necessarily a hoax, but it clearly appears mistaken and/or lacking sources to establish notability. Even assuming good faith of the two references provided in the article, one of them is labelled "privately published" meaning it is not a likely reliable source, and as such this fails . My searches have drawn the same blank that others have, and as such this article cannot be saved. feel free to ping me if sources are found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)