Deletion of Rachid Matta

Comment: A Google search turns up a couple of potential sources (http://www.ams.org/mathmedia/archive/10-2004-media.html, http://www.ams.org/mathmedia/archive/10-2004-media.html), but these really don't provide enough context to sustain an article. It seems that the "proof" may be well-founded (if it were, I'd think wed have heard more about such a long-standing problem). The viewpoint of the proof seems to be held only by the subject of the article, and so mentioning it in Euclidean geometry would violate . Therefore, I don't think this article or any of its content is salvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)