Deletion of List of Berserk chapters

Comment: But merge could work depending. I'm concerned that this fails , which advises that content is supposed to be a summary of accepted knowledge, not a complete exposition of all details. After the Contents box, what is there that is original to wikipedia? The page could likely be autogenerated by a script. It has formatting but no writing or editing. As with others, I think that this type of catalogue/database is better suited for a site focused on exhaustive coverage. And as for other lists currently existing,  reminds us that the goal isn’t to set the bar as low as possible. Perhaps, as some mention, it would be worth a discussion at one of the higher level pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: and possible rename to List of Berserk volumes since the list focuses on the volumes instead of the chapters. The main topic of the list is unquestionably notable as is covered by multiple reliable sources, and since the main topic is made up of individual volumes, a list of those volumes is appropriate per . Likewise, when reliable sources review the work, they comment on the collection of chapters that are within a volume and over the course of multiple volumes as well. On top of that, there are a List of Fullmetal Alchemist chapters|number of List of Naruto chapters (Part I)|similar List of Marmalade Boy chapters|lists List of Tokyo Mew Mew chapters|that are Featured Lists. I doubt that those lists would have been elevated to Featured List status if they were viewed as "|indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:IINFO)