Deletion of Keith Starr

Comment: Although I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keith_Starr&diff=304320581&oldid=304292648 did what I could with the article, my Google searches suggest that it is unpublished fiction, i.e. see what happens when you type in the author's name and the character http://www.google.com/search?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Keith%20Starr%22%20%22Karl%20Smith%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=pw on Google (no reviews or interviews even).  As such, unless if the stories became published and critical commentary comes about, we cannot do much beyond what I tried--in other words we would either only be summarizing or duplicating one author's ideas.  I usually support inclusion of fictional characters on ''Wikipedia'', but within reason.  They should receive at least some kind of media attention or inclusion in say multiple works of fiction in order to write an article effectively.  Maybe the article is , but unless if it becomes an internet sensation, it just seems not much different than if I invented my own character, write a short story on my personal website, and then tossed an article on here.  I encourage the author to keep writing and would gladly support undeleting this article should the stories become published or receive reviews that we can use to expand the article.  Finally, while not a  and |verifiable, we really do need more than just the one author's source here.  Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:HARMLESS||WP:HOAX||WP:V)