Deletion of MBJ London

Comment: Can folks stop using "promotional tone" as a reason to delete an article? That's a reason to clean up an article. With regards to this one... references 1 and 6 don't represent depth of coverage, reference 2 is a press release, reference 3 isn't about the company, and references 4 and 5 are from questionably reliable sources. At least for now, this doesn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The article's references are largely a mixture of primary (the PR item and The Guardian piece by an employee), about an award co-organised by the firm and passing start-up coverage. The most substantial is the Deutschlandfunk item about the firm seeking to start operating in Berlin, but that too is essentially propositional coverage. I am seeing nothing to meet  to demonstrate that this website firm is of encyclopaedic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)