Deletion of Tunable White-Light-Emitting Nanocrystals

Comment: as being |too new, subject t later re-creation.  Turkish science and medicine is advanced; for example, their surgeons have been on the cutting edge (pardon the pun) of work on Gastric antral vascular ectasia|watermelon stomach.  However, in this case, we need to let the scientific method do its job
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: This is a ridiculously notable technology for which hundreds of scholarly citations could be listed. However, it's a very deficient article, and the subject is already better covered in Light-emitting diode#Quantum dot LEDs (experimental). While  says atrociousness isn't a valid basis for deletion, in this case I think common sense trumps the guidelines. Keeping a bad article, when it's likely to remain this bad for a while, when there's already good coverage elsewhere, doesn't make sense. Merging doesn't make sense because there's nothing to salvage. Redirecting doesn't make sense because the title is an arbitrary description of the technology (there is no succinct name for it), and google shows no external links to the page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)