Deletion of Religious explanations of gravity

Comment: The meagre start is not a reason to delete because it is explicit |policy that "''one person may start an article with an overview of a subject or a few random facts.''"  There is no synthetic proposition and |juxtaposition is not synthesis.  There is plenty more to be said about the topic as it is discussed extensively in sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=beRh2rLUsMIC&pg=PA185 God and Nature'' which states, "''In the decades after Newton's Principia, theologians and religious popularizers latched onto the grace of gravity as a valuable weapon in the ongoing fight against atheism.''"  Even now, people talk of the God particle.  If we were to merge then the most appropriate target would be history of gravitational theory in which the ideas of theologians such as Thomas Aquinas belong.  See ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fqx5-t_DjYQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA26 The Grip of Gravity: The Quest to Understand the Laws of Motion and Gravitation'' for a good book-length treatment of this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:SYNNOT)