Deletion of Johannes Hill

Comment: And I second the suggestion of a special:diff/828306522|fish course for the filer for the bizarre nom. Is there something going on that we don't know / ought to know here? In any case, there is clearly sufficient sourcing—in https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&biw=1600&bih=805&tbm=nws&ei=WQqbWpT2GYHGwAKS3ZegBA&q=%22Johannes+Hill%22&oq=%22Johannes+Hill%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...2216.6774.0.7270.6.5.1.0.0.0.96.372.5.5.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.sGyMVpaS0OY news and https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Johannes+Hill%22&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjK35LZg9HZAhURElAKHboFDyoQ_AUIECgB&biw=1600&bih=805&dpr=1.2 the literature to indicate a |depth and |persistence of coverage to pass the minimum requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:ANYBIO)