Deletion of Betty Sutherland (2nd nomination)

Comment: I will acknowledge that I was the nominator the first time, but this article isn't much of an improvement. Serving on North York city council is not a notability freebie just because North York got amalgamated into Toronto 12 years after the end of her term — she does not get retroactively reclassified as a global city councillor for the purposes of NPOL #2, but still has to clear the same "special case of significantly ''greater'' notability than most other city councillors" test as any other run of the mill city councillor. Having a piece of municipal infrastructure named after her does not do that, however — at a guess, about half of everybody who'd ever served on any municipal council anywhere would get an instant inclusion freebie if having had a street or a park or a hiking trail or a public building named after them were all it took. Notability is |not inherited, so having been related to more notable people doesn't help — and even her husband's notability is actually debatable, since he doesn't pass the global city test either. And there's not nearly enough substantive or |reliable sourcing here to claim that she passes , either — five of the seven footnotes are either photographs or primary sources, so they're doing absolutely nothing to help make her notable at all, and one of the remaining two is just a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about Mel Lastman. That leaves just one source that's both reliable and substantively about her to count for something — but one source is not ''enough'' to singlehandedly GNG a suburban city councillor all by itself, because ''every'' municipal councillor ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show one source. So no, there's still not enough here to get her over the bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:RS||WP:GNG)