Deletion of Oolite (computer game)

Comment: So? "Beyond normal clone coverage"... Where is "clone coverage" in ? For something to be notable, it must have ''significant'' coverage, and ''multiple sources'' are preferred. While that one page article in Linux Format is nice, it's not enough to stand on its own
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: You were registered December 28, 2008. Some people are lurkers long before they contribute, I actually was too, though I started contributing first as an anonymous IP and then created my account after. You'll have to forgive the suspicions (Wikipedia does have an |assume good faith policy) but some of us were involved in another recent deletion discussion of an article for a similar game, in which someone was |canvassing and suddenly a number of people created accounts or posted anonymously to support the game. That was a clear case of canvassing though, where there was harsh language about Wikipedia and the nominators on the forum and the new accounts had names identical to the forum accounts. In my eyes this isn't as clear a case, in fact on the forum where someone announced this AfD discussion, there was debate over whether or not this game really was notable enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:CANVAS)