Deletion of List of people with coronavirus disease 2019

Comment: It is only a matter of time before this list gets out of hand with an eventual majority of the world population getting infected eventually much like the flu. This is |not news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: It may leads to an unlimited list that invades privacy of living person . The case of a famous Hollywood actor and actress couple is quite a extremely exceptional cases (see abcnews-web 12 March 2020, 23:24) because patients themselves publish online on their own. It is not so needed list article. Someone said there is List of HIV-positive people, but it says in header 'may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness'. It is nothing but what proves it is  article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:IINFO)

Comment: It's managable if only people who meet  are added. No redlinks. BLP is not an issue if reliably cited
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There are no BLP issues where the information is |verifiable by |reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: List of coronavirus disease deaths or similar, per rationale put forward by Lightburst, epicgenius, Netoholic, Shhhhwwww!!, Bondegezou, Muboshgu, Y not?, Kevin McE, CaptainEek, Spirit of Eagle and Carrite, except instead of delete, limit scope; medical professionals are saying that a very large portion of humanity will catch this, most with light symptoms, and many others will have it and not even know it, making it akin to List of people with fever, per . It is a case of , where understandably there is interest due to the current shock value, but not likely to be interesting in |ten years time. A death list OTOH is both more notable and more manageable, along the lines of List of pneumonia deaths
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RECENTISM||WP:10YT)

Comment: It is useful, and  does not apply here, because the impact of this event is certainly going to outlast many events of the present decade (as it did the Spanish flu in the last century, for which we do have a List of Spanish flu cases). Also  is not applicable, as this is only containing notable people for a notable event. And of course, the number of users asking to keep this article is more than enough to disregard completely gnore all rules (which would be applicable only in blatant cases in which almost everyone agrees, without needing to consider specific rules). I think the nominator's criterion for wanting to delete this list is more related to a personal opinion that doesn't fit with either Wikipedia standards or other similar lists already present in the project. I would just make sure this list contains only notable people with source, but I wouldn't delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:IINFO||WP:I)

Comment: I'd like to ask the last few delete votes how it is a violation of someone's privacy to rely information about diagnoses that have been already publicized in reliable sources. This list strictly adheres to . "Ick" and "you have no human decency" are 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTAVOTE)