Deletion of Glossary of Please Save My Earth

Comment: We've already have some (loose) consensus that terminology sections or articles are unencyclopedic and don't have a place on Wikipedia. Such sections/articles are fancruft magnets and it is essentially impossible for such articles to be notable. These terms aren't covered in reliable sources anyway. It's just a collection of  that will only interest a specific audience
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per , unlike other glossaries I do see sources here. Have more sources been looked for here and on Japanese sites? (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:BEFORE)