Deletion of ROM Bat Cave

Comment: Keep because this topic easily passes  with in-depth secondary coverage.http://www.thestar.com/life/parent/2010/02/24/the_rom_reopens_the_bat_cave.html http://torontoist.com/2010/02/rom_revamped_bat_cave/  http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/02/25/13028986.html http://www.insidetoronto.com/news-story/49091-the-bats-are-back-in-town-at-the-rom/  Speedy because the nom has given absolutely zero rationale as to how this topic is "Not notable" and the first two of the sources were already ''in'' the article at time of AfD.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ROM_Bat_Cave&oldid=639897772  Too much topic-specific content to be merged into the ROM article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)