Deletion of The Game (game) (2 nomination)

Comment: But  which determines sourcing reliability is a guideline, not a rule, and  does say "For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources." The use of "largely" in there indicates that it is not an ironclad rule, so  overrides
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:UCS)

Comment: WP:IAR|Ignore all rules presides over |No Original Research on this one by |common sense. It is widespread, it is not internet-confined, as I have experienced several times myself. Nobody is going to write anything authoritative about it but there is enough acquired knowledge about it to write good undisputed prose about it, so it should stay. If you've never heard of it, tough, don't edit the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SENSE)

Comment: Whether it is notable is not the issue to me. It is simply unverified -- and, much worse, ''unverifiable'' -- by the terms of  and . If it's not verifiable from reliable sources, it shouldn't be here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)