Deletion of Allegations of state terrorism by the United States

Comment: balance issues are pervasive and unavoidable, due to the pov nature of the article title. On its face, it violates |NPOV, |Notability and |undue weight concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOTE||WP:V)

Comment: As the other editor said: "none of the reasons stated by the nom (which are mostly not true either)  "POV violations, coatracking, off-topic straying, synthesis, original research, et cetera" are valid criteria for deletion. This is yet another bad faith nomination to try to censor WP of information that they don't like others to know about. Clearly a POV motivated attack by conservatives, again. The fact is that the topic is very notable per  and is loaded with numerous reliable sources per . This is a no brainer a speedy keep that says a lot more about those who want to delete it than it does about this article. I also note that they have vandalized the article by removing lots of soured material right before this nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: It looks sourced but the sources are not online so it's hard to verify. Depending on the quality of the sources that are not online, it could be a  or it could turn out to be a . I recommend that the sources get verified before deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:FA)

Comment: bad faith nomination as part of a  crusade against controversy/allegation articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)