Deletion of Kandy Tuskers in 2020

Comment: although the series is brand new but sources confirm the next season to be held in July 2021. https://www.islandcricket.lk/news/lpl-will-be-back-better-and-stronger-next-season/ https://www.thepapare.com/lpl-2021-to-feature-a-franchise-from-east/ https://www.islandcricket.lk/news/slc-promises-a-bigger-and-brighter-lpl-season-2/. The article passes the notability according to . It's not a content forking as the main article presents information about "all" seasons whereas the 2020 article presents information about only "one" season. COI would be valid if anyone of contributors would work for the league. I doubt User:Churot may be working for LPL 😂. How does it seem to be COI? Could you explain? Regarding PROMOTION, it would be valid only iff we were promoting the subject but all the informations present in the article are sourced, though mostly from ESPN Cricinfo. It's written according to NPOV. I see no advertising, advocacy, propaganda and promotion in the whole article. At last SPAM comes, which says {{tq|Spam is the inappropriate addition of content to Wikipedia with the intention of promoting or publicizing an outside organization, individual or idea, and is considered harmful to the encyclopedia.}} So, can you point out where the article is being promoted or publicized? I see spam nowhere. No spamming external links, no advertisement and no references promoting the subject or author. So, all the issues of the nomination are baseless and pointless
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASON)