Deletion of Pornography-induced erectile dysfunction

Comment: essentially per {{user|Gaijin42}}, above. Also, . Cheers, &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: or redirect to erectile dysfunction. A single paragraph based on not so reliable sources does not justify a separate article. This stub is an obvious  of Erectile dysfunction#Causes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: and do not redirect. I completely agree with the IP nominator and with IRWolfie. This topic fails  by a country mile, and thus should not have its own article here as if to imply it is a real medical condition. The only halfway-reputable-sounding reference in the article, from Psychology Today, turns out to be from a sort of advice column rather than any kind of study - and everything else I found is just laymen (no pun intended) speculating and talking in generalities
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)