Deletion of Zoe Levin

Comment: OK, I am finding a sizable amount of dedicated and extensive coverage in a number of reliable sources. It's just that this article doesn't mention or reflect that at all and seems to have been written by someone less than competent, and the article does not assert any kind of recognizable notability. It's also true that the article creator has been edit warring over non- citations, etc. I don't know whether to !vote Delete with no prejudice for someone else creating a decent article with the actual RS interview coverage she has received, or just leave this article standing and wait for someone else to add the RS coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Having reviewed , it appears the article passes. I have also added a few better sources from popular news agencies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYA)