Deletion of List of poorly performing college football coaches

Comment: as a blatant violation of . Besides the |original research issues, there are no reliable sources describing these coaches as 'poorly performing'; an admin who speedy-deleted this as an |attack page (|CSD criterion G10) would be wholly justified in doing so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:OR||WP:ATTACK||WP:G10)

Comment: has great functionality as lists in Wikipedia do, including grouping article pages in one place for reference and navigation.  Provides more detail than a category.  |Point of view and |synthesis?  Hardly--certainly losing 0-222 in a single game is a poor performance, and many experts state so.  Losing 44 consecutive games without a win and holding the worst lifetime record in college football as a head coach would also qualify, as would having the most losses of any other coach.  Could the "qualifications" be better stated and handled?  Probably, and through collaboration that will happen.  Some names will be added, others will drop off.  Perhaps a better list name could be created as well.  But the list itself should stay in one form or another
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:SYN)