Deletion of The Agonist

Comment: The band passes  based on coverage. http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=THE|AGONIST&sql=11:djfuxqwdldfe~T1 This allmusic bio is perhaps too short to be classed as significant coverage, but http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:g9ftxzqgld0e~T1 this allmusic review certainly is, as is http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1576014/20071206/agonist.jhtml this MTV article (already referenced in the article) as is http://www.montrealmirror.com/2008/010308/music5.html this article from the Montreal Mirror and possibly these from The Gauntlet http://www.thegauntlet.com/concertreviews/3814/98/.html, http://www.thegauntlet.com/article/1225/8002/.html, and http://www.blastbeat.nl/24/12/2007/the-agonist-once-only-imagined/ this from Dutch site blastbeat (translated http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://www.blastbeat.nl/24/12/2007/the-agonist-once-only-imagined/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=7&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dagonist%2B%2522once%2Bonly%2Bimagined%2522%26start%3D130%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official%26hs%3DMej%26sa%3DN here). Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources constitutes notability and appears to be easily satisfied here. Two releases on significant labels is only one criteria that would indicate notability, and failing one of the criteria of  is not an indication that a band is not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: passes  with the ref's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)