Deletion of Michael L. Vincent

Comment: Insignificant. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails io#Basic_criteria, and I can't find any reason to why he should be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: IMO sufficient notability established. Also: ''Cui bono?'' Wikipedia can afford thousands of pages on the most obscure sportspeople, starlets of dubious talent, etc. I'm aware of ,  and similiar essays, but it still irks me that the exclusion of less popular or even esoteric artists is so passionately argued
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:POKEMON)

Comment: I feel Gregg has made a strong case for himself. While I feel his arguments in this discussion have been both stubborn and wrong, I also feel that the witless vandalism, like the grotesque "racism" accusation made by an IP some while back, do not sound like him in any way. I say we |assume good faith and go on about the discussion without accusations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (:WP:AGF)