Deletion of The Law of One (2nd nomination)

Comment: I can't find any coverage in neutral or critical sources, even though it is mentioned in a lot of New Age books. Therefore it appears to violate  and it's impossible to write a neutral article based on the existing sources. Possibly some reviews or press coverage exist from the time of publication; these might provide background and balance and allow keeping the article, but at the last AfD no such sources were provided. At the last AfD it was asserted that some citations from apparently New Age books were actually critical of this theory, but no evidence was provided, and no section on criticism or reception has been added to the article. The subject can be treated either as literature, in which case it needs reviews in publications able to perform literary criticism, or as fringe science, in which case it needs some analysis of the theories by mainstream thinkers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)