Deletion of Internet encyclopedia project

Comment: Wikipedia has many articles which arise from humble dicdef beginnings. Noms assertion that poorly refed seems misleading, I don't see ''any'' refs. But neither do I see exceptional statements or and content that seems dubious and needing sourcing to be introduced asap. Most of those links are blue and not red so that too seems false. It would be nice to see a few good refs but that subject is clearly notable and sourcible. efore would seem to be a relative concept here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)