Deletion of List of mobile phones with HD display

Comment: The nomination states that the lists should be deleted because the previous discussion only factored in usefulness and then links to .  The attempt with this statement is to imply that policy states usefulness is not a reason to keep an article or list.  The nominator's argument is fallacious.  The link provided states that when making an argument about usefulness that saying ''only'' the two words "it's useful" is not sufficient.  What is required is to ''state why it is useful'', which the discussion in the previous AfD did do.  explicitly states that "'''Information found in tables in particular is focused on usefulness to the reader.'''". In addition it states "'''An argument based on usefulness can be valid if put in context.'''"  The arguments in the previous AfD did put the usefulness in context, and 80% of the editors responding after that voted to keep.  Thus, the primary argument for this AfD is based on the fallacy that usefulness is not a criteria for lists when, in fact, usefulness not only is a valid argument, but can be the particular focus of a list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:USEFUL)