Deletion of Kenneth Kim

Comment: per CaliforniaAliBaba at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Kenneth K. Kim. The sources presented in this AfD demonstrate that the subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria: ''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.'' The http://www.koreatowndaily.com/read.php?id=20090612182751&section=local&type=fdb&ss=6 two http://www.koreatowndaily.com/read.php?id=20090526191041&section=local&type=fdb&ss=2 articles from the ''Korean Daily'' and the article by Allan Choi in the ''Korean Daily'' (the U.S. edition of ''JoongAng Ilbo'') provide nontrivial coverage of Kenneth K. Kim. Add these to http://www.koreatimes.com/article/520947 this articlehttp://webcitation.org/64hPc34PV WebCite from ''The Korea Times'' and the other sources at ({{find|케네스 김}}) and notability is solidly established.I acknowledge that Kim doesn't pass ; however, the depth and breadth of coverage he has received in several Korean newspapers demonstrate that he has had a significant impact on his community&mdash;enough, in my opinion, to warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. This well-researched, carefully-crafted article by Peoples bio will help Wikipedia Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias|counter Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias on a non-English topic where sources are difficult to locate. (rationale copied from previous AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Sources seem insignificant or just public relations material, as per DGG. There is no evidence that the subject is anything more than a un of the mill|run of the mill physician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)