Deletion of Xinsheng Ling

Comment: Thanks, DGG, for the clarification on the role of SNGs and GNG. It will be interesting to see if S Marshall or Bearcat decide to share their thoughts on GNG/SNGs. Nevertheless, this very short stub-class article adds very little value to the encyclopedia and nothing would be lost by a  deletion. I would note, too, that no editors have specifically ''opposed'' deletion on  deletion grounds, and two editors (myself included) are or seem supportive of granting such a request. I think, out of respect, that's something we have to consider here, and if the closing administrator wants to involve Oversight to verify the requestor's identity, as I said above, that is fine, but since it's been ''requested'', we should be '''draftify'''-ing this at least until (a) Oversight verifies the identity of the requestor and closes as "delete" (in such a case, I'd support administrator-level '''salt'''-ing of the '''Main:''' namespace article title or (b) the requestor doesn't respond to Oversight's request within the requisite guided timeline and moves the draftified article back to the '''Main:''' namespace
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: A Fellow of the American Physical Society seems notable enough to merit an article ( criterion 3 to be specific
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)