Wikipedia:Proposed good articles/Archive 12 Archived requests Selena
The third method is one I wouldn't recommend, but more and more seems to become the prevailing attitude towards the process. Any article is selected and random. It gets a nomination, reviews are made yet these are ignored and challenged at every possibility, with the nominator expecting the reviewer and community to be the ones to fix 'their' article. Invariably the review appears on the talk page yet that is always the 'wrong' location.