Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 29 User talk:Christianrocker90
CR90 has not edited since his ban, at least I assume so. When we therefore review the block in its current form, this is based on old evidence. This is probably a pointless approach, as TRM has pointed out. At the moment I am not talking about time periods, all I say is that if the community decides to re-evaluate the decision, it should probably do so on new evidence, as doing so on old one is pointless. People change during their life. Making mistakes is the only way we have to learn what is right and what isn't.