Update files from the datasets library (from 1.14.0)

Release notes: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/releases/tag/1.14.0

README.md

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ The supported tasks are the following:
 <table>
 <tr><td>Dataset</td><td>Source</td><td>Sub-domain</td><td>Task Type</td><td>Classes</td><tr>
 <tr><td>ECtHR (Task A)</td><td> <a href="https://aclanthology.org/P19-1424/">Chalkidis et al. (2019)</a> </td><td>ECHR</td><td>Multi-label classification</td><td>10+1</td></tr>
-<tr><td>ECtHR (Task B)</td><td> <a href="https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.22/">Chalkidis et al. (2021a)</a> </td><td>ECHR</td><td>Multi-label classification </td><td>10</td></tr>
+<tr><td>ECtHR (Task B)</td><td> <a href="https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.22/">Chalkidis et al. (2021a)</a> </td><td>ECHR</td><td>Multi-label classification </td><td>10+1</td></tr>
 <tr><td>SCOTUS</td><td> <a href="http://scdb.wustl.edu">Spaeth et al. (2020)</a></td><td>US Law</td><td>Multi-class classification</td><td>14</td></tr>
 <tr><td>EUR-LEX</td><td> <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00904">Chalkidis et al. (2021b)</a></td><td>EU Law</td><td>Multi-label classification</td><td>100</td></tr>
 <tr><td>LEDGAR</td><td> <a href="https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.155/">Tuggener et al. (2020)</a></td><td>Contracts</td><td>Multi-class classification</td><td>100</td></tr>
@@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ The current leaderboard includes several Transformer-based (Vaswaniet al., 2017)
 <table>
 <tr><td>Dataset</td><td>ECtHR Task A </td><td>ECtHR Task B </td><td>SCOTUS </td><td>EUR-LEX</td><td>LEDGAR </td><td>UNFAIR-ToS </td><td>CaseHOLD</td></tr>
 <tr><td>Model</td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1 </td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1 </td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1 </td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1 </td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1 </td><td>μ-F1  / m-F1</td><td>μ-F1 / m-F1  </td></tr>
-<tr><td>BERT </td><td><b>71.4</b>  / 64.0  </td><td>87.6  / <b>77.8</b> </td><td>70.5   / 60.9 </td><td>71.6  / 55.6 </td><td>87.7   / 82.2 </td><td>97.3  / 80.4</td><td>70.7   </td></tr>
-<tr><td>RoBERTa </td><td>69.5  / 60.7 </td><td>87.2  / 77.3 </td><td>70.8   / 61.2 </td><td>71.8  / <b>57.5</b> </td><td>87.9  /  82.1 </td><td>97.2 / 79.6</td><td>71.7 </td></tr>
-<tr><td>DeBERTa </td><td>69.1   / 61.2 </td><td>87.4   / 77.3 </td><td>70.0  / 60.0 </td><td><b>72.3</b>  / 57.2 </td><td>87.9   / 82.0 </td><td>97.2 / 80.2</td><td>72.1  </td></tr>
-<tr><td>Longformer </td><td>69.6  / 62.4 </td><td>88.0  / <b>77.8</b> </td><td>72.2  / 62.5 </td><td>71.9  / 56.7 </td><td>87.7  / 82.3 </td><td><b>97.5</b> / 81.0</td><td>72.0  </td></tr>
-<tr><td>BigBird </td><td>70.5  / 63.8 </td><td> <b>88.1</b>  / 76.6 </td><td>71.7  / 61.4 </td><td>71.8  / 56.6 </td><td>87.7 / 82.1 </td><td>97.4 / 81.1</td><td>70.4  </td></tr>
-<tr><td>Legal-BERT </td><td>71.2  / <b>64.6</b> </td><td>88.0  / 77.2 </td><td>76.2  / 65.8 </td><td>72.2  / 56.2 </td><td><b>88.1</b>  / <b>82.7</b></td><td> 97.4  / <b>83.4</b></td><td>75.1</td></tr>
-<tr><td>CaseLaw-BERT </td><td>71.2   / 64.2 </td><td>88.0   / 77.5 </td><td><b>76.4</b>  / <b>66.2</b> </td><td>71.0  / 55.9 </td><td>88.0  / 82.3</td><td>97.4  / 82.4</td><td><b>75.6</b>  </td></tr>
+<tr><td>BERT </td><td><b>71.4</b>  / 64.0  </td><td>79.6  / <b>78.3</b> </td><td>70.5   / 60.9 </td><td>71.6  / 55.6 </td><td>87.7   / 82.2 </td><td>97.3  / 80.4</td><td>70.7   </td></tr>
+<tr><td>RoBERTa </td><td>69.5  / 60.7 </td><td>78.6  / 77.0 </td><td>70.8   / 61.2 </td><td>71.8  / <b>57.5</b> </td><td>87.9  /  82.1 </td><td>97.2 / 79.6</td><td>71.7 </td></tr>
+  <tr><td>DeBERTa </td><td>69.1   / 61.2 </td><td>79.9   / <b>78.3</b> </td><td>70.0  / 60.0 </td><td><b>72.3</b>  / 57.2 </td><td>87.9   / 82.0 </td><td>97.2 / 80.2</td><td>72.1  </td></tr>
+<tr><td>Longformer </td><td>69.6  / 62.4 </td><td>78.8  / 75.8 </td><td>72.2  / 62.5 </td><td>71.9  / 56.7 </td><td>87.7  / 82.3 </td><td><b>97.5</b> / 81.0</td><td>72.0  </td></tr>
+<tr><td>BigBird </td><td>70.5  / 63.8 </td><td> 79.9  / 76.9 </td><td>71.7  / 61.4 </td><td>71.8  / 56.6 </td><td>87.7 / 82.1 </td><td>97.4 / 81.1</td><td>70.4  </td></tr>
+  <tr><td>Legal-BERT </td><td>71.2  / <b>64.6</b> </td><td><b>80.6</b>  / 77.2 </td><td>76.2  / 65.8 </td><td>72.2  / 56.2 </td><td><b>88.1</b>  / <b>82.7</b></td><td> 97.4  / <b>83.4</b></td><td>75.1</td></tr>
+<tr><td>CaseLaw-BERT </td><td>71.2   / 64.2 </td><td>79.7   / 76.8 </td><td><b>76.4</b>  / <b>66.2</b> </td><td>71.0  / 55.9 </td><td>88.0  / 82.3</td><td>97.4  / 82.4</td><td><b>75.6</b>  </td></tr>
 </table>
 
 ### Languages
@@ -223,12 +223,7 @@ An example of 'train' looks as follows.
 An example of 'test' looks as follows.
 ```json
 {
-  "contexts": ["In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
-  "In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
-  "In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
-  "In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
-  "In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
-  ],
+  "context": "In Granato v. City and County of Denver, No. CIV 11-0304 MSK/BNB, 2011 WL 3820730 (D.Colo. Aug. 20, 2011), the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger, now-Chief United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, ruled similarly: At a minimum, a party asserting a Mo-nell claim must plead sufficient facts to identify ... to act pursuant to City or State policy, custom, decision, ordinance, re d 503, 506-07 (3d Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>).",
   "endings": ["holding that courts are to accept allegations in the complaint as being true including monell policies and writing that a federal court reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint has a limited task",
     "holding that for purposes of a class certification motion the court must accept as true all factual allegations in the complaint and may draw reasonable inferences therefrom", 
     "recognizing that the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true on a threshold motion to dismiss",